Natural Resource Law Notes
Natural Resource Law Notes
Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................................................
What are Natural resources?.......................................................................................................................................
What is Natural Resource law?...................................................................................................................................
Natural Resources and the Environment........................................................................................................................
THE EXERCISE OF THE REGULATORY POWER.............................................................................................
Sovereignty and natural resources..................................................................................................................................
Permanent sovereignty over natural resources..............................................................................................................
Origin and Evolution of the Principle of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources
(PSNR)...........................................................................................................................................................................
Legal Status of the Principle........................................................................................................................................
Content of the Principle...............................................................................................................................................
Sustainable Development.................................................................................................................................................
The Founex Report.......................................................................................................................................................
The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (The Brundtland
Commission).................................................................................................................................................................
The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio Conference/ Rio +20).....................................
Legal status of sustainable development.....................................................................................................................
Uncertainties about the nature of sustainable development......................................................................................
Is it a legal principle; and if so, how is it to be interpreted, applied, and achieved by
governments or how to enforce it nationally and globally?...................................................................................
Is it a Principle of Customary International Law?................................................................................................
Fisheries............................................................................................................................................................................
The tragedy of commons..............................................................................................................................................
Zones of Fisheries entitled to Ghana...........................................................................................................................
Fisheries in Pre --1970s................................................................................................................................................
The legal framework of fisheries.....................................................................................................................................
The 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf..........................................................................................................
The 1958 Convention on the Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High
Seas................................................................................................................................................................................
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea....................................................................................
The legal status of the territorial sea, the air space above the territorial sea and its bed and
subsoil........................................................................................................................................................................
The maximum breadth of the territorial sea..........................................................................................................
What forms part of the internal waters of states?..................................................................................................
1
Emelda’ s Notes
2
Emelda’ s Notes
Introduction
What are Natural resources?
Natural resources are naturally occurring materials that are useful to man or could be useful
under conceivable technological, economic or social circumstances; They are supplies drawn
from the earth. Natural resources are material endowments of nature including the geology
and ecology of a particular place where the resources are located. E.g., oil, gas, forestry
products and water.
Simply, natural resources are materials or substances occurring in nature which can be
exploited for economic gain.
What is Natural Resource law?
Natural resource law involves the laws, the regulations and principles that govern the
exploitation, use and management of natural resource politics of natural resource regulation.
The laws here refer to the pieces of legislation, regulation and principles that govern the
exploitation, use and management of natural resources.
Natural resource law concerns who have the power to allocate rights of property over such
resources. The regulations found in natural resource law, are means by which natural
resources are allocated among competing uses and users. The power to formulate and enforce
regulation also determines who can determine what natural resources consisted of, as well as
how the resources are distributed. This power to “formulate and enforce regulation” of
natural resources, is referred to as regulatory power.
The Exercise of The Regulatory Power
The exercise of regulatory power over natural resources is done because of a variety of
reasons which are:
3
Emelda’ s Notes
The exercise of regulatory power depends on what is called the natural resource matrix,
which is shown below:
Renewable Non-renewable
Boundary Forestry Minerals
Transboundary Fishery Water
NB: Boundary resources are those that occur within a political period/boundary whilst trans
boundary resources extends from one boundary to another. Transboundary resources occur
across political boundaries.
By virtues of the fact that every political boundary has some kind of a sovereign, this system
of regulatory power begins to break down such that, where a particular resource is trans-
boundary, this is likely to generate some kind of conflict in terms of sharing that particular
resource. The regulatory policies of trans-boundary resources are often tackled at the
international level and not the national level; this could be bilateral or multilateral [involving
only two countries or more].
4
Emelda’ s Notes
Legally,
The meaning, scope and contours of sovereignty are extensively debated but have not been
subjected to a precise definition. ‘Traditionally, sovereignty has been identified as having
four main characteristics;’
First is the power of a state to exercise supreme authority over all persons and things within
its territory. This also includes the power to legislate on any issue that is within the state’s
jurisdiction. Secondly, sovereignty consists of the capability of a state to ‘regulate movement
across its borders.’ Inherent in sovereignty also is the recognition that the territorial integrity
of a state is inviolable and as such, the state has independence from interference from other
states.
