Short-Term High-Vs. Low-Velocity Isokinetic Lengthening Training Results in Greater Hypertrophy of The Elbow Exors in Young Men

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/8091726

Short-term high- vs. low-velocity isokinetic lengthening training results in


greater hypertrophy of the elbow flexors in young men

Article  in  Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology · June 2005
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01027.2004 · Source: PubMed

CITATIONS READS
197 983

6 authors, including:

Stuart M Phillips
McMaster University
559 PUBLICATIONS   36,607 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Aging and the impact of exercise and anabolic supplements View project

Attenuation of resting but not load-mediated protein synthesis in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Stuart M Phillips on 02 June 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Tim N. Shepstone, Jason E. Tang, Stephane Dallaire, Mark D. Schuenke, Robert S.
Staron and Stuart M. Phillips
J Appl Physiol 98:1768-1776, 2005. First published Jan 7, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01027.2004

You might find this additional information useful...

This article cites 48 articles, 26 of which you can access free at:
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/98/5/1768#BIBL

This article has been cited by 3 other HighWire hosted articles:


Consumption of fat-free fluid milk after resistance exercise promotes greater lean mass
accretion than does consumption of soy or carbohydrate in young, novice, male
weightlifters
J. W Hartman, J. E Tang, S. B Wilkinson, M. A Tarnopolsky, R. L Lawrence, A. V Fullerton
and S. M Phillips
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86 (2): 373-381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Resistance Training Reduces Fasted- and Fed-State Leucine Turnover and Increases
Dietary Nitrogen Retention in Previously Untrained Young Men
D. R. Moore, N. C. Del Bel, K. I. Nizi, J. W. Hartman, J. E. Tang, D. Armstrong and S. M.
Phillips

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


J. Nutr., April 1, 2007; 137 (4): 985-991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Intensity of eccentric exercise, shift of optimum angle, and the magnitude of repeated-bout
effect
T. C. Chen, K. Nosaka and P. Sacco
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102 (3): 992-999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Updated information and services including high-resolution figures, can be found at:
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/98/5/1768

Additional material and information about Journal of Applied Physiology can be found at:
http://www.the-aps.org/publications/jappl

This information is current as of October 1, 2007 .

Journal of Applied Physiology publishes original papers that deal with diverse areas of research in applied physiology, especially
those papers emphasizing adaptive and integrative mechanisms. It is published 12 times a year (monthly) by the American
Physiological Society, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD 20814-3991. Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.
ISSN: 8750-7587, ESSN: 1522-1601. Visit our website at http://www.the-aps.org/.
J Appl Physiol 98: 1768 –1776, 2005.
First published January 7, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01027.2004.

Short-term high- vs. low-velocity isokinetic lengthening training results in


greater hypertrophy of the elbow flexors in young men
Tim N. Shepstone,1 Jason E. Tang,1 Stephane Dallaire,1
Mark D. Schuenke,2 Robert S. Staron,2 and Stuart M. Phillips1
1
Exercise and Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;
and 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio
Submitted 16 September 2004; accepted in final form 29 December 2004

Shepstone, Tim N., Jason E. Tang, Stephane Dallaire, Mark crease in protein synthesis is directed toward remodeling and
D. Schuenke, Robert S. Staron, and Stuart M. Phillips. Short- addition of cellular protein structures, in particular myofibrillar
term high- vs. low-velocity isokinetic lengthening training results proteins, and is critical in the process of skeletal muscle
in greater hypertrophy of the elbow flexors in young men. J Appl hypertrophy. Most forms of resistive exercise also induce
Physiol 98: 1768 –1776, 2005. First published January 7, 2005; disruption of the protein ultrastructure, commonly observed as
doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01027.2004.—We performed two studies
to determine the effect of a resistive training program comprised of
Z-line streaming and myofibrillar disorder, that is greater with
fast vs. slow isokinetic lengthening contractions on muscle fiber lengthening vs. shortening contractions (17, 18).
Both lengthening and shortening contractions [terms used

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


hypertrophy. In study I, we investigated the effect of fast (3.66
rad/s; Fast) or slow (0.35 rad/s; Slow) isokinetic high-resistance according to arguments outlined by Faulkner (14) but often
muscle lengthening contractions on muscle fiber and whole muscle referred to as eccentric and concentric contractions, respec-
cross-sectional area (CSA) of the elbow flexors was investigated in tively] induce what has been labeled as muscle protein ultra-
young men. Twelve subjects (23.8 ⫾ 2.4 yr; means ⫾ SD) performed structural damage, which is greater with lengthening contrac-
maximal resistive lengthening isokinetic exercise with both arms for tions (17, 18). With repeated exposure to lengthening contrac-
8 wk (3 days/wk), during which they trained one arm at a Fast velocity tions, a combination of factors bring about a reduction in
while the contralateral arm performed an equivalent number of con- damage: the so-called “repeated-bout” effect (for review, see
tractions at a Slow velocity. Before (Pre) and after (Post) the training, Ref. 8). Where hypertrophy is concerned, various studies have
percutaneous muscle biopsies were taken from the midbelly of the
shown that resistive muscle training using isotonic (21, 26) and
biceps brachii and analyzed for fiber type and CSA. Type I muscle
fiber size increased Pre to Post (P ⬍ 0.05) in both Fast and Slow arms. isokinetic (13, 23, 24, 27, 40) training protocols in the absence
Type IIa and IIx muscle fiber CSA increased in both arms, but the of lengthening contractions results in less hypertrophy, and
increases were greater in the Fast- vs. the Slow-trained arm (P ⬍ smaller strength gains, than a corresponding condition consist-
0.05). Elbow flexor CSA increased in Fast and Slow arms, with the ing solely of shortening contractions or combinations of short-
increase in the Fast arm showing a trend toward being greater (P ⫽ ening and lengthening contractions. However, greater hyper-
0.06). Maximum torque-generating capacity also increased to a trophy with isokinetic lengthening-only training programs is
greater degree (P ⬍ 0.05) in the Fast arm, regardless of testing not always observed (9, 28, 31). Higher velocity lengthening
velocity. In study II, we attempted to provide some explanation of the contractions have been shown to increase muscular strength to
greater hypertrophy observed in study I by examining an indicator of a greater extent than slow contractions (13, 36); however,
protein remodeling (Z-line streaming), which we hypothesized would mechanism(s) responsible for this phenomenon remains un-
be greater in the Fast condition. Nine men (21.7 ⫾ 2.4 yr) performed known. Using B-mode ultrasound, Farthing and Chilibeck (13)
an acute bout (n ⫽ 30, 3 sets ⫻ 10 repetitions/set) of maximal
lengthening contractions at Fast and Slow velocities used in the
showed that muscle thickness (i.e., hypertrophy) was greater
training study. Biopsies revealed that Fast lengthening contractions with lengthening as opposed to shortening contractions, and
resulted in more (185 ⫾ 1 7%; P ⬍ 0.01) Z-band streaming per that there was a tendency (⬃5% greater) for greater hypertro-
millimeter squared muscle vs. the Slow arm. In conclusion, training phy in fast (3.14 rad/s) vs. slow (0.52 rad/s) trained arms.
using Fast (3.66 rad/s) lengthening contractions leads to greater Using their mixed design, these authors were likely underpow-
hypertrophy and strength gains than Slow (0.35 rad/s) lengthening ered to detect the difference between fast- and slow-trained
contractions. The greater hypertrophy seen in the Fast-trained arm arms (13). We hypothesized that the tendency for greater
(study I) may be related to a greater amount of protein remodeling hypertrophy seen previously with faster vs. slower lengthening
(Z-band streaming; study II). contractions (13) would be due to greater protein remodeling
muscle damage; time under tension; Z-band disruption induced by fast contractions (51, 52). Additionally, high-
velocity lengthening contractions, due to the nature of muscle
mechanics on the lengthening portion of the force-velocity
HYPERTROPHY OF SKELETAL MUSCLE as a result of resistance curve, generate greater muscle forces, which may also stimu-
training is due to a chronic summation of periods of positive late a greater protein synthetic response resulting in greater
net protein balance. The positive net protein balance arises due muscle hypertrophy.
to the synergistic stimulatory effect of both resistive exercise The purpose of the present study (study I) was to examine
and feeding on muscle protein synthesis (6, 7, 48). The in- the early-phase adaptations in muscle fiber and whole muscle

