Lecture Guide Introduction To Total Quality Management Defining Quality
Lecture Guide Introduction To Total Quality Management Defining Quality
Defining Quality
Quality is sometimes defined as meeting the requirements of the customer. According to
Quality Improvement Glossary, quality is “a subjective term for which each person or sector
has its definition.”
One study asked the manager of 86 firms in the Eastern United States to define quality. These are
some of the responses:
− Perfection − Providing a good, usable product − Consistency − Delighting or pleasing
customers − Eliminating waste − Total customer service and satisfaction − Speed of
Delivery − Compliance with policies and procedures − Doing it right the first time
According to Professor David Garin that was included in his book Managing Quality, there are five
principal approaches to defining quality: transcendent, product-based, user-based, manufacturing-
based and value-based.
Transcendent
According to the transcendent approach or perspective, quality is synonymous with innate
excellence, absolute and universally recognizable (quality cannot be precisely defined): “You will
know it when you see it.” The origin of quality as excellence dates back to the Greek
philosophers who referred to it as the best, the highest form, or the highest ideal.
According to this approach, the title ‘quality’ should be attributed to those products and services
that achieve the highest standards. But what is to be said of the rest then? This approach has
some shortcomings. Unlike the Greeks in ancient times philosophizing over the concept of
quality, practitioners in the business world seek something much more practical. For them,
quality should be capable of implementation, delivery, and measurement. We will therefore
consider several more sophisticated definitions of product quality.
Some examples of products associated with excellence are Rolex watches, Ritz-Carlton hotels,
and Lexus automobiles.
Product-based
The emphasis in the product-based approach is on quality as a precise and measurable variable.
Any differences (in quality) may reflect differences in the quantity of some ingredient or
attribute possessed by a product.
Definition of quality can be related to the quantity of several product attributes (thread count for
bed sheets or shirts, or many features of automobiles or cellphones). Usually, good marketing
research is needed to understand what features the customer wants in a product.
User-based
This approach starts from the premise that quality lies in the eyes of the beholder. Consumers
have specific wants or needs, and those products that best meet preferences have the highest
quality.
There are two problems with this approach. First, with so many different preferences in the
marketplace, it is hard to arrive at an agreed definition of quality. Second, it tends to equate
quality with satisfaction. A product that maximizes satisfaction is preferable to one that meets
fewer needs, but is it necessarily better?
The user-based approach focuses exclusively on the customer in the determination of quality.
The strength of this approach is that it allows the customer the say in defining quality. However,
this strength may also be a sight as a weakness. The reason is that expectations can also be
highly varied and personal, which can be problematic. Furthermore, customers may not be in
the position to articulate their expectations due to a lack of knowledge and understanding.
Definition of quality can be related to the fitness for intended use, or how well the product
performs its intended function.
Manufacturing-based
The user-based approach to quality is rooted in the subjectivity of consumer preferences, while
the manufacturing-based focuses on internal matters. It relates to requirements for conformity.
Predetermined specifications are applied to develop and produce products. Quality control
procedures aid in the detection of deviations from specifications.
In the case of services, measuring quality may be more difficult. However, under standardization
or routinization (McDonaldization of Services), services are subject to standard operating
procedures or models, which helps in the quality measurement.
The term McDonaldization was brought about by George Ritzer, who defines it as “the process
by which the principles of the fast-food restaurant are coming to dominate more and more
sectors of American society as well as the rest of the world”.
Value-based
In contrast to quality as absolute, the value-based approach regards quality relative to price.
According to this view, the buyer’s perception of value represents a mental trade-off between
the quality and benefits perceived to price paid.
Quality Types
Quality of Design
Quality of design is the quality that the producer or supplier intends to offer to the customer.
The producer or supplier should ponder the customer's requirements to satisfy the product's
fitness for use.
If it does not reflect the customer's requirements, the product would not probably satisfy the
customer, even if it does conform to the design. Quality of design is usually indicated by
completeness and correctness of specifications, drawings, catalogs, and others and measured
with fitness for use.
Quality of Conformance
Quality of conformance is the extent of quality of product generated and provided by the
organization's manufacturing or service process following the specifications or design. When the
quality of a product entirely conforms to the specification (design), the quality of conformance is
deemed excellent.
Specifications are targets and tolerances determined by the designer of a product. Targets are
the ideal values for which a product is expected to strive; tolerances are acceptable deviations
from ideal values recognizing that it is difficult to meet the exacT targets all the time due to
variability in material, machine, men, and process.
For example, in the case of a service product like maintenance of law and order by governmental
agencies, the quality of design is reflected in the relevant acts and rules, whereas the quality of
conformance depends upon the extent to which acts, and rules are comply by the enforcement
agencies. Despite having excellent rules and regulations, the quality of law and order of society
cannot be rated as good, if these rules and regulations are not adhered to properly.
Fitness for use (quality of design) and conformance to specification (quality of conformance)
provide the fundamental basis for managing the processes to produce quality products. Good
quality can be attained only when both, the quality of design and quality of conformance are
good.
