0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views3 pages

Thursday, 30 September 2021, 2:30 PM Submitted Answers: 25 Questions: 15 Label Responses

The document contains the results of a survey evaluating a course with 15 questions. 25 students submitted responses. For each question, the number of students who selected each response option on a 5-point scale is shown. Most students rated the course as good or very good across categories like coverage, engagement, clarity, communication and more. The overall feedback for the course is satisfactory.

Uploaded by

Vikas Mahor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views3 pages

Thursday, 30 September 2021, 2:30 PM Submitted Answers: 25 Questions: 15 Label Responses

The document contains the results of a survey evaluating a course with 15 questions. 25 students submitted responses. For each question, the number of students who selected each response option on a 5-point scale is shown. Most students rated the course as good or very good across categories like coverage, engagement, clarity, communication and more. The overall feedback for the course is satisfactory.

Uploaded by

Vikas Mahor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Thursday, 30 September 2021, 2:30 PM

Submitted answers: 25
Questions: 15

Label Question Responses


1 Coverage of syllabus/course conten
1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 1 7 8 9
0 0.04 0.28 0.32 0.36
2 The classes are engaged with good1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 0 4 13 8
0 0 0.16 0.52 0.32
3 The concepts are cleared by giving1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 0 7 10 8
0 0 0.28 0.4 0.32
4 Rate the communication skills of th1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 1 4 11 9
0 0.04 0.16 0.44 0.36
5 Evaluation/assessment (mid-term, qui
1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 1 6 8 10
0 0.04 0.24 0.32 0.4
6 Performance in assignments/quiz/m1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 1 6 10 8
0 0.04 0.24 0.4 0.32
7 Expected Course Outcomes (CO), 1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 1 6 10 8
0 0.04 0.24 0.4 0.32
8 Classes are useful and help in ide 1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 0 6 11 8
0 0 0.24 0.44 0.32
9 The PPTs/notes and lecture recordi1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 0 6 11 8
0 0 0.24 0.44 0.32
10 Additional classes are conducted f 1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 1 6 10 8
0 0.04 0.24 0.4 0.32
11 The weekly quiz and fortnightly ass1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 0 9 8 8
0 0 0.36 0.32 0.32
12 Attitude is in general positive, sup 1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 0 4 12 9
0 0 0.16 0.48 0.36
13 Behaviour is ethical and shows no 1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
1 1 2 11 10
0.04 0.04 0.08 0.44 0.4
14 Overall rating of the course covered1- Below Average2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent
0 1 5 11 8
0 0.04 0.2 0.44 0.32
If strongly Suggestions for improvement (PleaAll is well
MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE, GWALIOR
(A Govt. Aided UGC Autonomous & NAAC Accredited Institute Affiliated to RGPV, Bhopal)
Department Name
Registered %
Faculty Name Subject Code Subject Name Semister Response Resp. FFI
Students

Dr. Karuna Markam 140313 Signal and Sys III 71 25 35.21 4.06

Thursday, 30 September 2021, 2:30 PM 4.30


4.20 1 2 3
4.10 4 5 6
Submitted answers: 25 4.00 7 8 9
3.90 10 11 12
3.80 13 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1- Below
Label Question 2- Average 3- Good 4- Very good 5- Excellent QV Comment
Average
1 Coverage of syllabus/course content is good 0 1 7 8 9 4.00 Satisfactory
2 The classes are engaged with good preparation 0 0 4 13 8 4.16 Satisfactory
3 The concepts are cleared by giving examples and applications 0 0 7 10 8 4.04 Satisfactory
4 Rate the communication skills of the faculty 0 1 4 11 9 4.12 Satisfactory
5 Evaluation/assessment (mid-term, quiz etc.) by the faculty is fair and justified 0 1 6 8 10 4.08 Satisfactory
6 Performance in assignments/quiz/mid-term exams is discussed in class 0 1 6 10 8 4.00 Satisfactory
7 Expected Course Outcomes (CO), Program Outcomes (PO), Programme Specific Outcomes (PSOs) & course 0 1 6 10 8 4.00 Satisfactory
8 Classes are useful and help in identifying strengths and correcting weaknesses 0 0 6 11 8 4.08 Satisfactory
9 The PPTs/notes and lecture recordings are shared in a timely manner 0 0 6 11 8 4.08 Satisfactory
10 Additional classes are conducted for remedial purpose 0 1 6 10 8 4.00 Satisfactory
11 The weekly quiz and fortnightly assignments motivates you to revise and learn better 0 0 9 8 8 3.96 Satisfactory
12 Attitude is in general positive, supportive and helpful 0 0 4 12 9 4.20 Satisfactory
13 Behaviour is ethical and shows no gender bias 1 1 2 11 10 4.12 Satisfactory
14 Overall rating of the course covered so far 0 1 5 11 8 4.04 Satisfactory
0.00 6.00 67.00 110.00 92.00 4.06
Attitude is in general positive, supportive and helpful FFI & Suggestions are noted for further improvement.

Faculty Name & Signature


The alloted Months to this semester (Sept-Dec) is not enough to completely understand and HOD DIRECTOR
Very good teaching
sir please provide more good numerical , beacuse most of student preparing for gate

You might also like