Sovereignty therefore defines the boundaries that protect one state from the intervention of
others. It is generally also considered to be the legal identity of the state in international law,
an equality of status with all other states and the claim to be the sole official agent acting in
international relations on behalf of a society. Lastly, the state is ‘free to make its foreign
policy choices freely.’
Origin and Evolution of the Principle of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources
(PSNR)
One of the earliest references to the principle of permanent sovereignty over natural
resources was its introduction by Chile in the United Nations Commission on Human
Rights (UNCHR) in 1952. The principle would subsequently develop through numerous
resolutions and declarations.
One of the earliest formulations of the principle is found in the United Nations General
Assembly Resolution 626 (VII) of 21 December 1952. This Resolution recognised that
countries had a right to determine the use of their natural resources so as to ensure the
realisation of their economic development.
In 1958, through UN General Assembly Resolution 1314, the principle would be
recognised as a basic element of the right to self determination. Up until that point the
principle was only enshrined in resolutions concerned with private investment. This,
however, changed after 1958 when the principle became intertwined with issues of
human rights and self determination.
5
Emelda’ s Notes
This period coincided with decolonisation when developing countries also began to assert
their right over their natural resources as means of generating internal revenue. The newly
independent states were convinced that their independence would only be complete and
effective when they had attained political self-determination as well as effective control
over their natural resources; This mindset was attained because, prior to decolonisation,
private corporations from the industrialised world undertook investments in colonised
countries under very favourable conditions and a significant portion of the proceeds of
those investments found their way back to their home countries.
As control over mining industries in developing countries was particularly of great
concern to the underdeveloped countries, the developing countries were quite taken by
this principle as they saw it as a means through which they would gain control over their
natural resources and, consequently, pushed for its promotion in the UN General
Assembly.
The 1952 Resolution stressed the importance of promoting economic development to
achieve universal peace and that to achieve economic development, it was important that
countries have the right to freely use and exploit their natural resources.
Following the 1952 Resolution, discussion of the concept took place in several fora
(plural for forum) such as the 9th session of the UN General Assembly Debates in 1954.
In 1955, permanent sovereignty over natural resources was discussed in the Human
Rights Commission, the Third Committee of the UN General Assembly and the
Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC).
Six years after the first resolution, the UN General Assembly recognised the right to
permanent sovereignty over natural resources as a basic element of the right to self-
determination through the adoption of Resolution 1314 (XIII) on 12 December 1958.
The adoption of this Resolution gave birth to the Commission on Permanent
Sovereignty over Natural Resources which had the task of determining the
nature of the right, the manner in which the right should be exercised and what
measures should be taken into account according to international law.
The work of the Commission culminated in the adoption by the UN General Assembly in
1962 of Resolution 1803 (XVII) entitled ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural
Resources.’
The Resolution constituted the broadest and most explicit declaration from the
United Nations on the subject. In addition, it was the last resolution dealing
with the concept that was supported by a large majority of states from all
groups concerned, as it embodied a balance between the interests of capital
importing and capital exporting countries.
The Resolution as a whole was adopted with eighty-seven votes to two, with
twelve abstentions. Like its predecessors, it once again linked the concept to
economic independence and self determination.
Resolution 1803, among other things, stated that permanent sovereignty over natural
resources must be exercised in the interest of ‘national development and well-being of the
people of the State concerned; that exploration, development, disposition of resources, as
well as capital imported shall be governed by national legislation; and that any
6
Emelda’ s Notes
7
Emelda’ s Notes
21; that is, ‘the right of ‘all peoples’ to ‘freely dispose of their wealth and
natural resources.’
The 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, in Article 2, also
recognised the sovereignty of a state to exploit their natural resources ‘pursuant to their
own environmental and developmental policies.’ It places emphasis on the connection of
the principle with its original aim of development.
The principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources thus gained widespread
international recognition, allowing it to become an important part of international law on the
utilisation of domestic natural resources. However, the countries who did not want to get
involved became the non-aligned movement.