Quality of Performance
It pertains to how sound the product functions or service performs when used. It also measures
the degree to which the product or service pleased the customer for the angle of quality design
with the quality of conformance. Meeting customer expectations is the focus of the quality
performance.
For example, in the automobile industry, they perform test drives of vehicles to gather
information about mileage and oil consumption. Bulbs are being tested for their useful life. A
customer survey is carried out to discover customers’ perceptions about services rendered.
Quality Levels
∙ Organizational Level
∙ Process Level
∙ Performer/Job/Task Design Level
Quality Paradigms
∙ Custom-craft paradigm
∙ Mass production and sorting paradigm
∙ Statistical quality control paradigm
∙ Total quality management paradigm
∙ Techno-craft paradigm
Cost of Quality
Cost of quality (COQ) is defined as a methodology that allows an organization to determine the
extent to which its resources are used for activities that prevent poor quality, that appraise the
quality of the organization’s products or services, and that result from internal and external
failures.
Prevention Costs
Prevention costs are incurred to prevent or avoid quality problems. These costs are associated
with the design, implementation, and maintenance of the quality management system. They are
planned and incurred before actual operation, and they could include:
∙ Product or service requirements – Establishment of specifications for incoming materials,
processes, finished products, and services
∙ Quality planning – Creation of plans for quality, reliability, operations, production, and inspection
∙ Quality assurance – planning and continuance of quality system; describes any systematic
process for ensuring quality during the successive steps in developing a product or service.
∙ Training – development, preparation, and continuance of a program
Appraisal Costs
Appraisal costs are associated with measuring and monitoring activities related to quality. These
costs are associated with the suppliers’ and customers’ evaluation of purchased materials,
processes, products, and services to ensure that they conform to specifications. They could
include:
∙ Verification – Checking of incoming material, process setup, and products against agreed
specifications
∙ Quality audits – Confirmation that the quality system is functioning correctly ∙ Supplier
rating – Assessment and approval of suppliers of products and services
These elements can be divided into four groups according to their function. The groups are:
I. Foundation – It includes: Ethics, Integrity and Trust.
II. Building Bricks – It includes: Training, Teamwork and Leadership. III.
Binding Mortar – It includes: Communication.
IV. Roof – It includes: Recognition.
Foundation
TQM is built on a foundation of ethics, integrity and trust. It fosters openness, fairness and
sincerity and allows involvement by everyone. This is the key to unlocking the ultimate potential
of TQM. These three elements move together, however, each element offers something different
to the TQM concept.
1. Ethics – Ethics is the discipline concerned with good and bad in any situation. It is a two-faceted
subject represented by organizational and individual ethics. Organizational ethics establish a
business code of ethics that outlines guidelines that all employees are to adhere to in the
performance of their work. Individual ethics include personal rights or wrongs.
2. Integrity – Integrity implies honesty, morals, values, fairness, and adherence to the facts and
sincerity. The characteristic is what customers (internal or external) expect and deserve to
receive. People see the opposite of integrity as duplicity. TQM will not work in an atmosphere of
duplicity.
3. Trust – Trust is a by-product of integrity and ethical conduct. Without trust, the framework of
TQM cannot be built. Trust fosters full participation of all members. It allows empowerment
that encourages pride ownership and it encourages commitment. It allows decision making at
appropriate levels in the organization, fosters individual risk-taking for continuous
improvement and helps to ensure that measurements focus on improvement of process and are
not used to contend people. Trust is essential to ensure customer satisfaction. So, trust builds
the cooperative environment essential for TQM.
Building Bricks
Basing on the strong foundation of trust, ethics and integrity, bricks are placed to reach the roof
of recognition. It includes:
4. Training – Training is very important for employees to be highly productive. Supervisors
are solely responsible for implementing TQM within their departments, and teaching their
employees the philosophies of TQM. Training that employees require are interpersonal skills,
the ability to function within teams, problem solving, decision making, job management
performance analysis and improvement, business economics and technical skills. During the
creation and formation of TQM, employees are trained so that they can become effective
employees for the company.
5. Teamwork – To become successful in business, teamwork is also a key element of TQM. With the
use of teams, the business will receive quicker and better solutions to problems. Teams also
provide more permanent improvements in processes and operations. In teams, people feel
more comfortable bringing up problems that may occur, and can get help from other workers to
find a solution and put into place. There are mainly three types of teams that TQM organizations
adopt:
∙ Quality improvement teams or excellence teams (QITs) – These are temporary teams with the
purpose of dealing with specific problems that often recur. These teams are set up for period
of three to twelve months.
∙ Problem solving teams (PSTs) – These are temporary teams to solve certain problems and also
to identify and overcome causes of problems. They generally last from one week to three
months.
∙ Natural work teams (NWTs) – These teams consist of small groups of skilled workers who share
tasks and responsibilities. These teams use concepts such as employee involvement teams,
self-managing teams and quality circles. These teams generally work for one to two hours a
week.
