Fair Value: T I V A
Fair Value: T I V A
FAIR VALUE
TM
By: George B. Hawkins, ASA, CFA method, looks at the actual past results of the company as
Managing Director an indicator of its expected future results. It then
converts these earnings into an estimate of value using a
Introduction capitalization rate. This article provides examples of each
In determining the price to pay for a company, a valuation method and explain the mechanics of the
buyer of a business ultimately looks to the return he or various calculations and their implications to value.
she will receive on his or her Finally, the article examines how to determine
investment. That return might come in the appropriate income valuation method to use in
the form of annual dividends, growth in particular situations. These include:
the value of the business over time (as
eventually realized by a sale at some � Rapidly growing companies
future point in time), or some � Cyclical companies
combination of the two. The � Start-up companies
quantification of the value, in today’s � Mature companies
George Hawkins dollars, of these expected future sources � Synergistic acquisitions
of return is at the essence of business valuation and the � Companies with multiple business lines
income valuation approach. Attorneys who deal with � Contracts or joint ventures with finite lives
valuations for any reason, including for estates and gifts, � Liquidation
divorce, litigation, health care ventures and in business � Size of the company and the sophistication of
transactions should at least have a basic understanding of typical buyers and sellers
the income approach. This is required in order to � Purpose of the valuation- including equitable
intelligently critique a valuation where it is used and to distribution, health care transactions involving
ask questions of and/or cross-examine valuation experts hospitals, and bankruptcy
or examine the reasonableness of a proposed transaction
price. Valuation Methods Within the Income Approach-
This article begins with an overview of the two An Overview
primary ways of using the income valuation approach. The concept of the time value of money is at the
The first, the discounted future income method, involves core of the income valuation approach. Namely, the
forecasting a company’s “income” streams (e.g., earnings income streams or cash flows the buyer of the business
or cash flow) on a year-by-year basis, and then converting anticipates he or she will receive in the future can be
these results into their present worth today based on the translated into their present worth by taking into account
investor’s required annual rate of return for taking the their risk. This risk is expressed as the investor’s
associated risk. The second, the capitalization of earnings required rate of return, also called a discount rate.
TABLE B- EXAMPLE OF THE DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW METHOD- FORECASTED INCOME STATEMENT
Cost of Goods Sold (Depreciation- New Assets) $0 ($67,163) ($136,341) ($207,594) ($421,944) ($457,669) ($581,499)
Cost of Goods Sold (Depreciation- Existing Assets) ($492,000) ($409,743) ($295,638) ($245,083) ($211,390) ($172,024) ($172,024)
Cost of Goods Sold ($7,000,000) ($8,533,000) ($9,556,960) ($10,512,656) ($11,353,668) ($11,921,352) ($12,517,420)
Gross Profit $6,508,000 $7,090,094 $8,043,061 $8,869,867 $9,435,014 $9,942,072 $10,346,830
Operating Expenses:
Fixed or Semi-Fixed Expenses $1,393,996 $1,203,213 $1,251,510 $1,301,869 $1,354,379 $1,755,709 $1,823,212
Variable Expenses $3,669,000 $4,310,827 $4,828,126 $5,310,938 $5,735,814 $6,022,606 $6,323,735
Depreciation- Existing Assets $130,755 $94,481 $46,898 $36,728 $28,065 $18,824 $0
Total Operating Costs $5,193,751 $5,608,521 $6,126,534 $6,649,535 $7,118,258 $7,797,139 $8,146,947
Net Profit (From Table B) $811,664 $1,063,363 $1,236,991 $1,287,230 $1,178,997 $1,206,568
Plus (Minus):
Depreciation- Existing (From Table )B $504,224 $342,536 $281,811 $239,455 $190,848 $172,024
Depreciation- New (From Table B) $67,163 $136,341 $207,594 $421,944 $457,669 $581,499
Capital Expenditures ($470,000) ($484,100) ($498,623) ($1,500,000) ($250,000) ($866,552)
Additional Working Capital Needs ($211,050) ($194,166) ($181,222) ($159,475) ($107,646) ($113,028)
Net Borrowings (Repayments) of Long-Term Debt ($250,000) ($250,000) ($250,000) $1,250,000 ($315,000) ($315,000)
Equals: Free Cash Flow $452,001 $613,974 $796,552 $1,539,154 $1,154,868 $665,512
Times: Present Value Factor (Mid-Period) at Selected Discount Rate 0.9054 0.7421 0.6083 0.4986 0.4087
Present Value of Each Annual Cash Flow at Valuation Date $409,223 $455,628 $484,523 $767,402 $471,969
working capital needs and debt repayment (or new years 1 to 5 to arrive at the present worth today of each
borrowings which represent a source of cash), as seen in anticipated annual cash flow. When summed together,
Table C. Using a discount rate of 22% (the annual rate of these five years of cash flows are worth a total present
return to compensate the buyer for risk), present value value to the buyer of $2,588,744.