NB: The permanent sovereignty over natural resources debate was underscored by the
following;
1. Inferior terms of trade and sharp fluctuations in the prices of raw materials which
affected developing economies
2. Promotion and protection of foreign investment
3. Post colonial states had the question whether to start on a clean slate or not
4. Cold war rivalry made for opposing views on permanent sovereignty over natural
resources
Legal Status of the Principle
The trite/ unoriginal sources of international law are treaties, custom and general principles of
international law. The majority of the pronouncements on permanent sovereignty over natural
resources, with the exception of its inclusion in the Human Rights Conventions, are however,
contained not in universal conventions but in UN General Assembly resolutions. This has
resulted in controversy over the legal status of the principle; that is to say, whether it is a
binding principle of international law.
Generally, resolutions of the UN General Assembly are not legally binding
instruments although it has been argued that on occasion, they have created law. While the
UN General Assembly has no legislative powers, it is accepted that international
organisations are a significant forum in which to search for sources of law and the
acknowledgement of the contribution of the political organs to the development of
international law has been even longer in coming. The argument is that, in practice, many of
its resolutions have had effects in and on international law and as a result this broad
construction of the UN General Assembly’s powers is now established and accepted. In other
words, the UN General Assembly resolutions are a reliable source of state practice as a
measure of the acceptance of any principle into international law. According to Onejeme, the
UN General Assembly is ‘today the most universal political organisation and is therefore the
most important forum for measuring the degree of agreement among states in matters of
international relations.’
Outside the UN General Assembly resolutions, the main elements of permanent
sovereignty over natural resources, particularly the sovereign right to make use of natural
resources have found their way into conventions such as the 1966 Human Rights
8
Emelda’ s Notes
Conventions and the 1981 African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Unlike the
resolutions of the UN General Assembly, these treaties are legally binding on the parties to
the treaties. In addition, the principle has also been recognised in a series of arbitral awards.
Thus, from the above it is clear that the principle has achieved a ‘firm status in
international law and is now widely accepted and recognised as a principle of international
law.’
Content of the Principle
Central to the principle of permanent sovereignty is the right of all peoples and states to
freely dispose of their natural resources within the limits of their national jurisdiction. This
right is contained in every instrument on permanent sovereignty. In the exercise of this right,
states are among other things entitled to regulate the admission of foreign investors, the
methods of exploitation, conduct of the entities engaged in the exploitation and the
distribution of profits. Regarding the meaning of sovereignty in relation to the principle of
permanent sovereignty over natural resources, the term can be generally stated as ‘legal,
governmental control and management authority over natural resources.’ Most of the
resolutions on the right of permanent sovereignty over natural resources state that the use of
natural resources must be undertaken for the well-being of the people.
Sustainable Development
Development broadly refers to desirable social and economic progress. Sustainable
development is broadly defined as: ‘development which meets the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’.
9
Emelda’ s Notes
10
Emelda’ s Notes
11
Emelda’ s Notes
recognized sources of international law. A proposition will have legal scope when it is
formulated ‘with the intention to modify . . . elements of the existing legal order,
or . . . that its implementation effectively achieves this result’. From this standpoint,
sustainable development as a proposition is clearly legal in scope. The Rio
Declaration (the structuring reference for sustainable development), is formulated in
terms of rights and obligations and uses prescriptive language throughout. This also
applies to a large proportion of binding and non-binding documents which include a
proposition relating to sustainable development. Such propositions are mostly
formulated with the intention of producing legal effects within the international legal
order.
Its central pillar is international environmental law. Sustainable development has
elements of a process, an objective and a principle. Judge Weeramantry said in
Gabcikovo Nagymaros Dam’s case that; Sustainable development serves as a
mediating principle which is fundamental in reconciling potentially conflicting
principles of the right to development and right to environmental protection. It also
aids judicial decision and provides the scope for progressive legal development. The
law necessarily contains the principle of reconciliation. That principle (of
reconciliation), is the principle of sustainable development.
Is it a Principle of Customary International Law?
