Effect of Blending Ratio On The Nutritional Value of Millet and Guinea Corn Using Mixture Design
Effect of Blending Ratio On The Nutritional Value of Millet and Guinea Corn Using Mixture Design
Effect of Blending Ratio On The Nutritional Value of Millet and Guinea Corn Using Mixture Design
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- This study focused on immunonutrition which expression of the immune response (Maggini,S et al; 2017).
is referring to boosting immune system response through Micronutrients such as vitamins and nutritionally essential
diet. In this study, the effect ofthe blending ratio of millet micro-nutrients such as zinc (Zn) influence and support
and guinea corn on their nutritional value was every stage of the immune response in which their
investigated for vitamin K, vitamin D, and Zinc deficiency can affect both innate and adaptive immunity
mineralswhich are considered to help bolster immunity thereby causing immunosuppression and thus increasing the
and their relevance in the fight against covid-19.The susceptibility to infection. Different approaches can be
proximate analysis result showed that guinea corn has a employed to offer children and adults improved food with
higher value of ash, carbohydrate, and crude protein low-cost and locally available food formulations with an
contents whilemillet on the other hand has a higher improved nutritive value. One study established that
moisture content, calorific value, crude lipids, and crude porridges prepared from extruded millet and press-dried
fiber contents as compared to that of guinea corn. Using cowpea had a high nutritional quality with acceptable
Design Expert for experimental design, a mixture D- properties of weaning foods (Almeida-Dominguez et al.,
Optimal design was employed. The analysis of variance 1993). It was reported that when millet was mixed with
(ANOVA) for the yield of vitamin K and D, and Zinc amaranth and buckwheat to make extruded breakfast cereal
mineral were statistically significant at “prob ˃ F” less products instead of the mixture of wheat and maize flour,
than 0.05. Optimization of the analysis revealed that a nutritional and physical quality of the cereal products were
blend in the ratio of 55.2 to 44.8 would be the best blend altered. In addition to this, all of the extruded products with
that maximizes vitamin K, D, and Zinc minerals with the inclusion of pseudocereals exhibited an enormous
desirability of 65.1 %. Although cereals are not a reduction in readily digestible carbohydrates in contrast to
significant source of vitamin K and D the blends from the control product during in vitro glycemic profiling
the study, if processed into food, would be able to (Brennan MA et al., 2012).Millet and red guinea corn were
provide an additional quantity of the vitamins and chosen for this study owing to their nutritive value,
minerals needed to boost our immune system. availability in the local market, cheapness, and being part of
the most neglected cereals. Hence, this study was to
Keywords:- Immunonutrition, nutritional value, immune- evaluate the nutritive value of a mixture of millet and guinea
boosting,Covid-19, cereals. corn in various proportions with a view to incorporating this
into our daily meals
I. INTRODUCTION
Tables for the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were evaluated to study the accuracy of the final model. The
generated. The significance of all the terms was statistically resulting analysis was then optimized to identify the blends
evaluated at prob˃F less than 0.05. The predicted coefficient that fully maximize the responses. The resulting analysis
of determination (R2), Adj-R2, and lack of fit were also was optimized using a numerical solution.
Sample
Proximate Analysis Millet (A) Red Guinea Corn (B)
Moisture (%) 19.93 17.2758
Ash % 1.2426 2.0748
CHO (%) 50.094 55.59307
Calorific Value (kJ/100g) 1654.6 1633.99
Crude Fiber (%) 2.1566 1.13604
Crude Lipids (%) 17.818 14.577
Crude Protein (%) 8.7595 9.34326
Table 2: Proximate Analysis Results
From the table above, millet has a moisture content of observed with red guinea corn (14.577%). Red guinea corn
19.9295% which is slightly higher than that of red guinea was higher in crude protein contents (9.34326%) compared
corn at 17.2758%. The ash content of 2.0748% observed to that millet of 8.75954%).
with red guinea corn was higher as compared to 1.2426%
observed in millet. Red guinea corn has 55.59307% of IV. RESULTS OF VITAMINS AND ZINC MINERAL
carbohydrates while millet has 50.09353%. A calorific value DETERMINATION
of 1654,593 kJ/100g was observed in millet which was
higher than 1633.99 kJ/100g in red guinea corn. The crude Table 3 displayed the result of the vitamins and zinc
fiber was higher in millet (2.15659%) as compared to that of mineral determination from the laboratory for various
red guinea corn (1.13604%). Crude lipids content was blending ratios of millet and guinea corn according to the
higher in millet (17.8182%) as compared to the one mixture design for two components.
