1 Discuss Briefly About Fair Value Measurement and Impairment
1 Discuss Briefly About Fair Value Measurement and Impairment
1 Discuss Briefly About Fair Value Measurement and Impairment
Fair value measurement is made up of one or more inputs, which are the assumption that market
participant would make in valuing the assets or liability. The most reliable evidence of fair value is a
quoted price in an active market. When this is not available, entities use valuation approach to measure
fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable input and maximizing use of unobservable input.
These input also form basis of fair value hierarchy, which is used to categorize affair value measurement
in to one of the three level
In accounting, impairment is a permanent reduction in the value of a company asset. It may be a fixed
asset or an intangible asset, so as to reflect a decline in the quality, quantity, or market value of the asset.
It’s an accounting concept based on the idea that an asset shouldn’t be carried in your business’s financial
statements at more than the highest amount that could potentially be recovered from selling it. When the
carrying amount does exceed the fair market value of the asset, it’s referred to as an “impaired asset.”
When testing an asset for impairment, the total profit, cash flow, or other benefit that can be generated
by the asset is periodically compared with its current book value. If the book value of the asset exceeds
the future cash flow or other benefit of the asset, the difference between the two is written off, and the
value of the asset declines on the company's balance sheet.
Impairment is most commonly used to describe a drastic reduction in the recoverable value of a fixed
asset. The impairment may be caused by a change in the company's legal or economic circumstances or
by a casualty loss from an unforeseeable disaster.
The objective of a fair value measurement is to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell
the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date
under current market conditions. A fair value measurement requires an entity to determine all of the
following: [IFRS 13:B2]
the particular asset or liability that is the subject of the measurement (consistently with its unit of
account)
for a non-financial asset, the valuation premise that is appropriate for the measurement
(consistently with its highest and best use)
the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability
the valuation technique(s) appropriate for the measurement, considering the availability of data
with which to develop inputs that represent the assumptions that market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the inputs
are categorised.
The generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) define an asset as impaired when its
fair value is lower than its book value.
To check an asset for impairment, the total profit, cash flow, or other benefit expected to be
generated by the asset is compared with its current book value.
If it is determined that the book value of the asset is greater than the future cash flow or benefit
of the asset, an impairment is recorded.
2 Discuss fair value hierarchy
Overview
IFRS 13 seeks to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related
disclosures through a 'fair value hierarchy'. The hierarchy categorises the inputs used in valuation
techniques into three levels. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to (unadjusted) quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
If the inputs used to measure fair value are categorised into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the
fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety in the level of the lowest level input that is significant
to the entire measurement (based on the application of judgement).
Definition. The Fair Value Hierarchy categorises the inputs used in Valuation techniques into three
levels. The hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to (unadjusted) quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs.
The Fair Value Hierarchy categorises the inputs used in Valuation techniques into three levels.
The hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to (unadjusted) quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs.
IFRS 13 seeks to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related
disclosures through a 'fair value hierarchy'.
If multiple inputs used to measure fair value are categorised into different levels of the fair value
hierarchy, the Fair Value Measurement (the final valuation) is categorised in its entirety in the
level of the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement (based on the
application of judgement).
Level 1 inputs
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can
access at the measurement date. [IFRS 13:76]
A quoted market price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and is used
without adjustment to measure fair value whenever available, with limited exceptions. [IFRS 13:77]
If an entity holds a position in a single asset or liability and the asset or liability is traded in an active
market, the fair value of the asset or liability is measured within Level 1 as the product of the quoted price
for the individual asset or liability and the quantity held by the entity, even if the market's normal daily
trading volume is not sufficient to absorb the quantity held and placing orders to sell the position in a
single transaction might affect the quoted price. [IFRS 13:80]
Level 2 inputs
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. [IFRS 13:81]
Level 3 inputs
Level 3 inputs inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. [IFRS 13:86]
Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not
available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or
liability at the measurement date. An entity develops unobservable inputs using the best information
available in the circumstances, which might include the entity's own data, taking into account all
information about market participant assumptions that is reasonably available. [IFRS 13:87-89]
The three widely used valuation techniques cited by IFRS 13 are: market approach, cost approach,
and. income approach.
Market Approach – A valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information
generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable (i.e., similar) assets,
liabilities, or a group of assets and liabilities, such as a business.
Income Approach – A valuation technique that converts future amounts (e.g., cash flows, or
income and expenses) to a single current (i.e., discounted) amount. The fair value measurement
is determined on the basis of the value indicated by current market expectations about those
future amounts.
