Scribd
Upload
53 views5 pages

Workshop in Descriptive Multivariate Methods in Social Sciences: Simple and Multiple Correspondence Analysis

Johs. Hjellbrekke, University of Bergen, $orway. Monitoring professor: Fabrizio Bernardi

Uploaded by

Aytaç Yürükçü
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
53 views5 pages

Workshop in Descriptive Multivariate Methods in Social Sciences: Simple and Multiple Correspondence Analysis

Johs. Hjellbrekke, University of Bergen, $orway. Monitoring professor: Fabrizio Bernardi

Uploaded by

Aytaç Yürükçü
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Workshop in Descriptive Multivariate

Methods in Social Sciences: Simple and


Multiple Correspondence Analysis

Organised by Martyn Egan & Stefano Palestini


Lecturer: Johs. Hjellbrekke, University of Bergen, $orway.
Monitoring professor: Fabrizio Bernardi
May 17th-18th, 2012
Please register with Pä[email protected]

Course Description: Simple and multiple correspondence analysis

In the social sciences, multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a statistical


technique that first and foremost has become known through the work of the late
Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002), in particular “Distinction” (Bourdieu 1984), “Homo
Academicus” (Bourdieu 1988) and “The State Nobility” (Bourdieu 1996).

As a counterpart to principal component analysis (PCA), a geometric technique for


the analysis of metric variables, MCA is a geometric technique for the analysis of
categorical or categorized variables. Originating in the early 1960s and the French
statistician Jean-Paul Benzécri’s work in mathematical linguistics, MCA represents
and models data sets as clouds of points in a multidimensional Euclidean space. The
interpretation of the data is based on these clouds of points. By combining MCA with
inferential techniques and variance analysis, we arrive at an integrated framework of
interpretation that also is known under the name of Geometric Data Analysis (GDA).

In a combination of lectures and laboratory excercises, this course will introduce


students to the fundamental properties, procedures and rules of interpretation of the
most commonly used forms of correspondence analysis, i.e. simple correspondence
analysis (CA) and MCA, and also to the most commonly used software.

Particular attention will be paid to how MCA can be used in the construction of social
spaces.

The course starts with an historical introduction to Benzécri’s work on contingency


tables, and to the key ideas and basic properties in geometric data analysis. A first

1
explanation of the procedures, the key concepts and the fundamental rules of
interpretation will be given through a simple correspondence analysis (CA) of a
standard contingency table.

Thereafter, and using Pierre Bourdieu’s work as a point of reference, we will go


through the generalisation from CA to MCA by analysing an Individuals x Variables
table. Particular emphasis will be put on the definition of distances between
individuals, of distances between categories or modalities, the fundamental rules for
the interpretation of axes in MCA, on how MCA can be integrated with variance
analysis, and also on more general guidelines and coding principles.

We will then proceed to the more detailed exploration of the cloud of individuals, the
introduction of supplementary variables, the use of concentration ellipses and how
MCA also can be used in a confirmatory or explanatory mode by introducing
variables as structuring factors in the constructed space. Tools for statistical inference,
i.e. confidence ellipses around mean modality points in factorial planes, will also be
presented, as will also the integration of MCA and hierarchical clustering as a way of
further validation of the results.

Lectures and reading list:

Day 1: May 17st 2011

Lecture 1:

1. General Introdution. Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences.


Some Basic Properties in CA

The BMS: (Karl M. van Meter, Marie-Ange Schiltz, Philippe Cibois and Lisa
Mounier) (1994). “Correspondence Analysis: A History and French Sociological
Perspective.” In Greenacre, Michael J. & Blasius, Jörg, eds., Correspondence
Analysis in the Social Sciences: Recent Developments and Applications. San Diego:
Academic Press. Pp.128-138.

Le Roux, Brigitte & Henry Rouanet (2004). Geometric Data Analysis. From
Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers. Chapter 1: Overview of Geometric Data Analysis. Pp.1-22

Le Roux, Brigitte and Henry Rouanet (2010). Multiple Correspondence Analysis.


Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Scienes #163. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications. Chapters 1-2.

Murtagh, Fionn (2005). Correspondence Analysis and Data Coding with Java and R.
Chapter 1: Introduction. Pp. 1-28

Rouanet, Henry & Werner Ackermann and Brigitte Le Roux


“The Geometric Analysis of Questionnaires: The Lesson of Bourdieu’s La
Distinction.” Pp. 5-18 in Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, January 2000, N.65.
13 pages.

2
Lecture 2, Day 1.
2. (Simple) Correspondence Analysis. Basic Concepts and Properties.
Interpretation of Results.

Greenacre, Michael (1994). “Correspondence Analysis and its Interpretation.” .” In


Greenacre, Michael J. & Blasius, Jörg, eds., Correspondence Analysis in the Social
Sciences: Recent Developments and Applications. San Diego: Academic Press. Pp. 3-
22.