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. M. Phillips, Dept. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment
of Kinesiology, IWC AB116, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement”
ON, Canada L8S 4K1 (E-mail: [email protected]). in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1768 8750-7587/05 $8.00 Copyright © 2005 the American Physiological Society http://www. jap.org
VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY 1769
CSA of the elbow flexors, in young men after an isokinetic torque within (ICC ⫽ 0.97) and between (ICC ⫽ 0.95) testing
resistance training program with disparate lengthening contrac- sessions. Five to seven days later, subjects reported back to the testing
tile velocities [low velocity (Slow; 0.35 rad/s) and high veloc- center and muscle biopsy samples were taken from the belly of the
ity (Fast; 3.66 rad/s)]. We used naive untrained subjects to see biceps brachii muscle of each arm. Arms were then randomly assigned
(counterbalanced for dominance based on strength) to be trained using
a maximal response in terms of hypertrophy (2). Given the
either fast (Fast) or slow (Slow) lengthening contractions.
variability in the extent (32, 49) as well as time course (20) of Subjects commenced training after 1 wk of rest. For the next 8 wk,
resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy and given that subjects reported to the testing center every Monday, Wednesday, and
we only used a short-term study, and were trying to detect Friday for exercise training. During the first week, one set (10
differences between two kinds of resistance training, we chose repetitions/set) of maximal lengthening contractions was completed
to use a within-subject design because this is a superior design for both Fast and Slow velocities, and every week subsequent an
compared with between-subject comparisons in terms of num- additional set was added to a maximum of four, with 180 s of rest
bers of subjects needed to see a significant effect of the between each set. For the remaining 4 wk, subjects continued to
differing velocities. We also chose to use the biceps as the complete four sets on every training day. All subjects completed
muscle for training because maximal lengthening actions dur- 100% of the prescribed 24 training sessions.
After the 8-wk training protocol, subjects were again given 4 days
ing knee flexion would likely have resulted in subjects being
of rest before posttraining (Post) testing for maximal torque genera-
able to exceed the maximal torque generating capacity of most tion. Post muscle biopsies were then obtained from a position ⬃4 –5
dynamometers (405 N 䡠m in our case), particularly after train- cm superior or inferior (randomized counterbalanced) to the Pre
ing. We hypothesized, in light of previous reports, that the Fast biopsies.
training would induce greater strength (12, 36) and hypertro- Strength measurements. Strength tests were performed both Pre

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


phic (13) gains. The greater hypertrophy in the Fast trained arm and Post in a completely randomized order, with 4 min of rest in
would occur despite a substantially smaller torque-time inte- between, at various contraction speeds (0.35, 1.05, 2.10, 3.14, and
gral vs. Slow training. 3.66 rad/s) and types (lengthening, concentric, and isometric). Sub-
To examine the potential mechanisms underlying the differ- jects placed their elbow on a positioning pad so that the ulnar-humeral
ential effects of velocity on hypertrophy, we also conducted a joint was at the axis of rotation of the Biodex machine, and they could
separate study in which the acute changes in Z-line disruption comfortably grasp the lever arm handle, while their forearm was in a
supinated position. Restraining straps were placed so as to secure the
were examined after Slow- and Fast-velocity lengthening con- subject while seated in the dynamometer. Most importantly, a re-
tractions. Biopsies were taken, from a separate group of sub- straining strap was placed diagonally over the involved shoulder to
jects from study I to examine the degree of Z-line disruption omit the involvement of any other muscle groups, other than the
induced by a single acute bout of lengthening muscle contrac- elbow flexors, during performance of the maximal contractions.
tions. Our hypothesis with this study was that Fast lengthening Isometric torque. Subjects performed three repetitions of a maxi-
actions would induce greater Z-line disruption than Slow mum voluntary contraction at 1.05 rad (120°) of elbow flexion. Each
lengthening, which is indicative of protein remodeling, which contraction was 5 s in duration with 30 s of rest between contractions.
may be a precursor to muscle hypertrophy (51, 52). Maximum isometric torque was considered to be the highest peak
torque of the three contractions.
METHODS Shortening torque. Concentric torque was recorded as the highest
peak torque of three repetitions through 1.57 rad (90°) range of
Study I: Training Study motion. Every repetition began at 3.05 rad (175°) of elbow flexion and
concluded when the subject flexed his arm, and the Biodex lever arm,
Subjects. Twelve healthy men (age 23.8 ⫾ 3.4 yr, height 178.5 ⫾
with maximal force to 1.48 rad (85°) of elbow flexion. Concentric
9.6 cm, weight 82.5 ⫾ 10.3 kg) who were recreationally active (i.e.,
torque was evaluated at the five different velocities: 0.35, 1.05, 2.10,
no weight training) participated in the 8-wk training study. Subjects
3.14, and 3.66 rad/s.
were performing no more than 1–2 h/wk of structured physical
Lengthening torque. Measurements of lengthening torque were
activity, and none was, or had been for the previous 6 mo, engaging
made at the five testing velocities in a similar manner as for concentric
in resistance training. No subjects were taking protein or other
torque. Lengthening torque was taken from the highest peak torque of
supplements or potential ergogenic aids of any kind. Subjects were
three repetitions starting at 1.48 rad (85°) and concluding at 3.05 rad
required to complete a routine medical screening questionnaire and
(175°) of elbow flexion. Each lengthening contraction, completed at
based on the questionnaire and physical examination were deemed
five velocities (0.35, 1.05, 2.10, 3.14, and 3.66 rad/s), was completed
healthy. Subjects were advised of the purposes and risks associated
by the subject maximally resisting the lever arm, which was returning
with the study, and they gave written, informed consent. The project
to the resting position after the contraction.
was approved by the Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster Uni-
pQCT scans. The midline of the belly of the biceps brachii was
versity Research Ethics Board.
determined by measuring halfway between midpoint of the antecubi-
General Experimental Protocol tal and axilla areas. The arm was then inserted into a small cylinder
that functions as the measurement area of the pQCT densitometer
One week before the study start date, subjects attended a familiar- (Stratec XCT 2000 Densiometer, Norland Medical Systems, Fort
ization session on the testing and training apparatus (Biodex-System Atkinson, WI). The subject’s arm remained motionless for ⬃4 min
3, Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY). On the study start date, while the scan (2.5 mm) was performed. Cross-sectional area (CSA)
subjects had a scan taken at the midpoint of their biceps brachii in images were analyzed by using BonAlyze (Jyvaskyla, Finland), a
both arms by using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed software for processing computerized tomography scans that automat-
tomography (pQCT). Subjects also underwent a series of pretraining ically identifies muscle tissue by assessing density and geometry. The
(Pre) strength tests (see Strength measurements) on both arms inde- BonAlyze software excludes intermuscular fat by quantifying pixels
pendently. Using this procedure, and given that the elbow flexors are within a range corresponding to muscle density (35–160 mg/cm3) and
an easy muscle to recruit maximally with little to no training (33), it excludes pixels that correspond to the density of intermuscular fat. In
is not surprising that we consistently observed interclass correlation our laboratory, repeated scans of the midline of the biceps muscle
coefficients (ICC) of 0.95 and above for repeat testing of maximal CSA, analyzed by the same investigator, had a coefficient of variation

