Ferrari Case Study
Ferrari Case Study
Ferrari Case Study
Professor McDermott
Case Studies in Finance
March 24, 2021
Ferrari Case Study
Summary
Ferrari, an Italy-based company, is famous all over the globe for its exclusive and
luxurious sports cars. The company was initiated and built by Enzo Ferrari but only 10% of the
firm is owned by the Ferrari family. The remaining 90% ownership was in the hand of Fiat, a car
manufacturer and a partner with Ferrari. From a private company, the company is looking to go
public and is already in the process of an IPO to sell the 10% stake being held by the Ferrari
family. The reasonable price range for the shares was set to be between $48 and $52.
Additionally, during the road-show, there was also strong demand of 17.18 million shares for the
initial offering. Since then, they will have 189 million shares outstanding to be offered on the day
of the initial public offering.
In this following report, our group will discuss the key problems and questions Ferrari
faces regarding their IPO decision, list out different valuation approaches namely the DCF and
the Multiples valuation approach along with the results of the intrinsic value for Ferrari (RACE)
stocks. The price which we believe Ferrari should be sold at is $48.00. Throughout this analysis
of the company and the valuation we will describe how we have come to that conclusion.
Similar to any private firm going public, the major question Ferrari and their team is
facing in the process of an IPO is around the price of their stock - what is a reasonable price
within the determined range for one share of the company’s stock? Related to this point, another
question is also considered: what are the applicable methodologies to be used in Ferrari
valuation? What are the recommended price per share for the stock using each way to evaluate
and what are the strengths and weaknesses associated with each method? What can be used as
industry benchmarks for Ferrari to price themselves accordingly given that there were hardly any
close competitors operating in the exact business as Ferrari?
While pricing is the most central topic of the firm’s IPO, Ferrari’s leaders have also been
questioning about the right direction for the company going forward after their big move of
going public. Since Ferrari has long been known as a private company selling premium limited
sport cars, this IPO decision along with the tendency of shifting Ferrari’s focus on production
and increasing quality more in the future has raised a concern of losing the long known
reputation of being an exclusive brand. As Ferrari completely transforms into a separately traded
company, they may face certain difficulties to sustain as an independent entity due to their small
scale.
V. Conclusion Lila
An initial public offering is an important aspect for a company to gain capital and
investors. In Ferrari’s case, it is crucial for their stock issuance to perform well as it provides an
opportunity for Ferrari to grow and expand. However, the issue with initial public offerings is
that if the stock is overvalued it can lead to losses for the company, and if it is undervalued the
company loses the opportunity to raise as much capital as possible, leading investors to profit on
the secondary market instead of the company profiting off of the IPO. The IPO for a business
needs to build buzz and excitement for investors but not be overly advertised and publicized.
Furthermore, as Ferrari is an exclusive and luxury brand that is going public, one of their primary
concerns is to keep intact the distinctive and extraordinary feeling that comes with owning a
Ferrari vehicle. The business needs to preserve the uniqueness of the brand while going public to
further develop and enable new opportunities for the company. That is why, as previously
mentioned, for Ferrari’s brand and business $48 is the ideal IPO stock price. It ensures that the
stock issuance is not overvalued, leading to an ultimate under performance and detrimental effect
on the company’s reputation. The combined results of the DCF and Multiples Models
evaluations leads to $48 as the ultimate compromise. Although DCF proves a valuation higher
than $48 would be beneficial, doubts in the Multiples Models shows that a lower valuation is the
smarter option. $48 is the best option to create value for both firms while ensuring that Ferrari’s
IPO is well received and the stock issuance ultimately performs well.
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4:
Exhibit 5