Constituency Office - IMO STATE A5 Final FINAL v1-2022-1
Constituency Office - IMO STATE A5 Final FINAL v1-2022-1
Constituency Office - IMO STATE A5 Final FINAL v1-2022-1
IMO STATE
CONSTITUENCY OFFICES
1
Enhancing Representative Democracy in Nigeria
Imo State
Constituency Offices
Conducted by the
CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE
2
Enhancing Representative Democracy in Nigeria
the
Project Team:
Dr. Adewale P. BALOGUN, Executive Director
Juliana IREGBU, Senior Expert
Secretariat:
CCG
10, Afolabi Lesi Street, llupeju
P.O. Box 7247, Lagos, Nigeria
Tel: 08034040009, 08034342516
e-mail: [email protected]
3
First Published
August, 2015
4
Acknowledgement
5
Contents
Acknowledgement ………………………………………………
1. Background …................................…………………………….
2. Introduction to Constituency Office..........................................
3. Criteria used to conduct Survey...............................................
4. Imo State Constituency Offices Survey.................................
5. The Report of the Analyses of the Questionnaires..................
1. Detail of Enumerators ………………………………….
2. Details of Respondents ………………………………..
3. Detail of Constituency…………………………………..
4. Details of Representatives …………………………….
5. Details of Constituency Offices………………………..
6. Accessibility of Constituency Offices………………….
7. Functions of Constituency Offices…………………….
8. Title of Projects………………………………………….
9. Method of Dissemination of Information………………
10. Further views on Constituency Offices ………………
6. Conclusion and Recommendations……………………………
ABOUT CCG…………………………………………………….
6
7
1. Background
This publication is the report of a survey which provided the opportunity to assess
the constituency offices of the elected representative in the House of Assembly
(HoA). The data collected from the survey assisted in understanding better the
constituency issues facing the management of the constituency offices or whether
such offices even exist at all.
8
2. Introduction to Constituency Office
Constituency offices have become a feature of our political system but whether a
well established feature or not is open to conjecture. A Constituency Office is usually
located in a low rent building nestled in a busy area in town to make it accessible. It
should comprise at least three rooms; one small room for the outer office or the
reception area, another more moderate room for the lawmaker where he can see his
visitors and a large room or if you like a hall that can sit up to 40 constituents.
The office is heralded with a bright signage outside along the road where it is
situated bearing the name of the representative and an indication that a constituency
office is located within. The walls inside are adorned with the pictures of the
President, the state governor, posters from various government departments,
certificates and photographs belonging to the representative and an assortment of
furniture inside to convey the seriousness and dignity of the office as well as a
friendly environment. These offices may only open for a few days in a week
especially from Monday to Saturday and should be there for everybody, whether a
member of the representative’s party or not.
In terms of staff – skilled staff that can help the public to learn more about how
government works should usually be present. The staff should have an idea of good
governance and development. This is a snapshot of a constituency office. Basically,
9
the space is intended to appear accessible and friendly and creatively used to make
it the focal point of the constituency for deepening and enriching the state’s political
conversation. Such an office allows the lawmaker to assert his presence in the
community and demonstrate commitment to local issues. The office should serve as
a private and local workspace for the representative, a service point for enquiries, a
meeting place, a protest site, an incubator for new projects and initiative.
10
Hon. Chima Munonye’s office – note the simple sign with no frills
11
3. Criteria used to conduct survey
One of the most significant objectives of this survey is to determine the physical
location of the Constituency Offices, to assess the office setup, the functions in the
office, method of dissemination of information and accommodating inputs from the
constituents.
Information gathered during the survey will help to identify existing gaps in our
representative democracy with a view to exploring available options for promoting
good governance through increased citizens’ participation in the management of
their affairs.
The survey was conducted in Imo State by 13 selected and trained enumerators
from non-governmental organisations in the State who covered all the constituencies
of the House of Assembly Legislators in the State. All of the twenty seven
lawmakers.
The study was carried out via questionnaire administration to respondents who are
members of the constituency office under consideration. We also applied
questionnaires to members of the public around the constituency office to see if they
can corroborate some of the information among others gathered from the
constituency location. As a starting point, we approached the House of Assembly for
12
the addresses of the members and they claimed not to have this data. We wrote to
each member of the House and did not get any response but in our investigation we
were able to identify 21 lawmaker’s addresses from other sources. We, however,
could not ascertain the addresses of 5 of the lawmakers. 1 constituency did not have
a representative at the State House of Assembly.