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org


1770 VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY

⬍1.33% (12 repeat scans). Interinvestigator variation in assessing Direct tracings using the Image Pro Plus software determined fiber
muscle CSA was never ⬎2.6%; hence, to minimize variability, all CSAs, which were expressed in micrometers squared. Fiber-type
scans for one subject were analyzed by one investigator who was percent area (defined as total fiber area for one fiber type divided by
blinded to condition. summed total fiber area for all fiber types multiplied by 100), using the
Muscle biopsies. Needle biopsy samples were obtained from each same cutoff thresholds and fiber-type distribution (number of one fiber
subject under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine) using manual suction. type as a percentage of the total number of fibers examined) measure-
One biopsy was taken from the medial portion of the right and left ments were also calculated automatically using Image Pro.
biceps brachii Pre to establish a baseline measurement. Another MHC protocol. Mixed-muscle myosin heavy chain (MHC) analysis
biopsy sample was taken from each of the trained arms in the same was carried out as described previously (16). Briefly, four to six serial
manner Post. Samples were immediately dissected free of visible fat sections from the OCT-embedded muscle sample were cut (20 ␮m)
and connective tissue, and they were placed in optimum cutting and placed into microfuge tubes containing 250 ␮l of lysing buffer
temperature (OCT; Tissue Tech, Sakura Finetechnical) embedding (10% wt/vol glycerol, 5% vol/vol 2-mercaptoethanol, and 2.3% wt/vol
medium with the muscle fibers oriented perpendicular to the plane in SDS in 62.5 mM Tris pH 6.8) and were heated for 10 min at 60°C.
which the muscle was to be cut. The samples were then quick frozen Approximately 4 – 6 ␮l of the lysed muscle extract were loaded into a
in isopentane cooled by liquid nitrogen, and then they were stored at 20-cm ⫻ 20-cm ⫻ 1.5-mm SDS-polyacrylamide gel, with Pre and
⫺80°C until subsequent analysis. Post samples adjacent to one another. The gel was poured and set in
Histochemical analysis. The frozen OCT-mounted muscle samples such a way that the top 25% of the gel was a 4% stacking gel, whereas
were serially cross-sectioned to 10 ␮m thick on a microtome cryostat the remaining 75% of the gel was a 4 – 8% acrylamide gradient.
(model HM500OM, MICROM International, Waldorf, Germany) Samples were run overnight (19 –21 h) at 120 V and subsequently
for histochemical analysis. Myofibrillar adenosine triphosphatase stained with Coomassie blue. Three separate and distinct MHC
(mATPase) histochemistry was performed using preincubation pH isoforms (I, IIa, and IIx) were visually identified according to their

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


value 4.60 (50 mM potassium acetate and 17.5 mM calcium chloride) masses (as compared with known standards). The gels were then
for 6.5 min to determine muscle fiber-type composition. Slides were scanned using a laser densitometer, the relative staining intensity (i.e.,
then rinsed with distilled water and incubated in 3 mM ATP using an number of arbitrary densitometric units) of each band was calculated,
alkaline solution (75 mM glycine, 40.5 mM calcium chloride, 75 mM and the intensity was expressed as a percentage of the total staining
NaCl, and 67.5 mM NaOH, adjusted to pH 9.4) for 45 min at 37°C intensity (i.e., the summed arbitrary units of all three bands).
and agitated at regular intervals in a temperature-controlled incubator Statistical analysis (study I). Muscle fiber size, fiber type, pQCT,
shaker. After the ATP incubation, a rinse with distilled water was and MHC data were analyzed by using a two-factor repeated-mea-
done, and the samples were incubated in 1% CaCl2 for 3 min at room sures ANOVA, with time (Pre vs. Post), and condition (Fast vs. Slow)
temperature. Slides were again rinsed with distilled water and incu- as the factors. Strength data were analyzed by using a four-factor
bated in 2% CoCl2 for 3 min at room temperature. Another rinse with repeated-measures ANOVA, with time (Pre vs. Post), condition (Fast
vs. Slow), contraction (eccentric vs. concentric), and velocity (5
distilled water and an incubation in 1% ammonium sulfide for 1 min
levels: 0.35, 1.05, 2.10, 3.14, and 3.66 rad/s) as the factors. All
at room temperature followed. Samples were rinsed with distilled
analyses were performed using SPSS (version 11.5, Chicago, IL).
water five times before being dehydrated by incubating for 2 min in
Statistical significance for all analyses was accepted as P ⬍ 0.05.
each ethanol concentrations (70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%). Samples were
Significant main effects and interactions, where seen in the ANOVA,
then cleared using xylene. After the slides were dried, coverslips were
were further analyzed by using Tukey’s post hoc test. Values pre-
mounted using Permount (Fisher SP15) and allowed to dry overnight.
sented are means (SD).
Sections were viewed under light microscope (Olympus BX-60,
Olympus America, Melville, NY), and images were digitized using a
SPOT camera (model SP401-115, SPOT Diagnostic Instruments, Study II: Acute Study
Sterling Heights, MI) and visualized using SPOT software (V3.2.4 for Subjects. Nine men (age 23.2 ⫾ 2.4 yr, height 181.9 ⫾ 6.1 cm,
Windows, SPOT Diagnostic Instruments). Images were analyzed by weight 81.1 ⫾ 5.6 kg) who were recreationally active (i.e., no weight
using both Image-J software (National Institute of Mental Health, training and no more than 1 structured exercise bout per week)
Bethesda, MD) and Image Pro Plus (V4.0 for Windows, Media participated in the acute study protocol. Subjects were required to
Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). The number of images taken at complete a routine medical screening questionnaire and based on the
⫻200 magnification of each sample was between five and seven and questionnaire and physical examination were deemed healthy. Sub-
was largely dependent on the quality of the serial sections. Each image jects were advised of the purposes and risks associated with the study,
contained ⬃30 –50 fibers. Three fibers (type I, IIa, and IIx) were and they gave written, informed consent. The project was approved by
consistently distinguished using the Image-J software by setting cutoff the Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University Research
limits resulting in the creation of optical density “bins” according to Ethics Board.
the darkest (type I), lightest (type IIa), and intermediate (type IIx) Experimental protocol. For 1 wk before reporting to the testing
fibers, as previously described (44). The classification of fiber type is center, subjects were instructed to refrain from any form of strenuous
thus dependent on the intensity of the staining by the mATPase upper body activity. On the first study day, subjects had a muscle
histochemical protocol. At pH 4.60, the light, intermediate, and dark biopsy removed from the belly of biceps brachii of both right and left
fibers correspond to fiber type IIa, type IIx, and type I, respectively. arms. Subjects also received instruction on the exercise protocol and
Sample images were converted to 8-bit, 256 gray-scale images, which use of the Biodex apparatus used for testing. For the week after the
linearly scales each pixel and assigns a value from between 0 (black) first biopsy, subjects were again asked to refrain from strenuous upper
to 255 (white). By setting lower and upper threshold values, optical body activity. The next day, subjects returned to the Ivor Wynne
density bins were created that were as follows: 0 –95 for dark areas, Centre to repeat the contraction protocol and subsequently had the
100 –175 for intermediate areas, 180 –255 for light areas. Using these second biopsy sample from each arm taken. Subjects again returned to
cutoffs, the three fiber types were more objectively classified. A repeat the contraction protocol 24 and 72 h after the second biopsy
similar procedure was employed using the Image Pro Plus software. In session.
comparing the ability of Image J and Image Pro Plus to classify the Exercise protocol. The exercise protocol was completed on the
same images (n ⫽ 26 sample sets Pre and Post), we obtained an ICC Biodex dynamometer. Subjects placed their elbow on the Biodex
of 0.985 (P ⬍ 0.001), and we also found that the ICC for repeated positioning pad so that their forearm was in a supinated position, the
image analysis was 1.0 for both programs. ulnar-humeral joint was at the axis of rotation of the Biodex lever arm,

