Impeller Design and CFD Analysis of Fluid Flow in Rotodynamic Pumps
Impeller Design and CFD Analysis of Fluid Flow in Rotodynamic Pumps
Impeller Design and CFD Analysis of Fluid Flow in Rotodynamic Pumps
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The intricate internal flows in the rotodynamic water pump impellers can be well predicted by using
Received 27 June 2020 computational fluid dynamics and mathematical modeling. An impeller is a radial type rotor that
Received in revised form 23 July 2020 increases the acceleration of the fluid due to the centrifugal action and the fluid is pumped through
Accepted 27 July 2020
the casing to a higher potential head. The efficiency and performance of the centrifugal pump can be
Available online 15 September 2020
enhanced by optimizing certain design parameters of the impeller. In this work, the impeller design
and development of potential flow calculations for the liquid flow using the MATLAB software was per-
Keywords:
formed. NX-CAD was used to model the impeller and pump. CFD analysis in ANSYS CFX showed the flow
Impeller design
Rotodynamic pumps
of liquid through the variable cross-section of the volute casing of the pump. Modification in impeller
MATLAB design showed that the overall performance of the pump can be improved. The program developed in
NX CAD the MATLAB also served as a type of calculator for determining the type of pump that can be used for var-
ANSYS CFX ious industrial purposes based on the velocity of the liquid, head and discharge rate.
Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Confer-
ence on Newer Trends and Innovation in Mechanical Engineering: Materials Science.
1. Introduction with various design parameters of the guide vanes. They showed
that the overall size of the pump can be reduced for the same
The requirements for energy efficient and low cost pumps had capacity due to improved aerodynamics.
driven the scientific community to develop new models for pump The impeller parameters significantly affect the overall operat-
design. Due to increasing demand for low carbon footprint several ing performance of the rotodynamic pumps as they provide the
researchers [1–6] have attempted to develop innovative materials, necessary pressure to the fluid. Careful analysis of the impeller
new processes and modifications in designs. In this work a modifi- profile can significantly improve the performance and efficiency
cation in design and selection process had been attempted to of the pump. Raj et al [12] had reviewed the application of various
reduce the energy waste in the rotodynamic pumps. The Impeller CFD techniques studied by the researchers, it was reported that
of the Centrifugal pump usually has vanes fitted between the two equation k-e turbulence model along with unsteady Navier–
shrouds or plates. The crown plate has a suction eye and the base Stokes equations (Reynolds-averaged) were giving closer predic-
plate is mounted which is keyed to a shaft. The impeller without tions on the centrifugal pump. It was also reported that further
the crown plate is known as the non-clog or semi-open impeller. studies on impeller volute interaction and fluid flow study in
Several researchers [7–10] have attempted to optimize the perfor- volute casing can improve the performance of the centrifugal
mance and improve the overall efficiency of the rotodynamic pumps. The work done by Gurupranesh et al [13] predicted the
pumps by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and performance of the pump by using virtual prototyping and CFD
varying the impeller design parameters suitably. Junaidi et al analysis by fluid flow simulation package. The impeller vane profile
[11] had shown that the vortices and non-uniformity in the fluid was created by using solid works software using point by point
flow can be reduced by introducing inner guide vanes at the method, and the parameters such as pressure distribution, static
entrance of the centrifugal pump, they performed CFD analysis pressure head, turbulence, fluid velocity and direction of flow.
The results were closely in agreement to that of the actual values.
Zhou et al [14] had investigated the three different types of cen-
⇑ Corresponding authors. trifugal pumps with different blades by using CFX software. The
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Chandrasekaran).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.637
2214-7853/Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Newer Trends and Innovation in Mechanical Engineering:
Materials Science.
M. Chandrasekaran et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 37 (2021) 2153–2157
The CAD model of the impeller was done using NX CAD soft-
ware. the design procedure involves the computation of required
Fig. 1. Generation of blade profile. Fig. 3. Flowchart for re-plot of the pump curve.
2154
M. Chandrasekaran et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 37 (2021) 2153–2157
Table 1 center and the length is equal to the second radius of curvature,
Boundary Conditions Used in CFD Analysis. with H as center and BH is radius, an arc was drawn till the arc
S. No. Type of Boundary Condition Values meets the next circle. This procedure was repeated until the curve
1 Mass flow rate 0.35 m3/kg meets the external diameter of the impeller. The curve was then
2 Inlet Pressure 1 bar off-set with internal blade thickness at the entry of the blade and
3 Rotation speed 2000 rpm external blade thickness at the exit of the blade as shown in Fig. 2.
4 Number of Iterations 625
2155
M. Chandrasekaran et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 37 (2021) 2153–2157
4. Conclusions
Fig. 7. Plot of speed versus discharge. The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
to influence the work reported in this paper.
obtained from the velocity triangle and then links the data points References
obtained with the pump performance curve and the data obtained
from the formulae. The final graph obtained was used to choose the [1] S. Ramasubramanian, M. Chandrasekaran, S. Baskar, A. Dowhithamaran, Mater.
pump with best efficiency, mass flow rate and pressure head. The Today (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.637.
