Prof. A.

Meher Prasad
Department of Civil Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
email: [email protected]

1
 Overview

What is pushover analysis?

What are its fundamental techniques?

What tools can be used?

Common pitfalls in pushover analysis

Example of pushover analysis application

2
 Why Push-Over Analysis?

¾ Static Nonlinear Analysis technique, also known as sequential

yield analysis, or simply "push-over" analysis has gained
significant importance during the past few years.

¾ It is one of the three analysis techniques recommended by FEMA

273/274 and a main component of the Capacity Spectrum Method
(ATC-40).

¾ Proper application can provide valuable insights into the

expected performance of structural systems and components

¾ Misuse can lead to an erroneous understanding of the

performance characteristics.

3
 What is Push-Over Analysis?

¾ Push-over analysis is a technique by which a computer

model of the building is subjected to a lateral load of a
certain shape (i.e., parabolic, inverted triangular or
uniform).

¾ The intensity of the lateral load is slowly increased and the

sequence of cracks, yielding, plastic hinge formations, and
failure of various structural components is recorded.

¾ Push-over analysis can provide a significant insight into

the weak links in seismic performance of a structure.

4
 What is Push-Over Analysis?

¾ A series of iterations are usually required during which, the

structural deficiencies observed in one iteration, are
rectified and followed by another.

¾ This iterative analysis and design process continues until

the design satisfies a pre-established performance criteria.

¾ The performance criteria for push-over analysis is generally

established as the desired state of the building given a
roof-top or spectral displacement amplitude.

5
 Push-over Curve or Capacity Spectrum

Using simple modal analysis

equations spectral displacement
and roof-top displacement may be
V/W (Acceleration)

converted to each other.

High-Strength; High-Stiffness; Brittle

Moderate Strength and Stiffness; Ductile

Low-Strength; Low-Stiffness; Brittle

Roof-top Displacement

6
 Design Spectra Representation

ƒ Ordinary Design ƒ Push-Over Analysis

- Composite or ADRS Plot

Co
V/W (Acceleration) V/W (Acceleration) nst
an
tP
er
io
d
Li
ne
s

Period Spectral or Roof-top Displacement

DESIGN SPECTRUM ELASTIC DEMAND SPECTRUM

7
 What Tools Can Be Used?

¾ Nonlinear Analysis software with built-in push-over analysis

capabilities

z DRAIN-2DX, DRAIN-3DX
z ANSR
z IDARC-2D, IDARC-3D
z SAP2000NL

¾ Sequential application of linear analysis software

8
 Establishing the Performance Point

ƒ No building can be pushed to infinity without failure.

ƒ Performance point is where the Seismic Capacity and the Seismic

Demand curves meet.

ƒ If it exists, it may be established by

• The Explicit R Factor Method (Reinhorn and others)

• The Displacement Coefficient Method (FEMA-273)
• The Capacity Spectrum Method (ATC-40)

ƒ If the performance point exists and damage state at that point is

acceptable, we have a building that satisfies the push-over
criterion.

9
 The Explicit R-Factor Method

R=FE/FI
e
S d⎡ 1 c ⎤
FE S dI = 1 +
⎢⎣ c µ ( R − 1)⎥⎦
Rµ
T0a b
V/W (Acceleration) c= a +
1 + To T0
capacity spectrum

Inelastic demand spectrum

FI
5% damped elastic spectrum

Roof-top Displacement

10
 FEMA-273 Method

ƒ Here an estimate of elastic displacement is

obtained first.

ƒ This displacement is then multiplied by a

set of modification factors to arrive at an
V/W (Acceleration) estimate of the target inelastic
displacement.
capacity spectrum

5% damped elastic spectrum

δe Roof-top Displacement

11
 ATC-40 Method
ƒ This is an iterative procedure involving
several analyses.
ƒ For each analysis an effective period for
an equivalent elastic system and a
V/W (Acceleration) corresponding elastic displacement are
calculated.
ƒ This displacement is then divided by a
T0 damping factor to obtain an estimate of real
displacement at that step of analysis.