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org


VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY 1771
that sections identified as having Z-band streaming were shown also
to have disrupted Z-bands by using electron microscopy (5, 45, 46).
We also confirmed, using electron microscopy (⫻3,500 –5,000 mag-
nification), in 30 randomly selected blocks (6 at rest, 12 at 24 h after
the Fast exercise, and 12 others at 24 h after the Slow exercise) that
Z-line streaming as identified using high-magnification light micros-
copy were in fact areas of disruption as estimated. Damage estimated
by light microscopy and by electron microscopy were highly corre-
lated (r ⫽ 0.98, P ⬍ 0.0001).
Statistical analysis (study II). Z-line streaming was analyzed as a
paired t-test, because no disrupted areas were seen in the baseline
biopsies; hence, values obtained were essentially a difference from
baseline (i.e., only a single value for Slow and Fast). All analyses
were performed using SPSS (version 11.5). Statistical significance
for all analyses was accepted as P ⬍ 0.05. Values presented are
means (SD).
RESULTS

Study I: Training Study


Strength. Training resulted in subjects being able to generate

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


higher maximal torques during lengthening contractions, re-
gardless of velocity, compared with shortening contractions
(P ⬍ 0.05). Training also resulted in a main effect for training
Fig. 1. Peak torque before (Pre) and after (Post) 8 wk (24 sessions) of Fast mode (Fast ⬎ Slow); hence, subjects were able to generate
(3.66 rad/s) and Slow (0.35 rad/s) training (study I). A: Slow arm. B: Fast arm. higher maximal torques after Fast training, regardless of ve-
Values are means (SD) for 12 subjects. *Significant main effect for time, P ⬍ locity, compared with shortening contractions (P ⫽ 0.023).
0.05. †Significant time ⫻ condition interaction (Fast ⬎ Slow) at all testing
velocities Post, P ⬍ 0.05. Fast training increased maximum torques across all velocities
by an average of 11.3 ⫾ 10.4 N䡠m, whereas Slow training only
increased strength by 6.3 ⫾ 12.0 N䡠m (P ⫽ 0.041; Fig. 1).
pQCT. Values for whole muscle CSA Pre and Post training
and they could comfortably grasp the lever arm handle. A restraining
are shown in Fig. 2. All changes are significantly different from
strap was placed diagonally over the involved shoulder to omit
involvement from other muscle groups. Each subject completed three zero (P ⬍ 0.01), with no significant difference between Fast
sets (10 repetitions/set) of maximal lengthening contractions through and Slow (P ⫽ 0.060 for a time ⫻ condition interaction) and
1.57 rad (90°) of arm flexion with 180 s of rest between sets. One arm with a significant difference (P ⫽ 0.024) between Post Fast vs.
was exercised at the Fast velocity (3.66 rad/s) while the other was Post Slow by post hoc test.
exercised at the Slow velocity (0.35 rad/s). Muscle fiber CSA. Training resulted in a significant increase
Muscle sampling. Needle biopsy samples were obtained from each in the mean CSA of all fiber types (P ⫽ 0.016). Type I muscle
subject under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine) using manual suction. fibers increased in size (P ⫽ 0.042; Fig. 3) by an average of
One biopsy was taken from the medial portion of the right and left 9.3 ⫾ 5.0% (range Slow ⫽ 3–560 ␮m2, Fast ⫽ 94 –1,300 ␮m2)
biceps brachii to establish a baseline measurement. Another biopsy with no significant differences between Fast or Slow (P ⫽
sample was taken from each of the trained arms in the same manner
0.19). The change in fiber area after training for only the type
24 h after the two-set exercise protocol was completed. Samples were
immediately dissected free of fat and connective tissue, and they were
placed into a chilled (4°C) fixative (2% gluteraldehyde buffered with
0.1% sodium cacodylate) for staining with toluidine blue as described
previously (5, 45, 46).
Light microscopy. After initial fixation, the tissue samples were
postfixed in osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in graded baths of ethyl
alcohol, and embedded in an epoxy resin (Spurr’s) with the fibers
oriented longitudinally. Each block was then sectioned (0.5 ␮m) and
stained with toluidine blue.
Individual fibers from each longitudinal muscle section were stud-
ied under ⫻1,000 magnification and examined for moderate (3–10
continuous and/or adjacent Z bands) and extreme (10 or more con-
tinuous and/or adjacent Z bands) Z-band streaming as described
previously (5, 45, 46). Sample areas were calculated, and the amount
of Z-band streaming was expressed per millimeter squared of muscle.
All muscle sections were scored and viewed blind to the investigator
as to the treatment (Fast or Slow) and subject. ICCs for repeated
sample analysis with one investigator were consistently ⬎0.96 on 10
separate samples. In addition, interinvestigator estimates of Z-line Fig. 2. Whole muscle peripheral computed tomography pQCT scan for muscle
streaming using this method were also consistently ⬎0.94, as reported cross-sectional area (CSA) before and after 8 wk of Fast and Slow training.
previously (5, 45, 46). To reduce the variability, one investigator Values are means (SD) for 12 subjects. *Significant main effect for time, P ⬍
performed all of the analyses. Using this method, it has been shown 0.05. Time ⫻ condition interaction, P ⫽ 0.06.

