2020 Annual Report On Form 10 K
2020 Annual Report On Form 10 K
Delaware 05-0412693
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number)
Title of each class Trading symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share CFG New York Stock Exchange
Depositary Shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of 6.350%
CFG PrD New York Stock Exchange
Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D
Depositary Shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of 5.000%
CFG PrE New York Stock Exchange
Fixed-Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series E
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☑ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act:
Portions of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.’s proxy statement to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with Citizens
Financial Group, Inc.’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. Such Proxy Statement will be
filed within 120 days of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Table of Contents
Page
Glossary of Acronyms and Terms................................................................................................. 2
Forward-looking Statements....................................................................................................... 5
Part I.
Item 1. Business................................................................................................................ 6
Item 1A. Risk Factors........................................................................................................... 21
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments........................................................................................ 35
Item 2. Properties............................................................................................................. 35
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.................................................................................................... 35
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures............................................................................................. 35
Part II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities.................................................................................................................. 35
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data............................................................................ 37
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations............ 39
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk................................................ 90
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................................................................ 91
Part IV.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules................................................................... 162
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary................................................................................................. 166
Signatures............................................................................................................................. 167
The following is a list of common acronyms and terms we regularly use in our financial reporting:
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements regarding potential future share repurchases and future dividends as
well as the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns on our business, operations,
financial performance and prospects, are forward-looking statements. Also, any statement that does not describe
historical or current facts is a forward-looking statement. These statements often include the words “believes,”
“expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “targets,” “initiatives,” “potentially,”
“probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,”
“should,” “would,” and “could.”
Forward-looking statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of management, and on
information currently available to management. Our statements speak as of the date hereof, and we do not
assume any obligation to update these statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from
those contained in such statements in light of new information or future events. We caution you, therefore,
against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor
guarantees or assurances of future performance. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and
uncertainties or risk factors is complete, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation:
• Negative economic and political conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing
prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other
things, the level of nonperforming assets, charge-offs and provision expense;
• The rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and
economic conditions, and changes in the competitive environment;
• Our ability to implement our business strategy, including the cost savings and efficiency
components, and achieve our financial performance goals;
• The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns and their effects on the economic and business
environments in which we operate;
• Our ability to meet heightened supervisory requirements and expectations;
• Liabilities and business restrictions resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations;
• Our capital and liquidity requirements under regulatory capital standards and our ability to
generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;
• The effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest income, net interest margin and our
mortgage originations, mortgage servicing rights and mortgages held for sale;
• Changes in interest rates and market liquidity, as well as the magnitude of such changes, which
may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect the ability to originate and
distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets;
• The effect of changes in the level of checking or savings account deposits on our funding costs
and net interest margin;
• Financial services reform and other current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could
have a negative effect on our revenue and businesses;
• A failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our
third party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of cyber-attacks; and
• Management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks.
In addition to the above factors, we also caution that the actual amounts and timing of any future
common stock dividends or share repurchases will be subject to various factors, including our capital position,
financial performance, risk-weighted assets, capital impacts of strategic initiatives, market conditions and
regulatory and accounting considerations, as well as any other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant
in making such a determination. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will repurchase shares from or pay
any dividends to holders of our common stock, or as to the amount of any such repurchases or dividends. Further,
statements about the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns on our business, operations,
financial performance and prospects may constitute forward-looking statements and are subject to the risk that
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 5
the actual impacts may differ, possibly materially, from what is reflected in those forward-looking statements
due to factors and future developments that are uncertain, unpredictable and in many cases beyond our control,
including the scope and duration of the pandemic, actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the
pandemic, and the direct and indirect impact of the pandemic on our customers, third parties and us.
More information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described
in the forward-looking statements can be found under Item 1A “Risk Factors”.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. is the 13th largest retail bank holding company in the United States.(1)
Headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island, we offer a broad range of retail and commercial banking products
and services to more than five million individuals, small businesses, middle-market companies, large corporations
and institutions. Our products and services are offered through approximately 1,000 branches in 11 states in the
New England, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions and 130 retail and commercial non-branch offices, though certain
lines of business serve national markets. At December 31, 2020, we had total assets of $183.3 billion, total
deposits of $147.2 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $22.7 billion.
We are a bank holding company incorporated under Delaware state law in 1984 and whose primary
federal regulator is the FRB. CBNA is our banking subsidiary, whose primary federal regulator is the OCC.
Business Segments
We manage our business through two reportable business operating segments: Consumer Banking and
Commercial Banking. For additional information regarding our business segments see the “Business Operating
Segments” section of Item 7 and Note 25 in Item 8. Our activities outside these segments are classified as
“Other” and include treasury activities, wholesale funding activities, securities portfolio, community
development assets, non-core assets, and other unallocated assets, liabilities, capital, revenues, provision for
credit losses and expenses, including income tax expense.
Consumer Banking Segment
Consumer Banking serves retail customers and small businesses with annual revenues of up to $25 million,
with products and services that include deposit products, mortgage and home equity lending, credit cards,
business loans, wealth management and investment services largely across our 11-state traditional banking
footprint. We also offer auto, education and point-of-sale finance loans in addition to select digital deposit
products nationwide.
Consumer Banking operates a multi-channel distribution network with a workforce of approximately
4,800 branch colleagues, approximately 1,000 branches, including 270 in-store locations, and approximately
2,700 ATMs. Our network includes approximately 1,420 specialists covering lending, savings and investment needs
as well as a broad range of small business products and services. We serve customers on a national basis through
telephone service centers as well as through our online and mobile platforms where we offer customers the
convenience of depositing funds, paying bills and transferring money between accounts and from person to
person, as well as a host of other everyday transactions.
We believe our strong retail deposit market share in our core regions, which have relatively diverse
economies and affluent demographics, is a competitive advantage. As of June 30, 2020, we ranked second by
retail deposit market share in the New England region and ranked in the top five in eight of our ten principal
MSAs.(1)
Business Strategy
Our mission is to help our customers, colleagues and communities reach their potential, and our vision is
to become a top-performing bank distinguished by our customer-centric culture, mindset of continuous
improvement, and excellent capabilities. We strive to understand customers and client needs, so we can tailor
advice and solutions to help make them more successful. Our business strategy is designed to maximize the full
potential of our businesses, drive sustainable growth and enhance profitability. Our success rests on our ability to
distinguish ourselves as follows:
Maintain a high-performing, customer-centric organization: We continually strive to enhance our
“customer-first” culture in order to deliver the best possible banking experience. We are taking talent
management to the next level, with a goal of attracting, developing and retaining great people, while ensuring
strong leadership, teamwork, and a sense of empowerment, accountability and urgency.
Develop differentiated value propositions to acquire, deepen, and retain core customer segments: Our
focus is on certain customer segments where we believe we are well positioned to compete. In Consumer
Banking, we focus on serving mass affluent and affluent customers and small businesses. In Commercial Banking,
we focus on serving customers in the middle market, mid-corporate, and select industry verticals. By developing
differentiated and targeted value propositions, we believe we can attract new customers, deepen relationships
with existing customers, and deliver an enhanced customer experience. We are building our fee-based
The coronavirus pandemic and resulting reactions, such as lockdowns, safety protocols, unprecedented
government measures to shore up the economy and drastic changes to daily life have been unique and
remarkable. These stresses have required a new level of resilience and adaptability and Citizens has risen to
meet these challenges so we can do more for our customers, communities, colleagues, and shareholders.
For our customers, we continued to provide support, advice and guidance during a time of tremendous
need. Our Consumer Banking business has provided vital branch services safely and with minimal disruption and
has offered loan forbearance to customers. Beginning in March 2020 and through December 31, 2020, we granted
payment forbearance relief to approximately 159,000 retail customers representing approximately 8% of the
retail loan portfolio. At December 31, 2020, loans remaining in forbearance had decreased to approximately 2.3%
of the retail loan portfolio.
Our Commercial Banking team has worked with clients on loan modifications and securing additional
liquidity, while maintaining top-of-peer satisfaction ratings. Beginning in March 2020 and through December 31,
2020, we granted payment deferrals to approximately 490 commercial clients on loans totaling approximately
$3.2 billion. As of December 31, 2020, this decreased to 19 commercial clients with deferrals on approximately
$290 million of loans.
We also took action to provide relief through the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), delivering
approximately $4.8 billion of loans to small and medium-sized business clients with an average loan size of
approximately $98,000. Approximately 84% of the loans were under $100,000, and 93% of the loans were to
businesses with fewer than 25 employees supporting over 540,000 jobs. As of December 31, 2020, approximately
$565 million of those loans have been forgiven by the SBA. We are building on this success to deliver more relief
For our communities, we are focused on promoting social equity and advancing economic opportunity in
underserved communities. In 2020, we launched a $5 million initiative in support of minority-owned small
business, and followed that up with a $10 million commitment for grants and charitable support for immediate
and longer-term initiatives aimed at supporting minority-owned small businesses, increasing awareness of racial
disparities, and supporting underserved communities through technology, education and digital literacy
initiatives. We also committed to provide more than $500 million in incremental financing and capital for small
businesses, housing, and other development in predominately minority communities. In addition, our colleagues
achieved meaningful volunteer hour contributions supporting community-based organizations in spite of the
current COVID-19 environment.
Our TOP 6 Program is on target despite the pandemic and has been expanded with significant new
efficiency-focused initiatives, such as the digitization of customer interactions and operations, as well as other
initiatives for a post-COVID-19 environment. These digitization efforts include increasing adoption of digital
applications, data analytics, artificial intelligence and machine learning, cloud software, Citizens Access®
enhancements and more remote services that compound and expand the customer experience and position us
well for future top-line growth.
We will continue to serve our stakeholders through this crisis and beyond, backed by our strong financial
position that enables us to deliver in meaningful ways.
Competition
The financial services industry is highly competitive. Our branch footprint is in the New England, Mid-
Atlantic and Midwest regions, though certain lines of business serve national markets. Within these markets we
face competition from community banks, super-regional and national financial institutions, credit unions, savings
and loan associations, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms,
insurance companies, money market funds, hedge funds and private equity firms. Some of our larger competitors
may make available to their customers a broader array of products, pricing and structure alternatives while some
smaller competitors may have more liberal lending policies and processes. Competition among providers of
financial products and services continues to increase, with consumers having the opportunity to select from a
growing variety of traditional and nontraditional alternatives. The ability of non-banking financial institutions,
including FinTech companies, to provide services previously limited to commercial banks has also intensified
competition.
In Consumer Banking, the industry has become increasingly dependent on and oriented toward
technology-driven delivery systems, permitting transactions to be conducted through telephone, online and
mobile channels. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-bank
institutions to attract funds and provide lending and other financial products and services. The emergence of
digital-only banking models has increased and we expect this trend to continue. Given their lower cost structure,
these models are often, on average, able to offer higher rates on deposit products than retail banking institutions
with a traditional branch footprint. The primary factors driving competition for loans and deposits are interest
rates, fees charged, tailored value propositions to different customer segments, customer service levels,
convenience, including branch locations and hours of operation, and the range of products and services offered.
In Commercial Banking, there is intense competition for quality loan originations from traditional banking
institutions, particularly large regional banks, as well as commercial finance companies, leasing companies and
other non-bank lenders, and institutional investors including collateralized loan obligation managers, hedge funds
and private equity firms. Some larger competitors, including certain national banks that compete in our market
area, may offer a broader array of products and due to their asset size, may sometimes be in a position to hold
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 9
more exposure on their own balance sheet. We compete on a number of factors including providing innovative
corporate finance solutions, quality of customer service and execution, range of products offered, price and
reputation.
Colleague wellness has always been central to our consciousness and strategy and it was a priority when
we were designing our Johnston, RI campus, which opened in 2018 and includes onsite fitness and wellness
centers, as well as walking paths and various sports and recreation facilities. Our commitment to colleagues’
wellness, including physical, financial, and mental wellness, has continued to be a central focus during the
COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns. In addition to ensuring that our colleagues had the necessary tools
and resources to continue to serve our customers safely, we shifted approximately 10,000 of our colleagues to a
work from home environment and implemented several programs to support their wellness and their ability to
maintain work-life balance. These programs included additional paid time off to address personal circumstances
and for COVID-19 quarantine and recovery, mental health and parental resources, as well as committing to no
increases in colleagues’ medical premiums for the 2021 year. With regard to financial support, during the onset
of the crisis we provided premium pay and an increased overtime rate for colleagues continuing to serve
customers in the branches and office, and also made changes to our production-based pay plans to take into
consideration decreased production.
We are committed to building deep partnerships among our customers, colleagues, and communities and
fostering a culture where all stakeholders feel respected, valued, and heard, and have a sense of belonging. A
core tenet of our business strategy is growth and innovation and a hallmark of that strategy is to focus on the
diversity of our colleagues, customers, and communities and the inclusivity of our culture. To that end, we have
been on a multi-year journey to enhance awareness and improve capabilities and opportunities within the
organization and in our communities, which has accelerated since we became an independent publicly-traded
company in 2015.
As part of that journey, we have conducted a third-party audit to de-bias our people practices, have put
into place several recruiting and development initiatives, and provide unconscious bias training. We acknowledge
that there is an opportunity to further increase the representation of women and people of color at all levels of
our organization, in particular in senior roles. Information regarding colleague demographics can be found on our
website. To enable further progress, we have implemented partnerships with community organizations to help
identify qualified diverse candidates and have expanded our diverse hire commitment, through which we
interview a slate of at least 50% diverse candidates for senior openings. In addition, our development programs
are designed to build a strong pipeline of diverse emerging talent internally. A key catalyst for change within our
organization is our six business resource groups (“BRGs”), Citizens WIN (Women’s Impact Network), Citizens Elev8
(rising professionals), Prism (multi-cultural), Citizens Pride (LGBTQ), Citizens Veterans and Citizens Awake
(disability awareness), each of which is sponsored by senior leaders. BRG members serve as cultural ambassadors
within the business to help formulate and influence our diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy and to identify
and solve related issues.
We are also committed to ensuring that equal pay is received for equal work throughout our organization
and we engage an independent third-party expert to regularly conduct a pay equity analysis that accounts for
factors that appropriately explain differences in pay such as performance, time in role, and experience.
Additional information about this analysis can be found on our website.
The world in which our business operates is changing rapidly in nearly every dimension, and the skills
required of our colleagues to meet the evolving needs of customers are changing at an accelerated pace. Our
We are in the midst of executing on a large-scale transformation agenda, including a path to end-to-end
digitization and transforming how we work. We are working to ensure that our colleagues are reframing their
mindsets, behaviors, and capabilities for the future. We invest significant resources in colleague development
and offer various programs aimed at equipping colleagues with the skills necessary to not only excel in their
current roles, but to build competencies that will enable them to be highly valuable contributors now and in the
future and ensure they are in step with changes in the market. Our programs build relevant critical skills such as
leadership, agile, digital, innovation, data and analytics, and coaching and advising in order to effectively
strengthen the necessary workforce capabilities for our organization. To enable development of these skills, we
have implemented resources, experiences, and technologies to facilitate quick consumption of new bodies of
knowledge and skills. One example of this is learning academies which are enabled by our new learning
experience platform to offer a collection of specifically curated learning experiences and content for a particular
area of expertise, such as engineering. We have also reframed our performance management process in order to
further enable colleague success with ongoing check-ins and feedback as another step toward colleagues being
able to contribute at their highest potential.
We use McKinsey & Company’s Organizational Health Index (“OHI”) survey to understand colleagues’
viewpoints about the Company on a wide range of factors to inform decisions regarding initiatives that will drive
sustained top-tier performance and growth. In 2020, our OHI overall score reached the top quartile, reflecting a
15-point improvement since 2014. Our success depends on employees understanding how their work contributes
to our overall strategy and we use a variety of platforms and forums to facilitate open and direct communication.
These include communications from our CEO and management team through live stream forums, “Let’s Connect”
sessions hosted by members of the management team, and engagement through our BRGs.
Employees
The table below presents our part-time and full-time equivalent employees by region as of December 31,
2020. None of our employees are parties to a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with
our employees to be good and have not experienced interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements.
Consumer Banking personnel make up a workforce of approximately 4,800 branch colleagues across
approximately 1,000 branches, and include approximately 1,420 specialists covering lending, savings and
investment needs as well as a broad range of small business products and services.
Beginning June 30, 2020, we allowed colleagues to return to our offices in 10 states and portions of three
others. Approximately 6,500 non-branch colleagues are normally assigned to offices in these states, and
approximately 10% of these are considered essential and work consistently in the office. Return to office for our
other colleagues is voluntary at this time.
Regulation and Supervision
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination under federal and state
laws and regulations. These laws and regulations cover all aspects of our business, including lending practices,
deposit insurance, customer privacy and cybersecurity, capital adequacy and planning, liquidity, safety and
soundness, consumer protection and disclosure, permissible activities and investments, and certain transactions
with affiliates. These laws and regulations are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the Deposit
Insurance Fund and the banking system as a whole and not for the protection of shareholders or other investors.
The discussion below outlines the material elements of selected laws and regulations applicable to us and our
subsidiaries. Changes in applicable law or regulation, and in their interpretation and application by regulatory
agencies and other governmental authorities, cannot be predicted, but may have a material effect on our
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 11
business, financial condition or results of operations.
We and our subsidiaries are subject to examinations by federal and state banking regulators, as well as
the SEC, FINRA and various state insurance and securities regulators. In some cases, regulatory agencies may take
supervisory actions that may not be publicly disclosed, and such actions may restrict or limit our activities or
activities of our subsidiaries. As part of our regular examination process, regulators may advise us to operate
under various restrictions as a prudential matter. We have periodically received requests for information from
regulatory authorities at the federal and state level, including from banking, securities and insurance regulators,
state attorneys general, federal agencies or law enforcement authorities, and other regulatory authorities,
concerning our business practices. Such requests are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. For
a further discussion of how regulatory actions may impact our business, see Item 1A “Risk Factors.” For
additional information regarding regulatory matters, see Note 24 in Item 8.
Overview
We are a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act. We have elected to be treated as
a financial holding company under amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act as effected by GLBA. As such,
we are subject to the supervision, examination and reporting requirements of the Bank Holding Company Act and
the regulations of the FRB, including through the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Under the system of
“functional regulation” established under the Bank Holding Company Act, the FRB serves as the primary regulator
of our consolidated organization, and the SEC serves as the primary regulator of our broker-dealer and
investment advisory subsidiaries and directly regulates the activities of those subsidiaries, with the FRB
exercising a supervisory role.
The federal banking regulators have authority to approve or disapprove mergers, acquisitions,
consolidations, the establishment of branches and similar corporate actions. These banking regulators also have
the power to prevent the continuance or development of unsafe or unsound banking practices or other violations
of law. Federal law governs the activities in which CBNA engages, including the investments it makes and the
aggregate amount of available credit that it may grant to one borrower. Various consumer and compliance laws
and regulations also affect its operations. The actions the FRB takes to implement monetary policy also affect
CBNA.
In addition, CBNA is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the CFPB with respect to
consumer protection laws and regulations. The CFPB has broad authority to regulate the offering and provision of
consumer financial products by depository institutions, such as CBNA, with more than $10 billion in total assets.
The CFPB may promulgate rules under a variety of consumer financial protection statutes, including the Truth in
Lending Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.
In October 2019, the FRB and the other federal banking regulators finalized rules that tailor the
application of the enhanced prudential standards to bank holding companies and depository institutions to
implement the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (“EGRRCPA”)
amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act (“Tailoring Rules”). The Tailoring Rules assign each U.S. bank holding
company with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as well as its bank subsidiaries, to one of four
categories based on its size and five other risk-based indicators:
i. cross-jurisdictional activity,
ii. weighted short-term wholesale funding (“wSTWF”),
iii. non-bank assets,
iv. off-balance sheet exposure, and
v. status as a U.S. global systemically important bank.
Under the Tailoring Rules, we are subject to “Category IV standards,” which apply to banking
organizations with at least $100 billion in total consolidated assets that do not meet any of the thresholds
specified for Categories I through III. Accordingly, Category IV firms, such as us,
i. are no longer subject to any LCR requirement (or in certain cases, are subject to reduced
requirements),
Effective October 1, 2020, the FRB finalized our stress capital buffer (“SCB”) of 3.4% which replaced the
capital conservation buffer (“CCB”) of 2.5%. Our SCB of 3.4% is based on the results of the 2020 Dodd-Frank Act
Stress Test (“DFAST”) in connection with the related CCAR and is imposed on top of each of the three minimum
risk-weighted asset ratios listed above. For Category IV firms, like us, the FRB has stated that the SCB will be re-
calibrated with each biennial supervisory stress test and updated annually to reflect our planned common stock
dividends and common share buybacks. Banking institutions that fail to meet the effective minimum ratios with
the SCB taken into account will be subject to constraints on capital distributions, including dividends and share
repurchases, and certain discretionary executive compensation. The severity of the constraints depends on the
amount of the shortfall and the institution’s “eligible retained income”, defined as the greater of four quarter
trailing net income, net of distributions and tax effects not reflected in net income, or the average four quarter
trailing net income. On September 30, 2020, the FRB issued a proposed rule to make conforming changes to its
Capital Plan Rule, stress capital buffer requirements, and capital planning requirements to be consistent with the
Tailoring Rules framework. Under the proposal, Category IV firms, like us, would have the ability to elect to
participate in the supervisory stress test and receive an updated SCB requirement in a year in which they are not
subject to the supervisory stress test. For more details, see “—Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements”
below and the “Capital and Regulatory Matters” section of Item 7.
We are also subject to the FRB's risk-based capital requirements for market risk. See the “Market Risk”
section of Item 7.
Liquidity Requirements
The Federal banking regulators have adopted the Basel III-based U.S. LCR rule, which is a quantitative
liquidity metric designed to ensure that a covered bank or bank holding company maintains an adequate level of
unencumbered high-quality liquid assets to cover expected net cash outflows over a 30-day time horizon under
an acute liquidity stress scenario. As noted above, under the Tailoring Rules, Category IV firms with less than $50
billion in wSTWF, including us, are no longer subject to any LCR requirement.
The Basel III framework also includes a second liquidity standard, the NSFR, which is designed to promote
more medium- and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks over a one-year time horizon. On
October 20, 2020, the federal banking regulators issued a final rule to implement the NSFR for large U.S. banking
organizations. Under the final rule, Category IV firms with less than $50 billion in weighted short-term wholesale
funding, including us, will not be subject to the NSFR requirement.
Finally, per the liquidity rules included in the FRB’s enhanced prudential standards adopted pursuant to
Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act (referred to above under “—Tailoring of Prudential Requirements”), we are
also required to maintain a buffer of highly liquid assets based on projected funding needs for 30 days. Under the
Tailoring Rules, the liquidity buffer requirements continue to apply to Category IV firms, such as us, and remain
subject to liquidity risk management requirements. However, these requirements are now tailored such that we
required to:
i. calculate collateral positions monthly, as opposed to weekly;
In 2016, federal regulators jointly issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on enhanced cyber
risk management standards that are intended to increase the operational resilience of large and interconnected
entities under their supervision. Once established, the enhanced cyber risk management standards would help to
reduce the potential impact of a cyber-attack or other cyber-related failure on the financial system. The advance
notice of proposed rulemaking addresses five categories of cyber standards:
The CRA requires banking regulators to evaluate the Parent Company and CBNA in meeting the credit
needs of our local communities, including providing credit to individuals residing in low- and moderate- income
neighborhoods. The CRA requires each appropriate federal bank regulatory agency, in connection with its
examination of a depository institution, to assess such institution’s record in assessing and meeting the credit
needs of the community served by that institution and assign ratings. The regulatory agency’s evaluation of the
institution’s record and ratings are made public. These CRA performance evaluations are also considered by
regulatory agencies in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and applications to open a branch or facility, and, in the
case of a bank holding company that has elected financial holding company status, a CRA rating of at least
“satisfactory” is required to commence certain new financial activities or to acquire a company engaged in such
activities. CBNA received a rating of “outstanding” in our most recent CRA evaluation.
On May 20, 2020, the OCC announced its final rule designed to strengthen and modernize its regulations
under the CRA, which followed a December 2019 joint notice of proposed rulemaking with the FDIC. The final
rule significantly revamps for national banks, like CBNA, how the OCC defines what qualifies for CRA credit,
where such activity must be conducted to receive credit, how CRA performance is measured, and how CRA
performance is documented and reported. The final rule was effective October 1, 2020, with a compliance date
of January 1, 2023. On November 24, 2020, the OCC issued a proposed rule which included its approach to
determine and assess significant declines in CRA evaluation measure benchmarks, retail lending distribution test
thresholds, and community development minimums under the general performance standards set forth in the May
2020 final rule. We will continue to evaluate the impact of any changes to the regulations implementing the CRA.
Compensation
Our compensation practices are subject to oversight by the FRB and the OCC. The federal banking
regulators have issued guidance designed to ensure that incentive compensation arrangements at banking
organizations take into account risk and are consistent with safe and sound practices. The guidance sets forth the
following three key principles with respect to incentive compensation arrangements:
i. the arrangements should provide employees with incentives that appropriately balance risk and financial
results in a manner that does not encourage employees to expose their organizations to imprudent risk;
ii. the arrangements should be compatible with effective controls and risk management; and
The guidance provides that supervisory findings with respect to incentive compensation will be
incorporated, as appropriate, into the organization’s supervisory ratings.
The U.S. financial regulators, including the FRB, the OCC and the SEC, jointly proposed regulations in
2011 and again in 2016 to implement the incentive compensation requirements of Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank
Act. These regulations have not been finalized.
Anti-Money Laundering
The USA PATRIOT Act, enacted in 2001 and renewed in 2006, substantially broadened the scope of U.S.
anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence
obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United
States. Institutions must maintain anti-money laundering programs that include established internal policies,
procedures and controls; a designated compliance officer; an ongoing employee training program; and testing of
the program by an independent audit function. We are prohibited from entering into specified financial
transactions and account relationships and must meet enhanced standards for due diligence in dealings with
The USA PATRIOT Act also provides for the facilitation of information sharing among governmental
entities and financial institutions for the purpose of combating terrorism and money laundering. The statute also
creates enhanced information collection tools and enforcement mechanics for the U.S. government,
including requiring standards for verifying customer identification at account opening, promulgating rules to
promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties
that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering, requiring reports by non-financial trades and businesses
filed with the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) for transactions exceeding $10,000
and mandating the filing of suspicious activities reports if a bank believes a customer may be violating U.S. laws
and regulations. The statute also requires enhanced due diligence requirements for financial institutions that
administer, maintain or manage private bank accounts or correspondent accounts for non-U.S. persons. Bank
regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations and are required to consider
compliance in connection with the regulatory review of applications.
FinCEN drafts regulations implementing the USA PATRIOT Act and other anti-money laundering and Bank
Secrecy Act legislation. FinCEN has adopted rules that require financial institutions to obtain beneficial
ownership information with respect to legal entities with which such institutions conduct business, subject to
certain exclusions and exemptions. Bank regulators are focusing their examinations on anti-money laundering
compliance, and we continue to monitor and augment, where necessary, our anti-money laundering compliance
programs.
Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation
The U.S. has imposed economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries,
nationals and others. These are typically known as the “OFAC” rules based on their administration by the U.S.
Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control. The OFAC-administered sanctions targeting countries take
many different forms. Generally, they contain one or more of the following elements:
i. restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country, including prohibitions against direct or
indirect imports from and exports to a sanctioned country and prohibitions on U.S. persons engaging in
financial transactions relating to, making investments in, or providing investment-related advice or
assistance to, a sanctioned country; and
ii. a blocking of assets in which the government or specially designated nationals of the sanctioned country
have an interest, by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including property in
the possession or control of U.S. persons). Blocked assets (e.g., property and bank deposits) cannot be
paid out, withdrawn, set off or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC.
OFAC publishes, and routinely updates, lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring
or engaging in terrorist acts, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. We are
responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of and transactions with, such targets and countries,
prohibiting unlicensed trade and financial transactions with them and reporting blocked transactions after their
occurrence. If we find a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, we must
freeze such account, file a suspicious activity report and notify the appropriate authorities. Failure to comply
with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences.
Regulation of Broker-Dealers
Our subsidiary CCMI is a registered broker-dealer with the SEC and subject to regulation and examination
by the SEC as well as FINRA and other self-regulatory organizations. These regulations cover a broad range of
issues, including capital requirements; sales and trading practices; use of client funds and securities; the conduct
of directors, officers and employees; record-keeping and recording; supervisory procedures to prevent improper
trading on material non-public information; qualification and licensing of sales personnel; and limitations on the
extension of credit in securities transactions. In addition to federal registration, state securities commissions
require the registration of certain broker-dealers.
We are subject to a number of risks potentially impacting our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. As we are a financial services organization, certain elements of risk are inherent in
our transactions and operations and are present in the business decisions we make. We, therefore, encounter risk
as part of the normal course of our business and we design risk management processes to help manage these
risks. Our success is dependent on our ability to identify, understand and manage the risks presented by our
business activities so that we can appropriately balance revenue generation and profitability. These risks include,
but are not limited to, credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, model risk, technology, regulatory
and legal risk and strategic and reputational risk. We discuss our principal risk management processes and, in
appropriate places, related historical performance in the “Risk Governance” section in Item 7.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors that may affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations. Other factors that could affect our business, financial condition and results of
operation are discussed in the “Forward-Looking Statements” section above. However, there may be additional
risks that are not presently material or known, and factors besides those discussed below, or in this or other
reports that we file or furnish with the SEC, that could also adversely affect us.
The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns have adversely affected us, and may continue to
adversely affect, and created, and may exacerbate or create new, significant risks and uncertainties for
our business, and the ultimate impact of the pandemic on us will depend on future developments, which
are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns have negatively affected the global and U.S.
economies, increased unemployment levels, disrupted supply chains and businesses in many industries, lowered
equity market valuations, decreased liquidity in fixed income markets, and created significant volatility and
disruption in financial markets. This has resulted, and could continue to result, in higher and more volatile
provisions for credit losses, and is also expected to result in increased charge-offs, particularly as more
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 21
customers experience credit deterioration and as customers need to draw on their committed credit lines to help
finance their businesses and activities. The pandemic’s negative economic impact and its effect on customer
needs and behaviors could adversely affect our liquidity and also continue to adversely affect our capital profile.
Moreover, governmental actions in response to the pandemic are meaningfully influencing the interest-rate
environment, which has, and is likely to continue to, reduce our net interest margin. The pandemic may also
have adverse effects on our noninterest income. The effects of the pandemic have resulted, and may continue to
result, in lower service charges and fees and card fees, and has also caused, and may continue to cause,
volatility in other noninterest income, in particular capital markets fees and foreign exchange and interest rate
products revenue.
In addition, our reliance on work-from-home capabilities and the potential inability to maintain critical
staff in our operational facilities present risks associated with our local infrastructure, restrictive stay-at-home
orders across jurisdictions, illness, quarantines and the sustainability of a work-from-home environment, as well
as heightened cybersecurity, information security and operational risks. Many of our service providers have been,
and may further be, affected by similar factors that increase their risk of business disruptions or that may
otherwise affect their ability to perform under the terms of any agreements with us or provide essential services.
Any disruption to our ability to deliver financial products or services to, or interact with, our clients and
customers could result in losses or increased operational costs, regulatory fines, penalties or other sanctions, or
harm to our reputation. We also face an increased risk of litigation and governmental and regulatory scrutiny as a
result of the effects of the pandemic on market and economic conditions and the actions of governmental
authorities in response to those conditions.
The federal banking regulators have issued interagency guidance to clarify supervisory expectations
regarding loan modifications due to COVID-19-related non-payment and the regulatory capital transition for the
current expected credit loss accounting standard. Further, the Federal Reserve has implemented a broad array of
actions to limit the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns on the economy and
U.S. businesses. In addition, the U.S. Congress has passed a number of economic stimulus packages, including the
$2 trillion CARES Act, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. In response to the
pandemic, we have (i) assisted our retail and small business customers through loan forbearances and
modifications, (ii) extended loans under the PPP, and (iii) committed funding for community support with a
particular emphasis on small businesses and non-profit partners. These government programs are complex and
our participation may lead to governmental and regulatory scrutiny, negative publicity and damage to our
reputation.
In April 2020, we announced that we would temporarily suspend our stock repurchase program through
December 31, 2020 to support the efforts of the Federal Reserve and other banks to moderate the impact of the
pandemic by making additional capital and liquidity available to our customers, including corporates, small
businesses and individuals. Further, the Federal Reserve took actions to preserve capital at banks by imposing
certain limitations on firms that participate in CCAR for the third and fourth quarters of 2020, including
mandatory suspension of share repurchases, and limiting common stock dividends to existing rates and the
average quarterly net income for the prior four quarters. In December 2020, the Federal Reserve modified its
limitations on capital distributions for the first quarter of 2021 such that firms that participate in CCAR, like us,
may resume share repurchases provided that the aggregate of share repurchases and common stock dividends for
the first quarter of 2021 do not exceed average quarterly net income for the trailing four quarters. The Federal
Reserve can extend or modify its current capital distribution limitations in future quarters. The pandemic may
cause us to limit future capital distributions.
The extent to which the pandemic and associated lockdowns adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations, as well as our liquidity and regulatory capital ratios, will depend on future
developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the
pandemic, the widespread availability, use and effectiveness of vaccines, the effectiveness of our work-from-
home arrangements and staffing levels in operational facilities, actions taken by governmental authorities and
other third parties in response to the pandemic and associated lockdowns and the direct and indirect impact of
the pandemic and associated lockdowns on us, our clients and customers, our service providers and other market
participants. As the pandemic and associated lockdowns adversely affect us, it may also have the effect of
heightening many of the other risks described herein.
Our business strategy is designed to maximize the full potential of our business and drive sustainable
growth and enhanced profitability, and our success rests on our ability to maintain a high-performing, customer-
centric organization; develop differentiated value propositions to acquire, deepen, and retain core customer
segments; build excellent capabilities designed to help us stand out from our competitors; operate with financial
discipline and a mindset of continuous improvement to self-fund investments; prudently grow and optimize our
balance sheet; modernize our technology and operational models to improve delivery, organizational agility and
speed to market; and embed risk management within our culture and our operations. Our future success and the
value of our stock will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively implement our business strategy. There are
risks and uncertainties, many of which are not within our control, associated with each element of our strategy.
If we are not able to successfully execute our business strategy, we may never achieve our financial performance
goals and any shortfall may be material. See the “Business Strategy” section in Item 1 for further information.
Supervisory requirements and expectations on us as a financial holding company and a bank
holding company and any regulator-imposed limits on our activities could adversely affect our ability to
implement our strategic plan, expand our business, continue to improve our financial performance and
make capital distributions to our stockholders.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the federal banking
agencies (the FRB, the OCC and the FDIC), as well as the CFPB. As part of the supervisory and examination
process, if we are unsuccessful in meeting the supervisory requirements and expectations that apply to us,
regulatory agencies may from time to time take supervisory actions against us that may not be publicly disclosed.
Such actions may include restrictions on our activities or the activities of our subsidiaries, informal (nonpublic) or
formal (public) supervisory actions or public enforcement actions, including the payment of civil money
penalties, which could increase our costs and limit our ability to implement our strategic plans and expand our
business, and as a result could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. See the “Regulation and Supervision” section in Item 1 for further information.
Net interest income historically has been, and we anticipate that it will remain, a significant component
of our total revenue. This is due to the fact that a high percentage of our assets and liabilities have been and will
likely continue to be in the form of interest-bearing or interest-related instruments. Changes in interest rates can
have a material effect on many areas of our business, including net interest income, deposit costs, loan volume
and delinquency, and the value of our mortgage servicing rights. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many
factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental
and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Federal Open Market Committee. Changes in monetary policy,
including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and
the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect our ability to
originate loans and obtain deposits and the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities. If the interest rates
on our interest-bearing liabilities increase at a faster pace than the interest rates on our interest earning assets,
our net interest income may decline and, with it, a decline in our earnings may occur. Our net interest income
and our earnings would be similarly affected if the interest rates on our interest earning assets declined at a
faster pace than the interest rates on our interest-bearing liabilities.
We cannot control or predict with certainty changes in interest rates. Global, national, regional and local
economic conditions, competitive pressures and the policies of regulatory authorities, including monetary
policies of the FRB, affect interest income and interest expense. Although we have policies and procedures
designed to manage the risks associated with changes in market interest rates, as further discussed under the
“Risk Governance” section in Item 7, changes in interest rates still may have an adverse effect on our
profitability.
If our ongoing assumptions regarding borrower or depositor behavior or overall economic conditions are
significantly different than we anticipate, then our risk mitigation may be insufficient to protect against interest
rate risk and our net income would be adversely affected.
Many of our lending products, securities, derivatives, and other financial transactions utilize a benchmark
rate, such as LIBOR, to determine the applicable interest rate or payment amount. In 2017, the Chief Executive
of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced that the FCA intends to stop persuading or compelling
banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. Since then, the financial industry has been working
towards the transition away from LIBOR to alternative reference rates. On November 30, 2020, the ICE
Benchmark Administration (“IBA”), the authorized administrator of LIBOR regulated by the U.K. FCA, announced
a proposal that, if adopted, would result in the cessation of one-week and two-month U.S. dollar LIBOR as
previously anticipated at the end of 2021, while extending the publication of the other tenors of U.S. dollar
LIBOR until June 30, 2023. While this proposal has received support from both U.K. and U.S. regulators, the U.S.
regulators are encouraging banks to stop entering into new U.S. dollar LIBOR contracts as soon as practicable and
not later than December 31, 2021. The combination of the IBA proposal and the U.S. official sector guidance
would continue to facilitate the transition away from LIBOR for new originations by the end of 2021 while
enabling more legacy contracts to mature before the final LIBOR cessation date of June 30, 2023.
The discontinuation of a benchmark rate, changes in a benchmark rate, or changes in market perceptions
of the acceptability of a benchmark rate, including LIBOR, could, among other things, adversely affect the value
of and return on certain of our financial instruments or products, result in changes to our risk exposures, or
require renegotiation of previous transactions. In addition, any such discontinuation or changes, whether actual
or anticipated, could result in market volatility, adverse tax or accounting effects, increased compliance, legal
and operational costs, and risks associated with customer disclosures and contract negotiations. The transition to
using a new rate could also expose us to risks associated with disputes with customers and other market
participants in connection with interpreting and implementing LIBOR fallback provisions.
In 2018, we formed a LIBOR Transition Program designed to guide the organization through the planned
discontinuation of LIBOR. Various regulators, industry bodies and other market participants in the U.S. and other
countries are engaged in initiatives to develop, introduce and encourage the use of alternative rates to replace
certain benchmarks. Despite progress made to date by regulators and industry participants, such as us, to
prepare for the anticipated discontinuation of LIBOR, significant uncertainties still remain. Such uncertainties
relate to, for example, whether replacement benchmark rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR for
different types of transactions and financial instruments, how the terms of any transaction or financial
instrument may be adjusted to account for differences between LIBOR and any alternative rate selected, how
any replacement would be implemented across the industry, and the effect any changes in industry views or
movement to alternative benchmarks would have on the markets for LIBOR-linked financial instruments.
We could fail to attract, retain or motivate highly skilled and qualified personnel, including our
senior management, other key employees or members of our Board, which could impair our ability to
successfully execute our strategic plan and otherwise adversely affect our business.
A cornerstone of our strategic plan involves the hiring of highly skilled and qualified personnel.
Accordingly, our ability to implement our strategic plan and our future success depends on our ability to attract,
retain and motivate highly skilled and qualified personnel, including our senior management and other key
employees and directors. The marketplace for skilled personnel is becoming more competitive, which means the
cost of hiring, incentivizing and retaining skilled personnel may continue to increase. The failure to attract or
retain, including as a result of an untimely death or illness of key personnel, or replace a sufficient number of
appropriately skilled and key personnel could place us at a significant competitive disadvantage and prevent us
from successfully implementing our strategy, which could impair our ability to implement our strategic plan
successfully, achieve our performance targets and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Limitations on the manner in which regulated financial institutions, such as us, can compensate their
officers and employees, including those contained in pending rule proposals implementing requirements of
Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act, may make it more difficult for such institutions to compete for talent with
financial institutions and other companies not subject to these or similar limitations. If we are unable to compete
effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected, perhaps
materially.
Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our obligations, including funding commitments,
as they come due. This risk is inherent in our operations and can be heightened by a number of factors, including
an over-reliance on a particular source of funding (including, for example, secured FHLB advances), changes in
credit ratings or market-wide phenomena such as market dislocation and major disasters. Like many banking
groups, our reliance on customer deposits to meet a considerable portion of our funding has grown over recent
years, and we continue to seek to increase the proportion of our funding represented by customer deposits.
However, these deposits are subject to fluctuation due to certain factors outside our control, such as increasing
competitive pressures for retail or corporate customer deposits, changes in interest rates and returns on other
investment classes, or a loss of confidence by customers in us or in the banking sector generally which could
result in a significant outflow of deposits within a short period of time. To the extent there is heightened
competition among U.S. banks for retail customer deposits, this competition may increase the cost of procuring
new deposits and/or retaining existing deposits, and otherwise negatively affect our ability to grow our deposit
base. An inability to grow, or any material decrease in, our deposits could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to satisfy our liquidity needs.
Maintaining a diverse and appropriate funding strategy for our assets consistent with our wider strategic
risk appetite and plan remains challenging, and any tightening of credit markets could have a material adverse
impact on us. In particular, there is a risk that corporate and financial institution counterparties may seek to
reduce their credit exposures to banks and other financial institutions (for example, reductions in unsecured
deposits supplied by these counterparties), which may cause funding from these sources to no longer be
available. Under these circumstances, we may need to seek funds from alternative sources, potentially at higher
costs than has previously been the case, or may be required to consider disposals of other assets not previously
identified for disposal, in order to reduce our funding commitments.
A reduction in our credit ratings, which are based on a number of factors, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Credit ratings affect the cost and other terms upon which we are able to obtain funding. Rating agencies
regularly evaluate us, and their ratings are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength. Other
factors considered by rating agencies include conditions affecting the financial services industry generally. Any
downgrade in our ratings would likely increase our borrowing costs, could limit our access to capital markets, and
otherwise adversely affect our business. For example, a ratings downgrade could adversely affect our ability to
sell or market certain of our securities, including long-term debt, engage in certain longer-term derivatives
transactions and retain our customers, particularly corporate customers who may require a minimum rating
threshold in order to place funds with us. In addition, under the terms of certain of our derivatives contracts, we
may be required to maintain a minimum credit rating or have to post additional collateral or terminate such
contracts. Any of these results of a rating downgrade could increase our cost of funding, reduce our liquidity and
have adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our financial performance may be adversely affected by deterioration in borrower credit quality,
particularly in the New England, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions, where our operations are concentrated.
We have exposure to many different industries and risks arising from actual or perceived changes in
credit quality and uncertainty over the recoverability of amounts due from borrowers is inherent in our
businesses. Our exposure may be exacerbated by the geographic concentration of our operations, which are
predominately located in the New England, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions. The credit quality of our borrowers
may deteriorate for a number of reasons that are outside our control, including as a result of prevailing economic
and market conditions and asset valuation. The trends and risks affecting borrower credit quality, particularly in
the New England, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions, have caused, and in the future may cause, us to experience
impairment charges, increased repurchase demands, higher costs, additional write-downs and losses and an
inability to engage in routine funding transactions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
One of the main types of risks inherent in our business is credit risk. An important feature of our credit
risk management system is to employ an internal credit risk control system through which we identify, measure,
monitor and mitigate existing and emerging credit risk of our customers. As this process involves detailed
analyses of the customer or credit risk, taking into account both quantitative and qualitative factors, it is subject
to human error. In exercising their judgment, our employees may not always be able to assign an accurate credit
rating to a customer or credit risk, which may result in our exposure to higher credit risks than indicated by our
risk rating system.
In addition, we have undertaken certain actions to enhance our credit policies and guidelines to address
potential risks associated with particular industries or types of customers, as discussed in more detail under the
“Risk Governance” and “Market Risk” sections in Item 7. However, we may not be able to effectively implement
these initiatives, or consistently follow and refine our credit risk management system. If any of the foregoing
were to occur, it may result in an increase in the level of nonperforming loans and a higher risk exposure for us,
which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards could materially affect how we
report our financial results and condition.
From time to time, the FASB and SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards that
govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be operationally complex to implement
and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. For
example, in June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on
Financial Instruments (“CECL”), that substantially changed the accounting for credit losses on loans and other
financial assets held by banks, financial institutions and other organizations. Upon adoption of CECL on January
1, 2020, we recognize credit losses on these assets equal to management’s estimate of credit losses over the full
remaining expected life. We consider all relevant information when estimating expected credit losses, including
details about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. As evidenced in the first
half of 2020 due to the impact of COVID-19, the standard introduces heightened volatility in provision for credit
losses, given uncertainty in the accuracy of macroeconomic forecasts over longer time horizons, variances in the
rate and composition of loan growth, and changes in overall loan portfolio size and mix. As a result, it is possible
that our ongoing reported earnings and lending activity could be negatively impacted. For more information
regarding CECL, see Note 1 in Item 8.
Our financial and accounting estimates and risk management framework rely on analytical
forecasting and models.
The processes we use to estimate our inherent loan losses and to measure the fair value of financial
instruments, as well as the processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market
measures on our financial condition and results of operations, depends upon the use of analytical and forecasting
models. Some of our tools and metrics for managing risk are based upon our use of observed historical market
behavior. We rely on quantitative models to measure risks and to estimate certain financial values. Models may
be used in such processes as determining the pricing of various products, grading loans and extending credit,
measuring interest rate and other market risks, predicting losses, assessing capital adequacy and calculating
regulatory capital levels, as well as estimating the value of financial instruments and balance sheet items. Poorly
designed or implemented models present the risk that our business decisions based on information incorporating
such models will be adversely affected due to the inadequacy of that information. Moreover, our models may fail
to predict future risk exposures if the information used in the model is incorrect, obsolete or not sufficiently
comparable to actual events as they occur. We seek to incorporate appropriate historical data in our models, but
the range of market values and behaviors reflected in any period of historical data is not at all times predictive
of future developments in any particular period and the period of data we incorporate into our models may turn
out to be inappropriate for the future period being modeled. In such case, our ability to manage risk would be
limited and our risk exposure and losses could be significantly greater than our models indicated. In addition, if
existing or potential customers believe our risk management is inadequate, they could take their business
elsewhere. This could harm our reputation as well as our revenues and profits. Finally, information we provide to
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 26
our regulators based on poorly designed or implemented models could also be inaccurate or misleading. Some of
the decisions that our regulators make, including those related to capital distributions to our stockholders, could
be adversely affected due to their perception that the quality of the models used to generate the relevant
information is insufficient.
The preparation of our financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from
actual results. Particularly, various factors may cause our Allowance for Credit Losses to increase.
The preparation of audited Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. Our most critical accounting
estimate is the ACL. The ACL is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense and
represents our estimate of expected credit losses within the existing loan and lease portfolio and unfunded
lending commitments. The level of the ACL is based on periodic evaluation of the loan and lease portfolios and
unfunded lending commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable considering a number of relevant
underlying factors, including key assumptions and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative information.
The determination of the appropriate level of the ACL inherently involves a degree of subjectivity and
requires that we make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo
material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, the stagnation of certain economic
indicators that we are more susceptible to, such as unemployment and real estate values, new information
regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside our
control, may require an increase in the ACL. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our ACL
and may require an increase in the ACL or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments that
can differ from those of our own management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the ACL—that
is, if the ACL is inadequate—we will need to recognize additional provision for credit losses. Should such
additional provision expense become necessary, it would result in a decrease in net income and capital and may
have a material adverse effect on us. For more information regarding our use of estimates in preparation of
financial statements, see Note 1 in Item 8 and the “Critical Accounting Estimates” section in Item 7.
Our operations depend on our ability to process a very large number of transactions efficiently and
accurately while complying with applicable laws and regulations. Operational risk and losses can result from
internal and external fraud; improper conduct or errors by employees or third parties; failure to document
transactions properly or to obtain proper authorization; failure to comply with applicable regulatory
requirements and conduct of business rules; equipment failures, including those caused by natural disasters or by
electrical, telecommunications or other essential utility outages; business continuity and data security system
failures, including those caused by computer viruses, cyber-attacks against us or our vendors, or unforeseen
problems encountered while implementing major new computer systems or upgrades to existing systems; or the
inadequacy or failure of systems and controls, including those of our suppliers or counterparties. Although we
have implemented risk controls and loss mitigation actions, and substantial resources are devoted to developing
efficient procedures, identifying and rectifying weaknesses in existing procedures and training staff, it is not
possible to be certain that such actions have been or will be effective in controlling each of the operational risks
faced by us. Any weakness in these systems or controls, or any breaches or alleged breaches of such laws or
regulations, could result in increased regulatory supervision, enforcement actions and other disciplinary action,
and have an adverse impact on our business, applicable authorizations and licenses, reputation and results of
operations.
The financial services industry, including the banking sector, is undergoing rapid technological
change as a result of changes in customer behavior, competition and changes in the legal and regulatory
framework, and we may not be able to compete effectively as a result of these changes.
The financial services industry, including the banking sector, is continually undergoing rapid
technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition,
new, unexpected technological changes could have a disruptive effect on the way banks offer products and
services. We believe our success depends, to a great extent, on our ability to address customer needs by using
technology to offer products and services that provide convenience to customers and to create additional
efficiencies in our operations. However, we may not be able to, among other things, keep up with the rapid pace
of technological changes, effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in
marketing these products and services to our customers. As a result, our ability to compete effectively to attract
In addition, changes in the legal and regulatory framework under which we operate require us to update
our information systems to ensure compliance. Our need to review and evaluate the impact of ongoing rule
proposals, final rules and implementation guidance from regulators further complicates the development and
implementation of new information systems for our business. Also, recent regulatory guidance has focused on the
need for financial institutions to perform increased due diligence and ongoing monitoring of third-party vendor
relationships, thus increasing the scope of management involvement and decreasing the efficiency otherwise
resulting from our relationships with third-party technology providers. Given the significant number of ongoing
regulatory reform initiatives, it is possible that we incur higher than expected information technology costs in
order to comply with current and impending regulations. See “—Supervisory requirements and expectations on us
as a financial holding company and a bank holding company and any regulator-imposed limits on our activities
could adversely affect our ability to implement our strategic plan, expand our business, continue to improve our
financial performance and make capital distributions to our stockholders.”
We are subject to a variety of cybersecurity risks that, if realized, could adversely affect how we
conduct our business.
Information security risks for large financial institutions such as us have increased significantly in recent
years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, such as Internet and mobile banking to conduct
financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists,
nation-states, activists and other external parties. Third parties with whom we or our customers do business also
present operational and information security risks to us, including security breaches or failures of their own
systems. The possibility of employee error, failure to follow security procedures, or malfeasance also presents
these risks, particularly given the recent trend towards remote work arrangements. Our operations rely on the
secure processing, transmission and storage of confidential information in our computer systems and networks. In
addition, to access our products and services, our customers may use personal computers, smartphones, tablets,
and other mobile devices that are beyond our control environment. Although we believe that we have
appropriate information security procedures and controls, our technologies, systems, networks and our
customers’ devices may be the target of cyber-attacks or information security breaches that could result in the
unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, theft, sale or loss or destruction of the confidential, and/or
proprietary information of CFG, our customers, our vendors, our counterparties, or our employees. We are under
continuous threat of loss or network degradation due to cyber-attacks, such as computer viruses, malicious or
destructive code, phishing attacks, ransomware, and Distributed Denial of Service (“DDoS”) attacks. This is
especially true as we continue to expand customer capabilities to utilize the Internet and other remote channels
to transact business. Two of the most significant cyber-attack risks that we face are e-fraud and loss of sensitive
customer data. Loss from e-fraud occurs when cybercriminals extract funds directly from customers’ or our
accounts using fraudulent schemes that may include Internet-based funds transfers. We have been subject to a
number of e-fraud incidents historically. We have also been subject to attempts to steal sensitive customer data,
such as account numbers and social security numbers, through unauthorized access to our computer systems
including computer hacking. Such attacks are less frequent but could present significant reputational, legal and
regulatory costs to us if successful. We have implemented certain technology protections such as Customer
Profiling and Set-Up Authentication to be in compliance with the FFIEC Authentication in Internet Banking
Environment (“AIBE”) guidelines.
As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to
continue to modify or enhance our layers of defense or to investigate and remediate any information security
vulnerabilities. System enhancements and updates may also create risks associated with implementing new
systems and integrating them with existing ones. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of information
technology systems, the process of enhancing our layers of defense can itself create a risk of systems disruptions
and security issues. In addition, addressing certain information security vulnerabilities, such as hardware-based
vulnerabilities, may affect the performance of our information technology systems. The ability of our hardware
and software providers to deliver patches and updates to mitigate vulnerabilities in a timely manner can
introduce additional risks, particularly when a vulnerability is being actively exploited by threat actors. Cyber-
attacks against the patches themselves have also proven to be a significant risk that companies will have to
address going forward.
The techniques used by cyber criminals change frequently, may not be recognized until launched and can
be initiated from a variety of sources, including terrorist organizations and hostile foreign governments. These
actors may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers or other users of our systems to disclose
sensitive information in order to gain access to data or our systems. In the event that a cyber-attack is
successful, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected. For a discussion
of the guidance that federal banking regulators have released regarding cybersecurity and cyber risk
management standards, see the “Regulation and Supervision” section of Item 1.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure,
interruption or breach in security of these systems, including due to hacking or other similar attempts to breach
information technology security protocols, could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship
management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. Although we have established policies and
procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the possible failure, interruption or security breach of our
information systems, there can be no assurance that these policies and procedures will be successful and that
any such failure, interruption or security breach will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately
addressed. The occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems could
require us to devote substantial resources (including management time and attention) to recovery and response
efforts, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny,
or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability. Although we maintain insurance coverage for
information security events, we may incur losses as a result of such events that are not insured against or not
fully covered by our insurance.
