TAX1 - Midterm Reviewer: I. General Principles of Taxation A. Definition, Concept, and Purpose of Taxation
TAX1 - Midterm Reviewer: I. General Principles of Taxation A. Definition, Concept, and Purpose of Taxation
TAX1 - Midterm Reviewer: I. General Principles of Taxation A. Definition, Concept, and Purpose of Taxation
d. Theories and Bases of Taxation (4) (LN-BF) - The tax system should be capable of being
effectively administered and enforced with the least
1. Lifeblood Theory inconvenience to the taxpayer. Mere inconvenience
will not render a tax imposition invalid “except to the
- Without taxes, the government would be
extent that specific constitutional or statutory
paralyzed for lack of motive power to activate and
operate it. (CIR v. Algue)
2
limitations are impaired.” (Diaz v. Secretary of i. Inherent Limitations (book)
Finance)
- emanate from the very nature,
- Example: In Diaz, the tollway operations VAT may characteristics, and rationale of taxation.
seem burdensome to implement but it is not
1. Public Purpose
necessarily invalid unless some aspect of it is
shown to violate any law or the Constitution. - They cannot be used purely for private
purposes or for the exclusive benefit of
private persons.
3. Theoretical Justice
- Rationale: The power to tax exists for the
- The tax burden should be proportional to the general welfare. Hence, implicit in its power
taxpayer’s ability to pay. is the limitation that is should be used only
for a public purpose.
- The rule of taxation shall be uniform and
equitable. (Section 28 [1], Article 6, 1987 - The term “public purpose” is not defined. It
Constitution) is an elastic concept that can be hammered
to fit modern standards. Jurisprudence
states that “public purpose” should be given
Note: Only the violation of theoretical justice will a broad interpretation.
render the law invalid for being unconstitutional.
- Heart of tax law.
Fiscal adequacy and administrative feasibility will
not render the law invalid
Tests in Determining Public Purpose in
Taxation (DP) (2)
f. Scope and Limitation of Taxation
a. Duty Test – whether the thing to be
i. Inherent Limitations (lecture)
threatened by the appropriation of public
1. Territoriality or Situs of Taxation revenue is something which is the duty of
the State as a government.
2. International comity
b. Promotion of General Welfare Test –
3. Exemption of government entities whether the law providing the tax directly
from taxes promotes the welfare of the community in
a. Commercial/Proprietary = equal measure.
Taxable
b. Governmental = Exempted 2. Inherently Legislative
i. SSS = Exempted - Taxation is purely legislative, and
ii. GSIS = Exempted Congress cannot delegate the power to
others.
iii. LBP = Taxable
- This arises from the doctrine of separation
iv. Pag-ibig = Exempted of powers among the three (3) branches of
the government.
v. Philhealth = Exempted
- However, delegation is not absolute and is
vi. PNR = Taxable
subject to the following exceptions:
1. BSP
3
- This is no longer by virtue of a valid the constituent political units. The organic acts shall likewise
delegation of authority by Congress but provide for special courts with personal, family, and property
law jurisdiction consistent with the provisions of this
pursuant to a direct authority as conferred Constitution and national laws.
by Section 5, Article 10 of the 1987
Constitution: The creation of the autonomous region shall be effective when
approved by majority of the votes cast by the constituent units
in a plebiscite called for the purpose, provided that only
provinces, cities, and geographic areas voting favorably in
ARTICLE X such plebiscite shall be included in the autonomous region.
General Provisions SECTION 20. Within its territorial jurisdiction and subject to the
provisions of this Constitution and national laws, the organic
xxx xxx xxx act of autonomous regions shall provide for legislative powers
over:
SECTION 5. Each local government unit shall have the power
to create its own sources of revenues and to levy taxes, fees, (1) Administrative organization;
and charges subject to such guidelines and limitations as the
Congress may provide, consistent with the basic policy of local (2) Creation of sources of revenues;
autonomy. Such taxes, fees, and charges shall accrue
(3) Ancestral domain and natural resources;
exclusively to the local governments.
(4) Personal, family, and property relations;
xxx xxx xxx
(5) Regional urban and rural planning development;
xxx xxx xxx - Lex loci rei sitae or the law of the place where the
property is situated.
5
- Determined by the nationality and residence of the and supreme and the State can impose tax on
decedent or donor almost everything within its jurisdiction.
- As well as the place where the property is located - The State can tax itself since there is no
prohibition in the Constitution for such act.