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org


1772 VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY

of type IIa fibers from Pre to Post but only in the Fast-trained
arm (P ⫽ 0.05; Table 1). The percent area occupied by IIa
fibers was also significantly greater in the Fast vs. the Slow arm
(P ⫽ 0.041; Table 1).
MHC content. The percentage of MHC isoforms expressed
showed a significant decrease in the percentage of type IIx
isoform expressed in both Fast and Slow arms after training
(P ⫽ 0.033; Table 1). Similarly, there was an increase in the
percentage of type IIa isoforms present after training that
was greater in the Fast vs. the Slow arm. The percentage of
MHC isoforms expressed according to gel electrophoresis
correlated well with the percent area for each fiber type as
analyzed by mATPase histochemistry (r ⫽ 0.95, P ⫽
0.0006; Fig. 4).

Study II: Acute Study


Z-line streaming. The extent of moderate Z-band disruption
(expressed per mm2 of muscle) seen in all muscle samples
from the postexercise time point was greater (P ⬍ 0.001) than

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


baseline samples, in which no damage could be identified.
Z-band disruption was greater (185 ⫾ 17%) after the Fast
exercise protocol than that seen after the Slow exercise proto-
col (P ⫽ 0.002; Fig. 5). The extent of extreme, compared with
moderate, Z-band streaming (defined as encompassing ⬎10
serially or longitudinally adjacent sarcomeres with damage)
(17, 18) was not significantly different (P ⫽ 0.096) between
Fast- and Slow-exercised arms (Fast ⫽ 0.10 ⫾ 0.15 and
Slow ⫽ 0.04 ⫾ 0.11 areas of extreme damage per mm2 of
muscle), but it was observed in six of nine Fast samples and
only two of nine Slow samples.

Table 1. Percentage muscle fiber composition and muscle


fiber area by histochemistry, as well as percentage myosin
heavy chain from biopsies taken before and after training
Type I Type IIa Type IIx

Fiber, %
Fast
Pre 46.9 (15.6) 46.0 (12.8) 9.1 (8.7)
Post 42.3 (10.0) 50.9 (9.0) 6.8 (6.6)*
Slow
Pre 45.2 (12.8) 43.5 (12.5) 11.3 (9.7)
Fig. 3. Muscle fiber sizes in the Fast and Slow trained arms (study I) before Post 49.8 (3.3) 42.8 (10.4) 7.4 (5.9)*
and after 8 wk (24 training sessions) of isokinetic lengthening contractions. Area, %
A: type I fibers. B: type IIa fibers. C: type IIx fibers. Values are means (SD)
Fast
for 12 subjects. Note different scales for each graph. *Significantly differ-
Pre 33.3 (11.8) 58.2 (13.2) 8.5 (7.6)
ent from Pre, P ⬍ 0.05. ⫹Significantly different from Slow arm at the same
Post 27.8 (7.6) 66.6 (9.0)*† 5.6 (6.2)
time, P ⬍ 0.01.
Slow
Pre 32.5 (11.8) 58.1 (12.8) 9.3 (6.9)
Post 34.1 (8.7) 59.8 (8.7) 6.1 (4.8)
II fiber subtypes was greater in the Fast-trained (IIa: range ⫽ MHC, %
279 –1,548 ␮m2; IIx range ⫽ 963–1,730 ␮m2) vs. the Slow- Fast
trained arm (IIa: range ⫽ 57–966 ␮m2; IIx range ⫽ 205–1,124 Pre 37.3 (8.0) 54.1 (13.1) 8.0 (6.2)
␮m2; all P ⫽ 0.007; Fig. 3). Post 30.3 (7.3) 65.6 (7.3)*† 4.1 (4.5)*
Slow
Muscle fiber type. A significant decrease was observed in the Pre 37.0 (10.8) 53.4 (12.8) 6.7 (8.0)
percent distribution of type IIx fibers (P ⫽ 0.031; Table 1), Post 34.1 (7.6) 61.3 (6.3)* 4.6 (7.8)*
regardless of training. Although statistical significance was not
Values are means (SD) for 12 subjects. Fast, fast trained arm (3.66 rad/s);
reached, a trend was also observed toward a decrease in the Slow, slow trained arm (0.35 rad/s); Pre, before training; Post, after training;
percent area that type IIx fibers occupy (P ⫽ 0.056; Table 1). MHC, myosin heavy chain. *Significantly different from Pre, P ⬍ 0.05.
There was, however, a significant difference in the percent area †Significantly different from Slow at the same time point, P ⬍ 0.05.

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org


VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY 1773
shortening (3.14 and 0.52rad/s) muscle training promoted a
greater degree of hypertrophy. In addition, the difference in
hypertrophy between the degree of hypertrophy induced by
training with fast and slow (0.52 rad/s) lengthening conditions,
whereas not statistically different, was 5% (13); their mixed-
factor design likely lacked the statistical power to detect this
difference. In our study, we attempted to address this short-
coming by using a completely within-subject design and by
using two lengthening conditions that were more disparate in
velocity: 10-fold vs. only a 6-fold used by Farthing and
Chilibeck, thinking that a greater difference in velocity may
play a role in emphasizing differences in protein remodeling
and thus hypertrophy, according to our hypothesis.
Fig. 4. Correlation between myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform distribution
Adams et al. (1) recently showed that training using con-
by gel electrophoresis and percent area distribution from histochemistry (study tractions that were isometric, lengthening, or shortening re-
I). Pearson’s r ⫽ 0.95 (P ⬍ 0.001). sulted in an equivalent hypertrophy in rats. The torque integrals
for these three training modes were obviously quite different
DISCUSSION from each other. Despite similar degrees of hypertrophy, in-
creases in mRNA expression for mechano-growth factor and

