A Critical Review of Shipbreaking Literature Reveals Shortcomings in Dimensions Considered For Sustainability

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 32

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/344123460

A Critical Review of Shipbreaking Literature Reveals Shortcomings in


Dimensions Considered for Sustainability

Preprint · September 2020


DOI: 10.20944/preprints202009.0121.v1

CITATIONS READS

0 127

1 author:

S M Mizanur Rahman
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers
21 PUBLICATIONS   184 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

REDLED View project

REDLED View project

All content following this page was uploaded by S M Mizanur Rahman on 05 September 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


1

2 A critical review of Shipbreaking literature reveals shortcomings in dimensions


3 considered for sustainability
4 SM Mizanur Rahmana
a
5 University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M
6 Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, France

8 Abstract:
9 The shipbreaking industry is located predominantly in South Asian countries, and dismantles
10 end-of-life ships to meet national steel demand. There are charges that this industry exploits
11 local environmental, economic and social conditions to boost profits. The majority of this
12 previous research often draws from a single disciplinary point of view that ignores or
13 downplays complexities and trade-offs, precluding realistic policy improvement. Here we
14 review 110 shipbreaking papers published in international peer reviewed journals that are
15 indexed in SCOPUS, Science Direct and Google Scholar. We found that to date, shipbreaking
16 research revolves around the coastal contamination of end-of-life ships waste over many other
17 topics, and lacks critical interdisciplinary studies that explain trade-offs between
18 environmental, social and economic factors that would better inform policy formulations for
19 improvement of worker safety and environmental conditions. We propose a Life Cycle
20 Sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework that could incorporate these trade-offs in a
21 single analysis. We hope this review guides future studies towards more comprehensive
22 sustainability measurement of shipbreaking activities.
23 Keywords: shipbreaking; ship recycling; life cycle sustainability assessment; literature
24 review; sustainability
25

26 1. Introduction:
27

28 The international shipbreaking industry provides a recycling service for commercial ships
29 worldwide. More than 90% of end-of-life (EOL) ships are dismantled in five developing
30 nations, a major shift from the historic dismantlement in developed countries due to higher
31 environmental and safety costs that render these activities uncompetitive (Figure 1). Many of
32 the developing nations which now host the ship recycling industry benefit as few have native
33 sources of steel and other recycled materials. For example, with annual economic transactions
34 of about 1.5 billion dollars, the scrap steel meets 60-70% of local steel demand in Bangladesh
35 (Rahman and Mayer 2015). The ship demolition activities represent a critical lifeline for
36 construction industries across the country, involving about 50,000 direct and 100,000 indirect
37 employment opportunities in Bangladesh (Gregson et al. 2012, Sujauddin et al. 2014, Rahman
38 and Mayer 2015).

1
39
40 Figure 1: Global shipbreaking activities in 2016: data from NGO Shipbreaking Platform, 2017
41

42 The shipbreaking industry currently faces a large number of social, economic and policy
43 challenges (Cairns 2007, Neser et al. 2008, Hillier 2009, Demaria 2010, Gregson et al. 2012,
44 Cairns 2014, Devault et al. 2016, Jain et al. 2016, Rahman and Mayer 2016). Stakeholders
45 who influence or are directly impacted by the positive and negative sustainability aspects of
46 the current state of affairs include yard owners, NGOs (both national and international), ship-
47 owners and brokers, international organizations and policy conventions (such as treaties),
48 national governmental agencies, academics, local communities, and the workers. Broadly
49 speaking, ship-owners and yard-owners have an interest in securing a positive profit margin
50 (Jain et al. 2016, Schoyen et al. 2017), while NGOs and researchers mainly focus on poor
51 working conditions and negative environmental effects (Anderson 2001, Neser et al. 2008,
52 Hossain and Islam 2006, Reddy et al. 2003, NGO Shipbreaking Platform 2017). International
53 and national policy makers tend to formulate policies that attempt a compromise between
54 economic demands and environmental and social impacts, however quite a few stakeholders
55 view these as ineffective in improving the status quo (Mikelis 2008, Cairns 2014, Rahman
56 and Mayer 2016). National policy implementers in government utilize least impact strategies
57 to deal with international policies and ground level realities, while international policies
58 struggle to enforce a “polluter pays principle” with the existing system of privatized profits
59 and socialized costs (Rahman and Mayer 2016). Given such a contrasting array of views,
60 identifying solutions that will improve multiple dimensions of the shipbreaking industry
61 remains a significant challenge for the stakeholders, leaving barriers to sustainability intact
62 (Cairns 2007; Cairns 2014).
63
64 But what would a sustainable ship breaking industry look like? Academic and professional
65 researchers play a role in identifying sustainability standards by documenting the current state
66 of the industry in terms of its environmental, social, and economic impacts. And since these
67 dimensions are highly connected, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research is needed to
68 investigate issues that lie in the interface of sustainability dimensions. However, given the
69 slow pace of improvement in sustainability indicators and targets for the shipbreaking

2
70 industry, we seek to identify gaps in knowledge in the scientific literature that may be
71 contributing to lack of progress. We hypothesize that the enduring sustainability issues in the
72 industry are driven by a single-discipline or single-dimension approach to knowledge
73 generation by researchers and other stakeholders. Furthermore, we hypothesize that this
74 exclusionary approach makes it difficult to develop a complementary policy environment
75 where policies focused on one dimension do not work against those formulated in others. This
76 review thus deals with this research question: where are the gaps within and between
77 environmental, social and economic spheres of the shipbreaking industry in Southeast Asia?
78 A paradigm shift occurs from environmental sustainability to triple bottom line sustainability
79 that acknowledges that a balance must be maintained among environmental, economic and
80 social wellbeing (Finkbeiner et al. 2010). Systematic assessment of these three dimensions is
81 addressed in LCSA literature through combining environmental life cycle assessment (eLCA),
82 life cycle costing (LCC) and social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Life cycle assessment is
83 unique from other assessment tools in at least two aspects: 1) it considers all phases of the life
84 cycle of a product, from the extraction and processing of raw materials, to manufacturing of
85 the products, to use and disposal; and 2) it combines and estimates environmental, social and
86 economic aspects within a functional unit and unified system boundary, allowing
87 comparability of the performance of the product among the life cycle phases within and
88 across dimensions (Weidema, 2006, Kloepffer 2008, Traverso et al. 2012). Related to the
89 shipbreaking industry, the application of LCSA can identify questions that require cross
90 disciplinary investigation such as: social and economic (the cost and equity of improved
91 occupational safety); environment and economic (costs versus benefits of proper waste
92 management), environment and social (the impact on community wellbeing of coastal
93 pollution). Here we adopt a systematic review technique to identify existing research patterns
94 and offer future research directions for advancing shipbreaking knowledge. A review paper
95 identifies long-standing research deficits and creates a framework for new research, leading to
96 reorganization of research areas (Webstar and Watson 2002). Our work complements that of
97 Hossain et al (2016), which reviews pollution assessment in Bangladesh but from a
98 predominantly environmental perspective.
99
100 2. Research Methodology:
101 We follow Suring and Muller’s (2008) two objectives for reviewing literature: 1) summarize
102 the major patterns, themes and issues; and 2) identify research gaps and propose a future
103 research focus. Mayring (2003) describes a four-step procedure for a review paper that we
104 also use here: 1) Study scope and literature search, 2) Descriptive analysis, 3) Category
105 selection and 4) Material evaluation. For the latter two tasks, we used NVivo qualitative data
106 analysis software to guide subjective theme selection and content analysis through the “text
107 search query”, “most frequent word search” and “coding” tools (NVivo 2017).
108 2.1. Study scope and literature search:
109 The scope was limited to peer reviewed scientific articles and conference papers, with
110 accessible full text in English, that contained “shipbreaking” or “ship recycling” in their titles
111 and/or in the abstract. The University of Technology of Troyes has access to a wide number
112 of journals, and access to full articles of identified papers was 86/94*100 = 91% for this

3
113 study. The boundary selection excluded research on shipbreaking in other languages, as well
114 as reports and news articles.
115

116
117

118 Figure 2 : Article selection process and database sources. The rectangular box with texts and
119 numbers denotes the keywords used to search the literature and the number of search results.
120 This paper utilized Scopus, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases to identify potential
121 papers. Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer reviewed literature, with
122 over 60 million records going back as far as 1823. The database has enabling tools to track,
123 analyse and visualize research (Scopus 2017). The keywords used were “Ship breaking” and
124 “Ship recycling” in “All article title, Abstract and Keyword search”. This returned 101 results
125 for “Ship Breaking” and 82 results for “Ship Recycling” searched in June 2017. The change
126 of key words to “Shipbreaking” “Shiprecycling” returned 61 and zero papers, respectively,
127 with no new results in the latter search. (Figure 2).
128 Of the 183 results, 125 articles were initially included based on an expanded set of keywords:
129 “Shipbreaking” and “Ship recycling”. A few additional articles were added based on our
130 familiarity of the content of the articles that discussed issues regarding shipbreaking, but may
131 not have made use of these words in the title or abstract. In the next round, 14 articles that
132 appeared in both searches were excluded. In the third round, based on a full text reading,
133 another 17 were excluded of which 14 articles were conference papers that were not indexed
134 in an internationally accepted scientific database. At this point, we added two more keywords:
135 “Ship Dismantling” and “Ship demolition”, resulting in four more articles added to the list,
136 demonstrating the inclusiveness of the search (Oxman 1993). Our main concern with the