However, Congress chooses not to impose tax on
those performing governmental functions.
b. Personal Property Sale – Place of sale. - GOCCs, agency and instrumentality may be
distinguished as follows:
a. GOCC
c. VAT – Where the goods, property or services are
destined, used, or consumed. - Any agency organized as a stock or non-stock
corporation, vested with functions relating to public
needs whether governmental or proprietary in
nature, and
4. International Comity
- owned by the government directly or through its
- Under this principle, the property or income of a
instrumentalities either wholly or where applicable
state or foreign government may not be taxed by
as in the case of stock corporations
another state where the said income is derived or
sourced or the property is located. - to the extent of at least 51% of its capital stock
(Section 2 [13], 1987 Administrative Code)
- Section 2, Article 2, 1987 Constitution:
ARTICLE II
6
- This includes regulatory agencies, chartered -Taxation is an inherent power of the State that
institutions, and GOCCs. (Section 2[10], 1987 does not need a constitution or a law to be
Administrative Code). exercised.
- Section 27 (C), NIRC - - Constitutional provisions do not give rise to the
power to tax but merely impose limitations on what
- General Rule: All GOCCs, agencies, or
would otherwise be an invincible power. (Churchill
instrumentalities are subject to income tax
v. Concepcion)
- Exception:
i. GSIS
1. Section 1, Article 3
ii. SSS SECTION 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or
property without due process of law, nor shall any person be
iii. PHIC (Philippine Health Insurance denied the equal protection of the laws.
Corporation)
iv. PCSO*
a. Due Process Clause
v. Local water districts**
Two (2) Aspects of Due Process (2) (SP)
vi. Government educational institution***
i. Substantive due process
*PCSO now subject to income tax as of January 1, 2018 per
RA 10963 or the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion - Enactment of tax law must be within the powers of
(TRAIN) Law. Congress granted by the Constitution.
**RA 10026 (March 11, 2010) amended Section 27 (C) to add
- The tax law must be valid before any right may
local water districts as one of the exceptions.
arise or liability is imposed.
*** Per Section 30 (I), NIRC. This is also exempted from VAT
(Section 109 [H], NIRC)
- General Rule: Local government cannot impose - The taxpayer must be duly informed of the nature
tax, fee, or charge to the national government and and basis of the assessment, and must be given an
its properties due to the “supremacy” of the national opportunity to respond or challenge the
government over local government. (Section 133 assessment.
[o]) of RA 7160 or the Local Government Code)
- This rule also applies in local tax, real property
- Exception: LGUs are allowed to fix rates for the tax, and tariff and customs duty assessments.
operation of public utilities owned, operated, and
maintained by the LGUs within their jurisdiction.
b. Equal Protection Clause
- Example of GOCC: Philippine Amusement and
Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) [Basco v. - Persons similarly situated should be treated alike
PAGCOR] as to rights and obligations.
- MIAA v. CA: Manila International Airport Authority - This clause does not guarantee absolute equality,
is not a GOCC. but only equality among equals.
- Thus, a different treatment is allowed when there
is a substantial distinction among the taxpayers.
ii. Constitutional Limitations
Essential requisites for a valid classification (4)
(SG-NA) [People v. Cayat]
7
a. rest on substantial distinctions; franchise may be revoked by Congress because no
franchise or right be granted except under the
b. be germane to the purpose of the law;
condition that it shall be subject to amendment,
c. not limited to existing conditions only; and alteration, or repeal by Congress when the
common good so requires. (Sec. 11, Art. 12, 1987
d. applies equally to all members of the same class. Constitution)
(2) The Congress may, by law, authorize the President to fix - Thus, only the first floor became subject to real
within specified limits, and subject to such limitations and property tax.
restrictions as it may impose, tariff rates, import and export
quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues, and other duties or
imposts within the framework of the national development
program of the Government. - “Exclusive” is defined as possessed and enjoyed
to the exclusion of others; debarred from
xxx xxx xxx
participation or enjoyment; and
- “Exclusively” is defined, “in a manner to exclude;
-This provision is also known as the Flexible Tariff as enjoying a privilege exclusively.”
Clause under the Tariff and Customs Code. - If real property is used for one or more
- Section 401 of the Tariff and Customs Code commercial purposes, it is not exclusively used for
establishes general standards with which the the exempted purposes but is subject to taxation.
exercise of the authority delegated by that provision
to the President must be consistent: that authority
must be exercised in “the interest of national 9. Section 28 (4), Article 6
economy, general welfare and/or national security”. SECTION 28.
8. Section 28 (3), Article 6 (4) No law granting any tax exemption shall be passed without
the concurrence of a majority of all the Members of the
SECTION 28. Congress.
xxx xxx xxx
SECTION 5. Each local government unit shall have the power c. Payment – the act of compliance by the
to create its own sources of revenues and to levy taxes, fees, taxpayer, including such options, schemes, or
and charges subject to such guidelines and limitations as the remedies as may be legally available.
Congress may provide, consistent with the basic policy of local
autonomy. Such taxes, fees, and charges shall accrue
exclusively to the local governments.
d. Refund – the recovery of any tax alleged to have
been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected,
11. Section 4(3)(4), Article 14. or of any penalty claimed to have been collected
xxx xxx xxx
without authority, or of any sum alleged to have
been excessively, or in any manner wrongfully
SECTION 4. collected.
(3) All revenues and assets of non-stock, non-profit educational
institutions used actually, directly, and exclusively for
educational purposes shall be exempt from taxes* and duties.
h. Definition, Nature and Characteristics of
Upon the dissolution or cessation of the corporate existence of
such institutions, their assets shall be disposed of in the Taxes
manner provided by law.
Definition and Nature
Proprietary educational institutions, including those
cooperatively owned, may likewise be entitled to such - Taxes are enforced proportional contributions
exemptions subject to the limitations provided by law including exacted by the State from persons and properties
restrictions on dividends and provisions for reinvestment. pursuant to its sovereignty
(4) Subject to conditions prescribed by law, all grants,
endowments, donations, or contributions used actually,
- in order to support the Government and
directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall be
- to defray all the public needs.
exempt from tax.
Taxes Debt
j. Tax as distinguished form other forms of
- Based on Laws - Generally based on
exaction (from PDF) Contract
- Generally, cannot be - Assignable
Taxes Tariff assigned
-All embracing term to - Kind of tax imposed on -Cannot be a subject of set -May be paid in kind
include various kinds of articles which are traded off or compensation
enforced contributions upon internationally (exported -A person cannot be - Can be a subject of set off
person for the attainment of from or imported to a imprisoned for non-payment or compensation
public purposes. country). Custom duties are of debt (except when from a
actually taxes but the latter crime)
is broader in scope. -Governed by the special -Governed by the ordinary
prescriptive periods periods of prescription
provided for in the NIRC.
Taxes Toll -Does not draw interest -Draws interest when it is so
- Paid for the support of the - Paid for the use of except only when delinquent stipulated or where there is
government. another’s property. default
- Demand of sovereignty - Demand of proprietorship -Imposed only by public - Can be imposed by private
- Generally, no limit on the - Amount paid depends authority individual
amount collected as long as upon the cost of
it is not excessive, construction or maintenance
unreasonable or of the public improvement Taxes Penalty
confiscatory. used. - Violation of tax laws may - Any sanction imposed as a
- Imposed only by the - Imposed by the give rise to imposition of punishment for violation of
government. government or by private penalty law or acts deemed injurious
individuals or entities. - Generally intended to raise - Designed to regulate
revenue conduct
- May be imposed only by - May be imposed by the
Taxes License and Regulatory the government government or private
Fee individuals or entities
- Imposed under the taxing - Levied under the police -Cannot be a subject of set -Can be a subject of set off
power of the state for power of the state. off or compensation or compensation (see Art.
purpose of revenue. 1279, Civil Code)
-Forced contributions for the - Exacted primarily to
purpose of maintaining regulate certain
11
k. Kinds of Taxes c. Mixed – tax rates are partly specific and partly ad
valorem. (law + value)
1. As to object (3) (PPE)
a. Personal, Capitation, or Poll Tax
- Tax of a fixed amount imposed on person residing
within a specified territory, whether citizens or not.
- This is without regard to their property or the
occupation or business in which they may be
4. As to burden or incidence (2) (DI)
engaged.
a. Direct Tax – it is a tax which the taxpayer is
directly or primarily liable and which he or she
b. Property Tax – tax imposed on property, real or cannot shift to another.
personal, in proportion to its value or in accordance
with some other reasonable method of
apportionment. b. Indirect Tax – demanded for a person in the
expectation and intention that he or she shall
indemnify himself or herself at the expense of
c. Excise Tax – a charge imposed upon the another, falling finally upon the ultimate purchaser
performance of an act, the enjoyment of privilege or or consumer. This can be shifted to another.
the engagement in an occupation.