Binding Mortar
7. Communication – It binds everything together. Starting from foundation to roof of the TQM
house, everything is bound by strong mortar of communication. It acts as a vital link between
all elements of TQM. Communication means a common understanding of ideas between the
sender and the receiver. The success of TQM demands communication with and among all the
organization members, suppliers and customers. Supervisors must keep open airways where
employees can send and receive information about the TQM process. Communication coupled
with the sharing of correct information is vital. For communication to be credible the
message must be clear and receiver must interpret in the way the sender intended
Roof
8. Recognition – Recognition is the last and final element in the entire system. It should be provided
for both suggestions and achievements for teams as well as individuals. Employees strive to
receive recognition for themselves and their teams. Detecting and recognizing contributors is
the most important job of a supervisor. As people are recognized, there can be huge changes in
self-esteem, productivity, quality and the amount of effort exhorted to the task at hand.
Recognition comes in its best form when it is immediately following an action that an employee
has performed. Recognition comes in different ways, places and time such as,
∙ Ways – It can be by way of personal letter from top management. Also by award banquets,
plaques, trophies etc.
∙ Places – Good performers can be recognized in front of departments, on performance boards
and also in front of top management.
∙ Time – Recognition can give at any time like in staff meeting, annual award banquets, etc.
The eight dimensions of quality were defined by David A. Garvin. He was a Professor of Business
Administration at Harvard Business school and his publications on quality were based on his
research on U.S. manufacturers.
Some of the performance requirements are related to subjective preferences, but when they are
the preference of almost every consumer they become as powerful as an objective requirement.
Features
What the dimension ‘performance’ doesn’t focus on are the features, the characteristics that
decide how appealing a product or service is to the consumer. Such features are the extras of a
product or service and complement its basic functioning. This means that the ones designing a
product or service should be familiar with the end-users and should be updated on developments
in consumer preferences. Often it’s difficult to see a clear line between primary performance
attributes and additional features.
An example of features in service is offering free drinks on a plane. An example of features in
products is adding a drink cooler in the car.
Reliability
Reliability is usually closely related to performance. The focus of the dimension reliability is
more on how long a product will perform consistently according to the specifications of that
product. This is important to customers who need the product to work without any errors and
contributes to a brand or company’s image.
The dimension reliability shows the probability of the product having signs of error within a
specific time of period. For measuring reliability you should measure the time to the first failure,
how much time there is between failures, and the failure rate per a specific time of period?
These measures are usually applied to products that are expected to last for a longer time and
not so much for products that are meant to be used directly and for a shorter time period. Usually
when the costs for maintenance or downtime increase, reliability as a dimension of quality
becomes more important to consumers.
For example, for parents with children who depend on a car, the reliability of the car becomes an
important element. Also for most farmers, reliability is a key attribute. This group of consumers
is sensitive to downtime, especially during the shorter harvest seasons. For a farmer, reliable
equipment can be crucial in preventing spoiled crops. Also, the reliability of computers is key for
many consumers.
Conformance
This dimension is closely related to the dimensions performance and features. The dimension of
conformance is about to what extent the product or service conforms to the specifications. Does
it function and have all the features as specified? Every product and service has some sort of
specifications that comes with it.
For example, the materials used or the dimensions of a product can be specified and set as a
target specification for the product. Something that can also be defined in the specification is the
tolerance, which states how much a product is allowed to deviate from the target. Problematic
with this approach is that it makes it easier for producers to focus less on if the specifications
have been met as long as they’ve met the tolerance limits.
When it comes to service businesses, conformance is measured by focusing on the accuracy, the
number of processing errors, unexpected delays and other common mistakes.
Durability
Out of the eight dimensions of quality, the dimension durability is about how long a product will
last or perform and under what conditions it will perform. Estimating the length of a product’s
life becomes complicated when it’s possible to repair the product. For such products, the
durability will be counted until it is no longer economically beneficial to use it. This is when the
repairs and the costs of repairing increase. Customers then must weigh the costs for future
repairs against the costs of investing in a new one together with its operating expenses. In other
cases, durability is measured by the amount someone can use a product before it stops working
and repair is impossible.
This, for example, is the case when a light bulb burns up and must be replaced by a new one. In
this case, repairing it is impossible.
Serviceability
Serviceability is one of the eight dimensions of quality that reflects on if the product is relatively
easy to maintain and repair. This becomes important for consumers who are more focused on the
total cost of ownership as criteria for selecting a product. Serviceability reflects on how easy it is
for the consumer to obtain repair service, how responsive the service personnel is, and how
reliable the service is. It also focuses on the speed with which a product can be repaired and also
the competence and behavior of the personnel.
Customer’s concerns are mainly about the product getting defects, but also how long it takes for
the product to be repaired. It is not only important if a product can be fixed, but also how
satisfied the customer is about the company’s complaint handling procedures.
This can affect how the customer evaluates the service quality and eventually the company’s
reputation. Each company has a different way of dealing with complaint handling and not every
company attaches the same level of importance to serviceability. For example, there are
companies that do their best to resolve the complaints they receive, while others don’t offer any
service when it comes to complaints. An example of improving a company’s serviceability is by
installing a cost-free phone number to reach the helplines.
