Microfinance Institutions in Ethiopia
Microfinance Institutions in Ethiopia
Abstract
Microfinance promises to reduce poverty. To achieve this amazing objective
Microfinance institutions have to become strong enough in financial performance
because donor constancy is not a given. In this paper we tried to see the overall
purpose of microfinance institutions as well as the impacts and challenges
microfinance institutions face in this country currently micro financing is one of the
most powerful tools for combating poverty primarily by providing loan to the poor
section of the society. The numbers of micro financing Institutions serving the poor
in Ethiopia have grown to over 39 with in short period of time the steady growth in
the sector has created a competition for scarce funding among Institutions. Hence,
recent years have seen a growing push to measure performance of micro financing
institutions in order to be able to compete and achieve their objectives. In light of
this, the paper attempted to look at the performance of MFIs by taking six
institutions as a Case from Profitability and Sustainability; Asset and Liability
management; and Efficiency and productivity perspectives.
Introduction
Limited access to financial services is among the major problems impeding rural
livelihood development (Hermes and Lensink 2007; Wijesiri et al. 2017). The
problem is particularly severe in developing countries, such as Ethiopia, mainly for
two reasons. First, most of the conventional banks in the country are concentrated in
urban areas, while more than 80% of the population is rural. Second, whenever
available, the formal banking sector systematically excludes the rural poor due to the
higher screening, monitoring, and enforcement costs of providing a small loan.
Moreover, most poor have few or no assets that can be secured by a bank as collateral
(Shu and Oney 2014; Hermes and Lensink 2007; Cull et al. 2011). Thus, a
considerable number (more than 80%) of the poor in Ethiopia obtain financial
services from informal lenders, who are able to enforce loan contracts but at a high
interest rate (Demirguc-Kunt et al. 2018; Wolday 2004). However, the government is
making efforts to curb the role of informal lenders through the support of
microfinance institutions (MFIs). In recognition of this, the Ethiopian government
1
issued the first microfinance legislation in 1996. Since then, the number of clients,
volume of the loan portfolio, and savings of MFIs have been increasing (Wolday
2004).
Objective
The main objective of this paper is to assess the role and performance of
Microfinance institutions (MFIs) operating in Ethiopia. Specifically, it ensures the
need and importance and also administration of MFIs. Further, to assess some of the
problems and prospects of MFIs and finally, put forward possible solutions to the
problems…….
In Ethiopia, microfinance was introduced in 1995 to reduce poverty, and since then,
Ethiopia's government has stimulated the expansion of modern financial services in
the country. Presently, around 31 licensed microfinance institutions are operating
throughout the country. In recent times, the government of Ethiopia developed
various developmental strategies such as a poverty reduction strategy paper which is
2
aimed at enhancing and supportable growth, among other documents, considered
microfinance as the best reference in achieving the intended development objectives
and limiting the risky trends in poverty problem and meeting the millennium
development goals. Normally, most of Ethiopia's microfinance institutions have
common goals: poverty reduction by providing loans and saving services by using the
group-approach lending system.
What Is Microfinance?
Microfinance has been defined as: - the means by which poor people convert small
sums of money into large lump sums (Rutherford 1999). Microfinance services may
be seen in terms of four main mechanisms:
Loans: which allow a lump sum to be enjoyed now in exchange for a series of
savings to be made in the future in the form of repayment installments.
Savings: which allow a lump sum to be enjoyed in future in exchange for a series of
savings made now.
Insurance: which allows a lump sum to be received at some unspecified future time
if needed in exchange for a series of savings made both now and in the future.
Insurance also involves income pooling in order to spread risk between individuals
3
on the assumption that not all those who contribute will necessarily receive the
equivalent of their contribution.
Pensions: which allow a lump sum to be enjoyed as a specified and generally distant
date in future in exchange for a series of savings made now. In the literature the
terms micro credit and microfinance are often used interchangeably, but it is
important to highlight the difference between them because both terms are often
confused. Sinha (1998) states "micro credit refers to small loans whereas
microfinance is appropriate where NGOs and MFIs supplement the loans with other
financial services (savings, insurance, etc.). Therefore micro credit is a component of
microfinance in that it involves providing credit to the poor, but microfinance also
involves additional non-credit financial services such as savings, insurance, pensions
and payment services (Okio credit,2005).
4
better life. In other ways, the major objectives of microfinance are to help in
generating income for low-income households and help in alleviating poverty.
Impacts on education
A service provided to the beneficiaries is believed in one way or another way to
promote the education status of children.
5
11. Digaf Micro Credit Provider S, Co.
12. Tesfa Micro Finance Institution 5. Co.
13. Somali Micro finance Institution S.Co.
14. Lideta Micro Finance Institution S.C.
15. Adaday Micro finance Institution S.Co.
16. Gambella Micro Financing S. Ce
17. Kendil micro finance institution
18. Kershi Microfinance Institution S.C
19. Sheger Microfinance Institution S.C
20.Grand microfinance institution
21. buusaa Gonofaa Micro & handing S.Co.
