Philo Q1 Mod2
Philo Q1 Mod2
Philo Q1 Mod2
Introduction to the
Philosophy of the Human Person
Module 2:
Methods of Philosophizing
AIRs - LM
LU_Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person_Module2
INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON
Module 1: Methods of Philosophizing
Edition, 2021
Copyright © 2021
La Union Schools Division
Region I
All rights reserved. No part of this module may be reproduced in any form without written
permission from the copyright owners.
Management Team:
Introduction to the
Philosophy of the Human Person
Module 2:
Methods of Philosophizing
Each SLM is composed of different parts. Each part shall guide you
step-by-step as you discover and understand the lesson prepared for you.
In addition to the material in the main text, Notes to the Teacher are
also provided to our facilitators and parents for strategies and reminders on
how they can best help you on your home-based learning.
Please use this module with care. Do not put unnecessary marks on
any part of this SLM. Use a separate sheet of paper in answering the exercises
and tests. And read the instructions carefully before performing each task.
Thank you.
1. Look at the comic strip. Do you agree with the reasoning of the person inside
the car? Why of why not?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
2. If you are the biker, how would you react to the remarks of the person inside
the car?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
3 2 1
Exceeded Satisfactorily Very close to
Criteria expectations Met all meeting the
expectations expectations
Details and
content
Reflect personal
thoughts/
knowledge/
learning
Mechanics
/grammar
Conclusion
Discover
Truth Vs Opinion
Identifying truth however can sometimes be tricky. The reason is that there
are times when we strongly held an idea that we feel “deep down” to be true. For
example, religious people strongly believed that there is life after death. Some people
who embraced democracy may passionately embraced the idea that the majority is
always right. Or on a more personal level you may feel strongly that your sister is
“selfish”.
However, we must not confuse strongly held beliefs with truth. Truth is
knowledge validated and when we say validated, we mean they are based on the facts
of reality.
You must understand dear student that the facts of reality are independent of
your thoughts, feelings, or preferences (Ayn Rand calls this the primacy of existence
[Rand 1982]). That is the characteristic of truth. For example, the statement “Jose
Rizal died in 1896” is true. You may not like that statement or deny it strongly. That
does not change the fact that the statement is true because it is based on what really
happened in the past. There are many sources that can validate the truth of that
statement if one cared to look.
However, when you say that “Jose Rizal is the greatest man who ever lived”
you are stating your preference and not facts. This is an opinion. Now it is true that
there are many facts about Rizal, but that statement is asserting something that is
beyond what the facts state. That statement represents not facts but your
interpretation of facts which may reveal your biases.
Fact Opinion
An opinion is a statement of belief
A fact is a statement that can be which may or may not be backed up by
proven true or false facts but cannot be proven true or
false.
Is objective Is subjective
Is discovered Is created
States reality Interprets reality
Can be verified Cannot be verified
Activity 2: Transformation
Directions: The statements below are examples of opinions. Transform them into
truth. Write your answers in the second column of the table below.
Opinion Truth
1. We live in a peaceful community.
2. My Father is taller than my mother.
3. Our House is tidy.
4. She can fry eggs.
5. He can play volleyball.
Deepen
Activity 3: Recall
Directions: Based on what you have encountered in everyday conversations give at
least five (5) examples of opinions and facts on what you have heard and seen.
Write your answers on the table below.
Opinion Truth
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
Discover
Now you can have an idea how philosophizing recognizes truth, let us apply it
in a various situation in your life. Everything you have encountered could either be
an opinion or truth. But what distinguishes one from the other? Let us look at the
following statement and observe the difference between truth and opinion.
Truth Opinion
1. the minimum fare for tricycle from 1. fare is increasing because the driver
Natividad, Naguilian, La Union to wants to have a high income.
Naguilian Public Market is 20.00.
2. Frederick Navarro arrived in La 2. Frederick Navarro arrived in La
Union at 01:15 pm. Union in the afternoon, he is supposed
to arrive in La Union in the morning
but because he feels lazy to wake up
early and feel bored to travel alone.
It is observed that statements in the first column are truth because they
contain ideas or information which are easily verifiable, which statement in the
second column are opinion since they need further facts which will provide
conclusion and beliefs in the given situation.
Explore
2. My sister delivered her baby girl through caesarian delivery because she
believes that it is safer way of delivering a baby. Opinion Truth
Why?______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
3 2 1
Exceeded Satisfactorily Very close to
Criteria expectations Met all meeting the
expectations expectations
Details and
content
Reflect personal
thoughts/
knowledge/
learning
Mechanics
/grammar
Conclusion
Discover
Both the Socratic and dialectic method are based on a discussion between
two or more people who carry differing views but wish to pursue truth by seeking an
agreement with one another. Meanwhile, the scientific method is a process of
determining truth or knowledge through experimentation, inductive and deductive
reasoning, and hypothesis or theory testing.
The scientific method, also called empirical method, is a process of
determining truth or knowledge through experimentation, inductive reasoning, and
hypothesis or theory testing.
Logic is the truth based on reasoning and critical thinking, it includes
analysis and construction of arguments. It serves as path to freedom from half-truths
and deception.
Types of Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
In this type of reasoning, conclusion comes first, followed by main points,
and the last will be the supporting data, facts, examples, and evidence. General idea
comes first before the specific or idea.
Inductive Reasoning
In this type of reasoning, supporting data, facts, examples, and evidence
comes first followed by the main points and conclusion will be the last part. This is
vice versa of the deductive reasoning because idea comes first before the genera idea.
Every day in our experiences, we argued on so many things. In our family
we often argued on who is right and is wrong, who is smart and who is not, who is
handsome and who is not or who is the best mother of the father. What then is
argument?
Arguments are series of statements that provide explanations to convince
the listener or a reader that the opinion is truthful.
Types of Arguments
1. Fallacy or Fake arguments are group of statements that appear to be
arguments to support the conclusion.
Example: there is no hope in the Philippine government, because it is tropical
country.
What makes the statement fallacious? It is fallacious because climate has
nothing to do with hope of Philippine government.
10
Deepen
11
Gauge
12
13
14
Books
16
17