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


The results of the present investigation show that a resistive insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), two proteins that have
training program consisting of fast isokinetic (3.66 rad/s) been implicated as playing a role in hypertrophic muscle
lengthening contractions resulted in a greater fiber hypertro- growth (19), were increased only in the isometric and short-
phy, in type II fibers, vs. lengthening training performed at a ening contraction conditions (1). In humans, a single bout of
slower isokinetic (0.35 rad/s) velocity. This conclusion is lengthening resistive exercise resulted in a greater increase in
supported by a significantly greater increase in muscle fiber IGF-I mRNA expression vs. a bout of shortening exercise (4).
size as indicated by mATPase histochemical analysis. Addi- We observed, despite a ⬎10-fold lower mean torque-time
tional support for the greater hypertrophy observed with fast integral (Fig. 6), a greater degree of hypertrophy (Fig. 3) with
lengthening training was demonstrated by our data measuring a training protocol that involved only high velocity lengthening
the CSA at the midline of the biceps brachii by pQCT. contractions. However, why we observed greater hypertrophy
Although we did not observe a significant difference between with Fast as opposed to Slow lengthening contractions when
the degree of change in the Fast and Slow arms using pQCT, Adams et al. (1) observed quite similar hypertrophy with
there was a strong trend (P ⫽ 0.06) toward the Fast-trained arm different contraction types and vastly dissimilar force-time
having greater hypertrophy over the Slow-trained arm; hence, integrals is not readily apparent. The difference in the model
it is likely a type II statistical error that we are reporting no utilized in our study as opposed to that of Adams et al. may
difference between the Fast and Slow trained arms in hyper- explain some of the differences: rats vs. humans, imposed vs.
trophy with pQCT. voluntary contractions, and the number of training bouts were
A number of studies (13, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 40) have shown greater in our study (24 vs. only 10 used by Adams et al.).
that training involving muscle lengthening contractions pro-
duces greater hypertrophy, and oftentimes greater strength
gains, than a condition in which shortening contractions or a
combination of shortening and lengthening contractions were
used. We also acknowledge that greater hypertrophy with
lengthening-only vs. shortening-only or mixed contractions is
not always observed (9, 28, 31). However, we believe that the
balance of evidence favors the idea that there is something
intrinsically unique with muscle lengthening contractions that
promotes hypertrophy. For example, the ability of lengthening
contractions to promote hypertrophy was elegantly demon-
strated by LaStayo and colleagues (30), who used cycle er-
gometry exercise to induce hypertrophy, but this occurred only
when performed eccentrically. Eccentric ergometry induced a
52% increase in muscle fiber area and a 36% increase in
isometric leg strength, whereas traditional concentric ergom-
etry induced no change in fiber size or strength. In addition,
compensatory hypertrophy after immobilization-induced atro-
phy has also been shown to be enhanced in terms of strength
gains as well as fiber hypertrophy when lengthening as op-
posed to shortening, or even mixed, contractions were used in Fig. 5. Moderate Z-band disruption (study II: see METHODS for details) seen in
biopsy samples 24 h after an acute lengthening isokinetic exercise protocol
rehabilitation postimmobilization (25). Recently, Farthing and (see METHODS for details). Values are means (SD) for 9 subjects. *Significantly
Chilibeck (13) found that training of the elbow flexors with fast different from baseline (i.e., zero or no disruption), P ⬍ 0.001. ⫹Significantly
lengthening contractions (3.14 rad/s) as opposed to fast or slow different from Slow, P ⬍ 0.01.

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org


1774 VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY

of protein turnover, synthesis or breakdown, in this study, so


this theory remains speculative.
Training increased muscle strength at all tested velocities,
regardless of training mode; however, the overall gain in
maximal torque generation was greater in the Fast arm at all
velocities (i.e., a main effect of training mode; Fig. 1). This
result is most likely at least in part a consequence of the greater
hypertrophy seen within the Fast-trained arm (Fig. 3). Accord-
ing to previous reports (24, 25, 27), however, strength gains are
typically dependent on training modes. Hence, when training
with lengthening-only muscle contractions, it is expected that
lengthening strength would increase more then concentric
strength. There is also the possibility of cross-education, that
is, an effect of one training protocol impacting on the con-
tralateral arm (10, 41, 47). However, when both limbs are
training simultaneously, it is impossible to estimate how the
strength gains in one limb would transfer to the other limb. In
other studies we examined, strength was variably altered in an
untrained limb (41) or remained unchanged (47); hence, in our

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


design where both limbs are training, it appears that strength
gains that transfer from one limb to other would be minimal,
compared with the transfer of strength to a nontrained limb.
We acknowledge that training mode may have been transferred
to the contralateral limb, but evidence for this phenomenon in
simultaneously training limbs indicates similar results to what
we observed, that is an overall generally greater increase in
strength with lengthening muscle actions with no specificity
Fig. 6. Torque tracings recorded during maximal torque testing Pre and Post effect for velocity (12, 36). Additionally, because the gains in
training in an individual subject (study I). A: Fast-trained arm (torque-time integral maximal torque were greater in the Fast-trained arm, then any
Pre ⫽ 19.1 and Post ⫽ 23.8). B: Slow-trained arm (torque-time integral Pre ⫽
213.3 and Post ⫽ 303.1). Note that time scales on the graphs are different.
cross-education in terms of strength gains would be to increase
strength gains in the Slow-trained arm in which we observed
“inferior” strength gains (Fig. 1). Hence, the fact that we saw
Previously, our laboratory had labeled the ultrastructural a difference between the Fast and Slow arms in terms of
observation of smeared or disrupted Z lines as muscle damage strength gains is even more impressive and likely due to our
(5, 46), in accordance with others (15, 18, 39). Recently, it was use of a unilateral all-within-subject design.
reported that an acute bout of lengthening muscle actions, The overall gains seen in maximal torque generation were quite
which would have resulted in severe muscle damage, resulted moderate, and hence differences would have been more difficult
in no detectable disturbances of the myofiber protein structure to detect were they present. We suspect that the moderate strength
(11). In fact, what we observed and labeled as Z-line stream- gains may have been due to some residual fatigue from the
ing, and have previously called muscle damage (5, 46), has training itself, despite several days of rest after the subjects’ last
recently been reported not to be muscle damage but instead training bout before strength assessment. In fact, Fig. 7 shows the
myofibrillar remodeling (11, 51, 52). This conclusion was
based on an elegant and detailed immunohistochemcial and
electron miscroscopic examination of the protein composition
of amorphous or smeared Z lines (11). These authors showed
that the smeared Z lines from damaged muscle were quite
dissimilar from their normal protein composition, containing
instead higher than normal quantities of actin and desmin,
which the authors concluded was an indication of fiber protein
remodeling and not damage (51, 52). With this interpretation in
mind (51, 52), then our data indicate that, in the Fast training
condition, which as our acute study showed was accompanied
by greater “Z-line streaming” (Fig. 5), there would have been
greater fiber remodeling. Our laboratory has recently observed
that lengthening contractions, as opposed to shortening con-
tractions, are associated with a more rapid rise in myofibrillar
protein synthesis (34). If a greater protein synthetic response
were to result in greater protein accretion over time, according Fig. 7. Mean peak torque values for training sessions (study I) averaged by
week throughout the 8-wk training protocol. Values are means (SD) for 12
to the series of events outlined by Phillips (37), then this subjects. *Significantly different between Fast and Slow arms at the specified
provides a basis for why we saw greater hypertrophy in the week, P ⬍ 0.05. a Different from week 1, P ⬍ 0.05. b Different from weeks
Fast-trained arms. Of course, we have no direct measurements 1–7, P ⬍ 0.05. c Different from week 7, P ⬍ 0.05.

