Class Notes
Class Notes
Analytic case
Increasing potential
to support
business decisions End User
Decision
Making
Data Exploration
Statistical Summary, Querying, and Reporting
3
Types of Data Sets
Record
Relational records
Data matrix, e.g., numerical matrix,
crosstabs
Document data: text documents: term-
frequency vector
Transaction data
Graph and network
World Wide Web
Social or information networks
Molecular Structures
Ordered
Video data: sequence of images
Temporal data: time-series
Sequential Data: transaction sequences
Genetic sequence data
Spatial, image and multimedia:
Spatial data: maps
Image data:
Video data:
4
Data Objects
Data sets are made up of data objects.
A data object represents an entity.
Examples:
sales database: customers, store items, sales
medical database: patients, treatments
university database: students, professors, courses
Also called samples , examples, instances, data points,
objects, tuples.
Data objects are described by attributes.
Database rows -> objects; columns ->attributes.
Binary
Numeric: quantitative
Interval-scaled
Ratio-scaled
17
Time Series Components--Cycle
A cyclic pattern exists when data exhibit rises and
falls that are not of fixed period.
The duration of these fluctuations is usually of at
least 2 years.
If the fluctuations are not of fixed period then they
are cyclic else seasonal.
18
Time Series Components-summary
These components are defined as follows:
Level: The average value in the series.
Trend: The increasing or decreasing value in
the series.
Seasonality: The repeating short-term cycle
in the series.
Cyclic: data exhibit rises and falls that are not
of fixed period
Noise: The random variation in the series.
d1 = (5, 0, 3, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0)
d2 = (3, 0, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1)
d1d2 = 5*3+0*0+3*2+0*0+2*1+0*1+0*1+2*1+0*0+0*1 = 25
||d1||= (5*5+0*0+3*3+0*0+2*2+0*0+0*0+2*2+0*0+0*0)0.5=(42)0.5 =
6.481
||d2||= (3*3+0*0+2*2+0*0+1*1+1*1+0*0+1*1+0*0+1*1)0.5=(17)0.5
= 4.12
cos(d1, d2 ) = 0.94
22
TASK FOR YOU—A2
1. Investigate the Attribute or dimensions or
features or variables with a suitable scenario
and prepare your critical report?
Nominal
Binary
ordinal
Numeric: quantitative
2
DSA For Analytics and Applications
4
DW-OLAP
Like SQL in DBMS
One-dimensional Two-dimensional
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
6
OLAP Architecture
7
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
OLAP Applications
Why happens?
17
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
Analytic is a never ending process.
Analytic is the Major part of Data science,
Analytic is a never ending process because of
progressive technological change requirements as well
as the business change requirements.
86 97 84
73 63 88
97 100 95
97
84
Lets find Abby’s 88
MEAN science test 100
score? 95
63
73
783 ÷ 9 86
+ 97
The mean is 87 783
63 73 84 86 88 95 97 97 100
2. Then divide by 2.
Ex 2: Find the median.
63 73 84 88 95 97 97 100
88 + 95 = 183
(12) 144
2
(4) 16
2
(8) 64
2
(24) 576
2
# Find mean.
result.mean <- mean(x)
print(result.mean)
Median
Mode
where,
A represents the A data vector
B represents the B data vector
mean of A data vector
mean of B data vector
[1] 30.66667
[1] 30.66667
28
Guidelines to interpreting Pearson's correlation coefficient
measure of the strength of a linear association between two
variables
Pearson correlation coefficient, r, can take a range of values
from +1 to -1. A value of 0 indicates that there is no
association between the two variables.
for example, that r = .67. That is, as height increases so does
basketball performance.
Coefficient, r
# Calculating
# Correlation coefficient
# Using cor() method
result = cor(x, y, method = "pearson")
Data Cleaning
Data Integration
Data Reduction
Summary
1
Major Tasks in Data Preprocessing
Data cleaning
Fill in missing values, smooth noisy data, identify or remove
outliers, and resolve inconsistencies
Data integration
Integration of multiple databases, data cubes, or files
Data reduction
Dimensionality reduction
Data reduction
Data transformation and data discretization
Normalization
Concept hierarchy generation
2
Data Cleaning
Data in the Real World Is Dirty: Lots of potentially incorrect data,
e.g., instrument faulty, human or computer error, transmission error
incomplete: lacking attribute values, lacking certain attributes of
interest, or containing only aggregate data
e.g., Occupation=“ ” (missing data)
noisy: containing noise, errors, or outliers
e.g., Salary=“−10” (an error)
inconsistent: containing discrepancies in codes or names, e.g.,
Age=“42”, Birthday=“03/07/2010”
Was rating “1, 2, 3”, now rating “A, B, C”
discrepancy between duplicate records
Intentional (e.g., disguised missing data)
Jan. 1 as everyone’s birthday?
3
Incomplete (Missing) Data
4
How to Handle Missing Data?
Ignore the tuple: usually done when class label is missing
(when doing classification)—not effective when the % of
missing values per attribute varies considerably
Fill in the missing value manually: tedious + infeasible?
Fill in it automatically with
a global constant : e.g., “unknown”, a new class?!
the attribute mean
the attribute mean for all samples belonging to the
same class: smarter
the most probable value: inference-based such as
Bayesian formula or decision tree
5
Noisy Data
Noise: random error or variance in a measured variable
Incorrect attribute values may be due to
faulty data collection instruments
technology limitation
incomplete data
inconsistent data
6
How to Handle Noisy Data?
Binning
first sort data and partition into (equal-frequency) bins
median, etc.
Regression
smooth by fitting the data into regression functions
Clustering
detect and remove outliers
7
Data Cleaning as a Process
Data discrepancy detection
Use metadata (e.g., domain, range, dependency, distribution)
8
Data Preprocessing: An Overview
Data Cleaning
Data Integration
Data Reduction
Summary
9
Data Integration
Data integration:
Combines data from multiple sources into a coherent store
Schema integration: e.g., A.cust-id B.cust-#
Integrate metadata from different sources
Entity identification problem:
Identify real world entities from multiple data sources, e.g., Bill
Clinton = William Clinton
Detecting and resolving data value conflicts
For the same real world entity, attribute values from different
sources are different
Possible reasons: different representations, different scales, e.g.,
metric vs. British units
10
Handling Redundancy in Data Integration
Expected
The larger the Χ2 value, the more likely the variables are
related
The cells that contribute the most to the Χ2 value are
those whose actual count is very different from the
expected count
Correlation does not imply causality
# of hospitals and # of car-theft in a city are correlated
Both are causally linked to the third variable: population
12
Chi-Square Calculation: An Example
14
Visually Evaluating Correlation
Scatter plots
showing the
similarity from
–1 to 1.
15
Correlation (viewed as linear relationship)
Correlation measures the linear relationship
between objects
To compute correlation, we standardize data
objects, A and B, and then take their dot product
16
Covariance (Numeric Data)
Covariance is similar to correlation
Correlation coefficient:
Suppose two stocks A and B have the following values in one week:
(2, 5), (3, 8), (5, 10), (4, 11), (6, 14).
Question: If the stocks are affected by the same industry trends, will
their prices rise or fall together?
Data Quality
Data Cleaning
Data Integration
Data Reduction
Data Transformation
Summary
19
Data Reduction Strategies
Data reduction: Obtain a reduced representation of the data set that
is much smaller in volume but yet produces the same (or almost the
same) analytical results
Why data reduction? — A database/data warehouse may store
terabytes of data. Complex data analysis may take a very long time to
run on the complete data set.
Data reduction strategies
Dimensionality reduction, e.g., remove unimportant attributes
20
Principal Component Analysis (Steps)
Given N data vectors from n-dimensions, find k ≤ n orthogonal vectors
(principal components) that can be best used to represent data
Normalize input data: Each attribute falls within the same range
Compute k orthonormal (unit) vectors, i.e., principal components
Each input data (vector) is a linear combination of the k principal
component vectors
The principal components are sorted in order of decreasing
“significance” or strength
Since the components are sorted, the size of the data can be
reduced by eliminating the weak components, i.e., those with low
variance (i.e., using the strongest principal components, it is
possible to reconstruct a good approximation of the original data)
Works for numeric data only
21
Attribute Subset Selection
Another way to reduce dimensionality of data
Redundant attributes
Duplicate much or all of the information contained in
one or more other attributes
E.g., purchase price of a product and the amount of
sales tax paid
Irrelevant attributes
Contain no information that is useful for the data
mining task at hand
E.g., students' ID is often irrelevant to the task of
predicting students' GPA
22
Data Reduction
Reduce data volume by choosing alternative, smaller
forms of data representation
Parametric methods (e.g., regression)
Assume the data fits some model, estimate model
23
Parametric Data Reduction: Regression
and Log-Linear Models
Linear regression
Data modeled to fit a straight line
Multiple regression
Allows a response variable Y to be modeled as a
24
Types of Sampling
Stratified sampling:
Partition the data set, and draw samples from each
partition (proportionally, i.e., approximately the same
percentage of the data)
Used in conjunction with skewed data
25
Sampling: With or without Replacement
Raw Data
26
Sampling: Cluster or Stratified Sampling
27
Chapter 3: Data Preprocessing
Data Quality
Data Cleaning
Data Integration
Data Reduction
Data Transformation
28
Data Transformation
A function that maps the entire set of values of a given attribute to a
new set of replacement values s.t. each old value can be identified
with one of the new values
Methods
Smoothing: Remove noise from data
Attribute/feature construction
New attributes constructed from the given ones
Aggregation: Summarization, data cube construction
Normalization: Scaled to fall within a smaller, specified range
min-max normalization
z-score normalization
Discretization: Concept hierarchy climbing
29
Data Normalization
Min-max normalization: to [new_minA, new_maxA]
v minA
v' (new _ maxA new _ minA) new _ minA
maxA minA
Ex. Let income range $12,000 to $98,000 normalized to [0.0,
73,600 12,000
1.0]. Then $73,000 is mapped to 98,000 12,000 (1.0 0) 0 0.716
Z-score normalization (μ: mean, σ: standard deviation):
v A
v'
A
73,600 54,000
Ex. Let μ = 54,000, σ = 16,000. Then 1.225
16,000
30
ACTIVITY-5
Investigate the Handling of Redundancy in Data
Integration.
Explore the usage of correlation analysis and
covariance analysis towards eliminating the
redundant attributes along with relevant
computations and scenario analysis.
y = wx+
¶
å
¶w i
(yi - wxi ) 2
= 2å-xi (yi - wxi )
i
¶
å
¶w i
(yi - wxi ) 2
= 2å -xi (yi - wxi ) Þ
i
åx y i i
w= i
åx 2
i
i
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
Implementation logic
# observations
x = np.array([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])
y = np.array([1, 3, 2, 5, 7, 8, 8, 9, 10, 12])
# estimating coefficients
b = estimate_coef(x, y)
print("Estimated coefficients:\nb_0 = {} \
\nb_1 = {w}".format(b[0], b[1]))
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
14
Analysis
y = wx+
Estimated coefficients:
= -0.0586206896552
w = 1.45747126437
The linear regression model ----------
y = 1.45747126437 x + (-0.0586206896552)
18
Cont..
Create Relationship Model & get the Coefficients
# Apply the lm() function.
relation <- lm(y~x)
print(relation)
N.B- "x ~ y" meaning that x and y are of the same order of magnitude.
3. O/P----Coefficients:
Find the coefficients from the model created and create the
mathematical equation using these
(Intercept) x
-38.4551 0.6746
Y = 0.6746 x + (-38.4551)
19
4. use the predict() function in R.
predict(object, newdata)
20
Predict the weight of new persons
# The predictor vector.
x <- c(151, 174, 138, 186, 128, 136, 179, 163, 152, 131)
# The resposne vector.
y <- c(63, 81, 56, 91, 47, 57, 76, 72, 62, 48)
# Apply the lm() function.
relation <- lm(y~x)
# Find weight of a person with height 170.
a <- data.frame(x = 170)
result <- predict(relation,a)
print(result) O/P-- 76.22869
21
# Create the predictor and response variable.
x <- c(151, 174, 138, 186, 128, 136, 179, 163, 152, 131)
y <- c(63, 81, 56, 91, 47, 57, 76, 72, 62, 48)
relation <- lm(y~x)
# Give the chart file a name.
png(file = "linearregression.png")
# Plot the chart.
plot(y,x,col = "blue",main = "Height & Weight Regression",
abline(lm(x~y)),cex = 1.3,pch = 16,xlab = "Weight in Kg",ylab =
"Height in cm")
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/r/r_linear_regression.htm
22
23
ACTIVITY -7( LAB-03)
Consider any dataset and Implement and
investigate the Linear regression algorithm, and
analyze the results in details.
2) ANOVA in R
3) Autocorrelation
2
Cont..
If we graph these two variables using a scatterplot,
with weight on the x-axis and height on the y-axis,
here’s what it would look like:
ŷ = b0 + b1x
15
Result Analysis
17
Cont..
The summary shows that the gear attribute is very
significant to displacement (Three stars denoting it).
20
# Installing the package
install.packages(dplyr)
am.
Decision Tree,
Naïve Bayes,
K-Nearest Neighbors
Classification And Regression Trees –Logistic Regression
Models. [To be discussed Later]
training set
The model is represented as classification rules,
9
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
Decision Tree
Decision tree is a flow-chart-like tree structure that
consists of nodes and branches. (Root node, Internal
node and Leaf node)
• Root Node: The top node of the decision tree with no
incoming branch and one or more outgoing branches.
• Internal Node(s): has (have) one incoming branch and
one or more outgoing branches.
• Leaf node: has only one incoming but no outgoing
branch and it represents the class label.
• Each internal node and root node denotes an
attribute (Feature), each branch represents an
outcome of the test.
10
Algorithm for Decision Tree Induction
Basic algorithm (a greedy algorithm)
Tree is constructed in a top-down recursive divide-and-
conquer manner
At start, all the training examples are at the root
discretized in advance)
Examples are partitioned recursively based on selected
attributes
Test attributes are selected on the basis of a heuristic or
Class:
C1:buys_computer = ‘yes’
C2:buys_computer = ‘no’
Data to be classified:
X = (age <=30,
Income = medium,
Student = yes
Credit_rating = Fair)
Task:
Classify X using Bayesian
classifier ????
_
_
_ _ .
+
_
. +
xq +
. . .
_ + . 17
k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) Classification
In k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN) classification, the training
24
Naive Bayes Classifier
pkgs = c("klaR", "caret", "ElemStatLearn")
# Install these packages
# Split the data in training and testing
# Define a matrix with features, X_train
# And a vector with class labels, y_train
# Train the model
train(X_train, y_train, method = 'nb‘)
# Compute pred using the model to get the
predictive accuracy.
25
K-Nearest Neighbors
K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm is a type
of supervised ML algorithm which can be used
for both classification as well as regression
predictive problems.
##use knn() function
install.packages("e1071")
install.packages("caTools")
install.packages("class")
# Confusiin Matrix
26
Cheers For the Great Patience!
Query Please?
[Review]
Classification Performance - Evaluating
Predictive Performance
TP FP
FN TN
3
Performance measures
• Performance metrics
4
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
Classifications - Classification methods
Decision Tree,
Naïve Bayes,
K-Nearest Neighbors
Already Discussed - ok
how to estimate the performance of those algorithms based on the
measures.
18
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
Performance measures Summary
19
Rules extracted from classification algorithms
The final classification Rules are the actual classifier model use for prediction.
20
Challenge of Evaluation Metrics
1) Evaluation measures play a crucial role in both
assessing the classification performance and
guiding the classifier modeling.
2) In fact, the use of common metrics in imbalanced
domains can lead to sub-optimal classification
models and might produce misleading conclusions
since these measures are insensitive to skewed
domains.
skewness is a measure of the asymmetry of the
probability distribution.
21
ACTIVITY-11
Explore a classification problem case by
considering any real-world domain application,
formulate a confusion matrix through scenario
assumption for the classifier model and
investigate the various parameters to measure
the performance of the classifier model.
23
Cheers For the Great Patience!
Query Please?
Y = mX+ C
13
THE KEY IDEA
Take all of your data.
Consider all possible values of all variables.
Select the variable/value (X=t1) that produces the
greatest
“separation” in the target.
(X=t1) is called a “split”.
If (X< t1) then send the data to the “left”; otherwise,
send data point to the “right”.
Now repeat same process on these two “nodes”
You get a “tree”
Note: CART only uses binary splits.
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
14
CART model transformation example
CART model
If Height > 180 cm Then Male
If Height <= 180 cm AND Weight > 80 kg Then Male
If Height <= 180 cm AND Weight <= 80 kg Then Female
Make Predictions With CART Models
Linear regression does not have this capability. Because, If you use
linear regression to model a binary response variable, the
resulting model may not restrict the predicted Y values within 0
and 1.
NEXT REGRESSION TREE-CART implements in R 16
install.packages("rpart")
install.packages("rpart.plot")
install.packages("ggplot2")
library(rpart)
library(rpart.plot)
library(ggplot2)
data() # to check the availability of datasets
data(msleep)
str(msleep) # to view the structure of the dataset
df <- msleep[ , c(3,4,6,10,11)] # reduce to specific attributes
str(df) # to view the structure of new data frame
head(df) # to view the table
# sleep_total ~ brainwt, bodywt
m1 <- rpart(sleep_total~ ., data = df , method= "anova")
print(m1)
print(p1)
REGRESSION TREE-CART implements in R 17
18
Logistic Regression
am cyl hp wt
Mazda RX4 1 6 110 2.620
Mazda RX4 Wag 1 6 110 2.875
Datsun 710 1 4 93 2.320
Hornet 4 Drive 0 6 110 3.215
Hornet Sportabout 0 8 175 3.440
Valiant 0 6 105 3.460
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
25
Cont..
input <- mtcars[,c("am","cyl","hp","wt")] am.data =
glm(formula = am ~ cyl + hp + wt, data = input, family =
binomial) print(summary(am.data))
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) 19.70288 8.11637 2.428 0.0152 *
cyl 0.48760 1.07162 0.455 0.6491
hp 0.03259 0.01886 1.728 0.0840 .
wt -9.14947 4.15332 -2.203 0.0276 *
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
26
Result analysis
In the summary as the p-value in the last
column is more than 0.05 for the variables
"cyl" and "hp",
we consider them to be insignificant in
contributing to the value of the variable
"am".
Only weight (wt) impacts the "am" value in
this regression model.
two records
2. Jaccard distance
Hierarchical Clustering
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
1
4.1-PART-01
Cluster analysis
same group.
dissimilar (or unrelated) to the objects in
other groups.
Cluster analysis (or clustering, data
segmentation, …)
Finding similarities between data according to
data distribution
As a preprocessing step for other
algorithms
clusters
Outlier detection
Outliers are often viewed as those “far away” from
any cluster
d1 = (5, 0, 3, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0)
d2 = (3, 0, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1)
d1d2 = 5*3+0*0+3*2+0*0+2*1+0*1+0*1+2*1+0*0+0*1 = 25
||d1||= (5*5+0*0+3*3+0*0+2*2+0*0+0*0+2*2+0*0+0*0)0.5=(42)0.5 =
6.481
||d2||= (3*3+0*0+2*2+0*0+1*1+1*1+0*0+1*1+0*0+1*1)0.5=(17)0.5
= 4.12
cos(d1, d2 ) = 0.94
11
Jaccard similarity/Jaccard distance
Similarity is computed through distance.
A set is an unordered collection of objects.
So for example, {1, 2, 3, 4} is equal to {2, 4,
3, 1}.
We can calculate its cardinality (represented
as |set|) which is no other thing than the
number of elements contained in the set.
15
[A-13]: PRACTICE FOR YOU
1. A document can be represented by thousands of attributes, each recording
the frequency of a particular word (such as keywords) or phrase in the
document.
Formulate a scenario by Considering at least 6 documents and 12 keywords
and keywords frequency may be assigned randomly. Compute the similarity
among those documents.
2. Formulate a real-world scenario to use Jaccard similarity and
compute the similarity between two object sets through the
scenario.
16
4.1-PART-02
17
Hierarchical Clustering
Create a hierarchical decomposition of the
set of data (or objects) using some criterion.
Cluster 1 : (7,10)
Cluster 2 : (20,28,35)
pairwise distance.
Cluster 1 : (7,10,20)
Cluster 2 : (28,35)
Dendrogram
34
REVIEW
Dendrogram
35
R-implements using Average-linkage Hierarchical
clustering
hclust() is pre-installed in stats package when R is
installed.
# Loading package
library(dplyr)
# Plotting dendrogram
plot(Hierar_cl)
table(fit)
rect.hclust(Hierar_cl, k = 3, border = "green")
37
Model Hierar_cl:
In the model, the cluster method is average, distance is
Euclidean and no. of objects are 32.
The plot dendrogram is shown with x-axis as distance matrix and y-axis as
height. 39
Cutted tree:
Tree is cut where k = 3 and each category represents
41
A-14: LAB--07
Consider a dataset without any class level and
Non-hierarchical Clustering
K-means Algorithm
K-Medoids
K=2
Where,
xi (j) = data point
cj = cluster center
n = Number of data points
k = Number of cluster
||xi(j) – cj||2 = distance between a data point xi(j) and cluster
center cj
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
7
K-means: Method-01
Using K-means clustering, cluster the following data into two clusters
and show each step.
{2, 4, 10, 12, 3, 20, 30, 11, 25}
Solution: K1
Given: {2, 4, 10, 12, 3, 20, 30, 11, 25} C1
Step 1: Assign alternate value to each cluster randomly.
Step 2: Group the numbers close to mean m1 = 3 are grouped into cluster
Step 3: k1 = {2, 3}, k2 = {4, 10, 12, 20, 30, 11, 25}, m1= 2.5, m2 = 16
Step 4: k1 = {2, 3, 4}, k2 = {10, 12, 20, 30, 11, 25}, m1= 3 m2 = 18
Step 5: k1 = {2, 3, 4, 10}, k2= {12, 20, 30, 11, 25}, m1= 4.75, m2 = 19.6
Final answer: k1 = {2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12} and k2 = {20, 30, 25}
Weakness:
Cluster I Cluster II Cluster III
16
17
Comments on the K-Means Method
Limitation
Applicable only when mean is defined, then what
about categorical data?
Need to specify k, the number of clusters, in advance
Unable to handle noisy data and outliers
10 10
9 9
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
20
Cluster Computation using K-Medoids through a dataset scenario
22
Each point is assigned to the cluster of that
medoid whose dissimilarity is less.
points 1, 2, 5 go to cluster C1
0, 3, 6, 7, 8 go to cluster C2.
The Cost = (3 + 4 + 4) + (3 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2) =
20
Step 3: randomly select one non-medoid point
and recalculate the cost.
Let the randomly selected point be (8, 4). The
dissimilarity of each non-medoid point with the
medoids – C1 (4, 5) and C2 (8, 4) is calculated
and tabulated.
23
Each point is assigned to that cluster whose
dissimilarity is less.
So, the points 1, 2, 5 go to cluster C1 and 0, 3, 6, 7, 8 go
to cluster C2.
The New cost = (3 + 4 + 4) + (2 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 3) = 22
Swap Cost = New Cost – Previous Cost = 22 – 20 and 2
>0 24
As the swap cost is not less than zero, we
undo the swap. Hence (4, 5) and (8, 5) are the
final medoids. The clustering would be in the
following way
25
Research Methodology
drug?
Can we automatically classify web documents?
Y.
be generated
16
Apriori Algorithm Example
• Exercise 1: TID Items purchased
Apriori Algorithm
18
LAB
Investigate any real world problem to
Implement the Apriori Algorithm for
Association Rule Learning and prepare your
Lab Report……
Lift, conviction,leverage
22
Cheers For the Great Patience!
Query Please?
https://www.kirenz.com/post/2020-05-14-r-association-rule-
mining/#:~:text=Association%20rule%20mining%20is%20one,the%20arules%20and%20arulesViz%20packages
R-Implements
Compiled By: Dr. Nilamadhab Mishra [(PhD- CSIE) Taiwan]
23
Module:5 Managing Health and Safety
The system should cover the entire gambit of an employer's occupational health and safety
organisation. The key elements of a successful safety and health management system are:
1. Policy and commitment
The workplace should prepare an occupational safety and health policy programme as part of the
preparation of the Safety Statement required by Section 20 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at
Work Act 2005. Effective safety and health policies should set a clear direction for the organisation
to follow. They will contribute to all aspects of business performance as part of a demonstrable
commitment to continuous improvement. Responsibilities to people and the working environment will
be met in a way that fulfils the spirit and letter of the law. Cost-effective approaches to preserving
and developing human and physical resources will reduce financial losses and liabilities. In a wider
context, stakeholders' expectations, whether they are shareholders, employees or their
representatives, customers or society at large, can be met.
2. Planning
The workplace should formulate a plan to fulfil its safety and health policy as set out in the Safety
Statement. An effective management structure and arrangements should be put in place for
delivering the policy. Safety and health objectives and targets should be set for all managers and
employees.
3. Implementation and operation
For effective implementation, organisations should develop the capabilities and support mechanisms
necessary to achieve the safety and health policy, objectives and targets. All staff should be
motivated and empowered to work safely and to protect their long-term health, not simply to avoid
accidents. These arrangements should be:
There should be a planned and systematic approach to implementing the safety and health policy
through an effective safety and health management system. The aim is to minimise risks. Risk
Assessment methods should be used to determine priorities and set objectives for eliminating
hazards and reducing risks. Wherever possible, risks should be eliminated through the selection and
design of facilities, equipment and processes. If risks cannot be eliminated, they should be
minimised by the use of physical controls and safe systems of work or, as a last resort, through the
1|Page
provision of PPE. Performance standards should be established and used for measuring
achievement. Specific actions to promote a positive safety and health culture should be identified.
There should be a shared common understanding of the organisation‘s vision, values and beliefs on
health and safety. The visible and active leadership of senior managers fosters a positive safety and
health culture.
4. Measuring performance
The organisation should measure, monitor and evaluate safety and health performance.
Performance can be measured against agreed standards to reveal when and where improvement is
needed. Active self-monitoring reveals how effectively the safety and health management system is
functioning. Self-monitoring looks at both hardware (premises, plant and substances) and software
(people, procedures and systems, including individual behaviour and performance). If controls fail,
reactive monitoring should find out why they failed, by investigating the accidents, ill health or
incidents, which could have caused harm or loss. The objectives of active and reactive monitoring
are:
Many companies now report on how well they have performed on worker safety and health in their
annual reports and how they have fulfilled their responsibilities with regard to preparing and
implementing their Safety Statements. In addition, employers have greater responsibilities under
Section 80 of the 2005 Act on ‘Liability of Directors and Officers of Undertakings’ that requires them
to be in a position to prove they have pro-actively managed the safety and health of their workers.
Data from this ‘Auditing and reviewing performance’ process should be used for these purposes.
2|Page
What issues should a review of the safety and health management system cover?
An organisation should carry out an initial review of the safety and health management system, and
follow this up with periodic reviews. The initial review should compare existing safety and health
practice with:
Is the Safety Statement clear and concise so that it can be read and understood by those
who may be at risk?
Is the Safety Statement available at the workplace to which it relates and are workers given
relevant extracts where they are at specific risk?
Is the overall safety and health policy of the organisation and the internal structure for
implementing it adequate, e.g. are responsibilities of named persons clearly outlined?
Does the Safety Statement contain a systematic identification of hazards and an assessment
of risks for the workplace(s) it covers?
Are Risk Assessments being carried out on a regular basis as risks change and are the
necessary improvements made to keep the safety and health management system up to
date?
Are the necessary safety control measures required for a safe workplace identified and
implemented, e.g. the provision of safe access and egress, good housekeeping, clear
passageways and internal traffic control?
Are written safe procedures for those operations that require them available, e.g. for routine
processing and ancillary activities, handling and using chemicals, preventive maintenance,
plant and equipment breakdown maintenance, accident and ill-health investigations,
emergency planning, assessment of personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements?
Are procedures available for monitoring the implementation of safety systems and control
measures, e.g. are safety audits being carried out?
Is safety and health training being carried out and does the training give adequate
information to workers on risks they might be exposed to?
Is the impact of this training and the level of understanding of the information assessed by
anyone?
Do safety consultation, employee participation and representation procedures exist and are
these procedures effective, e.g. is there good co-operation between employer, managers
and employees on safety and health issues at the workplace? Is there a safety committee in
existence and if so does it comply with the 2005 Act requirements? Are safety committee
meetings constructive with meeting reports and follow-up action lists? Is the safety
representative or representatives involved at every stage of the safety consultation process?
3|Page
A Safety Statement should have a safety and health policy incorporated into it. What is this
policy?
A safety and health policy is a written document which recognises that safety and health is an
integral part of the organisation’s business performance. It is a statement by the organisation of it’s
intentions and approach in relation to it’s overall safety and health performance and provides a
framework for action, and for the setting of its safety and health objectives and targets. The safety
and health policy must:
be appropriate to the hazards and risks of the organisation’s work activities and include a
commitment to protect, so far as is reasonably practicable, its employees and others, such
as contractors and members of the public, from safety and health risks associated with its
activities.
include a commitment to comply with relevant safety and health legislation, Codes of
Practice and guidelines, as a minimum.
provide a framework for measuring performance and ensuring continuous improvement by
setting, auditing and reviewing safety and health objectives and targets.
be documented, understood, implemented and maintained at all levels of the organisation.
clearly place the management of safety and health as a prime responsibility of line
management from the most senior executive level to first-line supervisory level.
cover employee safety and health consultation, safety committee meetings where they exist,
worker participation and safety representation and includes a commitment to provide
appropriate resources to implement the policy.
provide for employee co-operation and compliance with safety rules and procedures.
Organisations achieving high standards of safety and health develop policies that recognise the:
contribution that safety and health can make to business performance by preserving and
developing human and physical resources, by reducing costs and liabilities, and by
expressing corporate responsibility.
need for leaders to develop appropriate organisational structures and a culture that supports
risk control and secures the full participation of all members of the organisation.
requirement to resource and plan policy implementation adequately.
necessity of approaching injury, ill health and loss prevention by systematically identifying
hazards, assessing and controlling risks.
need for the organisation to develop an understanding of risks and risk control and to be
responsive to internal and external change.
requirement to scrutinise and review performance to learn from experience.
connection between quality, the environment, safety and health, and good management
practice.
4|Page
What critical safety and health issues should be addressed, and allocated adequate
resources, in the safety and health policy?
Critical safety and health issues, which should be addressed and allocated resources, in the safety
and health policy, include the:
design, provision and maintenance of a safe place of work for all employees
design, provision and maintenance of safe means of access to and egress from each part of
the workplace
design, provision and maintenance of any article, plant, equipment or machinery for use at
work in a safe manner, provision of systems of work that are planned, organised, performed,
maintained or revised, so as to be safe, particularly for safety critical process operations or
services
performance of ongoing hazard identification and Risk Assessments, and compliance with
the general principles of prevention as set out in the legislation
provision and maintenance of welfare facilities and PPE
preparation of emergency plans and the provision of first-aid training
reporting of accidents and dangerous occurrences to the Authority and their investigation
provision and dissemination of safety and health information, instruction, training and
supervision as required
operation of safety and health consultation, employee participation and safety representation
programmes
review and keeping up-to-date the safety and health policy in order to prevent adverse
effects on the safety and health of employees from changing processes, procedures and
conditions in the workplace
appointment of people responsible for keeping safety and health control systems in place
and making them aware of their responsibilities
establishment of monitoring arrangements, including safety and health inspections and
audits, which should be used by the employer to ensure ongoing compliance with legal
duties, responsibilities and controls
development of in-house safety and health competence
employment of external safety and health experts as required
use of standards, Codes of Practice, guidelines or industry practices
co-operation required from employees and disciplinary procedures for non-compliance.
However, this list is not exhaustive and the critical safety and health issues that could be covered by
the policy will depend on the risks in the organisation. If the above issues are adequately covered
elsewhere in the Safety Statement or in the safety and health management system, they might need
only to be referred to in the safety and health policy. Backup documentation may also be referred to
in the policy.
5|Page
What are the responsibilities of management regarding the implementation of safety and
health in the organisation?
Responsibility for safety and health management ultimately rests with the employer. This
responsibility is normally delegated to executive directors, senior managers, line managers,
supervisors and employees. Each person’s authority and duties should be clearly defined,
documented and communicated to them. The organisational and reporting structure for
implementing these duties should be illustrated in an in-house organisational chart. In addition each
director on the organisation’s board needs to accept their responsibilities in providing safety and
health commitment and leadership by:
ensuring that each members’ actions and decisions at board level always reinforce the
message in the organisation’s Safety Statement
preventing a mismatch between individual board members attitudes, behaviour or decisions
and the organisation’s Safety Statement so as not to undermine workers belief in maintaining
good safety and health standards.
Accidents, ill health and incidents are seldom random events. They generally arise from failures of
control and involve multiple contributory elements. The immediate cause may be a human or
technical failure, but such events usually arise from organisational failings, which are the
responsibility of management. Successful safety and health management systems aim to utilise the
strengths of managers and other employees. The organisation needs to understand how human
factors affect safety and health performance. Senior executive directors or other senior management
controlling body members and executive senior managers are primarily responsible for safety and
health management in the organisation. These people need to ensure that all their decisions reflect
their safety and health intentions, as articulated in the Safety Statement, which should cover:
6|Page
Senior managers responsibilities include:
preparing safety and health policies and consulting employees, including the safety
committee where it exists, and the safety representative, as appropriate
devising safety and health strategies for key high risks
setting safety and health objectives and targets for employees
devising plans to implement the safety and health policy
ensuring that appropriate organisational structures are in place
identifying and allocating resources for safety and health
ensuring that the safety and health policy is effectively implemented and checking whether
objectives and targets have been met
reviewing the effectiveness of the safety and health management system
implementing any necessary improvements derived from carrying out Risk Assessments
giving all personnel the authority necessary to carry out individual safety and health
responsibilities
devising appropriate arrangements whereby employees are held accountable for discharging
their responsibilities
establishing clear and unambiguous reporting relationships
devising job descriptions that include safety and health responsibilities
incorporating safety and health performance in the appraisal system where personal
appraisal systems exist
developing safety and health cultures in project teams and team working situations.
7|Page
How can an organisation control safety and health aspects of contractors’ work?