Sustainable development, as an objective, already constitutes a principle of customary
law, even if this principle is a very general one, with a high degree of abstraction and
which requires case by case substantiation.
a. Due to its widespread adoption in legal documents, has sustainable
development attained the status of a principle of customary international law
as recognised in Article 38 of the International Court of Justice treaty1?
Article 38 of the International Court of Justice treaty ‘describes the law to be
applied by the International Court of Justice when deciding cases within its
jurisdiction’. It is generally considered to be the most authoritative enumeration of the
sources of International Law. Judge Weeramantry said in Gabcikovo Nagymaros
Dam’s case that; Sustainable development serves as a mediating principle which is
fundamental in reconciling potentially conflicting principles of the right to
development and right to environmental protection. It also aids judicial decision and
provides the scope for progressive legal development. The law necessarily contains
the principle of reconciliation. That principle (of reconciliation), is the principle of
sustainable development. And according to Article 38 (1)(d) of the International
Court of Justice treaty, ‘the general principles of law recognized by civilized
1
"1. The Court, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted
to it, shall apply:
a. international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the
contesting states;
b. international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
c. the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;
d. subject to the provisions of Article 59, [ i.e, that only the parties bound by the decision in any particular case,]
judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary
means for the determination of rules of law
12
Emelda’ s Notes
nations’ can be sources of law. Since the principle of sustainable development is seen
as a principle of reconciliation which is recognized by law, then it can be said that S.D
has attained the status of a principle of customary international law. He (the judge),
argued that current international practice supports the concept. He cited several
multilateral treaties; declarations from international conferences; the foundation
documents of international organizations; regional declarations and planning
documents, and argued that there is a wide and general acceptance of the concept of
sustainable development by the global community. He concluded that, “the principle
of sustainable development is a part of modern international law not only by reason of
its inescapable logical necessity but also of its wide and general acceptance by the
global community”.
b. Sustainable development is and cannot be a principle of customary
international law because it lacks by nature a certain degree of the normative
which prevents it from merging into a binding international law:
Lowe: sustainable development lacks a 'fundamental norm-creating character,' and as
such, it cannot constrain action. Since it lacks normativity, it is incapable of evolving
into a customary rule that is binding on States and other actors. Lowe reaches this
conclusion because treaty and other provisions relating to sustainable development
lack fundamentally norm-creating character and cannot, as such, form the basis of a
general rule of international law. In his view only a formula such as ‘states must
develop sustainably’ would have this character.
c. Birnie and Boyle: normative uncertainty coupled with the absence of
justiciable standards for review suggest that there is no international legal
obligation that development must be sustainable and decisions on what is
sustainable depends on individual governments?
Is there a general obligation to develop sustainably? The answer is no. The flexible
formulations relating to sustainable development mean that evidence of opinio juris
and state practice of an obligation to develop sustainably is impossible to ascertain .
Sustainable development is a convenient if imprecise label for a general policy goal
which may be unilaterally or multilaterally adopted by States. That general policy
goal is a body of international legal principles, new and existing, that are adapted to
new political values and principles that emerge specifically in the context of
sustainable development. However, sustainable development principles and practices
can provide guidance to both domestic and international law, helping to shape future
directions for societies. It can also provide much needed balance in economic
globalization, strengthening the social and environmental aspects of these processes.
13
Emelda’ s Notes
Fisheries
Oceans cover 70% of the earth’s surface. Dangers to the oceans range from land-based
sources and from the oceans and seas themselves. Land-based sources like:
1. Temperature rises and climate change which degrade marine ecosystems
2. The depletion of the biodiversity of marine species through fishing. Some depleting
marine species not even directly exploited but caught as incidental catches.
3. Inadequate management of marine species particularly fish supplies
4. The rise in fish catches which is a major threat to sustainable use of fisheries.
5. Destructive fishing methods like, bottom trawling; which can damage coastal reefs
and the use of nylon drift nets which float when lost at sea and end up trapping a
variety of species. Long line fishing attracts and snares sea birds in large numbers.
14
Emelda’ s Notes
For many developing countries, they are hampered by inability to effectively monitor their
jurisdiction and the lack of scientific research vessels leads to the difficulty of arresting
offenders at sea, as this requires naval vehicles with up-to-date satellite equipment etc.