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org


VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY 1775
mean peak torque on a week-to-week basis throughout the course under tension in the Fast- vs. the Slow-trained arms. We
of the study and shows that, during training, the weekly peak observed that acutely an isolated set of Fast contractions
torque was actually depressed, likely as a result of muscle protein resulted in greater disruption to the muscle ultrastructure,
remodeling (see Ref. 50 for a review), for some time before which could be indicative of greater protein remodeling and
recovering and eventually exceeding pretraining values only in the potentially faster onset (34) and potentially a greater duration
last week. This pattern of depressed force and yet substantial fiber of protein synthesis. Over time, the greater protein synthesis
remodeling, ultimately resulting in hypertrophy, is similar to that may result in greater hypertrophy.
seen with chronic low-frequency stimulation in animals. In this
model of extreme overload, force is persistently depressed, and ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
yet fiber adaptations still occur while substantial fiber remodeling We thank the subjects for time and John Moroz for outstanding expertise in
is still present (22). In two other studies in which differing the set up and use of testing and training equipment.
lengthening velocities were used for training (12, 36), the gains in
GRANTS
maximal torque were not large. For example, Paddon-Jones et al.
(36) found no significant gains in maximal torque generation in a This research was supported by a National Science and Engineering
Research Council of Canada grant to S. M. Phillips. S. M. Phillips is the
slow-trained arm performing lengthening contractions at 0.52 recipient of a Premier’s Research Excellence Award and a Canadian Institutes
rad/s and a 5- to 10-N䡠m increase in the fast-trained (3.14 rad/s) of Health Research New Investigator Award.
arm. Farthing and Chilibeck (12) also reported the increments in
maximal torque were in the range of 11–14 N䡠m. REFERENCES
Muscle fiber-type transitions that occur with resistance train- 1. Adams GR, Cheng DC, Haddad F, and Baldwin KM. Skeletal muscle

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


ing have usually demonstrated a shift from IIx to IIa fibers (25, hypertrophy in response to isometric, lengthening, and shortening training
42, 43). However, a recent observation of fiber-type distribu- bouts of equivalent duration. J Appl Physiol 96: 1613–1618, 2004.
tion after fast lengthening training showed an increase in the 2. Alway SE, Grumbt WH, Stray-Gundersen J, and Gonyea WJ. Effects
of resistance training on elbow flexors of highly competitive bodybuilders.
percentage of type IIx fibers and a decrease in type I fibers J Appl Physiol 72: 1512–1521, 1992.
found within muscle samples (36); on completion of the 3. Andersen JL, Mohr T, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, and Kjaer M.
present study, no such changes were observed. In fact, a Myosin heavy chain isoform transformation in single fibres from m. vastus
decrease was seen in type IIx fibers after both Fast and Slow lateralis in spinal cord injured individuals: effects of long-term functional
electrical stimulation (FES). Pflügers Arch 431: 513–518, 1996.
lengthening training according to both mATPase histochemical 4. Bamman MM, Shipp JR, Jiang J, Gower BA, Hunter GR, Goodman
and MHC gel electrophoretic analysis. Although the hypothe- A, McLafferty CL Jr, and Urban RJ. Mechanical load increases muscle
sized concomitant increase in IIa fiber distribution was not IGF-I and androgen receptor mRNA concentrations in humans. Am J
seen, we did observe a significant increase in the total area Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280: E383–E390, 2001.
occupied by type IIa fibers but in the Fast-trained arm only. A 5. Beaton LJ, Tarnopolsky MA, and Phillips SM. Contraction-induced
muscle damage in humans following calcium channel blocker administra-
shift from IIx to IIa fibers was to be expected according to tion. J Physiol 544: 849 – 859, 2002.
Andersen et al. (3), who hypothesized that the type IIx isoform 6. Biolo G, Tipton KD, Klein S, and Wolfe RR. An abundant supply of
is the “default” MHC that is expressed frequently in untrained amino acids enhances the metabolic effect of exercise on muscle protein.
subjects. However, when a resistance training protocol is Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 273: E122–E129, 1997.
7. Borsheim E, Tipton KD, Wolf SE, and Wolfe RR. Essential amino acids
implemented, the MHC isoforms shift toward an increase in and muscle protein recovery from resistance exercise. Am J Physiol
type IIa fiber percent (25, 42, 43). Type IIa fibers, although Endocrinol Metab 283: E648 –E657, 2002.
they may have a lower maximal torque-generating capacity 8. Clarkson PM and Hubal MJ. Exercise-induced muscle damage in
(29), do have a greater oxidative capacity, which confers on humans. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81: S52–S69, 2002.
them a greater resistance to fatigue. Moreover, the increase 9. Colliander EB and Tesch PA. Effects of eccentric and concentric muscle
actions in resistance training. Acta Physiol Scand 140: 31–39, 1990.
fiber CSA of both the IIa and IIx fibers more than compensates 10. Colliander EB and Tesch PA. Effects of detraining following short term
for any small shift away from IIx to IIa. resistance training on eccentric and concentric muscle strength. Acta
To place our findings in some context with other resistance Physiol Scand 144: 23–29, 1992.
training protocols, it is interesting to note that the degree of 11. Crameri RM, Langberg H, Magnusson P, Jensen CH, Schroder HD,
Olesen JL, Suetta C, Teisner B, and Kjaer M. Changes in satellite cells
hypertrophy we observed compared with other studies in which in human skeletal muscle after a single bout of high intensity exercise.
the elbow flexors have been trained have shown similar in- J Physiol 558: 333–340, 2004.
creases in muscle CSA (13), greater increases in CSA and 12. Farthing JP and Chilibeck PD. The effect of eccentric training at
individual muscle fiber area with longer training protocols (35, different velocities on cross-education. Eur J Appl Physiol 89: 570 –577,
38), or no change in fiber size-trained subjects who superim- 2003.
13. Farthing JP and Chilibeck PD. The effects of eccentric and concentric
posed elbow flexor training on top of their normal routines (2). training at different velocities on muscle hypertrophy. Eur J Appl Physiol
The increases in muscle CSA and fiber area that our laboratory 89: 578 –586, 2003.
and others have observed (13, 35, 38) tend to be larger than that 14. Faulkner JA. Terminology for contractions of muscles during shortening,
seen in muscles such as the vastus lateralis (42, 43). Hence, our while isometric, and during lengthening. J Appl Physiol 95: 455– 459,
2003.
findings must be viewed in the context of a short-term training 15. Friden J, Sjöstrom M, and Ekblom B. Myofibrillar damage following
protocol of elbow flexor training and could differ if different intense eccentric exercise in man. Int J Sports Med 4: 170 –176, 1983.
subjects (i.e., trained) or muscles (i.e., lower body locomotor 16. Fry AC, Allemeier CA, and Staron RS. Correlation between percentage
muscles) had been studied. fiber type area and myosin heavy chain content in human skeletal muscle.
We observed that higher velocity (3.66 rad/s) isokinetic Eur J Appl Physiol 68: 246 –251, 1994.
17. Gibala MJ, Interisano SA, Tarnopolsky MA, Roy BD, MacDonald JR,
lengthening contractions are associated with greater muscular Yarasheski KE, and MacDougall JD. Myofibrillar disruption following
hypertrophy than slower (0.35 rad/s) velocity lengthening con- acute concentric and eccentric resistance exercise in strength-trained men.
tractions. This finding occurred despite a ⬎10-fold greater time Can J Physiol Pharmacol 78: 656 – 661, 2000.