4
137 Scopus results was that this search did not return any studies on Pakistan shipbreaking, and
138 returned only two studies on China, which are the fourth and third major shipbreaking nations
139 after Bangladesh and India respectively.
140 To validate and ensure the exhaustive capture of the shipbreaking literature, we also ran a
141 literature search in Science Direct using the same key words. “Ship breaking” and “Ship
142 recycling” keywords returned 356 and 97 articles respectively. The change of key words to
143 “Shipbreaking” and “Shiprecycling” returned 96 and 3 results respectively. We considered
144 key words for “Ship breaking” and “Ship recycling” in order to ensure the maximum possible
145 capture of published literature. Out of these 356 papers, we identified an additional six papers
146 that were not covered in the Scopus database through title and abstract reading. The
147 decreasing returns with respect to additional articles not identified in Scopus suggested we
148 were nearing an exhaustive list of shipbreaking literature. This Science Direct search returned
149 three articles on India, two on China, one that was global in scope, and none from Pakistan.
150 We then used Google scholar in a targeted search for “Shipbreaking in Pakistan” and
151 “Shipbreaking in China”, which produced 6 publications on Pakistan and 8 on China,
152 including reports published in collaboration with NGOs. These publications are not often
153 indexed in international databases, and thus may be the reason they were missed in the
154 previous two searches. Finally, we scanned the cited references of the papers. An additional
155 13 articles were identified from references sections that met our search criteria. Thus, a total
156 of 110 articles are included in this review paper (Figure 2).
157 The papers were categorized into disciplinary categories. Environmental Science categories
158 included papers that investigated pollution, such as applying laboratory-based experiments
159 through the collection of water samples to identify pollutant contents. Environmental
160 Engineering disciplines represented methods such as material flow analysis and engineering
161 assessments, seeking to optimize the design aspect of shipbreaking. Safety management deals
162 with exposure assessment and working conditions. Social Science disciplines broadly
163 engaged in world system, policy development and cultural contexts. Papers that discussed
164 more than one dimension were placed into interdisciplinary categories, however those papers
165 generally lacked methodologies that could explain complex trade-offs. The articles were also
166 divided in terms of the dimension of sustainability covered. Environmental and economic
167 dimensions were straightforward with explicit content in the paper. However, the social
168 dimension included diverse themes including policy, culture, risk assessment and working
169 conditions. When there was more than one dimension discussed in a paper, we included it in a
170 “sustainability” dimension.
171

172 3. Results
173 3.1 Papers by time, discipline and country
174 Descriptive analysis was performed based on the distribution of scientific articles across time,
175 discipline, and country. Figure 3 shows the rapidly increasing number of papers published
176 since 2003. The figure also shows the absence of shipbreaking research from 1990 to 2000.
177 This is probably due to the transition in the shipbreaking industry at that time, with a
178 geographic shift in activities from developed to developing countries. The earlier publications
179 demonstrated the consequences of occupational exposure of the workers, contributing to the

5
180 cessation of those jobs in developed countries and the decline in the attention paid by
181 researchers. The reappearance of the topic demonstrates a time lag between the actual start-up
182 of the work in developing countries and the visible consequences of the work on the
183 environment and workers. For example, shipbreaking in Bangladesh started in the early
184 1980s, and literature on the issue started to appear two decades later (Figure 3).
20

18

16

14
Number of publication

12

10

185
186 Figure 3: Shipbreaking literature published by year.

6
Economic Engineering
Interdisciplinary 4% 8%
4a 4%

Environmental
Social Science Science
35% 35%

Safety
Management
14%

187

Indonesia

Egypt 4b
Taiwan

Global

US

EU

Turkey

China

Pakistan

India

Bangladesh

0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Engineering Environmental science Safety Management Social Science Economic Interdisciplinary
188
189

190 Figure 4: Shipbreaking research by discipline (a) and nation (b).

191 Figure 4a illustrates the disciplinary representation of the shipbreaking research. Social
192 Science studies (excluding economic analyses), including a substantial number of qualitative
193 ethnographic studies, represent the largest category of focus, accounting for 35% of all
194 studies. Environmental Science studies also represented 35% of the total number of papers,
195 while Environmental Engineering accounted for only 8% of literature. Safety Management

7
196 shares 14% , while Economic discipline shares only 4%. Studies that encompassed more than
197 one disciplinary boundaries were few; they represented less than five percent of the studies on
198 SBI.
199
200 Figure 4b further breaks down the disciplinary boundaries by country. India and Bangladesh
201 have had a similar number of Environmental Science, Social Science and Environmental
202 Engineering studies, with pollution assessment as a primary focus of most of the publications.
203 Studies in Turkey exclusively focused on pollution assessment. Papers that looked at the
204 global industry as a whole had the most publications from the Social Sciences, and none from
205 Environmental Science, which we consider to be a major gap in the field given the pollution
206 implications of avoided mining activities and the global trade in recycled metals. Generally
207 speaking, the total number of papers by country was correlated to the relative size of each
208 country’s shipbreaking activities (Figure 5). Bangladesh and India receive the highest number
209 of EOL ships and also receive the most attention, although the SBI in Pakistan and China
210 seems to be getting less attention than the size of their activities warrant.
211

350
Number of Ships 2015
305
300 Number of Ships 2016

Number of papers
250
224
Number of Ships

194 193
200

158
150 141

100
100 92
81
74

50
28 25 28
20
9 13
3 6
0
Bangladesh India China Pakistan Turkey EU
212
213
214
215 Figure 5: The number of end-of-life ships dismantled in 2015 and 2016 and the number of
216 peer reviewed papers published up to June 2017 by country. Shipbreaking data from the NGO
217 shipbreaking platform. The number of publications on the US (2), Global scale (18) and other
218 countries (5) that are not shipbreaking countries are not included in this figure.
219 3.2. Dimensions of Sustainable development:
220 There were only 4 publications which discussed more than one dimension and were
221 categorized as interdisciplinary (Neser et al. 2008, Choi et al. 2016, Devault et al. 2016,

8
222 Welaya et al. 2012). Likewise, a critical shortage of papers on economic conditions was
223 evident; only 5 publications published out of 110 (McKenney 1994, Knapp et al. 2008,
224 Kagkarakis et al. 2016, Kusumaningdyah et al. 2013, Schoyen et al. 2017) (Figure 6).
225

Environment 47

Economic 5

Social 54

Sustainability 4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60
226
227 Figure 6: Dimensions of sustainability addressed in selected papers.

228
229
230

231 3.3. Review structure:


232 We used a concept centric review style using a concept matrix to proceed with the themes
233 analysis (Webster and Watson 2008). We developed themes based on the major set of
234 commonly-used words (Figure 7). Each paper was categorized in at least one of the themes
235 with a maximum of two themes for each paper. Within each disciplinary category
236 (Environmental Science, Environmental Engineering, Safety Management, Economics, Social
237 Sciences), multiple subthemes emerged (Table 1).
238

239
240 Figure 7 : Most pronounced concepts identified in N-Vivo from the selected articles.

9
241
242
243 Table 1. Disciplinary categories and subthemes used to classify papers.
244
245

Disciplinary categories and subthemes


ES Environmental Science
ES1 Waste quantification
ES2 Pollution assessment
ES3 Source apportionment
ES4 Impact assessment

EE Environmental Engineering
EE1 Design for recycling
EE2 Best waste management practices

SM Safety Management
SM1 Exposure assessment
SM2 Worker and working rights

SS Social Science
SS1 Justice and world system
SS2 Policy challenges
SS4 Recycling networks as cultural

Econ Economics of shipbreaking

10
Figure 8. Subject-wise classification of the reviewed articles. The left bold boundary denotes the dimension wise category. MS category is
considered as the Social dimension category for evaluation purpose but are analyzed separately because of its significant representation in the
literature.

