Stress Response
Stress Response
Stress Response
Thus, controllability of, and individual responses to, stressors influence the effects of stress
exposure on cognitive and behavioral functioning. However, several intriguing questions about
the nature of these effects remain unexplored. First, the question of what types of stress exposure
can enhance cognitive functioning remains only partially resolved. While some promising
evidence suggests that exposure to moderately intense stress predicts improved working memory
performance, the dearth of research on individual differences, and inconsistencies in group-level
effects, make this association far from conclusive. Furthermore, the question remains open
whether exposure to controllable stress can enhance behavioral functioning. A number of studies
documented the impairing effects of uncontrollable stress, but failed to find any benefit of
exposure to controllable stress (Hiroto, 1974; Hiroto and Seligman, 1975).However, several
other studies demonstrated that people exposed to controllable stress show improved learning
and cognitive ability in comparison to people exposed to either uncontrollable stress or no-stress
(Thornton and Jacobs, 1971; Thornton and Powell, 1974)We have yet to determine whether, and
how, controllable stress exposure may enhance cognitive and behavioral functioning.
Although controllability of stress and individual differences in stress response have been
investigated separately, studies has examined the interaction of these factors. One research study
showed that participants who appraised stressors as challenging performed better on an active
coping task than participants who appraised the same stressors as threatening (Tomaka et
al., 1993), suggesting that subjective reactions predict performance differences in a context of
controllable stress. However, because the passive coping task used in this study for comparison
had no measure of performance, it is not possible to determine whether subjective reaction would
predict a different pattern in the context of uncontrollable stress. Another study identified an
interaction between dosage of stress and individual differences in locus of control in predicting
performance on an anagram task (Pittman and Pittman, 1979), although individual responses to
stressors were not assessed. In sum, existing research supports the robust influences of
controllability and stress reactivity in moderating the effect of stress on cognitively demanding
tasks, but investigation of interactions between these factors remains sparse
Reference of response
Qin S., Hermans E. J., van Marle H. J. F., Luo J., Fernandez G. (2009). Acute psychological
stress reduces working memory-related activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Biol.
Psychiatry 66,
Schoofs D., Wolf O. T., Smeets T. (2009). Cold pressor stress impairs performance on working
memory tasks requiring executive functions in healthy young men. Behav. Neurosci. 123, 1066
Arnsten A. F. T. (2009). Stress signaling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and
function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 410–42210.1038/nrn2648
Lupien S. J., Maheu F., Tu M., Fiocco A., Schramek T. E. (2007). The effects of stress and stress
hormones on human cognition: implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain Cogn. 65,
209–3710.1016/j.bandc.2007.02.007
Mizoguchi K., Ishige A., Takeda S., Aburada M., Tabira T. (2004). Endogenous glucocorticoids
are essential for maintaining prefrontal cortical cognitive function. J. Neurosci. 24, 5492–
549910.1523/JNEUROSCI.0086-04.2004
Tomaka J., Blascovich J., Kelsey R. M., Leitten S. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and
behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 248–
26010.1037/0022-3514.65.2.248