Advanced Stress Analysis
Advanced Stress Analysis
2018
This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY).
Contact: [email protected]
FALL 2018 SYLLABUS Page 1/1
Frame
Beam
Beam-Column
Curved Beam
Beam-Tie (or Tension Beam)
Ring
Plate (Out-of-Plane) Panel (In-Plane)
EA P0 GKt T0
x,u x,
L L
y,v y,v
T0 L T0 SL
end angle of twist: L
P0 L
end elongation: u L or
EA GKt 4G2t
normal stress distribution shear stress distributions:
P x T x r T x
x x x x, r & x, s
A J 2t s
normal force vs axial-load intensity relation: twisting torque vs torque intensity relation:
dPx x dT x
s x mt x
dx dx
normal force vs axial displacement relation: twisting torque vs angle of twist relation:
du x d x
Px x EA T x GKt
dx dx
axial rigidity: EA torsional rigidity: GKt
mt(x) GKt
s(x) EA
Px Px+dPx T T+dT
x,u
x,u
ds d R
dx
dx
y,v y,v
d 2u x d 2 x
D.E.: EA s x D.E.: GKt mt x
dx 2 dx 2
x 0 : u 0 0
x 0 : 0 0
B.C.: @ B.C.: @
x L : Px L P0
x L : T L T0
B0
V0
EIz EI& GKt
x,u x,
T0
L
L
y,v y,v
V0 L3 T0 L T0 SL
end deflection: v L end angle of twist: L or
3EI z GKt 4G2t
bending normal/shear stress distributions: warping normal/shear stress distributions:
M x y V x Qz y B x s T x Q s
x x, y z ; xy x, y y x, s ; x, s
Iz I zb y I I t s
bending moment/shear force vs load intensity bimoment/twisting torque vs torque intensity
d 2M z x dV x d 2 B x dT x
relations: 2
y p x relations: mt x
dx dx dx 2 dx
bending moment/shear force vs deflection Bimoment/twisting torque vs angle of twist:
d 2v x d 3v x d 2 x d x d 3 x
M z x EI z ; V y x EI z B x EI ; T x GK t EI
dx 2 dx3 dx 2 dx dx3
bending (or flexural) rigidity: EI z warping rigidity: EI & torsional rigidity: GKt
p(x)
Vy Vy dVy EIz
x,u
Mz Mz dMz
dx
y,v
d 4v x d 4 x d 2 x
D.E.: EI z p x D.E.: EI GKt mt x
dx 4 dx 4 dx 2
x 0 : v 0 0
& 0 0 x 0 : 0 0
B.C.: @ B.C.: @
x L : M z L 0 & Vy L V0
x L : T L T0
Questions: 1. How many types of structural members used in this modern high-speed railway station?
2. In addition to Structural Engineering (or Stress Analysis), what other disciplines are needed for
the design, manufacture, test and operation of this modern technological product?
Ancient Italian marble column in storage: top, with Galileo’s illustration of two failure modes.
modified support; bottom, as originally supported.
Mid-air explosion of space shuttle Challenger during O-ring designs for Titan III and space shuttle
launching in a chilly winter morning (January 28, 1986). It booster rockets.
was caused by failure of an O-ring, which was designed to seal
the shuttle booster rocket (SBR’s).
New joint design and other changes due to the Challenger accident.
(a) Sagging
(b) Hogging
William Fairbairn’s illustration of ship loadings caused by wave motion; top, sagging as supported on two wave
crests; bottom, hogging as supported on a single wave crest, 1865.
The Tacoma Narrows Bridge (Tacoma, Washington, USA) in its fatal torsional oscillation mode and collapsing,
1940. The resonant twisting motion was caused by fluid-induced vibration due to aerodynamic Kármán
vortices.
The Bronx-Whitestone Bridge, as built in 1939 (left) and as modified in 1946, employing the original stiffening
girders as the bottom chord of an unattractive stiffening truss (right).
Architectural rendition of suspended walkways in the Kansas City Hyatt Regency Hotel.
Connection detail of upper suspended walkway in the Kansas City Failed walkway connection.
Hyatt Regency Hotel, which failed in 1981; left, as built; right, as
originally designed.
or A
MZ 0 B
MZ 0 C
M Z 0 where points A, B, and C are not collinear. (1.4b)
FIGURE 1.5 (a) Prismatic bar in uniaxial tension; (b) stress distribution across the cross-section.
P
1-D normal stress: x (1.10)
A
FIGURE 1.1 Method of sections & free-body diagram: (a) sectioning of a loaded body;
(b) free body with external and internal forces; (c) enlarged area A with components of the force F .
F dF F dF F dF
x lim x x xy lim y y xz lim z z (1.5)
A0 A dA A0 A dA A0 A dA
FIGURE 1.2 Element subjected to three-dimensional stress. All stresses have positive sense.
xx xy xz x xy xz
stress tensor: ij τ yx yy yz yx y yz ~ 2nd-rank tensor (1.6)
zx zy zz zx zy z
Note: The notations: ij vs ij (or similarly, τ vs σ ) are used interchangeably in this course.
Sign convention of stress component: For a stress component ij , the subscript i represents the positive
surface normal whereas subscript j points to the positive force direction.
Tensorial-Indicial Notation (see Sec 1.17)
Range convention: When a lowercase alphabetic subscript is unrepeated, it takes on all values indicated.
(Einstein) summation convention: Unless stated otherwise, when a lowercase alphabetic/Greek subscript
appears twice in the same term, then summation over the range (e.g., from 1 to 3 for a 3-D problem) of that
subscript is implied, making the use of the summation symbol unnecessary.
Note: It should be apparent that ii jj kk , and therefore the repeated subscripts or indices are
sometimes called dummy subscripts. Unspecified indices that are not repeated are called free or distinct
subscripts.
Special Stress States
a. Triaxial Stress. An element subjected to only stresses and acting in mutually perpendicular directions is
said to be in a state of triaxial stress. Such a state of stress can be written as:
x xy xz 1 0 0
ij τ yx y yz 0 2 0 (a)
zx zy z 0 0 3
Note: The absence of shear stresses indicates that the preceding stresses are the principal stresses for the
element.
a1. Spherical or Dilatational or Hydrostatic Stress. A special triaxial-stress case occurring if all principal
stresses are equal: 1 2 3 . Equal triaxial tension/compression is also called hydrostatic
tension/compression. An example of hydrostatic compression is found in liquid under hydrostatic
pressure:
x xy xz p 0 0
ij τ yx y yz 0 p 0 where p h gh (b)
zx zy z 0 0 p
FIGURE 1.3 Examples of special stress states: (a) Element in plane stress;
(b) two-dimensional presentation of plane stress; (c) element in pure shear.
b. Two-Dimensional or Plane Stress. Only the x and y faces of the element are subjected to stress, and all
the stresses act parallel to the x and y axes, as shown in Fig 1.3a & b.
