From Neurodidactics To Language Teaching and Learning: The Emotional Approach
From Neurodidactics To Language Teaching and Learning: The Emotional Approach
Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 1457-1467, August 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.01
Gloria Toledo-Vega
Department of Language Science, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
Francisco Núñez-Román
Department of Language and Literature Teaching, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Abstract—The latest findings in Neurodidactics in understanding learning processes are forcing a review of the
methodological approaches underlying teaching practices, including those used in second language teaching.
Therefore, drawing on the principles of Neuroscience, Didactics and Linguistics, a review of the central factors
of language learning and acquisition is carried out. A new methodological approach to foreign language
teaching based on emotions is proposed: the Emotional Approach. Next, the principles of the Emotional
Approach are presented, and its most relevant theoretical and practical contributions are highlighted. These
include the functioning of neural connections in second language learning and the critical role played by
emotions in the teaching-learning processes. Finally, this study provides the theoretical bases necessary to
elaborate future didactic proposals and experimental research on the postulates presented here. Implications
for research and practice are also discussed.
Index Terms—second language instruction, neurodidactics, emotions, teachers education, teaching method
innovations
I. INTRODUCTION
Over the last decades, different methods and approaches to second language acquisition (SLA) have been proposed
and are now widely accepted. Worthy of mention are, among others, Competency-Based Learning, Task-Based
Learning, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), student-centred approach, process-centred approach, and,
of course, the Communicative Approach, which the previous ones are closely interrelated (Chen, 2021; Debbağ &
Yıldız, 2021; Dvoryatkina et al., 2021; Ellis, 2009; Gallagher & Savage, 2020; Khong & Kabilan, 2020; Larsen-
Freeman & Anderson, 2011; Lucas-Oliva et al., 2021; Richards & Rodgers, 2014). All of them are born from the
advances of Theoretical Linguistics based on cognition and the postulates of Chomsky (1966), Hymes (1972) or
Krashen (1983), and leave aside the neuroscientific advances. These advances reveal how language learning and
acquisition function at the neural level and the actual relevance of the emotional factor to this process (Dewaele, 2015;
Nguyen, 2018; Swain, 2013; White, 2018).
In this regard, Willingness To Communicate (WTC) (Kim & Pae, 2018) and Need For Cognition (NFC) (Makiabadi
et al., 2019) have been proven to be emotion-related attitudes (Heydarnejad et al., 2019), which are critical for optimal
target language development (Pishghadam, 2016). Thanks to advances in neuroscience, we can better understand how
the brain processes learning and language acquisition. The interrelation of concepts from diverse disciplines is
fundamental to understanding these problems according to developmental science (Gauvain, 2018; Hernandez et al.,
2021) and intersectionality (Collins & Bilge, 2016; Midby et al., 2020). For this reason, we present a new
interdisciplinary theoretical approach to second language teaching and learning based on the postulates of
Neurodidactics and Linguistics.
Lloyd, 2007). In our research, we have chosen to call Neurodidactics from the Brain (NfB) the line of research that aims
to: a) understand the neural processes and brain transformations that take place when learning occurs or when there are
problems for it to occur, and b) study the various reactions of the brain to certain stimuli to explain, first, what happens
at the physiological level in the brain when learning occurs and, second, what stimuli activate neurotransmitters that
favour or hinder the synapse (the connection between neurons) and, thereby, the creation of new neural networks. In
contrast, we have named Neurodidactics from the Classroom (NfC) the line of research that aims to transfer to the
classroom the discoveries made by NfB about brain processes during learning in order to study how these can be
applied theoretically in methodological and curricular designs, or empirically in the classroom. The present study starts
from the NfB and ends with a methodological approach assigned to the NfC.
