Cdeo Clup Vol 1 - Clup
Cdeo Clup Vol 1 - Clup
Cdeo Clup Vol 1 - Clup
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
ii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
iii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
iv
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
v
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
vi
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The Planning Management Team (PMT) and the Technical Working Group (TWG)
for the updating of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) of Cagayan de Oro
City acknowledges with appreciation the following:
The Housing and Land use Regulatory Board – Northern Mindanao Region
for providing technical assistance during the modular workshops;
The United Nations (UN) Habitat for providing technical and financial
assistance in the preparation of the Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment
(VAA) Report;
Non-Government Organizations
Government Organizations and Line Agencies
Academe
Business Sector;
City Mayor Oscar S. Moreno for giving his full support to the project;
Vice Mayor Cesar Ian E. Acenas and Members of the City Council for taking
the lead as chairman of the different sectors;
The City Government Department Heads and Chiefs of Offices for providing
data and for helping coordinate the formulation of priority programs and
projects with their respective sectoral groups.
vii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
Executive Summary
The Cagayan de Oro City Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the period 2013 to
2022 was prepared pursuant to the Local Government Code of 1991 (RA 7160),
which mandated the Local Government Units, to “prepare their comprehensive
land use plans and enact them through zoning ordinances”.
This plan has been prepared by the City Government of Cagayan de Oro with
technical assistance from the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB)
and National Economic Development Authority (NEDA). The Plan is meant to guide
the city’s future physical development and to steer the city’s growth as the business
and trading center of Southern Philippines. It provides a framework of goals,
objectives, strategies and actions required for the city by the year 2022.
I. Vision
Demography
Cagayan de Oro is the 10th most populous city in the country with a total population
of 602,088 based on May 2010 Census of National Statistics Office and constitutes
14.01% of the total population in Region X. Its annual population growth rate (APGR)
of 2.69% from 2000-2010 is higher than that of the National and Region X which is
2.32%. The high APGR is mainly due to immigration from adjoining municipalities.
The population will double in the span of 23 years or in 2036 (CdeO SEP, 2011).
Cagayan de Oro has a population density of 11 persons per hectare. Among the
densely populated barangays are as follows: Macabalan, Consolacion, Lapasan,
Barangays 12,13,17,18,19,22,25,26,32,34,35, Nazareth and Carmen. These
barangays are located along Cagayan River and near Macajalar Bay which exposes
more people to the risk of overflowing waterways during heavy downpour.
Local Economy
The city plays a very important economic role not only in Region X but also in the
whole Mindanao Island.
Revenue Sources - The City gets its income and other revenue from the
following: taxes; fees, permits & licenses, business and services, subsidies
from the national government and other sources. Total revenue generated in
viii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
The availability and accessibility of the City to public services, key facilities, and
critical infrastructures serves as a magnet to attract more people towards to City.
This urban phenomenon drains the service delivery capacity of the city and poses a
lot of urban development issues. Informality, poverty and vulnerability, and slums are
increasingly becoming the key social and underdevelopment issues in the city.
Listed below are the general urban development challenges faced by the City.
ix
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
Urban High carbon emission (transport)- need support for city regulation
Energy and guidelines
x
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
Comparative/Competitive Advantages
xi
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
4. Identify and legally declare built heritage sites in Divisoria, Taguanao and
Poblacion and regulate building heights, architecture and color for
historical-cultural tourism
5. Intensify and sustain urban greening in Poblacion, Isla de Oro and along
riverbanks
11. Provision of structural mitigation measures (special land use planning) for
hazard prone areas
xiii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xiv
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xv
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xvi
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xvii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xviii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xix
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
I. Reforestation Program
xx
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.4.2 Services/Facilities/Utilities/Amenities 16
1.4.2.1 Power 16
1.4.2.2 Water 18
1.4.2.3 Communication Network 20
1.4.2.4 Waste Management 20
xxi
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
3.1 Introduction 86
3.2 Vision 86
3.3.1 Goals 86
3.3.2 Objectives 86
3.3.3 Strategies 89
3.3.3.1 Social 89
3.3.3.2 Economic 90
3.3.3.3 Infrastructure 90
3.3.3.4 Land Use and Environment 91
xxii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
xxiii
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
LIST OF TABLES
xxiv
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
ANNEXES
xxv
Cagayan de Oro City 2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
LIST OF MAPS
xxvi
Cagayan de Oro City 2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan CLUP Volume 1
Chapter 1
Brief Profile of
the City
The City's history dates back many centuries before the Spaniards came
when the territory was called Kalambagohan. Its main town, Himologan, was
an uphill fortress situated some eight kilometers south of the present
Poblacion.
At the time when the first Spanish missionaries came in 1622, the people of
Cagayan had tributary relation to Kudarat, the Muslim Sultan of Maguindanao
Empire in Cotabato. However, the people had not embraced Islam and
instead, many became Christians after sometime. Because of this, Muslim
warriors began to attack the settlement. As a defense strategy, the priests
persuaded the people to transfer from the hilltop to a better location which is
the present site of the Saint Augustine Cathedral. The Cagayanons were able
to defend themselves for almost 250 years from Muslim harassment.
In 1871, the "Partidos" became a town and was made permanent capital of
Misamis. In 1883, the town became seat of the Spanish government in
Mindanao for the provinces of Misamis Oriental, Misamis Occidental,
Bukidnon, Lanao del Norte. Consequently, from a purely farming-fishing area,
Cagayan emerged into a booming commerce and trade center.
The war years in Cagayan were prompted by the presence of the Americans
in 1898. The Americans were initially and successfully repulsed by the local
forces led by Major Apolinar Velez at the historic battle of Macahambus in
June 4, 1900.
After the troubled years, peace finally brought back the economic activities to
normal under the guidance of Americans. St. Augustine School, the
forerunner of the present Xavier University and of Lourdes College, was
inaugurated in 1928.
On June 15, 1950 President Elpidio Quirino signed Republic Act No. 521,
which granted the status of a chartered city to the municipality of Cagayan de
Oro.
Table 1.1
Historical Growth of Population, 1903-2010
Cagayan de Oro City
Growth
Increase/ Growth Rate
Year Population Rate
Decrease
% Provincial Regional National
1903 11,029
1918 21,179 92 %
1939 28,062 32.5 %
1948 48,084 71.3 %
1960 46,266 -3.8 %
1970 128,319 177.35 % 5.19 3.56 2.78
1975 165,220 28.8 % 6.59 3.28 2.71
1980 227,312 37.6 % 4.10 2.22 2.35
1990 339,598 49.4 % 4.44 2.32 2.32
2000 461,877 36.0 % 2.54 1.67 2.04
2010 602,088 30.4 % 2.69
Source: National Statistics Office
The average population density of the City is 11 persons per hectare. The
most densely populated barangay is Macabalan with a population density of
450 persons per hectare. It is followed by Barangay 35 and Barangay 18.
Barangay Besigan has the lowest population density of about 0.25 person per
hectare.
