Giant human remains found in Georgia

<photo id=”1″ />

Georgia Giant human remains found in Georgia.

Mon 05 September 2011 05:52 GMT | 0:52 Local Time

Relics of giant man found in Georgia.

Relics of a giant man of 2.5-3 meter height were found in the Southern Georgia. The bones
found are dating 25,000 years back.

Georgian academic Abesal Vekua called the discovery a sensational one.

“The discovery is a sensation as scientific circles have for many years run discussions on giants
living in the regions of Eurasia,” Georgia online reports.

According to Vekua, those people lived and developed separate from civilizations. Scientific
literature mentions them as giants though no facts prove this hypothesis.
I'm not fond of posting pictures that are supposed to prove a contentious point as I
think the arguments should be more cogent than just the visual evidence. Accusations
of photographic tampering are not very fruitful so instead of these photographs it's
the discussions I've been listening to over the last couple of weeks that have aroused
my curiosity and the photos just happened to have turned up in a post this morning so
I'm going to use them. 

I absolutely don't trust the Smithsonian version of history which aims to keep us
ignorant of so much, and detached from the rapidly accumulating evidence for a
much longer and more cosmic human history on this planet.

Yesterday's interview with Alex Putney by Red Ice Radio pointed out that for dinosaurs
to have existed, the size of heart required to push the blood up a brontosaurus neck
would pop that head off the end of presumably the longest and bloodiest stump in
history. Either that or eight normal sized hearts would need to be lined up the neck to
ensure blood delivery. That physics and biology problem was answered best so far by
Clif High in the interview I posted last week in which he explains that the expando
earth model is the most plausible solution for giants dinosaurs (and humans) living on
our planet because gravity is reduced on a smaller planetary sphere. 

It's simple, it's very appealing and also it would explain why both the dinosaurs and
the giants died out.
I'm not fond of posting pictures that are supposed to prove a contentious point as I
think the arguments should be more cogent than just the visual evidence. Accusations
of photographic tampering are not very fruitful so instead of these photographs it's
the discussions I've been listening to over the last couple of weeks that have aroused
my curiosity and the photos just happened to have turned up in a post this morning so
I'm going to use them. 

I absolutely don't trust the Smithsonian version of history which aims to keep us
ignorant of so much, and detached from the rapidly accumulating evidence for a
much longer and more cosmic human history on this planet.

Yesterday's interview with Alex Putney by Red Ice Radio pointed out that for dinosaurs
to have existed, the size of heart required to push the blood up a brontosaurus neck
would pop that head off the end of presumably the longest and bloodiest stump in
history. Either that or eight normal sized hearts would need to be lined up the neck to
ensure blood delivery. That physics and biology problem was answered best so far by
Clif High in the interview I posted last week in which he explains that the expando
earth model is the most plausible solution for giants dinosaurs (and humans) living on
our planet because gravity is reduced on a smaller planetary sphere. 

It's simple, it's very appealing and also it would explain why both the dinosaurs and
the giants died out.
I'm not fond of posting pictures that are supposed to prove a contentious point as I
think the arguments should be more cogent than just the visual evidence. Accusations
of photographic tampering are not very fruitful so instead of these photographs it's
the discussions I've been listening to over the last couple of weeks that have aroused
my curiosity and the photos just happened to have turned up in a post this morning so
I'm going to use them. 

I absolutely don't trust the Smithsonian version of history which aims to keep us
ignorant of so much, and detached from the rapidly accumulating evidence for a
much longer and more cosmic human history on this planet.

Yesterday's interview with Alex Putney by Red Ice Radio pointed out that for dinosaurs
to have existed, the size of heart required to push the blood up a brontosaurus neck
would pop that head off the end of presumably the longest and bloodiest stump in
history. Either that or eight normal sized hearts would need to be lined up the neck to
ensure blood delivery. That physics and biology problem was answered best so far by
Clif High in the interview I posted last week in which he explains that the expando
earth model is the most plausible solution for giants dinosaurs (and humans) living on
our planet because gravity is reduced on a smaller planetary sphere. 

It's simple, it's very appealing and also it would explain why both the dinosaurs and
the giants died out.

