Discussion Forum Post
Discussion Forum Post
Discussion Forum Post
As a teacher, how can I make informed decisions about the use of digital
technologies in the classroom? (Include a reference or two as needed).
How does current policy and the ICT capabilities in the curriculum help prepare your
students for living and working in society today?
The current curriculum plans for effective ICT use in the classroom through
various policies and objectives that are to be carried out by educators. This is
an important aspect of the new dynamic of contemporary which is ever
evolving to a heavy adaptation to the use of technology. This is effectively
applied in many areas in the classroom but in my opinion the most
applicable way the curriculum involves providing students how to safely use
ICT’s platforms. In an age where technology can be used as an avenue for
misconduct by the user and others wishing to do harm it is important that
there is content that is mandatory to inform students of these dangers.
Research suggests that if educators are also provided with information and
knowledge of how to competently use technology, they are more inclined to
integrate educational technology into their classroom.
Why do you think a constructivist approach to learning with technology
is often recommended?
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
I believe there are many avenues in the classroom that a teacher could use to
incorporate true collaboration in the classroom. To truly deliver this the
teacher must understand what collaboration is and how to extend it further
than working in pairs. Collaborative learning entails a learning process that is
alternative to the typical instructive teacher centred way content is
delivered. As the name suggests this style involve collaboration with others in
the classroom to achieve a goal through teamwork, consideration, and
motivation (Smith and MacGregor, 1992). In an effective classroom activity,
which involves collaborative learning typical record taking is generally
altered also as the project is group orientated and the characteristics
mentioned above take priority in the assessment process. With these
components within an activity, I believe it is possible for a task to incorporate
true collaboration (Smith and MacGregor, 1992). An idea for such a
collaboration task involving technology would involve all students in the
class being linked to a brainstorm activity, adding ideas to the topic of
“earthquakes” through an ICT platform as they find info with others and
contribute to a group project.
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
the task needs the input of various group members in order to achieve the
goal
ICT capabilities
Applying social and ethical protocols and practices when using ICT
To develop students understanding of how social and ethical protocols and practices an ICT
platform called “mentimeter” could be used, involving various questions concerning social
and ethical protocols. This website poses questions on the board using a live polling system
as students answer each question and get instant feedback of where there fellow students
stand on each question involving: recognise intellectual property, apply digital information
security practices, apply personal security protocols, identify the impacts of ICT in society
Students will apply technical knowledge and skills to select, use and troubleshoot
appropriate digital technologies as they participate in various scenarios as they act out being
a tech support worker. Also applying problem solving and collaboration skills as they work in
groups to solve problems and also create scenarios for others. select and use hardware
and software understand ICT systems manage digital data.
I drew from many experiences and resources upon finding and creating the
ideas for the ICT capabilities in my Explain Everything diagram. Firstly, I drew
from my own experiences in school setting surrounding ICT capabilities and
their different elements. Being from a generation where technology has
grown through my schooling life has given me a great view on how it can
change the dynamic of a classroom. This is shown through the Creating with
ICT task of making a video game task and also the managing and operating
ICT where students are in the position where they are troubleshooting
technology problems. However it is known that students were least
confident performing more advanced ICT tasks such as these activities
(Thomson, 2015). However exposure to higher order tasks which involve
interest through collaboration I believe will make a difference. Lastly ICT’s
that are embedded in all curriculum areas has also impacted my choices
within this task (Newhouse, 2013), providing me with experience through
my teacher and students interactions.
Comic script
Intro
Class rules
Children music lesson must create a beat using a musical instrument of their
choosing,
once completed then they teach someone else and also learn someone
elses beat.
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
They can chose 1 of the 4 structures including sky scraper, house, rocket
ship and water fall.
They will then be able to only use 3 materials in the building process. This
allows for teamwork and collaboration in decision making.
Then begin building, possibly assigning jobs to certain people for increase
productivity
Finally present your piece to the class explaining what the group found easy
and what the group found hard
"Why do you think digital technologies have been put into schools?"
Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-
capabilities/information-and-communication-technology-ict-capability/
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (1st Edition).
Bloomsbury Academic.
Australia. https://growingupinaustralia.gov.au/research-findings/annual-statistical-
report-2017/use-technology-classroom
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
“Which of these models is the most useful for you at your stage in your
teaching career and why? How could you apply it?”