11
1 4. Discussion:
2 4.1. Environment:
3 4.1.1. Waste quantification on board:
4 Actual waste content and the proportion that is released into the environment are two
5 important environmental impacts of EOL ship dismantling. Few studies have focused on
6 estimating the actual waste content in the ships, with uncertainty and variability arising from
7 ship type and age (Carvalho et al. 2011, Hiremath et al. 2015, Rahman et al. 2016, Jain et al.
8 2016). Actual waste content based on different types of ships was estimated as 0-3% by
9 weight in Carvalho et al. (2011) based on five type of ships, 2% in Jain et al. (2016) based on
10 a bulk carrier, 5-10% in Demaria (2010) and 6% in Sujauddin et al. (2015). Structural
11 organization, material use and distribution, in addition to ship type, make it difficult to obtain
12 reliable and consistent data of waste content and the associated impact (Carvalho et al. 2011,
13 Du et al. 2012, Jain et al. 2016). Waste content models by ship type and age may be
14 developed in the future (Hiremath et al. 2016, Jain et al. 2016).
15 The consideration of content as waste also depends on cultural, institutional and market
16 conditions (Gregson et al. 2010, Rahman and Mayer 2015), thus requiring the incorporation
17 of additional social variables in waste quantification modelling. This area of on board waste
18 content deserves more research attention in order to generate reliable waste data, and to model
19 actual waste discharge to the environment in shipbreaking countries.
20

21 4.1.2. Pollutant assessment in shipbreaking areas:


22 A total of 24 pollution assessment studies of the 38 Environmental Science papers revealed a
23 strong research focus on identifying pollution potentials of shipbreaking. The studies differ in
24 terms of type and nature of pollutants, affected areas and seasons. Most of the literature
25 estimated the concentration of common water and air pollutants such as oil, heavy metals,
26 asbestos and persistent organic pollutants, demonstrating concentration levels above safety
27 threshold values in India (Reddy et al. 2003, 2004 and 2005 Patel et al. 2012, Patel et al.
28 2013, Patel et al. 2014, Jumaila et al. 2015, Shah et al. 2015), in Bangladesh (Siddiquee et al.
29 2009, Sharifuzzaman et al. 2016, Khan et al. 2017, Hasan et al. 2013, Khan and Khan 2003,
30 Hasan et al. 2013, Islam and Hossain 1986, Abdullah et al. 2013, Aktaruzzaman et al. 2014,
31 Hossain et al. 2016, Kibria et al. 2016), and in Turkey ( Neser et al. 2008, 2012a, 2012b,
32 Kacar and Kocyigit 2013). This high level of pollution threatens ecosystems and local
33 communities. However, pollution assessment studies can be more precise if the diverse
34 sources of pollutant release are taken into account in discussing pollution from shipbreaking
35 (Neser et al. 2008).
36 The major attempts to identify and separate sources of pollutants diagnosed in coastal
37 soil, water and air were taken by Aydin et al. (2014) and Kara et al. (2014). They used
38 multiple site analysis and principal component analysis to understand the level of pollutants
39 emitted from each of multiple sites: biomass and coal combustion 40% (residential and
40 industrial coal combustion), iron and steel production (27%), unburned crude oil and
41 petroleum products (27%), diesel (3%) and gasoline exhaust emissions (3%; Ayedin et al.
42 2015). In Bangladesh, Kibira et al. (2016) conducted a pollution assessment on 7 heavy

12
43 metals in three regions in Bangladesh: Dhaka (3 sites), Chittagong (4 sites) and Khulna (2
44 sites). The study found that the sites near the shipbreaking industry yield less impact
45 compared to the other sites where both shipbreaking and other industries exist. The highest
46 impact was observed in Dhaka (the capital of the country), with five out of seven heavy
47 metals measured beyond safety thresholds. This source-specific pollutant estimation indicates
48 a nuanced understanding of shipbreaking impacts.
49

50 4.1.3. Impact assessment


51 Applying life cycle assessment methods in Bangladesh shipbreaking, Rahman et al. (2016)
52 found that the core activities that happen during ship dismantling in the yards record less
53 environmental damage compared to the other stages that occur outside of the yards, such as
54 rerolling of scrap metals. In addition, the study modelled waste discharge to coastal waters
55 based on interview data and secondary data and found that the waste impact in three damage
56 categories comprise only 0.3% of the total impact. The results of this study conformed to
57 findings of Ayedin et al. (2014), Kara et al. (2015a) and Kara et al. (2015b), necessitating
58 changes of research direction towards sophisticated impact assessment methods that can
59 model waste discharge and its impact on ecosystems. Although the waste content, waste
60 release and impact mechanism within the ecosystem greatly varies based on ship type, size
61 and age, these studies provide evidence that environmental pollution studies require inclusion
62 of source apportionment research and actual waste content and release of EOL ships.
63

64 4.2 Engineering:
65 4.2.1. Design for Environment:
66 Three articles discussed ship design for improved recycling and avoided environmental
67 pollutants and hazardous materials. Shivaprashad and Nandakumar (2013) discussed
68 extended life cycle thinking and recyclability analysis to include EOL ship dismantling in the
69 design phase. Jain et al. (2015) stated that the EOL stages are ignored in the design process,
70 despite the fact that 96% of ships are dismantled in shipbreaking yards with environmental,
71 social and safety issues, leading to serious environmental injustice for the shipbreaking
72 nations. The EOL consequences make it necessary to incorporating ship dismantling into
73 design thinking (Sunaryo and Pahalatua 2015,Jain et al. 2017b). The purpose of design for
74 ship recycling is three fold: reduce or replace hazardous materials, provide an inventory of
75 hazardous materials, and allow for easy dismantling (Sivaprasad and Nandakumar 2013, Jain
76 et al. 2015, Jain et al. 2017a). Following IMOs instruction, some research has already been
77 conducted on replacing asbestos, tri-butyl-tin (TBT) in antifouling paints, and chloro-fluoro-
78 carbons (CFCs) in refrigerants (Jain et al. 2015).
79

80 4.2.2. Best Management Practices:


81 Given the 20-30 year life span of a ship, the benefits of the “designing for dismantling”
82 approach need to be accompanied by a risk reduction strategy and waste management plan –
83 these two areas constitute the management strategy of ship dismantling. To do this, Garmer et

13
84 al. (2015) developed a three step risk assessment method with subsequent validation to ensure
85 that the risk assessment method can be practically applied. The method development is based
86 on a team of yard personnel comprising yard officials, safety and inspection officials, but no
87 involvement of workers. The first step includes preparing ship-specific documents with
88 detailed arrangements of decks, firefighting equipment, logbooks of tank substances, and
89 other pertinent information (Garmer et al. 2015). The second step includes hazardous tasks
90 identification, deployment of safety analysis personnel, and development of
91 inspection/screening tools. Finally, a deeper risk assessment is conducted to advance
92 recommendations for risk minimization. While the process itself is rigorous and provides an
93 important contribution to reducing shipbreaking risks, without involving workers and yard
94 managers, the validation process remains incomplete. The management approach lacks
95 identification of actor characteristics and cost apportionment of the risk adjusted management
96 approach (Hiremath et al. 2016). Life cycle costing (LCC) and social life cycle assessment
97 may be useful for understanding the cost structure (stepwise and define fraction of cost)
98 required to produce a certain level of risk adjusted social benefits.
99

100 4.3. Safety Management:


101 A total of 16 publications were identified in this category, with 9 addressing exposure
102 assessment and 6 on working conditions and workers’ rights.
103 4.3.1. Exposure assessment:
104 Workers face three types of occupational risks: occupational hazards with immediate
105 consequences such as accidents and injuries; short-term exposure to hazardous materials via
106 the inhalation of toxic fumes (infecting respiratory systems); and long-term consequences that
107 appear after retiring from dismantling activities. Most of the studies focused on occupational
108 hazards and short-term exposure because the damage is relatively easy to determine and
109 noticeable (Anderson et al. 2001, Hossain et al. 2016).
110 Hazards-specific exposure assessments have been conducted in several areas: asbestosis
111 (Courtice et al. 2011, Wu et al. 2015), lead exposure (Goldberg et al. 1963, Maccallum et al.
112 1968, Tola and Karskela 1976, Nosal et al. 1990), paint exposure (Engstrom et al. 1990),
113 metal exposure during cutting (Ho et al. 1989), and long term mortality among shipbreaking
114 workers in Taiwan (Liu et al. 2003, Wu et al. 2013). In Bangladesh, 87% of the shipbreakers
115 were not aware what “asbestos” was and 41% did not recognize photographs of it (Tola and
116 Karskela 1976).
117 Metal cutting activities dominate 71% of the total labor force. These activities pose risks to
118 cutters and helpers due to inhalation of fumes released during cutting (Deshpande et al. 2013,
119 Rahman et al. 2016). The connection between asbestos exposure and cancer detection was
120 also studied on 4427 shipbreaking workers in Taiwan from 1985-2008, and the authors
121 recommended continuous monitoring of workers for early detection of asbestosis and cancer
122 (Wu et al. 2013, 2015). Liu et al. (2003) provided information regarding exposure-induced
123 mortality rates and externally caused mortality in Taiwan through a 13 year retrospective
124 study. Symptoms develop over time and thus require continuous health surveillance
125 throughout a worker’s life (Ho et al. 1989).

