Layout Design of Row Decoder Using Cadence
Layout Design of Row Decoder Using Cadence
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.46214
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
Abstract: Logic circuits, data transport circuits, and analogue to digital conversions all frequently employ decoders. For the line
decoders, a mixed logic design approach incorporating transmission gate logic, pass transistor logic, and complementary metal-
oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology is employed to achieve the desired performance and operation.
A unique topology is proposed for the 2 to 4 decoders, which calls for a topology with fourteen transistors to reduce operating
power and transistor count and a topology with fifteen transistors to achieve high power and low delay performance. For a total
of four new designs, standard and inverting decoders are created for each situation. All of the suggested decoders have a low
transistor count in comparison to their traditional CMOS architectures.
Last but not least, a number of suggested solutions demonstrate a notable improvement in operating power and propagation
latency, exceeding CMOS in virtually all instances.
Keywords: Decoders, Mixed Logic design, Logic gates, Power and Delay Optimization.
I. INTRODUCTION
More room is required in internal circuits for general decoders. Using two inverters and four AND gates, a general-purpose
traditional 2-4 decoder with a total of 28 transistors can be created. Similar to this, a 4-16 conventional decoder that uses 104
transistors overall and 4 inverters, 16 AND gates, and 16 AND gates can be created. By combining transmission gate logic and pass
transistor logic, new mixed logic can lower these sizes. Speed and power are also increased via pass transistor logic. The CMOS
circuits have greater propagation delays, power dissipation, and die area requirements. All of these characteristics will be as
minimally reduced as possible by the suggested method. The design of integrated circuits frequently makes use of CMOS
technology, which ranges from simple digital logic gates to System on Chips (SoCs) [2].
Both n-channel enhancement mode and p-channel enhancement mode metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFET)
are employed in complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. To obtain superior fan-in and fan-out capabilities,
MOSFET additionally uses NMOS transistors as pull-down networks and PMOS transistors as pull-up networks. Because CMOS
logic circuits can endure various voltage scaling and enable transistor channel sizing to be as small as possible, this technology can
operate at high speeds while using little power.
The pass transistor logic (PTL) was first introduced in the early 1990s, and various design approaches are discussed in [4] to [6]
with the aim of generating additional opportunities to achieve high speed and occupy less space on the die by applying the inputs
directly to the gates of transistors and drain-source terminals of MOSFETs. The pass transistor designs use individual PMOS and
NMOS transistors, in contrast to the transmission gate logic designs, which use parallel pairs of either NMOS or PMOS transistors.
All digital circuits, input and output circuits, data transmission modules, memory devices, and all basic digital circuits employ
decoders extensively.
A. Conventional Design
The decoder, which decodes coded input typically utilised in all forms of memory devices, is the fundamental digital module as
shown in Fig.1 and Fig.2 shows the Gate level logic of Decoder. An n input to 2n output binary decoder is the most used type of
decoder circuit. The logic of any application is created using CMOS technology in the typical architecture.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 461
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
Fig.1. Block diagram of 2-4 Decoder. Fig. 2. 2-4 Decoder Gate level diagram.
Logic operation of 2:4 decoder is summarized Table I where A and B are the inputs and D0 to D3 are outputs of the decoder. An
inverting 2:4 decoder generates complementary outputs D0 - D3 and each time the selected output will be set to logic 0 and the
other three outputs are set to logic 1. The logic operation of an inverting 2:4 decoder is summarized in Table II
Table I : 2:4 Decoder Truth Table Table II : 2:4 Inverting Decoder Truth Table
.
Fig. 3. DVL AND Fig. 4. DVL OR
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 462
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 463
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
(a) (b)
15-Transistor High Performance Topology For 2-4 Decoder The drawback of 14 transistor low power decoder topologies presented
above is the worst-case delay due to the complementary propagate signal used in minterms D0 and I3. It is possible to overcome this
drawback by implementing these minterms using standard CMOS logic gates as they do not need complementary inputs. CMOS
NOR gate is used to implement minterm D0 and I3 is implemented using CMOS NAND gate, with addition of one extra transistor
in each topology. With this modification, the resulting decoder topology has 3 types of logic (CMOS. TGL, DVL) in the same
circuit providing improvement in both power and delay performance, hence it is named as High Performance (HP) topology. The
schematics of 2-4 HP and 2-4 HPI decoders are as shown in Fig. 8(a) and Fig. 8(b), respectively.
