Pool Standards, 2006: For The Swimming Pool, Wading Pool and Water Spray Park Regulation
Pool Standards, 2006: For The Swimming Pool, Wading Pool and Water Spray Park Regulation
Page
V. Pool Premises 14
Reference Materials
Bibliography 25
______________________________________________________________ 2
Pool Standards, 2006
I. Definitions and Interpretation
________________________________________________________________
The following terms are defined in the Swimming Pool, Wading Pool and Water
Spray Park Regulation and are repeated here for ease of reference.
(a) “bed and breakfast” means a private dwelling occupied by the owner
or operator that offers overnight lodging and breakfast, but no other
meal, for a fee, to no more than 8 registered guests at one time;
(d) “pool” means a swimming pool, wading pool, water spray park and
whirlpool;
and means all buildings and equipment used in connection with the
structure but does not include
(iv) a swimming pool that is drained, cleaned and filled after each
use by each individual;
______________________________________________________________ 3
Pool Standards, 2006
(i) “water spray park” means a structure onto which water is sprayed or
released but does not accumulate and is used for recreation or other
similar purpose and all buildings and equipment used in connection
with it;
______________________________________________________________ 4
Pool Standards, 2006
II. Purpose and Scope
________________________________________________________________
The Pool Standards (Standards) are established under the authority of the Public
Health Act (“Act”) and the Swimming Pool, Wading Pool and Water Spray Park
Regulation (“Regulation”).
The primary objective of the Regulation and the Standards is to set out permit,
operating and maintenance requirements for swimming pools, wading pools,
water spray parks, whirlpools and any fountain or artificial pond that falls within
the definition of a structure that constitutes a “pool”, in accordance with the above
definitions. The Regulation and Standards do not apply to flotation tanks or
therapeutic pools which are used by one individual at a time and drained,
cleaned and filled between each use, or to pools constructed for the use of a
single family dwelling.
The Regulation and Standards set minimum standards for safe water quality and
a safe and sanitary pool environment. These are minimum standards.
Depending on the type of pool and use that a pool is put to; higher standards
may be required. It is the responsibility of each pool owner to ensure optimum
water quality and pool safety. Reference should also be made to the Alberta
Building Code (ABC) for the specific requirements for pool construction.
______________________________________________________________ 5
Pool Standards, 2006
III. Construction, Operation and Maintenance of Pools
________________________________________________________________
Practice Note:
Operating a pool facility has become progressively more complex with the
increased use of water recreational facilities, the introduction of waterslides,
water rides, wave pools, water spray play areas; the increased complexity of the
pool equipment and treatment systems; and the emergence of chlorine resistant
pathogens. Setting requirements for pool operator qualifications will ensure that
all pools in the province are under the care and control of a person with a
minimum level of training.
______________________________________________________________ 6
Pool Standards, 2006
2) Filtration and Recirculation
2. All recirculating pools must have a filter flow rate no greater than that
specified by the manufacturer.
Practice Note:
The turnover rate for a new pool has been increased to 4 hours while existing
pools can continue to operate at 8 hours provided that the required
microbiological standards are being consistently met and maintained .
In pools with water quality issues, the dye test can provide an indication of the
movement of water in the pool and any areas which are not well circulated. The
test can also be a useful tool to check circulation patterns in a new facility or
where renovations are being considered.
______________________________________________________________ 7
Pool Standards, 2006
Practice Note:
The highest concentration of organic pollution and contamination in a pool is
found at or near the surface of the water irrespective of the mixing effects of the
circulation. Therefore, recirculation of 50-80% of the water from the surface will
produce a much healthier pool. (Pool Water Treatment Advisory Group 1999)
Each responsible person will need to evaluate the flow of the water and
determine how to meet this requirement. The Alberta Building Code currently
requires the circulation piping to accommodate 100% of the flow either through
the skimmers or the drain, therefore, it may be possible to increase the flow from
the skimmers or overflow channels without major changes to the system.
Practice Note:
The goal of these requirements is to produce satisfactory microbiological quality
using the most effective filtration system in combination with minimum
concentrations of chlorine residuals. Effective filtration will remove most of the
organics and allow the chlorine to act on pathogens rather than the oxidation of
organic material.
3) Disinfection
Practice Note:
Cyanuric acid (CYA) is effective in reducing chlorine loss due to sunlight in
outdoor pools. However, CYA does not degrade and even at 5 ppm of CYA,
chlorine effectiveness can be reduced by 35%. There are diminishing returns
with increasing concentrations. (Professional Pool Owner and Operators of
America)
______________________________________________________________ 8
Pool Standards, 2006
3. To assist in maintaining proper pH, the alkalinity must be maintained at
80-120 ppm and measured weekly. A higher concentration may be
allowed in instances where an executive officer has provided approval.