UFOs - Return of the

Nephilim (Bible Verses
About Giants)? Bones of
Giants in Ohio? - World
Wide
Femur (upper leg bone) -- But thigh bone of WHAT?
 NEPHILIM - GENESIS 6 "SONS OF GOD" (FALLEN ANGELS)
BREEDING WITH HUMAN WOMEN RESULTING IN GIANTS

Subjects like UFOs, Giant Humanoids -

Nephilim (Strong's Concordance 5303,
Hebrew - nĕphiyl) - rendered Giants in the King
James Bible KJB, are interesting to some
folks, but avoided by other folks.
Many researchers say these things are true,
some say they are hoaxes.
In viewing Dr. Chuck Missler's video, listed
below, I discovered there is a terrific
secrecy method called "Active Disinformation
Strategy."
The Devil and his helpers, human and
otherwise, want supernatural things, especially
about them and their activities, kept a deep
secret.
Governments, corporations, etc., also want
some things kept as highly classified secrets.
The Active Disinformation Strategy will
deliberately "surface" documents or
evidences which are deliberately, but
subtly, flawed -- so investigators will conclude
the subjects are hoaxes.
This provides "perfect cover" -- because people
will figure that the thing has been "debunked,"
and will stop paying attention.
Thus, there can, indeed, be UFO hoaxes, and
real UFOs, giant bone skeletons of giants
(Nephilim) hoaxes, and real bones from real
Nephilim, crop circle hoaxes, and real crop

circles, etc., etc.

I’m often amazed at our lack of knowledge about history. Ordinary people are
hungry for this information, yet the organizations responsible to disseminate
these facts seem to have an agenda to keep us in the dark. This is especially
true when it comes to our ancient human history.

I won’t hold you in suspense with this article: The Ark of Noah has been
found. It’s real. I’ll describe the evidence in some detail and end with the
historical and religious implications.

How It Was Discovered

In 1959, Turkish army captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape

while examining aerial photographs of his country. The smooth shape, larger
than a football field, stood out from the rough and rocky terrain at an altitude
of 6,300 feet near the Turkish border with Iran.

Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

Capt. Durupinar was familiar with the biblical accounts of the Ark and its
association with Mount Ararat in Turkey, but he was reluctant to jump to any
conclusions. The region was very remote, yet it was inhabited with small
villages. No previous reports of an object this odd had been made before. So
he forwarded the photographic negative to a famous aerial photography expert
named Dr. Brandenburger, at Ohio State University.

Brandenburger was responsible for discovering the Cuban missile bases

during the Kennedy era from reconnaissance photos, and after carefully
studying the photo, he concluded: “I have no doubt at all, that this object is a
ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo
photo.”
Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

In 1960 the picture [above] was published in LIFE magazine under the
heading of Noahs Ark? That same year a group of Americans accompanied
Capt. Durupinar to the site for a day and a half. They were expecting to find
artifacts on the surface or something that would be unquestionably related to a
ship of some kind. They did some digging in the area but found nothing
conclusive and announced to the anxiously waiting world that it appeared to
be a natural formation.

Most of the global media turned away from the find and it became a non-
story.

In 1977 Ron Wyatt visited the site. Obtaining official permission, Ron and
others conducted more thorough research over a period of several years. They
used metal detection surveys, subsurface radar scans, and chemical analysis
— real science — and their findings were startling. The evidence was
undeniable. This was the Ark of Noah.

The Visual Evidence

The first part of the survey was to examine the object and take its
measurements. The shape looked like hull of a ship. One end was pointed as
you would expect from bow [below: D] and the opposite end was blunt like a
stern. The distance from bow to stern was 515 feet, or exactly 300 Egyptian
cubits. The average width was 50 cubits. These were the exact measurements
mentioned in the Bible.
Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

On the starboard side (right) near the stern there were four vertical bulges
protruding from the mud [B], at regular intervals, that were determined to be
the “ribs” of the hull [see below]. Opposite to these, on the port side, a single
rib [A] protrudes from the mud. You can see its curved shape very clearly.
Surrounding it are more ribs, still largely buried in the mud, but visible upon
close examination.

Remember that this object, if it is the Ark, is extremely old. The wood has
been petrified. Organic matter has been replaced by minerals from the earth.
Only the shapes and traces of the original wood remain. Perhaps this is why
the expedition in 1960 was disappointed. They anticipated finding and
retrieving chucks of wood, long since eroded.
Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

From the position of the object in the middle of an obvious mud flow, it is
obvious that the object slid down more than a mile from its original location.
Geologists believe it was originally over 1000 feet higher in the mountain and
encased in a shell of hardened mud. They think that an earthquake in 1948
cracked the mud shell and revealed the structure. This is confirmed by stories
from the surrounding villagers who tell of its “sudden appearance” around that
time.

Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

Biblical accounts of the Ark describe it as having as many as six levels. The
assumed shape of the Ark seems consistent with the bulge [C] in the middle of
the object. In fact, as we will soon learn, radar scans of the structure suggest
that this bulge is the collapsed debris of these levels.

