Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 47 views

    Approved FOR Transmssi I On: Ion S

    Uploaded by

    asansur es
    This document provides guidelines for conducting searches to identify outstanding teachers in SDO Pangasinan II, Philippines. It outlines criteria in three main areas: 1) performance ratings from evaluations, 2) competence and effectiveness in areas like curriculum implementation, content knowledge, learning environment, and research, and 3) professional development and community involvement through training, memberships, and community projects. Teachers are scored on each criteria and may receive additional points for accomplishments like publishing or awards. School heads will nominate top teachers based on these criteria for consideration at district, division, and higher levels.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Approved FOR Transmssi I On: Ion S

    Uploaded by

    asansur es
    47 views5 pages
    This document provides guidelines for conducting searches to identify outstanding teachers in SDO Pangasinan II, Philippines. It outlines criteria in three main areas: 1) performance ratings from evaluations, 2) competence and effectiveness in areas like curriculum implementation, content knowledge, learning environment, and research, and 3) professional development and community involvement through training, memberships, and community projects. Teachers are scored on each criteria and may receive additional points for accomplishments like publishing or awards. School heads will nominate top teachers based on these criteria for consideration at district, division, and higher levels.

    Original Title

    DM-137-S-2022

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides guidelines for conducting searches to identify outstanding teachers in SDO Pangasinan II, Philippines. It outlines criteria in three main areas: 1) performance ratings from evaluations, 2) competence and effectiveness in areas like curriculum implementation, content knowledge, learning environment, and research, and 3) professional development and community involvement through training, memberships, and community projects. Teachers are scored on each criteria and may receive additional points for accomplishments like publishing or awards. School heads will nominate top teachers based on these criteria for consideration at district, division, and higher levels.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    47 views5 pages

    Approved FOR Transmssi I On: Ion S

    Uploaded by

    asansur es
    This document provides guidelines for conducting searches to identify outstanding teachers in SDO Pangasinan II, Philippines. It outlines criteria in three main areas: 1) performance ratings from evaluations, 2) competence and effectiveness in areas like curriculum implementation, content knowledge, learning environment, and research, and 3) professional development and community involvement through training, memberships, and community projects. Teachers are scored on each criteria and may receive additional points for accomplishments like publishing or awards. School heads will nominate top teachers based on these criteria for consideration at district, division, and higher levels.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    - -• !1§:'Q.

    Republic or the
    Philippines Region I
    SDOPANGASINAN II
    Bin alonan , Pangasinan
    Division Memorandum
    No. 1}1 , s. 2022

    To: Chief Education Supervisors, CIO/SGOO


    CID/SGOD Superv isors
    School Heads (Elementary/ Secondary)
    All others conce(ned

    GUIDELINESON THE CONDUCT OF THE SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDINGTEACHERS


    CATEGORY IN Al l THE GRADE LEVELS, LEARNING AREAS AND STRANDS, AND SPECIAL
    PROGRAMS
    (For Se:hoo l/ Oistrict/ Oivision-Based Searches)

    1. In line with the Programs on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence (PRAISE) of the
    Departm en t of Edu cation, the S00 Pangasinan U th rough the Curriculum Implementation
    Division CID, and in cooperation of the School Governance and Operations OivisJon
    SGOO issue a common criteria and guidelines on the conduct of the sea(ches for out standing
    teachers for grade levels,key stages and sub ject areas/ learning strands category; Special
    Pr ogramsand InclusiveEducation Programssuch as IPED andSPED.

    2. This aims to recognize and reward teac-hers and program owners who exhibit exemplary
    performance, innovative Ideas,. and genuine public services, and demonstrated the highest
    degree of integrity and honesty in the service; andcontribut·ed meaningfully to improve the
    implemen tation of curriculum in the different key stages and programs of the Deparment of
    Educatjon part icularly S0 0 Pangasinan II,

    3. The result of RPMSPhase IV - Performance Rewards and Developm ental Planning shallbe
    the bases of the school heads to recommend top performing teachers and program
    implementers in the searches to be co nducted in the district, congressional, divisional,
    pro vincial, r egional and national searches.