Cost Approach – A valuation technique that reflects the amount that would currently be
required to replace the service capacity of an asset (i.e., current replacement cost).
4 Discuss the nature of investement property
What Is an Investment Property? An investment property is real estate property purchased with the
intention of earning a return on the investment either through rental income, the future resale of
the property, or both. The property may be held by an individual investor, a group of investors, or a
corporation.
An investment property is real estate purchased to generate income (i.e., earn a return on the
investment) through rental income or appreciation. Investment properties are typically
purchased by a single investor or a pair or group of investors together.
Summary of IAS 40
Investment property is property (land or a building or part of a building or both) held (by the owner or
by the lessee under a finance lease) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both. [IAS 40.5]
The following are not investment property and, therefore, are outside the scope of IAS 40: [IAS 40.5 and
40.9]
property held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative
purposes
property held for sale in the ordinary course of business or in the process of construction of
development for such sale (IAS 2 Inventories)
property being constructed or developed on behalf of third parties (IAS 11 Construction
Contracts)
owner-occupied property (IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment), including property held for
future use as owner-occupied property, property held for future development and subsequent use
as owner-occupied property, property occupied by employees and owner-occupied property
awaiting disposal
property leased to another entity under a finance lease
Investment Law
Print
Email
The term ‘investment’ may mean different things in different disciplines and contexts.
Thus, it may mean “expenditure to acquire property or assets to produce revenue”. [1]
Fisher and Jordan[2] define investment as commitment of funds made in the
expectation of some positive rate of return. According to them, the return will
commensurate with the risk the investor assumes if the investment is properly
undertaken. We observe from this definition that investment is a commitment of
funds. Thus, a person would commit fund on something. In addition, the commitment
is made with the expectation of some positive rate of return. This positive rate of
return is a profit gained from the commitment of the fund. However, it is important to
bear in mind that investment carries with it a risk, i.e. the commitment of the fund
might end up with no profit. Thus, the investor needs to properly manage the
investment to make sure that it will be profitable.
Every kind of asset and in particular shall include though not exclusively:
a) movable and immovable property and any other property rights such as mortgages,
liens and pledges;
defined as: “Any kind of asset and any direct or indirect contribution in cash, in kind
or in services, invested or reinvested in any sector of economic activity.”[5 As per
this Agreement though not exclusively, it includes: 1[6] movable and immovable
property and rights in rem like mortgages, liens, pledges, and usufruct; shares;
copyrights, industrial property rights, technical processes, trade names and goodwill;
1. It is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the
entity; and
2. The cost of the item can be measured reliably.
1
The rules for recognition of investment property are essentially the same as stated in IAS 16 for
property, plant and equipment, i.e. you recognize an investment property as an asset only if 2
conditions are met: It is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will
flow to the entity
For subsequent measurement an entity must adopt either the fair value model or the cost
model as its accounting policy for all investment properties. All entities must determine fair
value for measurement (if the entity uses the fair value model) or disclosure (if it uses the cost
model).
Once you make your choice, you should stick to it and measure all of your investment property
using the same model (there are actually exceptions from that rule).
Option 1: Fair value model
Under fair value model, an investment property is carried at fair value at the reporting date.
(IAS 40.33)
The fair value is determined in line with the standard IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.
A gain or loss from re-measurement to fair value shall be recognized in profit or loss.
Sometimes, the fair value cannot be reliably measurable after initial recognition. This can happen
in absolutely rare circumstances (e.g. active marked ceased existing) and in this case, IAS 40
prescribes (IAS 40.53):
To measure your investment property at cost, if it’s not yet completed and is under
construction; or
To measure your investment property using cost model, if it’s completed.
Option 2: Cost model
The second choice for subsequent measurement of investment property is a cost model.
Here, IAS 40 does not describe it in details, but refers to the standard IAS 16 Property, Plant and
Equipment. It means you need to take the same methodology as in IAS 16.
7. Discuss presentation and disclosure of fair value model and cost model
An entity shall present and disclose information that enables users of the financial
statements to evaluate the financial effects of investment property held in accordance with
either the cost model or the fair value model
Disclosure
a reconciliation between the carrying amounts of investment property at the beginning and end of
the period, showing additions, disposals, fair value adjustments, net foreign exchange differences,
transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property, and other changes [IAS 40.76]
significant adjustments to an outside valuation (if any) [IAS 40.77]
if an entity that otherwise uses the fair value model measures an item of investment property
using the cost model, certain additional disclosures are required [IAS 40.78]