Although organisations routinely contract out either all or parts of their work activities, they may still
retain some of the legal responsibility for health and safety, particularly if they directly control how
this work is done. For this reason, the organisation should establish and maintain procedures for
controlling the safety and health aspects of contractor work. These should include:
pre-planning for medium or long-term contracts. This will involve carrying out a full safety and
health pre-qualification procedure; for short-term contracts, safety and health aspects should
be suitably checked by questionnaire or review
ensuring the contractor has prepared Risk Assessments and an up-to-date Safety
Statement, which are specirfic for the project to be undertaken
defining responsibility for and setting up communication links between appropriate levels of
the organisation and the contractor before work starts and throughout the contract
who is responsible for developing and providing site safety rules and method statements
providing safety and health training and induction of contractor personnel, where necessary,
before work begins
monitoring safety and health aspects of contractor activities on site
establishing procedures for communication of accidents and incidents involving the
contractor‘s personnel
Additionally, it is also necessary for organisations to check the ability of contractors where they work
close to, or in collaboration with, direct employees or with other contractor's employees. Such
arrangements should cover the:
recruitment and placement procedures that ensure employees (including managers) have
the necessary physical and mental abilities to do their jobs or can acquire them through
training and experience. This may require individual fitness assessments by medical
examination and tests of physical fitness or aptitudes and abilities where work-associated
risks require it
systems to identify safety and health training needs arising from recruitment, changes in
staff, plant, substances, technology, processes or working practices
training documentation as appropriate to suit the size and activity of the organisation
refresher training to maintain or enhance competence, to include where necessary
contractors‘ employees, self-employed people or temporary workers who are working in the
organisation
communication systems and resources made available to ensure work is co-ordinated safely
and the risk of accidents are minimised
arrangements to ensure competent cover for staff absences, especially for staff with critical
safety and health responsibilities
general health promotion and surveillance schemes that contribute to the maintenance of
general health and fitness; this may include assessments of fitness for work, rehabilitation,
job adaptation following injury or ill-health, or a policy on testing employees for drugs or
alcohol abuse
8|Page
Effective safety and health management includes effective emergency planning. What should
this cover?
The organisation should establish and maintain procedures to respond to accidents and emergency
situations, and to prevent and minimise the safety and health impacts associated with them. This is
required by Section 11 of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005. Emergency planning
should cover:
details on the installation, availability and testing of suitable warning and alarm systems
details of emergency scenarios that might occur, including the means for dealing with these
scenarios
the emergency procedures in the organisation, including the responsibilities of key
personnel, procedures for fire-fighting and evacuation of all personnel on site and first-aid
requirements
details of emergency services (e.g. fire brigade, ambulance services, spill clean-up services)
and the contact arrangements for these services
internal and external communications plans
training plans and testing for effectiveness
details on the availability of emergency rescue equipment and its maintenance log.
The organisation should periodically test, review and revise its emergency preparedness and
response procedures where necessary, in particular after the occurrence of accidents or emergency
situations. The emergency plan should dovetail with the Safety Statement as required by Section 20
of the 2005 Act. Major accident hazard sites covered by the EU COMAH Regulations, need to have
emergency plans in place to cover major accidents involving chemicals. Details of what is required
are covered at Control of Major Accident Hazards on this website.
9|Page
What key questions should an employer ask her/himself to determine the adequacy of safety
and health management in the organisation?
The following are some key questions for employers to assist in determining the adequacy of their
safety and health management in the organisation:
Does your executive board of directors or senior management team ensure all their
decisions reflect the safety and health intentions in your Safety Statement?
Does your executive board of directors or senior management team recognise the need to
involve all staff in issues that affect their safety and health?
Do your directors and senior managers provide daily safety and health leadership in the
organisation?
Do you have an agreed safety and health policy? Is it written into your Safety Statement?
Have you allocated responsibilities for safety and health to specific people - are they clear on
what they have to do and are they held accountable?
Is safety and health always considered before any new work is started or work equipment is
bought?
Did you consult and involve your staff and your safety representatives effectively?
Have you identified the hazards and assessed the risks to your own staff, to others and to
the public in the workplaces you control?
Do you set standards for the premises, plant, substances, procedures and people you
control or the products you produce? Are these standards in place and the risks effectively
controlled?
Do you have an emergency plan to deal with serious or imminent danger, e.g. fires, process
deviations, gas leaks, the effects of poor weather, floods etc?
Does your staff have sufficient information about the risks they are exposed to and the
preventive measures they must take?
Do you have the right levels of safety and health expertise? Are your employees properly
trained and do they attend the training provided by you?
Do you need specialist safety and health advice from outside and if so have you arranged to
obtain it?
Does all your staff accept their responsibilities under safety and health law?
10 | P a g e
How can the safety and health management system
be monitored?
It should be a line-management responsibility to monitor safety and health performance against
predetermined plans and standards. Monitoring reinforces management’s commitment to safety and
health objectives in general and helps to develop a positive safety and health culture by rewarding
positive work done to control risk. Two types of monitoring are required:
1. Active Systems, that monitor the design, development, installation and operation of
management arrangements, safety systems and workplace precautions.
2. Reactive Systems, that monitor accidents, ill health, incidents and other evidence of
deficient safety and health performance.
1. Active monitoring
Every organisation should collect information to investigate the causes of substandard performance
or conditions adequately. Documented procedures for carrying out these activities on a regular basis
for key operations should be established and maintained. The monitoring system should include:
identification of the appropriate data to be collected and accuracy of the results required
monitoring of the achievement of specific plans, set performances criteria and objectives
installation of the requisite monitoring equipment and assessment of its accuracy and
reliability
calibration and regular maintenance of this equipment together with documented records of
both the procedures involved and the results obtained
analysis and records of the monitoring data collected and documented actions to be taken
when results breach performance criteria
evaluation of all the data as part of the safety and health management review
documented procedures for reviewing the monitoring and safety and health implications of
forthcoming changes to work systems.
Techniques that should be used for active measurement of the safety and health management
system include:
2. Reactive monitoring
A system of internal reporting of all accidents (which includes ill health cases) and incidents of non-
compliance with the safety and health management system should be set up so that the experience
gained may be used to improve the management system. The organisation should encourage an
open and positive approach to reporting and follow-up and should also put in place a system of
ensuring that reporting requirements are met.
11 | P a g e
The organisation should establish procedures for investigating accidents and incidents to identify
their causes, including possible deficiencies in the safety and health management system. Those
responsible for investigating accidents, and incidents should be identified and the investigation
should include plans for corrective action, which incorporate measures for:
12 | P a g e
What should be contained in the system audit
protocols and procedures?
The protocols and procedures for the audit on the health and safety management system should
include the following:
13 | P a g e
Do the audits involve staff at all levels? Do you involve your safety representative and safety
committee, where it exists, in the audits?
When did you last review your Safety Statement and your safety and health performance?
Does your executive board of Directors or senior management team review your safety and
health performance and ensure safety and health risk management systems are in place and
remain effective?
Has your executive board and your Directors or senior management team appointed
someone at Director level to ensure safety and health risk management issues are properly
addressed and is this person competent to do so?
leadership skills
communication skills
14 | P a g e
techniques of safety and health management
training, instruction, coaching and problem - solving skills relevant to safety and health
understanding of the risks in a manager's area of responsibility
knowledge of relevant legislation and appropriate methods of control, including risk
assessment
knowledge of the organisation‘s planning, measuring, reviewing and auditing arrangements
awareness of the financial and economic benefits of good safety and health performance.
3. Individual needs: Individual needs are generally identified through performance appraisal. They
may also arise because an individual has not absorbed formal job training or information provided as
part of their induction. Training needs vary over time, and assessments should cover:
15 | P a g e
How does an organisation ensure it has access to
sufficient safety and health knowledge, skills and/or
experience to identify and manage safety and health
risks effectively?
Organisations should ensure they have access to sufficient safety and health knowledge, skills or
experience to identify and manage safety and health risks effectively, and to set appropriate
objectives by:
Whichever method or combination of these methods is chosen by an organisation it does not relieve
the employer and the management of the organisation from their legal responsibilities to ensure a
safe workplace.
****************************************************************************************************************
formulating and developing safety and health policies, not just for existing activities but also
with respect to new acquisitions or processes
promoting a positive safety and health culture in the organisation and securing the effective
implementation of safety and health policy
planning for safety and health, including the setting of realistic short and long term
objectives, deciding priorities and establishing adequate systems and performance
standards
day-to-day implementation and monitoring of policy and plans, including accident and
incident investigation, reporting and analysis
reviewing performance and auditing the whole safety and health management system.
16 | P a g e
maintain adequate information systems on topics including safety and health law, safety and
health management and technical advances
demonstrate the ability to interpret the law in the context of the organisation
be involved in establishing organisational arrangements, systems and risk - control
standards relating to hardware and human performance, by advising line management on
matters such as legal and technical standards
establish and maintain procedures for reporting, investigating, recording and analysing
accidents and incidents
establish and maintain procedures, including monitoring and other means such as review
and auditing, to ensure that senior managers get a true picture of how well safety and health
is being managed (where a benchmarking role may be especially valuable)
present their advice independently and effectively.
1. The event:
Details of any injured person, including age, sex, experience, training, etc.
A description of the circumstances, including the place, time of day and conditions.
a. the nature of the outcome for example, injuries or ill-health to employees or members of the
public; damage to property; process disruptions; emissions to the environment; creation of
hazards
b. the severity of the harm caused, including injuries, ill-health and losses
c. the immediate management response to the situation and its adequacy, i.e.
Was it dealt with promptly?
Were continuing risks dealt with promptly and adequately? Was the first-aid response
adequate?
Were emergency procedures followed?
d. Whether the event was preventable and if so how.
17 | P a g e
2. The potential consequences:
What was the worst that could have happened?
What prevented the worst from happening?
How often could such an event occur (the ‘Recurrence Potential’)?
What was the worst injury or damage, which could have resulted (the ‘Severity Potential’)?
How many people could the event have affected (the 'Population Potential')?
3. Recommendations:
Prioritised actions with responsibilities and targets for completion
Whether the risk assessments need to be reviewed and the safety statement updated.
identify root causes in the safety and health and general management of the organisation
communicate findings and recommendations to all relevant parties
include relevant findings and recommendations from investigations in the continuing safety
and health review process.
most organisations have too few injury accidents or cases of work-related ill health to
distinguish real trends from random effects.
if more work is done by the same number of people in the same time, increased workload
alone may account for an increase in accident rates.
the length of absence from work attributed to injury or work-related ill health may be
influenced by factors other than the severity of injury or occupational ill health. Such factors
can include poor morale, monotonous work, stressful working conditions, poor management /
employee relations and local advice or traditions.
accidents are often under-reported, and occasionally over-reported. Levels of reporting can
change. They can improve as a result of increased workforce awareness and better reporting
and recording systems.
a time delay can occur between safety and health management system failures and harmful
effects. Moreover, many occupational diseases have long latent periods. Management
should not wait for harm to occur before judging whether safety and health management
systems are working.
**********************************************************************
18 | P a g e
HEALTH & SAFETY
Along with physical health, we should also
take care of our mental health also.
When you are stressed or depressed or
anxious, you may not able to do your duties
properly.
But these types of issues, most of the time we
ignore.
So if you want to be a real healthy person,
then You must have to take care of your
mental health also.
Whenever you feel any stress, anxiety or
depression, take the help of professionals.
Some of the health issues faced by software engineers are:
1.Neck and back pain due to sitting on desks in front of the
computer for long hours.
2.Eye pain or bloodshot eyes due to staring continuously at the
computer screen.
3.Spine problems due to sitting on a desk for long durations.
4.Insomnia due to working on the computer for long hours.
5.Headache due to long hours of work and exposure to the
screen for a long time.
6.Increase in weight due to sitting in a desk causing inactivity.
7.Depression and stress due to increased amount of work and
therefore the need to work overtime.
8.Improper blood circulation in the body due to the sitting idle in a
desk.
9.Risk of bacterial infection due to dirty tech equipment.
10.Laziness due to inactivity.
11.Reduced vision or gradually reducing eyesight due to
continuous exposure to computer screen.
STAY
HEALTHY & SAFE !!
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Maintain a Healthy, Safe and Secure Working By the end of this session, you will be able
Environment to learn about:
1. Workplace safety
2. Reporting accidents and emergencies
3. Protecting health and safety as you
work
Page 37 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Develop understanding on the potential health and safety hazards found Classroom
at work place
Create awareness on the common safety signs used at workplace
Facilitator Preparation
Responsibilities
Review examples provided: reflect on your own experiences and determine when to
share them.
Review all material – Facilitator Guide, Presentation, Guides and Handouts (if any)
Conduct a run through of the content. Conduct a dress rehearsal of the session as you
move through the content. Make sure you are comfortable with the tools and
interactions recommended in the facilitator guide.
Note that all examples are in italics to emphasize key learning points; however, you
may use your own professional experience to enhance the learning.
Page 38 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Principles of Facilitating
Personal Experiences
As a facilitator, you lead participants through prepared scenarios and discussions. During
this process, relate your own professional experience to add realism. Often, personal
experienceson how you helped a colleague through the career ownership process and
guided them to achieving work satisfaction are more memorable than step-by-step
instructions on following the career ownership process. Sharing experiences helps
participants understand how professionals work and think, and gives them the opportunity
to apply those lessons to their own work processes. Also, participants are more likely to
remember answers if they have to think and explore on their own. Your goal is to foster
independent thinking and action rather than having participants depend on your experience.
Experiential Learning
This workshop includes exercises designed to help participants discover the principles of
guiding the participants through the career ownership process and career satisfaction.
Encourage a free-wheeling discussion and call out important trends and insights. Make
liberal use of the whiteboard to capture and display critical participant insights.
Socratic Questions
Your goal throughout the session is to guide participants towards thinking through the
scenarios and discussion questions independently, rather than providing answer. For
example:
The Reality Check worksheet provides valuable What information can you gather from the
information about how time is currently spent and Reality Check worksheet and how can the
what it would look like in the best case scenario. information be used to move towards
career satisfaction?
Page 39 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Introductions
I am <Facilitator’s Name> and I am your facilitator today.”
Briefly review the roles of the Lead Facilitator and Support Facilitator, if any.
Give a brief of your own experience and background.
“Regardless of why you’re here today, we’re all going to walk away with some key benefits – let’s
discuss those briefly.”
Page 40 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Page 41 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
1. Refer to the Workplace Safety Rules table in the material later and identify
the rules that employees/workers must follow.
2. Refer to the Vocabulary Words table in the material later if you do not
understand the meaning of a word/term.
Page 42 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Suggested Responses:
Safety rules in the workplace protect workers from injury or death.
These rules teach workers how to work safely – use rules in tables as outlined later to
discuss .
Prompt participants to come up with basic safety rules that they follow at their
workplace.
Fire Safety
Employees should be aware of all emergency exits, including fire escape routes, of the
office building and also the locations of fire extinguishers and alarms.
First Aid
Employees should know about the location of first-aid kits in the office. First-aid kits
should be kept in places that can be reached quickly. These kits should contain all the
important items for first aid, for example, all the things required to deal with common
problems such as cuts, burns, headaches, muscle cramps, etc.
Security
Employees should make sure that they keep their personal things in a safe place.
Electrical Safety
Employees must be provided basic knowledge of using electrical equipment and common
problems. Employees must also be provided instructions about electrical safety such as
keeping water and food items away from electrical equipment. Electrical staff and
engineers should carry out routine inspections of all wiring to make sure there are no
damaged or broken wires.
Page 43 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
1. True or False? The employer and employees are responsible for workplace
safety.
a. True
b. False
Suggested Responses:
Yes – It is the joint responsibility of both employer and employees to ensure that the workplace
is safe and secure.
Suggested Responses:
True, always keep the management informed on any potential injury or health, Safety and
Security events or risks noticed in an organization.
3. True or False? No matter how big or small the injury; the injured person
should receive medical attention.
a. True
b. False
Suggested Responses:
True, No matter what the size of the injury – it is critical that medical help is sought.
Sometimes physical injury may be minimal but internal injury cannot be assessed, which could
be critical.
Page 44 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Suggested Responses:
True, all guidelines set by the company takes into account the potentials risks to the employees
and measures to encounter those risks. While there is temptations to indentify shortcuts or
alternative ways of working with machines and equipment, the pre-defined protocol should not
be changed without proper authorization by requisite experts.
5. True or False? At any office, the first-aid kit should always be available for
use in an emergency.
a. True
b. False
Suggested Responses:
True, at times when a medical emergency hits – the medical aid could take time to reach. First
aid kits can provide relief in the interim and prevent increased risks.
Suggested Responses:
False, fire drills are critical activities that everyone should participate unless permissions have
been taken prior. When emergency hits knowing the process to follow is very critical to
provide safety support to the employees. It is always better to be prepared for such situations.
7. True or False? The "Wet Floor" sign is not needed and causes problems for people. Wet
floor can be identified easily, without the signs.
a. True
b. False
Page 45 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Suggested Responses:
False, Wet floors are hazards waiting to happen unless clearly marked. It is not
very easy from distance to know if a surface is wet. Slips can be fatal and should be avoided
with proper signage on the floor when they are wet
8. True or False? It is okay to place heavy and light items on the same shelf.
a. True
b. False
Suggested Responses:
False, Heavy and light items should be clearly demarcated. If heavy items are placed by error
in light items they can lead to breakage and other related accidents. Further limits of weight
for each shelf should be defined so that it does not exceed acceptable limits.
9. True or False? There is no need to train employees on how to use the fire
extinguisher. They can operate extinguishers following the instruction written
on the extinguisher case, when needed.
a. True
b. False
Suggested Responses:
False, In case of situations like fire panic is created and there will not be enough time to react.
Reading instructions will be a challenge leading to more disaster. Being prepared knowing
how to operate will enable employees to react fast and prevent further damage that could be
caused due to fire
10. True or False? The cleaning supplies, especially chemical products, can be left in the
bathrooms or in any of the cupboards in the office.
a. True
b. False
Page 46 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Suggested Responses:
False, Cleaning supplies and other chemical products should be kept safe and
secure with only authorized staff. If consumed by error can cause harmful
impact.
Activity Description:
Based on what you have learnt, create safety checklists for yourself.
These checklists will be discussed in the next session.
Summary
Page 47 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Case 1: On Friday, June 13, 1997 a fire broke out at Uphaar Cinema, Green Park, Delhi, while
the film Border was being shown. The fire happened because of a blast in a transformer in an
underground parking lot in the five-organization building which housed the cinema hall and
several offices.59 people died and 103 were seriously hurt when people rushed to move out of
the exit doors. Many people were trapped on the balcony and died because the exit doors were
locked.
Case 2: 43 people died when fire broke out on the fifth and sixth floors of the Stephen Court
building in Kolkata.
Case 3: 9 people were killed and 68 hurt when a fire accident took place in a commercial
complex in Bangalore.
Case 4: In Kolkata, more than 90 people were killed when a fire broke out at the Advanced
Medicare and Research Institute (AMRI) Hospitals at Dhakuria.
Page 48 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Discuss the definition of ‘accidents and emergencies’ and the events that fall in the category of
accidents.
Each organization or chain of organizations has procedures and practices to handle and report
accidents and take care of emergencies. Although you will find most of these procedures and
practices common across the industry, some procedures might be modified to fit a particular type of
business within the industry. For example, procedure to handle accidents caused by slipping or
falling will be similar across the industry. You need to be aware of the general procedures and
practices as well as the ones specific to your organization.
The following are some of the guidelines for identifying and reporting an accident or emergency:
Notice and correctly identify accidents and emergencies: You need to be aware of what
constitutes an emergency and what constitutes an accident in an organization. The organization’s
policies and guidelines will be the best guide in this matter. You should be able to accurately
identify such incidents in your organization. You should also be aware of the procedures to tackle
each form of accident and emergency.
Page 49 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Get help promptly and in the most suitable way: Follow the
procedure for handling a particular type of accident and
emergency. Promptly act as per the guidelines. Ensure that you
provide the required help and support as laid down in the policies.
Do not act outside the guidelines and policies laid down for your
role even if your actions are motivated by the best intention.
Remember that only properly trained and certified professionals
may be authorized to take decisions beyond the organization’s
policies and guidelines, if the situation requires.
Follow company policies and procedures for preventing further injury while waiting for help
to arrive: If someone is injured, do not act as per your impulse or gut feeling. Go as per the
procedures laid down by your organization’s policy for tackling injuries. You need to stay calm and
follow the prescribed procedures. If you panic or act outside the prescribed guidelines, you may
end up further aggravating the emergency situation or putting the injured person into further
danger. You may even end up injuring yourself.
Act within the limits of your responsibility and authority when accidents and emergencies
arise: Provide help and support within your authorized limit. Provide medical help to the injured
only if you are certified to provide the necessary aid. Otherwise, wait for the professionals to arrive
and give necessary help. In case of emergencies also, act within your authorized limits and let the
professionals do the task allocated to them. Do not attempt to handle any emergency situation for
which you do not have formal training or authority. You may end up harming yourself and the
people around you.
Promptly follow instructions given by senior staff and the emergency services: Provide
necessary services as described by the organization’s policy for your role. Also, follow the
instructions of senior staff that are trained to handle particular situations. Work under their
supervision when handling accidents and emergencies.
Types of Accidents
Trip and fall: Customers or employees can trip on carelessly left loose material and fall down,
such as tripping on loose wires, goods left on aisles, elevated threshold. This type of accident may
result in simple bruises to serious fractures.
Page 50 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Slip and fall: People may lose foothold on the floor and stairs
resulting in injuries. Slips are mainly due to wet floors. Other
causes: spilling of liquids or throwing of other slip-causing
material on floors, such fruit peels. Tripping and slipping is
generally caused by negligence, which can be either from the
side of organization employees or from the side of customers.
It can also be due to broken or uneven walking surface, such as
broken or loose floor tile. However, you should prevent any
such negligence. In addition, people should be properly
cautioned against tripping and slipping. For example, a “wet
floor” sign will warn people to walk carefully on freshly
mopped floors. Similarly, “watch your steps” signs can prevent accidents on a staircase with a
sharp bent or warn against a loose floor tile.
Injuries caused due to escalators or elevators (or lifts): Although such injuries are uncommon,
they mainly happen to children, ladies, and elderly. Injuries can be caused by falling on escalators
and getting hurt. People may be injured in elevators by falling down due to sudden, jerking
movement of elevators or by tripping on elevators’ threshold. They may also get stuck in elevators
resulting in panic and trauma. Escalators and elevators should be checked regularly for proper and
safe functioning by the right person or department. If you notice any sign of malfunctioning of
escalators or elevators, immediately inform the right people. If organization’s procedures are not
being followed properly for checking and maintaining these, escalate to appropriate authorities in
the organization.
Accidents due to falling of goods: Goods can fall on people from shelves or wall hangings and
injure them. This typically happens if pieces of goods have been piled improperly or kept in an
inappropriate manner. Always check that pieces of goods are placed properly and securely.
Accidents due to moving objects: Moving objects, such as trolleys, can also injure people in the
organization. In addition, improperly kept props and lighting fixtures can result in accidents. For
example, nails coming out dangerously from props can cause cuts. Loosely plugged in lighting
fixtures can result in electric shocks.
Page 51 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Activity Description:
1. Refer to the Workplace Safety Rules table in the Student Workbook
and identify the rules that employees/workers must follow.
2. Refer to the Vocabulary Words table if you do not understand the
meaning of a word/term.
Page 52 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
11 Make sure there is proper lighting
in all areas.
Vocabulary Words
Mock Drill/Fire Drill
Practice how to respond/react in case of an emergency, such as a fire
Fire Extinguisher
A small container usually filled with special chemicals for putting out a fire.
Exit
The way to go out of a building or room
Emergency
A sudden, urgent and unexpected event
Spilt Liquid
Soft drink/water/coffee/tea etc. that has fallen on the floor
Routine inspections –
Regular checking
Damaged equipment
Torn wires or broken plugs
Stairways
Staircase/ stairs to go to the next floor
Page 53 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Light fixtures
Bulbs, tube lights etc.
Injury
Getting hurt/bleeding
Kitchen equipment
Vessels used in the kitchen, such as wok, knives, cutting board etc.
Cleaning Supplies
Liquid soap, dish washing liquid etc.
Handling Accidents
Try to avoid accidents in your organization by finding out all potential hazards and eliminating
them. If a colleague or customer in the organization is not following safety practices and
precautions, inform your supervisor or any other authorized personnel. Always remember that one
person’s careless action can harm the safety of many others in the organization. In case of an injury
to a colleague or a customer due to an accident in your organization, you should do the following:
Attend to the injured person immediately. Depending on the level and seriousness of the injury,
see that the injured person receives first aid or medical help at the earliest. You can give medical
treatment or first aid to the injured person only if you are qualified to give such treatments. Let
trained authorized people give first aid or medical treatment.
Inform your supervisor about the accident giving details about the probable cause of accident and
a description of the injury.
Assist your supervisor in investigating and finding out the actual cause of the accident. After
identifying the cause of the accident, help your supervisor to take appropriate actions to prevent
occurrences of similar accidents in future.
Page 54 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Activity Description:
1. Present a scenario where there is a physical injury to a colleague at
workplace.
2. Ask participants on how they would react/attend to the emergency.
Types of Emergencies
Discuss the various types of emergencies that one may come across at the
workplace.
Share some examples.
Each organization also has policies and procedures to tackle emergency situations. The purpose of
these policies and procedures is to ensure safety and well-being of customers and staff during
emergencies. Categories of emergencies may include the following:
Page 55 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Security emergencies, such as armed robberies, intruders, and mob attacks or civil disorder:
Security emergency is an unfavourable situation caused by a breach in security posing a significant
danger to life and property.
What all services and equipment should you shut down during which emergency?
Here are some general emergency handling procedures that you can follow:
Keep a list of numbers to call during emergency, such as those of police, fire brigade, security,
ambulance etc. Ensure that these numbers are fed into the organizations telephone program and
hard copies of the numbers are placed at strategic locations in the organization.
Page 56 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Regularly check that all emergency handling equipments are in working condition, such as the
fire extinguisher and fire alarm system.
Ensure that emergency exits are not obstructed and keys to such exists are easily accessible.
Never place any objects near the emergency doors or windows.
Suggested Responses:
True, you need to attend to the person immediately, inform to the supervisor and assist the
supervisor
2. Which of the following are appropriate actions for handling accidents and emergencies?
Select the two correct actions.
Suggested Responses:
Page 57 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
c and d – You should provide first aid only if you are qualified to do such treatments. While
attending the accident or emergencies it is critical that all policy and guidelines needs to be
adhered to.
Page 58 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Summary
Page 59 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
o Each year, an estimated 2 million people die because of occupational accidents and work-
related diseases.
o Across the globe, there are almost 270 million occupational accidents and 160 million
work-related diseases each year.
Hazards
In relation to workplace safety and health, hazard can be defined as any source of potential harm
or danger to someone or any adverse health effect produced under certain condition.
A variety of sources can be potential source of hazard at workplace. These hazards include
practices or substances that may cause harm. Here are a few examples of potential hazards:
o Material: Knife or
sharp edged nails can
cause cuts.
o Substance: Chemicals
such as Benzene can
cause fume
suffocation.
Inflammable substances like petrol can cause fire.
o Electrical energy: Naked wires or electrodes can result in electric shocks.
Page 60 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
o Condition: Wet floor can cause slippage. Working conditions in mines can cause health
hazards.
o Gravitational energy: Objects falling on you can cause injury.
o Rotating or moving objects: Clothes entangled into ratting objects can cause serious harm.
Using computers: Hazards include poor sitting postures or excessive duration of sitting in one
position. These hazards may result in pain and strain. Making same movement repetitively can
also cause muscle fatigue In addition, glare from the computer screen can be harmful to eyes.
Stretching up at regular intervals or doing some simple yoga in your seat only can mitigate such
hazards.
Handling office equipment: Improper handling of office equipment can result in injuries. For
example, sharp-edged equipment if not handled properly can cause cuts. Staff members should be
trained to handle equipment properly. Relevant manual should be made available by
administration on handling equipment.
Handling objects: Lifting or moving heavy items without proper procedure or techniques can be
a source of potential hazard. Always follow approved procedure and proper posture for lifting or
moving objects.
Stress at work: In today’s organization, you may encounter various stress causing hazards. Long
working hours can be stressful and so can be aggressive conflicts or arguments with colleagues.
Always look for ways for conflict resolution with colleagues. Have some relaxing hobbies for
stress against long working hours.
Working environment: Potential hazards may include poor ventilation, inappropriate height
chairs and tables, stiffness of furniture, poor lighting, staff unaware of emergency procedures, or
poor housekeeping. Hazards may also include physical or emotional intimidation, such as
Page 61 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
bullying or ganging up against someone. Staff should be made aware of organization’s policies to
fight against all the given hazards related to working environment.
Each organization will has its own evacuation procedures as listed in its policies. An alert
employee, who is well-informed about evacuation procedures, can not only save him or herself,
but also helps others in case of emergencies. Therefore, you should be aware of these procedures
and follow them properly during an emergency evacuation. Read your organization’s policies to
know about the procedures endorsed by it. In addition, here are a few general evacuation steps
that will always be useful in such situations:
o Leave the premises immediately and start moving towards the nearest emergency exit.
o Guide your customers to the emergency exits.
o If possible, assist any person with disability to move towards the emergency exit.
However, do not try to carry anyone unless you are trained to do so.
o Keep yourself light when evacuating the premises. You may carry your hand-held
belongings, such as bags or briefcase as you move towards the emergency exit. However,
do not come back into the building to pick up your belongings unless the area is declared
safe.
o Do not use the escalators or elevators (lifts) to avoid overcrowding and getting trapped, in
case there is a power failure. Use the stairs instead.
o Go to the emergency assembly area. Check if any of your colleagues are missing and
immediately inform the personnel in charge of emergency evacuation or your supervisor.
o Do not go back to the building you have evacuated till you are informed by authorized
personnel that it is safe to go inside.
After discussing the course content, ask candidates to prompt the key points
on their understanding of the evacuation procedures at their current
organization.
Safety Signs
Some of the common safety signs are given below. Note down the labels for
each sign.
Page 62 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Discuss and check the participants understanding of the various safety signs given in the picture
above.
Page 63 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
1. Store all cleaning chemicals in tightly closed containers in separate cupboards.
2. Keep the kitchen clean and dry all the time.
3. Throw away rubbish daily.
4. Make sure all areas have proper lighting.
5. In case of any injury or fracture, do not move the person until he or she has received medical
attention.
6. Do not wear loose clothing or jewelry when working with machines. It may catch on moving
equipment and cause a serious injury.
7. Never distract the attention of people who are working near fire or with some machinery,
tools or equipment.
8. Where required, wear protective items, such as goggles, safety glasses, masks, gloves, hair
nets, etc.
9. Shut down all machines before leaving for the day.
10. Do not play with electrical controls or switches.
11. Do not operate machines or equipment until you have been properly trained and allowed to
do so by your supervisor.
12. Do not adjust, clean or oil moving machinery.
13. Stack all shelves in an orderly way.
14. Stack all boxes and crates properly.
15. Never leave dishrags, aprons and other clothing near any hot surface.
16. Repair torn wires or broken plugs before using any electrical equipment.
17. Do not use equipment if it smokes, sparks or looks unsafe.
18. Cover all food with a lid, plastic wrap or aluminium foil.
19. Do not smoke in “No Smoking” areas.
20. Report any unsafe condition or acts to your supervisor. These could include:
Slippery floors
Missing entrance and exit signs
Poorly lighted stairs
Loose handrails or guard rails
Loose, open or broken windows
Dangerously piled supplies or equipment
Unlocked doors and gates
Electrical equipment left operating
Open doors on electrical panels
Leaks of steam, water, oil or other liquids
Blocked aisles
Blocked fire extinguishers.
Blocked fire doors
Smoke in non-smoking areas
Roof leaks
Safety devices not operating properly
Find the Problem
Page 64 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
In this activity, you will be shown some pictures. Observe the displayed pictures
carefully and identify the problems in each of the pictures that could cause
accidents.
There are many sources of hazard in the picture among others discuss about –
painter on ladder without any support being provided, people walking on the
stairs with wet paint on the floor, person picking a heavy box without any
support, ladder too close and in the way of the stairs.
Page 65 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
There are many sources of hazard in the picture among others discuss about –
Women climbing on the chair and handling electric equipment. Heater on the
floor could be a cause of fire, Computer wires hanging out could easibly get
entangled in legs and make people fall, there is material on the floor on the
mat where a person could trim, coffee kettle on a tall drawer chest could
create electric hazard
Page 66 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
There are many sources of hazard in the picture among others discuss about:
Page 67 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Healthy Living
Eating a balanced diet: A balanced diet is a meal that provides you the right amount of
carbohydrate, fat, protein, vitamins, and minerals. A balanced diet helps to keep you physically
fit and provides stamina to work.
Having proper sleep: Good sleep reduces stress, reduces risk for developing diseases, and keeps
you alert. You need to get 6 or 7 hours of sleep each night. Lack of sleep increases the chances of
high blood pressure and cholesterol, and stroke.
Exercising regularly: Exercise is a physical activity that keeps your body fit. Exercising helps
prevent development of disease conditions and makes you energetic.
Avoiding bad habits, such as smoking and drinking: It's not too late to identify and change
bad habits such as smoking, drinking, over-eating, and more. Understanding the harmful routines
is the first step to reversing these. The next step is realizing ways correct them and embracing
new ones, which help adopt healthier behaviours and start living a happier, healthier life.
Page 68 of 141
Facilitators Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Ergonomics: Ergonomics is the science concerned with designing and arranging things so that
people can use them easily and safely. Applying ergonomics can reduce the potential for
accidents, potential for injury and ill health, and improve performance and productivity.
Activity Description:
1. Make groups of 4-5.
2. Ask participants to discuss within group – and present their
thoughts on “healthy living”.
Summary
Using computers
Handling objects
Stress at work
Working environment
Follow all safety rules and warning to keep your workplace free from
accidents.
Page 69 of 141
Matters of Discussion
proposition.
or is false" is a proposition.
SPIRAL FRAMEWORK
13
tacit to tacit knowledge transfer
As tacit knowledge is internal, and embedded in
people, human interactions are essential for its
transfer.
So in the socialization process tacit knowledge in the
form of experience or skills can be transferred
between individuals.
online social networks seem to be a more efficient
way to transfer tacit knowledge than are individual
face-to-face interactions.
Tacit to Tacit: When skills and knowledge are shared
directly from one person to another - think about
how a new sales hire might learn through shadowing
your company's top seller.
