NURSE-II, IPCR PARAMETERS

MAJOR SUCCESS TOOLS RATI QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS REMARKS

OUTPUT INDICATOR NG
Better Health 90% performed PSS, IR and No negative feedback/ no error/ 100% of assigned patients were NA CORE
5
Outcomes nursing care CPAR deficiency in performing duty accorded with quality nursing care
activities with no 1-2 negative feedbacks/ 1 or 2 90-99% of assigned patients were not NA
negative feedback 4 minor errors/ deficiencies in accorded with quality nursing care
performing duty
3-4 negative feedbacks/ more 80-89% of assigned patients were not NA
3 than 2 or more errors/ deficiencies accorded with quality nursing care
in performing duty
5-6 negative feedbacks / 1 or 2 70-79% of assigned patients were not NA
2 major errors/ deficiencies in accorded with quality nursing care
performing duty
7 and above negative feed backs/ Below 70% of assigned patients were NA
1 work not acceptable not accorded with quality nursing
care
100% of staff were Staff NA 100% of staff were monitored and Regularly done CORE
5
monitored and Evaluation evaluated ( monthly)
evaluated in Tool, Nursing NA 90-99% of staff were monitored and NA
4
performing efficient Audit evaluated
and effective nursing Checklist NA 80-89% of staff were monitored and Occasionally done
3
care procedures evaluated
regularly NA 70-79% of staff were monitored and NA
2
evaluated
NA below 70% of staff were monitored Not done
1
and evaluated
100% satisfactorily Preventive Excellent results; every aspect of 100% of requests/ defects were Regularly done CORE
maintained Maintenance 5 work assignment thoroughly addressed
inventory of Logbook, covered
supplies, equipment Article NA 90- 99% of requests/ defects were NA
4
and facilities Logbook and addressed
regularly RIS Minor error/ deficiency in the 80- 89% of requests/ defects were Occasionally done
3 execution of work assignment; addressed
results are still acceptable
2 NA 70- 79% of requests/ defects were NA
addressed
 Haphazard or careless execution Below 70% of requests/ defects were Not done
1 of work assignment; unacceptable addressed
result
Staff schedules were Receiving No revision; well distributed NA On or before due CORE
5
submitted every 10th Logbook and staffing pattern date
and 25th day of the Schedules 4 NA NA NA
month with no with minor revisions needed (1-2 NA 1-2 days after due
3
revision revision) date
2 NA NA NA
With Major revisions needed (3 NA 3 or more days after
1
and more) due date
100% of reports Receiving No mistakes or deficiency in 100% of reports submitted On or before due CORE
were Logbook and content; every aspect of report date
comprehensively Monthly 5 well covered; clearly presented;
prepared and Reports well organized; no lapses in
submitted every 2nd grammar; excellent report.
day of the month 1-2 errors or deficiencies in 90-99% of reports submitted NA
4 content; 1-2 errors in grammar;
report is still very good.
3-4 errors or deficiencies in 80-89% of reports submitted 1-2 days after due
3 content; 3-4 errors in grammar; date
report is still acceptable.
5-6 errors or deficiencies in 70-79% of reports submitted NA
2 content; 5-6 errors in grammar;
needs major revision
More than 6 errors or deficiencies below 70% of reports submitted 3 or more days after
1 in content; more than 6 errors in due date
grammar; report unacceptable
100% of letters, Letters, Letters, communications, memos 100% of letters, communication, On or before SUPPORT
communication, Communicatio 5 and other reports prepared with memos and other reports were acted prescribed deadline
memos and other n, Memos and no error upon
reports were other Reports 90- 99% of letters, communication, 1 day after
4
satisfactorily memos and other reports prescribed deadline
prepared and Letters, communications, memos 80- 89% of letters, communication, 2 days after
finalized on 3 and other reports prepared with memos and other reports were acted prescribed deadline
scheduled time minor error upon
2 70-79 of letters, communication, 3 days after
memos and other reports were acted prescribed deadline
upon
 Letters, communications, memos Below 70% of letters, communication, More than 3 days
1 and other reports prepared with memos and other reports were acted after prescribed
major revisions upon deadline
100% efficiently and Nursing Order No negative feedback/no error/ 100% of aspect of work assignment NA SUPPORT
5
effectively Hospital Order deficiency in performing duty were covered
performed other Accomplishme 1-2 negative feedbacks/ 1 or 2 90%-99% of aspect of work NA
functions as directed nt Report 4 minor errors/ deficiencies in assignment were covered
performing duty
3-4 negative feedbacks/ more 80%- 90% of aspect of work NA
3 than 2 or more minor errors/ assignment were covered
deficiencies in performing duty
5-6 negative feedbacks/ 1 or 2 70%- 79% of aspect of work NA
2 major errors/ deficiencies in assignment were covered
performing duty
7 and above negative feedback; Below 70% of aspect of work NA
1
work not acceptable assignment were covered
Human All general Attendance No tardiness recorded Complete attendance on all general NA CORE
Resource assemblies, unit Sheet 5 assemblies, unit meetings , seminars,
Training meetings , seminars, trainings and other hospital
trainings and other 4 1-2 tardiness 1-2 absences without valid reason/s NA
hospital activities 3 3-5 tardiness 3-5 absences without valid reason/s NA
were attended with 2 6-8 tardiness 6-8 absences without valid reason/s NA
no tardiness 9 and above tardiness More than 8 absences without valid NA
recorded 1
reason/s
100% of new staff, Narrative No negative feedback/ no error/ 100% of staff, trainees and student Regularly done CORE
trainees and student Evaluation 5 deficiency in performing duty affiliates were oriented and/or
affiliates were and Students mentored
properly oriented evaluation 1-2 negative feedbacks/ 1 or 2 90-99% of staff, trainees and student NA
and/or mentored as and 4 minor errors/ deficiencies in affiliates were oriented and/or
to policies, and Attendance performing duty mentored
nursing care Logbook (to 3-4 negative feedbacks/ more 80-89% of staff, trainees and student Occasionally done
procedures regularly be done at the 3 than 2 or more errors/ deficiencies affiliates were oriented and/or
end of each in performing duty mentored
rotation) 5-6 negative feedbacks / 1 or 2 70-79% of staff, trainees and student NA
2 major errors/ deficiencies in affiliates were oriented and/or
performing duty mentored
7 and above negative feed backs/ below 70% of staff, trainees and Seldom
1 work not acceptable student affiliates were oriented
and/or mentored