13
4. The Imo State Constituency Offices Survey
The Imo State Enumerators Training held successfully on Thursday, 14 August 2014
at the Links Hotel, Owerri. 13 outstanding participants out of the 20 participants that
benefitted from the training were subsequently mobilized for the field work which
took place between August 14 and 21, 2014. Questionnaires were applied in all the
constituencies in the State which presently have representatives in the State House
of Assembly. Oguta Constituency was without representation in the House, while the
Legislator representing Oru west was on suspension.
14
13 enumerators were mobilized to apply the questionnaires in the 27 Constituencies
comprising the Imo State Houses of Assembly Constituencies. The Constituencies
are:
15
5. The report of the analyses of the questionnaires
5.1 Detail of Enumerators
The survey was conducted by 13 enumerators who were mostly senior level officers
in various non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and civil society organisations
(CSOs) located in Imo State. Of the 13 Enumerators, 4 Enumerators representing
31% were Heads of organisation (Executive Directors), 5 enumerators representing
38% were Senior Programme Officers in their organisations, while the last 4
representing 31% worked in other departments in their various civil society
organizations. These show that the competence deployed in the field work was high.
Position of Enumerators
16
5.2 Details on Respondents
i. Name of Respondents
Of the 120 questionnaires analyzed, 103 of the respondents representing 86%
provided their names and some bio data information, while the remaining 17
respondents representing 14% declined.
Names of Respondents
14%
Available
Not available
86%
17
ii. Occupation of Respondents
Out of the 103 respondents, 92 representing 89% were from the private sector while
the remaining 11 representing 11% were from the Public Sector.
With most of the respondents from the private sector it is more likely that the
information or data they will provide on the constituency offices will be un-biased.
Occupation of Respondents
11%
18
iii. Age of Respondents
3 Respondents representing 3% were above 50 years of age, 30 respondents
representing 29% were between ages 40 to 50 years, 47 respondents representing
46% of the total number were between ages 30 to 39 years while the remaining 23
respondents representing 22% were between 18 and 29 years.
All the respondents are within the voting age range and are expected to be politically
aware and knowledgeable in the area of focus and have the capacity to answer the
questions in the constituency offices survey questionnaire.
Age of Respondents
3%
19
5.3 Detail of Constituency
20
5.4 Details on Representatives
Oguta Constituency did not have a representative in the State House of Assembly
because elections in the LGA were cancelled due to widespread violence during the
2011 governorship and State House of Assembly Elections and there was no rerun.
23
23. Mbaitolu Hon. Victor Male APC Not available
Ndunagu
24. Oguta No
representative
25. Ohaji Hon. Luke Male APC 1 Not available
Egbema Chukwu
26. Ideato- Hon. Eudora Female APGA 1
North Igwe
27. Orlu Hon. Mike Male APC 1 Not available
Ndubuaku
24
i. Gender of Representatives
23 Legislators out of 26, representing 88% were males, while the remaining 3
Legislators representing 12% were females.
Very clearly, the gender distribution of legislators of the Imo State House of
Assembly is lopsided with the male gender dominating. There is need to enhance
women’s participation in politics and in running for elective positions to reach at least
the recommended 35% for affirmative action.
Gender of Legislators
12%
Males
Females
88%
25
ii. Political Party of Representatives
Out of the 26 representatives that were available, 9 representatives, representing
34% were members of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), another 13 Legislators,
representing 50% are members of the All Progressive Congress (APC), 2
Honourables with 8% were members of the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA),
while another 2 representatives with 8% were not identified with any political party.
26
iii. Tenures Spent in Office
17 Legislators representing 65% were just in their first tenure, 5 reps. Representing
19% were in their 2nd tenure, 2 representing 8% were already in their 3 rd tenure,
while 2 Legislator with 8% did not have information available on how many tenures
he has spent in office. Generally, the rate of return is low considering that only 7
legislators were returned out of 27.
Tenures in offfice
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
First tenure Second tenure Third tenure Not indicated
27
iv. Contact details of representatives - 8 Legislators representing 31% provided
either a phone number or an email through which their constituents could reach
them. The remaining 18 representing 69% did not provide either a phone number or
an email.
31%
Available
Not available
69%
28
5.5 Details on Constituency Offices
34
Does Representative have an Office?
