Drafting of Pleadings Basics
Drafting of Pleadings Basics
Drafting of Pleadings Basics
Sampath Bulusu
What Are Pleadings?
• ‘Pleadings’ means plaint or written statement. (Order VI,
Rule 1, C.P.C.)
• ‘Plaint’ is the statement of claim, in writing and filed by
the plaintiff , in which he sets out his cause of action with
all necessary particulars .
• ‘Written Statement (WS)’ Is a pleading of a defendant. A
reply of a defendant to the plaint filed by a plaintiff. A WS
is a pleading of a defendant dealing with every material
fact of a plaint. It may also contain new facts in favour of
a defendant or legal objections against the claim of a
plaintiff.
Object and Importance of Pleadings
“The object and purpose of pleading is to enable
the adversary party to know the case it has to
meet........ In such a case it is the duty of the
court to ascertain the substance of the pleadings
to determine the question.” Ram Sarup Gupta
(dead) by L.Rs. v. Bishun Narain Inter College &
Ors., AIR 1987 SC 1242
Privy Council & Supreme Court on
Pleadings
Pleadings and particulars are required to enable the court to decide
the rights of the parties in the trial. Thus, the pleadings are more to
help the court in narrowing the controversy involved and to inform the
parties concerned to the question in issue, so that the parties may
adduce appropriate evidence on the said issue. It is settled legal
proposition that as a rule relief not founded on the pleadings should
not be granted.; Therefore, a decision of a case cannot be based on
grounds outside the pleadings of the parties. The pleadings and issues
are to ascertain the real dispute between the parties to narrow the
area of conflict and to see just where the two sides differ. (Sri Mahant
Govind Rao v. Sita Ram Kesho, (1898) 25 Ind. App. 195; M/s. Trojan &
Co. v. RM. N.N. Nagappa Chettiar, AIR 1953 SC 235; Raruha Singh v.
Achal Singh & Ors.; AIR 1961 SC 1097; Om Prakash Gupta v. Ranbir B.
Goyal, AIR 2002 SC 665; Ishwar Dutt v. Land Acquisition Collector &
Anr., AIR 2005 SC 3165; and State of Maharashtra v. Hindustan
Construction Company Ltd., (2010) 4 SCC 518.)
Certain Basic Provisions of C.P.C.
Before Drafting of a Plaint or a WS
• Jurisdiction of Civil Courts
• Place of Suing
• Institution of Suit
• Parties to a Suit
• Joinder of Parties
• Joinder of Causes
• Special Suits
Types of Civil Suits
• Suit for Possession
• Suit for Recovery of Money
• Suit for Injunction
• Suit for Declaration
• Suit for Specific Performance
• Suit for Partition
• Suit for Accounts
This merely an illustrative list
Special Suits
• Suits by or against the Government or public
officers in their official capacity: Sec .80, C.P.C.
• Suits by alien enemies: Sec 83, C.P.C.
• Suit by a foreign State: Sec 84, C.P.C.
• Suits against foreign rulers, Ambassadors, and
Envoys: Sec.86, C.P.C.
• Suits by or against minors and persons of
unsound mind: Order XXXII, Rule 1, C.P.C.
Special Suits-Contd.
• Interpleader suit: Sec.88 Order XXXV, C.P.C.
• Suits by indigent persons (Pauper Suits) Order
XXXII, Rule 1
• Mortgage suits: Order XXXIV, C.P.C.
• Summary suits: Order XXXVII, C.P.C.- Please
refer Mechelec Engineers (1976) 4 SCC 687)
• Public trusts/Charity Suits: Sec.92, C.P.C.
• Special case: S.90 and Order XXXVI, C.P.C.
Frame of a Suit Order II, C.P.C.
• Order 2 Rule 1 "Every suit shall as far as
practicable be framed so as to afford ground for
final decision upon the subject in dispute and to
prevent further litigation concerning them.”
• Underlying Principle:- Firstly, before framing a suit
a lawyer should bear in mind that as far as
practicable, it should be so framed as to afford
ground for final decision of the subject in
disputes and secondly, to prevent further
litigation concerning them.
Frame of a Suit-Contd.
• Order 2 Rule 2: “Every suit shall include the whole of the claims which
the plaintiff is entitled to make in respect of the cause of action; but a
plaintiff may relinquish any portion of his claim in order to bring the
suit within the jurisdiction of any court.
"(1) Where the defendant bases his defence upon a document or relies upon any
document in his possession or power, in support of his defence or claim for set-off
or counterclaim, he shall enter such document in a list, and shall produce it in Court
when the written statement is presented by him and shall, at the same time, deliver
the document and a copy thereof, to be filed with the written statement.
(2) Where any such document is not in the possession or power of the defendant, he
shall, wherever possible, state in whose possession or power it is.
(3) A document which ought to be produced in Court by the defendant under this rule,
but, is not so produced shall not, without the leave of the Court, be received in
evidence on his behalf at the hearing of the suit.
[(1)] Every allegation of fact in the plaint, if not denied specifically or by necessary implication, or stated to be
not admitted in the pleading of the defendant, shall be taken to be admitted except as against person under
disability.
Provided that the Court may in its discretion require any fact so admitted to be proved otherwise than by such
admission.
[(2) Where the defendant has not filed a pleading, it shall be lawful for the Court to pronounce judgment on the
basis of the facts contained in the plaint, except as against a person under a disability, but the Court may, in its
discretion, require any such fact to be proved.
(3) In exercising its discretion under the proviso to sub- rule (1) or under sub-rule (2), the Court shall have due
regard to the fact whether the defendant could have, or has, engaged a pleader.
WS and Set Off
• Particular of Set-off to be given in Written Statement ( Order VIII Rule 6 CPC)
A reading of Rule 6 of Order VIII CPC would show that following conditions have to be satisfied before a
defendant is entitled to set-off under that Rule:-
"A defendant may claim a set-off under this rule if the following conditions are satisfied, but not
otherwise--
(d) it must be recoverable by the defendant from the plaintiff or all the
plaintiffs if more than one. Thus, where th defendant is sued by the agent, he
cannot set-off what is due to him from the principal as the principal is not the
plaintiff;
(e) it must not exceed the pecuniary limits of the jurisdiction of the court in
which the suit is brought; and
(f) both parties must fill, in the defendant's claim to set-off the same,
character as they fill in the plaintiff's suit
Counter Claim
Counter-Claim by Defendant (Order VIII Rule 6-A):
(1) A defendant in a suit may, in addition to his right of pleading a set-off under Rule 6, set up, by way of
counter-claim against the claim of the plaintiff, any right or claim in respect of a cause of action accruing
to the defendant against the plaintiff either before or after the filing of the suit but before the
defendant has delivered his defence or before the time limited for delivering his defence has expired,
whether such counter-claim is in the nature of a claim for damages or not:
Provided that such counter-claim shall not exceed the pecuniary limits of the jurisdiction of the Court.
(2) Such counter-claim shall have the same effect as a cross-suit so as to enable the Court to pronounce
a final judgment in the same suit, both on the original claim and on the counter-claim.
(3) The plaintiff shall be at liberty to file a written statement in answer to the counterclaim of the
defendant within such period as may be fixed by the Court.
(4) The counter-claim shall be treated as a plaint and governed by the rules applicable to the plaints.
Q&A