22. Meklit Micro Finance Institution S. Co.
23. Addis Credit and Saving Institution S. Co.
24. ESHET Micro Finanance institution s. Co.
25. Wasasa MicroFinance institutionS.Co.
26. Benishangul-Gumuz Micro Financing S.Co.
27. Metemamen Micro Financing Institution S. Co
28.Harbu Micro Financing Institution S. Co.
29. Harar Microfinance Institution S. Co.
30.Lefayda Credit And Saving S. Co.
31. Dynamic Microfinance S. Co.
32. Specialized Financial and Promotional Institution S. Co.
33. Nisir Microfinance Institution S. Co.
34. Peace Microfinance Institution S. Co
35. Afar Micro Finance Institution S. Co
36. Debo Micro Finance Institution S. Co
37. Yemisrach Micro Finance Institution S. Co
38.KAAFI Micro Finance Institution S.C
39. Kalub Microfinance Institution S.C
6
areas of the planet, which can be dangerously unprofitable without high rates
of process automation and mobile delivery.
● Lack of scalability - smaller microfinance systems often struggle to preserve
the profitability and performance in these markets, as FI's experience high
growth rates that result from getting the service delivery right. This results in
thwarting the growth of these organizations.
● Geographic Factors - Geographic factors make it difficult to communicate with
clients of far-flung areas which create a problem in growth and expansion of
the organization.
● Diverse business models - Supporting a very wide range of features and
lending activities is difficult and requires a considerable amount of cost and
effort.
● High Transaction Cost - High transaction cost is a big challenge for
microfinance institutions. The volume of transactions is very small, whereas
the fixed cost of those transactions is very high.
● Security challenges – The customers serviced by Microfinance instructions are
usually the ones having none or very limited official identification or able to
provide tangible security, this makes it extremely difficult for institutions to
offer any banking services.
● Limited budgets – limits their capability to fulfill their requirements and
support their growth targets.
● Lack of capital is the main obstacle to increasing outreach. Even though the
MFIs obtain funds from various sources such as donation from Ireland head,
Oxfam and getting loan from RUFIP (Rural Financial Intermediation
Program) under Development Bank of Ethiopia (DBE), it is not sufficient to
meet the demand of the large population.
● Almost all MFIs in Ethiopia face lack of good infrastructure
● Lack of experienced man power. In addition to this because most of the board
members of MFIs are not real investors, there is a carelessness to see and
control the operations seriously..
● The legal environment does not allow MFIs to sell assets which are taken as
collateral without declaring to the court.
● Low saving habits of the society.
7
Role of Microfinance Institutions
A main goal of many microfinance institutions is to provide sustainable microfinance
facilities to the poor to facilitate income generation and reduce poverty (Baumann,
2001). Access to credit can play a pivotal role in economic growth. Banks and lending
institutions provide the services that allow people to save and invest available assets
and resources, which further support and strengthens economic activity. Within
underdeveloped communities, the role of microfinance institutions provides the
credit access and financial services needed to develop income-earning businesses
(Jacquelyn Jeanty, Demand Media). MFIs fill a needed gap within the financial
services industry by offering small loans, or microloans, to people unable to access
conventional loan services. Microfinance institutions vary in size and function with
some organizations focusing entirely on microfinance, while others work as
extensions of large investment banks.
MFIs provide a reliable source of financial support and assistance compared to other
sources for financing. MFIs typically work alongside government organizations and
also have ties with larger global organizations. To meet unsatisfied demand for
financial services, a variety of microfinance institutions (MFIs) has emerged over
time in Ethiopia.
8
number of women clients. It is planned that the existing MFIs to deliver variety types
of services like saving, insurance and money transfer. New MFIs will be launched
that will respond to new market in the economy, these include creating institutions
specialized in providing financial service to Muslim community and women.
Moreover commercial banks will participate in giving on lend fund to MFIs and
research and development will be promoted by the MFIs and government
institutions.
CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis made in previous part of the paper it is found that the
performance of Ethiopian microfinance from outreach point of view that was
measured by number of active client, gross loan portfolio and percentage of women
participation, the growth pattern is encouraging but it increases at decreasing rate.
Especially since the concept of women empowerment is a critical role of
microfinance, the percentage of women participation in Ethiopian microfinance
sector is still not satisfactory which under 50%.
From sustainability angle, all institutions are not financial self- sufficient. During the
study period, Even though it is not continuously improved some MFIs could cover
their operational cost but they are not financially sustainable. This indicates that,
most of them are in difficulty of fund, that means the subsidy they get from donors
and the existed sources of capital are not sufficient. The result of the study
discovered that outreach and operational self- sufficiency are positively correlated.
The major challenges that the MFIs in the country face include minimum paid up
capital, efficient and competent team, and organizational structure of the institutions
and lack of infrastructure like electricity, management information system and
communication network.