x xy xz x xy 0
x xy
ij τ yx y yz xy y 0 or simply, ij τ (1.8)
zx zy z 0 0 0 xy y
xy yx
Note: The relation: ij ji or yz zy , i.e., the stress tensor is symmetric will be proven in Sec 1.8.
zx xz
b1. Biaxial Stress. A special plane-stress case occurs if only two normal stresses are present:
x xy 1 0
ij τ (c)
xy y 0 2
Note: The absence of shear stresses implies the principal stresses of a biaxial-stress state are:
1 2 0 .
c. 3-D Pure Shear. The element is subjected to shear stresses only:
x xy xz 0 1 2
ij τ yx y yz 1 0 3 (d)
zx zy z 2 3 0
c1. (2-D) Pure Shear. The element is subjected to plane shear stresses only (Fig. 1.3c):
x xy xz 0 0 0
0 0
ij τ yx y yz 0 0 0 or simply, ij τ
0 0
(e)
zx zy z 0 0 0
Note: A typical 2-D pure shear occurs over the cross
sections and on longitudinal planes of a circular
shaft subjected to torsion.
d. Uniaxial Stress. When normal stresses act along one
direction only, the one-dimensional state of stress is
referred to as a uniaxial (or simple) tension/compression:
x xy xz 0 0 0
ij τ yx y yz 0 0 0 (f)
zx zy z 0 0 0
a
Detailed derivations and limitations of the use of these formulae are described in Secs 1.6, 5.7, 6.2 & 13.13.
ME 54100: ADVANCED STRESS ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 1 – ANALYSIS OF STRESS
ME I4200: APPLIED STRESS ANALYSIS
SECTION 1.7 STRESSES ON INCLINED SECTIONS PAGE 1/2
FIGURE 1.6 (a) Prismatic bar in tension; (b, c) side views of a part cut from the bar.
P cos
x A x cos 2
x
axially loaded member: (1.11)
P sin sin cos
x y Ax
x
P
max x when 0 or 180
A
(1.12)
1 P when 45 or 135
max 2
x
2A
xy x sin cos 75 sin 35 cos 35 35.24 MPa
The normal and shearing stresses acting on the adjoining y′ face are 24.67 MPa and 35.24 MPa, respectively, as
calculated from Eq (1.11) by substituting the angle 90 125 . The values of x , xy are the same on
opposite sides of the element. On the basis of the established sign convention for stress, the required sketch is
shown in Fig 1.8.
FIGURE 1.7 Variation of stress at a point with the inclined section in the bar shown in Fig 1.6a.
(a) 3-D stress components at a material point (b) X-Y planar view with body force components
within a differential element
FIGURE 1.9 Differential element with stresses and body forces in Cartesian coordinates.
Differential Scheme
With respect to the center of the differential element, taking moment balance about the z-direction:
xy
d xy dx xy dy xy dz
x y z
Apply the chair rule for partial differentiation, we get:
d yx dx yx dy yx dz
yx x y z
xy dx dx dy dy
xy dx dydz xy dydz yx yx dy dxdz yx dxdz 0
x 2 2 y 2 2
1 1 xy 1 1 1 yx 1
or xy dxdydz dx dydz xy dxdydz yx dxdydz dx dy dz yx dxdydz 0
2 2
2 2 x 2 2 2 y 2
Ignoring the higher-order terms, we obtain: xy yx
xz yz z
and force balance in z-direction: Fz 0
x y z
ij
In tensor-index notation: Fi ij , j Fi 0 where i, j x, y, z (1.15)
x j
x xy
Fx 0
x y
For 2-D case: F , F 0 where , x, y or (1.13)
x xy y F 0
x y
y
Notes: a. In Eq (1.15), i is a free index whereas j is a dummy index; similarly, is free while is dummy in
Eq (1.13).
b. In Eq (1.14), there are 6 unknown stress components: x , y , z , xy , xz , yz , but only 3 equations;
similarly, 3 unknown stresses: x , y , xy with 2 equations only. Hence, stress analysis problems are
in general internally statically indeterminate.
c. zero body force: Fx Fy Fz 0 , then:
x xy xz
0
x y z
xy y yz ij
0 or ij , j 0 where i, j x, y, z (1.8-A2)
x y z x j
yz z
xz 0
x y z
indicating that the sum of the three stress derivatives is zero.
Figure 1.8-B1 Body and surface forces acting on an arbitrary portion of a continuum.
conservation of linear momentum (force balance principle): S
Ti n dS Fi dV 0
V
(1.8-B1)
Ti n ji n j
S ji n j dS Fi dV 0
V
(1.8-B2)
divergence theorem: S
ji n j dS ji , j dV
V
V ji , j Fi dV 0 (1.8-B3)
zero-value theorem equilibrium eqs in tensor-index notation: ji , j Fi 0 V (1.8-B4)
x yx zx
Fx 0
x y z
xy y zy
scalar-component notation: Fy 0 (1.8-B6)
x y z
yz z
xz Fz 0
x y z
Gauss divergence theorem: ijk x j lk nl dS ijk x j lk ,l dV x j lk ijk x j Fk dV 0
S V V ijk ,l
expand and simplify the integral
V
jk dV 0
ijk
xy yx
symmetric stress tensor: ij ji yz zy (1.8-B8)
zx xz
x xy xz
Fx 0
x y z
xy y yz
scalar-component notation: Fy 0 (1.8-B10)
x y z
yz z
xz Fz 0
x y z
Note: The stress tensor is symmetric only if there is no body moment or force doublet, which exist in strong
electromagnetic fields. See M.H. Sadd, Elasticity, 3rd ed., Ch 15: Micromechanics Applications for
Mindlin’s micropolar & stress-couple theories.
r 1 r rz 1
r r z r r Fr 0
1 z 2
equilibrium eqs: r r F 0 (1.8-C3)
r r z r
rz 1 z z 1
r r z r rz Fz 0
xy xy cos sin y x sin cos
(1.17a,b)
xy p y cos px sin
2 2
Note that the normal stress y acting on the y face of an inclined element (Fig 1.11c) may readily be
obtained by substituting 2 for θ in the expression for x . In so doing, we have:
y x sin 2 y cos2 2 xy sin cos (1.17c)
2 1 cos 2
cos 2
1 cos 2
trigonometric identities: sin 2
2
sin 2
sin cos 2
transformation equations for plane stress:
x y x y
x x cos y sin 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
x y
xy xy cos sin y x sin cos sin 2 xy cos 2
2 2
(1.18)
2
x y x y
y x sin y cos 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
Note: x y x y constant ~ stress invariant (see Sec 1.13)
By interchanging symbols: x, y, x, y, , we also get:
x y x y
x x cos y sin 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
x y
xy xy cos sin x y sin cos sin 2 xy cos 2
2 2
(1.9-A1)
2
x y x y
y x sin y cos 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
FIGURE 1.12 Stress trajectories: polar representations of x and xy (in MPa) vs .