B. Neurodidactics From the Brain
Learning has often been defined as the ability to store information in order to be able to retrieve it when necessary to
make associations or to apply it in performing an activity (skills and abilities) (Mora Teruel, 2017; Paz Illescas et al.,
2019). In turn, from a neural perspective, learning consists of generating new neural networks (new memories) from the
stimuli received in the interaction with the environment. The aforementioned implies transforming experiences in neural
connections, which are strongly linked to memory (Di Gesù et al., 2014). This process causes transformations in the
changing structure of the brain and occurs thanks to brain plasticity (Ibarrola, 2018). For learning to occur, new
synapses must be generated, which means that a neuron has to communicate with other ones through a complex
biochemical and electrical process, generating networks through which information is transmitted throughout the brain.
These neural networks will become more efficient (forming more numerous or more direct connections) the more this
information is used, i.e., with constant and continuous practice, regardless of whether this activation of memories results
correct or mistaken from a linguistic perspective (Walker, 2017; Ibarrola, 2018; Saavedra et al., 2015; Squire & Dede,
2015).
However, it is not only the practice that influences the generation and proliferation of such networks, but also all the
stimuli of the environment in which the learning takes place; in particular, the emotions that these stimuli arouse in the
learner (Squire & Dede, 2015; Willis, 2021). Based on the specialized literature (Conte et al., 2019; Damasio, 2010,
2019; Goleman, 2018; Heydarnejad et al., 2019; Makiabadi et al., 2019), we define the concept of emotion as the
reaction to external stimuli (from the environment) or internal stimuli (from the individual's memory or imagination)
that automatically triggers the secretion in the brain of various chemical substances, which influence the activation of
specific neural systems and affect the whole organism (including muscular and visceral alterations, among others). At
first, this reaction happens unconsciously, although we can become aware of it (or rather, of the sensation it generates in
us) once the brain's emotional process has been managed and developed.
C. Motivation and the Learning Process
The influence of the emotional factor becomes evident when the force of attraction or rejection is activated in the
brain. Inhibitory hormones and neurotransmitters are secreted when the brain detects and identifies unpleasant stimuli.
Depending on the level of alertness, they hinder or even block the thalamocortical (between the neocortex and the
thalamus) and corticocortical (between different areas of the neocortex) afferent and efferent connections (Saavedra et
al., 2015). This action will activate reactive brain systems (as opposed to reflexive ones) and prevent the proper
performance of cognitive functions and memory systems (Goleman, 2016). Stressful situations (which involve a rise in
cortisol) are directly linked to cognitive blocking or the feeling of "going blank" (Willis, 2021). At peak levels of
secretion of this stress hormone, this state of cognitive inefficiency, commonly referred to as "amygdala hijack", leads
to a decrease of up to 50% in linguistic performance. In brief, the desired linguistic acquisition becomes impossible
under stressful circumstances or the influence of unpleasant emotions (Ibarrola, 2018).
On the contrary, the brain reacts positively to pleasant stimuli, the experience of which favours learning. A
correlation exists between the receptive attitude towards the stimulus (and towards learning) and the rise in the secretion
of neurotransmitters in different superior areas of the brain that temporarily modify the way in which diverse neural
networks operate (De La Barrena & Donolo, 2009). These modifications favour, streamline and promote synapses and
the activation of other neurons, resulting in fast and efficient information processing, which is also pleasurable
(Damasio, 2019; Willis, 2010).
It has been widely documented that one of the neurotransmitters with the most significant impact on this process and
directly linked to the sensation of pleasure is dopamine. Specific actions have been shown to trigger a dopamin booster
in the brain (Willis, 2010, 2021). Together with favouring neural synapses, this activity produces a vital sensation of
pleasure and well-being and is connected to the sense of reward, thus playing an essential role in increasing motivation
toward learning (Ibarrola, 2018; Saavedra et al., 2015; Willis, 2010, 2021). Proven dopaminizing activities include
physical activity of one's preference, laughing, positive social interaction, achieving goals, well-done tasks, being read
to, acting kindly, and being right (Willis, 2010, 2021). When high doses of dopamine flood the neocortex thanks to
these actions, creativity, concentration, analytical skills, and general motivation to persevere increase, regardless of the
complexity of the activity and the mistakes that may be made (Damasio, 2019; Willis, 2021). The increase of this
neurotransmitter triggers concurrently the secretion of other neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine, "that increase your
alertness, focus, memory, and prefrontal cortex executive functions" (Willis, 2010, p. 172) or serotonin, which is
secreted in states of relaxation and calm, is associated with contentment, and favours homeostasis and memory
consolidation processes (Squire & Dede, 2015).