14
126 The exposure assessment studies summarize the exposure of heavy metals, exposure to
127 occupational hazards and differences of exposure in terms of distances, times and type of
128 work/workers, with some retrospective references to the long-term impacts on worker health
129 and mortality. It is noteworthy that similar studies have not been conducted in the current
130 shipbreaking nations (except Deshpande et al. 2012 and Courtice et al. 2011), signaling a
131 critical gap in our understanding of impacts on workers’ long-term health in developing
132 countries.
133

134 4.3.2. Working conditions:


135 Working conditions and worker rights mostly revolve around medical facilities, safety
136 equipment, and accidents and injuries management (Anderson 2001, Bianchi 2005, Sahu
137 2014). Our review revealed an observed disparity in conditions and rights across the three
138 largest shipbreaking nations. The Gadhani shipbreaking yard in Pakistan provides safety
139 equipment and emergency medical care while India and Bangladesh devolve responsibility to
140 the workers (Iqbal and Heideggar 2013, Sahu 2014). Gadhani shipbreaking surpasses India
141 and Bangladesh in terms of application of heavy machinery, the existence and functioning of
142 labor unions, and compensation enforcement for accidents and injuries. With no report of
143 child labor, no night shifts with less overtime, higher wages, and strong inspection teams, the
144 Gadhani yard represents a higher social responsibility to workers and working conditions.
145 However, issues such as lower use of protective equipment, awareness of asbestos removal,
146 training for workers, health screening, the contractual nature of employment, and causes of
147 deaths and injuries remain comparable to India and Bangladesh (Iftikhar et al. 2016). It is
148 common practice for these three Asian nations to sell asbestos to local communities,
149 demonstrating the low awareness of its dangers (Ahmed and Siddiqui 2013). Another
150 common theme of this working conditions literature is the lack of proper documentation of
151 accidents and their consequences for the workers.
152 While poor working conditions have dominated conversations about shipbreaking from
153 NGOs, few peer-reviewed research has been conducted on the specificities of the workers
154 engaged in this risky industry, indicating an urgency of a social life cycle assessment across
155 different scales (Tiwary et al. 2008). This will provide interesting comparability among
156 shipbreaking nations and identify critical areas of improvement. It is also noteworthy that
157 except for general discussions of working conditions in the sub-standard yards, we still lack
158 information that relates these risks to workers’ long-term wellbeing.
159

160 4.4. Social, cultural and policy aspects:


161 Studies in this broad area have focused on environmental justice, policy challenges, and
162 economic issues such as capacity building, marketing, cost-benefit analysis, and recycling
163 chains. Among these, capacity building mechanisms and funding requirements emerged as
164 key conditions that can reduce shipbreaking’s adverse impacts (Rahman and Kim 2020,
165 Rahman and Mayer 2016). While economic drivers are highly important in the sustainability
166 of shipbreaking industry, it is very important to make economics as a separate analytical
167 discipline. However, in this paper, due to a few papers that fall in economic discipline, we
168 have analyzed within social science category. In the next category where we will discuss the

15
169 dimension as a sustainable dimension, we will regard economic dimensions as one of three
170 important dimensions.
171

172 4.4.1. Environmental Justice:


173 Justice framing of shipbreaking issues was well addressed. Most studies mentioned poor
174 working conditions, lax environmental regulations, and economic incentives for toxic
175 dumping in developing countries. Environmental justice was considered from multiple
176 perspectives and scales: world system (Frey et al. 2013), north-south value conflict (Cairns
177 2007), socio-economic compulsion (Gregson et al. 2012, Cairns 2014), ecological distribution
178 conflicts (Demaria 2010), and tension between NIMBY vs WIMBY (Sonak et al. 2008). For
179 example, Demaria (2010) suggested that it is a WIMBY (Welcome Into My Backyard)
180 phenomenon, posing challenges to Western notions of justice. Gregson et al. (2016) showed
181 that strict enforcement of toxic bans might lead to the movement of peripheral workers to the
182 toxic activities in core countries, as seen with the migration of Eastern European laborers to
183 Western European recycling facilities. Socio-economic compulsion along with lack of
184 institutional capacity pose challenges to ensure justice from developing country perspectives.
185

186 4.4.2. Policy challenges:


187 The Basel Convention and the Hong Kong International Convention on the Safe and
188 Environmentally Sound Recycling (HKC) are important policies that regulate the
189 shipbreaking industry, along with the latest European Ship Recycling Regulations (ESRR).
190 Policy publications mostly focused on national and international policy gaps and challenges
191 for improvement of the industry (Alam and Faruque 2014, Zhang and Chang 2014, Rahman
192 and Mayer 2016, Alcaidea et al 2016), technical and financial incentive structures (Rahman
193 and Mayer 2016), and international regulatory loopholes (Alcaidea et al. 2016). These
194 regulations mostly focus on “polluter pays principals”, “proximity principals” and “extended
195 producer responsibility”. The ESRR forbids EU ships from being dismantled in substandard
196 yards, as per proximity principals and guided by the Basel Convention. The HKC provides
197 detailed procedural guidelines, from dismantling decisions by shipowners to dismantling
198 ships in yards, through the deployment of proper documentation, certification and inspections
199 (Karim 2014, Rahman and Mayer 2016, Alcaidea et al. 2016).
200 Practices of selling ships for dismantling are not well regulated: loopholes exist which allow
201 owners to reflag EOL ships before beaching, relaxing ship owner responsibilities and
202 boosting their profit margin (Saraf et al. 2010, Alcaidea et al. 2016). These loopholes and
203 perverse economic incentives need to be addressed (Schoyen et al. 2017). The economic
204 incentives of the ship-owners for substandard recycling facilities and strong demand for metal
205 scraps in the recipient countries reinforce lax regulations that come at the cost of worker
206 safety (Rahman and Mayer 2016, Cairns 2014).
207 Another important issue is the difference in commitment to regulations of international policy
208 institutions and the implementing nation state (Alam and Faruque 2014). Given the
209 consequences of the strict enforcement of international regulations (e.g., leakage effect, lack
210 of enforcement of polluter pay principals), national policies often only superficially respond

16
211 to improvement mechanisms (Rahman and Mayer 2016). While there are several causes and
212 factors that prevent nation states from enforcing laws, the extent to which the national level
213 regulators influence the existing working conditions and tolerate pollution levels is still
214 unknown (Garud 2012). A national/ global level LCSA study should identify to what extent
215 the lack of suitable international policies allows yardowners to maintain the status quo.
216 The noteworthy concept of technical and funding assistance stipulated in the HKC was
217 mentioned in most of the publications in this category, but there is not a single paper which
218 focuses on that as a main concept to formulate guidelines for assistance. This is another
219 critical research need.
220 4.4.4. Cultural aspects of recycling networks:
221 Gregson and colleagues (2011, 2013) developed a strong argument, drawing from economic
222 and cultural geography, which shapes an innovative perception of shipbreaking practices.
223 According Gregson et al. (2011), the resource recovery activities epitomize a corporeal
224 vulnerability that disregards space and time – be it in developing countries or developed
225 countries (Gregson et al. 2011, 2014). The microscale activities represent “dirty” work
226 capable of attracting migrants and the underprivileged, creating spatial injustice (Gregson et
227 al. 2014).
228 Hazardous waste is often culturally contingent (Gregson et al. 2011). In the context of
229 developing countries, the ship-scrapped materials (glass wool, asbestoses, black paint oil and
230 furniture) are used by lower and middle classes in South Asia (Gregson et al. 2010a, Gregson
231 et al. 2012, Gregson et al. 2013 and Crang et al 2013). For example, the formation of the
232 secondary processing industry across Bangladesh and consumption of EOL consumer
233 products indicates a cultural inclination that is intricately bound with the global flow of waste,
234 a symbiotic relationship that spans local to global scales.
235 A social life cycle study is thus important to quantify how the processing of so-called “waste”
236 endangers and/or uplifts a recycling society through the consideration of local, social, cultural
237 and individual preferences and expectations.
238 4.5. Economics of shipbreaking:
239 There were only six papers with economics as a main content of analysis. The studies mostly
240 discussed disposal decisions of shipowners (Knapp 2008, Kagkarakis et al. 2016), economic
241 feasibility of ship dismantling in developed countries (Mackenny 1994, Choi et al 2016),
242 funding estimates for yard capacity development of the south Asian countries (Yujuico 2014,
243 Rahman and Mayer 2016) and dwindling competitiveness of Chinese yards (Du et al. 2017).
244 Choi (2016) provided interesting information about the cost of the standard recycling method
245 of ships in the US, and found that the decision to recycle ships in developed countries can be
246 profitable, in addition to the benefits derived through the production of metal scrap. Yujuico
247 (2014) described the need to apply the “polluter pays principle”, and estimated about 53.5
248 million USD would be needed to upgrade Bangladesh shipbreaking capabilities (as well as 43
249 M USD for Gadhani, Pakistan). His analysis incorporated the needs for developmentally
250 appropriate aid and good governance, supported by strong international policies. The Chinese
251 shipbreaking market has been shrinking despite its satisfactory safety management and higher
252 environmental standards setting (Du et al. 2017). The increasing investment costs in greener
253 facilities require government monetary incentives (subsidies) and other trade supports in order