factors are then shown to enable the translation of each However, the business and its cash flows are not
year’s cash flow into its present worth today to a buyer. likely to come to a screeching halt at the end of year 5.
For example, in year three the present value factor is Therefore, the capitalized value of the long-term
0.6083. This was determined as follows using mid-period continuing income (cash flow) needs to be determined
discounting (assumes each year’s cash flow is realized, and also converted into its present value today. The final
on average, in the middle of the year), where n stands for year’s forecasted cash flow is capitalized (more about this
the year (here, the n is 2.5, or 3-0.5, because the cash later) by dividing the cash flow (here $665,512) by a
flow is realized midway during year 3): capitalization rate (here 17%, which is based on the
annual discount rate of 22% for risk, minus a long-term
1
_________________ 1
___________ sustainable annual growth rate of 5%) to arrive at a value
(1 + discount rate)n-0.5 = (1 +0.22)3-0.5 estimate of $3,914,777. In other words, if the business
were sold at the end of year 5 based on its expected cash
= 0.6083 (Present Value Factor)
flow for year 6, it would be worth $3,914,777 at that
where “n” stands for the period in which the time. However, the buyer of the company today is not
cash flow is to be received standing out at the end of year 5 about to pocket these
In other words, the present worth today of the proceeds. Therefore, these proceeds must be discounted
cash flow in year 3 (which is realized in the middle of back to their present worth today.
year 3, or period 2.5) is about $0.61 per dollar. Since the sale and its proceeds are assumed to
Therefore, the present value, today, of the cash flow in come at the end of year 5 (and not at the middle of year
year 3 ($796,552) is $484,523 ($796,552 times 0.6083). 5), then the end of period discounting convention rather
This same calculation is repeated for each year from than mid-period discounting convention needs to be used.
Since the buyer requires a 22% rate of return, the present
1
_______________ 1
________ The “Invested Capital” (or “Net of Debt”)
(1 + discount rate)n = (1 +0.22)5 Valuation Alternative
Instead of forecasting the individual changes in
= 0.3700 (Present Value Factor)
the debt levels of a company, one alternative is to assume
where “n” stands for the period in which the that the company employs a constant level of interest-
cash flow is to be received bearing debt over the forecast period in proportion to the
In other words, proceeds from the sale received market value of equity in its capital structure. That
at the end of year 5 are only worth $0.37 per dollar today, proportion of debt might be assumed to be its actual
taking into account the risk of their receipt and the time current amount, or an amount based upon some normal
value of money. Multiplying the estimated sale value of industry standard (such as in the case of the previously
$3,914,777 by a present value factor of 0.3700 results in a discussed company which under-utilizes debt and
present worth, today, of $1,448,464. therefore has an inefficient capital structure). This method
Finally, reaching the overall company value is is often referred to as either the “invested capital” or “net
simply a matter of adding the sum total of the present of debt” variation, each of which can be misleading to the
values of the individual annual cash flows ($2,588,744) to uninformed. “Net of debt” does not mean that the
the present value of the terminal year value ($1,448,464) company has no debt. Rather, it means that the income
to arrive at a total value of $4,037,208. This represents streams (cash flows) exclude any impact of the claims of
the value of the company before other possible interest-bearing creditors who expect the repayment of
adjustments such as for issues related to control, lack of interest and principal (i.e., interest expense or principal
marketability and other factors, subjects for a different debt repayment is not incorporated into the discounted
discussion. cash flow model). Said another way, the forecasted cash
flows do not take into account how the company is
The Result is an “Equity” Value financed, whether with debt, equity, or a combination of
Because the cash flow measure previously used is the two.