Teaching and Digital Technologies: Big Issues and Critical questions. Melbourne:
Marcovitz, D., & Janiszewski, N. (2015). Technology, models, and 21st-century learning:
How models, standards, and theories make learning powerful. In Society for
http://www.fresnostate.edu/academics/oie/documents/assesments/Blooms
%20Level.pdf
Skiba, D. J. (2013). Bloomʼs Digital Taxonomy and Word Clouds. Nursing Education
Marcovitz, D., & Janiszewski, N. (2015). Technology, models, and 21st-century learning:
How models, standards, and theories make learning powerful. In Society for
Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-
capabilities/information-and-communication-technology-ict-capability/
Blooms Digital Taxonomy is a framework I have largely operated in the
areas of applying and analysing. Through my teaching experiences
technology in the classroom to date in both primary and secondary
sectors these areas have been where my classroom has been mainly
functioning. Due to many first order barriers not being an issue due to
available technology despite being inexperienced many educators can
create learning experiences that apply technology to create material and
analyse their own and peers material (Marcovitz et al., 2015; Phillips,
2015). Within my experiences in high school the PDHPE KLA has allowed
me to teach in the applying and analysing areas. During theory lessons
these two factors are key in interpretating information regarding health.
Integrating technology into lessons regarding the areas of analysing and
applying in Blooms model is applicable for these classes as it involves the
addition of technology without being its integral focus (Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) Capability, 2021b).
During my time in the Primary sector I have been able to apply a more
widespread knowledge and application of technology in the classroom
even operating in the evaluating to creating range across as the different
KLA’s allow for different vast opportunities (Marcovitz & Janiszewski,
2015). In late stages especially technology can be readily used to evaluate
using criteria and create by recognising elements and patterns. Allowing for
the development of independent construction in tasks such as designing a
website in a technology specific class. This area of the curriculum allows for
the learning activities to be technology centred and for the areas of Blooms
digital taxonomy of evaluating and creating to be reached effectively
(Fresno State, 2021).
Teaching and Digital Technologies: Big Issues and Critical questions. Melbourne:
Marcovitz, D., & Janiszewski, N. (2015). Technology, models, and 21st-century learning:
How models, standards, and theories make learning powerful. In Society for
information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1227-
http://www.fresnostate.edu/academics/oie/documents/assesments/Blooms
%20Level.pdf
Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-
capabilities/information-and-communication-technology-ict-capability/
“What do you think will be the greatest difficulty for you when it comes to
integrating digital technologies into your classroom?”
Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-
capabilities/information-and-communication-technology-ict-capability/
Marcovitz, D., & Janiszewski, N. (2015). Technology, models, and 21st-century learning:
How models, standards, and theories make learning powerful. In Society for
Ibieta, A., Hinostroza, J. E., Labbé, C., & Claro, M. (2017). The role of the Internet in teachers’
professional practice: activities and factors associated with teacher use of ICT inside
Great response to the initial question!! I think a way to deal with the
main difficulty you spoke about regarding how to integrate technology
in meaningful ways and not using it as a strictly fun non educational
experience (Eady & Lockyer, 2013). To avoid doing this it could be useful
to cross reference your ICT integrated activity with models and
frameworks such as SAMR and Blooms digital taxonomy. For example
think if your planned activity is “Creating” or if it is “Evaluating”,
checking through the model and taking ideas to modify the activity or
cross check if the activity is valid (Marcovitz & Janiszewski, 2015). In
doing so this would allow you to know if the integration if technology
for the lesson is meaningful as if it fulfils major components of a model
it is likely to be a valid inclusion in the classroom.
Marcovitz, D., & Janiszewski, N. (2015). Technology, models, and 21st-century learning:
How models, standards, and theories make learning powerful. In Society for
Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies.
Australia.
Plague Inc
Age/year level:
The application would be appropriate for the age and year level of the students in
stage 3 only for primary, stage 1 and 2 it would not be suitable for.
The reading level of the text and type of media is also appropriate for stage 3 only,
there is limited text in the app however it has jargon regarding infection and disease
that may be too high level.
Curriculum links:
There are links between the content/functions of the application and the
expectations of the curriculum but only within the KLA of science and only
specifically when the students are learning about disease.
Again, the content and examples relevant to the curriculum is relevant if the lesson
is specifically for disease, this app has no other applicable reason to be used.
Therefore, it will only help teach the curriculum in new or different way for this
content area.
Instructional content:
The information in the app is accurate, complete and current as it mainly is an
interactive app that responds to what you are doing and isn’t text heavy.
There are minimal sources as the disease the student creates is fictional.
The content does not encourage higher-order thinking.
The content has minimal connects with culture, so evidentially it is culturally
appropriate and doesn’t present multiple perspectives.
Assessment:
Assessment tasks are not included, the teacher also may find it difficult to develop
relevant assessment as it already has the main feedback within the app as discussed
previously, also the app doesn’t require higher order thinking and interpretation,
limiting a meaningful assessment task.
Tasks relating to science and disease control may be linked to this tool.
Flexibility:
As the task itself in the app is simple it can be integrated easily to the classroom,
however a device is needed and if there is limited access this may be a difficult
aspect of the app being integrated into activities.