We rely on third parties for the performance of a significant portion of our information technology.
We rely on third parties for the performance of a significant portion of our information technology
functions and the provision of information technology and business process services. For example, (i) unaffiliated
third parties operate data communications networks on which certain components and services relating to our
online banking system rely, (ii) third parties host or maintain many of our applications, including our Commercial
Loan System, which is hosted and maintained by Automated Financial Systems, Inc., and our Mobile Digital
Banking Application, which is hosted and maintained by Amazon Web Services, Inc., (iii) Fidelity National
Information Services, Inc. maintains our core deposits system, (iv) Infosys Limited provides us with a wide range
of information technology support services, including service desk, end user, servicer, and private cloud support,
and (v) IBM Corporation provides us with mainframe support services. The success of our business depends in part
on the continuing ability of these (and other) third parties to perform these functions and services in a timely
and satisfactory manner, which performance could be disrupted or otherwise adversely affected due to failures
or other information security events originating at the third parties or at the third parties’ suppliers or vendors
(so-called “fourth party risk”). We may not be able to effectively monitor or mitigate fourth-party risk, in
particular as it relates to the use of common suppliers or vendors by the third parties that perform functions and
services for us. If we experience a disruption in the provision of any functions or services performed by third
parties, we may have difficulty in finding alternate providers on terms favorable to us and in reasonable time
frames. If these services are not performed in a satisfactory manner, we would not be able to serve our
customers well. In either situation, our business could incur significant costs and be adversely affected.
We are exposed to reputational risk and the risk of damage to our brands and the brands of our
affiliates.
Our success and results depend, in part, on our reputation and the strength of our brands. We are
vulnerable to adverse market perception as we operate in an industry where integrity, customer trust and
confidence are paramount. We are exposed to the risk that litigation, employee misconduct, operational failures,
the outcome of regulatory or other investigations or actions, press speculation and negative publicity, among
other factors, could damage our brands or reputation. Our brands and reputation could also be harmed if we sell
We may be adversely affected by unpredictable catastrophic events or terrorist attacks and our
business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from serious disaster.
The occurrence of catastrophic events such as hurricanes, tropical storms, tornadoes and other large-
scale catastrophes and terrorist attacks could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations if a catastrophe rendered both our production data center in Rhode Island and our recovery data
center in North Carolina unusable. Although we enhanced our disaster recovery capabilities in 2016 through the
completion of the new, out-of-region backup data center in North Carolina, there can be no assurance that our
current disaster recovery plans and capabilities will adequately protect us from serious disaster.
Any deterioration in national economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is affected by national economic conditions, as well as perceptions of those conditions and
future economic prospects. Changes in such economic conditions are not predictable and cannot be controlled.
Adverse economic conditions could require us to charge off a higher percentage of loans and increase the
provision for credit losses, which would reduce our net income and otherwise have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, our business was significantly affected
by the global economic and financial crisis that began in 2008. The falling home prices, increased rate of
foreclosure and high levels of unemployment in the United States triggered significant write-downs by us and
other financial institutions. These write-downs adversely impacted our financial results in material respects.
Although the U.S. economy has made a significant recovery, an interruption or reversal of this recovery would
adversely affect the financial services industry and banking sector.
We operate in an industry that is highly competitive, which could result in losing business or margin
declines and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive industry. The industry could become even more competitive as a
result of reform of the financial services industry resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act and other legislative,
regulatory and technological changes, as well as continued consolidation. We face aggressive competition from
other domestic and foreign lending institutions and from numerous other providers of financial services, including
non-banking financial institutions that are not subject to the same regulatory restrictions as banks and bank
holding companies, securities firms and insurance companies, and competitors that may have greater financial
resources.
With respect to non-banking financial institutions, technology and other changes have lowered barriers to
entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. For
example, consumers can maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage
accounts or mutual funds. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring
funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as
“disintermediation,” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the
related income generated from those deposits. Some of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same
extensive regulations we are and, therefore, may have greater flexibility in competing for business. As a result of
these and other sources of competition, we could lose business to competitors or be forced to price products and
services on less advantageous terms to retain or attract clients, either of which would adversely affect our
profitability.
The conditions of other financial institutions or of the financial services industry could adversely
affect our operations and financial conditions.
Financial services institutions are typically interconnected as a result of trading, investment, liquidity
management, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. Within the financial services industry, the default
by any one institution could lead to defaults by other institutions. Concerns about, or a default by, one
institution could lead to significant liquidity problems and losses or defaults by other institutions, as the
commercial and financial soundness of many financial institutions are closely related as a result of these credit,
trading, clearing and other relationships. Even the perceived lack of creditworthiness of, or questions about, a
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 30
counterparty may lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults by various institutions. This
systemic risk may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, banks and exchanges with
which we interact on a daily basis, or key funding providers such as the FHLBs, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our access to liquidity or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
As a financial holding company and a bank holding company, we are subject to comprehensive
regulation that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
As a financial holding company and a bank holding company, we are subject to comprehensive regulation,
supervision and examination by the FRB. In addition, CBNA is subject to comprehensive regulation, supervision
and examination by the OCC. Our regulators supervise us through regular examinations and other means that
allow the regulators to gauge management’s ability to identify, assess and control risk in all areas of operations
in a safe and sound manner and to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. In the course of their
supervision and examinations, our regulators may require improvements in various areas. If we are unable to
implement and maintain any required actions in a timely and effective manner, we could become subject to
informal (non-public) or formal (public) supervisory actions and public enforcement orders that could lead to
significant restrictions on our existing business or on our ability to engage in any new business. Such forms of
supervisory action could include, without limitation, written agreements, cease and desist orders, and consent
orders and may, among other things, result in restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, requirements to
increase capital, restrictions on our activities, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, and enforcement of
such actions through injunctions or restraining orders. We could also be required to dispose of certain assets and
liabilities within a prescribed period. The terms of any such supervisory or enforcement action could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are a bank holding company that has elected to become a financial holding company pursuant to the
Bank Holding Company Act. Financial holding companies are allowed to engage in certain financial activities in
which a bank holding company is not otherwise permitted to engage. However, to maintain financial holding
company status, a bank holding company (and all of its depository institution subsidiaries) must be “well
capitalized” and “well managed.” If a bank holding company ceases to meet these capital and management
requirements, there are many penalties it would be faced with, including the FRB may impose limitations or
conditions on the conduct of its activities, and it may not undertake any of the broader financial activities
permissible for financial holding companies or acquire a company engaged in such financial activities without
prior approval of the FRB. If a company does not return to compliance within 180 days, which period may be
extended, the FRB may require divestiture of that company’s depository institutions. To the extent we do not
meet the requirements to be a financial holding company in the future, there could be a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be unable to disclose some restrictions or limitations on our operations imposed by our
regulators.
From time to time, bank regulatory agencies take supervisory actions that restrict or limit a financial
institution’s activities and lead it to raise capital or subject it to other requirements. Directives issued to enforce
such actions may be confidential and thus, in some instances, we are not permitted to publicly disclose these
actions. In addition, as part of our regular examination process, our regulators may advise us to operate under
various restrictions as a prudential matter. Any such actions or restrictions, if and in whatever manner imposed,
could adversely affect our costs and revenues. Moreover, efforts to comply with any such nonpublic supervisory
actions or restrictions may require material investments in additional resources and systems, as well as a
significant commitment of managerial time and attention. As a result, such supervisory actions or restrictions, if
and in whatever manner imposed, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations;
and, in certain instances, we may not be able to publicly disclose these matters.
The regulatory environment in which we operate continues to be subject to significant and evolving
regulatory requirements that could have a material adverse effect on our business and earnings.
We are heavily regulated by multiple banking, consumer protection, securities and other regulatory
authorities at the federal and state levels. This regulatory oversight is primarily established to protect
depositors, the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund, consumers of financial products, and the financial system as a
We are also subject to laws and regulations relating to the privacy of the information of our customers,
employees, counterparties and others, and any failure to comply with these laws and regulations could expose us
to liability and/or reputational damage. As new privacy-related laws and regulations are implemented, the time
and resources needed for us to comply with those laws and regulations, as well as our potential liability for non-
compliance and our reporting obligations in the case of data breaches, may significantly increase.
While there have been significant revisions to the laws and regulations applicable to us that have been
finalized in recent months, there are other rules to implement changes that have yet to be proposed or enacted
by our regulators. The final timing, scope and impact of these changes to the regulatory framework applicable to
financial institutions remains uncertain. For more information on the regulations to which we are subject and
recent initiatives to reform financial institution regulation, see the “Regulation and Supervision” section in Item
1.
We are subject to capital adequacy and liquidity standards, and if we fail to meet these standards
our financial condition and operations would be adversely affected.
We are subject to several capital adequacy and liquidity standards. To the extent that we are unable to
meet these standards, our ability to make distributions of capital will be limited and we may be subject to
additional supervisory actions and limitations on our activities. See “Regulation and Supervision” in Item 1 and
the “Capital and Regulatory Requirements” and “Liquidity” sections in Item 7, for further discussion of the
regulations to which we are subject.
The Parent Company could be required to act as a “source of strength” to CBNA, which would have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
FRB policy historically required bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial
strength to their subsidiary banks. The Dodd-Frank Act codified this policy as a statutory requirement. This
support may be required by the FRB at times when we might otherwise determine not to provide it or when doing
so is not otherwise in the interests of CFG or our stockholders or creditors, and may include one or more of the
following:
• The Parent Company may be compelled to contribute capital to CBNA, including by engaging in a public
offering to raise such capital. Furthermore, any extensions of credit from the Parent Company to CBNA
that are included in CBNA’s capital would be subordinate in right of payment to depositors and certain
other indebtedness of CBNA.
• In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment that the bank holding company
had been required to make to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary
bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.
• In the event of impairment of the capital stock of CBNA, the Parent Company, as CBNA’s stockholder,
could be required to pay such deficiency.
From time-to-time, we may become or are subject to regulatory actions that may have a material
impact on our business.
We may become or are involved, from time to time, in reviews, investigations and proceedings (both
formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies regarding our business. These regulatory
actions involve, among other matters, accounting, compliance and operational matters, certain of which may
result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief that may require changes to
our business or otherwise materially impact our business.
In regulatory actions, such as those referred to above, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any
loss is probable or whether it is possible to reasonably estimate the amount of any loss. We cannot predict with
certainty if, how or when such proceedings will be resolved or what the eventual fine, penalty or other relief,
conditions or restrictions, if any, may be, particularly for actions that are in their early stages of investigation.
The Parent Company may be required to make significant restitution payments to CBNA customers arising from
certain compliance issues and also may be required to pay civil money penalties in connection with certain of
these issues. This uncertainty makes it difficult to estimate probable losses, which, in turn, can lead to
substantial disparities between the reserves we may establish for such proceedings and the eventual settlements,
fines, or penalties. Adverse regulatory actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We are and may be subject to litigation that may have a material impact on our business.
Our operations are diverse and complex and we operate in legal and regulatory environments that expose
us to potentially significant litigation risk. In the normal course of business, we have been named, from time to
time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation, arising in
connection with our activities as a financial services institution, including with respect to alleged unfair or
deceptive business practices and mis-selling of certain products. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions
include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of
damages. In some cases, the entities that would otherwise be the primary defendants in such cases are bankrupt
or in financial distress. Moreover, a number of recent judicial decisions have upheld the right of borrowers to sue
lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories, collectively termed “lender liability.”
Generally, lender liability is founded on the premise that a lender has either violated a duty, whether implied or
contractual, of good faith and fair dealing owed to the borrower or has assumed a degree of control over the
borrower resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower or its other creditors or stockholders.
This could increase the amount of private litigation to which we are subject. For more information regarding
ongoing significant legal proceedings in which we may be involved, see Note 18 in Item 8.
Compliance with anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing rules involves significant cost
and effort.
We are subject to rules and regulations regarding money laundering and the financing of terrorism.
Monitoring compliance with anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing rules can put a significant
financial burden on banks and other financial institutions and poses significant technical challenges. Although we
believe our current policies and procedures are sufficient to comply with applicable rules and regulations, we
cannot guarantee that our anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing policies and procedures completely
prevent situations of money laundering or terrorism financing. Any such failure events may have severe
Our stock price may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment as a result.
You should consider an investment in our common stock to be risky, and you should invest in our common
stock only if you can withstand a significant loss and wide fluctuation in the market value of your investment.
The market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to, among other things,
the factors described in this “Risk Factors” section, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.
These factors include:
• quarterly variations in our results of operations or the quarterly financial results of companies
perceived to be similar to us;
• changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates by
securities analysts and investors;
• our announcements or our competitors’ announcements regarding new products or services,
enhancements, significant contracts, acquisitions or strategic investments;
• fluctuations in the market valuations of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;
• future sales of our common stock;
• additions or departures of members of our senior management or other key personnel;
• changes in industry conditions or perceptions; and
• changes in applicable laws, rules or regulations and other dynamics.
Furthermore, the stock markets have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected and
continue to affect the market price of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations have often been
unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market
fluctuations, as well as general economic, systemic, political and market conditions, such as recessions, loss of
investor confidence, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively affect the
market price of our common stock.
If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to securities class
action litigation that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.
We may not repurchase shares or pay cash dividends on our common stock.
Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors may
declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Although we have historically declared cash dividends
on our common stock, we are not required to do so and may reduce or eliminate our common stock dividend in
the future. This could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Also, as a bank holding company,
our ability to repurchase shares and declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain federal regulatory
considerations, including the rules of the FRB regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Additionally, we are
required to submit periodic capital plans to the FRB for review, or otherwise obtain FRB authorization, before we
can take certain capital actions, including repurchasing shares, declaring and paying dividends, or repurchasing
or redeeming capital securities. If our capital plan or any amendment to our capital plan is objected to for any
reason, our ability to repurchase shares and declare and pay dividends on our capital stock may be limited.
Further, if we are unable to satisfy the capital requirements applicable to us for any reason, we may be limited
in our ability to repurchase shares and declare and pay dividends on our capital stock. See the “Regulation and
Supervision” section in Item 1, for further discussion of the regulations to which we are subject.
“Anti-takeover” provisions and the regulations to which we are subject may make it more difficult
for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change in control would be beneficial to stockholders.
We are a bank holding company incorporated in the state of Delaware. Anti-takeover provisions in
Delaware law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as
well as regulatory approvals that would be required under federal law, could make it more difficult for a third
party to take control of us and may prevent stockholders from receiving a premium for their shares of our
common stock. These provisions could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and could reduce
the amount that stockholders might get if we are sold.
Furthermore, banking laws impose notice, approval and ongoing regulatory requirements on any
stockholder or other party that seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of an FDIC-insured depository
institution. These laws include the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act.
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We lease eight operations centers in Boston, Medford, and Westwood, Massachusetts; Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania; Warwick, Rhode Island; Franklin, Tennessee; Irving, Texas and Glen Allen, Virginia. We own two
principal operations centers in Johnston and East Providence, Rhode Island. At December 31, 2020, our
subsidiaries owned and operated a total of 38 facilities and leased an additional 1,172 facilities. We believe our
current facilities are adequate to meet our needs. See Note 6 and Note 8 in Item 8 for more information
regarding our premises and equipment, and leases, respectively.
Information required by this item is presented in Note 18 in Item 8 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CFG.” As of February 1,
2021, our common stock was owned by seven holders of record (including Cede & Co.) and approximately 209,000
beneficial shareholders whose shares were held in “street name” through a broker or bank. Information relating
to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is presented in Item 12.
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder returns for our performance during the
five-year period ended December 31, 2020 relative to the performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500® index, a
commonly referenced U.S. equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from diverse economic sectors; the
KBW Nasdaq Bank Index (“BKX”), composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts;
and a group of other banks that constitute our peer regional banks (i.e., Comerica, Fifth Third, KeyCorp, M&T,
PNC, Regions, Truist, Huntington and U.S. Bancorp). The graph assumes a $100 investment at the closing price on
December 31, 2015 in each of CFG common stock, the S&P 500 index, the BKX and the peer market-capitalization
weighted average and assumes all dividends were reinvested on the date paid. The points on the graph represent
the fiscal quarter-end amounts based on the last trading day in each subsequent fiscal quarter.
$220
$200
$180
$160
$140
$120
$100
$80
12/31/15 12/31/16 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/19 12/31/20
We did not purchase any of the Company’s equity securities during the quarter ended December 31,
2020.
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7 and our
audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes in Item 8. Our historical results are not necessarily
indicative of the results expected for any future period.
Page
Introduction...................................................................................................................... 40
Financial Performance.......................................................................................................... 40
Results of Operations - 2020 compared with 2019....................................................................... 43
Net Interest Income..................................................................................................... 43
Noninterest Income...................................................................................................... 46
Noninterest Expense.................................................................................................... 47
Provision for Credit Losses............................................................................................. 48
Income Tax Expense..................................................................................................... 48
Business Operating Segments.......................................................................................... 49
Results of Operations - 2019 compared with 2018....................................................................... 50
Analysis of Financial Condition............................................................................................... 51
Securities.................................................................................................................. 51
Loans and Leases......................................................................................................... 52
Allowance for Credit Losses and Nonaccruing Loans and Leases............................................... 54
Deposits.................................................................................................................... 61
Borrowed Funds.......................................................................................................... 62
Quarterly Results of Operations.............................................................................................. 64
Capital and Regulatory Matters............................................................................................... 66
Liquidity........................................................................................................................... 71
Contractual Obligations........................................................................................................ 74
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements............................................................................................. 74
Critical Accounting Estimates................................................................................................. 74
Risk Governance................................................................................................................. 78
Market Risk........................................................................................................................ 80
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations....................................................................... 88
This document contains non-GAAP financial measures denoted as “Underlying” results. Underlying results
for any given reporting period exclude certain items that may occur in that period which management does not
consider indicative of our on-going financial performance. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide
useful information to investors because they are used by management to evaluate our operating performance and
make day-to-day operating decisions. In addition, we believe our Underlying results in any given reporting period
reflect our on-going financial performance and increase comparability of period-to-period results, and,
accordingly, are useful to consider in addition to our GAAP financial results.
Other companies may use similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures that are calculated differently
from the way we calculate such measures. Accordingly, our non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable
to similar measures used by such companies. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on such non-GAAP
financial measures, but to consider them with the most directly comparable GAAP measures. Non-GAAP financial
measures have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our
results reported under GAAP.
Non-GAAP measures are denoted throughout our MD&A by the use of the term Non-GAAP or Underlying
and where there is a reference to Non-GAAP or Underlying results in that paragraph, all measures that follow
that reference are on the same basis when applicable. For more information on the computation of non-GAAP
financial measures, see “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations.”
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Key Highlights
Net income of $1.1 billion decreased 41% from 2019, with earnings per diluted common share of $2.22,
down 42% from $3.81 per diluted common share for 2019. ROTCE of 6.9% declined from 12.6% in 2019. Declining
results continue to be driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated impact on our ACL which, coupled
with our adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020, resulted in a $923 million reserve build during 2020.
In 2020, results reflected a $83 million after-tax reduction, or $0.19 per diluted common share, from
notable items, largely tied to TOP 6 transformational and revenue and efficiency initiatives. In 2019, we
recorded $17 million after-tax, or $0.03 per diluted common share, of notable items tied to Acquisition
integration costs, costs related to strategic initiatives and income tax benefits associated with an operational
restructure and legacy tax matters.
1)
Other notable items include noninterest expense of $50 million related to our TOP programs and other efficiency initiatives and an income tax benefit of $34
million related to an operational restructure and legacy tax matters.
• Net income available to common stockholders of $950 million decreased $768 million, or 45%, compared
to $1.7 billion in 2019.
◦ On an Underlying basis, which excludes notable items, 2020 net income available to common
stockholders of $1.0 billion compared with $1.7 billion in 2019.
◦ On an Underlying basis, EPS of $2.41 per share compared to $3.84 in 2019.
• Total revenue of $6.9 billion increased $414 million, or 6%, from 2019, as a 24% increase in noninterest
income, given record results across mortgage, capital markets and wealth, was partially offset by a 1%
decrease in net interest income given lower rates.
◦ Net interest income of $4.6 billion reflected 8% growth in average interest-earning assets offset by
the impact of the lower rate and challenging yield-curve environment.
◦ Net interest margin of 2.88% decreased 26 basis points from 3.14% in 2019, reflecting the impact of
lower interest rates, partially offset by lower funding costs and improved funding mix, as well as
continued mix shift towards higher yielding assets.
– Net interest margin on a fully taxable-equivalent basis of 2.89% decreased by 27 basis points,
compared to 3.16% in 2019.
– Average loans and leases of $124.5 billion increased $6.6 billion, or 6%, from $117.9 billion in
2019, reflecting a $5.5 billion increase in commercial loans and leases primarily driven by
$3.2 billion of PPP loans as well as a $1.1 billion increase in retail loans.
– Period-end loan growth of $4.0 billion, or 3%, from 2019, reflected 6% growth in total
commercial driven by PPP loans.
– Average deposits of $138.7 billion increased $15.4 billion, or 13%, from $123.3 billion in 2019,
as a result of government stimulus benefiting consumers and small businesses as well as
commercial clients building liquidity given COVID-19 disruption.
– Period-end deposit growth of $21.9 billion, or 17%, from 2019, reflecting growth in demand
deposits, money market accounts, savings and checking with interest, partially offset by a
decrease in term deposits.
2.90% 2.89%
Net interest income of $4.6 billion decreased $28 million, reflecting 8% average interest-earning asset
growth, including the addition of PPP loans, and improvements in funding mix and deposit pricing that were more
than offset by a 26 basis point decrease in net interest margin given the lower rate and challenging yield curve
environment.
Net interest margin on an FTE basis of 2.89% decreased 27 basis points compared to 3.16% in 2019,
primarily reflecting the impact of lower interest rates and elevated cash balances given strong deposit flows
(elevated cash balances drove 8 basis points of the decline), partially offset by improved funding mix and deposit
Table 3: Changes in Net Interest Income Due to Average Volume and Average Rate
Year Ended December 31,
2020 Versus 2019
Average Average
(in millions) Volume(1) Rate(1) Net Change
Interest Income
Interest-bearing cash and due from banks and deposits in banks $90 ($109) ($19)
Taxable investment securities (7) (116) (123)
Total investment securities (7) (116) (123)
Commercial and industrial 194 (409) (215)
Commercial real estate 61 (251) (190)
Leases (9) (4) (13)
Total commercial 246 (664) (418)
Residential mortgages (5) (64) (69)
Home Equity (52) (187) (239)
Automobile 1 10 11
Education 103 (98) 5
Other retail 44 (56) (12)
Total retail 91 (395) (304)
Total loans and leases 337 (1,059) (722)
Loans held for sale, at fair value 41 (29) 12
Other loans held for sale 19 1 20
Total interest income $480 ($1,312) ($832)
Interest Expense
Checking with interest $22 ($161) ($139)
Money market accounts 100 (358) (258)
Regular savings 16 (41) (25)
Term deposits (136) (88) (224)
Total interest-bearing deposits 2 (648) (646)
Short-term borrowed funds (5) (3) (8)
Long-term borrowed funds (56) (94) (150)
Total borrowed funds (61) (97) (158)
Total interest expense (59) (745) (804)
Net interest income $539 ($567) ($28)
(1)
Volume and rate changes have been allocated on a consistent basis using the respective percentage changes in average balances and average rates.
(in millions)
$2,319
$1,877
$1,497 $1,534 $1,596
Noninterest income of $2.3 billion increased $442 million, or 24%, from 2019, reflecting increased
mortgage banking fees due to higher origination volumes and gain on sale margins, and capital markets fees.
These results were partially offset by lower service charges and fees and card fees as well as lower foreign
exchange and interest rate products revenue, reflecting challenging market conditions. Results also reflected
decreased securities gains and other income given lower leasing income and lower gains related to asset
dispositions, partially offset by gain on sale of education loans.
(in millions)
$3,847 $3,991
$3,474 $3,619
$3,352
Noninterest expense of $4.0 billion in 2020 increased $144 million, or 4%, compared to 2019, reflecting
higher salaries and employee benefits, reflecting strong mortgage production, outside services, tied to growth
initiatives, and an increase in equipment and software expense, given continued investments in technology.
These results were partially offset by lower other operating expense given a decline in travel, pension, and
advertising expenses. Underlying noninterest expense increased $87 million, or 2%, due to the reasons listed
above.
(dollars in millions)
$1,616
0.56%
0.36%
0.32%
0.28% 0.28% $693
The provision for credit losses is the result of a detailed analysis performed to estimate our ACL. The
total provision for credit losses includes the provision for loan and lease losses and the provision for unfunded
commitments. Refer to “—Analysis of Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses and Nonaccruing Loans
and Leases” for more information.
Provision for credit losses of $1.6 billion included a $923 million reserve build primarily associated with
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns on our loan portfolio, which resulted in a sudden
rise in unemployment and drop in GDP. Net charge-offs of $693 million increased $263 million from 2019, which
reflected charge-offs in our commercial portfolio concentrated in certain sub-categories, including retail real
estate, metals and mining, energy and related, and casual dining, as well as the impact of continued seasoning in
retail growth portfolios, and loan growth.
(dollars in millions)
$489
$462 $460
$260 $241
31.9%
Income tax expense of $241 million decreased $219 million from $460 million in 2019. The 2020 effective
tax rate of 18.5% decreased from 20.4% in 2019, driven by the increased benefit of tax-advantaged investments
on lower pre-tax income. An Underlying effective tax rate of 19.9% in 2020 compared to 22.0% in 2019.
We have two business operating segments: Consumer Banking and Commercial Banking. Segment results
are derived by specifically attributing managed assets, liabilities, capital and related revenues, provision for
credit losses, which, at the segment level, is equal to net charge-offs, and other expenses. The residual
difference between the consolidated provision for credit losses and the business operating segments’ net charge-
offs is reflected in Other.
Non-segment operations are classified as Other, which includes corporate functions, the Treasury
function, the securities portfolio, wholesale funding activities, intangible assets not directly allocated to a
business operating segment, community development, non-core assets, and other unallocated assets, liabilities,
capital, revenues, provision for credit losses, expenses and income tax expense. In addition, Other includes
goodwill not directly allocated to a business operating segment and any associated goodwill impairment charges.
For impairment testing purposes, we allocate all goodwill to our Consumer Banking and/or Commercial Banking
reporting units.