This correlation of neurotransmitter secretion forms the basis of what we call the D.A.S. Circuit (see Figure 1) (W. de
Fox, 2013; Willis, 2021), based on the Dopamine Reward Cycle (Willis, 2021).
We secrete dopamine in response to the desire to know if a prediction is correct (initial learning process) and the
potential reward for being right. This reward allows the brain to secrete acetylcholine, which promotes memorization,
and norepinephrine (better known as noradrenaline), which keeps the brain focused and prepares the whole organism
for action. Finally, in response to the satisfaction of a well-done job, the brain secretes serotonin, which regulates the
organism, promotes its recovery (homeostasis), generates pleasant sensations of calm and relaxation and collaborates
within the memory processes in the hippocampus. This pleasurable sensation will awaken in the brain the desire for the
activity that has generated dopamine in the first place, thus giving rise to a virtuous circle. According to Willis (2010),
"when dopamine is released during enjoyable learning activities, it actually increases your power to control attention
and turn the learning into long-term memories" (p. 172).
D. Motivation and Emotion in Language Teaching and Learning
The motivational factor has been one of the most studied aspects concerning language acquisition in the last decades
and has been investigated from a scientific perspective from the 20th century onwards (Rodríguez-Lifante, 2015).
Bringing together existing definitions of the concept of motivation and relying mainly on Chournazidi (2016), Ibarrola
(2013), Khong and Kabilan (2020), Mora Teruel (2017) and Paz Illescas et al. (2019), we venture to define it as the
force, external or internal, conscious or unconscious, that drives us to carry out an activity, generating in its course a
series of emotions that will propitiate the force of attraction towards the mentioned activity. Reinforcing this idea,
Damasio (2019) refers to these impulses as "triggers or constituents of emotions, but not as emotions in the proper
sense" (p. 346). Therefore, the concepts of motivation and emotion are often interrelated in teaching-learning contexts
(both share an etymology related to "movement") and are also perceived as two feelings that sometimes seem to express
very similar ideas. However, there is a differentiating nuance: motivation is what moves us to perform specific actions
because we know that these will please us; emotion ―closely related to motivation (Di Gesùet al., 2014, p. 23)― is the
reaction generated in the brain that affects the entire organism by disposing it either toward or against those actions
(Goleman, 2018).
According to the various neurodidactic and linguistic theories discussed above, the first motor for learning is the
learner's interest and desire to approach knowledge and enjoy dealing with it, which is related to intrinsic motivation
and depends directly on the emotions that the different stimuli generate in their brains. In other words, emotion is the
key factor that decisively determines the success or failure of learning. Many studies have concluded that certain
"positive" emotions are beneficial for learning and the acquisition or development of communicative competence in a
second language (Ansari et al., 2017; Dewaele, 2015; Di Gesù et al., 2014; Jensen, 2010; Nguyen, 2018; Odendahl,
2021; Oxford, 2015; Rodríguez-Lifante, 2015; White, 2018). Even more numerous are those studies that also
demonstrate the detriment of negative emotions such as anxiety or stress on the same point (Chournazidi, 2016;
Delgado et al., 2018; Pedrosa & Martí n, 2013; Salimzadeh et al., 2020; Suleman et al., 2021; Tsang, 2011; Willis, 2021).
Despite the vast literature demonstrating the critical influence of emotions on learning, the role of the emotional
factor in SLA research has not received the necessary attention or, at least, not until very recently (Dewaele, 2015).
Authors such as Dörnyei and Ryan (2015), Agudo (2018), Nguyen (2018), Xu (2018) or White (2018) express the need
to incorporate the study of emotions in SLA research. However, there are currently no studies that translate these
scientific advances into theoretical models that offer a solidly supported methodological framework and establish the
scientific bases that allow these advances to be applied in the classroom. For this reason, this paper offers a
methodological approach to language teaching and learning that takes emotions as the starting point and basis for
linguistic acquisition. This means that all decisions taken concerning the teaching-learning experience (like the attitude
and role of teachers and learners, the strategies and dynamics carried out, or the types of materials and resources) will
have to be considered in terms of the emotions we wish to foster and only in their favour.
III. METHOD
In order to meet the proposed objectives, we framed our research methodologically under the parameters of what
Bunge (2012, 2013) defines as formal science or formal true. According to the author, formal knowledge seeks to
achieve external consistency, that is, to establish interrelationships between ideals and principles that, with a rational
and logical consistency, provide answers from abstraction and generalization to facts of reality, generating new ideas.
The contributions of this research correspond to the three principles that define formal knowledge: a) it is rational,
defined by concepts, judgments, and reasoning; its starting point and endpoint are ideas; b) it is based on deductive
inference, i.e., a set of rules is logically interrelated in order to produce new ideas; and c) these ideas are systematically
organized, generating ordered sets of propositions, that is, new theories.
The theoretical review of this study is developed following the stages of the framework synthesis approach
(Esterhazy et al., 2021; Gough et al., 2012, 2017).
Although the parameters of formal science govern the study, it also seeks to comply with one of the main
characteristics of factual science: the knowledge offered by science is valuable (Bunge, 2013). In other words, "it is
effective in providing tools" (Bunge, 2013, p. 26) that influence the facts of reality and constitute the basis of
knowledge that will impact improving society.
TABLE 1
THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE EMOTIONAL APPROACH (OWN ELABORATION)
Main Principle
All stimuli and learning proposals will be at the service of emotions: it is necessary to ensure an activation, management and maintenance of the
emotions that foster learning. It is required to constantly evaluate whether the stimuli involved in the didactic proposal respect this basic principle or if
they need to be adapted.
Linguistic principles Didactic principles
– Language lies in neural connections. – Emotions determine learning. Thus, teaching must:
– Language is an interconnected set of inseparable structures and ogenerate interest;
skills. oawaken curiosity;
– Error and feedback are an inherent part of the process of: opose modest and manageable challenges;
oself-construction of the scaffolding; oeliminate stress.
ointerlanguage development; – Unconscious learning is possible under the appropriate emotions.
oself-learning capability. – Desire to communicate and to gain knowledge is required.
– Declarative knowledge fosters procedural learning and favours an emotional
state.
– Genuine learning is discovered and constructed by the learner.
– Authentic use of language is essential.
– Action should be driven by dopaminizing tasks:
osocial interaction;
oclear objectives and evaluation of progress;
oongoing feedback;
oprediction-resolution of attainable challenges.
6. Authentic use of language is essential. To increase receptivity and foster motivation, real language samples should
always be used in authentic communicative situations.
7. Dopaminizing tasks have to be the basis for action. The brain rewards positive social interactions, the feeling of
progress, the achievement of goals and the possibility of making accurate predictions with rewarding
neurotransmitters (dopamine). Thus, the teaching-learning process should: encourage social interaction, set clear
objectives, evaluate progress, provide ongoing feedback and continuously offer the possibility of predicting or
solving attainable challenges.
D. The Role of Actors
(a). The Teacher Role
Teachers working under the Emotional Approach must be aware of the learning culture of their students and
respectful towards it. Through the different strategies within their reach, they should try to identify the profile of
students they are teaching to adapt their proposals to their students' needs and avoid excessive estrangement or stressful
situations. Teachers must remain in the background, giving the student the leading role, and assuming the functions of
guide, linguistic and didactic advisor, manager of emotions and administrator of the tasks.