(North Sea Continental Shelf case) – Germany v Denmark and the Netherlands (1969);
The court delivered its judgement, by 11 votes to 6, in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases.
The dispute which was submitted to the court on the 2oth February 1967, related to the
delimitation of the continental shelf between the Federal Republic of Germany and Denmark
on the one hand and between the Federal republic of Germany and the Netherlands on the
other hand. The parties to the case asked the court to state the principles and rules of
international law applicable and undertook thereafter to carry out the delimitation on that
basis.
The court found that the boundary lines in question were to be drawn by agreement between
the parties and in accordance twith equitable principles and it indicated certain factors to be
15
Emelda’ s Notes
taken into consideration for the purpose. It was up to the parties to negotiate on the basis of
such principles, which they agreed to do.
The 1958 Convention on the Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of
the High Seas
The Convention on the Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas is
an agreement that was designed to solve, through international cooperation, the problem
involved in the conservation of living resources of the High Seas, considering that because of
the development of modern technology some of these resources were in danger of being over-
exploited. The convention opened for signature on the 29th April 1958 and entered into force
on 20 March 1966.
Vessels of all states have access to fish stocks on the high seas according to Article 1(1) of the
1958 Convention on the Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas ;
1) All states have the right for their nationals to engage in fishing in the high seas, subject
(a); to their treaty obligations, (b) to the interests and rights of coastal states as provided
for in this convention and (c) to the provisions contained in the following articles
concerning conservation of the living resources of the high seas.
The Convention also recognized the special interest of coastal states in the conservation of
high seas fisheries adjacent to its territorial sea— Article 1(2);
2) All states have the duty to adopt, or to cooperate with other Sates in adopting, such
measures for their respective nationals as be necessary for the conservation of the living
resources of the high seas.
It however failed to establish a balance of interests widely acceptable to coastal fishing states
and many major fishing nations failed to ratify it.
16
Emelda’ s Notes
Article 18;
Passage means navigation through the territorial sea without entering internal waters or
navigation to port facilities inside/outside internal waters; such Passage shall be continuous
and expeditious. However, passage includes stopping and anchoring, but only in so far as the
same are incidental to ordinary navigation or are rendered necessary by force majeure or
distress or for the purpose of rendering assistance to persons, ships or aircraft in danger or
distress.
Article 19;
Passage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the
coastal State.
Article 20;
Submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface of territorial
seas and to show their flag.
17
Emelda’ s Notes
In taking such measures the coastal State shall take into consideration the effects on species
associated with or dependent upon the harvested species with a view of maintaining or
restoring populations of such associated or dependent species above levels at which their
reproduction may become seriously threatened.
Article 62;
The coastal State shall promote the objective of optimum utilization of the living resources in
the exclusive economic zone. Where the coastal State does not have the capacity to harvest
the entire allowable catch, it shall, through agreements or other arrangements give other
States access to the surplus of the allowable catch.
Article 77
The coastal State exercises over the continental shelf sovereign rights for the purpose of
exploring it and exploiting its natural resources.
18
Emelda’ s Notes
Shared stocks in the United Nations Convention on the law of the Sea
Same stock within the exclusive economic zones of two or more coastal states
Where the same stock or stocks of associated species occur within the exclusive economic
zones of two or more coastal States, these States shall seek, either directly or through
19
Emelda’ s Notes
20
Emelda’ s Notes
appropriate regulatory measures for fishing in all waters landward of the outer limits of its
exclusive economic zone.
The State of origin may, after consultations with the other States, establish total allowable
catches for stocks originating in its rivers.
Fisheries for anadromous stocks shall be conducted only in waters landward of the outer
limits of exclusive economic zones, except in cases where this provision would result in
economic dislocation for a State other than the State of origin. In cases where anadromous
stocks migrate into or through the waters landward of the outer limits of the exclusive
economic zone of a State other than the State of origin, such State shall cooperate with the
State of origin with regard to the conservation and management of such stocks -- Article 66.