Cartesian Representation of State of Plane Stress (Option)
FIGURE 1.13 Graph of normal stress x and shear stress xy within angle 0 180 .
x xy x
y
2
x y x y y 1 2 xy2
y cos 2 p xy sin 2 p x
x
2 2 2 2
x y 4 xy2 y 4 xy2
p 2 2
x
x y y
2
x y
sin 2 s
x y 4 xy2
2
(1.10-A2)
cos 2 2 xy
x y 4 xy2
s 2
Eq (1.10-A2) Eq (1.18b), we obtain:
y
2
x y 1 2 xy2
xy sin 2 s xy cos 2 s
x
2 2
y 4 y 4 xy2
p 2 2 2
x xy x
y
2
1 2 max min
maximum shear stresses: max x xy
2
(1.22)
2 2 2
Notes: a. Since tan 2 s tan 2 s , hence there are also two maximum shear directions: s, s
correspond to max , max , respectively, with s s .
b. It is necessary to substitute one of the s values into Eq (1.18b) to determine which of the
maximum shear directions corresponds to the “” maximum shear stress max .
x y x y y
x s cos 2 s xy sin 2 s x
2 2 2
Substituting Eq (1.10-A2) into Eqs (1.18a,c):
x y x y x y
y cos 2 s xy sin 2 s
s 2 2 2
x y 1 2 max min
ave (1.23)
2 2 2
The above results are illustrated in Fig 1.14. Note that the diagonal of a stress element toward which the shear
stresses act is called the shear diagonal. The shear diagonal of the element on which the maximum
'ave
2
'ave max
1
2
1
'ave p
max
'ave 45
45
45 y
xy
p
x
FIGURE 1.14 Planes of principal stresses, maximum shear stresses and shear diagonal.
ME 54100: ADVANCED STRESS ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 1 – ANALYSIS OF STRESS
ME I4200: APPLIED STRESS ANALYSIS
SECTION 1.11 MOHR’S CIRCLE FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL STRESS PAGE 1/9
FIGURE 1.15 (a) Stress element; (b) Mohr’s circle of stress; (c) interpretation of positive shear stresses.
Notes: a. The angles on the circle are measured in the same direction as θ is measured in the stress element
(Fig 1.15a). However, an angle of 2θ on the circle corresponds to an angle of θ on the stress
element.
b. The state of stress associated with the original x and y planes corresponds to points A and B on the
circle, respectively.
c. Points lying on any diameter, such as A′ and B′, define states of stress w.r.t. x′-y′ coordinates rotated
relative to the original x-y coordinates through an angle θ, see Eq (1.18).
x y x y
x x cos y sin 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
x y
xy xy cos sin y x sin cos sin 2 xy cos 2
2 2
2
x y x y
y x sin y cos 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
d. Points A1 and B1 on the circle locate the principal stresses 1 , 2 . Their magnitudes and
directions are defined by Eqs (1.19) and (1.20):
x y x y
2
1,2 max,min xy
2
2 2
1 2 xy
p 2 tan
1
x y
e. Points D and E represent the maximum shear stresses. Their magnitudes and directions are defined
by Eqs (1.21) and (1.22):
x y
2
max 1 2 min
xy max
2
2 2 2
1 x y
s tan
1
2 2 xy
x y
CF
f. The radius of the circle is: CA CF 2 AF 2 where 2 , thus, the radius equals the
AF xy
magnitude of the maximum shear stress max .
g. Mohr’s circle shows that the planes of maximum shear are always located at 45° from planes of
principal stress, as already indicated in Fig. 1.14 (Sec. 1.10).
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
FIGURE 1.11-A1 Two versions of pure shear.
0
1 0
y x xy 0 0 center @ 0, 0 2
0
x yx y 0 0 radius 0
max 0
0 0 2 p 0 p 45
0
Pure shear
0
1 0
x xy 0 0
y center @ 0, 0 2
yx y 0 0
0
0 0
x radius 0
max
0
0 0 p 90
2 p
3 pr pr
center @ ,0 1 t
pr 4t
0
x xy 2t
pr
Cylindrical t
radius pr pr
y
2
pressure pr
yx y 0 pr 4t pr 2t
x 2t
vessel t 4t pr
max
(surface only) pr pr 4t
2 p
2t t p 90
y pr
x xy 2t
0 1 2 0
pr
Spherical 2t pr
center @ , 0
pressure x yx y 0 pr 2t max 0
pr
vessel 2t radius 0 ~ undefined
2t
pr p
(surface only) t
degenerate circle
FIGURE 1.16 (a) Element in plane stress; (b) Mohr’s circle of stress;
(c) principal stresses; (d) maximum shear stress.
FIGURE 1.17. Example 1.4. (a) Element in biaxial stresses; (b) Mohr’s circle of stress;
(c) stress element for 30 .
Solution Mohr’s circle of Fig 1.17b describes the state of stress given in Fig 1.17a. Points A1 and B1 represent
the stress components on the x and y faces, respectively. The center and radius of the circle are,
x y 28 14
center: OC 7 MPa
2 2
, respectively.
radius: CA CB x y 2 28 14 0 21 MPa
2 2
xy
2 2
Corresponding to the 30° plane within the element, it is necessary to rotate through 60° counterclockwise on the
circle to locate point A′. A 240° counterclockwise rotation locates point B′. Referring to the circle, we get
x OC CA cos 2 7 21cos 60 17.5 MPa
xy CA sin 2 21sin 60 18.19 MPa
y OC CB cos 2 7 21cos 60 3.5 MPa
Figure 1.17c indicates the orientation of the stresses. The results can be checked by applying Eq (1.18), using
the initial data as
x y x y 28 14 28 14
x cos 2 xy sin 2 cos 60 17.5 MPa
2 2 2 2
x y 28 14
xy sin 2 xy cos 2 sin 60 18.19 MPa
2 2
x y x y 28 14 28 14
y cos 2 xy sin 2 cos 60 3.5 MPa
2 2 2 2
FIGURE 1.18. Example 1.5. Combined stresses in a thin-walled cylindrical pressure vessel:
(a) side view; (b) free body of a segment; (c) and (d) element A (viewed from top).
Solution The internal force resultants on a transverse section through point A are found from the equilibrium
conditions of the free-body diagram of Fig 1.18b. They are V P 20 kN , M P AP 20 0.4 8 kN-m
and T 3 kN-m . In Fig 1.18c, the combined axial, tangential, and shear stresses are shown acting on a small
element at point A. These stresses are (Tables 1.1 and C.1):
250 103
8 103
axial stress (bending): b
Mr Mr
3 2 32.6 MPa
I r t 250 10 3
5 10
3
3
2
250 103
3 103
shear stress (torque): t
Tr
Tr
2 6.112 MPa
J 2 r t 3
250 10 3
5 10
3
2 3
2
250 103
1.2 106
axial stress (internal pressure): a
pr
2 15 MPa
2t 2 5 10 3
6 250 10
3
1.2 10
tangential stress (internal pressure): 2 a
pr
2 30 MPa
t 5 10
3
Note that for element A, Q 0 (Why? Hint: 1st moment of the shaded area w.r.t. N.A.)
VQ
direct shear stress: xz d 0
Ib
a. The principal stresses are from Eq. (1.20):
x y
2
47.6 30 47.6 30 47.6 30 49.51 MPa
2
2 2 2 2
To find the principal directions, we use Eq (1.19):
1 2 xy 1 2 6.112 17.4
p tan 1 tan 1
2
2 x y 47.6 30 72.6
To differentiate the maximum & minimum principal directions, we choose p 17.4 and use Eq (1.18a):
x y x y
x cos 2 xy sin 2 p 17.4
2 2
47.6 30 47.6 30
cos 2 17.4 xy sin 2 17.4 49.51 MPa p 72.6
2 2
b. The maximum shear stresses are from Eq (1.22):
y
2
47.6 30
2
2 2
To locate the maximum shear planes, we use Eq (1.21):
1 y 1 47.6 30 27.6
s tan 1 x tan
1
2 2 xy 2 2 6.112 117.6
Choosing s 27.6 and applying Eq (1.18b), then
x y 47.6 30
xy sin 2 s xy cos 2 s sin 2 27.6 6.112 cos 2 27.6 10.71 MPa
2 2
s 27.6
Hence,
s 27.6
Equation (1.23) yields the average (or mean) stress, which is also the normal stresses associated with max at
x y 47.6 30
point A: ave 38.8 MPa
2 2
These stresses are shown in their proper directions in Fig 1.18d.
V
l cos cos V , x x
V
Vy
m cos cos V , y , where V Vx2 Vy2 Vz2 (1.24)
V
n cos cos V , z Vz
V
and l 2 m2 n2 1 (1.25)
QAB ABC nˆ iˆ ABC
liˆ mˆj nkˆ iˆ l
ABC
QAC ABC nˆ ˆj ABC liˆ mˆj nkˆ ˆj m ABC (a)
QBC ABC nˆ kˆ ABC
liˆ mˆj nkˆ kˆ n ABC
N
Def: stress traction vector (or surface traction): p px iˆ p y ˆj pz kˆ ~ unit: Pa 2 (1.12-A2)
m
Fx 0 : px ABC x QAB xy QAC xz QBC x l xy m xz n ABC
force balance on the plane ABC: Fy 0 : p y ABC xy QAB y QAC yz QBC xy l y m yz n ABC
Fz 0 : pz ABC xz QAB yz QAC z QBC xz l yz m z n ABC
px xl xy m xz n
thus, in scalar-component form: p y xy l y m yz n (1.26)
p l m n
z xz yz z
Following the same logic, we can project the components of the above-mentioned stress traction vector
p px iˆ p y ˆj pz kˆ in the x′-, y′- and z′-axes, respectively, then take force balances along the x′-, y′- or z′-
direction to obtain:
x px l1 p y m1 pz n1 xy px l1 p y m1 pz n1 xz px l1 p y m1 pz n1
xy px l2 p y m2 pz n2 y pxl2 p y m2 pz n2 yz px l2 p y m2 pz n2 (1.27)
p l p m p n p l p m p n p l p m p n
xz x 3 y 3 z 3 yz x 3 y 3 z 3 x x 3 y 3 z 3
z x l3 y m3 z n3 2 xy l3m3 yz m3n3 xz l3n3
2 2 2
l l m m n n l m l m m n m n l n l n
yz x 2 3 y 2 3 z 2 3 xy 2 3 3 2 yz 2 3 3 2 xz 2 3 3 2
Note: Owing to the symmetry of the stress tensor: ij ji , only 6 of the 9 stress components thus developed
are unique.
The direction cosine components in Table 1.2 can be collected to form:
l11 l12 l13 l1 m1 n1
direction cosine (or orthogonal rotation) matrix: lij l l21 l22 l23 l2 m2 n2 (1.12-A7)
l31 l32 l33 l3 m3 n3
Note: The direction cosine matrix is NOT symmetric: lij l ji
The scalar-component form of Eq (1.28) can then be expressed in the short-hand forms:
rs lir l js ij
tensor-index notation: (1.29)
rs lri lsj ij
τ l τ l T
or vector-matrix notation: (1.12-A8)
τ l τ l
T
Finally, it can be proven the components of the direction cosine (or orthogonal rotation) matrix have the
following properties:
l12 m12 n12 1 l1l2 m1m2 n1n2 0
2
l2 m2 n2 1 and l2l3 m2 m3 n2 n3 0 l l
2 2 1 T
(1.30)
l 2 m 2 n 2 1 l l m m n n 0
3 3 3 13 1 3 1 3
2 2
x y x y
y x
sin 2
y
cos 2
2 xy
sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
sin cos sin cos cos 2 sin 2 y x sin 2 cos 2
xy 2 (1.12-A11)
xy x y xy
z z
xz zx cos yz sin
yz yz cos zx sin
x y x y
x
x
cos 2
y
sin 2
2
xy
sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
x y x y
y x sin y cos 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
y
xy x sin cos y sin cos xy cos 2 sin 2 x
or (1.12-A12)
sin 2 xy cos 2
2
z z
yz yz cos zx sin
zx zx cos yz sin
Mnemonics: The equations in each pair of the relations in the 2-D Special Case are interchangeable by
switching the primed and unprimed and by replacing with .
x y x y
r x cos y sin 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
2 2
x y x y
x sin y cos 2 xy sin cos cos 2 xy sin 2
2 2
(1.12-A13)
2 2
y x
r x sin cos y sin cos xy cos sin sin 2 xy cos 2
2 2
2
r r
x r cos sin 2 r sin cos cos 2 r sin 2
2 2
2 2
r
or y r sin 2 cos 2 2 r sin cos r cos 2 r sin 2 (1.12-A14)
2 2
r
xy r sin cos sin cos r cos sin sin 2 r cos 2
2 2
2
which are the same as Eqs (1.18) and (1.9-A1) in Sec 1.9.
Large Deformation/Finite Elasticity Theory (Option)
Following the principles of Small Deformation/Infinitesimal Elasticity Theory, the previous definitions for the
stress tensor and traction vector do not make a distinction between the deformed and undeformed (or
reference) configurations of the body since such a distinction only leads to small modifications that are
considered higher-order effects and are normally neglected. However, for Large Deformation/Finite Elasticity
Theory, sizeable differences exist between these configurations and several stress tensors have been defined.