Taking the above into account, teachers will seek to fulfil the following functions:
1. Managing emotions and creating a cordial and relaxed classroom atmosphere, as close as possible to a social
gathering of people with common interests, where students feel involved, free to express their thoughts and,
most importantly, to make mistakes.
2. Provide feedback on their pragmalinguistic performance and give the necessary hints to encourage self-correction
and discovery learning. More than solving doubts, teachers should offer learners the tools to solve them
independently.
3. Select (or design) and administrate materials and tasks according to learners' interests and needs and the
established curriculum.
4. Encourage interaction among students as well as with the teacher.
5. Conduct a constant assessment of the students' progress and pragmalinguistic needs, the emotional state and
classroom atmosphere, and the teaching-learning experience itself, in order to adopt the required adjustments at
any time and in any context (pace, complexity, learning style, subject matter, content to be emphasized, etc.).
(b). The Learner Role
Regarding the role of the learner, the Emotional Approach maintains the same position as in the previous point on the
role of the teacher: it will be essential to attend to their personal and individual characteristics and avoid excessive
strangeness or stressful situations. However, learning will be more effective if the learner assumes an active and
protagonist role based on the following functions:
1. Take responsibility for their learning.
2. Actively participate in the negotiations raised (which may be about meanings, procedures, topics, content, etc.).
3. Engage in tasks and interact openly with peers and the teacher, taking risks and not being afraid for mistakes.
4. Adopt a positive attitude towards the target language, culture, and learning process.
V. THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTION
The Emotional Approach proposed here draws directly from widely accepted approaches such as the Communicative
Approach or the Natural Approach. However, it offers an eclectic and novel vision of language and its teaching and
learning from an interdisciplinary perspective, bringing together Neuroscience, Didactics, and Linguistics.
This work provides a new methodological approach to second language teaching. The most remarkable aspect of this
study is the inclusion of the neurodidactic perspective, traditionally ignored in linguistic research on SLA (Heller, 2018).
The Emotional Approach adapts these advances in Neuroscience to the field of SLA and language teaching and offers a
theoretical framework that will bridge the gap between these advances and the teaching practice. At its core, it provides
new insights into the importance of emotion in second language acquisition, placing it at the centre of the learning
process (Makiabadi et al., 2019). At the same time, it is closely related to other approaches, such as the Communicative
Approach or the Natural Approach, whose postulates align with the Emotional Approach's main principle. Moreover, by
focusing the learning process on emotions, the theoretical model presented here allows us to approach the learning
process from a holistic perspective, centred on the learner's natural interests.
The theoretical principles of the Emotional Approach concerning language and its acquisition process are intimately
linked to the functioning of learning at the neural level. The Emotional Approach understands that if language is a set of
neural networks, teaching should promote the generation and efficacy of these networks (Di Gesù et al., 2014). In this
process, certain pleasant emotions act as an enhancer, while other stressful or demotivating emotions will block
cognitive processes and impede learning. Clearly, this is the most novel and significant aspect of the Emotional
Approach and it contributes with a theoretical framework to build the links between Neuroscience, Didactics and
Linguistics.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research has been funded by the following entities:
The European Union "NextGenerationEU", by the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan and by the
Ministry of Universities, within the framework of the Margarita Salas grants for the Recualification of the Spanish
University System 2021-2023 called by the Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, in collaboration with the University of
Seville from the State Project PID2019-104557GB-I00, Improvement of Multimodal Literacy in Childhood (3-8 Years):
Development of an Integrative Model in Areas in Need of Social Transformation of the University of Seville.
The Chilean National Research and Development Agency (ANID), with the Fondecyt Regular project 1190254.
We also thank the support of the Spanish Program of the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile for its invitation to
the first author to carry out her research stay during which an essential part of this study was carried out under the
auspices of Professor Toledo.
REFERENCES
[1] Albashtawi, A. H. (2019). Improvement of EFL Students' Academic Reading Achievement Through the Cognitive Academic
Language Learning Approach (CALLA). Reading Psychology, 40(8), 679-704.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1658669
[2] Ansari, D., König, J., Leask, M., & Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2017). Developmental cognitive neuroscience: Implications for
teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching
Profession (pp. 195-222). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en
[3] Brown, H., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by Principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th. ed.). Pearson
Education.
[4] Bunge, M. (2012). The correspondence theory of truth. Semiotica, 188, 65-75. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1515/sem-2012-0004
[5] Bunge, M. (2013). [Science: method and philosophy]. DeBolsillo.
[6] Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing.
Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
[7] Carrillo-García, M., & Martínez-Ezquerro, A. (2018). Neurodidáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura [Language and Literature
Neurodidactics]. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 78(1), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie7813243
[8] Cerdas-Ramí rez, G., & Ramí rez-Acosta, J. (2015). La enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras: historia, teoría y práctica [Foreign
language teaching: history, theory and practice]. Revista de Lenguas ModeRnas, 22, 297-316.
[9] Chen, R. (2021). Fostering Students’ Workplace Communicative Competence and Collaborative Mindset through an Inquiry-
Based Learning Design. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci11010017
[10] Chomsky, N. (1966). Topics in the theory of generative grammar. Mouton.
[11] Chomsky, N., & Krashen, S. (2021). A Historic webinar with Chomsky and Krashen: Modern Linguistics (N. Belmekki (ed.)).
[12] Chournazidi, A. (2016). The Social Framework of Learning via Neurodidactics. Creative Education, 7(15), 2175-2192.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.715215
[13] Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press. Retrieved January 12, 2022, from
https://books.google.es/books?id=wWUnDQAAQBAJ
[14] Conte, E., Ornaghi, V., Grazzani, I., Pepe, A., & Cavioni, V. (2019). Emotion Knowledge, Theory of Mind, and Language in
Young Children: Testing a Comprehensive Conceptual Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(September), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02144
[15] Corder, S. P. (1981). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. In The Modern Language Journal. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/326720
[16] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). [Flow: The Psychology of Happiness] (13a ed.).
Kair s.
[17] Damasio, A. (2010). [Descartes' error: emotion, reason and the
human brain]. Editorial Andrés Bello.
[18] Damasio, A. (2019). [The Feeling of what
Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness]. Destino.
[19] De La Barrena, M., & Donolo, D. (2009). Neurociencias y su importancia en contextos de aprendizaje [Neurosciences and their
importance in learning contexts]. Revista Digital Universitaria, 10(4), 1-18. Retrieved February 2, 2022, from
http://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.10/num4/art20/art20.pdf
[20] Debbağ, M., & Yıldız, S. (2021). Effect of the flipped classroom model on academic achievement and motivation in teacher
education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3057-3076. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10395-
x
[21] Delgado, B., Aparisi, D., García-Fernández, J. M., Torregrosa, M., Estévez, E., Marzo, J., & Inglés, C. J. (2018). Academic
goals and learning strategies in secondary education Spanish students with social anxiety. Estudios de Psicología, 39(1), 58-80.
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2017.1407901
[22] Dewaele, J. (2015). On Emotions in Foreign Language Learning and Use. The Language Teacher, 39.3(July), 13-15. Retrieved
January 19, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281716361_
[23] Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. Educational Forum, 50(3), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
[24] Di Gesù, F., Seminara, A., Di Gesú, F., & Seminara, A. (2014). Neurodidáctica y la implicación de emociones en el aprendizaje.
LynX. Panorámica de Estudios Lingüí sticos, 11, 5-39.