Practice Note:
There are water sources throughout the province which have higher levels of
alkalinity. In those cases, the responsible person must discuss the alkalinity level
with executive officer and determine what steps are required in order to maintain
the pH between 6.8 and 7.6.
The measure of total dissolved solids (TDS) is not included in this standard. TDS
is closely related to the operation of the pool but is less important as a measure
of pool water quality. Several authorities including the World Health Organization
indicate that high TDS does not negatively compromise pool water quality.
5) Microbiological Sampling
3. The regional health authorities must forward the results of the samples to
the responsible person for self-monitoring purposes.
______________________________________________________________ 9
Pool Standards, 2006
Practice Note:
The results of routine microbiological sampling must always be interpreted in
conjunction with:
6) Water Quality
1. The responsible person shall ensure that the maximum design bather load
is not exceeded during the operation of the pool. Where the maximum
bathing load has not been established, the following shall be met:
2. The responsible person may apply to the executive officer for an increase
in bather load beyond the maximum design bather load specified in the
design plans. The executive officer shall review the bather load as well as
the overall swimming pool operation and if satisfied that pool water quality
will be maintained, may allow the increase in bather load.
Practice Note:
Chemical parameters, turnover periods, turbidity, bacteriological results as
opposed to bather ratios are the best indicators of water quality, particularly since
each pool has varying capabilities to maintain pool water quality. Bather load is
an historical guide that may help manage water clarity issues in some
circumstances.
______________________________________________________________ 10
Pool Standards, 2006
7) Anti-Entrapment
2. The responsible person must ensure that all anti-entrapment devices are
properly installed and in good working order.
3. The responsible persons must be able to demonstrate to the satisfaction
of an executive officer that no entrapment or entanglement risk exists in
the operation of a pool.
Practice Note:
This section is based on a minimum requirement to provide one “layer of
protection” against entrapment or entanglement. The use of “one layer of
protection” anti-entrapment devices requires ongoing monitoring and
maintenance of that protection. The Guidelines for Entrapment Hazards: Making
Pools and Spas Safer (United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
March 2005) recommend an additional layer of protection in all swimming pools
including whirlpools plus the installation of multiple drains and an SRVS back-
up system in all wading pools. Every responsible person must determine
whether an additional layer of protection is required for their pool.
______________________________________________________________ 11
Pool Standards, 2006
IV. Written Policies
________________________________________________________________
This section outlines the written policies every responsible person must have and
implement under Section 20 of the Regulation. Policies must be appropriate for
the type and number of pools that the policies cover.
1. The responsible person must develop and implement a safety and supervision
plan which sets out for each pool:
a. lifesaving equipment,
b. telephone access for emergencies,
c. a First Aid kit,
d. required bather to lifeguard ratios,
e. recommended bather safety for special events in any facility which
does not provide life guarding, and
f. proper storage of pool treatment chemicals in compliance with the
Alberta Fire Code.
Practice Note:
Information regarding lifesaving equipment and bather to lifeguard ratios can be
found in the Lifesaving Society “Public Aquatic Facility Safety Standards 2004”,
“Semi-public Swimming Pool Safety Standards 2004” and “Public Wading Pool
Safety Standards 2004”.
The Alberta Building Code and the Alberta Association of Recreational Facility
Personnel and the Lifesaving Society set out additional safety standards.
1. Each pool must have a sign(s) containing written information and, if possible,
visual information, in a size and location that may be easily seen by all users,
which directs or specifies:
______________________________________________________________ 12
Pool Standards, 2006
g. Bather load and provides an explanation of why bather load is
limited.
h. No pets are allowed onto the premises, except for seeing eye dogs
or other animal used to assist persons with disabilities.
i. No street shoes may be worn in wet traffic areas.
j. Any other information that the responsible person determines is
necessary to maintain the health and safety of the pool facility
users.
2. In addition to Section 1, for those facilities where life guarding is not provided,
signs must be provided directing or specifying that:
3) Public Education
1. The responsible person must develop and implement a plan that is appropriate
to the type of pool facility, for the education of bathers on the following:
Practice Note:
With the increased concern regarding cryptosporidium, there is a greater need
for young children and incontinent swimmers to wear water resistant swim wear.
There does not appear to be truly waterproof swimwear on the market therefore,
water resistant is the best choice available. Where possible, young children
should be encouraged to swim in the teach/wading pool where any
contamination can be isolated from the other pools (assuming there is an
independent circulation system).
