Method Statement House Building in NCR
Method Statement House Building in NCR
Method Statement House Building in NCR
Part 2
Design methods/procedures
1 All design disciplines for addition were conducted self, without any aid from architect
2 Off sets/zoning, architectural plans, elevations, sections & detailing were conducted self
3 Structural analysis were conducted using Kani’s rotation contribution method, for which,
self formulized excel templates were used to reach moments, shear force, deflections,
seismic impacts etc.
4 Designing was also, conducted, using custom self formulized excel templates for beam,
columns, foundations etc.
5 Bar bending schedules were prepared using excel sheet, duly formulized in line &
consideration to BS 4466 shape codes, which is now replaced by BS 8866
Part 3
Safety
References
1 Drawings- Included within synopsis
2 Specifications- General international & national
Part 4
Materials
1 Local materials from various sources procured for all activities
2 Structural materials/ingredients were procured from NCR Pali crushers/queries
3 Reinforcing bars procured in full length 12/14 meters, without being bent. Extra payment
was made to distributor for trailer transport
4 All reinforcing bars were fabricated on site only under my direct supervision, for steel
fixer vendor did not accept to protect steel bars
5 Concrete was mixed on site, since RMC was not consistent in quality & RMC vendor
failed to answer my queries
6 Formwork was designed, using marine plywood & wooden scantling battens, both hard
wood & softwood
Part 5
Methods
Surveys
1. Setting out was done by old methods of formation of a right angle triangle, instead of
using a Theodolite.
2. All references regarding grids & levels were established on existing walls around
excavated area
Excavation
1 Existing soil type is silt/y clay with sand strata @ 20 m depth
2 No dewatering was required, since water table is much below
3 JCB equipment was utilized for excavations up to limited depth & limited setting out
4 Reason being that on 3 sides, buildings existed, which did not permit full excavation by
machine, requiring manual means for further work
5 Donkeys with masters were used for remaining excavation to reach formation level
6 Excavated material was removed from site immediately, as & when, it was dropped into
truck or on to tractor trolley to transport to temporary stockpile or deliver to someone
else, for some activity
7 Sides of excavation were protected from erosion by covering with polythene sheet, so
that rain water could not help, loosen strength in this case
8 Horizontal/inclined bracings/supports were not required, due to nature of soil
Foundation
1 Setting out foundations bases, a part of foundation beams was conducted
2 Concrete Spacers were cast on location. Thickness 50mm, 40mm, 30mm, 20mm
3 16mm dia. Tie bolts for concrete beams were procured fabricated from mechanical shop,
using 550N special steel
4 Preparation of beams, included placing fabricated reinforcement, fixing of forms to sides
of proposed beams, fixing spacers, cleaning whole RCC space etc.
5 Special waterproofing compound was procured to be mixed with concrete for areas,
where a water tank portion, required to be included, within portions of beams itself
6 Concrete mixing & pouring was carried out in one day successfully, followed by
application of wooden finish & continuous curing for required number of days
7 Work started for upright part of foundation beam, which included all activities, respecting
forms fabrication & fixing, reinforcing bars fabrication & fixing, inclusion respecting box
outs/inserts for services, water tank slab etc, were prepared to be ready for inspection
8 Concrete was mixed for this pour added with self leveling concrete compound. Concrete
for water tank beams & bases were cast monolithically, because PVC waterbar could not
be procured
9 During all foundation beams pour, one sectional beam side tried to open, but
immediately, it was controlled by pressing back to alignment within tolerance limit.
10 Continuous Curing was effected for required number of days
Basement Walls/Columns/Stairs
1 Setting out respecting walls & columns was given & verified
2 Work of columns commenced, as it was to be part, within RCC walls
3 Works of columns included formwork fabrication, rebar fabrication & provision of
electrical inserts, all to be carried out in stages, depending on number of form sets