[25] Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The
Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553
[26] Dvoryatkina, S. N., Zhuk, L. V., Smirnov, E. I., & Shcherbatykh, S. V. (2021). Didactic model of development of research
activities of schoolchildren in a hybrid intellectual learning environment. Perspectives of Science & Education, 2(50), 278-292.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.2.16
[27] Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
19(3), 221-246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
[28] Escorza Walker, J. (2017). Crear puentes entre neurociencia y educación [Building bridges between neuroscience and
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7242010.pdf
[59] Piaget, J. (1995). Commentary on Vygotsky’s Criticisms of Language And Thought Of The Child And Judgment And
Reasoning In The Child. New Ideas in Psychology, 13(3), 325-340.
[60] Piaget, J. (2006). Reason. New Ideas in Psychology, 24(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.04.003
[61] Pishghadam, R. (2016). Emotioncy, Extraversion, and Anxiety in Willingness to Communicate in English. In A. Lokman, M. A.
Fazidah Fariyah, I. Salahuddin, & A. Mohd Iskandar (Eds.), 5th International Conference on Language, Education, and
Innovation (ICLEI) (pp. 1-5). Infobase Creation Sdn Bhd. www.icsai.org/iclei
[62] Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[63] Rodríguez-Lifante, A. (2015). Motivación, emoción y cognición en adquisición de segundas lenguas desde la perspectiva de la
teoría de los sistemas complejos [Motivation, emotion and cognition in second language acquisition from the perspective of
complex systems theory]. In Y. Morimoto, M. V. Pavón Lucero, & R. Santamarí a Martínez (Eds.), La enseñanza de ELE
centrada en el alumno (pp. 813-822). ASELE.
[64] Saavedra, J., Díaz, W., Zúñiga, L., Navia, C., & Zamora, T. (2015). Correlación funcional del sistema límbico con la emoción,
el aprendizaje y la memoria [Functional correlation of the limbic system with emotion, learning and memory]. Morfolia, 7(2),
29-44. Retrieved January 16, 2022, from https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/morfolia/article/view/52874
[65] Salimzadeh, R., Hall, N. C., & Saroyan, A. (2020). Stress, Emotion Regulation, and Well-Being among Canadian Faculty
Members in Research-Intensive Universities. Social Sciences, 9(12), 227, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9120227
[66] Squire, L. R., & Dede, A. J. (2015). Conscious and unconscious memory systems. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 7(3),
a021667. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021667
[67] Suleman, Q., Syed, M. A., Khattak, A. Z., Kayani, K. M., Zaman, Z., & Khan, I. (2021). The Relationship between Emotional
Intelligence and Occupational Stress among Secondary School Heads in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. International Journal
of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(7), 953-972.
[68] Swain, M. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46(2), 195-
207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000486
[69] Szűcs, D., & Goswami, U. (2007). Educational Neuroscience: Defining a New Discipline for the Study of Mental
Representations. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228x.2007.00012.x
[70] Toledo-Vega, G., Lizasoain, A., & Mena, L. (2021). Acquisition of Spanish by Haitian Secondary School Students in Chile.
The International Journal of Learner Diversity and Identities, 28(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-
0128/CGP/v28i01/27-41
[71] Tsang, K. K. (2011). Emotional labor of teaching. Educational Research, 2(8), 1312-1316. http://www.interesjournals.org/ER
[72] Vygotski, L. (1984). Aprendizaje y desarrollo intelectual en la edad escolar [Learning and intellectual development at school
age]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 7(27-28), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.1984.10822045
[73] W. de Fox, S. (2013). El impacto de las emociones en el aprendizaje [Impact of emotions on learning]. In S. W. de Fox, J. Peire,
M. E. De Podestá, & A. Rattazzi (Eds.), El cerebro que aprende. Una mirada a la Educación desde las Neurociencas (pp. 109-
132). Aique Educación. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.380
[74] Węsierski, M. R. (2021). The manner of use, the uses and sub-uses of terms in social sciences: from the functional approach to
natural language to applied semiotics and the philosophy of science. Semiotica, 2021(240), 23-39.
https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/sem-2021-0019
[75] White, C. J. (2018). The Emotional Turn in Applied Linguistics and TESOL: Significance, Challenges and Prospects. In J. de D.
