Open navigation menu
Close suggestions
Search
Search
en
Change Language
Upload
Sign in
Sign in
Download free for days
0 ratings
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
344 views
SW Simulation 2012
Solidworks
Uploaded by
Wayne
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here
.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Download now
Download
Save SW Simulation 2012 For Later
Download
Save
Save SW Simulation 2012 For Later
0%
0% found this document useful, undefined
0%
, undefined
Embed
Share
Print
Report
0 ratings
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
344 views
SW Simulation 2012
Solidworks
Uploaded by
Wayne
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here
.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Download now
Download
Save SW Simulation 2012 For Later
Carousel Previous
Carousel Next
Save
Save SW Simulation 2012 For Later
0%
0% found this document useful, undefined
0%
, undefined
Embed
Share
Print
Report
Download now
Download
You are on page 1
/ 510
Search
Fullscreen
TRAINING SolidWorks Simulation intercad wz enerSolidWorks Student Survey In conjunction with your local reseller, we at SolidWorks Corporation are continually striving to improve the quality of our taining material courses, and delivery. We know that the best way to gauge our progress is to get direct feedback from you immediately after your training experience, Completing the survey will take less than 3 minutes and will provide information that will help drive the direction of the course material and its presentation, When you have completed the course through your local reseller please set your interet browser tothe following URL: www.solidworks.com/tmsurvey. In the box labeled ‘Training Manual Serial Number, please enter 26124001240-ENGO025 We appreciate your assistance in helping us to improve the overall educational experience that we deliver in conjunction with your reseller, Dia David Pancoast ‘Training Manager, SolidWorks Corporation COUN 52612400SolidWorks® 2012 SolidWorks Simulation Dassault Systdmes SolidWorks Corporaton 175 Wyman Steet ‘Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 USA{S407520 Da Sys Sens Capron» ‘iti, Sa 0851 USA, Al nema reaed Teter ate ptr get seer Soi Ss Slee Cperson tn ‘une es ie aan DS Ses Tecepeccraless apes trteiee Restneines rapists Soe eect en Sa eeeeesreet emma Soy Stier see Sa Sw Inching wares inte lees sgremen. Pt AOS Se EP Ini16,90 end JP 3.817.863), aoe eevee tan ves OS lence Temata and Product Names for Salwar Prod snd Sonia Sets 3 Fagen 3D Cone tacoma Festa joy ow bee ‘Became cad ‘Chere, feta Xe Woks SConlacais Poeun Fotue¥nseteireent of ome Ser Sos ese Meas Sit sting Peesonal an Soon Ctr bdr prot one tants oped amt Sys tae COMMERCIAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE — ‘The Soars 6 some” tht rm ied PsP a (Ser coating a oon ‘Eecumenaon ss such rs are ed $8 CER 12212 SEF nf pices et a sol eee CER fa; = ‘Blase coniston with ie ples fork na CF. San GNIS andar sess GUN, Ingest youre ust pany apc fe UStgoremmenoprovde Str peo st oe above, oa il nt 08 Sai of he Secs ATES Saves ee) a, Contairhdancte isd Seces Sion Cera 173 Wyo rset aan, ‘Gopyrght Notices for SokdWorks Standar, Fret, rofessionl ana Eaocoton Potts orion of his stare 1986-201 leans Prods iegeieNanagamea Somare ne All sr, isa conig he long sae ome ty (D-Cates™"2D DCM © 291 Sones Sofare ined Al Righr Reseed Sofware Linted AI Rights Resewed. Cinied allRighs Reeves ‘eabed™ CDM € 2011, Siemens Ids Sofie Cine Al Rigs Reed Cubed AE O20, Sens Indy Sore Tipit aligns Ree, Paci ft are © 1998-21] Gene i tin th atte © 19962011 Mice spanning eee Pac fis stare rcpt PX by NVIDIA Siem aon tin tie sofivre ©2001-2011 Lalo ne Al Fikes pac pee Patan of i ofare ©2007-2011 Drivers Li ‘Caps 1984-2010 Adobe Stn I nd ese ‘NR ered Prey Une 099 Soda: gia aot asehsth-acs9s5i 654580 panes pig ‘Aebehe Ado ge Aco the Ade PDF gs, Bead Render gare atcoars rama cf Adobe Sytean inte Sand oe cate Foemore Sais copra formation ep > ‘ou Songer oe enya Notices or SokeWorks Simulation etn fie sate ©2008 Sven Coron CGLSE © 1982010 Conpetonl pps ad Copyright Notices for Enterprise POM Product Ouse Viewer Teena. © 19922010 Once Ferien hig soar © 19962011 Miao cipro Alphas ‘Copyright Notices for Drawings Products Pores his sofa © 20002011 Tech Sf 2. Partin ftir © 1995.1988 JLo Gall a Sinkadier te Poin oft oh © 198-201 3Beonaln, Pui th are © 998-2011 Open Desan Dizi ened atin oft ata © 1995-2010 Spi Copmon Teesnware ste in pron he work of the nde. Tea,Introduction About This Course .- Prerequisites : Course Design Philosophy Using this Book Laboratory Exercises About the Training Files Windows® XP . Conventions Used in this Book Use of Color ........+. What is Solid Works Simulation? What Is Finite Element Analysis? Build Mathematical Model Defeaturing Idealization .- Clean-up Build Finite Element Model Solve Finite Element Model Analyze Results Errors in FEA ContentsContents Lesson 1: ‘The Analysis Process Finite Elements Element Types Available in SolidWorks Simulation. First Order Solid Tetrahedral Elements ‘Sevond Order Solid Tetrahedral Elements First Order Triangular Shell Elements Second Order Triangular Shell Elements Beam Elements - 7 ‘Choosing Between Sold and Shell Elements. Draft vs. High Solid and Shell Elements Degrees of Freedom . Calculations in FEA Interpretation of FEA Results... Principal Stresses: Pl, P2, and P3 Units of Measurement Limitations of SolidWorks Simulation Linear Material Small Structural Deformations Static Loads Summary Objectives ....-...- ‘The Analysis Process ‘Stages in the Process. Case Study: Stress in a Plate Project Deseription SolidWorks Simulation Interface SolidWorks Simulation Options Plot Setings : Preprocessing "New Study” Assigning Material Properties Fixtures inure Types... Display/Hide Symbols External Loads Size and Color of Symnbols Preprocessing Summary Meshing ec ‘Curvature Based Mesh Mesh Density Element Sizes Minimum Number of Elements in a Circle Ratio... Mesh QualitySotaworks 2042 Lesson 2: Postprocessing . Result Pots Editing Plots Nodal vs. Element Stresses, ‘Show as Tensor Plot Option Modifying Result Pots. Other Plot Controls Other Plots Multiple Studies Creating New Studies Copy Parameters. ‘Check Convergence and Accuracy. Results Summary Compatiton With Anica! Rents Reports Summary References. Questions Exercise 1: Bracket Exercise 2: Compressive Spring Stites Exercise 3: Container Handle Mosh Controls, Stress Concentrations and Boundary Conditions Objectives Mesh Contral ‘Case Study: The L Bracket Project Description ‘Stages in the Process Run All Studies. Analysis with Local Mesh Refinement. Mesh Contes Results, Results Comparison Stress Singularities Case Study: Analysis of Bracket with a Fillet . Case Study: Analysis ofa Welded Bracket, . Understanding the Fifect of Boundary Conditions Conclusion . Summary Questions : Exercise 4: C-bracket Exercise 5: Bone Wrench Exercise 6: Foundation Bracket 103, 19Contents ‘Sotiorks 2012 Lesson ‘Assembly Analysis with Contacts Objectives 29 Contact Analysis. ..2.... ceca Bo Case Study: Pliers with Global Contact 130 Project Description . . 130 ‘Stages in the Pracess. : Bo Applying Materials to Assemblies G1 Component Contact ..2.2.+.2e+.000+ 132 Component Contact: Options 133, ‘Component Contaet: Default setting... 134 Component Contact: Hierarchy and Conflicts -...2...0...2. 134 Viewing Assembly Results. 1B? mn oe ae Handle Contact 138 Required Forces... e000 139 Pliers with Local Contact 39 Local Contact 140 Local Contact Types Su No Penetration Locel Contact Options. 142 ‘No Penetration Local Contact: Accuracy... 143 ‘No Penetration Local Contact: Remarks M3 Contact Stresses ee 145, Summary. as Questions 146 Exercise 7: Two Ring Assembly ...- fect MT Lesson 4: ‘Symmetrical and Free SeitEquilbrated Assorbites Objectives : 151 Shrink Fit Parts... 132 Case Suudy: Shrink FIC as Project Description 132 Symmetry... ee — 132 Stages inthe Proce. isl Defeaturing.......- 5 : 153 Rigid Body Mode .- iss Shrink Fit Contact Condition 156 Plot Results in Local Coordinate System... 158 Cylindrical Coordinate Systems... : 158 Saving All Plots 162 ‘What's Wrong Feature 22.2020... cieeeeee 2162Soliaorks 2012 ‘contents ‘Analysis with Soft Springs cate 162 Soft Springs. 163 Inertial Relief = : 163 ‘Summary . 166 [Exercise 8: Chain Link iG Exereise 9: Chain Link 2 7 182 Lesson 5: Assembly Analysis with Connectors Objectives... 187 Connecting Components. Peoria) Connectors... +. 188 Connector Types. Soi 188 Case Study: Vise Grip Pliers. 190 Project Description 00) Stages inthe Process. : oo 190 Spring Connector Types. 196 Spring Connector Options co 196, PinvBolt Force : 201 Summary. : 203 Exercise 10: Lift Assembly... = 205 Exercise 11: Analysis with Base (optional) cad Exercise 12: Shock Absorber coe 215 Exercise 13: Spot Welds-Solid Mesh 219 Lesson 6: Compatible/incompatible Meshes Objectives... 227 Compatible Incompatible Meshing. 28 Case Study: Rotor... : 28 Project Description : 228 Compatible Mesh... ..s. sss. 229 Incompatible Mesh 232 ‘Automatic Switch o incompatible Mesh... 22 Incompatible Bonding Options. 2234 Discussion, 236 Summary : 236Contents Lesson SolcWorks 2012 Assembly Analysis Mesh Refinement Lesson 8: Objectives Mesh Contol in an Assembly Case Study: Cardan Joint... Problem Statement Part 1: Draft Quality Coarse Mesh Anslysis Remote Load, Bolt Tight ft and Diameter. Bolt Pre-load : Local Contact Sets ‘No Penetration Local Contact Options Rotational and Axial Stiffness Knowledge Base. Part 2: High Quality Mesh Analysis. ....- [Required Number of Solid Elements in Thin Features. Aspect Ratio Plot Jacobian Summary. Questions... Exercise ld: Bolt Connectors Exercise 15: Awning, Analysis of Thin Components Objectives. Thin Components Case Study: Pulley Project Description Part 1: Mesh with Solid Elements. Symmety Fixtures... Pact 2: Refined Solid Mech Solid vs. Shell Creating Shell Elements. Part 3: Shell Elements - Mid-plane Surface .. Thin vs, Thick Shells. Shell Mesh Colors. Changing Mesh Orientation Shell Element Alignment Automatic Shell Surface Re-alignment Applying Symmetry Restraints Deformed Results 237 238 238 29 240 243 Dad 248 248 254 236 259 2260 260 262 268 268 269 23 215 276 276 2 285SolidWorks 2012 Lesson 9: Results Comparison ‘Computational Effort Case Study: Joist Hanger Project Description Summary Questions Exercise 16: Bracket. Exercise 17: Shell Mesh Using Outer/nner Faces. Exercise 18: Spot Welds - Shell mesh .. Exercise 19: Edge Weld Connector [Exercise 20: Container Handle Weld Mixed Meshing Shells & Solids Objectives Mixed Meshing Solids and Shells Bonding Shells and Solids Mixed Mesh: Supported Analysis Types: Case Study: Pressure Vessel Project Description .. Analyze the Assembly Preparing the Model Material : Steel Identification Systems UNS Index Other Indies, Bulk and Shear Moduli Bonding Entities with Clearance Shell Face to Shell Face Bonding. . Shell Edge to Shell Face Bonding Shell Solid Bonded Contact Failure Diagnostics Meshing Small Features ‘Summary Questions Exercise 21: Mixed Mesh Analysis contents 297 1297 208 299 305 307 313 317 318 327 330 3a 341 347 347 349Contents Lesson 10: Mixed Meshing Solids, Beams & Shells Lesson 11: Design Study ‘Objectives: Mixed Meshing Case Study: Particle Separator Project Description Element Choices Beam elements Stages inthe Process. Beam Mesh ‘Beam Joints: Locations Beam Joint Types Section Properties. Connected and Disconnected Joints Sphere Diameter Defining Beam Joint Render Beam Profile. ‘Beam imprint ‘Cross-section Ist and 2nd Directions Bending Moment and Shear Force Diagrams. ‘Summary. aoe Exercise 22: Beam Elements Slendemess ratio. Exercise 23: Cabinet Exercise 24: Frame Rigidity Objectives Design Study Case Study: Suspension Design .