17
254 to remain competitive, as is the case for China (Du et al. 2017). This demonstrates a strong
255 need to employ Life Cycle Costing (LCC) in the shipbreaking industry in order to understand
256 complex dynamics such as cost vs competitiveness.
257 5. Discussion:
258 5.1. Strengths of the shipbreaking literature:
259 The literature on environmental dimensions demonstrated that shipbreaking activities
260 discharge pollutants to coastal ecosystems, and aimed to highlight environmental impacts for
261 policy makers at national and international levels. All shipbreaking nations have conducted
262 environmental pollution research to identify sources of pollutants, with varying levels of
263 precision (Aydin et al. 2014, Kara et al. 2014), and impact assessments (such as life cycle
264 assessment) at the process level (Rahman et al. 2016, Despande et al. 2013). In addition,
265 recent efforts to identify waste content inside EOL ships signifies a shift to more detailed
266 environmental data that can be used to formulate more effective policies (Jain et al. 2016,
267 Hiremath et al. 2015).
268 Although workers’ issues are rarely investigated in detail, most of the publications touched
269 upon the aspects of working conditions, often using an environmental justice frame or an
270 employment opportunities frame. Long term occupational exposure was studied only in
271 Taiwan, establishing exposure impact on worker health and wellbeing during employment
272 and afterwards. Worker safety indicators and implementation were typically discussed
273 without developing consistent social indicators and their impacts across scales (for example
274 families, self-health conditions, wellbeing) and without referring to critical trade-offs in areas
275 such as economic investment required, cultural contagiousness, risk or cost versus benefits for
276 workers (short- and long-term). Deeply understanding these critical issues requires
277 innovative, interdisciplinary methodologies.
278 Economic analyses are rare, although they are discussed in general terms in most of the
279 publications. Scrap price variability and market conditions, which determine ship-owners’
280 decisions whether and where to discarding ships, have been studied as stand-alone issues
281 (Knapp et al. 2008, Kagkarakis et al. 2016). There is still a need to generate cost information
282 with business competitiveness, social variables and environmental indicators. More critical
283 research should explore stage-wise cost distributions at national and international levels, to
284 resolve issues related to ship-owners decision criteria at the point of selling ships for
285 dismantling, and tradeoffs between economic and sustainability considerations (Choi et al.
286 2016, Welaya et al. 2012).
287

288 5.2. Shortcomings of the existing research:


289  Environmental impacts beyond pollutant assessment
290 The environmental impacts of shipbreaking have been reduced to pollution impacts. There is
291 some recognition that the pollution assessment research is incomplete; there is a need for
292 better identification of all sources of pollutants (Neser et al. 2008). According to this review,
293 pollution apportionment research has only been conducted in Turkey and India (Aydin et al.
294 2014). More research is needed on direct ship-based waste quantification, and life cycle
295 assessment to identify impacts of those pollutants on human health and ecosystems.

18
296  Institutional conditions that can promote fair working conditions are neglected
297 Institutional and policy setting is highly specific to country context. Therefore, it is important
298 to understand how (and to what extent) socio-political context can impede policy and
299 regulatory improvements. This knowledge is key to developing better policies at multiple
300 scales, and understanding interactions across scales.
301  An interdisciplinary approach is missing.
302 The shipbreaking literature predominately covers environmental and social issues from a
303 single discipline approach. Few studies have addressed environmental, social and safety
304 issues together in a holistic framework. For example, Neser et al. (2008) and Devault et al.
305 (2016) generally discussed the environmental, social and safety issues but did not incorporate
306 economic aspects such as cost distribution or funding mechanisms for regulatory
307 enforcement.
308
309 6. Proposed LCSA methods in SBI research:
310

311 6.1. System integration:


312 It is evident so far that shipbreaking research represents conventional disciplinary boundaries
313 and ignores synergistic interactions, conflicting social goals and trade-offs (Liu et al. 2015).
314 System integration enables coupling of human and ecological systems in order to understand
315 system complexity and enhance synergies among factors (Liu et al. 2015). Shipbreaking
316 generates impacts across scales (local, national and global), dimensions and organizational
317 levels. For example, asbestos use threatens yard workers (local impact) but adds to local
318 secondary business including yard owners’ income (economic dimension) and reduces
319 environmental waste production (environmental dimension). The business culture, in turn,
320 supports the persistence of EOL ship trade in the international market (global impact).
321 Improving yards is not a goal in itself. For example, facility improvement in China reduced
322 overall business competiveness, resulting in net negative impacts through leakage effects,
323 which in turn influenced yard owners’ decisions in other countries (Du et al. 2017).
324 Shipbreaking income provides economic security but may reduce family solidarity through
325 labor migration and threatens health through exposure to occupational hazards (Figure 9).
326

19
327
328

329 Figure 9: Interaction trajectories among shipbreaking variables at the national level; (+)/(-)
330 inside the parenthesis () represents the nature of the variables; +/- inside the circle alongside
331 the arrow represents synergistic effects.
332

333 6.2. Application of LCSA tool:


334 We propose the use of LCSA which combines three dimensions following four essential
335 steps: Goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, life cycle impact assessment and
336 interpretation. The approach depends upon compatible system boundaries and functional
337 units, not just co-publishing the three dimensional evaluation scores together. Until recently,
338 ELCA was applied in many product systems with less application of LCC and SLCA. Thus,
339 the sustainability estimation lacks the understanding of the triple bottom line approach.
340 Currently, product system research emphasizes the combination of those three assessment
341 tools, called LCSA. LCSA can be represented by the following equation:
342 LCSA = ELCA + LCC + SLCA
343

20
344 This approach seeks to measure/evaluate interdependent effects using a systemic approach,
345 and to allow for the estimation of trade-offs in improvement across dimensions (e.g., the
346 economic cost of increased standards for worker safety and environmental protection against
347 the profit margin of the yardowners) (Traverso et al. 2012). However, Kleopffer (2008)
348 maintains that separate assessment of the three dimensions can still be compared if they
349 utilize the same system boundary. As shipbreaking is a new field of LCSA evaluation,
350 flexibility in terms of separate individualized assessment can be a first step for evaluation
351 because the collection and preparation of data for each step are usually difficult to obtain.
352 Inventory analysis – an obligatory step in LCSA standardised by ISO 14040-14044 (e
353 LCA), offers yard-level data with associated trade-off information that can facilitate critical
354 policy analysis. Environmental LCA quantifies hazards and environmental impacts caused by
355 the release of toxic contaminants with its limitations for high data collection times, resources
356 and lack of availability of appropriate data (Rahman et al. 2016). LCC examines the cost
357 structure from environmental and industrial perspectives of different stages of the product life
358 cycle, identifying the viability of stages (brokering in international zones) and profitability to
359 stakeholders (Figure 10). Finally, SLCA evaluates the social wellbeing of stakeholders such
360 as workers, local communities, evaluates socio-economic development, and identifies
361 organizational behaviour such as company negligence, policy gaps, and institutional
362 weaknesses (Weidema 2006, Drayer et al. 2010). The sustainability score from each of these
363 assessments can be communicated together in a sustainability dashboard exemplified in
364 Finkbeiner et al. (2010) and Traverso et al. (2012). The dashboard displaying sustainability
365 status can be compared among the shipbreaking nations, using data inventory to compare
366 among inventories at the yard level (such as yard level cost data, profit level, waste discharge
367 and exposure, safety cost and inspection arrangements).
368

369

370

21
371 Figure 10: Potentials of Life Cycle Assessments for resolving shipbreaking issues

372 In addition, individual case studies can also provide important national-scale/ yard scale data
373 and allow for improved policy analysis. For example, yard officials can document
374 environmental, social and economic data, and the results might be used to negotiate with a
375 government for policy support and enhancing competitiveness, and international
376 organizations for eliciting ship-owner compliance. National level studies can apply LCSA to
377 obtain yard level compliance and direct funding incentives from international organizations.
378 LCSA is not without its limitations: for example, SLCA is still not standardized and require
379 subjective assumptions. In addition, there are some issues that LCSA cannot improve, such as
380 the flag state problem. However, this approach will systematically approach towards the
381 conflicting social, economic and environmental goals and offer a baseline information for
382 trade offs to inform sound policy making.
383

384 7. Conclusion:
385 The current collection of research covers a few areas very deeply, but leaves many gaps
386 within and across disciplines. The papers reviewed here do establish the pollution potential of
387 shipbreaking, but more rigorous studies are required to address source apportionment issues,
388 ship-wise waste content, designing ships with less hazardous materials and easy dismantling
389 techniques, cost distribution and profit sharing, and workers income versus health risks.
390 Better detail on these points can support rigorous policy initiatives, such as schemes of
391 financial assistance for improvements of shipbreaking yards (Rahman and Mayer 2016).
392 Indeed, economic considerations are often prioritized over environmental and social
393 dimension of sustainability. However, as economic development occurs, environmental and
394 social issues begin to take precedence, as noticed in the migration of shipbreaking activities to
395 south Asian nations. For this reason, shipbreaking sustainability depends upon a clear
396 understanding of trade off criteria among economic, social and environmental factors. The
397 introduction of stricter regulations for improving environmental and working conditions may
398 not be immediately effective given the continuous pursuit for profit that drives dismantling
399 across borders, leading to worse performance and policy failure. In addition, the projects such
400 as IMO-SENSREC project should utilize LCSA methodological tools for sound estimation of
401 sustainability issues. We hope this review spurs new research towards complicated issues that
402 cut across sustainability dimensions.
403

404 References:
405 Abdullah, H. M., Mahboob, M. G., Banu, M. R., & Seker, D. Z., 2013. Monitoring the
406 drastic growth of ship breaking yards in Sitakunda: a threat to the coastal environment of
407 Bangladesh. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 185(5), 3839-3851.

408 Ahmed, R., & Siddiqui, K., 2013. Ship breaking industry in Pakistan- problems and
409 prospects. International Journal of Management. IT and Engineering. 3(9), 140.