Table 1.2
Urban-Rural Population Density, 2010
Cagayan de Oro City
Population Population
Density Density
Barangays Barangays
(person per (person per
hectare) hectare)
CdeO 10.57
Urban 41. Barangay 15 302.96
1. Agusan 28.89 42. Barangay 16 55.64
2. Balulang 36.96 43. Barangay 17 303.76
3. Balubal* 4.01 44. Barangay 18 316.95
4. Bayabas 73.37 45. Barangay 19 160.54
5. Bonbon 79.08 46. Barangay 20 57.62
6.Bugo 33.60 47. Barangay 21 53.81
7. Bulua 47.41 48. Barangay 22 164.86
8. Camaman-an 33.68 49. Barangay 23 111.03
9. Canitoan 12.20 50. Barangay 24 78.53
10. Carmen 70.65 51. Barangay 25 247.61
11. Consolacion 200.59 52. Barangay 26 269.27
12. Cugman 11.75 53. Barangay 27 140.96
13. Gusa 37.51 54. Barangay 28 74.62
14. Indahag* 4.44 55. Barangay 29 24.00
15. Iponan 34.11 56. Barangay 30 139.78
16. Kauswagan 67.39 57. Barangay 31 76.56
17. Lapasan 184.38 58. Barangay 32 158.07
18. Lumbia 4.24 59. Barangay 33 10.30
19. Macabalan 449.68 60. Barangay 34 152.96
20. Macasandig 58.63 61. Barangay 35 318.91
21. Nazareth 156.02 62. Barangay 36 118.06
22. Pagatpat* 4.71 63. Barangay 37 27.60
23. Patag 57.40 64. Barangay 38 25.13
24. Puerto 12.92 65. Barangay 39 19.83
25. Puntod 111.58 66. Barangay 40 60.98
26. Tablon 4.25 Rural
27. Barangay 1 42.74 67. Baikingon 3.47
28. Barangay 2 22.88 68. Bayanga 2.01
29. Barangay 3 23.02 69. Besigan 0.25
30. Barangay 4 39.27 70. Dansolihon 0.66
31. Barangay 5 32.30 71. FS Catanico 1.55
32. Barangay 6 49.07 72. Mambuaya 2.25
33. Barangay 7 90.64 73. Pagalungan 1.68
34. Barangay 8 53.77 74. Pigsag-an 1.18
35. Barangay 9 42.44 75. San Simon 1.00
36. Barangay 10 128.60 76. Taglimao 1.13
37. Barangay 11 104.59 77. Tagpangi 1.23
38. Barangay 12 205.23 78. Tignapoloan 0.61
39. Barangay 13 266.90 79. Tuburan 1.34
40. Barangay 14 107.40 80. Tumpagon 1.55
*proposed urban barangays
Figure 1.1
Population Density Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Table 1.3
Population by Urban and Rural Barangay, 2010
Cagayan de Oro City
Barangays Population Percent Barangays Population Percent
Urban 569,911 94.66 Barangay 16 143 0.02
Agusan 14,812 2.46 Barangay 17 2,342 0.39
Balubal* 2,893 0.48 Barangay 18 1,496 0.25
Balulang 32,531 5.40 Barangay 19 419 0.07
Bayabas 12,999 2.16 Barangay 20 121 0.02
Bonbon 9,195 1.53 Barangay 21 254 0.04
Bugo 27,122 4.51 Barangay 22 1,944 0.32
Bulua 31,345 5.21 Barangay 23 916 0.15
Camaman-an 24,651 4.09 Barangay 24 929 0.15
Canitoan 15,069 2.50 Barangay 25 1,295 0.22
Carmen 67,583 11.22 Barangay 26 2,383 0.40
Consolacion 9,919 1.65 Barangay 27 1,380 0.22
Cugman 20,531 3.41 Barangay 28 541 0.09
Gusa 26,117 4.34 Barangay 29 485 0.08
Indahag* 6,235 1.04 Barangay 30 875 0.15
Iponan 20,707 3.44 Barangay 31 1,506 0.25
Kauswagan 34,541 5.74 Barangay 32 1,410 0.23
Lapasan 41,903 6.96 Barangay 33 86 0.01
Lumbia 14,079 2.34 Barangay 34 621 0.10
Macabalan 20,303 3.37 Barangay 35 2,395 0.40
Macasandig 23,310 3.87 Barangay 36 791 0.13
Nazareth 10,658 1.77 Barangay 37 77 0.01
Pagatpat* 5,178 0.86 Barangay 38 94 0.02
Patag 17,219 2.86 Barangay 39 46 0.01
Puerto 11,475 1.91 Barangay 40 830 0.14
Puntod 18,399 3.06
Tablon 18,608 3.09
Barangay 1 453 0.08 Rural 32,177 5.34
Barangay 2 84 0.01 Baikingon 2,342 0.39
Barangay 3 177 0.03 Bayanga 2,769 0.46
Barangay 4 108 0.02 Besigan 1,404 0.23
Barangay 5 83 0.01 Dansolihon 4,811 0.80
Barangay 6 212 0.04 FS Catanico 1,710 0.28
The City has 66 urban barangays; most of these barangays are considered
the location for the essential and non-essential establishments and the center
for trade and commerce. Since Cagayan de Oro is one of the fastest growing
cities in the country it becomes the favorite investment of many investors and
tourism haven to many tourists.
The 14 rural barangays of the city serve as the City’s vegetable and crops
provider.
The average labor force participation rate for both sexes comprises 69.8
percent (81.7 male and 57.7 female) as of 2010 for ages 15 years old and up;
lower than that of 2007 which is 70.9 percent (based on NSO Regional
Survey). The decreasing number of labor force indicates that there are more
members of the household who are not in the labor force.
Table 1.4
Labor Force Population, 2010
Cagayan de Oro City
Age Percent Male Percent Female Percent
Both Sexes
Group age age age
Total 387,180 100.00 192,882 49.82 194,299 50.18
15-19 70,220 18.14 34,982 9.03 35,239 9.10
20-24 62,407 16.12 31,089 8.03 31,318 8.09
25-29 54,197 14.00 26,999 6.97 27,198 7.02
30-34 44,243 11.43 22,041 5.69 22,203 5.73
35-39 39,690 10.25 19,772 5.11 19,918 5.14
40-44 33,795 8.73 16,836 4.35 16,959 4.38
45-49 29,968 7.74 14,929 3.86 15,039 3.88
50-54 24,863 6.42 12,386 3.20 12,477 3.22
55-59 17,517 4.52 8,726 2.25 8,791 2.27
60-64 10,280 2.65 5,121 1.32 5,159 1.33
Cagayan de Oro City has a total land area of 57,851.00 hectares. Its territorial
size is 2.8 percent of the region and 22.8 percent of Misamis Oriental.
The total land area of the city is based on the definitions set forth by Republic
Act No. 521 Series of 1950, an act creating the city of Cagayan de Oro which
was signed by then President Elpidio R. Quirino and of the 1994 Codified
Ordinance which is a total extract of Resolution No. 6, Series of 1960 which
defines the city’s territory comprising the forty (40) urban and forty (40) rural
barangays. This was further corroborated by the political subdivision survey
commissioned and initiated by the DBM through the LMB-DENR’s PRS 92
Project conducted last 2012 in accordance with DENR Administrative Order
Nos. 98-12, s. 2010-13 and 2007-29 under the supervision of the Regional
Executive Director, DENR-X, Cagayan de Oro City.
Table 1.5
Land Area by Barangay by District, 2010
Cagayan de Oro City
Barangay Land Area (has.) Barangay Land Area (has.)
Cagayan de Oro City 57,851.00
District 1 43,637.40 Tablon 4,381.01
Baikingon 675.40 Barangay 1 10.60
Balulang 880.25 Barangay 2 3.67
Bayabas 177.17 Barangay 3 7.69
Bayanga 1,378.22 Barangay 4 2.75
Besigan 6,159.23 Barangay 5 2.57
Bonbon 116.28 Barangay 6 4.32
Bulua 661.21 Barangay 7 5.98
Canitoan 1,234.86 Barangay 8 2.92
Carmen 956.65 Barangay 9 3.11
Dansolihon 7,267.19 Barangay 10 4.79
There had been changes in the political subdivision of the city. Cagayan de
Oro is divided into two districts by Republic Act 9371. The first district
comprises the 24 barangays; barangays Baikingon, Balulang, Bayabas,
Bayanga, Besigan, Bonbon, Bulua, Canitoan, Carmen, Dansolihon, Iponan,
Kauswagan, Lumbia, Mambuaya, Pagalungan, Pagatpat, Patag, Pigsag-an,
San Simon, Taglimao, Tagpangi, Tignapoloan, Tuburan, and Tumpagon while
the second district are barangays; Agusan, Balubal, Bugo, Camaman-an,
Consolacion, Cugman, F.S. Catanico, Gusa, Indahag, Lapasan, Macabalan,
Macasandig, Nazareth, Puerto, Puntod, Tablon, and all Poblacion Barangays
1-40.
