ITAD Rul. 91-06 (183 Days Per Project)
ITAD Rul. 91-06 (183 Days Per Project)
ITAD Rul. 91-06 (183 Days Per Project)
Gentlemen :
This refers to your letter dated April 20, 2006 requesting a ruling on the tax
implication on the purchase of Canon Information Technologies Philippines, Inc.
(Canon-Philippines) from Atrenta, Inc. (Atrenta) of the following software products
namely:
(a) copy and install software on the designated server (s) at the designated
location and use such installed software and the software keys,
including use on licensee's local or wide area network; to develop the
licensee products, provided that the number of seats using the software
is no greater than the total number granted under the Agreement;
(c) authorize the use of the software for the licensee's business activities by
Copyright 1994-2007 CD Technologies Asia, Inc. Taxation 2006 2
licensee's subsidiaries and affiliates;
that under such Agreement, Canon-Philippines will not permit any third party to:
That ownership of all the right, title and interest in and to the Atrenta
trademarks and service marks and the software, documentation, in whole and in part,
shall remain the exclusive property of Atrenta and its licensor; that Atrenta shall
provide Canon-Philippines with:
That under the Agreement, Atrenta shall provide Canon-Philippines with: (i)
basic technical support in accordance with Atrenta's support policy, (ii) error
verification, analysis and correction to the extent possible by telephone, and (iii) any
Updates and Upgrades to the Software; that in order to be eligible for Support
Services, Canon-Philippines must provide to Atrenta a technically qualified single
point of contact for dealing with technical support; that in consideration of the
licenses and rights granted in this Agreement for the initial term and any renewal
Copyright 1994-2007 CD Technologies Asia, Inc. Taxation 2006 3
term, and the support services provided thereunder, Canon-Philippines shall pay
Atrenta the annual Subscription Fee.
1) Error Correction;
And that the fees for the initial term of the support and maintenance services are
outlined in the purchase order.
Concerning software payments, the Bureau of Internal Revenue has issued two
Revenue Memorandum Circulars (RMC) that govern the taxation of software
payments. The first Circular (RMC 77-2003 1) covers software payments made as of
November 18, 2003 and until September 7, 2005 and generally treats software
payments as royalties, thus:
On the other hand, the second Circular (RMC 44-2005 2) covers payments
made as of September 8, 2005 and onwards and substantially amends the first
Circular by treating software payments either as business income, royalties, rental
income, or capital gains, depending on the nature of the transaction out of which such
payments are made. It provides:
c. After Sales Service. Contracts for the use of software are often
accompanied with the provision of services (e.g., installation,
maintenance, and customization of the software) by personnel of the
relevant foreign licensor/owner or of the relevant local subsidiary,
reseller, and distributor. Payments as consideration for after-sales
service in a mixed contract are not royalties alone, but will include
income from services. The appropriate course to take with such a
contract is, in principle, to break down, on the basis of the information
contained in the contract or by means of a reasonable apportionment,
the whole amount of the stipulated payments according to the various
parts of what is being provided under the contract, and then to apply
to each part of it so determined the taxation treatment proper thereto.
Thus, the part of the payments representing the use of the software will
be treated as royalties and taxable as such and the other part of the
payments representing the provision of services will be treated as
income from services and taxable as such. (Emphasis supplied)
If, however, one part of what is being provided constitutes by far the
principal purpose of the contract and the other parts stipulated therein are only
of an ancillary and largely unimportant character, then the treatment
applicable to the principal part should generally be applied to the whole
amount of the consideration. (De minimis)"
In addition to the foregoing, it should be noted that under the same Software
License Agreement, Atrenta will also provide Canon-Philippines the necessary
maintenance services. Accordingly, based on the aforequoted Section 5(c) of the
RMC No. 44-2005, the subject Software License Agreement should generally be
characterized by breaking down the same into the portion which represents the use of
the software and the portion which pertains to the provision of services. But if, as
stated above, and as in this case, one part of what is being provided constitutes by far
the principal purpose of the contract and the other parts stipulated therein are only of
an ancillary and largely unimportant character, then the treatment applicable to the
principal part should generally be applied to the whole amount of the consideration.
Thus, the whole amount of the Subscription Fees to be paid by Canon-Philippines to
Atrenta for the Software License Agreement, which includes support services, are to
be considered as business profits.
"Article 8
BUSINESS PROFITS
"Article 5
Copyright 1994-2007 CD Technologies Asia, Inc. Taxation 2006 7
PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT
2. The term 'fixed place of business' includes but is not limited to:
a) A seat of management;
b) A branch;
c) An office;
e) A factory;
f) A workshop;
g) A warehouse;
- the carrying on of the business of the enterprise through this fixed place
of business. This means usually that persons who, in one way or
another, are dependent on the enterprise (personnel) conduct the
business of the enterprise in the State in which the fixed place is
situated." (Paragraph 2)
Since Atrenta, based on the documents submitted, does not have a place of
business at its disposal which is fixed or established at a distinct place with a certain
degree of permanence in the Philippines through which it may use for carrying on its
business, Atrenta does not have a permanent establishment to which its business
profits may be attributed to.
Such being the case, since Atrenta does not have a permanent establishment to
which it may attribute any profits earned from the sales of the software and services
to Canon-Philippines, then said profits are not subject to Philippine income tax under
Section 28(B)(1) of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997.4
With regard to the procedures for withholding and paying the VAT, Sections 4
Copyright 1994-2007 CD Technologies Asia, Inc. Taxation 2006 9
and 6 of Revenue Regulations No. 4-2000, Section 3 of Revenue Regulations No.
8-2002, and Section 7 of Revenue Regulations No. 14-2002, provide that
Canon-Philippines shall be responsible for the withholding of the 10/12 percent VAT
on the license fee before remitting it to Atrenta. In remitting to the Bureau of Internal
Revenue the VAT withheld on such fee, Canon-Philippines shall use BIR Form No.
1600 (Monthly Remittance Return of VAT and Other Percentage Taxes Withheld). If
a VAT-registered taxpayer, Canon-Philippines may use as documentary
substantiation for its claim of input VAT the duly filed BIR Form No. 1600 and the
proof of payment accompanying it. If a non-VAT-registered taxpayer.
Canon-Philippines may include as part of the cost of the services provided to it by
Atrenta the VAT consequently shifted or passed on to it and may treat such VAT
either as expense or asset, whichever is applicable. In addition, Canon-Philippines is
required to issue in quadruplicate the relevant Certificate of Final Tax Withheld at
Source (BIR Form No. 2306), the first three copies for Atrenta and the fourth copy for
Canon-Philippines as its file copy.
This ruling is issued on the basis of the facts as represented. However, if upon
investigation it shall be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be
without force and effect insofar as the herein parties are concerned.
By: