GE 5 MODULE 2 - The Structures of Globalization
GE 5 MODULE 2 - The Structures of Globalization
Prepared By:
ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION
It is the increasing economic integration and interdependence of national, regional, and local economies
across the world through an intensification of cross-border movement of goods, services, technologies and
capital. Economic globalization is a historical process, the result of human innovation and technological
progress.
The post-World War II era is marked by two major geopolitical events, the Cold War and the period of
decolonization. Some political scientists viewed the world as being divided into three groups of nations. The
first-world consisted of the western democratic industrial nations. The second-world was made up of the
communist nations and the third-world, a term still in use today refers to the developing nations. The Cold War
was an ideological battle between the first and second worlds. Each believed the other wished to spread its
influence and dominate the world. The actual hostilities that took place were in the third world. The Korean
War, Vietnam War, and numerous other conflicts were at their core battles between the first and second worlds
for the allegiance of third world nations. The end of the Cold War occurred in the beginning of the 1990s with
the fall of the Soviet Union.
De-colonization
This period also saw the birth of many new nations as the European powers decolonized. Shortly after
World War II, Great Britain de-colonized South Asia leading to the partition of British India into India and
Pakistan. France, as a result of the Algerian Civil war, decolonized later in late 1950s and early 1960s. Portugal,
the last of the European colonizer granted independence to the last of its colonies in the middle 1970s. This
means that many developing countries are relatively young, especially those in Africa, the Middle East and South
Asia. These newly liberated countries had to choose which economic structure to adopt to achieve their
developmental objectives. Many of these countries adopted Socialist policies giving government a very large
role in their economies. Their choices, by and large, were a function of distancing themselves from their former
colonial masters.
Furthermore, Keynesian policy, whose central tenet was that government should play an active role in
the economy to combat recessions and unemployment, was being practiced in the United States and other
stalwarts of market economics. A third reason was the example of Stalinist Russia which in relatively quick time
transformed the Soviet Union from an agrarian to industrial society.
Import Substitution
These new nations adopted government-controlled economies that relied on import substitution
industrialization strategies to achieve industrialization. Import substitution meant that these countries fostered
the growth of industries that produced goods that were being imported, usually from the former colonialist.
The basic premise for this policy was that their former colonial economic relationship was one in which the
colonialist exploits its colony by importing its raw materials and then exporting high-valued manufactured goods
back to it. This cycle of exploitation could be broken if the colony used its raw materials itself to manufacture
its own goods. While the notion might appear to be compelling, it is a movement away from efficient resource
allocation.
Newly formed manufacturing industries in the young nations were relatively inefficient and required
fairly high levels of protection from imports, mainly from the industrialized countries. Behind protectionist
barriers these industries did not have the incentive to become efficient. While import substitution policies did
initially succeed in producing some economic growth, they were not sustainable. Many nations in Africa, South
Asia and Latin America saw their economies stagnate after an initial growth spurt. Several Southeast Asian
nations, after initially implementing import substitution policies, adopted export promotion strategies. Here
they would focus their industrial efforts on producing goods that were competitive in global markets. They
created industries whose products had high world demand, required labor-intensive production, and had
economies of scale. What was not consumed at home could be exported.
Four Worlds
After World War II the world split into two large geopolitical blocs and spheres of influence with contrary
views on government and the politically correct society:
1 - The bloc of democratic-industrial countries within the American influence sphere, the "First World".
2 - The Eastern bloc of the communist-socialist states, the "Second World".
3 - The remaining three-quarters of the world's population, states not aligned with either bloc were regarded
as the "Third World."
4 - The term "Fourth World", coined in the early 1970s by Shuswap Chief George Manuel, refers to widely
unknown nations (cultural entities) of indigenous peoples, "First Nations" living within or across
national state boundaries.
First there was the three worlds model
The origin of the terminology is unclear. In 1952 Alfred Sauvy, a French demographer, wrote an article
in the French magazine L'Observateur which ended by comparing the Third World with the Third Estate: "ce
Tiers Monde ignoré, exploité, méprisé comme le Tiers État" (this ignored Third World, exploited, scorned like
the Third Estate). Other sources claim that Charles de Gaulle coined the term Third World, maybe de Gaulle only
has quoted Sauvy.
“First World" refers to so called developed, capitalist, industrial countries, roughly, a bloc of countries aligned
with the United States after World War II, with more or less common political and economic interests: North
America (USA and Canada), Western Europe (United Kingdom,France, Germany, Italy), Japan and Australia.
"Second World" refers to the former communist-socialist, industrial states, (formerly, the territory and sphere
of influence of the Union of Soviet Socialists Republic) today: Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan,
Armenia, Georgia, etc. China and Vietnam also belong to the sphere of the 2nd world.
"Third World" are all the other countries, today often used to roughly describe the developing countries of
Africa, Asia and Latin America. The term Third World includes as well capitalist (e.g., Venezuela) and communist
(e.g., North Korea) countries, as very rich (e.g., Saudi Arabia) and very poor (e.g., Mali) countries.
Third World Countries classified by various indices: their Political Rights and Civil Liberties, the Gross
National Income (GNI) and Poverty of countries, the Human Development of countries (HDI), and the Freedom
of Information within a country.
What makes a nation third world?
Despite ever evolving definitions, the concept of the third world serves to identify countries that suffer
from high infant mortality, low economic development, high levels of poverty, low utilization of natural
resources, and heavy dependence on industrialized nations. These are the developing and technologically less
advanced nations of Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Latin America. Third world nations tend to have economies
dependent on the developed countries and are generally characterized as poor with unstable governments and
having high rates of population growth, illiteracy, and disease. A key factor is the lack of a middle class — with
impoverished millions in a vast lower economic class and a very small elite upper class controlling the country's
wealth and resources. Most third world nations also have a very large foreign debt.
The term "Fourth World" first came into use in 1974 with the publication of Shuswap Chief George
Manuel's: The fourth world: an Indian reality (amazon link to the book), the term refers to nations (cultural
entities, ethnic groups) of indigenous peoples living within or across state boundaries (nation states).
Prepared By: