Stasi - The Untold Story of The East German Secret Police (PDFDrive)
Stasi - The Untold Story of The East German Secret Police (PDFDrive)
Stasi - The Untold Story of The East German Secret Police (PDFDrive)
STASI
THE UNTOLD STORY OF
THE EAST GERMAN
SECRET POLICE
JOHN O. KOEHLER
All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this
publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information
storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American
National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials
Z39.48-1984.
To the victims of totalitarianism
PHOTOS
Photos
Celebrating the Stasi’s twentieth anniversary
KGB Chairman Viktor M. Chebrikov and Stasi minister Erich Mielke in 1987
The young Erich Mielke
Erich Ziemer, Mielke’s partner in the murder of two Berlin policemen in 1931
Hans Kippenberger, who together with Heinz Neumann planned the murder of
the two policemen
Heinz Neumann, communist firebrand and member of the Reichstag
Berlin police captain Paul Anlauf, communist murder victim
Communist rabble-rouser Walter Ulbricht addresses a 1931 mass rally in
Berlin
Berlin police officer Franz Lenck, murdered in 1931
Babylon movie theater in East Berlin, backdrop to murder
Typical scene in front of Communist Party headquarters in Berlin
Wilhelm Zaisser, longtime Soviet agent and the first Stasi minister
Ernst Wollweber, saboteur for Soviet intelligence
The oppressors meet for lunch
Walter Ulbricht toasts Minister of State Security Erich Mielke
Rüdiger Knechtel stands guard at the Berlin Wall
Irmgard and Josef Kneifel after their arrest
Soviet tank memorial damaged by Kneifel’s homemade bomb
Josef Kneifel, Stasi prisoner
West German Chancellor Willy Brandt and his top aide, Günter Guillaume
Stasi cipher pads hidden inside a walnut
Hans Joachim Tiedge, high-ranking West German counterespionage official
who defected to East Germany in 1985
Klaus Kuron, section chief of West Germany’s counterespionage agency,
convicted in 1992 of spying for East Germany
Hans Cohancz, commander of a military counterespionage group, presents a
door prize to Major Joachim Krase
A camera so small that it fits inside a matchbox
Cipher pads hidden inside a harmonica
A Stasi agent’s Minox camera, concealed in a beer can
False bottom in an instant coffee container
Stasi counterintelligence officers celebrate recruitment of U.S. Army Warrant
Officer James Hall III
James Hall III caught on videotape accepting $60,000
Huseyin Yildirim, Turkish auto mechanic who helped Hall copy top secret
documents
Hall is escorted by military police to his 1989 court-martial
Rainer Rupp, top Stasi spy at NATO headquarters
East German leader Erich Honecker with Günther Kratsch, Erich Mielke, and
Werner Grossmann
Bar at La Belle discotheque in Berlin, devastated by a Libyan terrorist bomb in
1986
Colonel Rainer Wiegand of the Stasi’s counterespionage directorate, who
defected to West Germany in December 1989
Yasser Chraidi, Libyan terrorist who planned La Belle bombing
International terrorist Ilich Ramirez Sanchez, commonly known as Carlos,
“the Jackal”
Members of the extreme left-wing terrorist group Red Army Faction: Susanne
Albrecht, Werner Bernhard Lotze, Henning Beer, Sigrid Sternebeck, Silke
Maier-Witt, Monika Helbing, Inge Viet
An armored Mercedes limousine, struck by an explosive projectile
Deutsche Bank Chief Alfred Herrhausen, assassinated in 1989
Red Army Faction (RAF) member Christian Klar
RAF member Adelheid Schulz
Detlev Rohwedder, head of trust agency for restructuring East German
industry
Young Berliners raid a Stasi safe in January 1990
ACRONYMS
When I began the research for this book, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, I knew
that I would need to tap many sources. People’s responsiveness to my requests
for information and guidance was overwhelming, and I wish to express my
deepest appreciation for their unselfish support. My thanks to Günther Buch,
Berlin, former chief archivist of the Ministry for All-German Affairs; Andreas
von Bülow, Bonn, former federal minister for research and technology and
member of parliament; the late William Colby, Washington, D.C., former
director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency; Ernst Cramer, Berlin, vice
chairman of Springer Verlag; Ambassador and former state secretary Günther
Diehl, Bonn, who supplied important data; Edward J. De Fontaine, Alexandria,
Virginia, a superb journalist and my close friend for thirty-five years, whose
skillful editing of the manuscript kept it from becoming twice as long as the
Bible; Otto Doelling, New York, general executive of Associated Press World
Services; Eduardo Gallardo, Santiago, Associated Press bureau chief for Chile;
Presiding Judge Klaus Forsen, Düsseldorf; Judge Wolfgang Frank, spokesman
for the High Provincial Court, Frankfurt am Main; Ambassador and former
Undersecretary of Defense Karl-Günther von Hase, Bonn, a member of the
Council of Elders of the Christian Democratic Party who opened important
doors; Tony Helling, Bonn, former Financial Times correspondent and my
tenacious research assistant; Dr. Rosemarie Hoffmann, Munich, whose medical
knowledge was essential during my interviews of a Stasi disinformation agent;
Ray Kendall, Lyon, France, director general of the International Criminal Police
Organization (In-terpol) and former Scotland Yard chief superintendent; State
Criminal Police Director Manfred Kittlaus, Berlin, chief of the Central
Government Criminality Investigation Office; Rainer Laabs, Berlin, chief
archivist of Springer newspapers; Paul Limbach, Bonn, special correspondent
for Focus magazine; A. F. “Fritz” von Marbod, retired Air Force lieutenant
colonel, ace counterintelligence specialist, and good friend; John Mapother,
Potomac, Md., a retired CIA officer who was stationed in Berlin during a critical
Cold War period; Presiding Judge Ina Obst-Öllers, Düsseldorf; Rosario Priore,
investigating magistrate and specialist on terrorism, Rome; Johannes Legner and
Cornelia Bull, in the Berlin press office of the federal commissioner for the Stasi
archives; Eva Schübel and Rolf Hannich, in the press office of the federal
prosecutor general, in Karlsruhe; the chief prosecutors for Berlin, Celle,
Dresden, Magdeburg, Neuruppin, Schwerin, and Stuttgart; Herbert Romerstein,
expert on Soviet intelligence for the U.S. government; the late Colonel Franz
Ross, an ace U.S. Army intelligence officer and my former commander; Colonel
(Ret.) Werner Schofeld, Bonn, Military Counterespionage Service (MAD);
archivists Günther Schreiber and Rudiger Stang, Berlin, who patiently helped me
sift through thousands of documents from Stasi archives; William L. Stearman,
Washington, D.C., former member of the U.S. National Security Council and
adjunct professor for international affairs at Georgetown University; Dieter
Steiner, New York bureau chief for Stern magazine; Harald Strunz, chairman of
the Association of Victims of Stalinism for Berlin and Brandenburg; Christa
Trapp, a Stasi kidnapping victim now living in the United States under a
different name; John Willms, former liaison chief of the 513th and 66th Military
Intelligence Groups in Germany, under whom I served as an intelligence officer
on several occasions; and attorney Jürgen Wischnewski, joint plaintiff in the
murder trial against Stasi chief Erich Mielke, Berlin. Finally, I wish to express
my special thanks to the many present and former government officials in
Germany and in the United States who generously shared their knowledge but
wished to remain anonymous.
John O. Koehler
STASI
INTRODUCTION
THE FIRST TIME I MET Erich Mielke, the notorious chief of the communist
East German secret police, was in February 1965, during a reception for Alexei
N. Kosygin, successor to Nikita S. Khrushchev as premier of the Soviet Union.
Kosygin had come to East Germany to help celebrate the 7OOth anniversary of
the Leipzig industrial fair and to provide a visible display of Soviet support for
the Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic
Republic. As I was then Berlin correspondent for the Associated Press, it was
my job to cover this event. At the time, the fair was the only opportunity for a
Western journalist, especially an American, to catch a glimpse of life inside the
“workers” and peasants’ state.” The communist regime had cleared me for travel
to the event, but I still lacked the official credentials guaranteeing access to the
new Soviet leader. I eventually obtained the necessary documents through Oleg
Panin, who served as chief of protocol at the Soviet embassy in East Berlin. I
had first met Panin during the highly charged days in October 1962 when U.S.
and Soviet tanks faced off, gun barrel to gun barrel, at Checkpoint Charlie on
Berlin’s east-west border. Panin had begun to court me assiduously—at the
outset, probably because he enjoyed the lavish lunches in West Berlin for which
I paid because he had no West marks. Later he suddenly had the West marks to
spend, and it became obvious that he thought he could recruit me as a spy. Panin
did not know that I was on to him. I knew he had been a captain in the Soviet
secret police, the NKVD, when he first came to Berlin at the end of World War
II. Years later he returned as a “diplomat” and a full colonel in the KGB. Panin
oozed politeness when I told him what I needed, and he eagerly provided me
Soviet passes and invitations to all events attended by Premier Kosygin.
On February 28,1 headed for the Altes Rathaus, the Leipzig city hall built in
1556—still the most beautiful Renaissance-period city hall in Germany. East
German Premier Willy Stoph was hosting a reception there for his Soviet
counterpart. With my Soviet invitation, I was quickly waved through by the
guards and passed into the narrow, dark ceremonial hall. Centuries of grime and
communist neglect had made it a dingy place. Like all East German public
buildings, the place reeked of lavatory disinfectant and cheap tobacco. Tables
laden with crystal bowls of caviar, plates of sturgeon and other delicacies, and
the inevitable liters of iced vodka had been strung together in a fifty-foot line
through the center of the hall. At the end, the hall widened into a larger room,
which was cut off by another long table bearing food and drink. There, looking
down the dingy hall at a hundred or so East German apparatchiks stuffing
themselves and guzzling vodka, stood Kosygin with a small entourage including
Soviet Ambassador Piotr A. Abrassimov and Stoph. General Pavel Koshevoi,
commander of Soviet forces in East Germany, was spooning caviar into his
mouth from a crystal bowl and taking bites from a slab of dark bread, washing it
down with vodka. Between the right end of the long table and the wall was a gap
through which one could pass to the VIP area. It was guarded by East Germans
and Soviets.
When Oleg Panin spotted me, he motioned to join him in front of the VIP
enclave. “I want you to meet a friend of mine,” he said, leading me toward a
group of goons, one of whom I recognized from photographs. It was Erich
Mielke, a three-star general (awarded four stars in 1980) and head of the
Ministry for State Security (MfS), the secret police, popularly referred to as the
“Stasi.” Mielke was already the most feared man in East Germany. Wearing a
dark blue suit, white shirt, and somber tie, Mielke, although broad-shouldered
and stocky, looked about two inches shorter than my five feet nine and a half.
His hairline was receding and his dark, graying hair was combed straight back.
His flabby jowls sported a five-o’clock shadow, and the bags under his dark eyes
were huge.
“Herr Mielke,” Panin said, “this is Mr. Koehler of the Associated Press and a
friend of mine. Jack, please meet Herr Mielke,” As we shook hands, I said, “Oh,
I know Herr Mielke very well,” Mielke looked puzzled. “I don’t think we have
met before,” he said. “How do you know me?” I smiled and replied, “A wanted
poster with your picture has been hanging at Checkpoint Charlie for years,”
Panin’s eyes widened. “Please don’t say things like that to our guest,” he
admonished me. But Mielke smiled, and with a wave of his hand, said, “Ach, I
am only a journalist like you.” I could not suppress a grin. “Yes, I know, you
were a reporter for the Rote Fahne,1 but that was before you were involved in
the murder of those two police captains.”2 Panin was squirming uncomfortably,
but Mielke seemed to take my taunt in stride. “You are right; after that, I had to
move to the Soviet Union.” Then he picked up a bottle of vodka, filled two
glasses, and handed one to me. “Prost! It is good to meet a friend of Oleg’s.”
After I finished the drink, Mielke apparently expected me to leave. But I still
had a job to do for the Associated Press (AP). I asked Panin to tell Ambassador
Abrassimov that I wanted an interview with the Soviet premier. Panin did so
reluctantly. The white-haired envoy conferred with Kosygin, then turned and
motioned me into the VIP area. Mielke watched and listened intently as I talked
to Kosygin for about thirty minutes. It was the first interview the new Soviet
leader had granted a Western journalist.
The following day Kosygin visited the fairgrounds. Panin had instructed me
to meet the official party in the East German pavilion. When I reached the
entrance, there stood Mielke, personally checking the credentials of those who
were trying to enter. It was an astounding sight—after all, he held a cabinet post
and a general’s rank. When he saw me, he grinned and exclaimed loudly, “Aha,
it’s you! Because of the nasty things you said last night, you are not going to get
in here!” I shrugged and held out my Soviet pass for his inspection. “Well, then,
our friends will be disappointed if they don’t see me,” I said, placing special
emphasis on our. “Oh, yes, I remember now, you are a friend of Oleg’s, so
please come in,” Mielke said, waving me toward the door obsequiously. I felt
more than a bit queasy later that day when I reflected on my encounter with the
secret police chief.
The Stasi’s function in East Germany was identical to that performed by
secret police organizations in other communist-controlled nations: It was the
primary instrument by which the ruling party—in this case, the Sozialistische
Einheitspartei (SED), or Socialist Unity Party—retained power. Mass arrests of
the leaders’ political opponents, including many veteran communists who
disagreed with current policies, had been reported. It was rumored that half a
dozen prisons were filled with tens of thousands of such political prisoners. East
Germany had become a police state; and when the Berlin Wall was built in 1961,
the entire population became the state’s prisoners.
Because of the communists’ penchant for extreme secrecy, and people’s fear
of the secret police, evidence of the extent of the oppression was as hard to come
by as were the details of intraparty struggles. However, the facts of East
Germany’s espionage operations began to surface more frequently in the West by
the mid-1950s, when the numbers of spies arrested increased as a result of
improved West German counterespionage methods. In addition, an occasional
defector from the Ministry for State Security (MfS) revealed operational secrets.
Nonetheless, the true extent of the terror exercised by the Stasi over the
German people, and the depth of its espionage apparatus, remained hidden until
the fall of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989. The communist regime
collapsed within weeks of that event, and the secret police organization quickly
disintegrated. Although Stasi officers tried at the last minute to destroy
incriminating documents, most of the organization’s archives were saved. As the
Stasi’s secrets gradually were unveiled, German citizens became increasingly
outraged.
Twice in the previous half century, a cabal of ruthless ideologues had
claimed for itself the sole right to rule in the name of “social justice.” After
World War II, the western part of Germany had developed into a modern,
economically powerful democracy governed strictly by the rule of law while the
other Germany wallowed in a morass of government-sponsored crimes, its
hapless citizens having passed from one dictatorship to another.
This book chronicles the distasteful and ruthless activities of the Stasi under
the leadership of Erich Mielke—activities without which the dictatorship could
not have maintained its grip on power. To be sure, the East German regime also
could not have existed without the backing of the armed might of the Soviet
Union. In the same token, there would have been no West Germany without the
protective shield of the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty (NATO)
allies.
KGB Chairman Viktor M. Chebrikov and Stasi minister Erich Mielke pose before
a bronze relief of Karl Marx after signing an agreement on cooperation between
the Soviet secret police and the Stasi in 1987. (Courtesy MfS Archive)
LESS THAN A MONTH after German demonstrators began to tear down the
Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the
Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it
was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of
“street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led
away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi
headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished
business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West
Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the
People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its
members thought was better style. Instead of sending the five-digit code groups
that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army
group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming
on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning
their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring
songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water
and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it
was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was
reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a
euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national
dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years
after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands
that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes
against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by
their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the
German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were
clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the
country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische
Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-
echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their
cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East
German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and
sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time
officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members
of the ministry’s own special guards regiment.1 Between 1950 and 1989, a total
of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.2
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi
informers, the inofflzielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been
identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18
and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or
roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many
records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be
determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure.3 Former Colonel Rainer
Wiegand, who served in the Stasi coun-terintelligence directorate, estimated that
the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were
included.4
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the
oppression of its own people/’ according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna,
Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo
had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed
102,000 to control only 17 million.”5 One might add that the Nazi terror lasted
only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its
machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East
German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any
other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB
employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million,
which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures
for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people.6 The ratio for the
Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular
informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there
would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in
the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of
monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to
assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve
dinner guests.
German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister
of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in
September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a
victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those
who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the
top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall,” Aware
that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims,
Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old
system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he
said:
Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and
vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same
time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug
as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will
later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own
experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in
this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”
Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty
lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under
laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent
and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were
nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try
individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling
their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators
of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they
existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of
the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified
Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of
law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of
parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of
the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be
applied to offenses committed in East Germany.13 Scholz’s view was upheld by
the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by
party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal
wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified
Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of
thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws
covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German
equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung,
because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to
international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division
of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor,
concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said.
Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West
German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East.
Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or
the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying
this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons
trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West
Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court.
Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of
the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally
controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted.
Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The supreme court ruling
overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they
had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over
to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life
imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be
convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East
German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily
harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star
general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman
who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother
were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and
voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided
city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to
psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an
agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector,
however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had
committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West
Germany. He was found guilty in March 1997 and sentenced to two years’
probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to
communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West,
have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler
issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political
commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early
postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When
that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German
Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect.
Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Fuhrer’s orders
were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way
as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany,
making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made
possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in
formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot
would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central
Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the
border shootings.14 His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was
established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was
erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor
(later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German
border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all
shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13,
1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings
were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found
that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West.
This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the
National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also
had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of
the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or
attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for
“political offenses.”15
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political
prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West
Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5
billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000
political prisoners.16 The price per head varied according to the importance of
the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to
more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears
to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to
the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von
Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a
West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while
trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The
case attracted international attention because his family was related to Queen
Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the
East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1
million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on
the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German government paid
DM40,000 (about $23,529).17 Such ransom operations were fully controlled by
the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West
Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to
keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after
reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total
of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions
would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved
either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions”
were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between
the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital
crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-
1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried
out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single
pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not
informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated
and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about
one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin
newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in
East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating
DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He
declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet
submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true
number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death
sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were
handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In
addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred
members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts
to escape to the West.18
SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?
The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the
code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under
the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be
prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.”
However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were
prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and
communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable
Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely
applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries.
The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested
legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many
cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about
immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor
were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable
offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying
that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border
fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a
television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends
what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge
considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a
year and a half at hard labor.19
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that
“glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself
“glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in
uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without
eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian
goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading
“When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was
rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had
applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father
of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’
state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We
want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months.
The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities
of the State or Society.”20
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally
emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State
Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted
under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend)
and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker).21 The Stasi had illegally
intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s
millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to
chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a
crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to
twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to
escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes
of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red
booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its
previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate
to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party
organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”22
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University
of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their
Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have
heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody
one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them
posthaste,” Scholz told me.23
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East
Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following
reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special
representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at
least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me.
“But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they
would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an
unbelievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”24
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the
German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi
perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the
right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be
removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal proceedings.
Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who
served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win
our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of
law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public
service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number
of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled
throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in
archival order would take one person 128 years.25 The job might have been
made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands
of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files
dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks.
These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15,
1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two
workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the
work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of
1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into
about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained
archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the
37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under
Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of
about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually
(about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget
had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.26
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to
examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000
persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being
received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see
their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of
those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and
friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well
under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators
would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED
functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they
should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is
actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for
embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politbüro, where the criminal
policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet
parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a
few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi
informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier
of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German
Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the
Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern
bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into
parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian
Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an
informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny,
but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had
ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.
What Gauweiler meant by his last remark was that East Germans who were
not communists or communist sympathizers had been driven into apathy and
inaction by a series of traumatic events. The first was the 1953 uprising, when
thousands of East Germans were imprisoned and many were shot. The Soviet
Army smashed the insurrection, and the Western powers limited themselves to
verbal protests. In 1956, the Germans witnessed the Soviet invasion of Hungary
while the West stood idly by. The promise made by U.S. Secretary of State John
Foster Dulles that the United States would “help those who help themselves”
turned out to be empty as far as the “captive nations” were concerned.30 The
Hungarians’ anguished cries for help, broadcast over Budapest radio, went
unheeded. In 1961, tens of thousands of East Germans began to vote against
communism with their feet; the Berlin Wall was built to stop their mass exodus.
President John R Kennedy, cowed by Soviet Premier Nikita S. Khrushchev at a
summit in Vienna two months earlier, agonized for three days before telling the
U.S. forces in Berlin to do nothing.31 Seven years later, the “Prague Spring” was
turned into another ice age by a massive invasion of the Soviet Army and the
forces of its Warsaw Pact allies, including the People’s Army of the DDR.
Although military intervention by NATO might have led to World War III, the
West could have pursued a number of other, nonmilitary measures to
demonstrate its staunch opposition, instead of communicating virtual
acquiescence.32
Another blow to opponents of the communist dictatorship was the retreat of
U.S. military forces from Vietnam, which provided the communists with a great
psychological victory. The final insult was the photograph of their tormentor,
Erich Honecker, seated between U.S. President Gerald Ford and West German
Chancellor Helmut Schmidt at the 1975 Helsinki Conference on Security and
Cooperation in Europe. The Helsinki Conference dealt in part with the human
rights and freedom of movement of the people of signatory nations. Both Ford
and Schmidt knew about Honecker’s order to shoot would-be escapees, and the
East German people knew that the DDR regime was violating the Helsinki
Agreement even as Honecker signed it. The photograph triumphantly adorned
the front page of the Communist Party newspaper Neues Deutschland, as
evidence of the DDR regime’s acceptance as an equal by Western nations. The
West German parties ’ fawning over Honecker during his 1987 state visit was not
lost on the East German people: They were watching coverage of the events on
television. They could see that the Social Democrats and many liberal Free
Democrats were particularly anxious to please the DDR’s leaders. The leading
officials of those two parties had tried for years to have the Central Registration
Office and its files on communist crimes destroyed.33 It is understandable,
therefore, that most East Germans, even those who did not join the party, chose
to accommodate the regime.
As for prosecuting former Communist functionaries, Gauweiler echoed
former Lithuanian President Vytautas Landsbergis, who had suggested that an
International Tribunal should be formed. In 1990, Gauweiler told me: “Such a
tribunal would be the ‘court of the victims,’ judging the communist chiefs of the
entire communist imperium—Poland, the Baltics, the DDR, Bulgaria, Ukraine,
and so on. They should not be prosecuted for personal enrichment but for crimes
against humanity.”
Even before the courts turned Honecker loose because of his terminal illness,
Gauweiler said he had opposed calls for Honecker’s trial by a West German
court:
They not only terrorized their own people worse than the
Gestapo, but the government was the most anti-Semitic and anti-
Israeli of the entire Eastern bloc. They did nothing to help the
West in tracking down Nazi criminals; they ignored all requests
from West German judicial authorities for assistance. We have
just discovered shelves of files on Nazis stretching over four
miles. Now we also know how the Stasi used those files. They
blackmailed Nazi criminals who fled abroad after the war into
spying for them. What’s more, the Stasi trained terrorists from all
over the world.35
All but one of the Stasi officers connected with training the international
terrorists to whom Wiesenthal was referring were arrested and held briefly for
investigation in summer 1991. One officer was tried, convicted, and sentenced to
four years in prison for his role in the bombing of a French cultural center in
West Berlin by Carlos “the Jackal” in 1983. However, a Berlin court ordered the
release of the others and suspended further action while the supreme court
deliberated on which laws—East or West German—were applicable. These Stasi
officers, including the chief of the “counterterrorism” directorate, trained
hundreds of German, Arab, and Latin American terrorists. In addition, they
provided logistical support and safe haven to such figures as Carlos, Abu Nidal,
and Abu Daoud, who have participated in and organized murders around the
world.
The Stasi officers who did such things were not acting on their own
initiative. They were following orders from Honecker and Mielke. Egon Krenz,
who served briefly as SED secretary-general and the state’s chief executive after
Honecker was deposed, is facing prosecution only in connection with the
government’s order to shoot people who were trying to escape to the West. Yet
he was also the Politbüro member responsible for security affairs, and he worked
closely with Stasi chief Mielke. Krenz, Honecker, and Mielke met frequently to
discuss terrorist matters. At one meeting they decided to turn a blind eye to
Libyan preparations for a bombing attack in West Berlin that resulted in the
deaths of three American soldiers and wounded more than two hundred civilians.
Markus Wolf also was involved with international terrorism. His espionage
service, the Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA), the Stasi’s Main
Administration for Foreign Intelligence, was closely linked to terrorists abroad.
In fact, Wolf’s agents made the first official East German contacts with such
individuals. The former general has denied having had a hand in terrorist actions,
but his knowledge of them is well documented, as is explained in a later chapter
of this book.36
German authorities probing into Wolf’s activities seemed mainly interested
in the espionage operations of the HVA, which was composed of 4,286 officers.
Virtually every West German government department was thoroughly infiltrated,
including the intelligence agencies. Had the regime not collapsed, the West
German counterespionage operation probably would have been rendered
ineffective against Wolf’s spies because of a major defection. One Stasi spy was
even a close adviser to Chancellor Willy Brandt, who was forced to resign when
the mole was unmasked.
Stasi espionage case officers did not limit themselves to ferreting out West
German secrets. They covered the globe. Among their primary targets were
NATO, U.S. diplomatic posts, and the U.S. armed forces intelligence operations.
Money, and lots of it, was a key HVA tool; few American traitors were
motivated by ideology. East German intelligence also maintained dossiers on top
U.S. leaders, including a surprisingly accurate political profile of President
Ronald Reagan.37 A similar, more extensive dossier on President George Bush,
complete with a psychological profile, was destroyed in the Stasi’s waning
days.38
Wolf has cynically defended himself and his men by insisting that they had
been Aufkldrer fur den Frieden, reconnoiterers for peace. They had stopped
“Western aggression” by knowing in advance of plans to attack the “peaceful”
DDR. Yet as late as 1988, Stasi chief Mielke told a small circle of his officers
that the next war in Europe would “commence with an attack of the Warsaw Pact
forces on the Federal Republic (West Germany).”39 Indeed, shortly after
reunification, Bonn defense ministry officials discovered the Warsaw Pact’s
attack plan, which consisted of some 25,000 documents. Contrary to the
contingency plans of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the
communists’ plans were strictly offensive. Nuclear strikes were to be employed
within two days after the start of the invasion. A separate, detailed plan for the
invasion of West Berlin, complete with the names of persons to be arrested, also
surfaced in Stasi archives.
Wolf also insisted that his department was an entity separate from the
Ministry for State Security and that he and his men were merely concerned with
espionage, like all Western intelligence agencies. Of course, he said, he had
absolutely nothing to do with the oppression of the population. Wolf probably
believed that the HVA’s most incriminating documents had been destroyed. He
was mistaken. A document now held by federal prosecutors reports on a speech
Wolf made to his staff in 1983 in which he emphasized that the HVA was not
independent but was an integral part of the MfS.40 He added that the Stasi’s
political operations against dissidents could not succeed without the information
supplied by his spies.
In the immediate aftermath of the DDR’s demise, only about a hundred
former Stasi officers publicly repented and revealed their knowledge of the terror
and espionage apparatus. Most members of the once 102,000-strong secret
police organization remained silent, claiming they were still bound by an oath
that they had been obliged to take by the last government of the DDR. The oath
eventually was declared null and void, and a numbers of case officers were
forced to testify against West Germans who spied for the East.
Berlin police officer Franz Lenck, murdered August 9, 1931. Private collection.
Back at Bülowplatz, the killings had triggered a major police action. At least
a thousand officers poured into the square, and a bloody street battled ensued.8
Rocks and bricks were hurled from the rooftops. Communist gunmen fired
indiscriminately from windows and from the roofs of surrounding apartment
houses. As darkness fell, police searchlights illuminated the buildings. Using
megaphones, officers shouted: “Clear the streets! Move away from the windows,
we are returning fire!” By now the rabble had fled the square, but shooting
continued as riot squads combed the tenements, arresting hundreds of residents
suspected of having fired weapons. The battle lasted until one o’clock the next
morning. In addition to the two police officers, the casualties included one
communist who died of a gunshot wound and seventeen others who were
seriously wounded.
Kippenberger became alarmed when word reached him that Sergeant Willig
had survived the shooting. Not knowing whether the sergeant could talk and
identify his attackers, Kippenberger was taking no chances. He directed a runner
to summon Mielke and Ziemer to his apartment at 74 Bellermannstrasse, only a
few minutes’ walk from where the two lived. When the assassins arrived,
Kippenberger told them the news and ordered them to leave Berlin at once. The
parliamentarian’s wife Thea, an unemployed schoolteacher and as staunch a
Communist Party member as her husband, shepherded the young murderers to
the Belgian border. Agents of the Communist International (Comintern) in the
port city of Antwerp supplied them with money and forged passports. Aboard a
merchant ship they sailed for Leningrad.9 When their ship docked, they were
met by another Comintern representative, who escorted them to Moscow.
For comparison, the OGPU had a personal history statement Mielke had
written years earlier in Germany, when he had joined the KPD.
The OGPU’s vetting of Mielke was completed within a few weeks. While he
waited, he took intensive courses in Russian. He had an ear for languages and
already spoke some French and English. The Comintern cadre division gave
Mielke the temporary pseudonym of Scheuer and assigned him to the M-P
school—the secret academy where the Soviet Union trained its most promising
cadres in military science, political affairs, and espionage.
Mielke had not always been a good student. In fact, he left the Köllnisches
Gymnasium in Berlin because, as school director F. Goss certified on February
19, 1929, he was “unable to meet the great demands of this school.”13 The
Köllnisches Gymnasium was a high school that emphasized the humanities, and
it was generally the preserve of the privileged; but a few children of the working
class were admitted if they could pass stringent examinations. The future secret
police chief, it seems, was smart enough to get into the school but not to
graduate. Or perhaps he neglected his studies because he was too busy training
as a communist thug. In any case, to make sure that no one could suspect him of
having a bourgeois family background, he had carefully noted in his biography
that he attended the school for two years “free of charge,” on scholarship.
Mielke received better than average marks from his Soviet instructors. Even
before he graduated from the spy school, a resolution of the Central Committee
of the German Communist Party in exile recommended he attend the elite Lenin
School, the ideological cadre factory. Study at the Lenin School was a must for
prospective leaders, especially for those who had been selected for future secret
operations. Again the OGPU and the International Committee of the Comintern
approved the recommendation, and Mielke was given a new cover name, Paul
Bach—a name he would use for the next few years.
Using mafia parlance, Mielke was “a made soldier” of the OGPU and the
Comintern, a man who would fit into a secret army that would obey orders
without hesitation and whose members had no moral scruples when it came to
fighting for the cause. The need for such an army was more urgent than ever.
Germany, the great obstacle to Lenin’s world revolution, had been taken over by
Adolf Hitler and his Nazis, and the Communist Party there was in shambles.
Thousands of comrades had been arrested and thrown into prisons and
concentration camps, and hundreds had gone into hiding. The KPD leadership
had fled abroad, most of them to Moscow. Their dream of a “Sowjet
Deutschland,” a Soviet Germany, had been shattered, but they were convinced
they would live to fight another day.
In mid-March 1933, while attending the Lenin School, Mielke received word
from his OGPU sponsors that Berlin police had arrested Max Thunert, one of the
conspirators in the Anlauf and Lenck murders. Within days, fifteen other
members of the assassination team were in custody. Mielke had to wait six more
months before the details of the police action against his Berlin comrades
reached Moscow. On September 14, 1933, Berlin newspapers reported that all
fifteen had confessed to their roles in the murders.14 Arrest warrants were issued
for ten others who had fled, including Mielke, Ziemer, Ulbricht, Kippenberger,
and Neumann.
Ziemer also attended the M-P and Lenin Schools, under the name Georg
Schlosser, but he was not in the same class as Mielke. In 1934, however, the two
were reunited at a special Comintern school. Both spent a year lecturing on
military and political subjects to other German communists, who were arriving
in Moscow in droves since the Nazi takeover. Meanwhile, Kippenberger and
Neumann were safe in Moscow. Ulbricht had escaped to Austria, where he
continued his subversive activities for the Comintern. Eventually, he too would
emigrate to Moscow.
Absorbed in his tasks at the Comintern school, Mielke had little time to
ponder the trial in 1934 at which Klause, Matern, and Brode were sentenced to
death. Others received terms ranging from nine months to fifteen years at hard
labor. Matern was guillotined and Brode hanged himself in his prison cell.
Klause’s sentence was commuted to life imprisonment because according to a
court report, he had “rendered valuable assistance in solving the case,” In
Mielke’s eyes, Klause and four other men against whom charges were dropped
or who were acquitted were obviously traitors to the cause.
All the while Mielke had maintained close links with the Soviet secret
police, which by then had changed its name to Narodnyi komissariat vnutrennikh
del (NKVD), the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs. Its new chairman
was Genrikh Grigorevich Yagoda, former assistant to OGPU chief Vyacheslav
Rudolfovich Menzhinsky, who had died.
This was a time of new peril for the arrivals from Germany, whom Stalin
soon began to view as a new threat to his power. The dictator had already
eliminated some of his closest associates who had opposed the forced
collectivization of Russian farmers. Tens of millions already had been murdered
by the OGPU, had perished in labor camps, or simply had been left to die of
starvation. Stalin’s secret police agents, among them Mielke, reported
“factionalism and deviationist trends” among the German exiles, whose elite was
housed at the Comintern-operated Hotel Lux. It was true that many German
communists abhorred his methods. Nevertheless, they were loyal to the cause as
a whole and had deluded themselves into believing that ruthless methods were
necessary for the eventual triumph of the international proletariat. The German
communists had never been particularly cohesive. Various factions had opposed
one another for years. There had always been tension between high-minded
intellectuals and men like Ulbricht and Mielke, who came from the poor,
uneducated, blue-collar class. It was a struggle that the intellectuals were
destined to lose. They never seemed to comprehend that the millions born into
abject poverty or who had become jobless during the horrendous inflation that
followed World War I were the backbone of the KPD.
On May 13, 1935, Stalin finally decided he would deal with his real and
imagined enemies once and for all. He ordered a final, great purge that lasted
until September 1936 and that was designed to eliminate “counterrevolutionary
elements” from the ranks of the Soviet Communist Party. Hundreds of foreign
communists who had sought safe haven in Moscow, including Germans, were
caught in Stalin’s net as well. Ultimately, the purge served to terrorize Stalin’s
own party into absolute obedience.
Squads of NKVD troops armed with rifles and revolvers raided the Hotel
Lux night after night. Hundreds of German communists—chiefly the
intellectuals—disappeared. Some landed in labor camps, in the gulag. The more
prominent were brought before military tribunals. Among them were
Kippenberger and Neumann, the strategists of the 1931 Berlin murders. Both
men were sentenced to death and shot. Kippenberger’s wife, Thea, died in the
gulag. Their daughter Margot, then nine years old, was packed off to an OGPU-
controlled boarding school and later to a prison camp in Siberia. She was not
told the fate of her parents until she was finally allowed to leave the Soviet
Union for East Germany in 1958.15 Neumann’s wife Margarete also survived
imprisonment but was turned over to the Nazi Gestapo after Stalin made his pact
with Hitler in 1939. During all of these events, Mielke remained a shadowy
figure working diligently for the NKVD. Was the proletarian Mielke the man
who fingered his erstwhile intellectual comrades and mentors for Stalin’s
executioners? The question is legitimate, based on the existent (admittedly
slight) circumstantial evidence; but it will remain unanswered until Mielke’s
dossier is released by the keepers of the KGB archives in Moscow.
Esteemed Comrade!
You have a comrade Georg Schlosser in your unit. Since we
intend to deploy the comrade in accordance with his
qualifications, we cordially request you to release Georg
Schlosser and send him to the Albacete Base. The deployment
here of the comrade is very urgent and we therefore ask you to
comply with our wish as quickly as possible.
In friendship,
Greetings,
Cadre Division, German Section
Ziemer, alias Schlosser, was sent to Mielke’s unit, and two months later he
was dead. The circumstances under which Ziemer died remain mysterious. That
it happened just after he was assigned to Mielke’s unit, however, certainly raises
suspicions. Was Mielke systematically eliminating witnesses to the 1931
murder? The planners of the crime, Kippenberger and Neumann, were wiped out
by Stalin. The others who abetted the crime had either been liquidated by the
Nazis or were languishing in concentration camps or penitentiaries. By 1945,
they too were dead.
Mielke was always careful to cover his tracks, but his membership in the
SIM alone had stigmatized him. Military tribunals were kept busy adjudicating
the cases of victims of the SIM, which used torture to extract “confessions” just
as its agents had been taught by their Soviet advisers. Prison cells were so small
that inmates could barely stand. Prisoners were subjected to deafening noises,
icy baths, hot irons, and severe beatings. Executions ran into the hundreds,
perhaps thousands, during the course of the three-year civil war.18
The carnage finally ended in 1939, and Mielke fled across the Pyrenees
mountains to southern France, where he was interned with thousands of his
comrades. He was still in a French camp when World War II began on
September 1, 1939. Agile as always, he managed to flee to the Soviet Union a
few months later. Secrecy once more shrouded Mielke, and his role during the
war remains a carefully guarded secret.
RETURN TO GERMANY
In 1945, Germany was baking in an unusually hot and dry summer. A yellowish
haze enveloped Berlin months after the last shot was fired and the last flames
from incendiaries were put out. The smell of burned wood and musty, centuries-
old masonry permeated the air. Here and there among the ruins the stench of
decaying flesh lingered. What British and American bombers began, thousands
of heavy Soviet artillery pieces had completed. The once vibrant city had
become a giant pile of rubble, and survivors ambled listlessly past the facades of
burned-out buildings.
While some Soviet soldiers distributed loaves of black bread to the starving,
others raped and plundered. The first German words they learned were Frau,
komm (“Woman, let’s go”); and Uhry (an incorrectly pluralized, Russianized
form of Uhr, the German word for watch), indicating that the owner was to hand
over the desired object. It was not unusual to see a woman desperately clutching
the handlebars of her battered bicycle and a grimy “Ivan”—the Germans’
nickname for all Russians—pulling on the rear wheel, determined to claim it as
his own. Passersby ignored such scenes, self-preservation being the order of the
day. No one wanted to tangle with the NKVD—or the “GPU,” as the Germans
still called the Soviet secret police—whose agents were sweeping the city for
Nazis. This was the Berlin to which Erich Mielke returned after a fourteen-year
odyssey through intrigue, treachery, and war. At the age of thirty-six, the fanatic
communist could once more set foot in his hometown without worrying about
the outstanding warrant for his arrest on charges of murder. All judicial functions
had been taken over by the Soviet Military Administration, and a loyal comrade
was not about to be arrested on charges of killing two Prussian police officers
back in 1931 when the communists were fighting for power.
There is little doubt that Mielke and Wilhelm Zaisser, his old commander in
Spain who had also escaped to the Soviet Union, returned to Germany as special
members of the Soviet secret police. They were joined by Ernst Wollweber,
another loyal fighter against fascism. Wollweber moved to Denmark in 1933 and
assumed leadership of the Seamen and Dockworkers International. Seven years
after that, he fled ahead of invading German troops to Sweden. There he led a
team of explosive experts in blowing up at least six freighters carrying goods
destined for Germany, Italy, and Japan.19 But his sabotage activities were short-
lived: Wollweber was caught stealing explosives and jailed until he was
extradited to the Soviet Union in 1943 after Moscow claimed that he was a
fugitive who had embezzled government funds. It was a clever ruse to extricate
one of their valuable secret agents, and the Swedes were only too happy to get
rid of him.
The trio had one thing in common—all had attended Moscow’s secret M-P
school and the International Lenin School. Much of Zaisser’s wartime service is
known: He was in charge of the “antifascist school” at Krasnogorsk. There, in
exchange for better food and treatment, thousands of German prisoners of war of
all ranks, including several generals, allowed themselves to be brainwashed and
turned into believers. The activities of Mielke and Wollweber, however,
remained closely guarded secrets. Mielke’s exploits must have been substantial.
By war’s end he had been decorated with the Order of the Red Banner, the Order
of the Great Patriotic War First Class, and twice with the Order of Lenin. It is
likely that he served as an NKVD agent, at least part of the time with guerrilla
units behind the German lines, for he knew all the partisan songs by heart and
sang them in faultless Russian.20
It is significant that Mielke, Zaisser, and Wollweber were not brought back to
Germany in April 1945 aboard the special Soviet aircraft with the handful of
men who were to assume leadership positions of a Soviet-controlled German
civil administration. Among that group was the man who gave the order for the
murders committed by Mielke in 1931, Walter Ulbricht. For the time being, the
Soviets must have wanted to keep Mielke, Zaisser, and Wollweber out of the
reach of public scrutiny as they began their work for the NKGB, the People’s
Committee for State Security, which had been created in 1943 to deal with
guerrilla and subversive activities, counterespionage, and foreign espionage. The
NKVD continued to exist separately until 1946, when it was elevated to the
ministerial level as the Ministry for Government Security (MGB), which
controlled the NKGB and the police and border guards.
Marshal Georgy K. Zhukov, supreme commander of Soviet Forces in
Germany and head of the Soviet Military Administration (SMA), issued his
SMA Order No. 2 on July 10, 1945, legalizing the establishment of “antifascist”
political parties such as the KPD. Five days later, Mielke walked into KPD
headquarters and offered his services, saying that he was already working with
street cells of the KPD. In completing the obligatory party membership
questionnaire, Mielke camouflaged his NKGB assignment, lying boldly about
his wartime activities.21 That he was successful in hiding the pertinent facts
proves that he had the absolute backing of the Soviet Military Administration,
the MGB, and the NKGB. Without this protection, lying on official documents
would have been fatal. “The Soviets trusted Mielke implicitly,” said Bernd
Kaufmann, former director of the Stasi’s espionage school. “He earned his spurs
in Spain.”22
When asked if he had ever been arrested or tried for a political offense,
Mielke wrote: “I was sentenced to death in absentia (Bülowplatz).” That was the
first lie. His name was mentioned in the 1934 trials but he was never tried. Next
he said that he had moved to Belgium after being released from internment in
France, following the Spanish Civil War, and that he had worked there for a
Communist Party underground newspaper using the cover name Gaston. The
third lie: Mielke attested that he had returned to France under the name Richard
Hebel and had served there in the Organisation Todt (which he misspelled as
Tod), an auxiliary paramilitary group for the construction of defensive positions,
airfields, and roads, which was attached to the Wehrmacht. There was no way he
could have joined the organization abroad. All German members were recruited
or drafted in Germany, where their identities were easily checked by the
Gestapo.
The questionnaire also provided this further evidence of Mielke’s role in
delivering German communists to Stalin’s firing squads: “During my stay in the
SU (Soviet Union), I participated in all Party discussions of the KPD and also in
the problems concerning the establishment of socialism and in the trials against
the traitors and enemies of the SU.”
To impress his new Berlin comrades, Mielke bragged about the awards he
had received, “including the sports medal of the Soviet Union.” In closing, he
wrote:
Wilhelm Zaisser, longtime Soviet agent and head of the International Brigade
during the Spanish Civil War. He was the first Stasi minister, from 1950 to 1953.
Ullstein.
U.S. intelligence accepted the deal, especially since both American and
British counterespionage agents were picking up hundreds of Russians disguised
as refugees, who were sent to the Western-occupied zones a mere year after the
last shot of the war was fired in Europe. In May 1946, a Soviet NKGB agent
defected to the American zone and brought with him Secret Order No. 24, which
listed seventeen agents and their locations in the West. The U.S. Army’s Counter
Intelligence Corps (CIC) responded immediately, and the seventeen agents were
arrested. During interrogation these agents named hundreds of others, setting the
stage for a spectacular CIC coup.
On June 21, 1946, the CIC launched Operation Bingo, the first and most
concentrated postwar effort to neutralize Soviet spies. A top secret CIC directive
ordered the arrest, interrogation, or surveillance of 385 persons who had been
positively identified as agents or who were prime suspects.28 Most were Soviet
citizens residing in camps for displaced persons, including Red Army officers up
to the rank of full colonel. These Soviets had been captured by the Germans.
Threatened with repatriation—which would almost certain land them in the
gulag, or worse—most accepted NKGB assignments. A few were trained
intelligence officers who had allowed themselves to be taken prisoner in a
classic infiltration ploy. They became double agents for the Abwehr, the
Wehrmacht’s counterintelligence service, or for the Gestapo.
Thus, the expertise of Gehlen and his men was needed not only to collect
information on the Soviets and on East German political developments but also
to assist in counterintelligence efforts. Conversely, Mielke became indispensable
to the Soviets in combating Gehlen’s organization.
HATCHET MAN
Meanwhile, the East German leadership (i.e., the SED) had already passed
through purges initiated by the MGB and later the MVD, the secret police
having been renamed once again after Lavrenty Beria assumed command in
March 1953. Dozens of high-ranking SED functionaries were expelled as
“enemies of the working class.” Most of those expelled were veteran
communists who had sought exile in the West when Hitler came to power rather
than escaping to the Soviet Union. They were accused of collaborating with
Noel H. Field, the “American secret service agent.” Field, an American
communist working in Switzerland during World War II for the Quakers, was
used by Allen Dulles of the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the
forerunner of the CIA, as a contact with the communist underground. Noel was
particularly close to German exiles operating within the French Communist
Party’s underground movement.
Similar purges were conducted in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Bulgaria,
where Field appeared as a witness in show trials that resulted in some death
sentences. The Soviets simply distrusted all Communist Party members who had
sought exile in the West. All the while, Erich Mielke remained untouched and
continued to serve as the deputy secret police chief. His survival reinforced the
belief that he had spent the war years in the Soviet Union instead of France and
Belgium as he had claimed in the 1945 questionnaire.
Josef Stalin died on March 5, 1953. The following day the Central
Committee of the SED met for a special session to mourn the dictator’s passing,
eulogizing him as “great friend of Germany who was always an adviser of and
help to our people.”
Two months later, on May 5, the SED celebrated the 135th anniversary of the
birthday of Karl Marx by increasing work quotas for industrial plants. The city
of Chemnitz was renamed Karl-Marx-Stadt and the Order of Karl Marx was
created as the DDR’s highest award. The party seemed to be enjoying a period of
unity and political tranquility. It lasted but a fortnight. Mielke had been reporting
secretly that a group of party officials were plotting against the leadership. This
resulted in more expulsions from the Politbüro and the Central Committee.
Discontent among the workers over increased work norms without
corresponding wage hikes reached the breaking point June 16, 1953, at
Stalinallee in Berlin. Probably encouraged by Stalin’s death, nearly a hundred
construction workers gathered for a protest meeting before starting work. Word
spread rapidly to other nearby construction sites, and soon several hundred men
and women marched to the House of Ministries, the government seat that once
had housed Hermann Goring’s Nazi aviation ministry. They chanted in protest
for five hours until a minister decided to speak to them. His cajoling was met
with jeers, and he retreated into the heavily guarded building. People’s police
riot units were called out of their barracks but made no move to break up the
demonstrations. The protesters returned to Stalinallee, and a general strike was
called. The following day, some 100,000 protesters marched through East Berlin;
about 400,000 took to the streets in other towns.31 Their demands were
everywhere the same: free and secret elections.
The American radio station in West Berlin (RIAS) and several West German
stations reported the protest marches and the plans for a general strike. These
broadcasts were picked up throughout the Soviet zone, and 267,000 workers of
major state-owned plants in 304 cities and towns spontaneously went on strike.
In 24 towns, irate burghers stormed prisons and freed between 2,000 and 3,000
inmates.
Mielke was nowhere to be seen in public, but his secret police agents and the
Vopo were out en masse, and bloody street battles erupted. Hundreds of
policemen defected to the side of the workers, police stations were overrun, and
government offices were sacked. The leadership had already retreated to its
residences in the heavily guarded compound in the Pankow district of East
Berlin. At 1 P.M. the Soviet commandant for Berlin, Major General P. K.
Dibrova, a sixty-year-old Chekist who had never seen wartime combat, declared
martial law. Stasi agents and people’s policemen opened fire. Drumhead courts
handed down death sentences that were carried out on the spot. The rioting
continued, and by late afternoon Soviet tanks accompanied by infantry and
MVD troops had rolled into East Berlin and other major cities in the Soviet
zone. This made the people even angrier. At Berlin’s Potsdamer Platz, which
bordered the American sector, irate protesters ignored machine gun fire and the
menacing barrels of tank guns. They ripped cobblestones from the streets and
hurled them at the tanks.
The massive and brutal use of Soviet power—two armored divisions—
against the unarmed protesters in 121 major cities and small towns broke the
back of the revolt within twenty-four hours. By nightfall June 18, relative calm
had been restored in the Soviet zone, and Stasi flying squads swept through the
cities. Provisional prison camps were set up to hold the thousands of Stasi
victims. Nearly 1,500 persons were sentenced in secret trials to long prison
terms.
On June 24, Mielke issued a terse announcement that one Stasi officer,
nineteen demonstrators, and two bystanders had been killed during the uprising.
He did not say how many were victims of official lynching. The numbers of
wounded were given as 191 policemen, 126 demonstrators, and 61 bystanders.
Alarmed by the events in East Germany, Beria, head of the Ministry for
Internal Affairs (MVD), which had replaced the MGB, flew to Berlin. He
wanted to know why the staff at his most important foreign outpost had failed to
prevent an uprising by not recognizing the signs of extreme discontent and not
taking early repressive measures.32 He conferred with MfS Minister Zaisser and
with Mielke, both of whom he had known since the early 1930s. True to form
when treading dangerous waters, Mielke handled himself with circumspection.
He was well aware that Zaisser’s ties with Beria had been close for three
decades. Beria decided to replace several hundred MVD officers, including
Major General Ivan Fadeykin, the MVD chief for the DDR. The MfS generally
remained untouched except for the arrests and dismissals, for dereliction of duty,
of a handful of officers in the provinces. One high-ranking Stasi officer shot
himself.
Calm returned to the streets of the Soviet zone, yet escapes to the West
continued at a high rate. Of the 331,390 who fled in 1953, 8,000 were members
of the Kasernierte Volkspolizei, the barracked people’s police units, which were
actually the secret cadre of the future East German Army. Also among the
escapees were 2,718 members and candidates of the SED, the ruling party.33
Within the Communist Party and the government, however, turmoil
persisted. Max Fechner, the minister of justice, declared that “illegal arrests” had
been made as a result of the uprising. Belonging to a strike council or suspicion
of being a ringleader, the justice minister observed, was not sufficient grounds
for arrest and conviction. This was enough cause for Mielke to personally arrest
Fechner. Hilde Benjamin, who became known as “Red Hilde” or “The Red
Guillotine” after she appeared as a judge in a number of show trials, was
appointed minister of justice. Fechner was convicted as an “enemy of the party
and the state,” He spent three years in the Stasi’s notorious Bautzen prison. The
prison was nicknamed the “Yellow Misery” because its yellow building housed
political prisoners under the most inhuman conditions.
MVD chief Beria was arrested shortly after his return to Moscow from his
Berlin inspection trip, and charged with plotting against the new Soviet
leadership. Mielke, either encouraged by Beria’s arrest or on direct orders from
Moscow, used the Stasi’s failure to keep the DDR quiescent as a pretext for a
power play against his boss and fellow Cheka comrade, State Security Minister
Wilhelm Zaisser. He told a party commission looking for scapegoats that Zaisser
was advocating a change in the party hierarchy. Mielke also accused Zaisser of
calling for rapprochement with West Germany because “he believed the Soviet
Union would abandon the DDR.”34 What Zaisser had really said was that “it is
the highest duty of a communist to remain always loyal to the Soviet Union, in
good times and during bad days as well. . . . Even if the Soviet Union abandons
the DDR tomorrow, you must remain loyal.”35
The party chose to believe Mielke. Zaisser was stripped of his job, expelled
from both the Politbüro and the Central Committee, and deprived of his party
membership.36 Mielke must have expected to be awarded for his loyalty to the
Soviet Union and to the party with a promotion to the post of minister of the
MfS. Instead the party decided to downgrade the MfS and place it under the
Ministry of the Interior. Ernst Wollweber, the old saboteur known in the West as
the “miserable creature with the brain of an evil scientist,” was named the new
chief of the state security secretariat. Mielke remained on staff as his deputy.
Since his return from the Soviet Union in 1945, Wollweber had not held any
known secret police posts, serving instead in various capacities in the Ministry
of Transport. Immediately prior to being named state security chief, he was head
of the State Secretariat for Sea Transport. In that capacity, he used his expertise
in blowing up ships by establishing a special course at the DDR’s merchant
marine school. From each graduating class of two hundred, twenty men were
selected for training with explosives and taught how to sabotage engines and
navigational equipment and how to transmit secret messages. Although there
were reports of numerous acts of sabotage aboard Western merchant and naval
vessels in 1953, there was never any firm evidence that Wollweber’s pupils were
involved.37
As a direct consequence of the uprising and the attempts by Zaisser and
associates to change the party and government leadership, the Ministry for State
Security was put under rigid control of the Communist Party. Walter Ulbricht,
who had risen to the all-powerful position of secretary-general of the SED and
first secretary of the Central Committee, transformed the Stasi into an instrument
for retaining power. Ulbricht prohibited the Stasi from keeping leading party
functionaries under surveillance and from otherwise interfering in the party
apparatus. Mielke had become Ulbricht’s most loyal servant—at least outwardly,
as he would later discover—and declared the MfS the “shield and sword of the
state,” It was not Mielke’s brilliance that inspired this logo, however. He had
simply copied it from the newly created Committee for State Security of the
Soviet Union, the KGB.
Ernst Wollweber, a saboteur for Soviet intelligence who specialized in blowing
up ships, succeeded Zaisser as Stasi minister from 1953 to 1957. Ullstein.
Mielke and Wollweber, who had also advanced to the Central Committee,
made an excellent team for four years. Their service had scored significant
successes against espionage operations run by the CIA-sponsored organization
of General Gehlen and by U.S. Army Military Intelligence. At the same time, the
Stasi had expanded its network of secret informers, which would eventually
penetrate every facet of life in the DDR. The Stasi’s work was rewarded. The
secret police was restored to the status of a full ministry in 1955, and Mielke
obtained the rank of state secretary.
Mielke still nursed greater ambitions, but Wollweber stood in his way and
had to be discredited. Mielke knew that Ulbricht had numerous disputes with the
secret police chief. Ulbricht was particularly disturbed by Wollweber’s stubborn
emphasis on hunting “foreign spies” rather than on strengthening his corps of
informers to watch over the population. Encouraged by Ulbricht, Mielke charged
Wollweber with “ideological subversion” against the state and the Communist
Party. As evidence Mielke cited his chief’s contacts with high-ranking members
of West Germany’s Social Democratic Party, who had been exploring a modus
vivendi with the DDR.38 Ulbricht already knew that yet another group had
formed within the Politbüro and the Central Committee that opposed his
policies. The new opposition was led by Politbüro member Karl Schirdewan.
Wollweber had taken Schirdewan’s side.
On November 1, 1957, Wollweber resigned as minister for state security,
citing ill health.39 Mielke was appointed minister for state security the same day.
He began at once to restructure the Stasi into a duplicate of the Soviet KGB,
which was then headed by Mielke’s old mentor Ivan Serov. The restructuring
included the establishment of military ranks. Ulbricht gave Mielke the rank of
major general, which he held until 1959 when he was promoted to the three-star
rank of lieutenant general. Within a year he created the Hauptverwaltung
Aufklärung (HVA), the Main Administration for Reconnaissance. Markus Wolf,
appointed a major general, became Stasi deputy minister and chief of the HVA,
which was put in charge of all foreign espionage operations.
Wolf was born in 1923, the son of a radical communist physician and writer
who had emigrated with his family to the Soviet Union to escape Hitler. In
Moscow, Markus attended the Karl-Liebknecht Schule, a middle school for the
children of German communists in exile. While attending the school, he
reportedly had connections to the GPU and was alleged to have served as a
secret informer on the teaching faculty. Several male and female teachers were
subsequently arrested during Stalin’s 1936-1938 purges and disappeared in the
labor camps.40 Whether some of the arrests resulted from young Wolf’s
activities was never reliably established.41 It is noteworthy, however, that Wolf
and his family were among the very few German communist intellectuals who
survived the purges.
Wolf became a Soviet citizen and member of the Soviet Communist Party in
1942 and adopted the alias of Kurt Förster. Together with other young German
communist men and women he was sent to a Comintern school at
Kushnarenkovo, a village about a thousand miles east of Moscow. The school
was camouflaged as an agricultural college, while its curriculum actually
consisted of espionage and sabotage training to prepare the students for
clandestine assignments behind German lines. As the war turned in favor of the
Red Army in 1943, the school was shut down, and Wolf returned to Moscow for
assignment to Scientific Research Institute No. 205. His Stasi personnel card
indicated that he was radio commentator and editor at the institute.42 When I
mentioned this fact to a former high-ranking Stasi officer, he guffawed and said,
“The 205 was run by the NKVD.”43
Two weeks after the end of the war, Wolf turned up in Berlin. Exactly how is
unclear, but one report said he was then a captain assigned to the First
Belorussian Front under Marshal Georgy Zhukov.44 Be that as it may, Wolf
became a commentator for Soviet-controlled Radio Berlin, and for a time was
assigned to cover the Nürnberg war crimes trials. By that time he had taken back
his real name. Fluent in Russian and with excellent contacts to influential Soviet
officials, he was sent to Moscow in 1951 as a counselor to the DDR’s first
diplomatic mission, a post in which he served for one year.
East Germany’s espionage service was the brainchild of Semyon D.
Ignatyev, the chief of the KGB’s forerunner, the MGB. He had persuaded the
Soviet government to take advantage of the unique intelligence opportunity
created by the defeat and division of Germany. In the immediate years following
the end of the war, Soviet intelligence, assisted by the Polish and Czechoslovak
services, had already been operating in the Western-occupied zones, as was
shown by the U.S. counterintelligence operation code-named Bingo.
Until the creation of the sovereign Federal Republic of Germany, the Eastern
communist bloc had considered the United States its main enemy. Now the new
democratic West Germany became main enemy number two. Intentions of
uniting Germany under Moscow’s control had been nipped in the bud, and the
Cold War assumed new dimensions. East German espionage became imperative
in Ignatyev’s view, because it could benefit immeasurably from the
commonalities of German language and culture. In addition, the remnants of the
prewar Communist Party of Germany, the KPD, and personal ties would be
valuable assets. The Soviets knew they could trust their German vassals and
profit from their zealous pursuit of perfection.45 Markus Wolf was such a trusted
minion.
Camouflaged as the Institute for Scientific Economic Research, the spy
service was attached administratively to the MfS in 1953, with Wolf, then thirty
years old, as its director. But its headquarters was in a Berlin suburb, and much
to Mielke’s distress, it operated more or less independently. At one point, the
Stasi chief accused Wolf and his service of being “ideological subversives who
underestimated the dangers of Western infiltration”46 In his earlier days, Mielke
had little use for waging espionage against the West, saying time and again that
it was more important to catch Western spies and enemies of the party. But
Wolf’s spies already had scored notable successes against Western targets, and
the general was able to weather Mielke’s attacks. Ulbricht’s suspicious nature,
however, helped Mielke obtain approval to move the espionage headquarters to
his ministry’s compound in central East Berlin.
The oppressors meet for lunch (1-r): Walter Ulbricht, SED secretary-general
(1946–1971) and head of state (1949–1971); Erich Honecker, successor to
Ulbricht (1971–1989); Colonel General Erich Mielke, minister for state
security; KGB General Vladimir Biroschkov; Lieutenant General Bruno Beater,
deputy to Mielke; and Major General Markus Wolf, chief of foreign espionage
(1969). Courtesy MfS Archive.
The creation of the HVA, with the internal security and counterespionage
services under one roof, completed Mielke’s consolidation of power—a power
he would wield for nearly four decades. Mielke managed to build the MfS into
an instrument for the ruthless oppression of East Germany’s population as well
as into one of the world’s most effective espionage services.
THE WALL
Soviet Premier Nikita S. Khrushchev called for a meeting of the Warsaw Pact in
March 1961 to discuss the situation. Ulbricht was accompanied by Erich
Honecker, Politbüro member and Central Committee secretary for security
affairs, and Stasi chief Mielke. Ulbricht pleaded for sealing the border with West
Berlin, the only escape hatch for refugees. But the other East European leaders
supported Khrushchev, who had rejected such a move months earlier, and
opposed Ulbricht’s plan.48 The Soviet leader wanted to keep Berlin neutral
territory, needing both a geostrategic Achilles’ heel in the Western security
system and a European Hong Kong, a trade link between the communist East
and capitalist West Germany.49
Ulbricht did not give up. Late in June, he invited Mikhail Pervukhin, the
Soviet Ambassador to East Germany, to his villa in the Wandlitz forest for a talk.
Mielke was present to provide facts on the security situation. The ambassador
reported to the Kremlin that Ulbricht said the exodus from the DDR was so
serious that if nothing was done, another revolt could not be excluded. And if
that happened, he believed the West German Bundeswehr would become
involved “and that would mean war.”50 Pervukhin closed his report by saying
that if the border with West Berlin remained open, collapse would be
“inevitable.”
Pervukhin’s report, as well as the Western allies’ determination to hold on to
West Berlin, finally persuaded Khrushchev to give in to the nagging Ulbricht.
Instead of barbed wire barricades, he suggested a wall and told the ambassador
to share his idea with Ulbricht and to ask Marshal Ivan I. Yakubovsky,
commander of Soviet troops in the DDR, to work out a plan for dividing
Berlin.51 After his meeting with Ulbricht, Honecker, and Mielke, Ambassador
Pervukhin reported to Moscow that “Ulbricht beamed with pleasure” and said:
“This is the solution. This will help. I am for this.”52
Shortly after this meeting, Ulbricht met with Western reporters to advance
again his determination to transform Berlin into a “Free City” without the
presence of the Western allies. “Does this mean,” asked one of the journalists,
“that according to your judgment the national border will be established at the
Brandenburg Gate? And are you prepared to accept the consequences of such an
action?” Ulbricht’s answer was a blatant lie: “I understand your question in this
way, that there are people in West Germany who wish us to mobilize the
construction workers of the capital of the DDR in order to erect a wall. I am not
aware of any such intention. The construction workers are fully occupied mainly
with building houses. Nobody has any intention to erect a wall.”
But throughout July, Central Committee Secretary for Security Honecker
worked with Mielke and the top leadership of the People’s Police and the
National People’s Army (NVA) on plans to do just that.
The morning of August 12, Mielke summoned his division chiefs and
announced that all members of his Berlin headquarters as well as the Berlin MfS
district office were to report to their offices immediately. Then he informed his
deputies of the Politbüro decision that all traffic between East and West Berlin
would be cut off at midnight. The task of the MfS was to man strategic road
crossings and guard against defectors from units of the National People’s Army,
the police, and the border guards, which were to choke off the sector border.53
While Mielke was exhorting his underlings and threatening any who talked with
a firing squad, the stream of refugees continued into the West. By nightfall, more
than 2,400 persons had joined the 3,241 escapees who had come across in the
previous two days.54
Mielke’s threat and the total isolation of all troops the moment the orders for
dividing Berlin were received achieved absolute secrecy. It was not until a few
minutes after midnight of August 13 that West Berlin police patrols spotted the
communist units stringing barbed wire along the border. There were no major
incidents, although at one point People’s Police units formed a human chain to
hold back about 1,500 persons who were heading for West Berlin. Mielke had
done his job well.
KGB reliance on the Stasi permeated all areas of secret police operations. Its
central focus, however, remained on foreign espionage and counterespionage.
Legends, or personal backgrounds, were falsified by the Stasi for Soviet
espionage agents operating worldwide but, particularly, in West Germany. Those
operating under an East German identity, including agents infiltrated as
“refugees”, were provided genuine East German documents. Others were
outfitted with forgeries produced in Stasi laboratories. Many KGB agents
inserted with Stasi help as deep cover agents, or illegals as they are known in the
intelligence trade, can be assumed to be still in place. The chances of discovery
by western counterspies are slim, since the Stasi retained no records of these
agents. It will take a few talkative high-ranking Soviet defectors to expose at
least some of them. East Germany also acquiesced to “take the heat” in the event
a Soviet deep cover agent operating under KGB-manufactured identity was
caught “in flagrante delicto” at a time when Moscow was steering a conciliatory
course vis-a-vis the West. The agents were instructed to insist that they were
operatives of General Wolf’s foreign espionage directorate. The Soviet
government not only saved face, it also made it easier to repatriate the spy in a
spy exchange or an exchange for political prisoners.
Besides aiding the KGB’s own operations, the Soviets benefitted in another
way. All information obtained by Wolf’s Stasi spies was immediately turned
over to them, sometimes before Stasi analysts had a chance to review the
material. This was particularly true in the penetration of western intelligence
services, top military commands, NATO headquarters and in science and
technology. Without a doubt, the East German activities saved the Soviet Union
hundreds of millions of dollars in high tech research and development costs.
OPERATION NEEDLE
While operation “Moses” was running smoothly for the KGB Second Chief
Directorate in Moscow, Colonel Vinogradov of the First Directorate stationed in
East Berlin approached Wiegand For help. The KGB leadership in the DDR had
become concerned over the increasing concentration of former Soviet citizens,
especially Jews of German extraction, in West Germany. Analysis of telephone
intercepts and reports from moles buried inside the West German security
services were alarming. The BND, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (Federal
Intelligence Service) and the BfV, the federal counterespionage service, had
stepped up recruitment of agents from among the emigrants. These agents, the
Soviets had learned, were to be employed against military targets in the DDR
and against Soviet citizens residing there.
Besides the pipeline into Israel established by Kremakovski’s department,
Vinogradov revealed that the foreign espionage directorate had also recruited a
number of Soviet Jews who were “allowed” to emigrate. Wiegand’s task force
was to assist in controlling these agents once they had infiltrated Jewish
organizations in West Europe, especially those located in West Berlin. In
addition, some of those agents were to penetrate specific offices of the West
German intelligence services, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S.
Army’s Intelligence and Security Command.
These offices were located at refugee and emigrant reception centers at
Traiskirchen near Vienna, Ostia near Rome and Marienfelde in West Berlin. East
German “Instrukteure”, agents providing moles in place with funds and
communications, were to be deployed. Vinogradov told Wiegand that this
operation was important to him personally. He explained that he was preparing
to return to Moscow and take over Department 2 at Moscow Central. This
department was headed by Colonel Mikhail “Micha” Skorik who had been
designated to assume command of the KGB contingent in the DDR. Skorik was
a highly acclaimed officer who had recruited and controlled BND officer Heinz
Felfe.11 But Skorik fell victim to an internecine battle and intrigue.12 Wiegand
reported Vinogradov’s proposition to his boss, General Kratsch, who authorized
the colonel to cooperate. The new operation was codenamed “Nadel” (Needle)
and another successful KGB/Stasi joint venture ensued. Within six months,
Wiegand reported to Vinogradov that the agents were in place, mainly as
interpreters. Thus, the KGB was able to keep track of emigrants recruited as
agents by the West as well as obtain information emigrants revealed during
interrogation.
Operation “Moses” also continued to develop as an important Stasi/KGB
asset. Miss Rehse proved how good and “loyal” an informant she was. At one
point she came to Wiegand with information so explosive that he suggested to
the counterintelligence chief, General Kratsch, that it be relayed quickly, directly
only to Mielke without a paper trail. “Anna” had reported that the Soviet citizen
mother-in-law of a Stasi officer was smuggling gold and other contraband from
the USSR to West Berlin. The Stasi officer himself was peripherally involved, a
fact which by itself needed not necessarily be disastrous for the Stasi. But that
the officer, First Lieutenant Thomas Kleiber, turned out to be a member of
Wiegand’s own task force was a calamity. Moreover, he was also the son of a
powerful member of the Politbureau and Minister for Science and Technology,
Guenther Kleiber. It was the father who had used his connection to get him the
Stasi job. He was appointed a lieutenant and before he served even a day on the
job he was detailed to study journalism at Leipzig University. There, he met and
married a Soviet girl who was also a student. When Wiegand was told to accept
him in his unit, he refused. An extraordinarily gutsy and dedicated professor said
in a written final evaluation that young Kleiber had been the worse student he
had ever instructed. “He was stupid, lazy and arrogant and he tried to bribe me
with western goods he had obtained in Wandlitz.”13 Although Mielke was fully
aware of Thomas Kleiber’s background, he had overruled Wiegand’s objection.
Now Mielke was forced to make a distasteful decision. Dismissal and
punishment? Recognizing the Stasi chief’s dilemma, General Kratsch seized the
moment to further ingratiate himself with the boss. The fat General decided to
retain Kleiber in his counterintelligence directorate, but transfer him to
Department 13, which was responsible for the surveillance of all journalists.
Mielke accepted. The matter was closed. Mielke ordered Wiegand to remain
silent and not to inform the KGB. Kleiber was not told that he and his family had
been tagged as criminals. Kleiber’s mother-in-law, known only as “Elyina”,
retained her job at Radio Volga, the Soviet Armed Forces station in East
Germany. She and young Kleiber continued business as usual.
Irina Rehse, alias “Anna”, had proved loyalty and ability as an agent and was
elevated from a mere informant to “Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter mit
Feindberuehrung”, 1MB for short. This designation, unofficial collaborator with
enemy contact, was the highest Stasi “rank” given to an operative who was not a
commissioned officer. It was reserved for tested agents who operated both inside
and outside the DDR. In agreement with the KGB, the Stasi then sent her on a
mission to Israel, using a genuine West German passport. Miss Rehse was
thoroughly briefed on how to make herself conspicuous to Israeli security
officials at Lod Airport in Tel Aviv. Stasi official hoped this would result in
recruitment by Israeli intelligence. It worked. The Stasi/KGB alliance obtained a
valuable insight into the operation of Mossad in West Berlin and in the DDR.
A year before he retired in 1988, Kremakovski told Wiegand that he had a
first class agent whom he wanted “Anna” to introduce to the Mossad for
recruitment. “Kremakovski characterized this agent as extremely dependable and
unfortunately we believed him.” In the late fall of 1989, shortly before that
Berlin Wall crumbled, “Anna” made another trip to Israel, after which Wiegand
received disturbing information from another double agent. It appeared that the
Mossad suspected “Anna” of being a double and she was no longer trusted.
Mossad officials told “Anna” that her services were being terminated because
the risk had become too high. The Israelis, Wiegand believed, decided against
arresting her, fearing that this might prompt the Soviets to interfere with Jewish
emigration.
Colonel Wiegand was convinced that there was a serious leak in Moscow
and flew to the Soviet capital to confront Kremakovski’s successor, a young and
less experienced lieutenant colonel. In an effort to stonewall, the colonel told a
tale which, because of clumsy contradictions, Wiegand knew was pure fiction.
The confrontation became heated and the East German threatened to return
home unless he was provided with truthful answers. The threat worked, probably
because the political situation in the DDR was already shaky and the KGB did
not want to alienate their best allies.
Wiegand was astounded to learn that Kremakovski’s agent was not one who
had proved his loyalty and his ability as a clandestine operator. Instead, the KGB
had gone to the woman, who had applied for an exit visa, and told her that she
would be contacted shortly by an Israeli agent. When that happened, she should
contact the KGB at once. Miss Rehse, “Anna”, made the contact. The woman
KGB informant not only told the KGB but also used relatives in the West to
inform the Mossad. It became clear that Kremakovski’s successor, and perhaps
Kremakovski himself, played a cynical game of betrayal in order to parade
themselves before their boss as successful spy catchers.
By the time Wiegand returned to East Berlin shortly before the Berlin Wall
crumbled, the MfS was in turmoil and many of their agents had already broken
off their Stasi contacts. There was no chance to warn “Anna.” Months later,
Wiegand learned that Miss Rehse, accompanied by Lt. Kleiber’s mother-in-law
Hyena, had made another “business” trip to Moscow, where they were promptly
arrested. “Interestingly, Hyena, the real culprit, was released and returned to East
Germany while Miss Rehse was kept in prison.” Despite efforts by the Stasi and
the East German government to obtain her release, she was still in KGB custody
when Germany was reunited. Wiegand said he felt “used, and betrayed.”
Operation “Moses” functioned until November, 1989, when the Berlin Wall
fell and the Stasi disintegrated within a few weeks. None of the smugglers and
speculators operating in the DDR and West Berlin had ever been arrested.
EXTORTION
On April 27, 1988, Anton Ivankovic disappeared in East Germany.15 The 53-
year-old owner of Ost-West Montage (OWM), a Swiss firm supplying
manpower to western construction firms, was frantically sought by his
employees. Work in progress at five major projects was in danger of shutting
down. Negotiations over OWM’s participation in the construction of a luxury
hotel collapsed when Ivankovic failed to show up at a scheduled meeting.
Finally, ten days later, Ivankovic telephoned his East Berlin office manager,
Achim Fassman, from Budapest. The normally gregarious Yugoslav sounded
deeply distraught. Fassman immediately flew to the Hungarian capital. He found
a spiritually broken man, who had been physically tortured and who was
suffering from extreme paranoia. Ivankovic, always dressed elegantly, was
dishevelled and penniless. Laboriously, Fassman was able to extract an
incredible story, one so monstrous that Fassman had difficulty in believing it.
Ivankovic was in Budapest on business when he had received a telephone
call on April 26 from an East German business partner. Ivankovic was asked to
travel to East Germany to complete negotiations which had been conducted over
several months with another Swiss company, Schulzer-Eschowitz. A
representative of that firm, a Herr Michael Schneider, would meet him in the
East German city of Leipzig for the signing of a contract. Ivankovic was eager to
comply. For months he had been in contact with Horst Virgens, owner of a
consulting firm at Singen near Lake Constance on the Swiss border. Virgens had
offered Ivankovic participation in the construction of a power plant at Tomsk in
the Soviet Union. Over the telephone, the business partner told Ivankovic that he
would be awarded a contract worth 20 million Swiss Francs (about $13.6
million). Ivankovic flew to Leipzig the next day.
Virgens met the Yugoslav businessman at Hotel Merkur where he introduced
him to Schneider, saying he would handle the deal. Virgens excused himself and
left Ivankovic alone with Schneider. After a 20-minute conversation about the
contract, Schneider invited Ivankovic to his apartment at the outskirts of the city
for a talk “unter vier Augen”, a confidential chat. When they arrived, Ivankovic
was attacked by Schneider and by second man who was already at the apartment
and whom he had not seen before. Neither was a match for Ivankovic, a well-
built six-footer who fought back and his jacket was torn off. Schneider was 5’7”
and of small stature. The stranger was about the same height and build, wore
glasses and, as Ivankovic recalled, “looked mean,” The melee ended when
Schneider pulled a pistol he had carried concealed beneath his jacket and
threatened to shoot. Ivankovic was shoved into what appeared to be a children’s
bedroom. The Yugoslav businessman was pushed onto a bed. His wrists were
tied and his arms, stretched above the head, were lashed to a wrought iron
headboard. His legs were tied as well and around his neck the attackers placed a
noose designed to strangle him if he moved. Then, Schneider pinched
Ivankovic’s nose while the second man poured a sleep-inducing solution into his
mouth.
When he awakened, he again faced his attackers who now introduced
themselves. Schneider said he was a member of the Ministry of State Security of
the DDR. The other man gave no name and merely said he was an officer of the
Soviet KGB. The reason for his detention, Schneider told Ivankovic, was that
over the years he worked in East Germany he “caused damage to the DDR and
other East European socialists countries” and that he was charged with
“economic sabotage and political subversion.” The accusation was that he did
not “honor the trust” put in him by the foreign trade ministry and DDR firms
which had contracted to supply manpower to “major construction projects of
socialism.” Specifically, the captors said, Ivankovic “merely raked in money and
cheated Socialism by not paying proper taxes and commissions.” The
accusations were interspersed with threats and beatings. Several times Schneider
released the clip from the pistol and showed Ivankovic that it was loaded with
live shells. He was deprived of food and drink. Not allowed to go to a toilet,
Ivankovic soon lay in urine and excrement.
“We are going to finish you off,” the nameless captors said after Schneider
accused Ivankovic of “collaborating with western intelligence against the DDR
and other Socialist States.” For espionage, he told the Yugoslav, the punishment
was death. From time to time, telephone calls were being made or received in an
adjoining room during which Schneider said he was relaying “preliminary
reports to headquarters. And all the while Ivankovic tried to figure out just what
these men wanted. He knew he had broken no laws. By midnight the first day his
wrists and ankles were bleeding. Then he was given another drug that put him to
sleep.
The torture and threats continued the second day. Ivankovic maintained his
innocence and repeatedly asked that he be brought before a normal court. The
situation became more tense and suddenly Schneider went out of the room and
returned with a rifle. The weapon was loaded, the ropes with which he was
lashed to the bed were cut and he was told stand up. A death sentenced was
pronounced and a shot was fired. Ivankovic fainted. The “execution” had been a
perverse sham. When he regained consciousness, Schneider said, “so now you
either do what we demand or you will be shot for real.” There were only two
demands: financial restitution to the DDR and Socialism and signing an
agreement to work for the Stasi and the KGB against the West. Physically and
mentally in agony, Ivankovic agreed to cooperate. He was given another sedative
and fell asleep.
On the third day, Ivankovic was released from the bed and blindfolded. His
wrists were still tied. Schneider led him to a telephone in another room and
forced him to call a bank in Vienna, where he maintained a special account used
only to cover business expenses incurred in East Germany and determine the
amount of the current balance. All the while Ivankovic could feel the muzzle of
the pistol pressed to the back of his head. Schneider was surprised that the
amount was no longer 1 million Deutsche Mark ($625,000), which he had
determined from a Bank reference when he was “negotiating” with Ivankovic,
but only 300,000 Marks ($187,500). In the interim, Ivankovic had withdrawn the
bulk of the money to pay salaries. Schneider pressed the pistol to Ivankovic’s
temple and forced him to call the bank again and to request a credit 700,000
Marks. When the bank refused, Ivankovic was told to order the transfer of the
remaining 300,000 Marks to his account at the Handelsbank in East Berlin. In a
third telephone call, Ivankovic was forced to inform the East Berlin Bank of the
upcoming transfer and that the money would be withdrawn by one of his
representatives. That completed, he was made to write on his firm’s stationary a
one page agreement volunteering his services to the Ministry for State Security
of the DDR and to the KGB for espionage assignments against the West. Even
then Ivankovic remained shackled.
The fourth day, a Saturday, began with new beatings and later in the day
Ivankovic was given official forms from his East Berlin bank which he had to
complete and designate Schneider as his representative who would withdraw the
funds. Then came a new twist. Ivankovic was informed that after much
deliberation it had been decided not to “ruin your business in the DDR and
Switzerland”, even though his guilt had been established.
Instead, his firm could continue and would even receive assistance. This
“magnanimous” offer of redemption was predicated not only upon his spying for
the Stasi and the KGB, but also on financing Stasi and KGB operations in the
West “in the spirit of further restitution.” For the time being, two million
Deutsche Mark ($1,250 million) were to be paid in installments every two weeks
over the following eight weeks. Payment would be made during clandestine
meetings in Vienna and Zurich with Schneider, who would function as his “case
officer,” The role of the “KGB officer”, who had not uttered a single word
during Ivankovic entire ordeal but who excelled in brutality, was characterized
by Schneider as that of the executioner. “If you break the agreement or fail to
pay, he will hunt you down and will execute you no matter where you hide in the
world.”
Psychologically broken and physically tortured, Ivankovic was ready to
agree to anything to stay alive. On the fifth day, he was allowed to visit the toilet
and clean himself up. Then he was given some food and drink. But after he had
eaten, Ivankovic was tied again to the iron bedstead. And the torture continued.
The scene changed from being left alone to beatings and threats with the pistol,
again and again the threat of being shot. The Yugoslav’s situation became once
more critical on the sixth day, Monday, May 2. His tormentors were suspecting
that Ivankovic had played a trick on them because the money had not been
deposited in East Berlin. Numerous telephone calls ensued. Later in the day the
bank finally confirmed receipt of the money. Ivankovic was told to clean up
again and get ready to leave for the Leipzig airport. Before Schneider and the
“KGB officer” led him out of the apartment, they took all of his cash in various
hard currencies, travelers checks, and other valuables.
At the airport, Ivankovic was given a ticket to Budapest and 300 West Marks
(about $187) and his passport. Before boarding the plane, he was instructed to
check into Hotel Thermal. He was warned not to leave the hotel and wait for
“control telephone calls.” Ivankovic obeyed. Indeed, the next day he did receive
two calls. It was Schneider making more threats and setting a date for the first
“Treff,” Stasi jargon for a clandestine meeting. It was to take place in 14 days
and he was told to bring the first installment of 250,000 West German Marks
($156,250).
It took Ivankovic another day to regain sufficient strength over body and
mind to call his office manager in East Berlin. The Yugoslav spoke haltingly and
with great difficulty. Achim Fassmann had listened incredulously. Things like
that just didn’t happen in the DDR, the Socialist state where such a horrendous
crime simply could not occur. Finally convinced of Ivankovic’s veracity,
Fassmann now had to persuade him to return to East Berlin and report the crime
to police. It took some effort but his boss finally agreed.
Arriving at Schoenefeld airport the morning of May 6, the two men went
directly to Peoples Police headquarters at Alexander Platz in downtown East
Berlin. A criminal investigator listened patiently while Ivankovic had told the
entire story. Then the detective dismissed him, saying that he didn’t believe a
word of it. Nevertheless, a report was forwarded to the Ministry of State
Security. Because it involved a foreigner, the report eventually landed on the
desk of Colonel Wiegand. The colonel remembered meeting Ivankovic several
times at the Ministry for Foreign Trade. Although highly skeptical, he decided to
look into the case because Ivankovic did not seem the type to make up such a
story. His decision meant, however, that he had to “deconspire” himself, the
Stasi jargon for revealing his true identity. The Yugoslav had known him only as
“Herr Falk,” a government official dealing with investment projects of foreign
firms in the DDR.
Wiegand ordered Major Klaus Schilling, a section chief in his department, to
pick up Ivankovic at the Metropol Hotel and question him at a Stasi safe house.
He, too, had trouble believing the man. When Wiegand read the statement
Ivankovic made to the major he still had his doubts.16 But there was a ring of
truth to the story and Wiegand handled the second interrogation of Ivankovic
himself. “Ivankovic was stunned when he saw me and I identified myself as a
ranking member of the MfS.” The colonel offered the man a brandy to put him at
ease and then produced several pistols of different make. “Is there a weapon here
of the type that you were threatened with?” Ivankovic picked out a 9 millimeter
Makarov, the standard issue sidearm carried by both the Stasi and the KGB.
There was also something familiar about the formulation of the espionage
agreement the Yugoslav was made to sign. The wording was very close to the
form used by both the Stasi and their KGB allies. Were the kidnappers
intelligence officers turned common criminals? It wouldn’t have been the first
time. Years earlier, Wiegand had caught a Stasi major who had killed his two
informants so he could put the money he was to pay them in his own pocket.17
Thus, he decided to give Ivankovic the benefit of the doubt. As a next step
Wiegand had him examined by a team of doctors assigned to the Stasi. “The
result was a shocker. Even days after his release, the man’s ankles, legs and
wrists clearly showed the marks of shackles and rope burns/’ Wiegand recalled.
“His entire body showed subcutaneous hemorrhages, ugly bruises which the
doctors said could only have been caused by severe beatings. A blood test
removed all doubt. It showed traces of chemicals identical to those used in sleep
inducing pharmaceuticals. The doctors diagnosed physical exhaustion, sleeping
disorder, traumatic fear and an irregular heart rhythm.
A search of the Stasi computer, in which personal data and photos of all
persons entering the DDR were stored, showed that a representative of the Swiss
firm Schulzer-Eschowitz named Schneider had traveled to the DDR on several
occasion. However, the travel dates did not correspond to the period during
which the Ivankovic kidnapping had taken place. Ivankovic’s description of
Schneider was different, too. Next, the MfS checked out Horst Virgens, who had
originally introduced Schneider to the Yugoslav businessman. Computer data
showed the man had been in East Germany during the dates in question, and had
entered the DDR from West Germany in the company of another man, whose
photograph was shown to Ivankovic. Without hesitation, he identified Uwe
Koenigsmark, a 24-year-old self-employed car dealer from the West German
town of Tuttlingen, as Schneider the “MfS officer,” The computer data on
Virgens also showed that in addition to Koenigsmark, he was often accompanied
by two other West Germans, Norbert Fuchs and Helmut Masannek. The latter
was an engineer employed by the West German firm Mannesmann, a giant
conglomerate producing heavy industrial equipment as well as electronics.
Ivankovic identified 31-year-old Fuchs as the nameless “KGB officer.” but said
he had never seen or heard of Masannek. To Wiegand’s regret, the computer
check also revealed that all four men had left East Germany the day Ivankovic
was put on the plane to Budapest.
Until that point, the investigation had been conducted in strictest secrecy
with knowledge of the results limited to Wiegand, his deputy Major Klaus
Schilling, and the medical team. Now it became necessary to inform his boss,
General Kratsch, and also provide Stasi Chief Mielke with an interim report.
Mielke approved the collaboration with the special criminology department of
Chief Directorate IX, which was responsible for internal investigations and
liaison with prosecutors and the courts. Wiegand briefed Major General Pycka,
an experienced criminologist, with whom he had worked previously on other
criminal cases. “But he didn’t display much interest and made a few remarks
which showed that he was not taking the matter seriously,” Next he sought the
help of Colonel Armin Waals, chief of the investigations directorate’s
Department I which passed final judgement on all espionage cases prior to
turning them over to prosecutors. “He was an old pro. through his hands had
passed all spy cases that had ever been uncovered in the DDR. I needed him
because, after all, the crime had been passed off as a joint MfS/KGB action. He
promised to help but nothing happened,” At this point, Wiegand officially
opened the investigation into the Ivankovic affair and assigned it the codename
“Alligator.”
Exasperated by the inaction of the other Stasi departments, Wiegand formed
a small “Alligator” task force staffed by his own officers. Since the Saxonian
city of Leipzig had been the center of the crime, Wiegand also summoned Lt.
Colonel Guenther Reum, deputy chief of the local counterespionage department,
to Berlin. Reum didn’t believe the Ivankovic story either. But he agreed to work
with Wiegand because he had known him for many years and respected him as a
solid professional. Returning to Leipzig, Reum reported to his district chief, Lt.
General Guenther Humitsch, and requested additional manpower. Humitsch
refused, saying his officers were too valuable to be wasted on a wild goose
chase.
With Reum getting organized in Leipzig, Wiegand requested access to the
computer of Department 12 which only Mielke could authorize. Next to ZAIG,
the central analysis and information group with access to the Moscow KGB
computer, Department 12 was the most highly restricted section of the Stasi. “I
was actually a little surprised when Mielke allowed me to dig there,” Wiegand
said. The digging paid off. Virgens and Masannek were listed as “registered by
order of the chief of Department 12.” It was the terminology used for the top
agents employed by the KGB group stationed in East Germany, a practice which
had developed over years to protect those agents from arrest by the Stasi.
Next, Major Schilling took Ivankovic to Leipzig in an attempt to jog his
memory and locate the apartment were he had been held. On the last day of his
imprisonment in Leipzig he was allowed to go to the toilet where he had looked
out of the window. He had noticed a small park and a large chestnut tree next to
which was parked a dark red Moskovich sedan. Schilling was joined by
Lt.Colonel Reum and together they drove Ivankovic through the outskirts of the
city for two days. Then Ivankovic excitedly pointed to an apartment building.
“That’s were they held me.” It stood opposite the park and the tree he had
described earlier. A dark red Moskovich sedan was parked next to the tree.
The apartment was rented to Dana Grimmling, a teacher who neighbors said
was spending a vacation in Sochi on the Black Sea.
Schilling reported his findings to Wiegand who drove to Leipzig with a
forensic unit of the Stasi’s Special Commission for Criminalis-tics to make a
surreptitious search of the apartment for evidence. Forensic scientists established
beyond any doubt that this was the place where Ivankovic had been held and
tortured. Bloodstains found on bed sheets and on piece of rope matched the
Yugoslav’s blood type. A bullet hole was found above the iron bedstead on
which Ivankovic had been tortured, attesting to the truth of his statement about
the mock execution. Wiegand was elated. “The forensic experts were the best we
had in the DDR and they found everything I needed, even the fingerprints of
Ivankovic and the perpetrators.”
All foreigners visiting the DDR, including West Germans, were under almost
constant surveillance by the Stasi. Even when they stayed in private homes there
presence had to be registered in a “Hausbuch,” a ledger kept by a trusted tenant.
The ledger was inspected daily by a representative of the Peoples Police. It was
easy, therefore, for Stasi officers to discover that in addition to being acquainted
with Dana Grimmling, Virgens had a lover. Her name was Kerstin Albrecht and
she was a teacher. Ivankovic was shown photographs of Miss Albrecht and Dana
Grimmling. He did not know Grimmling, but said that Miss Albrecht posed as
Virgens’ secretary at a negotiating session in Vienna. A file check revealed she
had never been issued an East German passport and there was no record of her
ever having been authorized to visit a noncommunist country. Wiegand was now
convinced that the KGB was directly involved in the case. He knew that the
Ministry for State Security had been supplying the KGB with genuine blank
DDR passports, official seals and exit permits.
Meanwhile, investigators had confirmed that money had been transferred
from the Viennese Bank to Handelsbank in East Berlin on the date provided by
Ivankovic. Furthermore, bank officials revealed that Horst Virgins had
established an account at the Handelsbank a few days before the kidnapping and
that he had been the recipient of the blackmail money. Additional incriminating
facts began to pile up. A car rented by Virgens was discovered and found to have
been the vehicle in which Ivankovic had been driven to the Leipzig airport.
According to Ivankovic, Virgens never appeared after their “negotiation” just
before the kidnapping. Yet, Wiegand was sure he had been the man directing the
operation, especially since the car was rented by him. The colonel figured that
Virgens probably was on the other end of the line when the telephone calls were
made to the Leipzig apartment. As an experienced espionage agent, Virgens
would have know that all telephone calls from hotels were being monitored.
Thus, he may have used a public telephone somewhere along the Autobahn
between East Berlin and Leipzig. All telephone calls made from public facilities
as well as from service stations along the major highways through East Germany
were also recorded by the Stasi. Within a few hours the surveillance station in
Potsdam had located the tapes of three calls placed at a service station near
Berlin by a West German to a number in Leipzig. That number belonged to Miss
Grimmling. The tapes were damning. Virgens had, indeed, managed the events.
He was the mastermind. Wiegand heard him say, “Beat him to a pulp and when
that doesn’t work do the execution like we discussed.”
At this juncture, Wiegand was summoned to report to State Security Minister
Mielke. “I am going to have Colonel Malkov report to you for a meeting,”
Mielke told the colonel. “Tell him everything you have uncovered and let’s see
what he says. In the meantime, the investigation is to be handled in such a way
that no one else finds out about the KGB connection,” The Stasi chief
emphasized that Ivankovic was not to be told either. Lastly, Mielke ordered
Wiegand to provide him with an interim report by 8 o’clock every morning.
Colonel Alexander A. Malkov, from 1970 to 1978 the KGB station chief at
the Soviet Embassy in Bonn and then assigned to the foreign intelligence Second
Directorate at Karlshorst, listened attentively as Wiegand detailed the case. The
Soviet colonel said he would take the information to his superiors.
Karlshorst KGB headquarters was silent. Wiegand prodded Malkov at a
second meeting but got nowhere. Wiegand complained directly to Major General
Gennadi F. Titov, chief of the KGB in Germany.18 “Titov told me to piss off. It
was typical Titov,” But Wiegand pressed on. “Finally, probably out of fear that
the crime and the KGB connection would become public, they were ready to tell
the truth about their connection with Virgens and Masannek.” The two men had
attended the Leipzig Industrial Fair in the spring of 1985, where they visited the
Soviet pavilion and volunteered their services to ever-present KGB
representatives. For a short time they collaborated with officials of the Soviet
Industrial Representation, unaware that they were dealing with the KGB. Then
the two West Germans were provided “legends,” cover stories, and taken over as
regular agents by Department IV, responsible for scientific and technical
espionage. Demanding increasingly higher pay, Virgens and Masannek provided
a wealth of information and technical goods embargoed by NATO nations for
sale to Communists countries. They also spied against military targets.
Masannek copied all documents to which he, in his position as a well-placed
engineer at Mannesmann, had access. Later, the pair began introducing scientists
and secretaries to KGB case officers. Now it was clear to Wiegand why the
Soviets had been so determined to stonewall and protect their agents. Virgens
and Masannek obviously were first class assets. But the East German colonel
knew only part of the Virgens/Masannek saga, the part that Titov, the KGB chief
in East Germany, wanted him to know.
As Wiegand was wrestling with the problem of how to turn over the
kidnappers to judicial authorities without revealing the KGB connection as Stasi
Chief Mielke had ordered, he received volatile information through a back
channel. For several years, Wiegand had worked closely with Colonel Anatoli
Mananikov, who was assigned as a KGB liaison officer to the Stasi’s
counterespionage directorate. “Mananikov was the type of the ‘honest’ Russian
who began his career in 1946. As a young officer he participated in the ruthless
extermination of the resistance in the Baltic states. In many talks with him I
realized that his conscience had begun to bother him—he was suffering because
of his past. His trust in me was boundless, and I, of course, helped him whenever
I could,” Mananikov now volunteered information to help Wiegand put the
Stasi/KGB dilemma in perspective.
Apparently, Virgens and Masannek were not making enough money from
their “genuine” activities. Thus, they began to manufacture false information and
forged documents. In mid–1987, Moscow Central became suspicious. Analysts
were puzzled by the extensive and massive supply of information and
documents. Concurrently, counterespionage specialists questioned the courage
and the agents’ normal lack of fear, the kind of behavior which might indicate
“hostile contact.” The case officer praised the agents highly and reported the
large amounts they were being paid. The reports also described the gifts which
the pair had been offering their case officer. All these circumstances led Moscow
Central to suspect Virgens and Masannek of being double agents, working for a
western service to disseminate false or doctored material.
Moscow told Titov to consider terminating the services of Virgens and
Masannek, but the ambitious General would have none of it. Without significant
successes he knew he would not inherit the top job. Thus, Titov devised a double
track strategy. He discredited the case officer, who was known to the East
German probers only by his cover name “Alexei.” Then he upgraded the status
of the two “ace agents” and presented them to Moscow as indispensable to
foreign intelligence collection. Wiegand’s friend, Colonel Mananikov, confided
that the case officer was charged with suspicion of treason. He was returned to
Moscow under guard. After his first interrogation by a special KGB
investigating panel at the Dzerzhinsky Square headquarters, “Alexei” committed
suicide. “He was my friend,” Mananikov told Wiegand, but he declined to reveal
his true name. “He was a dedicated officer and he shot himself out of shame and
desperation.”
Titov told Moscow that the suicide was evidence that there had been at least
a recruiting attempt by a western intelligence service. Moscow Center agreed
and at the same time ordered that the Virgens/Masannek operation be
discontinued forthwith. But according to the KGB liaison officer, Titov ignored
the directive and secretly planned to continue using Virgens and Masannek as
agents. To cover his back, Titov needed to rid himself of those intimately
acquainted with the case. Charging that they were responsible for the death of
“Alexei,” he relieved Lt. Col. Sergei Maskolniv, chief of Department IV, and all
other officers of that department above the rank of captain and sent them back to
Moscow. At the same time, he cunningly transferred the operation to the
counterintelligence department of the foreign espionage directorate and assigned
Colonel Malkov as the new case supervisor. In turn, Malkov assigned a
lieutenant colonel, known only as “Eugen” as the new case officer and the direct
contact to Virgens and Masannek. It would be Titov’s alibi in case the operation
went sour and Moscow got wind of his disobedience. He could always say that
he assigned Malkov in order to follow up on the suspicion that “Alexei” had
been approached by the “enemy.” On the other hand, if Virgens and Masannek
continued to deliver, the general was in a position to show off his successes as
the master spy handler. No wonder that Titov’s colleagues had years earlier
nicknamed him “The Crocodile.”19 Wiegand described him as “the most
unscrupulous Russian” he had ever met. Karl Grossmann, former colonel and
deputy head of counterintelligence in the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate,
characterized Titov simply as a “Schwein,” a pig.20
Wiegand now was sure that Malkov, the very KGB officer to whom Stasi
Chief Mielke had complained, and the new case officer “Eugen” were somehow
involved in the crime. In his next report to Mielke, Wiegand said he did not think
that the crime had not been full-blown KGB operation but that the two officers
had at least known something of Virgins’ plans. Faced with the evidence, Mielke
agreed that Wiegand confront Malkov again.
Meeting in a luxuriously appointed visitors room at Stasi headquarters,
Wiegand told the Soviet colonel all that he knew about the crime. “I must admit
that I felt good when I saw Malkov squirm as I revealed all the KGB internal dirt
that I had heard from my friend Mananikov.” Playing from the strength of
Mielke’s support, Wiegand demanded that the KGB summon the four men to a
“treff” in East Berlin. “We want Virgins to be questioned by you and we want a
recording of that meeting, Wiegand told the Soviet colonel.
Within a few days Virgins, accompanied by Koenigsmark, alias Schneider
the bogus Stasi officer, and Masannek arrived in East Berlin. Fuchs, who had
played the KGB role, did not make it. While awaiting the arrival of the
kidnapers/extortionists, Wiegand had spent his time well. He had his Stasi
technicians break into the KGB office at the Soviet Industrial Representative to
install their own bugs. The “treff” took place as the Soviet colonel said it would.
Wiegand sat in an office above, earphones clamped on, and listened as Malkov,
accompanied by “Eugen,” demanded to know what had happened. There was no
question that the KGB man had known what Virgens had planned. “But I told
you that Ivankovic would make a top source with his connections in the West,”
Wiegand heard. “And I also told Eugen that we may have to use force . . . that
without force it wouldn’t work and he said ‘nu’, (a Russian expression meaning
‘well’) you must do what you think will work,” Neither Malkov nor Eugen
responded. Virgins didn’t mention the money he had extorted from Ivankovic,
which convinced Wiegand that Malkov was not an accomplice per se. “What
shall I do now?” Malkov told him to sit tight at his hotel until he heard from him.
“We will straighten it out, don’t worry,” Before leaving, Virgens handed Malkov
the passport which the KGB had supplied to Miss Albrecht. “She has to go to
London on an import business matter, please give her the exit visa,” Colonel
Wiegand heard it all. To his astonishment, Malkov summoned an assistant who
stamped the passport then and there. Until then, the Stasi had not known that the
covert KGB office in downtown Berlin was equipped to issue phony visas, rather
that a special documentation section at Karlshorst headquarters handled such
matters.
Before General Titov had a chance to contact Mielke, a team of Stasi officers
arrested the trio. Virgens’ lover, Kerstin Albrecht, also was taken into custody
with the KGB issued passport in her possession. Miss Grimmling, the owner of
the torture apartment, was apprehended at Schoenefeld airport when she returned
from her Black Sea vacation. Admonished once more by the State Security
Minister that the KGB involvement must remain secret, Wiegand circumvented
the civil courts. Instead, he turned the case over to the High Military Tribunal
and the military prosecutor. Interrogated by both the Stasi and the prosecutor,
Virgens maintained that he merely wanted to coerce Ivankovic into spying for
the KGB. Koenigsmark, the phony MfS officer, admitted to nothing except that
he “acted on orders of the highest authorities.” Masannek said he was merely
spying for the KGB. He was released and allowed to return to West Germany
where he was eventually tried for espionage and sentenced to four years at hard
labor. Both Miss Albrecht and Dana Grimmling turned states evidence and were
released.
Again, Wiegand tried to contact Titov, who by now had been promoted to the
top KGB post in East Germany. True to form, Titov had sensed, as Wiegand put
it, “das er tief in der Scheisse steckt,” that he was stuck in deep shit, and refused
to see the East German. Instead, he met again with Malkov and another colonel
whom he had never seen and who introduced himself only as “Vassily.” “Now
comrades, I want to know everything about those men you had registered as your
agents and I want to know why.” Malkov was fidgety. “Eh, we must first ask
Comrade Colonel General Titov. You know, in such big things the general
decides everything.” Wiegand lost his patience. He gave a brief summary of
what the Stasi knew. “So, and now I must tell you that we, even I, my dear
friends, suspect that you have something to do with this case and now you must
now disprove it. We have collaborated for a long time, but that you commit
crimes on our territory is, of course, a new twist.” Malkov tried to protest but the
East German colonel cut him off. “I want you to tell General Titov that we have
informed the permanent representative of the BRD (West Germany) that we have
arrested three of their citizens. As you know, we have to do this in accordance
with our agreement with them. I also know that a journalist is already on the trail
of this story and in a few days something is to appear in the press. I can’t believe
that it would enhance the present policy of the Soviet Union when headlines
appear that say ‘KGB kidnaps in the DDR and tortures West European’.” It
pleased Wiegand when he sensed the panic in Malkov and “Vassily” as they
hastily departed. He knew that the Soviets had finally understood the seriousness
with which the Stasi viewed the incident.
Within hours, Malkov called and said he had the files but tried one last time
to stonewall, saying that there was nothing the Stasi could do with them as the
documents were all written in Russian. “Don’t tell me that,” Wiegand replied.
“You know very well that I have an excellent translator. Let’s have them
quickly.” The documents were on his desk by late evening. The translator
worked all night. By morning Wiegand had the full story. Virgens and Masannek
had, indeed, been top agents.
The military judicial authorities ruled that kidnapping, extortion and robbery
of Ivankovic had been a “common crime” to be tried in a civilian court at
Leipzig. Prior to the trial, Virgens and Koenigsmark were threatened with more
severe punishment if they ever told any “outsider” of their KGB connection. The
ban included their court-appointed lawyers.
Simultaneously with the military tribunal’s decision, Stasi Chief Mielke sent
a special courier to Moscow with a copy of the final investigation report to be
hand delivered to KGB Chairman Vladimir A. Kryuchkov. In turn, the KGB
chief notified Foreign Minister Eduard A. Shevardnadze. In less than a week, the
Soviet Ambassador to the DDR, Vyacheslav Ivanovich Kochemasov, sent a note
to Mielke. The Soviet envoy declared that Virgens and Masannek have had
“business contacts” with representatives of the Soviet Foreign Trade Mission in
the DDR. “At no time did they have a connection with the KGB.” General Titov,
too, wrote a letter in which he stated that “the claims by Virgens and Masannek
that they had contacts with the KGB are false,” Both letters were handed to the
military tribunal and prosecutor, who informed the civil court judges but swore
them to secrecy.
Virgens and Koenigsmark were charged with unlawful detention, causing
bodily harm and robbery. They were sentenced to eight and four years in the
penitentiary respectively. A warrant was issued for Fuchs and sent to West
Germany. Just days before German reunification in October, 1990, Virgens was
granted a furlough from prison and failed to return. When he was recaptured he
told police that he felt the sentence given him by an East German court was no
longer valid.
Meanwhile, Norbert Fuchs, The “KGB officer,” had been apprehended in
Southwestern Germany. His trial on charges of kidnapping was held on May 21
and 22, 1992, before the provincial court in Rot-tweil. Virgens and Koenigsmark
were brought from Berlin to testify. The star witnesses, however, were Ivankovic
and the former MfS colonel Wiegand. The court commented favorably on the
Stasi’s investigation and its “meticulous development of the chain of evidence in
accordance with the rule of law.”
Both Virgens and Koenigsmark told the court that they had told their KGB
case officer “Eugen” of their intention to recruit Ivankovic by force, but that they
had not revealed the ransom scheme.
Virgens attempted to play down his role as the mastermind of the crime, but
Koenigsmark and Fuchs testified that Virgens had threatened them with the KGB
when they tried to quit on the third day of the kidnapping because Ivankovic was
not cooperating. “Virgens also gave me and Fuchs only part of the money,
25,000 West marks (about $16,600), because he said the KGB had confiscated
the rest,” Koenigsmark claimed. Wiegand learned something new. Virgens had
taken away their passports so that they could not quit before Ivankovic was sent
to Budapest.
Taking note of his full confession that Virgens had assigned him the role of
the KGB officer, the court sentenced Fuchs to only three years imprisonment.
Earlier, a court in eastern Germany, had ordered Virgens to make restitution,
but Ivankovic was able to recover only about half of the money that was extorted
from him.
General Titov was recalled to Moscow in 1989 to take over the KGB’s Main
Directorate II, responsible for counterintelligence. KGB Chief Kryuchkov once
more took his protege under his wing. In August, 1991, Kryuchkov and Titov
were involved in the putsch against President Gorbachev. They were arrested
when the coup failed. Titov was stripped of his rank, kicked out of the KGB, and
released from prison. Along with other conspirators, Kryuchkov was released
after the Russian parliament ordered their pardon.
Occasional irritations and Soviet heavyhandedness notwithstanding, the
KGB/Stasi collaboration had been a successful enterprise for nearly half a
century. In suppressing political opposition and oppressing a restive people, the
secret police alliance provided both the Soviet Union and the East German
Communist party with “Two Shields and Two Swords.”
4
THE SWORD OF REPRESSION
The dignity, liberty, and rights of the human being are protected
by the criminal laws of the socialist state. The socialist society is
guided by the respect for human dignity, even vis-à-vis the
violator of the law, that is the steadfast mandate for the activity of
the state and of justice.
-Constitution of the DDR, Article 4
STASI MINISTER ERICH MIELKE once said at a memorial rally for victims of
fascism, “The DDR is a state that guarantees its citizens freedom, democracy,
and basic human rights,” Had he been honest, he would have added that these
noble ideals were valid only so long as citizens did not question or oppose the
will of the party. However, hundreds of thousands of citizens did test the state’s
guarantees, and they paid dearly for it—many with their lives.
The cell had no window, and the only incoming air flowed through a small
ventilation duct.
For weeks the Stasi tried to break Erdmann by depriving him of sleep. Then
there were seven weeks when he was not questioned at all and his only human
contact was the warder who silently slipped food into the cell. Erdmann did not
know where he was until months later, when another prisoner was put in his cell
and told him he was in what prisoners called the Hundekeller, the “dogs’ cellar”
of the Stasi’s district headquarters in Berlin. “At first I refused to sign any
statements, and they repeatedly kicked me in the kidney, even threatened to put
my mother in the cell next to mine,” Erdmann continued. “’Well, eventually
you’ll sign anything!’—and I did.”