Figure 1.2
Region 10 Map
Figure 1.3
Base Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 1.4
Barangay Boundary Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Table 1.6
Schedule of Flights, 2013
Laguindingan Airport
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
PAL (Mla-CdeO-Mla)
5 5 5 5 5 5 5
CEBU PACIFIC (Mla-CdeO-
Mla) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
PAL EXPRESS
(Cebu-CdeO-Cebu) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ZEST AIRWAYS
(Cebu-CdeO-Cebu) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Figure 1.5
Road Network Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 1.6
Urban Road Network Map
Cagayan de Oro City
The Port of Cagayan de Oro and other five private ports serve as entry points
by sea from other areas of the country.
1.4.2 Services/Facilities/Utilities/Amenities
1.4.2.1 Power
There are two power distribution utilities that serve the city namely,
CEPALCO and MORESCO 1 and Minergy serves as power generation
company.
Table 1.7
Number of Households Served by Distribution Utility, 2012
Cagayan de Oro City
Name of Electric Number of Total Number Percentage
Cooperative/ Households of Households Served
Utility/Barangay Served of Service Area (%)
CEPALCO
66 barangays
(40+26) 103,074 123,326 84
CDO City
MORESCO-1
16 barangays 8,129 14,139 54
Total Number 111,203 137,465 81
of HHs served
Source: CEPALCO and MORESCO-1
*Canitoan and Lumbia are served by both CEPALCO and MORESCO-1
Figure 1.7
Electric Power Facilities Map
Cagayan de Oro City
1.4.2.2 Water
As to status of water supply in the city, data from the City Health
Office in 2012 shows that 80.40% of households have access to
potable water supply. Level I, II and III connections is shown in
Table 1.8 below.
Table 1.8
Status of Water Supply System, 2012
Cagayan de Oro City
Source of Water Number of HHs Percentage to
served total (%)
Level I 6,395 4.60
Level II 9, 793 7.04
Level III 96,034 69.04
Total Number of HHs served 112,222 80.68
No access 26,884 19.32
Total Number of HHs of the
139,106*
City
Source: COWD/CPDO (number of households)
*2012 HHs less doubled-up HHs
Figure 1.8
Water Facilities Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 1.9
Location Map of Sanitary Landfill
Cagayan de Oro City
The City of Cagayan de Oro gets its income and other revenue
from the following: taxes; fees, permits & licenses, business and
services, subsidies from the national government and other
sources allowed by law. Total revenue generated in 2011
amounted to PhP 1,719,874,752.98. The biggest source of
income is the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) of PhP
902,306,610.00 which is about 52.46%. Income generation by
source in the last three (3) years is shown in below.
Table 1.9
Income Generation by Source for the last Three Years
(2009-2011)
Cagayan de Oro City
Income (PhP)
Income
Source 2009 2010 2011
1.5.2 Employment
Based on 2009 NSO Regional survey on family income and expenditures, the
average regional family income for 2009 goes up to PhP 165,000 from
Php142,000 in 2006. Total number of families was recorded at 839,000 in
2009 and 789,000 in 2006 respectively. This 50,000 rising number of families
from 2009 to 2006 indicates the increasing number of population in this time
span. This is directly proportional to the growing income/needs and number of
families at a certain time.
Based on 2003 Small Area Poverty Estimates of the National Statistical
Coordination Board (NSCB), Cagayan de Oro City posted the least in poverty
incidence in Northern Mindanao. According to the said estimates, the City had
a poverty incidence of 15.50% which implies that 15.50 % of the City’s
population has an income below the poverty line for 2003.
The 2012 land use cover of Cagayan de Oro was updated through the
combination of the following:
The existing land uses were analyzed through the GIS based data gathered
from the results of the above-mentioned methods.
The general land use of the city emphasizes on the following districts/areas:
agricultural, built-up, forest, mining and quarrying, open land,
swamp/marshland, and other areas (roads, rivers and creeks).
Table 1.11 shows the existing General Land Use of Cagayan de Oro as
compared with CY 2000 General Land Use of the City.
Agriculture
The agricultural areas of Cagayan de Oro are located mostly in the rural
barangays, although patches of productive agricultural lands are still found in
the lowland barangays, some of which already belong to the urban
classification. Most agricultural lands are located in the southern parts of the
city. They contain mostly upland crops grown on the plateaus and terraces
and piedmont areas. Agricultural produce in the lowlands is taken from the
river flood plain areas. Existing agricultural areas of the city totaled 16,393.39
hectares.
On the other hand, strip or linear urban development occur along the national
highway from Bugo to Iponan, or from east to west of Cagayan de Oro.
Forest
Forest area of the city summed up to 24,652.75 or 45.41 percent of the city’s
total land area. This area includes the 11,334.9 hectares difference of the
city’s area in 2000 and 2012. Forest areas are located in Besigan,
Tignapoloan, Bayanga, Mambuaya, Dansolihon, Tumpagon, Pigsag-an,
Tuburan, Taglimao, Tagpangi, Pagalungan, Baikingon, San Simon, Cugman,
Tablon, and F.S. Catanico. Activities in these areas include Community-
Based Forestry Management (CBFM), Integrated Social Forestry (ISF), IFMA,
FLGA, Co-forest management and mining of copper ore. Some of these areas
are claimed by Indigenous People (IP).
Existing mining and quarrying areas are mostly found in barangays along
Iponan River such as Pagatpat, San Simon, Baikingon, Canitoan, and Iponan.
However, only the mining and quarrying areas in Isla Puntod, Balulang and
Lumbia are reflected in Table 1.11. Mining and quarrying areas summed up to
31.12 hectares or 0.05 percent of the city’s total land area where only sand
and gravel, as well as filling materials are extracted.
Open Land
The city’s existing vacant land, which summed up to 3,079.18 hectares, are
very prominent in the many rolling hills and plateaus that are found in the
uplands, conglomerates, and sandstone hills. These are found in Lumbia,
Pagalungan, and other hinterland barangays. These are vast areas of open
grassland; although suitable for pasture, there seems to be little activity of that
kind.
The total coastline length of the City is 25 kilometers from east to west. From
this coastline, the potential area for mangrove and wetland development is
approximately 21 kilometers. There are 11 coastal barangays, namely:
Barangays Puerto, Bugo, Agusan, Tablon, Gusa, Cugman, Lapasan,
Macabalan, Bonbon, Bayabas and Bulua.
The following table shows the comparative 2000 and 2012 General Land Use
of the City:
Table 1.11
Comparative General Land Use (2000 and 2012)
Cagayan de Oro City
2000 2012
General Land Use
Area (has.) Percent to Area (has.) Percent to
Total Total
Agricultural
13,704.92 29.63 16,393.39 28.34
Built Up Area
7,714.50 16.68 11,977.09 20.70
Mining and
Quarrying
23.35 0.05 31.12 0.05
Open Land
7,037.09 15.22 3,079.18 5.32
Preservation Area
Forest
17,726.57 38.33 24,652.75 45.41
Swamp/Marshland
39.70 0.09 102.53 0.18
Roads, Rivers and
Creeks - - 1,614.93
Total
46,246.13 100.00 57,851.00 100.00
Source: Research Division, City Assessment Department/GIS-CPDO
Figure 1.10
Existing General Land Use Map
Cagayan de Oro City
The urban land use of the city is dominantly built-up area stretching from east
to west between Macajalar Bay and escarpment areas, as well as in the
uptown areas Lumbia, Macasandig and Indahag.
