Binder Psy3406-2 Assignment 5
Binder Psy3406-2 Assignment 5
Aja Binder
personality disorders. I was appreciative of these classes because a week prior I was struggling to
differentiate a general personality disorder diagnosis from bipolar disorder. However, as class
progressed, I became quickly aware of the many different types of personality disorders that may
or may not contain similar elements of bipolar disorder. This comorbidity reassured my
confusion. Because of the many types of personality disorders, you not only organized them by
their respected clusters, but you also gave them unique nicknames. You referred to antisocial
disorder as the “dramatic” type or cluster B. As someone fascinated by forensics and the mind of
a killer, I was particularly intrigued when you discussed antisocial personality disorder as a
major contribution of criminal behavior. The DSM-5 indicates “irritability and aggressiveness, as
indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults” as a criterion for antisocial personality disorder.
However, because of the organization that DSM-5 goes by, I was intrigued to find out further if
violence due to the dramatizing factor of cluster B personality types, showed up in any of the
other personality types such as borderline personality disorder. Then suddenly, I thought about
the general DSM-5 definition of personality disorder: “an enduring pattern of inner experience
and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual’s culture, is
pervasive and inflexible, has an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, is stable over time, and
leads to distress or impairment” and questioned the relationship of violence and the entirety of
personality disorders. I had questioned this relationship because of the strong deviation the
individual experiences from their culture expectations and the result of that which is distress and
impairment. I thought that the impact of these two characteristics were enough to make anyone
resort to violence by means of lashing out due to the overwhelming deviation from their culture’s
expectations and it’s resulting consequence of distress. Therefore, I went researching for an
article discussing a link between violence and personality disorders and to my luck, I was able to
find one.
Personality Disorder and Violence: Contributions of the General Aggression Model”. In this
report, Gilbert et al. explore the personality disorder-violence relationship by integrating a theory
of aggression, the General Aggression Model (GAM) with the pre-existing personality disorder-
violence literature. This report was a qualitative analysis that compared prior literature of
research on the relationship between personality disorder and aggression to the GAM which
focuses on key cognitive and affective factors proposed to influence aggression tendencies. Prior
literature states that patients with BPD of ASPD were four times more likely to violent after
discharge from a psychiatric hospital than those without a personality disorder. Prior literature
also notes that individuals diagnosed with a cluster A or B personality disorder had a threefold
likelihood of committing violent acts in the future. When the team applied the GAM they saw
that people who have ingrained an accessible aggression-related cognitions and who are most
susceptible to experiencing internal states that activate those cognitions are more likely to act
aggressively. The research also notes that those who believe aggressive behavior will produce
their desired outcome and they believe they can successfully carry out aggressive acts are more
likely to be violent. Gilbert et al. note imitations in their report. One Gilbert et al. note is a poor
frequently limit their research by only focusing on the disorders widely assumed to be linked to
violence. Another limitation Gilbert et al. note is that there is not enough research using females,
which may skew the research. The authors conclude by noting that the accumulating evidence
supports the theory that people with personality disorders who are more violent show key
In the 1990 horror film, Misery, Stephen King beautifully captures the insanity of former
nurse, Annie Wilkes who recently saves novelist Paul Sheldon after a serious blizzard car crash.
Wilkes claims to be Sheldon’s biggest fan and proceeds to bring him to her remote cabin to
recover. Wilke’s obsession takes a horrid turn when she discovers Sheldon is killing off her
favorite character from his novels. Wilkes then becomes increasingly controlling and violent as
she forces Sheldon to shape his writing to suit her twisted fantasies.
King makes Wilkes someone obsessed with perfection. When Sheldon gets the
opportunity to escape from his room and venture into the rest of the house, he bumps into a
ceramic penguin and places it back with the snout facing the opposite way. Wilkes notices the
penguin isn’t facing “due-south” and punishes him by breaking his ankles. Similarly, when
Wilkes forces Sheldon to write a new book, she gathers all the necessary equipment, although
Sheldon notes she has gotten the wrong paper. At this, Wilkes immediately shuts down and
then sarcastically yells, “Do you need anything else? I’ll bring back the whole store for you!”
Wilkes clearly is obsessed with perfection in these examples but more important to note is when
that perfection becomes impaired. She is very critical of her own mistakes, which is why when
Sheldon mentions the paper, she shuts down at first. Wilkes’ hate for profanity is another
interesting aspect of her personality. Wilkes yells at Sheldon for the use of profanity in his work,
in fact, she makes up childish words like “cookiedoodie” to replace those words, because she is
severely inflexible about matters of morality. She believes profanity has no nobility and thus she
forces others to follow her rigid moral principle of profanity. Wilkes has a rigid personality and
wants things done the “correct” way, which is her way. These features are all characteristic of
Wilkes of having.
Wilkes also has borderline personality disorder (BPD). Wilkes shows signs of “unstable
idealization and devaluation” which is criterion 2 on the BPD diagnostic criteria. Wilkes
idealizes Sheldon, however, after the paper incident she immediately devalues him after and
says, “I go out of my way for you and what thanks do I get?!” Similarly, when she discovers how
Sheldon has been able to escape from his room she asks him, “When are you going to develop a
sense of trust. I cook for you every day!” Both examples show how quick Wilkes goes from
idealization to devaluation. Also, in general, she nurtures him daily but only with the expectation
that Sheldon will be there in return to meet her standards on demand, which is to write the book.
Also, Wilkes has depressive episodes in which she binge eats which is characteristic of BPD as
criterion 7 as she is troubled with chronic feelings of emptiness which causes her to express an
inappropriate amount of anger over small things. These episodes happen after Sheldon, whom
she is caring for and who she sees a lover, is uncaring and she feels he wants to abandon her. The
previous study supports this diagnosis of BPD because Wilkes believes she can cause easily
pain, as she has in the past, killing several infants who were under her nursing care, killing her
father, and her childhood neighbors and their fathers as well. Thus, she believes that is how she
will get her desired outcome: Sheldon re-writes the last Misery book to her liking.
The last disorder I believe Wilkes has is delusional disorder. I believe Wilkes shows
signs of erotomanic delusions and grandiose delusions. Wilkes thinks that Sheldon and she are
“meant to be together” and as Sheldon is a famous writer, he is of higher status, which is typical
of erotomanic delusions. As for grandiose delusions, Wilkes believes she has made a greater
discovery, which is that “she will be judged only by [Sheldon]”, that “God said [he] delivered
[Sheldon] onto her so that she can show [Sheldon] the way”, and that she and Sheldon are meant
to be together, even in the afterlife as she prepares to kill him and then herself. These are very
characteristic of grandiose delusions because not only do they have a religious context, but they
The ending results in Sheldon killing her, although even after 18 months he still sees her
in the form of hallucinations. Even now that Wilkes is dead, Sheldon becomes overwhelmed by
seeing visual hallucinations of Wilkes and undoubtedly suffers from PTSD. This is very brilliant
of King because it shows the twisted nature of mental illness and how it is truly never ending.
References
Gilbert, F., & Daffern, M. (2011). Illuminating the relationship between personality disorder and
230–244. https://doi-org.ezproxy.neu.edu/10.1037/a0024089