QCE Instrument Teachers Evaluations

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The QCE of the NBC No.

461
Instrument for Instruction/Teaching Effectiveness

Rating Period:__JANUARY 2022___ to ____APRIL 2022_____

Name of Faculty: _ALBERT A. JALANDONI_ Academic Rank: Asst.Prof.-I_

Evaluators:
O Self O Peer
O Student O Supervisor

Instruction: Please evaluate the faculty using the scale below. Encircle
your rating.

Scale Descriptive Rating Qualitative Description


The performance almost always exceeds the
5 Outstanding job requirements. The Faculty is an
exceptional role model
The performance meets and often exceeds the
4 Very Satisfactory
job requirements
3 Satisfactory The performance meets job requirements
The performance needs some development to
2 Fair
meet job requirements.
1 Poor The faculty fails to meet job requirements

A. Commitment Scale
1. Demonstrates sensitivity to students’ ability to attend and
absorb content information. 5 4 3 2 1

2. Integrates sensitively his/her learning objectives with


those of the students in a collaborative process. 5 4 3 2 1

3. Makes self available to students beyond official time 5 4 3 2 1


4. Regularly comes to class on time, well-groomed and
well-prepared to complete assigned responsibilities. 5 4 3 2 1

5. Keeps accurate records of students’ performance and


prompt submission of the same. 5 4 3 2 1

Total Score 25

B. Knowledge of Subject Scale


1. Demonstrates mastery of the subject matter (explain the
subject matter without relying solely on the prescribed 5 4 3 2 1
textbook).
2. Draws and share information on the state on the art of
5 4 3 2 1
theory and practice in his/her discipline.

3. Integrates subject to practical circumstances and


5 4 3 2 1
learning intents/purposes of students.

4. Explains the relevance of present topics to the previous


lessons, and relates the subject matter to relevant 5 4 3 2 1
current issues and/or daily life activities.
5. Demonstrates up-to-date knowledge and/or awareness
5 4 3 2 1
on current trends and issues of the subject.

Total Score 22
C. Teaching for Independent Learning Scale
1. Creates teaching strategies that allow students to
practice using concepts they need to understand 5 4 3 2 1
(interactive discussion).
2. Enhances student self-esteem and/or gives due
5 4 3 2 1
recognition to students’ performance/potentials.
3. Allows students to create their own course with
objectives and realistically defined student-professor 5 4 3 2 1
rules and make them accountable for their performance
4. Allows students to think independently and make their
own decisions and holding them accountable for their
5 4 3 2 1
performance based largely on their success in executing
decisions.
5. Encourages students to learn beyond what is required
and help/guide the students how to apply the concepts 5 4 3 2 1
learned
Total Score 24

D. Management of Learning Scale


1. Creates opportunities for intensive and/or extensive
contribution of students in the class activities (e.g. 5 4 3 2 1
breaks class into dyads, triads or buzz/task groups).
2. Assumes roles as facilitator, resource person, coach,
inquisitor, integrator, referee in drawing students to
5 4 3 2 1
contribute to knowledge and understanding of the
concepts at hands.
3. Designs and implements learning conditions and
experience that promotes healthy exchange and/or 5 4 3 2 1
confrontations.
4. Structures/re-structures learning and teaching–learning
context to enhance attainment of collective learning 5 4 3 2 1
objectives.
5. Use of Instructional Materials ((audio/video materials:
fieldtrips, film showing, computer aided instruction and 5 4 3 2 1
etc.) to reinforces learning processes.
Total Score 25

COMPUTATION
Formula/Equation
Total % QCE
Areas of Evaluation ts
Score (Percentage) % Point
hps
A. Commitment 25 25 25 / 25 X 25 25
B. Knowledge of Subject 22 25 22 / 25 X 25 22
C. Teaching for Independent Learning 24 25 24 / 25 X 25 24
D. Management of Learning 25 25 25 / 25 X 25 25
Total QCE Point 96
Legend for the Formula/Equation:
ts = Total Score
hps = Highest Possible Score
% = Percentage

Signature of Evaluator :
Name of Evaluator : JUNIO, MICAELLA F.
Position of Evaluator : STUDENT
Date : April 8, 2022

You might also like