4 Work of RCC walls fabrication for basement started immediately, after, beams were
completed
5 Works of staircase also, started in parallel from basement level to its first landing
6 Setting out of staircase was given on site, using details from Autocad, so that no error
should result on site by contractor
7 Basement walls were required to be poured in stages, due to fact that formwork for 2
walls were only fabricated
8 One by one all elements were prepared & poured followed by required number days of
curing application
Part 6
Reference
House Construction on Plot 430 Sector 21 B, NCR India, Faridabad
Construction Synopsis
1 Construction commenced 12.11.2008
2 Structure completed 9.7.2009
3 Please refer to plates from 1 to 26 giving entire views of structural construction.
4 Cost on RCC 500 rupees per square foot
Structural
7 72
4 50
level
2 47 2
5750 1 00 0
1 25 0
level
7 50
8 00 1 50
1 50
5 750 1 2 50
2 00 1 50 15 0
1 78 9 600
60 0
1 60 0 16 6 1 3 00 60 0 1 50
3 00 1 43
385 20 0 16 77 30 0
7 14 14 94
2 50 0 2 00
H a ll Entry Le ft Si de ba lc ony 4 64 14 9 4
R ight S ide ba lcon y
St ai r r ai l o n beam
C 2 00 x 3 00
20 0 x 30 0 D
A B
1 7 83 2 00 x 3 00 200
1 50 0 2 00 x 30 0 2 00 x 30 0
20 0 3 00 x 2 00
1 1 00 0
6 00 F2 20 0 x 3 0 0
300
47 49 51 53 55 57 59
1 4 00
2 4 72
2 00 x 3 0 0 1 80 0 72 70 66 64 62 60
1 0 00 2 00 x 4 00
F2 7 72
2 F2 u p st an d
20 0 x 3 0 0
30 0
3 00 x 30 0 x
6 00 600
80 0 F11
F9 14 00
1 80 0 2 00 x 3 00 2 3 00
Bal co n y l i nk /Rai li n g
1 00 0 3 20 0 x 30 0
10 00 6 00
2 00
30 0 x 3 0 0
2 00 x 3 00
2 00
10 00 3 00 x 30 0
578
39 7 7 F12
2 00 x 3 00
F9 20 0 1 20 0 27 77
2 00 x 3 00
4 30 0 x
F4 F4 5 89
6 00 4 00
2 00 x 3 00 3 00
F9 F9 F13
2 00 2 00 x 3 00 2 4 99
2 00 x 3 00
20 0 x 30 0 30 0 x 20 0 3 00 x
5 F5 6 00 60 0 F5
1 00 0 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8
1 8 00 17 20 1 72 0 18 50 1 90 0 18 5 1 18 0 0
2 00 x 30 0 2 00 x 3 00 2 00 x 3 00 2 00 x 3 00
2 00 x 30 0
2 00 200 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0
11 7 8 3 59 1 60 51
1 50
300
4 50
1 378
1000
F1, F2 , F4, F5/3 00 x 60 0 m m deep, F3 do n ot exis t
F6, F7 , F8, F9/20 0 x 3 00 mm d eep
F10, F11, F12, F13/2 00 x 300 m m deep
Fir st Str uc tu ra l Fr a ming Le vel Ha ll Por tion
40 0 4 00 4 00 4 00 40 0 40 0 4 00 40 0 4 00
40 0 4 00
20 0
I nt er na l Bal con y/ Ra il in g
400
Figure 1 Plan
1 Plot Size 420 SQM
2 Basement below drawing room hall portion
3 Ground coverage 55 %
4 Total coverage added 540 SQM
bea ms
C 200 x 300 m m D
A B 200 x 300
200 x 300
2 00 x 30 0 200
17 83
1500 200 x 300 200 x 300
300 x
1 1000
200
600 F2
200
200 x 300
300
47 49 51 53 55 57 59
1400
247 2
2 00 x 30 0
10 00 18 00 72 70 66 64 62 60 200 x 4 00
2 F2 772
ups ta nd
F2 200 x 300
300
300 x 300 x
600 600
800 F 11
1 400
F9
1800 200 x 3 00 230 0
10 00 3 2 00 x 300
1 000
600
200
200 x 300
20 0
3 00 x 3 00
1000 39 77
578 F 12
200 x 300
F9 2 00 12 00 277 7
200 x 3 00
4 300 x
F4 600
F4 589
200 x 300
300
F9 F9 F 13
200 2 00 x 30 0 249 9
200 x 3 00
2 00 x 300 300 x 200 300 x
5 F5 600 600 F5
1000
F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8
1800 1 720 1 720 1850 1 900 1 851 1 800
2 00 x 300 200 x 300 200 x 300 200 x 3 00
200 x 300
200 200 200 200 2 00 200
1 50
300
450
13 78 1 00 0
F1, F 2, F4, F 5/300 x 600 m m de ep, F3 do not e xist
F6, F7, F8, F9/200 x 300 mm deep
F10, F11, F 12, F13/200 x 300 m m dee p
Fir st Str u ctur al Fra ming Level H a ll Por tion
Figure 2 Plan
Salient features of construction carried out:
1 Front portion double height drawing room or hall
2 Rear portion Bed Room area in three stories
3 Ground floor portion 75 SQM previously constructed in year 2000
4 Soil Silt/y Clay with high affinity to water & white ants.
5 Depth of formation level (-3.4 m) for basement.
6 Excavation carried out by JCB partly & then used donkey stock for a total excavation
quantity of 550 cum.
Part 7
Soil improvement activity below formation level as defined below:
1 Soil improvement by filling/laying 40 mm size graded aggregate 250 mm thick, followed
by placing 20 &10 mm graded aggregate, one after other to fill voids & then on that
layer, placed graded machine dust to completely pack fill voids.