Although most people think of the Ark as being rectangular, that only applies
to the top decks. The sleek shape of the hull is necessary to enable the huge
ship to remain stable in the water and survive tremendous waves.

Ground Penetrating Radar

The human eye needs to see reflected light to recognize an object. To

visualize what remains below the earth, scientists use microwaves which can
penetrate the ground and bounce back when they hit something solid. This
technique is commonly used to locate oil and other minerals. Called Ground
Penetrating Radar (GPR), the apparatus us made from an antenna that
transmits, then listens to receive the “echo” and prints the result on a piece of
paper. The delay and strength of this echo tell the geologists how solid and at
what depth the objects are under the earth.

Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

The team of geologists didn’t scan the entire object. Instead, they marked out
lines that crossed the object with yellow tape. Then they dragged the antenna
(about the size of a lawnmower) over the lines and watched the output on the
paper recorder. When they got a strong “hit” — meaning there was something
solid underneath — they would record the position on the tape [above]. Later,
when they made a map of the object, the tape and the location of the “hits”
they realized that there was indeed a structure underneath the mud.

“This data does not represent natural geology. These are man made structures.
These reflections are appearing too periodic… too periodic to be random in
that type of natural pace.” – Ron Wyatt of SIR Imaging team

Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

The radar cans revealed this structure [above] under the mud. The symmetry
and logical placement of these objects shows that this is unmistakably a man
made structure, most likely the Ark of Noah.

Artifacts Retrieved From The Ark

Using the GPR, Ron Wyatt discovered an open cavity on the starboard side.
He used an improvised drill to make core sample inside this cavity and
retrieved several very interesting objects. Below you can see the artifacts
which were sent for laboratory analysis. On the left is the bore hole [see
below], followed by what turned out to be petrified animal dung, then a
petrified antler and lastly a piece of cat hair.

Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

Perhaps the most significant find from the Ark itself is a piece of petrified
wood. When this was first found it appeared to be a large beam. But upon
closer examination it is actually three pieces of plank that have been laminated
together with some kind of organic glue! This is the same technology used in
modern plywood. Lamination makes the total strength of the wood much
greater than the combined strength of the pieces. This suggests a knowledge
of construction far beyond anything we knew existed in the ancient world.

Tests by Galbraith Labs in Knoxville, Tennessee, showed the sample to

contain over 0.7% organic carbon, consistent with fossilized wood. The
specimen was once living matter.
Photo:http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

Examination reveals the glue oozed from the layers. The outside of the wood
appears to have been coated with bitumen.

Even more surprising were laboratory analyses which not only revealed that
the petrified wood contained carbon (proving it was once wood) but there
were iron nails [above right] embedded in the wood!

We like to imagine that humanity evolved in a neat sequence of eras, each

named after the technology that was discovered. We have the Stone Age
(where man developed arrows and stone tools), the Bronze Age (where metals
were combined and heated to make tools and household items) and lastly the
Iron Age (where iron and steel objects were made by heating iron ore and
adding other material — like charcoal — to strengthen it). The Iron Age is
usually placed at 1200-1000 BC, yet we have iron nails being used in this
extremely old construction

But Wait… There’s More!

The most surprising find was discovered with sensitive metal detectors. The
team located several strong “hits” that, when dug up, revealed large disc
shaped rivets. From simple observation of the metal it was possible to see
where the rivet had been hammered after being inserted through a hole
[below].

Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

If rivets being used in ancient construction doesn’t impress you, this surely
will.

An analysis of the metal used to make the rivets revealed that they were a
combination of iron (8.38%), aluminum (8.35%) and titanium (1.59%).
Remember these trace metals have survived petrification and so do not
indicate the exact content in the original material. (see Report from Galbraith
Labs)

We know the aluminum was incorporated in the metallic mixture because it

does not exist in metallic form in nature. This implies an extremely advanced
knowledge of metallurgy and engineering. Characteristics of an iron-
aluminum alloy have been investigated in The Russian Chemical
Bulletin (2005) and reveal that this alloy forms a thin film of aluminum oxide
which protects the material from rust and corrosion. The addition of titanium
would provide added strength. This seems to have worked. The rivets have
survived from antiquity!

The Surrounding Areas

Several miles from the location of the Ark, huge stones were discovered, some
standing upright while others lying on the ground. These stones, weighing
many tons, have holes carved in them. Scientists have determined that they
were anchors and the holes would have been their attachment to a ship with
hemp rope.

Photo: http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html

Often these stones will have crosses carved in them, from centuries ago when
pilgrims made the journey to visit the Ark. Yes, the Ark was well known in
the Middle Ages and even before. And its location was recorded in many
historical documents.

Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2013/12/noahs-ark-found-keeping-us-

dark/