- Project Description Suaes inthe Process. Part 1: Multiple Load Cases - Design Studies Parameters. Design Study Results Design Study Options. Part 2: Geometry Modification Design Study Graph ‘Summary. Exercise 25: Design Study Soliorks 2012 359 361 373 375 376 377 378 387 396 417Soltaworks 2012 Lesson 12: ‘Thermal Stress Analysis Lesson 13: ‘Adaptive Meshing Objectives ‘Thermal Stress Analysis. Case Study: Bimetallic Strip Project Description Material Properties .- Importing Temperatures Averaging Stress Question Examining Results in Local Coordinate Systems (Optional) Saving Mode in its Deformed Shape. Summary. Objectives: ‘Adaptive Meshing... Case Study: Support Bracket Project Description .. Geometry Preparation b-Adaptivity Study hn-Adaptivity Options b-Adaptive Plots Convergence Graph : Review h-adaptive Solution Strain Energy Ervor is NOT Stress Error p-Adaptivity Smdy Adaptive Solution Method hays. p Elements Method Comparison hhvs.p Blements - Summary : ‘Which Solution Method is Beter? Summary — ‘contents 3 444 erry 445 438 432 482 433 484 455 435 1461| Solon 2012 Losson 14: Large Displacoment Analysis Objectives 465 Small vs, Large Displacement Anais. 466 Case Study: Clamp : 461 Project Description... 467 Part 1: Small Displacement Linear Analysis... 467 Results Discussion ...- 469 Contact Soltion in Small and Large Displacement Analyses 469, Part 2: Large Displacement Nonlinear Analysis 469 Permanent Deformation a7 SolidWorks Simulation Premium DN Nan Summary 5 an Questions San Appendix ‘Meshing, Solvers, and Tips & Tricks Meshing Strategies . . 414 Geometry Preparation... 00... 44 Defeaturing......- Pas Tdealization a 416 Clean-up... 7 a Mesh Quality ma an ‘Aspect Ratio Check <0... 47 Jacobian Check. : 478 Mesh Controls = 480 ‘Automatic Trials for Solids 2482 ‘Meshing Stages on 482 Trilure Diagnostics... 0.2... 1483 ‘Tips for Meshing Pars ne 484 Tips for Meshing Assemblies... 484 Tips for Using Shell Elements 485 Hardware Considerations in Meshing... 7 486 Solvers in Solid Works Simulation 2487 ‘Choosing @ Solver. . : 487 Appendix B: Customer Help and Assistance Customer Help and Assistance . 490 Werk perennepla BO ee of > ~ D pecmnderder 10! webe Tee ThA pla Here ale. ae ~ entice aplits ip al aba steplacte, RP, Act Sta mod eel oe ee i . Bape site. pe para oN Adee tio © Uses apm a4 i. O38 stl Introduction ped Piste ee CES 24 patel peer Pe Gt es So ee) fen o ae Ted on pr he Cen [a ‘ ' =a 7 ax -ohe ce eS 4B WEE cooly wu eet @ — i mt ee paleo PIRT, eed canTrol + i ott Zale et be eos yii—p by rat iss 1B? al poet Spe wer dat eet ph w J tho Apart daap-leret LT ekleeet fetIntroduction About This Course Prorequisites Course Design Philosophy Recommended Length Using this Book Laboratory Exercises Solidworks 2012 ‘The goal of this course isto teach you how to use the Solid Works. Simulation software to help you analyze static stuctural behavior of -your Solid Works part and assembly models, ‘The focus ofthis course is onthe fundamental skills and concepts central to the suecessl use of Solid Works Simulation 2011. You should view the training course manual as @ supplement to, and not a replacement for, the system documentation and on-line help. Once you have developed a good foundation in basic skills, you ean refer to the on-line help for information on ess frequently used commane! options. Students attending this course are expected to have the following: = Mechanical design experience ‘a Experience with the Windows™ operating system. ‘© Complete the course SolidWorks Essentials ‘= Completed the on-line Solid Works Simulation tutorials that are available under Help. You can access the on-line tutorials by clicking Help, SolidWorks Simulation, Tutorials This course is designed around a process- or task-based approach to training. Rather than focusing on individual features and functions, & process-based training course emphasizes processes and procedures ‘you should follow to complete a particular task. By utilizing ease ‘Studies toillustrate these processes, you Team the necessary commands, ‘options, and menus in the context of completing a design task ‘The minimum recommended length of this eourse is three days. ‘This training manual i intended tobe used in a classroom environment under the guidance of an experienced Solid Works Simulation instructor. It snot intended tobe a selfpaced tutorial, The examples and case studies are designed to be demonstrated “live” by the instructor, ‘There may be slight differences in results in certain lessons due to service pack upgrades, ete Laboratory exercises give you the opportunity to apply and practice the ‘material covered during the lecture/demonstration potion oftheSoidWorks 2012 About the Training Files Windows® xP Conventions Used in this Book ‘A complete set ofthe various files used throughout this course can be ‘downloaded from the Solid Works website, www.solldwarks.com, Click on the link for Support, then Training, then Training Files, hen SolidWorks Simulation Training Files. Select the link for the desired file set. There may be more than one version ofeach file set available Direct URL: wwrw.solidvorks.com/trainingflessimulation ‘The files are supplied in signed, self-extracting executable packages ‘The files are organized by lesson number. The Cage Study folder within each lesson contains te files your instructor uses while presenting the lessons. The Exercises folder contains any files that are Fequited for doing the laboratory exercises. The screen shots in this manual were made using SolidWorks and SolidWorks Simulation running oa Windows? 7. Ifyou are running on Windows Vista, or XP, you may notice differences inthe appearance of the menus and windows. These differences do not affect the performance ofthe software This manual uses the following typographic conventions: ‘Convention | Meaning ‘Bold Sans Serif | SolidWorks Simulation commands and ‘options appear inthis style. For example, External Loads Advisor > Force -4: means | click the External Loads Advisor ican on the ‘Simulation tab ofthe Command Manager. ‘Typewriter Feature names and file names appear in this style, For example. Fixed Geometry: Double lines precede and follow sections of ae the procedures. This provides separation teP | peices the steps ofthe procedure and large blocks of explanatory text. The steps themselves are numbered in sans serif bol.Introduetion Use of Color Saliaworks 2012 The Solid Works and SolidWorks Simulation use interface make extensive use of color to highlight selected geometry and to provide you with visual feedback. This greatly increases the intitiveness and ‘ease of use of the SolidWorks Simulation software. To take maximum ‘advantage ofthis, the training manuals are printed in full color ‘Also, in many eases, we have Rus Soren used additional color inthe illustrations to communicate ‘concepts, identify features, and ‘otherwise convey important information. For example, we might show the filet areas of @ part ina different color to highlight areas for mesh control, eventhough by default, the Solid Works Simulation software would not display the results in that way. ade SmSoliWorks 2042 What is SolidWorks Simulation? SolidWorks Simulation isa design analysis tool based on a numerical technique called Finite Element Analysis or FEA. SolidWorks ‘Simulation belongs to the family of engineering analysis software products developed by SRAC, now part of SolidWorks Corporation. Established in 1982, SRAC pioneered the implementation of FEA into ‘desktop computing. In 1995, SRAC entered the emerging mainstream FEA software market by partnering with Solid Works Corporation and creating COSMOS Works software, one ofthe frst SolidWorks Gold Produets. COSMOS Works soon became the top-selling, add-in analysis software for Solid Works Corporation. The commercial success of ‘COSMOS Works integrated with SolidWorks CAD software resulted in the acquisition of SRAC in 2001 by Dassault Systemes, the parent company of SolidWorks Corporation. In 2003, SRAC merged with SolidWorks Corporation. COSMOS Works was renamed for 2008 10 SolidWorks Simulation. SolidWorks isa parametric, solid, feature-based CAD system. As ‘opposed to many other CAD systems that were originally developed in a UNIX environment and only later ported to Windows, SolidWorks has, from the very beginning, been developed specifically forthe ‘Windows operating system, SolidWorks Simulation has also been specifically developed forthe Windows operating system Full integration between SolidWorks and Solid Works Simulation is possible because both of the programs are native Windows OS applications. SolidWorks Simulation comes indifferent “bundles”, of applications, ‘designed to best suit the needs of different users. With the exception of SolidWorks SimulationXpress, which is an integral part of SolidWorks, all SolidWorks Simulation bundles ae add-ins, A bret deseription of the capabilities of different bundles is as follows: SolidWorks SimulationXpress ‘The static analysis of ports with simple types of loads and supports SolidWorks Simulation The static analysis of parts and assemblies. SolidWorks Simulation Professional ‘The static, thermal, buckling, frequency, drop test, optimization and fatigue analysis of parts and assemblies. ‘SolidWorks Simulation Premium All capabilities of Solid Works Simulation Professional plus nonlinear and dynamic analyses. In this volume, we introduce Solid Works Simulation through a series of| Fhands-on lessons intermixed with FEA fundamentals, We recommend that you study the lessons in the order presented in the text. As you go through the lessons, note that explanations and steps deseribed in detail in earlier lessons are not repeated laterIntroduction What Is Finite Element Analysis? SolaWorks 2012 Each subsequent lesson assumes familiarity with software functions and the FEA background discussed in previous lessons, Each lesson builds on the skills and experience gained from the previous lessons. Betore we proceed withthe lessons, let us construct a foundation for ‘ur skills in SolidWorks Simulation by taking a closer look at what, Finite Element Analysis ig and how it works. [In mathematical