2 Above mix was compacted dry as well as, wet to get placed mix material dense for both
to improve/enhance bearing capacity & to reduce possible settlement.
3 I had observed one pit 1 M x 1 M x 2 M deep for about six months to understand soil
conduct, observations of which were utilized for designing foundations.
4 There was no problem in excavation & there was no need of any shoring during
excavation that indicates that soil was self supporting, due to having no angle of internal
friction, but due to possessing high value of cohesion.
5 Substrata did not have any water table, but certain moisture content % very nominal.
6 It appears that land was used for purpose of agriculture in long past & for development of
area, Development authority acquired land for urbanization around Delhi.
7 Soil definitely contained certain organic chemicals that had to be avoided to impart
adverse affect to proposed building.
8 I judged SBC of soil to be around, 5 to 10 T /SQM based on my experience, yet, it did
not meet building requirement, due to unforeseen conduct of Clays, that could have
contended minerals like Montmorillonite or Illite or some others, which could help soil,
either to swell, while being in contact with water or to loosen entire shear
strength/resistance.
9 Proposal was to include one equal size basement that caused me a cause of concern.
10 I decided to avoid construction of isolated foundations on existing soil, even at cost of
additional expenses.
11 Fortunately, I have experienced during my career extensively on RCC building projects
as well as, on industrial onshore projects, both in office engineering, as well as, in field
engineering.
12 Based on my experience earning, I could solve proposal easily, which I did comfortably
with full confidence successfully.
13 A decision was made to apply soil improvement technique in easiest way, so that bearing
capacity as well as, permeability of soil below formation is sustainable.
14 Water should not affect foundation, if it is allowed to move beneath foundation
structures, because mobility of water can result in various chemical changes within soil &
also, can impact other adjacent structures.
15 Clay soil had to be isolated from building substructures for purpose of RCC protection.
16 To meet requirement, I decided to form a road type WBM structure below foundation
formation, without involving any cementing material, but to be included just water
bound.
17 Some person suggested to include lime also, to mix with soil for soil stabilization, but it
did not convince me, since lime is not a reliable material in moist environment.
18 I went ahead to excavate about 300 mm additional depth to accommodate proposed soil
improvement to a minimal meeting.
Part 8
Structural:
1 On prepared soil improvement base, a 50 mm thick layer of blinding concrete was laid.
2 Surface of blinding concrete waterproofed using CICO Tapecrete coating, protected by
CM plastering like on coating.
3 Analysis of structures was done using Kani’s Rotation Contribution Method, a very old
method of moment distribution, but yet useful
4 Analysis of foundation framed matting done by purpose made worksheets.
5 Sketch shows details of foundation section 400 x 1200 mm beam, with 800 mm wide
spreader embedded in full 200 mm thick RCC matting under all beams in both directions.
6 Columns were revealed for stubs/full columns from beams
7 One 16000 litres capacity water storage tank has also, been provided, below basement
accommodated, between foundation beams to contain 600 deep water.
8 Between beams, river sand filling provided in place of soil, since it is difficult to compact
available soil, which could also, deteriorate concrete protection, applied in solution form
as cement based coating.
400.00
Foun dation Beam
1000.00
200.00
300.00
Righ t Elevation
Arch itectur al
Elevation
500
2125
8.85 sqm 1.56
5 25 59 5
297297297297
594 47 5 475 475 47 5 300
738
3250
3250
738
738
3.0
737 300
3.24
52 5
3250
3250
73 8 3.4
437
100 300
750
1625 1.37
2.35 O WNE RS- SURAJ SINGH & SUMI TRA
2500
F O R Submiss ion
875
PLO T 43 0/1 A, SECTOR 2 1B, FARIDABAD-HUDA ARE A
Figure 4
Elevation
3 250
1000
OWNER S- SURAJ SINGH & SUM ITR A
3 250
3 250
FO R Su b mission
3 250
3 750
300
1250
3 250
200 0 20 00
Left Elevation
200
300
349 698 349 228
1.82
F O R S ubmi ssi on
349
349 228 2000
666
667
650
650
Fr on t Eleva tion
Ar ch itectu ral Eleva tion
Figure 6
FO R Su bmission
OWNER S- SURAJ SI NGH & SUMIT RA
PLOT 430 /1A, SE CTOR 2 1B, FARI DABAD-HUDA AREA
1371 37 59
V1
80 3
SF L+ 1 2' 0 "
pra yer
Ba th
4200 44 99
BED
1 000 850 W4
D8 D10
V5 90 0 2052
650 75 0
12 00 W1 5 D11 1 200
118 0
2 50
927 802
W5 47 49 51 53 55 57 59
10 70 V6
72 70
927 66 64 62 60
20 00
W6 800
10 00 W14
W7 1 500
1000
D ouble H eight
20 00 W8 W13 2000
SFL + 14'-6"
1500
W9
800 W12 15 00
D 13
2791 200 0
W10 W1 1 1800
A B C 40 0
3 00
2 00
D
T ypic al2 00
2 00
2 00 1 00
2 00
1 80 0
6 / 12 Ø in 1 laye r, 4 ot h er la ye r