14
tacit to explicit knowledge transfer
The process of converting Tacit-to-Explicit is
called 'Externalization', that means making
internal & implicit knowledge, external &
explicit.
Tacit Knowledge can only be made explicit
when it is possible to codify and express such
knowledge formally, in forms associated with
Explicit Knowledge.
CITATIONS READS
3 9,446
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Relationship between knowledge management practices and library users' satisfaction at malaysian university libraries: A preliminary finding View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Ts. Dr. Muhamad Saufi Che Rusuli on 21 October 2015.
Abstract
The effectiveness of a knowledge sharing activities in organization has the potential of improving customer services, bringing
new product to market and reducing cost of business operations. Recently, Information Technologies are often used in knowledge
management in informing customers and employees of the latest innovation or development as well as sharing knowledge
among the employees. In knowledge management, effective knowledge sharing is considered to be one of the most vital
components of KM success. Knowledge sharing practice helps organization to improve performance and achieve their mission.
However, many researchers and authors agree and disagree with each others about embedding knowledge sharing practice in
workplace. Therefore, this paper discusses generally about knowledge sharing practices in organization to investigate whether
knowledge sharing is practiced and embedded sufficiently in organization.
1.0 Introduction
Knowledge sharing is central to success of all knowledge management strategists. Effective knowledge
sharing practices enable reuse and regeneration of knowledge at individual and organizational level.
In recent years there had been considerable emphasis on the need to create a culture in organization
that is proponent to knowledge sharing and implement strategies that are more knowledge friendly.
Nowadays, organizations worldwide have been seriously undertaking initiatives to ensure knowledge
management is successful by embedding knowledge sharing practices in their daily work process. In
Malaysia context, several organizations have taken initiatives to embed knowledge sharing in their
operational activities. They believe that through knowledge management platform they could share
the experience and knowledge from individual to individual without boundaries.
Park and Im (2003) defined knowledge sharing as “the process of transferring knowledge from a person
to another in organization. It is a process to accumulate shared knowledge among members”. Bock and
Kim (2002) stated it can be defined also as a kind of social interaction among people. Knowledge, unlike
information and is locked in the human mind and part of human identity. Frappaolo (2006) claimed
that knowledge sharing is about “how people share and use what they know”. In addition, Tasmin and
Woods (2007) asserted that knowledge sharing as a social system that supports collaboration and
integration which is normally facilitated by technology.
Dalkir (2005) also supported the defined notion that knowledge sharing is to be associated with
“appropriate mix” of technological channels for optimizing knowledge exchanges. Creating and
exchanging knowledge are intangible activities that can neither be supervised nor imposed. They
International Conference on Ethics and Professionalism 2010 (ICEP 2010)
happen only when people cooperate voluntarily. This exchange of knowledge can lead to the creation
of new knowledge, which can be an important source of competitive advantage.
Referring to Bock and Kim (2002) stated that Davenport (1997) argues sharing knowledge is
often unnatural. He said that people will not share their knowledge as they think their knowledge is
valuable and important. But, Samieh and Wahba (2007) agreed that the knowledge sharing practice are
motivated and executed mainly at the individual levels. Even in the absence of strong organizational
norms of knowledge sharing, employees may tend to share knowledge according to their personal
benefits and cost. At the end, knowledge sharing practices can help organizations becomes more
profitable and undefeated.
Nowadays, many CEOs and managers in organizations understand the importance of knowledge
sharing among their employees and eager to introduce the knowledge management paradigm in
their workplaces. Chaudhry (2005) reported that several studies have been conducted during five
years to review knowledge management strategies and knowledge sharing practices in the local
organizations. Singapore, for example, provides an interesting case study in this regard. Singapore
is conservative in adhering to Asian cultural traditions and at the same time open to innovation
and creativity. It is a diverse and multiethnic society that is eager to stick to meritocracy and system
efficiency in its pursuits of innovation and creativity which are crucial to the success of knowledge
management activities.
In Malaysia, knowledge sharing practices are not widely implemented. Only several government
body and private sectors especially which have link with worldwide company embedding knowledge
sharing. Besides, the private companies which embedding knowledge sharing own their innovation
and creativity to become more profitable and knowledgeable.
Chong (2003) found that knowledge sharing was taking place on informal basis through face-to-
face communication and collaborative workgroups. His study reveals that knowledge is supported
in this environmental by a culture that encourages sharing of knowledge, learning from failures, and
developing people’s skills. Rastogi (2000) emphasized that organisational culture required favorable
social environment such as trust, shared values, and goodwill to facilite knowledge sharing. This
signifies the importance of trust in knowledge culture and knowledge sharing.
Lim, Tang and Yang (2004) agreed through face-to-face context, people that have knowledge
sharing attitudes were getting more evident rather than electronic medium. Employees were found
to be more willing to share knowledge with increased rewards.
“Embedding knowledge into everyday work process is time consuming and expensive”
Snowden (2002) stated it’s impossible to measure whether someone is sharing their knowledge or
not in organizations, but it is possible to measure if they comply with a process. Therefore, employees
are not susceptible to directive control in respect of intangible assets such as knowledge.
Norris et al. (2003) supported that knowledge becomes tangible as digitized content, as context
that can be digitally shared and through direct and indirect interactions. Knowledge can be created by
asking a question and watching responses provoke through conversations, responses, and interactions
among network participants.
Today, managers are very concerned with implementing knowledge management practices in their
organization. They face a number of challenges in implementing and developing knowledge practice
methods. Both the growing literature on knowledge management and the advice offered by various
798
International Conference on Ethics and Professionalism 2010 (ICEP 2010)
Explicit knowledge is the type of knowledge that can be easily documented and shaped. It can be
created, written down, transferred and followed among the organizational units verbally or through
computer programs, patents, diagrams and information technologies (Calo, 2008; Keskin, 2005; Choi
& Lee, 2003). Explicit knowledge is easier to capture and distribute because of its ability to be passed
on in the form of tangible material. However, while it is easier to transfer, there are still obstacles with
the transference of explicit knowledge. One major issue is that though explicit knowledge is available,
it must be left up to the interpretation of the person who is using the material (Parise et al., 2006).
As mentioned earlier, knowledge sharing needs to communicate with face-to-face and collaboration
with workgroup. One of the challenges of knowledge management is that of getting people to share
their knowledge. In some organizations, sharing is caring and natural (Skyrme, 2008). There are
questions why don’t people share knowledge:
799
International Conference on Ethics and Professionalism 2010 (ICEP 2010)
People have pride in not having to seek advice from others and in waiting to discover new ways for
themselves.
An individual may have knowledge used in one situation but unaware that other people at other
times and places might face similar situations.
If people share some of their experience, will they used it out of context, mis-apply it and then blame
each other or pass it off as their own without giving any acknowledgement or recognition to them
as source.
Skyrme (2008) reveals that lack of time is the major reason given by employees in many organizations.
There is pressure on productivity on deadlines, and it’s general rule that the more knowledgeable
they are, the more people waiting to collar for the next task.
There is not all information and knowledge can be share within community and society. In organization,
there are or maybe have top secret information which cannot be share. This classified “Top Secret”
information and knowledge which keep in organizations have a high values. Only trusted individuals
or people know the secret information and knowledge to protect organizations or country.
Kim, Lee and Olson (2006) stated that embedding knowledge sharing practice can be regarded as a
public good because people who do not pay or contribute to the organization or community also can
share knowledge. Multiple people also can access and shared knowledge at the same time. Viehland
(2005) stated that the alternative approach to managing knowledge sharing is the practice approach.
This approach is more effective in gathering tacit knowledge through informal networks with moderate
use of information technology. Table 1 show two approach of knowledge sharing.
800
International Conference on Ethics and Professionalism 2010 (ICEP 2010)
Kim, Lee and Olson (2006) stated that embedding knowledge sharing practice can be regarded as a
public good because people who do not pay or contribute to the organization or community also can
share knowledge. Multiple people also can access and shared knowledge at the same time.
Knowledge sharing practices can make people in organization innovative and creative to created
things. Meetings, discussion and forum are the best platform to share the knowledge and idea among
groups. The people in the groups can easily exchange and share knowledge to make their tasks
work. It is generally understood that knowledge sharing is an antecedent to many more knowledge
management activities. Tasmin and Woods (2008) evinced that knowledge sharing through knowledge
management effort has been empirically shown to positively and strongly influence higher innovation
activities among manufacturing firms in Malaysia. According to Tasmin and Woods (2008), the
predictive constructs of knowledge management enabling practices were able to explain 99% of its
variance and innovation activities were 52% of its variance. Most importantly, the influence strength
of KM on innovation was at a magnitude of 0.74. These facts show the significance and importance
of knowledge sharing towards innovative activities.
When knowledge sharing among people or employees in organization becomes stronger, it shows
that knowledge also becomes more powerful in organization. Individual or person who shares
their tacit knowledge through conversation becomes more innovative and creative in their work.
Norris et al. (2003) agreed that much of this tacit knowledge exists and is communicated through
conversations in community of practices or networks of practices. Such “know how”, “know who”,
“know where” knowledge promises to be more important. As it is aptly said by an industry captain
of Hewlett-Packard;
801
International Conference on Ethics and Professionalism 2010 (ICEP 2010)
7.4 Attitude
One of advantages of embedding knowledge sharing practice in organization is attitude. Kuo and
Young (2008) stated that for knowledge sharing practices, attitude has been shown to be a critical factor
because one’s knowledge about how to solve organizational problems could influence one’s trade
value. Chowdhury (2004) reported, in a case study at Petronas, the importance of the expertise sharing
attitude with peers and people in workplaces. People also may consider sharing their knowledge in
an organization if they believe this will be personally important and valuable for them.
Culture change is never easy and takes time. But cultures can be changed. Takeuchi and Nonaka
(2004) stated, in his KM milestone book, that “both IBM and Canon have successfully undergone a
transformation and have proven themselves capable of changing as fast as the environment around
them…” (p.25). In those firms environment, effective knowledge sharing deals with cultural change
of the people, process transformation, and technological management systems. According to Skyrme
(2008), involvement from people or individual in organization could be some of the best knowledge
sharing cultures is where everybody believes their knowledge is respected, valued and used to inform
decision. Knowledge sharing practice could make people and individual become valuable.
8.0 Conclusion
Finally, knowledge sharing practice in organization is very important and beneficial to be implemented.
It helps organizations in many ways such as information updating, innovations, creations and others.
Therefore, by understanding the concepts and advantages could facilitate knowledge sharing and
help managers, information and knowledge professionals to support knowledge sharing practices.
Due to this importance, it is expected that organizations to take advantage of the new transformation
of information handling skills for their employees to turn into knowledge management capabilities.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author would like to thank the lecturer, Dr. Rosmaini Tasmin, who was particularly insightful in
guiding the paper throughout the writing process. The author is also grateful to Faculty of Technology
Management, Business and Entrepreneurship and Library of Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia,
Johor for their supports on the paper.
REFERENCES
Alwis, R. S., Hartmann, E. and Gemünden, H. G. (2004). The role of tacit knowledge in innovation management.
20th Annual IMP Conference in Copenhagen. Sept. 2nd – 4th. 2004. p.1-23.
Bock, G. W. and Kim, Y. G. (2002). “Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes About
Knowledge Sharing”. Information Resources Management Journal. 15(2), p.14-21.
Calo, T., 2008. Talent management in the era of the aging workforce: The critical role of knowledge transfer.
Public Person. Manage, 37. p. 403-416.
802
International Conference on Ethics and Professionalism 2010 (ICEP 2010)
Chaudhry, A. S. (2005). Knowledge Sharing Practices in Asian Institutions: A Multi-Cultural Perspective From
Singapore. World Library and Information Congress: 17th IFLA General Conference and Council. Aug. 14th –
18th.
Chowdury, N. (2004). People’s perception on various KM issues: Case Study with A Malaysian Oil Company.
Gombak, Malaysia: IIUM.
Davenport, T. H. (1997). Some Principles of Knowledge Management. (PhD Thesis).
Frappaolo, C. (2006). Knowledge Management. Capstone Publishing Ltd. (A Wiley Company): West Sussex,
England.
Keskin, Halit. (2005).The relationships between explicit and tacit oriented KM strategy and Firm Performance.
Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge Hollywood. 7(1), p.169-176.
Kim, J., Lee, S. M. and Olson, D. L. (2006). Knowledge Sharing: Effects of Cooperative Type and Reciprocity Level.
International Journal of Knowledge Management. 2(4), p.1-16.
Kimiz, D. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford:
UK.
Kuo, F. Y. and Young, M. L. (2008). Predicting Knowledge Sharing Practices Through Intention: A Test of Competing
Models. Computer in Human Behavior. (24), p.2697-2722.
Lee, H. & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An
Integrative View and Empirical Examination. Journal of Management Information Systems. 20(1), p. 179-
228.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N. (2000): SECI, Ba and Leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation,
in: Long Range Planning, 33(4), p.4-34.
Norris, D. M. et. al. (2003). A Revolution In Knowledge Sharing. EDUCAUSE Reviews. Sept./Oct., p.15-22.
Parise, S., R. Cross and T. Davenport, 2006. Strategies for preventing knowledge-loss crisis. MIT Sloan Manage.
Rev., 47. p. 31-38.
Park, H. S. and Im, B. C. (2003). “A study on the Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Local Public Servants in Korea”.
[Internet] http://www.kapa21.or.kr/down/2003
Rastogi, P.N. (2000). Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital – The New Virtuous Reality of
Competitiveness. Human Systems Management. 19(1), p.39-49.
Skyrme, D. J. (2008). The 3Cs of Knowledge Sharing: Culture, Co-opetition and Commitment. (64). p.1-6.
Snowden, D. (2002). Knowledge Management Review. 5(5), p.13-17.
Takeuchi, H. & Nonaka, I. (2004). Hitotsubashi on Knowledge Management. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
Tasmin, R. and Woods, P. (2007). Relationship between corporate knowledge management and the firm’s
innovation capability. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 8(1), p. 62-79.
Tasmin, R. and Woods, P. (2008). Knowledge Management Practices and Innovation Activities Among Large
Manufacturers in Peninsular Malaysia. PhD. Thesis. Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Viehland, D. (2005). ISExpertNet: Facilitating Knowledge Sharing in the Information Systems Academic
Community. The Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology. (2), p.441-450.
803
CITATIONS READS
3 667,519
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Syed Muhammad Sajjad Kabir on 25 June 2018.
CHAPTER – 9
generally their findings are not generalizable to any specific population, rather each case study
produces a single piece of evidence that can be used to seek general patterns among different
studies of the same issue.
Regardless of the kinds of data involved, data collection in a qualitative study takes a great deal of
time. The researcher needs to record any potentially useful data thoroughly, accurately, and
systematically, using field notes, sketches, audiotapes, photographs and other suitable means. The
data collection methods must observe the ethical principles of research. The qualitative methods
most commonly used in evaluation can be classified in three broad categories -
In-depth interview
Observation methods
Document review.
Quantitative Data: Quantitative data is numerical in nature and can be mathematically computed.
Quantitative data measure uses different scales, which can be classified as nominal scale, ordinal
scale, interval scale and ratio scale. Often (not always), such data includes measurements of
something. Quantitative approaches address the ‘what’ of the program. They use a systematic
standardized approach and employ methods such as surveys and ask questions. Quantitative
approaches have the advantage that they are cheaper to implement, are standardized so
comparisons can be easily made and the size of the effect can usually be measured. Quantitative
approaches however are limited in their capacity for the investigation and explanation of similarities
and unexpected differences. It is important to note that for peer-based programs quantitative data
collection approaches often prove to be difficult to implement for agencies as lack of necessary
resources to ensure rigorous implementation of surveys and frequently experienced low
participation and loss to follow up rates are commonly experienced factors.
The Quantitative data collection methods rely on random sampling and structured data collection
instruments that fit diverse experiences into predetermined response categories. They produce
results that are easy to summarize, compare, and generalize. If the intent is to generalize from the
research participants to a larger population, the researcher will employ probability sampling to
select participants. Typical quantitative data gathering strategies include -
Experiments/clinical trials.
Observing and recording well-defined events (e.g., counting the number of patients waiting in
emergency at specified times of the day).
Obtaining relevant data from management information systems.
Administering surveys with closed-ended questions (e.g., face-to face and telephone interviews,
questionnaires etc).
In quantitative research (survey research), interviews are more structured than in Qualitative
research. In a structured interview, the researcher asks a standard set of questions and
nothing more. Face -to -face interviews have a distinct advantage of enabling the researcher to
establish rapport with potential participants and therefore gain their cooperation.
Paper-pencil-questionnaires can be sent to a large number of people and saves the researcher
time and money. People are more truthful while responding to the questionnaires regarding
controversial issues in particular due to the fact that their responses are anonymous.
Mixed Methods: Mixed methods approach as design, combining both qualitative and quantitative
research data, techniques and methods within a single research framework. Mixed methods
approaches may mean a number of things, i.e. a number of different types of methods in a study or
at different points within a study or using a mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods. Mixed
methods encompass multifaceted approaches that combine to capitalize on strengths and reduce
weaknesses that stem from using a single research design. Using this approach to gather and
evaluate data may assist to increase the validity and reliability of the research. Some of the
common areas in which mixed-method approaches may be used include –
Initiating, designing, developing and expanding interventions;
Evaluation;
Improving research design; and
Corroborating findings, data triangulation or convergence.
Some of the challenges of using a mixed methods approach include –
Delineating complementary qualitative and quantitative research questions;
Time-intensive data collection and analysis; and
Decisions regarding which research methods to combine.
Mixed methods are useful in highlighting complex research problems such as disparities in health
and can also be transformative in addressing issues for vulnerable or marginalized populations or
research which involves community participation. Using a mixed-methods approach is one way to
develop creative options to traditional or single design approaches to research and evaluation.
There are many ways of classifying data. A common classification is based upon who collected the
data.
PRIMARY DATA
Data that has been collected from first-hand-experience is known as primary data. Primary data has
not been published yet and is more reliable, authentic and objective. Primary data has not been
changed or altered by human beings; therefore its validity is greater than secondary data.
Importance of Primary Data: In statistical surveys it is necessary to get information from primary
sources and work on primary data. For example, the statistical records of female population in a
country cannot be based on newspaper, magazine and other printed sources. A research can be
conducted without secondary data but a research based on only secondary data is least reliable and
may have biases because secondary data has already been manipulated by human beings. One of such
sources is old and secondly they contain limited information as well as they can be misleading and
biased.
Sources of Primary Data: Sources for primary data are limited and at times it becomes difficult to
obtain data from primary source because of either scarcity of population or lack of cooperation.
Following are some of the sources of primary data.
Experiments: Experiments require an artificial or natural setting in which to perform logical study
to collect data. Experiments are more suitable for medicine, psychological studies, nutrition and for
other scientific studies. In experiments the experimenter has to keep control over the influence of
any extraneous variable on the results.
Survey: Survey is most commonly used method in social sciences, management, marketing and
psychology to some extent. Surveys can be conducted in different methods.
Questionnaire: It is the most commonly used method in survey. Questionnaires are a list of
questions either open-ended or close-ended for which the respondents give answers. Questionnaire
can be conducted via telephone, mail, live in a public area, or in an institute, through electronic mail
or through fax and other methods.
Interview: Interview is a face-to-face conversation with the respondent. In interview the main
problem arises when the respondent deliberately hides information otherwise it is an in depth
source of information. The interviewer can not only record the statements the interviewee speaks
but he can observe the body language, expressions and other reactions to the questions too. This
enables the interviewer to draw conclusions easily.
Observations: Observation can be done while letting the observing person know that s/he is being
observed or without letting him know. Observations can also be made in natural settings as well as in
artificially created environment.
Advantages of Using Primary Data
The investigator collects data specific to the problem under study.
There is no doubt about the quality of the data collected (for the investigator).
If required, it may be possible to obtain additional data during the study period.
Disadvantages of Using Primary Data
1. The investigator has to contend with all the hassles of data collection-
deciding why, what, how, when to collect;
getting the data collected (personally or through others);
getting funding and dealing with funding agencies;
ethical considerations (consent, permissions, etc.).
2. Ensuring the data collected is of a high standard-
all desired data is obtained accurately, and in the format it is required in;
there is no fake/ cooked up data;
unnecessary/ useless data has not been included.
3. Cost of obtaining the data is often the major expense in studies.
SECONDARY DATA
Data collected from a source that has already been published in any form is called as secondary
data. The review of literature in any research is based on secondary data. It is collected by someone
else for some other purpose (but being utilized by the investigator for another purpose). For
examples, Census data being used to analyze the impact of education on career choice and earning.
Common sources of secondary data for social science include censuses, organizational records and
data collected through qualitative methodologies or qualitative research. Secondary data is
essential, since it is impossible to conduct a new survey that can adequately capture past change
and/or developments.
Sources of Secondary Data: The following are some ways of collecting secondary data –
Books
Records
Biographies
Newspapers
Published censuses or other statistical data
Data archives
Internet articles
Research articles by other researchers (journals)
Databases, etc.
Importance of Secondary Data: Secondary data can be less valid but its importance is still there.
Sometimes it is difficult to obtain primary data; in these cases getting information from secondary
sources is easier and possible. Sometimes primary data does not exist in such situation one has to
confine the research on secondary data. Sometimes primary data is present but the respondents are
not willing to reveal it in such case too secondary data can suffice. For example, if the research is
on the psychology of transsexuals first it is difficult to find out transsexuals and second they may
not be willing to give information you want for your research, so you can collect data from books or
other published sources. A clear benefit of using secondary data is that much of the background
work needed has already been carried out. For example, literature reviews, case studies might have
been carried out, published texts and statistics could have been already used elsewhere, media
promotion and personal contacts have also been utilized. This wealth of background work means that
secondary data generally have a pre-established degree of validity and reliability which need not be
re-examined by the researcher who is re-using such data. Furthermore, secondary data can also be
helpful in the research design of subsequent primary research and can provide a baseline with which
the collected primary data results can be compared to. Therefore, it is always wise to begin any
research activity with a review of the secondary data.
Advantages of Using Secondary Data
No hassles of data collection.
It is less expensive.
The investigator is not personally responsible for the quality of data (‘I didn’t do it’).
Disadvantages of Using Secondary Data
The data collected by the third party may not be a reliable party so the reliability and accuracy
of data go down.
Data collected in one location may not be suitable for the other one due variable environmental
factor.
With the passage of time the data becomes obsolete and very old.
Secondary data collected can distort the results of the research. For using secondary data a
special care is required to amend or modify for use.
Secondary data can also raise issues of authenticity and copyright.
Keeping in view the advantages and disadvantages of sources of data requirement of the research
study and time factor, both sources of data i.e. primary and secondary data have been selected.
These are used in combination to give proper coverage to the topic.
or even kill patients, and a researcher who fails to abide by regulations and guidelines relating to
radiation or biological safety may jeopardize his health and safety or the health and safety of staff
and students.
Given the importance of ethics for the conduct of research, it should come as no surprise that many
different professional associations, government agencies, and universities have adopted specific
codes, rules, and policies relating to research ethics. The following is a rough and general summary
of some ethical principles that various codes address -
Honesty: Strive for honesty in all scientific communications. Honestly report data, results, methods
and procedures, and publication status. Do not fabricate, falsify, or misrepresent data. Do not
deceive colleagues, granting agencies, or the public.
Objectivity: Strive to avoid bias in experimental design, data analysis, data interpretation, peer
review, personnel decisions, grant writing, expert testimony, and other aspects of research where
objectivity is expected or required. Avoid or minimize bias or self-deception. Disclose personal or
financial interests that may affect research.
Integrity: Keep your promises and agreements; act with sincerity; strive for consistency of thought
and action.
Carefulness: Avoid careless errors and negligence; carefully and critically examine your own work
and the work of your peers. Keep good records of research activities, such as data collection,
research design, and correspondence with agencies or journals.
Openness: Share data, results, ideas, tools, resources. Be open to criticism and new ideas.
Respect for Intellectual Property: Honor patents, copyrights, and other forms of intellectual
property. Do not use unpublished data, methods, or results without permission. Give credit where
credit is due. Give proper acknowledgement or credit for all contributions to research. Never
plagiarize.
Confidentiality: Protect confidential communications, such as papers or grants submitted for
publication, personnel records, trade or military secrets, and patient records.
Responsible Publication: Publish in order to advance research and scholarship, not to advance just
your own career. Avoid wasteful and duplicative publication.
Responsible Mentoring: Help to educate, mentor, and advise students. Promote their welfare and
allow them to make their own decisions.
Respect for Colleagues: Respect your colleagues and treat them fairly.
Social Responsibility: Strive to promote social good and prevent or mitigate social harms through
research, public education, and advocacy.
Non-Discrimination: Avoid discrimination against colleagues or students on the basis of sex, race,
ethnicity, or other factors that are not related to their scientific competence and integrity.
Competence: Maintain and improve your own professional competence and expertise through lifelong
education and learning; take steps to promote competence in science as a whole.
Legality: Know and obey relevant laws and institutional and governmental policies.
Animal Care: Show proper respect and care for animals when using them in research. Do not conduct
unnecessary or poorly designed animal experiments.
Human Subjects Protection: When conducting research on human subjects, minimize harms and risks
and maximize benefits; respect human dignity, privacy, and autonomy; take special precautions with
vulnerable populations; and strive to distribute the benefits and burdens of research fairly.
Training in research ethics should be able to help researchers grapple with ethical dilemmas by
introducing researchers to important concepts, tools, principles, and methods that can be useful in
resolving these dilemmas. In fact, the issues have become so important for training in research.
Questionnaires with questions that are aggregated into either a scale or index, include for instance
questions that measure -
latent traits (e.g. personality traits such as extroversion)
attitudes (e.g. towards immigration)
an index (e.g. Social Economic Status).
Question Types: Usually, a questionnaire consists of a number of questions that the respondent has
to answer in a set format. A distinction is made between open-ended and closed-ended questions. An
open-ended question asks the respondent to formulate his/her own answer, whereas a closed-ended
question has the respondent pick an answer from a given number of options. The response options
for a closed-ended question should be exhaustive and mutually exclusive. Four types of response
scales for closed-ended questions are distinguished –
Dichotomous, where the respondent has two options.
Nominal-polytomous, where the respondent has more than two unordered options.
Ordinal-polytomous, where the respondent has more than two ordered options.
Continuous (Bounded), where the respondent is presented with a continuous scale.
A respondent’s answer to an open-ended question is coded into a response scale afterwards. An
example of an open-ended question is a question where the testee has to complete a sentence
(sentence completion item).
Question Sequence: In general, questions should flow logically from one to the next. To achieve the
best response rates, questions should flow from the least sensitive to the most sensitive, from the
factual and behavioral to the attitudinal, and from the more general to the more specific. There
typically is a flow that should be followed when constructing a questionnaire in regards to the order
that the questions are asked. The order is as follows -
Screens
Warm-ups
Transitions
Skips
Difficult
Changing Formula
Screens are used as a screening method to find out early whether or not someone should complete
the questionnaire. Warm-ups are simple to answer, help capture interest in the survey, and may not
even pertain to research objectives. Transition questions are used to make different areas flow well
together. Skips include questions similar to ‘If yes, then answer question 3. If no, then continue to
question 5’. Difficult questions are towards the end because the respondent is in ‘response mode’.
Also, when completing an online questionnaire, the progress bars lets the respondent know that they
are almost done so they are more willing to answer more difficult questions. Classification or
demographic question should be at the end because typically they can feel like personal questions
which will make respondents uncomfortable and not willing to finish survey.
Basic Rules for Questionnaire Item Construction: The basic rules are -
Use statements which are interpreted in the same way by members of different subpopulations
of the population of interest.
Use statements where persons that have different opinions or traits will give different answers.
Think of having an ‘open’ answer category after a list of possible answers.
Use only one aspect of the construct you are interested in per item.
Structured Interviews
Characteristics of the Structured Interview
The interviewer asks each respondent the same series of questions.
The questions are created prior to the interview, and often have a limited set of response
categories.
There is generally little room for variation in responses and there are few open-ended questions
included in the interview guide.
Questioning is standardized and the ordering and phrasing of the questions are kept consistent
from interview to interview.
The interviewer plays a neutral role and acts casual and friendly, but does not insert his or her
opinion in the interview.
Self-administered questionnaires are a type of structured interview.
When to Use a Structured Interview: Development of a structured interview guide or questionnaire
requires a clear topical focus and well-developed understanding of the topic at hand. A well-
developed understanding of a topic allows researchers to create a highly structured interview guide
or questionnaire that provides respondents with relevant, meaningful and appropriate response
categories to choose from for each question. Structured interviews are, therefore, best used when
the literature in a topical area is highly developed or following the use of observational and other
less structured interviewing approaches that provide the researcher with adequate understanding
of a topic to construct meaningful and relevant close-ended questions.
Recording Interviews: There are a range of ways to collect and record structured interview data.
Data collections methods include, but are not limited to - paper-based and self-report (mail, face-
to-face); telephone interviews where the interviewer fills in participants’ responses; web-based and
self-report.
Benefits: Structured interviews can be conducted efficiently by interviewers trained only to follow
the instructions on the interview guide or questionnaire. Structured interviews do not require the
development of rapport between interviewer and interviewee, and they can produce consistent data
that can be compared across a number of respondents.
Semi-structured Interviews
Characteristics of Semi-structured Interviews
The interviewer and respondents engage in a formal interview.
The interviewer develops and uses an ‘interview guide’. This is a list of questions and topics that
need to be covered during the conversation, usually in a particular order.
The interviewer follows the guide, but is able to follow topical trajectories in the conversation
that may stray from the guide when s/he feels this is appropriate.
When to Use Semi-structured Interviews: Semi-structured interviewing, according to Bernard
(1988), is best used when you won’t get more than one chance to interview someone and when you will
be sending several interviewers out into the field to collect data. The semi-structured interview
guide provides a clear set of instructions for interviewers and can provide reliable, comparable
qualitative data. Semi-structured interviews are often preceded by observation, informal and
unstructured interviewing in order to allow the researchers to develop a keen understanding of the
topic of interest necessary for developing relevant and meaningful semi-structured questions. The
inclusion of open-ended questions and training of interviewers to follow relevant topics that may
stray from the interview guide does, however, still provide the opportunity for identifying new ways
of seeing and understanding the topic at hand.
Recording Semi-Structured Interviews: Typically, the interviewer has a paper-based interview guide
that s/he follows. Since semi-structured interviews often contain open-ended questions and
discussions may diverge from the interview guide, it is generally best to tape-record interviews and
later transcript these tapes for analysis. While it is possible to try to jot notes to capture
respondents’ answers, it is difficult to focus on conducting an interview and jotting notes. This
approach will result in poor notes and also detract for the development of rapport between
interviewer and interviewee. Development of rapport and dialogue is essential in unstructured
Informal Interviewing
Characteristics of Informal interviewing
The interviewer talks with people in the field informally, without use of a structured interview
guide of any kind.
The researcher tries to remember his/her conversations with informants, and uses jottings or
brief notes taken in the field to help in the recall and writing of notes from experiences in the
field.
Informal interviewing goes hand-in-hand with participant observation.
While in the field as an observer, informal interviews are casual conversations one might have
with the people the researcher is observing.
When to Use Informal Interviews: Informal interviewing is typically done as part of the process of
observing a social setting of interest. These may be best used in the early stages of the
development of an area of inquiry, where there is little literature describing the setting,
experience, culture or issue of interest. The researcher engages in fieldwork - observation and
informal interviewing - to develop an understanding of the setting and to build rapport. Informal
interviewing may also be used to uncover new topics of interest that may have been overlooked by
previous research.
Recording Informal Interviews: Since informal interviews occur 'on the fly,' it is difficult to tape-
record this type of interview. Additionally, it is likely that informal interviews will occur during the
process of observing a setting. The researcher should participate in the conversation. As soon as
possible, s/he should make jottings or notes of the conversation. These jottings should be developed
into a more complete account of the informal interview. This type of account would tend to be
included in the researcher's field notes. Developing field notes soon after an informal interview is
recommended. Even with good field jottings the details of an informal interview are quickly lost
from memory.
Benefits: Interviews can be done informally, and ‘on the fly’ and, therefore, do not require
scheduling time with respondents. In fact, respondents may just see this as ‘conversation’. Informal
interviews may, therefore, foster 'low pressure' interactions and allow respondents to speak more
freely and openly. Informal interviewing can be helpful in building rapport with respondents and in
gaining their trust as well as their understanding of a topic, situation, setting, etc. Informal
interviews, like unstructured interviews, are an essential part of gaining an understanding of a
setting and its members' ways of seeing. It can provide the foundation for developing and
conducting more structured interviews.
Interviewing, when considered as a method for conducting qualitative research, is a technique used
to understand the experiences of others. Characteristics of qualitative research interviews –
Interviews are completed by the interviewer based on what the interviewee says.
Interviews are a far more personal form of research than questionnaires.
In the personal interview, the interviewer works directly with the interviewee.
Unlike with mail surveys, the interviewer has the opportunity to probe or ask follow up questions.
Interviews are generally easier for the interviewee, especially if what is sought are opinions
and/or impressions.
Types of Interviews
Informal, Conversational interview: No predetermined questions are asked, in order to remain as
open and adaptable as possible to the interviewee’s nature and priorities; during the interview the
interviewer ‘goes with the flow’.
General interview guide approach: Intended to ensure that the same general areas of information
are collected from each interviewee; this provides more focus than the conversational approach, but
still allows a degree of freedom and adaptability in getting the information from the interviewee.
Standardized, open-ended interview: The same open-ended questions are asked to all interviewees;
this approach facilitates faster interviews that can be more easily analyzed and compared.
Closed, fixed-response interview: All interviewees are asked the same questions and asked to choose
answers from among the same set of alternatives. This format is useful for those not practiced in
interviewing. This type of interview is also referred to as structured.
Interviewer’s judgments: According to Hackman and Oldman several factors can bias an
interviewer’s judgment about a job applicant. However these factors can be reduced or minimized by
training interviews to recognized them. Some examples are -
Prior Information: Interviewers generally have some prior information about job candidates, such as
recruiter evaluations, application blanks, online screening results, or the results of psychological
tests. This can cause the interviewer to have a favorable or unfavorable attitude toward an
applicant before meeting them.
The Contrast Effect: How the interviewers evaluate a particular applicant may depend on their
standards of comparison, that is, the characteristics of the applicants they interviewed previously.
Iterviewers’ Prejudices: This can be done when the interviewers’ judgment is their personal likes and
dislikes. These may include but are not limited to racial and ethnic background, applicants who
display certain qualities or traits and refuse to consider their abilities or characteristics.