It was almost a year after his arrest when Erdmann was told that he would be
tried for crimes under Order No. 160 of Soviet Military Administration Directive
No. 38. He didn’t find out until his secret trial on March 1, 1954 that his crime
was engaging in “sabotage and fascist propaganda that endangered the peace,”
His six friends were tried with him. His fellow medical student Horst Strobel had
already been tried earlier and sentenced to six years at hard labor and now was
facing another charge. All six had court-appointed attorneys, but none had much
to say during the three-hour proceeding before a trial judge and two “jurors”—a
female social worker and a stonemason.
Erdmann received eleven years at hard labor and Strobel got another five
years, bringing his sentence to a total of eleven years. The other five defendants
received sentences of between three and a half and nine years each. Erdmann
described the attorneys as useless panderers and the prosecutor as a figurehead.
The Stasi set the terms, and the judge gave them the rubber stamp. After
pronouncing sentence, Chief Judge Gotz Berger launched into such a tirade that
it seemed he must have studied under Chief Judge Roland Freisler of the Nazi
People’s Court.4 Freisler’s rantings, as when he handed down death sentences to
those involved in the 1944 attempt to kill Adolf Hitler, are among the darkest
moments of German judicial history.
Erdmann was separated from his friends after the trial and taken to the
Stasi’s bedbug-infested special treatment plant, Rummelsburg prison in Berlin.
He worried about his fifty-seven-year-old mother, and found out after his release
that she had been kept in the dark about her son’s arrest and trial until November
1954. Her letters to East German President Wilhelm Pieck only evoked replies
denying any knowledge of him.
In September 1954, Erdmann and other political prisoners were loaded
aboard a train nicknamed the “Grotewohl Express,” after Otto Grotewohl, then
the DDR’s prime minister. Like the prison truck, it had tiny cells and stopped at
numerous places to pick up more prisoners during its journey of almost two
days. When they arrived, they realized that they had been sent to the “Yellow
Misery” penitentiary, notorious for its yellow-painted exterior and its dismal
treatment of prisoners inside. The prison is located in Bautzen, a small town
about two hundred miles southeast of Berlin.
After reunification, West German authorities estimated that about 16,000
prisoners had died in Bautzen, especially in the early years, when the Soviets
still had some control.5 “The dead were taken out of their cells and piled on
trucks,” said Erdmann. “Then a warder would stab into the pile with a long pole
that had a steel point, to make sure no living prisoner had been smuggled among
the dead. The bodies were taken to an area on the periphery of Bautzen that was
known popularly as Karnickel Berg [Rabbit Hill], thrown into pits, and covered
with lime. Today the area is a housing project.”
Erdmann spent six years in Bautzen under conditions that equaled those in
the worst of Nazi prisons. After a year in solitary confinement, he was put into a
cell designed for only one person that held three or four. The former medical
student had to empty latrine buckets for his cell block. The wooden buckets
dated back to the era of the kaisers, when the prison was built. The buckets
leaked, and often there was no chlorine to cover the stench. Although it was a
filthy job, Erdmann considered it a godsend: “At least it got me out of that
horrible cell.”
Because he was fluent in English and French, Erdmann was eventually
assigned to what was called the “Construction Bureau,” where he translated
specialized Western magazines—including Aviation Week and other American
aviation publications—for the Ministry of Defense. Erdmann lasted nearly two
years at the prison’s most pleasant job. Then he was denounced by a fellow
prisoner, who had been recruited by the Stasi, for making an anticommunist
remark. After that, Erdmann was put to work in a weaving plant, a move he
described as leaving heaven and descending into hell: “We worked eight hours a
day, seven days a week on ancient looms that seemed to date back to when the
Frenchman Jacquard invented the machine, in the eighteenth century. The daily
fare, standard for all DDR prisons, was meager—for example, twenty-one
ounces of dark bread and an ounce of marmalade and lard.”6 Lunch was two
pints of soup. Potatoes were served only on Sundays. Those who performed
especially heavy work received extra lard and a slice of sausage. Black ersatz
coffee was served twice a day.
Prisoners who worked and whose behavior was certified as good were
allowed to receive food packages from relatives twice a year, on their birthdays
and at Christmas. No package could exceed 6.6 pounds, and the contents were
strictly regulated. Medicine, toilet articles, candy, and tobacco were taboo. In the
eleven years of his imprisonment, Erdmann received four parcels from his
mother. Another sixteen were denied him because of various infractions of the
rules—some real, most imagined. When the packages were handed out, the
nastiness of the Stasi warders came to the fore, as they would maliciously pour
the sugar over the butter or dump the jam over the sausage.
Despite the severe conditions of prison life, Erdmann and his fellow
politicals at least enjoyed a camaraderie based on a common bond: their loathing
of communism. But this dynamic changed as soon as the authorities realized that
they were failing to make the political prisoners more compliant and to reeducate
them as good communists. In 1956, the Stasi, which controlled all prisons,
changed the housing rules: Mimicking common practice in the Soviet gulag, it
began to lock up criminal convicts—murderers, robbers, burglars, sexual
deviates, and petty thieves—together with political prisoners. “This became a
terrible psychological burden,” Erdmann told me. “Until then we were soul
brothers. Now our things were stolen, such as a bit of food we had saved. Soon
we didn’t know who was a political anymore. The criminals had no conscience
and worked as informers for the Stasi, to get better treatment or early discharges.
They told the Stasi things that weren’t even true,” New charges were brought
against Erdmann for breaking prison rules, based on denunciations by criminal
prisoners.
After six years at “Yellow Misery,” Erdmann was moved to Brandenburg
prison, a more modern, maximum security institution. The treatment still was
harsh. For a while he worked in the kitchen peeling potatoes. Then he was
assigned to a factory that produced steel treads for tanks and tractors—a
dangerous place, given the total absence of safety equipment. Many prisoners
working there were killed or badly injured in accidents. “I had a few more years
to serve, and I was not about to lose an arm or a leg, so I refused to work there,”
Erdmann said. His rebellion earned him twenty-one days in solitary
confinement. However, in the end, he had his way: After he was released from
the “hole,” Erdmann was assigned to a tailor shop that produced uniforms for the
People’s Army. There he was reunited with his old friend Horst Strobel, the
medical student who had been tried with him seven years earlier. Strobel was to
be released in summer 1961 and was planning to move to West Berlin. To stay in
touch, the two friends worked out a code: Strobel was to visit Erdmann’s mother
and tell her to copy the letters she received from her son, word for word, and
send the copy to Strobel. She was also to copy the letters she would receive from
Strobel and send the copies on to Erdmann. “We had to do this, because I could
only write to my mother and no one else,” Erdmann told me. “That was how I
found out that he had settled in West Berlin just before the wall was built on
August 13, 1961.”
In April 1964, Erdmann received a letter from his mother. He decoded the
message from Strobel, which said that Erdmann would be smuggled into West
Berlin as soon as possible after his release, which was scheduled for June 1. “I
replied that I was ready to do anything except remain in the DDR. Early in May
I was informed by the prison director that my release had been set for June 26.
Through another letter to my mother, I told Strobel of the release date,” Erdmann
said.
By now Strobel had resumed his medical studies at West Berlin’s Free
University, but his primary extracurricular activity was getting people out of East
Berlin: He had joined one of several dozen groups that were smuggling human
beings to freedom. In the eyes of the communists, the smugglers were arch-
criminals. Strobel sent another message to Erdmann, instructing him to meet a
contact in East Berlin on June 27.
I was astonished that it was a young lady who was also a medical
student in West Berlin. She held a West German passport, and for
that reason she could enter East Berlin. I was told that I would be
taken to West Berlin on August 13. I was to hide in the bushes of
a small park in an area near the wall that was usually fairly quiet.
An American car driven by an army officer would come to the
area and turn around. While turning, the car would back up
against the bushes. The trunk would not be locked but loosely tied
down with string, and I was to rip it open, jump in, and pull it
shut. The Americans were not searched at the Checkpoint Charlie
crossing, and so the officer would drive me to freedom.7
The day of Erdmann’s planned trip to freedom arrived, but his friends in
West Berlin had made a serious miscalculation. “When I tried to get to the park,
I saw that all hell had broken loose. August 13 was the third anniversary of the
[building of the] wall. I could hear an angry crowd shouting and chanting on the
Western side. On my side, the place was crawling with border guards and Stasi
officers. I guess they expected trouble. The streets were blocked by armored cars
and water cannons. There was no way I could get even close to the pickup
point,” Erdmann never knew the name of the American officer who was to bring
him to West Berlin, except that it was a woman who held the rank of major; nor
did Strobel. Both thought she might have been a U.S. Army nurse, since
Strobel’s co-conspirators were all medical students, many of whom had
American friends.
Just a few hours after the fiasco, Erdmann was contacted and told he would
be brought out the next day. Two Jordanian students, who were permitted to use
the Checkpoint Charlie crossing reserved for non-Germans, would pick him up
in a car. “By now my nerves were stretched to the limit, and when I saw the car I
nearly gave up,” Erdmann recalled. The rescue vehicle was a tiny, two-seater
French Renault powered by a rear engine. Between the engine and the backrests
of the seats, the rescuers had ingeniously built a compartment of thin steel plates.
Erdmann was jammed into this compartment, which was just over a foot wide,
four feet long, and three feet deep. The journey began.
Knechtel and his friends were right not to trust Jakobs: In August 1963, his
entire platoon and three-quarters of the company—about a hundred men in all—
were arrested by the Stasi on charges of espionage. The SED comrade was not
among them. A month earlier, Knechtel had tossed a bottle over the wall, which
contained a letter to the American Forces Network (AFN) radio station in Berlin,
explaining his plight and requesting a song. The word Schandmauer (Wall of
Shame) also appeared in the letter. AFN was just celebrating an anniversary, and
in a special program dedicated to the occasion, the announcer described
Knechtel’s letter as “congratulations from the other side,” The letter was posted
on the station’s bulletin board, alongside congratulations from President John F.
Kennedy and West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer. A Stasi spy saw it,
and together with the reports of Stasi Spitzel Jakobs, this was “evidence”
sufficient to convict the young border guard of espionage. In total, the men
arrested with him received between twenty-five and thirty years’ imprisonment
at hard labor. Jakobs was promoted to sergeant, received a cash bonus, and was
awarded the post of regimental secretary of the Free German Youth (FDJ), the
Communist Party’s equivalent to the Hitler Youth.
After his release from prison, Knechtel was put under constant Stasi
surveillance. His church attendance was duly noted. Instead of resuming his
profession as a geological engineer, he chose to work as a nurse’s aide in a home
for psychiatric patients. In July 1982, he was arrested again, this time for “illegal
possession” of five valuable antique paintings he had intended to sell. He was
released, but the paintings were confiscated and sold in West Germany to earn
foreign currency for the state.
In May 1988, Knechtel’s son Ralf was arrested by the Stasi. Ralf had been
born in 1966, five years after the Berlin Wall was built. He was baptized at the
age of twelve, and when he turned fourteen, he was the only student in his class
who had refused to submit to Jugendweihe, the atheist ritual that had replaced
confirmation. Ralf was nabbed by police when he threatened at Vopo
headquarters to demonstrate at a monument of Karl Marx unless he received an
exit permit. His sentence was one year at hard labor, but he was ransomed by the
West German government after serving six months.
During the next four years Kneifel worked at odd jobs that provided him and
his family of three the barest subsistence. When Soviet troops invaded
Afghanistan to prop up the embattled communists, Kneifel became enraged.
Every time he bicycled past a Soviet monument featuring a tank, to him a
symbol of bloody communist aggression, Kneifel inwardly cringed. One day, his
growing sense of outrage got the better of him. Kneifel approached two like-
minded friends, one of whom was a sergeant and tank commander in the
People’s Army, for help in planning a meaningful act of protest. “We thought
long and hard over what we could do before we decided we would make the
biggest impact by blowing up the monument tank. We agreed to make sure that
innocent people would not be hurt, or not to do it at all. We are not
murderers.”12
Soviet tank memorial damaged by Josef KneifeVs homemade bomb. Courtesy
MfS Archive.
Having determined the right explosive composition, they poured the material
into a hundred-pound steel hydrogen tank. Kneifel fashioned an electric
detonator and a crude timing device. When the day came to set off the bomb,
Kneifel prevailed on his friends to stay at home because “they were younger
than me and had small children.”
On the evening of March 9, 1980, the third Sunday of Lent, Kneifel loaded
the bomb into his old, rickety gray Trabant car. In his pockets he carried a
revolver and five hand grenades, all homemade: “I was sure I would be caught,
and I was determined not to be taken alive.” he explained. Kneifel parked his car
on a side street about a hundred yards from the memorial. Although it was dark
and sleeting, he could clearly see the monument on its massive red granite
pedestal, awash in the glare of floodlights from the People’s Police barracks,
which stood directly opposite. The surrounding area looked deserted. Kneifel,
wet and exhausted from lugging the bomb, climbed the pedestal and shoved his
load as far as he could beneath the tank. He set the timer for ten minutes, jumped
off, and walked to his car. A moment after he was inside and had slammed the
door, there was a deafening boom accompanied by a tremendous flash. The
explosion was immense. A chunk of the tank’s steel tread was catapulted against
the high wall surrounding the police barracks. As the police stormed out of the
building, Kneifel made his escape.
The regime imposed a blackout on reportage of the event, but news of the
bombing spread throughout East Germany by word of mouth. Horst Knechtel,
the border guard turned anticommunist activist, remembered the incident well:
“While special Stasi units and all the Vo-pos were looking for the perpetrator, the
people were gleefully rubbing their hands.”13
For a while Kneifel escaped detection. Eventually, however, he made a
grievous mistake, confiding in his pastor and other church friends. Kneifel later
came to believe that there was an informer in the group or that the pastor’s
apartment was bugged. On August 18, five months after the blast, Kneifel was
arrested as he entered the plant where he had a temporary job. Three Stasi men
who had concealed themselves behind a pile of rocks rushed at him with pistols
drawn. At about the same time, another Stasi squad arrested his wife, Irmgard. A
few days later they grabbed the couple’s eighteen-year-old son Friedeman
(which translates roughly into “Man of Peace”). Kneifel’s two accomplices also
landed in prison.
The secret trial of Kneifel began March 9, 1981, at the heavily guarded
courthouse in Karl-Marx-Stadt. Of course, the prosecutors, judge, and jurors
were all members of the Communist Party. “I was determined to boycott the
farcical proceedings,” Kneifel later told me. “When the judge began to read the
sentence, beginning with the phrase ‘in the name of the people,’ I shouted:
‘Enough of this misuse of the people’s name, you lackeys! I will not accept a
sentence from you.’” Two Stasi men immediately dragged Kneifel from the
courtroom. He did not hear the life sentence pronounced.14
A prison van delivered him to the Brandenburg penitentiary on March 16. He
was shoved into a tiny cubicle in the van, his left hand manacled to steel bars,
and his right, to a steel ring bolted to the floor. He had no choice but to remain in
this contorted position for the entire three-hour ride. He was clad only in a thin
shirt and pants, and it was bitterly cold. Shaking from the cold and from pain, he
screamed, “You dogs, stop torturing a political prisoner!” A fat warder stuck his
rubber truncheon through the bars and smashed it over his head. “My teeth
smashed together, and I spit blood. When they dragged me out of the van, I was
only able to moan.”15
Josef Kneifel, described by West German officials as the most courageous
political prisoner held by the East German communists, shown here prior to his
release from prison in 1987, on the eve of Erich Honeckefs state visit to West
Germany. Courtesy MfS Archive.
At Brandenburg, Kneifel was assigned a tiny cell measuring no more than six
feet square. It was unheated. Later he was locked up with two felons. One had
been a married party official who had seduced a female comrade. She later
began to blackmail him, and he killed her. This murderer, the warders told
Kneifel, was supposed to “modernize” him. In protest against such attempts to
“criminalize” political prisoners, Kneifel began the first of many hunger strikes.
This strike lasted several months. From time to time he was brought to a prison
hospital, where he was force-fed. “Despite the malicious directives of Stasi
Major Arndt, who wanted me to die, a Dr. Hoffmann, a man of unshakable
medical ethics, eventually hauled me out of my hole and saved my life,” Kneifel
told me.
Irmgard Kneifel, meanwhile, had been sentenced to two years at hard labor
for “failing to report a crime” to the Stasi, even though her husband had never
told her of his plans. “When the Stasi questioned me, they kept urging me to
divorce my husband and said I would be immediately released. But I refused”16
Her treatment was nearly as brutal as her husband’s. Kneifel’s son was sentenced
to ten months in the penitentiary but was released after four and a half months
and placed on probation for two years. The People’s Army sergeant was
sentenced to fourteen years, and Kneifel’s other friend received six and a half.
A year passed before Kneifel was told about his family’s plight. Six months
after her release, Irmgard Kneifel was allowed to visit her husband at the prison
hospital for one hour. They were forbidden to embrace or hold hands. She was
not allowed to talk about her time in prison, so Kneifel did not know how
terribly she had been treated. “But I could tell by looking at her. She was forty
years old and looked like fifty.”
In 1984, the Stasi decided that the obstreperous Kneifel should be moved to a
more austere punitive environment. Bautzen I, the “Yellow Misery,” was just the
place for him. There the Stasi had established a special isolation ward dubbed
the gesonderte Kommando. For the next year Kneifel vegetated in a dark, dank,
one-man cell.
Kneifel refused to be identified with common criminals, and throughout his
imprisonment, he used to shout, “Kneifel, political prisoner of the communists,
reporting!” It earned him so many brutal beatings that he lost count. The
beatings were almost invariably administered by privileged felons. One of the
worst of these torturers was a former Communist Party member and People’s
Police officer named Thierfeld. A giant of a man, he was serving a second term
for abusing children. His first conviction had been on charges of sexually
assaulting his daughter. His specialty in prison was twisting arms out of their
sockets. But there was also a warder, Master Sergeant Wolfgang Schmidt, who
liked to handle matters himself. In the dead of winter he enjoyed pouring buckets
of cold water over Kneifel.
From time to time Kneifel would be moved to a larger cell containing three
or four other prisoners, all convicted felons, including murderers. Because of his
stubborn resistance to “reeducation,” it never lasted long. A year of close arrest
followed each such episode. All the while, he thought up new ways to mock the
regime and prison officials. Using the jagged end of a broken plastic spoon, he
cut veins in his legs and collected the blood in a plastic cup. Before it could
coagulate, he painted caricatures on the whitewashed cell wall, ridiculing Stasi
warders and communism. Another time, he used his blood to daub the label
“Political Prisoner” on the yellow stripes of his prison trousers. At this point,
Kneifel’s health rapidly declined. His feet had swollen to mere lumps.
In August 1985, Kneifel was moved to a prison hospital near Leipzig. In an
adjacent room was patient Johannes Zuber, a twenty-two-year-old student from
Erlangen, West Germany who was serving time for “banditry,” having helped
East Germans escape to the West. The prisoners never saw each other. There
were moments, however, when guards were distracted and the two could
exchange a few fleeting whispers through their adjacent windows, which were
barred but could be opened. When Zuber revealed that he would be released and
returned to West Germany, Kneifel hurriedly prepared a Kassiber, a secret
message. It got through, and within days KneifePs message was published in a
small West German newspaper aptly titled Dei Patriot. The headline over
KneifePs incredible story of Stasi torture and courageous resistance was “A Call
for Help from the Other Side.” At the same time, the young student informed the
West German government and Lutheran church officials of KneifePs dire
situation.
The “call for help” had little immediate effect. As time passed, Kneifel began
to change his style of reporting when warders entered his cell, often saying,
“Cell occupied by two felons and a political prisoner of the Honecker gang.” By
1987, KneifePs head was covered with scars left by beatings. Some of the
wounds had been sutured; others had healed without medical attention: “There
were times when I was left with untreated sores and cuts,” Kneifel recalled. “I
licked them or poured my own urine over them to ward off infection. Once when
I was brought to the dispensary with another head wound, I complained to the
doctor, who said only, ‘You shouldn’t bump your head so much.”
But there was another doctor whom Kneifel considered an angel of mercy:
“This was Dr. S. C. Rogge. Though a lieutenant colonel, he was a humanitarian
of the first order who saved many lives, including my own. Not all the East
German officials were scoundrels. We prisoners were very much afraid that the
Stasi would catch up with him some day.” Years later Kneifel would discover
that the Stasi did, indeed, get wise to the humanitarian traits of Dr. Rogge.
However, a lack of concrete evidence saved him from imprisonment.
One of the Stasi-led warders’ favorite torture instruments was a special
handcuff called die Acht, or the Figure Eight—so named because of its
configuration. Lacking the swivels that connect normal handcuffs, it was rigid to
prevent any movement of the hands. On January 2, 1987, a special order arrived
at Bautzen from General Wilfred Lustik, the man in charge of all prisons in East
Germany, whose office was in Berlin. Incensed by the reports of KneifePs
resistance that landed on his desk nearly every day, he had ordered “special
treatment for the recalcitrant prisoner.”17 Kneifel was thrown onto a bare metal
cot in an isolation cell, clad only in a thin shirt and trousers. There was no
mattress. In the scuffle with the felons who were assisting the warders, his shirt
had slipped above the waist, and the steel springs cut into his back. His arms
were stretched out, and his hands and feet were cuffed together with an Acht.
There was no heat. He was not released from this position even to urinate into a
bucket, and his trousers quickly became soggy, the urine dripping onto the
concrete floor. “After a day Captain Braune entered the cell, pinching his nose.
He asked only, ‘Are you finally willing to be reasonable?’ I declined. He
slammed the cell door shut. Two days later, the same dialogue.” General Lustik
also denied Kneifel medical treatment.18 After reunification, Lustik said: “My
prisoners had it good. After all, they didn’t have to do anything for themselves.
Food and lodging were free, and they received 80 marks in pocket money. And
don’t forget, they were criminals. I was only the executive organ.”19
After spending five days on the steel springs, during which he had refused all
food, Kneifel felt near death. Then two mattresses and a wooden stool were
brought into the cell. The shackles were taken off, and he was visited by
Lieutenant Colonel Heinz Gerhard, the chief medical officer at Bautzen I.
Kneifel described what followed: “I looked on as he tore off the rounded tip of a
rubber catheter. He used this sharp end to probe into my nasal passages and
throat. Blood gushed over the apron they had hung over me. During this
procedure, or rather torture, the colonel’s assistant, a young sublieutenant, left
the room in obvious disgust,” After the examination, Kneifel was fed. “When the
first drops of soup reached the stomach, my body slackened and I suddenly
could hardly see anything. The muscle system seemed to have become
paralyzed. The second stomach filling made me feel better,” The mattresses and
the stool were removed when the doctor left. In the evening one mattress was
returned. The next day he was given another bowl of a hot liquid consisting of
eggs, milk, and sugar. As he began to swallow, he felt something solid between
his teeth and bit down on it. “I knew the taste. It was the kind of pharmaceutical
chalk used in binding tablets, and since I was able to move around a little better,
I figured it must have been a muscle relaxant.” After two weeks of this new
regime, Kneifel’s vision improved.
Although he was now feeling better physically, Kneifel’s hatred of Dr.
Gerhard and his “treatment” got the better of him. He used the sharp end of a
bedspring to cut his finger and began a new protest in blood, covering the
whitewashed walls of his tiny cell once more with his defiant scrawl. Kneifel
was taken out of his cell while the walls were scrubbed by other prisoners. For
the next two months he vegetated in a dark chamber, and then pent-up anger
exploded once more. Throughout the month of April he repeatedly drew blood,
which he poured against the lock of his cell door. When a warder opened the
cell, Kneifel sprayed him with blood he had collected in a metal bowl. The
warder called for assistance, then beat him with a baton made of steel springs.
So it went until July 13, 1987, when Kneifel was visited by Johannes
Hempel, the Lutheran bishop of Saxony. “I was astounded when he embraced
me and said, ‘Brother Kneifel, I bring you an offer from the chairman of the
State Council. You are free and are allowed to leave for West Germany with your
wife/” Three days later, Stasi officers drove Kneifel to the city of Eisenach, near
the border. There he was released into the bishop’s custody. His wife was already
there, and they were driven together to West Germany. “When we arrived in
Bavaria, I experienced the last infamy of the Stasi. When I unwrapped my sparse
belongings, I found they had stolen my personal documents—all court papers,
my driver’s license, wristwatch, and the mail from my wife.”
The reason for Erich Honecker’s “act of mercy” became clear less than two
months later when he made his state visit to West Germany. He had wanted to
appear humane and generous. As part of the deal for his freedom, Kneifel was
not allowed to reveal his experiences to the news media. It was a time when
conservatives, social democrats, liberals, and the church—especially the
Lutherans—were hell-bent on “normalizing” relations with a state that everyone
knew was ruled by a criminal clique.
The Social Democratic Party and the Liberal Free Democrats were
particularly anxious to please Honecker and his gang. The leading officials of
both parties tried for several years to have the Central Registration Office of
SED crimes closed and its files destroyed. Only the fierce resistance of the
conservative Christian Democratic Party kept the office intact.
Kneifel and his wife settled in a small town in Bavaria. In fall 1991,
Kneifel’s doctors prescribed a regimen of kidney dialysis. The forty-eight-year-
old man looked sixty-eight. His wife, who was fifty-four, also appeared twenty
years older. Kneifel had entered prison a healthy man, five feet nine inches tall
and weighing nearly 180 pounds. He weighed less than 140 pounds when he was
freed and had not gained much since. His health was ruined, although like most
former political prisoners, his spirits remained intact. He filed charges against
various Bautzen prison officials, some of whom were still at their posts. Only
criminal convicts remained. The torture-happy Dr. Gerhard was still the chief
medical officer. The “Kremlin Bedbug”—First Lieutenant Scherch—and several
other warders also still held the same jobs.20
In spring 1992, Kneifel was invited by the custodians of Stasi files to view
his own dossier—8,000 pages of it—which had been found in Chemnitz. His
faith in humanity was once again severely jolted. In the dossier he discovered the
reports of spies who had informed on him and his wife. To his astonishment,
these included Jürgen Meier, the lawyer in whom his wife had confided. Then he
spotted the names of several pastors and family friends. “I realized then that the
DDR was even a greater cesspool than anyone could have imagined.” Kneifel
commented.
Kneifel and his wife Irmgard enjoyed their life in freedom, often traveling
with their camper through the scenic Black Forest and the Bavarian Alps. But
Kneifel’s tranquillity was to last only five years: Irmgard died in July 1993 of
cancer.
THE RESISTANCE
It was inevitable that the political oppression in East Germany would spawn a
number of anticommunist groups in West Berlin and in the U.S.-occupied zone.
The first was the so-called Ostburo (East Bureau) of the Social Democratic Party
(SPD) of the Western-occupied zones of Germany and West Berlin.
SPD membership in the Soviet zone had soared between December 1945 and
March 1946, from 376,000 to nearly 700,000. East German Communist Party
membership at the same time was about 600,000. Fearing that they would lose
the election scheduled for late fall 1946 in the Soviet zone, Communist Party
leaders had received Stalin’s permission to seek an amalgamation with the Social
Democrats. The SPD agreed to put the question to a membership vote, but the
vote was banned by the Soviet Military Administration (SMA). The Soviets,
aided by the fledgling Stasi, then resorted to mass arrests of SPD members who
opposed the merger. In addition, Soviet officials corrupted some top SPD
officials with expensive gifts and other favors.22 On April 22, 1946, the
leadership of the Soviet zone’s SPD, without the consent of the rank and file,
signed the merger document. The new party, under firm control of the
communists, named itself the Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands (SED).
All of the SPD functionaries who betrayed social democratic ideals by signing
the agreement were awarded high posts.
The SPD East Bureau was established immediately after the forced
amalgamation, initially to provide moral support to Social Democrats who had
been sold out. Later, the bureau engaged in widespread propaganda campaigns.
Working with the East Bureau, or merely espousing SPD ideals, was dangerous.
By 1950, some 400 Social Democrats had lost their lives by execution or by
maltreatment during their imprisonment in the Soviet gulag, or had simply
disappeared. More than 5,000 were imprisoned. Two hundred of these were
sentenced to a total of 10,000 years.23 Until 1950 all sentences were pronounced
by Soviet military tribunals—in every sense of the word, kangaroo courts in
which thousands of “trials” lasted no more than ten minutes. These tribunals also
had mail-order proceedings, meaning that they met in the Soviet Union and sent
the convicts’ sentences by post to wherever they were incarcerated.
As the terror escalated, Berlin humanitarians and anticommunists not directly
affiliated with any political party decided to create a new organization that would
operate less clandestinely—and more aggressively—than the SPD East Bureau.
It would become known as the Kampfgruppe gegen Unmenschlichkeit (KgU),
the Battle Group Against Inhumanity. Its founder was Rainer Hildebrandt. An
examination of Hildebrandt’s background is necessary to grasp the motivation
that led him to become one of the most passionate defenders of human rights in
postwar Germany.
Rainer Hildebrandt was born in 1914. His father was an art historian and an
anti-Nazi who was stripped of his university teaching job in 1937, after his name
appeared on the Nazis’ blacklist due to his publications and his wife’s
“degenerate” paintings. (Mrs. Hildebrandt was an artist and a Jew.) With his
father on the Gestapo’s surveillance list, Rainer and his mother were in grave
danger. Sworn statements sent to the “racial authorities” in Germany by Rainer
and by family friends living abroad persuaded the Nazis to classify Rainer’s
mother as “half Aryan.”
Rainer Hildebrandt wanted to become a physicist and began his studies at
Berlin’s Technical University. In his spare time he read the writings of
philosopher Oswald Spengler, the author of Decline of the West, who viewed the
Nazis’ theory of Aryan blood as reprehensible.24 Spengler’s philosophy, as well
as the writings of the Weimar Republic Foreign Minister Walther Rathenau,
prompted young Hildebrandt to change course and pursue a doctorate in the
social sciences. In 1940 he attended the lectures of Albrecht Haushofer,
professor of geopolitics. Deeply impressed by the professor’s idealism,
Hildebrandt befriended him and was drawn peripherally into a circle of anti-
Hitler patriots. In fall 1940, the professor told him that he believed he was being
watched by the Gestapo and asked him to deliver a letter to Johannes Popitz, the
former Prussian minister of finance. Thus young Hildebrandt became part of the
1944 conspiracy to assassinate Hitler, albeit playing a minor, unwitting role.
Rainer Hildebrandt was drafted into the Wehrmacht in 1943 and served as an
interpreter for a year until he was arrested by the Gestapo and imprisoned
without charge. Released in June 1944, he was assigned as a guard to an
internment camp that primarily held Polish prisoners of war. He was questioned
again after the attempt on Hitler’s life. His friend and mentor Haushofer was
executed in April 1945. Former Minister Popitz, to whom Hildebrandt had
delivered that letter in 1940, was hanged from a meat hook at Berlin’s Plotzensee
prison in October 1944. When it became clear that the war was drawing to a
close, Hildebrandt, fearing a massacre by SS troops, supplied a group of Polish
officers with a pistol.
After the war, Hildebrandt returned to Berlin to write a number of treatises
on the anti-Nazi resistance and a book chronicling Haushofer’s life. Even as he
was engaged in combating fascism, Hildebrandt sensed that a new and equally
dangerous dictatorship was tightening its grip on the East German population. In
June 1948, when the Soviets started their Berlin blockade to drive out the Allies,
the Cold War was on, and Hildebrandt shifted gears. Coining the slogan “silence
is suicide,” he began to exhort citizens to speak out against communist violations
of human rights. He organized rallies of West Berliners and invited prisoners
who had been released in summer 1948 to appear there as guest speakers. When
he was not holding public rallies, Hildebrandt and a small group of Berlin
university students questioned returning prisoners about the conditions in camps
and penitentiaries. The names of those still in communist custody and the
circumstances of their arrest were registered. Hildebrandt’s organizational and
oratorical talents began to bring results. He soon convinced U.S. occupation
authorities to broadcast a statement over the American-controlled German-
language radio station RIAS-Berlin—the most popular station in the Soviet
zone, initially because of its jazz programming. Hildebrandt’s first message was:
“Fellow Germans in the Soviet zone! We want to help you. From now on, we
will broadcast every week the truth about the conditions under communist
dictatorship. We urge you to join us in shedding light on Soviet slavery. Silence
is suicide,” The effect was immediate. Thousands of anguished letters poured
into the RIAS studios. The management had to add staff to cope with the flood.
Hildebrandt’s campaign and the initial RIAS broadcasts alarmed Soviet
occupation authorities. A representative of the SMA remonstrated with Brigadier
General Frank L. Howley, the U.S. commander, demanding that he punish the
RIAS announcer. Howley, a crusty old U.S. Army cavalryman, rejected the
Soviet demand. “There was no way I was going to accommodate the sons-of-
bitches,” he commented later. “The bastards had it coming to them.”25
Hildebrandt’s zeal and idealism were infectious. Soon the Student
Association of West Berlin’s Free University, the Christian Democratic Party’s
youth organization, and the Social Democratic Party called a mass meeting.
Hildebrandt responded promptly. Under the new slogan Nichtstun ist Mord
(inaction is murder), the meeting was convened on October 17, 1948, at the
Titania Palast, the city’s largest movie theater, with five hundred seats. There
was standing room only.
The audience listened in embarrassed silence as former inmates of Soviet
concentration camps and a teenager who had fled from forced labor in a uranium
mine related their experiences. They heard that conditions inside the camps,
which once held prisoners of the Nazis, were worse than they had been before
1945. At the Sachsenhausen camp, illnesses including tuberculosis were
reaching epidemic proportions; in addition, between sixty and eighty prisoners
were dying each day of starvation and malnutrition. In 1948 the camp housed
about 6,400 prisoners, about 1,000 of whom were later deported to corrective
labor camps in the Soviet Union.26
Hildebrandt told those assembled that on the basis of the eyewitness
accounts, one could surmise that the entire Eastern zone resembled “a
concentration camp in which only the warders and those who hand out the food
can still live well.” He described Stalinism as the “third and last ultimatum given
the Western world to be unified in all basic matters confronting humanity.”
Hildebrandt announced his intention to create the “Battle Group Against
Inhumanity.” Six months later, the Allied command headquarters—minus the
Soviets, who had walked out a year earlier—approved the KgU as a political
organization.
Heckscher was a cross between a joke and a loose cannon and a monumental
jerk. He was a braggart with a direct line to Washington, a dangerous nut with
clout in some high places, a damned fool who liked to throw his weight around.
Heckscher was really an asshole and an arrogant son-of-a-bitch! When he was
operating in Turkey, Iran, and Iraq, the Kurds he was in contact with gave
Heckscher the nickname “Thousand and One Nights.”38
Peter Sichel, Berlin CIA station chief and Heckscher’s boss, said he could not
fathom how Heckscher, a refugee from the Nazis, could wind up “acting like a
Nazi—he was a nut.”39
West German politicians who were anxious to achieve rapprochement with
the East became increasingly concerned about the operations of the
Kampfgruppe and the resulting drumbeat of propaganda in the Communist Party
newspaper Neues Deutschland. In a newspaper interview, West Berlin Mayor
Willy Brandt, who later became chancellor of West Germany, called the KgU a
Mistverein, a dung heap.40 Minister for All-German Affairs Ernst Lemmer
likened the KgU to a “pigsty.”41 This pressure, including a highly critical study
conducted by the West Berlin Senate, finally led to the KgU’s dissolution on
March 11, 1959. Even feeling the way he did, there was nothing the CIA Berlin
station chief could do to rein in Heckscher’s activities, since the OPC was
independent. Besides, as Bailey pointed out, Heckscher had friends in high
places.
THE STASI’S ESPIONAGE WAR against capitalist enemies abroad was hugely
successful and ended only when the diehard communists realized that their
dream of clinging to power at home had been shattered. On May 31, 1990, Stasi
spies in West Germany sat by their radios, poised to copy the five-digit code
groups that for years had been used to relay instructions from their controllers
behind the Berlin Wall. On that day, however, the familiar, monotonous female
voice said only “Wittenberg” three times. Then there was silence. Wittenberg, the
name of the town where Martin Luther broke with Catholicism and started the
Protestant Reformation, was also the code word ordering the recall of about
three hundred Stasi operatives on special deployment—OIBEs, in Stasi jargon—
who served as espionage case officers in West Germany. The agents scurried
back to East Germany, abandoning their Western collaborators.
Six days earlier, the intelligence division of the People’s Army had told its
spies by radio that the game was over. In contrast to the Stasi announcer, the
army men apparently had to boost their courage with schnapps: Giggling and
slurring their words, they sang a children’s ditty about a duck swimming in a
lake, dunking its little head in the water and lifting its little tail. Staging this
broadcast may have been hilarious to the alcohol-stimulated singers in East
Berlin; not so to the spies who listened.
These two broadcasts ended espionage operations that had functioned
successfully for nearly four decades. The Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA,
the Stasi foreign intelligence service) and the military intelligence service of the
DDR were dead. Eighty percent of all East German espionage operations in West
Germany had been run by the HVA. The military played a smaller but no less
successful role, with 20 percent.1
Within months, some Stasi spy handlers had talked, and dozens of officials—
some highly placed—in all of the government ministries found themselves under
investigation or in prison. In the first three years after October 3, 1990, when
Germany was reunified, hardly a week passed without sensational arrests.
Although dozens of East German spies as well as Soviet and Polish operatives
had been arrested annually over four decades, the infiltration was far worse than
had been suspected. It became clear that the entire government was infested, as
was every political party, West Germany’s industry, banks, the church, and the
news media. The Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND, the Federal Intelligence
Service) and the nation’s counterespionage service Bundesamt für
Verfassungsschutz (BfV, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution) also
had been covertly invaded. The Ministry of Defense’s Counterintelligence
Service, the Militarischer Abschirmdienst (MAD), had as well. One female Stasi
mole in the BND, an East German agent for seventeen years, had been entrusted
with the job of preparing the daily, top secret intelligence summary for
Chancellor Helmut Kohl. The West German security services had failed
miserably.
Joachim Gauck, federal commissioner charged with maintaining and
evaluating the Stasi archive, estimated that at least 20,000 West Germans had
spied for the Stasi.2 He based his estimate on the reconstruction of dossiers that
had been shredded. “This estimate is a conservative one. When the
reconstruction process is completed, we may find that the figure is closer to
30,000.”3 But even if all spies were exposed, none could be prosecuted because
the statute of limitations for espionage is five years.
Nevertheless, a staggering number of espionage cases have been solved.
According to the Federal Prosecutor General, about 6,600 investigations were
conducted between 1990 and 1996.4 Forty percent involved West Germans; 25
percent, East Germans who had spied in the West; and 35 percent, regular Stasi
officers. West German spies for the Stasi came from all walks of life. In addition
to government employees and politicians, they included high-ranking provincial
police officers, journalists, university professors, and employees of defense
plants. Some 4,000 cases that the federal prosecutor considered less serious were
handed over to provincial prosecutors. There are no central statistics to show the
outcome of these cases. Hundreds were dismissed because of the defendants’ old
age or illness. Many others brought mild sentences of probation or fines,
particularly when the accused had been coerced into committing espionage.
About 130 cases were still awaiting adjudication in 1998. Finding those who had
spied for East German military intelligence was made extremely difficult
because the DDR’s last defense minister, Rainer Eppelmann, had ordered several
tons of files burned. Eppelmann, a prominent dissident and Protestant minister,
was appointed by a government that thought it could still salvage the DDR as a
reformed socialist country governed by democratic ideals.
West German Chancellor Willy Brandt (left) and his top aide Gixnter Guillaume,
a longrange Stasi agent who wormed his way into the Social Democratic Party
leader’s confidence. Guillaume spied eighteen years before he was arrested in
1974 and sentenced to thirteen years in prison. He was later exchanged for
Western spies caught by the Stasi. UllsteinlAgentur Simon.
Under Suspicion
Heinrich Schoregge, a senior investigator of the federal counterespionage
agency, sat in his Cologne office in early March 1973, studying the case of a
Frankfurt journalist suspected of working for the East Germans.16 It was the
beginning of the end of the spy careers of Guillaume and his wife. When
Schoregge noticed that the suspected spy had been a friend of Guillaume, he
remembered that the name also had appeared in two other cases. In 1965,
Guillaume was questioned about a woman who worked for the press department
of the Frankfurt SPD and who was arrested for espionage. The other case, in
1972, concerned a labor union official who was arrested as he met his East
German courier. When the man’s apartment was searched, investigators found a
number of notes, one of which bore the name Guillaume. Schoregge, a former
police detective, smelled a rat. His intensive research turned up the report that
the Free Jurists Committee had provided Berlin police seventeen years earlier.
Deciphered spy messages were rechecked, especially those containing
personal greetings.17 Dates were compared with those in the Guillaume dossier
—and the tenacious Schoregge hit pay dirt. Birthday wishes to “Georg” sent on
February 1 corresponded with the date Günter Guillaume was born. Another
congratulatory message was broadcast on his wife’s birthday, October 6, and a
third when his son was born on April 8, 1957. The counterspy’s fifty-four-page
report, listing thirty such suspicious coincidences, was turned over on May 24,
1973 to Günther Nollau, president of the Office for the Protection of the
Constitution. Five days later Nollau informed his immediate superior, Interior
Minister Dietrich Genscher, a liberal party member, who at once relayed the
suspicion to Brandt. The chancellor was told to act as usual toward Guillaume
because the spy catchers wanted to collect solid evidence before making an
arrest. Brandt told only State Secretary Horst Grabert, responsible for
chancellery administration, and his office manager about the suspicion.
In the meantime, counterspies placed the Guillaumes under tight, although
not around-the-clock, surveillance. Despite more than 150 observation
operations stretching over nearly eleven months, watchers were unable to catch
Guillaume red-handed.18 However, they noted that Guillaume periodically
exhibited the behavior of a trained agent. He would enter department stores,
railroad stations, or hotels through one door and slip out through another.
In early April 1973, Guillaume informed Brandt that he would travel by car
to Lyon, France on a brief vacation. Interior Minister Genscher passed this
information on to the counterespionage agency. From past cases the spy catchers
knew that Stasi agents operating in West Germany often met with their case
officers in France. Therefore, they requested surveillance assistance from the
Service de Documentation Extérieure et de Contre-Espionage (SDECE), the
French counterespionage service. German and French agents shadowed
Guillaume during the entire trip without noting anything suspicious.
Toward the end of June, Chancellor Brandt was planning a vacation with his
wife Rut and his youngest son Matthias near scenic Lake Mjosa, at Hamar,
Norway, where they owned a rustic log cabin.19 Brandt’s wife was a Norwegian
whom he had met while in exile in Norway. Since Guillaume had been a
frequent travel companion, Brandt was told to take him along lest he become
suspicious. The fact that the pudgy, mild-mannered spy was not under
surveillance during that time later created an enormous controversy. In any case,
Guillaume and his family left Bonn by car for Norway on July 2, 1973. The
Brandts and the security detail flew to Norway a few days later. Halfway through
the 662-mile journey that took them through Denmark and Sweden, the spies
stopped at the small town of Halmstad, on Sweden’s west coast, and checked
into Hotel Hallandia. Guillaume’s luggage included two identical attache cases.
After deciding that the place would be suitable for a Treff on the way back,
Guillaume wrote a postcard. “Gudrun and Peter await you with ardent
anticipation at Hallandia hotel July 31,” Guillaume wrote. He had picked the
spot knowing that Sweden was a Cold War neutral and was not as security
conscious as states belonging to NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
A Parting Flourish
At the Brandts’ vacation spot in Hamar, seventy-three miles north of Oslo, the
Guillaumes were billeted at a local youth hostel, which also housed the security
staff and served as a command center. As the only personal aide present, the spy
had unlimited access to the chancellor’s mail and teletype messages. Departing
again ahead of the Brandt party, Guillaume handed the chief of the security
detail a locked attache case, saying he did not want to carry classified material in
his car and asking that he lock it in his safe upon returning to the chancellery.
What it actually contained, however, were knickknacks Guillaume had
purchased in souvenir shops. The other case, crammed with highly sensitive
material classified as high as “cosmic,” the highest NATO classification reserved
mostly for wartime nuclear contingency plans, had already been stowed in the
trunk of Guillaume’s car. The correspondence file contained a top secret letter
from President Richard M. Nixon detailing serious differences in Franco-U.S.
relations.
On arrival at the hotel in Halmstad, Guillaume went to the hotel bar, where
he met the East Berlin case officer and slipped him the key to his room. The
officer went to Guillaume’s room, photographed the documents, and within an
hour was on his way home. The next day the Guillaumes continued their return
trip to the West German capital. No one took any notice when Guillaume arrived
at the chancellery with the attache case, since he had carried it often in the past.
He took it to his office and then asked his secretary to bring him the case the
security officer had given her to lock in the safe. After a while he took the
documents to Chancellor Brandt’s office, one floor below his own. The switch
had been the epitome of simplicity. It was the master spy’s grand finale.
Caught!
Surveillance of Guillaume continued whenever he left the chancellery building
throughout 1973, with no concrete results. Although Guillaume’s behavior had
become increasingly suspicious, he was not yet being watched inside the
workplace. One month into the new year, the interior minister summoned
Nollau, the head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, and
demanded a decision on the Guillaume case.20 Nollau, whose agency did not
have arrest powers, submitted on March 1 a final report with facts so tenuous
that Federal Prosecutor General Siegfried Buback declined to seek an arrest
warrant.21 But Buback ordered that the case and all information concerning it be
turned over to the BKA. As the government’s law-enforcement arm, the BKA
was subject to stringent supervision and direction by both the interior minister
and the prosecutor general. The criminal investigators and the counterspies
collaborated in watching Guillaume, particularly when the spy took another brief
vacation in southern France in April. Again, tight observation revealed nothing.
When the Guillaumes returned home, criminal police officials became worried
that the spy might have detected the surveillance and might try to escape to East
Germany. They persuaded Prosecutor General Buback to ask the federal court to
issue arrest warrants for both Gun-ter Guillaume and his wife Christ el.
At 6:32 A.M. on April 24, 1974, four BKA detectives went to the spy’s
apartment. His eighteen-year-old son Pierre answered the knock on the door,
thinking it was the bakery delivering fresh breakfast rolls. Instead he faced four
criminal police officials with the arrest warrants. His father had just finished
shaving and was still in the bathroom. When Guillaume was told he was under
arrest on espionage charges, he blurted out: “I am an officer of the National
People’s Army of the DDR and a member of the Ministry for State Security. I
beseech you to respect my honor as an officer.”22 The arresting officers were
relieved by the contemporaneous confession, for until then, they had been acting
on circumstantial evidence. A search of the apartment turned up the microdot
camera and a camera disguised as a wristwatch. Guillaume and his wife were led
away in handcuffs, leaving behind a son who had known nothing about his
parents’ espionage activities nor that his father held the rank of a Stasi captain.
Falling Stars
Later that morning Chancellor Brandt returned to Bonn from a meeting in Cairo
with Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat. Waiting at the airport was Interior Minister
Genscher with news of the arrest, which was already sweeping the capital like a
firestorm. Chancellery officials attempted to downplay Guillaume’s importance
until journalists confronted them with a directory showing that Guillaume was
one of the sixty-one most important aides out of a staff of 279. Former
Chancellery Minister Ehmke, who had bungled the questioning of Guillaume
four years earlier and was now postal and telecommunications minister, refused
to meet with reporters. The Guillaume spy case was the most damaging political
scandal in West Germany’s postwar history.
The scandal occupied the front pages of newspapers for weeks. Each day
produced headlines with new revelations, including lurid stories about
Guillaume acting as a pimp for the chancellor. It had been rumored for years that
Brandt frequently stepped out on his wife. He was also said to have been more
than a social drinker, which earned him the nickname “Weinbrand Willy”
(Brandy Willy) during his tenure as mayor of West Berlin. The scandal could not
have come at a worse time for Brandt. The winner of the Nobel Peace Prize had
been under fire for some time for leadership failures in domestic affairs. In
March, his party was soundly defeated in local elections in Hamburg,
traditionally a socialist stronghold. Coincidentally, another Western government
leader was under siege as well. Across the Atlantic, Richard M. Nixon was
battling to hang onto the U.S. presidency as the Watergate affair assumed ever
greater dimensions.
On May 6, 1974, Willy Brandt resigned as chancellor of West Germany. In a
statement that was televised nationwide, he said he was resigning “out of respect
for the unwritten rules of democracy and also to prevent my political and
personal integrity from being destroyed.” This was clearly a reference to the
rumors that Guillaume had threatened to reveal spicy details of Brandt’s private
life if he were not released and allowed to return to East Germany. Referring to
reports alleging that he was being blackmailed all along by his former aide, the
chancellor said: “Whatever may yet be written about it, it is and remains
grotesque to think a German federal chancellor would be subject to blackmail. In
any event, I am not.” Brandt was replaced on May 16 by Helmut Schmidt, also a
member of the Social Democratic Party.
Nineteen months after Brandt’s resignation, on December 15, 1975, Günter
Guillaume was found guilty of high treason and sentenced to thirteen years in
prison. His wife Christel was given an eight-year term for treason and complicity
in espionage. Before pronouncing the sentences, Presiding Judge Hermann Josef
Müller of the provincial high court in Düsseldorf said the mild-mannered
espionage agent had “endangered the entire Western defense alliance.” The
judge confirmed that Guillaume had passed to his East Berlin control top secret
letters to Brandt from President Nixon, one of which described a meeting with
French Foreign Minister Michel Jobert. After the sentencing, government
spokesman Klaus Boiling said the Guillaumes would not be exchanged for
Western spies held in East German prisons. However, in October 1981,
Guillaume was freed in exchange for eight West German spies who had been
sentenced to long prison terms. His wife had been exchanged seven months
earlier for six persons and was reunited with her son and mother, who had
resettled in East Berlin shortly after the trial.
Heroes’ Welcome
Lieutenant General Markus Wolf, head of the Stasi’s foreign espionage
directorate, embraced his returning spy warmly when Guillaume reported to him
at East Berlin’s Stasi headquarters. “Welcome home, Gunter,” Wolf said, smiling
broadly. Stasi chief Mielke presented Christel Guillaume with a bouquet of red
roses. This scene was filmed for posterity, but the public did not see it until the
communist regime collapsed in 1990: The film had been locked away in the
Stasi’s secret archives.
The Guillaumes were accorded the highest honors. Günter was promoted to
Lieutenant Colonel by Stasi Minister Mielke. Erich Honecker, party secretary-
general and head of state, awarded the spy and his wife East Germany’s highest
decoration, the Order of Karl Marx. They were assigned a state-owned villa on a
quarter acre abutting a scenic lake northeast of Berlin. The communist regime
made sure that their show-and-tell “reconnoiterers for peace,” as Markus Wolf
called his spies, were well provided for. Guillaume’s bank account, into which
the Stasi had been paying his captain’s pay of 1,425 East marks plus hardship
bonus of 250 marks every month since June 1956, had burgeoned to well over
500,000 marks, not counting dividends.23 For a man who had never attended
high school, Guillaume had done well.
Christel Guillaume would not enjoy the new riches for long. Shortly after
arriving back in East Berlin, her husband, then fifty-four years old, divorced her
and married a nurse twenty years his junior. Until his retirement in 1989,
Guillaume lectured three times a week at the Stasi espionage school. His son,
who had spent his developing years in West Germany, never could come to
terms with life under communism. In February 1988, Pierre, then thirty-one and
married with two small boys, officially requested an exit visa.24 His father
called him a traitor, and the Stasi placed him under surveillance as they would
have any other “enemy of the people,” Stasi officers also pressured him to
remain—first with threats and later with promises of material rewards, good
schools for his children, and the possibility of travel abroad. Pierre remained
adamant, and in March the family was allowed to leave for West Germany,
where they live under a new identity.
In 1993 Günter Guillaume was summoned again to the very courtroom
where he had stood trial eighteen years earlier. This time he was called as a
witness in the trial of his old boss, Markus Wolf, who stood accused of treason.
This time Guillaume answered questions about his spy career with relish. He
described in detail the caper with the two attache cases in Norway, about which
he had been silent at his own trial. Two years later, this communist spy who had
brought down a German chancellor died of heart disease and a stroke.
Four months later Frau Garau was released. Her husband was sentenced to
life imprisonment at Bautzen II, the prison dubbed the “Yellow Misery.” “I was
allowed to see my husband every other month,” Gerlinde Garau recalled in a
1992 interview with Quick magazine. “He deteriorated more and more, spoke as
if in a trance, and was hardly able to concentrate. When he shook my hand, he
seemed totally without strength.”
In a letter dated July 6, 1988, Garau had written to his wife: “Don’t be sad,
be confident. Someday we will be together again. I will see it through.”30
Apparently he had been hoping that he would be exchanged for East German
spies jailed in the West. Six days later Gerlinde Garau was summoned to the
military prosecutor, who reported tersely and without emotion that her husband
had committed suicide. The official version was that he had hanged himself with
a blanket on a bedpost in his cell. The absence of a death certificate or medical
examiner’s report made Gerlinde Garau suspicious. She refused to believe the
suicide story, and demanded to see the body, which had been taken to a judicial
medical facility in Dresden. Her husband’s body was covered with a white sheet,
which she pulled aside, despite attempts by a Stasi officer to stop her. “I saw
head wounds and bloody hair, but no signs of strangulation on the neck,” she
told Quick’s reporter.
