Introduction To Dropped Call Rate
Introduction To Dropped Call Rate
100 ms _
150
td = average caU delays = 2 (1 - Q.665) - ms
The average deJay on call processing during the busy call equals 150
JJ1S x 0.665 = 100 ms.
When comparing the centralized system with the decentralized ~ys-
we find that in the centralized system the average call delay time
teD1,
. · processmg
h shorter but its · much 1ess. However, the
· capac1·ty 1s
:e:~~ralized system is mo~e flexible, is easier to install, and has a
greater potential for expansion.
ct
Because this percentage is based on many parameters, there is no
analytic equation. But when the number of call drops increases, we
have to find out why and take corrective action. The general rule is
that unless an abnormal situation prevails, call drops usually should
be less than 5 percent.
J~aves celJ site A of system A and enters cell site B of syatem B. Cell
81
tes A and B are oontl'olJed by uv0 d ""' . - · •
unit 8 - aJ b omes weak - tuetent MTSO!. When the mobile
. ign ec in cell site A MTSO A h
clidate cell site in its system and n., searc eg ,or a c~-
the handoff request to MTSO :nnot find one. Then MTSO A sends
MTso A and MTSO B, and MTso th rough a dedicated line betw~en
the call conversation. This is . B makes a complete handoff dunng
st
are many ways of implemenJ: . a one-point connection case. There
the actual circumstances ,:,0 _g mtersystem handoffs, depending on
tured by different companies th
. r, r mstan ·r
ce, 1 two MTSOs are manufac-
before implementation of int en compatibility must be determined
detailed discussion of this top~rsyste m handoff can be considered. A
Ic appears in Sec. 11.4.
-
9.10 Introduction to Dropped Call Rate _.,,,,
/
l
298 Ol'tllJ'f~ ,tf,r,e h ercentage (saY 90%) that all
v1· de ~igna1 _coverAge basebd on at !~en signal level.
• t,he received
_
~ s1gn. J will be a ove 1c,- d adjacent channel 1nterfer-
8 ·
•
l. Pro 1
2 Maintain the spcc1·t, ed co-chflfl11e
. busan hour, i.e., the wors t mterfer-
·
. l vels in each cell dunng a y
ence case.
e ll d pped rate is calculated as pos-
3 Since the perfoflll"-nce of the tcil f~~rn the radio link to the PSTN
· sible call dropping · in cvefY. s age
f the handoff 1n• the network will· be
connection, the response tune osrnall the response time for a hand
a fact-or when tl,e cell becomes • to reduce the call dropped·
rt r in order
1
off request has to be s 10 e
rate. . . ,. A uo a 1gon'th m w1·11 also
f th handoff and the 1vu-u•
O
4_ The s1gnahng e
impact the call dropped rate. ..
The relationship among the voice quality, system capacity and call
· dropped rate can be elCpressed through a common parameter C/I.
5
Relationship among capacity, voice quality, dropped call rate. Radio Ca-
m= Jf(cll:.
where BrfB, is the total number of voice channels. Br!B,
is a given
number, and (C/1) is a required Cll for designing a system. The above
equation is obtained8
based on six co-channel interferers which occur
in busy traffic, i.e., a worst case. In an interference limited system
the adjacent channel interference has only a secondary effect. The der'.
ivation of Eq. (9.10:1) will be e"pressed in Chap. 13. Eq. (9.10-1) can
be changed to the following form:
(C/Ils =~(Br;:} = (!:Y ·;. (9.10-2)
Sine? t~e (C/Ils is a required Gil for designing a system, the voice
the r d" •t . . s 1s reduce d,
quahty 1s based on the (C/1)8 • When the specified (C /I) ·
a io capacr y is mcreased. When the measured (CI I) is less th
!1:U::"cified (C/I)s, both poor voice quality and dropped calls c:::
always
Coverageuses the equal-stren
of 90% coverag : th ;ntour. The coverage in cellular cells
90 t
tion tool (Lee Model) des:;bed::. ~qual-S ~ength contour: The predic-
strength contour at level C with 50 %
ha~- 4 isand
time used to predict
50% area in the equal-
a cell. For
Handoffs and Dropped Calls 299
example,
-120 dBm. let If
C C= ::: 102 dBm, which is 18 dB above the ambient noise
;ncrease the lev - - 102 dBm is 50% equal-strength contour, then
the following eqe 1 C + 10 dB contour which can be calculated from
uation:
P (x' < A) = JA
-oo
1
~CT exp
[(y' - m)2] dy
2CT2
I
(9.10-3)
(9.10-3)
£q.sired signalislevel
the and
cumulat· . .
- . ,ve distribution function where A is the
e mis the mean I I · 1 t £'. d' d
dto terrain contour. If A - C + 10 = -92 eve." ,s ong- erm
dB and CT= 8 dB: ,a ing ue
p =1 - [1 l=I "• .
a)C' P.
(9.11-1)
where (9.11-2)
P. is the probability of a dropped call when the call has gone through
n handoffs and 2 (9.11-3)
X = (1 - 8)(1 - µ)(1 - 6v)(l - ~) •
300 Chapter Nine
& = Probability that the signal is below the specified receive threshold (in a
noise-limited system).
µ. = Probability that the signal is below the specified cochannel interference
level (in an interference-limited syS t em).