Aesthetics
The aesthetics dimension is all about the way a product looks and contributes to the company’s
identity or a brand. Aesthetics is not only about how a product looks but also about how it feels,
tastes, smells or sounds.
This is clearly determined by individual preference and personal judgement, however, there is a
way to measure this dimension. There are some clear patterns found in the way consumers rank
products based on personal taste. Still, the aesthetics of a product is not as universal as the
dimension ‘performance’.
Not all people prefer the same taste or smell, which makes it impossible to please every single
customer. For this reason, companies end up searching for a niche.
Perceived Quality
The perception of something is not always reality. Meaning that a product or service can have
high scores on each of the seven dimensions of quality, but still receive a bad rating from
customers as a result of negative perceptions from customers or the public.
Customers sometimes lack information about a service or product and for comparing brands will
rely on indirect reviews. This is usually the case when it comes to a product’s durability because
in most cases it can’t be observed directly.
Also, reputation plays a significant role when it comes to perceived quality. It’s easier for a
customer to trust the quality of a company’s new product when the established products
received positive reviews.
What exactly is service quality? It refers to how a company's customer service compares to the
expectations of its consumers.
Service Differs from the product reliability in that it Achieving delivery times
reliability relates to the ability of the service provider stated on the website
to perform the promised service dependably
and accurately
Assurance The knowledge and courtesy of employees The excellent reputation
and their ability to inspire trust and and high levels of trust
confidence – creating trust and confidence based on previous
will gain the customers’ loyalty experiences with the
company
“We must preserve the power of intrinsic motivation, dignity, cooperation, curiosity, joy in
learning, that people are born with.”
– Dr. Deming
Dr. William Edwards Deming is often referred as the “Father of Quality Control.” The Deming
Prize, the highest award for quality in Japan, is named after his honor.
Deming’s 14 Points on Quality Management, or the Deming Model of Quality Management, a core
concept on implementing total quality management (TQM), is a set of management practices to
help companies increase their quality and productivity.
These total quality management principles can be put into place by any organization to more
effectively implement total quality management. As a total quality management philosophy, Dr.
Deming’s work is foundational to TQM and its successor, quality management systems.
In the third chapter of Out of the Crisis, titled “Diseases and Obstacles,” Dr. Deming explores, in
great detail, the diseases listed below:
1. Lack of constancy of purpose to plan product and service that will have a market and keep the
company in business, and provide jobs.
2. Emphasis on short-term profits: short-term thinking (just the opposite from constancy of
purpose to stay in business), fed by fear of unfriendly takeover, and by push from bankers
and owners for dividends.
3. Evaluation of performance, merit rating, or annual review.
4. Mobility of management; job hopping.
5. Management by use only of visible figures, with little or no consideration of figures that are
unknown or unknowable.
6. Excessive medical costs. As reported by Dr. Deming in Out of the Crisis (pages 97- 98),
executives shared with him that the cost of medical care for their employees was amongst
their largest overall expenses, not to mention the cost of medical care embedded in the
purchase price of what they purchased from their suppliers.
7. Excessive costs of liability, swelled by lawyers that work on contingency fees.
Philip Crosby is best known for:
∙ Quality is Free - His first book that made him famous.
∙ Zero Defects - One of his four absolutes of quality.
∙ The Four Absolutes of Quality
∙ The Crosby Vaccine - for management to prevent poor quality
∙ The Fourteen Steps of Quality Improvement
A Brief Introduction:
The founder and chairman of the board of Career IV, an executive management consulting firm.
Crosby also founded Philip Crosby Associates Inc. and the Quality College. He has authored many
books, including Quality is free, Quality without tears, Let's talk Quality, and Leading: The art of
becoming an executive. Crosby originated the concept of zero defects.
The Crosby Vaccine - In the Crosby style, the “Vaccine” is explained as medicine for management to
prevent poor quality. It is in five sections that cover the requirements of Total Quality
Management.
Integrity - Treat quality seriously throughout the whole business organization from top to
bottom. That the company’s future will be judged on its performance on quality. Systems -
Appropriate measures and systems should be put in place for quality costs, education, quality,
performance, review, improvement and customer satisfaction. Communication - The
communication systems are of paramount importance to
communicate requirements and specifications and improvement opportunities around the
organization. Customers and operators know what needs to be put in place to improve and
listening to them will give you the edge.
Operations - Work with and develop suppliers. Processes should be capable and improvement
culture should be the norm.
Policies - Policies must be clear and consistent throughout the business.
4. Cost of Quality - Evaluate the cost of quality and explain its use as a management tool.
5. Quality Awareness - Raise the quality awareness and personal concern of all employees.
6. Correct Problems - Take actions to correct problems identified through previous steps.
7. Monitor Progress - Establish progress monitoring for the improvement process.
8. Train Supervisors - Train supervisors to actively carry out their part of the quality
improvement program.
9. Zero Defects Day - Hold a Zero Defects Day to reaffirm management commitment.
10. Establish Improvement Goals - Encourage individuals to establish improvement goals for
themselves and their group.
11. Remove Fear - Encourage employees to tell management about obstacles to improving
quality.