13
- Tax laws are civil and not penal in nature, provisions of the enabling statute if such rule or
although there are penalties provided for their regulation is to be valid. In case of conflict between
violation. a statute and an administrative order, the former
must prevail. To be valid, an administrative rule or
- The purpose of tax laws in imposing penalties for
regulation must conform, not contradict, the
delinquencies is to compel the timely payment of
provisions of the enabling law. An implementing
taxes or to punish evasion or neglect of duty in
rule or regulation cannot modify, expand, or
respect thereof.
subtract from the law it is intended to implement.
Any rule that is not consistent with the statute itself
is null and void (Fort Bonifacio Development
ii. Tax Exemption and Exclusion Corporation v. CIR, G.R. No. 175707, November
- Tax exemptions must be construed strictly against 19, 2014).
the taxpayer and liberally in favor of the taxing Revenue Memorandum Circulars (RMCs) must not
authority; and he who claims an exemption must be override, supplant, or modify the law, but must
able to justify his claim by the clearest grant of remain consistent and in harmony with the law they
organic or statute law. An exemption from the seek to apply and implement (CIR v. SM Prime
common burden cannot be permitted to exist upon Holdings, Inc., 613 SCRA 774, 2010).
vague implications. (CIR v. General Foods)
Admittedly the government is not estopped from
- PLDT v. City of Davao: Exemption is an immunity collecting taxes legally due because of mistakes or
or privilege; it is freedom from a charge or burden errors of its agents. But like other principles of law,
to which others are subjected. this admits of exceptions in the interest of justice
- Lecture: It is not a right. and fair play, as where injustice will result to the
taxpayer (CIR v. CA, G.R. No. 117982, February 6,
- Burden of proof is on party claiming the same. 1997).
- Exception of the Exception: The exemption may
thus be withdrawn at the pleasure of the taxing
authority. iv. Penal provisions of tax laws
- Exception of the Exception of the Exception: The - In criminal cases, statutes of limitations are acts of
exemption was granted to private parties based on grace, a surrendering by the sovereign of its right to
material consideration of a mutual nature, which prosecute. They receive strict construction in favor
then becomes contractual and is thus covered by of the Government and limitations in such cases
the non-impairment clause of the Constitution. will not be presumed in the absence of clear
(Mactan Cebu International Airport Authority v. legislation (Lim v. CA, G.R. No. 48134-37, October
Marcos) 18, 1990).
14
(b) Where the facts subsequently gathered by the Bureau of iii. Double taxation
Internal Revenue are materially different from the facts on
which the ruling is based; or - CIR v. Bank of Commerce: Double taxation
(c) Where the taxpayer acted in bad faith. means taxing the same property twice when it
should be taxed only once; that is, “taxing the same
person twice by the same jurisdiction for the same
thing.” It is obnoxious when it should be but once.
n. Sources of Tax Laws (from PDF)
Otherwise described as “direct duplicate taxation,”
1. 1987 Constitution
the two taxes must be imposed on the same
2. Laws subject matter, for the same purpose, by the same
taxing authority, within the same jurisdiction, during
3. Treaties the same taxing period and the taxes must be of
4. Administrative Material the same kind or character.
15
- Tax-saving device within the means sanctioned by (1) That each one of the obligors be bound principally, and that
law. he be at the same time a principal creditor of the other;
Article 1279. In order that compensation may be proper, it is (6) Future legitime. (1814a)
necessary:
16
Macapagal-Arroyo, 489 SCRA 160, G.R. No.
171409, May 3, 2006).
Under the Tax Code, the CIR is authorized to enter
into compromise of the civil and criminal aspect of In the case of a taxpayer’s suit, plaintiff is allowed
taxes. With respect to local taxes and real property to sue where there is a claim that public funds are
taxes, there is no specific provision in the Local illegally disbursed, or that public money is being
Government Code regarding compromise of these deflected to any improper purpose, or that there is
taxes. a wastage of public funds through the enforcement
of an invalid or unconstitutional law (Francisco, Jr.
v. Nagmamalasakit na mga Manananggol ng mga
x. Taxpayer’s suit Manggagawang Pilipino, Inc., 415 SCRA 44, G.R.
No. 160262, November 10, 2003).