Preparation and Process of Conducting Interviews
Interviews are among the most challenging and rewarding forms of measurement. They require a
personal sensitivity and adaptability as well as the ability to stay within the bounds of the designed
protocol. The followings describe the preparation need to do for an interview study and then the
process of conducting the interview itself.
Preparation
Role of the Interviewer: The interviewer is really the ‘jack-of-all-trades’ in survey research. The
interviewer’s role is complex and multifaceted. It includes the following tasks –
Locate and enlist cooperation of respondents: The interviewer has to find the respondent. In door-
to-door surveys, this means being able to locate specific addresses. Often, the interviewer has to
work at the least desirable times (like immediately after dinner or on weekends) because that’s
when respondents are most readily available.
Motivate respondents to do good job: If the interviewer does not take the work seriously, why
would the respondent? The interviewer has to be motivated and has to be able to communicate that
motivation to the respondent. Often, this means that the interviewer has to be convinced of the
importance of the research.
Clarify any confusion/concerns: Interviewers have to be able to think on their feet. Respondents
may raise objections or concerns that were not anticipated. The interviewer has to be able to
respond candidly and informatively.
Observe quality of responses: Whether the interview is personal or over the phone, the interviewer
is in the best position to judge the quality of the information that is being received. Even a verbatim
transcript will not adequately convey how seriously the respondent took the task, or any gestures or
body language that were evident.
Conduct a good interview: Last, and certainly not least, the interviewer has to conduct a good
interview! Every interview has a life of its own. Some respondents are motivated and attentive,
others are distracted or disinterested. The interviewer also has good or bad days. Assuring a
consistently high-quality interview is a challenge that requires constant effort.
Training the Interviewers: Here are some of the major topics that should be included in interviewer
training –
Describe the entire study: Interviewers need to know more than simply how to conduct the
interview itself. They should learn about the background for the study, previous work that has been
done, and why the study is important.
State who is sponsor of research: Interviewers need to know who they are working for. They and
their respondents have a right to know not just what agency or company is conducting the research,
but also, who is paying for the research.
Teach enough about survey research: While you seldom have the time to teach a full course on
survey research methods, the interviewers need to know enough that they respect the survey
method and are motivated. Sometimes it may not be apparent why a question or set of questions was
asked in a particular way. The interviewers will need to understand the rationale for how the
instrument was constructed.
Explain the sampling logic and process: Naive interviewers may not understand why sampling is so
important. They may wonder why you go through all the difficulties of selecting the sample so
carefully. You will have to explain that sampling is the basis for the conclusions that will be reached
and for the degree to which your study will be useful.
Explain interviewer bias: Interviewers need to know the many ways that they can inadvertently bias
the results. And, they need to understand why it is important that they not bias the study. This is
especially a problem when you are investigating political or moral issues on which people have
strongly held convictions. While the interviewer may think they are doing good for society by
slanting results in favor of what they believe, they need to recognize that doing so could jeopardize
the entire study in the eyes of others.
‘Walk through’ the Interview: When you first introduce the interview, it’s a good idea to walk
through the entire protocol so the interviewers can get an idea of the various parts or phases and
how they interrelate. Explain respondent selection procedures, including –
Reading maps: It’s astonishing how many adults don’t know how to follow directions on a map. In
personal interviews, the interviewer may need to locate respondents who are spread over a wide
geographic area. And, they often have to navigate by night (respondents tend to be most available in
evening hours) in neighborhoods they’re not familiar with. Teaching basic map reading skills and
confirming that the interviewers can follow maps is essential.
Identifying households: In many studies it is impossible in advance to say whether every sample
household meets the sampling requirements for the study. In your study, you may want to interview
only people who live in single family homes. It may be impossible to distinguish townhouses and
apartment buildings in your sampling frame. The interviewer must know how to identify the
appropriate target household.
Identify respondents: Just as with households, many studies require respondents who meet specific
criteria. For instance, your study may require that you speak with a male head-of-household between
the ages of 30 and 40 who has children under 18 living in the same household. It may be impossible
to obtain statistics in advance to target such respondents. The interviewer may have to ask a series
of filtering questions before determining whether the respondent meets the sampling needs.
Rehearse interview: You should probably have several rehearsal sessions with the interviewer team.
You might even videotape rehearsal interviews to discuss how the trainees responded in difficult
situations. The interviewers should be very familiar with the entire interview before ever facing a
respondent.
Explain supervision: In most interview studies, the interviewers will work under the direction of a
supervisor. In some contexts, the supervisor may be a faculty advisor; in others, they may be the
‘boss’. In order to assure the quality of the responses, the supervisor may have to observe a
subsample of interviews, listen in on phone interviews, or conduct follow-up assessments of
interviews with the respondents. This can be very threatening to the interviewers. You need to
develop an atmosphere where everyone on the research team - interviewers and supervisors - feel
like they're working together towards a common end.
Explain scheduling: The interviewers have to understand the demands being made on their schedules
and why these are important to the study. In some studies it will be imperative to conduct the
entire set of interviews within a certain time period. In most studies, it's important to have the
interviewers available when it's convenient for the respondents, not necessarily the interviewer.
Interviewer’s Kit: It’s important that interviewers have all of the materials they need to do a
professional job. Usually, you will want to assemble an interviewer kit that can be easily carried and
includes all of the important materials such as –
a ‘professional-looking’ notebook (this might even have the logo of the company or organization
conducting the interviews);
maps;
sufficient copies of the survey instrument;
official identification (preferable a picture ID);
a cover letter from the Principal Investigator or Sponsor; and
a phone number the respondent can call to verify the interviewer’s authenticity.
Process
So all the preparation is complete, the training done, the interviewers ready to proceed, their ‘kits’
in hand. It’s finally time to do an actual interview. Each interview is unique, like a small work of art
(and sometimes the art may not be very good). Each interview has its own ebb and flow - its own
pace. To the outsider, an interview looks like a fairly standard, simple, prosaic effort. But to the
interviewer, it can be filled with special nuances and interpretations that aren’t often immediately
apparent. Every interview includes some common components. There’s the opening, where the
interviewer gains entry and establishes the rapport and tone for what follows. There’s the middle
game, the heart of the process, that consists of the protocol of questions and the improvisations of
the probe. And finally, there's the endgame, the wrap-up, where the interviewer and respondent
establish a sense of closure. Whether it’s a two-minute phone interview or a personal interview that
spans hours, the interview is a bit of theater, a mini-drama that involves real lives in real time.
Opening Remarks: In many ways, the interviewer has the same initial problem that a salesperson has.
You have to get the respondent's attention initially for a long enough period that you can sell them
on the idea of participating in the study. Many of the remarks here assume an interview that is
being conducted at a respondent's residence. But the analogies to other interview contexts should
be straightforward.
Gaining entry: The first thing the interviewer must do is gain entry. Several factors can enhance the
prospects. Probably the most important factor is your initial appearance. The interviewer needs to
dress professionally and in a manner that will be comfortable to the respondent. In some contexts a
business suit and briefcase may be appropriate. In others, it may intimidate. The way the
interviewer appears initially to the respondent has to communicate some simple messages - that
you're trustworthy, honest, and non-threatening. Cultivating a manner of professional confidence,
the sense that the respondent has nothing to worry about because you know what you’re doing - is a
difficult skill to teach and an indispensable skill for achieving initial entry.
Doorstep technique: You’re standing on the doorstep and someone has opened the door, even if only
halfway. You need to smile. You need to be brief. State why you are there and suggest what you
would like the respondent to do. Don’t ask suggest what you want. Instead of saying ‘May I come in
to do an interview?’, you might try a more imperative approach like ‘I’d like to take a few minutes of
your time to interview you for a very important study’.
Introduction: If you’ve gotten this far without having the door slammed in your face, chances are
you will be able to get an interview. Without waiting for the respondent to ask questions, you should
move to introducing yourself. You should have this part of the process memorized so you can deliver
the essential information in 20-30 seconds at most. State your name and the name of the
organization you represent. Show your identification badge and the letter that introduces you. You
want to have as legitimate an appearance as possible. If you have a three-ring binder or clipboard
with the logo of your organization, you should have it out and visible. You should assume that the
respondent will be interested in participating in your important study - assume that you will be doing
an interview here.
Explaining the study: At this point, you’ve been invited to come in. Or, the respondent has continued
to listen long enough that you need to move onto explaining the study. There are three rules to this
critical explanation - (1) Keep it short; (2) Keep it short; and (3) Keep it short! The respondent
doesn't have to or want to know all of the neat nuances of this study, how it came about, how you
convinced your thesis committee to buy into it, and so on. You should have a one or two sentence
description of the study memorized. No big words. No jargon. No detail. There will be more than
enough time for that later (and you should bring some written materials you can leave at the end for
that purpose). This is the ‘25 words or less’ description. What you should spend some time on is
assuring the respondent that you are interviewing them confidentially, and that their participation is
voluntary.
Asking the Questions: You’ve gotten in. The respondent has asked you to sit down and make yourself
comfortable. It may be that the respondent was in the middle of doing something when you arrived
and you may need to allow them a few minutes to finish the phone call or send the kids off to do
homework. Now, you’re ready to begin the interview itself.
Use questionnaire carefully, but informally: The questionnaire is your friend. It was developed with a
lot of care and thoughtfulness. While you have to be ready to adapt to the needs of the setting,
your first instinct should always be to trust the instrument that was designed. But you also need to
establish a rapport with the respondent. If you have your face in the instrument and you read the
questions, you'll appear unprofessional and disinterested. Even though you may be nervous, you need
to recognize that your respondent is most likely even more nervous. If you memorize the first few
questions, you can refer to the instrument only occasionally, using eye contact and a confident
manner to set the tone for the interview and help the respondent get comfortable.
Ask questions exactly as written: Sometimes an interviewer will think that they could improve on the
tone of a question by altering a few words to make it simpler or more ‘friendly’ – don’t. You should
ask the questions as they are on the instrument. If you had a problem with a question, the time to
raise it was during the training and rehearsals, not during the actual interview. It is important that
the interview be as standardized as possible across respondents (this is true except in certain types
of exploratory or interpretivist research where the explicit goal is to avoid any standardizing). You
may think the change you made was inconsequential when, in fact, it may change the entire meaning
of the question or response.
Follow the order given: Once you know an interview well, you may see a respondent bring up a topic
that you know will come up later in the interview. You may be tempted to jump to that section of the
interview while you're on the topic – don’t. You are more likely to lose your place. You may omit
questions that build a foundation for later questions.
Ask every question: Sometimes you’ll be tempted to omit a question because you thought you already
heard what the respondent will say. Don't assume that. If you hadn’t asked the question, you would
never have discovered the detail.
Obtaining Adequate Responses - The Probe: OK, you’ve asked a question. The respondent gives a
brief, cursory answer. How do you elicit a more thoughtful, thorough response? You probe.
Silent probe: The most effective way to encourage someone to elaborate is to do nothing at all -
just pause and wait. This is referred to as the ‘silent’ probe. It works (at least in certain cultures)
because the respondent is uncomfortable with pauses or silence. It suggests to the respondent that
you are waiting, listening for what they will say next.
Overt encouragement: At times, you can encourage the respondent directly. Try to do so in a way
that does not imply approval or disapproval of what they said (that could bias their subsequent
results). Overt encouragement could be as simple as saying ‘Uh-huh’ or ‘OK’ after the respondent
completes a thought.
Elaboration: You can encourage more information by asking for elaboration. For instance, it is
appropriate to ask questions like ‘Would you like to elaborate on that?’ or ‘Is there anything else you
would like to add?’
Ask for clarification: Sometimes, you can elicit greater detail by asking the respondent to clarify
something that was said earlier. You might say, ‘A minute ago you were talking about the experience
you had in high school. Could you tell me more about that?’
Repetition: This is the old psychotherapist trick. You say something without really saying anything
new. For instance, the respondent just described a traumatic experience they had in childhood. You
might say ‘What I’m hearing you say is that you found that experience very traumatic’. Then, you
should pause. The respondent is likely to say something like ‘Well, yes, and it affected the rest of
my family as well. In fact, my younger sister...’
Recording the Response: Although we have the capability to record a respondent in audio and/or
video, most interview methodologists don’t think it’s a good idea. Respondents are often
uncomfortable when they know their remarks will be recorded word-for-word. They may strain to
only say things in a socially acceptable way. Although you would get a more detailed and accurate
record, it is likely to be distorted by the very process of obtaining it. This may be more of a
problem in some situations than in others. It is increasingly common to be told that your
conversation may be recorded during a phone interview. And most focus group methodologies use
unobtrusive recording equipment to capture what’s being said. But, in general, personal interviews
are still best when recorded by the interviewer using pen and paper.
Record responses immediately: The interviewer should record responses as they are being stated.
This conveys the idea that you are interested enough in what the respondent is saying to write it
down. You don’t have to write down every single word – you’re not taking stenography. But you may
want to record certain key phrases or quotes verbatim. You need to develop a system for
distinguishing what the respondent says verbatim from what you are characterizing.
Include all probes: You need to indicate every single probe that you use. Develop a shorthand for
different standard probes. Use a clear form for writing them in (e.g., place probes in the left
margin).
Use abbreviations where possible: Abbreviations will help you to capture more of the discussion.
Develop a standardized system (e.g., R=respondent; DK=don’t know). If you create an abbreviation on
the fly, have a way of indicating its origin. For instance, if you decide to abbreviate Spouse with an
‘S’, you might make a notation in the right margin saying ‘S=Spouse’.
Concluding the Interview: When you've gone through the entire interview, you need to bring the
interview to closure. Some important things to remember -
Thank the respondent - Don’t forget to do this. Even if the respondent was troublesome or
uninformative, it is important for you to be polite and thank them for their time.
Tell them when you expect to send results - You owe it to your respondent to show them what you
learned. Now, they may not want your entire 300-page dissertation. It’s common practice to prepare
a short, readable, jargon-free summary of interviews that you can send to the respondents.
Don’t be brusque or hasty - Allow for a few minutes of winding down conversation. The respondent
may want to know a little bit about you or how much you like doing this kind of work. They may be
interested in how the results will be used. Use these kinds of interests as a way to wrap up the
conversation. As you’re putting away your materials and packing up to go, engage the respondent. You
don’t want the respondent to feel as though you completed the interview and then rushed out on
them - they may wonder what they said that was wrong. On the other hand, you have to be careful
here. Some respondents may want to keep on talking long after the interview is over. You have to
find a way to politely cut off the conversation and make your exit.
Immediately after leaving write down any notes about how the interview went - Sometimes you will
have observations about the interview that you didn’t want to write down while you were with the
respondent. You may have noticed them get upset at a question, or you may have detected hostility
in a response. Immediately after the interview you should go over your notes and make any other
comments and observations - but be sure to distinguish these from the notes made during the
interview (you might use a different color pen, for instance).
Strengths and Weaknesses
Possibly the greatest advantage of interviewing is the depth of detail from the interviewee.
Interviewing participants can paint a picture of what happened in a specific event, tell us their
perspective of such event, as well as give other social cues. Social cues, such as voice, intonation,
body language etc. of the interviewee can give the interviewer a lot of extra information that can be
added to the verbal answer of the interviewee on a question. This level of detailed description,
whether it be verbal or nonverbal, can show an otherwise hidden interrelatedness between emotions,
people, objects unlike many quantitative methods of research. In addition, interviewing has a unique
advantage in its specific form. Researchers can tailor the questions they ask to the respondent in
order to get rich, full stories and the information they need for their project. They can make it
clear to the respondent when they need more examples or explanations. Not only can researchers
also learn about specific events, they can also gain insight into people’s interior experiences,
specifically how people perceive and how they interpreted their perceptions. How events affected
their thoughts and feelings. In this, researchers can understand the process of an event instead of
what just happened and how they reacted to it.
Interviewing is not a perfect method for all types of research. It does have its disadvantages. First,
there can be complications with the planning of the interview. Not only is recruiting people for
interviews hard, due to the typically personal nature of the interview, planning where to meet them
and when can be difficult. Participants can cancel or change the meeting place at the last minute.
During the actual interview, a possible weakness is missing some information. This can arise from the
immense multitasking that the interviewer must do. Not only do they have to make the respondent
feel very comfortable, they have to keep as much eye contact as possible, write down as much as
they can, and think of follow up questions. After the interview, the process of coding begins and
with this comes its own set of disadvantages. Second, coding can be extremely time consuming. This
process typically requires multiple people, which can also become expensive. Third, the nature of
qualitative research itself, doesn’t lend itself very well to quantitative analysis. Some researchers
report more missing data in interview research than survey research, therefore it can be difficult
to compare populations.
way, and assist in determining the reason for attitudes and beliefs. They are conducted with a small
sample of the target group and are used to stimulate discussion and gain greater insights.
The design of focus group research will vary based on the research question being studied. Below,
highlight some general principles to consider -
Standardization of questions - focus groups can vary in the extent to which they follow a
structured protocol or permit discussion to emerge.
Number of focus groups conducted - or sampling will depend on the ‘segmentation’ or different
stratifications (e.g. age, sex, socioeconomic status, health status) that the researcher identifies
as important to the research topic.
Number of participants per group - the rule of thumb has been 6-10 homogeneous strangers, but
as Morgan (1996) points out there may be reasons to have smaller or slightly larger groups.
Level of moderator involvement - can vary from high to low degree of control exercised during
focus groups (e.g. extent to which structured questions are asked and group dynamics are
actively managed).
Focus group interviews typically have the characteristics -
Identify the target market (people who possess certain characteristics).
Provide a short introduction and background on the issue to be discussed.
Have focus group members write their responses to the issue(s).
Facilitate group discussion.
Recommended size of the sample group is 6 - 10 people as smaller groups may limit the potential
on the amount of information collected, and more may make it difficult for all participants to
participate and interact and for the interviewer to be able to make sense of the information
given.
Several focus groups should be used in order to get a more objective and macro view of the
investigation, i.e. focusing on one group may give you idiosyncratic results. The use of several
groups will add to the breadth and depth of information. A minimum of three focus groups is
recommended for best practice approaches.
Members of the focus group should have something in common which is important to the
investigation.
Groups can either be put together or existing groups - it is always useful to be mindful of the
group dynamics of both situations.
Provide a summary of the focus group issues at the end of the meeting.
The purpose of an FGD is to obtain in-depth information on concepts, perceptions, and ideas of the
group. An FGD aims to be more than a question-answer interaction. In combination with other
methods, focus groups might be used to -
explore new research areas;
explore a topic that is difficult to observe (not easy to gain access);
explore a topic that does not lend itself to observational techniques (e.g. attitudes and decision-
making);
explore sensitive topics;
collect a concentrated set of observations in a short time span;
ascertain perspectives and experiences from people on a topic, particularly when these are
people who might otherwise be marginalized;
gather preliminary data;
aid in the development of surveys and interview guides;
Wrap-up summary
Debriefing
Collecting and managing information in FGD.
STEP 8: Analyze and interpret FGD results
How much analysis is required
Debriefing;
Notes;
Transcripts; and log book
Writing the report
Interpretation of findings
Example of format of an FGD report.
Identify suitable discussion participants and invite a small group to a meeting at an agreed place and
time. The ideal number of participants is six to eight, but be flexible about numbers - do not turn
away participants after they had arrived at the meeting and do not pressure people to come to the
meeting. Be psychologically prepared for the session; you will need to remain alert to be able to
observe, listen, and keep the discussion on track for a period of one to two hours. Make sure you
arrive at the agreed place before the participants, and be ready to greet them. Maintain a neutral
attitude and appearance, and do not start talking about the topic of interest before the official
opening of the group discussion. Begin by introducing yourself and your team (even if the
participants have already met them individually), and ask participants to introduce themselves.
Explain clearly that the purpose of the discussion is to find out what people think about the
practices or activities depicted by the pictures. Tell them that you are not looking for any right or
wrong answer but that you want to learn what each participant's views are. It must be made clear to
all participants that their views will be valued. Bring the discussion to a close when you feel the topic
has been exhausted, and do nor let the group discussion degenerate into smaller discussions. Be
sincere in expressing your thanks to the participants for their contributions. Refreshments may be
served at the end of the meeting as a way of thanking the participants and maintaining good rapport
with them.
Conducting FGD
The following guideline may be provided for conducting FGD.
Preparation
Selection of topic: It is appropriate to define and clarify the concepts to be discussed. The basic
idea is to lay out a set of issues for the group to discuss. It is important to bear in mind that the
moderator will mostly be improvising comments and questions within the framework set by the
guidelines. By keeping the questions open-ended, the moderator can stimulates useful trains of
thought in the participants that were not anticipated.
Selecting the study participants: Given a clear idea of the issues to be discussed, the next critical
step in designing a focus group study is to decide on the characteristics of the individuals who are
to be targeted for sessions. It is often important to ensure that the groups all share some common
characteristics in relation to the issue under investigation. If you need to obtain information on a
topic from several different categories of informants who are likely to discuss the issue from
different perspectives, you should organize a focus group for each major category. For example a
group for men and a group for women, or a group for older women and group for younger women. The
selection of the participants can be on the basis of purposive or convenience sampling. The
participants should receive the invitations at least one or two days before the exercise. The
invitations should explain the general purpose of the FGD.
Physical arrangements: Communication and interaction during the FGD should be encouraged in every
way possible. Arrange the chairs in a circle. Make sure the area will be quite, adequately lighted,
etc., and that there will be no disturbances. Try to hold the FGD in a neutral setting that
encourages participants to freely express their views. A health center, for example, is not a good
place to discuss traditional medical beliefs or preferences for other types of treatment. Neutral
setting could also be from the perspective of a place where the participants feel comfortable to
come over and above their party factions.
Conducting the Session
One of the members of the research team should act as a ‘facilitator’ or ‘moderator’ for the
focus group. One should serve as ‘recorder’.
Functions of the Facilitator: The facilitator should not act as an expert on the topic. His/her
role is to stimulate and support discussion. S/he should perform the following functions -
Introduce the session - S/he should introduce himself/herself as facilitator and introduce the
recorder. Introduce the participants by name or ask them to introduce themselves (or develop
some new interesting way of introduction). Put the participants at ease and explain the purpose
of the FGD, the kind of information needed, and how the information will be used (e.g., for
planning of a health program, an education program, et.).
Encourage discussion - The facilitator should be enthusiastic, lively, and humorous and show
his/her interest in the group’s ideas. Formulate questions and encourage as many participants as
possible to express their views. Remember there are no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answers. Facilitator
should react neutrally to both verbal and nonverbal responses.
Encourage involvement - Avoid a question and answer session. Some useful techniques include
asking for clarification (can you tell me more?); reorienting the discussion when it goes off the
track (Saying - wait, how does this relate to the issue? Using one participant’s remarks to direct
a question to another); bringing in reluctant participants (Using person’s name, requesting
his/her opinion, making more frequent eye contact to encourage participation); dealing with
dominant participants (Avoiding eye contact or turning slightly away to discourage the person
from speaking, or thanking the person and changing the subject).
Avoid being placed in the role of expert - When the facilitator is asked for his/her opinion by a
respondent, remember that s/he is not there to educate of inform. Direct the question back to
the group by saying ‘What do you think?’ ‘What would you do?’ Set aside time, if necessary, after
the session to give participants the information they have asked. Do not try to give comments on
everything that is being said. Do not feel you have to say Something during every pause in the
discussion. Wait a little and see what happens.
Control the timing of the meeting but unobtrusively - Listen carefully and move the discussion
from topic to topic. Subtly control the time allocated to various topics so as to maintain
interest. If the participants spontaneously jump from one topic to the other, let the discussion
continue for a while because useful additional information may surface and then summarize the
points brought up and reorient the discussion.
Take time at the end of the meeting to summarize, check for agreement and thank the
participants: Summarize the main issues brought up, check whether all agree and ask for
additional comments. Thank the participants and let them know that their ideas had been
valuable contribution and will be used for planning the proposed research/intervention/or
whatever the purpose of FGD was. Listen to the additional comments made after the meeting.
Sometime some valuable information surfaces, which otherwise may remain hidden.
Advantages and Disvantages of FGD
Focus groups and group discussions are advantageous as they -
Are useful when exploring cultural values and health beliefs;
Can be used to examine how and why people think in a particular way and how is influences their
beliefs and values;
Can be used to explore complex issues;
Can be used to develop hypothesis for further research;
Do not require participants to be literate.
Disadvantages of focus groups include -
Lack of privacy/anonymity;
Having to carefully balance the group to ensure they are culturally and gender appropriate (i.e.
gender may be an issue);
Potential for the risk of ‘group think’ (not allowing for other attitudes, beliefs etc.);
Potential for group to be dominated by one or two people;
Group leader needs to be skilled at conducting focus groups, dealing with conflict, drawing out
passive participants and creating a relaxed, welcoming environment;
Are time consuming to conduct and can be difficult and time consuming to analyze.
solving the problem(s) and comes up with a Community Action Plan to address the concerns that have
been raised. PRA is particularly concerned that the multiple perspectives that exist in any
community are represented in the analysis and that the community itself takes the lead in evaluating
its situation and finding solutions. Outsiders may participate as facilitators or in providing technical
information but they should not ‘take charge’ of the process.
In PRA, a number of different tools are used to gather and analyze information. These tools
encourage participation, make it easier for people to express their views and help to organize
information in a way that makes it more useful and more accessible to the group that is trying to
analyze a given situation. It is also called ‘Participatory Learning for Action (PLA)’, is a
methodological approach that is used to enable farmers to analyze their own situation and to develop
a common perspective on natural resource management and agriculture at village level.
Key Tenets / Principles of PRA
Participation: Local people’s input into PRA activities is essential to its value as a research and
planning method and as a means for diffusing the participatory approach to development.
Teamwork: To the extent that the validity of PRA data relies on informal interaction and
brainstorming among those involved, it is best done by a team that includes local people with
perspective and knowledge of the area’s conditions, traditions, and social structure and either
nationals or expatriates with a complementary mix of disciplinary backgrounds and experience. A
well-balanced team will represent the diversity of socioeconomic, cultural, gender, and
generational perspectives.
Flexibility: PRA does not provide blueprints for its practitioners. The combination of techniques
that is appropriate in a particular development context will be determined by such variables as
the size and skill mix of the PRA team, the time and resources available, and the topic and
location of the work.
Optimal Ignorance: To be efficient in terms of both time and money, PRA work intends to gather
just enough information to make the necessary recommendations and decisions.
Triangulation: PRA works with qualitative data. To ensure that information is valid and reliable,
PRA teams follow the rule of thumb that at least three sources must be consulted or techniques
must be used to investigate the same topics.
Organizing PRA
A typical PRA activity involves a team of people working for two to three weeks on workshop
discussions, analyses, and fieldwork. Several organizational aspects should be considered –
Logistical arrangements should consider nearby accommodations, arrangements for lunch for
fieldwork days, sufficient vehicles, portable computers, funds to purchase refreshments for
community meetings during the PRA, and supplies such as flip chart paper and markers.
Training of team members may be required, particularly if the PRA has the second objective of
training in addition to data collection.
PRA results are influenced by the length of time allowed to conduct the exercise, scheduling and
assignment of report writing, and critical analysis of all data, conclusions, and recommendations.
A PRA covering relatively few topics in a small area (perhaps two to four communities) should
take between ten days and four weeks, but a PRA with a wider scope over a larger area can take
several months. Allow five days for an introductory workshop if training is involved.
Reports are best written immediately after the fieldwork period, based on notes from PRA team
members. A preliminary report should be available within a week or so of the fieldwork, and the final
report should be made available to all participants and the local institutions that were involved.
PRA Tools
PRA is an exercise in communication and transfer of knowledge. Regardless of whether it is carried
out as part of project identification or appraisal or as part of country economic and sector work,
the learning-by-doing and teamwork spirit of PRA requires transparent procedures. For that reason,
a series of open meetings (an initial open meeting, final meeting, and follow-up meeting) generally
frame the sequence of PRA activities. Common tools in PRA are –
Mapping: Making a community map is probably the best approach for you to get started, and for a
community to get started. Take a group on a walk through the community, and let them draw a map
of the area. Let the map include communal facilities, personal and family buildings, assets and
liabilities. Do not draw the map for them. One method is for individuals or small groups to each make
a separate map, then, as a group exercise later, all the small groups of individuals prepare a large
map (e.g. using newsprint or flip chart paper) combining and synthesizing what is included on all the
maps. Valuable information over and above that shown on scientifically produced maps can be
obtained from maps drawn by local people. These maps show the perspective of the drawer and
reveal much about local knowledge of resources, land use and settlement patterns, or household
characteristics. You can encourage community members to draw their map on the ground, using
sticks to draw lines. Drawing the map on the ground, like drawing a large map on the wall, gives you
and the participants a chance to easily make the drawing process a group process.
Models: If the community members add sticks and stones to a map scratched onto the ground, they
are making a simple model - a three dimensional map. Do not draw the map or construct the model
for the participants; encourage them to all contribute. As you watch them, note if some facilities
are made before others, if some are larger in proportion than others. This will give you some insight
into what issues may be more important than others to the participants. Make notes; these will
contribute to your sociological understanding of the community. Make a copy on paper of the map or
model as a permanent record. Maps and models can later lead to transect walks, in which greater
detail is recorded
Creating a Community Inventory: The inventory, and especially the process of making it, is the most
important and central element of participatory appraisal. The process of making the community
inventory is sometimes called semi structured interviewing. If it were perfectly unstructured, then
it would be a loose conversation that goes nowhere. A ‘Brainstorm’ session, in contrast, is highly
structured (The brainstorm has its uses, especially in the project design phase of community
empowering). Making the inventory is somewhere in between these two. You also allow the discussion
to be a little bit free, especially in allowing participants to analyze their contributions to making the
inventory. You do not work with a set of specific questions, but you might best prepare a check list
of topics to cover and work from that so that you cover all topics. When you prepare your check
list, remember that you should include both assets and liabilities in the community. Include available
facilities, including how well they are working, or not working. Include potentials and opportunities as
well as threats and hindrances, both possible and current. Remember that this is an assessment. Aim
for an inventory that assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the community. Your job is not to
create the inventory, but to guide the community members to construct it as a group.
Focus Group Discussions: There may be a range of experiences and opinions among members of the
community or there may be sensitivity in divulging information to outsiders or to others within the
community. This is where a focus group discussion can be useful. It is best here if you do not work
alone, but as a facilitation team of two or three facilitators, one leading the discussion and another
making a record. The discussion topics chosen should be fewer than for the general community
inventory. First conduct separate sessions for the different interest groups, record their
contributions carefully, and then bring them together to share as groups their special concerns. It
is important to be careful here. While you recognize the different interest groups in the community,
you do not want to increase the differences between the groups - to widen the schism. You are not
trying to make all the different groups the same as each other, but to increase the tolerance,
understanding and co-operation between them. Special focus groups gives you the opportunity to
work separately with different groups that may find it difficult at first to work together; but you
must work towards bringing them together.
Preference Ranking: When you are working with a community with different interest groups, you may
wish to list preference rankings of the different groups, and then look at them together with the
groups together. Preference ranking is a good ice-breaker at the beginning of a group interview, and
helps focus the discussion.
Wealth Ranking: This is a particularly useful method of (1) discovering how the community members
define poverty, (2) to find who the really poor people are, and (3) to stratify samples of wealth. This
is best done once you have built up some rapport with the community members. A good method here
is to make a card the name of each of the households in the community on it. Select some members
of the community. Ask them to put these cards into groups according to various measures of wealth
and to give their rationale (reasons) for the groupings. How they categorize members of the
community, and the reasons they give for making those categories and for putting different
households into each category, are very revealing about the socio-economic makeup of the
community.
Seasonal and Historical Diagramming: Seasonal and historical variations and trends can be easy to
miss during a short visit to the field. You can attempt various diagramming techniques can help
explore changes in - rainfall, labor demand, farming (fishing, hunting, herding) activities, wood supply
for fuel, disease incidence, migration for employment, food stocks and many other elements that
change over time. The diagrams you produce can be used as a basis for discussions for the reasons
behind changes and implications for the people involved.
Institutional Mapping: Information about the social organization of the community and the nature of
social groups is difficult to get in a short visit. Complex relationships between rich and poor
segments of the community, family ties and feuds, and political groups cannot be untangled in a few
weeks. Using participatory appraisal methods can be useful here. One way to understand the less
sensitive aspects of social interaction in a community is to ask key informants to construct a ‘Venn
diagram’. This technique is simply a collection of circles, each of which represents a different group
or organization active in the community. The size of each circle reflects the relative importance of
the group represented-the smaller the circle, the less influential the group. The amount of overlap
between two circles represents the amount of collaboration or joint decision making between two
groups.
Participatory Mapping: Create a wall or ground map with group participation. Members should do the
marking, drawing and coloring with a minimum of interference and instruction by outsiders. Using
pencils, pens or local materials (e.g. small rocks, different colored sands or powders, plant material)
members should draw maps that depict/illustrate certain things. Each group member is then asked
‘to hold the stick’ to explain the map or to criticize it or revise it. Create resource maps showing the
location of houses, resources, infrastructure and terrain features-useful for analyzing certain
community-level problems. Create social maps, showing who is related to whom and where they live.
Seasonal Calendars: These charts show monthly changes in climate (rainfall or temperature) or
agricultural activities (agricultural hours worked, different activities undertaken, crop cycles). The
calendars are useful in identifying planting and harvesting times, labor constraints and marketing
opportunities.
Matrices: These are grid formats used to illustrate links between different activities or factors.
They are useful in information gathering and analysis.
Important Techniques of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
Village Transect: A transect is constructed with the help of local inhabitants by walking through the village. The major
objective of a transect is to identify the types of land-use, opportunities and constraints to the agricultural or rural
development. The application of a transect is to identify and explain the cause and effect relationships between
topography, soils, natural vegetation, cultivation and other production activities and human settlement patterns.
Procedure - Draw an outline map of the village. Ask villagers to select one or more routes which cover the main variations in
topography. Ask two or more people to accompany you to the edge of the village. Stop when you arrive at the edge of a new
topography zone; record the characteristics and distance covered by the last zone. When the transect is completed prepare
a chart summarizing the major features encountered. When more than one transects has been completed, prepare a
combined chart, compare results and generate questions and hypothesis for latter enquires.
Social and Physical Maps: The social and resource map is used to show the relative location of different households,
resource points, roads, canals, crop fields, residential areas, markets, educational institutions, co-operative societies, etc.