(ed. . Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in Second Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Teacher Education (pp. 19-34).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75438-3
[76] Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication (1a ed.). Oxford University Press.
[77] Willingham, D. T., & Lloyd, J. W. (2007). How Educational Theories Can Use Neuroscientific Data. Mind, Brain, and
Education, 1(3), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228x.2007.00014.x
[78] Willis, J. (2010). Learning to love math teaching strategies that change student attitudes and get results. ASCD.
[79] Willis, J. (2021). Stepping up Social-Emotional Learning to Reignite All Brains. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 57(1), 18-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2021.1851582
[80] Xu, Y. (2018). A Methodological Review of L2 Teacher Emotion Research: Advances, Challenges and Future Directions. In J.
de D. (ed. . Martí nez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in Second Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Teacher Education (pp. 35-
49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75438-3
[81] Zou, D., Wang, M., Xie, H., Cheng, G., Wang, F. L., & Lee, L. K. (2021). A comparative study on linguistic theories for
modeling EFL learners: facilitating personalized vocabulary learning via task recommendations. Interactive Learning
Environments, 29(2), 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789178
Inés Lucas-Oliva is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher for the European competitive program "NextGenerationEU", in the
Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan and for the Spanish Ministry of Universities in the framework of the Margarita Salas
grants for the Requalification of the Spanish university system, awarded by the Pablo de Olavide University, Seville. She holds a
PhD in Applied Linguistics, and her line of research focuses on the study of language teaching and learning (L1 and SL/FL) in which
she unifies educational, neuroscientific, and linguistic perspectives. She is a member of the Research Group of the University of
Seville HUM-527 "Spanish Language Applied to Teaching" and is also a researcher in several R+D+i, University innovation, and
cooperation projects. Prior to her current position, she was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Language and Literature
Teaching in the Faculty of Education Sciences at the University of Seville. She has taught in faculties of Education, Philology,
Translation and Language Sciences and in universities in Spain, Chile, and the United States. She is an accredited examiner for the
DELE certificates of the Instituto Cervantes and has collaborated as a linguistic evaluator in the Fulbright Program in the U.S.A.
Gloria Toledo-Vega is Associated Professor of the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile (PUC). She is PhD in Philology from
the University of Valladolid (2012). Since 1998 she has beeb working as a Spanish/ L2 teacher for the Pontificia Universidad
Católica de Chile (PUC), the Stanford University Study Center in Chile and the University of British Columbia, Canada. She teaches
classes in the areas of Pragmatics and Applied Linguistics and is head of the SFL program and the Specialization Diploma in SFL
program. Her research has to do with the development of Spanish among Haitian immigrants in Chile and the relationship between
acquisition and development of additional languages and sociocultural immersion. On this topic she is the author of several articles.
She has been awarded research funds at national level and has collaborated with organizations such as the Jesuit Service for Migrants
and Spanish schools for immigrants, within Chile.
Francisco Núñez-Román is an Associate Professor of the Department of Language and Literature Teaching in the Faculty of
Education Sciences at the University of Seville. He holds a PhD in Linguistics (2008). He is the Head of the University of Seville
Research Group HUM-527 “Spanish Language Applied to Teaching” and he has also participated in several Research Projects, such
as "Literacy as social practice in Early Childhood and Primary Education (5-7 years): research and intervention design with children
at risk of social exclusion in urban contexts" or “Strengthening Europeans’ Capabilities by Establishing the European Literacy
Network (ELN)”. Has published several papers in journals indexed in Web of Sciences (JCR) and Scopus (SJR). His research
interests are focused on second language teaching, academic writing, and literacy in Higher Education in monolingual and bilingual
contexts, written norm, and gender-fair language.