Module 2: Quantum Mechanics
Module 2: Quantum Mechanics
−β v
3 T
u(v ,T )= A v e Wien's distribution
2
8π v
u( v ,t )= 3 kT Rayleigh–Jeans distribution
c
Failure of classical mechanics
In contrast to classical assumption that a standing wave can
exchange any amount (continuum) of energy with matter,
Planck considered that the energy exchange between
radiation and matter must be discrete. He then postulated
that the energy of the radiation (of frequency ν) emitted by
the oscillating charges (from the walls of the cavity) must
come only in integer multiples of hν:
E = nhν, n = 1, 2, 3, ...........
2
8πv hv Plank’s distribution
u(v ,t )= 3 hv
c kT
e −1
Photoelectric effect
The photoelectric effect provides a direct confirmation for the energy quantization of light.
If the frequency of the incident radiation is smaller than the metal’s threshold frequency—
a frequency that depends on the properties of the metal—no electron can be emitted
regardless of the radiation’s intensity.
No matter how low the intensity of the incident radiation, electrons will be ejected instantly
the moment the frequency of the radiation exceeds the threshold frequency.
At any frequency above threshold frequency, the number of electrons ejected increases
with the intensity of the light but does not depend on the light’s frequency.
The kinetic energy of the ejected electrons depends on the frequency but not on the
intensity of the beam; the kinetic energy of the ejected electron increases linearly with the
incident frequency.
Photoelectric effect
K e =hv−W
k e =h(v−v 0 )
Compton effect
Wave-particle duality
Wave-particle duality
Wave-particle duality
Wave-particle duality
Wave-particle duality
Calculate the de Broglie wavelength for
(a) a proton of kinetic energy 70 MeV kinetic energy
(b) a 100 g bullet moving at 900 m s-1 .
Wave-particle duality
Experiments such as Compton effect or Double slit experiments suggest a dual nature of
both radiation and particle.
Dual behavior can in no way be reconciled within the context of classical physics, for
particles and waves are mutually exclusive entities.
Quantum mechanics, however, provides the proper framework for reconciling the particle
and wave aspects of matter.
ψ (r ,t )= Aei(k . r−ω t)
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle
According to classical physics, given the
initial conditions and the forces acting on
a system, the future behavior (unique
path) of this physical system can be
determined exactly.
h ℏ
Δ E Δ t= =
4π 2
In contrast to classical physics, quantum
mechanics is a completely
indeterministic theory.
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle
Estimate the uncertainty in the position of (a) a neutron moving at 5 x 106 ms-1 and (b) a 50
kg person moving at 2 ms-1.
Probabilistic interpretation
In quantum mechanics the state of a particle is described by a wave function (r, t)
corresponding to the de Broglie wave of this particle.
2
|ψ| Probability density
The main question now is, how does one determine the wave function O of a particle?