For instance, both directions of the force and surface normal in the true (Cauchy) stress tensor is defined
based on the deformed configuration. Other examples of stress tensors defined in Finite Elasticity are:
Kirchhoff stress tensor, the 1st & 2nd Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors and Biot stress tensor. In addition,
there are also several incremental stress updates, also called stress rates: Jaumann, Green-Naghdi, Oldroyd,
Trusdell, convective, etc. It should be noted that since the physical meaning of the integral of stress with
respect to strain is the strain energy, the selection of proper pair of stress and strain tensors should obey the
rule of stress objectivity. That is, the superimposition of rigid-body motion on the deformed configuration
should not alter the stress state and should produce no extra strain energy.
here
1 2
eigenvector: nˆ pth principal stress directions nˆ , nˆ , nˆ
p 3
In the cubic equation, Eq (1.33), I1 , I 2 , I 3 are the three fundamental stress invariants:
Def : 1st stress invariant: I1 x y z 1 2 3 (1.34a)
x xy y yz z zx 1
I2
yx y zy z xz x 2 ii jj ij ji
Def: 2nd stress invariant: x y y z z x xy yx yz zy zx xz (1.34b)
xy2 yz2 x2z
1 2 2 3 3 1
x xy xz
1 1 1
I 3 det ij det σ yx y yz ij jk ki ij ji kk ii jj kk
3 2 6
zx zy z
Def: 3rd stress invariant: x y z xy yz zx yx zy xz x yz zy y zx xz z xy yx (1.34c)
2 xy yz zx x yz2 y xz2 z xy2
1 2 3
2 2 3 3 1
Def: (3-D) maximum shearing stress: max max 1 0 (1.13-A2)
2 2 2
p xy n1 p 0
Eq (1.31) becomes x
yx y p n p 0
2
p xy
det x p x y p x y xy 0
2 2
(1.13-A4)
xy y
p
I1 x y 1 2
x xy
I2 x y xy2 1 2 Note: Typo in textbook (1.35)
yx y
I 0
3
y x y
2
principal stresses: I1 I12
1,2 x xy
2
I2
2 2 2 4
(1.20 & 22)
2 x y
2
I 2
maximum shearing stress: max 1 xy I2
2 1
2 2 4
1 2 xy
principal stress directions: p tan 1 two values
2 x y
(1.19 & 21)
maximum shearing stress directions: 1 tan 1 y x two values
s
2 2 xy
FIGURE 1.13-A1 The principal directions p and the maximum shear directions s .
1
then n n or n
T
(1.13-A6)
1 0 0
& n τ n 0 2 0 (1.13-A7)
0 0 3
(a) (b)
FIGURE 1.22 (a) Element in triaxial stress state; (b) traction vector decomposition.
x xy xz
in a general coordinate system (x-y-z or iˆ-ˆj -kˆ ): ij τ xy y yz ~ 6 stress components
zx zy z
1 0 0
in principal coordinate system ( nˆ -nˆ -nˆ ): ij 0 2 0 ~ 3 stress components
1 2 3
0 0 3
Note: For the principal coordinate system, all shearing stresses vanish and thus the state includes only normal
stresses, which are the principal stresses themselves. That is to say, under transformation to principal
axes, the matrix form of the stress tensor will reduce to a diagonal form with the principal stresses as its
diagonal components.
x y z 1 2 3
Consider Fig 1.22, an element in a triaxial stress state: , the traction vector p
xy xz
yz 0 0 0
on a surface with a unit normal vector nˆ liˆ mˆj nkˆ , from Eq (1.26), becomes:
p x
py pz 1l 2 m 3n (a)
With the aid of Fig 1.22b, p can also be decomposed into a normal traction vector σ and a shear traction
vector τ as:
normal traction : σ p n
ˆ
p σ τ with Eq (1.12-A4) (1.14-A1)
2 2
shear traction : τ p σ Pythagorean theorem
Eq (a) into Eq (1.14-A1a) p 2 12l 2 22 m2 32 n2 2 2 (1.36)
Eq (1.28a) = xl 2 y m2 z n2 2 xy lm yz mn xz ln
1l 2 2 m2 3n2 (1.37)
Alternatively, Eqs (1.14-A1a) & (1.12-A3) = pi ni ij n j 1l 2 2 m2 3n2
Substitute Eq (1.37) into Eq (1.36), we get:
2 2 p 2 1l 2 2 m2 3n2 12l 2 22 m2 32 n2
2
(1.38)
12
Since Eq (1.25): l 2 m2 n2 1 1 2 l 2 m2 2 3 m2 n2 3 1 n2l 2
2 2 2
(1.39)
Note: Eq (1.39) indicates that if the principal stresses are all equal: 1 2 3 , the shear stress vanishes,
regardless of the choices of the direction cosines: l , m, n .
Finally, for a general stress state (Fig 1.14-A1a), we have:
= xl 2 y m2 z n 2 2 xy lm yz mn xz ln
(1.40 & 41)
x xz xy y yz xy yz z
12
l m n
2
l m n
2
l m n
2
2
xy
Lamé’s Stress Ellipsoid (Option)
1.14a SPHERICAL, DEVIATORIC, OCTAHEDRAL, VON MISES & TRESCA STRESSES (Lecture)
Spherical Stress Tensor
Def: mean (or average or hydrostatic) stress:
1 2 3 x y z I1
m (1.14-S1)
3 3 3
m 0 0
Def: spherical stress tensor:
pij m ij 0 m 0 (1.14-S2)
0 0 m
where Kronecker delta ij is defined as:
1 0 0
1 if i j no sum
Def: ij I 0 1 0 unit or identity matrix (1.14-S3)
0 if i j
0 0 1
fundamental spherical stress invariants
Def: 1st spherical stress invariant:
I1 px p y pz p1 p2 p3 3 m I1 (1.14-S4a)
Def: 2nd spherical stress invariant:
px 0 p 0 p 0
I2 y z
0 py 0 pz 0 px
(1.14-S4b)
2
I
p x p y p y p z p z p x p1 p2 p2 p3 p3 p1 3 m2 1
3
Def: 3rd spherical stress invariant:
px 0 0
I13
I 3 det pij 0 py 0 px p y pz p1 p2 p3 m
3
(1.14-S4c)
27
0 0 pz
Note: As presented in next topic: Chapter 2: Strain & Material Properties, the 2nd spherical stress
I2
invariant I 2 1 3 m2 is directly proportional to the dilatational component of strain energy.