terms, FEA, also known as the Finite Element Method, i a numerical technique of solving field problems described by a set of partial differential equations. Those types of problems are commonly ound in many engineering disciplines, such as machine design, acoustics, electromagnetism, soil mechanies, uid dynamics, and others. In mechanical engineering, FEA is widely used for solving. struetural, vibration, and thermal problems. FEA is not the only tool availabe for numerical analysis. Other ‘numerical methods used in engineering include the Finite Difference Method, Boundary Element Method, or Finite Volumes Method, However, due to its versatility and high numerical efficiency, FEA has ‘come to dominate the software market for engineering analysis, while ‘other methods have been relegated to niche applications. Using FEA, ‘we can analyze any shape, use various ways to idealize geometry and produce results with the desired accuracy. FEA theory, numerical problem formulation, and solution methods become completely transparent to users when implemented into modern commercial software, including Solid Works Simulation. A powerful tool for engineering analysis, FEA is used to solve problems ranging from very simple to very complex. Design engineers use FEA during the product development process to analyze the desiga-in-progress. Time constraints and limited availability of product data call for many simplifiations of the analysis models. At the other ‘end of scale, specialized analysts implement FEA to solve very ‘advanced problems, such as vehicle erash dynamics, meta forming, of snalysis of biostructures.Soliawocks 2012 Introduetion Regardless of the project complexity or the field of application, the fundamental steps in any FEA project are always the same, be it for example a structural, thermal, or acoustic analysis. The stating point for any analysis is the geometric model. In our case, this is @ SolidWorks model of a part or an assembly. To this model, we assign material properties, and define loads and restraints. Next, a always the ‘ase when using a tool based on the method of numerical approximations, we diseretize the model intended for analysis. ‘The discretization process, beter known as meshing, splits the ‘geometry into relatively small and simply-shaped entities, called finite elements. The elements are called “finite” to emphasize the fact that they are not infinitesimally small, but only reasonably small in comparison to the overall model size. When working with finite elements, the FEA solver approximates the ‘wanted solution (for example, deformations or stresses) for the entire ‘model with the assembly of simple solutions for individual elements, From the perspestive of FEA software, each application of FEA requires three steps: Proprocessing ‘The type of analysis (¢g., static, thermal, frequency), material properties, loads and restraints are defined and the model i sp Finite elements Solution ‘Computing the desired results. Postprocessing Analyzing the results ‘We follow the preceding three steps every time we use SolidWorks, Simulation, From the perspective of FEA methodology, we lst the following FEA. steps Building the mathematical modet Building the finite element model Solving the finite element model Analyzing the resultsBuild Mathematical Model Defeaturing Idealization Clean-up, [Analysis with SolidWorks Simulation stats with the geometry represented by SolidWorks model of part or assembly: This ‘geometry must be meshable into a correct and reasonably small, finite clement mesh. By small, we do not refer tothe element size, but the ‘number of elements in the mesh. This requirement of meshability has very important implications. We must ensure that the CAD geometry indeed meshes and that the produced mesh provides the correct solution of the data of interest, such as displacements, stresses, temperature distribution, and soon. ‘Often, but not always, this necessity of meshing requires modifications to the CAD geometry. Such modifications can fake the form of efeaturng, idealization, andor clean-up, described as follows: _Defeaturing refers tothe process of suppressing or removing geometry features deemed insignificant for analysis, such as external fillets, rounds, logos, and soon, dealization presents a more agoressive exercise that may depart from, solid CAD geometry as, for example, when representing thin walls ‘with surfaces, Clean-up is sometimes required because the meshable geometry must satisfy much higher quality requirements than those commonly followed in Solid Modeling. For clean-up, we can use CAD quality- control tools to check for problems, lke sliver faces or multiple entities, that the CAD model could tolerate, but Would make meshing ificult or impossible, 113s important to mention that we do nt abeays simplify the CAD model with te sole objective of making it meshable. Often, we ‘Simplify model that would mesh correctly “ass, but the resulting ‘mesh woul be too large and, consequent, the analysis would run too suvly, Geouteey muietions allow for simpler mesh and shorter computing time Successful meshing depends es much onthe quality of the geometry submitted for meshing as onthe sophistication af the meshing tools implemented inthe FEA software Having prepared a meshable, but not yet meshed, geometry, we define material properties, loads, supports and restraints, and provide information on the type of analysis that we wish o perform.Solidworks 2012 Build Finite Element Model Solve Finite Element Model Analyze Results Introduction This procedure completes the creation of a mathematical model, Note that the process of creating the mathematical model is not FEA specific. FEA has not yet entered the picture, (tresses sr FES ae ua 1 vey se - -ea CAO peomety ova sty cAD_FeAPrerocesing ‘We now split the mathematical mode into finite elements through a process of discretization, better known as meshing, Discretization visually manifests itself as the meshing of geometry. However, loads and supports are also discretized and ater the model has been meshed, the discretized loads and supports are applied to nades ofthe finite element mesh. + ‘ mun - 75% - FEA model FEA recite FEA Pre-pocessing FEASolulon FEA Pestprosesting After creating the finite clement model, we use a solver provided in Solid Works Simulation to produce the desired data of interest ‘The analysis of result is often the most difficult step of ll. The analysis provides very detailed results data, which can be presented in almost any format. Proper interpretation of results requires that we appreciate the assumptions, simplifications, and errors introduced in the fist three steps: building the mathematical model, building the finite element model, and solving the finite element modelIntrodution Errors in FEA Finite Elements Element Types Available i ‘SolidWorks ‘simul 0 Soliaworks 2012 ‘The process of creating a mathematical mode! and diseretizing it into @ finite element model introduces unavoidable errors. Formulation of a ‘mathematical model introduces modeling errors, also called idealization rors, Discretzation of the mathematical model inteoduces discretization errors, and solution introduces numerical Of these three types of errors, only discretization errors are specific to FEA, Therefore, only discretization errors can be controlled using FEA methods, Modeling erors affecting the mathematical model, are introduced before FEA is uilized and can only be controlled by using correct modeling techniques. Solution errors, which are round-ofT crors accumulated by solver, ae difficult o control, but fortunately are usually very low. ‘As we have already sad, the diseetization process, better known as ‘meshing, splits continuous models into finite elements, The type of ‘elements created in tis process depends on the type of geometry meshed, the typeof analysis to be executed, and sometimes on our own preferences SolidWorks Simulation features tetrahedral solid elements for meshing solid geometry, and triangular shell elements for meshing surface geometry, Why are we limited to tetrahedral, and triangular shapes? ‘This is because the automeshers reliably mesh almost any solid or surface geometry using only those shapes of elements. Elements in ‘other shapes, such as hexahedral (brick) elements, cannot be ereated reliably by the present-day automeshers. This imitation is not specific to automeshers used in Solid Works Simulation. A reliable brik ‘element automesher has nat been invented yer Before proceeding, we need o clarity an important terminology issue What in CAD torminology we call solid geometry, in FEA is called volumes. Solid elements are used to mesh those volumes. The term solid has different meanings when itis used as solid geomeary in CAD terminology and when its used as solid element in FEA terminology. Five element types are available in Solid Works Simulation: first order solid tetrahedral elements, second order solid tetrahedral elements, first ‘order triangular shell elements, second order triangular shell elements, and two-node beam elements. The next few paragraphs describe them inthis order. SolidWorks Simulation terminology refers to first order elements as Draft Quality elements and second order elements as High Quality clements.SoliaWorks 2012 First Order Solid Tetrahi Elements Introduction eee ae een aes a aa straight and the faces are flat. These hestaeinen oa "Introduction ‘Second Order Solid Tetrahedral Elements 2 Soliorks 2012 Second order (high quality solid tetrahedral elements model the placements field and, consequently, first rn re gar evetes ote function isa linear function). The second order displacements field ives these elements their name: second order elements Each second order tetrahedral element has ten nodes (our corer nodes and six mi-side nodes) and each node has three degrees of freedom, ‘The edges and faces of second order pe solid elements can assume curvilinear etrmaton shapes ifthe elements need to map to curvilinear geometry and/or during the deformation process when the elements deform under a load. Tina, fe ea ne ets / tocurvilinear geometry as ifstated by SAO the same elbow geometry. Again, for demonstration purposes, excessively large (as compared to ‘the model size) elements are used for this mesh, This mesh isnot sufficiently refined for analysis, even though it uses second order elements that require a significantly ess-refined mesh compared to that for first order elements. [Because oftheir much better mapping capabilites and because of their ability to model the second order displacements field, second order tetrahedral elements are used for the vast majority of analyses with SolidWorks Simulation, even though second order elements are more ‘computationally demanding than first order elements.‘idWorks 2042 First Order Triangular Shell Elements Introduction Analogous to frst order solid elements, first order triangular shell