It may be difficult for the tool to be used for multiple curriculum units as stated
before it is predominantly suited to one content area of disease.
Media:
The medium used support or distract from the learning activity depending on the
self-control of the learner, the app requires the disease to be named which the
learner creates themselves. This will either lead to sensible appropriate names or
disrespectful silly names, either supporting or distracting them from the learning
activity.
Usability:
As the tool is an app that students may have used before and that is phone based it
will most likely be easy to use and intuitive.
Technical considerations:
The tool will work consistently if the app is currently up to date
This is also true as there are no special technical requirements for using the tool
However the school may not have complete access to those requirements as there is
a free and a paid version of the app
Support materials:
The tool has multiple forms of help including context-sensitive help,
and tutorials within the app to support the learner
However there are limited teaching support materials or online resources available
to help a teacher as it is mainly embedded within the tool itself
I approached this task with a mindset to use apps and websites that
were applicable to students in high school and specifically for the KLA of
Art. The decision to use these certain tools I chose for my concept map
were divided into four sub sections including “art news, photo apps,
explanation tools and creating”. Upon choosing the apps and websites
for my mind map I considered each one by cross referencing it through
the suggested approach for evaluating digital technologies for the
classroom in the first reading (Eady and Lockyer, 2013). This allowed me
to accurately determine if the app or website was applicable to students
by having connections with curriculum and other components
important to learning. Research has shown that the use of ICT’s can
encourage and develop students’ construction and creation of ideas,
this is crucial in the KLA of art (Ibieta et al,). Integrating technology into
the KLA of art may seem atypical but adds a unique component to the
learning process (Vic government, 2021).
Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies.
Australia.
Ibieta, A., Hinostroza, J. E., Labbé, C., & Claro, M. (2017). The role of the Internet in teachers’
professional practice: activities and factors associated with teacher use of ICT inside
https://victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/static/docs/Arts%20ICT%20v2.pdf
What information do you need to have before you start planning
your lessons?
Where do you think you are situated in the TPACK diagram? Which
areas do you need to building on?
What do you think is the biggest challenge for you when you are
designing an assessment task that uses technology?
Wilson, D., Alaniz, K., & Sikora, J. (2016). Digital Media in Today’s Classrooms: The
Potential for Meaningful Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers.
of-assessment-illustration-of-practice
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2015). Rethinking assessment in a
digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal,
Using the TIP model I have redesigned a lesson below which I used on a
high school practicum for the KLA of PDHPE for year 9. There are
multiple ways of planning a lesson for the integration of technology,
however this model is applicable and easy to follow with its 3 phases (2
I’m focusing on) and steps within, showing a clear scaffold of how to
integrate meaningful components to the lesson. The below lesson plan
regarding shock and bleeds in first aid, this was one of my first lessons
and as research states pre service teachers are often hesitant to use
technology. I re-wrote this lesson that was white board and paper heavy
and transformed it into a technology based lesson taking the TIP
model into account. I showed my changes using the track changes
feature on word and highlighting where I added text so modifications
are visible, also adding the ICT capabilities including Investigating with
ICT, Creating with ICT, Managing and operating ICT.
Changes using the TIP include
Great response as per usual Amy! I agree with the point you made about
technology being a force that plays a dominant role in instructional and
pedagogical practices in classrooms today. Technology is a great tool
and one that can be used effectively or not quite easily. This brings us to
where you have stated your biggest for you is, being able to choose and
effectively apply appropriate, accessible and accurate assessment tools
whilst integrating technology in the classroom. There are many ways in
which you could asses the validity of your starting with components of
ICT assessment strategies within the article rethinking assessment in a
digital age. Such components to consider being applying to the lesson
include: Supporting and enhancing collaboration, Increasing flexibility,
Assessing complex problem-solving skills, Enhancing feedback to
students and many more (Timmis et al., 2015). Additionally as stated
throughout cross referencing the ICT platfrom for intergartion strategy
through the Evaluation strategy in relation to (Eady & Lockyer, 2013, pg
18) would also be an indicator if it is applicable to your objectives and
goals.
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2015). Rethinking assessment in a
digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research
Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies.
Australia.
Formative assessment
The formative assessment within this lesson was edited within last
weeks activity but serves the same principle of this week’s objectives as
I have edited my previous work to create a formative assessment. This
was done by substituting the previous formative assessment strategy of
a class recap through a discussion and possible notes on the white
board to utilising the technology inclusive environment that was
created through booking the laptops to have a peer review through a
google docs form (AITSL, 2021). Although this is sent to the teacher this
task will not be graded as it is peer reviewed and has limitations to its
validity and I have decided to not count it is as summative task (Wilson
et al., 2016). This is also due to the task being within the learning
process of the topic “choking” which they have only started this lesson.