Agricultural
Although agricultural areas are located mostly in the rural areas of the City,
there are also agricultural lands in the urban areas. At present, a total of
8,065.10 hectares or 33.82% of the total urban area is agricultural. These
areas are located in Barangays Lumbia, Canitoan, Iponan, Bayabas, Bulua
and Pagatpat.
Agro-Industrial
Existing agro-industrial areas in the city having 14.07 hectares are situated
along the strip of Sayre Highway in Upper Puerto and include feedmills, post-
harvest and warehousing facilities. This area, abutting the province of
Bukidnon caters to its large volume of agricultural production.
Commercial
The commercial land use category covers lots where there are business
activities. This includes offices, services, supermarkets, and shopping
centers. Regional offices and financial establishments concentrated in the
Poblacion (CBD) create pressure in the area. Large-scale shopping centers
(such as the Limketkai Mall, Gaisano, Ororama, and Centrio) are also within
the CBD. Small-scale operations (like hardware, store and services) are
located in all parts of urban area, as well as in dominantly residential areas.
Forest
Industrial
Existing industrial area of the City is 175.58 hectares. This is almost twice the
industrial area of the City in CY 2000 which is 88.36 hectares. The increasing
number of industries attributed to the expansion of the industrial area.
Institutional
The various school sites with their corresponding open spaces comprise the
bigger share of institutional uses. Xavier University Manresa Farm occupies
the biggest area while elementary and secondary schools, barangay centers,
churches and government center/offices of the region, the province of
Misamis Oriental and the City occupies the remaining area.
Existing institutional area covers 383.25 hectares which is slightly higher than
its area coverage in CY 2000 which is 287.94 hectares.
Of the existing total urban area, 31.12 hectares has been allowed for mining
and quarrying along Iponan River, located in Barangays Pagatpat, Canitoan
and Iponan.
Residential
Residential areas are the largest in the urban land use and covers 10,911.61
hectares or 45.76 % of the total urban area. This is relatively higher than the
figure in CY 2000 wherein residential land use is only 24.37% of the total
urban area.
Residential areas are divided further into: residential area within planned
subdivision with appropriate road network system and facilities; low density
residential area with sub-standard road facilities; and blighted areas as well as
resettlement sites.
Swamp/Marshland
Utilities
Airport
Sea Port
There are six sea ports in the City; one is a government port, located at
Macabalan, while five others are private ports. One private port is
located in Bugo while the remaining four are in Tablon.
Bus Terminals
The City has two integrated bus terminals strategically located in the
west at Barangay Bulua and in the east at Barangay Lapasan.
The following table shows the comparative 2000 and 2012 Urban Land
Use of the City:
Table 1.12
Comparative Urban Land Use (2000 and 2012)
Cagayan de Oro City
2000 2012
Urban Land Use
Area Percent to Area Percent to
(has.) Total (has.) Total
Figure 1.11
Existing Urban Land Use Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Insufficient/low income
Presence of informal settlers
Mismatched skills and the need of the industry
Traffic Congestion
Frequent Flooding
Inadequate Supply of Potable Water in some areas
Water Pollution and Contamination
Low farm productivity
Frequent flooding in business districts
Lack of area for public burial sites
High level of GHG emission
Inadequate protective services facilities
Absence of City Sports Complex
Unregulated mining activities
Low agricultural productivity
Water pollution and contamination
Undeveloped tourism sites
Low student performance in the ff: promotion, graduation
and survival rates
Absence of established evacuation centers
Absence of social welfare center
Chapter 2
Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment
Barangay 1
Barangay 2
Barangay 3
Barangay 4
Barangay 5
Barangay 6
Barangay 7
Barangay 8
Barangay 9
Barangay 10
Barangay 11
Barangay 12
Barangay 13
Rain- Earthquake-
Storm Ground Liquefac
Barangay Flood induced induced Typhoon
Surge Shaking tion
Landslide Landslide
Barangay 14
Barangay 15
Barangay 16
Barangay 17
Barangay 18
Barangay 19
Barangay 20
Barangay 21
Barangay 22
Barangay 23
Barangay 24
Barangay 25
Barangay 26
Barangay 27
Barangay 28
Barangay 29
Barangay 30
Barangay 31
Barangay 32
Barangay 33
Barangay 34
Barangay 35
Barangay 36
Barangay 37
Rain- Earthquake-
Storm Ground Liquefac
Barangay Flood induced induced Typhoon
Surge Shaking tion
Landslide Landslide
Barangay 38
Barangay 39
Barangay 40
Agusan
Baikingon
Balubal
Balulang
Bayabas
Bayanga
Besigan
Bonbon
Bugo
Bulua
Camaman-an
Canitoan
Carmen
Consolacion
Cugman
Dansolihon
FS Catanico
Gusa
Indahag
Iponan
Kauswagan
Rain- Earthquake-
Storm Ground Liquefac
Barangay Flood induced induced Typhoon
Surge Shaking tion
Landslide Landslide
Lapasan
Lumbia
Macabalan
Macasandig
Mambuaya
Nazareth
Pagalungan
Pagatpat
Patag
Pigsag-an
Puerto
Puntod
San Simon
Tablon
Taglimao
Tagpangi
Tignapoloan
Tuburan
Tumpagon
Figure 2.1
Flash flood Typhoon Sendong and Pablo Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.2
Geohazard Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.3
Liquefaction Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.4
Tsunami Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.5
Earthquake Induced Landslide Hazard Map
Cagayan de Oro City
RISK EVALUATION
This section provides discussions on the evaluation from the city and
local risk assessment and should reveal implications of the losses that would
occur; e.g., how much a hazard may cost (in terms of financial and other
resources needed for relief and rescue, reconstruction and rehabilitation)
were it to occur; and how the lives and quality of life in the community or city
or the clusters might be affected in view of the estimated risk.
The measures that may be undertaken by the city also depend on the
types of risks. The choice as to which final DRR measure or approach to
adopt will depend on the decision-making process of the city. Generally, the
city may adopt corresponding intervention approaches or options to address
the impact of the disaster risks, the measures of which are classified into four
major categories, as follows: (a) risk avoidance or elimination; (b) risk
reduction or mitigation; (c) risk sharing or transfer; and (d) risk acceptance or
retention. 1 Table 9 the strategies under these four major categories that the
city may adopt in responding to the varied disaster risks identified.
This DRA should guide the thrusts and direction of the Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management (DRRM) Plan of the city as mandated under the
Republic Act (RA) 10121, otherwise known as the Philippine DRRM Law of
2010.
1
Source: Guidelines on Mainstreaming DRR in Subnational Development Land Use Planning
The passage of ordinance for no build zone areas will prohibit the
illegal construction of properties by the informal settlers. The provision
of decent, affordable housing on environmentally safe areas is a
strategy to relocate and resettle affected families (Map 15). The
national and local government needs to increase funds for the housing
program especially for the poor families;
Table 2.2
Disaster Risk Reduction Strategies
Cagayan de Oro City
Risks/
Avoid or Eliminate Risk Retention
Share and Transfer
Strategies Reduce and Mitigate Risks
Risks
Risks
Infrastructure Prohibit development in Strengthen structure’s ability to resist hazard Develop alternate Take no action
high risk areas locations for key functions
risks
Risks/
Avoid or Eliminate Risk Retention
Share and Transfer
Strategies Reduce and Mitigate Risks
Risks
Risks
Social and Deny occupancy Integrate sociocultural indicators into risk Promote incentives for Take no action
assessment homeowners, renters and
cultural risks of hazardous businesses to purchase
insurance
buildings Prepare shelter plans for
Fund hospitals and social services mitigation displaced residents
Economic risks Avoid or eliminate Provide incentives to mitigate or reduce risk Shared responsibilities Take no action
capital stock risks by
mandating “smart” between government
Risks/
Avoid or Eliminate Risk Retention
Share and Transfer
Strategies Reduce and Mitigate Risks
Risks
Risks
growth or avoiding high Diversify income sources and private / business Special funds
risk areas
sector or lines of credits for lost
revenues
Attract wide range of business types
Develop business
Natural resource/ Eliminate sources of Eliminate point sources of pollution Develop transfer of Take no action
pollution development rights
environmental programs, or
environmental land swaps
risks Launch clean-up efforts Brownfield clean-up and
Risks/
Avoid or Eliminate Risk Retention
Share and Transfer
Strategies Reduce and Mitigate Risks
Risks
Risks
Technologies (e.g., Regulate use and storage of potential pollutants Greater shared
emissions free responsibilities of
Indigenous Peoples in
vehicles)
Reduce densities in sensitive areas the management and
protection of forests
Enforce strictly zoning
ordinances Habitat conservation plans
Cross-Sectoral Analysis
A. Threat Level
Per cross-sectoral analysis, Flooding and Typhoon scored the highest threat
levels to the City. This rating is determined not only from the level or scope of
exposure to the climate change driver or hazard but the degree to which it can
adversely impact the communities. Hence, the more dense settlements with
higher risks of being flooded and affected by typhoons, as aggravated by
negative and unsustainable practices of the people, are considered the
hotspot areas.