410 Aktaruzzaman, M., Chowdhury, M. A. Z., Fardous, Z., Alam, M. K., Hossain, M. S., &
411 Fakhruddin, A. N. M., 2014. Ecological risk posed by heavy metals contamination of ship

22
412 breaking yards in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research. 8(2),
413 469-478.

414 Alam, S., & Faruque, A., 2014. Legal regulation of the shipbreaking industry in
415 Bangladesh: The international regulatory framework and domestic implementation
416 challenges. Marine Policy. 47, 46-56.

417 Alcaidea, J. I., Piniella, F., & Rodríguez-Díaza, E.,2016. The “Mirror Flags”: Ship
418 registration in globalised ship breaking industry. Transportation Research Part D:
419 Transport and Environment. 48, 378-392.

420 Alcaidea, J. I., Rodríguez-Díaz, E., & Piniella, F., 2017. European policies on ship
421 recycling: A stakeholder survey. Marine Policy. 81, 262-272.

422 Andersen, A. B., 2001. Worker safety in the ship-breaking industries. International
423 Labour Office, Geneva.

424 Aydin, Y. M., Kara, M., Dumanoglu, Y., Odabasi, M., & Elbir, T.,2014. Source
425 apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated
426 biphenyls (PCBs) in ambient air of an industrial region in Turkey. Atmospheric
427 Environment. 97, 271-285.

428 Basha, S., Gaur, P. M., Thorat, R. B., Trivedi, R. H., Mukhopadhyay, S. K., Anand, N., ...
429 & Jha, B., 2007. Heavy metal content of suspended particulate matter at world’s largest
430 ship-breaking yard, Alang-Sosiya, India. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 178(1), 373-384.

431 Cairns, G., 2007. Postcard from Chittagong: wish you were here?. critical perspectives on
432 international business. 3(3), 266-279.

433 Cairns, G., 2014. A critical scenario analysis of end-of-life ship disposal: The “bottom of
434 the pyramid” as opportunity and graveyard. Critical perspectives on international
435 business. 10(3), 172-189.

436 Carvalho, I. S., Antão, P., & Soares, C. G., 2011. Modelling of environmental impacts of
437 ship dismantling. Ships and Offshore Structures. 6(1-2), 161-173.

438 Chang, Y. C., Wang, N., & Durak, O. S., 2010. Ship recycling and marine pollution.
439 Marine pollution bulletin. 60(9), 1390-1396.
440 Choi, J. K., Kelley, D., Murphy, S., & Thangamani, D., 2016. Economic and
441 environmental perspectives of end-of-life ship management. Resources, Conservation and
442 Recycling. 107, 82-91.
443 Courtice, M. N., Demers, P. A., Takaro, T. K., Vedal, S., Ahmad, S. A., Davies, H. W., &
444 Siddique, Z., 2011. Asbestos-Related Disease in Banlgadeshi Ship Breakers: A Pilot
445 Study. International journal of occupational and environmental health. 17(2), 144-153.

446 Crang, M., Hughes, A., Gregson, N., Norris, L., & Ahamed, F., 2013. Rethinking
447 governance and value in commodity chains through global recycling networks.
448 Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 38(1), 12-24.

23
449 Demaria, F., 2010. Shipbreaking at Alang–Sosiya (India): an ecological distribution
450 conflict. Ecological economics. 70(2), 250-260.

451 Demaria, F., 2016. Can the Poor Resist Capital? Conflicts over ‘Accumulation by
452 Contamination’at the Ship Breaking Yard of Alang (India). In: Nature, Economy and
453 Society (pp. 273-304). Springer, India.

454 Deshpande, P. C., Kalbar, P. P., Tilwankar, A. K., & Asolekar, S. R., 2013. A novel
455 approach to estimating resource consumption rates and emission factors for ship recycling
456 yards in Alang, India. Journal of Cleaner Production. 59, 251-259.

457 Deshpande, P. C., Tilwankar, A. K., & Asolekar, S. R., 2012 . A novel approach to
458 estimating potential maximum heavy metal exposure to ship recycling yard workers in
459 Alang, India. Science of the Total Environment. 438, 304-311.

460 Devault, D. A., Beilvert, B., & Winterton, P., 2016. Ship breaking or scuttling? A review
461 of environmental, economic and forensic issues for decision support. Environmental
462 Science and Pollution Research. 1-34.
463 Dreyer, L. C., Hauschild, M. Z., & Schierbeck, J., 2010. Characterisation of social
464 impacts in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.15(3), 247-259.

465 Du, Z., Zhu, H., Zhou, Q., & Wong, Y. D., 2017. Challenges and solutions for ship
466 recycling in China. Ocean Engineering. 137, 429-439.

467 Du, Z. F., 2012. The Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships and its
468 Application in China. Advanced Materials Research. 490, 2704-2708
469 Du, Z. F., Wang, H., Xu, H., Li, C., Yan, H. S., Xu, H. L., ... & Li, H. W., 2012.
470 Discussion on Control of Hazardous Materials in Ship Recycling Activities. In: Advanced
471 Materials Research (Vol. 476, pp. 1674-1677). Trans Tech Publications.

472 Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., & Traverso, M. 2010. Towards life cycle
473 sustainability assessment. Sustainability. 2(10), 3309-3322.
474 Galley, M., 2014. Shipbreaking: hazards and liabilities. Springer.

475 Garmer, K., Sjöström, H., Hiremath, A. M., Tilwankar, A. K., Kinigalakis, G., &
476 Asolekar, S. R., 2015. Development and validation of three-step risk assessment method
477 for ship recycling sector. Safety science. 76, 175-189.
478 Garud, P. (2012). Incorporation of Global Environmental Norms into Indian Legal
479 Systems: social and economic challenges, with special reference to ship-breaking.
480 Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 37, 150-156.

481 Gregson, N., Crang, M., Ahamed, F., Akhter, N., & Ferdous, R., 2010. Following things
482 of rubbish value: End-of-life ships,‘chock-chocky’furniture and the Bangladeshi middle
483 class consumer. Geoforum. 41(6), 846-854.
484 Gregson, N., Watkins, H., & Calestani, M., 2010. Inextinguishable fibres: demolition and
485 the vital materialisms of asbestos. Environment and Planning A. 42(5), 1065-1083.

24
486 Gregson, N., 2011. Performativity, corporeality and the politics of ship disposal. Journal
487 of Cultural Economy. 4(2), 137-156.

488 Gregson, N., Crang, M., Ahamed, F. U., Akter, N., Ferdous, R., Foisal, S., & Hudson, R.,
489 2012. Territorial Agglomeration and Industrial Symbiosis: Sitakunda‐Bhatiary,
490 Bangladesh, as a Secondary Processing Complex. Economic Geography. 88(1), 37-58.

491 Gregson, N., Watkins, H., & Calestani, M., 2013. Political markets: recycling,
492 economization and marketization. Economy and Society. 42(1), 1-25.

493 Gregson, N., Crang, M., Botticello, J., Calestani, M., & Krzywoszynska, A., 2016. Doing
494 the ‘dirty work’of the green economy: Resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU.
495 European urban and regional studies. 23(4), 541-555.
496 Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M., Ahmed, M. K., Raknuzzaman, M., Islam, M. S., Negishi, J.,
497 Nakamichi, S., ... & Masunaga, S., 2016. Occurrence and distribution of perfluoroalkyl
498 acids (PFAAs) in surface water and sediment of a tropical coastal area (Bay of Bengal
499 coast, Bangladesh). Science of the Total Environment. 571, 1089-1104.

500 Hasan, A. B., Kabir, S., Reza, A. S., Zaman, M. N., Ahsan, A., & Rashid, M., 2013.
501 Enrichment factor and geo-accumulation index of trace metals in sediments of the ship
502 breaking area of Sitakund Upazilla (Bhatiary–Kumira), Chittagong, Bangladesh. Journal
503 of Geochemical Exploration. 125, 130-137.

504 Hasan, A. B., Kabir, S., Reza, A. S., Zaman, M. N., Ahsan, M. A., Akbor, M. A., &
505 Rashid, M. M., 2013. Trace metals pollution in seawater and groundwater in the ship
506 breaking area of Sitakund Upazilla, Chittagong, Bangladesh. Marine pollution bulletin.
507 71(1), 317-324.

508 Hillier, J., 2009. Assemblages of justice: the ‘ghost ships’ of Graythorp. International
509 Journal of Urban and Regional Research: 33(3), 640-661.
510 Hiremath, A. M., Pandey, S. K., & Asolekar, S. R., 2016. Development of ship-specific
511 recycling plan to improve health safety and environment in ship recycling yards. Journal
512 of Cleaner Production. 116, 279-298.
513 Hiremath, A. M., Tilwankar, A. K., & Asolekar, S. R., 2015. Significant steps in ship
514 recycling vis-a-vis wastes generated in a cluster of yards in Alang: a case study. Journal of
515 Cleaner Production. 87, 520-532.
516 Ho, S. F., Wong, P. H., & Kwok, S. F., 1989. Study on the health hazards of scrap metal
517 cutters. Headache. 8, 13.