______________________________________________________________ 13
Pool Standards, 2006
4) Water Quality Issues
1. The responsible person must develop and implement a response plan which
outlines the steps to be taken when:
2. The response plan must outline the persons responsible, emergency contact
numbers, and the steps required to respond to each scenario.
1. The responsible person must develop and implement a plan which outlines a
routine schedule for cleaning and adequate disinfection of:
a. pool decks;
b. washrooms and change rooms;
c. showers;
d. steam rooms and saunas; and
e. any other equipment in contact with users of the facility.
2. The plan must ensure that soap is provided in washrooms and showers.
Practice Note:
The pool facility must have a plan for ongoing cleaning and disinfection of all
surfaces to minimize the transmission of pathogens. When considering flooring
in dressing rooms, several studies indicate that the transmission of "athletes foot"
is increased in those who swim regularly and that the floors in the facilities are a
source of the fungi (Kamihama 1997, Attye, 1990). The best method of
controlling transmission is the cleaning of floors, use of sandals and treatment of
the disease. It follows that the floors must be made of surfaces which are
impervious to moisture. The provision of soap and warm water at the showers
will encourage bathers to shower prior to swimming.
______________________________________________________________ 14
Pool Standards, 2006
V. Pool Premises
3. A whirlpool must not operate at greater than 400 C (1040 F) while in use.
5. The ventilation in all pool facilities must maintain safe air quality. Without
limitation, the ventilation in all pool facilities must protect against the
buildup of chlorine gas or other disinfection by-products.
______________________________________________________________ 15
Pool Standards, 2006
Schedule A
________________________________________________________________
I. Formed Stool
Solid fecal material is generally associated with healthy individuals and presents
a low risk of transmitting microorganisms. It is also easily captured and removed
from the pool. Should formed stool be found in a pool, the following steps must
be taken:
a. Direct all bathers to leave the contaminated pool and close the pool
to swimmers. To avoid cross-contamination, ask bathers to take a
shower prior to re-entering any pool.
b. Shut off the recirculating pump and chemical feeders to slow down
the dispersion of material through the water.
c. For those facilities with diatomaceous earth, continue to recirculate
water to ensure exposure to the 2.0 ppm of chlorine.
d. Carefully remove as much of the fecal matter as possible using a
net or scoop and dispose in a sanitary sewer. Vacuum the
remaining particles and dispose vacuum contents to waste - not
through the filter system. Thoroughly clean and disinfect any
equipment used in this process. (100 parts per million chlorine
solution)
e. If deck surfaces are contaminated, thoroughly clean and disinfect
with a chlorine solution of 100 ppm.
f. Once cleaning is complete, turn on the recirculating pump.
g. Raise the free chlorine to 2.0 ppm throughout the pool and maintain
for 30 minutes. Disinfectant concentrations must be measured at a
minimum of three different locations in the pool. The pH must be
maintained between 6.8 and 7.6 at all times.
h. Reopen the pool after the disinfection process and continue to
maintain the free chlorine at operational levels.
______________________________________________________________ 16
Pool Standards, 2006
II. Vomitus
There are few pathogens associated with vomitus. An exception is the Norovirus
(previously known as Norwalk virus). However, Norovirus is more commonly
spread through person to person contact rather than through pool water. To
date, there is very little information on the inactivation of Norovirus in a pool
setting. It is generally accepted that Norovirus is more resistant to chlorine
disinfection than other viruses such as Hepatitis A.
The important steps in responding to vomitus in the pool are the physical removal
of the organic material, followed by disinfection adequate to inactivate viruses.
Should vomitus be found in the pool, follow steps 1 - 7 for formed stool as listed
above.
Liquid stool or diarrhea is associated with intestinal illness and often carries
disease-causing micro-organisms. With the release of diarrhea into the pool, it
must be assumed that there is a release of pathogens as well. Many
gastrointestinal pathogens are sensitive to chlorine and are easily destroyed by
normal operating concentrations of chlorine in the pool. However, the parasite
Cryptosporidium, which is now known to be transmitted in pool water, is highly
resistant to chlorine and may not be completely removed using standard rapid
sand filtration or diatomaceous earth (DE) filtration. (refer to “Inactivation of
Viruses, Giardia and Cryptosporidium” in the reference section (p. 23)). Since it
is rarely known what microbe(s) is released by a swimmer, each incident of liquid
fecal release must be treated as a potential release of Cryptosporidium and any
treatment measures must be capable of inactivating the parasite.
