Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Engineer Comments To P1 To P6 LHS Design

    Uploaded by

    Chiranjaya Hulangamuwa
    The letter summarizes comments on structural design drawings and calculations submitted for review for the Central Expressway Project 03 viaduct between chainages 7+149.039 to 7+658.844. Key points include: [1] The design calculation report needs to include the computer model used; [2] Concrete grades and reinforcement details need clarification and improvement; [3] Comments on remaining submissions will be provided later. The project director is requested to resubmit the designs addressing the comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Engineer Comments To P1 To P6 LHS Design

    Uploaded by

    Chiranjaya Hulangamuwa
    43 views2 pages
    The letter summarizes comments on structural design drawings and calculations submitted for review for the Central Expressway Project 03 viaduct between chainages 7+149.039 to 7+658.844. Key points include: [1] The design calculation report needs to include the computer model used; [2] Concrete grades and reinforcement details need clarification and improvement; [3] Comments on remaining submissions will be provided later. The project director is requested to resubmit the designs addressing the comments.

    Original Title

    Engineer Comments to P1 to P6 LHS Design

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The letter summarizes comments on structural design drawings and calculations submitted for review for the Central Expressway Project 03 viaduct between chainages 7+149.039 to 7+658.844. Key points include: [1] The design calculation report needs to include the computer model used; [2] Concrete grades and reinforcement details need clarification and improvement; [3] Comments on remaining submissions will be provided later. The project director is requested to resubmit the designs addressing the comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    43 views2 pages

    Engineer Comments To P1 To P6 LHS Design

    Uploaded by

    Chiranjaya Hulangamuwa
    The letter summarizes comments on structural design drawings and calculations submitted for review for the Central Expressway Project 03 viaduct between chainages 7+149.039 to 7+658.844. Key points include: [1] The design calculation report needs to include the computer model used; [2] Concrete grades and reinforcement details need clarification and improvement; [3] Comments on remaining submissions will be provided later. The project director is requested to resubmit the designs addressing the comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    My No.

    RDA/ES/B/G-109
    Bridge Designs Office,
    31.03.2022
    Proj ect Director (CEP3)

    Central Expressway project - 03


    RDA

    RE: REVIEW OF STRUCTURAL DESIGNS _ PACKAGE lJ OF CEP -03

    SUBJECT: SUBMISSION OF STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS OF VIADUCT (CH. Z + TSO


    KM)

    This refers to your letter no. RDA/CEP3/PACK 1J dated 07-03-2022 and the subsequent site
    visit had by Design review team with CEP 3 Engineers and Contractors' staff on 10.03.2022
    regarding the above subject.

    As per the submitted set of design repofis and drawings, our noted comments on the following
    documents are listed as below.

    1. Structural Design Calculation of Pier P1 to P6 LHS of the Viaduct at


    Ch. 7 +149.039 to Ch. 7+658.844

    2. Structural Drawings - Foundation & Substructure


    Viaduct - 07+150 km
    Ch- 7 +149.039 to Ch. 7+658.844

    1) Design Reports

    1.1 We are not in a position to check the design calculation report since it is compiled
    based on the finite element model output values. Hence it is needed to submit
    computer model along with the calculation reporl.

    2) Drawings

    2.1 No any objections on physical locations of Piers.


    2.2 Concrete grades of each structural element shall be separately indicated under
    concrete notes.
    2.3 Grade of the pocket filling concrete shall be same as the concrete grade of
    foundation concrete
    2.4 Reinforcement details shall be indicated as per typical bar notations in order to
    identify bar sizes and spacing clearly instead providing bar marks only.
    2.5 Reinforcement details of columns in Drg. No.CEP-3/PK-J/ 07+150 NDIPI-
    P6IL/SB/RF/001/R00 sheet no. 01 of 01 need to be improved since it is too
    complicated with several bar marks.

    \,-
    2.6There are two types (Type T and Type B) mentioned in bar schedule which are not
    clear.

    Hence, you are hereby requested to resubmit the design reports and drawing, ut.. attending
    the above comments.

    Further, please note that comments to the remaining submissions will be forwarded to you in
    due course. "

    Director &16*^9 S ervices)


    RDA

    Cc. ADG (Projects) - f.i.pl.


    Addl. Director (Bridge Designs) - f.i.pl

    You might also like