A coastal State in whose waters catadromous species spend the greater part of their life cycle
shall have responsibility for the management of these species and shall ensure the ingress and
egress of migrating fish. Harvesting of catadromous species shall be conducted only in waters
landward of the outer limits of exclusive economic zones. In cases where catadromous fish
migrate through the exclusive economic zone of another State, whether as juvenile or
maturing fish, the management, including harvesting, of such fish shall be regulated by
agreement between both states.
Land-locked and geographically disadvantaged states (Rights) -- UNCLOS
Land-locked States shall have the right to participate, on an equitable basis, in the
exploitation of an appropriate part of the surplus of the living resources of the exclusive
economic zones of coastal States of the same subregion or region -- Article 69
Geographically disadvantaged States shall have the right to participate, on an equitable basis,
in the exploitation of an appropriate part of the surplus of the living resources of the exclusive
economic zones of coastal States of the same subregion or region, taking into account the
relevant economic and geographical circumstances of all the States concerned -- Article 70
Penalties involved
The coastal State may, in the exercise of its rights take such measures, including boarding,
inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings, as may be necessary to ensure compliance with its
laws and regulations. Arrested vessels and their crews shall be promptly released upon the
posting of reasonable bond or other security. Coastal State penalties for violations of fisheries
laws and regulations in the exclusive economic zone may not include imprisonment, in the
absence of agreements to the contrary by the States concerned, or any other form of corporal
punishment.
In cases of arrest or detention of foreign vessels the coastal State shall promptly notify the
flag State, through appropriate channels, of the action taken and of any penalties
subsequently imposed -- Article 73
Disputes
The coastal states management duties are not subject to compulsory settlement of disputes --
Article 97(1)
21
Emelda’ s Notes
No disputes concerning the exercise by a coastal state of its sovereign rights or jurisdiction
within its Exclusive Economic Zone is subject to the compulsory procedures entailing
binding decisions unless it is alleged that--
a. the state has violated the freedoms set out in the convention
b. that a state exercising any such freedom has violated the convention or coastal laws
adopted in conformity with the convention
c. that the coastal state has in breach of UNCLOS exercised its jurisdiction in a manner
inconsistent with certain internationally adopted rules and standards on marine pollution.
22
Emelda’ s Notes
23
Emelda’ s Notes
24
Emelda’ s Notes
Penalty: fishing during a closed season is a fine of not less than $500,000 and not more than
$2 million in respect of a local industrial or semi-industrial fishing vessel or a foreign fishing
vessel, or one hundred penalty units and not more than five hundred penalty units in any
other case.
Driftnet fishing activities
A fishing vessel shall not be used for or to assist in any driftnet fishing activities in the
fishery waters -- Section 87. A person shall not engage or assist in a driftnet fishing activity.
Penalty: a fine of not less than twenty-five penalty units and not more than five hundred
penalty units in respect of an artisanal fishing activity, or $250,000 and not more than $2
million in respect of any other fishing vessel, and in addition, the catch, fishing gear or any
other apparatus or any combination of them used in the commission of the offence may be
forfeited.
Other prohibited fishing methods
Other prohibited fishing methods include; use of explosive, a poison or any other noxious
substance for fishing -- Section 87
It is an offence to carry on board or possess without lawful authority at a place within a two-
kilometre radius from a shore or river, an explosive, a poison or any other noxious substance
in circumstances indicating an intention to use in fishing. A person who lands, sells, receives
or possesses fish taken by prohibited means or who knows or has reasonable cause to believe
that the fish has been so taken, commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a
fine of not less than $250,000 no more than $ 2 Million for semi-industrial fishing vessel or a
foreign fishing vessel, or twenty-five penalty units and not more than five hundred penalty
units in any other case and forfeiture.
The Act also protects gravid and juvenile lobsters, other crustacean and juvenile fish.
Knowingly taking any is an offence and if caught accidentally must immediately be returned
the sea.
Penalty: fine of $50,000 and not more than $1 million or two hundred and fifty penalty units
(respectively) and forfeiture.
Fishing for marine mammals is also prohibited -- section 90.
25
Emelda’ s Notes
Geological Perspectives
What are Minerals under Ghanaian Law?