The villagers are asked to draw a social map of the village usually on the ground using a pointed stick. A social map drawn by
villagers should encourage maximum participation and interaction of the villagers.
Procedure - Select a suitable space. Mark paths and other landmarks from the residential part of the village on the ground.
Sub-divide the village into para or other units to enable the available informants to provide accurate information. Ask the
informant to identify the position of each household, and write the name on a strip of paper, which can then be placed on
the map. Use appropriate symbols and materials to build on any further information, which may be required about assets,
group membership, etc. Start recording on a separate sheet of paper as soon as the locations of the households have been
identified.
Seasonality Exercise: To identify the times of year at which people suffer from particular hardship like unemployment,
diseases, rainfall, draught and some other allied aspects of the rural life. To take appropriate safety nets or other remedial
action.
Procedure - Consider all the months in a year either in Bangla or in English year. Lay out the matrix on the ground
considering months along one axis and the items of a particular phenomenon along the other axis. To get information with
degree of differentiation by the villagers use sticks, seeds and other locally available materials. Count the number of seeds
or sticks by row and column. Consider this number as score of the respective item. Assign rank according to score.
Chapati or Venn Diagrams: To identify the institutions in a community. To show how the various external institutions
involved in the delivery of services. To show how they relate to each other.
Procedure - Cut a large circle of paper to represent the major institutions with which you are concerned (Village or Para).
Cut or draw oval shapes to represent outside institutions with linkages in the village and place these overlapping with the
outer edges of the circle (size can be used to indicate relative importance). Cut or draw further circles of appropriate sizes
to represent institutions wholly contained within the village. Relate these to each other through overlaps where these exist,
through incorporation where one institution lies entirely within another and through separate location where there is no
overlap. Check that the basic diagram is correct before reproducing a clean version on another sheet of paper.
Wealth Ranking: Means of dividing households into different economic categories. This can be used to identify target group
members before an activity is launched or to determine the extent to which targeting has proved successful after the
event.
Procedure - List each household name on a card together with other information. Identify the criteria which they use in
distinguishing between the better and less well off households. Keeping the criteria in mind request the participants to
place the cards in a small number of piles. The category of each household to be recorded at the bottom of the card.
Finally, count the number of households in each pile and record accordingly.
Preference Ranking: Ranking means placing something in sequential order. Preference ranking is a tool that helps us
prioritizing the problems.
Procedure- Organize one focus group representing relevant stakeholders. Make a list of all the problems to be prioritized.
Identify criteria on which problems are to be prioritized. Criteria can be identified through comparing the problems by pair
wise. Define all of the criteria positively. For example ‘tastes good’, ‘not tasted bad’, or ‘easy to cook’, ‘not hard to cook’,
then select a suitable symbol for each one. Decide whether you will ask the informant to rank items on a simple yes/no
basis, or whether you want to assign scores (say from one to three). Lay out the matrix on the ground with the problems
along one axis and the criteria along the other. Ask the informant to rank or score each item against each criterion, using
seeds or available material. This can be done on a scale of 1-3 or by allocating a fixed number of seeds for each criterion.
When the exercise is completed verify the results with the participants. Put the most favored items at the top; the least
favored at the bottom, the most powerful criteria on the left, and the weakest on the right.
Sequence of Techniques
PRA techniques can be combined in a number of different ways, depending on the topic under
investigation. Some general rules of thumb, however, are useful. Mapping and modeling are good
techniques to start with because they involve several people, stimulate much discussion and
enthusiasm, provide the PRA team with an overview of the area, and deal with noncontroversial
information. Maps and models may lead to transect walks, perhaps accompanied by some of the
people who have constructed the map. Wealth ranking is best done later in a PRA, once a degree of
rapport has been established, given the relative sensitivity of this information. Preference ranking
is a good icebreaker at the beginning of a group interview and helps focus the discussion. Later,
individual interviews can follow up on the different preferences among the group members and the
reasons for these differences.
Seven major techniques used in PRA
1. Secondary data reviews - books, files, reports, news, articles, maps, etc.
2. Observation - direct and participant observation, wandering, DIY (do-it-yourself) activities.
3. Semi-structured interviews - this is an informal, guided interview session, where only some of
the questions are pre-determined and new questions arise during the interview, in response to
answers from those interviewed.
4. Analytical game - this is a quick game to find out a group’s list of priorities, performances,
ranking, scoring, or stratification.
5. Stories and portraits - colorful description of the local situation, local history, trend analysis,
etc.
6. Diagrams - maps, aerial photos, transects, seasonal calendars, Venn diagram, flow diagram,
historical profiles, ethno-history, timelines, etc.
7. Workshop - local and outsiders are brought together to discuss the information and ideas
intensively.
Modified PRA Tools: Resource Map; Social Map; Wealth Ranking Objectives; Local Perceptions of Malnutrition Mapping
Objectives; Venn Diagram on Institutions; Resource Cards; Seasonal Calendar; Income and Expenditure Matrix; Daily
Activity Clocks; Focus Group Discussion; Semi Structured Interview; Community Workshop; Daily Evaluation and Planning
Meeting.
Resource Map: It is a tool that helps us to learn about a community and its resource base. The primary concern is not to
develop an accurate map but to get useful information about local perceptions of resources. The participants should develop
the content of the map according to what is important to them. The objective is to learn the villagers’ perceptions of what
natural resources are found in the community and how they are used.
Social Map: It is a map that is drawn by the residents and which shows the social structures and institutions found in an
area. It also helps us to learn about social and economic differences between the households. The objectives are – to learn
about the social structures and the differences among the households by ethnicity, religion and wealth; to learn about who
is living where; to learn about the social institutions and the different views local people might have regarding those
institutions.
Wealth Ranking Objectives: To investigate perceptions of wealth differences and inequalities in a community; to identify
and understand local indicators and criteria of wealth and well-being; to map the relative position of households in a
community. Ranking and mapping methods are used. Carry out the exercise with a few key informants who know the
community well.
Local Perceptions of Malnutrition Mapping Objectives: To identify various forms of malnutrition prevalent in the community;
to understand the local perceptions of malnutrition; to map nutritionally vulnerable households. Ranking, mapping and matrix
methods are used. Carry out the interview with one or more key informants (Community Health Worker; Traditional Birth
Attendant; Home Agent; Traditional Healer; Teacher etc.).
Venn Diagram on Institutions: It shows institutions, organizations, groups and important individuals found in the village
(Kushet), as well as the villagers view of their importance in the community. Additionally the Diagram explains who
participates in these groups in terms of gender and wealth. The Institutional Relationship Diagram also indicates how close
the contact and cooperation between those organizations and groups is. The objectives are – to identify external and
internal organizations/groups/important persons active in the community; to identify who participates in local
organizations/ institutions by gender and wealth; to find out how the different organizations and groups relate to each
other in terms of contact, co-operation, flow of information and provision of services.
Resource Cards: Resource picture cards are useful for facilitating a discussion about who uses and controls resources in a
fun and non-threatening way. They show very clearly the resource base of both men and women. This can lead to discussions
about differences between men’s and women’s priorities and their need for resources. The objective is to learn about
differences between men and women in use and control over resources.
Seasonal Calendar: A seasonal calendar is a participatory tool to explore seasonal changes (e.g. gender-specific workload,
diseases, income, expenditure etc.). The objective is to learn about changes in livelihoods over the year and to show the
seasonality of agricultural and non agricultural workload, food availability, human diseases, gender-specific income and
expenditure, water, forage, credit and holidays.
Income and Expenditure Matrix: It is a tool that helps us to identify and quantify the relative importance of different
sources of income and expenditures. The tool also helps us to understand how secure or how vulnerable certain groups of
people incomes are. In the Expenditures matrix, we can see if all, most or only some of people's total income is spent to
meet basic needs - food, water, clothing, shelter, health care, education. We can also ask whether people have any money
left over to save or to invest in tools, fertilizer, or other important items that could help them in their work. The objective
is to learn about sources of income (cash and kind) and how income is proportionality spent by gender and wealth.
Daily Activity Clocks: Daily activity clocks illustrate all of the different kinds of activities carried out in one day. They are
particularly useful for looking at relative work-loads between different groups in the community. Comparisons between
clocks show who works the longest hours, who concentrates on a few activities and who does a number of tasks in a day, and
who has the most leisure time and sleep. The objective is to learn what different people do during one day and how heavy
their workloads are.
Focus Group Discussion: Semi-structured group interview, ranking and matrix methods are used. The objectives are –
understand local perceptions of nutrition and household food security; identify and understand constraints in the household
and community to achieving nutrition and household food security; identify and understand mechanisms in the household and
the community to cope with nutrition and household food insecurity; identify what community, household and individual
resources are required to obtain nutrition and household food security.
Semi Structured Interview: Semi-structured group interview, ranking and observation methods are used. The objectives
are – understand why members of a household (that was mapped as being affected by malnutrition) have nutrition-related
health problems and why other households are not affected; identify constraints and opportunities in the household and
community for household members to achieve nutrition security.
Community Workshop: ‘Group Discussion’ and ‘Presentation’ are used as methods. The objectives are – to present the main
findings and conclusions of the appraisal to the community at large; to provide an opportunity to the community for
discussion of the main findings of the appraisal; to reach a consensus on the way forward and the roles and responsibilities
of the community, the community support staff and the project. Organize a meeting with the community at large, ensuring
that men and women are equally represented, as well as people from different socio-economic groups and ages.
Daily Evaluation and Planning Meeting: Every afternoon the PRA team comes together to reflect the process of day, to
present the results gathered, to evaluate the results and to plan for the next day. The objectives are – to present the
results of the day; to summarize and structure the results according to the key questions and according to related
‘Strength and Weaknesses’ inside the community and according to ‘Opportunities and Threats’ identified outside the
community; to compare the results of the different groups and to identify differences and correspondences; to enable the
PRA team to elaborate new relevant key questions and a program for the next day.
Using of PRA
PRA supports the direct participation of communities, with rural people themselves becoming the
main investigators and analysts. Rural people set the priorities; determine needs; select and train
community workers; collect, document, and analyze data; and plan and implement solutions based on
their findings. Actions stemming from this research tend to serve the local community. Outsiders
are there to facilitate the process but do not direct it. PRA uses group animation and exercises to
facilitate information sharing, analysis, and action among stakeholders. PRA is an exercise in
communication and transfer of knowledge. Regardless of whether it is carried out as part of project
identification or appraisal or as part of country economic and sector work, the learning-by-doing and
teamwork spirit of PRA requires transparent procedures. For that reason, a series of open meetings
(an initial open meeting, final meeting, and follow-up meeting) generally frame the sequence of PRA
activities. A typical PRA activity involves a team of people working for two to three weeks on
workshop discussions, analyses, and fieldwork.
Scope of PRA
PRA is used –
To ascertain needs;
To establish priorities for development activities;
Within the scope of feasibility studies;
During the implementation phase of projects;
Within the scope of monitoring and evaluation of projects;
For studies of specific topics;
For focusing formal surveys on essential aspects, and identifying conflicting group interests.
Areas of Application
Natural resource management
Agriculture
Poverty alleviation/women in development programs
Health and nutrition
Preliminary and primary education
Village and district-level planning
Institutional and policy analysis.
Advantages of PRA
Identification of genuine priorities for target group. PRA allows local people to present their
own priorities for development and get them incorporated into development plans.
Devolution of management responsibilities. An important goal of PRA is to encourage self-reliant
development with as much of the responsibility for the management and implementation of
development activities devolved to local people themselves. This can greatly improve the
efficiency of development work and eliminate many of the problems regarding proprietorship of
development activities at the community level.
Motivation and mobilization of local development workers. Participation in PRA by local
development workers, whether from NGOs, government or other agencies can greatly increase
the motivation and level of mobilization in support of the project or program of which it is part.
Where changes in development approaches are being introduced, such as a shift to a more
integrated development planning mechanism, a PRA-type activity which illustrates how these new
mechanisms will work on the ground can help to ensure better understanding and commitment by
local workers. This is one reason why involvement of people from different administrative and
organizational levels can be vital so that commitment is built up right through the chain.
Forming better linkages between communities and development institutions. PRA can assist in
forming better links between communities and the agencies and institutions concerned with rural
development. A PRA which encourages a better understanding of the environmental issues at
stake in local communities and develops activities which enable them to benefit from better
management could also lead to better monitoring of mangrove exploitation by the communities
themselves. PRAs involve intensive interaction between communities and outsiders which can
have lasting effects in breaking down the barriers of reticence and suspicion which often
characterize these relationships.
Use of local resources. Where local people have had more say in the design of projects they are
also more likely to design activities which make full use of existing resources.
Mobilization of community resources. Greater commitment from the community can also mean
greater mobilization of community resources for development and less reliance on outside inputs.
This can take the form of labor inputs, savings or time devoted to management functions.
More sustainable development activities. This combination of effects will generally lead to more
sustainable development activities which are less reliant on support from outside agencies and is
technically, environmentally and socially appropriate to local conditions.
These benefits from participation can only be realized where the full implications of participation
for the development agencies which are encouraging it have been taken into account and
accommodated and the institutions involved are willing to support the sort of long-term changes in
social, political and institutional frameworks which proper participation, and PRA, can set in motion.
Where this is not the case, many of the following disadvantages can come into play.
Weaknesses of PRA
The term PRA itself can cause difficulties. PRA need not be rural, and sometimes is not even
participatory, and is frequently used as a trendy label for standard RRA techniques.
Raising expectations which cannot be realized. One of the most immediate and frequently
encountered risks in PRA is that it raises a complex set of expectations in communities which
frequently cannot be realized given the institutional or political context of the area. This can be
due to the political situation, the local power and social structure or simply too bureaucratic
inertia in institutions which are supposed to be supporting development. In some cases the
intended aim of the PRA may be to deliberately raise expectations ‘at the grassroots’ so as to
put pressure on the institutional and political structures above to change. However, not all
development agencies are in a position to support such activities and there is a risk that agencies
which are not properly equipped to respond to PRA-type planning may use the approach
inappropriately.
Hijacking. If PRA becomes part of the global development agenda, there are risks of hijacking -
When this occurs, the PRA agenda is externally driven, and used to create legitimacy for
projects, agencies and NGOs.
Disappointment. Local expectations can easily be raised. If nothing tangible emerges, local
communities may come to see the process as a transient external development phenomenon. Lack
of feedback to the community adds to the sense of disappointment.
Failure to take account of stratification in communities. The fact that PRA is often carried out
with the community as a whole can mean that stratification within the community, whether by
wealth, social status, gender or ethnic group, can often be obscured and ignored.
Threats. The empowerment implications of PRA, and the power of its social analysis, can create
threats to local vested interests, although less so than with PAR (Participatory Action
Research).
Many ‘definitions’ of RRA have been offered by different people who have worked on it, but there
are always others who object to those definitions because they are not what they think RRA is or
should be. The fact that it is difficult to give a precise definition to RRA is a reflection of the fact
that it is very flexible - it is a tool which can be used in a lot of different situations to achieve very
different objectives. Not surprisingly everybody seems to think RRA is what they have used it for.
So it is probably best to avoid ‘definitions’ and just describe the features which most RRAs seem to
have in common. RRA essentially consists of the following –
an activity carried out by a group of people from different professional fields or disciplines
which usually aims to learn about a particular topic, area, situation, group of people or whatever
else is of concern to those organizing the RRA
it usually involves collecting information by talking directly to people ‘on the ground’
it uses a set of guidelines on how to approach the collection of information, learning from that
information and the involvement of local people in its interpretation and presentation
it uses a set of tools - these consist of exercises and techniques for collecting information,
means of organizing that information so that it is easily understood by a wide range of people,
techniques for stimulating interaction with community members and methods for quickly
analyzing and reporting findings and suggesting appropriate action.
These features are just about the ‘bottom line’ with RRA but everything else is fairly flexible within
the guidelines described below.
RRA Guidelines
Structured but flexible: RRA is a structured activity requiring careful planning, clear
objectives, the right balance of people involved and a good choice of tools and techniques for
use in the field. At the same time, it is flexible enough to respond to local conditions and
unexpected circumstances. Progress is reviewed constantly so that new information can be
understood and the focus of the RRA redirected.
Integrated and interdisciplinary: RRA helps ‘outsiders’ to learn about rural conditions by looking
at them from many points of view. This means having people participating with a variety of
different technical and scientific skills and a balance of different institutional outlooks. This
requires an integrated development approach which cuts across institutional and disciplinary
boundaries.
Awareness of bias: Researchers and development workers who are trying to understand rural
conditions can be biased by their urban attitudes, their own professional and personal priorities,
the type of transport they use, the language they speak. The people researchers talk to can be
biased as well by their limited experience, their customs and beliefs and their own interests and
those of their families. RRA seeks to avoid biases by being aware of them and by being
systematic in taking into account different points of view and different sets of interests.
Accelerating the planning process: RRA tries to shorten the time it takes to get from knowing
nothing about an area or a situation to deciding what development interventions might be best
for that area by using key informants, careful observation and by exploiting the knowledge and
experience of local people. The information produced is analyzed ‘on the spot’ and presented in a
form which is more easily used by planners and which can be discussed and understood by local
people themselves.
Interaction with and learning from local people: Whatever the purpose of the RRA it must
involve the people who are the intended ‘beneficiaries’ of any eventual development activities.
RRA should give them the opportunity to describe their lives and conditions. The people carrying
out an RRA must be prepared to listen to local people and learn from them. Participation by local
people can take many forms but any RRA will involve intense interaction between researchers,
planners, traditional and formal authorities and local people.
Combination of different tools: The RRA approach uses a combination of communication and
learning tools. These tools help outsiders to observe conditions in a concise but systematic way.
They also allow local people to present their knowledge, concerns and priorities to outsiders. The
combination of different tools and techniques builds up a more complete picture where
different viewpoints can be compared and contrasted. The systematic cross-checking of
information collected in different ways by different people from different sources can
increases accuracy and comprehensiveness.
Iterative: During an RRA, what has been learnt is constantly reviewed and analyzed in the field.
This is usually done in workshops carried out at regular intervals. This means the focus of the
RRA, the tools used and the people talked to can be adjusted constantly.
Obviously, these guidelines leave plenty of room for the people using RRA to decide exactly what
they want to do with it. For example, if the most important thing for the people organizing the RRA
is to collect information quickly, they might want to structure the activity more carefully so that
things move faster. If one of the principal concerns is to get local people involved as much as
possible, the structure of the RRA would probably have to be looser and more time allowed for
getting to know the people and putting them at ease.
RRA Teams
The composition of the team which carries out an RRA is extremely important in determining the
outcome of an RRA. Obviously, the composition of an RRA team depends very much on the objectives
of the RRA and the particular concerns which it is addressing.
Gender Considerations: Gender bias is particularly important for RRA teams. For male
researchers, women in many rural communities are difficult to contact and talk to and may
remain almost invisible to anyone visiting the community for a short time. However all aspects of
rural conditions studied by an RRA team will have gender dimensions which need to be taken into
consideration.
Multidisciplinary: The composition of teams carrying out RRAs should be dictated by a careful
consideration of the objectives of the appraisal, the issues which are thought to be of
importance in the area and the need to have a balanced set of disciplinary, institutional and
gender viewpoints represented on the team. As a minimum requirement, there should be a
balance between specialists in the biological and physical sciences and specialists in the social
sciences. However, the need for different formal backgrounds should not be overemphasized.
The important point is to have people who can contribute different ways of looking at rural
conditions - so, when organizing an RRA, it might be possible for people to ‘cover’ different
disciplines at the same time if they have the relevant experience.
Levels of Expertise: One of the risks of RRA is that it tends to rely on the knowledge,
experience and ‘sensitivity’ of team members to come to conclusions about rural conditions.
These conclusions cannot then be tested or checked against ‘hard data’. This means that a great
deal depends on the skills of team members. As a result, it has always been regarded as
important to have experienced and skilled people on RRA teams. Obviously this is preferable, but
RRA does not depend only on the skills and experience of its team members to overcome the
risks of coming to faulty conclusions due to lack of hard data. It is the combination of different
viewpoints and the systematic use of cross-checking during an RRA that counts perhaps more
than individual skills. The presence on the team of ‘authoritative’ experts, with a wide range and
depth of experience in their fields, can be an advantage as they bring new knowledge and
experience to bear on local problems. However, such ‘experts’ also have to be willing to listen and
learn from the activity. Frequently, those who are most qualified are also most likely to impose
their own biases and interpretations on the work of the team. Experts who are not willing to
learn something new during an appraisal can create more problems than they solve. In such
circumstances it can be better to have a less experienced specialist who is willing to learn
something new than a highly experienced expert who is sure that s/he knows everything already.
RRA Experience: At least one member of the team should have experience in carrying out RRAs.
This person can act as trainer in RRA techniques and as facilitator, guiding the rest of the team
through the process of carrying out the RRA and making sure that the activity keeps on track.
Mix of Institutions: The involvement of people from the institutions and agencies which will
implement RRA recommendations is important. It can ensure that the subsequent involvement of
different agencies is based on the same understanding of the local situation and a similar
interpretation of local needs and priorities. Where many agencies are involved a few key
personnel have to be selected either because of their skills or because they are likely to play a
leading role in the future. Team members from different agencies can also contribute a range of
perspectives to the RRA and improve the depth of understanding achieved. RRAs can provide an
opportunity for people from different levels of the hierarchy of development agencies and
institutions to work together. Involvement of such a range of people in an RRA can lead to a
better understanding both of the conditions of ‘target’ communities and of the different
priorities and problems of workers at different administrative and organizational levels i.e.
regional planners and village extension workers.
Language Ability: As many of the team as possible should be able to communicate directly with
local people in their normal language. Use of translators and interpreters is clumsy and risky.
Advantages of RRA
The approach is responsive and flexible to new learning and conditions on the ground.
Achieves a complex understanding of processes and dynamics and connections between different
disciplines, activities and sets of conditions.
The analysis and interpretation of findings is carried out during the appraisal providing
opportunities for cross-checking.
Weaknesses of RRA
The findings will not be statistically ‘sound’, even if RRA teams can use ‘quick and dirty’ sampling
methods to make sure that they cover a reasonable number of people or households in a
particular area.
Risk that the information gathered by an RRA is not very ‘representative’ but is a collection of
‘particular cases’ which do not tell researchers very much about general conditions.
RRA is very dependent on the skills of the people carrying it out and having the right
combination of experience and viewpoints on the team.
Subjective and Objective Observation: All the observations consist of the two main components, the
subject and the object. The subject refers to the observer whereas the object refers to the
activity or any type of operation that is being observed. Subjective observation involves the
observation of the one’s own immediate experience whereas the observations involving observer as
an entity apart from the thing being observed, are referred to as the objective observation.
Objective observation is also called as the retrospection.
Direct and Indirect Observation: With the help of the direct method of observation, one comes to
know how the observer is physically present in which type of situation is he present and then this
type of observation monitors what takes place. Indirect method of observation involves studies of
mechanical recording or the recording by some of the other means like photographic or electronic.
Direct observation is relatively more straight forward as compared to the indirect observation.
Participant and Non Participant Observation: Participation by the observers with the various types
of operations of the group under study refers to the participant type of observation. In participant
observation, the degree of the participation is largely affected by the nature of the study and it
also depends on the type of the situation and also on its demands. But in the non participant type of
observation, no participation of the observer in the activities of the group takes place and also
there occurs no relationship between the researcher and the group.
Undisguised participant observation is often used to understand the culture and behavior of groups
of individuals. Disguised participant observation is often used when researchers believe individuals
would change their behavior if they knew it was being recorded. Participant observation allows
researchers to observe behaviors and situations that are not usually open to scientific observation.
Participant observers may sometimes lose their objectivity or may unduly influence the individuals
whose behavior they are recording.
Structured and Unstructured Observation: Structured observation works according to a plan and
involves specific information of the units that are to be observed and also about the information
that is to be recorded. The operations that are to be observed and the various features that are to
be noted or recorded are decided well in advance. Such observations involve the use of especial
instruments for the purpose of data collection that are also structured in nature. But in the case of
the unstructured observation, its basics are diametrically against the structured observation. In
such observation, observer has the freedom to note down what s/he feels is correct and relevant to
the point of study and also this approach of observation is very suitable in the case of exploratory
research.
Structured observations are set up to record behaviors that may be difficult to observe using
naturalistic observation. Clinical and developmental psychologists often use structured observations.
Problems in interpreting structured observations can occur when the same observation procedures
are not followed across observations or observers, or when important variables are not controlled.
Structured observation is more likely to be carried out by those operating from a ‘positivist’
perspective, or who at least believe it is possible to clearly define and quantify behaviors.
Unstructured observation is more likely to be carried out by those operating from an ‘interpretive’
or ‘critical’ perspective where the focus is on understanding the meanings participants, in the
contexts observed, attribute to events and actions. Positivist and critical researchers are likely to
be operating from a ‘realist’ perspective, namely that there is a ‘real world’ with ‘real impact’ on
people’s lives and this can best be studied by looking at social settings directly.
Controlled and Un-controlled Observation: Controlled observations are the observations made under
the influence of some of the external forces and such observations rarely lead to improvement in
the precision of the research results. But these observations can be very effective in the working if
these are made to work in the coordination with mechanical synchronizing devices, film recording
etc. Un-controlled observations are made in the natural environment and reverse to the controlled
observation these observations involve no influence or guidance of any type of external force.
Covert and Overt Observation: Covert observations are when the researcher pretends to be an
ordinary member of the group and observes in secret. There could be ethical problems or deception
and consent with this particular method of observation. Overt observations are when the
researcher tells the group s/he is conducting research (i.e. they know they are being observed).
Type of Obser- Advantages Disadvantages
vational Method
Naturalistic Particularly good for observing specific Ethics: Where research is undisclosed
Observation subjects. consent will not be obtained, where
Provides ecologically valid recordings of natural consent is not obtained - details may
behavior. be used which infringe confidentiality.
Spontaneous behaviors are more likely to
happen.
Structured Allows control of extraneous variables. The implementation of controls may
Observation Reliability of results can be tested by repeating have an effect on behavior.
the study. Lack of ecological validity.
Provides a safe environment to study Observer effect.
contentious concepts such as infant attachment. Observer bias.
Unstructured Gives a broad overview of a situation. Only really appropriate as a ‘first step’
Observation Useful where situation/subject matter to be to give an overview of a situation /
studied is unclear. concept / idea.
Participant Gives an ‘insiders’ view. Observer effect.
Observation Behaviors are less prone to misinterpretation Possible lack of objectivity on the part
because researcher was a participant. of the observer.
Opportunity for researcher to become an
‘accepted’ part of the environment.
Non-Participant Avoidance of observer effect Observer is detached from situation
Observation so relies on their perception which may
be inaccurate
Qualitative Records of Behavior: Observation can provide rich qualitative data, sometimes described
as ‘thick description’ (Geertz, 1973), for example, where the relevant phenomena have been
carefully observed and detailed field notes have been recorded. Typically, the researcher would not
approach the observation with pre-determined categories or questions in mind. Because of this
openness, observation in qualitative research is often referred to as unstructured.
Quantitative Measures of Behavior: Researchers often obtain quantitative measures such as
frequency or duration of occurrence when they seek to describe specific behaviors or events.
Quantitative measures of behavior use one of the four levels of measurement scales: nominal,
ordinal, interval, and ratio. The term ‘systematic’ observation is usually associated with observation
undertaken from the perspective of quantitative research where the purpose is to provide reliable,
quantifiable data. This usually involves the use of some kind of formal, structured observation
instrument or schedule. The observation method being used will clearly identify - the variables to be
observed, perhaps by means of some kind of behavioral checklist; who or what will be observed; how
the observation is to be conducted; and when and where the observations will take place.
Analysis of Observational Data
Data Reduction: Observational data are summarized through the process of data reduction.
Researchers quantify the data in narrative records by coding behaviors according to specified
criteria, for example, by categorizing behaviors. Data are summarized using descriptive measures
such as frequency counts, means, and standard deviations.
Observer Reliability: Inter-observer reliability refers to the extent to which independent
observers agree in their observations. Inter-observer reliability is increased by providing clear
definitions about behaviors and events to be recorded, by training observers, and by providing
feedback about discrepancies. High inter-observer reliability increases researchers' confidence
that observations about behavior are accurate (valid). Inter-observer reliability is assessed by
calculating percentage of agreement or correlations, depending on how the behaviors were measured
and recorded.
Influence of the Observer: If individuals change their behavior when they know they are being
observed (reactivity), their behavior may no longer be representative of their normal behavior.
Research participants may respond to demand characteristics in the research situation to guide
their behavior. Methods to control reactivity include unobtrusive (non-reactive) measurement,
adaptation (habituation, desensitization), and indirect observations of behavior. Researchers must
consider ethical issues when attempting to control reactivity.
Observer Bias: Observer bias occurs when observers’ biases determine which behaviors they choose
to observe and when observers’ expectations about behavior lead to systematic errors in identifying
and recording behavior. Expectancy effects can occur when observers are aware of hypotheses for
the outcome of the study or the outcome of previous studies. The first step in controlling observer
bias is to recognize that it may be present. Observer bias may be reduced by keeping observers
unaware (blind) of the goals and hypotheses of the study.
to the population. The sample should not be selected haphazardly or only from those who volunteer
to participate.
Surveys are a good way of gathering a large amount of data, providing a broad perspective. Surveys
can be administered electronically, by telephone, by mail or face to face. Mail and electronically
administered surveys have a wide reach, are relatively cheap to administer, information is
standardized and privacy can be maintained. They do, however, have a low response rate, are unable
to investigate issues to any great depth, require that the target group is literate and do not allow
for any observation. As surveys are self-reported by participants, there is a possibility that
responses may be biased particularly if the issues involved are sensitive or require some measure of
disclosure on trust by the participant. It is therefore vital that surveys used are designed and
tested for validity and reliability with the target groups who will be completing the surveys.
Careful attention must be given to the design of the survey. If possible the use of an already
designed and validated survey instrument will ensure that the data being collected is accurate. If
you design your own survey it is necessary to pilot test the survey on a sample of your target group
to ensure that the survey instrument is measuring what it intends to measure and is appropriate for
the target group. Questions within the survey can be asked in several ways and include: closed
questions, open-ended and scaled questions, and multiple choice questions. Closed questions are
usually in the format of yes/no or true/false options. Open-ended questions on the other hand leave
the answer entirely up to the respondent and therefore provide a greater range of responses.
Additionally, the use of scales is useful when assessing participants’ attitudes. A multiple choice
question may ask respondents to indicate their favorite topic covered in the program, or most
preferred activity. Other considerations when developing a survey instrument include - question
sequence, layout and appearance, length, language, and an introduction and cover letter. Sensitive
questions should be placed near the end of a survey rather than at the beginning.
Use of Survey
When determining the need for a survey, departments/agencies should first check that the
required information is not already available. The option of collecting the required information using
existing administrative records should also be explored. Using existing data or records provides
considerable advantages in terms of cost, time and the absence of respondent burden. The major
disadvantage is the lack of control over the data collected. If existing data are not available or
suitable, a number of factors must then be considered when determining which type of survey, if
any, is appropriate. For example -
Practicality
Can the information be collected cost effectively and accurately via a survey?
How complex and how sensitive is the topic?
Do respondents have access to the required information?
Will they be willing to supply the information?
Will their responses to the questions be valid?
Resources
Are the necessary financial, staff, computer or other resources available?
Timing
When is the information required?
Is enough time available to ensure that data of sufficient quality can be collected and analysed?
When is the best time to conduct the survey? (For example, need to allow for seasonality,
impact of school holiday periods etc).
Survey requirements
Do you want to use this information to target program improvements? If so, you may need to
identify the key sub-groups you wish to report on (for example, geographic areas, age groups,
sex, industry and size of business) and obtain sufficient responses for each group to ensure
results are accurate enough for your needs.
Accuracy
What level of error can be tolerated? This depends on how and for what purposes you intend to
use the survey results.
Frequency
Is the survey to be repeated? How often?
Legislative powers
Does the department/agency have authority to collect the information through either a
compulsory or voluntary survey?
Ethical consideration
Ethical considerations must be observed during the survey exercise. This includes that data, where
appropriate, are treated confidentially, and that where information is sought on the understanding
that the respondent cannot be identified, that such anonymity is preserved. Other ethical
considerations include -
Do you need identifiable information (for example, names, addresses, telephone numbers)
relating to respondents for follow-up research or matching with other data? If so, you need to
clearly explain why you need such details and obtain the respondents’ consent.
Will respondents be adversely affected or harmed as a direct result of participating in the
survey?
Are procedures in place for respondents to check the identity and bonafides of the
researchers?
Is the survey being conducted on a voluntary basis? If so, respondents must not be misled to
believe it is compulsory when being asked for their co-operation.
Is it necessary to interview children under 14 years? If so, the consent of their parents /
guardians / responsible adults must be obtained.
These factors must all be taken into consideration when developing an appropriate sample design
(that is, sample size, selection method, etc.) and survey method.
Survey Process
The following is an outline of the general process to be followed once the need for a survey has been
determined. Some steps will not be necessary in all cases and some processes can be carried out at
the same time (for example, data collection and preparation for data entry and processing). A
sample survey is cheaper and timelier than a census but still requires significant resources, effort
and time. The survey process is complex and the stages are not necessarily sequential. Pilot testing
of, at least, key elements such as the questionnaire and survey operations is an essential part of the
development stage. It may be necessary to go through more than one cycle of development, testing,
evaluation and modification before a satisfactory solution is reached. The entire process should be
planned ahead, including all critical dates. The time required from initial planning to the completion
of a report or publication may vary from several weeks to several months according to the size and
type of survey. Key steps in the survey process include –
Planning and Designing
1. Define the purpose, objectives and the output required. Experience has shown that well-defined
output requirements at the outset minimize the risk of the survey producing invalid results.
2. Design collection methodology and sample selection method.
3. Develop survey procedures. Design and print test questionnaires and any other documentation
(for example, instructions for interviewers and introductory letters).
Testing and Modifying
4. Pilot test all aspects of the survey if possible. As a minimum, a small-scale pre-test of
questionnaires can reveal problems with question wording, layout, understanding or respondent
reaction.
5. Analyze test results (completed questionnaires, response/consent rate etc). Obtain feedback
from respondents and/or interviewers.
6. Modify procedures, questionnaires and documentation according to test evaluation.
7. Repeat steps 1–6 if necessary.
Conducting the Survey
8. Finalize procedures, questionnaires and documentation.
9. Select sample.
10. Train interviewers (if interviewer-based).
11. Conduct the survey (that is, mail out questionnaires or commence interviewing) including follow-
up of refusals and non-contacts, supervision and checks of interviewers’ work.