3
Deviatoric Stress Tensor
x m xy xz
Def: deviatoric stress tensor: sij ij pij ij m ij yx y m yz (1.14-S5)
zx zy z m
Notes: a. total stress = spherical stress + deviatoric stress: ij pij sij (1.14-S6)
b. The spherical stress pij m ij is an isotropic stress tensor. That is, its components are the same
and equal to the mean stress m in all coordinate systems and the principal spherical stress
ME 54100: ADVANCED STRESS ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 1 – ANALYSIS OF STRESS
ME I4200: APPLIED STRESS ANALYSIS
SECTION 1.14a SPHERICAL, DEVIATORIC, OCTAHEDRAL, VON MISES & TRESCA STRESSES PAGE 2/7
6 x y y z
(1.14-S7b)
1 1
1 2 2 3 3 1 I12 I 2
2 2 2
6 3
2 3 1
Def: 3rd deviatoric stress invariant: J 3 1 m 2 m 3 m I1 I1 I 2 I3 (1.14-S7c)
27 3
(a) (b)
FIGURE 1.24 (a) An octahedron containing 8 octahedral stress planes;
(b) On an octahedral plane: l m n i.e., cos1 54.74 .
Octahedral Stresses
Def: principal stress space: A 3-D stress space (Note: not a physical space) with the three principal stresses
1 , 2 , 3 (that is, their principal directions: n̂1 , n̂ 2 , n̂3 ) as the coordinate axes.
Def: In the principal stress space, a plane whose normal vector makes equal angles with each of the principal
1
axes (i.e. having direction cosines equal to cos 54.74 ) is called an octahedral stress plane. There
3
are a total of eight octahedral stress planes, as shown in Fig 1.24. The shear and normal components of
the stress tensor on these planes are called octahedral shear stress oct and octahedral normal stress
oct , respectively:
1 2
oct 1 2 2 3 3 1 J 2
2 2 2
3 3
(1.43 & 44)
1 2 3 I1
oct 3 3
m
2 2
Def: Tresca stress: Tr 2 max max 1 2 , 2 3 , 3 1 (1.14-S9)
vM
Notes: a. It can be proven that: Tr (1.14-S10)
max oct
b. vM (or equivalently, oct and J 2 ) and Tr (or equivalently, max ) play significant roles in Failure
by Yielding (Ch 4).
c. Obtain the associated spherical and deviatoric stress tensors.
d. Find the invariants of the original, spherical and deviatoric stress tensors, respectively.
e. Find the maximum shear, von Mises, Tresca and octahedral normal and shear stresses.
f. Plot the 3-D Mohr’s circle and indicate the locations of the principal stresses 1 , 2 , 3 and the maximum
shear max .
nˆ 1 l1iˆ m1 ˆj n1kˆ 0.0266iˆ 0.8638ˆj 0.5031kˆ Note: l12 m12 n12 0 (a2)
19 9.0015 l2 4.7m2 6.45n2 0
For 2 9.0015 MPa : 4.7l2 4.6 9.0015 m2 11.8n2 0
6.45l 11.8m 8.3 9.0015 n 0
2 2 2
nˆ 3 l3iˆ m3 ˆj n3kˆ 0.7834iˆ 0.3306ˆj 0.5262kˆ Note: l32 m32 n32 0 (a4)
b. Eigendecomposition and diagonalization.
0.0266 0.8638 0.5031 19 4.7 6.45 0.0266 0.6209 0.7834
nˆ 1
nˆ 2
nˆ nˆ 1
3 T
nˆ 2
nˆ 0.6209 0.3802 0.6855 4.7 4.6 11.8 0.8638 0.3802 0.3306
3
I 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 170.8 MPa
2
(d2)
I3 1 2 3 2, 647.5 MPa
3
(d3)
The invariants of the spherical stress tensor can be obtained from Eqs (1.14-S4a,b,c):
I1 I1 22.7 MPa (d4)
I12
I2 171.7633 MPa
2
(d5)
3
I13
I3 433.2253 MPa
3
(d6)
27
The invariants of the deviatoric stress tensor can be obtained from Eqs (1.14-S7a,b,c):
J1 0 (d7)
1
J2 1 2 2 3 3 1 342.5758 MPa
2 2 2 2
(d8)
6
The von Mises (or effective or equivalent) stress can be obtained from Eq (1.14-S8):
3
vM oct 32.0582 MPa (e3)
2
The Tresca stress can be obtained from Eq (1.14-S8):
Tr 2 max 36.9341MPa (e4)
max=1.8.467 MPa
FIGURE 1.25 Triaxial state of stress: (a) wedge; (b) planes of maximum shear stress.
FIGURE 1.26 (a–c) Views of elements in triaxial stresses on different principal axes;
(d) Mohr’s circles for three-dimensional stress.
2 2 2 3
l 0
1 2 1 3
2 3 1
Solve Eq (a) m 2 0 (Note: typos in textbook) (1.46)
2 3 2 1
2 1 2
n 2 0
3 1 3 2
Without loss in generality, assume 1 2 3 , we have:
2 2 3 0
Mohr’s circles of stresses: 2 3 1 0 (Note: typos in textbook) (b)
2 0
1 2
2 1 2 2 1 2
2 2 3 23 max 4 2 3
2 12 1 3 13 max 14 1 3
2 2 2
(Note: typos in textbook) (1.47)
2
12 1 2 12 max 14 1 2
2 2 2
1 3
absolute maximum shearing stress: max a 13 max (1.45)
2
u u u
u u x rx y ry z rz
o
v v v
v v rx ry rz
o
(2.2-A2)
x y z
w w w
w w rx ry
o
rz
x y z
where u, v, w and rx , ry , rz are the Cartesian components of the displacement and position vectors, u and
r , respectively. Hence, Eq (2.2-A1) becomes:
u u u
rx rx rx u u x rx y ry z rz
o
v v v
in scalar- component notation: ry ry ry v v o rx ry rz
x y z
(2.2-A3)
w w w
rz rz rz w w rx ry
o
rz
x y z
or in tensor-index notation: ri ui , j rj
or in vector-matrix notation: r u r
u u u
x y z
v v v
u
z
Here, the displacement gradient tensor: ui , j (2.2-A4)
x y
w w w
x y z
Notes: a. The higher-order terms of the Taylor series expansion have been dropped since the components of
u and r are small. This approximation is only good for the so-called Small Displacement (or
Deformation or Strain) Theory (or Infinitesimal Elasticity Theory). On the contrary, if u is large,
Large Displacement (or Deformation) or Finite Strain Theory, which is also called Finite Elasticity
Theory, should be used instead.
b. Principle of Superposition. The small displacement assumption leads to one of the basic
fundamentals of solid mechanics, called the principle of superposition. This principle is valid
whenever the quantity (stress or displacement) to be determined is a linear function of the loads
that produce it. For the foregoing condition to exist, the material must also be linearly elastic (see
Sec 2.9). In such situations, the total quantity owing to the combined loads acting simultaneously
on a member may be obtained by determining separately the quantity attributable to each load and
combining the individual results. Clearly, superposition cannot be applied to (post-yielding) plastic
deformations. The main motivation for superposition is the replacement of a complex load
configuration by two or more simpler loads.
