Kendra Cherry - The Dunning-Kruger Effect
Kendra Cherry - The Dunning-Kruger Effect
Kendra Cherry - The Dunning-Kruger Effect
pr nt
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a type of cognitive bias in which people believe that they are
smarter and more capable than they really are. Essentially, low ability people do not possess
the skills needed to recognize their own incompetence. The combination of poor self-
awareness and low cognitive ability leads them to overestimate their own capabilities.
The term lends a scientific name and explanation to a problem that many people immediately
recognize—that fools are blind to their own foolishness. As Charles Darwin wrote in his book
The Descent of Man, "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge."
The effect is named after researchers David Dunning and Justin Kruger, the two social
psychologists who first described it. In their original study on this psychological phenomenon,
they performed a series of four investigations.
People who scored in the lowest percentiles on tests of grammar, humor, and logic also
tended to dramatically overestimate how well they had performed (their actual test scores
placed them in the 12th percentile, but they estimated that their performance placed them i
the 62nd percentile).
The Research
In one experiment, for example, Dunning and Kruger asked their 65 participants to rate how
funny different jokes were. Some of the participants were exceptionally poor at determining
what other people would find funny—yet these same subjects described themselves as
excellent judges of humor.
Incompetent people, the researchers found, are not only poor performers, they are also
unable to accurately assess and recognize the quality of their own work. This is the reason
why students who earn failing scores on exams sometimes feel that they deserved a much
higher score. They overestimate their own knowledge and ability and are incapable of seeing
the poorness of their performance.
Low performers are unable to recognize the skill and competence levels of other people,
which is part of the reason why they consistently view themselves as better, more capable,
and more knowledgeable than others.
"In many cases, incompetence does not leave people disoriented, perplexed, or cautious,"
wrote David Dunning in an article for Pacific Standard. "Instead, the incompetent are often
blessed with an inappropriate confidence, buoyed by something that feels to them like
knowledge."
This effect can have a profound impact on what people believe, the decisions they make, and
the actions they take. In one study, Dunning and Ehrlinger found that women performed
equally to men on a science quiz, and yet women underestimated their performance because
they believed they had less scientific reasoning ability than men. The researchers also found
that as a result of this belief, these women were more likely to refuse to enter a science
competition.
Dunning and his colleagues have also performed experiments in which they ask respondents
if they are familiar with a variety of terms related to subjects including politics, biology,
physics, and geography. Along with genuine subject-relevant concepts, they interjected
completely made-up terms.
In one such study, approximately 90 percent of respondents claimed that they had at least
some knowledge of the made-up terms. Consistent with other findings related to the
Dunning-Kruger effect, the more familiar participants claimed that they were with a topic, the
more likely they were to also claim they were familiar with the meaningless terms. As
Dunning has suggested, the very trouble with ignorance is that it can feel just like expertise.
So what explains this psychological effect? Are some people simply too dense, to be blunt, to
know how dim-witted they are? Dunning and Kruger suggest that this phenomenon stems
from what they refer to as a "dual burden." People are not only incompetent; their
incompetence robs them of the mental ability to realize just how inept they are.
Dunning has pointed out that the very knowledge and skills necessary to be good at a task
are the exact same qualities that a person needs to recognize that they are not good at that
task. So if a person lacks those abilities, they remain not only bad at that task but ignorant to
their own inability.
A Lack of Metacognition
The Dunning-Kruger effect is also related to difficulties with metacognition, or the ability to
step back and look at one's own behavior and abilities from outside of oneself. People are
often only able to evaluate themselves from their own limited and highly subjective point of
view. From this limited perspective, they seem highly skilled, knowledgeable, and superior to
others. Because of this, people sometimes struggle to have a more realistic view of their own
abilities.
Other factors that can contribute to the effect include our use of heuristics, or mental
shortcuts that allow us to make decisions quickly, and our tendency to seek out patterns even
where none exist. Our minds are primed to try to make sense of the disparate array of
information we deal with on a daily basis. As we try to cut through the confusion and interpret
our own abilities and performance within our individual worlds, it is perhaps not surprising
that we sometimes fail so completely to accurately judge how well we do.
The reality is that everyone is susceptible to this phenomenon, and in fact, most of us
probably experience it with surprising regularity. People who are genuine experts in one area
may mistakenly believe that their intelligence and knowledge carry over into other areas in
which they are less familiar. A brilliant scientist, for example, might be a very poor writer. In
order for the scientist to recognize their own lack of skill, they need to possess a good
working knowledge of things such as grammar and composition. Because those are lacking,
the scientist in this example also lacks the ability to recognize their own poor performance.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is not synonymous with low IQ. As awareness of the term has
increased, its misapplication as a synonym for "stupid" has also grown. It is, after all, easy t
judge others and believe that such things simply do not apply to you.
So if the incompetent tend to think they are experts, what do genuine experts think of their
own abilities? Dunning and Kruger found that those at the high end of the competence
spectrum did hold more realistic views of their own knowledge and capabilities. However,
these experts actually tended to underestimate their own abilities relative to how others did.
Essentially, these top-scoring individuals know that they are better than the average, but they
are not convinced of just how superior their performance is compared to others. The problem,
in this case, is not that experts don't know how well-informed they are; it's that they tend to
believe that everyone else is knowledgeable as well.
learning more about how the mind works and the mistakes we are all susceptible to might be
one step toward correcting such patterns.
Dunning and Kruger suggest that as experience with a subject increases, confidence typically
declines to more realistic levels. As people learn more about the topic of interest, they begin
to recognize their own lack of knowledge and ability. Then as people gain more information
and actually become experts on a topic, their confidence levels begin to improve once again.
So what can you do to gain a more realistic assessment of your own abilities in a particular
area if you are not sure you can trust your own self-assessment?
Keep learning and practicing. Instead of assuming you know all there is to know
about a subject, keep digging deeper. Once you gain greater knowledge of a topic, the
more likely you are to recognize how much there is still to learn. This can combat the
tendency to assume you’re an expert, even if you're not.
Ask other people how you're doing. Another effective strategy involves asking others
for constructive criticism. While it can sometimes be difficult to hear, such feedback can
provide valuable insights into how others perceive your abilities.
Question what you know. Even as you learn more and get feedback, it can be easy to
only pay attention to things that confirm what you think you already know. This is an
example of another type of psychological bias known as the confirmation bias. In order
to minimize this tendency, keep challenging your beliefs and expectations. Seek out
information that challenges your ideas.
Article Sources
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts
within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our
content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
Dunning, D. Chapter five: The Dunning-Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one's own ignorance.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2011;44;247-296. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-
0.00005-6.
https://www.verywellm nd.com/an-overv ew-of-the-dunn ng-kruger-effect-4160740?pr nt 5/6
10.04.2020 https://www.verywellm nd.com/an-overv ew-of-the-dunn ng-kruger-effect-4160740?pr nt
Ehrliner, J, Johnson, K, Banner, M, Dunning, D, & Kruger, J. Why the unskilled are unaware: Further
explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process.
2008;105(1):98-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946242.