T = Probability that no traffic channel is available upon handoff attempt
(1) 2 and 22 are two events, z 1 is the case of no traffic channel in the
c~ll, z2 is the case of no-safe return to original cell. Assuming that
Z1 and Z2 are independent events, then
-. P(z 2lz 1) • P(z 1) = P(z 1) • P(z 1) = 0 • T
I
' (2) (1 - J3) is the probability of a call successfully connecting from the
old BSC to the MSC. Also, (1 - J3) is the probability of a call
successfully connecting from the MSC to the new BSC. Then the
total probability of having a successful call connection is:
(3) The call dropped rate P expressed in Eq. (9.11-1) can be specified
in two cases:
1. In a noise limited system (startup system): there is no fre-
quency reuse, the call dropped rate PA is based on the signal
coverage. It can also be calculated under busy hour conditions.
In a noise-limited environment (for worst case)
6 -- 01
0
T=T}
= e: the conditions for the noise limited case
J3 = J31
2· In an inte_rference-limited system (mature system): fre-
quency reuse is applied, and the dropped rate p is based on
8
Handoffs and Dropped Calls . 301
0,-='T}
= 0: the conditions for the interference limited case
J3 = J32
Eq. (9.11-1) has to make a distinguished difference between PA
and pB· The cases of PA and PB do not occur at the same time.
When capacity is based on frequency reuse, the interference
level is high, the size of the cells is small, and coverage is not
an issue. The call dropped rate totally depends on interference.
n=O
I an= 1
K .:::
ds::..:o:.:_f::._
_ in
_' U,: ni::
ts:___ __:_:
" _::H::an::d=ofli
:,:e:..:P..:.er:...C
:..&
_IJ_ _ _Pe_rc_e_nt:--:-o-:-:-
f _U_ni_ts_ _ _ a.
100% ---
Handset Units n "' 0 20% °o
0
-= 1
Mobile Units n = 0 60% o = 0.2
n == 1 20% a, :: 0.6
n= 2 °2 :: 0.2
The a" in microcells is used for calculating the dropped call rate p8 :
Kinds of Units
Handset Units
n Handoff's Per Call
n=O
n= 1
Percent of Units
80%
20%
CXo
<l1
-
a.
= 0.8
= 0.2
20% <lo = 0.2
n=O
Mobile Units 60% <l1 = 0.6
n= 1 01 2 = 0.2
20%
n= 2
The values of a" are used for calculating the dropped call rate. For
instance, calculating the general formular of dropp~d cal~ rate (Eq.
/ (9.11-1)) in macrocells (noise-limited system) for mobile umts.
2
PA = 1 - [0.2X0 + 0.6X 1 + 0.2X ]
r
e, and 13 are usually small. Therefore, the value of X is heavily de-
pendent on 6 and µ.
Fonnula for 6 and µ.. We first find the value of 6 in a single cell by
integrating Eq. (9.10-3) over a whole cell to find the area Qin which
the measured x will be greater than A(r) - m!<J'. The mean value m
is a specified receive level. A is the signal level which is a function of
A(r) that exceeds m at the distance r which is less or equal to the cell
radius R. .
Q = Jo
(R (
P x >
A(r) -
<J'
m) • 2-rrrdr (9.12-1)
H•tdofl'9 and Dropped Calla 303
;.1
e xnaY use the numerical calculation to solve Eq. (9.12-2) and Eq.
2_3) for drop~d calls due to handoffs.
~
5
P·
(
X > Ai(ri) - m)
__::........;..___ • a-
6 =1 - i=l '
_____1T_R_2_ _ __
<1 '
(9.12-4)
where
A -(r.) - m)
1 - p . ( x < ·' '
' u = P·' ( x > A;(r;)(] - m)
ai = 1r[2i - lJrf
5
(9.12-5)
La;= 1rR2
i=l
in asingle cell. A5(r5 = R) is the desired signal level at the cell radius
R::: 5r1, Let .
l
_/_ !
. X
A(r.)
I I - m) -p
PI ( >
- - i
(J
Eq. (9.12-6) is also the equation for obtaining the value of I'- in the
interference case.
&, and v-. are improved due to the natural two-site diversity in the handofl
region. Due to natural situations providing equivalent two-site diver-
sity in the handoff region, in region a,, the probability of dropping a
call is reduced by 1 - (1 - p 5) 2 as compared with p,. In region a,, the
probability of dropping a call is 1 - (1 - p 4)(1 - p 6) as compared with
p,. p is tho probability of a dropped call due to the fact that the
handoff
6 takes place in a 4 by the new cell coverage. Therefore, &h and
f.Lh are expressed as:
(9.12-7)
P2 = l, P1 = 1, Ps = 0.7967
Then applied to Eq. (9.12-7), we obtain
Handoffs and Dropped Calls 305
High Problblllty
Hlndoff Region
--------- ,,,
.............
''
''
''
''
''
'I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
' I
-- _______ _
' I
'
......... ... ,,,.,"' I
__ ,,
Figure 9.11 The diagram for calculating the dropped calls due to handoffs.
6h ::
(1- p )2a5 + (1 - p4)(l - P6)a4 + (1 - Pa)aa + (1 - P2)a2 + (1 - P1)a1
5
-rrR2
= 0.64%
example 9.2 Given a = 6, I = -104 dBm, CII = 12 dB, and the signal
received is requested to be 8 dB above the average C/1, find the value
of µh during a handoff? Based on the 40 dB/dee rule, C = -92 dBm
and A = -84 dBm, we obtain A 1 = -50 dBm, A 2 = -62 dBm, A3 =
5
-75 dBm, and A = -80 dBm, A 6 = -87 dBm. Then applying Eq.
4
(9.12-7), we find:
JJ-h =
(1 - Ps)2a5 + (1 - p 4)(l - Pa)a• + (1 - Pa)aa + (1 - P2)a2 + (1 - P1)a1
-rrR2
= 1.45%
References
1. "Advanced Mobile Phone Services," Special Issue, Bell System Technical Journal, Vol.
68, January 1979.