Case Study Developing Professional Capacity
Case Study Developing Professional Capacity
Case Study Developing Professional Capacity
Case Analysis
For this case, I am a K-8 principal of a diverse school with 1,400 students. We have
adopted a new teacher evaluation tool and noticed in the past year teacher scores have declined
in the following areas: “the methods used for instruction, monitoring and adjusting the lesson,
and the levels of engagement between students”. The stakeholders involved are the
administrators and teachers. District policy requires schools to have continuous improvement
plans. The plans need to include professional development for teacher growth and learning.
The potential solutions include providing professional development that targets the areas
for improvement, opportunities for teachers to reflect on their teaching and use that as
opportunities for growth, or creating a CIP that narrows down goals that are data-driven and
includes measurable outcomes for teachers. To go along with whichever solution, it might be
beneficial to hire an instructional coach to assist teachers who may need extra help in perfecting
their craft. I believe the best solution would be to create a CIP with measurable goals which
includes the implementation of PLCs and a meaningful professional development schedule that
addresses the needs of the teachers. The CIP should include the evaluation tool as the measurable
outcomes for teachers. To build the CIP, I would form a committee including teachers and
administrators as well as students from higher grade levels, if possible, because they are also
stakeholders. In the committee we would build the CIP based on the needs assessment and create
measurable outcomes as well as a schedule for professional development and PLCs. When
teachers return, there will be training over the CIP, PLCs, and expectations. There will also be
continued training throughout the year to ensure PLCs are running efficiently. Throughout the
year there will be check-ins with teachers to hold them accountable as well as make
improvements if needed.
Rationale
Based on the case study background provided and my research, for there to be
meaningful improvement, it is crucial for there to be data, collaboration, and measurable goals to
guide teachers. According to “Data Use for Continuous Instructional Improvement in Early
instructional practices through clear communication of expectations surrounding data use and
weaknesses related to data use (e.g., data collection efforts, staff capacity, use of evidence-based
practices), allocation of resources in an effort to promote data use, and modeling data-use
behaviors such as using data to inform program decisions” (deMonsabert, et al 496). They go on
to say, teachers must be trained in data collection in order to accurately collect and use data and
they also need to have regular professional development to increase their skills and knowledge.
Therefore, a detailed CIP is important as well as a plan in which teachers are attending
professional development and collaborating with their peers. It is also believed that “targeted
support is likely needed much more frequently than once a year. The literature supports the use
maintaining new skills in early childhood settings” (deMonsabert 500). The use of an
instructional coach on campus would help to fill in gaps teachers may have as well as facilitate
any professional learning opportunities. I would use this data to make the case to my district if
there was a question as to why this position was necessary, if there was not money in the budget
for this position, I would need to work with my team to come up with a different solution such as
a teacher mentor program or peer-evaluation program. Furthermore, including all stakeholders in
these decisions would be pertinent in forming an all-inclusive CIP which is why the inclusion of
students as well as parents would help to know what is expected of us as educators from our
school community in order to improve. There could be issues involving families as some may be
more outspoken or joining for malice, a way to mitigate this would be to survey families rather
than selecting people to be members. Overall, the most important factor will be the willingness
of the staff, continuing to build positive staff relationships and foster a community that is willing
to learn and improve will determine the success of the CIP. Therefore, there needs to be buy-in
from teachers and as the educational leader, I will need to show my excitement for the CIP and
deMonsabert, J., Brookes, S., Coffey, M. M., & Thornburg, K. (2022). Data Use for Continuous
021-01168-3
Shakman, K., Wogan, D., Rodriguez, S., Boyce, J., Shaver, D., National Center for Education
Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED), Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast &
Improvement in Education: A Toolkit for Schools and Districts. REL 2021-014. Regional