12. Recognize - Recognize and appreciate those who participate.
13. Quality Councils - Establish Quality Councils to communicate on a regular basis.
14. Repeat the Cycle - Do it all over again to emphasize that the quality improvement process
never ends.
Juran's Trilogy
Juran's Quality Trilogy is an approach to cross-functional management that is composed of three
managerial processes: planning, control, and improvement.
Quality Planning is the activity of developing the products and processes required to meet
customer's needs. It involves:
• Establish quality goals
• Identify the customers- those who will be impacted by the efforts to meet the goal.
Pareto Principle - Juran emphasized that 80% of problems are created by 20% causes.
Organizations should identify the vital few (20%) causes and take actions to remove them from
the system.
Walter Andrew Shewhart was an American physicist engineer and statistician, sometimes known
as the father of statistical quality control.
Most of Shewhart's professional career was spent as an engineer at Western Electric from 1918
to 1924, and at Bell Telephone Laboratories, where he served in several capacities as a member
of the technical staff from 1925 until his retirement in 1956. He also lectured on quality control
and applied statistics at the University of London, Stevens Institute of Technology, the graduate
school of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and in India.
• He is also known as “Grandfather of Quality Control.”
• Control charts (Control Charts laid the foundation of Statistical Process Control (SPC) and
modern quality improvement practices, including Six Sigma) are also known as Shewhart
charts (after Walter A. Shewhart ).
• Shewhart classified the causes of variation as "assignable cause" and "chance cause".
• The original founder of the PDCA cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act) is Walter A. Shewhart. Edwards
Deming promoted the use of the PDCA cycle for process improvement and later changed it to
the PDSA cycle (Plan-Do-Study-Act).
Feigenbaum originated the concept of total quality control in his book Total Quality Control. This
concept laid the foundation of Total Quality Management (TQM).
1961: Feigenbaum originated the concept of Total Quality Control in his book titled Total Quality
Control. This concept later laid the foundation of Total Quality Management (TQM).
Armand V. Feigenbaum is also known for his concept of the hidden plant. That is that in every
factory a certain proportion of its capacity is wasted through not getting it right the first time.
Feigenbaum quoted a figure of up to 40% of the capacity of the plant is wasted. At the time this
was an unbelievable figure; even today some managers are still to learn that this is a figure not
too far removed from the truth.
Kaoru Ishikawa
Kaoru Ishikawa served as president of the Japanese Society for Quality Control and the Musashi
Institute of Technology and co-founded and served as president of the International Academy for
Quality. Upon retirement, he was named professor emeritus of the University of Tokyo, Honorary
Member of ASQ and the honorary member of the International Academy for Quality.
He wrote 647 articles and 31 books, including two that were translated into English:
"Introduction to Quality Control" and "What Is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way".
He is well known for coming up with the concept for the fishbone shaped diagram, known as the
Ishikawa or cause and effect diagram, used to improve the performance of teams in determining
potential root causes of their quality problems.
He developed and delivered the first basic quality control course for the Union of Japanese
Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) Credited with creating the Japanese quality circle movement.
ASQ named a national medal after him, recognizing him as a distinguished pioneer in the
achievement of respect for humanity in the quality disciplines.
• 1949 - Developed and delivered the first basic quality control course for the Union of Japanese
Scientists and Engineers (JUSE)
• 1962 - Credited with creating the Japanese quality circle movement. • 1993 - ASQ named a
national medal after him, recognizing him as a “distinguished pioneer in the achievement of
respect for humanity in the quality disciplines.”
The Ishikawa Diagram is also called as the Fishbone diagram and the Cause-and-Effect Analysis.
This is the most commonly used to analyze a problem and to find out the potential causes
creating the problem.
Ishikawa Diagram is one of the Seven Basic Quality Tools promoted by Ishikawa.
Quality Circles
Quality Circle is a small group of employees working in the same area, or doing the same type of
job. This group regularly meets for one hour every week to identify and collectively resolve the
problems in the work area. They use Seven Basic Quality tools to understand the causes and to
propose solutions.
Company-wide Quality
Kaoru Ishikawa emphasized that every function in the organization contributes to quality. He
emphasized the concept of internal customers and Company-wide Quality. This requires the
involvement of all from the top management to the front-line workers. He suggested the
following benefits of Company-wide Quality approach.
• Reduced defects
• Improved product quality
• The quality improvement becomes the norm rather than the exception • Increased
reliability
• Reduced costs
• Wastes are identified and reduced
• Rework is identified and reduced
• Improvement techniques are established and the product and processes are continually
improved
• Inspection and after-the-fact expenses are reduced
• Sales and market opportunities are increased
• Company reputation is increased
• Interdepartmental barriers are broken down and communication becomes easier
• False and inaccurate data is reduced
• Improvement in human relations
• Company loyalty is increased
Genichi Taguchi
Genichi Taguchi is best known For:
∙ Taguchi Methods
∙ Taguchi Loss Function
∙ Design of Experiments
∙ Robust Design
∙ Quality Engineering
The executive director of the American Supplier Institute, the director of the Japan Industrial
Technology Institute, and an honorary professor at Nanjing Institute of Technology in China.