Our capital levels are evaluated and managed centrally; however, capital is allocated on a risk-adjusted
basis to the business operating segments to support evaluation of business performance. Because funding and
asset liability management is a central function, funds transfer-pricing (“FTP”) methodologies are utilized to
allocate a cost of funds used, or credit for the funds provided, to all business operating segment assets, liabilities
and capital, respectively, using a matched-funding concept. The residual effect on net interest income of asset/
liability management, including the residual net interest income related to the FTP process, is included in Other.
We periodically evaluate and refine our methodologies used to measure financial performance of our business
operating segments.
Noninterest income and expense are directly attributed to each business operating segment, including
fees, service charges, salaries and benefits, and other direct revenues and costs and are respectively accounted
for in a manner similar to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Occupancy costs are allocated based on
utilization of facilities by each business operating segment. Noninterest expenses incurred by centrally managed
operations or business operating segments that directly support another business operating segment’s operations
are charged to the applicable business operating segment based on its utilization of those services.
Income tax expense is assessed to each business operating segment at a standard tax rate with the
residual tax expense or benefit to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate included in Other.
Developing and applying methodologies used to allocate items among the business operating segments is
a dynamic process. Accordingly, financial results may be revised periodically as management systems are
enhanced, methods of evaluating performance or product lines are updated, or our organizational structure
changes.
Consumer Banking
Net interest income increased $129 million, or 4%, from 2019, driven by the benefit of a $4.8 billion
increase in average loans led by education, other retail and the impact of the PPP loan program, partially offset
by lower deposit margins driven by the low rate environment. Noninterest income increased $499 million, or 43%,
from 2019, driven by mortgage banking fees (reflecting strong origination volumes and gain on sale margins) and
other income (gain on sale of education loans), partially offset by lower service charges and fees (higher deposit
balances and lower transaction volumes) and card fees (lower transaction volumes). Noninterest expense
increased $113 million, or 4%, from 2019, reflecting higher salaries and employee benefits costs tied to higher
mortgage origination volumes and PPP loans. Net charge-offs of $288 million decreased $37 million, or 11%,
reflecting the impact of loan forbearance programs.
Commercial Banking
Net interest income of $1.6 billion decreased $177 million, or 12%, from 2019, primarily due to the low
rate environment, partially offset by higher loan and lower-costing deposit volume. Noninterest income of $595
million decreased $12 million, or 2%, from $607 million in 2019, as higher capital markets fees were offset by a
decrease in other income and foreign exchange and interest rate products. Noninterest expense of $860 million
increased $2 million, from $858 million in 2019, driven by higher salaries and employee benefits, partially offset
by lower travel costs. Net charge-offs of $398 million increased $301 million from 2019, driven by the impact of
COVID-19 and associated lockdowns, primarily in the retail real estate, metals and mining, energy and related,
and casual dining industries.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — 2019 compared with 2018
For a description of our results of operations for 2019, see the “Results of Operations — 2019 compared
with 2018” section of Item 7 in our 2019 Form 10-K.
Securities
Table 7: Amortized Cost and Fair Value of AFS and HTM Securities
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Federal agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities 21,954 22,506 19,803 19,875 20,211 19,634
Other/non-agency 396 422 638 662 236 232
Total mortgage-backed securities, at fair value 22,350 22,928 20,441 20,537 20,447 19,866
Total debt securities available for sale, at fair value $22,364 $22,942 $20,517 $20,613 $20,476 $19,895
Mortgage-backed securities, at cost:
Federal agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities $2,342 $2,464 $3,202 $3,242 $3,425 $3,293
Other/non-agency — — — — 740 748
Total mortgage-backed securities, at cost $2,342 $2,464 $3,202 $3,242 $4,165 $4,041
Asset-backed securities, at cost $893 $893 $— $— $— $—
Total debt securities held to maturity $3,235 $3,357 $3,202 $3,242 $4,165 $4,041
Total debt securities available for sale and held to maturity $25,599 $26,299 $23,719 $23,855 $24,641 $23,936
Equity securities, at fair value $66 $66 $47 $47 $181 $181
Equity securities, at cost 604 604 807 807 834 834
Our securities portfolio is managed to maintain prudent levels of liquidity, credit quality and market risk
while achieving appropriate returns that align with our overall portfolio management strategy. The portfolio
includes high quality, highly liquid investments reflecting our ongoing commitment to appropriate contingent
liquidity levels and pledging capacity. U.S. government-guaranteed notes and GSE-issued mortgage-backed
securities represent 95% of the fair value of our debt securities portfolio holdings. Holdings backed by mortgages
dominate our portfolio and facilitate our ability to pledge those securities to the FHLB for collateral purposes.
The fair value of the AFS debt securities portfolio of $22.9 billion at December 31, 2020 increased $2.3
billion from $20.6 billion at December 31, 2019 largely reflecting an increase of $1.8 billion related to
reinvestment timing and a $482 million increase in value from lower long-term rates. The fair value of the HTM
debt securities portfolio decreased $115 million largely reflecting portfolio runoff, partially offset by the reclass
of certain ABS. In September 2020, we purchased $813 million of asset-backed securities, which were recorded as
AFS; however, in October 2020, management transferred these securities to HTM after concluding to hold these
securities through maturity. For further information, see Note 1 in Item 8.
As of December 31, 2020, the portfolio’s average effective duration was 2.7 years compared with 3.7
years as of December 31, 2019, as lower long-term rates drove an increase in both actual and projected
securities prepayment speeds. We manage our securities portfolio duration and convexity risk through asset
selection and securities structure, and maintain duration levels within our risk appetite in the context of the
broader interest rate risk in the banking book framework and limits.
Total loans and leases increased $4.0 billion, or 3%, from $119.1 billion as of December 31, 2019, largely
driven by commercial PPP loans to small business customers. Growth in retail loans, driven by education, was
muted in part by the sale of education loans in September and December 2020 amounting to $1.1 billion,
inclusive of accrued interest, capitalized interest and fees, and a decline in home equity and other retail. For
further information, see Note 10 in Item 8.
PPP loans to small business customers totaled approximately $4.7 billion for the quarters ended June 30,
2020 and September 30, 2020, and $4.2 billion as of December 31, 2020. Average PPP loans totaled
approximately $3.4 billion, $4.7 billion and $4.5 billion for the quarters ended June 30, 2020, September 30,
2020, and December 31, 2020, respectively. There were no outstanding PPP loans as of and during the quarter
ended March 31, 2020.
• Approximately $1.4 billion, or 2.3%, of our retail portfolio, for which the weighted average FICO
score is 711
◦ 94% of customers that exited forbearance are current on payments
◦ Although not required, approximately 42% of our residential mortgage borrowers have
made payment while in active forbearance, and the weighted average loan-to-value of
the $700 million in residential mortgage loans in active forbearance is 62%.
• Approximately $343 million, or 0.6%, of our commercial portfolio, including approximately $53
million, or 1.0%, of our small business portfolio.
At December 31, 2020, we did not identify any concentration of loans and leases exceeding 10% of total
loans and leases that were not otherwise disclosed as a category of loans and leases. For further information on
how we manage concentration exposures, see Note 5 in Item 8.
Table 11: Summary of Changes in ALLL and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses — Beginning:
Commercial and industrial $548 $530 $541 $516 $376
Commercial real estate 107 138 121 99 111
Leases 19 22 23 48 23
Qualitative — — — — 86
Total commercial 674 690 685 663 596
Residential mortgages 35 36 44 55 46
Home equity 83 108 122 182 203
Automobile 123 127 139 127 106
Education 116 101 120 102 96
Other retail 221 180 126 107 88
Qualitative — — — — 81
Total retail 578 552 551 573 620
Total allowance for loan and lease losses — Beginning $1,252 $1,242 $1,236 $1,236 $1,216
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle:
Commercial and industrial ($197) $— $— $— $—
Commercial real estate (57) — — — —
Leases 78 — — — —
Total commercial (176) — — — —
Residential mortgages 95 — — — —
Home equity 74 — — — —
Automobile 82 — — — —
Education 298 — — — —
Other retail 80 — — — —
Total retail loans 629 — — — —
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $453 $— $— $— $—
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses — Beginning, Adjusted:
Commercial and industrial $351 $530 $541 $516 $376
Commercial real estate 50 138 121 99 111
Leases 97 22 23 48 23
Qualitative — — — — 86
Total commercial 498 690 685 663 596
Residential mortgages 130 36 44 55 46
Home equity 157 108 122 182 203
Automobile 205 127 139 127 106
Education 414 101 120 102 96
Other retail 301 180 126 107 88
Qualitative — — — — 81
Total retail loans 1,207 552 551 573 620
Total allowance for loan and lease losses — beginning, Adjusted $1,705 $1,242 $1,236 $1,236 $1,216
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans and leases (0.56%) (0.36%) (0.28%) (0.28%) (0.32%)
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses:
Commercial and industrial $706 $81 $22 $50 $117
Commercial real estate 421 8 17 32 (17)
Leases 33 11 (1) (25) 34
Qualitative — — — — (21)
Total commercial 1,160 100 38 57 113
Residential mortgages 12 (2) (5) (6) 8
Home equity (36) (35) (18) (49) (8)
Automobile 58 82 79 120 99
Education (18) 71 33 62 21
Other retail 255 224 196 121 95
Qualitative — — — — 27
Total retail 271 340 285 248 242
Total provision for loan and lease losses $1,431 $440 $323 $305 $355
The ALLL represented 1.98% of total loans and leases and 240% of NPLs as of December 31, 2020
compared with 1.05% and 178%, respectively, as of December 31, 2019.
Table 13: Nonaccrual Loans and Leases, Accruing and 90 Days or More Past Due and Restructured Loans
and Leases
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Nonaccrual loans and leases
Commercial and industrial $280 $240 $194 $238 $322
Commercial real estate 176 2 7 27 50
Leases 2 3 — — 15
Total commercial 458 245 201 265 387
Residential mortgages 167 93 105 125 139
Home equity 276 246 313 348 406
Automobile 72 67 81 70 50
Education 18 18 38 38 38
Other retail 28 34 28 22 20
Total retail 561 458 565 603 653
Total nonaccrual loans and leases $1,019 $703 $766 $868 $1,040
Loans and leases that are accruing and 90 days or more delinquent
Commercial and industrial $20 $2 $1 $5 $2
Commercial real estate — — — 3 —
Leases 1 — — — —
Total commercial 21 2 1 8 2
Residential mortgages 30 13 15 16 18
Education 2 2 2 3 5
Other retail 9 8 7 5 1
Total retail 41 23 24 24 24
Total accruing and 90 days or more delinquent 62 25 25 32 26
Total $1,081 $728 $791 $900 $1,066
Troubled debt restructurings (1) $690 $692 $723 $629 $633
(1)
TDR balances reported in this line item consist of only those TDRs not reported in the nonaccrual loan or accruing and 90 days or more delinquent loan
categories. Thus, only those TDRs that are in compliance with their modified terms and not past due, or those TDRs that are past due 30-89 days and still
accruing are included in the TDR balances listed above.
NPLs of $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2020 increased $316 million from December 31, 2019, driven by a
$103 million increase in retail reflecting growth in mortgage NPLs, and a $213 million increase in commercial
NPLs reflecting a deterioration in certain industry sectors from the impacts of COVID-19 and associated
lockdowns. NCOs of $693 million increased $263 million, or 61%, from $430 million in 2019 reflecting charge-offs
in our commercial portfolio related to retail real estate, metals and mining, energy and related, and casual
dining, while retail NCOs were down compared to 2019 due in large part to U.S. Government stimulus programs
and forbearance. NCOs as a percentage of total average loans of 0.56% increased 20 basis points compared to
0.36% in 2019.
We continue to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns and have
instituted a variety of measures to identify and monitor areas of potential risk, including direct outreach to
commercial clients and close monitoring of retail credit metrics.
At December 31, 2020, we did not identify any potential problem loans or leases within the portfolio that
were not already disclosed in “—Risk Elements” and “—Commercial Loan Asset Quality.” Potential problem loans
or leases consist of loans and leases where information about a borrower’s possible credit problems cause
management to have serious doubts as to the ability of a borrower to comply with the present repayment terms.
The increases in commercial NPLs and NCOs were driven largely by a deterioration in certain industry
sectors, including retail real estate, casual dining, and energy and related, resulting from the impacts of
COVID-19 and associated lockdowns.
For commercial, we utilize regulatory classification ratings to monitor credit quality. For more
information on regulatory classification ratings, see Note 5 in Item 8. The recorded investment in commercial
based on regulatory classification ratings is presented below:
Total commercial criticized balances of $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2020 increased $1.6 billion
compared with December 31, 2019. Commercial criticized as a percent of total commercial of 7.6% at December
31, 2020 increased from 5.3% at December 31, 2019.
Commercial and industrial criticized balances of $3.3 billion, or 7.5% of the total commercial and
industrial loan portfolio as of December 31, 2020, increased from $2.5 billion, or 6.1%, as of December 31, 2019.
The increase was due to the migration to criticized loans for hospitality, energy and related, and casual dining.
Commercial and industrial criticized loans represented 71% of total criticized loans as of December 31, 2020
compared to 83% as of December 31, 2019.
Commercial real estate criticized balances of $1.3 billion, or 8.8% of the commercial real estate
portfolio, increased from $353 million, or 2.6%, as of December 31, 2019. The increase was due to the migration
to criticized loans for a few larger borrowers in the hospitality and retail industry sectors. Commercial real estate
accounted for 28% of total criticized loans as of December 31, 2020 compared to 12% as of December 31, 2019.
% of % of
(dollars in millions) Balance Total Loans Balance Total Loans
Finance and insurance $6,481 5% $5,155 4%
Health, pharma, and social assistance 3,243 3 3,496 3
Accommodation and food services 3,206 3 3,346 3
Professional, scientific, and technical services 2,804 2 2,986 3
Other manufacturing 2,403 2 2,337 2
Information 2,378 2 2,485 2
Retail trade 2,336 2 2,319 2
Energy and related 2,237 2 2,564 2
Wholesale trade 1,904 2 2,606 2
Metals and mining 1,646 1 1,956 2
Arts, entertainment, and recreation 1,382 1 1,229 1
Other services 1,370 1 1,413 1
Administrative and waste management services 1,320 1 1,454 1
Computer, electrical equipment, appliance, and component manufacturing 1,174 1 1,199 1
Transportation and warehousing 1,169 1 1,141 1
Consumer products manufacturing 1,112 1 1,005 1
Automotive 1,051 1 1,213 1
Educational services 844 1 1,093 1
Chemicals 736 — 983 1
Real estate and rental and leasing 732 — 659 —
All other (1) 490 — 840 1
Total commercial and industrial 40,018 32 41,479 35
Real estate and rental and leasing 13,169 11 12,116 10
Accommodation and food services 749 1 606 1
Finance and insurance 498 — 418 —
All other (1) 236 — 382 —
Total commercial real estate 14,652 12 13,522 11
Total leases 1,968 2 2,537 2
(2)
Total commercial $56,638 46 % $57,538 48 %
(1)
Deferred fees and costs are reported in All other
(2)
Excludes PPP loans for the year-ended December 31, 2020.
For more information on the aging of accruing and nonaccruing retail loans, see Note 5 in Item 8.
Year Ended
December 31,
(dollars in millions) 2020 2019 Change Percent
Net charge-offs $268 $314 ($46) (15%)
Annualized net charge-off rate 0.44 % 0.52 % (8) bps
Retail asset quality remained relatively stable with December 31, 2019. The net charge-off rate of 0.44%
for the year ended December 31, 2020 reflected a decrease of 8 basis points from the year ended December 31,
2019, driven by the forbearance and stimulus activity stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic and associated
lockdowns.
In the first quarter of 2020, we adopted the CARES Act and interagency guidance issued by the bank
regulatory agencies which provide that COVID-19-related modifications to retail and commercial loans that met
certain eligibility criteria are exempt from classification as a TDR. Loans with payment deferrals and forbearance
plans entered into as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were generally not considered
TDRs.
As of December 31, 2020, $718 million of retail loans were classified as TDRs, compared with $667 million
as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, $171 million of retail TDRs were in nonaccrual status with
38% current with payments, compared to $143 million in nonaccrual status with 38% current on payments at
December 31, 2019. TDRs generally return to accrual status once repayment capacity and appropriate payment
history can be established. TDRs are individually evaluated for impairment and loans, once classified as TDRs,
remain classified as TDRs until paid off, sold or refinanced at market terms. For additional information regarding
TDRs, see “—Critical Accounting Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses” and Note 5 in Item 8.
Cross-Border Outstandings
Cross-border outstandings can include loans, receivables, interest-bearing deposits with other banks,
other interest-bearing investments and other monetary assets that are denominated in either dollars or non-local
currency. As of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, there were no aggregate cross-border outstandings from
borrowers or counterparties in any country that exceeded 1%, or were between 0.75% and 1% of consolidated
total assets.
Deposits
Table 21: Average Balances of and Average Interest Rates Paid for Deposits
For the Year Ended December 31,
2020 2019 2018
Average Average Average
(dollars in millions) Balances Yields/ Rates Balances Yields/ Rates Balances Yields/ Rates
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits (1) $37,553 — $28,936 — $29,231 —
Checking with interest $26,002 0.24 % $23,470 0.87 % $21,856 0.63 %
Money market accounts 44,732 0.43 36,613 1.23 36,497 0.94
Regular savings 16,144 0.31 13,247 0.57 10,238 0.15
Term deposits 14,309 1.42 21,035 2.03 18,035 1.61
Total interest-bearing deposits (1) $101,187 0.50 % $94,365 1.22 % $86,626 0.91 %
(1)
The aggregate amount of deposits by foreign depositors in domestic offices was $839 million, $1.7 billion and $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and
2018, respectively.
Borrowed Funds
Our advances, lines of credit, and letters of credit from the FHLB are collateralized by pledged
mortgages and securities at least sufficient to satisfy the collateral maintenance level established by the FHLB.
The utilized borrowing capacity for FHLB advances and letters of credit was $3.2 billion and $9.8 billion at
December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Our remaining available FHLB borrowing capacity was $13.9 billion
and $7.2 billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. We can also borrow from the FRB discount window
to meet short-term liquidity requirements. Collateral, including certain loans, is pledged to support this
borrowing capacity. At December 31, 2020, our unused secured borrowing capacity was approximately $64.6
billion, which included unencumbered securities, FHLB borrowing capacity, and FRB discount window capacity.
Long-term borrowed funds of $8.3 billion as of December 31, 2020 decreased $5.7 billion from December
31, 2019, as strong deposit flows allowed for significantly lower levels of borrowings. The decline in borrowed
funds reflected a decrease of $5.0 billion in FHLB borrowings, and a decrease of $729 million in subordinated
debt and unsecured notes.
The Parent Company’s long-term borrowed funds as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 included principal
balances of $3.5 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively, and unamortized deferred issuance costs and/or discounts
of ($90) million and ($8) million, respectively. CBNA and other subsidiaries’ long-term borrowed funds as of
December 31, 2020 and 2019 included principal balances of $4.8 billion and $11.5 billion, respectively, with
unamortized deferred issuance costs and/or discounts of ($11) million and ($13) million, respectively, and
hedging basis adjustments of $112 million and $50 million, respectively. See Note 13 in Item 8 for further
information about our hedging of certain long-term borrowed funds.
In light of the heightened uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns, the
FRB took certain actions to preserve capital at banks. Among those actions, the FRB imposed certain limitations
on firms for the third and fourth quarters of 2020, including mandatory suspension of share repurchases, and
limiting common stock dividends to existing rates and the average quarterly net income for the prior four
quarters. Further, the FRB required that CCAR firms, like us, conduct an additional round of stress tests and
resubmit updated capital plans to reflect changes in the macroeconomic environment due to the COVID-19
pandemic. Consistent with the FRB’s mandate, we resubmitted our capital plan on November 2, 2020. The results
of our resubmission, received on December 18, 2020, exceeded all capital requirements under the FRB’s severe
stress scenarios and we reiterated key aspects of our 2020 Capital Plan, which include maintaining quarterly
common dividends of $0.39 per common share through the SCB window period ending third quarter 2021. In
December 2020, the FRB modified its limitations on capital distributions for the first quarter of 2021 such that
firms that participate in CCAR, like us, may resume share repurchases provided that the aggregate of share
repurchases and common stock dividends for the first quarter of 2021 do not exceed average quarterly net
income for the trailing four quarters. The FRB can extend or modify its current capital distribution limitations in
future quarters. In January 2021, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to $750 million of our
common stock beginning in the first quarter of 2021. The timing and amount of future dividends and share
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 66
repurchases will depend on various factors, including our capital position, financial performance, risk-weighted
assets, capital impacts of strategic initiatives, market conditions and regulatory considerations. All future capital
distributions are subject to consideration and approval by the board of directors prior to execution.
Regulations relating to capital planning, regulatory reporting, and stress capital buffer requirements
applicable to firms like us are presently subject to rulemaking and potential further guidance and interpretation
by the applicable federal regulators. We will continue to evaluate the impact of these and any other prudential
regulatory changes, including their potential resultant changes in our regulatory and compliance costs and
expenses.
Capital Framework
Under the current U.S. Basel III capital framework, we and our banking subsidiary must meet the
following specific minimum requirements: CET1 capital ratio of 4.5%, tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, total capital
ratio of 8.0%, and tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. As a bank holding company, our SCB of 3.4% is imposed on top of
the three minimum risk-based capital ratios listed above and a CCB of 2.5% is imposed on top of the three
minimum risk-based capital ratios listed above for our banking subsidiary.
Effective for us on April 1, 2020, the CET1 deduction threshold for MSRs, certain deferred tax assets and
significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated institutions is 25%. As of December 31, 2020, we did not
meet the threshold for these additional capital deductions. MSRs or deferred tax assets not deducted from CET1
capital are assigned a 250% risk weight and significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial
institutions not deducted from CET1 capital are assigned an exposure category risk weight.
In reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FRB and the other federal banking regulators adopted a final
rule relative to regulatory capital treatment of ACL under CECL. This rule allowed electing banking organizations
to delay the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital for a two-year period ending January 1, 2022,
followed by a three-year transition period ending January 1, 2025 to phase-in the aggregate amount of the
capital benefit provided during the initial two-year delay. As of December 31, 2020, $568 million of the capital
benefit has been accumulated for application to the three-year transition period.
Table 26: Regulatory Capital Ratios Under the U.S. Basel III Standardized Rules
Required Minimum plus
Required Buffer for Non-
(in millions, except ratio data) Amount Ratio Leverage Ratios(1)(2)
December 31, 2020
CET1 capital $14,607 10.0 % 7.9
Tier 1 capital 16,572 11.3 9.4
Total capital 19,602 13.4 11.4
Tier 1 leverage 16,572 9.4 4.0
Risk-weighted assets 146,781
Quarterly adjusted average assets 175,370
December 31, 2019
CET1 capital $14,304 10.0 % 7.0 %
Tier 1 capital 15,874 11.1 8.5
Total capital 18,542 13.0 10.5
Tier 1 leverage 15,874 10.0 4.0
Risk-weighted assets 142,915
Quarterly adjusted average assets 158,782
(1)
Required “Minimum Capital ratio” for 2020 and 2019 are: Common equity tier 1 capital of 4.5%; Tier 1 capital of 6.0%; Total capital of 8.0%; and Tier 1 leverage
of 4.0%.
(2)
“Minimum Capital ratio” includes stress capital buffer of 3.4% for 2020 and capital conservation buffer of 2.5% for 2019; N/A to Tier 1 leverage.
At December 31, 2020, our CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital ratios were 10.0%, 11.3% and
13.4%, respectively, as compared with 10.0%, 11.1% and 13.0%, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. The CET1
capital ratio remained stable as $3.9 billion of risk-weighted asset (“RWA”) growth and the impact of the capital
actions described in “—Capital Transactions” below were primarily offset by net income for the year ended
December 31, 2020 and 25% of the increase in AACL subsequent to CECL adoption. The tier 1 capital ratio
increased due to the changes in CET1 capital and the issuance of Series F preferred stock described in “—Capital
Transactions” below. The total capital ratio increased due to the changes in CET1 and tier 1 capital and the net
change in AACL attributable to CECL adoption, the modified transition amount and excess ACL, partially offset by
On February 11, 2021, we completed $265 million in private exchange offers for five series of outstanding
subordinated notes. Exchange offer participants received newly issued subordinated notes due 2031 which are
redeemable by us five years prior to their maturity. In September 2020, we completed $621 million in private
exchange offers for five series of outstanding subordinated notes. Exchange offer participants received a
combination of our newly issued subordinated notes due 2032 and an additional cash payment. We also
completed related cash tender offers which result in $11 million of subordinated notes being validly tendered and
accepted for purchase by us and subsequently cancelled. The completion of these subordinated debt exchange
offers will benefit our tier 2 and total capital going forward by increasing the amount of subordinated debt
eligible for inclusion in tier 2 capital without increasing the aggregate principal amount of subordinated debt
outstanding.
CBNA CET1 and tier 1 capital totaled $16.0 billion at December 31, 2020, up $422 million from $15.6
billion at December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily driven by net income for the year ended December 31,
2020 and 25% of the increase in AACL subsequent to CECL adoption, partially offset by dividend payments to the
Parent Company. Total capital was $19.0 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $1.0 billion from $17.9
billion at December 31, 2019, driven by the change in CET1 capital, the net change in AACL and an increase in
qualifying subordinated debt.
CBNA had RWA of $146.6 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $4.0 billion from December 31,
2019, driven by higher derivative valuations, increases in education loans, commercial real estate loans, MSR
RWA, resulting from the finalization of the simplification rules which increased risk weight from 100% to 250%,
and increases in residential mortgages, loans held for sale and commercial past due loans. These RWA increases
were partially offset by decreases in high volatility commercial real estate, commercial loans, home equity loans
and consumer personal loans.
As of December 31, 2020, the CBNA tier 1 leverage ratio decreased to 9.2% from 9.9% at December 31,
2019, driven by the $16.6 billion increase in quarterly adjusted average assets, partially offset by higher tier one
capital. The increase in quarterly adjusted average assets was primarily driven by COVID-19 and the associated
lockdowns, resulting in increased cash level of $9.3 billion and an increase in total loans of $4.6 billion. The
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 70
increased cash is a result of higher deposits caused by government stimulus and commercial clients building
liquidity. The increase in total loans is primarily the result of an increase in commercial and industrial loans from
PPP.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity is defined as our ability to meet our cash flow and collateral obligations in a timely manner, at
a reasonable cost. An institution must maintain operating liquidity to meet its expected daily and forecasted cash
flow requirements, as well as contingent liquidity to meet unexpected (stress scenario) funding requirements. As
noted earlier, reflecting the importance of meeting all unexpected and stress scenario funding requirements, we
identify and manage contingent liquidity (consisting of cash balances at the FRB, unencumbered high-quality and
liquid securities, and unused FHLB borrowing capacity.) Separately, we also identify and manage asset liquidity
as a subset of contingent liquidity (consisting of cash balances at the FRB and unencumbered high-quality
securities.) We consider the effective and prudent management of liquidity fundamental to our health and
strength.
We manage liquidity at the consolidated enterprise level and at each material legal entity, including at
the Parent Company and CBNA level.
CBNA Liquidity
In the ordinary course of business, the liquidity of CBNA is managed by matching sources and uses of
cash. The primary sources of bank liquidity include deposits from our consumer and commercial customers;
payments of principal and interest on loans and debt securities; and wholesale borrowings, as needed, and as
described under “—Liquidity Risk Management and Governance.” The primary uses of bank liquidity include
withdrawals and maturities of deposits; payment of interest on deposits; funding of loans and related
commitments; and funding of securities purchases. To the extent that CBNA has relied on wholesale borrowings,
uses also include payments of related principal and interest. For further information on CBNA’s outstanding debt,
see Note 12 in Item 8.
As CBNA’s primary business involves taking deposits and making loans, a key role of liquidity management
is to ensure that customers have timely access to funds from deposits and for loans. Liquidity management also
Liquidity Risk
We define liquidity risk as the risk that an entity will be unable to meet its payment obligations in a
timely manner, at a reasonable cost. Liquidity risk can arise due to contingent liquidity risk and/or funding
liquidity risk.
Contingent liquidity risk is the risk that market conditions may reduce an entity’s ability to liquidate,
pledge and/or finance certain assets and thereby substantially reduce the liquidity value of such assets. Drivers
of contingent liquidity risk include general market disruptions as well as specific issues regarding the credit
quality and/or valuation of a security or loan, issuer or borrower and/or asset class.
Funding liquidity risk is the risk that market conditions and/or entity-specific events may reduce an
entity’s ability to raise funds from depositors and/or wholesale market counterparties. Drivers of funding
liquidity risk may be idiosyncratic or systemic, reflecting impediments to operations and/or damaged market
confidence.
Changes in our public credit ratings could affect both the cost and availability of our wholesale funding.
As a result and in order to maintain a conservative funding profile, CBNA continues to minimize reliance on
unsecured wholesale funding. At December 31, 2020, our wholesale funding consisted primarily of secured
borrowings from the FHLBs collateralized by high-quality residential mortgages and term debt issued by the
Parent Company and CBNA.
Existing and evolving regulatory liquidity requirements represent another key driver of systemic liquidity
conditions and liquidity management practices. The FRB, the OCC and the FDIC regularly evaluate our liquidity as
Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests. We review goodwill for impairment
annually as of October 31 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value of one or
more reporting units may not be recoverable. If it is more likely than not that the fair value exceeds the carrying
value, no further testing is necessary, otherwise a quantitative assessment of goodwill is required.
The quantitative assessment used to identify potential impairment involves comparing each reporting
unit’s fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying
value inclusive of goodwill, the applicable goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying value of the
reporting unit inclusive of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge against net income is recorded
equal to the excess amount. Under the quantitative impairment assessment, the fair values of our reporting units
are determined using a combination of income and market-based approaches. We rely on the income approach
Significant management judgment is necessary in the determination of the fair value of a reporting unit
as the income approach requires an estimation of future cash flows, considering the after-tax results of
operations, the extent and timing of credit losses, and appropriate discount and capital retention rates. The
determination of fair value is a highly subjective process, and actual future cash flows may differ from
forecasted results.
Cash flow projections rely upon multi-year financial forecasts developed for each reporting unit that
consider key business drivers such as new business initiatives, customer retention standards, market share
changes, anticipated loan and deposit growth, fees and expenses, forward interest rates, historical performance,
credit performance, and industry and economic trends, among other considerations. The long-term growth rate
used in determining the terminal value of each reporting unit is estimated based on management’s assessment of
the minimum expected terminal growth rate of each reporting unit, as well as broader economic considerations
such as GDP, unemployment and inflation.
Our discount rate was based on the estimated cost of equity under the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which
considers the risk-free interest rate, market risk premium, and beta specific to a particular reporting unit. The
discount rates are also calibrated on the assessment of the risks related to the projected cash flows of each
reporting unit.
Under the market approach, valuation of our reporting units considers a combination of earnings and
equity multiples from companies with characteristics similar to the reporting unit. Since the fair values
determined under the market approach are representative of non-controlling interests, the valuations
incorporate a control premium.
We performed our annual goodwill impairment assessment on a quantitative basis in the fourth quarter of
2020. When calculating the fair value of our reporting units under the income approach, short and medium-term
forecasts incorporated current economic conditions and ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and
associated lockdowns, including a federal funds target near zero and near-term elevated ACL, offset by
significant monetary and fiscal stimulus. Long-term cash flow projections reflected normalized rate and credit
environments, as well as a long-term rate of return for each reporting unit. At the conclusion of the quantitative
assessment it was determined that the estimated fair value of the Commercial Banking and Consumer Banking
reporting units substantially exceed their carrying values due primarily to an improvement in the short and
medium-term economic forecasts.
When performing the quantitative goodwill impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of 2020, we
corroborated the fair value of our reporting units determined by the DCF method by adding the aggregated sum
of these fair value measurements to the fair value of our Other non-segment operations and comparing this total
to our observed market capitalization. The excess of the sum of the fair values of the reporting units over the
market capitalization of Citizens decreased from third quarter of 2020 to October 31, 2020, and decreased
significantly to December 31, 2020 as our per share price rose from $25.28 to $35.76. The increase in our market
capitalization resulted in a corresponding decrease in our implied control premium.
Fair Value
We measure fair value of assets and liabilities using the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair
value is also used on a recurring and nonrecurring basis to evaluate certain assets for impairment or for financial
statement disclosure purposes. Examples of nonrecurring uses of fair value include impairment for certain loans,
leases and goodwill. Examples of recurring uses of fair value for financial statement disclosure purposes include
disclosure of the fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities accounted for on an amortized cost basis,
such as HTM securities. For certain assets or liabilities, the application of management judgment in the
determination of the fair value is more significant due to the lack of observable market data.
MSRs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. MSRs are classified as Level 3 since
the valuation methodology utilizes significant unobservable inputs. The MSR fair value was calculated using a
discounted cash flow model which used assumptions, including weighted-average life, prepayment assumptions
and weighted-average option adjusted spread. It is important to note that changes in our assumptions may not be
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 77
independent of each other; changes in one assumption may result in changes to another (e.g., changes in interest
rates, which are inversely correlated to changes in prepayment rates, may result in changes to discount rates).
The underlying assumptions and estimated values are corroborated by values received from independent third
parties based on their review of the servicing portfolio, and comparisons to market transactions.
For additional information regarding our fair value measurements, see Note 1, Note 3, Note 8, Note 13,
and Note 19 in Item 8.
RISK GOVERNANCE
We are committed to maintaining a strong, integrated and proactive approach to the management of all
risks to which we are exposed in pursuit of our business objectives. A key aspect of our Board’s responsibility as
the main decision making body is setting our risk appetite to ensure that the levels of risk that we are willing to
accept in the attainment of our strategic business and financial objectives are clearly understood.
To enable our Board to carry out its objectives, it has delegated authority for risk management activities,
as well as governance and oversight of those activities, to a number of Board and executive management level
risk committees. The Executive Risk Committee (“ERC”), chaired by the Chief Risk Officer, is responsible for
oversight of risk across the enterprise and actively considers our inherent material risks, analyzes our overall risk
profile and seeks confirmation that the risks are being appropriately identified, assessed and mitigated.
Reporting to the ERC are the following additional committees, covering specific areas of risk: Compliance and
Operational Risk Committee, Model Risk Committee, Credit Policy Committee, Asset Liability Committee,
Business Initiatives Review Committee, and the Conduct and Ethics Committee.
Risk Framework
Our risk management framework is embedded in our business through a “Three Lines of Defense” model
which defines responsibilities and accountabilities for risk management activities.
Credit Risk
Overview
Credit risk represents the potential for loss arising from a customer, counterparty, or issuer failing to
perform in accordance with the contractual terms of the obligation. While the majority of our credit risk is
associated with lending activities, we do engage with other financial counterparties for a variety of purposes
including investing, asset and liability management, and trading activities. Given the financial impact of credit
risk on our earnings and balance sheet, the assessment, approval and management of credit risk represents a
major part of our overall risk-management responsibility.
Objective
The independent Credit Risk Function is responsible for reviewing and approving credit risk appetite
across all lines of business and credit products, approving larger and higher risk credit transactions, monitoring
portfolio performance, identifying problem credit exposures, and ensuring remedial management.
Organizational Structure
Management and oversight of credit risk is the responsibility of both the business line and the second line
of defense. The second line of defense, the independent Credit Risk Function, is led by the Chief Credit Officer
who oversees all of our credit risk. The Chief Credit Officer reports to the Chief Risk Officer. The Chief Credit
Officer, acting in a manner consistent with Board policies, has responsibility for, among other things, the
governance process around policies, procedures, risk acceptance criteria, credit risk appetite, limits and
authority delegation. The Chief Credit Officer and team also have responsibility for credit approvals for larger
and higher risk transactions and oversight of line of business credit risk activities. Reporting to the Chief Credit
Officer are the heads of the second line of defense credit functions specializing in: Consumer Banking,
Commercial Banking, Citizens Restructuring Management, Portfolio and Corporate Reporting, ALLL Analytics,
Current Expected Credit Loss, and Credit Policy and Administration. Each team under these leaders is composed
of highly experienced credit professionals.
Governance
The primary mechanisms used to govern our credit risk function are our consumer and commercial credit
policies. These policies outline the minimum acceptable lending standards that align with our desired risk
appetite. Material changes in our business model and strategies that identify a need to change our risk appetite
or highlight a risk not previously contemplated are identified by the individual committees and presented to the
Credit Policy Committee, Executive Risk Committee and the Board Risk Committee for approval, as appropriate.
Consumer
On the Consumer Banking side of credit risk, our teams use models to evaluate consumer loans across the
life cycle of the loan. Starting at origination, credit scoring models are used to forecast the probability of default
Commercial
On the Commercial Banking side of credit risk, the structure is broken into C&I loans, leases and CRE.
Within C&I loans and leases there are separate verticals established for certain specialty products (e.g., asset-
based lending, leasing, franchise finance, health care, technology and mid-corporate). A “specialty vertical” is a
stand-alone team of industry or product specialists. Substantially all activity that falls under the ambit of the
defined industry or product is managed through a specialty vertical when one exists. CRE also operates as a
specialty vertical.
Commercial credit risk management begins with defined credit products and policies.
Commercial transactions are subject to individual analysis and approval at origination and, with few
exceptions, are subject to a formal annual review requirement. The underwriting process includes the
establishment and approval of credit grades that confirm the PD and LGD. All material transactions then require
the approval of both a business line approver and an independent credit approver with the requisite level of
delegated authority. The approval level of a particular credit facility is determined by the size of the credit
relationship as well as the PD. The checks and balances in the credit process and the independence of the credit
approver function are designed to appropriately assess and sanction the level of credit risk being accepted,
facilitate the early recognition of credit problems when they occur, and to provide for effective problem asset
management and resolution. All authority to grant credit is delegated through the independent Credit Risk
function and is closely monitored and regularly updated.
The primary factors considered in commercial credit approvals are the financial strength of the borrower,
assessment of the borrower’s management capabilities, cash flows from operations, industry sector trends, type
and sufficiency of collateral, type of exposure, transaction structure, and the general economic outlook. While
these are the primary factors considered, there are a number of other factors that may be considered in the
decision process. In addition to the credit analysis conducted during the approval process at origination and
annual review, our Credit Quality Assurance group performs testing to provide an independent review and
assessment of the quality of the portfolio and new originations. This group conducts portfolio reviews on a risk-
based cycle to evaluate individual loans and validate risk ratings, as well as test the consistency of the credit
processes and the effectiveness of credit risk management.
The maximum level of credit exposure to individual credit borrowers is limited by policy guidelines based
on the perceived risk of each borrower or related group of borrowers. Concentration risk is managed through
limits on industry asset class and loan quality factors. We focus predominantly on extending credit to commercial
customers with existing or expandable relationships within our primary markets (for this purpose defined as our
11 state footprint plus contiguous states), although we do engage in lending opportunities outside our primary
markets if we believe that the associated risks are acceptable and aligned with strategic initiatives.
Substantially all loans categorized as Classified are managed by a specialized group of credit
professionals.
MARKET RISK
Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates,
equity prices, commodity prices and/or other relevant market rates or prices. Modest market risk arises from
trading activities that serve customer needs, including hedging of interest rate and foreign exchange risk. As
Non-Trading Risk
We are exposed to market risk as a result of non-trading banking activities. This market risk is
substantially composed of interest rate risk, as we have no commodity risk and de minimis direct currency and
equity risk. We also have market risk related to capital markets loan originations, as well as the valuation of our
MSRs.
We continue to manage asset sensitivity within the scope of our policy and changing market conditions.
Asset sensitivity against a 200 basis point gradual increase in rates was 10.8% at December 31, 2020, compared
with 3.2% at December 31, 2019. Current levels of asset sensitivity are elevated relative to our core sensitivity
profile due to meaningful increases in cash and deposit balances as a result of monetary and fiscal stimulus
programs. This increase in asset sensitivity is recognition of the current level of historically low interest rates and
is consistent with our positioning in prior periods of policy rates between zero and 25 basis points. The risk
position can be affected by changes in interest rates which impact the repricing sensitivity or beta of the deposit
base as well as the cash flows on assets that allow for early payoff without a penalty. The risk position is
managed within our risk limits, and long term view of interest rates through occasional adjustments to securities
investments, interest rate swaps and mix of funding.
We use a valuation measure of exposure to structural interest rate risk, Economic Value of Equity
(“EVE”), as a supplement to net interest income simulations. EVE complements net interest income simulation
analysis, as it estimates risk exposure over a long-term horizon. EVE measures the extent to which the economic
value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments may change in response to fluctuations in interest
rates. This analysis is highly dependent upon assumptions applied to assets and liabilities with non-contractual
maturities. The change in value is expressed as a percentage of regulatory capital.
We use interest rate swap contracts to manage the interest rate exposure to variability in the interest
cash flows on our floating-rate assets and floating-rate wholesale funding, and to hedge market risk on fixed-rate
capital markets debt issuances.
Using the interest rate curve at December 31, 2020, the estimated net contribution to net interest
income related to the ALM interest rate swap contracts we use to manage the interest rate exposure to the
variability in the interest cash flows on our floating-rate commercial loans and floating-rate wholesale funding,
as well as the variability in the fair value of AFS securities is approximately $58 million for the full-year 2021.
This amount could differ from amounts actually recognized due to changes in interest rates, hedge de-
designations, and the addition of other hedges subsequent to December 31, 2020.
Table 34: Pre-Tax Gains (Losses) Recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Amounts Recognized for the Year
Ended December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Amount of pre-tax net gains recognized in OCI $130 $138
Amount of pre-tax net gains (losses) reclassified from OCI into interest income 184 (68)
Amount of pre-tax net (losses) gains reclassified from OCI into interest expense (35) 11
LIBOR Transition
As previously disclosed, many of our lending products, securities, derivatives, and other financial
transactions utilize the LIBOR benchmark rate and will be impacted by its planned discontinuance. In late 2018,
we formed a LIBOR Transition Program designed to guide the organization through the planned discontinuation of
LIBOR. The Program, with direction and oversight from our Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for developing,
maintaining and executing against a coordinated strategy to ensure a timely and orderly transition from LIBOR.
The Program is structured to address various initiatives including program governance, transition management,
communications, exposure management, new alternative reference rate product delivery, risk management,
contract remediation, operations and technology readiness, accounting and reporting, as well as tax and
regulation impacts. We have identified and are monitoring the risks associated with the LIBOR transition on a
quarterly basis.
The ARRC recommended that banks be systemically and operationally capable of supporting transactions
in alternative reference rates, such as SOFR, by the end of September 2020. Guided by this milestone, we are
systemically and operationally prepared to support alternative reference rate transactions. In light of
announcements from the ICE Benchmark Administration regarding their proposal to extend the availability of U.S.
dollar LIBOR for most tenors through June 20, 2023 and the support for this proposal from the official sector in
the U.S., we are now engaged in determining the impact that this change may have on our LIBOR transition
activities. Remaining mindful that regulators are still urging market participants to stop entering into new U.S.
dollar LIBOR contracts as soon as practicable, but no later than the end of 2021, we will continue all efforts to
move new originations to alternative reference rates over the course of 2021. However, plans for legacy contract
remediation will extend through mid-2023 should the proposal become final in its current form. More broadly,
program governance remains robust, and progress has been made in the above-outlined initiatives as
management closely monitors the consultations and waits for timelines to be finalized.
Capital Markets
A key component of our capital markets activities is the underwriting and distribution of corporate credit
facilities to partially finance mergers and acquisitions transactions for our clients. We have a rigorous risk
management process around these activities, including a limit structure capping our underwriting risk, our
potential loss, and sub-limits for specific asset classes. Further, the ability to approve underwriting exposure is
delegated only to senior level individuals in the credit risk management and capital markets organizations with
each transaction adjudicated in the Loan Underwriting Approval Committee.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
We have market risk associated with the value of residential MSRs, which are impacted by various types
of inherent risks, including risks related to duration, basis, convexity, volatility and yield curve. Through
December 31, 2019, we had elected to account for the MSRs acquired from FAMC at fair value while maintaining
a lower of cost or market approach on our MSRs held before the FAMC acquisition. On January 1, 2020, we
elected to change our accounting treatment such that all MSRs will be accounted for at fair value.
As part of our overall risk management strategy relative to the fair market value of the MSRs we enter
into various free-standing derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions, interest rate futures,
and forward contracts to purchase mortgage-backed securities to economically hedge the changes in fair value.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the fair value of our MSRs was $658 million and $642 million, respectively,
and the total notional amount of related derivative contracts was $11.4 billion and $8.6 billion, respectively.
Gains and losses on MSRs and the related derivatives used for hedging are included in mortgage banking fees on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
As with our traded market risk-based activities, earnings at risk excludes the impact of MSRs. MSRs are
captured under our single price risk management framework that is used for calculating a management value at
risk that is consistent with the definition used by banking regulators, as defined below.
Trading Risk
We are exposed to market risk primarily through client facilitation activities including derivatives and
foreign exchange products, as well as corporate bond underwriting and market making activities. Exposure is
created as a result of changes in interest rates and related basis spreads and volatility, foreign exchange rates,
and credit spreads on a select range of interest rates, foreign exchange, commodities, corporate bonds and
secondary loan instruments. These trading activities are conducted through CBNA and CCMI.
Client facilitation activities consist primarily of interest rate derivatives, financially settled commodity
derivatives and foreign exchange contracts where we enter into offsetting trades with a separate counterparty or
exchange to manage our market risk exposure. In addition to the aforementioned activities, we operate a
secondary loan trading desk with the objective to meet secondary liquidity needs of our issuing clients’
transactions and investor clients. We do not engage in any trading activities with the intent to benefit from
short-term price differences.
We record these rate derivatives and foreign exchange contracts as derivative assets and liabilities on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Trading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value with income earned related to
these activities included in net interest income. Changes in fair value of trading assets and liabilities are
reflected in other income, a component of noninterest income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
VaR Overview
The market risk measurement model is based on historical simulation. The VaR measure estimates the
extent of any fair value losses on trading positions that may occur due to broad market movements (General VaR)
such as changes in the level of interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. It is
calculated on the basis that current positions remain broadly unaltered over the course of a given holding period.
It is assumed that markets are sufficiently liquid to allow the business to close its positions, if required, within
this holding period. VaR’s benefit is that it captures the historic correlations of a portfolio. Based on the
composition of our “covered positions,” we also use a standardized add-on approach for the loan trading and high
yield bond desks’ Specific Risk capital which estimates the extent of any losses that may occur from factors other
than broad market movements. The General VaR approach is expressed in terms of a confidence level over the
past 500 trading days. The internal VaR measure (used as the basis of the main VaR trading limits) is a 99%
confidence level with a one day holding period, meaning that a loss greater than the VaR is expected to occur, on
average, on only one day in 100 trading days (i.e., 1% of the time). Theoretically, there should be a loss event
greater than VaR two to three times per year. The regulatory measure of VaR is done at a 99% confidence level
with a ten-day holding period. The historical market data applied to calculate the VaR is updated on a two
business day lag. Refer to “Market Risk Regulatory Capital” below for details of our ten-day VaR metrics for the
quarters ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, including high, low, average and period end VaR for
interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks, as well as total VaR.
Table 35: Results of Modeled and Non-Modeled Measures for Regulatory Capital Calculations
For the Three Months Ended For the Three Months Ended
(in millions) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Period Average Period Average
Market Risk Category End High Low End High Low
Interest Rate $2 $2 $4 $— $1 $— $1 $—
Foreign Exchange Currency Rate — — — — — — — —
Credit Spread 9 10 12 3 5 4 5 3
Commodity — — — — — — — —
General VaR 9 8 13 4 5 4 5 3
Specific Risk VaR — — — — — — — —
Total VaR $9 $8 $13 $4 $5 $4 $5 $3
Stressed General VaR $13 $10 $16 $6 $13 $10 $13 $7
Stressed Specific Risk VaR — — — — — — — —
Total Stressed VaR $13 $10 $16 $6 $13 $10 $13 $7
Market Risk Regulatory Capital $56 $42
Specific Risk Not Modeled Add-on 14 14
de Minimis Exposure Add-on — —
Total Market Risk Regulatory Capital $70 $56
Market Risk-Weighted Assets (calculated) $871 $695
Market Risk-Weighted Assets (included in our FR Y-9C
regulatory filing) $871 $695
Stressed VaR
SVaR is an extension of VaR, but uses a longer historical look-back horizon that is fixed from January 3,
2005. This is done not only to identify headline risks from more volatile periods, but also to provide a counter-
balance to VaR which may be low during periods of low volatility. The holding period for profit and loss
determination is ten days. In addition to risk management purposes, SVaR is also a component of market risk
regulatory capital. We calculate SVaR daily under its own dynamic window regime. In a dynamic window regime,
values of the ten-day, 99% VaR are calculated over all possible 260-day periods that can be obtained from the
complete historical data set. Refer to “Market Risk Regulatory Capital” above for details of SVaR metrics,
including high, low, average and period end SVaR for the combined portfolio.
Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is the measure of exposure to a single risk factor, such as a one basis point change in
rates or credit spread. We conduct and monitor sensitivity on interest rates, basis spreads, foreign exchange
exposures, option prices and credit spreads. Whereas VaR is based on previous moves in market risk factors over
recent periods, it may not be an accurate predictor of future market moves. Sensitivity analysis complements
VaR as it provides an indication of risk relative to each factor irrespective of historical market moves, and is an
effective tool in evaluating the appropriateness of hedging strategies and concentrations.
Stress Testing
Conducting a stress test of a portfolio consists of running risk models with the inclusion of key variables
that simulate various historical or hypothetical scenarios. For historical stress tests, profit and loss results are
simulated for selected time periods corresponding to the most volatile underlying returns while hypothetical
stress tests aim to consider concentration risk, illiquidity under stressed market conditions and risk arising from
our trading activities that may not be fully captured by our other risk measurement methodologies. Hypothetical
scenarios also assume that market moves happen simultaneously and no repositioning or hedging activity takes
place to mitigate losses as market events unfold. We generate stress tests of our trading positions on a daily
basis. For example, we currently include a stress test that simulates a “Lehman-type” crisis scenario by taking
VaR Backtesting
Backtesting is one form of validation of the VaR model and is run daily. The Market Risk Rule requires a
comparison of our internal VaR measure to the actual net trading revenue (excluding fees, commissions,
reserves, intra-day trading and net interest income) for each day over the preceding year (the most recent 250
business days). Any observed loss in excess of the VaR number is taken as an exception. The level of exceptions
determines the multiplication factor used to derive the VaR and SVaR-based capital requirement for regulatory
reporting purposes, when applicable. We perform sub-portfolio backtesting as required under the Market Risk
Rule, using models approved by our banking regulators, for interest rate, credit spread, and foreign exchange
positions.
The following graph shows our daily net trading revenue and total internal, modeled VaR for the year
ended December 31, 2020.
Allowance for credit losses to total loans and leases, excluding the impact of PPP loans:
Total loans and leases (GAAP) A $123,090 $119,088
Less: PPP loans 4,155 —
Total loans and leases, excluding the impact of PPP loans (non-GAAP) B $118,935 $119,088
Allowance for credit losses (GAAP) C $2,670 $1,296
Allowance for credit losses to total loans and leases (GAAP) C/A 2.17% 1.09%
Allowance for credit losses to total loans and leases, excluding the impact of PPP loans
(non-GAAP) C/B 2.24% 1.09%
The following table presents computations of non-GAAP financial measures representing certain metrics
excluding the impact of elevated cash levels used in “—Net Interest Income”:
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are presented in the “Market Risk” section of
Part II, Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is
incorporated herein by reference.
Page
Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.............................................. 92
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements..... 93
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.. 96
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019................................................... 97
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018......... 98
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and
2018.............................................................................................................................. 99
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020,
2019, and 2018................................................................................................................. 100
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018......... 101
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 103
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation............................................................................................... 103
Note 2 - Cash and Due from Banks......................................................................................... 105
Note 3 - Securities............................................................................................................. 105
Note 4 - Loans and Leases.................................................................................................... 109
Note 5 - Allowance for Credit Losses, Nonperforming Assets, and Concentrations of Credit Risk............ 111
Note 6 - Premises, Equipment and Software............................................................................. 123
Note 7 - Mortgage Banking................................................................................................... 124
Note 8 - Leases................................................................................................................. 126
Note 9 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets................................................................................... 128
Note 10 - Variable Interest Entities........................................................................................ 129
Note 11 - Deposits............................................................................................................. 132
Note 12 - Borrowed Funds................................................................................................... 132
Note 13 - Derivatives.......................................................................................................... 134
Note 14 - Employee Benefits................................................................................................ 137
Note 15 - Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).......................... 139
Note 16 - Stockholders’ Equity.............................................................................................. 140
Note 17 - Share-Based Compensation...................................................................................... 141
Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies.............................................................................. 142
Note 19 - Fair Value Measurements........................................................................................ 144
Note 20 - Noninterest Income............................................................................................... 150
Note 21 - Other Operating Expense........................................................................................ 152
Note 22 - Income Taxes....................................................................................................... 152
Note 23 - Earnings Per Share................................................................................................ 155
Note 24 - Regulatory Matters................................................................................................ 155
Note 25 - Business Operating Segments................................................................................... 156
Note 26 - Parent Company Financials ..................................................................................... 159
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s system of internal
control over financial reporting is designed, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2020 based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that assessment,
management concluded that, as of December 31, 2020, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is
effective.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 has been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their accompanying report, appearing
on page 96, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated
financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based
on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2021, expressed an unqualified
opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
As described in Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for
estimating the allowance for credit losses on January 1, 2020 due to the adoption of Financial Instruments -
Credit Losses (Topic 326).
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to
assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud,
and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also
included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the
consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit
committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2)
involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit
matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we
are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit
matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Management’s estimate of expected credit losses in the Company’s loan and lease portfolios is recorded in the
allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments (collectively, the “ACL”).
The ACL is maintained at a level the Company believes to be appropriate to absorb expected lifetime credit
losses over the contractual life of the loan and lease portfolios and on the unfunded lending commitments. The
determination of the ACL is based on periodic evaluation of the loan and lease portfolios and unfunded lending
commitments that are not unconditionally cancelable considering a number of relevant underlying factors,
including key assumptions and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative information. Key assumptions used in
the ACL measurement process include the use of a two-year reasonable and supportable economic forecast
period followed by a one-year period during which the expected credit losses revert to long-term historical
macroeconomic inputs.
The quantitative evaluation of the adequacy of the ACL utilizes a single economic forecast as its foundation and
is primarily based on econometric models that use known or estimated data as of the balance sheet date and
forecasted data over the reasonable and supportable period. Known and estimated data include current
probability of default, loss given default, and exposure at default (for commercial), timing and amount of
expected draws (for unfunded lending commitments), FICO scores, loan-to-values ratios, term and time on books
(for retail loans), mix and level of loan balances, delinquency levels, assigned risk ratings, previous loss
experience, current business conditions, amounts and timing of expected future cash flows, and factors
particular to a specific commercial credit such as competition, business and management performance. Forward-
looking economic assumptions include real gross domestic product, unemployment rate, interest rate curves, and
changes in collateral values. This data is aggregated to estimate expected credit losses over the contractual life
of the loans and leases, adjusted for expected prepayments. In highly volatile economic environments, historical
information, such as commercial customer financial statements or consumer credit ratings, may not be as
important to estimating future expected losses as forecasted inputs to the models.
The ACL may also be affected materially by a variety of qualitative factors that the Company considers to reflect
current judgment of various events and risks that are not measured in the statistical procedures including
uncertainty related to the economic forecasts used in the modeled credit loss estimates, loan growth, back
testing results, credit underwriting policy exceptions, regulatory and audit findings, and peer comparisons. The
qualitative allowance is further informed for certain industry sectors or loan classes by alternative scenarios to
support the period-end ACL.
While the macroeconomic forecast at year-end slightly improved relative to the third quarter of 2020 forecast,
the Company continued to apply management judgment to adjust the modeled reserves in the commercial
industry sectors most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns, including in retail and
hospitality, casual dining, retail trade, price-sensitive energy and related, and educational services, as well as in
certain retail products.
Given the size of the loan and lease portfolios and unfunded commitments and the subjective nature of
estimating the ACL, including the estimated impact of COVID-19, auditing the ACL involved a high degree of
auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort.
Our audit procedures related to the ACL for the loan and lease portfolios and unfunded commitments included
the following, among others:
• We tested the effectiveness of controls over the (i) selection of the foundational economic forecast, (ii)
development, execution, and monitoring of the econometric models, (iii) estimation of management’s
adjustments to the modeled reserves for COVID-19, (iv) determination of the qualitative allowance, and (v)
overall calculation and disclosure of the ACL.
• We used our credit specialists to assist us in evaluating the reasonableness of the econometric models and
management’s adjustments to the modeled reserves for COVID-19.
• We (i) evaluated the reasonableness of the econometric models and related assumptions, (ii) assessed the
reasonableness of design, theory, and logic of the econometric models for estimating expected credit losses,
(iii) tested the accuracy of the data input into the econometric models, and (iv) tested the arithmetic
Boston, Massachusetts
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
Accumulated
Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Treasury Other
Paid-in Retained Stock, at Comprehensive
(in millions) Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings Cost Loss Total
Balance at January 1, 2018 — $247 491 $6 $18,781 $4,164 ($2,108) ($820) $20,270
Dividends to common stockholders — — — — — (471) — — (471)
Dividend to preferred stockholders — — — — — (29) — — (29)
Preferred stock issued 1 593 — — — — — — 593
Treasury stock purchased — — (26) — — — (1,025) — (1,025)
Share-based compensation plans — — 1 — 20 — — — 20
Employee stock purchase plan
shares purchased — — — — 14 — — — 14
Total comprehensive income:
Net income — — — — — 1,721 — — 1,721
Other comprehensive loss — — — — — — — (276) (276)
Total comprehensive income — — — — — 1,721 — (276) 1,445
Balance at December 31, 2018 1 $840 466 $6 $18,815 $5,385 ($3,133) ($1,096) $20,817
Dividends to common stockholders — — — — — (617) — — (617)
Dividend to preferred stockholders — — — — — (73) — — (73)
Preferred stock issued 1 730 — — — — — — 730
Treasury stock purchased — — (34) — — — (1,220) — (1,220)
Share-based compensation plans — — 1 — 59 — — — 59
Employee stock purchase plan
shares purchased — — — — 17 — — — 17
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting standards — — — — — 12 — 5 17
Total comprehensive income:
Net income — — — — — 1,791 — — 1,791
Other comprehensive income — — — — — — — 680 680
Total comprehensive income — — — — — 1,791 — 680 2,471
Balance at December 31, 2019 2 $1,570 433 $6 $18,891 $6,498 ($4,353) ($411) $22,201
Dividends to common stockholders — — — — — (672) — — (672)
Dividends to preferred stockholders — — — — — (107) — — (107)
Preferred stock issued — 395 — — — — — — 395
Treasury stock purchased — — (8) — — — (270) — (270)
Share-based compensation plans — — 1 — 30 — — — 30
Employee stock purchase plan
shares purchased — — 1 — 19 — — — 19
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting standards — — — — — (331) — — (331)
Total comprehensive income:
Net income — — — — — 1,057 — — 1,057
Other comprehensive income — — — — — — — 351 351
Total comprehensive income — — — — — 1,057 — 351 1,408
Balance at December 31, 2020 2 $1,965 427 $6 $18,940 $6,445 ($4,623) ($60) $22,673
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid $837 $1,560 $1,184
Income taxes paid 261 326 241
Non-cash items:
Transfer of securities from available for sale to held to maturity $813 $192 $—
Transfer of securities from held to maturity to available for sale — 734 —
Loans securitized and transferred to securities available for sale 956 150 142
Loans securitized and transferred to securities held to maturity 111 — —
Stock issued for share-based compensation plans 30 59 20
Stock issued for Employee Stock Purchase Plan 19 17 14
(a)
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks and interest-bearing cash and due from banks as reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
• Equity investment securities, at fair value, and equity investment securities, at cost, have been
reclassified to other assets;
• Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and other short-term
borrowed funds have been reclassified to short-term borrowed funds;
• Purchases of equity securities, at fair value, proceeds of equity securities, at fair value, purchases of
equity securities, at cost, and proceeds or equity securities, at cost, have been reclassified to other
investing activities; and
• Purchases of mortgage servicing rights has been reclassified to other investing activities.
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified in the applicable Notes to the Financial Statements
due to the following loan class changes:
• Home equity loans, home equity lines of credit, home equity loans serviced for others, and home equity
lines of credit serviced for others have been reclassified into home equity; and
• Credit card and other retail have been reclassified into other retail.
Additionally, the commercial loan class has been renamed commercial and industrial and the commercial
loans and leases loan segment has been renamed commercial.
These changes had no effect on net income, total comprehensive income, total assets, or total
stockholders’ equity as previously reported.
Note Page
Cash and Due From Banks Note 2 105
Securities Note 3 105
Loans and Leases Note 4 109
Allowance for Credit Losses Note 5 111
Premises, Equipment and Software Note 6 123
Mortgage Servicing Rights Note 7 124
Leases Note 8 126
Goodwill Note 9 128
Variable Interest Entities Note 10 129
Derivative Instruments Note 13 134
Employee Benefits Note 14 137
Treasury Stock Note 16 140
Employee Share-Based Compensation Note 17 141
Fair Value Measurement Note 19 144
Revenue Recognition Note 20 150
Income Taxes Note 22 152
Earnings Per Share Note 23 155
• Requires enhanced credit quality disclosures • Based on the credit quality of the Company’s existing debt
including disaggregation of credit quality securities portfolio, the Company did not recognize an
indicators by vintage. allowance for HTM and AFS debt securities upon adoption.
Simplifying the • Simplifies the accounting for income taxes by • The Company adopted the new standard on January 1,
Accounting for eliminating certain exceptions related to the 2020.
Income Taxes approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the
methodology for calculating income taxes in an • Adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s
Issued December interim period and the recognition of deferred tax Consolidated Financial Statements.
2019 liabilities for outside basis differences.
Facilitation of the • Provides the option to apply a number of • The Company adopted the new standard in the first quarter
Effects of Reference practical expedients when evaluating if a of 2020 upon issuance and is effective through December
Rate Reform on contract modification as the result of 31, 2022.
Financial Reporting reference rate reform is considered a new
contract or a continuation of an existing • Adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s
Issued March 2020 contract. Consolidated Financial Statements.
Citizens maintains certain average reserve balances and compensating balances for check clearing and
other services with the FRB. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the balance of deposits at the FRB amounted to
$11.7 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively. Average balances maintained with the FRB during the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019 exceeded amounts required by law for the FRB’s requirements. All amounts, both
required and excess reserves, held at the FRB currently earn interest at a fixed rate of 10 basis points. Citizens
recorded interest income on FRB deposits of $10 million, $28 million, and $28 million for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, in interest-bearing deposits in banks in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
NOTE 3 - SECURITIES
Investments include debt and equity securities and other investment securities. Citizens classifies debt
securities as AFS, HTM, or trading based on management’s intent to hold to maturity at the time of purchase.
Management reserves the right to change the initial classification of debt and equity securities purchased based
Distribution of Maturities
After 1 After 5
Year Years
1 Year through 5 through 10 After 10
(in millions) or Less Years Years Years Total
Amortized cost:
U.S. Treasury and other $11 $— $— $— $11
State and political subdivisions — — — 3 3
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities 1 127 1,616 20,210 21,954
Other/non-agency — — — 396 396
Total debt securities available for sale 12 127 1,616 20,609 22,364
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities — — — 2,342 2,342
Asset-backed securities — — 893 — 893
Total debt securities held to maturity — — 893 2,342 3,235
Total amortized cost of debt securities $12 $127 $2,509 $22,951 $25,599
Fair value:
U.S. Treasury and other $11 $— $— $— $11
State and political subdivisions — — — 3 3
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities 1 133 1,660 20,712 22,506
Other/non-agency — — — 422 422
Total debt securities available for sale 12 133 1,660 21,137 22,942
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities — — — 2,464 2,464
Asset-backed securities — — 893 — 893
Total debt securities held to maturity — — 893 2,464 3,357
Total fair value of debt securities $12 $133 $2,553 $23,601 $26,299
Taxable interest income from investment securities as presented on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations was $519 million, $642 million and $672 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and
2018, respectively.
Citizens regularly enters into security repurchase agreements with unrelated counterparties, which
involve the transfer of a security from one party to another, and a subsequent transfer of substantially the same
security back to the original party. The Company’s repurchase agreements are typically short-term in nature and
are accounted for as secured borrowed funds on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Citizens recognized
no offsetting of short-term receivables or payables as of December 31, 2020 or 2019. Citizens offsets certain
derivative assets and derivative liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For further information see Note
13.
Securitizations of mortgage loans retained in the investment portfolio for the years ended December 31,
2020, 2019 and 2018, were $144 million, $150 million and $142 million, respectively. These securitizations
include a substantive guarantee by a third party. In 2020, 2019 and 2018 the guarantors were FNMA, FHLMC, and
GNMA. The debt securities received from the guarantors are classified as AFS.
Impairment
Upon purchase of HTM investment securities and at each subsequent measurement date, Citizens is
required to evaluate the securities for risk of loss over their life and, if necessary, establish an associated
reserve. Recognition of a reserve for expected credit losses is not required if the amount the Company expects to
realize is zero (commonly referred to as “zero expected credit losses”). The Company evaluated its existing HTM
portfolio as of December 31, 2020 and concluded that the majority (72%) of the securities met the zero expected
credit loss criteria, and therefore no ACL was recognized as of the balance sheet date. Lifetime expected credit
losses for the remaining (28%) HTM portfolio were modeled using various approaches and determined to be $0 at
December 31, 2020. The Company monitors the credit exposure through the use of credit quality indicators. For
these securities, the Company uses external credit ratings or an internally derived credit rating when an external
rating is not available. All securities were determined to be investment grade at December 31, 2020.
Citizens reviews its AFS debt securities for impairment at the individual security level on a quarterly
basis, or more frequently if a potential loss triggering event occurs. The initial indicator of impairment for debt
securities classified as AFS is a decline in fair value below its amortized cost basis. For any security that has
declined in fair value below the amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes an impairment loss in current
period earnings if management has the intent to sell the security or if it is more likely than not it will be required
to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.
Estimating the recovery of the amortized cost basis of a debt security is based upon an assessment of the
cash flows expected to be collected. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at
the security’s original effective yield, is less than the amortized cost basis, impairment equal to the shortfall in
cash flows has occurred. Citizens evaluates whether any portion of the impairment is attributable to credit-
related factors or various other market factors affecting the fair value of the security (e.g., interest rates,
spread levels, liquidity in the sector, etc.), and the public credit rating of the security. If credit-related factors
exist, credit-related impairment has occurred regardless of the Company’s intent to hold the security until it
recovers.
The credit-related portion of impairment is recognized in current period earnings as provision expense
through the establishment of an allowance for AFS securities, to the extent the allowance does not reduce the
value of the AFS security below its current fair value. The remaining non-credit related portion of impairment is
recognized in OCI. Improvement in credit losses in subsequent periods results in a reversal of the allowance for
AFS securities and a corresponding decrease to provision expense, to the extent the allowance does not become
negative. Accrued interest receivable on AFS debt securities is excluded from the balances used to calculate the
allowance for AFS securities. All accrued and uncollected interest is immediately reversed against interest
income when it is deemed uncollectible. The Company has evaluated any AFS securities in an unrealized loss
position at December 31, 2020 and concluded that all unrealized losses are due to non-credit related factors. As
such, the Company does not have an allowance for AFS securities as of December 31, 2020.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 108
The following table presents AFS mortgage-backed debt securities with fair values below their respective
carrying values, separated by the duration the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
The following table present AFS and HTM mortgage-backed debt securities with fair values below their
respective carrying values, separated by the duration the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position:
Loans held for investment are reported at the amount of their outstanding principal, net of charge-offs,
unearned income, deferred loan origination fees and costs, and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased
loans. Deferred loan origination fees and costs and purchase premiums and discounts are amortized as an
adjustment of yield over the life of the loan, using the effective interest method. Unamortized amounts
remaining upon prepayment or sale are recorded as interest income or gain (loss) on sale, respectively. Credit
card receivables include billed and uncollected interest and fees.
Interest income on loans is determined using the effective interest method. This method calculates
periodic interest income at a constant effective yield on the net investment in the loan, to provide a constant
rate of return over the term. Loans accounted for using the fair value option are measured at fair value with
corresponding changes recognized in noninterest income.
Loan commitment fees for loans that are likely to be drawn down, and other credit related fees, are
deferred (together with any incremental costs) and recognized as an adjustment to the effective interest rate
over the loan term. When it is unlikely that a loan will be drawn down, the loan commitment fees are recognized
over the commitment period on a straight-line basis.
Loans and leases are disclosed in portfolio segments and classes. The Company’s loan and lease portfolio
segments are commercial and retail. The classes of loans and leases are: commercial and industrial, commercial
real estate, leases, residential mortgages, home equity, automobile, education and other retail.
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Commercial and industrial(1) $44,173 $41,479
Commercial real estate 14,652 13,522
Leases 1,968 2,537
Total commercial 60,793 57,538
Residential mortgages 19,539 19,083
Home equity 12,149 13,154
Automobile 12,153 12,120
Education 12,308 10,347
Other retail 6,148 6,846
Total retail 62,297 61,550
Total loans and leases $123,090 $119,088
(1)
The December 31, 2020 commercial and industrial balance includes $4.2 billion of PPP loans fully guaranteed by the SBA.
Accrued interest receivable on loans and leases held for investment totaled $449 million and $495 million
as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Loans pledged as collateral for FHLB borrowed funds, primarily residential mortgages and home equity
loans, totaled $25.5 billion and $25.3 billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Loans pledged as
collateral to support the contingent ability to borrow at the FRB discount window, if necessary, were primarily
comprised of education, auto, commercial and industrial, and commercial real estate loans, and totaled $40.0
billion and $17.4 billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company purchased $2.4 billion of education loans and
$870 million of other retail loans. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased $1.1 billion
of education loans and $530 million of other retail loans.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company sold $500 million of commercial loans,
$1.0 billion of education loans and $1.5 billion of residential mortgage loans. During the year ended December
31, 2019, the Company sold $454 million of commercial loans and $628 million of retail loans, including
$22 million of TDR sales.
Citizens is engaged in the leasing of equipment for commercial use, primarily focused on middle market
and mid-corporate clients for large capital equipment acquisitions including corporate aircraft, railcars and
trucks and trailers, among other equipment. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease and the
related lease classification at inception. Lease terms predominantly range from three years to ten years and may
include options to purchase the leased property prior to the end of the lease term. The Company does not have
lease agreements which contain both lease and non-lease components.
A lessee is evaluated from a credit perspective using the same underwriting standards and procedures as
for a loan borrower. A lessee is expected to make rental payments based on its cash flows and the viability of its
operations. Leases are usually not evaluated as collateral-based transactions, and therefore the lessee’s overall
financial strength is the most important credit evaluation factor.
Interest income on direct financing and sales-type leases for the years ended December 31, 2020 and
2019 was $64 million and $77 million, respectively, and is reported within interest and fees on loans and leases in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
A maturity analysis of direct financing and sales-type lease receivables at December 31, 2020 is
presented below:
(in millions)
2021 $334
2022 308
2023 246
2024 170
2025 112
Thereafter 211
Total undiscounted future minimum lease rentals $1,381
NOTE 5 - ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES, NONPERFORMING ASSETS, AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management’s estimate of expected credit losses in the Company’s loan and lease portfolios is recorded
in the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments (collectively the ACL). Through December 31,
2019 the ACL reserve was management’s best estimate of incurred probable losses in the Company’s loan and
lease portfolios based on reviews of certain individual loans and leases, analyzing changes in the composition,
size and delinquency of the portfolio, reviewing previous loss experience and considering current and anticipated
economic factors. The Company’s methodology for determining the qualitative component through December 31,
2019 included a statistical analysis of prior charge-off rates and an assessment of factors affecting the
determination of incurred losses in the loan and lease portfolio. Such factors included trends in economic
conditions, loan growth, back testing results, credit underwriting policy exceptions, regulatory and audit
findings, and peer comparisons. Upon adoption of CECL effective January 1, 2020, the Company’s ACL reserve
methodology changed to estimate expected credit losses over the contractual life of loans and leases.
The ACL is maintained at a level the Company believes to be appropriate to absorb expected lifetime
credit losses over the contractual life of the loan and lease portfolios and on the unfunded lending commitments.
The determination of the ACL is based on periodic evaluation of the loan and lease portfolios and unfunded
lending commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable considering a number of relevant underlying
factors, including key assumptions and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative information.
Key assumptions used in the ACL measurement process include the use of a two-year reasonable and
supportable economic forecast period followed by a one-year reversion period to historical credit loss
information.
The evaluation of quantitative and qualitative information is performed through assessments of groups of
assets that share similar risk characteristics and certain individual loans and leases that do not share similar risk
characteristics with the collective group. Loans are grouped generally by product type (e.g., commercial and
industrial, commercial real estate, residential mortgage, etc.), and significant loan portfolios are assessed for
credit losses using econometric models.
The quantitative evaluation of the adequacy of the ACL utilizes a single economic forecast as its
foundation, and is primarily based on econometric models that use known or estimated data as of the balance
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 111
sheet date and forecasted data over the reasonable and supportable period. Known and estimated data include
current PD, LGD and EAD (for commercial), timing and amount of expected draws (for unfunded lending
commitments), FICO, LTV, term and time on books (for retail loans), mix and level of loan balances, delinquency
levels, assigned risk ratings, previous loss experience, current business conditions, amounts and timing of
expected future cash flows, and factors particular to a specific commercial credit such as competition, business
and management performance. Forward-looking economic assumptions include real gross domestic product,
unemployment rate, interest rate curve, and changes in collateral values. This data is aggregated to estimate
expected credit losses over the contractual life of the loans and leases, adjusted for expected prepayments. In
highly volatile economic environments historical information, such as commercial customer financial statements
or consumer credit ratings, may not be as important to estimating future expected losses as forecasted inputs to
the models.
The ACL may also be affected materially by a variety of qualitative factors that the Company considers to
reflect current judgment of various events and risks that are not measured in the statistical procedures including
uncertainty related to the economic forecasts used in the modeled credit loss estimates, loan growth, back
testing results, credit underwriting policy exceptions, regulatory and audit findings, and peer comparisons. The
qualitative allowance is further informed for certain industry sectors or loan classes by alternative scenarios to
support the period-end ACL balance.
The measurement process results in specific or pooled allowances for loans, leases and unfunded lending
commitments, and qualitative allowances that are judgmentally determined and applied across the portfolio.
There are certain loan portfolios that may not need an econometric model to enable the Company to
calculate management’s best estimate of the expected credit losses. Less data intensive, non-modeled
approaches to estimating losses are considered more efficient and practical for portfolios that have lower levels
of outstanding balances (e.g., runoff or closed portfolios, new products or products that are not significant to the
Company’s overall credit risk exposure).
Loans and leases that do not share similar risk characteristics are individually assessed for expected
credit losses. Nonaccruing commercial and industrial, and commercial real estate loans with an outstanding
balance of $5 million or greater and all commercial and industrial, and commercial real estate TDRs (regardless
of size) are assessed on an individual loan level basis. Generally, the measurement of ACL on individual loans and
leases is the present value of its future cash flows or the fair value of its underlying collateral, if the loan or
lease is collateral dependent. Loans that are deemed to be collateral dependent are written down to the fair
value, less costs to sell, if sale of the collateral is expected as of the evaluation date and are reassessed each
subsequent period to determine if a change to the ACL is required. Subsequent evaluations may result in an
increase or decrease to the ACL, based on a corresponding change in the fair value of the collateral during the
period. Any subsequent decrease to the ACL (because of an increase to the collateral-dependent loan’s fair
value) is limited to the total amount previously written off for that loan. For retail TDRs that are not collateral
dependent, the ACL is developed using the present value of expected future cash flows compared to the
amortized cost basis in the loans. Expected re-default factors are considered in this analysis. Retail TDRs that are
deemed collateral dependent are written down to fair market value less cost to sell.
Expected recoveries are considered in management’s estimate of the ACL and may result in a negative
adjustment (i.e., reduction) to the ACL balance. A loan is collateral dependent if repayment is expected to be
provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is experiencing financial
difficulty as of the evaluation date. Generally, repayment would be expected to be provided substantially by the
sale or continued operation of the underlying collateral if cash flows to repay the loan from all other available
sources (including guarantors) are expected to be no more than nominal. If repayment is dependent only on the
operation of the collateral, the fair value of the collateral would not be adjusted for estimated costs to sell. If a
loan is considered collateral dependent, the ACL is calculated as the difference between the fair value of
collateral (adjusted for the costs to sell if the sale of the collateral is expected) and the amortized cost basis as
of the evaluation date. It is possible to have a negative ACL for a collateral dependent loan if the fair value of
the collateral increases in a subsequent reporting period. The negative ACL cannot exceed the total amount
previously charged off.
Accrued interest receivable on loans and leases is excluded from asset balances used to calculate the
ACL. All accrued and uncollected interest is immediately reversed against interest income when a loan or lease is
placed on nonaccrual status. Uncollectible interest is written off timely in accordance with regulatory guidelines.
Generally, loans and leases are placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more, or
earlier if management believes that the probability of collection is insufficient to warrant further accrual.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 112
Residential mortgages are placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 120 days or more, or sooner
if deemed collateral dependent, unless guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration. Residential mortgages
that received extended forbearance and were subsequently modified as a result of COVID-19 will be placed on
nonaccrual sooner than those that were not on extended forbearance, and will return to accrual status only
following a sustained period of repayment performance. Loans in COVID-19 pandemic-related forbearance
programs continue to accrue interest during the forbearance period; a reserve is established for interest income
expected to be uncollectible following forbearance. Accrued interest reversed against interest income for the
year ended December 31, 2020 was $8 million and $19 million for commercial and retail, respectively.
The Company estimates expected credit losses associated with off-balance sheet financial instruments
such as standby letters of credit, financial guarantees and unfunded loan commitments that are not
unconditionally cancellable. Off-balance sheet financial instruments are subject to individual reviews and are
analyzed and segregated by risk according to the Company’s internal risk rating scale. These risk classifications,
in conjunction with historical loss experience, current and future economic conditions, timing and amount of
expected draws, and performance trends within specific portfolio segments, result in the estimate of the reserve
for unfunded lending commitments. The Company does not recognize a reserve for future draws from credit lines
that are unconditionally cancellable (e.g., credit cards).
The ALLL and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments are reported on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets in the allowance for loan and lease losses and in other liabilities, respectively. Provision for credit losses
related to the loan and lease portfolios and the unfunded lending commitments are reported in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as provision for credit losses.
Loan Charge-Offs
Commercial loans are charged off when available information indicates that a loan or portion thereof is
determined to be uncollectible, including situations where a loan is determined to be both impaired and
collateral-dependent. The determination of whether to recognize a charge-off involves many factors, including
the prioritization of the Company’s claim in bankruptcy, expectations of the workout/restructuring of the loan
and valuation of the borrower’s equity or the loan collateral. A loan is considered to be collateral-dependent
when repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral, rather than by cash
flows from the borrower’s operations, income or other resources.
Retail loans are generally fully charged-off or written down to the net realizable value of the underlying
collateral, with an offset to the ALLL, upon reaching specified stages of delinquency in accordance with
standards established by the FFIEC. Residential real estate loans, credit card loans and unsecured open end loans
are generally charged off in the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due. Auto loans, education
loans and unsecured closed end loans are generally charged off in the month in which the account becomes 120
days past due. Certain retail loans will be charged off or charged down to their net realizable value earlier than
the FFIEC charge-off standards in the following circumstances:
• Loans modified in a TDR that are determined to be collateral-dependent.
• Residential real estate loans that received extended forbearance and were subsequently modified as a
result of COVID-19
• Loans to borrowers who have experienced an event (e.g., bankruptcy) that suggests a loss is either known
or highly certain.
◦ Residential real estate and auto loans are charged down to the net realizable value within 60
days of receiving notification of the bankruptcy filing, or when the loan becomes 60 days past
due if repayment is likely to occur.
◦ Credit card loans are fully charged off within 60 days of receiving notification of the bankruptcy
filing or other event.
◦ Education loans are generally charged off when the loan becomes 60 days past due after
receiving notification of a bankruptcy.