after the repayment of interest expense and debt to In addition, net of debt does not mean that the
creditors it represents the potential discretionary cash flow impact of the company’s ultimate obligation to repay the
of the business that might be paid out to the common actual debt is ignored. In the final step using the invested
shareholders. Therefore, the value of the company in this capital technique, the value of a company’s actual debt
instance is synonymous with the value of its common outstanding is subtracted to arrive at the value of its
shares. This is referred to as an equity-oriented use of common stock. For this reason some valuators also refer
the discounted future income method. For this same to this method as an enterprise valuation method, as
reason, the discount rate that was used to discount the opposed to an equity valuation method. The earlier equity
equity cash flows is called an equity discount rate. version of the discounted cash flow method goes directly
This equity valuation technique is not always the to the value of the equity, never dealing with the question
easiest or the best valuation method to employ. Practically of the value of the enterprise or how the company is
speaking, it is often difficult to forecast individual financed.
borrowing and repayment plans in the future on a year-by When an “invested capital” approach is
year basis, however, those forecasted changes in the debt employed, the income streams are discounted back to their
of the business can have a significant impact on its interest present value at a “weighted average cost of capital,” or
expense, and therefore, its earnings and cash flows. “WACC.” The WACC is simply a discount rate measure
Finally, the use of debt (up to a certain prudent point) in a (again, an annual return for risk) which incorporates the
company’s capital structure can lower its overall cost of costs of debt and equity assumed to be used in the capital
capital because borrowing is much cheaper than the cost structure, assuming that this capital structure stays at a
of equity, and interest expense is tax deductible. But what constant fixed proportion. Remember that the earlier
if the company being valued is for sale, but has been very example of the discounted cash flow method used an “all
conservative and uses no debt whatsoever? Or, what if the equity discount rate.” The weighted average cost of capital
company uses a less than efficient level of debt? These simply moves a step further and says that the investor’s
factors make an equity-oriented discounted future income required annual rate of return (a discount rate) is really a
its present worth, as in the discounted future income Calcu lating The Valu e By The Capitalization Of
Capitalizing Earnings Is Not Just A Theory, But Is Specific Situations and Their Ramifications to the
Evident In the Real World Method Indicated
It is a common reaction of business owners, a. Rapid Growth Companies- Going back to the
attorneys and others not familiar with valuation theory to importance of the time value of money, remember that the
react with disbelief and skepticism at the idea of earlier in time an income stream is received, the greater
capitalizing a company’s earnings into a value estimate. its present worth today. Suppose the valuation
Typically, either the math makes no sense to them or they assignment involves a rapidly growing company. In the
react with the notion that this is all just an exercise latest historic year (year 0), the company had annual
devised by esoteric academics in ivory towers. after-tax earnings of $100,000. Over each of the next
For the best real world laboratory of why these three years, management expects annual earnings to grow
theories actually work, simply follow the stock market at a 35% annual rate of increase because of the market
daily and see what happens to public company share acceptance of a new product line. In years four and five
values. If a business comes out with a new product that the rate of growth is expected to slow to 8% increases,
brightens its future earnings outlook the share value rises followed by a long-term growth rate of 5% from years six
as investors, in effect, “capitalize” the higher anticipated onward as the demand for the product reaches maturity.