If liquid stool (diarrhea) is found in the pool, the following steps must be taken:
A. Cleaning
a. Direct all bathers to leave the contaminated pool. Any pools connected
through the circulation and filtration systems should be treated as if
contaminated. Swimmers are required to take a shower prior to re-
entering any other pools in the facility.
b. Shut off the recirculation pump and feeders to reduce the spread of
contaminants in the water.
c. Carefully remove as much of the fecal matter as possible and dispose
in sanitary sewer. Vacuum the remaining particles and the immediate
areas. Any waste should be discharged into the sanitary sewer. The
vacuum should be placed in the pool once the chlorination begins and
flushed with the pool water for the duration of the treatment.
______________________________________________________________ 17
Pool Standards, 2006
d. Thoroughly clean and disinfect deck surfaces as needed with a
solution of 100 ppm chlorine.
e. Turn the recirculation pump and chemical feeders back on after
cleaning is complete. Ensure that the filtration is operating at maximum
efficiency during the disinfection process.
B. Disinfection
The current United States Center for Disease Control recommendation for
responding to liquid stool is a Ct* of 9600 where C is the disinfectant
concentration (in mg/l) and t is the time (in min.) This Ct will inactivate 99.9% (3
log removal) of Cryptosporidium oocysts in the pool. (MMWR May 25, 2001) This
recommendation is based on the use of chlorine as the disinfectant and a long
exposure period. Pathogens have varying sensitivity to chlorine and the Ct
provides a quantitative number to indicate that sensitivity.
Some jurisdictions have suggested that a lower Ct value may be adequate but
must be accompanied with other processes to minimize the infectious dose. In
Britain, flocculation and coagulation, accompanied by filtration and six pool
turnovers is required to achieve a 5 log removal. (Croll, 2002).
Given this current information and the limited scientific data available regarding
the inactivation of oocysts in pool water, executive officers require a minimum
3 log removal to be reached when a liquid fecal incident occurs.
______________________________________________________________ 18
Pool Standards, 2006
a) Disinfection with Chlorine
Where chlorination is used to treat the pool, the following steps must be followed:
______________________________________________________________ 19
Pool Standards, 2006
b) Disinfection with Supplemental Technology
If low volume pools such as a whirlpools, teach pools or wading pools are
contaminated with loose stool, the fecal matter must be removed, the pool
drained and the pool basin cleaned and disinfected.
After cleaning, the pool basin should be disinfected with a 100 ppm chlorine
solution (6.7 ml of 5.25% bleach in 1 gallon water). The water should be
recirculated for 2 full turnovers in order to ensure that all parts of the system are
superchlorinated. A recirculating type pool should be refilled and then re-opened
when free chlorine levels and pH are within acceptable operational range as
specified by the Regulation. Flow-through pools may resume operation following
disinfection of the pool basin.
All fecal accidents must be recorded in a log book describing the date, time of the
event, type of incident, concentration of free available chlorine and ORP at the
time, pH, procedures followed and the person(s) conducting the procedures.
Any release of liquid fecal material into a pool should be reported to the regional
health authority within 24 hours.
______________________________________________________________ 20
Pool Standards, 2006
Reference Materials
________________________________________________________________
Transmittance describes the extent to which radiation is able to pass through the
water. Transmittance, which is affected by organics in the pool, is a key
parameter that will determine whether a UV system will be effective in a
particular pool.The United States Environmental Protection Agency indicates that
95% transmittance reflects an excellent source of water, 85% transmittance
reflects "good" source and 75% transmittance is a "fair" source of water. If below
80% transmittance, the design of the lamps becomes more complex and more
UV lamps may be required.
Since the UV reactor is installed in the pool piping system (after the pool filters),
a mixing study must be done on the pool to ensure that there are no dead zones
in the pool basin and that 99% of pool water goes through the filter over the
specified number of turnovers. If there are dead zones, any contaminants in
these zones will not pass through the UV unit in an acceptable time period. A
mixing study should be conducted in two phases - a dye test and a tracer study.
A dye test is a visual test while a tracer test provides quantitative results.
Dye Test
An initial dye test will identify circulation patterns in the pool. To pass the test,
the entire body of water should change to a fully dispersed dye color within 20
minutes. If unsuccessful, the circulation system should be modified and the pool
retested prior to any further steps.
______________________________________________________________ 21
Pool Standards, 2006
Tracer Study
A tracer study provides more precise information regarding the mixing and circulation of
the pool water. It determines how long it takes for water to turn over in the pool using a
standard methodology from the water industry. It measures the length of time required
for a tracer chemical to fully mix into the pool and reach full equilibrium after reaching
the filters. The results are interpreted on a pool by pool basis.