Processing and Analyzing
12. Prepare data entry, estimation and tabulation systems.
13. Code, enter and edit data.
14. Process data - calculate population estimates and standard errors, prepare tables.
15. Prepare report of survey results.
16. Prepare technical report. Evaluate and document all aspects of the survey for use when
designing future surveys.
Data Collection Method in Survey
Commonly used methods for collecting quantitative data include telephone and face-to-face
interviews, self-completion questionnaires (such as mail, email, web-based or SMS) or combinations
of these. Each has advantages and disadvantages in terms of the cost, time, response/consent rate
and the type of information that can be collected.
Self-completion Surveys via mail, email, the internet or SMS are generally the least expensive,
particularly for a widespread sample. They allow respondents time to consider their answers, refer
to records or consult with others (which can be helpful or unhelpful, depending on the survey’s
objectives). They also eliminate interviewer errors and reduce the incidence of selected people (or
units) being unable to be contacted. A major disadvantage of self-completion surveys is the
potentially high non-response. In such cases, substantial bias can result if people who do not
complete the survey have different characteristics from those who do. However, response can be
improved using techniques such as well-written introductory letters, incentives for timely return of
questionnaires and follow-up for those initially not responding. In self-completion surveys there is no
opportunity to clarify answers or supplement the survey with observational data. In mail surveys the
questionnaire usually has to be simple and reasonably short, particularly when surveying the general
community. Internet and email-based surveys are commonly used for surveying clients or staff
within organizations and allow more complex questionnaires to be used than mail surveys do.
Interviewer-based Surveys such as face-to-face or telephone surveys generally allow more data to
be gathered than self-completion surveys and can include the use of more complex questionnaires.
Interviewers can reduce non-response by answering respondents’ queries or concerns. They can
often pick up and resolve respondent errors. Face-to-face surveys are usually more expensive than
other methodologies. Poor interviewers can introduce additional errors and, in some cases, the face-
to-face approach is unsuitable for sensitive topics. Telephone surveys are generally cheaper and
quicker than face-to-face surveys, and are well suited to situations where timely results are needed.
However, non-response may be higher than for face-to-face surveys as it is harder for interviewers
to prove their identity, assure confidentiality and establish rapport. Telephone surveys are not
suited for situations where the respondents need to refer to records extensively. Also, the
questionnaires must be simpler and shorter than for face-to-face surveys and prompt cards cannot
be used.
Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) is a particular type of telephone survey technique
that helps to resolve some of the limitations of general telephone-based surveying. With CATI,
interviewers use a computer terminal. The questions appear on the computer screen and the
interviewers enter responses directly into the computer. The interviewer’s screen is programmed to
show questions in the planned order. Interviewers cannot inadvertently omit questions or ask them
out of sequence. Online messages warn interviewers if they enter invalid values or unusual values.
Most CATI systems also allow many aspects of survey operations to be automated, e.g. rescheduling
of call-backs, engaged numbers and ‘no answers’, and allow automatic dialing and remote supervision
of interviewer/respondent interaction. A survey frame or list which contains telephone numbers is
required to conduct a telephone survey. For general population surveys, such lists are not readily
available or they have limitations that can lead to biased results. If the Electronic White Pages list
is used to select a sample of households then the sample will not include households with silent
numbers. In addition, it may exclude households with recent new connections or recent changes to
existing numbers. Electoral rolls exclude respondents aged less than 18 years of age, migrants not
yet naturalised and others ineligible to vote. Random Digit Dialing may address some of the under-
coverage associated with an Electronic White Pages or electoral role list, but it is inefficient for
sampling at a low geographic level and does not allow for communicating (via pre-approach letter, for
example) with households prior to the commencement of telephone interviewing.
Combinations of Collection Methods such as interviewers dropping off a questionnaire to be mailed
back or returning to pick it up, a mail survey with telephone follow-up, or an initial telephone call to
obtain cooperation or name of a suitable respondent followed by a mail survey – are sometimes used
to obtain higher response/consent rates to a survey.
If in-depth or purely qualitative information is required, alternative research methods should be
considered. Focus groups, observation and in-depth interviewing are all useful when developing a
survey or initially exploring areas of interest. They can also be a valuable supplement to survey data.
However, results from such studies should not be considered representative of the entire
population of interest.
Sources of Error
Non-response occurs in virtually all surveys through factors such as refusals, non-contact and
language difficulties. It is of particular importance if the characteristics of non-respondents differ
from respondents. For example, if high-income earners are more likely to refuse to participate in an
income survey, the results will obviously be biased towards lower incomes. For this reason, all
surveys should aim for the maximum possible response/consent rate, within cost and time
constraints, by using techniques such as call-backs to non-contacts and follow-up of refusals. The
level of non-response should always be measured.
Bias can also arise from inadequate sampling frames, the lists from which respondents are selected.
Household and business telephone listings and electoral rolls are often used as sampling frames, but
they all have limitations. Telephone listings exclude respondents who do not have telephones and can
exclude those with ‘silent’ or unlisted numbers. Electoral rolls exclude respondents aged less than 18
years of age, migrants not yet naturalized and others ineligible to vote.
Issues for Selecting Survey Methods
Selecting the type of survey you are going to use is one of the most critical decisions in many social
research contexts. There are very few simple rules that will make the decision to balance the
advantages and disadvantages of different survey types. Here, is a number of questions which can
be asked for decision.
Population Issues
The first set of considerations has to do with the population and its accessibility.
Can the population be enumerated? For some populations, you have a complete listing of the units
that will be sampled. For others, such a list is difficult or impossible to compile. For instance, there
are complete listings of registered voters or person with active driver’s licenses. But no one keeps a
complete list of homeless people. If you are doing a study that requires input from homeless
persons, you are very likely going to need to go and find the respondents personally. In such
contexts, you can pretty much rule out the idea of mail surveys or telephone interviews.
Is the population literate? Questionnaires require that your respondents can read. While this might
seem initially like a reasonable assumption for many adult populations, we know from recent research
that the instance of adult illiteracy is alarmingly high. And, even if your respondents can read to
some degree, your questionnaire may contain difficult or technical vocabulary. Clearly, there are
some populations that you would expect to be illiterate. Young children would not be good targets
for questionnaires.
Are there language issues? We live in a multilingual world. Virtually every society has members who
speak other than the predominant language. Some countries (like Canada) are officially multilingual.
And, our increasingly global economy requires us to do research that spans countries and language
groups. Can you produce multiple versions of your questionnaire? For mail instruments, can you know
in advance the language your respondent speaks, or do you send multiple translations of your
instrument? Can you be confident that important connotations in your instrument are not culturally
specific? Could some of the important nuances get lost in the process of translating your questions?
Will the population cooperate? People who do research on immigration issues have a difficult
methodological problem. They often need to speak with undocumented immigrants or people who may
be able to identify others who are. Why would we expect those respondents to cooperate? Although
the researcher may mean no harm, the respondents are at considerable risk legally if information
they divulge should get into the hand of the authorities. The same can be said for any target group
that is engaging in illegal or unpopular activities.
What are the geographic restrictions? Is your population of interest dispersed over too broad a
geographic range for you to study feasibly with a personal interview? It may be possible for you to
send a mail instrument to a nationwide sample. You may be able to conduct phone interviews with
them. But it will almost certainly be less feasible to do research that requires interviewers to visit
directly with respondents if they are widely dispersed.
Sampling Issues
The sample is the actual group you will have to contact in some way. There are several important
sampling issues you need to consider when doing survey research.
What data is available? What information do you have about your sample? Do you know their current
addresses? What are their current phone numbers? Are your contact lists up to date?
Can respondents be found? Can your respondents be located? Some people are very busy. Some
travel a lot. Some work the night shift. Even if you have an accurate phone or address, you may not
be able to locate or make contact with your sample.
Who is the respondent? Who is the respondent in your study? Let’s say you draw a sample of
households in a small city. A household is not a respondent. Do you want to interview a specific
individual? Do you want to talk only to the ‘head of household’ (and how is that person defined)? Are
you willing to talk to any member of the household? Do you state that you will speak to the first
adult member of the household who opens the door? What if that person is unwilling to be
interviewed but someone else in the house is willing? How do you deal with multi-family households?
Similar problems arise when you sample groups, agencies, or companies. Can you survey any member
of the organization? Or, do you only want to speak to the Director of Human Resources? What if
the person you would like to interview is unwilling or unable to participate? Do you use another
member of the organization?
Can all members of population be sampled? If you have an incomplete list of the population (i.e.,
sampling frame) you may not be able to sample every member of the population. Lists of various
groups are extremely hard to keep up to date. People move or change their names. Even though they
are on your sampling frame listing, you may not be able to get to them. And, it’s possible they are not
even on the list.
Are response rates likely to be a problem? Even if you are able to solve all of the other population
and sampling problems, you still have to deal with the issue of response rates. Some members of
your sample will simply refuse to respond. Others have the best of intentions, but can’t seem to find
the time to send in your questionnaire by the due date. Still others misplace the instrument or
forget about the appointment for an interview. Low response rates are among the most difficult of
problems in survey research. They can ruin an otherwise well-designed survey effort.
Question Issues
Sometimes the nature of what you want to ask respondents will determine the type of survey you
select.
What types of questions can be asked? Are you going to be asking personal questions? Are you going
to need to get lots of detail in the responses? Can you anticipate the most frequent or important
types of responses and develop reasonable closed-ended questions?
How complex will the questions be? Sometimes you are dealing with a complex subject or topic. The
questions you want to ask are going to have multiple parts. You may need to branch to sub-questions.
Will screening questions be needed? A screening question may be needed to determine whether the
respondent is qualified to answer your question of interest. For instance, you wouldn’t want to ask
someone their opinions about a specific computer program without first ‘screening’ them to find out
whether they have any experience using the program. Sometimes you have to screen on several
variables (e.g., age, gender, experience). The more complicated the screening, the less likely it is
that you can rely on paper-and-pencil instruments without confusing the respondent.
Can question sequence be controlled? Is your survey one where you can construct in advance a
reasonable sequence of questions? Or, are you doing an initial exploratory study where you may need
to ask lots of follow-up questions that you can’t easily anticipate?
Will lengthy questions be asked? If your subject matter is complicated, you may need to give the
respondent some detailed background for a question. Can you reasonably expect your respondent to
sit still long enough in a phone interview to ask your question?
Will long response scales be used? If you are asking people about the different computer equipment
they use, you may have to have a lengthy response list (CD-ROM drive, floppy drive, mouse, touch
pad, modem, network connection, external speakers, etc.). Clearly, it may be difficult to ask about
each of these in a short phone interview.
Content Issues
The content of your study can also pose challenges for the different survey types you might utilize.
Can the respondents be expected to know about the issue? If the respondent does not keep up with
the news (e.g., by reading the newspaper, watching television news, or talking with others), they may
not even know about the news issue you want to ask them about. Or, if you want to do a study of
family finances and you are talking to the spouse who doesn’t pay the bills on a regular basis, they
may not have the information to answer your questions.
Will respondent need to consult records? Even if the respondent understands what you’re asking
about, you may need to allow them to consult their records in order to get an accurate answer. For
instance, if you ask them how much money they spent on food in the past month, they may need to
look up their personal check and credit card records. In this case, you don’t want to be involved in an
interview where they would have to go look things up while they keep you waiting (they wouldn't be
comfortable with that).
Bias Issues
People come to the research endeavor with their own sets of biases and prejudices. Sometimes,
these biases will be less of a problem with certain types of survey approaches.
Can social desirability be avoided? Respondents generally want to ‘look good’ in the eyes of others.
None of us likes to look like we don’t know an answer. We don’t want to say anything that would be
embarrassing. If you ask people about information that may put them in this kind of position, they
may not tell you the truth, or they may ‘spin’ the response so that it makes them look better. This
may be more of a problem in an interview situation where they are face-to face or on the phone with
a live interviewer.
Can interviewer distortion and subversion be controlled? Interviewers may distort an interview as
well. They may not ask questions that make them uncomfortable. They may not listen carefully to
respondents on topics for which they have strong opinions. They may make the judgment that they
already know what the respondent would say to a question based on their prior responses, even
though that may not be true.
Can false respondents be avoided? With mail surveys it may be difficult to know who actually
responded. Did the head of household complete the survey or someone else? Did the CEO actually
give the responses or instead pass the task off to a subordinate? Is the person you're speaking with
on the phone actually who they say they are? At least with personal interviews, you have a
reasonable chance of knowing who you are speaking with. In mail surveys or phone interviews, this
may not be the case.
Administrative Issues
Last, but certainly not least, you have to consider the feasibility of the survey method for your
study.
Costs: Cost is often the major determining factor in selecting survey type. You might prefer to do
personal interviews, but can’t justify the high cost of training and paying for the interviewers. You
may prefer to send out an extensive mailing but can't afford the postage to do so.
Facilities: Do you have the facilities (or access to them) to process and manage your study? In phone
interviews, do you have well-equipped phone surveying facilities? For focus groups, do you have a
comfortable and accessible room to host the group? Do you have the equipment needed to record
and transcribe responses?
Time: Some types of surveys take longer than others. Do you need responses immediately (as in an
overnight public opinion poll)? Have you budgeted enough time for your study to send out mail
surveys and follow-up reminders, and to get the responses back by mail? Have you allowed for
enough time to get enough personal interviews to justify that approach?
Personnel: Different types of surveys make different demands of personnel. Interviews require
interviewers who are motivated and well-trained. Group administered surveys require people who are
trained in group facilitation. Some studies may be in a technical area that requires some degree of
expertise in the interviewer.
Clearly, there are lots of issues to consider when you are selecting which type of survey you wish to
use in your study. And there is no clear and easy way to make this decision in many contexts.
work mates and others who have a good knowledge of the person, as well as to obtain facts from the
person him or herself.
In a case study, nearly every aspect of the subject’s life and history is analyzed to seek patterns
and causes for behavior. The hope is that learning gained from studying one case can be generalized
to many others. Unfortunately, case studies tend to be highly subjective and it is difficult to
generalize results to a larger population.
Characteristics of Case Study Method
Case study research is not sampling research. Selecting cases must be done so as to maximize
what can be learned in the period of time available for the study.
The unit of analysis is a critical factor in the case study. It is typically a system of action rather
than an individual or group of individuals. Case studies tend to be selective, focusing on one or
two issues that are fundamental to understanding the system being examined.
Case studies are multi-perspectives analyses. This means that the researcher considers not just
the voice and perspective of the actors, but also of the relevant groups of actors and the
interaction between them. This one aspect is a salient point in the characteristic that case
studies possess. They give a voice to the powerless and voiceless.
Case study is known as a triangulated research strategy. Snow and Anderson (1991) asserted
that triangulation can occur with data, investigators, theories, and even methodologies. Stake
(1995) stated that the protocols that are used to ensure accuracy and alternative explanations
are called triangulation. The need for triangulation arises from the ethical need to confirm the
validity of the processes. In case studies, this could be done by using multiple sources of data
(Yin, 1984). The problem in case studies is to establish meaning rather than location. Denzin
(1984) identified four types of triangulation: Data source triangulation, when the researcher
looks for the data to remain the same in different contexts; Investigator triangulation, when
several investigators examine the same phenomenon; Theory triangulation, when investigators
with different viewpoints interpret the same results; and Methodological triangulation, when one
approach is followed by another, to increase confidence in the interpretation.
Characteristics of the case study method in legal research can be described shortly as follows -
Any researcher can hold research into one single or more social unit such as a person, family,
society and so on for the accomplishment of the aim of his/her study under this method. He/she
can hold comprehensive and intensive study in different aspects of the unit so selected. Under
this method, he/she can give the weight and consideration towards all the aspects of a person,
group or society so selected for study. All aspects can be deeply and intensively studied.
Any researcher does not only hold the study to find out how many crimes have been committed
by a man but also deeply hold study into causes that forces or abets him to commit such crimes.
In this example, one of the main objectives of the researcher could be to give suggestion to
referring the criminals.
Under this method, any researcher can endeavor to know the relationship of causal factors
interlinked.
Under this method, all the related aspects of the unit, which is in subject to study, can be
directly or indirectly studied.
Case study method helps to find out the useful data and enables to generalize the knowledge
also.
The main characteristics of the case study method includes continuing, completeness, validity,
and data as it deals with the life of social unit or units or society as whole.
Application of Case Study Model
Yin (1994) presented at least four applications for a case study model.
To…
explain complex causal links in real-life interventions;
describe the real-life context in which the intervention has occurred;
describe the intervention itself; and
explore those situations in which the intervention being evaluated has no clear set of outcomes.
Sources of Information in Case Study
There are a number of different sources and methods that researchers can use to gather
information about an individual or group. The six major sources that have been identified by
researchers (Yin, 1994; Stake, 1995) are –
Direct Observation: This strategy involves observing the subject, often in a natural setting. While
an individual observer is sometimes used, it is more common to utilize a group of observers.
Interviews: One of the most important methods for gathering information in case studies. An
interview can involve structured survey-type questions, or more open-ended questions.
Documents: Letters, newspaper articles, administrative records, etc.
Archival Records: Census records, survey records, name lists, etc.
Physical Artifacts: Tools, objects, instruments and other artifacts often observed during a direct
observation of the subject.
Participant Observation: Involves the researcher actually serving as a participant in events and
observing the actions and outcomes.
Category of Case Study
There are several categories of case study.
Prospective: A type of case study in which an individual or group of people is observed in order to
determine outcomes. For example, a group of individuals might be watched over an extended period
of time to observe the progression of a particular disease.
Retrospective: A type of case study that involves looking at historical information. For example,
researchers might start with an outcome, such as a disease, and then backwards at information
about the individuals life to determine risk factors that may have contributed to the onset of the
illness.
Explanatory: Explanatory case studies examine the data closely both at a surface and deep level in
order to explain the phenomena in the data. On the basis of the data, the researcher may then form
a theory and set to test this theory (McDonough and McDonough, 1997). Furthermore, explanatory
cases are also deployed for causal studies where pattern-matching can be used to investigate
certain phenomena in very complex and multivariate cases. Yin and Moore (1987) note that these
complex and multivariate cases can be explained by three rival theories - a knowledge-driven theory,
a problem-solving theory, and a social-interaction theory. The knowledge-driven theory stipulates
that eventual commercial products are the results of ideas and discoveries from basic research.
Similar notions can be said for the problem-solving theory. However, in this theory, products are
derived from external sources rather than from research. The social-interaction theory, on the
other hand, suggests that overlapping professional network causes researchers and users to
communicate frequently with each other.
Exploratory: A case study that is sometimes used as a prelude to further, more in-depth research.
This allows researchers to gather more information before developing their research questions and
hypotheses. A pilot study is considered an example of an exploratory case study (Yin, 1984;
McDonough and McDonough, 1997) and is crucial in determining the protocol that will be used.
Descriptive: Descriptive case studies set to describe the natural phenomena which occur within the
data in question. The goal set by the researcher is to describe the data as they occur. McDonough
and McDonough (1997) suggest that descriptive case studies may be in a narrative form. An example
of a descriptive case study is the journalistic description of the Watergate scandal by two
reporters (Yin, 1984). The challenge of a descriptive case study is that the researcher must begin
with a descriptive theory to support the description of the phenomenon or story. If this fails there
is the possibility that the description lacks rigor and that problems may occur during the project.
Intrinsic: A type of case study in which the researcher has a personal interest in the case.
Collective: Involves studying a group of cases.
Instrumental: Occurs when the individual or group allows researchers to understand more than what
is initially obvious to observers.
According to McDonough and McDonough (1997) other categories include interpretive and evaluative
case studies. Through interpretive case studies, the researcher aims to interpret the data by
developing conceptual categories, supporting or challenging the assumptions made regarding them. In
evaluative case studies, the researcher goes further by adding their judgment to the phenomena
found in the data.
Intrinsic - when the researcher has an interest in the case; Instrumental - when the case is used to
understand more than what is obvious to the observer; Collective - when a group of cases is studied.
Exploratory cases are sometimes considered as a prelude to social research. Explanatory case
studies may be used for doing causal investigations. Descriptive cases require a descriptive theory
to be developed before starting the project. In all of the above types of case studies, there can be
single-case or multiple-case applications.
This case study method is also taken as indispensable and significant as regards to taking
decision on many management issues. Case data are also very useful for diagnosis and thereby of
practical case issues. It can be taken as an example to be followed in future.
Case studies can help us generate new ideas (that might be tested by other methods). They are an
important way of illustrating theories and can help show how different aspects of a person's life are
related to each other. The method is therefore important for a holistic point of view. Despite its
merits as referred to in above, demerits of the case study method can be described shortly as
follows –
This case study method is a very vague process. There is no mechanism to control researcher.
Generalization is almost impossible to a larger similar population.
Under this case study method, letters and other documents can be used. A write up is generally
prepared to impress and give undue influence to personal matters. It always depends on the
personal feeling and thought. As a result, the study of the researcher may be worthless and
meaningless by virtue of possible occurrence of distortion.
Under this case study method, there is no limitation of study. The researcher always finds
difficulties in deciding when s/he should stop to collect data for his/her study. He/she may find
all things to be pertinent.
This case study method is always based on several assumptions. However, sometimes, they may
not be realistic. Under such circumstances, such data should be tested.
Under this case study method, the result is drawn up on the basis of all post experiences.
Collection of much data and information may lead to confusion to find out pertinent and specific
information.
This case study method is based on comparison with the post life. However, human value,
attitude, behavior, reactions, circumstance are very wide and differ with each other. It is
difficult to compare from one another.
This case study method always collects post information and data of the society. However, there
is no system of checking. Difficult to replicate.
This case study method is time consuming, expensive and complex.
all possible relevant activities should be listed together with the appropriate codes. Where more
than one type of activity is to be entered, that is, primary and secondary (or background)
activities, guidance should be given on how to deal with competing or multiple activities.
There should be an explanation of what is meant by the unit of observation, such as a ‘session’,
an ‘event’ or a ‘fixed time block’. Where respondents are given more freedom in naming their
activities and the activities are to be coded later, it is important to give strict guidelines on
what type of behavior to include, what definitely to exclude and the level of detail required.
Time budget diaries without fixed time blocks should include columns for start and finish times
for activities.
Appropriate terminology or lists of activities should be designed to meet the needs of the
sample under study, and if necessary, different versions of the diary should be used for
different groups.
Following the diary pages it is useful to include a simple set of questions for the respondent to
complete, asking, among other things, whether the diary keeping period was atypical in any way
compared to usual daily life. It is also good practice to include a page at the end asking for the
respondents' own comments and clarifications of any peculiarities relating to their entries. Even
if these remarks will not be systematically analyzed, they may prove helpful at the editing or
coding stage.
Data Quality and Response Rates: In addition to the types of errors encountered in all survey
methods, diaries are especially prone to errors arising from respondent conditioning, incomplete
recording of information and under-reporting, inadequate recall, insufficient cooperation and sample
selection bias.
Diary keeping period: The period over which a diary is to be kept needs to be long enough to capture
the behavior or events of interest without jeopardizing successful completion by imposing an overly
burdensome task. For collecting time-use data, anything from one to three day diaries may be used.
Household expenditure surveys usually place diaries on specific days to ensure an even coverage
across the week and distribute their field work over the year to ensure seasonal variation in
earnings and spending is captured.
Reporting errors: In household expenditure surveys it is routinely found that the first day and first
week of diary keeping shows higher reporting of expenditure than the following days. This is also
observed for other types of behavior and the effects are generally termed ‘first day effects’. They
may be due to respondents changing their behavior as a result of keeping the diary (conditioning), or
becoming less conscientious than when they started the diary. Recall errors may also extend to
‘tomorrow’ diaries. Respondents often write down their entries at the end of a day and only a small
minority are diligent diary keepers who carry their diary with them at all times. Expenditure surveys
find that an intermediate visit from an interviewer during the diary keeping period helps preserve
‘good’ diary keeping to the end of the period.
Literacy: All methods that involve self-completion of information demand that the respondent has a
reasonable standard of literacy. Thus the diary sample and the data may be biased towards the
population of competent diary keepers.
Participation: The best response rates for diary surveys are achieved when diary keepers are
recruited on a face-to-face basis, rather than by post. Personal collection of diaries also allows any
problems in the completed diary to be sorted out on the spot. Success may also depend on the
quality of interviewing staff who should be highly motivated, competent and well-briefed. Appealing
to respondent’s altruistic nature, reassuring them of confidentiality and offering incentives are
thought to influence co-operation in diary surveys.
Coding, Editing and Processing: The amount of work required to process a diary depends largely on
how structured it is. For many large scale diary surveys, part of the editing and coding process is
done by the interviewer while still in the field. Following this is an intensive editing procedure which
includes checking entries against information collected in the personal interview. For unstructured
diaries, involving coding of verbatim entries, the processing can be very labor intensive, in much the
same way as it is for processing qualitative interview transcripts. Using highly trained coders and a
rigorous unambiguous coding scheme is very important particularly where there is no clear
demarcation of events or behavior in the diary entries. Clearly, a well designed diary with a coherent
pre-coding system should cut down on the degree of editing and coding.
Relative Cost of Diary Surveys: The diary method is generally more expensive than the personal
interview, and personal placement and pick-up visits are more costly than postal administration. If
the diary is unstructured, intensive editing and coding will push up the costs. However, these costs
must be balanced against the superiority of the diary method in obtaining more accurate data,
particularly where the recall method gives poor results.
Computer Software for Processing and Analysis: Although computer assisted methods may help to
reduce the amount of manual preparatory work, there are few packages and most of them are
custom built to suit the specifics of a particular project. Time-budget researchers are probably the
most advanced group of users of machine readable diary data and the structure of these data allows
them to use traditional statistical packages for analysis. More recently, methods of analysis based
on algorithms for searching for patterns of behavior in diary data are being used (Coxon 1991).
Software development is certainly an area which merits future attention. For textual diaries,
qualitative software packages such as the ‘Ethnograph’ can be used to code them in the same way as
interview transcripts (Fielding & Lee 1991).
Archiving Diary Data: In spite of the abundance of data derived from diary surveys across a wide
range of disciplines, little is available to other researchers for secondary analysis (further analysis
of data already collected). This is perhaps not surprising given that the budget for many diary
surveys does not extend to systematic processing of the data. Many diary surveys are small scale
investigative studies that have been carried out with very specific aims in mind. For these less
structured diaries, for which a common coding scheme is neither feasible, nor possibly desirable, an
answer to public access is to deposit the original survey documents in an archive. This kind of data
bank gives the researcher access to original diary documents allowing them to make use of the data
in ways to suit their own research strategy. However, the ethics of making personal documents
public (even if in the limited academic sense) have to be considered.
This number can be calculated quite simply once an approximate picture of the situation is
established, using the following formula.
N= 4P(100-P)
L2
Where, N = Number of observations; P = Approximate occurrence of factor as a percentage of N; L
= Acceptable accuracy in occurrence of factor being studied.
This formula will give the accuracy of the study within 95% confidence limits.
For exmple, a worker is studied using activity sampling, and 32 observations are noted. Of these
75% showed that the worker was performing useful work. If we assume that we would like to check
that the worker is performing at this level continuously, plus or minus 10%, ie. between 67.5% and
82.5%, how many observations would we need to provide 95% confidence in the result.
Solution: Here, P = 75%; L = 10%
Hence, N = 4 x 75(100-75)
10 * 10
N = 300 * 25
100
N = 75
However, after performing 75 checks, the value of P was found to be only 70% so the extra data
could be used to assess the new requirement for the number of checks.
N= 4 * 70(100-70)
10 * 10
N = 280 * 30
100
N = 28 * 3 = 84
Hence more checks would be required, ie. a total of 9.
Once these checks had been completed, a final calculation should be done to ensure that the
number required had not changed.
It is normally used for collecting information on the percentages of time spent on activities, without
the need to devote the time that would otherwise be required for any continuous observation. One
of the great advantages of this technique is that it enables lengthy activities or groups of activities
to be studied economically and in a way that produces statistically accurate data. Activity sampling
can be carried out at random intervals or fixed intervals. Random activity sampling is where the
intervals between observations are selected at random e.g. from a table of random numbers. Fixed
interval activity sampling is where the same interval exists between observations. A decision will
need to be made on which of these two approaches is to be chosen. A fixed interval is usually chosen
where activities are performed by a person or group of people who have a degree of control over
what they do and when they do it. Random intervals will normally be used where there are a series of
automated tasks or activities as part of a process, that are have to be performed in a pre
established regular pattern. If fixed interval sampling were to be used in this situation there is a
danger that the sampling point would continue to occur at the same point in the activity cycle.
operations by using a camera. It was developed 1946 by Marvin E. Mundel at Purdue University, who
was first to save film material while planning studies on kitchen work.
Mundel published the method in 1947 with several studies in his textbook ‘Systematic Motion and
Time Study’. A study showed the following advantages of Memo-Motion in regard to other forms of
time and motion study –
Single operator repetition work.
Area studies, the study of a group of men or machines.
Team studies.
Utilisation studies.
Work measurement.
As a versatile tool of work study it was used in the US to some extent, but rarely in Europe and
other industrial countries mainly because of difficulties procuring the required cameras. Today
Memo-Motion could have a comeback because more and more workplaces have conditions which it can
explore.
tracing the path of an item or activity through a process. The continuous flow line enables
process teams to identify redundancies in the work flow and opportunities to expedite process
flow.
Process Flow Diagram
The process boundaries are defined by the entry and exit points of inputs and outputs of the
process. Once the boundaries are defined, the process flow diagram (or process flowchart) is a
valuable tool for understanding the process using graphic elements to represent tasks, flows, and
storage. The following is a flow diagram for a simple process having three sequential activities-
In a process flow diagram, tasks drawn one after the other in series are performed sequentially.
Tasks drawn in parallel are performed simultaneously. In the above diagram, raw material is held in a
storage bin at the beginning of the process. After the last task, the output also is stored in a
storage bin. When constructing a flow diagram, care should be taken to avoid pitfalls that might
cause the flow diagram not to represent reality. For example, if the diagram is constructed using
information obtained from employees, the employees may be reluctant to disclose rework loops and
other potentially embarrassing aspects of the process. Similarly, if there are illogical aspects of the
process flow, employees may tend to portray it as it should be and not as it is. Even if they portray
the process as they perceive it, their perception may differ from the actual process. For example,
they may leave out important activities that they deem to be insignificant.
Process Performance Measures
Operations managers are interested in process aspects such as cost, quality, flexibility, and speed.
Some of the process performance measures that communicate these aspects include-
Process capacity - the capacity of the process is its maximum output rate, measured in units
produced per unit of time. The capacity of a series of tasks is determined by the lowest
capacity task in the string. The capacity of parallel strings of tasks is the sum of the capacities
of the two strings, except for cases in which the two strings have different outputs that are
combined. In such cases, the capacity of the two parallel strings of tasks is that of the lowest
capacity parallel string.
Capacity utilization - the percentage of the process capacity that actually is being used.
Throughput rate (also known as flow rate ) - the average rate at which units flow past a specific
point in the process. The maximum throughput rate is the process capacity.
Flow time (also known as throughput time or lead time) - the average time that a unit requires to
flow through the process from the entry point to the exit point. The flow time is the length of
the longest path through the process. Flow time includes both processing time and any time the
unit spends between steps.
Cycle time - the time between successive units as they are output from the process. Cycle time
for the process is equal to the inverse of the throughput rate. Cycle time can be thought of as
the time required for a task to repeat itself. Each series task in a process must have a cycle
time less than or equal to the cycle time for the process. Put another way, the cycle time of the
process is equal to the longest task cycle time. The process is said to be in balance if the cycle
times are equal for each activity in the process. Such balance rarely is achieved.
Process time - the average time that a unit is worked on. Process time is flow time less idle time.
Idle time - time when no activity is being performed, for example, when an activity is waiting for
work to arrive from the previous activity. The term can be used to describe both machine idle
time and worker idle time.
Work In process - the amount of inventory in the process.
Set-up time - the time required to prepare the equipment to perform an activity on a batch of
units. Set-up time usually does not depend strongly on the batch size and therefore can be
reduced on a per unit basis by increasing the batch size.
Direct labor content - the amount of labor (in units of time) actually contained in the product.
Excludes idle time when workers are not working directly on the product. Also excludes time
spent maintaining machines, transporting materials, etc.
Direct labor utilization - the fraction of labor capacity that actually is utilized as direct labor.
Process Bottleneck
The process capacity is determined by the slowest series task in the process; that is, having the
slowest throughput rate or longest cycle time. This slowest task is known as the bottleneck.
Identification of the bottleneck is a critical aspect of process analysis since it not only determines
the process capacity, but also provides the opportunity to increase that capacity. Saving time in the
bottleneck activity saves time for the entire process. Saving time in a non-bottleneck activity does
not help the process since the throughput rate is limited by the bottleneck. It is only when the
bottleneck is eliminated that another activity will become the new bottleneck and presents a new
opportunity to improve the process. If the next slowest task is much faster than the bottleneck,
then the bottleneck is having a major impact on the process capacity. If the next slowest task is
only slightly faster than the bottleneck, then increasing the throughput of the bottleneck will have
a limited impact on the process capacity.
Starvation and Blocking
Starvation occurs when a downstream activity is idle with no inputs to process because of upstream
delays. Blocking occurs when an activity becomes idle because the next downstream activity is not
ready to take it. Both starvation and blocking can be reduced by adding buffers that hold inventory
between activities.
Process Improvement
Improvements in cost, quality, flexibility, and speed are commonly sought. The following lists some
of the ways that processes can be improved.
Reduce work-in-process inventory - reduces lead time.
Add additional resources to increase capacity of the bottleneck. For example, an additional
machine can be added in parallel to increase the capacity.
Improve the efficiency of the bottleneck activity - increases process capacity.
Move work away from bottleneck resources where possible - increases process capacity.
developed to drive productivity improvement in manufacturing plants, motion and time study is also
now used in service industries. Motion and time study is associated with the so-called scientific
management movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century’s in the United States,
primarily with the work of industrial engineers Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856–1915), Frank B.
Gilbreth (1868– 1924), and Lillian Gilbreth (1878–1972). Some time studies had been conducted
before Taylor, particularly by French engineer Jean Rodolphe Perronet (1708–1794) and English
economist Charles Babbage (1791–1871), both analyzing pin manufacturing. However, modern motion
and time study was developed as part of the scientific management movement championed by Taylor
and eventually became known as Taylorism .
