Comparison and Contrast - Different Definition of Curriculum
Comparison and Contrast - Different Definition of Curriculum
5.) Base on a research study conducted at Australian University to some academic teachers and Fraser, Sharon P. & Based on the experiences of the participant:
students having both strengths in teaching and research aimed at knowing the 'conceptions of the Bosanquet, Agnes M. Category A- is based on how you deliver that content whether
curriculum' which refers to both what academics perceive to be the curriculum and their through readings or lectures. It may be once a week, twice a
understandings and experiences of this curriculum. Four distinct categories of description emerged week, or over a semester.
from the data, in which the curriculum is conceptualized as: Category B- adding extra units to the program as electives, or
providing students with increased flexibility of delivery or
Category A: The structure and content of a unit (subject)- the curriculum is defined by what is taught in avenues such as via the internet.
the individual unit or subject, and articulated in the unit outline. Category C focuses on finding what suits and motivates the
Category B: The structure and content of a program of study- curriculum as a program of study that students. Likely to be achieved in maintaining open
encompasses multiple units. communication.
Category C: The students’ experience of learning- moving away from the curriculum as a product Category D- to promote change in both teacher and student by
provided for students, to a process that enables student learning. The content and delivery of a unit, achieving the goal of student learning from their teachers and
and its structure within the program as a whole, is an integral part of the curriculum but is only one part teachers also learn from their students. This is likely to be
of a broader process. achieved by increasing student participation in class discussions.
Category D: A dynamic and interactive process of teaching and learning - the understanding of
curriculum as a collaborative process of learning, with the teacher and student acting as co-constructors
of knowledge.
REFERENCES:
Marsh, Colin J. (2009). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum Fourth Edition. London England: Taylor and Francis Routledge.
Walker, Decker F., & Soltis, Jonas F. (1997). Curriculum and Aims Third Edition. Teachers College, Columbia University Newyork, and London: Teachers College Press.
Kumar, Ashwani. (2019). CURRICULUM IN INTERNATIONAL CONTEXTS Understanding Colonial, Ideological and Neoliberal Influences. Gewerbestrasee 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goodlad, John I. (1960) Curriculum: The State of the Field. Review of Educational Research, 30(3), pp. 185-198.
Fraser, Sharon. P., & Bosanquet, Agnes. M., (2006). The Curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), pp. 269-284. London England: Taylor and Francis Routledge.