Table 2.3
Average Threat Level Scores Across all Five Development Sectors
Average
CC Land
Social Economic Environment Infrastructure THREAT
Hazard Use
LEVEL*
Flooding 5 5 5 4 5 4.8
Drought 3 3 2 3 1 2.4
RIL 2 2 3 1 3 2.2
Typhoon 5 5 5 2 4.25
* High – 5; Low - 1
The GIS experts of the City TWG have prepared risk maps to provide a visual
presentation of the location of at risk elements for each sector (social,
economic, environmental, infrastructure, and land use), as shown in the
Figures below. Taking off from this information, an overlay analysis of the
cross-sectoral risks for each identified climate change hazard was also
prepared.
Figure 2.6 shows the location of elements at risk for all the five sectors in
three identified climate change hazards, namely: Flooding, landslide, and
drought. Figure 2.7 is an overlay of the drought map (across all five sectors-
social, economic, environment, infrastructure, and land use) to the population
density map of CDO. This map depicts that the entire city is vulnerable to
drought but the ones that were highly impacted are the following barangays:
Bayabas, Bulua, Iponan, Patag, Carmen, Consolacion, Kauswagan, Bonbon,
Macabalan, Puntod, Lapasan, Nazareth, Agusan, Bugo, and Barangays 13,
15, 22, 24, 29, 31. Meanwhile, Figure 2.8 shows the location of cross-sectoral
(high to medium) risks to flooding overlaid with the population density map.
This map shows the high level threat of flooding in the coastal and river-side
barangays where most residential areas are situated. High risk barangays in
the coast (Macajalar Bay) include: Bayabas, Bulua, Bonbon, Macabalan,
Puntod, Lapasan, and the settlements in the coast line of Bugo. Moreover,
Barangays along Cagayan River (Kauswagan, Consolacion, portions of
Carmen, Nazareth, Macasandig, and Balulang, Barangays
1,13,15,22,24,28,31,35,36, settlements along the riverbanks of Lumbia,
Bayanga, and Mambuaya) and Barangays along Iponan River (Iponan,
portions of Bulua, Canitoan, Pagatpat, Baikingon, Taglimao) are also being
threatened by flooding.
Figure 2.6
Social Sector Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.7
Economic Sector Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.8
Infrastructure Sector Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.9
Environment Sector Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.10
Land Use Sector Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.11
Multi-hazard Risk Map
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.12
Drought Vulnerability Map of Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.13
Flood Vulnerability Map of Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.14
Landslide Vulnerability Map of Cagayan de Oro City
The city’s inherent ability to adapt to CC and its impact has also been
recognized, and became the basis for adaptive capacity assessment. The
adaptive capacity of Cagayan de Oro City was assessed by listing down the
adaptive capacity evidences for each development sector and categorized in
six dimensions, namely: Wealth, Technology, Institutions, Information,
Infrastructure, and Social Capital. It is perceived that the Adaptive Capacity
of Cagayan de Oro City will offset the Threat (Exposure and Sensitivity).
Typhoon (1.8) scored the highest AC status (1 being the highest) while the
adaptive capacity to drought has been identified as the lowest. This low score
can be attributed to the lack of available scientific information that can be
used to prepare and enhance resiliency to drought and the insufficient
historical data about the hazard which primarily impacts the agriculture and
water sector.
The inherent ability of these sectors and systems to adjust or adapt to climate
change is a vital factor in these assessment. The adaptive capacity
assessment as summarized below helped determine the level or status of AC
that needs to be improved in order to build more resilient communities and
sectors. All ratings were identified through a large multi-level stakeholder
group consultation workshop.
Table 2.4
Perceived Adaptive Capacity
Sector Flooding Drought RIL Typhoon Ave. AC
Social 2.5 3.5 2.8 2.0 2.7
Economic 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.7
Environment 1.5 2.3 1.8 1.7 1.8
Infrastructure 3.0 2.6 2.5 - 2.7
Land Use 2.33 2.33 2.17 2.33 2.3
City Wide AC 2.23 2.55 2.2 1.8 2.24
* High – 1; Low - 5
Meanwhile, the average AC scores for each of the six Adaptive Capacity
dimensions (as shown in the table below) reveal that in the context of CCA
and DRRM, “Social Capital” has the highest overall rating (1.76). This is an
evidence of the large and diverse network of support and assistance that the
City is getting to increase their resilience to climate change. However, the
assessment showed the need to improve on the infrastructure (construction
/rehabilitation of protective infrastructure and promotion of sustainable and
climate-resilient structural designs), which has scored the lowest (2.65).
For flooding, technology and social capital (1.6) are the highest adaptive
capacity status for flooding, while wealth and infrastructure needs to be given
more attention. Drought has a high AC status on institution and social capital
(2) while information has the lowest rating. It is noted that very few records
and studies are available for drought in the City. In RIL (1.8) and Typhoon
(1.2), the technology dimension has been scored the highest due to the
introduction and promotion of slope management and stabilization
technologies in the upland ecosystem of Cagayan de Oro and upgraded
technology that is being used in the country to determine and project the
occurrence and pathways of tropical cyclones. In both CC hazards,
infrastructure scored the lowest as reflected by the need to enhance resilience
of this dimension in all sectors.
Table 2.5
Average Rating per Adaptive Capacity Dimension
Wealt Technol Informati Instituti Infrastruct Social
CC Hazard
h ogy on on ure Capital
Flooding 2.6 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.4 1.6
Drought 2.2 3 2.8 2 2.6 2
RIL 2 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.6 2
Typhoon 2 1.2 1.5 1.25 3 1.5
Ave. AC
score per 2.2 1.9 2.15 1.89 2.65 1.76
dimension
C. Relative Vulnerability
technical working group of Cagayan de Oro City. Below is the score guide
used for the assessment.
Based from the results of the assessment, Cagayan de Oro City is most
vulnerable to flooding. Flooding and Typhoon marked the highest threat levels
among the four identified climate change hazards. The rating was based on
the level of threat (exposure and sensitivity) that the hazard brings and the
level of the city-wide adaptive capacity (capacity of the system to cope and
adjust to the changing climatic conditions) to the particular climate change
impacts. Although not very low on AC rating, the level of adaptive capacity of
the City as a response to these hazards can still be improved.
Table 2.6
Relative Vulnerability by Hazard
Threat Level Adaptive Relative Vulnerability
Climate
(5-highest) Capacity Rating
Change Hazard
(1-highest) (10-most vulnerable)
Flooding 4.8 2.23 7.03
Typhoon 4.25 1.8 6.05
Drought 2.4 2.55 4.95
Rain Induced 2.2 2.2
4.4
Landslide
assessment, there are other crucial aspects that need to be improved and
prioritized in order to reduce the threat level and increase resiliency of
identified highly vulnerable areas (highly dense coastal
communities, poor families in barangays alongside Cagayan and Iponan River
and informal settlements in its riverbanks, CBD being a floodplain, deforested
and rain-dependent farming communities in the upland).