No Remorse
Georg Mascolo and Georg Bonisch, top reporters for the German news magazine
Dei Spiegel, interviewed Tiedge in Moscow in December 1993. Tiedge said he
was living well as a pensioner and that he worked occasionally as a legal
consultant to Russian firms doing business in Germany. Blaming his treachery
on his superiors for not having rescued him when he was down and out, Tiedge
said defection was the only solution: “I lacked the courage to commit suicide,”
He also blamed security officials for their sloppiness in conducting the
obligatory background checks every five years. He had worked sixteen years
without his security dossier being updated as was required to retain clearance.
Asked by Spiegel’s reporter whether he viewed himself as a traitor, Tiedge
arrogantly replied, “Of course I am a traitor,” The statute of limitations for
treason will run out in 2005, after which Tiedge still hopes to receive his German
government pension of DM800 or 900 a month. He will be disappointed.
Convicted federal officials and those who have evaded prosecution are not
entitled to their civil service pensions. Instead, they are paid just enough from a
welfare insurance fund to eke out a living and not fall through the social safety
net.37
German law specifies that a convict may ask for probation after serving 50
percent of his sentence, including pretrial detention. Kuron applied but was
rejected by the court. However, he was moved to a halfway house. On weekends
he visited his wife. Kuron felt aggrieved that he had to associate with murderers
and robbers. “Real riffraff, the scum of the earth.38 For people like us, there
should be special jails.” He felt absolutely no remorse; but his wife, Agnes,
whom Kuron told early on of his treachery, showed a trace of it. “I did not know
the extent of his activities. I thought, What that man does is right. Today I think,
If only I had offered more resistance.”39
After that first meeting, Kratsch and Krase would meet three or four times a
year at Wirchensee castle, where the Stasi trained Chilean and Palestinian
guerrillas, and in various European cities such as Helsinki, Prague, Vienna, and
Budapest. Besides travel expenses, Krase was paid DM5,000 (about US$2,700)
after each meeting—a paltry sum, compared to what other spies were paid.
Krase also sent encoded messages to East Berlin, directly to General Kratsch,
over a special telephone that Kratsch had secured in a vault. The numbers were
changed frequently. In brief, Krase employed the same technology used by
Kuron and many others.
Kratsch was promoted to lieutenant general and chief of the Second
Directorate in the early 1970s, after which his deputy, Major General Wolfgang
Lohse, became an additional control officer. By then, Krase’s wife had died of
cancer. It is perhaps indicative of Krase’s character that he completely neglected
her grave and remarried almost immediately.
On his promotion to the rank of lieutenant colonel, Krase was named chief of
the MAD office in Hamburg, thus becoming the primary liaison officer to all
West German intelligence substations in that city and to the local CIA
representative. He had easy access to the most sensitive information. He also
was in a position to spy on the General Staff Academy as well as on the Military
University, which were based in Hamburg.
With Krase’s promotion to full colonel and chief of staff of the MAD, Lohse
was assigned as his primary controller. In the meantime, the MAD had become a
hotbed of internecine intrigues and internal scandals. This trend intensified with
the appointment of Brigadier General Paul Albert Scherer, a member of the
Social Democratic Party, as head of the military counterespionage service—a
position to which West German Navy Captain Konrad Koch had aspired. But as
they say in Bonn, Koch owned the wrong party book. He was a conservative
Christian Democrat, and the Socialists were in power. Compared to Koch, an ace
intelligence officer with years of experience, General Scherer was an utter
dilettante. To get rid of his rival, Scherer transferred Koch to Kiel. Scherer’s six-
year tenure was characterized by numerous scandals. He illegally ordered the
surveillance of Luftwaffe pilots. Without a court order, he had a listening device
placed in the bedroom of a secretary to Defense Minister Georg Leber. For the
amusement of colleagues in his Bonn office, Scherer played the taped exchange
of passionate declarations of love between the woman and a married ministerial
director of the Defense Ministry.
Navy Captain Koch found solace by plunging into a torrid affair with his
secretary, described as a “full-blooded, buxom redhead with eyes that seemed to
pierce through a man’s suit and strip him naked.” She accompanied the captain
on weekend trips in his official Mercedes, and he charged their expenses to the
government. When Koch’s Bonn chief found out, he requested an independent
investigation conducted by a defense ministry colonel. Koch vehemently termed
the charges malicious slander and turned incriminating facts into
misunderstandings. No action was taken against the captain. In fact, he was
eventually transferred back to Bonn and became deputy chief of the MAD.
These incidents were fodder for the traitor Krase, whose Stasi employers
were constantly searching for dirt with which to compromise officials and recruit
them as spies. Former West German intelligence officials still cannot fathom
why the defense ministry took no action to clean out the MAD. There were
numerous indications of a possible mole within its ranks as counterintelligence
operations against the East Germans became increasingly ineffective.
In fall 1978, with the Munich Oktoberfest in full swing, the 66th U.S. Army
Military Intelligence Group sponsored a three-day joint conference with the
German military counterespionage service and the Landesamt für
Verfassungsschutz (LfV) of the province of North Rhine–Westphalia. U.S.
intelligence officers revealed their top secret wartime contingency plans in
minute detail. The proceedings were recorded, and a transcript was made
available to all attendees. Because the Americans knew that Krase spoke no
English, the presentation was translated and enhanced by graphics and
photographs projected on a screen.
Count Hardenberg, head of the LfV in Düsseldorf, lectured on his methods
and techniques of counterintelligence operations. The lecture was followed by a
discussion period, during which there was a free exchange of ideas. Every detail
of Count Hardenberg’s operations was examined and tape recorded. A few
months later, three of the count’s agents were arrested in East Berlin and
sentenced to several years in prison. Hardenberg suspected the MAD of sloppy
security work. Since he was unable to produce any proof, the case was filed
away.42 When the agents were bought out of East German prisons in 1984 and
returned to the West, they were intensely interrogated but were unable to provide
clues as to what had led to their arrest.
Krase retired for health reasons in April 1985, but he kept on spying. While
visiting MAD offices around the country, he took advantage of his comrades’
loose tongues as they discussed ongoing operations and sought his advice.
Meetings with his East German handlers continued until 1987, when he met for
the last time with Major General Lohse in Salzburg, Austria. A year later Krase
died of cancer at the age of 60. His burial was attended by high officials of the
intelligence community, including the Bonn station chief of the CIA.
Krase’s son Wolfgang was mystified when in July 1988, two months after the
funeral, he received a package containing DM5,000 (US$2,793) and a cassette
tape. He played the tape and was astonished to hear the voice of his father,
saying that the money, along with an apartment he had bought for Wolfgang in
Tubingen, were his legacy. His father also urged him to work for the East
German secret service. The son had been unaware of his father’s treachery. He
gave the contents of the package to a family friend, Gerhard Boeden, former
deputy chief of the Federal Criminal Police Agency, who had been promoted to
lead the counterespionage office (BfV). Reaction was one of shock and
consternation when the news reached officials at the chancellery, the defense and
interior ministries, and the prosecutor general’s office.43 “It was quickly agreed
to keep the scandal quiet, because luckily, the man had died in time,” an
intelligence official later told me. “From now on officialdom was ruled by the
maxim: ‘Don’t touch anything: danger of explosion!’”44 Although rumors about
a top mole circulated throughout the West German capital, it was not until the
collapse of the East German regime and the discovery of Stasi files that Krase’s
treachery became public. A close examination of the tape eventually showed that
it had been spliced together from other tapes made of Krase’s voice: Krase’s
Stasi handlers were thumbing their noses at the West Germans, deliberately
exposing the treachery in order to create suspicion among the military’s spy
catchers.
In another case of MAD infiltration, Gisela Gieren, at age sixty-eight, was
convicted of treason and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment in March
1995.45 Her younger sister, forty-eight-year-old Dagmar Sdrenka, got off with
four years and six months. Gieren and her husband Günther, who died in 1989,
had been running a spy ring in Hannover for General Kratsch’s domestic
counterespionage directorate since 1964. Using phony CIA credentials produced
by Stasi forgers, and with the persuasion of his wife, Günther Gieren recruited
his sister-in-law Dagmar and told her to apply for a government job. On July 1,
1968, Dagmar began work as an administrative assistant for the Hannover office
of the MAD. Like the MAD’s Colonel Krase, she became a valuable operative
for the communists—thinking all the while, however, that she was serving the
Americans. From the position of typist she gradually advanced to the job of
registrar of all classified material. In the latter post she succeeded in
photographing countless top secret and “cosmic top secret” documents, the latter
dealing with nuclear weapons and planning. She also betrayed the Poseidon
Objekte in North Germany—air force units with nuclear capability, as well as
Lance and Nike missile sites. Dagmar’s sister Gisela delivered the material to
case officer, Lieutenant Colonel Kurt Ulbrich. Because of the importance of the
spy ring, it was closely controlled by General Kratsch and his deputy, General
Lohse. Federal prosecutors termed the betrayal “espionage of the highest
significance.” Also belonging to the Gieren conspiracy was Ute Barth, a twenty-
two-year-old secretary at the counterespionage office for Lower Saxony. She
was put on probation for two years and fined DM30,000 (about US$18,700). At
the age of twenty, while she was working as a typist for a military court, Sabine
Gieren was likewise recruited by her spying mother Gisela. Sabine was given
fifteen months’ probation and was fined DM20,000 (about US$12,500).
The Gieren spy ring was paid DM360,000 altogether (about US$225,000). In
addition, the Stasi put money into an East Berlin bank account as a retirement
nest tgg. There was about DM140,000 in that account when the regime
collapsed. Gieren’s case officer said he took out the money and handed it to a
courier who was to deliver it to Gieren. No trace of the money was ever
found.46
A camera so small that it fits inside a matchbox. Cameras like this one were used
by Stasi espionage agents to photograph documents. Private photo.
In 1970 Gabriele Gast made another trip to Chemnitz, this time to celebrate
her “engagement” to Karliszek. In the meantime she had undergone a crash
course in espionage communications, clandestine photography, and handling
specially prepared pocketbooks and cosmetic items for use in secreting coded
messages. From then on, every Tuesday evening she received Karliszek’s
encoded love notes over shortwave radio. After graduating in 1972, Gast was
hired by the Institute for Security and International Affairs, a think tank financed
by the conservative Christian Socialist Union, the Bavarian wing of the Christian
Democratic Party. A year later she applied for a position with the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, after which she was approached with a job offer from the
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND). She accepted the offer, and using the invisible
ink process she had been taught in Chemnitz, notified her Stasi lover by letter.
Gast started her new job on November 1, 1973. Like all BND employees, she
was issued identification papers and a passport bearing a new name—she was
now Gabriele Leinfelder. Her first assignment was to the BND’s Soviet affairs
department.
Gast moved steadily up the career ladder. Her value to East German
intelligence correspondingly increased to the point where spy chief Markus Wolf
requested in 1975 that she meet him in a small resort town on Yugoslavia’s
Adriatic coast. She felt flattered that the top man wanted to see her. Gast told her
BND colleagues she would be vacationing in Ireland; and in fact, she did fly to
Dublin, where she spent a few days before going on to Rome. There she was met
by Karliszek, and together they drove to Yugoslavia. Wolf was his charming self.
Gast was impressed by his intellect. Wolf soon had her eating out of his hand as
so many had done before. (Others who have had direct dealings with Wolf have
described him variously as possessing the mingled qualities of a snake and a
pious priest; as a Halunke [a scoundrel]; and as a Charakterschwein [a person
with the character of a pig]—the latter being an insult to the pig.) Gast met Wolf
again on two other occasions in East Germany, traveling on her West German
passport to Sweden, then crossing the Baltic by ferry on an East German
diplomatic passport. Wolf always lavishly entertained Gast and her lover, who
had been promoted to the rank of major.
By the mid–1980s Gast had reached the grade of Regierungsdirektorin,
which is roughly equivalent to the military rank of lieutenant colonel—a rank
commanding a monthly salary of DM7,000 (about US$4,300). Using the alias
Leinfelder, she traveled the world on official business. In Langley, Virginia, she
conferred and exchanged information with CIA officials. In London she met
with officers of the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), and in the Middle
and Far East she visited other friendly services. Her experience made her a top
expert of the BND. Finally she was handed an assignment that made her Wolf’s
treasure: Gast was given access to every piece of top secret information the BND
was gathering worldwide. Her new job was preparing the daily intelligence
digest for Chancellor Helmut Kohl. Markus Wolf, Stasi chief Erich Mielke, and
the communist leadership were reading the chancellor’s daily intelligence mail
until the end of the German Democratic Republic.
In December 1991, Gast sat before Presiding Judge Ermin Briessman of the
Bavarian High Court in Munich, answering questions freely though at times with
a faint sob. She testified that she never accepted money, even paid her own
expenses when traveling to meet her handlers. No evidence to the contrary was
presented. This may have been a mitigating factor in sentencing, as Gast served
only six years and nine months in prison.
Many other communist moles, like Gabriele Gast, operated for years inside
the BND without being caught. Another case that subsequently came to light is
that of Alfred Spuhler. Two years after entering the BND’s service in 1968, the
twenty-seven-year-old Spuhler decided that the portrayal of the Eastern bloc as
militarily superior to the West was a myth and that therefore the intense
rearming, especially of West Germany, was endangering peace.50 He therefore
sought contact with the West German Communist Party, whose ideological
espousal of a fair and just socialist society was closer to his personal beliefs.
During a visit to Berlin in 1972 he volunteered to spy for the Stasi in order to
contribute toward establishing a military balance. Then he recruited his brother
Ludwig, a technician at Munich’s Max Planck Institute, Germany’s eminent
research center encompassing all scientific disciplines. Alfred stole the secrets,
including reports from BND agents operating in the East, and brother Ludwig
acted as courier. Ludwig would leave the material in dead drops, secret hiding
places in southern Germany and Austria. Periodically he would meet with case
officer Lieutenant Colonel Günther Bottcher at various sites in Greece,
Yugoslavia, and Austria.
In 1989, the BND was tipped off, and placed the Spuhler brothers under
surveillance. Counterspies observed a secret rendezvous in Greece, which led to
Ludwig’s arrest on circumstantial evidence. The same defector who led to the
downfall of Gabriele Gast furnished the details that made both men confess. In
November 1991, the same judge that sentenced Gast, Ermin Briessman, gave
Alfred Spuhler ten years in prison and brother Ludwig five and a half. During
the trial it was revealed that Alfred had been paid nearly DM280,000 (about
US$175,000), and his brother about DM260,000 (about US$162,500). Alfred
had been assigned the rank of a Stasi major and was awarded the East German
Fatherland Order of Merit in silver and gold. Ludwig was given the same
decoration in silver.
SPYING POLITICIANS
The Stasi was able to place a number of spies in the federal chancellery. Few,
however, were as devastatingly effective as Günter Guillaume. For the most part,
they were secretaries with limited access to the West German leader’s secrets. At
least two were able to flee to East Germany before they could be arrested. There
was also no shortage of diplomats and politicians of all parties who were willing
to betray their country. Most of the latter group, however, belonged to the Social
Democrats—a party that espoused an ideology close to that of the communists.
Federal criminal investigators searched three years to find a spy code-named
Töpfer, whom they suspected was a highly placed official at the chancellery. In
1993, researchers for the federal prosecutor general’s office found a “clear”
name (a real name as opposed to a pseudonym) in Stasi documents that pointed
to material delivered to the Stasi by Töpfer. During an unrelated investigation of
a diplomat, Federal Prosecutor Joachim Lampe, who had tried hundreds of
espionage cases, casually dropped the name “Töpfer.”64 The diplomat was an
espionage suspect because his name had shown up in a computer search for
individuals who had traveled to Vienna when spy chief Markus Wolf also was
known to have been there. After the interrogation session, the diplomat was
asked to come to the Foreign Office. There a former Stasi officer who had been
Töpfer’s case officer (he did not know the spy’s true name) and who was willing
to come clean was asked whether the diplomat was his former charge. He said he
had never met the man. The former Stasi officer then casually asked the
diplomat where he would spend the next few days. He answered, “At my friend
Knut Gröndahl’s house.” Gröndahl had been under suspicion, but detectives had
found no concrete evidence against him. Now he was detained for questioning,
during which the Stasi officer made a positive identification.
Gröndahl’s arrest sent another shock wave through Bonn’s bureaucracy and
the Social Democratic Party. The spy was a close collaborator of SPD Vice
Chairman Wolfgang Thierse. Gröndahl, a socialist ideologue, was recruited by
the Stasi while studying law in the mid–1960s, picked specifically as a
longrange agent to infiltrate the government. He complied, and embarked on a
fast career track, first joining the Ministry for All-German Affairs, which dealt
with the situation in communist East Germany. There he was able to betray
ministry informants who furnished political and economic information as well as
to provide top secret policy documents. For two years, from 1986 to 1988,
Gröndahl served as political adviser in the office of West Germany’s permanent
representative to the DDR in East Berlin, a quasi-diplomatic post. This position
made him privy to all political correspondence with and policies toward East
Germany emanating from Chancellor Helmut Kohl’s office. That was why
counterspies thought the mole had to be located there. Gröndahl’s moral
corruptness and unbelievable hubris is exemplified by the love affair he had with
the wife of a colleague. The colleague found out and told the head of the East
Berlin office, who confronted Gröndahl, telling him he would be returned to
Bonn for fear that he could be blackmailed by East German spy recruiters.
Gröndahl admitted the affair and agreed that he had become a candidate for
blackmail.65
During his trial Gröndahl admitted that he had used the name of his diplomat
friend when he traveled to meet HVA General Wolf. He had other covert
meetings in Copenhagen, Paris, Venice, and Florence. During his last meeting
with Wolf’s successor, General Werner Grossmann, in East Berlin in spring
1990, he was assured that all documents showing his activities had been
destroyed; but Grossmann had not counted on a defector from his ranks.
Gröndahl never was paid for his espionage services except for reimbursement of
travel expenses, and from time to time, expensive gifts. Gröndahl received a
prison sentence of three and a half years, which a higher court reduced to three
years.
Karl Wienand, the former manager of the Social Democratic Party (SPD)
parliamentary faction, was sentenced in June 1996 to two and a half years in
prison and fined DM1 million (about US$750,000). The sixty-nine-year-old
politician and confidant of SPD leaders including Chancellors Willy Brandt and
Helmut Schmidt had spied for the East Germans for thirteen years. Wienand
vehemently denied the charges, but the evidence was overwhelming. Former
Stasi Colonel Alfred Voolkol, confronted with a file found in the Stasi archive,
acknowledged that he was the contact for Wienand, whose code name was Streit.
The indictment said Wienand received DM10,000 per month (about US$5,000)
from the Stasi.
Bodo Thomas, a member of West Berlin’s city parliament and of the mayor’s
cabinet, hanged himself in May 1995, before he could be tried as a spy for the
communists. A social democrat who was fond of elegant suits, fine cigars, and
his collection of tin soldiers, Thomas had been accused of working for the Stasi
for twenty-six years.
William Borm, former liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) parliamentarian
and the party’s chairman emeritus, who died in 1987 at the age of ninety-two,
had spied for the East Germans since at least 1973. Borm had served nine years
in an East German prison on charges of warmongering and spreading hatred
against the regime, a typical charge against dissidents. He had been arrested in
1950 while driving through East Germany and was apparently brainwashed in
prison. Borm was deputy chairman of the FDP at the time. After his
imprisonment, he settled in Bonn, became a member of parliament, and served
on committees for intraGerman and foreign affairs. An outspoken advocate of
reconciliation with the East German communist regime, Borm attracted the
attention of counterespionage authorities as early as 1973, but no evidence that
he was a spy could be found. Stasi files discovered in 1991 proved that he had
delivered the minutes of secret policy discussions to the East and that he was an
agent of influence. Many of his speeches and newspaper articles had been
written for him by Wolf’s disinformation experts.66 Borm was personally
decorated by spy chief Wolf in 1983—which attests to the value of the service he
had performed.
When asked to comment on the report that Borm had been an agent, FDP
Chairman Count Otto von Lambsdorff answered laconically: “The news did not
surprise us. We knew it.”67 One of Borm’s secretaries was Johanna Olbrich,
who was sixty-seven years old when she was sentenced in 1961 to two and a half
years in prison. Formerly a teacher in East Berlin, Olbrich had volunteered for
idealistic reasons to spy for the Stasi in 1966. She was given the identity of
Sonja Lüneburg, a West Berlin hairdresser who had moved to East Germany.
Olbrich was sent to West Germany via France with the assignment to apply for a
job with Borm. Whether he knew that she was also a spy was never established.
In any case, Borm later recommended her for other jobs within the government.
Warned that she was about to be arrested after counterespionage computers
fingered her as a spy, Olbrich escaped to East Germany. She was apprehended
after the DDR faded into oblivion.
Unsuccessful in getting a job with the all-German affairs ministry—his
assignment when he agreed to become a longrange agent for the HVA in 1972—
Rainer Ott recruited his twin brother Reinhard. Reinhard held a doctorate in
economics and was a member of the conservative Christian Democratic Party
(CDU). As an economic adviser to the CDU provincial parliamentary faction of
North Rhine–Westphalia, he was privy to many party secrets. In addition, he
managed to elicit other highly sensitive information from top officials. The Ott
brothers were arrested in 1992 and found guilty of espionage in August 1994.
Rainer the recruiter received a mild sentence of one year’s probation, and
Reinhardt was sentenced to a four-year prison term, a fine of DM250,000 (about
US$156,000), and loss of civil rights for three years.
SPYING DIPLOMATS
The West German diplomatic corps had at least a dozen spies in its midst. Most
had been recruited while they were studying at universities during the turbulent
1960s and early 1970s, when student protests against the Vietnam war were
popular on West German campuses. Many students were sympathetic to the
communists, believing that they were the true guardians of world peace.
While studying law at West Berlin’s Free University in 1959, Klaus von
Raussendorf was drawn into a circle of leftists. He attended ideological
discussions in the communist part of the city and was recruited as a longrange
agent in 1960, when he was twenty-four years old. Everything went as the Stasi
had planned. In 1961 Raussendorf was hired as an attache in the higher
diplomatic service by Bonn’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He served at a number
of embassies, rising steadily until he reached the rank of embassy counselor.
According to testimony at his trial in 1991, Raussendorf met his couriers
clandestinely twice a year between 1963 and 1972, each time turning over two to
five tiny films with images of secret foreign service documents he had
photographed. At those meetings he also made oral reports. In addition the
diplomat used so-called “traveling dead letter drops,” hiding material in a
preselected toilet of an express train destined to travel through East Germany.
The last covert meeting during which he passed documents to the courier took
place in October 1989, a month before the Berlin Wall crumbled.
Raussendorf’s services were terminated at a final meeting with his case
officer in the Ruhr Valley city of Essen on November 22, 1989. He was the
acting ambassador to the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO) in Paris when he was arrested on April 9, 1990, at the
age of fifty-five. Investigators were unable to establish exactly what secrets the
diplomat had betrayed. However, a Stasi defector said analysts judged his
contributions “satisfactory to good,” and in a few instances, “very good.”70 At
his trial in June 1991, the court noted that the value of Raussendorf’s espionage
was “illuminated” by the fact that he was received twice by HVA chief Markus
Wolf and that he had held the rank of a Stasi lieutenant colonel. Raussendorf was
paid at least DM100,000 (about US$62,500) for his treachery. Found guilty on
charges of espionage and venality, he drew a prison term of six years.
Hagen Blau, an embassy counselor convicted of espionage and venality in
November 1990, was also sentenced to a prison term of six years. His
recruitment path and diplomatic career were nearly identical to Raussendorf’s.
Blau, too, joined the diplomatic corps in 1961 and had served at the West
German embassies in Tokyo, Vienna, and London, and lastly, as deputy
ambassador at Colombo, Sri Lanka. Blau was equipped with a miniature camera
built into a cigarette case, produced in East Germany for espionage work. During
his assignment in London, he was in constant consultation with West Germany’s
allies, working out common positions for negotiating multilateral balanced force
reduction (MBFR) with the Soviets. In addition, Blau participated in
negotiations for Great Britain’s entry into the European Economic Community.
Everything to which Blau was privy he reported to Wolf’s spy shop, where it
was analyzed and shared with the KGB, giving Soviet officials a distinct
advantage at the MBFR negotiating table. According to the German federal
prosecutor general, Blau also provided the communists with the position of West
Germany and other western nations toward China. His value as a spy was
spotlighted by a meeting with Wolf. Blau, according to his own testimony, never
wanted money from the Stasi but twice accepted $6,000 at the urging of his case
officer during their secret meetings in Sri Lanka. Blau has been described by
some as a brilliant analyst. In contrast, retired Ambassador Günter Diehl told
me: “I gave him an unsatisfactory appraisal while he worked for me in Tokyo for
a year. He was a rather intelligent man, but his muddle-headed and convoluted
way of thinking produced nothing tangible,” Asked why he thought Blau spied
for the communists, Ambassador Diehl said: “The man had a complex of self-
importance. He was convinced that he was morally right, and things like the
Berlin Wall and the oppression of the East German people didn’t matter to him.”
Ludwig Pauli, a senior counselor in the foreign ministry, had an affair with a
“swallow” and then was blackmailed into becoming a spy. So far as I have been
able to determine, Pauli was the only man who fell into a honey trap and was
later exposed. He paid for his transgression with a conviction for espionage and
venality, for which he went to prison for four years in 1992. Had he reported his
misstep and the Stasi contact to his superiors, he probably would have received
no more than a slap on the wrist or a one-grade demotion.71 Pauli’s downfall
was a German “journalist” whom he met while he was assigned to the West
German embassy in Belgrade. The journalist enticed the diplomat into a sexual
escapade with a Yugoslav beauty. That accomplished, the “journalist” identified
himself as a Stasi officer and threatened that if Pauli refused to spy for the Stasi,
he would expose the affair.
Operating under the code name Adler, Pauli received intensive training in
cryptography, document photography, clandestine radio communications, and
the use of secret dead letter drops.72 In more than two decades of spying, he
copied nearly every document of interest that came across his desk at various
consulates around Europe and at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where he was
assigned when detectives put him in handcuffs. After the fall of the Berlin Wall
and the collapse of the communist government, Pauli had met with his case
officer in East Berlin and agreed to continue spying for the new DDR
government. Pauli had been instructed to watch for certain chalk marks on a
preselected wall in Bonn, a sign that his case officer wanted a meeting. The
chalk marks never appeared, he told the court.
SPYING JOURNALISTS
Dozens of West German journalists were arrested as Stasi spies in the first years
after reunification. Some worked for the country’s major news organizations. A
few went to prison for their treachery; most merely lost their jobs after getting
away with suspended sentences and fines.
Karl-Heinz Maier, one of the most prominent post-World War II newsmen,
died in January 1996. At a memorial service, Berlin Mayor Eberhard Diepgen
called his death a “heavy loss” for Berlin’s journalistic establishment. Someday,
he said, one will recall the time when “Karl-Heinz Maier, with his usual
circumspection and human warmth, coaxed those who governed into revealing
their secrets.”81 A month later Diepgen would find out why Maier did so much
coaxing, when the federal prosecutor general revealed that since 1994,
authorities had been investigating Maier for espionage. The newsman was the
West Berlin correspondent for the large Rhineland daily newspaper
Westphälische Rundschau in the 1950s, and in 1968 switched to the government
radio station Deutsche Welle, serving as its Berlin chief until his retirement. For
many years he served as chairman of the Berliner Presse Konferenz, a
prestigious and influential position to which he was elected by his admiring
peers. He was honored by the West German, British, and Austrian governments
with high decorations. Maier would issue the highly coveted invitations for the
press association’s annual dinner. His guests over the years included the U.S.
Secretaries of State George Shultz and James Baker, French President Francois
Mitterrand, Israeli President Chaim Herzog, and Austrian Chancellor Bruno
Kreisky. His work for the Stasi continued over three decades. According to
documents uncovered after reunification, he did exactly what Mayor Diepgen
said: He wheedled secrets out of officials. How he became a spy and what
rewards he received from the communists is not known. For the East German
espionage service, according to its own files, he was a “interesting partner who
delivered important information,” The tip that Maier had been an agent
reportedly came from the CIA, to whom a former Stasi general had sold
microfilms showing the code and clear names of about 2,000 German spies in
high places.
Consternation and disbelief was the reaction of managers and editors of the
left-leaning weekly news magazine Dei Spiegel on December 11, 1990, when the
federal prosecutor general announced that the magazine’s Berlin bureau chief,
Diethelm Schröder, had been an East German spy for thirty years. Born in 1930
in the East German city of Greifswald, Schröder had been a member of a Hitler
Youth antitank squad during the last days of the war. He was captured by Soviet
troops and interned for three months. It is probable that Schröder expressed his
enthusiasm for communism while in captivity, since other youths were held for
years, even sent to the Siberian gulag. After his release he went back to high
school. Following his graduation, Schröder worked for a newspaper in the Soviet
zone, taking correspondence courses in journalism and Marxism offered by the
University of Leipzig. In 1956 he was recruited as a longrange agent by the HVA
and sent to West Germany as a “refugee.”
Schröder worked for various news organization, including the Associated
Press in its Bonn bureau. Eventually he was hired by Dei Spiegel to cover
military affairs, a job that brought him into contact with the top military echelon
and defense department officials. In 1964, counterespionage officials questioned
him after intercepting Stasi radio messages to an agent code-named Schrammel.
There was no hard evidence for an arrest, but suspicions remained. Subsequently
Schröder became a close friend of Defense Minister Manfred Wörner, with
whom he discussed military affairs. The Defense Minister would like to have
appointed him his press spokesman, but he belonged to the wrong political party,
the Social Democrats.82 Schröder also covered Allied maneuvers, during which
he was briefed by NATO Commander General Alexander Haig and later by
Haig’s successor Bernard Rogers. His case officers were impressed by the
wealth of information he supplied. In mid–1980 Schröder, for reasons known
only to himself, quit spying. Ten years later he was betrayed by his former case
officer. Schröder was sentenced to twenty-one months’ probation in November
1992 and was fired by Dei Spiegel, where he had been earning an annual salary
of DM280,000 (about US$175,000).
HOW WOLF ACHIEVED SOCCESS
These great successes of the East German intelligence apparatus were no
accident, but the predictable results of foresight and longrange planning. Not
content merely to milk contacts that they had established before 1945, Markus
Wolf and his Soviet mentors perceived unprecedented opportunities as well as
challenges in the division of Germany and the evolving Cold War. West
Germany, its eastern borders abutting two communist countries, the DDR and
Czechoslovakia, had become NATO’s first line of defense. Upward of 600,000
U.S., British, French, Canadian, and Belgian troops were stationed in the Federal
Republic of Germany. The country’s economic power was steadily increasing,
and its democratic government was stable and gaining in influence on world
affairs. In contrast, East Germany was languishing in isolation from the West.
Thus, West Germany was a prime target for military, political, and industrial
espionage as well as for attempts at destabilization through disinformation
campaigns and agents of influence from the East. The Soviet intelligence
services and their Polish, Czechoslovakian, and Hungarian allies also were
active in West Germany. But most clandestine activities were left in the hands of
the Stasi: The East Germans enjoyed the distinct advantages of a common
cultural heritage and a shared language with the West Germans, facilitating
infiltration, communication, and control. In addition, hundreds of thousands of
West Germans had relatives in the DDR, making it relatively easy for the Stasi to
coerce many of the former group into becoming agents by threatening the well-
being of their loved ones in the East. Thus, in the late 1950s, the farsighted Wolf
—then a major general and deputy minister of the Stasi—ordered the
recruitment of a wave of new, young cadres, many of whom had just graduated
from high school or university. These young men and women were trained in
espionage techniques and sent to West Germany as perspektiv Agenten,
longrange agents. Some, like the chancellery spy Guillaume, spent years
worming their way into the upper ranks of the government and industry before
being activated.
This period witnessed the coming of age of the Stasi, signaled by the
espionage service’s move into the ministerial compound and by its formal
designation as the Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA). Wolf was allocated ever
increasing amounts of personnel and funding. Within two or three years, the
HVA’s structure consisted of thirteen departments directing espionage or
counterintelligence operations. Administrative, logistical, and analytic/evaluative
services and special scientific units were organized in another fourteen
departments and working groups, including one for forging documents. The
Stasi had become a formidable communist weapon.
6
THE STASI AGAINST THE UNITED
STATES AND NATO
WHITMONDAY IN 1956 FELL on May 20. As had been their tradition for
centuries, Germans celebrated the three-day Pentecost weekend with family
gatherings and outings to enjoy the new foliage and blooming fruit trees. The
more faithful Christians visited their churches to celebrate the descent of the
Holy Spirit upon the Apostles. Horst Hesse, however, had no inclination either to
tour the countryside or to attend church services. He was taking advantage of a
monumental security blunder to do major damage to his employer—the military
intelligence service of the U.S. Army.1
At 12:30 A.M. on May 20, Hesse entered the two-story villa at 4
Eisenmannstrasse, a quiet and affluent neighborhood in Würzburg, in
northwestern Bavaria. The villa housed a detachment of the 522nd Military
Intelligence Battalion of the U.S. Army, which was responsible for conducting
espionage in Eastern Europe. The German had no trouble entering the villa: He
had the keys to the front door, and he had every right to be there. Hesse was a
recruiter and principal agent for U.S. Army intelligence.
Inside the building, Hesse punched the code numbers into the security lock
that opened the steel gate barring unauthorized entry to the second floor. Then he
made his way to the office of Captain James G. Campbell, the station
commander. Behind a desk stood two olive-colored Mosler field safes. Each
weighed 110 pounds and measured 12 3/8 inches in height, 15 7/16 inches in
width, and 17 inches in depth. They were the most secure containers the captain
had for storing highly secret documents. When these safes were first built,
during World War II, military specifications did not require them to be protected
against forced entry but merely against unauthorized or surreptitious entry. The
safes were similar to the padlocked strongboxes carried by stagecoaches in
bygone days. However, instead of a simple lock-and-key mechanism that might
be quickly demolished by a six-shooter, they were secured by dial locks that
opened only to a particular combination of code numbers. Because the safes
could be carted away easily, army regulations had decreed that they be fastened
to the wall by a massive chain. In many army offices they were chained to
radiators. The captain had neglected such security measures.
Hesse knew that a sergeant was always on guard duty on the second floor,
but he was unconcerned. He knew from past experience that the man on duty
that night always sacked out on a field cot. True to form, the sergeant was
sleeping soundly in an adjacent room. Nevertheless, Hesse moved quietly. He
had no difficulty hefting the first safe and lugging it downstairs after stowing it
in a heavy canvas U.S. Army mailbag he had found in the captain’s office. Hesse
was lean and strong, five feet ten inches tall and weighing 170 pounds. He
placed the safe on the rear seat of his bone-white Mercedes Benz 190 SL
convertible and returned to the house to get the second safe. The sergeant was
still asleep.
Within fifteen minutes Hesse was on a country road, driving northeast
toward the autobahn some seventy miles away. The car’s gasoline tank was full,
the weather was good—with only a few, scattered clouds—and the temperature
was mild. Although the road was narrow with tricky curves and on hilly, wooded
terrain, Hesse made good time, slowing only as he drove through a half dozen
sleepy villages. Shortly before 3 A.M. he drove onto the four-lane superhighway,
and fifteen miles farther north he turned onto a secondary road. The border of
the DDR now was only twenty miles ahead. Hesse would reach the communist
part of Germany—and safety—well before daylight, just as he had planned.
Hesse was only a mile or two from the border when suddenly he saw a red light
being waved and his headlights picked up two uniformed figures. He slowed
down and stopped when he realized it was a patrol of the Bundesgrenzschutz, the
West German border police.
When asked for his papers, Hesse nonchalantly produced credentials issued
by the refugee affairs section of the U.S. Army’s European Command
Department for Public Opinion Research. Actually, there was no such unit in the
U.S. Army. This was, in fact, the cover name for the clandestine branch of U.S.
Army military intelligence. If his heartbeat and pulse rate increased, Hesse never
showed it. He was confident that the document would pass any inspection; after
all, it was of genuine U.S. Army issue. He coolly eyed the patrol officer who was
carefully scrutinizing the identification card, which called on “all Allied Forces
to assist the bearer,” It stated further that “all documents and other items carried
by the bearer are the property of the United States Government and cannot be
inspected or confiscated without permission of the issuing authority,”
Recognizing the document as legitimate, the officer knew at once that he was
dealing with a U.S. intelligence agent and immediately relaxed his stance. He
passed the card to his companion, who merely shrugged and grinned. Before he
was waved on, Hesse offered each of the border patrolmen a cigarette, then gave
them a mock salute as he drove off.
Fifteen minutes later Hesse was stopped again, this time by the East German
border police. He had made it, his mission complete at only a few minutes past
five o’clock in the morning—or so he thought. Rather than being welcomed as a
hero returning from enemy territory, Hesse was greeted with skepticism by the
border guards, and not without reason. The only papers he was carrying were a
West German identity card and a U.S. Army pass. The guards refused to notify
Stasi headquarters in Berlin as Hesse demanded. Instead, the officer in charge
placed him under guard and called his own headquarters for instructions.
At dawn Hesse was driven to the border police headquarters at Rudolstadt,
about thirty miles away. More questioning followed, and finally a call was made
to Berlin. Incredibly, no one answered the number Hesse had memorized. Finally
it dawned on him that the comrades, too, were celebrating Pentecost and had
taken the day off. Although it was a Christian holiday, the atheistic communist
regime had never abolished it. Evidently the leadership feared that doing away
with a centuries-old tradition would further aggravate a populace that to a large
extent was already hostile.
Hesse’s carefully constructed plan, the most important element of which was
taking advantage of the quiet holiday weekend, was turning into a nightmare.
Border police officers refused to help him break open the safes despite Hesse’s
pleas that time was of the essence. Not until Tuesday morning when Berlin
resumed normal office hours were orders given to release him. Hesse was
instructed to bring his booty to Berlin, where the safes finally were opened—
more than twenty-four hours after Hesse had hauled them out of the Würzburg
intelligence station.
Troubles Mount
In the meantime, the nine agents who had been extricated from East Germany
spent four months at the Würzburg station awaiting West German government
recognition as refugees. They were fed and provided with pocket money. When
their status was approved, the former agents were paid cash settlements ranging
from DM500 to 1,500 (US$125 to $375), for which they were made to sign
quitclaims. This was shabby compensation at best. After all, while performing a
dangerous service for the United States, they had lost their homes and personal
property and had nearly lost their freedom, thanks to a U.S. Army officer’s
negligence.
The cavalier treatment of the compromised agents backfired in January 1957.
Five former agents filed a claim for additional compensation with the European
Command Headquarters, which bucked the hot potato to Lieutenant Colonel
Crawford, the chief of the 522nd MI Battalion. In a letter classified as secret,
Crawford replied that in view of the original denial that the safe caper had
occurred, the only appropriate answer was a reiteration of the denial: “It is
considered that any admission of the validity of such claims would create a
precedent which could possibly result in hundreds of such claims by dropped
sources of this unit.”11 Undoubtedly, Crawford felt he was acting in the best
interest of the government. These agents were not just “dropped sources”; they
were victims of betrayal. Nevertheless, acting on the colonel’s recommendation,
the Judge Advocate General in Heidelberg, the U.S. Army’s highest legal
authority in Europe, denied the claims.
For almost two years the intelligence brass at European headquarters sat on
their hands, probably hoping the claims would evaporate with the passage of
time. By now, all nine of the compromised agents had filed claims. Then, in
December 1987, Chief Warrant Officer Quinton B. Shafer, an agent control
officer, was forced to reopen the matter. Despite the original rebuff, the former
agents had continued to press their claims and as a result were being watched
constantly by CIC agents. The surveillance established that the “Würzburg Nine”
had hired an American attorney, George C. Dix of New York. “Continuing CIS
[counterintelligence surveillance] indicates Dix is taking an active interest in the
case and that the claimants are passing extensive data to Dix to substantiate the
claims,” the CIC reported to Shafer.
While Shafer was trying the decide how to cope with the new information,
he received another unsettling report. A former Würzburg agent had written to
the U.S. Commander in Berlin demanding payment of “DM7,850 [US$1,962]—
DM6,000 as indemnification, and the remainder for unpaid operational expenses
and salary while employed.”
This new claim prompted Shafer to send a memorandum to the chief of the
section that handled transportation intelligence at Heidelberg headquarters.12
“This development puts an entirely different light on our problems with this
group, as it will undoubtedly lead (the new claimant) into contact with other
former Würzburg sources residing in West Berlin and West Germany,” Shafer
wrote. Horst Hesse’s safe caper was still having repercussions—repercussions
that had assumed dimensions over which Stasi officers must have been gloating:
When communist agents were caught in the West or managed to escape before
being nabbed, the Stasi generously awarded them monetary bonuses, new
apartments, and jobs.
Shafer must have taken a deep breath before recommending that an
“equitable settlement” be reached with the group. Even then, he was still
pinching pennies. “It is believed that such settlements should range from a
minimum of DM5,000 [US$1,250] to a maximum of DM10,000 [US$2,500],”
he wrote. To justify his figures, Shafer wrote that some of the group “lost
considerably more than others; some are comparatively young and have
adjusted, while others have difficulty in obtaining satisfactory employment due
to their age.” Finally, Shafer suggested that settlements be paid by “intelligence
personnel directly to the claimants and not through negotiations with Dix.” He
figured that this method was necessary because the judge advocate had officially
discredited the claims. “In addition, through use of intelligence personnel we can
officially disclaim the attempt in the event of misfire.” In closing, Shafer warned
that even if his recommendations were implemented, the files on the incident
could not be completely closed: “Numerous sources were arrested and
imprisoned in the East Zone and may appear at a later date requesting
assistance.”
Shafer’s memorandum went unanswered for two months. At that point, he
wrote another plea for a “thorough review” of the matter, rehashing his earlier
memorandum, and because he sensed that any recommendation for an
appropriate settlement would again go unheeded, adding a new twist: He
proposed that the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), the West German Federal
Intelligence Service, be asked for “assistance in putting pressure on the group to
have the claims withdrawn.”
Shafer’s superiors stewed another two months over the new memorandum.
Eventually they decided to wash their hands of the matter and let Colonel Ross
of the 513th MI Group settle it. By then, Ross had completely reorganized the
unit. Operations in East Germany were running more smoothly, although the
Eastern-bloc intelligence services were formidable opponents. In an article
attacking “American secret service gangsters,” the Czechoslovakian Communist
Party newspaper Rude Pravo called Colonel Ross “the gray ghost.” The moniker
had been coined by a KGB general stationed in Prague, who was quoted as
saying Ross would appear at trouble spots and disappear as suddenly as he had
arrived. Ross was proud of the label, and it became a badge of honor.
Meanwhile, he was plagued by an occasional defector from the American ranks
and an occasional penetration from the East. However, no one else had damaged
the U.S. Army’s intelligence effort in Germany as much as had Hesse. Ross had
heard about the claims and was not surprised when he was requested to put an
end to the matter. He knew just how to do it: His ace in the hole was John H.
Willms, who had become Ross’s most dependable troubleshooter. Bilingual in
French and German, Willms had arrived in Germany during the war as a captain
in counterintelligence. He had been involved in Operation Paperclip, locating
German rocket scientists to work for the United States—among them Wernher
von Braun, who developed the rocket used in the first manned flight to the
moon. When the war ended, Willms chose to remain in Germany as a civilian
employee of the Department of the Army. His rank as chief of the 513th MI
Group’s special liaison section was equivalent to that of colonel. Many German
officials he had helped during the lean postwar years with food and such luxuries
as American soap, chocolate, and cigarettes now held top government positions.
His friends were mayors, police chiefs, lawyers, and above all, ranking members
of the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), the West German
counterespionage agency. No other U.S. intelligence official in Germany, the
CIA included, was as well connected as Willms.13
“John, Heidelberg wants us to clean up the Würzburg claims mess.” Ross
told Willms at a meeting in the colonel’s austere office, furnished by nothing
more than a desk and a few straight back chairs. Its only adornments were a
photograph of President Eisenhower and a U.S. flag. “It burns my ass, the way
they have treated those agents,” Ross said heatedly, and rose out of his chair.
“First they just about threw them out; told them they ought to be lucky to be
alive. Then they denied the claims, and now those people in Heidelberg are
running scared.”
Willms knew that if anyone would act resolutely to resolve the claims issue
quickly and equitably, it would be Ross. He once was called to a conference with
a CIA official who had asked Ross’s help in getting a prominent chemist out of
East Germany. The CIA man had hemmed and hawed about the money it would
cost. The colonel cut him short, saying, “Stop moaning, Til spend 10,000
dollars,” It was vintage Ross. A week later the chemist was safely in the West.14
“I can’t imagine what got into Heidelberg, suggesting that I beg the BND to
put pressure on those people to drop the claims,” Ross said as he handed Willms
the memorandum written by Chief Warrant Officer Shafer. The memorandum
had been sent to Ross for action, without comment from headquarters. “Damn it,
John, those agents risked their necks for us, and I’m going to do right by them,”
Then Ross gave Willms another sheaf of papers. It was a scathing three-page
reply to the assistant chief of staff for intelligence, Major General Willems,
rejecting all his recommendations. The liaison officer read the letter and grinned.
“I know what you’re going to say, John, but I’m not sending it,” the colonel said,
pursing his lips. “We’ll settle this mess and then tell ‘em, right?” Problem
solving was Willms’s forte. He looked at Ross and said, “Can do.”
On April 30, 1959, Willms drove to the headquarters of the BfV in Cologne.
He knew the counterespionage agency had a special department handling
resettlement cases. BfV President Manfred Schriibbers and Willms met for thirty
minutes, and the claims problem was solved. The former Würzburg agents were
offered well-paying jobs and new apartments, and for the next five years they
were exempted from paying income tax. All accepted happily and swore to keep
their espionage activities for the Americans, and the settlement, secret.
Hall served only a year at Fort Monmouth, but during that time he flew to
Vienna to contact the KGB, using a telephone number he had been given before
leaving Germany.30 There Hall met with a Russian who was an expert in signal
intelligence. He had no documents with him but gave him an oral report. Toward
the end of meeting, the KGB agent told Hall the KGB knew that he had been
providing information to the East Germans and had ordered him to stop. The
sergeant explained the difficulty with the dead letter drops. The KGB case
officer understood and provided him with specially treated paper to use for
invisible letter writing as well as a cover address. Hall never used either the
paper or the address. In fact, he lost them while packing to return to Germany
with a promotion to staff sergeant after only a year at Fort Monmouth.31
With his new assignment to the 302nd Military Intelligence Battalion of the
Fifth U.S. Army Corps in Frankfurt, Hall’s spying activity became frenetic.
Security was so lax that he was able to “borrow” hundreds of secret and top
secret documents. Yildirim the Meister had to come down from West Berlin to
help. Hall was back in business with the Stasi. He acquired a panel truck solely
for photographing documents. Later this became too cumbersome, so Hall rented
an apartment near his headquarters. The East Germans paid the rent and other
expenses, including the purchase price of a portable photocopier that Hall could
take along on military maneuvers so as to continue his spying without missing a
beat. There was hardly a sensitive document crossing Hall’s desk that was not
copied or photographed for the communists. While in Frankfurt, Hall learned
that his unit’s personnel would be subjected to polygraph examination. Alarmed
about having to take a lie detector test, he sent an urgent message to his East
Berlin control, asking for instructions on how to beat the “box.” He promptly
received the information, but it was so technical (terms such as cardiovascular
were used) that he had trouble comprehending it.32 As it turned out, he need not
have worried. The army did not have enough trained polygraph operators, and
the examinations were scrapped.
Despite his lucrative treasonous sideline, Hall remained a top performer in
his unit, with excellent efficiency reports, which got him selected to attend a
warrant officer training school in the United States. He graduated in February
1988 and was assigned to G-2 (intelligence) of the 24th Infantry Division at Fort
Stewart, Georgia, just west of Savannah. Yildirim had also moved to the United
States and was living in Belleair Beach, Florida with Peggy Bie, whom he had
met in Berlin and who sponsored his immigration. In addition to his espionage
courier job, the Turk smuggled diamonds into Europe and the United States from
Sierra Leone, West Africa, though that sideline may not have been as lucrative as
the spy business.33
THE SHOPLIFTER
Colonel Wolfgang Koch’s ace agent had dried up and he was diligently
exploring ways to reactivate Hall. Furthermore, he had lost contact with five
other members of the Berlin Field Station’s listening post staff, albeit in
positions not as advantageous to the communists as Hall’s.34 All had been
recruited by the Turkish auto mechanic. At the same time, the Stasi colonel had
developed misgivings about the further use of Yildirim as a courier, for reasons
that have never been clearly established.35 It might have been that Koch felt the
Turk’s diamond smuggling made him too vulnerable to arrest. To prepare for
Hall’s eventual return to Germany, Koch decided to find a new courier. Koch
needed someone who could speak English to deal with Hall in the West because
the warrant officer had let it be known that he no longer wanted to crawl through
the hole in the border fence. The lot fell to Joachim Reiff,36 a professor of
languages at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, who had been used as a courier
years earlier but had been dropped as unreliable.37 Without obtaining the
required permission from Lieutenant General Günter Moller, head of the Main
Directorate’s Cadre and Training, Koch hired the professor.
Briefed on his assignment to scout locations for possible dead letter drops
and clandestine meetings, the professor was sent to West Berlin carrying false
identification papers in early August 1988. The linguist had not been in the West
for some years and was dazzled by the well-stocked shops. The Stasi had given
him just enough West marks to cover expenses and no more. After completing
his scouting assignment, the professor went to a department store to browse. As
he looked over the goods unavailable in East Germany, temptation got the better
of him. Oblivious to the surveillance cameras, he slipped various items into his
briefcase and was promptly challenged by a security officer and turned over to
police.
“I want to see somebody from the Staatsschutz/’ the professor blurted out
before police had a chance to question him.38 Staatsschutz is a section of the
city’s criminal investigation department responsible for political offenses
including espionage. Staatsschutz listened to the professor’s tale and contacted
the Berlin CIA Station, since it involved an American and a civilian whose
names he did not know. But whoever was on duty that late afternoon was not
interested in the matter.39 Instead of dropping the matter then, a detective called
U.S. Army intelligence. The duty officer also did not seem to show much
interest, remarking that there were too many cases of persons who had been
arrested for minor crimes claiming to have knowledge of espionage.
Nevertheless, Colonel Stuart Herrington, a brilliant intelligence officer with two
decades of counterespionage experience, took charge and opened an
investigation on August 24, 1988. A team of agents was dispatched to West
Berlin. They interrogated the professor and told him he had to return to East
Berlin to gather more information and establish his bona fides. They also
promised that if he cooperated, his family would be resettled in the West under
new identities. Professor Reiff agreed. By fall, Colonel Herrington had zeroed in
on James Hall III and Huseyin Yildirim. The involvement of Der Meister must
have come as a shock to Herrington. While stationed in Berlin as commander of
counterespionage, the colonel also had frequented the auto shop and was on
friendly terms with the Turk. However, his emotions in no way deterred him
from pursuing the pair of spies with the determination for which he had become
known during his two tours of duty in Vietnam.40 Herrington was the last man
to board the final helicopter leaving the U.S. embassy in Saigon on April 18,
1975.
Court-approved wiretaps were installed on both suspects’ telephones and
legal mail intercepts were put into place. The telephone surveillance uncovered
that Yildirim was also using the alias Mike Jones, particularly when he called
Hall. Dozens of officers and enlisted men who had served with Hall were
questioned. Both Hall and the Turk were watched around the clock by U.S.
Army counterintelligence agents. Sophisticated surveillance equipment was
installed in areas frequented by Hall. By the end of November, the FBI was
brought in on the case.
In early December, Hall was contacted by a man using only the first name
Phil. He had met Phil a few months earlier and had accepted him as a fellow
conspirator. This time Phil said he wanted to arrange a meeting with an official
of the Soviet embassy, who would travel from Washington to Savannah. Hall,
eager to get his spy business going again, agreed to a rendezvous the evening of
December 20, 1988, at a Days Inn in Savannah.
At the Days Inn, Phil introduced Hall to Vladimir Kossov, who spoke
English with an unmistakable Russian accent, and left the room. After a few
minutes of chit-chat, Kossov got down to business, saying that the KGB wanted
to take over the operation again, in cooperation with its “East German friends,”
The Soviet told Hall that this was necessary to make sure that he was “safe and
secure,” and secondly, because “we can help you much more.” Hall was
noncommittal. Kossov said he was new on the case and wanted to know a bit
more about Hall’s operations. They chatted for about two hours, Hall relating
how he worked with Yildirim, methods they used and how he hated to crawl
beneath the border fence in Berlin. “My superiors have been looking at some of
the things we have been receiving through our East German friends,” Kossov
remarked. “They think that you’re a very valuable person and the material you
have been giving them is very valuable, very valuable. Now, to speak frankly
with you, my superiors in Moscow, they thought that the way our friends
handled the whole thing could have been done much better for two important
reasons. One is your personal safety and security, which is number one for
everybody involved. And the second one, we think that, uh, because the material
that you provided was so good and so valuable, we think that they should’ve
taken—how you say in America?—better care of you.”
