Optoelectronics: Wave Nature of Light (II)
Optoelectronics: Wave Nature of Light (II)
Email: [email protected]
Website: https://charuslukv.wordpress.com
Snell’s law
The waves 𝐴𝑡 and 𝐵𝑡 have different velocities
than 𝐴𝑖 and 𝐵𝑖 .
𝐴𝑡
Refracted light 𝝀𝑡 𝒌𝑡
If it takes time 𝑡 for the phase at 𝐵 to reach 𝐵′
(Transmitted light) 𝐵𝑡 and the phase 𝐴 has progressed to 𝐴′ .
𝑦 𝐴′ 𝑐𝑡 𝑐𝑡
𝐵𝐵′ = 𝑣1 𝑡 = and 𝐴𝐴′ = 𝑣2 𝑡 =
𝜃𝑡 𝜃𝑡 𝑛2 𝑛1 𝑛2
𝑧 𝐴 𝐵′
𝑛1 > 𝑛2
𝜃𝑖 𝜃𝑟 𝜃𝑖 𝜃𝑟 From geometrical considerations;
𝐴′′ 𝐵
𝝀
𝒌𝑖
𝝀 𝐵𝐵′ 𝐴𝐴′
𝐴𝐵′ = and 𝐴𝐵′ =
sin 𝜃𝑖 sin 𝜃𝑡
𝒌𝑟
𝐴𝑖 𝐵𝑟
𝑣1 𝑡 𝑣2 𝑡
Incident light 𝐵𝑖 𝐴𝑟 Reflected light 𝐴𝐵′ = =
sin 𝜃𝑖 sin 𝜃𝑡
https://charuslukv.wordpress.com 2182580 Optoelectronics 2
Snell’s law 𝐴𝐵′ =
𝑣1 𝑡
=
𝑣2 𝑡
sin 𝜃𝑖 sin 𝜃𝑡
Snell’s law;
sin 𝜃𝑖 𝑣1 𝑛2
= =
sin 𝜃𝑡 𝑣2 𝑛1
Refracted light
𝑦
(Transmitted light)
𝑧 𝐴
𝜃𝑡 𝑛2 When the refraction angle 𝜃𝑡 reaches 90°, the
𝜃𝑐 𝜃𝑐
𝑛1 > 𝑛2 incidence angle is called the critical angle, 𝜃𝑐 ,
𝑛2
sin 𝜃𝑐 =
𝑛1
Incident light Reflected light
𝑧 𝐴
𝑛2 When the refraction angle 𝜃𝑡 reaches 90°, the
𝑛1 > 𝑛2 incidence angle is called the critical angle, 𝜃𝑐 ,
𝜃𝑖 > 𝜃𝑐
𝑛2
sin 𝜃𝑐 =
Incident light Reflected light 𝑛1
When the incidence angle 𝜃𝑖 exceeds 𝜃𝑐 then
Total internal reflection there is no transmitted wave but only a
reflected wave.
https://charuslukv.wordpress.com 2182580 Optoelectronics 4
Fresnel’s equation
To obtain the magnitude of the reflected and refracted waves, electric field in
the light wave must be considered.
𝑧 Direction
Incident plane
The plane of incidence is defined as the plane containing the incident
and the reflected rays.
𝑦
Transmitted
𝐸𝑡,∥ wave Evanescent
𝑦
𝒌𝑡 wave
𝜃𝑡 𝑛2
𝑧 𝐸𝑖,∥ 𝐸𝑡,⊥ 𝐸𝑖,∥
𝒌𝑖 𝐸𝑟,⊥ 𝑛1 > 𝑛2
𝜃𝑖 𝜃𝑟 𝐸𝑟,⊥ 𝜃𝑖 𝜃𝑟
𝒌𝑖
𝒌𝑟
𝒌𝑟 𝐸𝑖,⊥
𝐸𝑖,⊥ 𝐸 𝐸𝑟,∥
𝑟,∥
Incident Incident Reflected
Reflected
wave wave wave
wave
𝜃𝑖 < 𝜃𝑐 𝜃𝑖 > 𝜃𝑐
𝐸𝑡0,⊥ 2 cos 𝜃𝑖
𝑡⊥ = =
𝐸𝑡0,⊥ cos 𝜃𝑖 + 𝑛2 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝜃𝑖 1/2
𝑛2
where the relative refractive index 𝑛 =
𝑛1
𝐸𝑡0,∥ 2𝑛 cos 𝜃𝑖
𝑡∥ = = 2
𝐸𝑡0,∥ 𝑛 cos 𝜃𝑖 + 𝑛2 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝜃𝑖 1/2
𝑛1 − 𝑛2
𝑟 = 𝑟∥ = 𝑟⊥ =
𝑛1 + 𝑛2
2𝑛1
𝑡 = 𝑡∥ = 𝑡⊥ =
𝑛1 + 𝑛2
For a light wave traveling with a velocity 𝑣 in a medium with relative permittivity 𝜀𝑟 ,
the light intensity 𝐼 is defined in terms of the electric field amplitude 𝐸.