Meanwhile, the table below reveals that the social sector (6.45) is relatively
the most vulnerable sector. This may be attributed to the higher risks on
settlements and social services especially in the densely populated hotspot
areas.
Table 2.7
Relative Vulnerability per Sector
Threat Adaptive Relative Vulnerability
Development
Level Capacity Rating
Sector
(5-highest) (1-highest) (10-most vulnerable)
Social 3.75 2.70 6.45
Environment 3.75 1.83 5.58
Economic 3.75 1.70 5.45
Infrastructure 2.67 2.70 5.37
Land Use 2.75 2.29 5.04
Social Sector
Economic Sector
Environment Sector
watershed areas
Creation of Bantay Kalikasan Taskforce
at barangay level
Implementation of National Greening
Program in upstream Barangays
Infrastructure Sector
resilient distribution
system
Establish disaster-resilient
telecommunication
facilities
To provide an efficient Promotion of wireless
Table 2.8
Long List of Adaptation Options obtained from City-Wide Consultation Workshop
Hazard Social Economic Environment Infrastructure Land Use
Flooding Construction Implementation of Establish Construction/Rehabilitation Re-Activate Local
of an Proposed Rainforest Ecological of Flood Control Dikes and Housing Board
Evacuation Development in 5 Baseline Data Slope Protection along Propose Creation of
Center and Brgys. (3,000has.) and conduct Cagayan and Iponan River City Housing/Shelter
equipment Develop High Quality river Establishment of New Department/Office
(identified in Infra facility on assessment Waterways in built-up area CDRRMC approval
Brgy. tourism on proper particularly on Acquisition of Heavy as requirement in
Dansolihon and safe location Water quality, Equipment for Desiltation the Issuance of
and Adjust planting volume of river of Rivers and Declogging Locational
Mambuaya) (harvesting) calendar discharges, tidal of Drainage Canals Clearance/ Building
Additional to ensure agricultural variation data, (identified in Carmen) Permit
skilled productivity extent of water Dredging of Major Rivers Strict enforcement
manpower Planting of early pollution after Adoption of climate of NIPAS
for rescue maturing varieties (5 flooding, actual resilient and green building Activate and
operations barangays around tenure over river technology enhance capacities
Purchase of Iponan River) easement Retrofitting of all bridges of BDRRMC
additional Create other tourism Geological Construction (identified in
rescue attractions and Assessment/Stu /Rehabilitation of Ugyaban Balulang)
equipment adventure like Rock dy of the River Bridge and Cabula Bridge Implementation of
Additional Wall Climbing etc. System Enforcement thru local Early Warning
trained Provide sustainable Riverbank ordinances of Flood- System at the brgy
manpower on alternative livelihood stabilization resistant housing level particularly in
psychosocial opportunities Communal structures (identified in high risk areas
support Prohibit firewood Gardening Balulang) (identified in
services (identified in
Chapter 3
The Comprehensive Land Use Plan
3.1 Introduction
The Cagayan de Oro City2013-2022 Comprehensive Land Use Plan was prepared
pursuant to the Local Government Code of 1991 (RA 7160), which mandated the
Local Government Units, to “prepare their comprehensive land use plans and
enact them through zoning ordinances”.
The Plan is meant to guide the city physical development and to steer the city’s
growth as the business and trading center of Southern Philippines. It provides a
framework of goals, objectives, strategies and actions required for achievement of the
city/s future “CdeO 2022”.
3.2 Vision
- crops
- fishery
- livestock & poultry
- forestry
Preserve, protect and enhance natural and heritage tourism sites and
indigenous peoples’ way of life
Strategies
Social
Economic
Infrastructure
The projected urban land requirement is based on the current land uses and
the population trends. The different sizes of lots used as basis for computation
was taken from prevalent size of lot in the city and which are considerably
acceptable. For residential projections, a minimum lot size of 80 square meters
per housing unit was used for computation.
Identification of land available was taken from the result of thematic mapping.
Land available are those potential growth areas which are the remaining areas
after deducting all development constraints.
3.5.3.1 Agriculture
For livestock and poultry, backyard production specifically for swine, goats and
cattle will be regulated in the hinterland barangays.
3.5.3.2 Forest
The forest areas in the hinterland barangays on the south abutting the
provincial boundary of Bukidnon and Lanao del Norte, i.e. Cugman, FS
Catanico, Tablon and Balubal will be retained/conserved. Premium and
introduced species will be used in the reforestation of these identified
barangays.
To sustain the National Greening Program, tree growing for reforestation at the
barangays shall be constantly enforced requiring NSTP to facilitate such
activity.
Open grassland will be devoted to fruit trees so as to protect the area from
further erosion.
3.5.3.3 Tourism
The current development thrust for the City of Cagayan de Oro identified Eco-
tourism as a priority. It has identified the development of Cluster 1 which
includes the Calabera Cave located in Indahag and Huluga Cave in Taguanao,
this City. It covers approximately 175 hectares comprising the Macahambus
Cave and Gorge as well as Historical Heritage sites located in Barangays
Lumbia and Bayanga. Total tourism area proposed within the planning period
summed up to 1,167.34 hectares.
For the planning period, proposed total urban land use of the city summed up
to 12,123.47 hectares.
The following table shows the proposed general land and water use of the City
within the planning period.
Table 3.1
Proposed General Land and Water Use
Cagayan de Oro City
% to total
Land Use Categories Area (hectares)
Agricultural 14,759.63 25.51
Forest 27,730.32 47.93
Tourism 1,167.34 2.02
Urban Land Use 12,123.47 20.96
Roads, Rivers and Creeks 2,070.24 3.58
Total 57,851.00 100.00
Figure 3.2
General Land Use Plan
Cagayan de Oro City
Settlement
The proposed settlement areas are the major and sub-nodes sited along east-
west stretch of the city towards the southern escarpment areas. There will be
strong linkages of these nodes to the CBD.
Major linkages in the east are the Agusan-Balubal Road and the national
highway. The J.R. Borja Road will be extended up to Agusan traversing
Cugman and Tablon. The Eastern Coastal Highway shall be completed to
decongest traffic along Iligan-Cagayan-Butuan Highway.
For the western nodes, Western Coastal Highway will be fast tracked for
completion.
Within the planning period, residential areas remain the highest allocation
estimated at 9,183.19 hectares of the total urban land area of Cagayan de Oro.
This would dominate the land uses. Significant areas are the relocation sites in
Indahag, Calaanan, Camaman-an, Canitoan, Balubal and Pagatpat. Medium-
rise residential buildings are expected to be adopted for the lack of space vis-à-
vis the increase of households. Residential areas are planned to be pedestrian-
friendly.
3.5.4.3. Industrial
Cashew and Cashew Nuts Production at Lumbia will be intensified for cashew
industry development, as well as product Innovation and promotion.
3.5.4.4 Institutional
Built heritage sites are located in Divisoria and the area stretching to St.
Augustine Cathedral. Building heights, architecture and color shall be regulated
for historical/cultural tourism. Approved cultural heritage sites shall be
preserved and enhanced.
Salient feature is the proposed Isla de Oro River Walk with the urban renewal
activity in Burgos Area. It features low-impact development and landscaping.
Beautification and urban greening in major thoroughfares will be implemented
and maintained.
Escarpment areas are for tree planting/growing and greening Cagayan de Oro
River.
Green-belt areas and forest parks in various islets in Cagayan de Oro River will
be identified and established.
Additional parks and playgrounds shall be developed while the existing shall be
improved.