    4. Schools and District may contextualize the crit eria and guidelines bas.ed on their speciftt
    and local needs.

    S. Imm ediate dissemination of this memorandum is enjoined.

    APPROVED
    FOR TRANSMSSI I ON:
    ARV! · PURISIMA
    A DM li ,i
    TIVE OFFICERV
    ST i
    r Enclosure A
    CRITERIA FOR THE SEUC: TION OF OUTSTANDING TEACHERS CATEGORY
    I. Performance Rating- 10points (Max)
    Averagt of 3 lotest IPCRFRatings
    Ave109e times 2

    11. Competence and Effectivene,s - 50 points (Max)


    a. Curriculum Plannlnc and Implementation-10 points (max)
    Complett Weekly Home Leaming Pion-5 points
    Complete Individual Leaming Pion - 2 points
    1 of the lessons were taught during the quarter-5 points
    901'c0ff11Jktio,iof WHtP/ILP sottst(W{lht • 1 S" of the sco<esho N begM'n to
    the nomhttt
    75" t:Ompktlon of WHLP/llP/l SOM tOIISl'lft • SOX- o/ rht non-Shall be 91wnto
    thenomintt
    LOIWf than7S"a>mptecloflof WHLP/ILP/1fnonsroughr • 2S" qf thescoteshON
    given to the nomintt

    b. Content knowledge and Pedagogy- IO (max)


    Two (2) Classroom Observation Ratings siQned by the Observer (Virtual/FTF)
    Average of 2 COT ratings2

    c. learningEnvironment and Diversity of Learners - 5 points (max)


    Sampleof WHLP that addresses thediverse needs of ftorntrs - 2 points
    Sample of Summotb,e Evaluotton (Easyto MostOif/icult Tesr Items}• 1 point
    Sample of Performance Tasks to address nett!s of diverse learners· 1
    point Sample of Portfolio of Learning prepared by the learners -1 point

    ForALS
    Accomplished/Updated lndivi'duol Leaming Agreement Form • 2 points
    Listof Modules learned by the Learnersvis•a-viz llA - 2 points
    Accomplished/Updated RPL - Recogniitonof Prior Learning - 1 point
    Portfolio of Leomni g- Z points

    d. Conducted Research and Development of IMs, SIMs, SlMs Modules, WS/8


    - 5 points (mlK)
    Conducted Act.ion/Boslc Research to address problemsintheclassroom • 3 pointseach
    Developed tnstruct!onol Moterlols such asSIM,SLM/Module, Worksheets/book to
    addressthe Least Learned Competencies -3 points each
    On going implementationof IMS,SIMs,SLM/Module, WS and on.golng conducr of
    Research {WithApproved Permit to Conduct}- I point each
    e. lnnontiom -5 points(max)
    Developed qualityassured videolessons -1 point eachVL
    Developed online test/orleorners-1 point peronline test withat least 30 items
    Developed Digital M odules orWorksheets-1point each
    Other lnnovatlons(useof technology to address teaching/learningduring the pandemfc}-
    1 point each
    f. Conduct of Remediation - 5points
    Conducttd onllneremed;oJ classat least twicea week - 5 points
    C-0nducted at least 3 timeshome visitation perquarter - 3 points
    Conducted Orientation with parents/guardians whosechlldren ore at risk of dropping out1
    non • decoder/frustrationrtoder - 1 points
    Provisio n of otherSLMs/ Modules for theslow lttorntrs/pacers- 2 points
    Complete lndividuol Leaming Pion for theslow /ea rners/pae,t,rt- 2 Polnr

    h. Records Management - s points (ma,c)


    Complete Recotds (SF/AF and otherstudent records,.submitted reports on rime) - 5
    points
    At least 1 -2 lncampleterecords (SF/ AF and athtt student.s,records) - 4 points
    Ar leas t 3 incomplete records (SF/AF andother studenr.s' records) - 3 points
    At least 4 Incomplete records (SF/AF and other students' record} - 2 points
    Atleast 5 Incom plete records (SF/AFand other student records) -1 paint