14%
Yes
24% No
62% No idea
35
Availability of Office Addresses
8%
Available
Not available
92%
36
Availability of Offices at Provided Addresses
23%
Available offices
Not available
77%
37
constituency offices. In situations where they didn’t function regularly, they were only
open for party meetings.
46% Regularly
38
offices. The non-functional offices only opened for special political party meetings or
during campaign periods.
`
5.6 Accessibility of Constituency Offices (120 questionnaires were analysed)
39
i. Is there a conspicuous signage outside the office?
50%
0%
Yes No Don't know
40
One room Two rooms Over two rooms Don’t know
9 (8%) 14 (12%) 36 (30%) 61 (50%)
40%
20%
0%
One room Two rooms Over two rooms Don't Know
41
Yes 43 (36%) No 23 (19%) Don’t know 54 (45%)
43 respondents representing 36% of the total respondents said yes, that there is a
conference room in the constituency offices. 23 respondents representing 19% of the
total answers said No, that there is no conference room in the offices, the last 54
respondents representing 45% said that they did not have an idea whether there is a
conference room or not.
17 respondents, representing 14% of the total number said there was one staff,
another 38 respondents representing 32% said there were more than one staff. 13
respondents representing 11% indicated that there was no staff working in the
offices, while the final 52 respondents representing 43% indicated that they did not
have an idea of the number of staff or volunteer that work in the offices.
40%
20%
0%
One Over one None Don't know
43
v. Capacity of the conference room
10 (8%) respondents stated that the available conference room has a capacity for
less than 20 people. 18 (15%) respondents stated that the available conference
room has a capacity for between 20 to 40 persons. 19 (16%) respondents said the
conference room could contain over 40 constituents, while 73 (61%) respondents
indicated they don’t know.
44
vi. Non-partisan outlook of the office
23 respondents representing 19% of the total answer stated yes, that the offices had
a non-partisan outlook; another 40 respondents representing 33% said the offices
did not have a non-partisan appeal, while 57 respondents representing 48% said that
they did not know. Partisan political party emblems and insignias decorating the
outside and inside of a constituency office may deter constituents that are not
members of that party or that are even neutral from approaching the office believing
that they may not receive attention.
Outlook of offices
60%
40%
20%
0%
Non Partisan appeal Partisan appeal Don’t know
45
5.7 Functions of Constituency Office (120 questionnaires were analysed)
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No Don’t know
46
ii. How often are meetings held in the office?
21 respondents representing 17% stated regularly, 38 respondents representing
32% said not regularly while 61 respondents representing 51% answered don’t
know.
Constituency offices should be a very important place in the community for regular
meetings. That about 80% of constituents cannot take advantage of this creates a
gap in the representation being provided.
47
iii. Does the Representative attend constituency meetings?
30 respondents representing 25% said Yes, another 40 respondents representing
33% said No while 50 respondents representing 42% stated that they did not know.
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No Don’t know
.
48
iv. Does the Representative visit his constituency?
49
Does Representative visit his constituency?
60%
40%
20%
0%
Yes No Don’t know
The reason why many constituents are ignorant of constituency projects is because
such projects are often times directed at members of the representative’s party in
that community or implemented as if the money for the project came from the
representative’s pocket.
50
Has Representative embarked on any constituency project?
37% Yes
39%
No
Don't Know
24%
vi. Was the choice of project made after consultations with constituents?
51
Was the choice of project made after consultation with
constituents?
18%
Yes
No
53%
29% Don't Know
Agriculture 4 3%
Drainage 5 4%
52
Education 10 8%
Electricity 10 8%
Employment 1 1%
Empowerment (Youth & Women) 22 18%
Roads 14 11%
Infrastructure 11 9%
Health 12 10%
Sports development 1 1%
Water 8 7%
No project 6 5%
Don’t know 18 15%
53
i. Are constituents consulted on issues before policy formulation? 120
responses were analysed. 9 respondents representing 8% said that the constituents
were consulted always before policies were formulated, 20 respondents representing
17% said they were seldom consulted, 34 respondents representing 29% said are
never consulted while the remaining 57 respondents representing 46% said they did
not know about it.
iii. How would you rate information sharing between the representatives and
their constituents?
Of the 120 questionnaires that were analysed, 9 respondents representing 9% stated
that information sharing was very efficient, another 22 respondents representing
18% said it was efficient, 29 respondents representing 24% indicated fair. 31
respondents representing 26% said it was poor, while the remainingt 29 respondents
55
representing 24% stated that information sharing was very poor. A high percentage,
74% rated the information dissemination poorly.