Results Advisor > New Plot > Factor of Safety Fatigue Check Plot serves as a quick indicator ifthe fatigue may be of ‘any concer in the design ofthe component ‘= Shortcut Menu: Right-click the Results folder and select Define Fatigue Check Plot ‘The fatigue check plot is only available if you have Simulation ProfessionalLesson Soliaworks 2012 The inayat Process 30 Plot Fatigue Check Plot. = Right-click on the Results folder and select Define # Fatigue Check Plot. ——s Set the Loading type to On/Off Loading to indicate m= thatthe Tensile force may oscillate between O and 110,000 N. ost Set the Surface Finish Factor to Machined. Keep === = the Loading Factor and Size Factor at their default = values of Axial and 0.75, +e ‘Under Material keep the Seale this value and Minimum safety factor fields at their default values oft Click 0K. ‘The areas in red indicate potential fatigue problems. Note that accurate calculations using the Solid Works Simulation Professional fatigue ‘modulus may be required Multiple Studies — wenave completed the analysis of rectangular hollow plate withthe default mesh and now wish 0 see how a change in mesh density affects the results, For this reason, we wil repeat the analysis two mote times using both coarser and finer density meshes To repeat the analysis with coarsened mesh, we ean create a new mesh while still in the default anatysis study, but this action would overwrite the old results ‘To preserve the results ofthe study, we will create anew study, coarse analysis. Creating a new study can be dane in several ways.Soliaworks 2012 Creating New Studies Copy Parameters Note Lesson ‘The Arayte roc [New studies can be created in one of two ways: ‘= Create a new study from scratch ‘= Duplicate an existing study. Right-click the tab for the study you \want to duplicate and click Duplicate, This i essentially the same as copying a study and pasting it into a blank study. ‘When we duplicate a study, SolidWorks Simulation displays the Define Study Name window. This will allow us to ham the duplicated study and choose the ‘model configuration to use, ‘When we ereate a new study, we can copy material, fixtures and extemal forces ftom existing studies rather than reereaing them inthe new study. To copy parameters, drag the parameter from the Simulation Study tree tothe tb of the new study, ‘When a study is duplicated, the study settings, Fixtures, External Forces, Mesh, and the study results will be copied as well Duplicate the study. Right-click the default analysis tab and click Duplicate. ‘Type coarse analysis forthe study ‘name. The model only has a Default configuration, so we cannot change it Create now mesh in coarse analysis study. Inthe conse analysis study, right-click Rfesh and select Create Mesh. A waming window appears: ‘Remeshing will delete the results for study: coarse analysis, Click OK to open the Mesh window: Select Curvature based mesh under Mesh ParametersLseson + Theale rocene Note e Move the Mesh Factor sider all the way tothe left. The Maximum element size and Minimum ‘element size should read 11.4491 mm, [0.4808 in, Click 0K, ‘The generated mesh is displayed tothe right Notice that there is only ‘one element across the thickness of the part. In the default analysis there ‘were two elements across the thickness. ‘The mesh is rather coarse. Later, we will discuss why this sort of mesh, is not acceptable for reliable analysis results 38 Display mesh details. Having created the mesh, we ean aceess the detailed mesh information by right-clicking Mesh, and selecting Dotalls. The same detailed information ean of course be displayed forthe “old” mesh in the default analysis study, ‘Many ofthe items in this ist will be discussed in later lessons. 34 Run the analysis.SolaWorks 2012 Note Lesson 4 35 View displacement and stress results, Record the maximum displacement (0.143 mm /0.00S63 in) and the ‘maximum von Mises stress (403 Mpa 58,393 psi), All plot settings remain the same as the default analysis study because the plot definitions are copied from that study 36 Re-run the analysis with fine mesh, Repeat steps 34 - 34 to generate a new study with fine mesh named fine analysis, When re-generating the mesh, move the slider all the way tothe right ‘The Maximum element size and Minimum element size should read 2.86227 mm [0.1127 i]. The fine mesh generated using the above settings is shown tothe right [Notice that we now have several elements in the ‘through-thickness direction, You will later Tear that this mesh is acceptable for reliable analysis results 37 View displacement and stress results. Record the maximum displacement (0.144 mm / 0.00567 in) and the maximum von Mises stress (415 Mpa / 60,282 psi).Leagon 4 Th hina Process Check Convergence and Accuracy SofcWorks 2012 [Now we must collect information from all ofthe studies (efeult, coarse and fine analysis) 1 compare the displacement and ‘maximum von Mises stress results forthe various mesh refinements. ‘We can determine the maximum displacement and the maximum von ‘Mises stress results in plots ‘We must also determine the number of elements and the number of ‘nodes in each mesh, These canbe found inthe Mesh Details window of each respective mesh, Finally, we must determine the number of degrees of freedom (DOF) in each model. To calculate this number, we could count the number of unconstrained nodes by subtracting the number of nodes on the ‘constrained face from the number nodes reported in mesh details. Then ‘we could multiply this number by three because each node in a solid clement mesh has 3 DOF. An easier method, however, is to right-click the Results folder in each study and select Solver Messages (see below). Solver Messages. Note the number ‘of elements, nodes, and degrees of freedom.SolidWorks 2012 Results Summary Lesson 4 The Anais Process ‘The summary ofthe results produced by the three studies is shown in the following table: Taw ness | apace | M208. | amber | NIBP | Namter ment ofbor ots iM tomes im aa 402.608 7,128 By vaso vars] snr detautt, vasa | asa | aan | gor on = 7 248 mig | vs | atsazr | sios77 | east | sosaee Note that al of the results ofthis table pertain to the same problem. The only difference isin the mesh density. You may find small differences between your own results and those presented inthis table, This is due to serviee pack upgrades, ete. Having noted that the maximum displacement increases with mesh refinement, we ean conchude thatthe ‘model becomes less sti (or softer) when the number of degrees of ‘reedom inereases. In our case by selecting second order elements, we ‘impose the assumption thatthe displacement feld in each element is described by second order polynomial functions ‘With mesh refinement, the displacement field in each element is stil described by second order polynomial functions; however, the larger ‘number of elements makes it possible to approximate the teal displacement and stess fields more accurately. ‘We can say thatthe atficial constrains resulting from element
Report siz = Simulation Toolbar: Click Report w = Menu: Click Reports in the Simulation menu: 39 Generate report in Microsoft Word format. Under SolidWorks Simulation menu item, select Report.Lesson 4 Soliaworks 2012 Thotinaalerocene 40 Add sections. Under Report sections, sclect the required report pars. (For example, you could deselect the option Contact Information, es we donot have any in this analysis.) Enter your Header information and click Publish. 44 Examine the report. (Open the report in Microsoft Word and examine the results 42 Save and Close theSoliorks 2012 ‘Summary References Questions Lesson 4 We used a simple model ofa hollow rectangular plate to introduce the Solid Works Simulation interface and, atthe same time, to go through all major steps in the FEA process. ‘We created multiple studies to execute a linear static analysis with three dierent meshes, While preparing models for analysis and examining results obtained ‘with different meshes, we introduced the concept of modeling error and discretization error, ‘This firs lesson was intended to provide an understanding of FEA ‘methodology and the software skills necessary to complete the lessons that follow. 1, Young and Budynas, Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain, 7th Edition, 1m The pre-processing stage ofthe FEA includes the following steps 1 The density of finite element mesh (does / does not) have considerable impact onthe analysis results. ‘= In general, we would favor (fine / coarser) meshes to obtain reliable enalysis raults. Therefore, the time required to solve the analysis will (increase / decrease), bu this isan unavoidable consequence. Ultimately, we will ry to design optimum meshes providing reasonable accuracy levels und resulting in acceptable run times. = The primary unknown in finite element analysis is (displacements / stains / stresses). This quantity is therefore the most accurate, ‘a The accuracy levels of (displacements / stains /strestes) and (displacements / strains tresses) are approximately the same, but significantly worse than that of (displacements / strains / stresses). ‘Therefor, to obtain good (displacement / strain stress) result, the imesh must be reasonably fine, 1 (Refining / Coarsening) the mesh results in solutions approaching the analytical solution of a mathematical modelLesson 1 SolawWorks 2012 Thermals ProcessSolitorks 2012 Exercise 1: Bracket Problem Statement. Exarcae 1 Inthis first exercise, you will analyze a simple part witha single restraint and one external force. ‘This lab uses the following skills: fe Fixtures on page 34, = External Loads on page 38. f& Meshing on page 43. f= Multiple Studies on page 60. ‘The aluminum part ofan assembly will be analyzed forts ‘maximum stresses and displacements. The partis bolted to the rest ofthe assembly through the two bolt holes, as indicated in the figure. The partis then subjected 10.8 normal force of 300 N, applied tothe counter bored face Open a part fle. ‘Open part from the LessonOl \Bxeretses folder Bot holes ‘Specify SolidWorks Simulation options. Select Options in the Simulation menu. Select the Default Options tab, specify $1 (MKS) as a default Units for this analysis. In the Units dialog, set the LengttvDisplacement and Prossure/Stress fields to mm and Nimm? (MPa), respectively.Exercise 1 n Soliaworks 2012 The following default results plots are generated after each stati study is completed: nodal von Mises stress and resultant displacement. Right-click on the Static Study Results folder and select Add New Pot, Adal an additional result plot for the nodal Pt: tst principal ‘stress be generated as a default result plot taped Specify the subfolder raulkain the SolidWorks document dircotory aa 2 Tocation to store the result fies. Number format. tt Select Color chart. Select sre Scientific and 2 decimal places. Sireaa Define a static study. Create anew static study named stress analysis.Solitorks 2012 FFeatureManager and select ApplyEdit. Material. Specify Aluminum 1060 Alloy from the solidworks materials library.Soliaorks 2012 6 Apply Fixtures, Apply Fixed Geometry to the two bolt holes, as shown in the figure below: ‘This restraint simulates the way this partis attached to the rest ofthe assembly Fixed Geometry fixtures are used inthis exercise to model the bolted connections mounting the bracket tothe ater pars ofthe larger assembly. Also the presence ofthe other pars to which this bracket is attached is ignored in this exercise. You will lear in the Inter lessons that more accurate and elegant ‘methods and features, such as bolt connectors and virtual wall, exist to simulate these conditions. 