β eff = κβ 0 + 0.05

T e ff 3.21 − 0.68ln( β eff )

SRA =
2.12
∆e/B 5% damped elastic spectrum
2.31 − 0.4 ln( β eff )
δe SRV =
1.65
Roof-top Displacement

12
ATC-40 Nonlinear Static Procedure

1. Develop the Pushover Curve

13
ATC-40 Nonlinear Static Procedure

2. Convert Pushover Curve to capacity diagram

14
ATC-40 Nonlinear Static Procedure

3. Plot elastic design spectrum in A-D format

15
 ATC-40 Nonlinear Static Procedure

4. Plot the demand diagram and capacity diagram together

Intersection point gives the displacement demand

Avoids nonlinear RHA; instead analyse equivalent linear

systems

16
 ATC-40 Nonlinear Static Procedure

5. Convert displacement demand to roof displacement and

component deformation.

6. Compare to limiting values for specified performance goals.

17
 Points to be taken care..

1. Do not underestimate the importance of the loading or

displacement shape function.
2. Know your performance objectives before you push the building.
3. If it is not designed, it cannot be pushed.
4. Do not ignore gravity loads.
5. Do not push beyond failure unless otherwise you can model failure.
6. Pay attention to rebar development and lap lengths.
7. Do not ignore shear failure mechanisms
8. P-Delta effects may be more important than you think.
9. Do not confuse the Push-over with the real earthquake loading.
10. Three-dimensional buildings may require more than a planar push.

18
1. Do not underestimate the importance of
the loading shape function.

¾ The loading or deformation shape function is selected to represent

the predominant dynamic mode shape of the building.

¾ It is most common to keep the load shape constant during the push.

¾ Loading shape importance increases for tall buildings whose

earthquake response is not dominated by a single mode shape.

¾ For these buildings, a loading shape function based on the first

mode shape may seriously underestimate the seismic demand on
the intermediate floor levels.

19
1. Do not underestimate the importance of
the loading shape function.
0.2

0.18

0.16

0.14
Uniform
Base Shear Coefficient

Inverted Triangular
0.12
Inverted Triangular with Top Loading

0.1

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Displacement (in)

20
 Influence of loading function on the
performance of the structure
1400

1200

1000
Base shear(kN)

uniform
800
inverted triangular
Triangular at top=0
600
Parabola

400

200

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Displacement(mm)

Pushover curves for different types of lateral force distribution

in PUSH X-Direction (SAP2000 NL)
21
 Influence of loading function on the
performance of the structure

0.16 Inverted Triangle

0.14 Uniform
parabola
0.12
0.1
Vb/W

0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
∆ /H(%)

Pushover curves for different types of lateral force

distribution in PUSH Y-Direction (IDARC)
22
 2. Know your performance objectives
before you push the building.

ƒ No building can be displaced to infinity without damage.

ƒ It is of paramount importance to understand the specific

performance objectives desired for the building.

ƒ Performance objectives such as collapse prevention, life safety, or

immediate occupancy have to be translated into technical terms
such as: (a) a given set of design spectra, and (b) specific limit
states acceptable for various structural components

ƒ A push-over analysis without a clearly defined performance

objectives is of little use.

23
3. If it is not designed, it cannot be pushed.

ƒ E, I, and A are not sufficient.

ƒ Push-over characteristics are strong functions of

force-displacement characteristics of individual
members and their connections.

ƒ If detailed characteristics are not known, the push-

over analysis will be an exercise in futility.

24
4. Do not ignore gravity loads.

ƒ Inclusion or exclusion of the gravity loads can have a

pronounced effect on the shape of the push-over curve and the
member yielding and failure sequence.

ƒ Example:

ƒ Due to the unsymmetric distribution of + and - reinforcements

in R/C beams, gravity load delays the onset of yielding and
cracking in the beams, resulting in a stiffer structure at lower
magnitudes of base shear.