Mineral is any substance in solid or liquid form that occurs naturally in or on the earth, or on
or under the seabed formed by or subject to geological process including industrial minerals
but does not include water or petroleum as defined under the Petroleum (Exploration and
Production) Act, Act 919.
System rocks
Industrial Minerals include basalt, clay, granite, gravels, gypsum, laterite, limestone, marble,
sand, sandstone, salt and other minerals as the Minister may declare and publish in a Gazette.
Ghana's economic geology is centered on Proterozoic rock types, notably the Birimian and
Tarkwian systems.
26
Emelda’ s Notes
Features of Minerals
Gold in its pure state:
Has a melting point of 1945 degrees Fahrenheit (1063 degrees Celsius).
When alloyed (chemically combined) with other base metals the melting temperature
changes.
o An 18K yellow gold has a melting point of 1675 degrees Fahrenheit and 14K
yellow gold has a melting point of about 1550 degrees Fahrenheit.
In terms of gravity, it is of a specific and definite gravity of 19.33. It is relatively
heavy compared to most metals, such as silver (SG 10.7) or iron (SG 7.8). A notable
exception is platinum (SG 21.4).
Is more malleable than any other metal and can be hammered into foil and become so
thin that it is almost transparent.
It is deep yellow in color and its great reflective properties help keep its brightness
and color from fading.
Will not rust, tarnish or corrode.
It is softer than most other metals.
On the MOHS scale of hardness (which is a measure of a gemstone or mineral’s
resistance to scratching), gold has a hardness value of 2 to 2.5. Diamond has a value
of 10. Pure gold may easily be scratched.
Gold becomes harder when alloyed with other base metals.
Is relatively scarce and therefore expensive.
It is estimated that only 125,000 tons of gold have been mined the world over since
the beginning of time.
Is able to bond with other base metals. This property gives rise to the many different
colors available in modern gold alloys.
27
Emelda’ s Notes
Since ancient times the purity and fineness of gold has been defined by the term karat, which
is 1/24 part of pure gold by weight. Pure gold is equivalent to 24K. Gold purity may also be
described by its fineness, which is the amount of pure gold in parts per 1000 karat.
Weighing of Minerals
The weight of a piece of gold is a factor that helps to determine its value. It is important
because it is an indication of the amount of fine gold in an item of jewelry. Grams (g) and
pennyweights (dwt) are the units of weight most commonly used in weighing gold.
Gold and silver are almost always weighted in the troy system of weights where one-pound
equals twelve ounces and twenty pennyweights equals’ one ounce.
28
Emelda’ s Notes
• It consolidated the enactment on small scale gold mining and other minerals to reflect
international best practices in the industry,
• It sought to re-position Ghana as a major producer.
• It sought to ensure an internationally competitive framework that ensures a stable and
equitable tax regime.
• It took cognizance of environmental protection as well as community interests in
order to provide the basis for the development and sustainability of mining in the
country.
Objectives of the Act
The main objectives of the law are to provide for:
• ownership of all minerals in the State
• a framework for granting of various mineral rights, indicating the rights and
obligations of the holder
• a fiscal regime stating the incentives available to the investor and government
• procedures for settlement of mining investment disputes
Ownership, Rights and Interests in Minerals
• By section 1 of the Minerals and Mining Act , all minerals in their natural state are
vested in the President in trust for the people of Ghana (Article 257 (6) of the 1992
constitution). To this end where land is secured for the utilization or development of a
mineral resource the state can compulsory acquire same under the relevant laws.
• The Minister may also reserve land not being the subject of a mineral right for mining
through an E.I. by virtue of Section 4.
• By section 5, Exclusive mining rights are negotiated, granted, revoked, suspended or
renewed by the Minister of Mines on behalf of the President upon the
recommendation of the Minerals Commission. Once the License is granted, the
Minister determines the land area of the license by virtue of section 5 (2). Such a
License or grant or any contract or undertaking involving exploitation of minerals
shall be subject to ratification by Parliament vide Section 5 (4), although Parliament
may exempt such particular class of contracts or undertaking by virtue section 5 (5).