A. Effect of blending ratio of millet and red guinea corn on The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the cubic model
the yield of vitamin K regression on the effect of blending ratio on the yield of
The vitamin K in the blends was observed to range from vitamin K showed that the model has an F-value of
16.980 µg to 18.9149 µg with sample C (80:20) giving the 21393.53. The value of “prob˃F” was less than 0.05 which
highest yield while the lowest was sample G (40:60). It was implies that the model is significant (Table 4). The model
further observed that as the quantity of the red guinea corn terms are significant at a confidence level of 95%. In this
increases in the blends, the vitamin K reduces. case, A, B, AB, and AB (A-B) are significant model terms.
The “predicted R2” of 0.9997 was in reasonable agreement
with the “adjusted R2” of 0.9998 which indicates a good
95
90
Normal % Probability
80
70
50
30
20
10
5
Design-Expert® Software
Component Coding: Actual
Vitamin K1 (µg)
Two Com ponent Mix
Design Points
95% CI Bands 19
3
X1 = A: Millet
X2 = B: Red Guinea Corn
18.5
Vitamin K1 (µg)
18
2
2
17.5
17 5
16.5
A: Millet (g) 40 50 60 70 80
B: Red Guinea... 60 50 40 30 20
Design-Expert® Software
Vitamin D3 Norm al Plot of Res iduals
Color points by value of
Vitamin D3:
81.098
99
56.9381
95
90
Normal % Probability
80
70
50
30
20
10
5
Design-Expert® Software
Component Coding: Actual
Vitamin D3 (%)
Two Com ponent Mix
Design Points
95% CI Bands 85
X1 = A: Millet
X2 = B: Red Guinea Corn 2
80
75
Vitamin D3 (%)
70
5
65
60
4
55
A: Millet (g) 40 50 60 70 80
B: Red Guinea... 60 50 40 30 20
C. Effect of blending ratio of millet and red guinea corn on significant at a confidence level of 95%. In this case, A, B,
Zinc (Zn) yield AB, and AB(A-B) are significant model terms. The
From Table 3, Sample C (80:20 blends) was observed to “predicted R2” of 0.9691 as compared to the “adjusted R2”
have the lowest yield of Zinc (Zn) (0.434ppm) while sample of 0.9764 implies a good explanation of the variability of the
F (50:50 blends) was the highest (1.386ppm). This means selected model. The lack of fit was found to be insignificant
that as the quantity of red guinea corn increases in the which implies that the model reliability of the experiments is
mixture, the yield of Zinc (Zn) also increases. a good fit. The Coefficient of Variation, CV % (5.20) gives
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the cubic model the precision and reliability of the experiment carried out (a
regression on the effect of blending ratio on the yield of lower value of CV % indicates a better precision and
Zinc (Zn) is presented in Table 4.8. The analysis of variance reliability of the experiment carried out). The adequate
(ANOVA) shows that the model has an F-value of 193.92 precision of 39.251 implies an adequate signal which means
which implies that the model is significant. “prob˃F” value that the model can be used to navigate the design space.
was less than 0.05 which indicates that the model terms are
95
90
Normal % Probability
80
70
50
30
20
10
5
Design-Expert® Software
Component Coding: Actual
Zinc (ppm)
Two Com ponent Mix
Design Points
95% CI Bands 1.6
X1 = A: Millet
X2 = B: Red G uinea Corn 1.4
1.2
2
Zinc (ppm)
1
5
0.8
0.6
2
0.4
0.2
A: Millet (g) 40 50 60 70 80
B: Red Guinea... 60 50 40 30 20
D. Optimization
Subjecting the analyses to numerical optimization yielded two solutions but the one with 65.1 % was selected as presented in
Table 8
Constraints
Lower Upper Lower Upper
Name Goal Limit Limit Weight Weight Importance
A:Millet is in range 40 80 1 1 3
B:Red Guinea Corn is in range 20 60 1 1 3
Vitamin K1 maximize 16.98 18.9149 1 1 3
Vitamin D3 maximize 56.9381 81.098 1 1 3
Zinc maximize 0.434 1.386 1 1 3
Table 7: Constraints for optimization of vitamin K, D, and Zinc minerals
Solutions
Number Millet Red Guinea Corn Vitamin K1 Vitamin D3 Zinc Desirability
1 55.146 44.854 17.633 79.731 1.261 0.651 Selected
2 79.291 20.709 18.82 58.613 0.453 0.11
Table 8: Solutions for the optimization of vitamin K, D, and Zinc minerals
REFERENCES