7 Apply external load, Apply normal force on the face indicated in the figure, Specify a magnitude of 500 N.SoliWorks 2012 eerie 8 Mesh, Select Curvature based mosh under Mesh Parameters, ‘Mesh the model using High quality elements withthe default element 9 Run the study. 10 Plot stress results ‘We observe that the maximum von Mises stress in the model is approximately 35.1 MPa, which is above the yield strength ofthe 1060 Aluminum Alloy (27.5 MPa), 66 " Soliaworks 2012 ‘The distribution ofthe PA: 41st principal stress indicates a maximum Value of approximately 32.6 MPa. This value eoeresponds to the ‘maximum tensile sires inthe part (maximum compressive stress, ‘where the value is negative). Probe stress on the fillet. Later inthe course you will learn thatthe fixtures may result in stress intensifications which are not real. For this reason, we will focus our attention to the filleted region between the horizontal and vertical bosses on the pat Right-click the Stness1 folder and click Probe, Select On selected entities, then pick the seven faces of the filet hetween the two bosses‘Soliaworks 2012 Exercne 1 (Click Update. Probing the results on selected faces we see thatthe maximum stress at this stress concentration region is 30.6 MPa [4,547 psi, which is slightly above the yield strength of 27.5 MP [3,989 psi) 12 Plot displacement results. ‘We observe the maximum resultant displacement of approximately (0.068 mm {0.0027 in]. ”Soliaworks 2012 Coarse Mesh and Are our current results accurate enough? Visual inspection of our finite Element Stross clement mesh suggests that it may be rather coarse, especially in the regions where the fillets are present. Furthermore, inspection ofthe istribution of the elemental values ofthe von Mises siress indicates considerable stress jumps from element-to-element inthe higher stress ‘We will repeat the analysis with finer mesh, 18 Create new static study. Duplicate the study stress analysis as a new study named stress analysis - refined. The folders Fixtures, External Loads, Parts, Mesh, and Resulte will be copied into the new study as well 414 Create fine mesh. Croate High quality mesh, Slide the Mesh Density slider all the way t the right which wil result in an Maximum element size of 2.198 mm and a MinimumSotaworks 2012 18 16 7 Exercise 1 “The resulting mesh shows significantly improved mapping ofthe ‘model geometry. Run the study. Plot stress results. ‘We now observe thatthe maximum von Mises stress increased from 35.1 MPa o 39.1 MPa, whichis above the material yield strength ofthe 27.5 MPa, This translates toa difference of nearly 11%. However, if we examine the plot, we will see that dhe maximum stress is at the sharp comer of the bolt holes. We will discuss this further in the next lesson, Probe stress on the fillet. Using the identical procedure deseribed in step 14 probe the stress results on the filleted geometries. ‘We ean observe the maximum von Mises stress on these entities increased from 30.6 MPa to 30.75 MPa, which is still above the yield sirength but is a neglible difference from the previous study. We ean therefore conclude that the mesh refinement confirmed the validity of ‘our similation and our results are converged. It should be noted that in ‘other situations the difference in the stress results may be significant. In ‘general, requirements on the good stress results translates into & necessity to generate finer meshes. In our present case further refinement does not produce further improvement inthe sress results ‘and we will thus conclude that they are converged.Fe Solidworks 2012 18 Plot displacement results. ‘The plot shows that the maximum displacement resultant inereased fom 0.0678 mm to 0.0683 mm; a difference of less than | Y% QO «cE ‘Summary In this exercise, we practiced the basic setup ofthe linear stati study as ‘well as the post processing features available in Solid Works ‘Simulation, We observed that the mesh quality has a significant impact ‘on the results (especially the stress results). While the deviation inthe resultant displacements obtained from the to studies was 1 %, the deviation for maximum von Mises stresses was nearly 11 % (often the difference in sresses is much greater). The greater difference in the ‘maximum stresses is atributed tothe following two phenomen: Dspace ae the primary anion ni ite element analysis and as sich, wi aways be siifcaty more accrate than stains and tess for rly rogue for astacton ses Tels t= The extreme values ofthe stresses occur inthe vicinity ofthe fixture where the stresses often assume unrealistically high values. ‘This isa subject studied inthe next lesson. The stresses at the flleted regions reported in both studies were closer in their ‘magnitudes with a negligible difference. Finer meshes ae required in flleted regions as stress results are of importance tous.Exercise 2: Compressive Spring Stiffness, Procedure Note exereae 2 Compressive Sprig Stioss In this exercise, we will use SolidWorks Simulation to determine the compressive stifiness ofa coil spring ‘This exercise reinforces the following skis: ‘New Study on page 31 fe Fistures on page 34. = Extemal Loads on page 38. Meshing on page 43 Result Plots on page 47 ‘The stiffness ofthe helical spring can be determined as follows: ‘Open a part fi (Open spring from Lesson01 \Exereises folder. For convenient application of fixtures nd external loads, disks have ‘been added to both ends of the spring. The distance between the disks corresponds tothe active length of the un-compressed spring. Set SolidWorks Simulation options. Set the system of Units to SI (MIKS) and the units of Length and Stress to mm and Nim? (Pa). Create study. Create a Static study named spring stiffness. Review material properties “The material properties (Alloy Steel) are transferred from SolidWorks. Apply Fixed restraint. Apply & Fixed Geometry fixture tothe end face of one disk (item 1).Exercise 2 Solidworks 2012 Compressive Spring Stinase 6 Apply radial restraint. Use an advanced fixture to apply a restraint inthe radial direction tothe cylindrical face of the other disk (tem 2), = ‘This restraint only allows the spring tobe — compressed (or expanded) in its axial direction aera) and to rotate about the longitudinal axis, 2 ey Bors [SB scrote 4 |O}eseweten 7 | a rents a 2 lee | aie ed 7 Apply compressive force. Apply @ 0.1 N compressive force to the end face ofthe disk with the eylindrieal face constrained in the radial direction 8 Mesh the model and run the analysis. Select Curvature based mesh unde: Mesh Parameters, Use High quality elements with the default Maximum element size and Minimum element size of 2.787 mm and 0.857 mm, respectively:‘SolidWorks 2042 Compressive Spring Stns 8 Plot z displacements. Displacement results indicate an axial displacement of 0.426 mm. The axial displacement is inthe = direction. ‘The axial stifiness ofthe spring can be ealeulated as 234.7 Nim. =p). ‘We use this result to define the spring comnector in later lessons using, the equation f= kx, where k=234.7 Nim. Alternately, we could use an approximate formula forthe stiffness of a helial spring (Mechanical Vibrations by S. S. Rao, 1995). 6 Kaxiat 7 3 sn: here: dis the diameter ofthe wire Dis the mean coll diameter nis the numberof active tums ‘= Gis the material shear modulus Substituting our values (n= 8.75, €= 1 mm, D=17 mm, and G= 7.9210 Pa) into the above formula gives an axial sifiness of approximately 230 Nim. This result is very close to our actual result of 234.7 Nim. 40 Save and Close the file. esexerci 3 Exercise Container Handle Problem Description Loading Conditions Goal In this exercise, you will assess the safety of the waste container handle, This exercise reinforces the following skills = New Study on page 31 ww Fistures on page 34. = External Loads on page 38. = Meshing on page 43 = Result Plots on page 47. The handle is used to attach the hook ofthe winch when loading the container on the rails of the transporting truck. The entire container is ‘manufactured from AISI 304 stel. The handle is welded (double-sided fillet weld) to the two square base plates located symmetrically on both sides. The diameter ofthe handle is 30mm; the thickness of the steel plates is Sm. Apply the most suitable fixtures to simulate the ‘connection between the handle and the ste! plates. In the most extreme loading situation, when the container is : pulled onto the truck rails, the handle is loaded by a 3000 N force inclined at 15 degrees. The force should be applied on the circular spit face indicated inthe figure above. a poy a aes ~~ Le © AN eee > q Decide whether the design ofthis handle is safe. Pay attention tothe 'most appropriate representation of the fixture. “The part for this exercise is located inthe Lesson01\ Exercises folder.Objectives Lesson 2 Mesh Controls, Stress Concentrations and Boundary Conditions Upon suecessful completion ofthis lesson, you will beable to: Mlustrate the differences between modeling and discretization Use Automatic traniton option to mesh model. Use mesh controls. Deseribe when the lack of convergence of FEA results may occur. Understand stess concentrations Analyze model in different Solid Works configurations Run multiple studies in batch mode Extract reaction forces.Lesson 2 Sotaworks 2012 [iethContols, Suess Concentatons and Boundary Condtone Mesh Control Case Study: The L Bracket Project Description Meshes are rarely uniform in practical problems. It would be very inefficient to uniformly reduce the mesh size in a large model because ofa local stress concentration. We would create large number of clements in areas of uniform or slowly changing stress resulting in an increase of computational time that in the end tells us litle about the model Using different methods to control the mesh, we can use a small mesh in areas of rapid changing stress and a large mesh in areas with litle change. In this case stady, we will determine the stress in an L bracket, under Toad. The L bracket presents the problem of stress at sharp comers and the effects of fillets and local mesh refinement ‘The comer of the bracket is rounded by a smal fillet. Since the radius ‘of the fillets small compared tothe overall size ofthe model, it may be suppressed. We will solve the model with and without fillet, discuss the differences and the applicability of each approach, ‘We will also investigate