future stream of income. Or consider two competitors in In this example an explosion in earnings will
the same industry and with the same annual income. One occur in the next few years, therefore having a large
has just become the target of a product liability lawsuit, impact on overall company value from the standpoint of
calling into doubt its future survival. Its share value is the time value of money. How can this valuation impact
driven down due to an increase in its perceived risk (the best be captured? This situation is clearly difficult to
“d,” or discount rate discussion earlier), possibly handle in the context of a single period valuation model
combined with a diminished future earnings outlook ( a such as the capitalization of earnings method. Under that
change in the “g,” or annual growth factor earlier). method the capitalization rate is determined by
Values of private companies, large and small, are subtracting a sustainable and constant annual rate of
impacted by the same factors of risk and growth. If two growth from the discount rate. Use of a 35% constant
companies have the same risk profile but one has a higher annual growth rate is clearly not appropriate, as it is
anticipated growth rate of earnings, the rational investor practically impossible for this to be maintained by any
will pay more for the one with growth. Similarly, if two company on a long-term basis. If compounded long
companies have the same income and growth outlook but enough at 35% the company would eventually become
one is much riskier, the one with greater risk will be larger than the entire U.S. economy! Alternatively, if 5%
worth less. is used as the long-term annual growth rate, the company
will be materially undervalued since the capitalization
Determining the Appropriate Income Method to Use- model will fail to capture the major impact of substantial
An Overview near-term growth rates that are seven times higher than
The two income methods just described quantify the long-term rate.
value in two fundamentally different ways that have By contrast, the discounted future income
important implications about which one is appropriate in method is perfectly suited to handle the rapid growth
a given valuation assignment. This distinction arises company and its valuation implications. Each individual
from the different underlying assumptions used in each year of the rapid growth phase can be separately
model. The capitalization method assumes that company forecasted and discounted back to a present worth. Then,
income (however defined) grows at the same constant the long-term growth would be captured by capitalizing
Actu al
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
the final forecast year earnings, which represents the valuation approach. If a company is at the very zenith of
point at which this stabilized growth rate is reached. the cycle, capitalizing the highest earnings extrapolates
Reaching the final value is then simply a matter of adding this peak each year into the future, missing the negative
the present values of the annual earnings streams together impacts of the down years and therefore overvaluing the
with the present value of the continuing value at the company. If a company is at the bottom of the cycle and
terminal year. Table G shows how the discounted future losing money the capitalization method assumes this too
income approach is used to solve the earlier rapid growth will continue forever and gives an inaccurately low value
example in a simple, yet accurate manner. by that method. If a rebound in income is likely to come
b. Cyclical Companies- Some companies are soon then capitalizing trough year earnings fails to
highly cyclical, with earnings riding a periodic roller capture the effects of this recovery and leads to an under
coaster tied to an overall industry or economic cycle. valuation.
Such a company might have two or three years of rapid This situation is well suited to the use of the
growth on the rebound from an economic slump, discounted future income method. However, there is one
followed by a slowing growth in earnings as market major caveat. For the discounted future income method
demand is satiated, followed by a downturn and then to work in this situation, the general nature of the cycle
potentially losses as the economy enters a recession. As must be reasonably predictable (i.e., as to the timing and
the economy recovers from a recession, earnings length of each phase of the cycle) and the associated
rebound, and the cycle is repeated. Examples of earnings for each year must be subject to estimation.
industries that are typically highly cyclical include This is easier said than done, since no two cycles are
general contractors, industrial truck manufacturers and exactly alike. Also, determining the patterns of a cycle
furniture manufacturers, to name just a few. As always, takes substantial time and effort and may require
the facts and circumstances affecting a particular obtaining a long history of financial results to help gauge
company will influence whether it is cyclical. the trends of past cycles and their impacts. Finally,
Consider the valuation dilemmas the cyclical determining when the final long-term sustainable terminal
company presents in the selection of the appropriate year will occur (which should represent the midpoint of