ƒ The ultimate capacity of the structure, is usually reduced with

increasing gravity load.

25
 5. Do not push beyond failure unless
otherwise you can model failure

Ultimate Capacity

Force or Moment
Lateral Force

Modeled with
failures ignored

Actual

Displacement or Curvature
Displacement

26
6. Pay attention to rebar development and
lap lengths.

ƒ For R/C members of existing structures, it is very important to

note the development lengths when calculating member
capacities.

ƒ If inadequate development lengths are present, as they are in

most of the older buildings, the contributing steel area should be
reduced to account for this inadequacy.

ƒ Failure to do so will result in overestimating the actual capacity

of the members and results in an inaccurate push-over curve.

27
 7. Do not ignore shear failure mechanisms

ƒ If the shear capacity of structural members is not sufficient to

permit the formation of flexural plastic hinges, shear failure will
precede the formation of plastic hinges at the end of the member.

ƒ In R/C members, even if the shear capacity is sufficient, but lateral

reinforcement is not spaced close enough at the plastic hinge
zones, the concrete may crush in the absence of sufficient
confinement.

ƒ If this happens, the plastic capacity is suddenly dropped to what

can be provided by the longitudinal steel alone.

28
8. P-∆ effects may be more important
than you think.

ƒ The P-∆ effects become increasingly significant with larger

lateral displacements and larger axial column forces.

ƒ Strong column - weak beam design strategy commonly deals

with the moment capacity of columns in the undeformed state.

ƒ In a substantially deformed state, the moment capacity of

columns may be sufficiently reduced to counteract the strong
column - weak beam behaviour envisioned by the design.

ƒ Cases of plastic hinge formations during a push-over analysis

in columns "designed" to be stronger than the beams are not
rare.

29
 9. Do not confuse the Push-over with the
real earthquake loading.
ƒ The push-over load is monotonically increased

ƒ The earthquake generated forces continually change in amplitude

and direction during the duration of earthquake ground motion.

ƒ Push-over loads and structural response are in phase

ƒ Earthquake excitations and building response are not necessarily in

phase.

ƒ This is particularly true for near-fault ground motions which tend to

concentrate the damage on the lower floors, an effect which is
difficult to model by the push-over loads.

30
9. Do not confuse the Push-over with the
real earthquake loading.
0.20
Pushover Envelope
JAMA-IDARC3D
0.15
IDARC4.0

0.10

0.05
Base Shear Coefficient

0.00

-0.05

-0.10

-0.15

-0.20

-0.25
-20.0 -15.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
Displacement (in)

31
Base shear coefficient Vs Roof displacement
(% of H) for various PGAs

0.2
El-Centro
0.15

0.1

0.05 IDARC
SAP
Vb/W

0.16g
0
0.25g
-0.008 -0.006 -0.004 -0.002 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008
0.3g
-0.05 0.35g

-0.1

-0.15

-0.2

∆ /H

32
10. Three-dimensional buildings may require
more than a planar push.

¾ For building with strong asymmetry in plan, or with numerous

non-orthogonal elements, a planar (two dimensional) push-over
analysis may not suffice.

¾ For such cases a 3D model of the building must be constructed

and subjected to push-over analysis.

¾ Three dimensional buildings may be pushed in the principal

directions independently, or pushed simultaneously in
orthogonal directions.

33
Analysis Procedure

SAP2000 NL

34
 Pushover Analysis Procedure

Create 3D Model Gravity Pushover

(Force controlled) DL+0.25LL
Lateral Pushover
(Displacement controlled)

Assign end offsets

Define Load case
(Lateral Load at centre of mass)

Define Hinge properties

Run Static analysis

Assign Hinge properties

Run static pushover analysis
Beams – Default M3
Columns – Default PMM

Define Static Pushover Establish Performance point

Cases

35
 Material Properties

Concrete Properties

• Cube compressive strength, fck

• Modulus of Elasticity of concrete ( E c = 5000 f ck )