1
𝐼 = 𝑣𝜀0 𝜀𝑟 𝐸 2
2
𝐼≈ 𝐸 2
• the reflection coefficients can be complex numbers that can represent phase changes,
reflectance is necessarily real numbers representing intensity changes.
• The transmitted wave is in a different medium and also that its direction with respect
to the boundary is different from that of the incident wave by virtue of refraction.
• For normal incidence: 𝜃𝑖 = 0
𝑛2 2
4𝑛1 𝑛2
𝑇= 𝑡 = 2
𝑛1 𝑛1 + 𝑛2
𝑅+𝑇 =1
This means that 30% of the light is reflected and is not available for conversion to
electrical energy.
Fraunhofer diffraction:
The incident light beam is a plane wave and the observation or detection of
the light intensity pattern is done far away from the aperture.
Inserting a lens between the aperture and the photographic screen enables
the screen to be closer to the aperture.
Fresnel diffraction:
The incident light beam and the received light waves are not plane waves
but have significant wavefront curvatures. Typically, the light source and the
screen are both close to the aperture so that the wavefronts are curved.
Knowing the wave front of the light at a certain location, the new wavefront
can be reconstructed old wave front by combining point sources located on the
previous wave front.
𝑓(𝑥′)
𝐷/2
𝑧
−𝐷/2
𝑧
𝑆1
∆𝜃
𝑆2
1.22𝜆
sin ∆𝜃 =
𝑛𝑑
One possible
𝑦 diffracted beam Diffraction grating with 𝑁 slits in an opaque
screen. Slit periodicity is 𝑑 and slit width is 𝑎;
𝑎 𝑎 ≪ 𝑑.
Incident
light wave An incident beam of light is diffracted in certain
well defined directions that depend on the
wavelength and the grating properties.
𝑑 𝜃 𝑧
𝑑 𝜃 𝑧
𝑑 sin 𝜃
Intensity
Strong beams of diffracted light” along certain directions (𝜃)
are labeled according to their occurrence: zero-order (center),
first-order and so on.
https://charuslukv.wordpress.com 2189341 Material Characterisation 30
Diffraction grating
Waves emanating at an angle 𝜃 from two neighboring slits are out of phase by
an amount that corresponds to an optical path difference 𝑑 sin 𝜃.
One possible All such waves from pairs of slits will interfere
𝑦 diffracted beam
constructively when this is a multiple of the
whole wavelength.
𝑎
Incident
light wave 𝑑 sin 𝜃 = 𝑚𝜆
Incident
light wave
Transmission grating
𝜃𝑚
𝜃𝑖
Incident
Reflected grating
light wave
https://charuslukv.wordpress.com 2189341 Material Characterisation 32
Absorption of light and complex refractive index
When light propagates through a material it becomes attenuated in the direction
of propagation.
𝐸 The attenuation coefficient 𝛼 is defined
as the fractional decrease in the
𝒌 irradiance 𝐼 of a wave per unit distance
along the direction of propagation 𝑧.
𝑧 𝑑𝐼
𝛼=−
𝐼𝑑𝑧
If the attenuation of the wave is due to
absorption only, then 𝛼 is the absorption
Attenuation of a traveling wave in a medium
coefficient.
results in the decay of its amplitude.
https://charuslukv.wordpress.com 2189341 Material Characterisation 33
Absorption of light and complex refractive index
Suppose that 𝑘0 is the propagation constant in vacuum. This is a real quantity as a
plane wave suffers no loss in free space.
The complex refractive index, 𝑛, with a real part, 𝑛, and imaginary part, 𝜅, is
defined as the ratio of the complex propagation constant in a medium to
propagation constant in free space.
𝑘 1 ′
𝑛 = 𝑛 − 𝑖𝜅 = = 𝑘 − 𝑖𝑘′′ In the absence of attenuation,
𝑘0 𝑘0
𝑘 ′′ = 0 𝑘 = 𝑘′
𝑘′ 𝑘′′ and
𝑛= and 𝜅=
𝑘0 𝑘0
𝑛 = 𝑛
Refractive index Extinction coefficient
(Real part) (Imaginary part)
https://charuslukv.wordpress.com 2189341 Material Characterisation 34
Absorption of light and complex refractive index
In the absence of loss, the relationship between the refractive index 𝑛 and the
relative permittivity 𝜀𝑟 is
1/2
𝑛 = 𝜀𝑟
In the presence of loss, the relationship between the complex refractive index 𝑛
and the relative permittivity 𝜀𝑟 is
𝑛 = 𝑛 − 𝑖𝜅 = 𝜀𝑟 = 𝜀𝑟′ − 𝑖𝜀𝑟′′
1 − 𝑛 + 𝑖𝜅
𝑟=
1 + 𝑛 − 𝑖𝜅
2 2
𝑛 − 𝑖𝜅 − 1 𝑛−1 + 𝜅2
𝑅= = 2 + 𝜅2
𝑛 − 𝑖𝜅 + 1 𝑛+1