the effet of different mesh sizes on the ‘maximum displacement and stress results. Rather than refining the ‘mesh uniformly in the entire model, whichis called globaf mesh refinement, we refine the mesh locally, where high stresses are located. ‘This is called local mesh refinement. ‘An L-shaped steel bracket is fixed athe top and a 900 N load is applied to the lower end face. We will evaluate the displacements and stresses in the model. cuprensed Filet Va ‘Some key stages in the analysis of this patt are shown in the following list: = Nofillet ‘The filet will be suppressed to simplify the geometry and to observe the stress atthe sharp comer. = Add fillet ‘The fillet will be unsuppressed to determine the effect ofthe fillet ‘on the maximum stress in this par.Mesh Conroe, SoeseConcentaton ana Baonaary = Mesh refinement As the fillet is small compared to the res ofthe model, we will use different techniques o reduce the mesh size only in the area ofthe fillet. Procedure In the frst part ofthis ease study, we will examine the stress on this part without the fillet. Open a part file. 7 Open I breaks. fom Leseon02\ ad Case Studios folder aie Inthe SolidWorks Configuration Manager, examine the two configurations: fillet and no fille, Make the no flit configuration active. Set the simulation options. ae CClick Options from the Simulation | 980 ‘menu. Select the Default Options tab. | Sums Select Units, then select (MKS) forthe | = Unit system. Select mm for Length! | mee Displacement and Nim*2(Pascals) for | tema ProssurelStress, rae Select Color Chart, For Number =r format, select Scientific (e) and 6 decimal places Define static study. Create anew study named mesh, {nthe analysis Type list, select State. Click OK. Examine the Simulation Study tree. The L bracket icon already has a check mark next tothe name of the assigned material because the material definition (AISI 304 steel) as ‘been transferred fiom Solid Works, Also, note thats sharp reentrant ‘comer takes the place ofthe suppressed ile. wLesson 2, Sotisorks 2012 lieth Control, Sess Concentration and Bounds Condtons 5 Apply a fixture. ‘Now apply a Fixed Geometry fixture to the top face ofthe L bracket. Right-click Fixtures and select Fixed Geometry. In the Standard list select Fixed Geometry. Click OK, 6 Apply an external load. Right-click External Loads and select Force. Select Force. ‘We want to apply a shearing foree and not a normal force, so we must define the direction ofthe force. Select Selected direction. Select the indicated face to apply the force and the Top plane o specify the direction ‘Type 900 N [202.33 It] forthe force Select Reverse direction to make sure the force is pointing as shown, Click OK.Sollaworks 2012 Lesson 2 oa ‘Mean Contos, Sees Concentaton ard Boundary 7 Mesh the mods Select Curvature based mesh under Mosh Parameters. Verify thatthe meshing option i set 10 High quality (Draft Quality Mesh is cleared), meaning that second order clement are created. Mesh the model using the default Maximum element size and Minimum clement size of 4.812 mm [0.1894 in}. Run All Studies __Multipfe studies can be run at the same time. This allows you to setup ‘multiple studies and then run them after hours ‘Where to Find It = CommandManager: Simulation > Run > Run All Studies 8 Create a duplicate study. Siudy mesh is now ready to be analyzed. However, we will create ‘evo more studies and run all three studies at the same time using the Run All Studies command. Duplicate study mesh} into a new study mesh2 (see Creating New Stuales on page 61 on how to duplicate a study). ‘When creating the duplicate ofthe study make sure thatthe Configuration to use field says no filet. Click 0K,Lesson 2 WS Catnol, tess Concentatons and Boundary Condons Analysis with Local Mesh Refinement Mesh Control Where to Find It Mesh Controls The second part ofthis case study will fnvestigate the effect of using smaller elements inthe model on the results. In Lesson 1, we refined the mesh uniformly throughout the sess «entire model by controlling the global element oneetar In this part ofthe case study, we will use a different technique, Note that a stess ‘concentration is located near the sharp re- Knowing the location of high tress, we ean refine the mesh locally in that area by applying local mesh controls Mesh controls allow you to control the Maximum element size and Ratio locally on selected entities independent ofthe global Maximum ‘eloment size and Ratio. As compared to global mesh refinement, this isa more numerically efficient technique. Small elements are placed ‘where needed, while portions of the model with no stress concentration are meshed with larger elements. f= Shortcut Menu: Right-click Mesh inthe Simulation Study tre and select Apply Mesh Control ‘= Menu: Simulation, Mesh, Apply Control Mesh controts can also be applied to vertices, faces, or entire components of assemblies. Once mesh controls have been defined, the ‘Mesh icon becomes a folder. Mesh controls can be edited using a shorteut menu displayed by right-clicking Control] and select Edit Definition in the Mest folder, or dlireotly by double-clicking on the Control-1 item, ‘The mesh, with applied control (aso called imesh bias), features localized refinement along the edges Meshing must be done after controls are defined, ‘Mesh control symbols are displayed along the affected edge. ‘Mesh Con Symbols‘SolidWorks 2012 ‘Mesh control symbols, ‘Mesh Contos, Sears Concantration nd Boundary Mesh control symbols can be displayed or hidden by: ‘= Shortcut menu: Right-click Mesh and select Hide or Show All Control Symbols ‘The visibility of mesh control symbols can also be controlled individually for each mesh contol ‘9 Apply local mesh control {for study mesh2. Select the edge shown, Right-click Mesh and select Apply Mesh Control Use the suggested local Element size of 2.406 mm. and the Ratio of 1.5 Click OK to close Mesh controls PropertyManager, 10 Create mesh. Select Curvature based mesh under Mesh Parameters Create High quality mesh with the default settings 41 Examine the mesh. Note that smaller elements have been created along the edge where mesh control has been just applied. Ku With edge mesh contol No wigo mesh contol 12 Duplicate study mesh2. [Name the new study mesh.Lesson 2 SotaWorks 2012 h Cools, Sues Concentrations and Bounday Canatone 13 Apply local mesh control for study meshs. Inthe mesh study, edit the definition of Control-1 In the Elomont size box, enter 0.608 mm to locally refine the mesh along the sharp reentrant edge. Keep the Ratio at its default value of 15. With this mesh control, we will erate very small elements along the sharp re-entrant edge Click OK. 14 Mesh study mesh3. ‘Mesh study mesh3 with High quality elements and the default mesh parameter. Use the curvature based mesh ‘We now have three studies: mesh, meshiz end mesh, The only difference is mesh refinement along the sharp reentrant edge. ‘sud: mesh1 ‘Suey: mesh? 15 Run all studies. Select the Simulation tab on the CommandManager Select the dawn arrow under Run Study to flyout the ther choices, Click Run All Studies. 16 Simulation progress log. Once the analyses are completed, review the report inthe M5Q file located in the result folder. Sia sree Se rere 17 Plot von Mises stresses. Display the mesh with the plot by right-clicking the corresponding result plot and seleting Settings. Under Boundary options, select Mesh. %2Soliaworks 2012 Click 0x, Lesson Sty: mesh Suey: meshe —_ Sudy- mesh4002 svar con — SoliaWorks 2012 18 Plot resultant displacements. ‘Susy: mesh] e — ‘Sudy: meshe wo a ‘Sud: mesh = sorSaliworks 2012 Lesson2 Mean Contos Stats Concentatons ana Bounsary Results Comparison Stress Singularities Reporting displacement results with six digits of accurney is excessive 1s uncertainties in loads, restraints, and material properties definition ‘do not normally justify this level of accuracy. ‘We used six digits of accuracy so that we can compare the minute differences in the displacement results calculated in the three studies ‘we undertook in this lesson. Results forthe maximum resultant displacement and maximum von Mises stress from mesh, mesh2 and mesh3 studies are summarized inthe following table: Tncreasein | Max: Yon | Increase in Max. displ Mises | Von Mises Study max. displ Iommy| Me en | stress | stress toaray | impair ‘moan | oat] ware | vo5 | 0.00058 2.82 meena | 08795 | goamy | 8 | (45.5%) ; 00115 11666 means | 028856 | oan) | 1772 | cas2.0%) Each mesh refinement results in an increase in both the maximum displacement and the maximum stress. The inerease inthe displacement result i negligible and becomes fess pronounced with successive runs. From this, we can say tha the displacement results ‘converge. I we continue this exercise af progressive mesh refinement, either Jocally near the sharp re-enteant corner as we did by means of the local :mesh controls or globally by reducing the global clement size as we did in Lesson 1, we would note that the displacement results converge {oa finite value and that even the first mesh is adequate if we are examining only displacement results Stresses, however, behave quite differently. Each subsequent mesh refinement produces higher stress results. Instead of converging 0 a finite value like the displacement results, the stress results diverge‘Suppressed Configuration Activate SW Configuration Where to Find It E ie . Hele i: With enough time and patience, we ean produce results that show any stress magnitude. Al that is necessary isto make the element size small enough! ‘The reason for divergent stress results isnot thatthe finite element ‘mode! is incorrect, but that the finite element model is based on the ‘wrong mathematical model According tothe theory of elasticity, stress in the sharp re-entrant ‘comer is infinite; a mathematician Would say that stess there is singular. The finite element model does not produce infinite stress results due to discretization errors, and these disretization errs mask the modeling ero However, tress results in the vicinity ofthe re-entrant comer are ‘completely dependent on mesh size; therefor, they are totally meaningless at this location. Tour objective isto determine the maximum stress a this location, then the decision to suppress the fillet and analyze a model with a sharp re-entrant comer is a very serious mistake. The stres ina sharp re entrant comer i singular, or infinite, The fillet, no matter how small it is, must be included in the model if we seek to find accurate stresses in or near that fillet ‘When the active configuration is different from the configuration used to create the study, the study is suppressed and all items in the study are shown in grey. To unsuppress the study, the configuration must be changed to that used to do the study. ‘To change the SolidWorks configuration tothe one used fora study, we ‘can activate the configuration from the Simulation Study tree ‘= Shortcut Menu: Right-click the study in the Simulation Study tree and click Activate SW ConfigurationSoltworks 2012 Lesson Moon Contos Sees Conestraons an unsary Case Study: Now that we understand the problem caused by the sharp re-entrant Analysis of ‘comer, we must repeat this analysis using a model with the file. Bracket with a Obtaining the correct model requires unsuppressing the fillet. Fillet 2 Examine the Simulation Study tree. With the filet configuration active, the mesh, mesh? and mesh3 studies are greyed-out. You can access them again only after activating the SolidWorks configuration corresponding to these studies, 3 Create new study. (Create a study mesh by duplicating the mesh study. We copied the mesh1 study and not the mesh? or meahs studies for ‘convenience because mesh} does not have mesh controls defined and mesh does not require mesh controls. Ifwe use mesh? or mesh3, we have to edit or delete the mesh controls in the mesh study because the geometry of the model as changed, 4 Mesh the model. Select Curvature based mesh under Mesh Parameters, Mesh the model with High quality elements and the Maximum element size and Minimum ‘element size of 4.813 mm [0.1895 in}seston seen Solaorks 2012 5 Run the analysis. 