MGEC Final Exam
MGEC Final Exam
1. Please answer all questions. If you want, you can choose to skip a question an come back
to it later.
2. This exam is open book and open notes. You can use on screen calculators.
3. There are 10 questions of 10 marks each. Each question has sub-questions. The part
marking for each sub-question is indicated on the side in square bracket.
4. These are all MCQ. You have to separately upload you rough worksheet. Although rough
work will not be evaluated. Please write legibly.
5. The exam is completely self-explanatory. If you think something is not right or needs to
be clarified, make an assumption and proceed. Please make sure that you clearly state
(make a box around it) any assumptions you make in your rough worksheet.
1
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
To be filled by Students
First Name
Last Name
PGP ID
Pledge:I have neither given nor taken any help for this exam.
Sign the above pledge here:
For Evaluators
Page 2 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 1 (10 points)
New Yorkers rely on the Hudson River for a large share of their drinking water. As such they
like the water to be clean and free of toxins and incur significant costs for purification if the
river is polluted. Factories upstream produce plastics and chemicals and often use the Hudson
as a giant drain for their effluents. The effluent level is directly proportionate to the production
level of a factory. Since New Yorkers suffer as a consequence, there is considerable litigation
between the upstream factories and the downstream cities about the level of effluents. Consider
the following costs and benefits of effluents.
(b) With bargaining, if city residents have a right to clean water, what will be the level of
effluents? [2 points]
(c) With bargaining, if city residents have a right to clean water, what is the minimum amount
the factories have to pay to the city? [2 points]
Page 3 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
1. 60 MM
2. 108 MM
3. 52 MM
4. 96 MM
(d) Before the enactment of clean water laws in the 1970s, factories had the right to dump
waste in rivers. If back then residents wanted cleaner water and engaged in bargaining with the
factories what would be the level of effluents? [2 points]
(e) If the residents engaged in bargaining with the factories what is the minimum amount the
city would have to pay to the factories? [2 points]
1. 60 MM
2. 108 MM
3. 52 MM
4. 96 MM
Page 4 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 2 (10 points) The market for cigarettes in Mohali is perfectly competitive. The de-
mand for cigarettes in Mohali is given by 20QD = 300 − P , where price (P) is measured in
rupees per packet of cigarette and quantity (Q ) is measured in thousands of packets. The ag-
gregate supply curve of cigarettes is known as P = 50 + 5QS .
(a) What is the equilibrium quantity of cigarettes consumed in this market? [2 points]
1. 8 thousands of packets
2. 10 thousands of packets
3. 12 thousands of packets
4. 15 thousands of packets
A researcher from the Max Institute of Health Care at ISB reports a strong link between
cigarettes consumption and lung cancer among children due to passive smoking, implying that
consumption of cigarettes causes a negative externality. The researcher has calculated that
the cost of the externality is |50 per packet of cigarettes. As a result, the municipality has
recommended imposing a tax of |50 per packet. Determine:
(b) What is the new equilibrium quantity of cigarettes consumed in this market? [2 points]
1. 6 thousands of packets
2. 8 thousands of packets
3. 10 thousands of packets
4. 12 thousands of packets
Page 5 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
2. Rs. 70 per packet
(e) What is the new equilibrium tax revenue received by the city. [2 points]
1. Rs. 400000
2. Rs. 500000
3. Rs. 200000
4. Rs. 300000
Page 6 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 3 (10 points)
Firms Alpha and Apple serve the same market. They have constant average costs of |2 per
unit. The firms can choose either a high price (|10) or a low price (|5) for their output. When
both firms set a high price, total market demand is 10,000 units which is split evenly between
the two firms. When both set a low price, total demand is 18,000, which is again split evenly.
If one firm sets a low price and the second a high price, the low priced firm sells 15,000 units,
the high priced firm sells only 2,000 units.
Apple
3. Alpha has a dominant strategy but Apple does not have a dominant strategy
Page 7 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 4 (10 points)
Meghan owns a company that produces TV shows and employs her friend Harry. Harry has to
decide whether to pursue a training course to learn the latest television production technology.
The cost of the training to Harry is |1,000. Meghan neither offers the training nor pays for it.
Meghan has to decide whether to pay a fixed wage of |10,000 to Harry or share the profits of the
enterprise 50:50 with him. The gross profit of the company (before paying Harry) is positively
affected by both training and profit sharing. Indeed, with no training and a fixed wage total
profit is |20,000, while if either training or profit sharing is implemented the profit of the com-
pany rises to |22,000. If both training and profit sharing are implemented, the profit is |25,000.
Harry
Training No Training
Page 8 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
1. Yes, fixed wage is the dominant strategy for Megan
(d) What will be the equilibrium strategy profile in this game? [2 points]
Page 9 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 5 (10 points)
A parent and a child are getting ready for the night. The parent moves first and decides whether
to set an alarm or not. The child then decides whether to get up early or not. Getting up early
gives a payoff of 10 to the parent and 0 to the child; conversely, getting up late gives 10 to the
child and 0 to the parent. Setting an alarm costs 2 to the parent. Getting up early costs 1 to the
child. Sleep in costs nothing if the alarm does not ring, but sleep in while the alarm rings has
irritation cost of 15 for the child. The net payoff is the payoff minus the cost. Both parent and
child want to maximize their own individual net payoff.
