Contents of Chapter 1: Working Title/ Topic
Contents of Chapter 1: Working Title/ Topic
Contents of Chapter 1: Working Title/ Topic
The topic or title of the proposal should accurately reflect the scope or
content of the study in not more than 20 words.
A good title should be clear and be able to explain itself.
A working title that is good should have an underlying business
concept for instance corporate governance, CSR, organizational culture,
corporate entrepreneurship etc in order to guide the researcher when
doing literature review
1.0 Introduction
The background describes the context from which the research idea has
emerged. It should provide evidence of the existence of the problem and
make the reader feel the significance or importance of studying the
existing problem in order to better understand it and contribute to its
solution. It is therefore a build up to the problem identified.
1
This is supposed to give a detailed account of what is transpiring in the
organisation. This detailed account is the one that is supposed to show
that there is need to carry out a research
Background study should normally be between 1.5 to 2 pages of text but
may exceed because of tables and graphs presented as evidence of the
existence or magnitude of an underlying problem.
1.3 Research Objectives (these are formulated from the statement of the
problem and the background of the study)
The research questions should arise directly from the research objectives
Research questions state the investigative curiosity underlying the
intended study
Research questions must be able to be analyzed scientifically through
gathering data or research evidence
It is here where the researcher states how the solution(s) to the problem will
positively influence theory and practice. It is also here where you consider
who benefits from the study and how. In short the section should be split
between:
1.51 To theory
3
You need to tell us what other authorities have done around your area of
research and what it that they have not covered that you wish to look at.
Maybe they have looked the issue of capitalization in other countries and
none have been done in Zimbabwe especially looking at your sector
1.5.2 The organisation(s) and sector
You must illustrate how the organisation(s) and/or sector are bound to
benefit from your study. (this may encompass internal stakeholders such
as management, employees as well as external stakeholders such as
clients. Usually as the organisation benefits something, these also
directly or indirectly benefit as well). However where there is need to
separate what these stakeholders are to benefit from the study with what
the organisation will benefit, you can still do so.
1.5.3 Researcher
You are supposed to illustrate what you as a researcher are going to
benefit from this study, e.g. how your research skills are to be refined
and how your understanding of a particular area of study is going to be
enhanced.
Please DO NOT write that the research is of significance to the
researcher because it is being done in partial fulfilment of your degree
program!!
1.5.4 To the university
Tell us how the organisation is going to benefit from your research
1.6 Assumptions
These are statements of what the researcher believes to be facts. They
cannot be verified but they strengthen the basis of your study.E.g It is
assumed that the economic environment is not going to change during
the period of study or it is assumed that respondents will be forthcoming
and truthful when completing research questionnaires
4
Though its ok you need to have conceptual assumptions that look at
your area of study on concept e.g if capitalization strategies were
effective SMEs would not be closing down
The objective of delimiting the study is to narrow down the study so that
it becomes manageable in terms of time, geography (Physical), as well as
concept.
1.8 Limitations
This must summarise what is in the entire chapter. Provide the reader
with the major highlights of the chapter. Take note that you are not
supposed to write a simple outline as you did in the introduction, rather
you must specify what was exactly discussed.
5
6