Greenacre, Michael J. (2007). Correspondence Analysis in Practice. London:


Chapman & Hall. Chapter 9: Two-dimensional Displays, pp. 65-72

Le Roux, Brigitte and Henry Rouanet (2010). Multiple Correspondence Analysis.


Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Scienes #163. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications. Chapters 1-2.

Lecture 3, Day 1:
3. From Simple to Multiple Correspondence Analysis.

Le Roux, Brigitte & Henry Rouanet (2004). Geometric Data Analysis. From
Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.

Chapter 5: Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Pp. 214-241.


Chapter 6: Structured Data Analysis. Pp. 251-256, 265-268.
Chapter 9: Research Case Studies. Pp. 365-394.

Le Roux, Brigitte and Henry Rouanet (2010). Multiple Correspondence Analysis.


Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Scienes #163. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications. Chapter 3.

Henry Rouanet (2006). “The Geometric Analysis of Structured Individuals X


Variables Tables.” In Greenacre, Michael J. & Blasius, Jörg, eds. (2006). Multiple
Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. London: Chapman & Hall, pp.138-
159.

Day 2:

Lecture 1:

4. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Specific Multiple Correspondence


Analysis. Examination of The Cloud of Individuals.

Le Roux, Brigitte & Henry Rouanet:


“Interpreting Axes in Multiple Correspondence Analysis: Method of the
Contributions of Points and Deviations.” In Greenacre & Blasius (1998):
Visualization of Categorical Data. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 197-220.
23 pages.

3
Brigitte Le Roux and Henry Rouanet. Geometric data analysis of individual
differences. pp. 1-36, 2003. http://epgy.stanford.edu/research/

Le Roux, Brigitte, Henry Rouanet, Mike Savage and Alan Warde (2008):
“Class and Cultural Division in the UK.” Under publication.
http://www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/papers.html pp.1-29. 29 pages.

Le Roux, Brigitte and Henry Rouanet (2010). Multiple Correspondence Analysis.


Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Scienes #163. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications. Chapters 3, 4 and 6

Day 2, Lecture 2
5. Stability Issues, Coding and Statistical Significance. Integration of
Cluster Analysis and MCA.

Le Roux, Brigitte & Henry Rouanet (2004). Geometric Data Analysis. From
Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers. Chapter 3: Euclidian Cloud. Pp. 106-116 & Chapter 9 : pp. 365-394

Murtagh, Fionn (2005). Correspondence Analysis and Data Coding with Java and R.
Chapter 3: Input Data Coding. Pp. 71-110.

Romesburg, H. Charles (2004). Cluster Analysis for Researchers. North Carolina:


LULU Press. Pp. 129-134.

Day 2, Lecture 3:

6. Constructing Social Spaces.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction. Cambr. Mass: Harvard University Press.


Chapter 5: The Sense of Distinction. Chapter 6: Cultural Goodwill
Appendix 1. Some Reflections on the Method. pp. 264-370 & pp.503-518.

Hjellbrekke, Johs. & al (2007). The Norwegian Field of Power anno 2004.
In European Societies, Volume 9, Issue 2 May 2007 , pp. 245 – 273.
30 pp.

Le Roux, Brigitte and Henry Rouanet (2010). Multiple Correspondence Analysis.


Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Scienes #163. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications. Chapter 6.

Lab sessions:

Brigitte Le Roux, Mikael Börjesson, Philippe Bonnet (2006):


Performing Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) USI-G SPAD 1 (VERSIO-
6.5) Can be downloaded from
http://www.skeptron.uu.se/broady/sec/p-gda-0609-spadguide-mca.pdf (more material can be
downloaded from the same site)

4
Data sets: TBA

SPSS 13.0. Categories. SPSS Inc.

Outline – lab sessions:

1. Introduction to SPAD
- SPAD – import files
- setting up first analyses
- getting to know the software
- CA
- a first introduction to the output file
- interpretation of results
- Own analyses of other variables

2. SPAD - MCA.
- MCA/MCAspe module in SPAD
- Detailed interpretation of results
- The graphic module in SPAD – how to manipulate the graphs
- First examination of the cloud of individuals
- Graphical tools of interpretation
- Use of supplementary variables

3. SPAD – Cluster Analysis and MCA.


- More on SPAD – MCA/MCAspe module
- More detailed examination of the cloud of individuals
- Concentration, Indicator and confidence ellipses
- More on supplementary variable
- Integration of cluster analysis and MCA
- Interpretation of cluster analyses in the factorial planes

You might also like