Reinforcing Steel Properties

• Yield strength of steel

• Modulus of Elasticity of steel Es

36
 Material Properties

Frame Elements

Infill (struts)

37
 Modeling of Structural elements

Beams and columns 3D Frame elements

Slab Diaphragm action

(ignore the out of plane stiffness)
Flat slabs Plate elements

Beam column joints End offsets (Rigid zone factor 1)

Asymmetric Structures Centre of mass

(add non structural mass to corresponding
beams)
Centre of stiffness
Inclusion of appendages Include water tanks, cantilever slabs

38
 Modeling of Structural elements

Stairway slabs Equivalent frame elements

Shear Walls Wide Column Elements

Infill walls Equivalent strut method

Foundation
Isolated footings Hinged at the bottom of foundation

Single pile Fixed at five times the diameter of

pile
Multiple piles
Fixity of columns at top of pile cap
Plinth beams
Frame elements

39
 Modeling of Beams and Columns

¾ 3D Frame Elements

¾ Cross Sectional dimensions, reinforcement details, material type

¾ Effective moment of inertia

Beams Rectangular 0.5 Ig

T-Beam 0.7 Ig

L-Beam 0.6 Ig

Columns 0.7 Ig

40
Modeling of Beams

41
Modeling of Columns

42
Modeling of Beam Column Joints

End offsets (Rigid zone factor 1)

43
Modeling of Slab

44
 Modeling of Infill
Equivalent Strut Approach

Step 1. Equivalent Strut Properties – Smith and Carter Model

a) Strength of infill, P
b) Initial modulus of elasticity of infill, Ei
c) Equivalent strut width (when force in the strut = R), w
d) Thickness of infill, t

Step 2. Stress – Strain Values

Stress = P/AEi ,where A = wt
Strain = P/A

45
 Modeling of Shear Wall (Lift Core )
Type I Model - Single Lift Core Column
Equivalent Wide Column Elements connected to the frame
through rigid links

BEAM
y
x
MASTER NODE

L
Beam elements with rigid ends

46
 Modeling of Shear Wall (Lift Core )
Type II Model - Single Lift Core Column

¾ The lift core can be treated as a single column with master node
defined at the centroid and the beams connected by rigid links

BEAM

y CORE MASTER NODE

x

SLAVE NODE

47
 Modeling of Shear Wall
(Lift Core Column Properties)

¾ For axial and torsional rigidity, the full cross-sectional area should be
used

BEAM
y
x CORE MASTER NODE

FOR
A, J

SLAVE NODE

48
 Modeling of Shear Wall
(Lift Core Column Properties)

¾ For shear along y axis and bending about x-axis (ground motion
along y-axis), the walls in the direction of ground motion should be
considered as two parallel elements

BEAM
y

x CORE MASTER NODE

FOR
Ay, Ixx

SLAVE NODE

49
 Modeling of Shear Wall
(Lift Core Column Properties)

¾ For shear along x axis and bending about y-axis (ground motion
along x-axis), the walls in the direction of ground motion should be
considered as three parallel elements

BEAM
y

x CORE MASTER NODE

FOR
Ax, Iyy

SLAVE NODE

50
Beam Hinge Properties - Flexural hinge (M3)

51
 Hinge Properties for Beams

b
a
C
Lateral Load

1.0 B

D E
c
A ∆y ∆
Lateral Deformation

Generalized Load
Deformation Relations

* ATC 40 Volume 1
52
Beam Hinge Properties - Shear hinge

53
 Beam Hinge Properties - Shear hinge

Shear capacity
Shear strength (V)

d
V sy = f y A sv Vu = 1.05Vy
0 .6 s v Vy

=0
Residual
Total Shear Capacity, Vy = Vc + Vsy 0.2 Vy Shear Strength

∆y 1.5∆y ∆m=15∆y
Shear deformation (∆)