Genichi Taguchi is well known for developing a methodology to improve quality and reduce
costs, which, in the United States, is referred to as the Taguchi Methods. He also developed the
quality loss function.
• Mid 50's: Genichi Taguchi was Indian Statistical Institutes visiting professor, where he met Walter
Shewhart.
• 1960: Genichi Taguchi was awarded the Deming Application prize • 1986: Willard F
Rockwell Medal by the International Technologies Institute
Taguchi's methodology
Taguchi's methodology is geared towards pushing the concepts of quality and reliability back
into the design stage, i.e. prior to manufacturing.
His method provides an efficient technique for designing product tests prior to beginning
manufacturing.
Taguchi methodology is fundamentally a prototyping technique that enables engineers/
designers to produce a robust design that can survive repetitive manufacturing to deliver the
functionality required by the customer.
Taguchi considered the design to be more critical than Quality Control in manufacturing
processes.
With this approach, the specification range is more important than the nominal (target) value.
But, is the product as good as it can be, or should be, just because it is within specifications?
Taguchi says no to this.
Taguchi specified three situations:
• Larger the better (for example, process yield);
• Smaller the better (for example, emissions, rejection rate); and
• On-target, minimum-variation (for example, a mating part dimensions in an assembly).
Robust Design - Taguchi's Three Stages of Product Development: The philosophy of off-
line quality control, designing products and processes so that they are insensitive ("robust") to
parameters outside the design engineer's control.
Shigeo Shingo was born in 1909 at Saga City, Japan where he attended the Saga Technical High
School. After graduation from Yamanashi Technical College in 1930, he went to work for the
Taipei Railway Company. In 1943 Shingo was transferred to the Amano Manufacturing Plant in
Yokohama.
Shingo worked for several manufacturers in 1945 and 1946 and also began a long association
with the Japanese Management Association (JMA).
• 1946-1954: Shingo had many assignments, delivered several important papers and
crystallized his ideas on process and plant layout. He also applied Statistical Process Control.
• Shingo had been involved all over Japan in the training of thousands of people, who joined his
courses on the fundamental techniques of analysis and improvement of the operational
activities in factories.
• 1955: Dr. Shingo began a long association with Toyota. It is during this period that he first
started work on setups by doubling the output of an engine bed planer at Mitsubishi's
shipyard.
• 1959: Dr. Shingo left JMA to start his own consulting company.
• The 1960s: During the early 1960s, as an outgrowth of work with Matsushita, he developed his
concepts of Mistake-Proofing.
• 1969: SMED was originated when he cut the setup time on a 1000 ton press at Toyota from 4.0
hours to 3.0 minutes.
• The 1970s: During the 1970s, Shingo travelled in Europe and North America on many
lectures, visits and assignments. He began to see Toyota's efforts as an integrated system
and began to assist several U.S. and European firms in implementation.
• Utah State University recognized Dr. Shingo for his lifetime accomplishments and created the
Shingo Prize for Operational Excellence that recognizes world class, lean organizations and
operational excellence.
Shigeo Shingo recognized three types of poka-yoke for detecting and preventing errors in a mass-
production system.
1. The contact method: The contact method identifies product defects by testing the product's
shape, size, color, or other physical attributes.
2. The fixed-value method: The fixed-value (or constant number) method alerts the operator if a
certain number of movements are not made.
3. The motion-step method: The motion-step (or sequence) method determines whether the
prescribed steps of the process have been followed.
MODULE 2
Lecture Guide
Kaizen
Kaizen is a philosophy of continuous improvement, a belief that all aspects of life should be
constantly improved. In Japan, where the concept originated, it applies to all aspects of life, not
just the workplace.
Japanese term for a gradual approach to ever higher standards in quality enhancement and waste
reduction, through small but continual improvements involving everyone from the chief
executive to the lowest level workers or all stakeholders.
Kaizen can be roughly translated from Japanese to mean "good change." The philosophy behind
kaizen is often credited to Dr. W. Edwards Deming. Dr. Deming was invited by Japanese industrial
leaders and engineers to help rebuild Japan after World War II.
Benefits
The goal of kaizen is to eliminate waste in the process
∙ Making job easier
∙ Making job safer
∙ Making job more productive
∙ Removing donkeywork from the job
∙ Removing irritation from the job
∙ Improving product quality
∙ Saving time and cost
∙ Get the workers involved: Involve the workers and get their ideas or suggestions through the
kaizen suggestion system.
∙ Identify the problem: Collect the list of ideas/suggestions in order to identify the issues or
problems.
∙ Analyze the problem: Analyze the problem by observing the present process/condition and
investigate the probable root cause.
∙ Develop the solution: Identify the alternate solutions/ideas and select the best solution after
validating all identified solutions.
∙ Implement solution: Implement the permanent solution/action against the real identified root
cause.
∙ Analyze the result: Monitor the effectiveness of the implemented solution. ∙ Standardize
the solution: If the result found effective then do the horizontal deployment of the
implemented solution at other areas/workplaces/machines and others.