As the conversation progressed, Hall became increasingly profuse in
describing the material he had supplied the East Germans. He told of a plan to
release a special kind of dust over enemy communications centers: “When it
goes into electronic equipment, it implodes it. Like if you blow dust into a TV
and turn the TV on, it just puff, it shuts it down.” One of the most sensitive
systems Hall betrayed was capable of intercepting and cutting into Warsaw Pact
communications, enabling U.S. military linguists to issue confusing commands
to combat commanders. This system was in communist hands even before it was
installed at the Teufelsberg electronic warfare facility. “So before you even
turned it on, our side knew already?” asked Kossov. “I hope so,” Hall replied.
“Don’t know, personally. ... As long as I get my money, you can do what you
like with whatever it is I give you.” This prompted Kossov to ask, “So you did it
just for money?” Hall: “Oh yeah. It’s not because I am anti-American. I wave the
flag as much as anybody else.”
Kossov then opened his attache case and took out bundles of money. He took
out six packets, saying Moscow had decided to make up the difference in
underpayment to him by the East Germans. “Five thousand, ten thousand,
twenty, twenty-five, that’s thirty.” Hall, slouching in his chair, took the money
and nonchalantly tossed it into a shopping bag. Kossov produced a receipt
stating that the money was payment for past services and asked Hall to sign it.
“Boy, you guys are tightening the reins, aren’t you? I used to just scribble my
name across it. Now I have to sign my full name.” Kossov smiled. “Well, you
know, bureaucracies are the same on both sides.” He took out another $30,000
and handed the bundles to Hall. “This is for services you will provide in the
future. Please write out another receipt.” Hall copied the wording from the first
receipt and signed.
In closing, the two discussed plans for the delivery of future secrets,
including the rental of a post office box. Before leaving the room, Kossov made
a little speech: “Well, I know you told me before that you do it for, uh, for
money; but still, I want to thank you on behalf of my country and on behalf of
socialism. I’m sure you probably don’t believe in socialism. But, uh . . . .” Hall:
“Well, I do have my personal problems with it.” Kossov shrugged. “But, uh,
well, I do honor socialism. And I thank you in the name of socialism. And, uh, I
do think we can work together.” The warrant officer replied that Kossov should
call him the next day and he would give him his post office box number.
When Hall walked out of the Days Inn, Colonel Herrington watched with
deep satisfaction as his men arrested him and put him in handcuffs. Vladimir
Kossov’s performance was worthy of an Oscar. Kossov turned out to be FBI
Special Agent Dimitry Dourjinsky, and Phil was a U.S. Army
counterintelligence agent. The entire meeting had been videotaped.41 FBI and
Army agents immediately searched Hall’s home in Richmond Hill, Georgia.
They found a briefcase holding four passports, his own and those of his family;
family medical records; and $5,000, plus some foreign currency. A search of
Hall’s pickup truck turned up a manila envelope containing $4,150 in fifty-dollar
bills. Hidden in a duffle bag was the British passport in the name of R. S. Hillyer
but bearing Hall’s photograph and a British vaccination certificate issued to
Robert Hillyer. Most damning was another duffle bag that held top secret
intelligence documents including a letter addressed to “Dear Friend” and
detailing the kind of intelligence information Hall needed to procure. While the
search of Hall’s home was under way, a team of agents combed through
Yildirim’s house in Florida, discovering false identification papers.
Confronted with unassailable evidence, Hall confessed fully and agreed to
cooperate with investigators. He was facing a possible death sentence. However,
prosecutors told him if he pleaded guilty and agreed never to reveal the details of
what he had betrayed, they would asked for a forty-five-year prison term. Hall
complied. At his general court-martial at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C., on
March 10, 1989, a tearfully contrite Hall said he felt his betrayal “to the bone.”
His father, James W. Hall Jr., told the court his son loved the U.S. Army and that
he was shocked when he learned of the espionage charge. When he met his son
after the arrest, the father said, “I felt like punching his lights out. . . but then I
threw my arms around him.” Colonel Howard C. Eggers, a military judge,
sentenced Hall to forty years at Leaven-worth military penitentiary, a fine of
$50,000, and a dishonorable discharge. The Soviets and the East Germans had
paid the traitor a total of about $300,000. His pay as a warrant officer was
$25,894 a year plus allowances.
Huseyin Yildirim, then sixty-two years old, was tried in Savannah,
vehemently denying that he had been a spy. He told such convoluted lies that
one intelligence officer remarked that the Turk was a “cultural phenomenon
whose manhood is enhanced by the size of his lies that are believed.” Yildirim
claimed that Hall had instigated the operation, and that Yildirim merely took the
documents to guard them from falling into the wrong hands. To buttress his
claim, Yildirim confided to his court-appointed defense attorney Lamar Walter, a
former U.S. Attorney, that he had hidden many documents in the wine cellar of
an apartment building in West Berlin and in two water jugs buried in a cemetery.
Walter, accompanied by FBI agents, flew to Berlin, where they found about
10,000 pages of highly sensitive National Security Agency and Army signal
intelligence documents.42 No one believed the Turk’s tale. It seemed more likely
that he had stashed the material away for a rainy day, as a sort of private
retirement plan under which he would give the East Germans a few pages
whenever he was short of cash.
U.S. Army Warrant Officer James Hall III caught on videotape accepting
$60,000 from an agent of the FBI who Hall believed was a Soviet KGB agent.
Courtesy U.S. Army.
At one point during the two-day trial before U.S. District Judge B. Avent
Edenfield, an FBI expert testified that he lifted Yildirim’s fingerprints from a
$50 bill found in Hall’s truck as well as from the “Dear Friend” letter. There was
also testimony that a copy of the “Dear Friend” letter was found in one of the
water jugs dug up in the cemetery. An FBI counterespionage expert testified that
the letters were typical of those sent by Soviet intelligence requesting
information from agents. The evidence against Yildirim, including the Hall
videotape, was overwhelming. The prosecution called about thirty witnesses.
The defense called none and rested. Walter had defended Yildirim to the best of
his ability under extremely trying circumstances that included a threat on his life
by the Turk’s girlfriend Peggy Bie.43 She was dissatisfied by the way he
handled Yildirim’s defense, maintaining that he should have tried the case in the
press, which is what she had attempted to do. Peggy Bie had contacted ABC
television, which aired her story that her live-in lover had been framed by U.S.
intelligence, in particular by Colonel Herrington. Attorney Walter would later
describe Peggy Bie as a “space cadet.”44 After six and a half hours of
deliberation, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. Yildirim was sentenced to life
imprisonment, and banishment from the United States forever if he was later
paroled. Interviewed by counterespionage officials from time to time in the
Lompoc, California federal prison, Yildirim has steadfastly denied having been
part of the Hall espionage conspiracy. Although spy chief Markus Wolf has said
that Yildirim recruited “several” Americans, the Turk has refused to discuss this
claim. His request for a reduction of his sentence was denied in 1996.
Huseyin Yildirim, a Turkish auto mechanic who helped Hall copy top secret
documents and who delivered the copies to the Stasi. Yildirim is shown leaving
the court after he was sentenced in 1989 to life imprisonment. Unlike Hall, who
made a full confession and cooperated with investigators, Yildirim pleaded
innocent and claimed that he was actually working for U.S. intelligence.
Courtesy U.S. Army.
The Hall/Yildirim espionage conspiracy was one of the U.S. Army’s worst
security failures. “It was the Army’s Walker case/’ commented a Washington
source intimately familiar with the affair. (Navy Warrant Officer Arthur J.
Walker sold codes and other information to the Soviets, rendering the Navy’s
worldwide communications useless. Walker was arrested in 1985 and
subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment.)
Hall is escorted by milital. He was sentenced to forty years in prison for spying
for the East Germans and the Soviets. Courtesy U.S. Army.
HALL’S TWIN
Paul Limbach and Heiner Emde, tenacious and well-connected reporters for the
now defunct German magazine Quick, made a contact in East Berlin in January
1990 who sold them several thousand documents from General Wolf’s espionage
archive. Among the documents were original U.S. intelligence manuals and
reports classified as top secrets. The reporters’ contact, a former Stasi officer,
said he procured the documents from two Americans. He named Hall as one but
knew only the alias of the other—Jens Karney—and his address in East Berlin.
Limbach contacted his friend Gerhard Boeden, the head of the Office for the
Protection of the Constitution. After examining the papers, Boeden decided to
hand over copies to the CIA station chief in Bonn, Ed Pechus.45 In summer
1990, I obtained copies of these documents along with Karney’s name and
address. Karney reportedly lived in an apartment building in the Friedrichshain
district of East Berlin, but residents there denied knowing anyone by that name.
Karl Grossmann, former deputy chief of the Stasi’s foreign counterintelligence
department, later confirmed that Karney was an American who had spied for his
department under the code name Kid, starting in 1982. Grossmann said he could
not remember the agent’s clear name—only that he was an air force sergeant
who defected to East Germany in 1985: “He was a homosexual with real
problems, but we gave him a job translating radio intercepts. We gave him the
Jens Karney name and made him a Danish citizen because of his Scandinavian-
like accent. Then when the MfS stopped functioning in January 1990, he got a
job as a building superintendent at the Liebknecht Haus.”46 Officials at the
Liebknecht Haus, traditional headquarters of Germany’s Communist Party,
denied in interviews that they employed Karney.
By summer 1990, Karney had been identified by American authorities as
U.S. Air Force Sergeant Jeffrey Carney, of Cincinnati, Ohio. He had been
assigned to the 6912th Electronic Security Group in Berlin from 1982 until
1984, when he was transferred to Goodfellow Air Force Base in Texas. He
deserted his post there in the fall of the following year, heading straight back to
Berlin, where he asked his Stasi contacts for asylum.47 It remains a mystery
why U.S. authorities did not arrest him in 1990, when Berlin was still governed
by occupation law and the Allies had legal jurisdiction over their own. Was it a
bureaucratic foul-up or had the CIA not informed the Air Force in time? Carney
was finally seized by agents of the Air Force Office of Special Investigation in
April 1991, at a time when full sovereignty had been restored to the city of
Berlin. German judicial authorities had not been privy to the U.S. action. Thus,
the Federal Attorney General’s office confirmed in June 1997 that it had
launched an investigation into the matter—particularly, whether CIA officials
had flouted German law. The investigation was eventually terminated when the
arrest was determined to have been legal under the Status of Forces Agreement
governing the stationing and rights of U.S. military forces in Germany.
Jeffrey Carney was controlled by Colonel Heinz Schockenbäumer, who led a
division of the Eleventh Department in foreign espionage against U.S. forces in
West Berlin. Carney did not always go to the trouble of copying documents. He
delivered numbered originals.48 The documents he provided enabled the KGB,
which had the greater expertise in this field, to spot and correct deficiencies in
the communications security of the Soviet military and the Warsaw Pact. Carney
provided much of the same information Hall had sold, which was ironclad
confirmation for the East Germans and the Soviets that Hall’s material had not
been doctored. Particularly critical was a supersecret study code-named Canopy
Wing, requested by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Carney’s unit was to work out
methods that would prevent the Soviet general staff from effectively employing
high frequency communications in controlling and leading combat forces.
Warsaw Pact planners must have danced a jig when they received a forty-seven-
page study of the weaknesses of Soviet general staff communications. The cost
of the recommended U.S. countermeasures, according to the study, was
estimated at $14.5 billion. The foregoing are but a fraction of the U.S. secrets
Carney transmitted to East Berlin.
Jeffrey Carney apparently did not turn traitor for money. He was a
homosexual with severe emotional problems, frequently suffering from deep
depression.49 Whether he was recruited by one of the Stasi’s homosexual
Romeos is not clear. He was, however, recruited, and did not volunteer after
walking through a checkpoint at the Berlin Wall, as some reports have
suggested. It is highly probable that Carney frequented the auto shop and came
into contact there with “Der Meister” Yildirim, who spotted him for the Stasi.
Money did not appear to be the reason for Carney’s turning traitor, though after
his defection he was provided with a car and a salary of 3,000 East marks a
month—roughly the salary of a Stasi lieutenant colonel.
Carney might never have been caught if reporters Paul Limbach and Heiner
Emde had not found the documents the sergeant betrayed. He was tried in secret
before a general court-martial on November 4, 1991, at Andrews Air Force
Base, near Washington, D.C. Carney pleaded guilty to charges of espionage,
conspiracy, and desertion, and was sentenced to thirty-eight years’ imprisonment
and a dishonorable discharge.
TOPAZ
The headquarters of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Brussels
was a high-priority target for the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate. Although
the Soviets had been able to penetrate NATO from time to time, the East
Germans were profoundly more effective in recruiting moles with access to the
secrets of the Western defense pact. Their recruitment efforts began in the late
1960s, when NATO had a shortage of well-trained and multilingual secretaries
while West German ministries had a surplus. The transfer of West German
secretaries to the Belgian capital prompted the Stasi to dispatch its Romeo
recruiters.
Ingrid Garbe, a secretary at West Germany’s diplomatic mission to NATO
headquarters in Brussels, was arrested as an East German spy recruited by a
Romeo in March 1979. The arrest triggered panic in another, more important
spy: Ursel Lorenzen, secretary to the British director for operations in NATO’s
general secretariat, fled Brussels the night of March 5, 1979, leaving most of her
personal effects behind. At the same time, an executive of the Brussels Hilton
Hotel, Dieter Will, also disappeared. Suspecting that the Garbe arrest and the
disappearances were no coincidence, NATO security officials investigated and
found that Lorenzen had had access to the alliance’s innermost secrets. Several
weeks after her disappearance, Lorenzen appeared on East German television for
a Stasi-managed propaganda interview. She said “pangs of conscience” caused to
her to seek East German asylum. “I have experienced the inhuman planning
which in fact is only directed toward a new war.” The Hilton executive was the
Romeo who had recruited her.
The flow of secrets did not end with Lorenzen’s escape. In fact, it continued
almost without interruption. Colonel Heinz Busch, military analyst for the Stasi’s
foreign espionage directorate, who knew Lorenzen and Will by the code names
Mosel and Bordeaux, was provided with first-class NATO secrets also by an
agent code-named Topas (Topaz).62 Like Lorenzen and Will, Topaz was
controlled by Colonel Klaus Roesler, whose HVA division dealt with NATO and
the European Community, and his deputy Colonel Karl Rehbaum. Busch noticed
that Topaz had been assigned the same internal registration number
(MfS/XV/333/69) under which Lorenzen had been carried. “That was curious,
because I have never seen this done before.” When East Germany collapsed and
Busch became the primary source for uncovering Topaz, NATO security officials
speculated that it was not merely one person but an entire spy ring. They based
this guess on the incredible volume of highly secret NATO documents—
sometimes up to 3,000 pages per delivery—that flowed across Busch’s desk.
This need not be so, Busch told security chief Bartelli, because Lorenzen also
produced an immense amount of material, albeit with the help of her Romeo,
who assisted in photographing papers during her lunch hour. But there was no
question that Topaz was the most extensive case of espionage inside NATO since
the founding of the alliance in 1949 63 Among the sensitive documents Busch
analyzed was MC-161, classified “cosmic top secret”—a comprehensive study
of the capabilities of Warsaw Pact armies and their order of battle.64 It was the
bible of western defense planners. No wonder the Stasi gave its agent the name
of a gem. Busch did not know that Topas collaborated with Turkis (Turquoise),
because that code name never showed up on transmittal slips attached to the
NATO documents.
Detectives of the Bundeskriminalamt, the German FBI equivalent, and
NATO security agents toiled for nearly three years, painstakingly piecing
together the information supplied by former Stasi colonel Busch. They probed
NATO personnel who had access to numbered documents discovered at the Stasi
archive, comparing security records showing who had checked them out. The
final lead came from a computer diskette on which a list of agents was recorded.
Former Stasi Major General Rolf-Peter Devaux is said to have sold it to the CIA
for $1.5 million.65 Rainer Rupp and his wife Ann-Christine were on that list.
Rupp worked in NATO’s economic directorate, and his wife was a secretary in
various departments, the last of which was the alliance’s highly sensitive security
service. On July 31, 1993, the couple was arrested while vacationing at Rainer’s
parents’ home in Saarburg, in southwestern Germany, near the border with
Luxembourg. Rupp was charged with treason, and his wife was prosecuted as an
accessory.
Rupp was twenty-two years old and a student of economics in Dusseldorf
when he participated in several left-wing demonstrations in the Rhineland. As
one of thousands of young left-leaning idealists radicalized in the 1960s, Rupp
railed against the “evils of capitalism” and America’s role in the Vietnam war.
After one rally in Mainz, he and fellow students went to a saloon for beer and
goulash. When it was time to pay, they lacked 50 pfennigs (about 16 cents).66 A
man at a neighboring table who introduced himself as “Kurt” bailed them out
and even sprang for another round of beer. The students and Kurt got into a
discussion of politics and found they had much in common, though Rupp was
not in favor of the type of communism practiced by the East German regime.
Rainer Rupp met Kurt again and they gradually developed a friendship. Kurt
eventually revealed himself as a Stasi recruiter and suggested to Rupp that he
meet with “friends” in East Berlin—in other words, with members of Wolf’s
Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung. “At my first meeting I met Jürgen, who later
became a leading man in the HVA,” Rupp recalled after his trial.67 Jürgen told
him: “We do many stupid things here, and not everything works as it should. But
if one day the DDR should disappear, the people will not allow capitalism to be
reintroduced.” This seeming openness on the agent’s part, and Rupp’s resultant
perception that East Germany was not only improving economically but also
becoming more liberal, influenced the young leftist to turn traitor. Rupp was
signed up as a perspektiv Agent and instructed to perfect his French by
continuing his studies in Brussels.
Rainer Rupp, code-named Topas, was a top spy for the Stasi in the Brussels
headquarters of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for twelve years. Rupp is
shown talking with his wife Ann-Christine after he was sentenced to twelve years
in prison for treason. His wife was sentenced to twenty-two months’ probation as
an accessory to the crime. Courtesy AP/Wide World.
Rupp’s description of Jürgen fits Colonel Jürgen Rogalla, who earned his
espionage spurs in the mid–1960s, when, disguised as a student, he was the HVA
station chief in Ghana. At that time, Kwame Nkrumah was attempting to
establish a communist-style dictatorship with massive assistance from the Soviet
Union and other Eastern-bloc countries.68 A military coup deposed Nkrumah in
February 1966, and Major Rogalla was thrown in jail. He was later released in
exchange for Ghanaian prisoners being held in East Germany. At the time of
East Germany’s collapse, Rogalla was a colonel in charge of espionage against
the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
Rupp completed his studies, then joined the Brussels branch of a British
commercial bank. One evening at a Brussels bar, friends introduced him to Ann-
Christine Bowen. The sophisticated and highly attractive daughter of a retired
British Army major from Dorchester, England, Ann-Christine had a secretarial
job with the British military mission. It was love at first sight for Ann-Christine.
She was two years younger than Rupp and impressed by his knowledge and
intelligence. In 1971 she took a job at NATO. Shortly after their wedding a year
later, Rupp told his wife he was an agent for the Stasi and asked her to join him
in his “work for peace.”69 She agreed.
Almost every working day for five years, Ann-Christine crammed NATO
documents into her handbag and carried them to her husband, who photographed
them with a miniature camera supplied by the Stasi. All of the documents were
classified, some as highly as “cosmic top secret”—particularly those dealing
with communications and defense plans. Periodically the Rupps would travel on
weekends to cities outside Belgium, such as Amsterdam and The Hague. There
they would meet with Colonels Roesler or Rehbaum, their Stasi case officers, to
receive instruction. Rupp delivered the exposed film rolls, hidden in the false
bottoms of beer cans, to couriers. The meeting dates and places were signaled to
Rupp over shortwave spy broadcasts. In time, Rupp himself applied for a NATO
job, and after a background investigation cleared him for access to the most
sensitive classified information, he was hired in 1977.
According to the German federal prosecutor general, Rupp’s betrayal of top
secret material provided the Warsaw Pact leadership with reliable and up-to-date
insight into NATO planning: “This insight made it possible to reliably judge the
military potential of the NATO states and to exploit this knowledge in event of a
crisis situation. This continual betrayal of state secrets to the MfS and the
relaying of the information to the KGB resulted in serious disadvantages for the
defense capability of the German Federal Republic and her allies.”70
During the Rupps’ trial in October and November 1994, Presiding Judge
Klaus Wagner tried to establish whether Rupp regretted his betrayal. He said that
he had also “served the interests of the German Federal Republic by trying to
make it clear to the Stasi that I had recognized that NATO was not an instrument
for an offensive war.”71 The judge then asked: “How could you be sure that
some crazy Soviet defense minister would not use this knowledge to order an
attack on Western Europe?” Rupp answered that in thinking it over, he could not
be sure.
In his testimony, Rupp accepted all the blame for the couple’s treachery and
tried to protect his wife. He described how after the birth of their first son, in
1984, Ann-Christine had told him they should quit but he had talked her out of
it. Judge Wagner thought Rupp’s portrayal of his leading role plausible: “Rupp
was intellectually and mentally superior to his wife.”72 Following the birth of
the couple’s second son two years later, Ann-Christine threatened to take the
children to England unless Rainer stopped spying. This time Rainer said he had
agreed but secretly had continued his covert activities. Even the birth of a
daughter did not deter him. He would sneak into the wine cellar of the plush villa
they had acquired with Stasi money and photograph the documents he continued
to haul out of his office. “We felt sorry for Mrs. Rupp, who had been roped into
his activities.” Judge Wagner commented.
Federal prosecutor Ekkehard Schulz presented his summation on November
5, 1994, and demanded a fifteen-year prison term for Rupp and two years for his
wife. The prosecution maintained that the Stasi paid Rupp about 800,000 marks
(about US$500,000) in his twenty-one years of spying. After two weeks of
deliberation, Judge Wagner sentenced Rainer Rupp to twelve years in prison and
Ann-Christine to two years’ probation.
Judging by this report, the American professor seemingly went out of his
way to ingratiate himself with the East German spy recruiter. He even went so
far as to inveigh against Israel. When Scholz asked Naor why he had settled in
the United States, Naor said that it was because of “widespread nationalism and
the increasing ‘fascism’ within the Israeli army.”
Naor, according to the recruiter’s report, spoke at length about his private
affairs: He said that his family owned a home bought for $40,000, paid a
mortgage of $450 a month, owned three cars, spent about $100 a week on food,
and paid between $900 and $1,000 a month on his daughter’s education (she was
studying engineering). “Mrs. N. is director of statistical services in the Maine
state department of health. The statistical services maintains data on all residents
of the State of Maine (about one million) and Mrs. N. has full access to all data.”
The underlined words are noteworthy, as in later reports she is listed as a
possible intelligence target.
During this very first meeting, the spy recruiter reported, Naor offered to
provide computer program information used by his college as well as by the
American Marketing Association. The report stated further:
The American professor, wrote the East German, said he would send some
material to a Dr. Szabo at the Budapest Institute for Market Research, where “I
could pick it up, because according to the KP, mail to Hungary was not subject
to such rigid controls. He would deliver the large database in person when he
visits Leipzig next year.” What did Naor fear? In any case, the Stasi dossier
contains a report that he did, indeed, send documents to the Hungarian cutout.
The Stasi case officer recommended that the Scholz-Naor relationship be
maintained and expanded. His chief, Colonel Claus Briining, approved, and
Naor was given the code name Flamme (in English, Flame). A background
check on Naor was ordered, which included a request to the Hungarian secret
police to furnish data on the professor’s travel to and within that country.
Preliminary Stasi vetting revealed that Naor was born in Vienna, Austria, in
1931, to a Christian mother and a Jewish father. His family name at the time was
Neubauer. To escape Nazi persecution, the family emigrated to Israel in 1939. In
1952 Naor moved to the United States and later studied economics at the
University of California, after which he worked as a financial analyst for the
American President Lines shipping company for five years, until 1971. Then he
moved to Israel, where he worked as a teacher until 1974, when he returned to
the United States. Naor lectured at the Universities of Wisconsin and Oklahoma
before being hired as a professor at the University of Maine’s College of
Business Administration. He was granted tenure in 1983. Naor was listed as
being married to a native-born American and as having two children, a daughter
and a younger son. As citizenship, the Stasi listed: “USA and Jew.”
Naor maintained an exchange of letters with Stasi recruiter Scholz in which
he told him that he would try to have his 1986 trip to East Germany funded by
the International Research and Exchanges Program (IREX), which is financed
by the U.S. government. On May 28, 1986, he wrote his East German contact
that his plans for IREX financing did not work out because “they don’t have any
money now (Reagan’s fault).” Naor did travel to East Germany in July 1986,
where he met with his Stasi contact. The Stasi dossier does not reveal whether
Naor brought with him the comprehensive database he had promised or how his
trip was financed.82
During a meeting in Leipzig, the Stasi recruiter asked Naor whether he
expected “unpleasantness” because of his frequent trips to communist countries.
“N. told me the following: He makes his reports at the university only to his
dean because he furnishes the money for the trips. So far he has not spotted any
interest on the part of the FBI or CIA. However, this could change, but he had a
“clear conscience.”
From East Germany Naor traveled to Hungary, flew from Budapest to Israel
on Romanian Airlines to visit his father and brother, and returned to Budapest on
Yugoslav Airlines. He reportedly told Scholz, whom he met in Budapest for
three long sessions between August 22 and 26, that he used those airlines
because they “posed a lesser risk with regard to terrorist attacks.” During the
clandestine meetings, Naor handed over “material from the University of Maine
(microcomputer training),” Scholz’s September 11 report to the Stasi said.
Over the next two years, Naor continued to travel to Eastern Europe,
including East Germany, to study “socialist marketing.” On each occasion he
met with the East German professor cum spy recruiter who then wrote the usual
elaborate reports for his Stasi handlers. The Forschung and the Flamme dossiers
clearly indicate that the groundwork was being laid for recruiting the American
as a spy. More importantly, Naor had told his East German “colleague” that he
had asked University of Maine officials to invite him to Maine as a guest
professor in 1988. For Stasi foreign espionage, getting one of their agents
officially invited to the United States with freedom to roam would be a coup of
the first order.
That Naor, described by a colleague in Maine as extremely intelligent, would
inveigle an invitation for the East German was bizarre. Why would Naor choose
to ignore the political unrest that was sweeping through East Germany at the
time, which was widely reported in the American media? Was he a naive,
muddleheaded, liberal academic who was bent on advancing his image as an
expert on communist economics and commercial policy?
On May 5, 1987, the chief of foreign espionage at the Stasi’s Leipzig
headquarters, Colonel Briining, shifted into high gear. He forwarded Naor’s
dossier to Colonel Armin Grohs, deputy chief of the HVA’s Eleventh
Department. This department was responsible for espionage against the United
States, Canada, and Mexico. In an accompanying, explanatory letter, Briining
wrote:
ACTIVE MEASURES
In late 1986 the New Delhi newspaper The Patriot published an article in which
the U.S. Army was accused of having created the AIDS virus in its
bacteriological laboratory at Fort Detrick, Maryland. The newspaper quoted a
Dr. Jakob Segal as having said that American scientists used genetic technology
to combine the leukemia virus Visna, found in sheep, with the human leukemia
virus HTLV-1, discovered by Dr. Robert Gallo, the eminent American virologist.
The HIV virus, according to The Patriot, had been tested on felons, some of
whom had been released and had spread the dread disease. The same story also
was picked up by the Soviet news agency TASS and by Western news media.
The idea that AIDS was created by genetic technology was quickly
pronounced rubbish by experts, including Meinrad Koch, head of the virology
department of the Robert Koch Institute in West Berlin. Nevertheless, left-
leaning newspapers and those with an anti-American bias had a field day. At the
time, I was working as a consultant to Charles Z. Wick, director of the U.S.
Information Agency, creating a task force to combat Soviet disinformation and
propaganda. We quickly established that the Indian newspaper was being
financed by the KGB and that its editor was the recipient of the Stalin Peace
Prize. Thus it was determined that the AIDS story was a dastardly canard cooked
up in Moscow by the active measures department of the Soviet secret police.
In research for this book in Berlin, I spotted Segal’s name in Stasi
documents. Born in pre-Soviet St. Petersburg, Segal had been a professor and
head of the Institute for Applied Bacteriology at East Berlin’s Humboldt
University and was then retired. In a 1991 interview with me in Berlin, Segal
presented himself as a die-hard Marxist, totally incapable of accepting the
demise of communist East Germany. Segal, then eighty years old, insisted that
his information on the origin of the HIV virus was solid, and he denied having
had any contact with the Stasi. He was lying. In 1992, two former officers of the
Stasi’s disinformation department published a book in which they described how
they collaborated with the KGB to spin the AIDS yarn, using Segal and his
scientific credentials to lend the story credence.86
As in the case of the AIDS lie, the Stasi active measures specialists often
worked separately from the KGB, but always in tandem with Soviet policy. In
the late 1970s the Soviet Union wanted to convince the world that the United
States was preparing a first nuclear strike against the communist bloc. The Stasi
created a number of pamphlets on the subject, using forged and real NATO
documents supplied by spies and distributed to pacifist groups and the media
under the names of fictitious publishers.87 In June 1979, West European
newspapers published a letter ostensibly written by outgoing NATO Commander
Alexander Haig to Secretary-General Joseph Luns. The letter contained a
discussion of U.S. war plans and the explosive statement, “We may be forced to
make first use of nuclear weapons,” The letter actually was written by Stasi
forgers.
THE REAGAN FILE
East German Communist Party Chief and Head of State Erich Honecker aspired
to visit the United States and meet with President Ronald Reagan to gain
prestige for himself and polish the image of his police state. However, the visit
never occurred, chiefly because of the DDR’s support of international terrorism.
However, to prepare for an eventual visit, the Stasi foreign espionage directorate
compiled an extensive dossier on the U.S. president.88 Most of the dossier
consisted of top secret KGB and Cuban intelligence reports and analyses.
President Reagan was described by the KGB as a “died-in-the-wool
anticommunist who engaged in a campaign to drive progressive people out of
the film industry and the unions,” As a presidential candidate, it added, he
promised to regain the “international leadership position the United States
forfeited under President Carter,” The KGB analysts expressed their low opinion
of President Jimmy Carter by noting that he had “mismanaged the economy,
reduced the morale of American business, and weakened the United States’
position worldwide,” A number of reports expressed the belief that Mr. Reagan
would reverse this trend and quoted him as saying during the 1980 campaign:
“No one wants to use atomic weapons, but the enemy should go to sleep every
night in fear that we could use them.”
The tone of many reports was one of reluctant respect: “Reagan is a firm and
unbending politician for whom words and deeds are one and the same.” In
remarkably frank language, one KGB profile emphasized the president’s
“incessant attacks on the lack of political freedom, prohibition of free speech,
restrictions on religious worship and travel, and economic failures of the
socialist countries,” In closing, the writer complained that Reagan ignored the
positive attributes such as “efforts to achieve world peace and disarmament and
the fulfillment of the Helsinki Accords by reuniting families,” A twenty-nine-
page Cuban intelligence analysis written in February 1986 expressed admiration
for President Reagan: “Despite advanced age, despite health problems and the
fact that he is in his second term, Reagan enjoys high personal popularity. He
presents himself as a capable president and is able, if necessary, to participate in
all important political events.”
Much information appears to have been obtained from the perusal of
newspapers, and perhaps to a larger extent, from agents’ eavesdropping in
Washington bars and restaurants on conversations of officials trying to impress
others with their importance. It takes little imagination to assume that KGB and
Cuban agents zeroed in on those who appeared in public with their White House
or State Department passes dangling from their necks. However, information in
one secret KGB report that reached the Stasi in May 1987 could only have come
from a State Department or White House insider or from highly secret
documents.89 It revealed that Reagan hoped to unify the reaction of Western
nations to the announced Soviet plan to withdraw intermediate range missiles
from Europe. The report anticipated that the White House would announce its
response at the seven-nation summit meeting in Venice, sometime between June
8 and 10. A handwritten marginal note said that U.S. intentions were not actually
revealed until June 22, 1987.
SPY CATCHERS WORKING for the Stasi had an incredible advantage over
their counterparts in the West. The eyes and ears of the secret police permeated
every stratum of East German society. The responsibility for domestic
counterespionage lay with the Second Main Directorate, under the command of
Lieutenant General Günther Kratsch when the regime collapsed in 1990.
Kratsch, an obese man just under six feet tall, was slavishly devoted to Stasi
minister Mielke and the party. He commanded his subordinates with iron
discipline and brutality.1 Woe to anyone who voiced an opinion that could be
interpreted as criticism of the party or the state! Kratsch reported directly to
Mielke—a chain of command that conferred on him a power and an autonomy
not enjoyed by most other directorate heads.
The counterespionage directorate had a full-time staff of 2,350, of which
1,962 served at the Stasi’s East Berlin headquarters. The rest were stationed in
the Stasi’s provincial offices. “Considering that we had only about two hundred
agents in all of Europe, it was not a fair fight,” commented a senior U.S.
counterespionage officer. Indeed, it was not. Years earlier, Mielke had issued a
special directive on counterespionage, ordering the entire MfS staff of 108,000
to put all their resources at the disposal of the Second Directorate whenever their
help was requested by any of the latter’s officers.2 The backbone of Stasi
counterespionage, as of all other Stasi operations, were the IMs, the unofficial
informers. The Second Directorate had a stable of between 2,500 and 3,000.
Major support for the counterespionage effort was provided by the 6,000
regular officers assigned to the Third Main Directorate, for electronic
intelligence. This directorate was the brainchild of Major General Horst
Männchen and included the installation and operation of telephone taps. For
many years, Männchen’s officers had tapped 2,200 telephones used by U.S.
installations in West Berlin. The magnitude of this operation becomes clear
when one considers the manpower required to operate just half of these taps
manually, twenty-four hours a day. The rest of the taps were handled by
computers that controlled the taping and storage of conversations for later
analysis.
Party chief and head of state Erich Honecker, shown here with Stasi Lieutenant
General Günther Kratsch, Minister Erich Mielke, and Major General Werner
Grossmann, successor to Markus Wolf as chief of the foreign espionage
directorate. Courtesy MfS Photo.
THE RAILROADER
Günther Müller, a corporal in the Luftwaffe’s Ninth Parachute Regiment, had
just celebrated his eighteenth birthday on the front line in Normandy when, in
August 1944, he was taken prisoner by U.S. infantrymen. He and several other
Luftwaffe paratroopers were shipped to an internment camp at Fort Sill,
Oklahoma. In 1948 he was released and returned to his home, 140 miles
northwest of Berlin—now part of the Soviet-occupied zone. Müller resumed his
job with the railroad and married his childhood sweetheart, but life was hardly
bearable. “I began to detest the Russians and their German stooges with a
passion. I had enough of the communists, who were no different than the Nazis,”
Müller later recalled.10 The Cold War was getting colder, and he decided to fight
in his way. “I loved the Americans ever since I was their prisoner. I was
astonished how well they treated me when I was captured and later in Oklahoma.
It was like living in paradise, and now I wanted to do something for them.” In
spring 1953, shortly after the birth of his daughter, he traveled to Berlin’s
American sector. He visited former schoolmate Paul Perner, whom he told about
his hatred of the communists and his desire to fight them. Perner confided that
he was working for U.S. military intelligence. Did he want to join up? Müller
agreed at once. The Americans enthusiastically welcomed the volunteer, who
was a strategically placed railroad dispatcher. He would become an important
link in the then primitive early warning system of U.S. military intelligence.
Müller, code-named Munzberger by the Americans, was handed a cheap box
camera and told to go to work. Because he was a volunteer and spied for
ideological reasons, he was reimbursed only for expenses.
Müller tackled his espionage assignment with zeal, photographing Soviet
troop, tank, artillery, and vehicle transports moving through his station. He
reported train numbers, departure points and destinations, and type of rail cars
and their contents if noticeable. In the case of troop trains, Müller counted the
passengers and the number of officers and their rank and uniform insignia. This
information provided important clues for analysts in determining Soviet military
strength in East Germany—whether it was being reinforced or merely moved to
other locations. Periodically, Müller would be summoned to West Berlin’s
Kempinski Hotel for meetings with his handlers, who flew in from their
headquarters in West Germany. At those meetings he would turn over his films
and notes. In the event of especially heavy military movement, Müller or Perner
(the two worked as a team) would head immediately for Berlin.
Toward the end of 1954, Müller and Perner were introduced to a new
intermediary who called himself as Moosbach but said they should call him by
his code name, Moritz. At this stage the operation became a bit more
sophisticated. The cheap box camera had given out under heavy use, and the
spying pair was given an 8mm motion picture camera and a tiny Minox camera
to share. In addition they received several fountain pens containing an invisible
ink solution and instructions on their use. They also were taught how to set up
and use dead letter drops. Müller’s code designation was changed to 2M, and
Perner became 1M.
At 1:30 A.M. on November 20, 1955, the Müllers were awakened by a man’s
voice shouting Günther’s name from the street below their second-floor
apartment. Müller put on pants over his pajamas and went below to unlock the
front door. A stranger pushed him aside, and with two other men, stormed
upstairs into the apartment. One man rushed to the kitchen stove and stirred the
ashes, another went to the bedroom, and the third demanded to see Müller’s
identity card. After inspecting the card, he pulled Müller’s arms behind his back,
handcuffed him, and dragged him out of the apartment. He had no chance to put
on shoes or dress properly, though his wife managed to throw a jacket over his
shoulders as she asked when he would return. Müller merely shook his head
without saying a word. His two-year-old daughter was crying and clinging to her
mother. The remaining men searched the apartment until the late afternoon. The
only incriminating item they found was a tiny cassette of unexposed Minox film.
All the while they never identified themselves or showed a search warrant. Irene
Müller, of course, knew they were members of the feared Stasi.
The following morning the Stasi officers returned and searched again. After
several hours they told Irene to get dressed, and one man pulled the wailing little
girl from her mother. “She goes to your mother’s, and you are coming with us,”
Irene was told. In reply to her question of whether she could take her daughter
along with her, a Stasi man said: “You may never see your child again.” When
they reached the street, Irene was shoved into a car while her mother, who lived
nearby, led the little girl away.
Wedged between two Stasi men, Irene Müller asked where they were taking
her but received no answer. When she turned her head to look out the window,
one of the Stasi men hit her head with his fist. It was already getting dark as the
car drove through a gate into the backyard of a red brick building. They had
arrived at the Stasi’s prison and interrogation center on Lindenstrasse, in
Potsdam. The building had served the Nazi Gestapo and the Soviet NKVD for
the same purpose. Irene Müller was taken to a room and told to sit on a wooden
stool that had been bolted to the concrete floor. Before her was a small table. The
interrogation began. A man sat on the table, and another paced back and forth,
asking why her husband always traveled to Berlin. “To buy medicine for our
daughter and oranges or bananas.” For hours they asked the same questions, over
and over. Frau Müller’s answer was always the same. By now she was sobbing
bitterly.
Eventually a women relieved the interrogators and continued the
questioning. Frau Müller described what followed:
Since I could not give her any answers other than those I had
given the men, she screamed at me and called me such names as
‘dirty slut/ ‘whore/ and ‘boozing bitch.’ When I held my
handkerchief to my eyes, she grabbed my hands roughly,
slammed them on the table, and hit them with her fist. Once,
when my arms dropped to my side because I was exhausted after
so many hours on the stool, she grabbed them so violently that
my dress was torn. I told her that I had never met a woman like
her in my life, which made her so mad that she punched me in the
face.11
At that point Frau Müller soiled herself, her earlier request to use the toilet
having been ignored.
In the morning the Stasi men returned and she was finally allowed to use the
toilet under guard; but the door had to remain open. When she was returned to
the room, a Stasi interrogator placed several typewritten sheets of paper before
her and covered the writing with a blank sheet except for her name at the bottom.
She was told to sign. “What does it say?” she asked. “Exactly what you have
told us.” When she lifted the cover sheet, her hand was slapped roughly. Frau
Müller refused to sign. “Either you sign, or you will never see your kid or your
mother again. We will send them to Siberia, and you will be behind penitentiary
walls where you will have time to think over everything.”
At midmorning, another Stasi man relieved the others. He took a thermos of
coffee and a package of sandwiches from his briefcase. Grinning, he said: “Well,
do you want to drink something too? First I will have my breakfast.” He ate
leisurely and gave Frau Müller nothing, although she had asked hours before for
something to drink. The ordeal continued. Frau Müller was close to collapse
when a man in uniform entered the room. One of the Stasi men spoke to him in
Russian, and she could not understand what they were saying. “I was shaking
and could no longer think straight. I don’t know if I signed the paper or what
they had written down.” There was more talk that she could not understand.
Then the man in uniform said “davai.” There was not a German of her age who
did not know that this Russian word meant “let’s get started.” Frau Müller was
taken out of the room. At the top of a staircase, one of the Stasi men said to her,
“Your husband is behind you.” As she tried to turn her head, she was shoved
down the stairs, taken to a car, and told to sit in the back seat. This time there
was only a driver and another man seated next to him. Again they would not tell
her where they were going. Shortly before noon the car stopped at her mother’s
house. “Now get out!” the driver yelled. The thirty hours of brutality without
sleep, food, or drink had ended for Irene Müller.
Günther Müller was subjected to the same brutal questioning as his wife
except that he was punched in the face more often and for the first few days his
hands were cuffed behind his back while he sat on the stool. “By far the worst
torturer was a woman who would scream and threaten. When I said to her, ‘If
you think you can squeeze me like a lemon, you are wrong,” she grabbed a large
key ring and smashed it over my temple.” Müller spent four months at the
Lindenstrasse torture house, in cells without heat and with just enough food to
keep him alive. “One of the Stasi men once said to me, ‘Müller, if you are going
to lie, you must do it logically,” and that’s what I did.”
From the questions being asked, Müller surmised that the Stasi knew about
some of his activities but not everything, and certainly not those he considered
the most damaging. For example, they did not know that he had spied since
1953. They also wanted to know what Perner looked like, which indicated that
they had not arrested him. Thus, Müller told them that it was Perner who used
the Minox camera and that he merely delivered the film. He admitted to starting
in July 1955, a mere four months before his arrest. “Since they really did not
know much about what I did, I was able to lie my way off the gallows; because
if the whole truth had come out, I would not have gotten away with less than life
in prison. I think I handled myself the right way.” Following a one-hour trial on
March 2, 1956, Günther Müller was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment and
taken to Brandenburg penitentiary. “I estimated that of the 5,000 prisoners there,
about 500 had been sentenced to long terms for espionage.”
Müller heard nothing from his family for four years. Then his mother wrote
that his wife had fled to West Berlin in 1956 and his daughter had died of
leukemia in a refugee camp. “For me the world caved in, and I began to doubt
God and justness. When I signed up with the Americans, I was told not to reveal
my activities to anyone, not even to my wife, and I obeyed. In hindsight, I
should have left a letter with instructions for my wife with someone I could trust
in Berlin. Then she could have been helped by the Americans.”
Müller’s sentence was reduced to six years in September 1960 by a state
clemency board, and fourteen months later he was released. But he was not yet
free. Three months earlier the Berlin Wall had been built, shutting off the last
escape hatch. Barred from returning to his railroad job, Müller worked on his
parents’ small farm, which had become part of a collective, and hatched plans to
escape and join his wife in West Germany. He contacted two former colleagues
whom he knew to be staunch anticommunists and who still worked for the
railroad. They were willing to help.
Müller remembered having seen some prewar lead railcar seals while
working at the railroad before he was arrested. He told his friends to remove all
the seals from the freight car in which he would ride and replace them with the
old ones, because if one seal were missing, the car would be opened and
inspected. The right moment presented itself on the night of March 10, 1962. A
freight car containing 400 sacks of cement, already sealed, was to be added to a
train destined for West Germany. Müller and his friends removed all the seals,
including one over a ventilation hatch. Müller removed his clothes and managed
to squeeze his skinny body inside. The two railroad workers threw his clothes in
after him, shut the hatch, and sealed it. With a pocket knife, Müller bored a tiny
hole through the wooden wall of the car. It would enable him to see where the
train was when daylight came. Twelve hours later the train stopped, and border
guards inspected the seals. Shortly thereafter it stopped again for another
inspection. Not knowing that all trains leaving East Germany were inspected
twice before crossing the border, Müller almost knocked on the door to have it
opened. But through his tiny peephole he saw the uniform of a border guard.
“God was on my side that day,” Müller told me. “If they had had their dogs
with them, I would have been finished; but it was a Sunday, and I guess they
were too lazy to be thorough,” At the third stop, Müller noted that it was a
switching yard and that the track beds were higher and looked newer than those
in East Germany. He took a chance, unhinged the sliding door, pushed until the
seal broke, and burst out. A few yards down the tracks he spotted a railroad man
checking a manifest. He walked up to him and asked the name of the station.
“Büchen,” the man answered. Müller was free at last. Railroad police questioned
Müller and gave him a ticket to Monchen-Glad-bach, near the Dutch border,
where he was reunited with his wife.
Müller was hired by the West German federal railroad, but none of the tests
he had taken in East Germany were recognized, and he had to start over. He was,
however, credited with past service years. By the time he retired in 1985, he was
a senior administrator. The West German government paid him DM8,260—
about US$2,750 at the exchange rate then prevailing—as compensation for his
time in prison. He claimed nothing from the U.S. Army. With the restitution
money and his salary, Müller was able to establish a new and full life.
As the years passed, the Müllers thought less and less about their ordeal,
until the East German regime collapsed. When the German government
announced that Stasi victims could peruse their files, Müller applied for
permission to do so. On October 26, 1993, he sat in a small room in the former
Stasi headquarters, seething with anger. He discovered why he had been
arrested: The file contained a statement by a George Anschütz, a.k.a. Anderson,
an agent of British intelligence who had sold out to the Stasi. For some
unexplained reason, Müller’s intermediary handler Moosbach had given
Anschiitz Müller’s clear name and address. At best, this was a flagrant violation
of procedures. Müller’s partner, Paul Perner, apparently got wind of events while
in Berlin but did not return to the East and thus was unable to warn his friend.
Müller received yet another shock. He found a letter by Stasi foreign
espionage chief Markus Wolf to a Stasi colonel in charge of the area covering
Müller’s former hometown. Wolf wrote that according to a statement made by
Müller to West German police after his escape, he was aided by railroad workers
Werner Preuss and Heinz Ludecke. Both men spent two years in prison for
helping their friend. Wolf also had enclosed copies of teletypes originating in
Düsseldorf with the West German counterespionage agency and the Criminal
Investigation Bureau (Landeskriminalamt, or LKA) of the province of North
Rhine–Westphalia, obviously provided by Stasi moles. Because West German
security was rife with spies for the East, the identity of the mole who provided
Wolf with the Müller teletypes might never be known. However, the most likely
suspect was Ruth Wiegand, a teletype operator who worked for the Düsseldorf
LKA office, which covered the city where Müller lived. She had been a Stasi spy
since 1957 and had collected DM846,000 (about US$528,000) for furnishing
more than 3,000 secret teletypes. She went to prison for three years. What really
irked Müller was that the teletype from the counterspy agency said he was
suspected of having been turned into a double agent while in prison and had his
sentence reduced because of it. Müller wrote scathing letters to the German
counterespionage agency and the U.S. embassy in Germany, accusing his
handler, Moosbach, of treason.
THE MACHINIST
Werner Juretzko was sixteen years old in 1948 when he fled the Soviet-occupied
zone, fearing arrest because of his anticommunist activities.12 He wound up in
the town of Kassel in the American zone, where he found a job as an apprentice
in a heavy machinery plant. The German Communist Party’s agitation and
propaganda apparatus was in high gear at the time, trying to organize the plant’s
workers with little success. Juretzko’s outspoken opposition soon drew the
attention of the local criminal investigation section charged with combating
political extremism of both right and left. He became an undercover operative
and was instructed to change his view on communism, at least in public. The
local communists accepted the new convert. He joined a peace group supported
by East Germany and the communist Free German Youth, both of which were
virulently anti-American. He kept police informed on upcoming demonstrations
and the methods used by the East Germans to ship propaganda material to the
West. U.S. military intelligence, which maintained a close liaison with the
German police, liked Juretzko’s diligence and recruited him as an agent in 1953.
At the same time, Juretzko kept his job as a master machinist.
Juretzko was trained in various espionage techniques and was used mainly as
a courier and on urgent assignments. Using false identity papers in the name of
Werner Markus, he traveled throughout East Germany emptying dead letter
drops. Having been born in Upper Silesia, where he learned to speak fluent
Polish, he also was used on occasional assignments during which he used phony
papers in the name of Stanislaw Swoboda. His frequent absences from his job,
which he excused with ill health, became intolerable to his employer. He was
given the option to resign or be dismissed. He quit. His espionage activities
became a full-time job.
Between courier assignments, Juretzko spied on Soviet air bases and troop
areas. For a time he worked as a crane operator at a base near Falkenburg, east of
Leipzig, where the Soviet Air Force was extending and widening the runways.
His orders were to stay until he could observe the type of aircraft being brought
in. What he eventually reported to his handlers in Kassel was the arrival of the
First Bomber Fleet, which hitherto had been stationed in Asia.
On August 13, 1955, Juretzko was sent to check a rumor that MiG-19
fighters had arrived at a Soviet base north of Berlin. Four days later he checked
into a hotel in Schwerin. Before dawn he was awakened by someone rapping at
his door. Juretzko sensed that it was the police, and he rushed to look out the
window with escape in mind. His perception had been correct. The hotel was
surrounded by what seemed an entire company of People’s Police. Juretzko
opened the door and faced two men in civilian clothes, one of whom demanded
to see his identification and then checked it against what Juretzko noticed was a
Stasi wanted list. After a perfunctory body search that yielded a few sketches, he
was handcuffed and driven straight to the Hohenschon-hausen prison in East
Berlin. The building had been built by the Nazis as a giant kitchen where
thousands of meals were prepared for workers in armaments plants. The Soviet
secret police (NKVD) had it rebuilt in 1945 with an underground cell block for
especially recalcitrant prisoners. All the cells were totally dark, and sixty-eight
of them were so small that a person could only stand. To encourage confessions,
the tiny cells could be filled with icy water up to a person’s chest. Others were
equipped with a sound system that would give off brain-scrambling noise. The
Stasi inherited the place in the early 1950s. Prisoners called the underground
dungeon the “U-boat.”
During his interrogations Juretzko pretended to be politically disinterested. “I
figured that if they thought I was a staunch opponent of communism and the
DDR regime, they might hack my head off, so I played the mercenary.” It did
not take long for Juretzko to determine that he had been betrayed by someone
who knew only his alias. “One of the Stasi guys said to me over and over,
‘Markus, Markus, what a stupid pig you are. We know all about you, Werner
Markus.’” What the Stasi wanted to know was whether he was part of a spy ring.
Since he always worked solo or emptied dead letter drops, Juretzko had nothing
much to give them. Assuming that agents who were loading the drops had been
warned of his arrest, he would occasionally “remember” a drop location.
During part of his time in the U-boat, Juretzko shared a cell with Heinz
Friedemann, an engineer and architect who had been part of a large espionage
group working for British intelligence. Apparently he was an especially hard
case for Stasi interrogators. In charge of the case was First Lieutenant Gerhard
Niebling, who sent many to their death, including the hapless secretary Elli
Barczatis. Niebling had been promoted since the Barczatis and Laurenz case. It
seemed that the way to move up in the Stasi and the judicial system was to
ignore humaneness, even truth, and go for the severest sentences. Juretzko told
me: “One time Friedemann came back to the cell and he was sweating profusely
and he stank terribly. Before they turned the light out I thought I saw that the
sweat was pink. I thought he was really sweating blood.” When Friedemann had
calmed down, he told Juretzko that Niebling had said that the final protocol was
almost complete and that his “noggin will roll.” Just before Friedemann was
taken away a few days later, he said: “Werner, please hug my family for me
when you get out.”
Juretzko spent more than a hundred days in the U-boat, until he made a full
confession on December 27. He was taken out of the U-boat and transported to
the prison in Halle known as the Rote Ochse (Red Ox). There he was sentenced
to thirteen years for espionage. Inexplicably, Juretzko was tried a second time,
resulting in a reduction of the original sentence to eight years. He would serve
seven years before he was released on August 18, 1961 and expelled to West
Germany.
Immediately after his release at age twenty-nine, Juretzko decided to begin a
new life in the United States, where his three sisters had settled years earlier. His
parents had died shortly after World War II. At the end of 1961 he arrived in
Chicago, enrolled in school, and became an industrial engineer. He married in
1963. After retiring from a steel corporation, Juretzko set up his own business
specializing in prototype engineering for industry and in aerospace components,
in Wheeling, Illinois.
In summer 1992, Juretzko traveled to Berlin, where he found out that his cell
mate Heinz Friedemann, then forty years old, had been executed on December
22, 1956—five days before his confession, which he now believed might well
have saved his own life. Juretzko located Friedemann’s seventy-three-year-old
widow Irmgard and his two daughters and fulfilled his friend’s last wish, giving
them all a hug. Irmgard Friedemann told Juretzko that she had been informed in
November 1955 that her husband was sentenced to death and that she had
written immediately to DDR President Wilhelm Pieck, pleading for mercy. Her
letter was never answered. On December 12 she wrote another letter, pleading
for an answer. The second letter was found in the archive of the East German
Prosecutor General. On it, someone whose signature is unreadable had written:
“I feel it appropriate that Frau Friedemann not be told before the holidays that
the sentence has been carried out.”13 That note was dated December 24, 1955.