3.5.4.7 Mangroves
Mangroves in the city are located in the coastal floodplains of Bulua, Bayabas,
Bonbon, Lapasan, Agusan, Bugo, Puerto, Tablon andalong the riverbank of
Kauswagan. These are the same areas currently subjected to mangrove
reforestation activities of the city government in partnership with the fisherfolks
associations of respective barangays.
Table 3.2 shows the proposed urban land and water use of the City within the
planning period.
Table 3.2
Proposed Urban Land and Water Use
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 3.3
Urban Land Use Plan
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 3.4
Transport Network and Circulation Pattern
Cagayan de Oro City
This growth node serves as the entry and exit points from and to Laguindingan
Airport and other parts of the country. This also serves as the major
convergence point for people, goods and products, as well as transport service
to and from other parts of the region.
Existing Facilities
1. Integrated Bus and Jeepney Terminal
2. Fish and vegetable landing
3. Coastal road passing through barangays Gusa, Lapasan,
Kauswagan, Bayabas, Bulua and Iponan
Proposed Development
1. Commercial mixed use medium to high density pedestrian friendly
center for Cagayan de Oro City.
2. Commercial areas along Western Coastal Highway-Kauswagan,
Bayabas, Bulua
3. Completion and widening of western coastal highway
4. Establish/construct main drain (canal)
5. Waste water treatment for subdivisions
6. Preservation and expansion of wetlands in Bulua, Bonbon and
Bayabas
7. Provision of multi-purpose and socio-economic centers (reading
centers, parks, and the like)
Existing Facilities
1. Macapagal Highway Extension connecting to the western coastal
highway.
2. An established residential and commercial areas and
neighborhood centers such as; Pueblo de Oro Township, Camella
and Xavier Estate.
3. SM Shopping Mall
4. Xavier University IT Park
Proposed Development
Existing Facilities:
1. Convention Center(on-going construction)
Existing Facilities:
1. Sayre Highway which has recently been upgraded with a fly-over
to ease traffic congestion at the intersection provides linkage to
the Provinces of Bukidnon and Cotabato
2. Iligan-Cagayan-Butuan Super Highway links the area to the
Provinces of Davao, Agusan, Surigao and Sarangani
3. Puerto Public Market serves as trading center for goods and other
products from adjoining areas.
Proposed Development
1. JR Borja Extension shall be connected to Agusan, Balubal and
Puerto
2. Concreting from Agusan to Manolo Fortich Highway
3. Waste water treatment for subdivisions
4. Establishment of green belt areas for subdivisions with slope
18deg and up
5. Establishment of tree parks in subdivisions
6. Strict implementation of tree planting strips in subdivisions
Proposed Development
1. Develop an expanded downtown master plan
2. Provision of new Transportation Master Plan with the introduction
of new traffic scheme
3. Downtown check-in and shuttle for airport passengers from
Cagayan de Oro to Laguindingan Airport (Fast craft or utility
vehicles)
4. Provision of sidewalks and pedestrian lanes
5. Establishment of interceptors from city hall to Isla Bugnaw
6. Establishment of green belt areas at Islas de Oro, Bugnaw,
Baksan
7. Installation of rain harvesting facility for commercial
establishments and residential buildings
8. Establishment of tree parks in subdivisions
3.5.5.2 Conservation and protection of natural sites and heritage i.e. gorges
caves, wetlands and river systems. (Barangays Lumbia, FS Catanico,
Cugman, Agusan, Bayanga, Mambuaya, Dansolihon, Macasandig,
Agusan and Bonbon.)
3.5.5.3.1Divisoria
3.5.5.3.2 Poblacion
3.5.5.5.1 Poblacion
3.5.5.5.2 Isla de Oro (8.85 has.), Isla Bugnaw (4.1 has.), Isla
Baksan (2.3 has.) with total area of 15.25 has.
3.5.5.9.1 Allocate industrial zone area for future expansion, new plants
and possible relocation of industries inappropriate to their
existing location (within residential areas) area: 100 hectares
within Tablon to Palalan
Adaptation Mitigation
Non preservation Lose identity of the city Identification, survey and Preservation and
of old evaluation of existing old enhancement of
identity/structure of structure and heritage site approved cultural
the city’s both natural and built with heritage sites and
cultural/heritage historical accounts structures
structure
Implementation of heritage
act pursuant to RA 1601
Degraded coastal Loss of fish habitat Adoption and implementation of the city integrated coastal management (ICM) plan pursuant to
areas EO 533
Low productivity of
coastal/marine resources Enactment of local fishery code in conformity with ra8550
Reduction of income of
maricultures
Identification and designation of appropriate Use Zone ( ex. Recreational, mariculture areas,
marine protected areas, marine parks, marine reserves, navigational lanes, fishing grounds, eco-
tourism destination sites, docking areas) and formulate coastal use management plan to be
Loss of biodiversity integrated in the CLUP
No designated docking Implementation of coastal use management plan integrated in the CLUP
areas for fishermen
Creation of Bantay
Kalikasan task force at
Brgy level
Timber poaching in Denuded forest Provisions of livelihood project in the upland barangays
the hinterland
barangays
Tree planting and growing
Strict regulation on
pesticide use
Promotion of organic
farming
Unregulated Depletion of ground water, Creation of city Strict regulation in putting Require owners of deep Monitoring of deep
extraction of salt water contamination water resources up of deep wells ( NWRB wells to plug abandoned wells
ground water (salinity intrusion), and board to look into permit) wells in order to prevent
ground subsidence deep wells further contamination of
neighboring deep wells.
Create Solid-Waste
Management Board
Lack of area for Congested and flood prone Multi-storey or Establish public
public burial sites burial site multi-level crematorium and
entombment columbarium
Lack of parks and Low performance on basic Improvement of Development of Identify area for
playgrounds, education indicators existing facilities additional facilities the construction of
sports, camping sports dome and
grounds and other its facilities
recreational
High incidence of life-style
facilities
diseases
Delayed response to
emergency call
Deprivation of senior
citizen’s need for
socialization and active
community involvement
Inaccessible health
services
Annexes
Annex A
Resilient
Built Environment 15 0.3 0.3 0.45
Sustainable
Diverse
Resilient
Progressive
Local Governance 30 0.9 0.9 0.6
Good
Resilient
Progressive
TOTAL 100 2.7 2.55 2.55
1
RANK CHOSEN tie tie
STRATEGY
Annex B
Policy Adjustments
Efficiency of Action
Resource Needed
Changes Needed
exposure/risk to
Urgency of DRR
Consequence of
exposure/risk to
Mngt of Actions
Implementation
Development
Total Score
Potential to
life to
No Action
Land Use
Preferred
Impact to
Negative
property
reduced
reduced
Needed
Needed
Ease of
Potential
Action
Action
-1.1 -1.2 -1.3 -2.1 -2.2 -2.3 -3.1 -3.2 -3.3 -3.4 -3.5
1. Enactment of city
ordinance to implement
the no build zone policy
in geohazard areas and
heritage areas
5 5 5 5 3 1 1 5 5 5 5 45
Implementation of Early
Warning system at the
Brgy level
5 3 5 5 3 1 5 2 2 3 5 39
Delineate no build
zones
5 5 5 5 3 1 1 5 5 5 5 45
Enactment of city
ordinance to implement
20-meter legal
easement
3 3 3 3 5 3 1 5 5 5 5 41
Removal/relocation of
informal settlers.