6 Plot Displacement results. ‘The maximum resultant displacement result (0.2845 mm) reported for the filet study differs only insignificantly from the earlier displacement results. This small difference can be attributed tothe change in the model geometry. 7. Plot von Mises stresses. The stress results obtained by the model withthe fillet indicate that the ‘maximum von Mises stess i atthe fillet location and its magnitude is 88.76 MPa,Lesson 2 Mean Controle Sees Concentrations an Boundary 8 Analyze the plots. Analyzing te stress distribution uniformity at the filet location we see rather spotty behavior and no symmetry. Ths is another sign of | insufficient mesh resolution for stresses. The displacement results are accurate in al studies solved in this lesson. ‘We will therefore apply @ new local mesh control on fillet and rerun the study again, 9 Apply mesh control on fillet. ‘To get more accurate results, We will apply @ local mesh control on the filler face. Apply mesh controls tothe fillet fe using 0.762 mm [0.030 in] for the local Element size, 1.2 for the Ratio. 10 Re-mesh model. Select Curvature based mesh under Mesh Parameters, Mesh the model with High quality elements and the Maximum ‘element size and Minimum ‘element size of 4.813 mm (0.1895 in} ‘The resulting mesh can be seen at right. ‘This mesh isa litte excessive in its size, but given the small size of the problem we ean afford it 11 Run the study.SolicWorks 2012 Itoh Control, Stes Concentatons and Boundary Conatons 100 12 Plot von Mises stress, ‘We observe thatthe maximum stress increased 10 102 MPa, The details ofthe stress distribution are uniform and symmetrial. We could ‘conclude that this stress value is accurate 13 Extract reaction force. Right-click on the Results folder and select List Result Force. ‘Select the face where the bracket is supported and click Update, Make sure the units are set to Sh ‘The Reaction force (N) dialog willis the resultant ofthe reaction on the selected face (or faces if more supported faces exist and are selected) as well as on the entire model. We can see that the equilibrium is satisfied; the reaction force is equal 0 900 N, which confims the equilibrium and the correctness ofthe solution,Soltaworks 2012 Note Lesson 2 Moon Contos Stress Concentatons ans Boundry ‘Moment reactions are not reported since solid elements feature three translational degrees of freedom only. Nodes of the solid elements do not carry any moment Case Study: Analysis of a Welded Bracket "Now that we understand the stress concentration in the file, let's repeat the analysis using a more realistic model whete the edges of the faces are fixed rather than the entite face. This would more closely represent the face being welded toa pate Create a new study. CCreate a static study named mesh by duplicating the study mesh. Ealt the Fixture, Fit the fixture and remove the top face, ‘Add the four edges surrounding that face = as shown, ‘This ype of restraint would simulate the part being welded toa surface when only the edges are firmly attached t the structure, and not the entie face. Run the analysis. 01Sottaworks 2012 4 Plot the stress results. ‘Another siress concentration has appeared atthe edges where fixed _geometry Was used. Again, a singularity of stress is formed due tothe fixed geometry tthe sharp end. Although perhaps a more realistic finite clement model, the stress concentration is an artifact ofthe ‘mathematical model ‘These types of effects must be understood to properly analyze model 5 Save and Close the file, Understanding the Effect of we Boundary conditions are necessary in order to fix the model in space and solve the mathematical problem. In real life every partis connected tw another and finally attached to the primary structure othe ground. ‘We can, however, view the boundary conditions as a means 10 ~ significantly simplify our simulation. As an illustration, ‘consider the bracket assembly shown in the figure tothe right, > ‘where the bracket is part of a larger structureSoliorks 2012 Conclusion Lesson 2 esn Convols, Sass Concantations and Boundary ‘Then, before we even begin modeling in Solid Works Simulation we have to decide whether to model the entire upper level assembly with the boundary conditions applied as shown inthe figure above, or the {ull bracket only, or a part ofthe bracket (a model identical to what we had in Lesson 2), See the images below ‘The decision is based on what is the objective ofthe analysis, i. what results do we truly need. The lager the model we chose, the more realistie it becomes, At the same time the size ofthe finite element ‘model increases, resulting in significantly longer solution times, Boundary concitions therefore serve to express the fact how a speci part or sub-assembly is grounded or attached to another primary structure, and help us substantially reduce the size of the problem. Reduction ofthe problem comes a a cost, Le the stress results atthe location of the boundary conditions may be singular and have to be ignored in such cases Also, we need to understand that the boundary conditions do effect our solution Inthe three ease listed above the final results will be ‘compatable, bt not exactly the same. Therefore the selection, as well asthe location, ofthe boundary condition must be done so that its effect, fn the results snd the rest ofthe model is minimal The question may arise: which one study isthe correct one? “The second to lat study withthe fillet and fixed face included inthe ‘model and the mesh control applied produce the most accurate results| and is favored provided one can afford the increased sizeof the model due tothe additonal regions that must he meshed. Then what about the other studies where stress concentrations are seen?Lesson 2 Soliaworks 2012 IitehConrots, Suess Concenvatons ans Boundoy Condtans Summary Questions ‘These results are obtained by using the incorrect mathematical model. It does not make sense to debate which ofthe frst three models produces the most accurate results and, therefore, which one was “the best” among the thre. All models with sharp re-entrant edges or edges that are fixed are equally poor if we examine the stess on those edges, ‘Thus, if we are interested in stress ator near a sharp edge (ora sharp ‘comer for shell models), this edge must be modeled with a filler, even ifthe fillets very small. In addition, ifthe edge ofthe model is fixed, We must realize thatthe appearance ofthe stress concentration is attificial. In general, istresses at these singularities are of no interest, these studies stil produce good results forthe overall mode, In this lesson, we illustrated what can go wrong when FEA is based on an incorrectly prepared model. Using local mesh controls rather than the global mesh controls, we ‘obtained solutions for different meshes and revealed stress singularities ata sharp re-entrant comer and at fixed geometries ‘We used this lesson to further discuss modeling and discretization «error, meshing techniques, and also to ilustrate the integration between SolidWorks and Solid Works Study tee = Why do we often eliminate filles and small rounds if such ‘suppression can lead to locally inaccurate stress resus? Does it imply that the stress results are inaccurate forthe whole model? | Are displacements affected by the suppression of small features (lets, rounds) as much as stresses? Why?Soliaworks 2012 Exercise 4: C-bracket Problem Statement Part 1: Analysis of Bracket with no Fillet Exgrcge 4 In this exercise, you will analyze a bracket with two different configurations to determine the effects ofthe intemal fillets, This exercise reinforces the following skill: = Mesh Controls on page 90 Results Comparison on page 95. i= Siress Singularities on page 95. Suppressed Configuration on page 96. ‘A hanging bracket mounted on the ceiling will x be supporting a sign mounted on the bottom, a flange of the bracket. The sign will be mounted ‘onto the bracket with a flat ribbon lke cable. A 900'N [202 Ib. force will be exerted on the bracket due tothe weight of the sign and ribbon. We will evaluate the displacements and sresses for the bracket due to this loading, We : are also interested in how modeling the bracket with and without filets will eect our results, The elects of different boundary conditions will also be investigated. Open a part file Open bracket from Leason02\ Exercises folder Specify active configuration. Make the configuration No Fillet active = oe Notice thatthe rounded inside edgos become sharp re-entrant comers. This configuration, = suppresses all inner fillets, Dofine a static study, Create a Statie study named no fillet 1 Apply material properties, “Apply the material Alloy Steel from the solidworks material library.Ercae 4 Sotieworks 2012 Apply a fixture. Apply a Fixed Geometry fixture to the op face as indicated ‘We will assume that the compressive force of the serew is large enough to prevent any. sliding or rotation about the screw. Apply fore Apply a 900 N [202 1b] normal force to the top face ofthe hotiom flange. This force is due to the weight of the sign Mesh the model Select Curvature based mesh under Mesh Parameters, ‘Mesh the model withthe default element size. Use High quality elements. Run the analysis. Plot stress results We find tha the bracket has @ maximum von Mises stress of 132 MPa [19.2 ksi] and does not yield. However, thee isa high stess ‘concentration atthe sharp comers. JSolieworks 2012 reise 4 10 Plot displacement results. ‘Maximum displacement i 1.25 me. J 11 Create a new study. Duplicate the existing study and name it no Alet@. 12 Apply mesh control. Apply mesh contol to each ofthe three edges on the inner faces ofthe bracket. Use the default mesh eontrol size, 13 Mesh the model. ‘Mesh the model with the default element size. We have ereated a finer ‘sh atthe inside edges of the bracket, while the mesh sizes ar coarser at all other locations in the bracket. 