• Auto loans are written down to net realizable value upon repossession of the collateral.
The following table provides additional detail on the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
on the ACL and related coverage ratios:
The difference in ACL as of December 31, 2020 as compared to December 31, 2019 continues to be driven
by the COVID-19 pandemic, associated lockdowns and the resulting economic impacts from March to December
31, 2020, as well as the Company’s adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020. Citizens added $451 million in ACL upon
adoption of CECL, and has since added an additional $923 million in the year ended December 31, 2020, resulting
in an ending ACL balance of $2.7 billion.
The increase in commercial net charge-offs in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2019 was driven by charge-offs in the retail real estate, metals and mining, energy and
related, and casual dining industry sectors. Retail net charge-offs in the year ended December 31, 2020 reflected
the benefit of forbearance and stimulus activity stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic and associated
lockdowns.
To determine the ACL as of December 31, 2020, we utilized an economic scenario that generally reflects
real GDP growth of approximately 4% over 2021, returning to fourth quarter 2019 real GDP levels by the last
quarter of 2021. The scenario also projects the unemployment rate to be in the range of approximately 7% to
7.5% throughout 2021. While the macroeconomic forecast was slightly improved relative to the third quarter 2020
forecast, we continued to apply management judgment to adjust the modeled reserves in the commercial
industry sectors most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns, including retail and
hospitality, casual dining, retail trade, price-sensitive energy and related, and educational services, as well as in
certain retail products.
For retail loans, Citizens utilizes credit scores provided by FICO and the loan’s payment and delinquency
status to monitor credit quality. Management believes FICO credit scores are considered the strongest indicator
of credit losses over the contractual life of the loan as the scores are based on current and historical national
industry-wide consumer level credit performance data, and assist management in predicting the borrower’s
future payment performance.
As of December 31,
As of December 31, 2020 2019
Nonaccrual 90+ days past Nonaccrual
loans and due and with no Nonaccrual loans
(in millions) leases accruing related ACL and leases
Commercial and industrial $280 $20 $56 $240
Commercial real estate 176 — 2 2
Leases 2 1 — 3
Total commercial 458 21 58 245
Residential mortgages 167 30 96 93
Home equity 276 — 207 246
Automobile 72 — 17 67
Education 18 2 2 18
Other retail 28 9 — 34
Total retail 561 41 322 458
Total loans and leases $1,019 $62 $380 $703
Interest income is generally not recognized for loans and leases that are on nonaccrual status. The
Company reverses accrued interest receivable with a charge to interest income upon classifying the loan or lease
as nonaccrual.
The Company estimates expected credit losses based on the fair value of collateral for collateralized
loans that management believes will not be paid under the terms of the original loan contract. These loans are
considered to be collateral dependent, and the estimated credit loss is calculated as the difference between the
loan’s amortized cost basis and the fair value of the collateral as of each evaluation date.
Collateral values for residential mortgage and home equity loans are based on refreshed valuations which
are updated at least every 90 days less estimated costs to sell. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had
collateral-dependent residential mortgage and home equity loans totaling $552 million and $227 million,
respectively.
For collateral-dependent commercial loans, the ACL is individually assessed based on the fair value of the
collateral. Various types of collateral are used, including real estate, inventory, equipment, accounts receivable,
securities and cash, among others. For commercial real estate loans, collateral values are generally based on
appraisals which are updated based on management judgment under the specific circumstances on a case-by-
case basis. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had collateral-dependent commercial loans
totaling $206 million and $85 million, respectively.
The amortized cost basis of mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property for which
formal foreclosure proceedings were in-process was $119 million and $152 million as of December 31, 2020 and
2019, respectively.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
In situations where, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, the
Company grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified
as a TDR. TDRs typically result from the Company’s loss mitigation efforts and are undertaken in order to improve
the likelihood of recovery and continuity of the relationship with the borrower. The Company’s loan
modifications are handled on a case-by-case basis and are negotiated to achieve mutually agreeable terms that
maximize loan collectability and meet the borrower’s financial needs. Concessions granted in TDRs for all classes
of loans may include lowering the interest rate, forgiving a portion of principal, extending the loan term,
lowering scheduled payments for a specified period of time, waiving or delaying a scheduled payment of principal
or interest for other than an insignificant time period, or capitalizing past due amounts. A rate increase can be a
concession if the increased rate is lower than a market rate for debt with risk similar to that of the restructured
loan. TDRs for commercial loans may also involve creating a multiple note structure, accepting non-cash assets,
accepting an equity interest, or receiving a performance-based fee. In some cases, a TDR may involve multiple
concessions. The financial effects of TDRs for all loan classes may include lower income (either due to a lower
interest rate or a delay in the timing of cash flows), larger loan loss provisions, and accelerated charge-offs if the
modification renders the loan collateral-dependent. In some cases, interest income throughout the term of the
loan may increase if, for example, the loan is extended or the interest rate is increased as a result of the
restructuring.
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Commercial $257 $297
Retail 718 667
Unfunded commitments related to TDRs 49 42
The net change to ALLL resulting from modifications of loans for the years ended December 31, 2020,
2019 and 2018 was $12 million, $9 million and $3 million, respectively. Charge-offs may also be recorded on
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 122
TDRs. Citizens recorded charge-offs resulting from the modification of loans of $51 million, $7 million and $5
million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
A payment default refers to a loan that becomes 90 days or more past due under the modified terms.
Loan data includes loans meeting the criteria that were paid off in full, charged off, or sold prior to December
31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. For commercial loans, recorded investment in TDRs that defaulted within 12 months of
their modification date for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $54 million, $1 million and
$63 million, respectively. For retail loans, there were $46 million, $37 million and $40 million of loans which
defaulted within 12 months of their restructuring date for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2020, under the Company’s COVID-19-related forbearance and other customer
accommodation programs that are guided by the CARES Act as well as banking regulator interagency guidance,
Citizens deferred payments on approximately $1.4 billion, or 2.3%, of the retail portfolio, approximately
$343 million, or 0.6%, of the commercial portfolio, including approximately $53 million, or 1.0%, of the small
business portfolio. The vast majority of these deferrals are not classified as TDRs.
Most of the Company’s lending activity is with customers located in the New England, Mid-Atlantic and
Midwest regions. Generally, loans are collateralized by assets including real estate, inventory, accounts
receivable, other personal property and investment securities. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, Citizens had a
significant amount of loans collateralized by residential and commercial real estate. There were no significant
concentration risks within the commercial loan or retail loan portfolios. Exposure to credit losses arising from
lending transactions may fluctuate with fair values of collateral supporting loans, which may not perform
according to contractual agreements. The Company’s policy is to collateralize loans to the extent necessary;
however, unsecured loans are also granted on the basis of the financial strength of the applicant and the facts
surrounding the transaction.
Certain loan products, including residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, and credit
cards, have contractual features that may increase credit exposure to the Company in the event of an increase in
interest rates or a decline in housing values. These products include loans that exceed 90% of the value of the
underlying collateral (high LTV loans), interest-only and negative amortization residential mortgages, and loans
with low introductory rates. Certain loans have more than one of these characteristics. The following tables
present balances of loans with these characteristics:
Residential
(in millions) Mortgages Home Equity Other Retail Total
High loan-to-value $289 $64 $— $353
Interest only/negative amortization 2,801 — — 2,801
Low introductory rate — — 170 170
Total $3,090 $64 $170 $3,324
Residential
(in millions) Mortgages Home Equity Other Retail Total
High loan-to-value $402 $151 $— $553
Interest only/negative amortization 2,043 — — 2,043
Low introductory rate — — 235 235
Total $2,445 $151 $235 $2,831
December 31,
Useful Lives
(dollars in millions) (years) 2020 2019
Land and land improvements 10 - 75 $102 $102
Buildings and leasehold improvements 5 - 60 800 848
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 4 - 20 644 535
Construction in progress 50 368
Total premises and equipment, gross 1,596 1,853
Accumulated depreciation (837) (1,092)
Total premises and equipment, net $759 $761
Depreciation charged to noninterest expense totaled $110 million, $116 million, and $117 million for the
years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, and is presented in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations in both occupancy and equipment expense.
Software
Costs related to computer software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized if the projects
improve functionality and provide long-term future operational benefits. Capitalized costs are amortized using
the straight-line method over the asset’s expected useful life, based upon the basic pattern of consumption and
economic benefits provided by the asset. Citizens begins to amortize the software when the asset (or identifiable
component of the asset) is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. All other costs incurred in
connection with an internal-use software project are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software is included in
other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Citizens had capitalized software assets of $2.2 billion and $2.0 billion and related accumulated
amortization of $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Amortization
expense was $215 million, $194 million, and $189 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and
2018, respectively.
The estimated future amortization expense for capitalized software assets is presented below.
The Company recognizes the right to service residential mortgage loans for others, or MSRs, as separate
assets, which are presented in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, when purchased, or when
servicing is contractually separated from the underlying mortgage loans by sale with servicing rights retained.
MSRs are initially recorded at fair value. Subsequent to the initial recognition, MSRs are measured using either
the fair value method or the amortization method. Effective January 1, 2020, the Company elected to account
for all MSRs previously accounted for under the amortization method under the fair value method. Upon election,
the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $6 million, net of taxes, equal to
the difference between the carrying value of the MSRs and the fair value. Under the fair value method, the MSRs
are recorded at fair value at each reporting date with any changes in fair value during the period recorded in
mortgage banking fees in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The unpaid principal balance of the related
residential mortgage loans was $81.2 billion and $77.5 billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The Company manages an active hedging strategy to manage the risk associated with changes in the value of the
MSR portfolio accounted for under the fair value method, which includes the purchase of freestanding
derivatives.
The following table summarizes changes in MSRs recorded using the fair value method:
The fair value of MSRs is estimated by using the present value of estimated future net servicing cash
flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates,
contractual servicing fee income, servicing costs, default rates, ancillary income, and other economic factors,
which are determined based on current market interest rates. The valuation does not attempt to forecast or
predict the future direction of interest rates.
The sensitivity analyses below present the impact to current fair value of an immediate 50 basis point
and 100 basis point adverse change in key economic assumptions and the decline in fair value if the respective
adverse change was realized. These sensitivities are hypothetical, with the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the MSRs calculated independently without changing any other assumption. In
reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (e.g., changes in interest rates, which drive
changes in prepayment rates, could result in changes in the discount rates), which may amplify or counteract the
sensitivities. The primary risk inherent in the Company’s MSRs is an increase in prepayments of the underlying
mortgage loans serviced, which is dependent upon movements in market interest rates.
Citizens accounts for derivatives in its mortgage banking operations at fair value on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets as derivative assets or derivative liabilities, depending on whether the derivative had a positive
(asset) or negative (liability) fair value as of the balance sheet date. The Company’s mortgage banking
derivatives include commitments to originate mortgages held for sale, certain loan sale agreements, and other
financial instruments that meet the definition of a derivative. Refer to Note 13 for additional information.
Other Serviced Loans
From time to time, Citizens engages in other servicing relationships. The following table presents the
unpaid principal balance of other serviced loans:
NOTE 8 - LEASES
Citizens as Lessee
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception and records a right-of-use asset and a
corresponding lease liability. A right-of-use asset represents the value of the Company’s contractual right to use
an underlying leased asset and a lease liability represents the Company’s contractual obligation to make
payments on the same underlying leased asset. Operating and finance lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are
recognized at commencement date based on the present value of the lease payments over the non-cancelable
lease term. As most of the Company’s leases do not specify an implicit rate, the Company uses an incremental
borrowing rate based on information available at the lease commencement date to determine the present value
of the lease payments. The Company evaluates right-of-use assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable.
In its normal course of business, the Company leases both equipment and real estate, including office and
branch space. Lease terms predominantly range from one year to ten years and may include options to extend
the lease, terminate the lease, or purchase the underlying asset at the end of the lease. Certain lease
agreements include rental payments based on an index or are adjusted periodically for inflation. The Company
has lease agreements that contain lease and non-lease components and for certain real estate leases, these
components are accounted for as a single lease component.
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance
Sheets and are recognized in occupancy expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations on a
straight-line basis over the remaining lease term. The Company may also enter into subleases with third parties
for certain leased real estate properties that are no longer occupied.
Operating lease cost is recognized on a straight line basis over the lease term and is recorded in
occupancy, equipment and software expense, and other income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Supplemental Consolidated Balance Sheet information related to the Company’s operating lease
arrangements is presented below:
Supplemental information related to the Company’s operating lease arrangements is presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in measurement of liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases $167 $164
Right-of-use assets in exchange for new operating lease liabilities 268 117
The weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate for operating leases as
of December 31, 2020 is eight years and 2.48%, respectively. The weighted average remaining lease term and
weighted average discount rate for operating leases as of December 31, 2019 is seven years and 3.15%,
respectively.
At December 31, 2020, lease liabilities maturing under non-cancelable operating leases are presented
below for the years ended December 31.
Operating
(in millions) Leases
2021 $149
2022 147
2023 130
2024 111
2025 90
Thereafter 294
Total lease payments 921
Less: Interest 86
Present value of lease liabilities $835
Citizens as Lessor
Operating lease assets where Citizens was the lessor totaled $153 million and $57 million as of
December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Operating lease rental income for leased assets where Citizens is the
lessor is recognized in other income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Consumer Commercial
(in millions) Banking Banking Total
Balance at December 31, 2018 $2,172 $4,751 $6,923
Business acquisition 83 35 118
Adjustments 3 — 3
Balance at December 31, 2019 $2,258 $4,786 $7,044
Business acquisitions — 6 6
Balance at December 31, 2020 $2,258 $4,792 $7,050
Accumulated impairment losses related to the Consumer Banking reporting unit totaled $5.9 billion at
December 31, 2020 and 2019. The accumulated impairment losses related to the Commercial Banking reporting
unit totaled $50 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019. No impairment was recorded for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Other Intangibles
Other intangible assets are recognized separately from goodwill if the asset arises as a result of
contractual rights or if the asset is capable of being separated and sold, transferred or exchanged. Intangible
assets are recorded in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Intangible assets are amortized on a
straight-line basis and subject to an annual impairment evaluation. Amortization expense is recorded in other
expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
A summary of the carrying value of intangible assets is presented below.
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Amortizable Accumulated Accumulated
(in millions) Lives (years) Gross Amortization Net Gross Amortization Net
Acquired technology 7 $21 $7 $14 $21 $4 $17
Acquired relationships 5 - 15 38 10 28 37 5 32
Naming Rights 10 11 2 9 11 1 10
Other 2-7 13 6 7 13 4 9
Total $83 $25 $58 $82 $14 $68
As of December 31, 2020, all of the Company’s intangible assets were being amortized. Amortization
expense recognized on intangible assets was $11 million, $11 million and $3 million for the year ended December
31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The Company’s projection of amortization expense is based on balances
as of December 31, 2020, and future amortization expense may vary from these projections.
Estimated intangible asset amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
(in millions) Total
2021 $10
2022 9
2023 9
2024 8
2025 7
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
LIHTC investment included in other assets $1,687 $1,401
LIHTC unfunded commitments included in other liabilities 875 716
Lending to special purpose entities included in loans and leases 1,295 1,101
Investment in asset-backed securities included in HTM securities 893 —
Renewable energy investments included in other assets 403 355
No LIHTC investment impairment losses were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2020,
2019, and 2018.
Citizens provides lending facilities to third-party sponsored special purpose entities. Because the sponsor
for each respective entity has the power to direct how proceeds from the Company are utilized, as well as
maintains responsibility for any associated servicing commitments, Citizens is not the primary beneficiary of
these entities. Accordingly, Citizens does not consolidate these VIEs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of
December 31, 2020 and 2019, the lending facilities had aggregate unpaid principal balances of $1.3 billion and
$1.1 billion, respectively, and undrawn commitments to extend credit of $1.5 billion and $1.2 billion,
respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, Citizens sold $1.1 billion of education loans, inclusive of accrued
interest, capitalized interest and fees, to a third-party sponsored VIE. As part of these sales, the Company
recognized a gain on sale of $35 million in other income. The Company provided financing to the purchaser for a
portion of the sale price in the form of $893 million of asset-backed securities collateralized by the sold assets.
Citizens will continue to act as primary servicer for the sold educational loans, and will receive a servicing fee. A
third-party special servicer will be responsible for servicing for all loans that become significantly delinquent, as
discussed below.
At the time of the sale, and at each subsequent reporting period, Citizens is required to evaluate its
involvement with the VIE to determine if it holds a variable interest in the VIE and, if so, if the Company is the
primary beneficiary of the VIE. If Citizens is both a variable interest holder and the primary beneficiary of the
VIE, it would be required to consolidate the VIE. As of December 31, 2020, the Company concluded that both
their investment in asset-backed securities as well as the primary servicing fee are considered variable interests
in the VIE as there is a possibility, even if remote, that would result in either the Company’s interest in the
asset-backed securities or the primary servicing fee absorbing some of the losses of the VIE.
After concluding that the Company has one or more variable interests in the VIE, the Company must
determine if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. GAAP defines the primary beneficiary as the
entity that has both an economic exposure to the VIE as well as the power to direct the activities that are
determined to be most significant to the economic performance of the VIE. In order to make this determination,
the Company needed to first establish which activities are the most significant to the economic performance of
the VIE. Based on a review of the historical performance of the types of education loans sold to the VIE, as well
as consideration of which activities performed by the owner or servicer of the loans contribute most significantly
to the ultimate performance of the loans, the Company concluded that the determination of the assets to be
purchased by the VIE and the servicing activities that are performed for significantly delinquent loans are the
activities that most significantly impact the performance of the loans, and thus the performance of the VIE
holding these assets. As a result, the Company concluded that the entity that controls the determination of the
assets to be purchased by the VIE and the servicing activities on significantly delinquent loans controls the
activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE. As part of the sale process, the
equity holder in the VIE had the ability to remove loans from the proposed sale pool, demonstrating control over
the determination of the assets to be purchased. In addition, as a holder of asset-backed securities and the
primary servicer of the loans, Citizens does not have the power to direct servicing of significantly delinquent
loans. These rights are reserved for the third-party special servicer of the loans, who is controlled through a
contractual relationship with the equity investor in the VIE. As the activities which most significantly affect the
performance of the VIE are controlled by the equity holder in the VIE, and not by Citizens, the Company has
concluded that Citizens is therefore not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, Citizens does not consolidate the
VIE and accounts for its investment in the asset-backed securities as HTM securities on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Demand $43,831 $29,233
Checking with interest 27,204 24,840
Regular savings 18,044 13,779
Money market accounts 48,569 38,725
Term deposits 9,516 18,736
Total deposits $147,164 $125,313
The following table presents the maturity distribution by year of term deposits as of December 31, 2020:
(in millions)
2021 $8,474
2022 660
2023 168
2024 162
2025 49
2026 and thereafter 3
Total $9,516
Of these deposits, the amount of term deposits with a denomination of $100,000 or more was $5.8 billion
at December 31, 2020. The following table presents the remaining maturities of these deposits:
(in millions)
Three months or less $3,420
After three months through six months 956
After six months through twelve months 986
After twelve months 436
Total term deposits $5,798
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase $231 $265
Other short-term borrowed funds 12 9
Total short-term borrowed funds $243 $274
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Parent Company:
2.375% fixed-rate senior unsecured debt, due July 2021 $350 $349
4.150% fixed-rate subordinated debt, due September 2022(1) 182 348
3.750% fixed-rate subordinated debt, due July 2024(1) 159 250
4.023% fixed-rate subordinated debt, due October 2024(1) 25 42
4.350% fixed-rate subordinated debt, due August 2025(1) 193 249
4.300% fixed-rate subordinated debt, due December 2025(1) 450 750
2.850% fixed-rate senior unsecured notes, due July 2026 497 496
2.500% fixed-rate senior unsecured notes, due February 2030 297 —
3.250% fixed-rate senior unsecured notes, due April 2030 745 —
2.638% fixed-rate subordinated debt, due September 2032 (1) 543 —
CBNA’s Global Note Program:
2.250% senior unsecured notes, due March 2020 — 700
(2)
2.447% floating-rate senior unsecured notes, due March 2020 — 300
2.487% floating-rate senior unsecured notes, due May 2020 (2) — 250
2.200% senior unsecured notes, due May 2020 — 500
2.250% senior unsecured notes, due October 2020 — 750
2.550% senior unsecured notes, due May 2021 1,003 991
3.250% senior unsecured notes, due February 2022 716 711
0.941% floating-rate senior unsecured notes, due February 2022 (2) 299 299
1.042% floating-rate senior unsecured notes, due May 2022 (2) 250 250
2.650% senior unsecured notes, due May 2022 510 501
3.700% senior unsecured notes, due March 2023 527 515
1.201% floating-rate senior unsecured notes, due March 2023 (2) 249 249
2.250% senior unsecured notes, due April 2025 746 —
3.750% senior unsecured notes, due February 2026 551 521
Additional Borrowings by CBNA and Other Subsidiaries:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances, 0.932% weighted average rate, due through 2038 19 5,008
Other 35 18
Total long-term borrowed funds $8,346 $14,047
(1
December 31, 2020 balances reflect the September 2020 completion of (i) $621 million in private exchange offers for five series of outstanding subordinated
notes whereby participants received a combination of the Company’s newly issued 2.638% fixed-rate subordinated notes due 2032 and an additional cash
payment and (ii) $11 million in related cash tender offers whereby validly tendered and accepted subordinated notes were purchased by Citizens and
subsequently cancelled.
(2) Rate disclosed reflects the floating rate as of December 31, 2020, or final floating rate as applicable.
The Parent Company’s long-term borrowed funds as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 included principal
balances of $3.5 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively, and unamortized deferred issuance costs and/or discounts
of ($90) million and ($8) million, respectively. CBNA and other subsidiaries’ long-term borrowed funds as of
December 31, 2020 and 2019 included principal balances of $4.8 billion and $11.5 billion, respectively, with
unamortized deferred issuance costs and/or discounts of ($11) million and ($13) million, respectively, and
hedging basis adjustments of $112 million and $50 million, respectively. See Note 13 for further information
about the Company’s hedging of certain long-term borrowed funds.
Advances, lines of credit, and letters of credit from the FHLB are collateralized by pledged mortgages
and pledged securities at least sufficient to satisfy the collateral maintenance level established by the FHLB. The
utilized borrowing capacity for FHLB advances and letters of credit was $3.2 billion and $9.8 billion at December
31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company’s available FHLB borrowing capacity was $13.9 billion and $7.2
billion at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Citizens can also borrow from the FRB discount window to
meet short-term liquidity requirements. Collateral, including certain loans, is pledged to support this borrowing
capacity. At December 31, 2020, the Company’s unused secured borrowing capacity was approximately $64.6
billion, which includes unencumbered securities, FHLB borrowing capacity, and FRB discount window capacity.
CBNA and
Parent Other
(in millions) Company Subsidiaries Consolidated
Year
2021 $350 $1,011 $1,361
2022 182 1,786 1,968
2023 — 778 778
2024 184 — 184
2025 643 759 1,402
2026 and thereafter 2,082 571 2,653
Total $3,441 $4,905 $8,346
NOTE 13 - DERIVATIVES
In the normal course of business, Citizens enters into a variety of derivative transactions to meet the
financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. These transactions include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate options, foreign
exchange contracts, residential loan commitment rate locks, interest rate future contracts, swaptions, forward
commitments to sell to-be-announced mortgage securities (“TBAs”), forward sale contracts and purchase
options. The Company does not use derivatives for speculative purposes.
The Company’s derivative instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in derivative
assets and derivative liabilities at fair value. Certain derivatives are cleared through a central clearing house.
Cleared derivatives represent contracts executed bilaterally with counterparties in the OTC market that are
novated to a central clearing house who then becomes our counterparty. OTC-cleared derivative instruments are
typically settled in cash each day based on the prior day value. Information regarding the valuation methodology
and inputs used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments is described in Note 19.
Derivative assets and derivative liabilities are netted by counterparty on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
if a “right of setoff” has been established in a master netting agreement between the Company and the
counterparty. This netted derivative asset or liability position is also netted against the fair value of any cash
collateral that has been pledged or received in accordance with a master netting agreement.
(1)
The notional or contractual amount of interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange contracts is the amount upon which interest and other payments under the
contract are based. For interest rate contracts, the notional amount is typically not exchanged. Therefore, notional amounts should not be taken as the
measure of credit or market risk, as they do not measure the true economic risk of these contracts.
(2)
Amounts represent the impact of enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to net settle positive and negative positions as well as
collateral paid and received.
The Company’s derivative transactions are internally divided into three sub-groups: institutional,
customer and residential loan. Certain derivative transactions within these sub-groups are designated as fair
value or cash flow hedges, as described below:
Interest rate swaps hedging borrowed funds $65 $107 $8 Interest expense - long-term borrowed funds
Hedged long-term debt attributable to the risk being
hedged (63) (107) (9) Interest expense - long-term borrowed funds
Interest rate swaps hedging fixed rate loans 17 (17) — Interest and fees on loans and leases
Hedged fixed rate loans attributable to the risk being
hedged (17) 17 — Interest and fees on loans and leases
Interest rate swaps hedging debt securities available
for sale (104) 8 — Interest income - investment securities
Hedged debt securities available for sale attributable
to risk being hedged 104 (8) — Interest income - investment securities
The following table reflects amounts recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to cumulative
basis adjustments for fair value hedges:
Economic Hedges
The Company’s economic hedges include those related to offsetting customer derivatives, residential
mortgage loan derivatives (including interest rate lock commitments and forward sales commitments) and
derivatives to hedge its residential MSR portfolio. Customer derivatives include interest rate and foreign
exchange derivative contracts designed to meet the hedging and financing needs of the Company’s customers,
and are economically hedged by the Company to offset its market exposure. Interest rate lock commitments on
residential mortgage loans that will be held for sale are considered derivative instruments, and are economically
hedged by entering into forward sale commitments to manage changes in fair value due to interest rate risk.
Residential MSR portfolio derivatives are entered to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of the Company’s
MSR asset.
The following table presents the effect of economic hedges on noninterest income:
Amounts Recognized in
Noninterest Income for the Year
Ended December 31, Affected Line Item in the
Consolidated Statements of
(in millions) 2020 2019 2018 Operations
Economic hedge type:
Foreign exchange and interest
Customer interest rate contracts $1,234 $687 $5 rate products
Foreign exchange and interest
Customer foreign exchange contracts 216 (166) (54) rate products
Foreign exchange and interest
Derivatives transactions to hedge interest rate risk (1,188) (620) 43 rate products
Foreign exchange and interest
Derivatives transactions to hedge foreign exchange risk (263) 200 158 rate products
Residential loan commitments 179 8 (3) Mortgage banking fees
Derivative contracts used to hedge residential loan commitments (50) 20 21 Mortgage banking fees
Derivative contracts used to hedge residential MSRs(1) 311 134 35 Mortgage banking fees
Foreign exchange and interest
Other derivative contracts (9) — — rate products
Foreign exchange and
Derivative transactions to hedge other derivative risk 13 — — interest rate products
Total $443 $263 $205
(1)
Includes ($5) million related to interest rate derivative contracts used to hedge residential MSRs valued at LOCOM for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Pension Plans
Citizens maintains a non-contributory pension plan (the “Qualified Plan”) that was closed to new hires
and re-hires effective January 1, 2009, and frozen to all participants effective December 31, 2012. Benefits
under the Qualified Plan are based on employees’ years of service and highest 5-year average of eligible
compensation. The Qualified Plan is funded on a current basis, in compliance with the requirements of ERISA.