56
shows that some Legislators establish offices which are not put to good use. A
constituency office should always be open to receive constituents whether or not the
Legislator is available. It is expected that the office should have competent staff that
will always be available to welcome constituents and to attend to their inquiries and
make appointments for the legislator.
0%
58
Of the 14 offices that were accessible, the furnishing of 6 of them representing 43%
were rated as very good, another 3 of them, representing 21% were rated as good, 2
offices representing 14% were rated fair while the last 3 offices representing another
21% were rated as poor in terms of furnishing.
Office set-up
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
very good Good Fair Poor
35% Skilled
Not skilled
65%
v. General views
a. Most constituents are not aware of the existence of the constituency office
and even where they are aware, most of them do not know the use of the
60
facilities. There is need for massive sensitization of grassroots citizens on the
use of constituency offices.
b. Some legislators prefer to have their office located in the State capital rather
than in their constituency therefore there is need for the sensitization of the
representatives on how to run an effective constituency office and
constituency relationship building.
61
6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The situation regarding the constituency offices in Imo State can be better. Though 9
of the 13 offices accessed provided a befitting venue, this number only accounted for
30% of the constituencies. Significantly, only 8 out of the 26 constituencies had the
contact to the constituency office or legislator, a major short coming in the
management of a constituency office.
There is need to realise that at the heart of democracy is participation. For any
government to qualify as being democratic it must be all inclusive and participatory,
close and accessible to the people, it should also be able to satisfy their needs and
aspiration, promote equality and social justice, ensure the security of lives and
property. Therefore, it is always assumed that elected l eaders would always work in
the best interest of their electorate. Individual representatives are expected to
maintain close contact with their electoral areas, consult the people on their needs
and the issues they wish to be addressed, present them to House of Assembly for
consideration, report back to their electorate the decision taken by the House on
their views and proposals, and the actions that will be taken to develop their area as
a whole. These enable citizens to access better services and lead improved
livelihoods thus building confidence on representation and deepening democracy.
62
Creating a more representative portrayal of political opinion in our legislative
assemblies is, therefore, a worthwhile and laudable goal, but so too is the
enrichment of whatever means we have to deepen and sustain an ongoing political
conversation between politicians and the citizens they represent. Notably,
constituency offices are one of the few pieces of physical and local infrastructure our
political system affords to maintain this connection. Inarguably, among our political
institutions, constituency offices serve as a rare space where citizens and their
representative can exchange views. They may not achieve agreement, but these
offices do support the possibility of greater understanding through exchange and a
reciprocal kind of political learning.
What constituency offices are uniquely poised to do is deepen and enrich the
political conversation in the state. The very notion of representative democracy
assumes that public participation in the decision-making process improves the
quality of decision-making. Legislators take in information which keeps them
informed about the constituency and can be taken back to the legislature to educate
other legislators about the area, resulting in more informed policy decision-making.
Legislators facilitate the flow of information and services back to the constituency,
making government more real and accessible thus improving delivery and
empowering constituents to participate in developing their communities.
63
We, therefore, offer a few recommendations as principles rather than prescriptions,
based on experience and lessons drawn from within Nigeria and other democracies.
64
The use of family members as staff in constituency office is not acceptable.
Staff and volunteers engaged in the running of a Legislators office should be
people who are both educated and knowledgeable about how government
works.
✓ It is not just enough to own a constituency office, the honourable should also
endeavour to make himself available to his constituents.
65
A three-dimensional representation of what a constituency office should
provide - note the reception area, small conference room, the legislator’s office
and a large space for meetings with constituents.
66
A high rate of return of lawmakers to the Assembly after every election-*+ will
improve the quality of the policies and allow for continuity and progress in
development in the community.
67
About CCG
The Centre for Constitutional Governance (CCG) was established in 1999
by the late Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti of blessed memory, with a vision to be
the best known and most effective non-governmental institution in Nigeria,
for the facilitation and protection of constitutional rights and democracy.
We sincerely believe that every community has abundant resources for the
fulfilment of its civic responsibilities and the protection of its members from
undemocratic inclination and that CCG, working with the community can
facilitate its optimal use by and for the community’s benefits.
68
• Working closely with community associations and representatives
to identify common resources.
69