Get up early a b
Child
Set Alarm
Sleep in
c d
Parent
(b) Solve for the equilibrium outcome using backward induction. [6 points]
2. The parent will set the alarm and the child will wake up early
3. The parent will not set up the alarm and the child will wake up early
4. The parent will set up the alarm and the child will not get up early
Page 10 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 6 (10 points) There are two routes for driving from Hizibizbiz to Golmal Airport. One
is a flyover (F) and the other is a local road (R). The local road takes 1 hour irrespective of
traffic. The flyover can be much faster but the commute time depends on the traffic. Suppose
1000 people play this game - decide which way to take. If x fraction of them take the flyover,
then it takes x hours. A traveler’s utility is the negative of the hours taken to commute.
3. Half of them takes the local road and the other half takes the flyover
(b) In equilibrium, how many hours in total will it take to commute for all the agents? [2
points]
1. 500 hours
2. 1000 hours
3. 750 hours
(c) Suppose that the agents do not use personal cars but use Uber (which decides centrally the
route its cars should take). Uber wants to minimize the total commute time. How many drivers
should Uber send on flyover? [4 points]
2. 250 cars
3. 500 cars
4. 0 cars
(d) What is the total commute time when Uber optimally chooses the traffic? [2 points]
1. 250 hours
2. 500 hoyrs
3. 750 hours
4. 1000 hours
Page 11 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 7 (10 points) Consider the wholesale market for haleem that is a duopoly with two
firms, Shah Ghouse and Pista House. The market demand for haleem is
140 − Q
Q < 140
P=
0
otherwise
The marginal cost of production for both the firm is |20, and the firms can choose any quantity.
1. (30,30)
2. (40,40)
3. (48,48)
(d) Compare the Cournot equilibrium to the perfectly competitive outcome. [1 points]
Page 12 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
3. The Cournot is same as the perfectly competitive output
(f) One possible strategy for each firm is to produce half of the monopolist quantity. This
would increase profit for both of them. Is this a Nash equilibrium? [2 points]
1. Yes
2. No
Page 13 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 8 (10 points)
The managers of two solar power companies Photon Energies and Aditya Power are deciding
to set up solar power plants in Ladakh. The only source of electricity in Ladakh is solar power
and the market demand for electricity is P = 100 − Q , where P is the price per MW and Q
is the demand for energy in MW. You have been hired by Aditya Power for consulting on the
capacity of their plant. Aditya Power has already received the necessary government permis-
sions, and their plant is going to come up before Photon’s plant. However, both the company
will start their production at the same time. Production is completely determined by initial
capacity choice and price of energy is determined by the market. While building the capacity
is expensive, per MW cost of producing solar energy is only |20 for both the firms.
1. qP = 40 − 21 qA
2. qP = 80 − 32 qA
3. qP = 40 − 14 qA
(b) How much capacity should you advice Aditya Power to build? [2 points]
1. 60 MW
2. 50 MW
3. 40 MW
4. 20 MW
1. 30 MW
2. 25 MW
3. 20 MW
4. 10 MW
(d) What is the equilibrium price of solar energy in the market. [2 points]
1. Rs. 50 per MG
Page 14 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
2. Rs. 40 per MW
3. Rs. 30 per MW
4. Rs. 20 per MW
1. Aditya Power’s profit is Rs. 1200 and Photon Energy’s profit is Rs. 600
2. Aditya Power’s profit is Rs. 1000 and Photon Energy’s profit is Rs. 750
3. Aditya Power’s profit is Rs. 800 and Photon Energy’s profit is Rs. 400
4. Aditya Power’s profit is Rs. 900 and Photon Energy’s profit is Rs. 500
Page 15 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 9 (10 points)
Gilbert wants to maximize his expected utility. His preferences are represented by the utility
√
function U(w) = w where w is his monetary payoff. Gilbert is offered the following bet on the
toss of a fair two-sided coin by Anne. If the coin comes up tails, Anne pays Gilbert |10,000. If
the coin comes up heads, Gilbert pays Anne |10,000. Gilbert’s initial wealth is |10,000 which
he retains in its entirety if he does not take the bet.
1. 0
2. 70.71
3. 100
1. risk averse
2. risk neutral
3. risk loving
(d) Given that Gilbert loses his entire |10,000 if the coin comes up heads, what is the smallest
amount that Anne has to pay Gilbert in the event of tails to persuade him to take the bet? [4
points]
1. 30, 000
2. 5, 000
3. 10, 000
Page 16 of 17
Indian School of Business Managerial Economics, 2019-20
Problem 10 (10 points)
ISB Insurers is considering an insurance policy for households that possess |90 lakh worth of
movable valuables. In addition, each household owns immovable assets worth |40 lakh that
burglars cannot steal. Suppose there are two types of households. High-risk households, which
are 50% of all households, face a 40% chance of a burglary. Rest of the households are low-
risk, facing a 20% chance of a burglary. During a burglary, all movable assets are lost. The
√
household’s utility function is given by U(w) = w, where w denotes the total wealth of the
household. The households know if they are high risk or low risk. The insurance company
knows that households have equal probability of being high risk or low risk, but they can’t
distinguish between the two types.
(a) If ISB Insurers were to offer an actuarially fair insurance premium, what would it be? [2
points]
1. |45,000
2. |9 lakhs
3. |27 lakhs
(b) Will high-risk households purchase this insurance policy at the actuarially fair price? [2
points]
1. Yes
2. No
(c) Will low-risk households purchase this insurance policy at the actuarially fair price? [2
points]
1. Yes
2. No
(d) Should the ISB insurer charge the actuarially fair insurance premium as in part (a)? [4
points]
1. Yes
2. No
Page 17 of 17