FIGURE 2.2 Normal strain in a prismatic bar: (a) undeformed state; (b) deformed state.
L L0
(1-D) uniaxial (normal) strain: 0 (2.2)
L0 L0
u du
1-D normal strain: x lim (2.1)
x 0 x dx
Plane (2-D) Strains
FIGURE 2.4 Deformations of an element: (a) normal strain; (b) shearing strain.
u
dx u dx u dx
x AB AB x
AB dx
From Fig 2.4a, normal strains:
v
dy v dy v dy
AD AD y
y
AD dy
v u
dx dy
x y
From Fig 2.4b, (engineering) shearing strain: xy x y
dx dy
u
x x
normal strains:
2-D (in-plane) y v (2.3)
y
u v
engineering shearing strain: xy
y x
Three-Dimensional Strains
x 1
2 xy 1
2 xz
strain tensor: ij 12 yx y 1
2 yz ~2
nd
-rank tensor (2.7)
12 zx 2 zy
1
z
in scalar-component notation:
u v w
x x y
y
z
z
engineering strains: (2.4)
v u yz
w v
u w
zx
xy
x y y z z x
1 u u 1
in tensor-index notation: ij i j ui , j u j ,i ij ji ~ symmetric (2.5)
2 x j xi 2
1
u u
T
in vector-matrix notation: (2.3-A1)
2
Notes: a. The strain-displacement relations, e.g., (2.4 & 2.5) are also called the kinematic relations.
b. The strain components defined above are based on the Small Deformation Theory (or Infinitesimal
Elasticity Theory); that is, the displacement vector u is infinitesimally small. When u is large, the
Large Deformation Theory (or Finite Elasticity Theory) should be used. In that case, there are four
strain measures:
L L0 L original or initial length
Def: engineering strain: E where 0
L0 L instantaneous or current length
L dL
Def: true (or natural or logarithmic) strain: L ln L ln L0
L0 L
L2 L20
Def: Green-Lagrangian strain: G based on the Lagrangian (material) description
2 L20
L2 L20
Def: Almansi-Euler strain: A based on the Euler (spatial) description
2 L2
L
For small deformation, i.e., L L L0 L0 or L , we have: E L G A
L0
Def: strain compatibility (or continuity or integrability) equations: The additional relations that the strain
tensor ij , which has 6 components, must satisfy to ensure a continuous, single-valued displacement
field ui , which has only 3 components.
1
Integrate Eq (2.5) twice w.r.t. xk , and xl ij ,kl
2
ui, jkl u j ,ikl
kl ,ij 2 u k , lij ul ,kij
1
Through simple interchange of subscripts ik , jl ui ,kjl uk ,ijl
1
2
jl ,ik 2 u j ,lik ul , jik
1
Assume the displacement field ui is continuous; then the order of differentiation on ui is immaterial. That is:
ui , jkl ui ,kjl , u j ,ikl u j ,lik , uk , lij uk ,ijl , ul ,kij ul , jik Saint-Venant strain compatibility equations:
2
y
2 xz xy yz (2.12)
z y 2 yz zx y y z x
2 2
2z 2x xz 2 z
2
2 xy yz xz
x z zx xy z z x y
Furthermore, these 6 equations are not independent. Only 3 of them are independent:
4 x 3 yz xz xy
2
y 2
z 2
x y z x y z
4 3 xz xy yz
2 y
(2.4-A2)
z 2
x 2
x y z y z x
4 3 xy yz xz
2 z
x 2y 2 xyz z x y
For 2-D cases, the 6 compatibility equations reduce to 1:
2 x y xy
2 2
(2.11)
y 2 x 2 xy
Finally, the compatibility equations (2.12) are necessary and sufficient conditions that the strain components
ij give continuous, single-valued displacements ui for a simply-connected domain. For a multiply-connected
domain, however, these conditions are necessary but generally not sufficient.
FIGURE 2.2 Normal strain in a prismatic bar: (a) undeformed state; (b) deformed state.
FIGURE 2.4 Deformations of an element: (a) normal strain; (b) shearing strain.
Transformation of 2-D Strain:
x y x y xy
x x cos 2
y sin 2
xy sin cos cos 2 sin 2
2 2 2
xy 2 y x sin cos xy cos sin x y sin 2 xy cos 2
2 2
(2.13 & 14)
sin 2 cos 2 sin cos x y x y cos 2 xy sin 2
y x y xy
2 2 2
Note: x y x y constant ~ strain invariant
2 2 2
xy 2 x y sin cos xy cos sin x y sin 2 xy cos 2
2 2
(2.5-A1)
sin 2 cos 2 sin cos x y x y cos 2 xy sin 2
y x y xy
2 2 2
l 2 m 2 n 2 l m m n l n
z x 3 y 3 z 3 xy 3 3 yz 3 3 xz 3 3
The scalar-component form of Eq (2.18) can then be expressed in the short-hand forms:
rs lir l js ij
tensor-index notation: (2.19)
rs lri lsj ij
l l T
or vector-matrix notation: (2.5-A2)
l l
T
2 2 y 2 xy 2 x yz xz xy
2x 2 2 x 2 xz 2 xy
yz x x z 2 2c1
y x xy y
2
AB ax2 bx2 cx2 2 1.5 0 2.5 m . From Sec 1.12, the direction cosines of AB are:
2 2 2
l1 cos x, x ax 2 0.8
AB 2.5
bx 1.5
m1 cos x, y 0.6 (B.1)
AB 2.5
n cos x, z cx 0 0
1 AB 2.5
Applying Eq (2.18a), we thus have:
x xl12 y m12 z n12 xy l1m1 yz m1 n1 xz l1 n1
750 0.8 800 0.6 1600 0.8 0.6 1536με
2 2
c. Let the y′-axis be placed along the line AC ay iˆ by ˆj cy kˆ 0iˆ 0 ˆj 1kˆ
a y 0 by 0 c y 1
l2 cos y, x 0 m2 cos y, y 0 n2 cos y, z 1 (C.1)
AC 1 AC 1 AC 1
Applying Eqs (2.18d,b), we have:
y x l22 y m22 z n22 xy l2 m2 yz m2 n2 xz l2 n2 900 0.1 900με
2
az 1.5
AB AD ax az bxbz cxcz 2az 1.5bz 0
bz 2 choose AD 1.5iˆ 2 ˆj 0kˆ
AC AD a y az bybz c ycz cz 0
c 0
z
AD az2 bz2 cz2 1.5 2 0 2.5 m and the direction cosines of AD are:
2 2 2
l3 cos z , x az 1.5 0.6
AD 2.5
bz 2
m3 cos z , y 0.8 (D.1)
AD 2.5
n cos z , z cz 0 0
3 AD 2.5
Applying Eqs (2.18e,f,c), we have:
z xl32 y m32 z n32 xy l3m3 yz m3 n3 xz l3 n3
750 0.6 800 0.8 1050 0.6 0.8 278με
2 2
FIGURE 2.8 (a) Axes rotated for θ 30°; (b) Mohr’s circle of strain.