6 / 1 2 Ø i n 1 la yer
2472
6 / 1 6 Ø ea ch i n 3 la yer s
6 / 12 Ø in 1 layer
6 / 1 6 Ø e ach in 3 layer s
2300
3 4 / 12 Ø ea ch in 2 layer s 6 / 1 2 Ø e ach in 2 layer s 4 L egge d/8 Ø r in g s @ 20 0 c/c 6 / 12 Ø
6 / 16 Ø ea ch in 3 l ayer s
6 / 12 Ø in 1 l ayer , 4 in a n oth er r
6 / 1 6 Ø e ach in 4 la ye rs
2777
4 6 / 12 Ø
6 / 1 2 Ø e ach in 3 la ye rs
6 / 1 2 Ø ea ch in 3 layer s
2499
4 / 1 2 Ø i n 1 la yer
2
4'6"1378
2300
3 1000
12848
17'0" 42'1.5"
E xcavat ion Level -3.125 M
103765177 2777
34'0" 4
2499
5 2699
8'10"
1000
12241
40'2"
13619
44'8"
Part 11
Quality Systems: Lessons Learnt & Conclusions
1 Quality Requirement is More Significant than Quality Awareness.
2 Quality requirement must be binding leaving chalta he or quality last attitude written
off for ever to be replaced by thik karo or quality must attitude.
3 Quality Systems Requirement must be adherently, applied from Designs to Tendering to
Award to Supervision to Execution of Construction Operations, as well as, post
construction maintenance.
4 Merely, signing off documents is not sufficient, but, carrying out of activities & cent per
cent inspections or examinations are mandatory.
5 Those personnel involved with quality system operations, must be themselves quality
competent, as well as, quality supportive & must campaign for its realty achievement by
encouraging other department’s personnel. Responsibility ignoring personnel spoil whole
system quality.
6 Lapse on quality cannot be digested in any case, whether activity belongs to pre
earthquake preventive measures or belongs to a post earthquake disaster management.
7 Loss of lives due to negligence cannot be compromised. Generally, it has been
experienced in almost all spheres that after quality system introduction for decades,
products quality has not resulted as expected consequently, by inefficient compliance of
quality system.
8 Lapse of quality on performance & its inefficiency cannot be allowed to be digested with
any disaster mitigation scenario whether, it has to be in operation or it has to be as
supporting resources or as involving leading authorities, whosoever & howsoever big one
may be.
9 Hard work input, determination, dedication, commitment, implementation, post
implementation scrutiny or audits, are all a must & must be seen, duly performing in
addition to approved or recognized agreements.
10 Bare talks & statements would not work to give required results. Real action must be seen
doing by one & by all members of all departments teams.
Other buildings
1 Chapter 13, sketch # 63 & 64 an officer’s apartment/flat & an administrative building
respectively, provide more proposals for construction purpose
2 As described in foregoing, similar, sequence for respective activities should be followed
3 All such buildings are RCC structures with internal & external finished on same pattern
or scheme
4 Sketch # 61 shows a central control building, which constitutes a part of major facilities
project with wide dimensions
5 Purpose of such building is to house all central controls that are required to control all
processes trains on a chemical processing plant
6 Since, this type of building is located in off sites of processing areas, such structure must
be blast resistant/resilient, due to fact that its distance of extreme corner lies within in
200/600 m of process area location for which, sketch # 20 indicative facility layout could
be referred
7 Sketch does not show complete details of settings out but, only that part, which requires
blast resistance that can be provided including RCC walls on periphery allowing blast
resistant steel thick doors on indicated locations or if so required, on other locations as
well.
8 CCB type building should have IT access room, with raised floor system to contain
optical networking supporting arrangements cabling
9 CCB must have devised with all equipment that would be required for total processing
controls & should have adequate accommodation capacity, as well as, internal circulation
areas from safety & ergonomics viewpoint
10 Entry locations should be provided with air lock doors/entries
11 Internal controls should be provided with access card system or other security &
surveillance system
12 CCB must have integration with CCTV network/SCADA controls etc.
13 Sketch # 62 indicates a line plan for a substation building, which requires blast resilience
or resistant design provisions
14 When such building is located within 200 M from process area, it should be blast
resistant & accordingly RC walls & slabs should be provided, while no precast elements
preferred on such buildings
15 When located, between 200 to 600 M, it could be blast resilient
16 When located more than 600 m, it could be non blast building/an ordinary structure
involving normal loads, wind loads & seismic shears applications
17 Substation constitutes cable cellar, high voltage switch gear area, transformer area,
control offices areas