Refer Clause 6.3.3 of IS13920

54
Column Hinge Properties- Flexural hinge
(PM2M3)

55
 Hinge Properties for Columns

b
a
C
Lateral Load

1.0 B

D E
c
A ∆y ∆
Lateral Deformation

* ATC 40 Volume 1 56
Column Hinge Properties- Shear hinge

57
 Column Hinge Properties- Shear hinge

Shear capacity

0.8 f ck ( 1 + 5 β − 1)
τc =
6β
0.116 f ck bd
w h ere β = ≥ 1.0
100 A st
3Pu
δ = 1+ ≤ 1.5 Note:
Ag f ck
For moderate and high ductility of the
Vc = δτ c bd column section
d 3 Pu
V sy = f y A sv δ = ≤ 0 .5
0 .6 s v A g f ck
Total Shear Capacity, Vy= Vc + Vsy is taken in calculation (ATC 40)

58
 Column Hinge Properties- Shear hinge

Yield deformation (∆y) is to be calculated using the following formula.

Yield shear strength R R×l

∆y = = =
Shear stiffness ⎛ GAeff ⎞ G × 0.75 Ag
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ l ⎠

Where G = Shear modulus of the reinforced concrete section

Ag = Gross area of the section
l = Length of member

59
Column Hinge Properties- Shear hinge
• The ultimate shear strength (Vu) is taken as 5% more
than yield shear strength (Vy) and residual shear
strength is taken as 20% of the yield shear strength for
modelling of the shear hinges as shown in Figure.
Shear strength
(V)
Vu = 1.05Vy
Vy

Residual Shear
0.2 Vy Strength
∆y 1.5∆ ∆m=15∆y
yShear deformation
(∆)

• Similarly maximum shear deformation is taken as 15

times the yield deformation. The values were taken as per
SAP 2000 manual recommendations.
60
Infill Properties - Axial hinge (P)

61
 Static Pushover Case Data
(Gravity Pushover – Force Controlled)

62
 Lateral Load Pattern

Determination of the Load pattern: (IS 1893 (part 1) : 2002 )

Fundamental 0 . 09 h Q3
Ta =
natural period d

Design Base VB = Ah W
Shear Q2

Design Lateral Wi hi
2
Qi = VB
Force ∑ W j hj
2

Q1

63
 Static Pushover Case Data
(Lateral pushover – Displacement controlled)

64
Seismic Evaluation of a
Typical RC Building

65
 Building Data

Building frame system RC OMRF

Usage Residential
Built in 1999
Zone V
Number of stories G+4
Footing Multiple Piles
Symmetry About Y-axis
Material used M15 & Fe 415
Plan dimensions 25.2m X 13.95m
Building height 15.7m
Soil Type (assumed) Type-II (Medium)

66
Plan- Beam Locations

n Storey number
Beams (only in 1 to 4 floor)

67
Plan - Column and Equivalent Strut
Locations

Infill wall Location

Storey number n

68
 Comments

¾ Visual inspection did not reveal concrete deterioration.

Knowledge factor was not applied.

¾ Architectural drawings were not available. Location of infill walls

was postulated.

¾ Geotechnical data was not available.

¾ Rebar detailing was not complete in the available structural

drawings.

¾ Building considered to be noncompliant with IS 13920: 1993

(R = 3).

¾ Fixity considered at pile cap. Soil-structure interaction neglected.

¾ Elevator walls not considered as lateral load resisting elements.

69
Plan – Frames along X-direction

70
Plan – Frames along Y-direction

71
Elevation along line A-A

72
Typical Beam Section (Ground Floor)

73
Typical Column Sections (Ground Floor)

Tie spacing 100 mm c/c near beam-to-column joints

74
 Detailed Structural Analysis

¾ Gravity Load Analysis

¾ Lateral Load Analysis

z Linear static analysis

(Equivalent Static Method, IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002)

z Response Spectrum Method

(IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002)

z Non-linear Static Analysis

(Pushover Analysis, ATC 40)

75
 Structural Parameters

Static Design
Center of Mass Center of rigidity Eccentricity, esi Eccentricity, edi
Seismic Lumped (m) (m)
Floor Weight ( m) (m)
Mass
(kN) (Ton) X- Y- X- Y- X- Y- X- Y-
direction direction direction direction direction direction direction direction