FIGURE 2.9 (a) Element with edges of unit lengths in plane strain; (b) element at θ 30°;
(c) principal strains; and (d) maximum shearing strains.
ME 54100: ADVANCED STRESS ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 2 – STRAIN & MATERIAL PROPERTIES
ME I4200: APPLIED STRESS ANALYSIS
SECTION 2.5 STATE OF STRAIN AT A POINT PAGE 8/9
c. Physically, the integration constants a, b, c represent the rigid-body motion: z , u0 , v0 . Thus,
u x, y Ax z y u0
(c1)
v x, y By z x v0
d. Assume a panel of unit size (11), if the panel is restrained at the center so that there is no RB motion, i.e.,
u x, y Ax
u0 v0 z 0 , then and the deformed and undeformed shapes are represented graphically
v x, y By
below, where Poisson’s ratio. These figures illustrate the possibilities of generating the same strain tensor
by uniaxial or biaxial tension.
Vertical Uniaxial Tension Biaxial Tension Horizontal Uniaxial Tension
A B B A
A
B
A B A
lateral strain y z
Poisson’s ratio: or (2.28)
axial strain x x
E
Note: G (2.35)
2 1
E
where K bulk modulus of elasticity. Note: K (2.39)
3 1 2
cij c ji
b. ~ symmetric (2.56)
sij s ji
c. The material is also called triclinic (or general anisotropic).
Monoclinic Material (Single Plane of Symmetry): 13 elasticity (or compliance) constants
1 yx zx
0 0 0
Ex Ey Ez
xy 1 zy
0 0 0
x s11 s12 s13 0 0 0 x Ex Ey Ez x
s s22 s23 0 0 0 y xz yz
y 12 0
1
y
0 0
s s23 s33 0 0 0 z Ex Ey Ez z
or z 13 (2.42)
xy 0 0 0 s44 0 0 xy 1 xy
0 0 0 0 0
yz 0 0 0 0 s55 0 yz Gxy yz
xz 0 0 0 0 0 s66 xz 1 xz
0 0 0 0 0
G yz
1
0 0 0 0 0
Gxz
ij ji xy yx yz zy xz zx
Due to symmetry of the matrix s or , , (2.43)
Ei Ej Ex Ey Ey Ez Ex Ez
Notes: a. Eq (2.42) in textbook contains typos.
b. In the above,
Ex , Ey , Ez orthotropic moduli of elasticity in the three directions of material symmetry
Gxy , Gyz , Gxz shear moduli in the three orthogonal planes of material symmetry
j
ij where i , j x, y , z , i j Poisson’s ratios between i, j directions (2.10-A5)
i
c. For isotropic materials, Poisson’s ratio is limited to 1 0.5 to ensure Young’s, shear and bulk
moduli E, G, K are all positive. For anisotropic materials, that constraint, however, does not
apply. Instead, in order to preserve the ve-definiteness of strain energy density, the Poisson’s
ratios need to satisfy the following relations:
1 xy yx 0
1 xz zx 0 (2.10-A6)
1 0
yz zy
Tension
Shear
0
1 G
0 0
z E z 1 yz
or y E y x z yz G
E E
(2.34)
xy 0 0 0
1
0 0 xy
yz
yz
z z x y xz xz
G 1
xz 0 0 0 0
1
0 xz E G
G
1
0 0 0 0 0
G
E
Note: G = shear modulus (2.35)
2 1
x 2G 0 0 0 x
2G 0 0 0 y
y x e 2G x xy G xy
z 2G 0 0 0 z
or y e 2G y yz G yz (2.36)
xy 0 0 0 G 0 0 xy e 2G G
yz 0 0 0 0 G 0 yz z z xz xz
xz 0 0 0 0 0 G xz
change in volume
where dilatation volume strain is defined as
original volume
V 1 2
e
V0
x y z
E
x y z (2.37)
E
1 1 2
and Lamé’s constants: (2.38)
G E
2 1
mean stress p E
Also bulk modulus of elasticity: K m (2.39)
volume strain e e 3 1 2
Figure 2.20 (a) Strain gage (courtesy of Micro-Measurements Division, Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.) and
(b) schematic representation of a strain rosette.
a x cos 2 a y sin 2 a xy sin a cos a
b x cos b y sin b xy sin b cos b
2 2
(2.44)
cos 2 sin 2 sin cos
c x c y c xy c c
FIGURE 2.21 (a) Deformation/displacement under uniaxial stress; (b) work done by uniaxial stress or
strain energy stored due to uniaxial deformation.
strain energy stored net work done:
x u x x u x u
dU dW x d u dx dydz x dudydz x d dxdydz x d dV
0
x 0 0
x 0
x
Since x
u
x
x
dU x d x dV
0
dU
Def: strain energy density: strain energy per unit volume: U o
dV
Def: (total) strain energy: U U o dV U o dxdydz
V
(2.58)
dU *
Def: complementary energy density: complementary energy per unit volume: U *
o
dV
Def: (total) complementary energy: U * U o*dV U o*dxdydz
V
U x d
o 0 x x
uniaxial tension: x
Note: U o U o* x x (2.48 & 49)
U o* x d x
0
1 1 1 2
linearly elastic: x E x U o U o* x x E x2 x (2.13-A1)
2 2 2E
U xy d
o 0 xy xy
pure shear: xy
Note: U o U o* xy xy (2.13-A2)
U o* xy d xy
0
1 1 1 2
linearly elastic: xy G xy U o U o* xy xy G xy2 xy (2.13-A3)
2 2 2G
U o U o*
1
2
x x y y z z xy xy yz yz zx zx
1
2E
x2 y2 z2 x y y z x z
E 2G
xy yz2 zx2
1 2
(2.51-53)
FIGURE 2.25 Resolution of (a) state of stress into (b) dilatational stresses and (c) distortional stresses.
total strain energy density = dilatational energy density + distortional energy density:
U o U ov U od (2.15-A1)
linearly elastic U o
1
2E
x2 y2 z2
2E
x y y z x z xy yz2 zx2
1 2
2G
(2.52)
then the (elastic) dilatational energy density:
m2 I12 1
1 2 3
1
x y z
2
U ov
2
(2.64)
2 K 18K 18K 18K
and the (elastic) distortional energy density:
3 oct
2
J 1
U od 2 1 2 2 3 3 1
2 2 2
4G 2G 12G
(2.65)
6 xy2 yz2 zx2
1
2 2
2
12G
x y y z z x
Here
m x y z 1
1 I
mean stress: 3 3
octahedral shear stress: 1 2 2 2 6 2 J
oct
3
x y y z z x xy yx yz zy zx xz
3
2