The minister by section 5 (3) can only refuse to grant a License upon written reasons.
• Section 8 provides the scale by way of cadastral system through which the area (for
mining) may be determined. Geometric sections determined in the cadastral system
are which is normally in blocks – A cadastre is a parcel based and up-to-date land
information system containing a record of interests in land.
•
Mineral rights
• By section 9 of the Act, all mineral activities require a mineral right and therefore
irrespective of the ownership of land under which the mineral is, no person can
conduct mineral operations unless the person has been given the right to do so.
29
Emelda’ s Notes
• Any application for a mineral right shall be submitted to the Minerals Commission
and if there are no delays the Commission will submit its recommendations to the
Minister and the Minister must within 60 days make a recommendation. If the
decision is favorable the applicant must communicate his acceptance to the Minister
who will grant the right. See section 11 to 13.
• No right can be assigned or transferred or mortgaged without the consent of the
Minister – Section 14
• Right to acquire further rights and right of first option of a holder is guaranteed under
section 15
• Requirements for permits for environmental and forestry protection as well as water
rights is guaranteed under section 17 and 18.
Water right
S 17; Subject to obtaining the requisite approvals or licences under the Water Resources
Commission Act 1996 (Act 552), a holder of a mineral right may, for purposes of or ancillary to
the mineral operations, obtain, divert, impound, convey and use water from a river, stream,
underground reservoir or watercourse within the land the subject of the mineral right.
30
Emelda’ s Notes
According to section 33 (1), a holder of a reconnaissance licence may, not later than three
months before the expiration of the initial term of the licence, apply to the Minister for an
extension of the term of the reconnaissance licence in respect of all or part of the
reconnaissance area. The license may be extended only once and not for a period not more
than 12 months.
Prospecting license
Section 34
This is the intentionally searching and knowing the extent and economic value of mineral
deposits which may be granted over an area normally of no more than 150 kilometers or not
more than 750 contiguous blocks for up to three years, with the possibility of further renewals
of up to two years each, though there are relinquishment obligations at each renewal. The
holder of a prospecting license is entitled to a mining lease upon the presentation of an
acceptable feasibility study which incorporates environmental impact studies.
A mining lease
A holder of a reconnaissance licence or a prospecting licence may, prior to the expiration of
the licence, apply in the prescribed form for one or more mining leases in respect of all or any
of the minerals the subject of the licence. It may be granted for a period of 30 years and may
be renewed for a further 30-year period, for an area normally not exceeding 50 sq. kilometers.
See section 39.
Fiscal regime
Fiscal provisions relate to government or public money, especially taxes. The main Fiscal
provisions in the Act are:
• Payment of annual ground rent to the owner of the land -- section 23
• Payment of annual ground rent in the case of stool lands -- section 23 (2)
• Payment of mineral right fees to the Commission -- Section 24
• A royalty rate which varies from a minimum of 3% to a maximum of 6%, the exact
rate being determined by a profitability measure -- section 25
• The Ghana Government acquires 10% free equity in any mining venture and has the
option to acquire an additional 20% participatory interest at fair price.
• The holder is required to pay income tax at the rate of 35% and an additional Profit
tax of 25% as provided under the Additional Profit tax Law 1985 (PNDCL 122).
• A mining lease holder is also required to pay annual rental charges as prescribed by
Regulations
• accelerated depreciation of capital, namely, of 75% in the year of investment and 50%
in subsequent years on a declining balance basis, with a loss - carry forward
provision.
31
Emelda’ s Notes
Dispute Resolution:
Section 27
32
Emelda’ s Notes
Section 82 (1)
Despite a law to the contrary, a person shall not engage in or undertake a small-scale mining
operation for a mineral unless there is in existence in respect of the mining operation a licence
granted by the Minister for Mines or by an officer authorized by the Minister.
• It is only for Ghanaians and shall be issued for a period of 5 years and renewable. S85
• Such license is transferable to another Ghanaian with the consent of the Minister by
s88.
• It may be revoked however if where there is non-compliance of a term of the license
or the licensee is convicted of an offence involving smuggling.s87
33