The presiding judge in the Friedemann case was a woman named Lucie von
Ehrenwall, director of the district court in Cottbus. The two lay judges assisting
her were Hildegard Schrögelmann, a factory worker, and Friedrich Gubatz, a
butcher. In 1992, prosecutors were preparing an indictment against von
Ehrenwall, who was known as the “bloody judge of Cottbus” for having sent at
least twelve persons to the guillotine. In one case she sentenced a man to fifteen
years in prison for singing a song that was considered antistate. Von Ehrenwall,
who was then seventy-nine years old, died before she could be tried for
perversion of justice. Hildegard Schrögelmann also was dead. The butcher
Friedrich Gubatz was alive, and Juretzko paid him a visit. They sat in the old
butcher’s well-tended garden.
Juretzko told me that Gubatz said he still could not figure out why he was
chosen: “I was not even a party member.” He said he had voted against the death
penalty but that “Frau von Ehrenwall was so horrible, a five hundred fifty
percenter, that nobody could convince her, and the other woman was also a
convinced communist.” Juretzko asked: “Were you able to sleep well that night?
Can you imagine that Heinz Friedemann would also have liked to sit in a little
garden?” The man did not reply. Juretzko handed him a copy of the certificate of
execution. “Here is a present for you; sleep well.” Gubatz looked at him and said
quietly, “I am sure I won’t.”
Juretzko was not finished in his quest for revenge. In August 1992, he wrote
the Berlin prosecutor general and demanded that former Stasi Major General
Gerhard Niebling be charged with actively participating in the murder of
Friedemann. At first he was notified that an investigation was pending, then that
the case was closed. “I guess the Germans have lost their balls,” he said
resignedly. Juretzko said he plans to return to Berlin someday to read his Stasi
file. When he does, he will find out who betrayed him.
A CIA COUP
The “mailmen” of the Stasi’s counterespionage directorate randomly opened
letters destined for West Germany, and West Berlin in particular, to test them for
invisible writing. This method of spy catching was extraordinarily successful in
tracking down a number of well-placed CIA agents. Wolfgang Reif, who held
the subcabinet rank of state secretary in the East German foreign ministry, was
arrested in 1984 after a letter written in invisible ink was traced to him.16 Reif
confessed to espionage and revealed that he had been recruited by the CIA in
1965, while serving as a vice consul at East Germany’s embassy in Jakarta,
Indonesia. He returned to East Berlin in early 1970, and seven years later he was
posted again to Jakarta, this time as deputy ambassador. His access to the most
secret foreign policy decisions with regard to East Germany’s relations with the
Soviet Union and other Easternbloc nations made him an extremely valuable
CIA asset. The fifty-four-year-old Reif, whose CIA code name was Greif, had
been sentenced to life imprisonment but was automatically released after
reunification in 1990.
Gertrude Liebing, a communications technician for the Central Committee of
the Communist Party, had written a letter in invisible ink to a CIA cover address
in February 1966.17 It was intercepted, and she was placed under investigation
for seven months before she was arrested. During that time she wrote a number
of other letters, all of which wound up in the hands of the Stasi mailmen.
Because she was suffering from terminal cancer, it took relatively little effort for
the Stasi to wring a confession out of Frau Liebing, who said she had been
recruited by the CIA in West Berlin eleven years earlier. It was a major coup for
the CIA when the woman joined because she had extensive and detailed
knowledge of and access to all major government ministries. At the CIA’s
behest, Frau Liebing researched the technical possibilities for installing listening
devices at Central Committee offices and supplied top secret telephone numbers
and telephone books. The woman, whose CIA code name was Markus, was also
an unofficial Stasi collaborator and reported to the CIA on the personalities of
members of the Ministry for State Security with whom she came into contact.
A Stasi interrogation protocol said that prior to the erection of the “antifascist
protective barrier,” as the communists called the Berlin Wall, the CIA had
supplied Liebing with ciphers that would enable her to decode radio messages.
This was how she received her assignment after the Wall was built on August 13,
1961. CIA messages were preceded by the letters “Kta,” followed by a number
—for example, Kta/11—indicating the agent for whom the messages were
intended. Frau Liebing apparently had no contact with other CIA agents in East
Berlin, but she gave Stasi probers a list bearing forty-two names that she had
relayed to the CIA as recruitment prospects.
Presumably working from that list, Stasi counterespionage officers were
successful in identifying and arresting at least five other agents. All were
employed in the Central Committee’s telecommunications department and were
obviously extremely useful to the CIA. Five other message recipients were only
partially identified, and their fate is not known. One of the arrested was Harry
Wierschke, a party member who had served one year in a Nazi concentration
camp for refusing to serve in the military. He is believed to have supplied the
CIA the tape recordings of secret party meetings, which he had been entrusted to
destroy. Wierschke was sentenced to life imprisonment—a sentence that was
later reduced to fifteen years. The sentences of the others ranged from five to
twelve years. Gertrud Liebing received a twelve-year term and died of cancer in
prison a year later. All the others had also died by the time their Stasi files were
found in 1997. In the case of one Arno Heine, it could be ascertained that he had
died in Bautzen II penitentiary, allegedly of cardiac arrest.
THE INNOCENT
The number of individuals imprisoned on false charges of espionage may never
be known, but it might well range in the thousands.18 Among the innocent was
Günther Jahn, who was an apprentice aircraft mechanic when, at age sixteen, he
was drafted into the Nazi Wehrmacht and assigned to a tank destroyer unit. He
was wounded just five days before the war ended, taken prisoner by a U.S. Army
unit, and sent to a British POW camp in northern Germany. He was released in
July and assigned to work as a farm hand. After a bout with typhus, pneumonia,
and pleurisy, Jahn headed for the Soviet zone to find his mother. His father had
died in the concentration camp at Dachau, where the Nazis had confined him for
resistance activities.
Jahn found his mother living near Berlin. The labor office there assigned him
to clearing rubble and cutting down trees and later to a job on a bridge
construction project. When the job was completed in 1948 Jahn and hundreds of
other men were ordered to report for work in a mine in the Ore Mountains, to dig
uranium for the Soviet atomic bomb project. Having heard of the miserable and
dangerous conditions that existed in the mines, Jahn decided to flee to the
American zone. However, as he was about cross the border, he was nabbed by a
patrol of the People’s Police. After interrogation by the K-5 criminal police, the
forerunner of the Stasi, he was turned over to the Soviet secret police. He was
confined to a room with seventeen other prisoners. They slept on a pile of straw,
and an old water bucket was their toilet. “The food was so bad that I want to
throw up just thinking about it,” Jahn wrote to me later. For weeks, sometimes
for months, the prisoners did not shave or bathe: “We looked like cave men and
stank like pigs. If the lice with which we were infested had been dollars, we’d
have been millionaires,” Jahn wrote.
For weeks Jahn was questioned by a Soviet secret police captain, who was
aided by a uniformed woman interpreter. He was accused of trying to reach the
Americans and give them “secret” information about the bridge he had helped
build. At one point he lost his temper, told the Soviet officer what he thought of
him, and spat in his face. In return, he was beaten severely, and for good
measure, the woman interpreter rammed a letter opener into his shoulder. The
metal tip broke off, and no one made an attempt to extract it. From then on he
was handcuffed to a heating pipe and his interrogations began with beatings. “I
realized after a while that I would not leave the place alive if I didn’t sign the
statement of lies they had concocted,” Jahn said. “So I signed all that shit.”
Three days later he stood before a Soviet military tribunal, and within five
minutes he had been sentenced to twenty-five years in a labor camp.
Jahn was confined in Bautzen II penitentiary, where the treatment was as bad
as could be. For talking to another prisoner a People’s Police warder smashed his
baton into Jahn’s right kidney. For weeks Jahn’s urine was pink. There was no
medical treatment. For minor infractions prisoners were squeezed into a cell
measuring about twelve by fourteen inches, the length of such confinement
depending on the mood of the warder. “I had several experiences with that cell.
If you were lucky you got out in two hours, if not you might be in for eight.
When they opened the door you would just fall out,” Jahn recalled. The food,
already sparse and barely edible when he arrived, got even worse in 1950. On
March 31, 1950, the prisoners rioted when they assembled in the mess hall.
Warders fled, and armed People’s Police units stormed into the prison yard.
Guards used fire hoses to spray the mess hall windows and drive away the
prisoners, who were chanting: “We call upon the Geneva Red Cross! . . . We are
starving, starving, starving! . . . We want our freedom! . . . We are innocent!”19
The prisoners could see people standing in nearby streets, waving at them. The
onlookers ran off when Soviet troops and tanks surrounded the penitentiary.
Suddenly the mess hall door swung open and police stormed in. The first wave
was badly beaten; but in the end, the prisoners were reduced to a sad, moaning,
and bleeding heap of humanity.
In December 1950, Jahn was called to the administrator’s office, where he
was received by Chief Commissioner Gustav Schulz (whom he called “Hunde
Schulz”—“Schulz the Dog”). He was given paper and pencil and told to write
down the poems he had written and distributed among the prisoners, one of
whom obviously had informed on him. What poems? Jahn asked. Schulz beat
him with a riding crop. Jahn wrote out the poems, all of which spoke of freedom
triumphing over misery. The last stanza of one poem read: “Walls will collapse,
bars will break, our precious possession shall always be the golden freedom, and
then you laugh with teary eyes over pain long forgotten.” His poetry earned him
fourteen days in solitary. For eight days Jahn was in handcuffs and fed a bowl of
soup every other day. Then the cuffs were removed and he received food every
day. After his solitary confinement Jahn was assigned to a tailor shop where he
said he learned a lot that he knew would stand him in good stead after his
release.
Release came suddenly, on January 16, 1954. He and other prisoners were
given new clothing, shoes, two packages of cigarettes, and a packet of
sandwiches. Jahn and the others were told to sign a pledge that they would
remain in East Germany, would never discuss prison conditions, and would work
for the Stasi. “The main thing was to get out of there,” Jahn explained.
“Everything else could wait till later; I signed,” He received ten marks, his
discharge paper, and a railroad ticket to Strausberg, where his mother lived, near
Berlin. When he arrived there, he registered with the police as required.
Instead of reporting back to the police three days later as he had been
ordered, Jahn slipped into West Berlin, where he checked into a refugee camp.
He was flown to another camp in West Germany, where he worked as a fitter in a
metal shop. At government expense he was sent to a spa for four weeks of
recuperation and removal of the tip of the letter opener that the Soviet woman
translator had rammed into his shoulder six years earlier. At the spa in Bad
Nauheim he met Helga Ramm, who was recuperating from five years of
unspeakable torture and humiliation during Soviet interrogation in a number of
prisons. She had been arrested by Stasi agents while visiting East Berlin. Ramm,
then 19, had worked as a housekeeper for Rainer Hildebrandt, who led the
anticommunist Battle Group Against Inhumanity (KgU). From time to time
Hildebrandt gave her letters to deliver to a U.S. Army officer. The KgU was
infiltrated by Stasi informers, who must have reported her name, and she was put
on a wanted list. The young woman was turned over to the Soviets, who tortured
her into signing a confession. Like Jahn, she was sentenced to twenty-five years
in a labor camp. She was pardoned and released a day after Jahn regained his
freedom.
Günther Jahn and Helga Ramm met on March 9, 1954, were engaged three
days later, and married in April. Their daughter Birgit was born a year later,
while the Jahns were still living in the refugee camp. Finally they were given a
tiny apartment in a small town near Frankfurt. “The treatment we received from
local officials was catastrophic,” Jahn told me. “[They were] narrow-minded
provincial bureaucrats in whose eyes we were interlopers and antisocial riffraff.
They told us straight out, ‘If you were in prison over there, you must have
committed a crime.” The young couple decided to turn their backs on Germany
and emigrate to Australia to seek a new life. The beginning was tough, having to
learn a new language and adapt themselves to the climate and culture. In time,
Jahn got a job in a factory near Melbourne that manufactured blades for aircraft
turbines. He worked his way up to head the toolmaking department. A second
daughter was born in Australia in 1959. Both children are married and the Jahns
have three grandchildren. The West German government paid them restitution,
and Jahn was granted a pension, although it was 30 percent less than he would
have received in Germany, because he and his wife are now Australian citizens.
Throughout the nearly eleven years of Sandinista rule, all Stasi reports on the
political progress toward absolute communist domination were couched in
careful language: On the one hand the top leadership was striving for a Marxist-
Leninist type of rule, but on the other some Sandinista commandantes and much
of the public and the churches were against it. Nevertheless, dozens of Stasi
delegations, often led by a general, visited Managua over the years and kept
urging the continuation, even intensification, of material support. These
communist officials did not merely wear ideological blinders but walked through
this world permanently and totally blind, or worse yet, lacked the courage to tell
the leadership the truth, though many said later they saw it coming as far back as
1983.
From 1980 through May 1989, when political turmoil was reaching its height
in East Germany, Mielke showered the Sandinistas with gifts that according to
records I obtained, totaled roughly $15.7 million. Most of the items supplied
were intended for use in political control, such as electronics for wiretapping of
practically every telephone in Nicaragua. Other shipments included surveillance
cameras, optical instruments, uniforms, and to a lesser extent, medical supplies
and food. In 1983 the Stasi chief approved $25,000 for installing a security
system at the home of Interior Minister Tomas Borge. No records could be found
covering the expenses incurred in flying Sandinistas to East Germany for
training or by the various delegations from both sides visiting each other’s
countries. It would certainly add another few million. And then there were the
personal gifts the Stasi presented to high officials—although in one such case the
quality and value of the gift might have been less than one would expect. Stasi
deputy minister Lieutenant General Gerhard Neiber once gave a watch to Javier
Amador, deputy director of Managua airport. The watch stopped working after a
few months, and Amador had it sent via a Stasi courier to East Berlin for repair.
It took several cables to find out whether the repairs had been made. Finally,
nearly two months later, comrade Amador received his repaired watch, courtesy
of a Cuban official who had been in Berlin and who agreed to act as a courier.
The most bizarre aspect of the Stasi’s involvement with the Sandinistas was
that East Berlin officials made detailed plans in November 1989, the month the
wall came down, for “solidarity” shipments through 1995 valued at roughly
$240 million. Again, nearly all of the items listed were designated to maintain
the technical inventory of Nicaragua’s secret police and intelligence department.
However, the shipment being readied in November 1989 included household
items such as 400 frying pans; 9,000 pieces of china; 18,000 pieces of
silverware, bed linens, and towels; and 36,000 bars of soap. The Stasi had not
forgotten the needs of women, and planned to send personal items ranging from
shoes, nightshirts, and panty hose to sweaters and sanitary napkins.
The first indication that the Sandinista regime was heading toward defeat
came in a report of May 15, 1989, by Stasi Lieutenant Colonel Artur Herman,
although one must read between the lines. Herman, assigned to the Twentieth
Main Directorate, responsible for control of the churches, spent two months in
Nicaragua. “A decisive influence on the attitude of the population is the Catholic
religion, which is solidly embedded in the people, who are deeply devout,”
Herman wrote. “Of the 3.5 million Nicaraguans, 80 percent are Catholics. The
church dignitaries have been supported for years by the United States and other
reactionary powers, who elevated the church to a symbolic figure in an exposed
position. Cardinal Miguel Obando has great influence, which he uses openly to
confront the Sandinista movement,” He went on to say that there was not a
single area of Nicaragua’s society that was not affected by the influence of the
church, and that “the critical ideological debate is increasing.” The colonel wrote
that the deputy director of state security, Commandante Castillo, said technical
methods need to be employed against the church and asked for Stasi assistance.
What he surely meant was that he wanted to bug the churches, rectories, and
confessionals, as the Stasi had done in East Germany for many years.
Included in an earlier Stasi “solidarity” shipment were ten document
shredders. It must be assumed that these were working at capacity when the
Sandinistas lost the election on February 29, 1990.
Southern Africa
The first group of Africans completed their five-month course at the Stasi’s
Department for International Relations in early 1971. These included members
of the terrorist wing of the African National Congress, Umkhonto we Sizwe, or
MK, (literally, “Spear of the Nation”). This group was headed by a white South
African communist, Ronnie Kasrils, who turned his charges into ferocious
guerrilla fighters.30 Subsequently, the East Germans trained members of
liberation movements from Rhodesia, Mozambique, Namibia, and Zimbabwe in
two distinctively separate groups. Military commanders received tactical
schooling, including training in terrorism, at the huge Teupitz troop training area
southeast of Berlin. Those slated for leadership positions in espionage,
counterespionage, and general security attended the Department for International
Relations. For practical exercises, the latter were bused to the Motz firing range
of the personnel security directorate or to nearby Kallinchen, where training in
handling explosives was conducted. I was unable to locate Stasi files showing
the exact number of Africans who received training in East Germany. However,
former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, responsible for surveillance of all foreigners,
estimated they numbered at least 1,500. Most of those, he told me, came from
the communist-controlled African National Congress (ANC) of South Africa.
Soviet President Nikolai Podgorny and Cuba’s Fidel Castro in a joint 1977
statement pledged “quick” establishment of additional training camps for Spear
of the Nation terrorists in Angola, with East Germany and Cuba providing the
instructors and the Soviet Union the weapons.
I also could not locate documents from which to calculate the total amount
spent by the East German communists on propping up liberation movements and
Marxist governments in Africa between the late 1960s and 1989. However, for
1988 alone, the Politbüro authorized spending more than 1.134 billion marks,
including 30.8 million “hard” (West German) marks.31 According to a secret
memorandum of the meeting, “this represents .43 percent of the annual national
income of the DDR.” Interestingly, the memorandum revealed that the regime
used an exchange rate of 3.399 West marks to 1 East mark, although the
communists always insisted their mark was just as solid as the hard deutsche
mark. Upon entering East Berlin, visitors were forced to change at least five
West marks, and the rate was always 1 for 1. Although the West German bank
rate was more advantageous (it held at 10 to 1 for years), it was illegal in East
Germany to import East marks from the West. Even when using the phony East
German exchange rate, the value of the 1988 deliveries in U.S. dollars would
come to roughly $444.7 million. This figure does not include the hundreds of
millions sent abroad by the so-called Solidarity Committee of the DDR, to which
all workers were obliged to contribute. In a September 28, 1988 letter to Kurt
Seibt, Solidarity Committee president and Central Committee member, Mielke
wrote that Stasi members alone had contributed 10 million marks between 1987
and 1988. Seibt thanked Mielke in a fawning letter that ended: “For Peace and
Liberty! This is an obligation, which also is an expression of the class
consciousness of members of your ministry to be the protective umbrella of our
free socialist fatherland and the peaceful life of its citizens.”
Most of the substantial Stasi financial assistance to the ANC was provided in
the form of top quality counterfeit Rands, the South African currency.32 Indeed,
the Stasi’s Technical Operations Sector (OTS) included a sophisticated currency
counterfeiting unit under Colonel Kurt Lewinsky, a veteran Berlin forger whom
the Nazis had imprisoned at Sachsenhausen concentration camp.33 He managed
to escape in 1945 as prisoners were being evacuated to keep them from falling
into the hands of the Red Army. After World War II, Scotland Yard launched an
extensive investigation into SS counterfeiting operations that produced such
high-quality British pound notes that even Swiss banks failed to recognize them
as bogus. In a secret 1947 Scotland Yard report, Kurt Lewinsky was named as
one of the counterfeiters.34
Despite the tight secrecy imposed by all communist countries on their
support for liberation movements, Western intelligence services became aware
of it early on. Nevertheless, the Denton Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism
of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee issued a report in November 1982 on
Soviet, East German, and Cuban involvement in fomenting terrorism in southern
Africa. While the Stasi had operatives in Mozambique, Rhodesia, Namibia,
Angola, and Zimbabwe, I could find no evidence of their presence with the ANC
on South African territory. The Stasi apparently had decided to concentrate only
on training ANC members in East Germany, since ANC activities were under the
direct control of the South African Communist Party (SACP). The party was led
by Joe Slovo, a white man born in Lithuania and believed by Western
intelligence officials to have held the rank of colonel in the Soviet KGB.35
Heading the ANC was Oliver Tambo, who during a visit to Moscow in the late
1980s, was awarded the Order of Lenin. Activities in South Africa were directed
capably by longtime communists who had proven themselves ideologically and
militarily trustworthy. In testimony before the U.S. Senate’s Denton Committee,
Bartholomew Hlapane, a former member of the ANC National Executive
Committee and the SACP Central Committee, described terrorist activities in
detail. “No major decision could be taken by the ANC without the concurrence
and approval of the SACP Central Committee,” he said. “Most major
developments were, in fact, initiated by the SACP Central Committee,” Less
than a month after his testimony, Hlapane and his wife were murdered in their
home in Soweto by an ANC assassin armed with a Soviet-made AK-47
automatic rifle.36
On February 11, 1990, Nelson Mandela, in his first major public address
after his release from prison, lavishly praised the SACP, saying, “I salute the
South African Communist Party for its sterling contribution to democracy,” This,
a Washington Post editorial two days later described as “passing uncomfortable.”
The author of the editorial asked whether the ANC “is about to create another of
the cruel, undemocratic, and inefficient state-centered regimes that are collapsing
in other parts of the world.” In 1997, all vital cabinet posts of the Mandela
government were in the hands of long-standing SACP members. Joe Modise was
secretary of defense. His deputy was Ronnie Kasrils, the former head of the
Spear of the Nation terrorist organization. The minister of foreign affairs was
Alfred Nzo, and Pallo Jordan was minister for telecommunications and
broadcasting. Takeover of the South African Army by the old ANC guard was
completed in June 1998 when Lieutenant General Siphiwe Nyanda became army
commander after George Melring went into early retirement. The forty-seven-
year-old Nyanda, a former MK terrorist, received his military training in
communist East Germany. In addition, and equally as important, Sidney
Mufamadi was named Minister for Safety and Security, a position that controls
all police forces. “It is a textbook example of the ministries communist parties
always covet as an essential first step to total control,” said William Stearman,
former U.S. National Security Council expert on Soviet Affairs and liberation
movements. “Moreover, First Deputy President Thabo Mbeki, designated
successor to seventy-eight-year-old Mandela, is also an SACP member,” added
Stearman. 37
Besides training and supplying liberation movements in southern Africa, the
East Germans also provided development aid, composed chiefly of civilian
technicians who were party members. Those selected or who volunteered for
such assignments underwent extensive vetting that sometimes lasted as long as a
year. During this time, the candidates were constantly observed by Stasi
informants. To assure that they remained loyal and would not defect to the West,
once abroad they were under constant scrutiny by informers reporting to Stasi
controllers based in all East German embassies. As an added security, only
married personnel were chosen, and their families remained home as hostages.
Over the years, there were only about a dozen defections out of some 2,000
workers serving in Africa at any one time.38 Concern over defections at times
resulted in bizarre machinations to protect the “workers’ and peasants’ state.”
Hermann-Hugo Kästner, a master mechanic from a small Thuringian town, often
spoke of his opposition to the regime when he was among friends.39 Privately,
the twenty-five-year-old was consumed by thoughts of escape. In 1977 he
applied for a foreign assignment and was rejected because he was not a party
member. In 1984 he joined the party, married, and reapplied. A childhood friend
who was a Stasi informer denounced him, saying he thought Kästner wanted the
foreign job only so that he could defect. He was the kind of citizen the Stasi
wanted behind bars. The Stasi arranged Kästner’s acceptance and at the same
time sent the informer along to collect evidence. In 1985 Kästner and the
informer, appropriately code-named Condor, were sent to Angola. In Luanda,
Kästner immediately made his plans. Knowing that visiting the West German
embassy was too dangerous, he eventually applied for a special harbor pass that
would allow him to accompany trucks picking up supplies. He planned to reach
a West German or noncommunist vessel and ask for asylum. The request for a
pass was enough evidence for the Stasi. Kästner was ordered to return to East
Berlin, ostensibly for treatment of an ankle he had sprained during a soccer
game. He at first declined, but the East German ambassador insisted, so he
returned aboard the government plane of party chief Honecker, who was visiting
Angola. He was arrested by the Stasi as he left the plane, and later was tried,
convicted, and sentenced to eighteen months in prison for attempting to defect.
In the end, however, he was lucky, having served only eight months before he
was ransomed by the West German government and allowed to leave East
Germany.
Northeast Africa
The Stasi bloodied its hands by proxy wherever it was instrumental in setting up
secret police organizations for Marxist governments. Nowhere was the
bloodshed worse than in Ethiopia. Three years after overthrowing Emperor Haile
Selassie in 1974, the Provisional Military Administrative Council (PMAC), or
Derg, of Marxist Lt. Colonel Mengistu Haile Mariam requested East German
assistance in establishing a state security apparatus. Stasi Major General Gerhard
Neiber was dispatched to Addis Ababa and arrived there at the start of
Mengistu’s reign of terror. Neiber’s mandate was to contribute to the
stabilization of Mengistu’s powers by establishing an effective secret police. He
was aided by about 100 other Stasi officers.40 In addition, roughly 300 other
East Germans from the People’s Army and police assisted some 1,000 Soviet
military advisers in training the Ethiopian army and police. Neiber
systematically patterned the military dictator’s state security service on the MfS.
By the time Neiber returned to East Germany and promotion to lieutenant
general in late 1978, the Mengistu reign of terror had reached its height.
Between 40,000 and 100,000, mostly young people, were murdered.41
Thousands more were imprisoned under extremely harsh conditions and
tortured.
In the late 1970s the Ethiopian intelligence service established what former
Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand called a “strong presence” in East Berlin. A
number of their operatives had been trained at the Stasi’s Center for International
Relations. They collaborated with the HVA’s Third Department and Wiegand’s
task force responsible for the surveillance of foreigners residing in East
Germany. At the same time, roughly one hundred Ethiopians were being
schooled at various East German educational institutions. “Here we had
considerable problems from an internal security point of view,” recalled
Wiegand, whose group was subordinate to the counterespionage directorate.
“For one thing, many of the Ethiopians lacked even an elementary education.”
They became targets of the anti-Mengistu Tigrean People’s Liberation Front,
which had established an office in West Berlin run by Colonel A. Teferre.
“Teferre’s people not only subversively influenced the students but also
developed an entire movement of students who would defect to the West once
their schooling was completed,” Wiegand said. “This went so far that Mengistu,
in a letter to Honecker, asked that this situation be stopped.” During one of
Teferre’s trips to East Berlin, after Stasi agents observed him visiting the U.S.
Army’s McNair barracks, where they suspected a CIA detail was housed, the
Stasi detained Teferre and questioned him for two days. “We knew that
Ethiopian students fleeing to West Berlin were held there for four to six weeks,
and we suspected that Teferre was working with the CIA,” said Wiegand. “Of
course, he did not admit it, but he also did not accept a lucrative recruiting offer,
and he never returned to East Berlin.” Under pressure from the party leadership,
the Stasi began to detain Ethiopians after they completed their studies, placing
them under guard on a direct Interflug flight to Addis Ababa. “This went on until
it got too hot for me and I refused to continue, pointing out that our methods
were bound to turn them into antisocialist zealots,” Wiegand told me. “The party
bought my argument, but frankly, I just felt sorry for those poor wretches. From
colleagues who returned from Addis Ababa I heard all about how the Mengistu
state security dealt with anyone suspected of being an enemy.”
In June 1984, Stasi Minister Mielke and the Ethiopian Minister for State and
Public Security Tessaye Wolde Selassie signed a five-point mutual cooperation
agreement classified as top secret.42 The preamble of the agreement said the two
sides were “guided by the principle of proletarian internationalism and our
mutual interests in the anti-imperialist struggle aimed at making an effective
contribution in the battle against the imperialist secret services and other
reactionary forces,” They pledged to exchange information regarding plans and
activities affecting the security of both states, particularly as it concerned
Ethiopians residing in East Germany and East German citizens visiting socialist
Ethiopia. In other words, you keep an eye on our people, and we’ll watch yours.
Mielke and Tessaye agreed they would exchange representatives based at each
other’s capital under diplomatic cover. The text of the agreement also stated that
both sides would “conduct joint operations against subversive activities of
imperialist and reactionary forces which are aimed against either of the two
states.” Mielke said his ministry would continue to provide free schooling at
universities or other institutions for “a certain number of cadres.” Furthermore,
the Stasi would provide unspecified “materials and equipment” on a “solidarity
basis”—i.e., gratis—and would assist in the acquisition and supply of other
materials and equipment, apparently arms and munitions, against “cash
payment.”
I was unable to locate official figures on East German support for Ethiopia
between 1977 and 1987. The German foreign policy journal Aussenpolitik,
however, said it totaled nearly 100 million East marks. Using the East German
exchange rate of 3.99 West marks to 1 East Mark and then converting it into
dollars by applying the average rate over the years, the assistance would have
amounted to $11,289,484. Aussenpolitik, in its 1996 issue, asserted that East
Germany had stopped its support in 1987. On the contrary, on March 29, 1988,
Honecker ordered “immediate” arms shipments to Ethiopia. Prime Minister Willi
Stoph executed the order by directing the Commercial Coordination (KOKO)
section, a trading organization controlled by the Stasi, to deliver weapons,
ammunition, military equipment, and 100 trucks, valued at a total of
US$14,134,078.43 Stoph ordered finance of the shipment with a 2.5-percent
annual interest government credit repayable in fourteen years. In addition, he
decreed that used and overhauled weapons valued at US$1,396,648 be given to
the Mengistu regime as a “solidarity gesture” free of charge, the money coming
out of the East German budget. These shipments were made at a time when
Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev sought to disentangle the Soviet Union
from the Ethiopian adventure but reluctantly went along with Moscow’s hard-
liners. Paul Henze, the foremost U.S. expert on Ethiopia, who served at the U.S.
embassy in Addis Ababa and in the National Security Council, said that although
the Soviets and Ethiopia had an agreement on delivery of arms, Moscow made it
clear in 1988 and 1989 that not much more was coming. “In fact, we knew that
the Soviets told them to ‘go to the East Germans, they have lots/” Edward M.
Korry, who was assigned to Ethiopia as ambassador after his tenure in Chile, told
me he was aware that the Soviets and East Germans were spending huge sums of
money to prop up the Mengistu terror machine, and said: “I recommended to the
State Department that we broadcast to the Soviet and East German people how
much money their governments were pouring into Africa while their own
economies were in dire straits. They turned me down on grounds that this would
be merely seen as propaganda.”
In addition to military equipment, the Stasi shipped building materials to
Addis Ababa. In East Berlin and other cities and villages, apartment buildings
were decaying at an incredible rate, and some had to be abandoned. Whole
balconies were dropping into the streets for lack of construction materials. Yet,
in January 1989, Stasi Major General Willi Damm, head of the international
relations directorate, signed a protocol with the Ethiopian interior ministry
pledging to deliver at Stasi expense items sorely needed in his own country. A
list of 105 items delivered to Ethiopia between 1988 and June 1989 was attached
to the protocol, including: 1,000 tons of portland cement, 331 tons of reinforced
steel, window frames, 5,197 feet of various pipes, 8,563 feet of electric cable,
and hundreds of electric switches. The 62 toilet bowls and 25 urinals, furniture,
refrigerators, freezers, and steel safes scheduled for delivery in December 1989
never made it to the port. The Berlin Wall had been dismantled a month earlier,
and the government was in disarray. But Ethiopian table tennis players were
lucky: They received two Ping-Pong tables with nets and paddles in June.
The murderous Marxist regime ended in May 1991, with the resignation of
Mengistu and his escape to Zimbabwe as Tigrean rebel units advanced on Addis
Ababa. Most of the East German contingent had returned home a year earlier,
but the Stasi men left something behind—their records. After retiring,
Ambassador Korry returned to Ethiopia in late 1994, just as the trials of former
Mengistu accomplices were getting under way. More than a thousand people,
including former State Security Minister Tessaye Wolde Selassie, who signed the
assistance agreement with Stasi Minister Mielke, were in prison. “An official of
the new government told me that the East Germans had left behind files
minutely detailing the crimes committed by the Mengistu people,” Ambassador
Korry told me. “These records are being used in the trials,” Ironically, while
many of the accused were sentenced to long prison terms or worse, their
accomplices in the Stasi remained free.
The LPB is misusing its diplomatic mission and status and is almost
entirely devoted to pursuing intelligence work. The bulk of the LPB
diplomats and administrative employees belong to three different
residencies3 of various Libyan secret services.
The LPB is misusing the territory of the DDR for planning,
organizing, and executing terrorist attacks in the West, specifically
bombings and murders of opponents of the Libyan regime in West
Berlin.
Weapons, ammunition, and explosives are stored inside the LPB
apartments of diplomats and in secretly and illegally rented
apartments of GDR citizens. These items are being imported into the
DDR by circumventing customs controls and are transshipped to
West Berlin in diplomatic vehicles.
Secret service employees within the LPB engage in espionage on the
territory of the DDR against other foreign embassies, especially
those of other Arab states, and are recruiting and controlling agents
who increasingly include citizens of the GDR who have even been
targeted against the MfS.
Foreigners employed by the LPB have been identified by the MfS
and by Western intelligence services as terrorists and murderers.
Yasser Chraidi, Libyan terrorist and planner of the 1986 bombing of the La Belle
discotheque in Berlin. Courtesy Ullstein Photo.
LA BELLE IS BOMBED
On April 5 between 12:30 and 2:00 A.M., Chraidi was at his apartment on Hans
Loch Strasse, about a mile and a half from Stasi headquarters. He was listening
to West Berlin news broadcasts and received a number of telephone calls from
unidentified Arabs in West Berlin. At 1:15 A.M. a caller told him: “It hasn’t
been possible yet.” The Libyan killer then left the apartment and drove to the
Berolina Hotel on Karl-Marx -Allee in downtown East Berlin, where he was
joined by Musbah. In a second-floor room expertly bugged by the Stasi, they
listened to a special newscast at 5 A.M., aired by RIAS (Radio in the American
Sector), reporting an explosion at the La Belle discotheque.
Wiegand became enraged when he heard the news: “The swine bluffed us!
They took the weapons and explosives through the front door and brought them
back out through the rear.” The colonel was furious at his own negligence. He
told Stuchly, “We were too anxious to believe that we had done a good deed, and
overlooked the deviousness of the Arab mentality,” The transport of the weapons
back to East Berlin had been a ruse, and the explosives, taken earlier to West
Berlin, had not been detected by Wiegand’s watchers.
At the Berolina Hotel, Chraidi telephoned Keshlaf, the Libyan secret service
station chief. Then he contacted Elamin A. Elamin, who had been accredited as a
diplomat only a month earlier and whom the Stasi believed was sent to East
Berlin specifically to organize the bombing. Both had already heard about the
bombing, and they profusely congratulated one another.
Returning to Chraidi’s apartment, Al-Albani and Chraidi drafted a note
claiming responsibility for the bombing: “We the Arab forces on German soil
and in Europe take responsibility for the bombing of the American discotheque,
an answer to the American aggression in the Gulf of Sidra. Under the leadership
of the Great Leader!” The two terrorists then drove to the Palast Hotel to phone a
West Berlin newspaper, but they were unable to get a connection and thus the
message was never sent. All telephone calls out of East Germany were under
constant control of the Stasi. The Stasi listener, knowing the West would be
monitoring as well, and wishing to protect the East German government, was
probably acting on personal initiative in refusing to put the call through.
Honecker’s anger over the political fallout resulting from the policy that had
made the bombing possible was perceptible. Yet, Wiegand noted, ambiguities
remained in that policy. Wiegand interpreted the instructions as saying, “Go
ahead and wash the bear, but don’t get his für wet.” General Kratsch telephoned
him to ask whether he understood the situation, and before hanging up, he
admonished Wiegand to follow instructions to the letter: “For heaven’s sake,
don’t do anything that would make the Libyans think we are allying ourselves
with the Americans,” he told Wiegand. “Remember, the main enemy is the
American imperialists. They are attacking; Libya is not attacking the USA.”
Wiegand repeatedly heard Mielke say the same thing many times. Now Kratsch
was using the Stasi chief’s words verbatim.
The East German government had realized that it was being adversely
affected by its alliance with extremist politics and terrorism, and the leadership
was distressed. Facing the leadership, however, was the sacrosanct basic political
and ideological position of solidarity in the “battle against imperialism and
support of national liberation movements.” This position did not provide the
impetus to pursue consequent and clear actions to disassociate the government
from dangerous entanglements.
It was in character, therefore, that Honecker would issue a statement on April
10 in which he condemned terrorism, and in a blatant attempt to shift blame,
urged that West Berlin police and customs exercise proper border controls. He
knew, of course, that the Western allies had never recognized his wall as a legal
border, and adhering to the right of free and unhindered access, would never
check anyone who was crossing from the East.
(January 12) But the White House warned that with the expected
departure of Americans (from Libya),9 the United States was
prepared to take drastic action in response to any future attacks
for which Colonel Qaddafi could be blamed. Mr. Reagan, in an
interview with European journalists, described the departure of
the Americans as a move ‘to untie our hands.’
(Secretary of State Shultz in a television interview) Asked if the
President was suggesting that the next incident probably would
provoke a strong military response, Mr. Shultz today pointedly
refused comment.
One of the suspects on Wiegand’s list, Faour Daher, the owner of the
discotheque Down Town, was brought to East Berlin after the bombing, in a
diplomatic car belonging to the LPB, and was hidden in a diplomat’s apartment.
He was later flown to Tripoli. One of Wiegand’s agents reported that Daher was
paid “at least $10,000” for his part in the bombing and that Libyan intelligence
agents had hailed him as the “hero of La Belle.”
Despite Wiegand’s detailed report and continued U.S. diplomatic pressure on
the East German government, no action was taken against the Libyans except for
the “friendly, comradely discussion” Honecker had ordered immediately after
the bombing. Rather than acting as a deterrent, Colonel Wiegand felt that the
“friendly” talks encouraged the Libyans to continue their murderous activities in
West Berlin and elsewhere in Germany.
Kratsch, Wiegand, and Stuchly met on January 29, 1987 for a comprehensive
discussion of the entire Libyan terrorist situation and future Stasi action. At the
end of the session, Kratsch finally made an important concession when he
agreed to start an operational dossier code-named Lux, with the MfS registry
number XV 1076/87.10 The dossier contained a chronological account of Libyan
terrorist activities as well as Wiegand’s reports and analyses sent earlier to Stasi
chief Mielke and notes that Kratsch had received from Mielke. Some of these
notes bore handwritten notations by Honecker. Omitted, of course, was any
record of the actions taken by Wiegand and Stuchly that violated the orders of
the MfS minister and the state and party leadership.
Kratsch, Wiegand, and Stuchly agreed that they would function as
codirectors of a task force dealing exclusively with the Libyan People’s Bureau.
Access to task force operational information was highly restricted, but this troika
was able to draw on the resources of all Stasi departments. The establishment of
the dossier and the task force provided a “legal” basis for operations against the
Libyans. Until then, most of Wiegand’s and Stuchly’s activities had been
“illegal” in the eyes of the Stasi chief. Nonetheless, Wiegand and Stuchly
continued to resort to subterfuge because they knew certain actions would never
be approved by the East German leadership.
ANOTHER MURDER
Alerted by a double agent to the increased activities of U.S. intelligence, the
Libyans involved in the La Belle bombings began an intensive surveillance of
Arabs living in West Berlin who had no connections with terrorist groups. These
Arabs were suspected of working for U.S. authorities not only by the Libyans
but by the MfS as well.
Among the suspects was Mohamed Ashur, a former Libyan diplomat and
member of the LPB in Bonn. He had become disenchanted with the Qaddafi
regime, refused to return to Libya, and moved to West Berlin. Ashur previously
had maintained “unofficial contacts” with the MfS’s Twenty-Second Directorate,
led by Colonel Harry Dahl, which was responsible for counterterrorism.
Although Ashur had a girlfriend in East Berlin, he had not been in the
communist part of the city for some months prior to the La Belle bombing. A
few days after the attack, Ashur was crossing into East Berlin almost daily.
Wiegand’s agents had been watching him and noted that Ashur was seeking to
establish contacts with a number of Arabs, including members of the LPB.
Mohamed Ashur was found dead with a bullet wound to the head on the
morning of May 2, 1986. The body was found in Treptow Park, close to the
giant Soviet war memorial and the river Spree, which runs through East Berlin.
It was subsequently determined that Ashur had been shot the day before.
The murder sounded an alarm at Stasi headquarters. Because of Ashur’s
previous association with the counterterrorism directorate, officials felt that he
might have been liquidated because of this connection and as a warning to the
MfS to stay away from the Libyans. The initial investigation was immediately
taken out of the hands of the criminal investigation department of the
Volkspolizei. A homicide investigation team of the Stasi’s so-called “Special
Commission” assumed command. This commission, known as the Department
Seven, was part of the Ninth Main Directorate, the investigations arm under
Major General R. Fister, who reported directly to Mielke. The commission was
established to investigate crimes and incidents such as major accidents, fires, and
the like, when “an attack on the security of the state” was suspected. The
homicide team, led by Colonel Ewald Pycka, was staffed by outstanding
criminologists and forensic experts recruited from the ranks of the People’s
Police and equipped with state-of-the-art technology far beyond the DDR police
norm.
The homicide officers, with whom Wiegand collaborated, concluded that the
murder had been committed by Musbah Abulgasem Eter, one of the La Belle
participants, and Yousef El Saleh, a member of the Libyan secret service. The
Stasi was able to establish that El Saleh had entered East Germany a few days
earlier, specifically to carry out the execution of Ashur.
As the criminologists wound up their probe, an Arab double agent reported
to Wiegand that the murder was ordered by secret service central in Tripoli. It
was punishment for becoming “an agent of the CIA” and to demonstrate the
“powerlessness of the U.S.A. vis-a-vis the power of Libya.”
The final report of the Ashur murder investigation (dubbed “Operation Lux”)
said the operation had been supervised by the Libyan secret service station chief
Keshlaf of the LPB. He had lured Ashur to East Berlin with an invitation to a
meeting with diplomats of the LPB. The car in which Ashur had been murdered
was recovered, and his blood was found on the back seat. Fingerprints of Eter
and El Saleh also were identified. The murder weapon was a 7.65 caliber Beretta
automatic pistol. Ballistic tests were performed on the projectile recovered from
Ashur’s head as well as on the spent cartridge found at the scene. The results
proved that the murder weapon was identical to the gun that had been officially
imported by the LPB for Keshlaf. It had been easy to identify the pistol. All
weapons officially brought into East Germany were test fired, and bullets and
cartridge cases were kept on file by the Stasi. After the murder, one of
Wiegand’s officers entered Keshlaf’s apartment illegally, performing a so-called
“black bag” job, and examined the weapon. It had been fired recently.
Officers of the homicide team and counterintelligence now took the initiative
in accordance with the East German penal code, arresting Eter and charging him
with murder. Before the Libyan could be taken to the Hohenschönhausen prison,
however, Wiegand and his collaborators received a direct order from Mielke to
release the man. Eter retained his diplomatic status and made several trips to
Tripoli in 1986. In January 1987, he traveled again to Tripoli and was held there
by Libyan authorities while he was being investigated for possible
unprofessional conduct. Inspectors from the three Libyan secret services flew to
Berlin, and after they uncovered the operational activities of the MfS against the
LPB, Eter was exonerated. He nonetheless remained in Libya.
Despite the overwhelming evidence against Eter, the East German leaders
stuck to their “principles” and blocked his arrest and trial for the Ashur murder.
Ashur’s murder, like the bombing of La Belle, was a necessary evil, as far as
Honecker, Krenz, Axen, and Mielke were concerned. Shielding “the interests of
the state” and maintaining “good fraternal relations” with the enemies of the arch
foe, the United States, were paramount. El Saleh, who came to East Berlin as the
executioner, was able to return to Tripoli just nineteen days after committing
murder.
The Libyan terrorists lay low the remainder of 1986. Wiegand and Colonel
Stuchly kept them under constant surveillance, now making sure that they knew
they were being watched. The Stasi pressed them hard, even threatening some
with death unless they desisted.
A NEW THREAT
Wiegand was alerted on April 9 by border watchers at Schönefeld Airport that
Musbah Eter had reentered the country on a diplomatic visa. He was
accompanied by another Libyan man, Sadegh Abousrewil. The two men were
met by “diplomats” of the LPB, and each was taken to a different apartment.
Abousrewil was ensconced in the home of a twenty-six-year-old German
woman, Silvia Pfennighaus. The files of the MfS had already listed the place as
an illegal residence of the LPB.
Wiegand sensed more trouble in the offing and told Stuchly of Eter’s arrival.
Wiegand showed Stuchly the photographs taken secretly by the MfS at the
airport. Stuchly looked at the pictures, slapped his forehead, and groaned, “Oh
Lord, that swine Musbah Eter is back.” Stuchly pointed to the photograph of
Abousrewil and said he had never seen him before, but since he was with Eter,
he “must be a heavy hitter.” Wiegand agreed, and the two decided to move
against Abousrewil. They would not use any of their own officers, but would
conduct around-the-clock surveillance themselves. The two colonels also
decided that they would surreptitiously enter the apartment as quickly as
possible and search the new arrival’s possessions.
The day after his arrival, the new Libyan member of the East Berlin terrorist
scene left the apartment in an LPB car driven by Eter. Wiegand, who stood
watch, had neglected to take the usual additional precautions, such as posting
lookouts. He picked the locks on the Pfenninghaus apartment. A cheap imitation
leather valise was in plain view and unlocked on a kitchen table. It was crammed
with documents, all in Arabic. Wiegand also found two sketches, one of which
he recognized as a location at West Berlin’s Tempelhof Airport that was being
used almost exclusively by the U.S. military. The other showed the locations of
the Pan American Airways and British Airways ticket offices at the Europa
Centrum, a high-rise office building in West Berlin. Wiegand knew that he had
found the plans for new terrorist attacks, and he quickly photographed them.
Back at Stasi headquarters, Wiegand told his translators that he was in a
hurry and to make just a rough translation of the documents. The translations
completed, the colonel saw that his guesses were correct. Simultaneous
bombings of the Pan American and British Airways ticket offices were
scheduled for November 25, the day before the American Thanksgiving holiday.
The last telephone checkin from Stuchly had placed Abousrewil at the bar in
the Palast Hotel on Liebknechtstrasse—in the center of the city, some four miles
from Stasi headquarters. He appeared to be waiting for someone. Wiegand
stuffed copies of the documents and sketches into a briefcase and headed for the
hotel. When he walked into the lobby, he spotted Stuchly watching the entrance
to the bar, and joined him. Wiegand pulled the documents from his briefcase and
told his colleague: “I have it all. Thanks to typical Arab Schlamperei
[sloppiness], I had no trouble finding this stuff. Abousrewil is not only a member
of the secret service but he is also planning new bombings.”
Stuchly looked at the sketches and simply said, “Let’s go.” Wiegand headed
into the bar while Stuchly stationed himself at the entrance and ostentatiously
assumed a “cop look,” making sure that the Makarov pistol he carried in a
shoulder holster could be seen by the Arab. Wiegand approached Abousrewil’s
table. Behaving as rudely as he knew how, he waved the documents before the
Arab’s face. The Libyan secret service man, startled and staring wide-eyed at the
papers, began to rise from his chair. Wiegand pushed him down.
“Meine Unterlagen! [my documents]” Abousrewil exclaimed in bad German,
glancing uneasily at the doorway where Stuchly stood, arms crossed, pistol in
plain sight, staring menacingly at the Arab. Wiegand told the man that he knew
the papers were his, but not to worry, as they were only copies and the originals
were still in his suitcase. The colonel then showed his credentials. “I am a
ranking member of the Ministry for State Security and I am going to give you a
message as a courtesy between colleagues, so to speak. We know everything you
plan to do. We were bystanders once and kept our mouths shut. But not this
time.” Wiegand then pulled a bluff. “This morning we notified the West Berlin
police about everything and gave them your photographs.” He showed the
Libyan a number of photos, starting with the ones taken secretly on his arrival
and continuing through a series of others taken later, to make clear that he had
been under constant surveillance. Wiegand told Abousrewil that he would “never
get back to Libya” if he carried out his plans, and advised him to get out of East
Germany quickly and never to return. “And while you’re here, don’t make any
false moves. . . . We are very edgy,” Before the Libyan terrorist could reply,
Wiegand turned and left the bar.
While in Berlin, neither Arab crossed through the wall to the West. In fact,
they rarely left their respective apartments. On May 20, Wiegand and Colonel
Stuchly followed Abousrewil and Musbah Abul-gassem to Schönefeld, where
they boarded a plane for Tripoli. When the Libyan Airlines jet lifted off,
Wiegand began to chuckle. Stuchly asked what the colonel found amusing.
“Simple: I made another set of copies of Abousrewil’s papers and sent them off
to the Tripoli center with a note extending greetings from the MfS.”
Two months later, on July 1, Abdukarim El Sadek, a member of Colonel
Qaddafi’s personal staff charged with supervising Libyan intelligence, arrived in
East Berlin. Wiegand’s agents inside the Libyan diplomatic mission reported that
El Sadek inspected the intelligence residencies in the LPB and investigated
charges of gross misconduct against Keshlaf, Chraidi, Eter, and Abousrewil. The
inspector returned to Tripoli July 31. A report written by El Sadek and obtained
by the Stasi through agents in Tripoli said that the LPB was “totally controlled
and hamstrung by the MfS.” Therefore secret operations in the DDR “have been
totally compromised.”
The Operationsspiele (operational games) played by Wiegand and Stuchly
appeared to have had the desired effect on the Libyan intelligence chief, Younis
Belqassim, as well. The games, as Wiegand called them, included supplying
double agents with evidence of infiltration of the LPB by agents of Western
intelligence services and the MfS. Wiegand had also assembled a number of
videotapes and voice recordings that he had delivered to Belqassim as proof that
his men had been violating the tenets of morality decreed by the Koran. Almost
all had engaged in sexual orgies, had been caught drunk in public, had used
narcotics, or had committed crimes such as smuggling and currency speculation.
From his agents Wiegand learned that El Sadek had recommended to the
Libyan leadership that the use of the LPB as a cover for intelligence and terrorist
activities be discontinued. This was accomplished in 1988. East German
counterespionage officers surmised that the Libyans then began to use only
illegals—i.e., deep-cover agents without diplomatic protection.
The final report of Operation Lux leaves little doubt that Wiegand’s “games”
prevented the bombing of the Pan American Airways and British Airways ticket
counters. In addition, they most likely had deterred other terrorist attacks,
including the murders of three Qaddafi opponents and the storming of a
synagogue in West Berlin for the purpose of taking hostages. Planned attacks
against the American school bus, the drive-in restaurant, the gasoline station, and
the Springer newspaper building also were not carried out.
In summer 1990, five of the Libyan terrorists were still in East Germany,
including Musbah Eter, who had returned as a correspondent for the Libyan
JANA news agency. Arrest warrants issued in West Berlin were ignored. By
then, the Ministry for State Security had been dissolved. Michael Diestel, the
interior minister of the last East German government, who was responsible for
law enforcement, allegedly refused to turn over the files on the La Belle
bombing and on other terrorist actions to West Berlin prosecutors. When the files
finally were given to West Berlin police, the terrorists had escaped. Also, all
memoranda bearing Erich Honecker’s signature or initials had been removed
from the dossier.
Ali Mansur, who had scouted West Berlin locales for possible attacks, was
detained briefly by West Berlin police in mid–August 1990 but was released for
lack of evidence. Unsettled by Mansur’s arrest, Eter quickly returned to Tripoli
in summer 1990.
In January 1991, West Berlin police got lucky. Faour Daher, the owner of the
Down Town disco had returned to West Berlin from his sanctuary in Libya.
Daher was arrested on an unspecified sex charge, but there was no direct
evidence tying him to the attack on the La Belle discotheque.
Constant surveillance revealed that Carlos spent much of his time at the
South Yemeni embassy and the Metropol Hotel, where he was staying. The all-
night bar at Haus Berlin, the hotel in the former Stalin Allee, was also a favorite
hangout of Carlos and his entourage. The bar on the top floor was attractively
decorated, and a fountain surrounded by fake palm trees gave the place a tropical
motif. Stasi agents also noted that in addition to being supported by South
Yemen, Carlos had a car and chauffeur provided by the Syrian embassy.
When Carlos was on another visit to East Berlin, in summer 1983, the
French cultural center Maison de France on West Berlin’s fashionable
Kurfürstendamm, the city’s main boulevard, was bombed. One person was killed
and twenty-four others were injured. Carlos was widely believed to have been
behind the attack; but not until seven years later was it proved that he was
responsible and that the Stasi counterterrorism directorate had played an active
role in the crime.10 The crime was part of a secret operation the Stasi had set up
with Carlos (Operation Separat).
In winter 1982, a German terrorist identified as Johannes Weinreich traveled
to East Berlin on a Syrian diplomatic passport.11 A routine x-ray examination of
his baggage revealed 24 kilograms (52.8 pounds) of explosives. Responding to
the customs alert, Lieutenant Colonel Voigt, who had previously escorted Carlos
during his East Berlin visits, took possession of the explosives. Weinreich,
whose cover name was Steve, was questioned for a few days and then released.