In the development and application of Kaizen, knowledge and related techniques are integrated
such as:
Organizational Behavior, Finance, Operations Management, Industrial Engineering, Quality,
Maintenance, Productivity, Innovation, Logistics, among others, are integrated.
Under the Kaizen structure, methods and tools are involved and interrelated such as: Total
Quality Control, Quality Circles, Suggestion Systems, Automation, Total Productive Maintenance,
Kanban, Quality Improvement, Just in Time, development of new products, Improvement, among
others.
Some of the advantages of implementing Kaizen include, but are not limited to: ∙
Utilization of Resources – Kaizen focuses on improving products through utilization of
existing resources (your people) to achieve incremental and continuous improvement.
Kaizen is centered around making small changes instead of relying on massive changes or
expensive equipment investments to gain improvements.
∙ Increased Efficiency – Central to Kaizen methodology is the importance of providing a well-
planned work area, eliminating unnecessary movement or operations and proper training for
all employees.
∙ Employee Satisfaction – Kaizen is about creating an atmosphere of teamwork and change,
where new ideas are encouraged. Team members are asked to really examine the processes
and make suggestions for improvement.
∙ Safety Improvements – A safer work environment is another benefit of Kaizen. The safety
improvements occur when new ideas to clean up and organize the work area are developed
and implemented.
Kaizen advantages
∙ Kaizen's focus on gradual improvement can create a gentler approach to change in contrast to
big efforts that may be abandoned due to their tendency to provoke change resistance and
pushback.
∙ Kaizen encourages scrutiny of processes so that mistakes and waste are reduced.
∙ With fewer errors, oversight and inspection needs are minimized. ∙ Employee morale
improves because Kaizen encourages a sense of value and purpose.
∙ Teamwork increases as employees think beyond the specific issues of their department.
∙ Client focus expands as employees become more aware of customer requirements.
∙ Systems are in place to ensure improvements are encouraged both in the short and long terms.
Kaizen disadvantages
∙ Companies with cultures of territorialism and closed communication may first need to focus
on cultural changes to create a receptive environment. ∙ Short-term Kaizen events may create
a burst of excitement that is shallow and short-lived and, therefore, is not sustained.
Examples of Kaizen
Toyota is arguably the most famous for its use of Kaizen, but other companies have successfully
used the approach. Here are three examples:
∙ Lockheed Martin. The aerospace company is a well-known proponent of Kaizen. It has used the
method to successfully reduce manufacturing costs, inventory and delivery time.
∙ Ford Motor Company. When lean devotee Alan Mulally became CEO of Ford in 2006, the
automaker was on the brink of bankruptcy. Mulally used Kaizen to execute one of the most
famous corporate turnarounds in history.
∙ Pixar Animation Studios. Pixar applied the continuous improvement model to reduce the risks of
expensive movie failure by using quality control checks and iterative processes.
An inventory strategy companies employ to increase efficiency and decrease waste by receiving
goods only as they are needed in the production process, thereby reducing inventory costs.
Just-in-time (JIT) is an inventory strategy that strives to improve a business’s return on
investment by reducing in-process inventory and associated carrying costs. This saves
warehouse space and costs. However, the complete mechanism for making this work is often
misunderstood.
Just-in-time manufacturing was a concept introduced to the United States by the Ford
motor company.
Six major losses that can result from poor maintenance, faulty equipment or inefficient
operation
Set-up and adjustment Results in lost production opportunity (yields) that occurs during
losses product changeovers, shift change or other changes in operating
conditions.
Quality defect losses Results in off-spec production and defects due to equipment
malfunction or poor performance, leading to output which must be
reworked or scrapped as waste.
Equipment and capital Results in wear and tear on equipment that reduces its durability
investment losses and productive life span, leading to more frequent capital
investment in replacement equipment.
The Six Big Losses don’t just encompass machine breakdowns, they also incorporate the quality
of the product produced and the efficiency of operation. As we have seen, OEE can be calculated
from this data and so an overall picture of the efficiency of each machine can be gained. That
allows improvement activity to be focused where it is needed most.
∙ Equipment Failure and Unplanned Stops (Availability Loss)
Significant periods of time during which equipment scheduled to be operating is not
running. Causes include breakdown, tool failure, and unplanned maintenance.
∙ Setup and Adjustments (Availability Loss)
Significant periods of time during which equipment that should be operating is not
running. Causes include warm-up time, tooling adjustments, changeovers, lack of
resources (e.g. operators, raw materials). Planned maintenance also falls into this
category.
∙ Idling and Minor or Slow Stoppages (Performance Loss)
Equipment stops for a short period of time (typically a few minutes) and the issue is
resolved by the operator. Causes include material jams, misfeeds, incorrect settings,
blocked sensors.
∙ Reduced Speed and Slow Running (Performance Loss)
Equipment is running at lower than its ideal speed. Causes include incorrect settings,
alignment issues, inexperienced operator, and poor lubrication. ∙ Quality and Production
Defects (Quality Loss)
Defective parts are produced during stable running of machines. Causes include incorrect
settings, operator error.
