0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views13 pages

John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism

This document provides an overview of utilitarianism and different types of utilitarian ethical theories. It discusses John Stuart Mill's view that actions are morally right if they tend to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It also describes two main types of utilitarianism: act utilitarianism, which focuses on the consequences of individual acts, and rule utilitarianism, which assesses acts based on general rules that promote the greatest well-being. The document examines criticisms of each approach and presents the classic "trolley problem" ethical dilemma.

Uploaded by

Jake Uberita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views13 pages

John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism

This document provides an overview of utilitarianism and different types of utilitarian ethical theories. It discusses John Stuart Mill's view that actions are morally right if they tend to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It also describes two main types of utilitarianism: act utilitarianism, which focuses on the consequences of individual acts, and rule utilitarianism, which assesses acts based on general rules that promote the greatest well-being. The document examines criticisms of each approach and presents the classic "trolley problem" ethical dilemma.

Uploaded by

Jake Uberita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

What is

Utilitarianism?
JOHN STUART MILL
Teleological
Moral Theory
Teleology

From the Greek word telos, meaning “purpose”


or “end," Teleology focuses on the goals, ends,
and purposes of things in the world.

While Christian von Wolff coined the term


Teleology in 1728, the idea originated in the
western world with Aristotle, who argued for
the purposeful-ness of nature.
Aristotle's Four Causes

Material Cause : the actual physical componets that make up a thing.

Formal Cause : the structure, blueprint, or design of a being

Efficient Cause : the agent which brigns something to existence

Final Cause : the ultimate purpose of a thing


What is your
ultimate purpose?
Epicureanism

Human being's Concept of Happiness

Happiness as the greatest


good.

Human beings have a Physical Intellectual


complex notion of pleasure. Pleasures Pleasures

"it is better to be Socrates


dissatisfied than a pig satisfied."
Greatest Happiness Principle

Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote


happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of
happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the
absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of
pleasure.

The standard is not the agent’s own great happiness, but the
greatest amount of happiness altogether.
Whose Happiness?
Whose happiness shoud be prioritized?

To prioritize an individua's self-interest is to follow the path of moral egosim.

To prioritize a group creates factionalism and injustice.

Ergo, the welfare of everyone must be prioritized to achieve the greatest


happiness for the greatest number.
Act Utilitarianism: do whatever will produce the
best overall results— should be applied on a case
by case basis.

seen as the most natural interpretation of the utilitarian ideal


focuses on individual acts, not to classes of similar actions

Kinds of
effects determine whether an action is right or wrong in
specific cases

how we should act must depend on actual consequences

Utilitarianism
of the available options

Richard Brandt introduced the terms Act Utilitarianism to


refer to “direct, extreme” utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism
to refer to “indirect, restricted” utilitarianism.
Objections to Act Utilitarianism

has the tendency to give the wrong answers to moral questions

people’s behavior would lack the kind of predictability and


consistency required to sustain trust and social stability
Rule Utilitarianism: judge the morality of
individual actions by reference to general moral
rules,

correct moral rules are those whose inclusion in our moral


code will produce better results (more well-being) than other
possible rules.

Kinds of
produces beneficial results by following rules instead of by
performing individual actions.

Utilitarianism
general rules or practices are more likely to promote good
effects than simply telling people to do whatever they
think is best in each individual case.

Richard Brandt introduced the terms Act Utilitarianism to


refer to “direct, extreme” utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism
to refer to “indirect, restricted” utilitarianism.
Objections to Rule Utilitarianism

will lead to rule worship: irrational deference to rules that have no


utilitarian justification.

has no regard for justice, rights, and desert which involves the
question: “does a person deserve such treatment or verdict or
predicament?”
The Trolley Problem
Consider this:

There is a runaway trolley barrelling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks,
there are five people tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for
them. You are standing some distance off in the train yard, next to a lever. If you pull
this lever, the trolley will switch to a different set of tracks. However, you notice that
there is one person on the side track. You have two options:
1. Do nothing and allow the trolley to kill the five people on the main track.
2. Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person.
Which is the more ethical option? Or, more simply: What is the right thing to do?
Assignment

Answer the posted Classwork

Read Richard Brandt's Utilitarianism and


the Rules of War
Thank You!

You might also like