Wave function
ψ ( r ,t )= Aei(k . r−ω t)
1. (r,t) is complex, therefore
Time dependent
Schrodinger eqn
Time independent
Schrodinger eqn
Operators PE
TE
KE
Operators
Free particle
Time independent Schrodinger eqn
2 2
−ℏ ∂ ψ
2
+V ( x) ψ = E ψ
2m ∂ x
ψ = Acos(kx)+Bsin (kx) 2 mE
ψ = Ce ikx + Deikx
k =
√ ℏ2
Particle in a 1-D box
For 0<x<L, Schrodinger wave eqn for the
particle is
2 2
−ℏ ∂ ψ
2
= Eψ
2m ∂ x
ψ (x) = Acos(kx )+ Bsin(kx)
2 mE
k =
√ ℏ2
At boundries i.e, x = 0
ψ ( x=0) = Acos(k 0)+ Bsin(k 0) = 0 A=0
and x = L
ψ ( x=L) = Acos(kL)+Bsin(kL) = 0 sin (kL)=0
0
Particle in a 1-D box
nπ
sin (kL)=0 kL=n π or k =
L
nπx
ψ ( x) = Bsin( )
L
k 2 ℏ2 n2 h2
E = E =
2m 8 mL2
h2 2 2
Δ E = En +1 −E n = 2
((n+1) −n ) =(2 n+1) E1
8 mL
Particle in a 1-D box
Expectation value of x
∫ ψ∗ψ dx=1
all space L
2 nπ x 2 nπ x
L
∫ B sin (
nπx
L
) Bsin(
nπx
L
)=1
⟨ x⟩ = ∫
0 √ L
sin (
L
L
)x
√L
sin (
L
) dx
0 2 2 nπx
L ⟨ x⟩ = ∫ L sin ( L ) x dx
2 2 nπ x 0
∫ B sin ( L
) dx= 1 L
0 ⟨x ⟩ =
2 2
B =
2
√ L
nπ x
ψ( x ) =
√ L
sin(
L
)
Particle in a 1-D box
Expectation value of px
L
2 nπx 2 nπx
⟨ px ⟩ = ∫
0 √ L
sin(
L
L
)(−i ℏ ∂ )
∂x L√ sin(
L
)dx
−2i ℏ nπ x ∂ nπx
⟨ px ⟩ =
L 0
∫ sin( )
L ∂x
sin (
L
)dx
L
−2i n π ℏ nπ x nπx
⟨ px ⟩ = 2 ∫ sin( ) cos( )dx
L 0 L L
⟨ px ⟩ = 0
2 2 1 1 2 2
⟨ x ⟩=L ( − 2 2 ) Δ x=√ ⟨ x ⟩−⟨ x⟩
3 2n π 2 2
Δ p x = √ ⟨ p x ⟩−⟨ p x ⟩
2 π2 ℏ 2 n 2
⟨ p x ⟩= 2 Δ x Δ p x =?
L
Tunneling Effect
Tunneling is a unique phenomena in quantum mechanics
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE I : Eo > V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
In Region 1:
In Region 2:
ψ A = Ae−ik x 1
ψC =Ce
−ik 1 x
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE I : Eo > V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
x
ψ1= Ae
−ik 1 x
+ Be
ik 1 x ψ2=Ce−ik 1
is continuous:
is continuous:
ψ A = Ae−ik x 1
ψC =Ce−ik 2 x
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE I : Eo > V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
Quantum Electron Currents
Given an electron of mass
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE I : Eo > V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
x
ψ A = Ae−ik 1
ψC =Ce
−ik 2 x
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE I : Eo > V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
1
ψ A = Ae−ik x 1
ψC =Ce kx
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE II : Eo < V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
In Region 1:
In Region 2:
ψ A = Ae−ik x 1
ψC =Ce kx
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE II : Eo < V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
ψ1= Ae −ik 1 x
+ Be
ik 1 x ψ2=Ce kx
is continuous:
is continuous:
x
ψ A = Ae−ik 1
ψC =Ce kx
A Simple
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
CASE II : Eo < V
V=0
Region 1 Region 2
2a = L
ψ A = Ae−ik1 x ψC =Ce kx ψ F =Fe−ik x
1
A Rectangular
Potential Step ψ B =Beik 1 x
ψ D =De−kx
CASE II : Eo < V
V=0 V=0
In Regions 1 and 3:
In Region 2:
for Eo < V :
2a = L
A Rectangular
Potential Step
Real part of Ψ for Eo < V, shows
hyperbolic (exponential) decay
in the barrier domain and
decrease in amplitude of the
transmitted wave.
x=0 x=L
for Eo < V :
Erased Programmed
“1” “0”
SOURCE DRAIN
CHANNEL
Channel
Substrate
STM images
Image originally created
by IBM Corporation
© IBM Corporation. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons
license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/fairuse. Image is in the public domain
Example: Barrier Tunneling
• Let’s consider a tunneling problem:
An electron with a total energy of Eo= 6 eV V0
approaches a potential barrier with a height of Eo
V0 = 12 eV. If the width of the barrier is metal metal
L = 0.18 nm, what is the probability that the 0 L x
air
electron will tunnel through the barrier? gap