Students will only evaluate what they have observed from their partner
following the questions created in the google doc evaluation sheet
(Appendix 1). This activity is to gauge where the students learning is
currently at upon learning the new topic (Timmis et al., 2015).
Summative assessment
https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/understanding-the-
curriculum/awarding-grades/common-grade-scale
Wilson, D., Alaniz, K., & Sikora, J. (2016). Digital Media in Today’s Classrooms: The
Potential for Meaningful Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers.
AITSL. (2021). Types of assessment. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/types-
of-assessment-illustration-of-practice
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2015). Rethinking assessment in a
digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research
Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
Choose one 'dilemma' from either reading, and briefly explain what you
think needs to be done to address it." There are rarely simple answers to
these types of issues, so there will be some complexity in your answer.
I have chosen to discuss the digital dilemmas of privacy and surveillance
in schools from the reading (Buchanan, R. 2019).
Across Australia schools are changing their views on whether they should
increase their level of surveillance, raising a complicated issue regarding
privacy. Schools are legally within their rights to have surveillance
cameras at school grounds to create a safe environment, aim to
improve school discipline and for the overall benefit for students, staff
and visitors (D’Cruz, 2016). The use of surveillance cameras is a dilemma
in both schools and society as it brings forth the issue of privacy and the
ethics surrounding legislation. However, the morals of the school
putting these devices in place for the better of the students and staff it is
natural for all involved to question such motives as their privacy is at
stake. Therefore there is no simple answer to how to address this issue,
my opinion on the matter is there needs to be honesty and integrity
regarding the implementation of these devices from the institution to
ensure trust from parents, students and staff (Buchanan, R. 2019). Fully
disclosing the motives for the implementation of these devices and the
benefits they can bring is a start to being able to ensure such devices
have a place in schools without backlash.
D’Cruz, C. (2016, May 19). The Use of Closed Circuit Cameras in Schools.
Schoolgovernance. https://www.schoolgovernance.net.au/news/2016/05/19/the-use-
of-closed-circuit-cameras-in-schools
Copyright infringement
Plagiarism
Cyber bullying
Sexting
Verbal and social bullying can happen online which also can potentially have an
enormous audience.
The above mind map I have created outlines the main components of two
digital factors that influence education in laws and ethics. This diagram
presents the important issues regarding both these issues visually on
either side of its corresponding label. I already had a sound understand of
laws in education as I have been exposed to such legislations as a student
and a staff member at various schools. However I have further developed
my knowledge regarding copyright infringement, plagiarism, cyber
bullying and sexting through the set reading and my own research. Ethics
is where possessed minimal prior knowledge previously to this module
(Tafe Nsw, 2010) (Nsw Government, 2021) (Bullying No Way, 2020). Using
the set reading of (Buchanan, R. 2019) I have filled the gaps in the
knowledge in this field, developing my understanding of the potential
harmful effects of apps in the classroom, privacy and surveillance,
boundary dilemmas and students online ethics. Mainly creating this
mind map has reminded me of the many factors that must be taken into
consideration as a teacher, outside of the lesson plan and even outside
of the classroom that can be problematic.
https://huntertafe.libguides.com/digitalcitizenship/law
https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/11-12/hsc/hsc-all-my-own-
work/plagiarism/what-is-plagiarism
bullying/types-of-bullying
'Lesson 7' in the second reading states: "ICT cannot be used all the time, in
all situations." When do you think you should use technology in your own
classroom?
Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-
capabilities/information-and-communication-technology-ict-capability/
Put one lesson plan together (about 1 page only) that shows how you
could use this resource for one of your classes. Include at least one
outcome, and the ICT capabilities as needed.
Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-
capabilities/information-and-communication-technology-ict-capability/
PART C - Assignment Feedback (100 words)
You are to write around 100 words explaining the ways in which you have addressed
the markers feedback from assignment 2 into this assignment. This can be included in the
Word document submitted through EASTs with the other assignment details included as
outlined below, or it can be a part of your eportfolio - as long as we can find it easily. It is
important to provide evidence (such as screen shots) of how you have improved your work.
It's not enough to just say you made changes - give us examples. A table format works well
for this.
2. Critical Evaluation
At the end of week 10, you are to write a brief final critical reflection about your
learning about digital technologies so far (600 words). The writing prompt is:
Your thoughts for this task should be informed by the tasks and readings you have
been doing, and you will need to use referencing for your critical evaluation -
your views and approach will also reflect the reading and thinking you have
done. A critical evaluation is a particular type of writing where you 'critique' the
idea in the topic. This means you need to think about the various perspectives
and positions that the research presents in relation to this topic. Using the
readings is necessary in order to do this properly.