Fig 8: 15-transistor 2-4 decoders: (a) 2-4 HP, (b) 2-4 HPI
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 464
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
Fig.9: 14-transistor 2-4 LP decoders: (a) Schematic design (b) transient result
Fig.10: 15-transistor 2-4 LPI decoders: (a) Schematic design (b) transient result
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 465
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
Fig.11: 14-transistor 2-4 HP decoders: (a) Schematic design (b) transient result
Fig.12: 15-transistor 2-4 HPI decoders: (a) Schematic design (b) transient result
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 466
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
IV. CONCLUSION
By using Mixed Logic Line methodology, we developed four 2–4 line decoder topologies, namely 2–4 LP, 2–4 LPI, 2–4 HP and 2–
4 HPI, which offer reduced transistor count and improved power delay performance in relation to conventional CMOS decoders. All
the circuits are designed using a DSCH tool and layout using Micro wind Software EDA Tool and simulated using built-in Mix-
Signal simulator and analyzed further for DRC in CMOS 180nm Technology.
The main feature of this project is to optimize the decoder designs in order to achieve better speed and power performance. This
work can be extended by using various mixed design styles like DVL, gating technique etc. in this we can obtain better results than
CMOS logic where the power consumption and transistor count can be reduced. By this way can obtain less power consumption and
high-performance operation when compared to CMOS logic design technique. The Higher input /output Decoders can be extended
to further by drawing Physical Layout and these Decoders can be used in Audio Frequency Applications like used at receiver end to
decode the audio signal. We can use these decoders in the applications where low power consumption and decoding is necessary
such as Generally, these decoders are frequently used in communication systems like telecommunications, networking and transfer
of data from one end to another end.
REFERENCES
[1] Dimitrios Balobas and Nikos Konofaos, “Design of Low-Power HighPerformance 2-4 and 4-16 Mixed-Logic Line decoders”, IEEE J. Circuits and Systems,
vol.64, no. 2, Feb. 2017.
[2] Weste and D. M. Harris, CMOS VLSI Design, a Circuits and Systems Perspective, 4th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2011.
[3] Sumana NS, Sahana B and Dr. Abhay A Deshapande, “ Design and Implementation of Low Power – High Performance Mixed Logic Line Decoders ”, 2019 4th
International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT- 2019), MAY 17th & 18th 2019.
[4] Simma Ranjitha and Pasumarthy Srikanth, “ Design of Decoders using Mixed Logic for Various Applications ”, International Journal of Engineering and
Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-6 Issue-6, August 2017.
[5] R. Zimmermann and W. Fichtner, “Low-power logic styles: CMOS versus Pass-transistor logic,” IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 7,pp. 1079– 1090,
Jul. 1997.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 467
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VIII Aug 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
[6] K. Yano et al., “A 3.8-ns CMOS 16 × 16-b multiplier using complementary pass-transistor logic,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25,no. 2,pp. 388–393, Apr.
1990.
[7] X. Wu, “Theory of transmission switches and its application to design of CMOS digital circuits,” Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl., vol. 20, no. 4,pp. 349– 356,
[8] Ku. Priyanka M.Raut and Dr. R M Deshmukh, “ Design of Low Power 2-4 Mixed Logic Line Decoders with clock based technique”, International Research
Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 05 Issue: 05 | May-2018 www.irjet.net p- ISSN: 2395-0072.
[9] Bondapalli Jayanthi and B Teena Ratna Prasuma, “ Design of Low-Power High-Performance 2- 4 and 4-16 Mixed-Logic Line Decoders ”, ISSN (Online):
2455-3662.
[10] Anantha P. Chandrakasan, Samuel Sheng, and Robert W. Brodersen, “Low-Power CMOS Digital Design ”, It E t JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS.
VOL 27, NO 4. APRIL 1992.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 468