5 3550 255 12.55 6.90 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.33 1.34 1.20

4 4175 306 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82

3 4175 306 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82

2 4175 306 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82

1 3200 222 12.55 7.15 12.60 7.23 0.05 0.08 1.34 0.82

edi = 1.5esi + 0.05bi edi = esi − 0.05bi

76
Location of Centre of Mass

77
 Calculation of Base Shear
IS 1893(Part 1):2002

Base shear, VB = AhW W = Total seismic weight of the building

Z = 0.36 (for Zone V)
ZI ⎛ Sa ⎞
Ah = ⎜ ⎟ I = 1 (for normal building)
2R ⎝ g ⎠
R = 3 (for OMRF)
Ah = 0.15 Sa/g = 2.5 corresponding to both the time
period in with-infill case.

VB = 0.15 × 20270 kN
= 3039 kN

78
 Comparison of Base Shear

Without infill
With infill stiffness
stiffness
Analysis methods
Vx (kN) Vy (kN) Vx (kN) Vy (kN)

Equivalent Static Method

EQX 2796 - 3039 -
EQY - 2796 - 3039
Response Spectrum Analysis
EQ 1773 1851 2092 2170

79
 Comparison of Fundamental Periods
Empirical Formulae Computational Model

With infill Without

With infill Without infill
infill
stiffness stiffness stiffness
stiffness

Time Period (s) Tax= 0.28 Tay= 0.38 0.59 0.73 0.83

Sa/g 2.50 2.50 2.30 1.87 1.64

80
First five modes and their participation

Without infill With infill

Mass Participation Mass Participation
Mode
T (s) (%) T (s) (%)
UX Uy UX Uy
1 0.83 88.34 1.95 0.73 92.29 1.10
2 0.78 2.22 86.71 0.69 1.26 90.23
3 0.42 1.23 0.47 0.38 0.72 0.59
4 0.25 6.05 0.16 0.22 4.44 0.13
5 0.24 0.14 8.02 0.21 0.11 6.33

81
 Mode Shapes

First Mode T=0.83s Second Mode T=0.76s

(UX=92.91%) (UY=90.51%)

82
 Mode Shapes

Third Mode T=0.39s (RZ)

(UX=0.11% UY=0.52%)

Fourth Mode T=0.25s

(UX=5.39% UY=0.04%)

83
Mode Shapes

Fifth Mode T=0.24s

(UX=0.03% UY=7.07%)

84
Demand and Capacity for Columns - Moment
(Equivalent static method)
Absolute Demand Absolute Demand
Section Absolute Capacities
(Without Infill stiffness) Max. (With Infill stiffness) Max.
Capacity Capacity
M2 M3 P M2 M3
P M2 M3 P factor Factor
(kNm) (kNm) (kN) (kNm) (kNm)
(kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kN)

1C1 2871 236 207 1744 323 311 2.30 1712 342 338 2.49

1C2 3102 280 218 1534 433 334 2.60 1860 159 354 2.72

1C3 3070 250 242 2266 288 335 1.81 2400 310 354 1.95

1C4 3241 263 277 2614 414 350 1.84 2506 435 368 1.92

1C5 3301 296 253 1422 420 346 2.20 1546 445 365 2.36

2C4 3241 263 277 2355 416 270 1.57 2029 285 220 1.04

85
Demand and Capacity for Columns – Shear
(Equivalent Static Method)

Absolute Absolute Absolute

Sections Capacities Demand
Demand CF CF
(With infill (Without infill
stiffness) stiffness)
Vd (kN)
Vu (kN) Vd (kN)
1C1 250 184 0.74 161 0.64

1C2 259 226 0.87 206 0.80

1C3 275 189 0.69 177 0.64
1C4 282 227 0.80 209 0.74
1C5 285 231 0.81 212 0.74
2C5 282 154 0.55 231 0.82

Vu is higher of the shear from analysis and the shear

corresponding to the flexural capacity Mu (Vu = Mu / Ls)