518 Hossain, M. S., Fakhruddin, A. N. M., Chowdhury, M. A. Z., & Gan, S. H., 2016. Impact
519 of ship-Breaking activities on the coastal environment of Bangladesh and a management
520 system for its sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy. 60, 84-94.

521 Iftikhar, S., Ali, M., & Nergis, Y., 2016. Risks and Hazards Study of Asbestos in Pakistan.
522 International Journal of Economic and Environment Geology. 6(1), 25-28.

25
523 Islam, K. L., & Hossain, M. M., 1986. Effect of ship scrapping activities on the soil and
524 sea environment in the coastal area of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Marine Pollution Bulletin.
525 17(10), 462-463.

526 Iqbal, K. M. J., & Heidegger, P., 2013. Pakistan shipbreaking outlook: the way forward
527 for a green ship recycling industry–environmental, health and safety conditions.
528 Sustainable Development Policy Unit and NGO Shipbreaking Platform,
529 Islamabad/Brussels.

530 Jain, K. P., Pruyn, J. F. J., & Hopman, J. J., 2015. Influence of ship design on ship
531 recycling. Maritime Technology and Engineering. 269-276.
532 Jain, K. P., Pruyn, J. F. J., & Hopman, J. J., 2016. Quantitative assessment of material
533 composition of end-of-life ships using onboard documentation. Resources, Conservation
534 and Recycling. 107, 1-9.
535 Jain, K. P., Pruyn, J. F. J., & Hopman, J. J., 2017. Material flow analysis (MFA) as a tool
536 to improve ship recycling. Ocean Engineering. 130, 674-683.

537 Jain, K. P., Pruyn, J. F. J., & Hopman, J. J., 2017. Strategic guidance based on the concept
538 of cleaner production to improve the ship recycling industry. Environment Systems and
539 Decisions, 1-11.

540 Kacar, A., & Kocyigit, A., 2013. Characterization of heavy metal and antibiotic resistant
541 bacteria isolated from Aliaga Ship Dismantling Zone, Eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey.
542 International Journal of Environmental Research. 7(4), 895-902.

543 Kagkarakis, N. D., Merikas, A. G., & Merika, A. (2016). Modelling and forecasting the
544 demolition market in shipping. Maritime Policy & Management. 43(8), 1021-1035.
545 Kaiser, M. J., 2008. A review of ship breaking and rig scrapping in the Gulf of Mexico.
546 Ocean Development & International Law. 39(2), 178-199.

547 Kara, M., Dumanoğlu, Y., Altıok, H., Elbir, T., Odabası, M., & Bayram, A., 2014. Spatial
548 distribution and source identification of trace elements in topsoil from heavily
549 industrialized region, Aliaga, Turkey. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 186(10),
550 6017-6038.

551 Kara, M., Dumanoglu, Y., Altiok, H., Elbir, T., Odabasi, M., & Bayram, A., 2015. Spatial
552 variation of trace elements in seawater and sediment samples in a heavily industrialized
553 region. Environmental Earth Sciences. 73(1), 405-421.

554 Kara, M., Hopke, P. K., Dumanoglu, Y., Altiok, H., Elbir, T., Odabasi, M., & Bayram, A.,
555 2015. Characterization of PM using multiple site data in a heavily industrialized region of
556 Turkey. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 15, 11-27.

557 Karim, M. S., 2015. Prevention of Pollution of the Marine Environment from Vessels.
558 Springer.

26
559 Karlis, T., Polemis, D., & Georgakis, A., 2016. Ship demolition activity. An evaluation of
560 the effect of currency exchange rates on ship scrap values. SPOUDAI-Journal of
561 Economics and Business. 66(3), 53-70.

562 Khan, I., Chowdhury, H., Alam, F., & Kumar, A., 2012. Sustainable design of ship
563 breaking industry in developing countries. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and
564 Pollution. 9(1), 1-11.

565 Khan, M. A. A., & Khan, Y. S. A., 2003. Trace metals in littoral sediments from the North
566 east coast of the Bay of Bengal along the ship breaking area, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
567 Journal of Biological Sciences. 3(11), 1050-1057.

568 Khan, M. Z. H., Hasan, M. R., Khan, M., Aktar, S., & Fatema, K., 2017. Distribution of
569 Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments of the Bay of Bengal Coast. Journal of toxicology.
570 2017.

571 Khandaker, N., 2017. Comment on “Ship Breaking and the Steel Industry in Bangladesh:
572 A Materials Flow Perspective” An Argument for Saving the Baby while Throwing away
573 the Bathwater with Caveat. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 21(1), 204-204.

574 Kibria, G., Hossain, M. M., Mallick, D., Lau, T. C., & Wu, R., 2016. Monitoring of metal
575 pollution in waterways across Bangladesh and ecological and public health implications
576 of pollution. Chemosphere. 165, 1-9.

577 Kloepffer, W., 2008. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. The International
578 Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 13(2), 89.

579 Knapp, S., Kumar, S. N., & Remijn, A. B., 2008. Econometric analysis of the ship
580 demolition market. Marine Policy. 32(6), 1023-1036.
581 Ko, N., Gantner, J., & Wehner, D., 2015. Life cycle assessment of ships with special
582 consideration of ship scrapping. Matériaux & Techniques. 103(1), 101.
583 Kurt, R. E., McKenna, S. A., Gunbeyaz, S. A., & Turan, O., 2017. Investigation of
584 occupational noise exposure in a ship recycling yard. Ocean Engineering. 137, 440-449.
585 Kusumaningdyah, W., Eunike, A., & Yuniarti, R.,2013. Modeling tradeoff in ship
586 breaking industry considering sustainability aspects: A system dynamics approach.
587 Procedia Environmental Sciences. 17, 785-794.
588 Liu, J., Mooney, H., Hull, V., Davis, S. J., Gaskell, J., Hertel, T.,. & Li, S. 2015. Systems
589 integration for global sustainability. Science. 347(6225), 1258832.
590 Matz‐Lück, N., 2010. Safe and Sound Scrapping of ‘Rusty Buckets’? The 2009 Hong
591 Kong Ship Recycling Convention. Review of European Community & International
592 Environmental Law. 19(1), 95-103.
593 McCallum, R. I., Sanderson, J. T., & Richards, A. E., 1968. The lead hazard in
594 shipbreaking: The prevalence of anaemia in burners. Annals of Occupational Hygiene.
595 11(2), 101-113.

27
596 Mckenney, T., 1994. Feasibility of a Ship Scrapping Yard in Philadelphia. Journal of Ship
597 Production.

598 Memon, A. A., & Zarar, M., 2016. Comprehensive Analysis of Existing Infrastructure
599 Conditions Correlating Ship-Breaking Activities and its Implications on Workers and
600 Community a Case Study of Gaddani Town and Ship-Breaking Industry, Baluchistan,
601 Pakistan. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and
602 Sciences (ASRJETS). 17(1), 245-257.

603 Mikelis, N. E., 2008. A statistical overview of ship recycling. WMU Journal of Maritime
604 Affairs. 7(1), 227-239.
605 Misra, H., 2008. Skill and education in income determination: a case study of unorganised
606 workers of Alang. Ind J Lab Econ. 51(4), 949-955.

607 Misra, H., 2009. Rights of Migrant Labour at the Alang Ship Breaking Yard. Indian
608 Journal of Social Work. 70(3), 487-498.

609 Moncayo, G. A., 2016. International law on ship recycling and its interface with EU law.
610 Marine pollution bulletin. 109(1), 301-309.
611 Muhibbullah, M., 2013. Health hazards and risks vulnerability of ship breaking workers:
612 A case study on Sitakunda ship breaking industrial area of Bangladesh. Global Advanced
613 Research Journal of Geography and Regional Planning. 02 (08), 172-184.
614 Neşer, G., Kontas, A., Ünsalan, D., Altay, O., Darılmaz, E., Uluturhan, E., ... & Yercan,
615 F., 2012. Polycyclic aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons pollution at the coast of Aliağa
616 (Turkey) ship recycling zone. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 64(5), 1055-1059.
617 Neşer, G., Kontas, A., Ünsalan, D., Uluturhan, E., Altay, O., Darılmaz, E., ... & Yercan,
618 F., 2012. Heavy metals contamination levels at the Coast of Aliağa (Turkey) ship
619 recycling zone. Marine pollution bulletin. 64(4), 882-887.
620 Neşer, G., Ünsalan, D., Tekoğul, N., & Stuer-Lauridsen, F., 2008. The shipbreaking
621 industry in Turkey: environmental, safety and health issues. Journal of cleaner production.
622 16(3), 350-358.
623 Nosal, R. M., & Wilhelm, W. J., 1989. Lead toxicity in the shipbreaking industry: the
624 Ontario experience. Canadian journal of public health. 81(4), 259-262.
625 Nøst, T. H., Halse, A. K., Randall, S., Borgen, A. R., Schlabach, M., Paul, A., ... &
626 Breivik, K., 2015. High concentrations of organic contaminants in air from ship breaking
627 activities in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Environmental science & technology. 49(19),
628 11372-11380.

629 Odabasi, M., Ozgunerge Falay, E., Tuna, G., Altiok, H., Kara, M., Dumanoglu, Y., ... &
630 Elbir, T., 2015. Biomonitoring the spatial and historical variations of persistent organic
631 pollutants (POPs) in an industrial region. Environmental science & technology. 49(4),
632 2105-2114.