∙ Reduced Yield (Quality Loss)
Defective parts are produced from machine start-up to steady running (e.g. during the
warm-up phase). Causes include the need for the machine to complete a warm-up cycle,
incorrect settings, and poor changeover practice.
Six Sigma
Six Sigma seeks to improve the quality of process outputs by identifying and removing the
defects (errors) and minimizing variability in manufacturing and business processes.
It uses a set of quality management methods, including statistical methods, and creates a special
infrastructure of people within the organization ("Champions", "Black Belts", "Green Belts",
"Yellow Belts",…) who are experts in the methods. Each Six Sigma project carried out within an
organization follows a defined sequence of steps and has quantified value targets, for example:
reduce process cycle time, reduce pollution, reduce costs, increase customer satisfaction, and
increase profits.
Six Sigma is a set of strategies, techniques, and tools for process improvement. Six Sigma is a
management philosophy developed by Motorola in 1981 that emphasizes setting extremely high
objectives, collecting data, and analyzing results to a fine degree as a way to reduce defects in
products and services. The Greek letter sigma is sometimes used to denote variation from a
standard. The philosophy behind Six Sigma is that if you measure how many defects are in a
process, you can figure out how to systematically eliminate them and get as close to perfection as
possible.
Methods
Six Sigma projects follow two project methodologies inspired by Deming's Plan-Do Check-Act
Cycle. These methodologies, composed of five phases each, bear the acronyms DMAIC and
DMADV.
DMAIC is used for projects aimed at improving an existing business process. DMADV is
used for projects aimed at creating new product or process designs.
DMAIC
The Six Sigma process is called Sigma DMAIC, which stands for "define, measure, analyze,
improve, control." This set of steps scrutinizes existing processes that are known to fall short of
Six Sigma requirements.
DMAIC is a tool for improving an existing process. The steps can be summarized as: ∙ Define: State
the problem, specify the customer set, identify the goals, and outline the target process.
∙ Measure: Decide what parameters need to be quantified, work out the best way to measure
them, collect the necessary data, and carry out the measurements by experiment.
∙ Analyze: Identify gaps between actual and goal performance, determine causes of those gaps,
determine how process inputs affect outputs, and rank improvement opportunities.
∙ Improve: Devise potential solutions, identify solutions that are easiest to implement, test
hypothetical solutions, and implement actual improvements. ∙ Control: Generate a detailed
solution monitoring plan, observe implemented improvements for success, update plan
records on a regular basis, and maintain a workable employee training routine.
DMADV
DMADV is a process defined by Motorola as part of their Six Sigma management philosophy.
DMADV is applied to new processes to make sure that they achieve Six Sigma quality. Six Sigma
sets extremely ambitious goals to minimize the occurrence of flaws in products and services.
Notes:
∙ Six Sigma is a quality-control process that businesses used to eliminate defects and improve
processes.
∙ The model was developed by a scientist who worked at Motorola in the 1980s. ∙ Companies often
choose to use the Six Sigma model to boost their profits. ∙ Originally developed as a management
method to work faster with fewer
mistakes, it is now an industry standard with certifications offered to practitioners.
∙ Lean Six Sigma is a team-focused managerial approach that seeks to improve performance by
eliminating waste and defects while boosting the standardization of work.
∙ Champions take responsibility for Six Sigma implementation across the organization in an
integrated manner. The Executive Leadership draws them from upper management. Champions
also act as mentors to Black Belts.
5S" was invented in Japan, and stands for five (5) Japanese words that start with the letter 'S':
1. Seiri – Sort
2. Seiton - Set (in place)
3. Seiso - Shine
4. Seiketsu - Standardize
5. Shitsuke – Sustain
Seiton
Seiton, or orderliness, is all about efficiency. This step consists of putting everything in an
assigned place so that it can be accessed or retrieved quickly, as well as returned in that same
place quickly. The correct place, position, or holder for every tool, item, or material must be
chosen carefully in relation to how the work will be performed and who will use them. Every
single item must be allocated its own place for safekeeping, and each location must be labeled for
easy identification of what it's for.
Seiso
Seiso, the third step in "5S", says that 'everyone is a janitor.' Seiso consists of cleaning up the
workplace and giving it a 'shine'. Cleaning must be done by everyone in the organization, from
operators to managers. No area should be left uncleaned. Everyone should see the 'workplace'
through the eyes of a visitor - always thinking if it is clean enough to make a good impression.
Seiketsu
The fourth step of "5S", or seiketsu, more or less translates to 'standardized cleanup'. It consists
of defining the standards by which personnel must measure and maintain 'cleanliness'.
Personnel must therefore practice 'seiketsu' starting with their personal tidiness. Visual
management is an important ingredient of seiketsu. Personnel are trained to detect abnormalities
using their five senses and to correct such abnormalities immediately.
Shitsuke
The last step of "5S", Shitsuke, means 'Discipline.' It denotes commitment to maintain orderliness
and to practice the first 4 S as a way of life. The emphasis of shitsuke is elimination of bad habits
and constant practice of good ones. Once true shitsuke is achieved, personnel voluntarily observe
cleanliness and orderliness at all times, without having to be reminded by management.