    111. Professional/ Personal Oevek>pment and Community Involvement - 40 points(max)


    a. Highest Educational Atta lnme nt - 10 points(max)
    PhD/EdD/any doctototedegree related to educatlon- 10 points
    Doctorate Academic Requirement - 7 points
    At least J!i1init : rl0/ Ph0 - f:; poinr:s
    MA/MS Degre,- 5 points
    MA/MS Academic Requirement - 3 points
    At l n JS units M A/MS- J point
    At least 9 units- 0.50 point

    b. Trainorship and Speakership durfng LAC/INSET


    Demosklll,tralnln&,seminar, wor1cshop (online/offline/ftf)-10 points (max)
    Notional- 2 Points och
    Reglo nol - 1 .5 pointseach
    Provincial / Division - 1 point t?och
    Disrtict /Municipal. 0.75 point each
    Cluster Schools/Zon- 0. 50 point each
    e
    School•Bosed• 0.25 point each
    Grade Level LAC - 0.15 point each

    c. Chairmanship/ Membership ofa Technical WorlclngGrouplWG - 5 points(max)


    CO/RD/SDOTrainings
    Cha irman - 2 points each
    Co--Choirman - 2.5 points each
    Member- 1 point each

    District/ClusterSchoosl/Schoo-lBased Trainings, etc.


    Chairman -1 paint eoch
    Co-Chairman - 0.75 point
    eoch Member- 0.50 point
    each

    d.Trainings Attended (In linewiththe nominee's s peciallzatlon)- 10 points (max)


    Nat ional - 3 points each
    Regino/ - 2 points eoch
    Provincial I Division -1 point eoch
    District/ Munlclpol - 0.75point each
    Cluster Schools/Zone - 0.50 point eoch
    Schoo-l Based - 0.25 point each
    Grade Level LAC/ INSET- 0.15 point eoch
    : . ·-=:::::::,::: :-; :-::.tag e ano 1nvo1vement - :, po1ntS 1mu1
    Cnmp/PtPrl Com muni ty•Ekrsed Pro/tct/JGP - s points
    ·""" ' .,. :. ..... ,•,;:;-:-.: u: n : .1, ,., ., ,. .. , S , · I • .
    • • • , • •·· · · - · yoof:f ,J\t 1ease 9 mos . . - • p o mrs
    On.going CBP/IGP tAr leasr l year/At reasc c, m os. / - .spomu
    On-gong CBP/IGP (At leost6 mos/ At /ea,r 3 mos .) . 2 points
    Launched CfiP/(GP with permit to Condu ct • l oolnr

    Chairman of a Committee during a Community Act.lvlty - 1 point eaeh activity


    Co·Cholrman of a co mmittee dutinga Community Acrlvlty - 0.50 point eachocltv l ry
    Member of a Committeedurlno a Communltv Act/vlty-0.25 ooint eoch oct.lvity
    · Tota l:100 polnU

    Add: Plus
    Factors
    (0.2Soach)
    tlook·JournalAut:hotlhlp

    Gr.irnl'n.lf £w N ,1101

    SlMUt'Y(MJt Ev.-tu.11or/u yo111M is t


    Comorm.ance wtf
    Coor u,n;t,ipIQ\alrpn SOMI$ / Advisontl!p !Orill IH lant(1J yut
    OeMOnffl'WOn radlet
    ,v-..,,
    flladl o-hstd·&r* st e1
    Vldn> .o,n-(-clltor
    fNSETILACOrtllliffl
    Ol ttkl/ nlclp.a/DMsiOtl/ ll lon at OltlCOn$011d.ator
    R.tte,11n:h P'reW-nttl OI;i lo(uM
    OIW.' Vl fo, ShortSlOl'ies
    Win,-, , Coa,h
    An.Ide Writ«
    LOO"-Ptomc,tion R, tt

    ZHODropout A.ate
    Ztt o Hol). AQOer

    AwardH dtKlrc the Current Y ar


    Other Plus:f K'ION to be declded/detcrmw:dby die SHrdl[ valuaton

    You might also like