28
633 Okay, O. S., Ozmen, M., Güngördü, A., Yılmaz, A., Yakan, S. D., Karacık, B., ... &
634 Schramm, K. W., 2016. Heavy metal pollution in sediments and mussels: assessment by
635 using pollution indices and metallothionein levels. Environmental monitoring and
636 assessment. 188(6), 1-18.
637 Onat, N. C., Kucukvar, M., Halog, A., & Cloutier, S., 2017. Systems Thinking for Life
638 Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and
639 Future Perspectives. Sustainability. 9(5), 706.

640 Patel, V., Jain, S., & Madamwar, D., 2012. Naphthalene degradation by bacterial
641 consortium (DV-AL) developed from Alang-Sosiya ship breaking yard, Gujarat, India.
642 Bioresource technology. 107, 122-130.

643 Patel, V., Munot, H., Shah, V., Shouche, Y. S., & Madamwar, D., 2015. Taxonomic
644 profiling of bacterial community structure from coastal sediment of Alang–Sosiya
645 shipbreaking yard near Bhavnagar, India. Marine pollution bulletin. 101(2), 736-745.

646 Patel, V., Munot, H., Shouche, Y. S., & Madamwar, D., 2014. Response of bacterial
647 community structure to seasonal fluctuation and anthropogenic pollution on coastal water
648 of Alang–Sosiya ship breaking yard, Bhavnagar, India. Bioresource technology. 161, 362-
649 370.

650 Patel, V., Patel, J., & Madamwar, D., 2013. Biodegradation of phenanthrene in
651 bioaugmented microcosm by consortium ASP developed from coastal sediment of Alang-
652 Sosiya ship breaking yard. Marine pollution bulletin. 74(1), 199-207.

653 Puthucherril, T. G.,2010. From shipbreaking to sustainable ship recycling: Evolution of a


654 legal regime. Brill.
655 Radonja, R., & Jugović, A. (2011). Shipowners' Business Policy in the Context of
656 Development in the Environmental Legislation. Scientific Journal of Maritime Research.
657 25(2).
658 Rahman, S. M., & Mayer, A. L., 2016. Policy compliance recommendations for
659 international shipbreaking treaties for Bangladesh. Marine Policy. 73, 122-129.

660 Rahman, S. M., Handler, R. M., & Mayer, A. L., 2016. Life cycle assessment of steel in
661 the ship recycling industry in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production. 135, 963-971.

662 Rahman, S. M., & Mayer, A. L., 2015. How social ties influence metal resource flows in
663 the Bangladesh ship recycling industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 104,
664 254-264.

665 Rahman, S. M., & Kim, J. (2020). Circular economy, proximity, and shipbreaking: A
666 material flow and environmental impact analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120681.

667 Rahman, S.M.M.; Schelly, C.; Mayer, A.L.; Norman, E.S. Uncovering Discursive
668 Framings of the Bangladesh Shipbreaking Industry. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 14.

29
669 Reddy, M. S., Basha, S., Adimurthy, S., & Ramachandraiah, G., 2006. Description of the
670 small plastics fragments in marine sediments along the Alang-Sosiya ship-breaking yard,
671 India. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 68(3), 656-660.

672 Reddy, M. S., Basha, S., Joshi, H. V., & Ramachandraiah, G., 2005. Seasonal distribution
673 and contamination levels of total PHCs, PAHs and heavy metals in coastal waters of the
674 Alang–Sosiya ship scrapping yard, Gulf of Cambay, India. Chemosphere. 61(11), 1587-
675 1593.

676 Reddy, M. S., Basha, S., Kumar, V. S., Joshi, H. V., & Ghosh, P. K.,2003 . Quantification
677 and classification of ship scraping waste at Alang–Sosiya, India. Marine pollution
678 bulletin. 46(12), 1609-1614.
679 Reddy, M. S., Basha, S., Kumar, V. S., Joshi, H. V., & Ramachandraiah, G., 2004.
680 Distribution, enrichment and accumulation of heavy metals in coastal sediments of
681 Alang–Sosiya ship scrapping yard, India. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 48(11), 1055-1059.

682 Reddy, N. G. K., 2014. Ship Recycling: An Important Mile Stone for India. Indian Journal
683 of Science and Technology. 7, 15.
684 Rousmaniere, P., & Raj, N., 2007. Shipbreaking in the developing world: problems and
685 prospects. International journal of occupational and environmental health. 13(4), 359-368.
686 Sahu, G., 2014. Workers of Alang-Sosiya. Economic & Political Weekly. 49(50), 53.
687 Saraf, M., Stuer-Lauridsen, F., Dyoulgerov, M., Bloch, R., Wingfield, S., & Watkinson,
688 R., 2010. Ship breaking and recycling industry in Bangladesh and Pakistan. The World
689 Bank, Washington.
690 Schøyen, H., Burki, U., & Kurian, S., 2017. Ship-owners’ stance to environmental and
691 safety conditions in ship recycling. A case study among Norwegian shipping managers.
692 Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2017.06.003.
693 Seuring, S., & Müller, M., 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for
694 sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production. 16(15), 1699-1710.
695 Shah, B., Jain, K., Patel, N., Pandit, R., Patel, A., Joshi, C. G., & Madamwar, D., 2015.
696 Draft genome sequence of Paenibacillus sp. strain DMB20, isolated from Alang ship-
697 breaking yard, which harbors genes for xenobiotic degradation. Genome announcements.
698 3(3), e00554-15.

699 Sharifuzzaman, S. M., Rahman, H., Ashekuzzaman, S. M., Islam, M. M., Chowdhury, S.
700 R., & Hossain, M. S. (2016). Heavy metals accumulation in coastal sediments. In:
701 Environmental Remediation Technologies for Metal-Contaminated Soils (pp. 21-42).
702 Springer, Japan.

703 Siddiquee, N. A., Parween, S., Quddus, M. M. A., & Barua, P., 2009. Heavy metal
704 pollution in sediments at ship breaking area of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Water,
705 Environment and Pollution. 6(3), 7-12.
706 Sivaprasad, K., & Nandakumar, C. G., 2013. Design for ship recycling. Ships and
707 Offshore Structures. 8(2), 214-223.

30
708 Sonak, S., Sonak, M., & Giriyan, A., 2008. Shipping hazardous waste: implications for
709 economically developing countries. International Environmental Agreements: Politics,
710 Law and Economics. 8(2), 143-159.

711 Sujauddin, M., Koide, R., Komatsu, T., Hossain, M. M., Tokoro, C., & Murakami, S.,
712 2015. Characterization of ship breaking industry in Bangladesh. Journal of Material
713 Cycles and Waste Management. 17(1), 72-83.

714 Sujauddin, M., Koide, R., Komatsu, T., Hossain, M. M., Tokoro, C., & Murakami, S.,
715 2017. Ship Breaking and the Steel Industry in Bangladesh: A Material Flow Perspective.
716 Journal of Industrial Ecology. 21(1), 191-203.

717 Sunaryo, S., & Pahalatua, D., 2015. Green ship recycle yard design. Journal of Naval
718 Architecture and Marine Engineering. 12(1), 15-20.

719 Tiwari, R. R., Dave, S. K., Tripathi, S. R., Sathwara, N. G., Majumdar, P. K., Patel, B. D.,
720 ... & Vyas, J. B., 2008. Health Hazards in Ship Breaking Workers of Alang.

721 Tola, S., & Karskela, V. (1976). Occupational lead exposure in Finland: V. Shipyards and
722 shipbreaking. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 31-36.
723 Traverso, M., Finkbeiner, M., Jørgensen, A., & Schneider, L., 2012. Life cycle
724 sustainability dashboard. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 16(5), 680-688.

725 Weidema, B. P., 2006. The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact
726 assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 11, 89-96.
727 Welaya, Y. M., Naby, M. M. A., & Tadros, M. Y., 2012. Technological and economic
728 study of ship recycling in Egypt. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean
729 Engineering. 4(4), 362-373.

730 Wu, W. T., Lin, Y. J., Li, C. Y., Tsai, P. J., Yang, C. Y., Liou, S. H., & Wu, T. N. (2015).
731 Cancer attributable to asbestos exposure in shipbreaking workers: a matched-cohort study.
732 PloS one, 10(7), e0133128.

733 Wu, W. T., Lu, Y. H., Lin, Y. J., Yang, Y. H., Shiue, H. S., Hsu, J. H., ... & Wu, T. N.
734 (2013). Mortality among shipbreaking workers in Taiwan—a retrospective cohort study
735 from 1985 to 2008. American journal of industrial medicine, 56(6), 701-708.

736 Yujuico, E., 2014. Demandeur pays: The EU and funding improvements in South Asian
737 ship recycling practices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 67, 340-
738 351.
739 Zhao, Y., & Chang, Y. C., 2014. A Comparison of Ship-Recycling Legislation Between
740 Chinese Law and the 2009 Hong Kong Convention. Ocean Development & International
741 Law. 45(1), 53-66.

31

View publication stats

You might also like