This document discusses various internal and external aids that courts use to interpret statutes and legislation. It provides examples of textbooks, parliamentary history, previous legislation, dictionaries, and judicial decisions or stare decisis as aids. For each aid, it provides a brief definition and example case law that illustrates how courts have used or not used that particular aid.
This document discusses various internal and external aids that courts use to interpret statutes and legislation. It provides examples of textbooks, parliamentary history, previous legislation, dictionaries, and judicial decisions or stare decisis as aids. For each aid, it provides a brief definition and example case law that illustrates how courts have used or not used that particular aid.
This document discusses various internal and external aids that courts use to interpret statutes and legislation. It provides examples of textbooks, parliamentary history, previous legislation, dictionaries, and judicial decisions or stare decisis as aids. For each aid, it provides a brief definition and example case law that illustrates how courts have used or not used that particular aid.
This document discusses various internal and external aids that courts use to interpret statutes and legislation. It provides examples of textbooks, parliamentary history, previous legislation, dictionaries, and judicial decisions or stare decisis as aids. For each aid, it provides a brief definition and example case law that illustrates how courts have used or not used that particular aid.
1. Title 2. Preamble 3. Headings 4. Marginal Notes 1. Text Books 2. Parliamentary History 3. Previous Legislation 4. Dictionaries 5. Doctrine of Stare Decisis 1. Text Books :- A text Book is a book used for the study. Courts, while interpreting a statute refer textbooks authored by distinguished jurists and eminent scholars, to get the true meaning of an enactment. Case Law:- Keshwanand Bharti vs. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 In this case, honorable Supreme Court referred a large number of textbooks. The majority opinion was that, in view of many opinions and counter opinions expressed by the authors and jurists in the textbooks, it was not desirable to follow the opinions quoted in the textbooks. 2. Parliament History :- Earlier courts, while interpreting a provision in a statute used to refer legislative history to ascertain its clear and complete meaning. The Traditional English Courts used to refer the report of a Committee presented to the Parliament as an external aid
Case Law:- A.K Gopalan vs. State of Madrad, AIR 1950
The Supreme Court observed that the debates in Parliament on a bill are not admissible for the interpretation of an act. 3. Previous Legislation :- A Law which is enacted by the Legislature. Where a code is consolidates the statutes law on a particular subject and in case of doubt. In such cases the history of the Previous Act may be looked at to determine the interpretation to be put on the same word in different sections.
Case Law:- Gulab Chand vs. Kudali
It is said that interpreting a statute the general rule is that the grammatical and ordinary sense of the word used is to be adhered. 4. Dictonaries :- A reference book which consist a set of words. When words are not defined in an Act than it is permissible to look into a dictionary to find out the real sense of the word.
Case Law:- Alamgir vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1956
supreme Court held that even tough the word detains may mean detention against the will of the detainee, this dictionary meaning of this word is not the true meaning of this word in the present context. 5. Stare Decisis / Judicial Decision :- The judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction on matters submitted to it. The term Stare Decisis means “To stand by the decided matters” Judicial decisions are binding on all courts of Indian except the Supreme Court, because the Supreme Court of India is free depart from its previous decisions for valid reasons. Case Law:- Bengal Immunity Company vs. State of Bihar According to this rule, the principle of the law which has become settled by a series of decisions, is generally binding on the courts and should be followed in similar cases. This rule is based on public policy.