1. Nature and concept
In a citizen’s suit, the interest of the petitioner
It is a case where the act complained of directly assailing the constitutionality of a statute must be
involves the illegal disbursement of public funds direct and personal. He must be able to show, not
collected through taxation. only that the law or any government act is invalid,
In the case of Abaya v. Ebdane (515 SCRA 720), but also that he sustained or is in imminent danger
the prevailing doctrine in the taxpayer’s suits is: of sustaining some direct injury as a result of its
enforcement, and not merely that he suffers
1. To allow the taxpayers to question contracts thereby in some indefinite way. It must appear that
entered into by the National Government or the person complaining has been or is about to be
government owned and controlled corporations denied some right or privilege to which he is
allegedly in contravention of law; lawfully entitled or that he is about to be subjected
to some burdens or penalties by reason of the
2. To allow the taxpayer to sue when there is a
statute or act complained of (Francisco, Jr. v.
claim that public funds are illegally disbursed or
Nagmamalasakit na mga Manananggol ng mga
public money is being deflected to any improper
Manggagawang Pilipino, Inc., 415 SCRA 44, G.R.
purpose, or that there is a wastage of public funds
No. 160262, November 10, 2003).
through the enforcement of an invalid or
unconstitutional law;
3. Significantly, a taxpayer need not be a party to 3. Requisites of a taxpayer’s suit challenging the
the contract to challenge its validity. constitutionality of tax measure or act of taxing
authority.
A taxpayer is allowed to sue where there is a claim
that public funds are illegally disbursed, or that a. Concept of locus standi
public money is being deflected to any improper
purpose, or that there is wastage of public funds The party suing as a taxpayer must prove that he
through the enforcement of an invalid or has sufficient interest in preventing the illegal
unconstitutional law (Land Bank of the Philippines expenditure of money raised by taxation. Thus,
v. Cacayuran, 696 SCRA 861, G.R. No. 191667, taxpayers have been allowed to sue where there is
April 17, 2013). a claim that public funds are illegally disbursed or
that public money is being deflected to any
improper purpose, or that public funds are wasted
through the enforcement of an invalid or
2. As distinguished from a citizen’s suit
unconstitutional law.
The plaintiff in a taxpayer’s suit is in a different
The taxpayer must establish that:
category from the plaintiff in a citizen’s suit. In the
former, the plaintiff is affected by the expenditure of 1. He has a personal and substantial interest in the
public funds, while in the latter, he is but the mere case; and
instrument of the public concern (David v.
17
2. He has sustained or will sustain direct injury as a NOTE: However, where the public interest requires
result of its enforcement or that he stands to be the resolution of the constitutional issues raised by
benefited or injured by the judgment in the case, or the taxpayer, the doctrine of “ripe for judicial
is entitled to the avails of the suit (Public Interest determination” is within the Court’s discretion to set
Center, Inc. v. Roxas, 513 SCRA 457, G.R. No. aside (ABAKADA Guro Partylist v. Purisima, G.R.
125509, January 31, 2007). No. 166715, August 14, 2008).
NOTE: Being a mere procedural technicality, the This doctrine is similar to that of exhaustion of
requirement of locus standi may be waived by the administrative remedies except that it applies to the
Court in the exercise of its discretion (David v. rule making and to administrative action which is
Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, May 3, embodied neither in rules and regulations nor in
2006). adjudication or final order.
b. Doctrine of transcendental importance It is applicable when the Interest of the plaintiff is
subjected to or imminently threatened with
The following determines the importance of
substantial injury; if the statute is Self-executing;
transcendental importance:
when a party is immediately confronted with the
1. The character of the funds or other assets problem of complying or violating a statute and
involved in the case; there is a risk of Criminal penalties; or when plaintiff
is harmed by the Vagueness of the statute [VICS].
2. The presence of a clear case of disregard of a
constitutional or statutory prohibition by the public
respondent agency or instrumentality of the
LECTURE NOTES:
government;
3. The lack of any other party with a more direct
and specific interest in raising the questions being
raised (CREBA v. ERC, 624 SCRA 556, G.R. No.
174697, July 8, 2010).
18
- A person may be imprisoned for non-payment of than EI
Reven
tax if due to tax evasion but not poll tax. ue =
(Small
Mediu
- Non-payment of tax moral turpitude for non- m
Entities
payment is inherently wrong. = 20
%) or
- Non-filing of tax return is likewise inherently wrong (Large
Entities
for moral turpitude. Rationale: Non-filing most likely = 25%)
no payment.
- Appropriation bill is a law for releasing for public - Retroactive even if oppressive as long as based
funds. on government error. Government never estopped.
19