14 Ru the analysis 40745 Plot stress results The maximum von Mises stress is now 160 MPa (232 ksi}, which is higher than the von Mises stress value obtained inthe previous study ‘with no mesh contol. This shows the diverging stress results and verifies that the stress inthe comers are indeed concentrations. Further ‘refinement will continue this trend, 16 Create a new study. Duplicate the no fillet 1 study and name it no filet 8. 17 Apply mesh control. ‘Add mesh control to the same three edges. Change the local size 10 0.889 mm [0.035 in} 18 Mesh the model. Mesh the model with the default element size. We have created a finer mesh at the inside edges of the bracket, while the mesh sizes re coarser tall other locations inthe bracketSoliaorks 2012 Part 2: Analysis of Bracket with Fillet Exercae § 49 Run the analysis. 20 Plot stress results. ‘We find that the maximum von Mises stress is significantly higher than the value obtained in the previous study with a coarser mesh control ‘We see that, although we ae refining the mesh, the siess results are not ‘converzing: This is duc to the sharp re-entrant comers, = We will now look at a model with fillets and analyze its solution, 1. Change configuration. Change the active configuration to Dafault = This configuration has the fillets unsuppressed, 2 Create a new study. Duplicate the no Alot study sul waane it alt. 3. Mesh the model. Mesh the model withthe default local Element IV 08Ef Part 3: Analysis of Bracket with Fillet and Fixed Hole 4 Run the analysis. 5 Plot etross results The stress results obtained from the model with the fillet indieate that the maximum yon Mises stress is approximately 127 MPa [18.4 ksi] Because no sharp edges are present inthe model, this value is close to the real stress magnitudes. Further mesh refinement would improve the results and eliminate the spoty stress distribution In this last study, we will change the way the part is retrained by editing the one fixture and holding the part by the cylindrical hole instead ofthe entire top face 1. Greate a now study. Duplicate the fillet study and name it filet fixed hole. 2. Use Fixed Geometry on hole. ait the fixture and remove the top face. Add the hoe face.SoliaWorks 2012 Exeroeo 4 3. Apply mesh control. = Apply a mesh control with an Element size of 0.508 mm to the inner cylindrical surface ofthe hole, 4. Mesh control on the fillets. Apply a mesh control with the default Element size of 1.9 mm to the three filles 5 Run the analysis. ‘The study will mesh and solve.SoliaWorks 2012 6 Plot the stress results. ‘The stress results obtained from the madel withthe fillet and the fixed geometry on the hole produce a stress concentration around the edges ofthe hole. This is because a singularity of stress appears in this region «due tothe perfectly rigid support at those edges. This i similar to the singularity seen in the fixed edges ofthe Z-Brackt in Lesson 2 and can be ignored, Change the scale ofthe legend to obtain a more realistic plot. ‘We can see thatthe stresses onthe filleted faces increased from 127 MPa (see previous study) to nearly 145 MPa. 7 Modify the mesh controls. Change the Element Size for both mesh controls to 0.1mm forthe hole and L-Lmm forthe fillets. ~~ =~ 8 Run the Study. ‘The study will mesh and solve,Soliaworks 2012 Exeroee 4 9. Examine the stross plot. ‘As can be seen the sess near the support inereased considerably and Fepresents the maximum stress inthe model. From. io Ce ——-pe 3 inte te Probing on selected entities reveal the maximum stress on the filleted faces as 150 MPa a slight increase from the 145 MPa obtained from the previous run, Ths sires is rel and approaching a finite value (we say iteonverges). 10 Save and Close the filearen Exercise 5: Bone Wrench Problem ‘Statement Note In this exercise a bone wrench will be analyzed for is stresses and
You might also like
09-Solidworks Weldments 2019
PDF
100% (1)
09-Solidworks Weldments 2019
193 pages
SolidWorks Essentials Ver. 2011
PDF
75% (4)
SolidWorks Essentials Ver. 2011
507 pages
08-Solidworks Sheet Metal 2019
PDF
100% (5)
08-Solidworks Sheet Metal 2019
293 pages
Solidworks MBD - Solidworks 2015 Training
PDF
100% (3)
Solidworks MBD - Solidworks 2015 Training
205 pages
Certified SOLIDWORKS Professional Advanced Weldments (CSWPA-WD)
PDF
No ratings yet
Certified SOLIDWORKS Professional Advanced Weldments (CSWPA-WD)
2 pages
2018 CSWE Training Manual
PDF
No ratings yet
2018 CSWE Training Manual
152 pages
2016 - SW PDM - Api Professional
PDF
No ratings yet
2016 - SW PDM - Api Professional
221 pages
Solidworks Motion - Solidworks 2015 Training
PDF
100% (2)
Solidworks Motion - Solidworks 2015 Training
359 pages
10-Solidworks File Management
PDF
100% (1)
10-Solidworks File Management
167 pages
05-Solidworks Advanced Part Modeling 2018
PDF
100% (4)
05-Solidworks Advanced Part Modeling 2018
473 pages
Solidworks Simulation Training Chapter 3
PDF
86% (14)
Solidworks Simulation Training Chapter 3
146 pages
Wes Mosler - The Piping and Tubing Design Guide For SolidWorks Routing 2011 - 2011
PDF
100% (8)
Wes Mosler - The Piping and Tubing Design Guide For SolidWorks Routing 2011 - 2011
160 pages
2018 - SW Simulation - Nonlinear-Desktop-Ob4j40b
PDF
No ratings yet
2018 - SW Simulation - Nonlinear-Desktop-Ob4j40b
237 pages
2018 - SW Simulation - Flow
PDF
0% (1)
2018 - SW Simulation - Flow
311 pages
Solidworks Routing - Piping and Tubing - Solidworks 2015 Training
PDF
100% (2)
Solidworks Routing - Piping and Tubing - Solidworks 2015 Training
349 pages
Tutorial Simulation Professional
PDF
No ratings yet
Tutorial Simulation Professional
252 pages
Thermal Analysis With Solidworks 2014
PDF
50% (2)
Thermal Analysis With Solidworks 2014
17 pages
SWEDU Fund3DCAD SIM201819 ENG LR PDF
PDF
100% (1)
SWEDU Fund3DCAD SIM201819 ENG LR PDF
405 pages
SolidWORKS (FEA) Simulation Theory Manual
PDF
100% (4)
SolidWORKS (FEA) Simulation Theory Manual
115 pages
SolidWorks Motion Tutorials
PDF
85% (13)
SolidWorks Motion Tutorials
358 pages
Solidworks Simulation
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation
504 pages
Solidworks Simulation PDF
PDF
100% (10)
Solidworks Simulation PDF
504 pages
HS Chem Solving Problems
PDF
100% (1)
HS Chem Solving Problems
480 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
PDF
88% (16)
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
508 pages
SolidWorks Simulation
PDF
No ratings yet
SolidWorks Simulation
31 pages
Solidworks Simulation PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation PDF
504 pages
Solidworks Simulation Standard
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation Standard
110 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
PDF
100% (1)
SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial
508 pages
SAE Project
PDF
100% (3)
SAE Project
200 pages
Solid Flow Simulation
PDF
No ratings yet
Solid Flow Simulation
182 pages
Solidworks Simulation
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation
162 pages
2018 - SW Simulation - Prof
PDF
No ratings yet
2018 - SW Simulation - Prof
305 pages
Advanced Part 2012
PDF
100% (3)
Advanced Part 2012
356 pages
Simulation Premium Nonlinear and Dynamics Package - Training - SOLIDWORKS PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Simulation Premium Nonlinear and Dynamics Package - Training - SOLIDWORKS PDF
3 pages
SolidWorks Flow Simulation 2012
PDF
50% (2)
SolidWorks Flow Simulation 2012
90 pages
SOLIDWORKS Simulation Professional
PDF
No ratings yet
SOLIDWORKS Simulation Professional
1 page
EDU Motion Student 2013 ENG
PDF
No ratings yet
EDU Motion Student 2013 ENG
20 pages
2018 - SW Simulation - Plastic
PDF
No ratings yet
2018 - SW Simulation - Plastic
287 pages
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2019 Validation
PDF
100% (3)
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2019 Validation
140 pages
Solidworks Plastics - Solidworks 2015 Training
PDF
100% (1)
Solidworks Plastics - Solidworks 2015 Training
217 pages
2011 - SWPDM Workgroup - Administrator
PDF
No ratings yet
2011 - SWPDM Workgroup - Administrator
156 pages
Simulation Best Practices For Large Assemblies, SolidWorks
PDF
No ratings yet
Simulation Best Practices For Large Assemblies, SolidWorks
52 pages
Bridge Project WB 2011 Eng
PDF
No ratings yet
Bridge Project WB 2011 Eng
109 pages
Customizing SolidWorks For Greater Productivity
PDF
100% (4)
Customizing SolidWorks For Greater Productivity
166 pages
SAE® Design and Analysis Project With SolidWorks®
PDF
No ratings yet
SAE® Design and Analysis Project With SolidWorks®
186 pages
PDM PDMWorks Draft
PDF
100% (1)
PDM PDMWorks Draft
320 pages
07-Solidworks Advanced Surface Modeling 2007 PDF
PDF
100% (4)
07-Solidworks Advanced Surface Modeling 2007 PDF
210 pages
SOLIDWORKS
PDF
100% (3)
SOLIDWORKS
341 pages
Analysis of Machine Elements: Using Solidworks Simulation 2011
PDF
50% (2)
Analysis of Machine Elements: Using Solidworks Simulation 2011
45 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Black Book
PDF
50% (6)
SolidWorks Simulation Black Book
40 pages
2018 - SW Simulation - Dynamics
PDF
No ratings yet
2018 - SW Simulation - Dynamics
185 pages
Solidworks 2018 Reference Guide: A Comprehensive Reference Guide With Over 250 Standalone Tutorials
PDF
100% (1)
Solidworks 2018 Reference Guide: A Comprehensive Reference Guide With Over 250 Standalone Tutorials
70 pages
Stress Analysis SW Simulation
PDF
100% (3)
Stress Analysis SW Simulation
70 pages
Cosmos Works Designer
PDF
No ratings yet
Cosmos Works Designer
349 pages
Simulacija SW 18oblasti
PDF
No ratings yet
Simulacija SW 18oblasti
4 pages
Solidworks Simulation Training Course
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation Training Course
12 pages
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2018 A Power Guide For Beginners and Intermediate Users by Willis, John Dogra, Sandeep CADArtifex
PDF
100% (1)
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2018 A Power Guide For Beginners and Intermediate Users by Willis, John Dogra, Sandeep CADArtifex
313 pages
SolidWorks Simulation Student Guide-EnG
PDF
No ratings yet
SolidWorks Simulation Student Guide-EnG
44 pages
Solidworks Similation
PDF
100% (1)
Solidworks Similation
447 pages
Solidworks Motions
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Motions
362 pages
Chapter 7 Key Terms
PDF
No ratings yet
Chapter 7 Key Terms
6 pages
Chapter 6 PowerPoint
PDF
No ratings yet
Chapter 6 PowerPoint
62 pages
Chapter 4 PowerPoint
PDF
No ratings yet
Chapter 4 PowerPoint
58 pages
Solidworks Simulation H Adaptive & P Adaptive
PDF
No ratings yet
Solidworks Simulation H Adaptive & P Adaptive
21 pages
SolidWorks 2012 Drawings
PDF
100% (4)
SolidWorks 2012 Drawings
224 pages
Solidworks Advanced Part Modeling 2009
PDF
100% (1)
Solidworks Advanced Part Modeling 2009
309 pages
Solidworks Advanced Assembly Modeling 2009
PDF
100% (1)
Solidworks Advanced Assembly Modeling 2009
383 pages