The foundation of Taylorism is a system of task management in which responsibilities are clearly
divided between managers and workers. Managers and engineers engage in planning and task
optimization, primarily through motion and time study, while workers are responsible for carrying
out discrete tasks as directed. The Gilbreths sought to find the best method to perform an
operation and reduce fatigue by studying body motions, attempting to eliminate unnecessary ones
and simplify necessary ones to discover the optimal sequence of motions. The Gilbreths developed
the technique of micromotion study, in which motions are filmed and then watched in slow motion.
Taylor incorporated early research from the Gilbreths in his ‘The Principles of Scientific
Management’ (1911), and subsequent industrial engineers further developed the Taylorist system.
Taylorism played a key role in the continuous productivity improvement generated by the Fordist
model of work organization. The Fordist model, which is based on the supply-driven, mass production
of standardized goods using semiskilled workers, achieved efficiency improvements via scale
economies and detailed division of labor, both accomplished through the Taylorist separation of
conception from execution, in which managers plan tasks that workers execute. Taylor argued that
such a division of labor between management and workers was a form of ‘harmonious cooperation’
that ultimately removed antagonisms from the workplace and benefited both managers and workers.
However, this process of separating conception from execution is often understood as a form of de-
skilling, and Taylorism has been rejected by unions, who have denounced it as a form of speedup that
harms workers and hence quality and productivity.
Debates about the effect of motion and time study on workers continue today in discussions of
post-Fordism, particularly lean production, which employs motion and time study to set standards
and achieve continuous improvement in work processes, but in a context of demand-driven
production without large buffers of in process inventory. Some workers and commentators argue
that motion and time study under lean production is simply a form of work intensification that is
detrimental to workers, while others argue that under lean production workers are able to
contribute to problem solving and standard setting and thus prefer motion and time study under lean
production to that under Fordism.
Underlying each system is a theory of worker motivation - that workers need to be coerced (in the
Fordist model) or that workers want to do their best and are interested in more intellectual activity
(in the post-Fordist model). In reality, there is more likely a distribution of different motivations
across workers, and worker well-being is likely to depend more on the interaction between individual
orientations toward work and how a given set of methods such as motion and time study are applied
in a particular work context. Because it’s the method that determines the time needed for any
activity, the whole emphasis has changed over the years. The 21st century equivalent of the time
and motion study is more literally a method and time study. This is a more far-reaching philosophy
and approach to managing a business. When everyone is focused on better and leaner processes the
methods improve, time is reduced and more value is added. This - with continuous improvement -
means activities become more streamlined and Lean. Lean means that anything wasteful is shown the
bin (movement, time, materials, space). When improvements and Lean initiatives are identified and
implemented, workers can often benefit from less stressful working conditions, less fatigue -
potentially better rewards, maybe in the form of different hours, increased pay and job
satisfaction. It can be a win-win situation.
Time and Motion Study Basics
In summary, it goes like this –
Look closely at what you’re doing.
Spot opportunities to be more efficient.
Make a change to the way you work to do it.
See if it produces the expected results.
Rinse and repeat.
Small changes, big benefits - Small savings quickly mount up. At the same time, we spend a lot of
time in our lives doing stuff that is not very useful.
Pay attention - Pay attention to what you do and how you do it.
Start by thinking, in broad terms, about how you spend your time over the course of a typical
working week.
Rescue Time, which tracks the applications and websites you use, may give you more objective
data about how you spend your time. Simply writing things down may be enough.
Spot opportunities for improvement - You already have data about the amount of time spent
from your observations.
Make a positive change.
Evaluate results.
Productivity is often linked with ‘time and motion’. The evidence of time and motion studies was used
to put pressure on workers to perform faster. Not surprisingly these studies had a bad press as far
as workers were concerned. Productivity is about the effective and efficient use of all resources.
To manage the resources of a business it is essential that you –
understand exactly what needs to be done to meet customer demand;
establish a plan that clearly identifies the work to be carried out;
define and implement the methodologies that need to be used to complete all activities and tasks
efficiently;
establish how long it will actually take to complete each activity and task;
determine what resources you need to meet the plan;
provide the necessary resources and initiate the plan;
constantly monitor what is actually happening against the plan; and
identify variances and take the relevant actions to correct them or modify the plan.
Experiment Terminology
Ecological validity: The degree to which an investigation represents real-life experiences.
Experimenter effects: These are the ways that the experimenter can accidentally influence the
participant through their appearance or behavior.
Demand characteristics: The clues in an experiment that lead the participants to think they
know what the researcher is looking for (e.g. experimenter’s body language).
Independent variable (IV): Variable the experimenter manipulates (i.e. changes) – assumed to
have a direct effect on the dependent variable.
Dependent variable (DV): Variable the experimenter measures.
Extraneous variables (EV): Variables, which are not the independent variable, but could affect
the results (DV) of the experiment. EVs should be controlled where possible.
Confounding variables: Variable(s) that have affected the results (DV), apart from the IV. A
confounding variable could be an extraneous variable that has not been controlled.
Research Biases
We have got a hypothesis which is the first step in doing an experiment. Before we can continue, we
need to be aware of some aspects of research that can contaminate our results. In other words,
what could get in the way of our results in this study being accurate. These aspects are called
research biases, and there are basically three main biases we need to be concerned with.
Selection Bias – occurs when differences between groups are present at the beginning of the
experiment.
Placebo Effect – involves the influencing of performance due to the subject’s belief about the
results. In other words, if I believe the new medication will help me feel better, I may feel
better even if the new medication is only a sugar pill. This demonstrates the power of the mind
to change a person’s perceptions of reality.
Experimenter Bias – the same way a person’s belief’s can influence his/her perception, so can the
belief of the experimenter. If I’m doing an experiment, and really believe my treatment works,
or I really want the treatment to work because it will mean big bucks for me, I might behave in a
manner that will influence the subject.
Controlling for Biases
After carefully reviewing our study and determining what might effect our results that are not part
of the experiment, we need to control for these biases. To control for selection bias, most
experiments use what’s called ‘Random Assignment’, which means assigning the subjects to each
group based on chance rather than human decision. To control for the placebo effect, subjects are
often not informed of the purpose of the experiment. This is called a ‘Blind’ study, because the
subjects are blind to the expected results. To control for experimenter biases, we can utilize a
‘Double-Blind’ study, which means that both the experimenter and the subjects are blind to the
purpose and anticipated results of the study. We have our hypothesis, and we know what our subject
pool is, the next thing we have to do is standardize the experiment. Standardization refers to a
specific set of instructions. The reason we want the experiment to be standardized is twofold.
First, we want to make sure all subjects are given the same instructions, presented with the
experiment in the same manner, and that all of the data is collected exactly the same or all
subjects. Second, single experiments cannot typically stand on their own. To really show that are
results are valid, experiments need to be replicated by other experimenters with different
subjects. To do this, the experimenters need to know exactly what we did so they can replicate it.
Statistical methods are the methods of collecting, summarizing, analyzing, and interpreting
variable(s) in numerical data. Statistical methods can be contrasted with deterministic methods,
which are appropriate where observations are exactly reproducable or are assumed to be so. Data
collection involves deciding what to observe in order to obtain information relevant to the questions
whose answers are required, and then making the observations. Sampling involves choice of a
sufficient number of observations representing an appropriate population. Experiments with variable
outcomes should be conducted according to principles of experimental design. Data summarization is
the calculation of appropriate statistics and the display of such information in the form of tables,
graphs, or charts. Data may also be adjusted to make different samples more comparable, using
ratios, compensating factors, etc.
Statistical analysis relates observed statistical data to theoretical models, such as probability
distributions or models used in regression analysis. By estimating parameters in the proposed model
and testing hypotheses about rival models, one can assess the value of the information collected and
the extent to which the information can be applied to similar situations. Statistical prediction is the
application of the model thought to be most appropriate, using the estimated values of the
parameters. More recently, less formal methods of looking at data have been proposed, including
exploratory data analysis.
Published Electronic Sources: As internet is becoming more advance, fast and reachable to the
masses; it has been seen that much information that is not available in printed form is available on
internet. In the past the credibility of internet was questionable but today it is not. The reason is
that in the past journals and books were seldom published on internet but today almost every journal
and book is available online. Some are free and for others you have to pay the price.
e-journals: e-journals are more commonly available than printed journals. Latest journals are
difficult to retrieve without subscription but if your university has an e-library you can view any
journal, print it and those that are not available you can make an order for them.
General Websites: Generally websites do not contain very reliable information so their content
should be checked for the reliability before quoting from them.
Weblogs: Weblogs are also becoming common. They are actually diaries written by different people.
These diaries are as reliable to use as personal written diaries.
Unpublished Personal Records: Some unpublished data may also be useful in some cases.
Diaries: Diaries are personal records and are rarely available but if you are conducting a descriptive
research then they might be very useful. The Anne Frank’s diary is the most famous example of this.
That diary contained the most accurate records of Nazi wars.
Letters: Letters like diaries are also a rich source but should be checked for their reliability before
using them.
Government Records: Government records are very important for marketing, management,
humanities and social science research.
Census Data/population statistics: Health records; Educational institutes’ records etc.
Public Sector Records: NGOs’ survey data; Other private companies records.
Interviews: A researcher can receive information sought by him/her asking people concerned
through interview. It is a direct method of receiving information. Interview can be generally held
asking questions in face-to-face contact to the person or persons and sometimes through telephone
conversation. This method is common in the research of legal and social science. In this method, the
researcher has to use less skill and knowledge to receive information s/he had sought. Interview is
known as an art of receiving pertinent information. Interview can be taken as a systematic method
by which a person enters more or less imaginatively into the life of a stranger.
Case Study: Case study is taken as one of the important and reliable methods for legal research.
Case study can be defined as a method of research where facts and grounds of each legal issue are
dealt with by taking individual case. Case study is a method of exploring and analyzing of life of a
social unit such as a person, a family, an institution, a cultural group or even entire community. Case
study is a way of organizing social data so as to preserve the utility character of the social object
being studied. Keeping in view to the matters as referred to in above, we can state here that the
case study is a method of legal research to explore and analyze the fact and data of a social unit
and to organize social data for prescription of useful character and society.
References
Kabir, S.M.S. (2016). Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All
Disciplines. Book Zone Publication, ISBN: 978-984-33-9565-8, Chittagong-4203,
Bangladesh.
Kabir, S.M.S. (2017). Essentials of Counseling. Abosar Prokashana Sangstha, ISBN: 978-984-
8798-22-5, Banglabazar, Dhaka-1100.
Kabir, S.M.S., Mostafa, M.R., Chowdhury, A.H., & Salim, M.A.A. (2016). Bangladesher
Samajtattwa (Sociology of Bangladesh). Protik Publisher, ISBN: 978-984-8794-69-2,
Dhaka-1100.
Kabir, S.M.S. (2018). Psychological health challenges of the hill-tracts region for climate
change in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, Elsevier,34, 74–77.
Kabir, S.M.S., Aziz, M.A., & Jahan, A.K.M.S. (2018). Women Empowerment and Governance
in Bangladesh. ANTYAJAA: Indian journal of Women and Social Change, SAGE
Publications India Pvt. Ltd, 3(1), 1-12.
Alam, S.S. & Kabir, S.M.S. (2015). Classroom Management in Secondary Level: Bangladesh
Context. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(8), 1-4, ISSN
2250-3153, www.ijsrp.org.
Alam, S.S., Kabir, S.M.S., & Aktar, R. (2015). General Observation, Cognition, Emotion,
Social, Communication, Sensory Deficiency of Autistic Children. Indian Journal of
Health and Wellbeing, 6(7), 663-666, ISSN-p-2229-5356,e-2321-3698.
Kabir, S.M.S. (2013). Positive Attitude Can Change Life. Journal of Chittagong University
Teachers’ Association, 7, 55-63.
Kabir, S.M.S. & Mahtab, N. (2013). Gender, Poverty and Governance Nexus: Challenges and
Strategies in Bangladesh. Empowerment a Journal of Women for Women, Vol. 20, 1-12.
Kabir, S.M.S. & Jahan, A.K.M.S. (2013). Household Decision Making Process of Rural Women
in Bangladesh. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), ISSN:
2279-0845,Vol,10, Issue 6 (May. - Jun. 2013), 69-78. ISSN (Online): 2279-0837.
Jahan, A.K.M.S., Mannan, S.M., & Kabir, S.M.S. (2013). Designing a Plan for Resource
Sharing among the Selected Special Libraries in Bangladesh, International Journal of
Library Science and Research (IJLSR), ISSN 2250-2351, Vol. 3, Issue 3, Aug 2013, 1-20,
ISSN: 2321-0079.
Kabir, S.M.S. & Jahan, I. (2009). Anxiety Level between Mothers of Premature Born Babies
and Those of Normal Born Babies. The Chittagong University Journal of Biological
Science, 4(1&2), 131-140.
Kabir, S.M.S., Amanullah, A.S.M., & Karim, S.F. (2008). Self-esteem and Life Satisfaction of
Public and Private Bank Managers. The Dhaka University Journal of Psychology, 32, 9-
20.
Kabir, S.M.S., Amanullah, A.S.M., Karim, S.F., & Shafiqul, I. (2008). Mental Health and Self-
esteem: Public Vs. Private University Students in Bangladesh. Journal of Business and
Technology, 3, 96-108.
Kabir, S.M.S., Shahid, S.F.B., & Karim, S.F. (2007). Personality between Housewives and
Working Women in Bangladesh. The Dhaka University Journal of Psychology, 31, 73-
84.
Kabir, S.M.S. & Karim, S.F. (2005). Influence of Type of Bank and Sex on Self-esteem, Life
Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction. The Dhaka University Journal of Psychology, 29, 41-
52.
Kabir, S.M.S. & Rashid, U.K. (2017). Interpersonal Values, Inferiority Complex, and
Psychological Well-Being of Teenage Students. Jagannath University Journal of Life and
Earth Sciences, 3(1&2),127-135.
--------------------------
ABSTRACT
Secondary data (SD) provides major advantage in the use of existing data sources, with large
amounts of information, at relatively cheaper cost and easily available for research purposes.
Even some researchers argue that millions of person-years of experience in the database will
be available through SD, which would be impossible to collect in prospective studies. But an
unreliable data could impede on the quality of research results and conclusions. The study
critical examination of literature has identified tools that can aid the assessment of SD
reliability. The study believes that the use of the adjusted inter-raters/observer as proposed by
the study will add value to the method of assessing the reliability of SD, because of it use of
statistical tools to directly estimate the available data. The study also believes that this will
serve as a base for other researchers to improve on the study of assessing the reliability of
secondary data.
KEYWORDS: Inter-raters/observer, Reliability, Secondary data, Validity
1
1.0 Introduction
The quality of data (primary or secondary) utilised in any research determines the
outcome of the research and its importance for further research work and relevance to business
or statistical institutes. Thus, the quality of the enormous data collected daily by relevant
non-profits, think tanks, public opinion polls, and students) in recent years should be of
importance to any system/institution especially the academic environment. Most times, vast
amounts of primary data are collected and archived by relevant institutions or researchers at
points in time all over the word. These results have made more prevalent the possibility of
utilizing exiting data tor research at a later point in time-i.e. use of secondary data (Andrews,
Depending on the researcher's perception, the term “secondar datal” (SD) are data or
information that was either gathered by someone else (researchers, recognized organisations
acceptable to a system, etc.) for records or other purpose than the one currently under
consideration, or often a combination of the two (Cnossen, 1997; McCaston, 2005) and is
thus sometime referred to as “second-hand" data. For the first researcher they are primary data,
but for the second researcher, they are secondary data (Peter & Piet, 2012). To Weijun (2008),
SD sometimes save the researcher the time that would have been spent on the field
collecting data and, accessing the area under study. It can provide relatively large database of
good quality, that may not be feasible for any individual researcher to collect. However, some
researchers in business and management studies especially indicants as proxies for constructs,
perhaps due to concerns over the possibility of been outdated, inaccurate or validity issues
2
Obtaining SD today could be a relatively routine and easy process depending on the
environment (i.e. how often such environment updates its records and what kind of records are
available). SD may be quite expensive, however, the upfront costs s c as registration fees, have
dropped with the emergence of the World Wide Web and the increase in the numbers of
from academic publications may have a high degree of background work needed for the present
research in the literature reviewed. Its use in such publication could already have promoted the
data in media and management academics environment. Hence it could make its pre-established
degree of validity and reliability need not be re-examined by the researcher or environment who
is re-using such data. It could also in some cases, be a baseline for comparison with collected
primary data results to determine the originality of the present data (Management Study Guide,
2016).
However, SD has its own shortcomings as identified earlier. The SD may be outdated,
inaccurate or have validity issues. It may not be relevant to the population under examination,
or detail enough. For example, an administrative data, transactional data or data from the
Internet, which is not originally collected for research, may not be available in the usual
'research formats‟ or may be difficult to get access to. This exposes researchers to possible
errors that can affect the quality (reliability and validity) of the data and invariably affects the
This study therefore, believed a critical examination of the concept, and assessment
3
As identified earlier, SD may be advantageous especially in term of cost as a result of
the large database it can provides for management research innovation, productivity, and
important conclusions in academic research, failing to check the reliability of that data could
lead to inaccurate analyses and inappropriate research findings and conclusion. This may be due
to some of the following. First, with today's accessibility to data via the internet, anyone can
publish anything from anywhere (Stewart, 2014). Secondly, some organisations fraudulently
manipulate information to give investors and client an impression that may not reflect their true
state, some organisations don't post or give out detail information/data needed for
comprehensive business and management research (especially details of their working capital
and other financial variables that can aid a comprehensive research) (Bankole, 2003; James &
Oyeniyi, 2017; Shabnam, Zakiah, & Mohd, 2016; Vlad, Tulvinschi & Chirita, 2011). Thirdly,
possibility of inappropriateness of data in research, little or no control over how research data
was generated and collated, possible modification of data by a researcher, a potential poor
documentation, that could make the data neither valid or reliable. Hence, the use of SD based
on face value without checking for potential errors and bias before it is used (Flintermann,
2014) or determining the reliability cannot be trusted for business and management research.
This corroborates the theory identified by Priezkalns (2016) that some researchers believed only
primary source of data can be trusted. This situation is one of the several reasons some
researchers in the academic field of business and management avoid SD sources in their
research.
confidence in the use of SD, by developing tools/methods of assessing SD. There have been
drawback as a result of limited literature. Thus, Flintermann (2014) is of the opinion that,
4
available literatures have not been able to identify a suitable tool/method for the assessment of
the reliability and validity of SD. Despite the various literature identified by few researchers in
this area, there is a dearth knowledge of how secondary information is correlated with the
primary data in business and management research and the solution to it. This also corroborated
the belief of Andrews et al., (2012); Johnston, (2014); Smith, (2008) that there remains a dearth
of literature that specifically addresses the process and challenges of conducting a reliable
Thus taking a critical examination of the above, this study provides an exploratory of
the available -tools available in management sciences to determine the reliability of SD.
data.
ii) To assess the available tools for determining the reliability of secondary data in
management/business research.
iii) To identify which criteria can be used to assess the reliability of secondary data in
management/business research.
The study examined various work from literature because the conceptual frame work
According to Johnston (2014), the concept 'secondary data analysis‟ was first identified
by Glaser's in the discussion of re-analyzing data; i.e. data which were originally collected for
other purposes. Weijun (2008) is of the opinion that SD include both raw data and published
summaries. To Weijun, most organisations collect and store a variety of data to support their
operations. These data are available only in the format the organisation that produce want it,
5
thus most likely required negotiation for it to be accessed. Researchers like Bankole (2003);
Oyeniyi, Obamiro, Abiodun, Moses, & Osibanjo (2016); believe that SD is an existing
information whose main source is from primary sources. To Boslaugh (2007) the difference
between SD and primary data depends on the relationship between the individual/research team
who collected a dataset and the researcher who is analyzing. Boslaugh (2007) concept is an
important one because the same data set could be primary data in one analysis and secondary
data in another depending on the time interval, purpose and environment. For example, three
researchers A, B & C examined the relationship between two research variables. While A used
system D as a case study, B used system E as a study area. While A & B collected data on the
field, researcher C analysed data collected from A & B for comparison of the relationship in the
two environment within the same time frame. Since data collected by A & B from the field
(primary data) were for different purpose, the same data given to C will be seen as a secondary
data.
Hakim (as cited in Johnston, 2014) believed secondary data analysis is any further
additional to, or different from, those presented in the first report on the inquiry as a whole and
its main results. Irrespective how researchers or professional alike conjure the definition or
concept of SD, the time interval that differentiate between the original purpose of the data
collection and later purpose differentiate it from primary data. This, is in convergence with the
view of Watson (2013) that see SD as analytical works that comment on and interpret other
works from primary sources and are thus "second hand, published accounts, because they are
created after primary sources and they often use or talk about primary sources.
social sciences and basic sciences, are aware of (Shuttleworth, 2009). To Shuttleworth, (2009)
it could be a way of maximizing the inherent repeatability or consistency in collated data. For
6
maintaining reliability internally, a researcher will use as many repeat sample groups as
possible, to reduce the chance of an abnormal sample group skewing the results. For example,
if three replicate samples for each analysis, and one generates completely different results from
the others, then there may be something wrong with the data collated.
To Golafshani (2003), it is the extent to which sampled research results are consistent
over time and the accuracy of representation of the total population under study'. If there results
of a study can be reproduced under a similar methodology, then the research instrument is
considered to be reliable. This concept is not different from the works of most researchers like
Bankole (2003); Oyeniyi, et al (2016); Phelan & Wren (2006); Roberta & Alison (2015). They
when applied to the same object. This concept shows that, reliability is a measure of the level of
consistency of the research instrument and not the data. Though, the initial data generated at
different period with the instrument is used to assess the reliability of the instrument. This
concept is in convergence with the concepts of researchers like Babbie (2010); Flintermann
(2014); Pierce (2009); Tasic & Feruh (2012) etc. To these researchers, reliability is the degree
to which a research instrument or process consistently yields the same results under the same
conditions, regardless of how many time the process is repeated, or degree to which a
researcher can rely on the source of the data and therefore on the data itself. Thus to
Flintermann, researchers can improve the reliability of their research instrument by repeatability
and increasing its internal consistency. He further identifies the following as cited in the work
of Golafshani, (2003) that reliability can be estimated by using the following tests especially in
quantitative research:
Parallel - Forms reliability: The reliability of two tests constructed the same way, from
Cronbach‟s Alpha
In science, the definition is the same, but needs a much. narrower and unequivocal
definition. Thus, Shuttleworth (2009) believed that just as in sciences reliability is extremely
important externally. This is because in science, the theory is that another researcher should be
able to perform exactly the same experiment, with similar equipment, under similar conditions,
and achieve exactly the same results least the design is unreliable. For example, the cold fusion
case, of 1989 where Fleischmann and Pons announced to the world that they had managed to
generate heat at normal temperatures, instead of the huge and expensive tori used in most
research into nuclear fusion. These findings shook the world, but other researchers that
attempted to replicate the experiment, experience no success. Thus the conclusion is that, it is
either the researchers lied, or genuinely made a mistake. Neither of the conclusion is unclear,
Just as Shuttleworth (2009) identified the similarities in concept, this study summarized the
concept of data reliability as stated by Adefioye (2016) as the consistency, ability and
repeatability of results i.e. the result of a researcher is considered reliable if consistent result
have situations but different circumstances. It can also be overall consistency, accuracy and
completeness of a measure of repeatability of findings from processed data, given the uses they
are intended for. In this context, reliability means that data are reasonably complete and
accurate, meet the intended purposes, and are not subject to inappropriate alteration.
Completeness refers to the extent that relevant records are present and the fields in each
information.
Consistency, a subcategory of accuracy, refers to the need to obtain and use data that are
clear and well defined enough to yield similar results in similar analyses (Adefioye,
2016).
It should be of note that, while researchers like Adefioye (2016) used the construct
'accuracy' in term of the actual underlying information within the stem understudy, others like
Oyeniyi, et al (2016) used it in term of expected underlying information within the system
understudy. Thus, Oyeniyi, et al (2016) believed that accuracy cannot be used to conceptualize
reliability. For example, a critical examination of the faulty wrist watch example stated by
Oyeniyi, et al (2016) shows that, the time it read is consistence with the information that it will
always be ten minutes late but not consistence the expectation that a normal wrist watch will
read the actual time. Hence, depending on the perception of the researcher the concept of
reliability might show slight variation in the use of constructs. But one unifying construct in the
Assessing secondary data reliability can entail reviewing existing information about the
data, which may include interviewing officials of audited Organisation; performing simple
analysis on the sample of data, including advanced electronic analysis; tracing to and from
source documents; and reviewing selected system controls (Shuttleworth, 2009). This
collaborate Corillo (2014) who argue that, an assessment of the reliability of data will involve
an assessment of the method(s) used to collect the data. Corillo (2014) also argue that, it will
depend on the source of the data been assessed. For example, for documentary source, it is
unlikely that there will be a formal methodology describing how the data were collected. But in
report attention is given to how the data were analysed and how the result are report.
9
Flintermann (2014) argued that researchers improve on the quality of their research if
they can assess the reliability of the research instrument or process used to generate and collet
data. But he stressed that, this does not only depend on source of data but also depends on if it
the reliability of research instruments or process used in quantitative research, there is little or
secondary data.
“Without the certainty of numbers and p-vetues, qualitative research expresses a loss of
confidence within and outside the field. Instead of explaining how reliability can be
attained and estimated; leading qualitative researchers either suggested the adoption of
new criteria or argued that reliability is an issue solely belonging to the quantitative
research. As much as researchers and methodologists agree upon the definition and
qualitative research. From a quantitative point of view/ reliability and its measurement
is clearly defined. In qualitative research the answer to what reliability is and how to
Thus researchers like Golafshani (as cited in Flintermann, 2014), are of the opinion that,
though the concept of reliability is used for both qualitative and quantitative research, the most
important test of a qualitative study is its quality, if researchers take the idea of testing as a way
of retrieving information. But to other researchers like Stenbacka (as cited in Flintermann,
2014) the concept of reliability is not applicable or pertinent or it even giving the wrong
method used. He further stressed that, the level of consistency required in quantitative research
10
does not have any value in qualitative research. Stenbacka (as cited in Flintermann, 2014) then
concluded that, rather than discussing reliability of qualitative research, it is better for
researchers to make the whole process (preparation, data gathering, analysis) visible. Hence,
Morse, Barrett, Mayan, Olson & Spiers (2002) identified new terms that can be introduced as
confirmability and dependability. To them, consistency can be achieved when the research
process can be verified from the raw data collection over data reduction to the findings. While
confirmability refers to the degree to which researchers actually arrived at their research
findings and interpretations or degree to, which others can confirm results (Flintermann., 2014;
Koch, 2006)
Irrespective of the new terms used to define reliability and under whichever type/source
of research, the above examination of the concept, of SO reliability shows the following;
generated data, with the believe that a reliable instrument will generate a reliable data
While it is easier to assess the reliability of SD in quantitative research the reverse is the
especially qualitative research, can be increased if the researcher can provide an insight into
how findings and interpretations were achieved, repeatability of the research (if necessary) and
instrument/process .and not the data (Wayne, 20 14), the situation is different ·for both types of
data. This is because it is easier to assess the, reliability of basic primary data collection
11
instruments like Questionnaire. Interview, Observation and Reading (Annum, 2017) because of
the availability of initial run of data, But assessing an existing 'document (in the form of
government publication, earlier research, personal records and clients' records, Vivek, 2011), or
non-document (in the form of tape and video recordings, pictures, drawings, films and
television programmes, DVO/CD, Weijun, 2008) the tools available from which secondary data
are gathered may not be easily execute with direct statistical tools .. This may be assessed by
The study examined various 'work from' literature 'because the theoretical framework
needed to address the second and third objectives-of the study. In this' regard, 'the common
errors influencing reliability, two theories (Delphi and Triangulation theories) used to improve
an existing model, and some models developed to assess the reliability of secondary data are
examined. The study then concluded with a list of criteria for the evaluation of reliability of SO
Also as identified earlier, Flintermann (2014) opinion that available literatures have not
been able to identify a suitable tool/method for the assessment of the reliability and validity of
SD. This also affect the availability of enough theory on the study. This study therefore used a
method of conceptual derivative and importation of theories from other field to explain existing
and Internal consistency are the basic tools of estimating research instruments reliability.
Leading researchers like Adefioye (2016); Bankole (2003); Oyeniyi, et al (2016) etc. believed
12
these tools are basically used to estimate reliability of primary data research instruments. But a
careful observation of the Inter-Rater/Observer method by the study observed that, it can be
used to estimate the reliability of data directly and not just the research instrument. This made,
it a, possible method of assessing the reliability of SD since it may not necessarily require an
as a part measurement procedure, to assess the consistency and invariably reliability of data,
For example, a researcher that required and collected working capital of an organisation(s) as
data for a study, can assess the data reliability. This is by estimating the consistency in the
responds of two expert observers regarding the possible level of the degree of error and
biasness.
William (2006) identified two methods to actually estimate inter-rater reliability First, if
the measurement consists' of categories the raters check off which category each observation
falls in the researcher calculates the percent of agreement between the raters. To William
(2006), it may be seen to some researchers as a crude measure, but it does give art idea of how
much agreement exists, and it works no matter how many categories are used for each
observation. Second if the measurement is a continuous one This involve calculating the
correlation between the ratings of the two observers. The correlation estimate will determine the
reliability or consistency in the responds of the raters and invariabty that of the data.
In other to improve this method, two adjustments are proposed to modify the Inter-
Rater/Observer method for assessment of the reliability of secondary data. The modification
could be based on the Delphi theory and the triangulation theory. This is because these theories
are similar to the existing inter-rater/observer method but allow the use of more than two
experts. This will involve the use of' coefficient of multiple correlation statistical tool to
As identified earlier, instead of restricting it to two expert observers, more than two
observers could be used. This will involve calculating the coefficient of the multiple
correlations between the ratings of the observers. The higher the result the more reliable the
data. It can also be done using the triangulation theory. The theory involves the use of multiple
independent source of data to establish the truth and accuracy of a claim. Hence, can be used to
This can invariably establish the reliability of data as researchers like Oyeniyi, et. al
(2016); Wayne (2014} etc. have identified that, though, a reliable data does not necessarily
mean a valid data, but a valid data mean's a reliable data. Hence assessing the validity of a SD
researchers (defense lawyers and prosecutors) convince a jury of the essential truth and
accuracy (validity and reliability) of their cases. This is done through the twin processes of
independent witnesses is brought in. As an additional witness corroborates the first witness, it
increased the confidence the juror will have in the initial testimony. The more independent
testimony from witnesses that support the initial witness before a jury, the more the jurors will
trust the truthfulness and accuracy of the claims. Conversely, the reverse is the case if lawyers
want the jury to doubt the truth and accuracy" (validity and reliability) of the other side, they try
to impeach (challenge the credibility of) the testimony of as many as presented by the lawyer.
Thus if as many as possible expert can pass a consistent judgment on a set of data
systematic, interactive forecasting method. Experts will assess the data in two or more rounds.
After each round, a facilitator provides an amonized summary of the experts ratings from the
previous round as well as reasons for their judgments. Thus, experts are encouraged to review
their rating/observation in view of the responds of the other experts. The process is deemed
optimal after an acceptable level of consistency in their responds. The coefficient of multiple
correlations is then used to assess the reliability of final rating/observation of the experts. The
tools/methods developed by most researchers. This is because, the above shows a direct use of
statistical tools/methods in assessing the reliability of SD. But most researchers use an indirect
qualitative step by" step methods as tools for assessing the reliability of SD. Some of these tools
FAO in their evaluation of the quality of both the source of SD and the data itself;
categorized the problems that may reduce quality as shown in table 1 below. The organisation
is of the opinion that if SD is analysed for each category, then the quality of the data can be
improved. FAO also presented a flow chart as shown in figure 1 depicting the decision path that
should be followed when using secondary data. The flowchart has two phases. The first phase
relates the relevance of the SD to the research objectives. The second phase is concern with
Definitions Researchers have to be careful of variables definitions when making use of secondary data.
For example, researchers with interest in rural communities and their average family size. If
published statistics are consulted, then a check must be done on how terms such as “family
size” have been defined. They may refer only to the nucleus family or include the extended
family. It should be noted that definitions may change overtime and where this is not
recognized erroneous conclusions may be drawn. Geographical areas may have their
boundaries redefined, units of measurement and grades may change and imported goods can
be reclassified from time to time for purposes of levying customs and excise duties.
Measurement error When a researcher conducts fieldwork she/he estimates inaccuracies in measurement through
15
the standard deviation and standard error, which are sometimes not published. They may
require speaking to the individuals involved in the collection of the data to obtain some
guidance on the level of accuracy of the data. The problem is sometimes not so much „error‟
but differences in levels of accuracy required by decisions makers. When the research had to
do with large investments in, say, food manufacturing, management will want to set very tight
margins of error in making market demand estimated. In order cases, having high level of
accuracy is not so critical. For instance, if a food manufacturer is merely assessing the
prospects for one more flavor for a snack food already produced by the company then there is
no need for highly accurate estimates in order to make the investment decisions.
Source bias Researchers have to be aware of vested interests when they consult secondary sources. Those
responsible for their compilation may have reasons for wishing to present a more optimistic or
pessimistic set of results for their organisations. For example, for officials responsible for
estimating food shortages to exaggerate figures before sending aid requests to potential
donors. Similarly, and with equal frequency, commercial organisations have been known to
inflate estimates of their market shares.
Reliability The reliability of published statistics may vary over time. It is not uncommon, for example, for
the systems of collecting data to have changed over time but without any indication of this to
the reader of published statistics. Geographical or administrative boundaries may be changed
by government, or the basis for stratifying a sample may have altered. Other aspects or
research methodology that affects the reliability of secondary data is the sample size, response
rate, questionnaire design and modes of analysis.
Time scale Most censuses take place at 10 years intervals, so data from this and other published may be
out-of-date at the time the researcher wants to make use of the statistics. The time period
during which secondary data was first complied may have a substantial effect upon the nature
of the data. For instance, the significant increase in the price obtained for Uganda coffee in the
mid-90‟s could be interpreted as evidence of the effectiveness of the rehabilitation programme
that set out to restore coffee estates which had fallen into a state of disrepair. However, more
knowledgeable coffee market experts would interpret the rise in Uganda coffee prices in the
context of large scale destruction of the Brazilian coffee crop due to heavy frost, in 1994,
Brazil being the largest coffee producer in the world.
Sources of data Whenever possible, researchers ought to use multiple sources of secondary data. In this way,
these different sources can be cross-checked as confirmed of one another. Where differences
occur an explanation for these must be found or the data should be set aside.
Source: Adopted from FOA Corporate Document Repository: Agriculture and Consumer
Protection, (n.d.)
Figure 1: Evaluating secondary data
A critical examination of the above simple flow chart shows some simple deficiencies.
One, it did not state what next if the data can be revised. Two, the researcher has to determine
its tool(s) of analyzing the risk of bias. Three, it did not examine the possibilities if error in
measurement of variables etc. but as identified in the last category in the study of FAO,
researchers are advised to use multiple sources of secondary data. Similarly, the use of one or
more other tools of analysis with the flow chart could improve the assessment of reliability of
SD. For example, table 2 shows, a Flintermann, (2014) summary of errors and issues that may
have an impact on the use of SD divided into different categories as identifies by (Tasic &
Feruh, 2012). A combination of table 2 as an assessment tool with the flow chart can help
researchers overcome some of the deficiencies in the flow chart in improving the quality of
17
c) Organization‟s staff may not know how to collect
data
Concept error Concept error arise because of the difference
between the concept to be measured and a specific
item that is used to measure a concept. Data
containing error can still be use, however, only if
something is known about the nature of the error.
Changing circumstances Changes affecting data series which are not readily
apparent in that data series. e.g. change in
geographical boundaries, change in underlying unit
of measurement
Inappropriate transformations Original data in secondary data sources is often
presented in categories or tables that make the data
more presentable or the original categories do not
Errors requiring data reflect an analyst‟s needs to handle the task at hand.
reformulation Inappropriate temporal Secondary data often not available for intervening
extrapolations periods between published reports. Data for these
periods need to be interpolated from the nearest two
reporting years. Not knowing the true change
between two these two points, any answer can be
obtained for the point of time in question.
Inappropriate temporal Arising from a misunderstanding of the time
recognition dimension of secondary data. There is always a time
lag between the gathering of primary data and the
time when it is made available.
Correct(ed) data Data can be inconsistent form one report to another
Errors reducing reliability in the same published series because of errors that
have been discovered, corrected and then reflected in
subsequent version of the data set. Or publisher of
secondary data can adjust forecasts for a decimal
year against actual census numbers.
Changes in collection Occurs due to different methods or circumstances
procedures surrounding the collection, e.g. time of collection,
way of summarizing data. Generated data can be
quite different from previous data in the dame data
set.
Clerical errors Occurs because of the transposition of numbers in a
series with the same number of digits or the
misplacing a decimal. Outliers can be easily detected
by creating diagrams or tables.
Source: Adapted from Flintermann (2014)
Flintermann (2014) is of the opinion that available literatures have not been able to
identify a suitable tool/method for the assessment of the reliability and validity of SD. But
based on study theoretical framework, Flintermann (2014) developed a set of criteria in five
categories as shown in table 3 for the assessment of reliability of SD. The table also shows
indicators of reliability or validity and the level of reliability or validity if these indicators are
found.
18
Indicators for Reliability and Validity Level of Level of
reliability validity
and
validity
Detailed description on which type of research was used High High
Definition of research variable High High
Clear specification of Sources used stated High High
data collection and data Information on how it dealt with missing data High High
analysis Date of collection available High High
Information on how quality of data used is controlled High High
Transforming data (from raw data to result) High High
Information about method used e.g. statistical tests High High
Coding of data whether and how? High High
Clear organisation of data High High
Contact data presented High High
Clear specification about Information about changes in methods used from one study to High High
potential changes in another
procedure Information about changes in sources used from one study to High High
another
Information about changes in definitions used from one study to High High
another
Updates Due to error correction – information given High High
Due to new version of report High High
Result of comparing data Dataset similar to each other High High
collected out the research
concepts with the actual
research concepts data
Missing researchData for missing variable could be found using other sources Low Low
variables report that the research
Data for missing variables could partly be found using other Medium Medium
sources that the research
Data for missing variable could not be found using other High High
sources that the research
Source: Adapted from Flintermann, (2014)
3.4 Clear specification of data collection and data analysis
This category refers to how the process of data collection and analysis are described.
organisation and distribution of data may poorly specify the particulars of the collection
process, the data procedures (methodology), insight into the whole process (gathering,
collection, analysis) and sources used. The specification of these indicators can make it easier
to replicate the study using the same procedures. In qualitative research, consistency and
conformability can be achieved by stating the whole process of data preparation, gathering and
anaivsis. If a researcher presents the whole research process, reliability is considered to be high
(Flintermann, 2014).
19
3.5 Clear specification about potential changes in procedures
acceptable high level if the information on changes in methods, sources or definitions can be
Updates
This category comprises of updates, which are either made due to error correction or
new methods of data presentation or new version of a research reports. Data can be even
inconsistent from one report/presentation to another in the same published series because of
errors being discovered and corrected in subsequent versions. For example, different
researchers using data collected from the same organisation shows obvious and unacceptable
variation In input data.· Corrections of errors may also be caused by using inappropriate
Theoretically, sources outside of research scope should provide data that is similar/equal
to research scope data since reliability of an instrument is expected to yields the same results
regardless of the number of repetitions. Hence, a search for data about the automotive industry
using the same definitions, years and units in a research scope should provide similar findings
Missing data may affect the reliability of researchers' results if data collection,
processing or storage are not properly coordinated or even forgotten to be obtained. If the final
data obtained for a research was reached based on missing data, chances are high that decisions
or conclusions are made based on biased data. Missing data can have a significant effect on
conclusions drawn. If any information about missing data or processes, sources and methods
20
used are clearly documented and hence a replication can be done to identify whether data is
As identified earlier, other researchers, like Koziol & Arthur (2012); Stewart (2014);
Weijun (2008) also use an indirect qualitative step by step methods as tools for evaluating the
quality of SD. But most of the steps identified by their work have been included in the earlier
SD provides major advantage in the use of existing data sources, with large amounts of
information, at relatively cheaper cost and easily available for research purposes. Even Henrik
& Jorn (1996) argue that millions of persons experience in the data bases will be available
through SD, which would be impossible to collect in prospective studies, But an unreliable data
could impede on the quality of research results and conclusions. The study critical examination
of literature has identified tools that can aid the assessment of SD reliability.
Of the tools identified, the study believed that the use of the adjusted inter-
raters/observer as proposed by the study will add value to the method of assessing the reliability
of SD, because of its use or statistical tools to directly estimate the available data.
The study also believed that, this will serve as a base for other researchers to improve on
References
Adefioye, T. (2016). Reliability abd validity. Retrieved March 21, 2017, from
https://www.lbs.edu.ng/sites/faculty_research/crle/Downloads/Notes%20on%20Reliability%20a
nd%20Validity%20by%20Temilade%20Adefioye.pdf
Andrews, L., Higgins, A., Andrews, M. W., & Lalor, J. G. (2012). Classical grounded theory to analyse
secondary data: Reality and reflection. The Grounded Theory Review, 11(1), 12-26.
21
Bankole, A. R. (2003). Research methods: An introductory approach. Lagos: Adeshina Press Production
and Publication.
Barbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmon, USA: Wadsworth Cengage
Learning.
Boslaugh, S. (2007). Secondary datasources for public health: A practical guide. London, U.K.:
Cambridge University Press.
Carillo, P. R. (2014). Secondary data analysis. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from
https://www.slideshare.net/honeyturqueza/secondary-data-analysis-report
Cnossen, C. (1997). Secondary research: Learning paper 7. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from
https://www.coursehero.com/file/p39mt1eo/20-No-2-Cnossen-C-1997-Secondary-Research-
Learning-Paper-7-The-Robert-Gordon/
Darren, L., & Gareth, H. J. (2013). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in Psychology
(3rd ed.). London, U.K.: Pearson Education Limited.
Flintermann, B. (2014). The quality of market research reports: The case of Marketline Advantage and
the automobile industry. Retrieved May 29, 2017, from
http://essay.utwente.nl/66122/1/Flintermann_MA_MB.pdf
FOA Corporae Document Repository. (n.d.). Marketing research and information systems. Retrieved
June 1, 2017
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative
Report, 8(4), 597-606.
Harkness, S. (2004). Social and political indicators of human well-being: Working paper. Retrieved
March 2, 2017, from https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/social-and-political-indicators-
human-well-being
Hassard, J. (2014). Why are scientist abandoning their research? Retrieved May 2, 2017, from
http://www.artofteachingscience.org/why-are-scientists-abandoning-their-research/
Henrik, T., & Jorn, O. (1996). A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for
epidemiological research. International Journal of Epidemiology, 25(2), 50-62.
Herrera, Y. M., & Kapur, D. (2007). Improving data quality: Actors, incentives and capabilities.
Political Analysis, 15(1), 365-386.
Houston, B. (2004). Assessing the validity of secondary data proxies for new constructs. Journal of
Business Research, 57(2), 154-161.
Johnson, M. P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which time has come. Qualitative and
Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 3(1), 619-626.
22
Johnson, S. A., & Houston, M. B. (2000). Buyer-supplier contracts versus joint ventures: Determinants
and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 1-15.
Kehinde, J., & Oyeniyi, O. (2017). Comment on mothly seminar series. Lagos State University, Faculty
of Management Sciences, Department of Business Administration.
Koch, T. (2006). Establishing rigourin qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 53(1), 91-103.
Koziol, N., & Arthur, A. (2012). An introduction to secondary daa analysis. Retrieved May 3, 2017,
from http://r2ed.unl.edu/presentations/2011/RMS/120911_Koziol/120911_Koziol.pdf
Management Study Guide. (2016). Secondary data. Retrieved May 23, 2017, from
http://www.managementstudyguide.com/secondary_data.htm
McCaston, M. K. (2005). Tips for collecting, reviewing and analysing secondary data. Retrieved May
13, 2017, from
https://www.ands.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/713235/Tips_for_Collecting_Reviewing_a
nd_Analyz.pdf
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for
establishing reliability and validity in quantitative research. International Journal of ualitative
Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
Norwegian Centre of Research Data. (n.d.). Data quality and comparability. Retrieved May 29, 2017,
from http://www.nsd.uib.no/macrodataguide/quality.html
Oyeniyi, O. T., Abiodun, A. J., Moses, C. L., & Osibanjo, A. O. (2016). Reesearch methodology: With
simplified ste-by-step application of SPSS package. Lagos: Pumark Nigeria Limited.
Peter, W. V., & Piet, J. D. (2012). 49 factors that influence the quality of secondary data sources: Paper
quality and risk management. Rotterdam, Statistics: Statistics Netherlands.
Phelan, C., & Wren, J. (2006). Exploring reliability in academic assessment. Cedar Falls: Iowa:
University of Norhern Iowa.
Pierce, R. (2009). Evaluating information: Validity, reliability, accuracy and triangulation. Retrieved
March 21, 2017, from https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-
binaries/17810_5052_Pierce_Ch07.pdf
Priezkalns, E. (2016). Revenue assurance: Expert opinions for communications providers. Chicago:
CRC Press.
Roberta, H., & Alison, T. (2015). Validity and reliabilty in quantitative studies. ResearchGate, 18(3),
50-62.
Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Virgina, USA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Schutt, R. (2006). Investigation the social world. New Jersey: SAGE Publications.
23
Shabnam, F. A., Zakiah, M. M., & Mohd, M. R. (2016). Detecting financial statement frauds in
Malaysia: Comparing thr abilities of Beneish and Dechow models. Asian Journal of Accounting
and Governance, 7(1), 57-65.
Smith, E. (2008). Using secondary data in educational and social research. New York: McGraw-Hill
Education.
Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision,
39(7), 551-555.
Stewart, C. (2014). How to evaluate external secondary data. Retrieved May 31, 2017, from
https://blog.marketresearch.com/how-to-evaluate-external-secondary-data
Tasic, S., & Feruh, M. B. (2012). Errors and issues in secondary data used in marketing research. The
Scientific Journal for Theory and Practice of Socioeconomic Development, 1(2), 326-335.
Vanhatalo, E., & Kulahc, M. (2015). Impact of autocorrelationon principal components and their use in
statistical process control (SPC). London: John Wiley & Son.
Vivek, A. (2011). Instrument to measure primary and secondary data. Retrieved May 29, 2017, from
https://www.slideshare.net/VivekArora2/instrument-to-measure-primary-secondary-data
Vlad, M., Tulvinschi, M., & Chirita, I. (2011). The consequences of fraudulent financial reporting. The
Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of he Faculty of Economics and
Public Administration, 11(1), 264-269.
Watson, K. A. (2013). Evaluating primary ans secondary sources. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from
https://www.nlj.gov.jm/rai/CSEC/Evaluating%20Primary%20and%20Secondary%20Sources.pd
f
Wayne, L. D. (2014). Terrorism, homeland security, and risk assessment via research proposal (3rd
ed.). Bloomington: Xlibris, LLC.
Weijun, T. (2008). Research methods for business student. Retrieved April 24, 2017, from
https://eclass.teicrete.gr/modules/document/file.php/DLH105/Research%20Methods%20for%20
Business%20Students%2C%205th%20Edition.pdf
William, M. (2006). Research method knowledge base: Types of reliability. Retrieved April 15, 2017,
from https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/reltypes.php
24
Last updated July 2016
Evaluating sources
During your research process, you will collect a lot of information from books, articles, and websites. Sometimes it may be difficult to determine
whether a source is appropriate for your research needs. This handout is designed to help you evaluate the sources you find in your research.
Most information sources can be critically evaluated according to these basic questions:
This table outlines specific questions you will want to ask when evaluating books, journal articles, and websites.
Is the text geared toward general readers, students, or specialists in the field?
Audience Does the text use technical or scholarly language?
Is the level of the source appropriate for your needs? Is the language difficult to understand? (if so, you might want to start with some
background information or sources written for a general audience).
Are there theories that have since been disproven in this source? (this is especially important to determine for scientific texts)
Accuracy Is there documentation or evidence presented for the information provided? Look for in-text references and citations or a bibliography at
the end of the article, chapter, book, or webpage.
Is the information in the article primarily fact, opinion, or propaganda?
Bias Is the information supported by research?
Does the author provide sufficient evidence for their claims?
Does the author used highly-charged or emotional language?
Who is the author? Do they have strong ties with any organizations or corporations? Is the author a political figure? If the source was
published by an organization, look carefully for political affiliations, leanings, or any specific agenda it might have.
Does the author present multiple sides of the issue or acknowledge other viewpoints?
Is the author an expert in this field? What else have they written? (hint: search for the author in library databases or Google Scholar).
Credibility Where is the author employed? Is the author associated with a group or organization that may stand to benefit from the research? For
instance, a scientific study about pain relievers may be less credible if the author works for Bayer, a major manufacturer of aspirin.
Is the publisher well known?
Do your sources need to be current? Currency is more important in some fields than in others. For example, an article on current medical
Currency research or case law is more time-sensitive than an essay on Aristotle.
Does the publication date affect the article’s accuracy or introduce bias? This is especially important when researching issues in the
sciences. Although an article may be published in a very well-respected scholarly journal, if it was published in 1960, it may no longer be
considered very accurate.
Last updated July 2016
Webpages
Look for documentation of the information provided. Wikipedia articles often contain footnotes at the bottom of the article page, which can
often lead to valuable print and electronic sources that may be more reliable than the entry itself.
Check the domain type, as it might influence the nature of the information you are viewing.
o Commercial sites usually end in .com. They might be trying to sell you something or promote their own product, so beware of self-
promotional language and potentially incomplete or biased information or statistics. What kind of support or information is used to
support their claims? Consider cross-checking information with other independent organizations and reviews.
o Academic sites end in .edu, but examine the URL and the page's content. Is it a library web page, or a student's personal project?
o Canadian government-related sites end in gc.ca; Nova Scotia government sites end in gov.ns.ca, and U.S. government-related sites
end in .gov. Keep in mind that reports, data and statistics, and official documents may be more reliable than general interest pages.
Consider the relationship between the level of government and the topic. Documents that are more specific to the region and
governance of a particular issue tend to be more valuable than broad international policies that could affect a local context.
o Non-profit groups such as public interest organizations, religious groups, and think tanks use the .org domain. These sites may be
biased toward the organization's point of view. Some organizations make clear their underlying philosophy, either in the very title of
the organization or through an "About Us" section or a "Mission Statement." Others may require more research to discover their
agenda.
o Is there a tilde (~) in part of the URL? This implies that a web page is a personal page, even if it's linked to a larger institution. It may
not be held to the same standards as the institution's pages, or reflect the institution's views.
Is contact information for the author or publisher provided?
Look for an “About the Author” or “About this site” link. What are the author’s credentials? Check a library database or Google Scholar to see
if the author has published books or articles in scholarly journals.
Be particularly wary of bias when viewing webpages. Anyone can create a webpage about any topic. Be sure to verify the validity of the
information you find.
Key Points
Provide a brief overview of the session. Discuss the importance of knowledge, skills
and development an individual’s career standpoint.
Open up the discussion for the session and ask participants to share their thoughts on
“why do you think skill development is important”?
o Interpersonal Skill: Is aware of, responds to, and considers the needs, feelings,
and capabilities of others. Deals with conflicts, confrontations, disagreements in
a positive manner, which minimizes personal impact, to include controlling one’s
feelings and reactions. Deals effectively with others in both favorable and
unfavorable situations regardless of status of position. Accepts interpersonal and
cultural diversity.
Page 64 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
resources such as time and information.
Page 65 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
The primary purpose of KSC is to measure those qualities that will set one candidate apart
from the others. KSC identify the better candidates from a group of persons basically
qualified for a position. How well an applicant can show that he or she matches the
position’s defined KSAs determines whether that person will be seriously considered for
the job.
Page 66 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Developing your skills through further training provides significant benefits including:
Increased career development opportunities:
Developing a career in a chosen field is something many of us aspire to. Experience alone, in
many cases does not suffice when employers are seeking to promote their staff. By undertaking
further training, the opportunity to develop your career is enhanced.
Personal growth:
Training not only provides you
with the skills in a particular
area. By undertaking further
training you build your
networking, time management,
communication and negotiation
skills.
Increase your knowledge and
understanding of the industry:
Trainings to know more about
the industry & its development
keeps the resource abreast with
current industry trends & a better perspective to approach industry problems
Activity Description:
Make groups of 3-5 people and ask them to discuss and come up with ideas on how they
would like to plan out their careers after they join an organization. The candidates will be
required to create a career map showing where they stand in the organization and their
individual career paths at 5 year intervals.
Page 67 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Suggested Responses:
True, skills development is one of the most important things any fresh joinee in an organization
needs to think about. Skills development helps out the individual in the long run.
2. True or False? After formal education is completed, one can lay free and
doesn’t need to engage in any additional self-training.
a. True
b. False
Suggested Responses:
False, one should never stop moving ahead in life; and one can move ahead in life only by
continuous self improvement.
Summary
Page 68 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Different methods are used by the organization to review skills and knowledge
including:
• training need analysis
• skills need analysis
• performance appraisals
o Training needs analysis is the first stage in training process and involves a
procedure to determine whether training will indeed address the problem, which
has been identified. Training can be described as “the acquisition of skills,
concepts or attitudes that result in improved performance within the job
environment”. Training analysis looks at each aspect of an operational domain
so that the initial skills, concepts and attitudes of the human elements of a
system can be effectively identified and appropriate training can be specified.
o Analysing what the training needs are is a vital prerequisite for an effective
training programme or event. Simply throwing training at individuals may miss
priority needs, or even cover areas that are not essential. TNA enables
organisations to channel resources into the areas where they will contribute the
most to employee development, enhancing morale and organizational
performance. TNA is a natural function of appraisal systems and is key
requirement for the award of Investors in People
Page 69 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Observe the employee performing the job. Document the tasks being
performed. When documenting the tasks, make sure each task starts with
an action verb. How does this task analysis compare to existing job
descriptions? Did the task analysis miss any important parts of the job
description? Were there tasks performed that were omitted from the job
description?
Organize the identified tasks. Develop a sequence of tasks. Or list the tasks by
importance.
Are there differences between high and low performing employees on specific
work tasks? Are there differences between Experts and Novices? Would
providing training on those tasks improve employee job performance?
Page 70 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Performance Analysis
Are there differences between high and low performing employees on specific
competencies? Would providing training on those competencies improve
employee job performance?
Facilitator Notes: Yes, there can be significant differences between high and low
performing employees on competencies, and that is why it is even more
important to understand training needs more carefully!
Evaluation/Review of Trainings
Page 71 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Evaluation of the impact of learning interventions may be carried out at a number of levels and
involve a variety of factors:
Reaction: What did the participants think about the learning interventions? What did the
providers think about the training interventions? What were their thoughts about the venue
facilities?
Learning: What were the main areas which were remembered by the whole group of
participants? What were the main areas which were forgotten by the whole group of
participants?
Transfer: Which elements of the learning have been applied in the workplace? Which elements
of the learning have not been applied in the workplace? Why do the participants apply some of
the elements of the learning programme and not others?
Results: What were results of the changed work behavior? What effect did this have on
productivity?
Return on Investment: What was the return on investment (ROI) of the training? How does the
cost of training compare to the financial return on increased (decreased) productivity?
Page 72 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Feedback
Feedback is an essential mean to understand and identify the right trainings & knowledge needed
for the required job function.
What is a 360-degree feedback survey?
Page 73 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
One of the best feedback tools for professionals is 360-degree feedback it’s also known as multi
source feedback that comes from members of an employee’s immediate work group. Most often,
360-degree feedback will include direct feedback from an employee’s subordinates, supervisors
and colleagues, as well as self-evaluation. In some cases it may also comprise feedback from
external sources, such as customers, suppliers and other interested stakeholders which reveals how
others perceive you.
It’s used for planning and mapping specific paths in their development. In few organizations results
are used in making administrative decisions related to pay and promotions. Usually it is best used
for development “than evaluation”.
How to go about 360-Degree Feedback survey?
To start the process 10-12 raters are to be pulled, out of which at least 6-8 (other than self) ratings
must be obtained. Raters should
offer confidential and anonymous
feedback about the individuals. The
accumulated report helps individuals
to reflect and start working on their
developmental aspects. Honest and
realistic feedback will be much
more valuable to the participants in
their self-development. Each
individual who receives feedback
will then be encouraged to work on
the development areas. It’s
advisable to re-run the survey after 9
months to know the progress and to
know the extent of improvement.
The feedback includes parameters such as: job performance, behaviour at workplace, managerial
effectiveness and skills like delegation, communication and team play. It also includes higher
aspects like ethics, fairness, etiquette values, like professional courtesies. These are only an
indicative list and we can customize the parameters for each organization.
Activity Description:
Create a feedback form for a soft skills training. Identify what fields you will include
and include a grading mechanism for the trainer on each parameter.
Page 74 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Summary
Page 75 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Genpact is completely committed towards continuous talent development, and our Learning
and development framework is a key differentiator for us when it comes to employee
retention. We have made significant investments in developing in-house capabilities in many
training areas, both technical and non-technical, and have also partnered with several leading
training providers, in order to ensure best-in-class training for our employees.
Our Learning & Development function delivers more than 6 million hours of training
annually. The testimony to our commitment lies in a series of industry recognition that we
have won over the years, such as recognition from American Society for Training &
Development (ASTD) and multiple Brandon Hall Excellence in learning awards.
Training needs identification for each individual is done at the time of joining the
organization / new process/ new role and during subsequent performance appraisals.
Trainings provided cover all aspects of professional and personal development – business /
process understanding, technical capabilities, domain knowledge, communication and
interpersonal skills, and leadership potential development.
All new hires are required to attend a mandatory New Hire Orientation program, which
familiarizes them with Genpact as an organization and its defining values, as well as various
HR policies and processes.
This is followed by process and vertical specific new hire inductions to familiarize the new
hire with the process and industry as well as provide overview of the work done in that
space. In order to sensitize our employees with cultural nuances we also provide a
certification program on cultural sensitivity, with modules for more than 130 countries in the
world.
Page 76 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
For technical trainings, the focus is towards developing self-reliance and having internal
experts to conduct trainings using case studies and practical examples as data points. This
allows for imparting of technical trainings within our business context. In order to
supplement the in-
house trainer pool we
also work extensively
with reputed training
providers to meet the
training needs in a
timely and effective
manner.
These programs are a mix of online modules, such as a suite of 42 e-learnings from Harvard
Business School (Harvard Manage Mentor®), and instructor-led classroom sessions.
What do you learn from the L&D policy for Genpact? Why do you think
Genpact invests so heavily into resource upskilling and training
Page 77 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Record Keeping
• As a professional, you have a responsibility to keep your skills and knowledge up to date.
The learning & development helps you turn that accountability into a positive opportunity to
identify and achieve your own career objectives.
• At least once a year, we recommend you review your learning over the previous 12 months,
and set your development objectives for the coming year. Reflecting on the past and
planning for the future in this way makes your development more methodical and easier to
measure. This is a particularly useful exercise prior to your annual appraisal!
• Training is an investment that you make in yourself. It’s a way of planning your
development that links learning directly to practice. Trainings help you keep your skills up to
date, and prepare you for greater responsibilities. It can boost your confidence, strengthen
your professional credibility and help you become more creative in tackling new challenges.
Trainings makes your working life more interesting and can significantly increase your job
satisfaction. It can accelerate your career development and is an important part of upgrading
to chartered membership.
• It is strongly recommended that you maintain a personal portfolio. This will assist you in a
number of key aspects related to your career:
You will be able to provide documented evidence of your commitment to your
chosen profession; and of your continued competence
Page 78 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
It will act as an excellent reference, both in the updating of your Curriculum Vitae
and in recalling details of topics you have studied
It will be a most useful aid in your career development, providing a means by which
you can plan, record and review your relevant activities
Figures : A sample development record (top) and a sample development plan template (bottom)
Page 79 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Continuous Professional Development (CPD) - Refers to the process of tracking and documenting
the skills, knowledge and experience that you gain both formally and informally as you work,
beyond any initial training. It's a record of what you experience, learn and then apply. The term is
generally used to mean a physical folder or portfolio documenting your development as a
professional.
CPD can help you to reflect, review and document your learning and to develop and update your
professional knowledge and skills. It is also very useful to:
provides an overview of your professional development to date
reminds you of your achievements and how far you've progressed
directs your career and helps
you keep your eye on your
goals
uncovers gaps in your skills
and capabilities
Opens up further development
needs
provides examples and
scenarios for a CV or interview
demonstrates your professional
standing to clients and
employers
helps you with your career development or a possible career change
Where am I now? - Review and reflect on any learning experiences over the previous year or over
the past three months. Write your thoughts down about what you learned, what insights it gave you
and what you might have done differently. Include both formal training events and informal learning
Where do I want to be? - Write down your overall job skill requirements – immediate & in next 1-
year.
What do I have to do to get there? - Make a note of what you need to do to achieve them. This
could include further training, job or role progression or changes in direction.
For shorter term objectives, include the first step - what you can do today or tomorrow. For
example, having a chat with your manager about a new responsibility or finding out about new
technology from a colleague who has experience of it.
Page 80 of 144
Facilitator Guide – SSC/ Q2101 – Associate Analytics
Key Points
Activity Description:
Create a sample development plan for your career after your hypothetical first year of
employment in a large organization. Make sure the development plan is a result of
development record which you’ve been maintaining throughout your tenure in the
organization. Do create a template of development record as well.
Summary
Page 81 of 144
Developing a Competency
Framework
Linking Company Objectives and Personal
Performance
© Veer
Binkski
You're probably familiar with the phrase "what gets measured gets done."
Defining and measuring effectiveness – especially the performance of
workers – is a critical part of your job as a manager.
The question is: how do you define the skills, behaviors, and attitudes that
workers need to perform their roles effectively? How do you know they're
qualified for the job? In other words, how do you know what to measure?
All of these are important, but none seems sufficient to describe an ideal set
of behaviors and traits needed for any particular role. Nor do they guarantee
that individuals will perform to the standards and levels required by the
organization.
This article outlines the steps you need to take to develop a competency
framework in your organization.
Design Principles of a Competency
Framework
A competency framework defines the knowledge, skills, and attributes
needed for people within an organization. Each individual role will have its
own set of competencies needed to perform the job effectively. To develop
this framework, you need to have an in-depth understanding of the roles
within your business. To do this, you can take a few different approaches:
1. Involve the people doing the work – These frameworks should not be
developed solely by HR people, who don't always know what each job
actually involves. Nor should they be left to managers, who don't always
understand exactly what each member of their staff does every day. To
understand a role fully, you have to go to the source – the person doing the
job – as well as getting a variety of other inputs into what makes someone
successful in that job.
2. Communicate – People tend to get nervous about performance issues. Let
them know why you're developing the framework, how it will be created,
and how you'll use it. The more you communicate in advance, the easier
your implementation will be.
3. Use relevant competencies – Ensure that the competencies you include
apply to all roles covered by the framework. If you include irrelevant
competencies, people will probably have a hard time relating to the
framework in general. For example, if you created a framework to cover
the whole organization, then financial management would not be included
unless every worker had to demonstrate that skill. However, a framework
covering management roles would almost certainly involve the financial
management competency.
Organizational principles.
Job descriptions.
Regulatory or other compliance issues.
Predictions for the future of the organization or industry.
Customer and supplier requirements.
Job analysis that includes a variety of techniques and considerations will
give you the most comprehensive and accurate results. If you create a
framework for the entire organization, make sure you use a sample of roles
from across the company. This will help you capture the widest range of
competencies that are still relevant to the whole business.
As you gather information about each role, record what you learn in
separate behavioral statements. For example, if you learn that Paul from
accounting is involved in bookkeeping, you might break that down into
these behavioral statements: handles petty cash, maintains floats, pays
vendors according to policy, and analyzes cash books each month. You
might find that other roles also have similar tasks – and therefore
bookkeeping will be a competency within that framework.
When you move on to Step Three, you'll be organizing the information
into larger competencies, so it helps if you can analyze and group your raw
data effectively.
Group the statements – Ask your team members to read through the
behavior statements, and group them into piles. The goal is to have three
or four piles at first – for instance, manual skills, decision-making and
judgment skills, and interpersonal skills.
Create subgroups – Break down each of the larger piles into
subcategories of related behaviors. Typically, there will be three or four
subgroupings for each larger category. This provides the basic structure of
the competency framework.
Refine the subgroups – For each of the larger categories, define the
subgroups even further. Ask yourself why and how the behaviors relate, or
don't relate, to one another, and revise your groupings as necessary.
Identify and name the competencies – Ask your team to identify a
specific competency to represent each of the smaller subgroups of
behaviors. Then they can also name the larger category.
Here's an example of groupings and subgroupings for general management
competencies:
Supervising and leading teams.
Provide ongoing direction and support to staff.
Take initiative to provide direction.
Communicate direction to staff.
Monitor performance of staff.
Motivate staff.
Develop succession plan.
Ensure that company standards are met.
Recruiting and staffing.
Prepare job descriptions and role specifications.
Participate in selection interviews.
Identify individuals' training needs.
Implement disciplinary and grievance procedures.
Ensure that legal obligations are met.
Develop staff contracts.
Develop salary scales and compensation packages.
Develop personnel management procedures.
Make sure staff resources meet organizational needs.
Training and development.
Deliver training to junior staff.
Deliver training to senior staff.
Identify training needs.
Support personal development.
Develop training materials and methodology.
Managing projects/programs
Prepare detailed operational plans.
Manage financial and human resources.
Monitor overall performance against objectives.
Write reports, project proposals, and amendments.
Understand external funding environment.
Develop project/program strategy.
You may need to add levels for each competency. This is particularly
useful when using the framework for compensation or performance
reviews. To do so, take each competency, and divide the related behaviors
into measurement scales according to complexity, responsibility, scope, or
other relevant criteria. These levels may already exist if you have job
grading in place.
Validate and revise the competencies as necessary – For each item, ask
these questions:
Is this behavior demonstrated by people who perform the work most
effectively? In other words, are people who don't demonstrate this
behavior ineffective in the role?
Is this behavior relevant and necessary for effective work
performance?
These questions are often asked in the form of a survey. It's important to
look for consensus among the people doing the job, as well as areas where
there's little agreement. Also, look for possible issues with language, or the
way the competencies are described, and refine those as well.
SELF DEVELOPMENT
Self-development efforts are unique to an individual, and the reasons for
undertaking them are specific to the individual.
The advantage of self-development efforts are that you decide for yourself how
and where best to expand your capabilities and strengths — which learning and
development activities you want to undertake and which are the different areas
where you can best apply your knowledge and skills.
- Paul Fortier (Plant training leader for libbey, Inc., in Toledo, OH)
1|Page
Need For Self Development
2|Page
3. Third, give personal opinions table to your friends and let him fill the personal
opinions table for you.
After that, Make Self Development Plan Table
Identify the knowledge and skills you need for your development.
Obtain feedback from appropriate people on your knowledge and skills and
how effectively you apply them
Review your knowledge, skills and competence regularly and take appropriate
action.
3|Page
To build loyalty in employees, as loyalty increases productivity
To create a learning culture in the organization
To motivate employees to learn new skills and acquire new leanings
Learning from colleagues ----We can learn so much from our colleagues that
we can put to use within our professional life and beyond Learning from those
we work with is one of the great benefit of being in the workplace Sometimes
what we learn from them is through what they teach us outright or simply
what we learn by just observing them
4|Page
E-learning ----It is the use of technology to enable people to learn anytime and
anywhere e-Learning can include training, the delivery of just-in-time
information and guidance from experts, For example, virtual classrooms,
application sharing, self-paced courses, audio and video conferencing, etc.
Review Performance
Identify accurately the knowledge and skills they need for their job role
Here are some of the skills that are commonly developed on the job:
5|Page
How to learn job skills at work
Use these methods to start learning new skills on the job:
Look for opportunities
Assess your skills
Practice
Learn from others
Ask for feedback
Track your progress
To identify training and development needs, you must first set clear
expectations for each role within your business. This creates a benchmark
to monitor performance against.
Review job descriptions when new positions are created.
Monitor employee performance----
Analysis --- training and development needs will fall into one of three
categories:
o improving staff knowledge about your industry
o Job-related needs
o Personal development
Use focus group to understand training and development needs---
o Identify training and development needs within your business.
Set up a system of mentoring and coaching
o Closely aligning staff with a mentor will help develop skills while
identifying additional training and development needs.
6|Page
Six steps to developing a coherent, practical and effective Learning and
Development plan:
7|Page