[2] Jishuchandran, K. Manikandan, R. Ganesh, S. Baskar, Int. J. Ambient Energy
flow chart of the program used in this study is presented in Fig. 3. (2020) 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2020.1725637.
[3] S. Baskar, V. Vijayan, I.I. Premkumar, D. Arunkumar, D. Thamaran, Mater Today.
(2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.352.
[4] B.S. Kumar, V. Vijayan, N. Baskar, Mech. Mech. Eng. 20 (2016) 347–354.
[5] D. Arunkumar, M. Ramu, R. Murugan, S. Kannan, S. Arun, S. Baskar, Mater
2.3. CFD analysis of the fluid flow in the pump Today. (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.220.
[6] D. Arunkumar, M. Ramu, R. Murugan, S. Kannan, S. Arun, Sanjeevi Baskar, Mat
ANSYS CFD had been used in this study to simulate the fluid Today. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.220
[7] S.R. Shah, S.V. Jain, R.N. Patel, V.J. Lakhera, Procedia Eng. 51 (2013) 715–720.
flow in the centrifugal pump, the flow was assumed to be turbu-
[8] L. Hedi, K. Hatem, Z. Ridha, Int. Renewable Energy Congress (2010) 300–304.
lent and the standard j – e model was used to simulate the fluid [9] N. Dash, A.K. Roy, K. Kumar, Mater Today 5 (2018) 4460–4466.
flow. Standard wall conditions were considered for the volute [10] J.P. Yuan, Y.W. Zhu, A.X. Ge, J. Adv. Mater. Res 945 (2014) 914–923.
casing, impeller and pump walls. The input velocity was assumed [11] M.A. Junaidi, N.L. Kumari, M.A. Samad, G.S. Ahmed, Mater Today 2 (2015)
2073–2082.
to be constant and the factors considered in the analysis is given [12] P.P. Raj, P.S. Gupta, P.P. Kumar, G. Paramesh, K. Rohit, Mater Today 21 (2020)
in Table 1. 175–183.
2156
M. Chandrasekaran et al. Materials Today: Proceedings 37 (2021) 2153–2157
[13] P. Gurupranesh, R.C. Radha, N. Karthikeyan, IOSR-JMCE, (2010) 2278–1684. [25] R. Muraliraja, J. Sudagar, R. Elansezhian, A. Raviprakash, R. Dhinakaran, V.S.
[14] W. Zhou, Z. Zhao, T.S. Lee, S.H. Winoto, Int. J. Rotating Mach. 9 (2003) 49–61. Shaisundaram, M. Chandrasekaran, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 44 (2019) 821–828.
[15] T. Nigussie, E. Dribssa, Int. J. Eng. Res. Gen. Sci. 3 (2015) 668–677. [26] R. Muraliraja, R. Elansezhian, Trans. he IMF 93 (2015) 126–132.
[16] S. Rajendran, D.K. Purushothaman, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 3 (2012) 2278– [27] R. Muraliraja, D. Sendilkumar, D. Elansezhian, Int J Electrochem Sci 10 (2015)
2281. 5536–5547.
[17] L. Tan, B. Zhu, S. Cao, H. Bing, Y. Wang, Chin. J. Mech. Eng.-En 27 (2014) 171– [28] S. Baskar, V. Vijayan, S. Saravanan, A.V. Balan & A. Godwin Antony,
177. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9 (2018)
[18] S.M. Rajmane, S.P. Kallurkar, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2 (2015) 984–988. 91–96.
[19] J.H. Kim, H.C. Lee, J.H. Kim, S. Kim, J.Y. Yoon, Y.S. Choi, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 29 [29] A. Godwin Antony, V.Vijayan, S.Saravanan, S.Baskar, M.Loganathan,
(2015) 215–225. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9 (2018)
[20] T. Minggao, L. Houlin, W. Yong, W. Kai, D. Liang, J. Irrig. Drain E-ASCE 5 (2009) 681–691.
314–318. [30] S. Saravanan, A. Godwin Antony, V. Vijayan, M. Loganathan, S. Baskar,
[21] V. S Shaisundaram, M. Chandrasekaran, Mohan Raj, S., & Muraliraja, R. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 1 (2019)
International Journal of Ambient Energy, 41(2020), 98–104. 785–790.
[22] V.S. Shaisundaram, M. Chandrasekaran, M. Shanmugam, S. Padmanabhan, R. [31] S. Dinesh, A. Godwin Antony, K. Rajaguru, V. Vijayan, Mech. Mech. Eng. 21
Muraliraja, L. Karikalan, Int. J. Ambient Energy (2019) 1–5. (2017) 17–28.
[23] V.S. Shaisundaram, M. Chandrasekaran, S. Mohan Raj, R. Muraliraja, T. [32] S. Dinesh, K. Rajaguru, V. Vijayan, A.Godwin Antony, Mechanics and
Vinodkumar, Int. J. Ambient Energy 40 (2019) 699–703. Mechanical Engineering , 20(2016) 451–466.
[24] V.S. Shaisundaram, L. Karikalan, M. Chandrasekaran, Int. J. Vehicle Struct. Syst.
11 (2019).
2157