Based on the mixing study, the number of pool turnovers required to reduce
Cryptosporidium levels in the pool to a safe level (no more than 1 oocyst/10 litres of
water) can be determined. If the pool is well mixed it has been estimated that 99.7% of
the water will have passed through the UV system in 4 pool turnovers, 99.95% in 5 pool
turnovers and 99.99% in 6 pool turnovers. Depending on the volume of the pool and
estimated contamination level, between 4 to 6 turnovers can reduce the
Cryptosporidium to a safe level. The actual number of turnovers will have to be
demonstrated to and approved by the regional health authority on a pool by pool basis.
The lamps and their quartz sleeves in the ultraviolet system require periodic attention to
maintain efficient operation. Daily checks of the control system are required to ensure
that the UV unit is operating within parameters.
______________________________________________________________ 22
Pool Standards, 2006
B. Inactivation of Viruses, Giardia and Cryptosporidium
Dr. Norman Neumann, Provincial Laboratory for Public Health
Dr. Steve Craik, Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, University of Alberta
January 2003
Viruses
Giardia
Much more work has been done on Giardia and published by Alberta
Environment in "Standards and Guidelines for Municipal Waterworks,
Wastewater and Storm Drainage Systems". These inactivation standards have
been adopted by Alberta Environment in their “Standards and Guidelines for
Municipal Waterworks, Wastewater and Storm Drainage Systems (1997).
pH Temp (°C) Ct
3 log Inactivation*
7.0 25 46
7.5 25 55
8.0 25 67
Based on this information, a Ct of 60, as required in this standard for low risk
incidents of formed stool, would be adequate to inactivate Giardia in the pool.
______________________________________________________________ 23
Pool Standards, 2006
Cryptosporidium
pH Tempº C Ct Ct
2 log inactivation 3 log inactivation
6 22 5,500 12,300
7 22 6,800 15,100
7.5 22 9,800 22,000
8.0 22 19,000 43,300
Further experimental work indicates that for Cryptosporidium, a Ct of 9600 may provide
a 3 log removal at 25ºC and pH 7.5 with filtration providing 0.5 log inactivation per pass
of water.
Characteristics of Cryptosporidium
______________________________________________________________ 24
Pool Standards, 2006
C. Equivalent Ct Values for Chlorination at 25°C*
Chlorine
Concentration pH time time C(mg/l)x t(min)
(C mg/l) (min) (hours)
¾ “Concentration” used in this table is the residual at the end of the specified
contact time – not the dose applied or the average residual.
______________________________________________________________ 25
Pool Standards, 2006
Bibliography
Alberta Association of Recreation Facility Personnel. (1998) Guidelines for the Operation
of Public Aquatic Facilities.
Croll, BT. (2002) "The latest position in Cryptosporidium control". Presented at the
School of Water Sciences conference on Swimming Pool Water Quality and Treatment.
(personal email)
Government of British Columbia. Swimming Pool, Spray Pool and Wading Pool
Regulations. British Columbia Regulation 289/72.
Government of Ontario. Health Protection and Prevention Act. Public Pools Regulation
1990 amended to 179/02.
Kamihama,T. et al. (1997) "Tinea pedis outbreak in swimming pools in Japan". Public
Health. 111(4):249-253.
______________________________________________________________ 26
Pool Standards, 2006
Kauppinen,K.(1997) “Facts and fables about sauna”. Annals of New York Academy of
Sciences. 813:654-63.
New South Wales Health Department. (December 1999) "Protocol for Minimising the
Risk of Cryptosporidium Contamination in Public Swimming Pools and Spa Pools".
Pool Water Treatment Advisory Group. (PWTAG) (1999) Swimming Pool Water
Treatment and Quality Standards. England.
New South Wales Health Department. (June 1996) Public Swimming Pool and Spa Pool
Guidelines.
United States Centre for Disease Control. (May 25, 2001) "Notice to Readers:
Responding to Fecal Accidents in Disinfected Swimming Venues". Morbidity Mortality
Weekly Report, 50(20):416-417
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. (March 2005) Guidelines for
Entrapment Hazards: Making Pools and Spas Safer
World Health Organization. (August 2000) Draft Guidelines for Safe Recreational - Water
Environments.
World Health Organization. (2006) Guidelines for safe recreational water environments.
Volume 2: Swimming pools and similar environments.
______________________________________________________________ 27
Pool Standards, 2006