Voigt had learned that Weinreich was Carlos’s right-hand man, and therefore
Weinreich was allowed to remain in East Berlin and was given a room in the
Metropol Hotel.
A few months later, Voigt and several Stasi officers visited the hotel and
searched Weinreich’s luggage. They found a sketch of the Maison de France,
indicating where the explosive was to be placed. The terrorist explained that the
bombing was intended to force the release of Magdalena Koop, a member of
Carlos’s gang who was then imprisoned in France. Incredibly, Voigt returned the
drawing. Worse yet, he handed over the bomb as well, on condition that it would
not be transported to West Berlin in a diplomatic vehicle, to make sure the East
German regime could not be implicated.12 Weinreich gave the bomb to another
associate of Carlos’s, a Palestinian named El Sibai. It was El Sibai who planted
and set off the explosives.13
Not long after learning that Carlos was a special protégé of the Hungarian
communist government, Wiegand attended a conference of top-level
counterintelligence officials from Hungary, Poland, and Czechoslovakia. At that
meeting, the East German colonel inquired about Carlos. He found that all East
European countries had been visited by Carlos at one time or another, although
Hungary remained his main base.14 All of the countries had refrained from
taking any action against him, on the “recommendation” of the Soviet KGB. The
MfS, too, held back. Wiegand did not know then that the KGB was involved:
His orders always came from Mielke, presumably in connivance with the
Politbüro.
Wiegand was still curious about the Soviet angle, especially when he was
informed by Twentieth Directorate that Carlos was again in East Berlin, planning
terrorist attacks. He contacted KGB Colonel Boris Smirnov, head of
counterespionage (Department Two) at the Karlshorst headquarters, and asked
for advice on how to proceed in the Carlos matter. Again Wiegand found that the
Soviets “kept themselves veiled like the oracle of Delphi.” Smirnov’s answer
was nebulous: He said only that the MfS should follow the example of others. So
long as Carlos could not be clearly implicated by Western authorities, Wiegand
was told, he should “let him be and just watch him.” Besides, the KGB colonel
added, Carlos was causing more damage to the West than any action against him
would be worth. When Wiegand suggested that he should at least detain Carlos
for interrogation, the KGB officer said: “I wouldn’t do that. . . . You’d be
pouring a bucket of water over your head.” Wiegand realized then that the
Soviets, too, were guided by the axiom, If you take action against an activist,
your own neck might be on the block.
INTERNECINE BATTLES
Not only was East Berlin a base for terrorists waging their war against the West;
for nearly two decades it was also a major arena for internecine battles among
myriad Arab intelligence services. Hundreds of politically active students from
various Arab countries were studying in the DDR as well as at institutions of
higher learning in West Berlin. In addition, hundreds of dissidents had formed a
number of organizations opposed to the various regimes—notably, those of Iraq,
Iran, Libya, Syria, and South Yemen.
Colonel Wiegand observed that the activities of the secret services mirrored
the Arab problem: “Sometimes they fought one another, and at other times the
former foes embraced and swore an oath to brotherhood. Sometimes they even
collaborated in a limited way; but on the whole, they remained distrustful of
each other,” The colonel’s counterspy team, for example, once discovered
through an Arab informer that the Libyans had recruited a third secretary of the
Iraqi embassy, who worked successfully for them over long period. The Iraqis, in
turn, were able to place three Kurds inside the Libyans’ network in East
Germany. The Stasi would take advantage of the situation and focus on
diplomats who were actually intelligence officers. Wiegand’s men would
summon them to the foreign ministry, where the chief of consular service,
Jochen Vogel, would introduce them as MfS members. The “diplomats” would
be told that one of their citizens had committed some criminal offense, usually
smuggling or currency speculation. However, there would be no arrest or
expulsion if they could reach a “gentlemen’s agreement.” The Stasi officers
would then provide confidential information about political opponents or other
embassies. After playing this game for a month or two, the seeds sown by the
Stasi would sprout, and this one-way street of suspicion became a two-way
operation. “Then they came to us and dropped each other into the frying pan—
the Libyans snitched on the Iraqis, the Iraqis on the Libyans, the Syrians on the
Iraqis, and so forth,” Wiegand recalled.
IRAQI MAYHEM
Iraqi “diplomats” created a stir in summer 1981 when they seized an Iraqi
dissident in broad daylight at the busy Alexanderplatz in the heart of East
Berlin.16 They dragged him by the hair and feet to a car bearing diplomatic
plates assigned to the Iraqi embassy. But before they could stow the hapless
victim in the trunk of the automobile, several passersby intervened and foiled the
abduction. The police report had not even reached the Stasi when the Iraqi
ambassador appeared at the foreign ministry to protest “a provocation of
imperialist forces” against his people on Alexanderplatz.
Beginning in 1981, Colonel Wiegand’s counterintelligence team carried out a
series of operations under the code name Orient. It was an effort to protect
dissident Iraqi students, especially those who were members of the Iraqi
Communist Party, from attacks by agents of Saddam Hussein’s secret service.
Wiegand told me: “Some barely escaped the murder squads by jumping out of
dormitory windows several floors above ground. We kept others hidden for
weeks in MfS safe houses to save them from the Iraqi murderers.”
The Iraqi government delivered a note protesting the MfS action to the East
German ambassador in Baghdad and presented photographs of MfS surveillance
teams. The Iraqis also accused the Stasi of planning the execution of members of
the Baath Party who were living in the DDR. Although Honecker, the party
leader and head of government, and Stasi chief Mielke were kept up-to-date on
the terror attacks and attempted murders by the Iraqi secret service in East
Germany, the Iraqi government’s complaint was heeded. Wiegand and his
associates were reprimanded and ordered to keep their hands off.
Iraqi citizens living in the DDR, especially students, were under the constant
surveillance of Iraqi intelligence. The Stasi noticed time and again that students
would fail to return from semester breaks without notifying their schools. They
just disappeared. Wiegand figured that the Iraqi government killed anyone who
had fallen out of favor. “They seemed to be operating according to the idea that
it is better to kill an innocent person than to allow one dissident to run around
loose.”
The ruthlessness of the Iraqis also caught the attention of the Stasi’s
Twentieth Directorate headed by Major General Paul Kienberg. Among this
directorate’s tasks was the control of churches and the suppression of
underground political movements. Rainer Eppelmann, a Lutheran pastor who
had formed a group opposing the communist regime, was a particular thorn in
the side of the directorate. Rather than arrest Eppelmann and risk a further
escalation in antigovernment activities, the Stasi church controllers resorted to a
dastardly scheme. In 1988 they sent a postcard to the Iraqi embassy in East
Berlin denouncing Eppelmann as an enemy of Islam. It said the pastor hated and
had cursed the Islamic religion.
One evening after church service, Eppelmann was visited by the Iraqi
embassy’s first secretary Chalabi, who said he had heard about the pastor’s
political activities and just wanted to meet him. In the course of the meeting,
Chalabi questioned Eppelmann on religion and on his feelings about Islam. At
the end of their chat, Chalabi showed the postcard to Eppelmann. “I see that
somebody doesn’t like you and wants to get rid of you,” the Arab diplomat said.
“When we received this card, we had our doubts, and I needed to talk to you
before sending it to Baghdad, because if we had done that, you would have been
put on a liquidation list.” Eppelmann had come close to being killed, and he
knew then that the postcard had been sent by the Twentieth Directorate.17
The memorandum added that besides informing the leadership of the DDR, it
would be in “our mutual interest if the ‘friends’ would exert pressure on the
various Palestinian groups with which they have contacts to prevent the
realization of any kind of terror acts in Europe.” The MfS always used the word
friends when referring to the Soviet Union. Therefore, the memorandum
suggested that the Soviets be asked to give the Stasi a hand.
Stasi chief Mielke had reacted immediately. He discussed the matter with his
KGB counterpart, who apparently agreed that Abu Nidal had to be stopped.
Mielke then issued an order to General Wolf, the head of the foreign intelligence
directorate, and to General Neiber, who supervised the antiterrorist directorate,
to carry out the suggestions. There were no incidents at the Düsseldorf book fair.
Wiegand concluded that as far as Hassan was concerned, Mielke had decided
that allowing him to run loose in the DDR was preferable to incurring the wrath
of Abu Nidal’s organization. Mielke did approve continued surveillance of the
assistant professor. What had really set off Mielke was something that neither
Wiegand nor Kratsch knew: Mielke was angry because he had been deceived by
the terrorist. When Abu Nidal visited in 1985, he had pledged to stay out of East
Germany in exchange for substantial weapons deliveries to Libya. Alexander
Schalck-Golodkovsky, a Stasi colonel operating under deep cover as a state
secretary of the Ministry for Foreign Trade, sold Qaddafi more than 4,000
Skorpion submachine guns and a million rounds of ammunition. He made the
deal through a commercial firm secretly owned by East Germany’s Communist
Party. The shipment went via Poland to hide its origin, and Qaddafi paid the
equivalent of more than US$470,500 in hard currency.19 Abu Nidal acted as
middleman and was paid a substantial commission by the East Germans.
In summer 1988, Stasi surveillance officers presented Wiegand with another
surprise. Hassan was observed and photographed at several meetings with Yasser
Chraidi, the Libyan killer—one of the chief planners of the La Belle bombing. In
addition, the surveillance agents documented that Hassan had close contacts with
diplomats of the Libyan People’s Bureau who had been identified as members of
Qaddafi’s intelligence service. Wiegand now realized that the Libyans were
pursuing a dual-track strategy: They controlled the East German segments of the
Abu Nidal group but kept them on a short leash and had not yet used them for
any terrorist actions. However, the weapons used in the December 1986 attacks
at the airports in Rome and Vienna most likely had been part of the East German
shipment that went to Libya a year earlier.20
Confronted with the Chraidi connection, Mielke authorized the arrest of the
Libyan killer. On June 20, 1988, Wiegand and a few of his junior officers picked
up Chraidi and detained him at a safe house on the outskirts of East Berlin.
Chraidi was interrogated for six days, and MfS officers wrung a detailed
confession from him. He admitted that he had hired Ghassan Ayaub, a
Palestinian living in West Berlin, to carry out the 1984 murder of Mustafa
Elashek in Bonn, West Germany, and described his role in the La Belle bombing
and in other terrorist actions. In addition, he supplied information on terrorist
activities that had been planned and controlled by the intelligence services and
organizations of various Arab countries. Again the communist government
refused to prosecute Chraidi and decided to expel him.
In less than a year, the RAF struck again. This time the target was Hans
Neusel, the sixty-three-year-old state secretary of the West German Interior
Ministry, responsible for internal security affairs. On July 27, 1990, a high-
explosive projectile slammed into the right side of his armored BMW limousine
as it was turning onto an autobahn exit ramp near Bonn. Neusel had given his
driver the day off and was driving himself, which saved his life. He suffered only
minor injuries. The bomb trigger was identical to the one used in the Herrhausen
murder—a photoelectric beam. Again the RAF claimed responsibility.
The terrorists were also trained by Stasi experts on such weapons as the 9mm
Heckler & Koch submachine gun of West German manufacture; the G-3
automatic rifle, a standard weapon of the West German Army; an American .357
magnum Smith & Wesson revolver; and the Soviet AK-47 Kalashnikov
automatic rifle. The weapons training phase in March 1981 was followed by
practice with the Soviet RPG-7, an antitank rocket weapon that was a longtime
favorite of communist insurgents around the world. Under intensive
interrogation by BKA detectives, former Stasi Major Hans-Dieter Gaudig
described how mannequins fashioned of cloth and stuffed with sawdust and a
German shepherd dog were placed in a Mercedes limousine. The instructors
were bent on creating as realistic a situation as possible. The mannequins and the
dog were torn to pieces by the three RPG-7 rounds. The “students” then were
shown how to construct explosive and incendiary devices and position them
where Stasi experts deemed the vehicle most vulnerable. Finally, RAF terrorists
learned how to make an explosive from chemicals readily available in any drug
store. This explosive was packed in fire extinguishers, which were placed
beneath front and rear automobile fenders and detonated. According to Inge
Viet, these exercises took place in March 1981.
Deutsche Bank Chief Alfred Herrhausen, assassinated November 30, 1989, when
a member of the extreme left-wing Red Army Faction fired explosive projectile
into his mored Mercedes limousine. C jurtesy AP/Wide World.
Five months later, on August 31, 1981, a bomb was set off in front of the
main administration building of the U.S. Air Force European headquarters in the
southwest German town of Ramstein. The blast occurred at 7 A.M., when base
personnel were arriving for work. It injured twenty people, including Brigadier
General Joseph D. Moore, assistant deputy chief of staff for operations, and the
air staff operations officer, Lieutenant Colonel Douglas R. Young. Experts of the
Federal Criminal Investigation Agency found that the bomb had been “very
professionally rigged” inside a Volkswagen. A second bomb was also in the car
but failed to explode. Two days after the explosion, the West German news
agency Deutsche Presse Agentur in Hamburg received a letter from the Red
Army Faction, saying the bombing was carried out by the “Sigurd Debus
Commando Unit.” Debus was an RAF terrorist who had died in April 1981 in a
Hamburg prison, as the result of a hunger strike.
Klar and Schulz, twenty-eight and twenty-six years old respectively at the
time of the attack, were captured in 1982. Pohl, at thirty-seven the oldest of the
killer team, was arrested in 1984, and twenty-seven-year-old Jacobsmeier, in
1986. They were sentenced to prison for life. Klar has never talked about his
RAF involvement. However, some four years later his former comrades, eager to
bargain for lesser prison terms, said that Klar had spent three days practicing
with the Soviet-made bazooka under Stasi supervision. The training was
conducted at the top secret Stasi base known as Objekt 74, at Briesen, a bucolic
location about forty miles southeast of East Berlin. According to a top secret
Stasi document2 originating with the Twenty-Second Directorate and dated May
25, 1987, Objekt 74 is the same base where members of the PLO and other
Middle Eastern and Latin American terrorists were trained by Stasi specialists
and members of the F. E. Dzerzhinski Guard Regiment.
The statements made by the former RAF terrorists and the Stasi trainers were
identical in every detail except one: the dates when the training took place. The
former terrorists insisted that the training took place early in 1981. Obviously
aware of their own culpability, the Stasi officers insisted that it was a year later,
from mid–February to mid–March 1982—i.e., several months after the attacks at
Ramstein Air Base and on General Kroesen. To prove it, they produced the
visitors’ registration book from Objekt 74. Experts of the Federal Criminal
Police Agency declared the entries forgeries. “And stupid forgeries at that,” one
official commented. For example, some Stasi officers were listed with ranks to
which they had been promoted after 1982.3 Inge Viet remained adamant that the
training took place in 1981, because in 1982 she was in South Yemen.
A FINAL ASSASSINATION
As the Stasi-RAF connection began to unravel, a new terrorist outrage
reemphasized the impotence of the West German security establishment.4 At
11:30 P.M. on March 31, 1991, Detlev Rohwedder, a prominent German
businessman, entered the second-floor study at his home in Düsseldorf. The
room was lit only by one 25-Watt bulb in a desk lamp. The second bulb had
burned out some time earlier. After checking his airline ticket for the flight
schedule to Berlin the next day, he returned it to a briefcase that stood on a desk
near the window. As Rohwedder turned to head back to the adjoining master
bedroom, his back was toward the window and his six-foot-three-inch frame
could only be seen from the outside as a shadow. At that moment an assassin
fired two shots. The first smashed into Rohwedder’s back, tearing into his
trachea and aorta. The second bullet missed; but Rohwedder was already dead as
he hit the floor. His wife, Hergard, heard the noise and thought it was the
burned-out light bulb exploding as her husband replaced it. Hergard, who had
always been a little afraid of “electrical things,” got out of bed to see if she could
help her husband. As she entered the study, the murderer again saw a shadow
and fired a third time, hitting her left arm.5
Rohwedder was chairman of the Treuhandanstalt, a government trusteeship
established to handle the privatization of former state property in eastern
Germany, including 8,000 industrial plants. Until buyers could be found, the
trust was to administer the industries’ operations. However, the decrepit
condition of many operations after forty years of communist mismanagement led
Rohwedder to close hundreds of plants. The resulting unemployment became
manna for communists who were irate over their spectacular fall from power and
desperate to regain their popularity: Now they could point to yet another
example of the “heartlessness” of capitalism. Rohwedder became their favorite
whipping boy. The party’s official newspaper Neues Deutsch-land called the
Treuhandanstalt the “bony hand of the grim reaper,” As a consequence,
Rohwedder, who had already been placed on a police list of threatened
executives, became a logical RAF target.
Detlev Rohwedder, head of the trust agency in charge of restructuring East
German industry, was shot and killed by a Red Army Faction assassin in April
1991. Courtesy AP/Wide World.
The weapon used to murder him was a G-3 rifle, the standard automatic
weapon of the West Germany Army. It was the same weapon from which more
than 100 shots had been fired at the U.S. Embassy at Bonn-Mehlem on February
13, 1991.6 Although some rounds penetrated windows, there were no casualties.
The RAF claimed responsibility for that shooting, as it had for the Rohwedder
killing.
Detectives reported that Rohwedder’s killer must be an “extraordinarily well-
trained shooter,” having hit a shadowy target from a distance of about 70 yards,
standing behind a hedge. The G-3 rifle was one of the weapons on which Stasi
officers had trained RAF terrorists. However, investigators were unable to come
up with any clues to the killer’s identity. Detectives also theorized that the RAF
had been tipped off by a Stasi agent employed by the security firm that had
installed the bullet-proof glass in the ground-floor windows of Rohwedder’s
home. Security experts evidently had assumed that the special glass was
unnecessary on the second floor.
Police experts on the RAF eventually determined that Rohwedder’s killer
belonged to the “third generation” of RAF terrorists. The first was the Bader-
Meinhof Gang (named after its leaders, Ulrike Meinhof and Andreas Bader),
which was active in the 1970s. Meinhof and Bader were arrested and sentenced
to life imprisonment. Bader starved himself to death and Meinhof hanged herself
in a prison cell. RAF killers active in the 1980s and those who had “retired” to
the DDR belonged to the second generation.
The first two generations of RAF terrorists delighted in thumbing their noses
at police. They deliberately left clues to their identities at crime scenes, taunting
law enforcers to catch them. Christian Klar went so far as to plant his
fingerprints on the Soviet-made rocket launcher that he abandoned after firing at
General Kroesen’s Mercedes limousine. But no usable clues had been uncovered
since the 1985 fatal shooting of Ernst Zimmermann, chairman of Motor &
Turbinen Union, a major defense contractor.
The shrill denunciations by left-wingers and civil libertarians of
Rasterfahndung, a system of identifying enemy spies that was devised by the
BKA, seriously undermined the work of investigators. Rasterfahndung involved
the establishment of fact-based profiles indicating potential terrorists, and the
use of investigative methods similar to those employed by U.S. Customs and
Drug Enforcement Administration agents to ferret out drug couriers. For
example, the Bader-Meinhof Gang and the second-generation RAF killers were
known to rent apartments and houses as hideouts, asking for three-month leases
and paying in advance. They also had a penchant for fast and expensive cars
such as Porsches, Mercedeses, and BMWs, typically paid for with the loot from
bank robberies. The police would receive tips about individuals fitting the profile
and would establish covert surveillance of those individuals, until they were
satisfied either that they had gathered enough evidence to obtain an arrest
warrant or that there were no grounds for further investigation. The public
pressure brought to bear on federal criminal investigators because of
Rasterfahndung became so intense that Horst Herold was forced to resign as
president of the Bundeskriminalamt in 1981. His offense was “overzealousness”
in collecting and computerizing data on possible terrorists, which left-wing and
liberal critics charged had grossly violated individuals’ civil liberties. Yet not a
single case of police harassment of an innocent citizen was ever established,
whereas many terrorists were caught by Rasterfahndung.
Wiegand pointed out that the RAF terrorists were not just random “illegal
border crossers.” Instead, their asylum and training were the results of deliberate
political considerations by the East German state and party leaders, and of those
leaders’ connections to the PLO as well as to the governments of South Yemen,
Libya, Ethiopia, Syria, and Iraq. Wiegand proved right.
Major General Werner Irmler submitted a report to Stasi chief Mielke on
August 5, 1979, in which he comprehensively detailed the activities of terrorists
residing in the DDR. Mielke had only eight copies made, one of which he sent to
Markus Wolf. The document9 was so sensitive that it was labeled “top secret,
only for personal information, return is requested,” Mielke had personally
written out the distribution list, and Wolf’s name was in third place.
The report named RAF terrorists Inge Viet, Ingrid Siepman, and Regine
Nicolai as having been “housed in a Stasi safe house from June 28 to July 12,
1978.” Then they were flown to Baghdad “under operational control,” meaning
that Stasi officers accompanied the trio to the Iraqi capital, where the terrorists
had told the Stasi they had their “operational base.” The Stasi felt obliged to
accord the terrorists special protection because earlier, Bulgarian authorities had
arrested other members of the group, who had been allowed to escape through
East Germany after they had broken convicted murderer Till Meyer out of a
West Berlin prison. The Bulgarians had turned these individuals over to West
German police for trial. Nonetheless, all of the RAF terrorists, including those
harbored by the East German communist regime, were eventually tried,
convicted, and sentenced to prison terms ranging from seven years to life.
On April 20, 1998, an anonymous eight-page statement was received by the
Bonn office of the British news agency Reuters. It was laden with the left-wing
anarchistic rhetoric typical of RAF documents and contained not a word of
apology for the murders and other high crimes the group had committed. It
ended with the words: “Today we are ending this project. The urban guerrilla
group in the form of the RAF is now history.” Emblazoned on the statement was
the RAF’s emblem—a red, five-point star superimposed over a sketch of a
submachine gun. This emblem had always been stamped on notes sent to the
news media after a murder or a bombing. An expert of the Federal Criminal
Police Agency (BKA) attested to its authenticity, and German newspapers
quoted Horst Herold, former BKA president, as saying: “With this statement the
Red Army Faction has erected its own tombstone.”
12
SHATIERED SHIELD, BROKEN SWORD
GORBACHEV’S WARNING
Despite the unrest, the regime celebrated its fortieth with a huge, pompous
ceremony in Berlin on October 7, while tens of thousands of jeering citizens
stood outside the ornate building of the State Council. The People’s Police
cordons were utterly ineffectual. As Stasi minister Erich Mielke drove up and
was greeted by General Günther Kratsch, the counterintelligence chief, Mielke
screamed at police: “Club those pigs into submission!”5 The police ignored
Mielke’s ranting.
Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev was also in attendance as a guest of
honor, although his East German allies had rejected his policies of glasnost and
perestroika and had banned the sale of Soviet publications, labeling them
subversive. He watched as thousands of demonstrators waved, many shouting
“Gorby, help us!” Just prior to his trip to Berlin, the Soviet president had
received a top secret analysis that Colonel Rainer Wiegand had prepared for the
KGB on his own initiative and at great personal risk. “If Mielke had found out, I
would have been finished,” the officer later told me, drawing a finger across his
throat. In this report he had described the situation in the DDR as verging on
chaos and had warned the Soviets against being taken in by “Potemkin villages.”
Perhaps with this briefing in mind, Gorbachev pointedly remarked in an
impromptu speech before East German party functionaries, “Life will punish
those who arrive too late.”
Erich Honecker, secretary-general of the party and head of state, ignored this
warning, and was stripped of his posts eleven days later. Egon Krenz, a Politbüro
member charged with the supervision of the state security apparatus and a
longtime Mielke ally, became the new party leader and head of state. Nothing
essential was altered by this changing of the guard, although Krenz tried to
ingratiate himself with the people, claiming that he had prevented the outbreak
of civil war on October 9 by countermanding Honecker’s orders to fire on the
estimated 200,000 anticommunist demonstrators in Leipzig. This time the
demonstrators had carried signs demanding free elections—an act that was
punishable just a decade earlier by at least ten years’ hard labor. Large banners
reading “no violence!” were stretched across the entrance to the imposing Stasi
district headquarters in downtown Leipzig.
Regardless of Krenz’s claims, the man the people credited with preventing a
bloodbath was Kurt Masur, the musical director of the renowned Leipzig
Gewandhaus orchestra. Masur is an imposing man not only because of his status
in the international cultural world but also in physical stature. A bear of a man
standing well over six feet, he towered over most of the protesters and politicians
whom he passionately debated. Western news media were reporting these
debates, forcing the party hierarchy to heed the pleas of the world-famous
conductor.
Young Berliners raid a Stasi safe after tens of thousands stormed the secret
police headquarters in East Berlin on January 15, 1990, signaling the end of the
regime. Courtesy AP/Wide World.
INTRODUCTION
1. Meaning “Red Banner,” the German Communist Party (KPD) newspaper
in Berlin for which Mielke worked in 1921.
2. On August 9, 1931, two Berlin police officers were shot and killed during
a communist demonstration. In a subsequent trial, Mielke and a compatriot were
named by witnesses as the killers. The incident will be examined in detail later
in this book.
3. In early 1991, a high-ranking German counterespionage official told the
author that only about 100 out of more than 100,000 Stasi officers have been
willing to reveal details of their activities.
CHAPTER ONE
1. Figures compiled by custodians of the archives of the East German
Ministry for State Security.
2. By comparison, U.S. security agencies—the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA—
have a combined staff of roughly 100,000 for a population of 250 million.
Proportionally, the U.S. security services would need a staff of some 1.8 million
if they wanted to emulate the Stasi’s personnel structure.
3. Interview in October 1991 with Joachim Gauck, federal commissioner in
charge of the Stasi archives in Berlin.
4. From my interview with Wiegand in September 1990, in Munich.
5. From my interview with Wiesenthal in October 1991, in Vienna.
6. There were other Nazi security services, such as the Sicherheitsdienst and
the Abwehr, but none was directly involved in political surveillance of the
population.
7. Interview in October 1991 with Joachim Gauck, federal commissioner in
charge of the archives of the MfS, in Berlin.
8. Ibid.
9. Die Welt, March 3, 1995.
10. These figures were reported by the federal government to parliament on
January 27, 1997.
11. Ibid.
12. From an interview published in the news magazine Dei Spiegel,
December 1994.
13. From my interview with Professor Scholz, in September 1991, in Bonn.
14. From my interview with Sauer in October 1991, in Braunschweig.
15. Ibid.
16. From my interview in 1991 with Günther Buch, a leading historian of the
Federal Institute for All-German Affairs in Berlin, who investigated and
registered political offenses for more than forty years.
17. Ludwig Rehlinger, Freikauf: Die Geschäfte der DDR mit politisch
Verfolgten, 1963–1989 (Berlin: Ullstein, 1991).
18. Interview with Günther Buch, historian and archivist at the Federal
Institute for All-German Affairs in Berlin.
19. Rüdiger Knechtel and Jürgen Fiedler, Stalins DDR: Berichte von
politisch Verfolgten (Leipzig: Forum, 1991).
20. Ibid.
21. Ibid.
22. Statut der Sozialistischen Einheitspartei Deutschlands (Berlin: Dietz,
1972), p. 25.
23. From my interview with Prof. Scholz in 1991, in Bonn.
24. From my interview with Joachim Gauck in 1991, in Berlin.
25. Ibid.
26. Ibid.
27. From my interview with Gauweiler in October 1991, in Munich.
28. Ibid.
29. Ibid.
30. Interview with William L. Stearman, former U.S. State Department
official and member of the National Security Council staff, in Washington, D.C.,
in 1992. Stearman said that in the 1952 election campaign, Dulles had pledged,
“We will roll back the Iron Curtain.” Stearman, a Soviet affairs expert, also
reported: “Every Hungarian official and those who participated in the uprising
told me later that they were encouraged by Dullest remarks, which had been
broadcast to Hungary, and that they fully expected U.S. intervention.“
31. I was reporting from Berlin at the time for the Associated Press, and
obtained this information from high-ranking U.S. and British officers on the
condition of their anonymity.
32. Stearman has asserted that many other courses of action might have been
taken to respond to these events. For example, the city of Budapest was in the
hands of the freedom fighters on October 28 and 29, and Allied observers and a
U.S. peacekeeping force could have been flown into the city. “It certainly would
have restricted Soviet action. But nothing was done, and on November 1, the
Red Army pushed into the city and steamrolled the resistance.” When
Czechoslovakia was invaded, Stearman charged, President Lyndon B. Johnson
was “more concerned about maintaining good relations with Brezhnev to further
detente, which had gotten under way during his Glassboro Summit with
Kosygin. Also, he badly wanted to start arms control negotiations.”
33. From my interview with the prosecutor, Sauer, in October 1991, in
Braunschweig.
34. Interview with Gauweiler in October 1991.
35. Interview with Wiesenthal in 1991, in Vienna.
36. The documents are in my possession.
37. I located this file in East Berlin and later presented it to the former U.S.
president on his eighty-third birthday.
38. Interview with Karl Grossmann, former HVA colonel and intimate
associate of Markus Wolf during the formation of the Stasi’s foreign espionage
directorate.
39. Interview with Rainer Wiegand, former colonel in the Stasi
counterintelligence directorate.
40. A copy of this document is in my possession.
41. Interview with Bert Rombach, formerly a ranking member of the Bun-
desverfassungsschutz, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, which
was charged with surveillance of espionage activities and radicalism. In 1991
Rombach became a leading official in the internal security department of the
German Federal Ministry of the Interior.
42. From my interview with Knechtel by telephone in 1991.
43. Hans Kroll, Lebenserinnerungen eines Botschafters (Berlin: Kiepenheuer
& Witsch, 1967).
CHAPTER TWO
1. Margarete Buber-Neumann, Von Potsdam nach Moskau (Berlin: Deutsche
Verlags-Anstalt, 1957).
2. Bernd Kaufmann, Eckard Reisener, Dieter Schwips, and Henri Walther,
Der Nachrichtendienst der KPD, 1919–1937 (Berlin: Dietz, 1993).
3. The events leading up to the murder were reconstructed from detailed
police interrogations of participants arrested in 1932 and 1933 and were
extensively reported by the Berlin press.
4. The photograph showing both men sharing the platform is on file at
Ullstein photo archives, Berlin.
5. The events of the day were meticulously reported by the newspaper
Berliner Morgenpost on August 10, 1931.
6. This information comes from Willig’s testimony during the trial on July 8,
1934. Willig had recovered after fourteen weeks in the hospital and was
promoted to police lieutenant.
7. In a 1997 interview, Dora—the only surviving member of the Anlauf
family—said her oldest sister had been engaged and that she quickly married so
that the underage Dora could live with her and avoid becoming a ward of the
state. Dora later married and lived quietly in East Berlin. She was never harassed
by the Stasi, probably because she was careful never to discuss her past with
anyone but her husband and her daughter. Her only run-in with the regime
occurred when she refused to join the East German communist party (SED) and
was demoted from her job as an office manager to a menial position. Her
husband died in 1984.
8. Berliner Morgenpost, August 10, 1931.
9. From my interviews with former officers of the Ministry for State
Security. Another version of the story that emerged during the 1934 trial was that
Mielke and Ziemer were provided with false passports, money, and railroad
tickets by Mrs. Kippenberger and left Berlin directly for Moscow by train. This
seems unlikely, since the shooting prompted police to seal off all railroad
stations and to inspect travelers’ documents meticulously.
10. From my conversation with former Lieutenant General Günther Kratsch,
former head of the East German Ministry for State Security’s counterespionage
directorate. Kratsch was allowed by the KGB to see Mielke’s Comintern dossier
in order to prepare a testimonial for presentation to Mielke on his eightieth
birthday. When Mielke learned of Kratsch’s mission, he angrily terminated it and
forbade the preparation of the testimonial, without any further explanation.
“Perhaps he didn’t want too much of his background to become public
knowledge,” Kratsch hypothesized.
11. Mielke’s addition of “Prussia” was a source of amusement to former
General Kratsch, who told me, “Apparently he was proud of his Prussian
heritage, and he certainly acted like a Prussian martinet in his later life.”
12. A copy of the document is in my possession.
13. A copy of the document is in my possession.
14. Defenders of Mielke would later claim that confessions had been
obtained under torture by the Nazi Gestapo. However, all suspects were in the
custody of the regular Berlin city criminal investigation bureau, most of whose
detectives were SPD members. Some of the suspects had been nabbed by Nazi
SA men and probably beaten before they were turned over to police. In the 1993
trial of Mielke, the court gave the defense the benefit of the doubt and threw out
a number of suspect confessions.
15. When I interviewed Margot Kippenberger in 1997, she told me that she
had lived for several years with Ivan Chernavin, whom she was not allowed to
marry because she was German. The couple had five children, who were allowed
to move with her to East Germany. Her common-law husband was kept behind
in Russia until she appealed to Khrushchev during the latter’s visit to East Berlin
in 1960. Two weeks later Chernavin was allowed to leave the Soviet Union.
However, he had become an alcoholic, and Margot could no longer live with
him. He returned to Soviet Russia, where he died in 1984. Margot and her
children were thoroughly fed up with communism. Three of her children had
been arrested for antistate activities. Only her connections with old party
functionaries saved them from long jail terms. In 1981, the family applied for
permission to leave for the West. It was granted, and they now live in Berlin.
16. From my conversation with Walter Janka in 1991. Janka fled from a
French internment camp and made his way to Mexico. In 1947, he returned to
Germany and became head of the Communist Party’s publishing company. Over
the years, he became disenchanted at the course that his party was taking in the
Stalinization of East Germany. He was arrested in 1956 and interrogated by his
old nemesis Mielke. At one point during the questioning, Mielke grabbed Janka
by his jacket collar, made a fist, and raised his arm as if to punch him. “Let go of
my jacket,” Janka said he told the irate Mielke. “You know that threats do not
impress me.” Mielke: “You underestimate your position and our patience. Don’t
play the strong man. Here we have brought other people to their knees.“ Janka
was sentenced to five years at hard labor on charges ranging from spying for the
West German Social Democratic Party to having been an organizer of a
counterrevolution.
17. A copy of the letter was found in Mielke’s prosecution file and is in my
possession.
18. Hugh Thomas, The Spanish Civil War, revised and enlarged edition (New
York: Harper & Row, 1977).
19. F. P. Martin, Know Your Enemy (London: Independent Information
Center, 1982).
20. This information comes from my 1991 conversations with former MfS
Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who told of Mielke bursting into the wartime songs
during office parties. At these parties he always preferred the company of Karl
Kleinjung, a German communist who served in Soviet partisan units and
repeatedly parachuted into Germany. Kleinjung served for years as a Stasi
lieutenant general.
21. A copy of the questionnaire is in my possession.
22. From my conversation with Kaufmann in February 1997, in Berlin.
23. Gerhard Finn, Die politischen Häftlinge der Sowjetzone, 1945–1959
(Pfaffenhofen: Ilmgauverlag, 1960).
24. The Soviets handed the court records to Mielke. Instead of destroying the
incriminating papers, he locked them in his private safe, where they were found
when his home was searched in 1990. They were used against him in his trial for
murder.
25. Documents concerning the Kühnast case are in my possession.
26. According to the newspaper Bild, the Mielkes secretly adopted an orphan
girl named Ingrid, who was born in 1950. Along with Frank, she was said to
have attended the Wilhelm Pieck School, an institution restricted to offspring of
high-ranking party functionaries, and eventually served as a captain in the Stasi.
The same newspaper reported that she was married to a Stasi first lieutenant,
Norbert Knappe, who had refused to talk to Bild’s reporters.
27. Finn, Die politischen Häftlinge.
28. I have a copy of the directive, 350.09 (CIC/S-3/PG), issued by
Headquarters, Counter Intelligence Corps, United States Forces, European
Theater, then located at Frankfurt-am-Main.
29. William L. Stearman, The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria
(Bonn: Siegler & Co., 1961).
30. Carola Stern, Ulbricht: Eine politische Biographie (Cologne:
Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1964).
31. Unless otherwise indicated, all figures regarding the revolt were released
in April 1993 by the Institute for All-German Affairs in Berlin.
32. From my conversations with Rainer Wiegand, former MfS
counterespionage colonel, in 1991.
33. Peter Przybylski [former spokesman for the DDR attorney general],
Tatort Politbüro: Die Akte Honecker (Berlin: Rowohlt, 1991).
34. From my conversations in 1975 with Gitta Bauer, journalist for the
Springer Foreign News Service, formerly the wife of Leo Bauer, a veteran
communist who was arrested in 1950 and sent to a Soviet labor camp. Mrs.
Bauer was also imprisoned eight years by the MfS, first at Bautzen and later at
the Waldheim women’s prison. After her release she became an ardent
anticommunist. She said she had gotten the information on Mielke’s game of
intrigue from Leo Bauer after he was released from prison and settled in West
Germany, where he became an intimate of Willy Brandt.
35. Nadja Stulz-Herrnstadt, Das Herrnstadt-Dokument (Hamburg: Rowohlt,
1990).
36. Zaisser died in obscurity in 1958. Unlike other purge victims, he was
never rehabilitated.
37. Der Spiegel magazine reported in 1971 that a West German agent
working for General Gehlen had infiltrated the school. Soon after his reports
reached the general’s headquarters near Munich, a series of shipping accidents
occurred that “bore Wollweber’s signature.“ The Empress of Canada burned in
Liverpool harbor on January 25, 1953; and that same month there were fires
aboard the Queen Elizabeth and the Queen Mary. Sabotage was also discovered
aboard the British aircraft carriers Warrior, Triumph, and Indomitable, as well as
aboard several cruisers, destroyers, and submarines.
38. Markus Johannes Wolf, former MfS colonel general and espionage chief,
in a series of articles in Stern magazine, nos. 47, 48, and 49 (1990).
39. Wollweber and Schirdewan were expelled from the Central Committee
and the party in February 1958. Wollweber died in 1967.
40. From a 1959 report by an informant of the Ministry for All-German
Affairs. A copy of the report is in my possession.
41. Ibid.
42. A copy is in my possession.
43. From my conversation in 1997 with Heinz Busch, former colonel in
charge of military analysis in the foreign espionage directorate and a graduate of
the Frunze Military Academy in Moscow.
44. Informants of the (West German) Ministry for All-German Affairs.
45. From my conversation with former HVA colonel Busch.
46. Ibid.
47. All refugee figures are based on reports of the Ministry for All-German
Affairs, issued in 1966.
48. From a presentation by Vladislav M. Zubok, a leading Russian historian
on the Cold War, at the “Conference on Cold War Military Records and History,”
March 1994, in Washington, D.C.
49. Ibid.
50. Zubok, citing documents found in Soviet archives.
51. Ibid.
52. Ibid.
53. Interview with Rainer Wiegand, former colonel in the Stasi’s
counterespionage department.
54. The preceding statistics are from the Ministry for All-German Affairs.
55. Central Party Archives in Berlin, cited in Przybylski, Tatort Politbüro,
PL 2 (Berlin: Rowohlt, 1992).
56. From the notes of Rainer Wiegand, former colonel in the Stasi’s
counterespionage directorate. (These notes are in my possession.) 57. Interview
with former Stasi colonel Rainer Wiegand.
58. Ibid.
59. Ibid.
CHAPTER THREE
1. Interview with former Colonel Rainer Wiegand of the MfS
counterintelligence directorate.
2. A copy of the agreement is in possession of the author.
3. The KGB retained its offices until 1994 when all Soviet troops were
removed from Germany. All powers accorded the KGB by the DDR regime,
however, were withdrawn after unification and its officers became subject to
German laws for infractions occurring outside military establishments.
4. In possession of the author.
5. Interview with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand, on which the entire
report on MfS activities in Poland, and elsewhere in Eastern Europe, is based.
6. Interviews with former Colonels Rainer Wiegand of the
counterintelligence directorate and Dr. Heinz Busch, who led analysis
department 7 of the espionage directorate.
7. In the summer of 1991, the author learned from a high level intelligence
source in Europe, who wished to remain anonymous, that Maennchen had been
offering to sell his knowledge to the highest western bidder. At the same time,
during a German television interview, he hypocritically denounced Stasi
defectors as traitors.
8. The entire episode was recounted by former Colonel Rainer Wiegand in a
written report and an hour-long tape recording which he provided to the author.
9. The exchange rate at the time was about $1.60 to the ruble.
10. Vinogradov spent about 10 years in Germany. His last assignment was in
Hamburg, West Germany, under the cover of representative of the Soviet
shipping line. He was so successful that the newly assigned Chief of the KGB
for Germany based in East Berlin, Major General Gennadi F. Titov, saw him as a
professional rival and had him transferred back to Moscow.
11. Felfe had been a Nazi SS intelligence officer. He was recruited by Skorik
in 1951 and joined the fledgling West German Federal Intelligence Service, the
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND). When he was finally arrested in 1961, he was
head of the BND’s counterintelligence department. Sentenced to 14 years
imprisonment, he was exchanged in 1969 for western spies caught in East
Germany. It was one of the most damaging cases of espionage in West Germany.
He obtained a doctorate in criminology and became a professor at East Berlin’s
Humboldt University.
12. Lt. Colonel Vladimir Vurfamalenko, the ambitious and unscrupulous son
of a high ranking party functionary with ties to KGB chief Victor Chebrikov,
was after Skorik’s job. But Skorik was the KGB’s sacred cow, a virtual
monument of the successful KGB officer who was fawned over by his Boss,
Colonel General Markelov, addressing him as “My esteemed, my dear Misha".
Vurfamalenko surreptitiously acquired the records of Skorik’s department over a
three year period, probably acting at the behest of Colonel Gennadi F. Titov, who
was after the top job in East Germany which called for promotion to Major
General and which Skorik also coveted. Vurfamalenko cobbled together an
analysis which purported to show that the entire Department II
(counterintelligence) had been resting on its past laurels for years. During a visit
to Moscow, MfS Colonel Rainer Wiegand was invited to the apartment of the
intriguer, who showed the East German the records. “See here, they paid 2,000
rubles for a single piece of information but they had not had a single success in
three years,” Vurfamalenko told Wiegand. “Instead they spent the money on
boozing, expensive dinners and whoring with agents and nothing comes of it.”
Skorik wound up in Afghanistan as head of counter intelligence and Titov got
the job in East Berlin.
13. Wandlitz, an idyllic village on a lake near East Berlin. The top members
of the regime lived there in a highly secure compound with its special shop that
was stocked with luxury goods imported from the West.
14. Interview with former Colonel Rainer Wiegand in 1997. the KGB
cheating was reconfirmed by Dr. Werner Bierbaum, former chief of the political
analysis division of the espionage directorate.
15. The entire Ivankovic incident is based entirely on interviews with the
victim and former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand.
16. A copy of the handwritten statement is in the author’s possession.
17. This case will be discussed in another chapter.
18. Titov was KGB resident in Norway where he controlled a number of
agents. He was expelled in 1977 and became an assistant to General Vladimir A.
Kryuchkov, chief of foreign espionage who later became head of the KGB. In
1985 Titov was assigned East Germany as deputy to Colonel General Oleg
Shumilov, whom he succeeded in 1987.
19. Oleg Gordievsky, former colonel and chief of the London KGB station
who defected in 1985, said in his book KGB: The Inside Story”, HarperCollins
1990: “Titov was deeply unpopular among his KGB colleagues (though not his
superiors) and, save for a small group of proteges, feared by his subordinates.”
20. Interview with Grossmann.
CHAPTER FOUR
1. The details of this case recounted here come from my interviews with
Erdmann in 1993, in Berlin; from Stasi files; and from court records.
2. From my interview with Erdmann on September 24, 1991, in Berlin.
3. Ibid.
4. A tape recording of the trial was found by Erdmann after reunification and
was made available to me.
5. Interview with Günther Buch, historian and archivist of the Federal
Institute for All-German Affairs.
6. Gerhard Finn, Die politischen Häftlinge der Sowjet Zone, 1945–1959
(Pfaffenhofen: Ilmgauverlag, 1960).
7. From my interview with Erdmann.
8. Ibid.
9. Rüdiger Knechtel and Jürgen Fiedler, Stalins DDR (Leipzig: Forum,
1991).
10. From my interview with Knechtel in 1993.
11. Kneifel’s story, retold here, is based on my 1993 interviews with Kneifel
and his wife in Nürnberg as well as on Stasi records.
12. Ibid.
13. Interview with Knechtel in 1993.
14. Interview with Kneifel.
15. Ibid.
16. Interview with Mrs. Kneifel.
17. The order was found in Kneifel’s Stasi file, which was made available to
me.
18. Statement by Frank Hiekel, who was installed as deputy director of the
Bautzen prison in 1991.
19. Interview with the Berlin newspaper Bild. Lustik retired on a pension of
DM2,300 (about US$1,500) and lives in a villa built by prisoners.
20. By 1995 all had retired, and pretrial investigations were under way into
those against whom former prisoners had filed charges of torture.
21. Conversation in 1990 with Gitta Bauer (since deceased), who also was
arrested and spent six years in various prisons, among them Bautzen. After her
release she became a foreign correspondent for the Berlin-based Springer
newspapers, reporting for many years from New York. Similar stories have been
reported by other communist functionaries who had fallen into disfavor,
especially stories of Mielke’s threats to hack off heads.
22. Wolfgang Leonard, member of the Communist Party’s division of
agitation and propaganda, who returned from Soviet exile, reported in a
February 1990 speech: “Max Fechner, chairman of the SPD Central Committee
in Berlin, received from the Soviets a new automobile and 300,000 marks for a
book he was writing. The son of Erich W. Gniffke, another SPD functionary, was
released from a Soviet prison camp and flown to Berlin aboard a special Red
Army plane. Otto Grotewohl, a leading member of the SPD Central Committee,
was promised a leading position in the new party by Marshal Georgy K. Zhukov,
the Soviet commander.“
23. All figures were reported by the SPD’s Friedrich Ebert Foundation in
1994.
24. Interview with Hildebrandt in Berlin in 1961, shortly after the Berlin
Wall was built.
25. Conversation with General Howley in 1969. He died on July 30, 1993, at
the age of ninety.
26. Report in West Berlin’s daily newspaper Morgen-Echo, October 18,
1948.
27. Conversation in 1992 with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who
said that during Stasi cadre meetings Knye would rail against officers who dared
asked questions he thought were nonsensical. “Knye branded them deviationists
in a manner so brutal that they shook in their boots for days, wondering when
they would be arrested.“
28. Interview with Rainer Hildebrandt in 1991.
29. Ibid.
30. Ibid.
31. Ibid.
32. Johannes Hedrich, a high-ranking officer of the East German State
Security Service who defected in June 1953, told U.S. intelligence interrogators
that it was indeed an attempted kidnapping. One car was to ram Hildebrandt as
he was riding his bicycle, causing him to fall. Then they were to speed away. A
second vehicle was to pick up Hildebrandt, ostensibly to take him to a hospital.
In actuality, it would cross the sector border and deliver him to waiting Soviet
MVD officers.
33. Conversation in 1995 with Günther Buch, former official of the Institute
for All-German Affairs in West Berlin.
34. Ibid.
35. Kai-Uwe Merz, Kalter Krieg als antikommunistischer Widerstand
(Munich: R. Oldenburg, 1987).
36. Conversation in 1995 with Peter Sichel, former CIA station chief in
Berlin.
37. Less than a year after Heckscher was reassigned to Laos, four members
of the KgU who had served as Stasi informants returned to East Berlin. The
communist press reported their “defection,” saying they “voluntarily turned
themselves in to state security organs” because they no longer wanted to be
associated with a terrorist group. It was a well-orchestrated propaganda
campaign.
38. Interview with Bailey in 1994 in Munich.
39. Conversation with Peter Sichel in 1995, in New York.
40. Kurier (Berlin), March 20, 1958.
41. Bild Zeitung, April 1958.
42. Melnikov’s role as mastermind of the UFJ was revealed to me by an
unimpeachable U.S. intelligence source on condition of anonymity. Although an
obviously brilliant intelligence officer, Melnikov simply applied a variation of
the so-called Trust formed in the 1920s by GPU Chief Feliks Edmundovich
Dzerzhinski as an ostensibly anti-Bolshevik organization. The Trust was used to
infiltrate the numerous White Russian emigre groups in Western Europe that
Lenin saw as a danger to his young Bolshevik state. With Trust operations
stretching over several years, the GPU succeeded in neutralizing emigres’
attempts to destabilize Bolshevik Russia and reestablish a non-Bolshevik
government.
43. I served as an interpreter at a U.S. Army Signal Corps radiotelephone
relay station a few miles outside Belzig in 1946. The station handled
communications between the U.S. Army’s European headquarters and the Berlin
garrison. It was established in the Soviet zone by special agreement between
General Eisenhower and Marshal Zhukov. Station personnel were under around-
the-clock surveillance by the Soviets, who delighted in petty harassment. One
evening the station commander was summoned by the Soviets to 25 Branden-
burgerstrasse in Belzig. When he asked directions to that address from a local
woman, she exclaimed: “My God, don’t go there! That is the GPU’s place.” The
Germans at the time still called the secret police by its old name. When the
station chief and I presented ourselves at the given address, we were met by a
short, heavy-set Russian carrying a shotgun and wearing a civilian coat over
military breeches that were tucked into jackboots. Another Russian addressed
him as “Tovarishch General.” The general appeared friendly and explained that
he wanted us to drive him in our three-quarter-ton weapons carrier across nearby
fields so he could shoot jackrabbits he hoped would be caught in the beams of
the headlights. Our excursion lasted a few hours, netted a dozen rabbits, and
concluded with the general passing around a bottle of vodka. During the
drinking bout I asked what the general’s name was, and one of the Russians
replied, “Melnikov.” When my Signal Corps group was detained a few weeks
later for accidentally having taken a road not listed on our Soviet passes, we
were brought to MGB headquarters and ran into Melnikov as he was leaving the
building. I tried to speak to him, but he looked at me stone-faced and continued
on his way without uttering a word. We were released a few hours later, after a
lecture about map reading. Later I saw Melnikov on yet another occasion in
uniform, beating a young Red Army private whom he had spotted holding hands
with a farm girl.
44. No relation to Stasi victim Horst Erdmann, whose story is told earlier in
this chapter.
45. The Latvian guerrillas were supported by the British intelligence service
using former German Navy S-boats with German crews to land supplies and
infiltrators on the Baltic coast. The Soviet deception operation is described by
Gordievsky in KGB: The Inside Story (New York: HarperCollins, 1990).
46. Anonymous U.S. intelligence source.
47. Interview with Günther Buch in 1995.
48. Interview with Günther Buch in 1995; Dei Spiegel, April 1952.
49. Anonymous U.S. intelligence source who had access to the files.
50. A copy of the pledge is in my possession.
51. The details of the kidnapping, of its planning, and of the subsequent
interrogation are recorded in a three-inch-thick Stasi file, a copy of which is in
my possession. The file contains a copy of Linse’s application for a position with
the UFJ, including a detailed questionnaire that UFJ Chief and Soviet agent
Erdmann had him complete. A highly reliable U.S. intelligence source told me
on condition of anonymity that Walther Rosenthal, Erdmann’s deputy and also a
Soviet agent, set up Linse for the kidnapping.
52. Copies of the transcripts are in my possession.
53. The interrogation protocols are in my possession.
54. Copies of the Soviet trial records are in my possession.
55. A copy of the thesis written by Colonel Thomas Rieger is in my
possession.
56. Conversation in 1993 with former MfS Colonel Rainer Wiegand.
57. The order, classified as secret, is in my possession.
58. A copy of the document is in my possession.
59. Interview in 1992 with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand.
60. Statement made in August 1990 by the last DDR deputy attorney general,
Lothar Reuter.
61. This information is from the Postal Ministry in Bonn.
62. After World War II, Felfe was recruited by the KGB and joined the West
German Federal Intelligence Service. After more than a decade as a successful
mole, he was uncovered in 1963 and was sentenced to fourteen years in prison.
He was exchanged six years later for Western agents held by the East Germans.
63. A copy of the report is in my possession.
64. A copy is in my possession.
65. I have such a tape in my collection.
66. A copy of the Stasi pay roster is in my possession.
67. Interview with the driver of a Stasi general on condition of anonymity.
68. Interviews with Günther Buch of the Federal Institute for All-German
Affairs and with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand.
CHAPTER FIVE
1. Cited in 1992 by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution,
responsible for counterespionage.
2. Comments from our conversation in April 1997.
3. Ibid.
4. Information given me by the office of the prosecutor general.
5. A copy of the report is in my possession.
6. Bernd Kaufmann, Eckard Reisener, Dieter Schwips, and Henri Walther,
Der Nachrichtendienst der KPD, 1919–1937 (Berlin: Dietz, 1993).
7. Interview with Günther Buch, Institute for All-German Affairs.
8. Information obtained from a West German counterintelligence official on
condition of anonymity.
9. Interview on condition of anonymity with a high-ranking West German
government official who was an observer at hearings of a special parliamentary
commission probing the Guillaume affair in summer and fall 1974. The
commission was chaired by the eminent professor of law Theodor Eschenburg,
University of Tubingen, and became known as the Eschenburg Commission.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. Interview with Ambassador Rush in 1974.
14. Statement by West German government spokesman Rüdiger von
Wechmar, June 26, 1974.
15. Interview in 1962 with Inspector Johannes Neumann of the Federal
Criminal Police (Bundeskriminalamt), the West German equivalent of the U.S.
FBI.
16. Interview on condition of anonymity with two former members of the
West German counterespionage agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz
(Office for the Protection of the Constitution).