86
 Maximum displacement response in
X-direction (Equivalent Static Method)

5 5

4 4
Storey Level

Storey Level
3 3

2 2

1 1

0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm)

With Infill Without Infill

87
 Inter-storey Drift in X-direction
Equivalent Static Method
18 18

16 16

14 14

12 12

Storey level (m)

Storey level (m)

10 10

8 8

6 6

4 4

2 2

0 0
0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60
-2
-2
In te r-store y dri ft ( X 10 %) Inter-store y drift ( X 10 %)

With infill Without infill

88
 Performance Objective

1. Design Basis Earthquake + Life Safety

(2% total drift)

2. Maximum Considered Earthquake + Collapse Prevention

(4% total drift)

89
 Distribution of Lateral Force
at each Storey Level for Lateral Pushover

Q5= 15.22 5

Q4= 11.70 4

Q3= 6.83 3

Q2= 3.25 2

Q1= 1.00 1

90
Moment Rotation Curve for a Typical
Element

Hinge Property

1.2
C B Yield state
1
B

LS
CP IO Immediate Occupancy
0.8 IO
Moment/SF

0.6 LS Life Safety

0.4
CP Collapse Prevention
D
0.2 E
0
A C Ultimate state
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04
Rotation/SF

91
 Demand Spectrum

Seismic Coefficient, CA
Zone II Zone III Zone IV Zone V
Soil
(0.10) (0.16) (0.24) (0.36)
Type I 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Type II 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Type III 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Seismic Coefficient, CV
Type I 0.10 0.16 0.24 0.36
Type II 0.14 0.22 0.33 0.49
Type III 0.17 0.27 0.40 0.60

92
 Capacity Curve – Push X

8000

Base Shear (kN) 7000

6000

5000

4000
0.5% 1.0%
3000

2000

1000

0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18

Roof Displacement (m)

93
State of the Hinge at every Increase in Lateral load

Step 0 Step 2

94
State of the Hinge at every Increase in Lateral load

Step 6 Step 9 (0.5% of H)

95
State of the Hinge at every Increase in Lateral load

Step 15 Step 17

96
State of the Hinge at every Increase in Lateral load

Step 22 Step 25 (1% of H)

97
Performance Point ( Demand spectrum- Z )

1.0 Teff = 1.094s

Demand Spectrum
Spectral Accelaration Coefficient (Sa/g)
5%
0.9
Capacity Spectrum βeff = 17.3%
0.8 V = 5831.6 kN
Effective Period
0.7
D = 0.112 m = 0.71% of H
0.6 15% Sa = 0.309 m/s2
0.5
17.3% Sd = 0.092 m/s
0.4
Performance Point
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Spectral Displacement (m)

98
State of Hinge at Performance Point

Flexure Hinge beyond “LS”

Shear Hinge beyond “C”

99
 Maximum displacement response in
X-direction Pushover Analysis (PUSH X)

5 5

4 4
Storey Height

Storey Height
3 3

2 2

1 1

0 0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1

Storey Displacement (m) Storey Displacement (m)

With infill Without infill

stiffness stiffness

100
What if Performance Point Does Not Exist?

FE ADD STRENGTH OR
STIFFNESS OR BOTH

V/W (Acceleration)

FI Inelastic demand spectrum

capacity spectrum 5% damped elastic spectrum

Roof-top Displacement

101
What if Performance Point Does Not Exist?

FE ENHANCE SYSTEM
DUCTILITY

V/W (Acceleration)

FI
Inelastic demand spectrum
capacity spectrum 5% damped elastic spectrum

Roof-top Displacement

102
What if Performance Point Does Not Exist?

FE
REDUCE SEISMIC DEMAND BY:
ADDING DAMPING OR ISOLATION
V/W (Acceleration)

FI

New demand spectrum 5% damped elastic spectrum

Roof-top Displacement

103