5 5 5 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 4 33
Demolition of illegal
structure after due
process
3 3 3 3 5 3 1 5 5 5 5 41
Identification, survey
and evaluation of
existing old structure
and heritage site both
natural and built with
historical accounts
1 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 3 20
Implementation of
heritage act pursuant to
RA 1601
1 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 3 20
Integration to the
strategy of the Tourism
program of the city
1 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 3 20
Preservation and
enhancement of
approved cultural
heritage sites and
structures
1 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 3 20
Review of existing
policies/guidelines on
issuance of tenurial
instruments to
timberland areas and
submit findings and
recommendation to
harmonize the
implementation of the
IPRA law. (Adaptation-
Non structural)
1 1 1 3 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 26
Formulation of the city
Integrated Coastal
Management (ICM)
Plan pursuant to EO
533
5 5 5 5 5 1 2 4 2 4 5 43
Enactment of local
fishery code in
conformity with RA
8550
1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 20
Identification and
designation of
appropriate Use Zone (
ex. Recreational,
mariculture areas,
marine protected areas,
marine parks, marine
reserves, navigational
lanes, fishing grounds,
eco-tourism destination
sites, docking areas)
and formulate coastal
use management plan
to be integrated in the
CLUP
3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 27
Implementation of
coastal use
management plan
5 5 5 5 5 1 2 4 2 4 5 43
Conduct massive
assessment and
inventory of
abandoned fishpond
and enact ordinance on
conversion of the same
to mangrove area
2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 4 5 34
Reversion of
abandoned fishpond
areas to mangrove
rehabilitation areas
4 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 5 5 5 44
Preparation and
adoption of watershed
management plan
5 5 5 5 5 4 2 4 4 5 5 49
Restore water quality
based on its most
beneficial
use/designated
classification
5 1 1 5 5 1 2 4 4 5 5 38
Formulation of CdeO
and Iponan River
Rehabilitation Plan
5 5 5 5 5 1 4 4 4 3 5 46
Reforestation/protection Severe Affe
in watershed areas to flooding cts
improve vegetative downstream built-
cover up
areas
5 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 3 4 5 48
Establishment of
protected areas
5 5 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 5 45
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 51
Provisions of livelihood
project in the upland
barangays
3 3 3 4 5 1 3 4 2 3 5 36
Enactment of septage
management
ordinance.
4 3 4 5 3 2 2 1 1 4 5 34
2 2 4 4 5 1 3 2 2 4 5 34
Strict enforcement of
PD 1096 and other
related laws that
require all hotels,
malls, hospitals, and
similar commercial and
industrial
establishments to put
up their own sewerage
treatment as a
requirement in building
permit issuance
4 3 4 5 5 1 5 1 1 1 5 35
Require plantations and
individual farms to
implement best
management practices
3 1 3 3 3 1 4 2 2 2 4 28
Strict regulation on
pesticide use
4 1 4 4 4 1 4 4 2 2 4 34
Promotion of organic
farming
4 1 4 3 4 1 4 3 3 3 4 34
Strict enforcement of
sanitation code (thru
barangay enforcement)
5 1 5 5 4 1 4 3 3 3 5 39
5 5 5 5 5 4 2 4 3 3 5 46
Deputize barangay
officials to enforce
mining laws.
5 5 5 5 5 4 2 4 3 3 5 46
Establishment of MRF
for every barangay or
cluster of barangays to
include hazardous
wastes (busted lamps,
used cellphone
batteries, etc.).
4 2 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 37
IEC on SWM
4 2 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 37
Strict enforcement of
Ecological Solid Waste
Management Act/City
Segregation Ordinance
4 2 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 37
Improve collection of
garbage
4 2 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 37
Enforce waste
segregation at source
(no segregation, no
collection policy)
4 2 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 37
4 2 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 37
Passage of an
ordinance in
accordance with RA
9003 and enforcement
of ordinance at the
barangay level.
4 2 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 37
Ban open burning
3 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 32
Intensify the conduct of
IEC on effects of open
burning
3 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 32
Intensify anti smoke
belching drive to be
undertaken by LGU (by
entering into a MOA
with LTO).
3 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 32
Operationalize
multisectoral CDO
airshed management
(RA 8749- clean air act)
3 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 32
Conduct Carbon
Reduction Initiative
3 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 32
Strengthen motor
vehicle inspection
system (MVIS) thru
LTO to check vehicle
condition prior to
registration.
3 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 32
Collaboration of LTO
and LGU in monitoring
smoke belchers
3 2 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 3 4 32
Adopt multi-storey or
multi-level entombment
3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 33
Establish public
crematorium and
columbarium
3 2 3 3 3 3 2 5 3 3 3 33
Identify additional burial
sites not prone to
flooding
3 2 3 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 37
Improvement of existing
facilities (parks and
playgrounds)
2 2 2 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 34
Development of
additional facilities
(parks and
playgrounds)
2 2 2 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 34
Identify area for the
construction of sports
dome and its facilities
2 2 2 4 4 3 2 5 4 4 4 36
Identify appropriate
areas for the
construction of
protective and social
welfare services
facilities
2 2 2 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 37
Annex C
Annex D
Temperature
From 1981 to 2010, the City has an annual mean temperature of 26.8 °C
while the average relative humidity is 81%. Figure 4 shows the average
temperature for each month in CDO. The hottest months are April, May, and
June while the coldest months are December, January, and February. The
data was obtained from the PAGASA station in Lumbia Airport.
25.0
24.5
24.0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Source: PAGASA
Rainfall
The figure below shows the average monthly rainfall and the average number
of rainy days in Cagayan de Oro City from 1981-2010.
14
200.0
12
10 150.0
8
100.0
6
4
50.0
2
0 0.0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Month
Source: PAGASA
PAGASA data shows that total annual average rainfall in Cagayan De Oro
from 1981-2010 is 1,703.3 mm. Further, PAGASA reveals that from June to
November which is rainy season, the average rainfall per month is 184.43
mm. From December to May which is dry season, the average rainfall per
month is 95.66 mm.
CDO usually experiences rainfall that would last for about two hours followed
by moderate to rains. MGB’s rainfall record in the upstream section of
Cagayan River is 140 mm annually while average annual precipitation
computed from monthly average for a ten-year period (2001-2011) is 1,540.98
mm of which 72 % falls during June to November and the remainder during
the dry period December to May.
Extreme Events
Increase in Temperature
Meanwhile, the figure below shows an increasing trend in the City’s monthly
average temperature per projections of PAGASA. This data is depicting a
hotter and warmer summer season which may have negative implications
primarily in the planting and harvesting activities of farming communities.
Projected
ProjectedChange
Change in in Monthly
Monthly Average
Average Temperature
Mean Temperature (°C)
under Medium-range Emission
Cagayan de Oro City Scenario (A1B)
Cagayan de Oro
32
31
Degree Centigrade (°C)
30
29
28 OBS
2020
27
2050
26
25
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Source: PAGASA
Despite the 3.7% projected decrease in rainfall for (JJA) season, its normal
rainfall amount has been considerably high (615.7 mm). The projections for
average monthly rainfall volume are highest during the months of June to
October as shown in the figure below. These can be associated with the
southwest monsoon, locally known as “Habagat”, which is characterized by
strong southwest breeze that is responsible for bringing significant rainfall in
the Philippines. It is a predominant weather pattern from late May through
early October.
250.0
200.0
Rainfall Amount (mm)
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
OBSERVED BASELINE (1971-2000) 2020 (2006-2035) 2050 (2036-2065)
Source: PAGASA
The decreasing trend in rainfall is not only projected for Cagayan de Oro City
but the whole of Mindanao.
Aside from the observed rainfall changes, the increasing trend in the
frequency of occurrence of extreme events, including the episodes of El Nino
and La Nina phenomenon, poses threat in the City. PAGASA projections
revealed that the number of days with maximum temperature greater than 35
°C will increase to 4539 days and 6180 days in 2020 and 2050, respectively.
Further, the current observation of dry days for the same time period has
reached 8521 while the projected figure is 6413 days in 2020 and is expected
to increase to 7060 days in 2050. Further, the projected number of days that
will pour a rainfall amounting to more than 150 mm will be 13 days in 2020
and 9 days in 2050. Projections on change in temperature and total frequency
of extreme events are presented in the table below.
Source: PAGASA
Annex E
Workshop Pictures