17. Conversation in 1997 with Fritz Michel, former department head with the
equivalent rank of colonel in the Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
18. Interview, on condition of anonymity, with an official observer at the
Eschenburg Commission.
19. Testimony at the 1993 treason trial of Markus Wolf, former head of the
Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate.
20. Dei Spiegel October 1974.
21. When the Office for the Protection of the Constitution was formed in the
late 1940s, the West German parliament decreed that the agency would be
restricted to observing subversive activities by both the left and the extreme right
and to counterespionage. Lawmakers decided against giving the agency powers
of arrest because they did not want to create an institution identical in structure
and powers to the Nazi Gestapo.
22. Conversation with the late Johannes Neumann, federal criminal police
inspector.
23. Bunte Illustrierte, September 1981.
24. Quick magazine, August 1988.
25. I obtained these details about the Kuron affair in confidential
conversations with former counterintelligence officials as well from trial
testimony in 1992.
26. West Germany had never recognized East Germany in a diplomatic
sense. In an agreement to “normalize” relations, however, the two states
established representatives who carried out ambassadorial functions.
27. Interview in 1997 with Klaus Wagner, presiding judge at the provincial
high court in Düsseldorf.
28. Interview with Hellenbroich in 1993.
29. Testimony at the 1992 trial of Kuron.
30. Interview with Gerlinde Garau published in Quick magazine, 1992.
31. From my interview in 1993 with Karl Grossmann, former colonel and
deputy head of counterintelligence in the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate
(the Main Administration for Foreign Intelligence).
32. Ibid.
33. A copy of this dissertation is in my possession.
34. Interview with presiding judge Klaus Wagner.
35. Interview in 1993 with Karl Grossmann.
36. Neither was ever indicted. In 1995 the West German Supreme Court
ruled that officers of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate could not be tried
if they worked only from East German territory.
37. Presiding judge Klaus Wagner of the provincial high court in Düsseldorf.
38. Bild am Sonntag, February 1997.
39. Ibid.
40. Details of the Krase case were provided by a retired high-ranking West
German intelligence officer on condition of anonymity. In addition, I gleaned
relevant facts from the indictment of former Lieutenant General Günther
Kratsch, who led the Stasi’s counterespionage directorate (the Second
Directorate).
41. Ibid.
42. This incident and others that took place during the conference were
described to me on condition of anonymity by an intelligence officer who
participated in the meeting and who was close to Count Hardenberg.
43. Related to me on condition of anonymity by a former intelligence
official.
44. Ibid.
45. Details of the Gieren case are listed in the indictment of Lieutenant
General Günther Kratsch et al. for treason. The case against Kratsch and officers
under his command was dismissed by the West German supreme court because
they operated solely on DDR territory.
46. Gieren indictment.
47. German newspapers identified the defector as Karl Grossmann, who had
been deputy chief of the counterintelligence division before his retirement in
1987. In an interview with me in 1992, Grossmann denied this but confirmed
Gast’s role as a spy.
48. The following details of the Gast case come from court testimony and
from my conversations with intelligence officers on condition of anonymity.
49. Interview in 1997 with Judge Wagner.
50. Conversation in 1991 on condition of anonymity with a high official of
the BND.
51. Conversation with Buch in July 1998.
52. Conversation in 1995 with Ferdi Breidbach, former Christian Democratic
member of the federal parliament.
53. Testimony before the high provincial court in Düsseldorf, 1993.
54. Ibid.
55. Lubig indictment.
56. Ibid.
57. Ibid.
58. Ibid.
59. Ibid.
60. Interview with Busch in 1993.
61. Bildzeitung, July 1991.
62. Trial testimony in 1961.
63. The journalist, who is now dead, confided this story to me in the 1960s. I
have withheld his name in deference to his family.
64. Focus (news magazine), no. 19, May 1993.
65. Interview in 1996 with Günther Buch, former chief archivist and
historian with the Ministry for All-German Affairs.
66. Peter-Ferdinand Koch, Die feindlichen Brüder (Munich: Scherz, 1994).
67. Süddeutsche Zeitung, April 1991.
68. Trial testimony.
69. Trial testimony in June 1992.
70. Interview with former Ambassador Günter Diehl, and information
provided by the prosecutor general’s office.
71. Conversation with retired Ambassador Günter Diehl.
72. Information provided by the federal prosecutor general’s office.
73. Trial testimony.
74. Statement by the federal prosecutor general.
75. Trial testimony.
76. Statement by the federal prosecutor general.
77. Trial testimony.
78. Interview in 1996 on condition of anonymity with a former high-ranking
West German counterespionage official.
79. Ibid.
80. 1993 indictment of Stasi Lt. Gen. Kratsch, whose counterintelligence
directorate controlled Gebauer.
81. Berliner Morgenpost, February 1996.
82. Interview with Schröder in summer 1992, after he was indicted for
espionage. Schröder, who worked for me when I was in charge of the Bonn
bureau of the Associated Press, denied that he had been a spy.
CHAPTER SIX
1. Unless otherwise indicated, this account of the safe caper has been
constructed from documents provided me by U.S. Army counterintelligence
agents and by individuals identified in later notes.
2. From my interview in 1991, in Port Charlotte, Florida, with retired
Colonel Franz H. Ross, who investigated the Hesse case for the chief of U.S.
Army Military Intelligence. Much of the story as retold below comes from this
interview.
3. Ibid.
4. Interview with Leyden in 1991, in Washington, D.C.
5. Interview with Colonel Ross.
6. As reported in the newspaper Main-Post, June 30, 1956.
7. Interview with Colonel Ross.
8. Ibid.
9. Reported in detail, with photographs, in the newspaper Main-Post, July
11, 1956.
10. Ibid.
11. A copy of the letter is in my possession.
12. Copies of this and preceding memoranda are in my possession.
13. From my interview in 1992, in Juan-les-Pins, France, with Willms, who
was my superior when I was assigned to the 513th MI Group as a reserve officer.
14. I was present at this meeting in 1960.
15. From my interview with Wiegand (Munich, 1992) about his attendance at
the Stasi counterespionage school.
16. Ibid.
17. My interview with retired Colonel William G. Leyden in Washington,
D.C., in 1992.
18. The details of the story retold here are from my interview in 1997 with
Christa Trapp, who now is a U.S. citizen and has a different name.
19. By agreement between the Western Allies and the Soviets, this was the
only transit route by which Westerners could reach the city.
20. A cable classified as secret was sent on July 22, 1955, to Secretary of
State John Foster Dulles by the Berlin mission, which said: “We have concluded
that giving publicity to Erdmann and Trapp cases might serve to give them both
protection from further harassment or possible recrimination by SSD [the State
Security Service, a forerunner of the Ministry for State Security] agents, on
theory that SSD less likely bother these individuals in future if SSD’s past action
were well known to the public. At the same time publicity would serve to alert
other local employees to penetration efforts of East Germany and thus better
enable to ward off SSD approaches, in particular by avoiding trips to East Berlin
or by surface through Soviet Zone.” Twenty-eight days later, the mission called a
news conference to announce the incidents.
21. The plan was found in the Stasi archive in 1990. A copy is in my
possession.
22. Interview with Christa Trapp.
23. From the kidnapping plan.
24. Interview with Christa Trapp.
25. Trial transcript.
26. I interviewed Koch in summer 1991 at the former colonel’s country
cottage, northeast of Berlin. Although reluctant to talk at first, Koch confirmed
details of the Hall case when I told him no harm could come to his ex-agents,
since Hall was already in prison and had fully confessed.
27. While researching the matter in Berlin in summer 1990, I was given
copies of documents that Hall had sold to the East Germans, which were found
at Stasi headquarters. Because the documents originated with the National
Security Agency and were highly classified, I complied with federal law and
turned them over to U.S. intelligence authorities.
28. Interview with former Stasi counterintelligence Colonel Rainer Wiegand
in Munich in 1991.
29. From a statement by Hall, videotaped in December 1988, and from a
copy of the transcript of Yildirim’s trial, both in my possession.
30. Ibid.
31. Ibid.
32. Ibid.
33. Ibid.
34. Ibid.
35. From my interview in 1991 with Karl Grossmann, former Stasi colonel
and deputy chief of foreign counterintelligence.
36. I have changed the name to protect his identity.
37. Interview with former Stasi Colonel Grossmann.
38. Interview in 1991, on condition of anonymity, with a ranking official of
West Berlin’s criminal investigation department.
39. Ibid.
40. Colonel Herrington is the author of Silence Was a Weapon and Peace
With Honoil (San Francisco: Presidio Press, 1982 and 1983, respectively).
41. I have a copy.
42. From my interview with Walter in 1997, in Savannah, Georgia.
43. Ibid.
44. Ibid.
45. From my conversation with Boeden in 1997, in Bonn.
46. From my interviews with Grossmann in 1990 and early 1991, in Berlin.
47. In his book, Man Without a Face (New York: Times Books, 1997), ex-
spy chief Markus Wolf claimed that Carney had contacted his department from
Texas, saying he wanted to desert. Wolf claimed that Carney left the United
States on a false Cuban passport and was flown to East Berlin via Havana and
Moscow. I know this is untrue, as is Wolf’s statement that Carney disappeared
from a hiding place in southern East Germany in early 1990 and was believed to
have been kidnapped by CIA agents.
48. I brought copies out of Berlin and relinquished them to U.S. authorities,
in compliance with federal espionage laws.
49. My interview with former Stasi Colonel Karl Grossmann.
50. A copy of the letter is in my possession.
51. Interview in 1992, in Munich, with former Colonel Heinz Busch, military
analyst and head of the task force.
52. Interview with General Lynn by telephone in 1992.
53. Interview with Koch in 1992, in Stolzenhagen, Germany.
54. Interview with Wiegand in 1991, in Munich.
55. Interview in 1991 with former Stasi Colonel Karl Grossmann.
56. Ibid.
57. Ibid.
58. Ibid.
59. I was allowed access to these files by the German government
commission in control of the Stasi archive in May 1996. Because of government
regulations, files involving Germany’s allies could not be copied.
60. Interview on condition of anonymity with German intelligence sources.
61. From a conversation in 1997 with the official, who requested anonymity.
62. Interview with Busch in 1992.
63. Ibid.
64. Ibid.
65. This has never been confirmed officially. However, I was told in 1997 by
a highly reliable German intelligence source that authorities have been searching
for Devaux for several years. Some believed he was provided a new identity and
is living in the United States. However, in May 1997, authorities were reportedly
concentrating their search on Belgium, where a man resembling Devaux had
made a bank deposit of more than DM1 billion (about US$625 million) that was
believed to have originated with a covert, Stasi-owned company.
66. From the trial record.
67. Interview in Die Zeit magazine, March 1997.
68. Interview in 1997 with former Colonel Heinz Busch, who said Rogalla
was the only agent with the first name Jürgen who occupied a high position and
who was known to criticize the regime with impunity.
69. Trial testimony.
70. Indictment of June 20, 1994.
71. Interview with Judge Wagner by telephone in 1997.
72. Ibid.
73. From my interview in 1996 with Presiding Judge Ina Obst-Oilers of the
provincial high court in Düsseldorf.
74. Ibid.
75. Trial testimony.
76. A copy of the report is in my possession.
77. Evan C. Reeves, President Kennedy: Profile of Power (New York: Simon
and Schuster, 1993).
78. Ibid.
79. From my 1997 interview, on condition of anonymity, with a former high-
ranking counterespionage official.
80. Copies of Scholz’s Stasi dossier are in my possession.
81. Copies of reports contained in Naor’s Stasi dossier are in my possession.
82. A professor at the University of Maine who wished to remain anonymous
recalled during a conversation with me in 1998 that Naor had twice been
awarded Fulbright scholarships for study in Eastern Europe, but the informant
could not recall the dates.
83. A copy of the briefing paper is in my possession.
84. Interview in 1992, in Munich, with former Colonel Heinz Busch.
85. The entire account, except when otherwise noted, originated with former
Colonel Rainer Wiegand. The woman’s clear name is known to me, but under
U.S. federal law it would be a felony to publish it.
86. Günter Bohnsack and Herbert Brehmer, Auftrag Irreführung: Wie die
Stasi Politik ina Westen machte (Hamburg: Carlsen, 1992).
87. Ibid.
88. The file was found by a young dissident who took part in the storming of
Stasi headquarters on January 15, 1990. He had forgotten about it until I
contacted him in fall 1991, in search of Stasi documents. After I purchased a
number of Stasi files from him, I asked whether he had anything else concerning
America. He suddenly remembered the Reagan file, which he had hidden behind
a bookcase. At first I suspected a forgery, but the details the file contained could
only have been assembled by an experienced intelligence officer from espionage
reports. I presented the original of the file to President Reagan on his eighty-first
birthday, February 6, 1992.
89. I traveled in Europe as a government consultant in May 1987, and spoke
with a broad spectrum of government and political party officials as well as the
media, eliciting their views on the proposed treaty to withdraw intermediate
range missiles from Europe. My analysis was shared with President Reagan and
with the U.S. secretary of state. Thus, I was familiar with sensitive discussions
on the subject within the administration.
90. Copies are in my possession.
91. Interview with Bierbaum in 1997, in Berlin.
92. From my interviews with numerous former Stasi officers, including
Heinz Busch, HVA chief military analyst, and Karl Grossmann, onetime deputy
head of external counterintelligence.
93. Report by former Colonel Rainer Wiegand after his defection to the West
German Federal Intelligence Service. A copy is in my possession.
94. Ibid.
CHAPTER SEVEN
1. Interview in 1992, in Munich, with former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who
served two decades under Kratsch.
2. Ibid.
3. I have several such warrants signed by Mielke.
4. The death list is in my possession.
5. Interview with former Colonel Wiegand.
6. Ibid.
7. Ibid.
8. A tape recording of the trial, as well as about a thousand pages of the Stasi
investigation, including the protocol of the execution, are in my possession.
9. General Reinhard Gehlen was the Wehrmacht’s intelligence chief for the
eastern front. In 1945 he surrendered to the U.S. Army and offered to place his
organization at the disposal of the United States until such time as West
Germany regained her sovereignty. In 1956, the organization became the
Bundesnachrichtendienst, the Federal Intelligence Service. Gehlen retired in
1968.
10. Interview in 1996 in Berlin and correspondence with Müller.
11. From a letter written by Frau Müller to me in 1996.
12. From my interview in 1996 with Juretzko and from documents
concerning his case.
13. I have a copy of this letter.
14. Indictment in 1993 for espionage of former Colonels Rolf Wagenbreth
and Rolf Rabe, chief and deputy, respectively, of the Stasi foreign espionage
directorate’s disinformation and active measures department. The charges were
eventually dropped, after the German Supreme Court ruled that former Stasi
espionage officers could not be tried because they had acted under laws of a
sovereign government and had not actually spied on West German territory.
15. Ibid.
16. Interview with former Stasi counterespionage officer Colonel Rainer
Wiegand.
17. This account of the Liebing affair is based on Stasi documents provided
me by Reinhard Borgman of Radio Free Berlin.
18. Interview with Günther Buch, former chief archivist and historian for the
West German Ministry for All-German Affairs.
19. From a letter I received from Günther Jahn in 1996.
20. Ministry for State Security arrest report of September 14, 1967.
21. These details are from my interview with Wiedenhoeft in 1997.
22. The United States established diplomatic relations with the German
Democratic Republic in fall 1974.
23. From my interview in 1997 with Maxwell Rabb, who served as U.S.
ambassador to Italy during Ronald Reagan’s presidency.
24. President Johnson wrote Rabb in June 1969: “Your own efforts in East
Germany and your successes in obtaining the release of the young Americans
imprisoned there were outstanding examples of what most gratifies me about our
country and the unselfish good people it produces. Please know that I am
grateful, as all your countrymen should be.”
25. Interview in 1993, in Munich, with former Colonel Rainer Wiegand of
the Stasi’s counterespionage directorate.
26. Ibid.
27. Ibid.
28. From a 1988 report to the counterespionage directorate by the Ninth
Main Directorate (charged with investigations). The report also listed names of
identified CIA and British Secret Intelligence Service officers. I am prevented by
U.S. federal law from revealing the names, but a copy of the report is in my
possession.
29. Interview with former Colonel Rainer Wiegand.
30. Ibid.
31. Ibid.
32. Interview in 1991, in Berlin, with former General Kratsch.
33. Ibid.
34. The entire sensor story is based on an extensive report former Colonel
Rainer Wiegand provided Western intelligence after his defection in 1989.
Wiegand gave me a tape recording of this report.
CHAPTER EIGHT
1. From my interview with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand in 1992, in
Munich.
2. Ibid.
3. Ibid.
4. A copy of the report is in my possession.
5. A copy of the protocol is in my possession.
6. Internal Stasi document, a copy of which is in my possession.
7. Thirty-page meeting protocol, a copy of which is in my possession.
8. A copy of the report is in my possession.
9. Stasi follow-up report of February 18, 1981, in my possession.
10. General Damm’s proposal to Mielke, a copy of which is in my
possession.
11. I have copies of these documents.
12. A copy of the cable is in my possession.
13. Top secret Stasi report, a copy of which is in my possession.
14. A copy of the memorandum is in my possession.
15. Excerpt from Honecker’s account 628 with the German Trade Bank in
East Berlin. The account was opened in 1974 on Honecker’s orders, which
decreed that it must have a continuous balance of 100 million convertible West
marks and be at his sole disposition. A copy of the balance sheet is in my
possession.
16. I have a copy of this cable, which was found in the Stasi archive.
17. From my 1992 interview with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand, in
Munich.
18. Ibid.
19. A copy of the order is in my possession.
20. A copy of the letter is in my possession.
21. Nathaniel Davis, The Last Years of Salvador Allende (Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 1985).
22. Ibid.
23. Guided by a former Stasi man who wished to remain anonymous and
who had been close to General Günther Kratsch, I visited the site after the Stasi’s
demise in 1990.
24. Interview with Wiegand in 1992.
25. The Associated Press, August 14, 1986.
26. Letters to party secretary-general Erich Honecker from the financial
administration of party-owned firms. Copies of these letters are in my
possession.
27. Honecker fled to Moscow in winter 1990, after the Soviets had given him
asylum in a military hospital near Berlin. When the Soviet Union collapsed, the
new Russian leader, Boris Yeltsin, ordered that Honecker be turned over to the
German judiciary, which wanted to try him on manslaughter charges in the
shooting of people trying to escape from East Germany. Pressured relentlessly
by the German government, the Chilean government ordered his expulsion from
the embassy in July 1992, and Honecker returned to Berlin. In January 1993, a
Berlin court ruled that he was unfit to stand trial. He flew to Chile on January 14
to rejoin his wife and daughter. He died a year later of liver cancer.
28. Interview with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand in 1992.
29. Ibid.
30. Interview with William L. Stearman, former U.S. National Security
Council expert on Soviet and liberation movement affairs, in 1997, in
Washington.
31. A copy of the decision is in my possession.
32. Morgan Norval, Inside the ANC (Washington, D.C.: Selous Foundation
Press, 1990).
33. Interview with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand.
34. I have the report.
35. Ibid.
36. Interview with William L. Stearman, former member of the U.S. National
Security Council and expert on Soviet and national liberation movement affairs,
and adjunct professor for international affairs (1977–1993) at Georgetown
University, Washington, D.C.
37. In this connection, Stearman commented: “Foreign correspondents’
obvious unconcern about the SACP is, I believe, due partly to ignorance, but
mostly to a reluctance to discredit the popular new regime. Furthermore, SACP
members keep silent about their affiliation and are acting more like capitalists
than communists, which communists normally do and have done in similar
circumstances; proceed very cautiously, slowly, and with guile in imposing
‘socialism’—in this case, to avoid, inter alia, discouraging foreign investments
and encouraging white flight and to buy time needed for incrementally
consolidating control of the levers of power and influence.”
38. Interview in 1992, in Berlin, with Günther Buch, former chief archivist
and historian of the Ministry for All-German Affairs.
39. Documents provided me by Kästner.
40. Interview in 1992, in Munich, with former Stasi Colonel Rainer
Wiegand.
41. The Economist, July 1994.
42. A copy of the document is in my possession.
43. A copy of the order is in my possession.
44. Interview in 1992, in Munich, with former Stasi Colonel Rainer
Wiegand.
45. Ibid.
46. Oleg Gordievsky, KGB: The Inside Story (New York: HarperCollins,
1990).
47. Copies of the contracts are in my possession.
48. A copy of the memo authorizing the payment is in my possession.
49. Interview with Wiegand in 1992, in Munich.
CHAPTER NINE
1. Statement in 1990 by Vaclav Havel, Czechoslovakia’s noncommunist
president.
2. The details of Stasi involvement in the La Belle bombing are based on my
extensive recorded interviews in 1991 and 1992 with former Colonel Rainer
Wiegand and on written reports that he provided.
3. Intelligence jargon for branches.
4. Interview with Wiegand in 1991, in Munich.
5. Ibid.
6. The document is in my possession.
7. From my conversation with Mr. Whitehead in 1991.
8. Statement made to me on February 1, 1991 by Thomas F. Jones, FBI
inspector in charge of the public affairs office.
9. President Reagan ordered that American businesses withdraw their U.S.
employees from Libya.
10. I have in my possession the final Operation Lux report, which was
written on December 28, 1989.
11. Conversation with Cynthia Miller.
12. All details of the case recounted here are based on the legal record.
CHAPTER TEN
1. Interview with former Colonel Rainer Wiegand in 1991, in Munich.
2. Ibid.
3. Ibid.
4. Former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who at the time of these events was
a counterintelligence officer with the National People’s Army.
5. Ibid.
6. Ibid.
7. A wanted notice was issued by West German authorities in 1952 for
Daoud, who was suspected of having masterminded the Munich attack.
8. Meeting recorded in an MfS protocol dated August 23, 1979, a copy of
which is in my possession.
9. Having made “contact” was an understatement at best. In June 1990, the
new noncommunist Interior Minister, Balasc Horvath, made public a letter
signed “Carlos.” This letter was addressed to Janos Kadar, the Communist Party
chief and head of the Hungarian government, and expressed appreciation for
Hungary’s hospitality. Horvath also turned over thirteen AVH files to the
prosecutor general. These files showed that “Carlos” carried a diplomatic
passport issued by the government of South Yemen and that he was asked to
leave Hungary in 1981. Nevertheless, he returned several times thereafter. His
last stay in Hungary was in fall 1985, and when he departed, according to the
interior minister, he left behind sixty rocket launchers and forty pounds of
explosives.
10. Statement to officials of the Federal Criminal Investigation Agency by
former Colonel Günter Jäckel of the Stasi’s antiterrorist directorate.
11. From a statement issued to the press by the Berlin prosecutor’s office in
1991.
12. Voigt’s admission in a June 1991 German television interview after he
eluded arrest.
13. Arrest warrant issued by the West Berlin prosecutor against El Sibai and
stating the involvement of Carlos, Weinreich, and Voigt, whose names also were
on the wanted list.
14. A high-ranking West European police official told me in March 1991, on
condition of anonymity, that Carlos had been in Warsaw several months earlier
and that Western security authorities knew it but had taken no action against
him. The official also said that Carlos was in Bulgaria for several days in 1986.
He was accompanied on this trip by several women and was armed. Bulgarian
officials met him at the airport. This information also was relayed to police in
Western Europe and presumably to intelligence organizations as well.
15. The episode was recounted to me by a Berlin police official on condition
of anonymity.
16. Interview in 1991 with former Colonel Rainer Wiegand.
17. Conversation with Rainer Eppelmann, who became minister of defense
after the ouster of the communist government in 1990. He served until
reunification, and then entered the parliament in Bonn.
18. A copy of the memorandum is in my possession.
19. Documents of the MfS’s Twenty-Second Directorate (for
counterterrorism).
20. Interview with investigating magistrate Rosario Priore in Rome in 1992.
21. After the Stasi was dissolved in 1990, according to Rainer Wiegand,
Stuchly was running a sausage stand near the Alexander Platz, in downtown East
Berlin.
22. I have changed the name to protect the former officer’s identity.
CHAPTER ELEVEN
1. Conversation with General Kroesen in 1993.
2. I have a copy of the document.
3. From my conversation with a German police official in 1992 on condition
of anonymity.
4. Police reports.
5. Interview with Caecily Rohwedder, the Rohwedders’ daughter, who was
twenty-three years old at the time and completing studies for a master degree in
international relations at New York’s Columbia University.
6. Conversation in 1991 with Gerhard Heuer, deputy undersecretary of the
Department of Interior and in charge of internal security. He was the deputy to
State Secretary Hans Neusel, whom RAF terrorists tried to kill with a bomb.
7. The DDR was apportioned into fifteen administrative districts called
Bezirke, each headed by a first secretary of the SED who wielded extraordinary
power and was responsible only to the Council of Ministers and the party
leadership in Berlin. A district secretary was the immediate superior of the
district Stasi chief.
8. A copy of the report is in my possession.
9. I have a copy of this report (No. 285/79), which was found in Mielke’s
personal safe.
CHAPTER TWELVE
1. Interview with former Stasi Colonel Rainer Wiegand in 1992, in Munich.
As head of a special task force in the counterespionage directorate, Wiegand was
privy to the most secret Stasi directives and analyses on internal security.
2. Ibid.
3. Ibid.
4. Ibid.
5. Interview in 1991 on condition of anonymity with the driver of a high-
ranking East German official, who witnessed the scene.
6. Dei Spiegel (news magazine) no. 45, 1996.
7. Valentin Falin, secretary for international affairs, Central Committee of the
Communist Party of the USSR, in a letter to Dei Spiegel magazine dated May
1991.
8. I was in West Berlin at the time and interviewed participants later that
night and the following day.
9. Interview in 1992 with former Colonel Wiegand.
10. BZ (West Berlin newspaper), January 16, 1990.
11. Interview in 1997 with Manfred Kittlaus, chief of the Berlin criminal
police group investigating government crimes.
INDEX
Abousrewil, Sadegh
Abrassimov, Piotr
A. Abuagela, Masud
Abwehr (Nazi security service) Active measures department of Soviet
secret police (KGB) Adam, Hans-Joachim
Africa, and Stasi African liberation movements support of by East
Germany African National Congress (ANC) AIDS promoted as being
produced by US Army
Al-Albani. SeeMusbah, El Albani Albin Gabrielle
Albrecht, Kerstin
Albrecht, Susanne
Albrot, Nina
Allende, Salvador
Allied Control Commission of Berlin
Almeyda, Clodomiro
Alregee, Abdusalam
Altamirano, Carlos
Alwyn, Patricio
Amador, Javier
Amnesty, and East German leaders Andropov, Yuri
Anlauf, Paul
Anti-Nazi resistance
A Question of Character: The Life of
John F. Kennedy(Reeves) Arab terrorists
Carlos the “Jackal,”
internecine conflict within and the Palestine Liberation Front (PLO)
training of around Berlin
Arafat, Yasser
Arbeitsgruppe Ausländer (AGA) Arms shipment by Stasi
to Libya
to Nicaragua
to Palestinian Liberation Front to South Yemen
Arms shipment from Soviets in Angola
to Chile
Arrest and search warrants Ashur, Mohamed
Associated Press
Awards given by Stasi
Axen, Hermann
Bader-Meinhof Gang
Bailey, George
Baker, Robert (Bobby)
Bailee, Wilhelm
Barczatis, Elli
Battle Group Against Inhumanity (KgU)
Bauer, Leo
Bautzen prison
Beater, Bruno
Beer, Henning
Beer, Wolfgang
Beil, Gerhard
Belqassim, Younis
Benjamin, Hilde
Berg, Carsten
Berger, Götz
Beria, Lavrenty
Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government
Criminality
Berlin Wall
building of
dismantling of
East German controls on
guarding of
BfV
federal counterespionage service (West German)
and defection of Klaus Tiedge and recruitment of Jews for espionage
Bie, Peggy
Biellce, Heinz
Bierbaum, Werner
Bildzeitung(newspaper) Birkelbach, Wilhelm
Black September group
Blau, Hagen
Bloch, Felix S.
Boeden, Gerhard
Bohm, Horst
Bombing of tank memorial
Bönisch, Georg
Boom, Erna
Border shootings
Borge, Tomas
Borm, William
Bothe, Colonel Klaus
Brandt, Willy
and rapprochement
Brezhnev, Leonid, and removal of Ulbricht
Briessman, Ermin
British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS)
Bröde, Friedrich
Brünger, Anita
Brüning, Claus
Brutality
See alsoStories of repression and brutality
Bubaclc, Siegfried
Buch, Günther
Buchenwald concentration camp Buchner, Willi
Bugging of briefing room in Heidelberg
Bukovsky, Vladimir
Bulgarians and Sandinista Liberation Front (FSLN)
Bundesgrenzschutz, West German border police
Bundeskriminalamt (BKA)
and arrest of enemy agents its investigation of NATO
espionage leaks
and Rasterfahndung
and Red Army Faction
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) Federal Intelligence Service and Busch,
Heinz
and defection of Rainer Wiegand and Gast, Gabriele
and Guillamme
infiltration by Stasi informers and recruitment of Jews for espionage
and Spuhler brothers
Bundestag, West German, and statute of limitations in
prosecution of Nazis
Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Supreme Court)
Burt, Richard
Busch, Heinz
Bush, George
Businessmen, as target for Stasi
Calderon, Magdalena
Campbell, Boniface
Campbell, James G.
corruption of,
Carlos “the Jackal” (Sanchez) Carney, Jeffrey
Carter, Jimmy
Casey, William
Castro, Fidel
Catholic church in Nicaragua Catholic informers
Central Committee of East Germany expulsions from
prosecution of
spying on
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and espionage in East Germany and
Investigating Committee of Free Jurists and the Kampfgruppe(KgU) and
Libyan activities,
and Liebing, Gertrude
and precursor of (OSS)
and Reif, Wolfgang
and Sandinistas
and Teferre
and Vogel, Dieter
and Wiegand
Central Registration Office of SED
crimes
Cerna, Lenin
Chaana, Ali and Verena
Chebrikov, Viktor M.
Checkpoint Charlie
Cheka (Soviet secret police), orientation of in East Germans Chile
and Stasi support
terrorism in
Chilean Communists, granted asylum in East Germany
Chimmy, Al
Chraidi, Yasser
and Abu Nidal group
Christian Democratic Party infiltration by Stasi spies its resistance to
appeasing SED
and Koch, Konrad
Christian Democratic Union Chuikov, Vasili
Chumilov, General
Church, Frank
Churchmen, as informers
Citizens’ committees
(Bürgerkommittees)
Clark, James
Coburger, Carli
Cold War
Collectivization, confiscatory College of Justice (Juristische Hochschule)
Colome, Ibarra
Cominform
Comintern
Communications, secrets of given away
by Albin, Gabrielle
by Carney
by Gebauer, Karl-Paul
by Hall
by Rupps
Communist Information Office Communist International
(Comintern)
Communist Party of Germany (KPD). SeeKommunistische Partei
Deutschlands (KPD)
Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and SED archives
Communists parties worldwide, and East Germany
Communist world revolution, and Germany
Communist Youth Movement
Computer programs, immobilization of, information from Hall
James
Computer system. SeeSystem of Joint Acquisition of Enemy Data (SOUD)
Concentration camps, maintained in East Germany after WWII
Conrad, Clyde L.
Contras, U.S. support of
Corvalan, Luis
Counterespionage
spies uncoverd only after
reunification
U.S disadvantage in
Counterfeiting of foreign currencies Crawford, Edward W. ("Big Ed")
Criminal code, East German Csordas, Laszlo
Cuba
espionage facility in and intelligence on Reagan and Nicaragua
and Stasi
and training of terrorists Czechoslovakia
and Chile
and Nicaragua
and production of explosives Soviet takeover of
Daher, Faour
Dahl, Harry
and the Red Army Faction
Dahms, Alexander
Damm, Willi
Daoud, Abu
in East Germany
Davis, Nathaniel
DDR. SeeDeutsche Demokratische Republik
Dead letter drops
Death penalty, as issued in East Germany
Decline of the West(Spengler) Defection from East Germany in 1960s
after 1953 uprising
and Erdmann, Horst
in first year
of overseas representatives through Hungary
Defense plans, secrets given over de Maiziere, Lothar
Demand for prosecution of East German regime
Demise of East German regime Demonstrations, public
Denton Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism of U.S. Senate Judiciary
Committee
Der Patriot(newspaper) Dei Sozialdemokrat(newspaper) Der
Spiegel(magazine) Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR)
adoption of its constitution as a police state
criticisms of by Grauweiler and diplomatic sovereignty its criminal
code
its guarantees (ostensibly) of freedom
its strategic importance for Soviets
support of African liberation movements
deutsche Gründlichkeit(German thoroughness)
Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP) West German,
Devaux, Rolf-Peter(65)
Development technicians, sending to Africa
Dibrova, P.K.
die Acht(handcuffs) Diehl, Günter
Diepgen, Eberharde
Diplomatic relations, desire to establish by East Germany
Diplomats, treated as spies Diskowski, Hildegard
Dissolution of Stasi
Dix, George C.
DKP. SeeDeutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP)
Domestic counterespionage
Domestic counterintelligence directive
Donnelly, Walther J.
Dorp, Gerald
Dourjinksy, Dimitry
Drexler, Edith
Duarte, President (El Salvador) Dulles, Allen
Dulles, John Foster
Dzerzhinski, Feliks
East German communist crimes comparison of prosecution of with Nazis
East German communist crimes prosecution of. SeeProsecution of East
German Communists
East German exodus to the West. See
Defection from East Germany East German Parliament. See
Politburo, East German
East Germany. SeeDeutsche Demokratische Republik
Eggers, Howard C.
Egypt, and Stasi
Einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat
(democratic state governed by the rule of law)
Elamin, Elamin A.
Election procedures
Electronic intelligence
by U.S.
El Sadelc, Abdukarim
El Saleh, Yousef
El Salvador, and kidnaping Emde, Heiner
Emlce, Horst
Eppelmann, Rainer
Erdmann, Elizabeth
Erdmann, Horst
Erdmann, Horst Johannes Karl See alsoFriedenau, Theo Espionage
by DDR in the United States by DDR in West Germany
by DDR versus NATO
by DDR versus United States and NATO
false charges of
prosecution of cases of
Espionage service of Stasi. See
Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA)
Eter, Musbah Albugasem
Ethiopia
agents trained in East Germany and arms and aid to
European Command Department for Public Opinion Research, U.S.
Army
European Intelligence Center Excessive sentences
Executions in East Germany for espionage
Fadeykin, Ivan
Faiola of Belgium (Queen)
False charges of espionage Fassman, Achim
Fechner, Max
Federal Border Police, infiltration by Stasi
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Federal counterespionage service
(West Germany). SeeBfV
Federal Intelligence Agency (West German). See
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) Federchuk, Vitaly V.
“Fee", failed recruitment
Felfe, Heinz
Fiedler, Siegfried
and South Yemen
Field, Noel H.
Field Station Berlin
Fighter, The(Nidal) Findeisen, Horst
Fink, Heinrich
Fischer, Oskar
Fister, R.
513th Military Intelligence Group of the U.S. Army
552nd Military Intelligence Battalion of the U.S. Army
and arrests of its East German agents
and claims of betrayed agents and recalling of its East German agents
Focus(magazine)
Food shortages in East Germany Ford, Gerald
Ford, Kenneth T.
Foreigners’ Task Force
Foreign Intelligence. See
Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA)
Forgery of death affidavit Fouche, Joseph
Free Democratic Party
Free German Youth organization (FDJ)
Freisler, Roland
Friedemann, Heinz
Friedenau, Theo
See alsoErdmann, Horst Johannes Karl
Fruclc, Hans
Fuchs, Norbert
Gant, Roland
Garau, Horst and Gerlinde
Garbe, Ingrid
Gauclc, Joachim
Gauweiler, Peter
Gebauer, Karl-Paul
Gehlen, Reinhard
Gehlen Organization
General strike, during uprising of 1953
Genscher, Hans-Dietrich
Gerhard, Heinz German Communist Party. See
Kommunistische Partei
Deutschlands (KPD)
German communists
in Russia, purging of
struggle between intellectuals and blue-collar class
German Democratic Republic. See
Deutsche Demokratische
Republik (DDR)
German Economic Commission (Deutsche
Wirtschaftskommission)
Germany, disparity of East and West after World War II
Gestapo
comparisons to Stasi
Ghana, and security training by Stasi
Gieren, Gisela and Günther Glavnoe razvedyvatel’noe
upravlenie (GRU),Soviet military espionage service East German
overseeing of
its espionage in U.S.
Goebbels, Joseph, and Communists Goins, James E.
Gorbachev, Mikhail S.
Goss, K.
Griffin, Thomas N.
Grimmling, Dana
Grohs, Armin
Gröndahl, Knut
Gross, H.R.
Grossmann, Karl
Grossmann, Werner
Grotewohl, Otto
and announcements of Wurzburg Safe caper
and Barczatis spy case
GRU. See Glavnoe razvedyvatel’noe
upravlenie (GR U)
Grunert, Rolf
Gubatz, Friedrich
Guillaume, Christel
Guillaume, Günter
Guillaume, Pierre
Guillotine, used for executions Guzman, Jaime
Gysi, Gregor
Haalc, Peter
Haig, Alexander
Hall, James W. Hall III
Halle prison (Red Ox)
Hallstein Doctrine
Hannay, Nermin
Hardenberg, Count
Haseler, Bernd
Hässan
Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA) as a means of political oppression
and bugging of briefing room in Heidelberg
emphasis on quality rather than quantity
founding of
and Hall, James
and infiltration of
Bundesnachrichtendienst
(BND)
and international terrorism, its means of success
as part of Ministry for State Security
and Romeos
and Rupp, Rainer
See alsoWolf, Marlcus Haushofer, Albrecht
Häusler, Andrea
Heckscher, Henry
Heine, Arno
Helbing, Monlcia
Hellenbroich, Heribert
Helsinki Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE)
Hempel, Johannes
Henze, Paul
Hepp, Odfried
Herbig, Karl-Heinz
Herbt, Ernst
Herold Horst
Herrhausen, Alfred
Herrington, Stuart,
Hesse, Horst
Heym, Stefan
Hildebrand, Dietmar
Hildebrandt, Rainer
Himmler, Heinrich, crimes of compared with East German
leaders
Hirsch, Ralph
Hitler, Adolf
Hlapane, Bartholomew
Hodes, H.I.
Hohenschönhausen political prison Honecker, Erich
and African liberation movements, becomes head of Communist
party
and Berlin Wall
and Chile
crimes of
death in Chile
and desire to improve relations with US
escape to Russia and extradition and Guillaumes
and his appeasement by the West his support of Miellce
and the La Belle bombing
and Nicaragua
ordering of training of terrorists, and Polish problem
and publicizing US spying
and receiving of daily intelligence digest
removal from office of
and removal of Ulbricht
and South Yemen
Hoover, J. Edgar
Horn, Gyula
Howley, Frank L.
Hungary
and Carlos the “Jackal,”
dismantling of fences in
and invasion by Soviets
Hussein, Saddam
HVA. SeeHauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA)
Ignatyev, Semyon D.
IMS. SeeStasi informers Industrial spying by Stasi Information sold to
East Germany by U.S. sources
Informers, Stasi (inoffizielle
Mitarbeiter, IMS)
inoffizieller Mitarbeiter mit
Feindberuhrung (IMB)
(unofficial collaborator with enemy contact)
Institute for All-German Affairs Institute for Scientific Economic
Research
International Brigade
International Relations, (Stasi) Department for
International Solidarity Committee of the DDR
International Tribunal, proposed, for prosecuting Communists
Internment camps, Stasi plans for, Investigating Committee of Free Jurists
(UFJ)
Investigation of crimes and incidents threatening state security Iraqi
murdering of dissident students planned bombing of Kurds
and Red Army Faction terrorists use of agents by Stasi
Irmler, Werner
Ivankovic, Anton
Ivashko, Vladimir A.
Iyab, Abu
Jaber, Khalid J.
Jäckel, Günter
Jackobs, Berndt
Jackson, Jesse
Jacobsmeier, Ingrid
Jäger, Harald
Jahn, Günther
Janicke, Horst
Janka, Walter
Jaruzelski, Wojciech
Jews, former Soviet, espionage relative to
John Paul II, Pope
Johnson, Lyndon B.
Journalists, as spies for Stasi Judges, communist, prosecution for crimes
committed
Judicial system
excessive sentences of
as instrument of political oppression
trials, show
Juretzko, Werner
Kahlig, Scheffler
Kaid, Ali
Kalugin, Oleg
Kardelj, Edvard
Kasrils, Ronnie
Kastner, Hermann-Hugo
KDP. SeeKommunistische Partei Deutschlands (KPD)
Keller, Heinz
Kennedy, John F.
Kennedy, Robert
Keshlaf, Ali Ibrahim
Kessler, Defense Minister Heinz KGB, Soviet State Security Committee
active measures department of after reunification of Germany and
comparison to Stasi
and complicity with terrorism, deception between departments within
financing of The Patriot
newspaper
foreign intelligence arm of and Hall, James
and Hesse, Horst
internal security concerns in Soviet bloc
its brutality in Ivankovic case its overseeing of U.S. espionage its
reception of Stasi secrets and Libyan terrorism
and Polish problem
practical support from Stasi and South Yemen
KgU. SeeBattle Group Against Inhumanity
Khrushchev, Nikita S.
Kidnapings
and El Salvador
Erdmann, Elizabeth
Hildebrandt, Rainer
Linse, Walther
Neumann, Erwin
Riemann, Josef
Trapp, Christa
Kief el, Josef
Kienberg, Paul
Kinlcel, Klaus
Kippenberger, Hans
background of
exile and death of
and murder of two police officers Kippenberger, Margot
Kippenberger, Thea
Kissinger, Henry
Kittlaus, Manfred
Klar, Christian
Klause, Michael
Kleiber, Günther
Kleiber, Thomas
Kleine, Gerda
Kleinpeter, Manfred
Knechtel, Rüdiger
Kneifel, Irmgard
Kneifel, Josef
Knye, Otto
Koch, Konrad
Koch, Wolfgang
Koclcro, Jürgen
Koehler, John O.
Koehler, Peter
Kohl, Helmut
Kolomyakov, S.
Komissariat
Kommunistische Partei
Deutschlands (KPD)
during Hitler’s regime
headquarters
merger into SED
working with Nazis in preplebiscite period
Königsmark, Uwe
See alsoSchneider, Michael Koop, Magdalena
Korry, Edward M.
Köshevoi, Pavel
Kosygin, Alexi N.
Krase, Joachim
Krase, Wolfgang
Kratsch, Günther
and Abu Nidal
and domestic counterespionage and Krase, Joachim
and Libyan bombing
and Operation Moses
relationship to Miellce
and suspicion of Wiegand
and U.S. diplomats, treatment of and U.S. electronics surveillance
Kraus, Alfred
Krause, Wolfgang
Kraut, Peter and Heidrun
Kremakovski, Valdimir
Krenz, Egon
Kroesen, Frederick J.
Kroesen, Rowene
Kryuchkov, Vladimir A.
Kühnast, Wilhelm
Kuron, Klaus
La Belle bombing
Lacy, Cecil C. Jr.
Landsbergis, Vytautas
Laufer, Paul
Laurenz, Karl
Leber, Georg
Lenclc, Franz
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich
Lenin School
Lenzkow, Marianne
Lewinsky, Kurt
Leyden, William G.
Liberal Free Democrat party, appeasement of Honecker
Libya
European economic ties with explosives sold to by
Czechoslovakia
and intimidation of U.S. diplomats in East Berlin
and Stasi
and terrorism
U.S. air strike on
See alsoPalestinian Liberation Organization (PLO)
Libyan People’s Bureau (LBP) and Abu Nidal
Liebing, Gertrude
Liewer, Walter
Limbach, Paul
Lindenstrasse interrogation center in Potsdam
Lindner, Wolfgang
Linse, Walther
Lohse, Wolfgang
Lomeiko, Vladimir
Lorenz, Egon
Lorenzen, Ursel
Lotze, Werner
Lowenthal, H.
Lubig, Margarethe
Lüdecke, Heinz
Lummer, Heinrich
Lustik, Wilfred
Lüttich, Eberhard
Lynn, Otis C.
Madani, El-Munir
Mafia, compared to Stasi
See also“Russian mafia” in Berlin Mahmoud, Hay Ali
Mahmoud, Imad Salim
Mahrenholz, Ernst
Maier, Karl-Heinz
Maier-Witt, Sillce
Mail, reading of
Maikov, Alexander A.
Mananikov, Anatoly
Mandela, Nelson
Mannchen, Horst
Mansur, Ali
Mansur, Souad
Manuel Rodriguez Revolutionary Front
Man Without a Face(Wolf) Marcus, Miron
Markelov, Ivan
Marshall Plan
Marx, Karl
Masannek, Helmut
Mascolo, Georg
Matern, Max
Mbelci, Thabo
Medyanik, Yakov P.
Meehan, Francis J.
Melnikov, Nikolai
Mengistu, Haile Mariam,
Menzhinsky, Vyacheslav
Merz, Ambassador
MfS (Ministry for State Security). See
Stasi
MGB. SeeMinistry for Government Security
Michaelson, Eric
Middle East, and Stasi
Mielke, Erich
and Abu Nidal
accusations of Zaisser
appearance, personality, and career of
arrest, trial, and prosecution of and Barczatis counterespionage case
and Berlin Wall
brutality personally committed by as chief of German Economic
Commission
and Chile
during demise of East Germany and Ethiopian agreement
and forced collectivization and guarantees (ostensibly) of freedom
and Guillaumes
his autobiography
and Honecker, work with
housing in Wandlitz Forest Settlement
as intrigue master
and Ivankovic affair
and the La Belle bombing
and links to Soviets and KGB
and meeting with Hall
and MGB saving him from murder trial in 1947
in Moscow
and murder of police captains and Nicaragua
and Polish problem
and political demonstrations promotions of
and purging of German
communists
reading Kohl’s intelligence reports and relations with Cuba
and removal of Ulbricht
return to Berlin in 1945 of and reward for Stiller’s capture in Spain
and support of Stasi spies and terrorist training
and Thompson, Robert Glen
training and schooling of
and uprising of 1953
and visit of Abu Iyab
wife and children of
and Wollweber
Military, West German, infiltration of by Stasi
Miller, Cynthia
Ministry for Government Security (MGB)
dissolving of, possible
and Investigating Committee of Free Jurists
its saving of Miellce from murder trial in 1947
Ministry for Internal Affairs (MVD) German secret police
Ministry for State Security (MfS). See
Stasi
Mitev, Colonel
Mittig, Rudi
Modrow, Hans
Mollenhoff, Clark
Moller, Günter
Moore, Joseph D.
Mossad (Israeli espionage
organization)
Muhammad, Ali Nasser
Müller, Gerturd
Müller, Günther
Multilateral Balanced Force Reduction (MBFR)
Munzel, Colonel
Musbah, El Albani
Naor, Jacob
Narodnyi komissariat vnutrennikh
del. SeeSoviet secret police (NKVD)
National Defense Council, East German, prosecution of
National Voksarmee (NVA)
NATO. SeeNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
Nazi
comparisons to East German regime
working with Communists in preplebiscite campaign
Nazi war crimes
comparison of prosecution for with East German communists
prosecution of
Nehls, Gunther
Neiber, Gerhard
Neubert, Siegfried
Neues Deutschland(newspaper) Neumann, Heinz
background of
exile and death
and murder of two police officers Neumann, Margarete
Neusel, Hans
Nevyhosteny, Bruno
Nicaragua
and Catholic church
East German conference on
equipment aid to
politics in
and Stasi
U.S. intervention in, possible U.S. support of Contras
See alsoSandinista Liberation Front
Nicaraguan General Directorate of State Security (DGSE)
Nidal, Abu
Niebling, Gerhard 1953
Uprising 1990
Elections 1994
General Election
Nixon, Richard M.
NKGB. SeePeople’s Committee for State Security (NKGB)
Nkrumah, Kwame, and security training by Stasi
NKVD. SeeSoviet secret police (NKVD)
Nollau, Günther
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
formation of
infiltration of Brussels
headquarters by Stasi
and Lubig, Margarete
and Topaz
Nunez, Ricardo
Nurnberg Tribunal
Obando, Miguel
Obedinennoe gosudarstvennoe
upravlenie (OGPU),Soviet secret police
Objelct Baikal
Obst-Ollers, Ina
Odessa
ODOM. SeeOrganization of Officers of the Ministry (ODOM)
Offenses warranting punishment during East German regime
Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV)
infiltration by Stasi informants and settlement of Wurzburg Nine claims
See alsoProvincial-level offices of the Office for the Protection of the
Constitution (LfV)
OGPU. See Obedinennoe
gosudarstvennoe upravlenie
Olbrich, Johanna
Olympic massacre of 1972
“One nation” principle
Operation Bingo
Operation Moses
Operation Needle
Operation Scorpion
Operation Siren
Operation Sylvester
Organization of Officers of the Ministry (ODOM)
Organization Todt
Orlov, Alexander
Ostburo (East bureau) of the Social Democratic Party (SPD)
Ostenrieder, Gerda
Ostpolitik
Ott, Rainer and Reinhardt
Qaddafi, Muammer
See alsoPalestinian Liberation Organization (PLO)
Quick(magazine)
Rabb, Maxwell M.
Radio frequencies, secrets given away by Hall
Radio station, American, in Berlin (RIAS)
Ramm, Helga
Ransoms, of political prisoners Rasterfahndung
Rathenau, Walter
Rau, Susanne
Reagan, Nancy, her visit to Checkpoint Charlie
Reagan, Ronald
Cuban and KGB intelligence and his visit to Checkpoint Charlie and La
Belle bombing
Stasi file on
Recall of West German Stasi spies in 1990
Reck, Rudolf
Red Army Faction (RAF)
Rehbaum, Karl
Rehse, Irina
Reichstag
Reif, Wolfgang
Reiff, Joachim
Reimann, Josef
Reimann, Max
Repression. SeeStories of repression and brutality
Resistance movement, and dissent of 1987
Resistance to East German
repression
by Battle Group Against
Inhumanity
by Ostburo of the Social
Democratic Party
Investigating Committee of Free Jurists (UFJ)
Reum, Günther
Reunification of Germany
Reuter, Mayor Ernst
Rodrich, Helga
Roesler, Klaus
Rogalla, Jurgen
Rogers, Bernard
Rogge, Dr. S.C.
Rohwedder, Detlev
Romeos
and Gast, Gabrielle
homosexual
Rometsch, Ellen
Rosenthal, Walther
Ross, Frans H.
Rotch, Hans-Joachim
Rote Fahne(newspaper) Ruiz, Hamel
Rule of law
Rummelsburg prison
Rupp, Ann-Christine
Rupp, Rainer
Rush, Kenneth
“Russian Mafia” in Berlin
Tambo, Oliver
Technical Operations Sector (OTS) Technology, spy communications
Teferre, A.
Telephone tapping
by U.S. intelligence
Television, West German,
prohibition against viewing Terrorism
and Carlos the “Jackal,”
Chile
complicity with
facilitating of passed from Soviets to East Germany
hands-off attitude towards international and East Germany and
international use of East Germany as base
Iraqi and Kurds
and Libya
and Odfried Hepp
and Red Star Faction
and Stasi
training for
trials relative to
various groups and
Tessaye, Wolde Selassie,
Thierse, Wolfgang
Third World countries
Soviet role in
Stasi espionage in
Thomas, Bodo
Thompson, Alan R.
Thompson, Robert Glen
302nd Military Intelligence Battalion of the Fifth U.S. Army Corps in
Frankfurt
Thunert, Max
Tiedge, Klaus
Tigrean People’s Liberation Front Tillich, Ernst
Tisch, Harry, prosecution of Titov, Gennady F.
Topaz espionage case
Torres, Hugo
Torture. SeeStories of repression and brutality
Training
in intelligence and
counterintelligence,
of Red Army Faction
in state security
of terrorists
Trapp, Christa
Trautman, Maria
Treason in East German regime Treuhandanstalt
Trials, show
See alsoJudicial system Trials by Soviet military tribunals,
Uhlig, Reinhard
Ulbricht, Walter
and asking for arrest of capitalist agents
and Berlin Wall and
call to join collectives
and murder of police captains, removal from office of
and retirement of Wollweber and the transformation of the Stasi
Umkhonto we Sizwe(Spear of the Nation) Unification Treaty, and
prosecution of East German communists
United States
espionage in
its support of West Germany as main enemy of Eastern
communist bloc
U.S. Army European Command (USAREUR)
U.S. Army Field Operations Intelligence
U.S. Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps (CIC)
and Battle Group Against
Inhumanity
and Investigating Committee of Free Jurists
and Würzburg Nine
U.S. Army’s Intelligence Center U.S. counterespionage, compared to Stasi
U.S. Embassies, Stasi infiltration of U.S. Embassy in East Berlin U.S.
High Commission for Germany (HICOG)
U.S. military intelligence and Juretzko, Werner
and Müller and Perner
and Zickmann, Hella
U.S. military spies for Stasi Carney, James
Conrad, Clyde L.
Hall, James
Peri, Michael A.
remaining unidentified
Thompson, Robert Glen
U.S. National Security Agency, U.S. Office of Policy Coordination (OPC),
its financing of KgU
U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS)
Uprising of 1953 and Stasi