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org


1776 VELOCITY OF LENGTHENING CONTRACTIONS AND HYPERTROPHY

18. Gibala MJ, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Stauber WT, and 35. O’Hagan FT, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, and Garner SH. Response to
Elorriaga A. Changes in human skeletal muscle ultrastructure and force resistance training in young women and men. Int J Sports Med 16:
production after acute resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 78: 702–708, 314 –321, 1995.
1995. 36. Paddon-Jones D, Leveritt M, Lonergan A, and Abernethy P. Adapta-
19. Goldspink G. Changes in muscle mass and phenotype and the expression tion to chronic eccentric exercise in humans: the influence of contraction
of autocrine and systemic growth factors by muscle in response to stretch velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol 85: 466 – 471, 2001.
and overload. J Anat 194: 323–334, 1999. 37. Phillips SM. Protein requirements and supplementation in strength sports.
20. Green H, Goreham C, Ouyang J, Ball-Burnett M, and Ranney D. Nutrition 20: 689 – 695, 2004.
Regulation of fiber size, oxidative potential, and capillarization in human 38. Roman WJ, Fleckenstein J, Stray-Gundersen J, Alway SE, Peshock R,
muscle by resistance exercise. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol and Gonyea WJ. Adaptations in the elbow flexors of elderly males after
276: R591–R596, 1999. heavy-resistance training. J Appl Physiol 74: 750 –754, 1993.
21. Hather BM, Tesch PA, Buchanan P, and Dudley GA. Influence of 39. Roth SM, Martel GF, Ivey FM, Lemmer JT, Tracy BL, Hurlbut DE,
eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Metter EJ, Hurley BF, and Rogers, MA. Ultrastructural muscle damage
Acta Physiol Scand 143: 177–185, 1991. in young vs. older men after high-volume, heavy-resistance strength
22. Hicks A, Ohlendieck K, Gopel SO, and Pette D. Early functional and training. J Appl Physiol 86: 1833–1840, 1999.
biochemical adaptations to low-frequency stimulation of rabbit fast-twitch 40. Seger JY, Arvidsson B, and Thorstensson A. Specific effects of eccen-
muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 273: C297–C305, 1997. tric and concentric training on muscle strength and morphology in hu-
23. Higbie EJ, Cureton KJ, Warren GL, and Prior BM. Effects of mans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 79: 49 –57, 1998.
concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, 41. Shima N, Ishida K, Katayama K, Morotome Y, Sato Y, and Mi-
and neural activation. J Appl Physiol 81: 2173–2181, 1996. yamura M. Cross education of muscular strength during unilateral resis-
24. Hortobagyi T, Barrier J, Beard D, Braspennincx J, Koens P, Devita P, tance training and detraining. Eur J Appl Physiol 86: 287–294, 2002.
Dempsey L, and Lambert J. Greater initial adaptations to submaximal 42. Staron RS, Karapondo DL, Kraemer WJ, Fry AC, Gordon SE, Falkel
muscle lengthening than maximal shortening. J Appl Physiol 81: 1677– JE, Hagerman FC, and Hikida RS. Skeletal muscle adaptations during
1682, 1996. early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women. J Appl

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on October 1, 2007


25. Hortobagyi T, Dempsey L, Fraser D, Zheng D, Hamilton G, Lambert Physiol 76: 1247–1255, 1994.
J, and Dohm L. Changes in muscle strength, muscle fibre size and 43. Staron RS, Leonardi MJ, Karapondo DL, Malicky ES, Falkel JE,
myofibrillar gene expression after immobilization and retraining in hu- Hagerman FC, and Hikida RS. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations
mans. J Physiol 524: 293–304, 2000. in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining. J Appl
26. Hortobagyi T, Devita P, Money J, and Barrier J. Effects of standard Physiol 70: 631– 640, 1991.
and eccentric overload strength training in young women. Med Sci Sports 44. Stewart BG, Tarnopolsky MA, Hicks AL, McCartney N, Mahoney
Exerc 33: 1206 –1212, 2001. DJ, Staron RS, and Phillips SM. Treadmill training-induced adaptations
27. Hortobagyi T, Hill JP, Houmard JA, Fraser DD, Lambert NJ, and in muscle phenotype in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Muscle
Israel RG. Adaptive responses to muscle lengthening and shortening in Nerve 30: 61– 68, 2003.
humans. J Appl Physiol 80: 765–772, 1996. 45. Stupka N, Lowther S, Chorneyko K, Bourgeois JM, Hogben C, and
28. Jones DA and Rutherford OM. Human muscle strength training: the Tarnopolsky MA. Gender differences in muscle inflammation after ec-
effects of three different regimens and the nature of the resultant changes. centric exercise. J Appl Physiol 89: 2325–2332, 2000.
J Physiol 391: 1–11, 1987. 46. Stupka N, Tarnopolsky MA, Yardley NJ, and Phillips SM. Cellular
29. Larsson L, Edstrom L, Lindegren B, Gorza L, and Schiaffino S. MHC adaptation to repeated eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. J Appl
composition and enzyme-histochemical and physiological properties of a Physiol 91: 1669 –1678, 2001.
novel fast-twitch motor unit type. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 261: C93– 47. Tesch PA, Ekberg A, Lindquist DM, and Trieschmann JT. Muscle
C101, 1991. hypertrophy following 5-week resistance training using a non-gravity-
30. Lastayo PC, Pierotti DJ, Pifer J, Hoppeler H, and Lindstedt SL. dependent exercise system. Acta Physiol Scand 180: 89 –98, 2004.
Eccentric ergometry: increases in locomotor muscle size and strength at 48. Tipton KD, Borsheim E, Wolf SE, Sanford AP, and Wolfe RR. Acute
low training intensities. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278: response of net muscle protein balance reflects 24-h balance after exercise
R1282–R1288, 2000. and amino acid ingestion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284: E76 –E89,
31. Mayhew TP, Rothstein JM, Finucane SD, and Lamb RL. Muscular 2003.
adaptation to concentric and eccentric exercise at equal power levels. Med 49. Wang N, Hikida RS, Staron RS, and Simoneau JA. Muscle fiber types
Sci Sports Exerc 27: 868 – 873, 1995. of women after resistance training— quantitative ultrastructure and en-
32. McCall GE, Byrnes WC, Dickinson A, Pattany PM, and Fleck SJ. zyme activity. Eur J Appl Physiol 424: 494 –502, 1993.
Muscle fiber hypertrophy, hyperplasia, and capillary density in college 50. Warren GL, Ingalls CP, Lowe DA, and Armstrong RB. Excitation-
men after resistance training. J Appl Physiol 81: 2004 –2012, 1996. contraction uncoupling: major role in contraction-induced muscle injury.
33. Moore DR, Burgomaster KA, Schofield LM, Gibala MJ, Sale DG, and Exerc Sport Sci Rev 29: 82– 87, 2001.
Phillips SM. Neuromuscular adaptations in human muscle following low 51. Yu JG, Carlsson L, and Thornell LE. Evidence for myofibril remodel-
intensity resistance training with vascular occlusion. Eur J Appl Physiol ing as opposed to myofibril damage in human muscles with DOMS: an
92: 399 – 406, 2004. ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopic study. Histochem Cell
34. Moore DR, Phillips SM, Babraj JA, Smith K, and Rennie MJ. Biol 121: 219 –227, 2004.
Myofibrillar and collagen protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle after 52. Yu JG and Thornell LE. Desmin and actin alterations in human muscles
maximal shortening and lengthening contractions. Am J Physiol Endocri- affected by delayed onset muscle soreness: a high resolution immunocy-
nol Metab. In press. tochemical study. Histochem Cell Biol 118: 171–179, 2002.

J Appl Physiol • VOL 98 • MAY 2005 • www.jap.org

View publication stats

You might also like