Citizens also provides an unfunded, non-qualified supplemental retirement plan (the “Non-Qualified Plan”),
which was closed and frozen effective December 31, 2012. The Company’s Qualified Plan and Non-Qualified Plan
are collectively referred to as the Company’s “Pension Plans”. The Pension Plans’ investments include equity-
oriented and fixed income-oriented investments, including but not limited to government obligations, corporate
bonds, and common and collective equity and fixed income funds.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 137
The following table presents changes in the fair value of the Company’s Pension Plans’ assets, projected
benefit obligation, funded status, and accumulated benefit obligation:
The Company’s projected benefit obligation increased for the year ending December 31, 2020, due to the
decrease in the discount rate assumption, partially offset by updated mortality assumptions. Citizens recognized
actuarial gains and losses on the Pension Plans in AOCI resulting in an ending balance of $571 million and $551
million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Citizens does not plan to contribute to the Qualified Plan in 2021. No contributions were made to the
Qualified Plan in 2020 or 2019. Citizens expects to contribute $8 million to the Non-Qualified Plan in 2021 and
contributed $8 million to the Non-Qualified Plan in 2020 and 2019.
The following table presents other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI for
the Company’s Pension Plans:
Costs under the Company’s Pension Plans are actuarially computed and include current service costs and
amortization of prior service costs over the participants’ average future working lifetime. The actuarial cost
method used in determining the net periodic pension cost is the projected unit method.
The following table presents the components of net periodic pension (income) cost for the Company’s
Pension Plans:
Year Ended December 31,
Qualified Plan Non-Qualified Plan Total
(in millions) 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 2018
Service cost $3 $3 $3 $— $— $— $3 $3 $3
Interest cost 37 41 39 3 4 4 40 45 43
Expected return on plan assets (82) (72) (79) — — — (82) (72) (79)
Amortization of actuarial loss 14 17 15 3 2 2 17 19 17
Net periodic pension (income) cost(1) ($28) ($11) ($22) $6 $6 $6 ($22) ($5) ($16)
(1)
In the Consolidated Statements of Operations, service cost is presented in salaries and employee benefits, and all other components of net periodic pension
(income) cost are presented in other operating expense.
(in millions)
Expected benefit payments by fiscal year ending:
December 31, 2021 $69
December 31, 2022 70
December 31, 2023 70
December 31, 2024 70
December 31, 2025 70
December 31, 2026 - 2030 351
401(k) Plan
Citizens sponsors a 401(k) Plan under which employee tax-deferred/Roth after-tax contributions to the
401(k) Plan are matched by the Company after completion of one year of service. Contributions are matched at
100% up to an overall limitation of 4% on a pay period basis. Substantially all employees will receive an additional
2% of earnings after completion of one year of service, subject to limits set by the Internal Revenue Service.
Amounts contributed and expensed by the Company were $78 million in 2020 compared to $72 million in 2019
and $68 million in 2018.
Preferred Stock
The following table provides the number of authorized preferred shares, the number of issued and
outstanding, the liquidation value per share and the carrying amount as of December 31:
2020 2019
Liquidation
value per Preferred Carrying Preferred Carrying
(in millions, except per share and share data) share Shares Amount Shares Amount
Authorized ($25 par value) 100,000,000 100,000,000
Issued and outstanding
Series A $1,000 250,000 $247 250,000 $247
Series B 1,000 300,000 296 300,000 296
Series C 1,000 300,000 297 300,000 297
(1) (2)
Series D 1,000 300,000 293 300,000 293
(1) (3)
Series E 1,000 450,000 437 450,000 437
Series F 1,000 400,000 395 — —
Total issued and outstanding 2,000,000 $1,965 1,600,000 $1,570
(1)
Equivalent to $25 per depositary share.
(2)
Represented by 12,000,000 depositary shares each representing a 1/40th interest in the Series D Preferred Stock.
(3)
Represented by 18,000,000 depositary shares each representing a 1/40th interest in the Series E Preferred Stock.
The following table provides information related to the Company’s preferred stock outstanding as of
December 31, 2020:
(in millions, except per share and share data)
Number of Optional
Preferred Shares Annual Per Share Dividend Redemption
Stock(1) Issue Date Issued Dividend Dates (2)
Rate Date(3)
Series A April 6, 2015 250,000 Semi-annually beginning October 6, 2015 until 5.500% until April 6, 2020 April 6, 2020
April 6, 2020
3 Mo. LIBOR plus 3.960%
Quarterly beginning July 6, 2020 beginning April 6, 2020
Series B May 24, 2018 300,000 Semi-annually beginning January 6, 2019 until 6.000% until July 6, 2023 July 6, 2023
July 6, 2023
3 Mo. LIBOR plus 3.003%
Quarterly beginning October 6, 2023 beginning July 6, 2023
Series C October 25, 2018 300,000 Quarterly beginning January 6, 2019 until April 6.375% until April 6, 2024 April 6, 2024
6, 2024
3 Mo. LIBOR plus 3.157%
Quarterly beginning July 6, 2024 beginning April 6, 2024
Series D January 29, 2019 300,000(4) Quarterly beginning April 6, 2019 until April 6, 6.350% until April 6, 2024 April 6, 2024
2024
Quarterly beginning July 6, 2024 3 Mo. LIBOR plus 3.642%
beginning April 6, 2024
Series E October 28, 2019 450,000(5) Quarterly beginning January 6, 2020 5.000% January 6, 2025
Series F June 4, 2020 400,000 Quarterly beginning October 6, 2020 until 5.650% until October 6, October 6, 2025
October 6, 2025 2025
Quarterly beginning January 6, 2026 5 Yr. US Treasury rate plus
5.313% beginning October 6,
2025
(1)
Series A through D are non-cumulative fixed-to-floating rate perpetual preferred stock, Series E is non-cumulative fixed-rate perpetual preferred stock, and
Series F is non-cumulative fixed-rate reset perpetual preferred stock. Except in limited circumstances, each series of preferred stock does not have voting
rights.
(2)
Dividends are payable when, and if, declared by the Company’s Board of Directors or an authorized committee thereof.
(3)
Redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, on any dividend payment date on or after the date stated, or in whole but not in part, at any time
within 90 days following a regulatory capital treatment event a as defined in the applicable certificate of designations, in each case at a redemption price
equal to $1,000 per share, plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. Under current rules, any redemption is
subject to approval by the FRB.
(4)
Represented by 12,000,000 depositary shares each representing a 1/40th interest in the Series D Preferred Stock.
(5)
Represented by 18,000,000 depositary shares each representing a 1/40th interest in the Series E Preferred Stock.
Treasury Stock
The purchase of the Company’s common stock is recorded at cost. At the date of retirement or
subsequent reissuance, treasury stock is reduced by the cost of such stock on a first-in, first-out basis with
differences recorded in additional paid-in capital or retained earnings, as applicable.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company paid $270 million to repurchase 7,548,655
common shares at a weighted-average price of $35.77. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company
recorded no shares of treasury stock associated with share-based compensation plan activity.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid $1.220 billion to repurchase 34,305,768
common shares at an average price of $35.56. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded
no shares of treasury stock associated with share-based compensation plan activity.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the following number of CFG share awards
were granted: 2020 (1,947,902 granted with a weighted-average grant price of $32.64); 2019 (1,677,167 granted
with weighted-average grant price of $36.21); and 2018 (1,174,501 granted with weighted-average grant price of
$39.54).
In addition, the following number of CFG share awards became vested and distributed: 2020 (1,384,091
vested and distributed with a weighted-average grant price of $38.59); 2019 (1,518,836 vested with weighted-
average grant price of $32.21); and 2018 (877,111 vested with weighted-average grant price of $30.50).
There are 46,236,889 shares of Company common stock available for awards to be granted under the
Omnibus Plan and Directors Plan. In addition, there are 5,024,904 shares available for awards under the ESPP.
Upon settlement of share-based awards, the Company generally issues new shares, but may also issue shares
from treasury stock.
Citizens measures compensation expense related to stock awards based upon the fair value of the awards
on the grant date. Compensation expense is adjusted for forfeitures as they occur. The related expense is
charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period (e.g., vesting period) of the award.
With respect to performance-based stock awards, compensation expense is adjusted upward or downward based
upon the probability of achievement of performance. Awards that continue to vest after retirement are expensed
over the shorter of the period of time from grant date to the final vesting date or from the grant date to the date
when an employee is retirement eligible. Awards granted to employees who are retirement eligible at the grant
date are generally expensed immediately upon grant.
Share-based compensation expense (including ESPP) was $48 million, $55 million, and $41 million for the
years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2020, the total unrecognized
compensation expense for nonvested equity awards granted was $43 million. This expense is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. No share-based compensation costs were
capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.
Citizens recognized income tax benefits related to share-based compensation arrangements of $8 million,
$1 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Commitments to extend credit $74,160 $72,743
Letters of credit 2,239 2,190
Risk participation agreements 98 37
Loans sold with recourse 54 37
Marketing rights 29 33
Total $76,580 $75,040
The Company’s commercial loan trading desk provides ongoing secondary market support and liquidity to
its clients. Unsettled loan trades (i.e., loan purchase contracts) represent firm commitments to purchase loans
from a third party at an agreed-upon price. Principal amounts associated with unsettled commercial loan trades
are off-balance sheet commitments until delivery of the loans has taken place. The principal balances of
unsettled commercial loan trade purchases and sales were $170 million and $237 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2020 and $183 million and $236 million, respectively, at December 31, 2019.
Letters of Credit
Letters of credit in the table above reflect commercial, standby financial and standby performance
letters of credit. Standby letters of credit, both financial and performance, are issued by the Company for its
customers. They are used as conditional guarantees of payment to a third party in the event the customer either
fails to make specific payments (financial) or fails to complete a specific project (performance). The Company’s
exposure to credit loss in the event of counterparty nonperformance in connection with the above instruments is
represented by the contractual amount of those instruments, net of the value of collateral held. Generally,
letters of credit are collateralized by cash, accounts receivable, inventory or investment securities. Credit risk
associated with letters of credit is considered in determining the appropriate amounts of reserves for unfunded
commitments. Standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit are issued for terms of up to ten years
and one year, respectively.
Other Commitments
Citizens has additional off-balance sheet arrangements that are summarized below:
• Marketing Rights - During 2003, Citizens entered into a 25-year agreement to acquire the naming and
marketing rights of a baseball stadium in Pennsylvania.
• Loans sold with recourse - Citizens is an originator and servicer of residential mortgages and routinely
sells such mortgage loans in the secondary market and to GSEs. In the context of such sales, the Company
makes certain representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the underlying loans and,
as a result, may be contractually required to repurchase such loans or indemnify certain parties against
losses for certain breaches of those representations and warranties. The Company also sells the
government guaranteed portion of certain SBA loans to outside investors, for which it retains the
servicing rights.
• Risk Participation Agreements - RPAs are guarantees issued by the Company to other parties for a fee,
whereby the Company agrees to participate in the credit risk of a derivative customer of the other party.
The current amount of credit exposure is spread out over 77 counterparties. RPAs generally have terms
ranging from one year to five years; however, certain outstanding agreements have terms as long as nine
years.
Contingencies
The Company operates in a legal and regulatory environment that exposes it to potentially significant
risks. A certain amount of litigation ordinarily results from the nature of the Company’s banking and other
businesses. The Company is a party to legal proceedings, including class actions. The Company is also the subject
of investigations, reviews, subpoenas, and regulatory matters arising out of its normal business operations,
which, in some instances, relate to concerns about fair lending, unfair and/or deceptive practices, mortgage-
related issues, and mis-selling of certain products. In addition, the Company engages in discussions with relevant
governmental and regulatory authorities on a regular and ongoing basis regarding various issues, and any issues
discussed or identified may result in investigatory or other action being taken. Litigation and regulatory matters
may result in settlements, damages, fines, penalties, public or private censure, increased costs, required
remediation, restrictions on business activities, or other impacts on the Company.
In these disputes and proceedings, the Company contests liability and the amount of damages as
appropriate. Given their complex nature, and based on the Company's experience, it may be years before some
Derivatives
The vast majority of the Company’s derivatives portfolio is composed of “plain vanilla” interest rate
swaps, which are traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. For
these interest rate derivatives, fair value is determined utilizing models that primarily use market observable
inputs, such as swap rates and yield curves. The pricing models used to value interest rate swaps calculate the
sum of each instrument’s fixed and variable cash flows, which are then discounted using an appropriate yield
curve (i.e., LIBOR or Overnight Index Swap curve) to arrive at the fair value of each swap. The pricing models do
not contain a high level of subjectivity as the methodologies used do not require significant judgment. Citizens
also considers certain adjustments to the modeled price that market participants would make when pricing each
instrument, including a credit valuation adjustment that reflects the credit quality of the swap counterparty.
Citizens incorporates the effect of exposure to a particular counterparty’s credit by netting its derivative
contracts with the available collateral and calculating a credit valuation adjustment on the basis of the net
position with the counterparty where permitted. The determination of this adjustment requires judgment on
The following table presents a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3 for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Impaired Loans
The carrying amount of collateral-dependent impaired loans is compared to the appraised value of the
collateral less costs to dispose and is classified as Level 2. Any excess of carrying amount over the appraised
value is charged to the ALLL.
The following table presents losses on assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recorded
in earnings:
The following table presents assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
The following table presents the estimated fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value
in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The carrying amounts are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
under the indicated captions:
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Year Ended December 31, 2019
Consumer Commercial Consumer Commercial
(in millions) Banking Banking Consolidated (1) Banking Banking Consolidated (1)
Service charges and fees $301 $100 $401 $400 $103 $503
Card fees 185 31 216 215 39 254
Capital markets fees — 249 249 — 202 202
Trust and investment services fees 203 — 203 202 — 202
Other banking fees 1 10 11 1 10 11
Total revenue from contracts with customers $690 $390 $1,080 $818 $354 $1,172
(1)
There is no revenue from contracts with customers included in Other non-segment operations.
Citizens does not have any material contract assets, liabilities, or other receivables recorded on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets related to revenues from contracts with customers as of December 31, 2020.
Citizens has elected the practical expedient to exclude disclosure of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i)
contracts with an original expected length of one year or less and (ii) contracts for which the Company
recognized revenue at the amount to which the Company has the right to invoice for services performed.
The following table presents a reconciliation between the U.S. federal income tax rate and the
Company’s effective income tax rate:
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019
Deferred tax assets:
Other comprehensive income $29 $141
Allowance for credit losses 622 315
State net operating loss carryforwards 71 62
Accrued expenses not currently deductible 77 24
Investment and other tax credit carryforwards 99 89
Fair value adjustments — —
Total deferred tax assets 898 631
Valuation allowance (98) (79)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance 800 552
Deferred tax liabilities:
Leasing transactions 459 513
Amortization of intangibles 376 370
Depreciation 262 186
Pension and other employee compensation plans 107 124
Partnerships 76 71
Deferred Income 62 79
MSRs 87 75
Total deferred tax liabilities 1,429 1,418
Net deferred tax liability $629 $866
Deferred tax assets are recognized for net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards.
Valuation allowances are recorded as necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that management
concludes are more likely than not to be realized.
At December 31, 2020, the Company had state tax net operating loss carryforwards of $1.2 billion.
Limitations on the ability to realize these carryforwards are reflected in the associated valuation allowance. At
December 31, 2020, the Company had a valuation allowance of $98 million against various deferred tax assets
related to state net operating losses and state tax credits, as it is management’s current assessment that it is
more likely than not that the Company will not recognize a portion of the deferred tax assets related to these
items. The valuation allowance increased $19 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Effective with the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, the reserve method for bad debts was no longer
permitted for tax purposes. The repeal of the reserve method required the recapture of the reserve balance in
excess of certain base year reserve amounts attributable to years ended prior to 1988. At December 31, 2020,
the Company’s base year loan loss reserves attributable to years ended prior to 1988, for which no deferred
income taxes have been provided, was $557 million. This base year reserve may become taxable if certain
distributions are made with respect to the stock of the Company or if the Company ceases to qualify as a bank
for tax purposes. No actions are planned that would cause this reserve to become wholly or partially taxable.
Citizens files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state and local
jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state and local income tax
examinations by major tax authorities for years before 2017.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax
benefits:
December 31,
(in millions) 2020 2019 2018
Balance at the beginning of the year $5 $8 $5
Gross increase for tax positions related to current year — — 3
Gross decrease for tax positions related to prior years — (2) —
Decrease for tax positions as a result of the lapse of the statutes of limitations (1) (1) —
Balance at end of year $4 $5 $8
Minimum Capital
Actual Adequacy
(in millions, except ratio data) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio(1)
As of December 31, 2020
CET1 capital $14,607 10.0 $11,596 7.9 %
Tier 1 capital 16,572 11.3 13,797 9.4
Total capital 19,602 13.4 16,733 11.4
Tier 1 leverage 16,572 9.4 7,015 4.0
As of December 31, 2019
CET1 capital $14,304 10.0 % $10,004 7.0 %
Tier 1 capital 15,874 11.1 12,148 8.5
Total capital 18,542 13.0 15,006 10.5
Tier 1 leverage 15,874 10.0 6,351 4.0
(1)
“Minimum Capital ratio” includes stress capital buffer of 3.4% for 2020 and capital conservation buffer of 2.5% for 2019; N/A to Tier 1 leverage.
Under the FRB’s Capital Plan Rule, the Company may only make capital distributions, including payment
of dividends and share repurchases, in accordance with a capital plan that has been reviewed by the FRB with no
objection or as otherwise authorized by the FRB. The timing and exact amount of future dividends and share
repurchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital position, financial performance, risk-
weighted assets, capital impacts of strategic initiatives, market conditions and regulatory considerations. All
future capital distributions are subject to consideration and approval by the Board of Directors prior to
execution. See Note 16 for more information regarding the Company’s preferred stock issuances, common stock
repurchases, and dividends.
Dividends payable by CBNA, as a national bank subsidiary, are limited to the lesser of the amount
calculated under a “recent earnings” test and an “undivided profits” test. Under the recent earnings test, a
dividend may not be paid if the total of all dividends declared by a bank in any calendar year is in excess of the
current year’s net income combined with the retained net income of the two preceding years, less any required
transfers to surplus, unless the national bank obtains the approval of the OCC. Under the undivided profits test, a
dividend may not be paid in excess of the entity’s “undivided profits” (generally, accumulated net profits that
have not been paid out as dividends or transferred to surplus). Federal bank regulatory agencies have issued
policy statements which provide that FDIC-insured depository institutions and their holding companies should
generally pay dividends only out of their current operating earnings.
Reportable Segments
Segment results are determined based upon the Company’s management reporting system, which assigns
balance sheet and statement of operations items to each of the business segments. The process is designed
around the Company’s organizational and management structure and accordingly, the results derived are not
necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions. A description of each
reportable segment and table of financial results is presented below:
Consumer Banking
The Consumer Banking segment focuses on retail customers and small businesses with annual revenues of
up to $25 million. It offers traditional banking products and services, including checking, savings, home loans,
Commercial Banking
The Commercial Banking segment primarily targets companies with annual revenues from $25 million to
$2.5 billion and provides a full complement of financial products and solutions, including loans, leases, trade
financing, deposits, cash management, commercial cards, foreign exchange, interest rate risk management,
corporate finance and capital markets advisory capabilities. It focuses on middle-market companies, large
corporations and institutions and has dedicated teams with industry expertise in government banking, not-for-
profit, healthcare, technology, professionals, oil and gas, asset finance, franchise finance, asset-based lending,
commercial real estate, private equity and sponsor finance. While the segment’s business development efforts
are predominantly focused in the Company’s footprint, some of its specialized industry businesses also operate
selectively on a national basis (such as healthcare, asset finance and franchise finance). A key component of
Commercial Banking’s growth strategy is to bring ideas to clients that help their businesses thrive, and in doing
so, expand the loan portfolio and ancillary product sales.
Non-segment Operations
Other
Non-segment operations are classified as Other, which includes corporate functions, the Treasury
function, the securities portfolio, wholesale funding activities, intangible assets, community development, non-
core assets, and other unallocated assets, liabilities, capital, revenues, provision for credit losses, and expenses
including income tax expense. In addition to non-segment operations, Other includes goodwill and any associated
goodwill impairment charges. For impairment testing purposes, the Company assigns goodwill to its Consumer
Banking and Commercial Banking reporting units.
Management accounting practices utilized by the Company as the basis of presentation for segment results
include the following:
FTP adjustments
Citizens utilizes an FTP system to eliminate the effect of interest rate risk from the segments’ net
interest income because such risk is centrally managed within the Treasury function. The FTP system credits (or
charges) the segments with the economic value of the funds created (or used) by the segments. The FTP system
provides a funds credit for sources of funds and a funds charge for the use of funds by each segment. The sum of
the interest income/expense and FTP charges/credits for each segment is its designated net interest income. The
variance between the Company’s cumulative FTP charges and cumulative FTP credits is offset in Other. Citizens
periodically evaluates and refines its methodologies used to measure financial performance of its business
operating segments.
Goodwill
For impairment testing purposes, the Company assigns goodwill to its Consumer Banking and Commercial
Banking reporting units. For management reporting purposes, the Company presents the goodwill balance (and
any related impairment charges) in Other.
Substantially all revenues generated and long-lived assets held by the Company’s business segments are
derived from clients that reside in the United States. Neither business segment earns revenue from a single
external customer that represents ten percent or more of the Company’s total revenues.
In accordance with federal and state banking regulations, dividends paid by CBNA to the Company are
subject to certain limitations, see Note 24 for more information. Additionally, see Note 16 for more information
regarding the Company’s common and preferred stock dividends.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 160
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. The design of any
disclosure controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In accordance with Rule
13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an
evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management,
including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and
communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting: During the first quarter of 2020, the Company
implemented controls related to the adoption of Current Expected Credit Losses (ASU 2016-13, Financial
Instruments- Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments) and the related
financial statement reporting. Changes to the control environment specific to the Allowance for Credit Loss
process include the enhancement of data validation procedures, tailoring of governance routines and verification
of information provided for disclosures. There were no other changes in our internal control over financial
reporting identified in management's evaluation pursuant to Rules13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act
during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, the Report of the Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the Report of the Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting are included in Item 8.
We refer in Part III of this Report to relevant sections of our 2021 Proxy Statement for the 2021 annual
meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the close
of our 2020 fiscal year. Portions of our 2021 Proxy Statement, including the sections we refer to in this Report,
are incorporated by reference into this Report.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by this item is set forth under the captions “Corporate Governance Matters” —
“Board Governance and Oversight — Director Independence” and “Related Person Transactions” of our 2021 Proxy
Statement, which is incorporated by reference into this item.
(a)(1) Financial Statements of Citizens Financial Group, Inc., included in this Report:
• Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements;
• Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019;
• Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018;
• Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and
2018;
• Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020,
2019 and 2018;
• Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018; and
• Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
All financial statement schedules for the Registrant have been included in the audited Consolidated
Financial Statements or the related footnotes in Item 8, or are either inapplicable or not required.
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated April 23, 2020 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 24, 2020)
3.2 Certificate of Designations of the Registrant with respect to the Series F Preferred Stock, dated June 1,
2020, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and effective June 1, 2020 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 4, 2020)
3.3 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (as amended and restated on April 23, 2020)
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 24, 2020)
4.1 Senior Debt Indenture between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon dated as of October 28,
2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed
October 29, 2015)
4.2 Subordinated Indenture between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon dated as of September
28, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1,
filed July 28, 2015)
4.3 Form of Certificate representing the Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 6, 2015)
4.4 Form of Certificate representing the Series B Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 24, 2018)
4.5 Form of Deposit Agreement, by and among the Company, Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust
Company, N.A., jointly as depositary, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts
described therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form
8-A, filed October 25, 2019)
4.6 Form of Depositary Receipt (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 of the Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed January 29, 2019)
4.7 Description of the Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1934*
4.8 Agreement to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of instruments
defining the rights of holders of certain long-term debt of the registrant and consolidated subsidiaries*
10.1 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.11 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 14, 2014)†
10.2 Amended and Restated Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan as of June 23, 2016
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 5,
2016)†
10.3 Amended and Restated Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan as of June 20, 2019
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 6,
2019)†
10.4 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement for 2017 Award (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K, Filed February 24, 2017)†
10.5 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement for 2018 Award (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed February 22, 2018)†
10.7 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement†*
10.8 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for
Bruce Van Saun Relating to Annual Awards (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K, Filed February 24, 2017)†
10.9 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form of Performance Stock Award Agreement
for 2017 Awards (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K,
Filed February 24, 2017)†
10.10 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Amendment to Form of Performance Stock
Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q, Filed August 3, 2017)†
10.11 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form of Performance Stock Award Agreement
for 2018 Awards (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed February 22, 2018)†
10.12 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form of Performance Stock Unit Award
Agreement for 2019 and 2020 Awards (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Annual
Report on Form 10-K, filed February 21, 2019)†
10.13 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form of Performance Stock Unit Award
Agreement†*
10.14 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement for
Bruce Van Saun Relating to Annual Awards (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K, Filed February 24, 2017)†
10.15 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 99.3 of the Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed September 26, 2014)†
10.16 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Compensation Policy, Amended and Effective as of
April 26, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed May 9, 2018)†
10.17 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Compensation Policy, as amended April 25, 2019
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6,
2019)†
10.18 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed September 26, 2014)†
10.19 Amended and Restated Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan as
of June 23, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
filed August 5, 2016)†
10.20 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 2014 Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan Form of Restricted Stock
Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Annual Report on Form
10-K, filed February 26, 2016)†
10.22 Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.,
effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of Amendment No. 2 to
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed August 15, 2014)†
10.23 Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Amendment No.
3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed September 8, 2014)†
10.24 Amended and Restated CFG Voluntary Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2009
and amended and restated on September 1, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of
the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2015)†
10.25 First Amendment to the CFG Voluntary Executive Deferred Compensation Plan dated March 1, 2019
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24,
2020)†
10.26 Second Amendment to the CFG Voluntary Executive Deferred Compensation Plan dated December 9, 2019
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24,
2020)†
10.27 Third Amendment to the CFG Voluntary Executive Deferred Compensation Plan dated March 4, 2020†*
10.28 Amended and Restated Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1,
2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement
on Form S-1, filed August 15, 2014)†
10.29 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Form of Deferred Cash Award Agreement for 2016 Awards (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 26, 2016)†
10.30 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Form of Deferred Cash Award Agreement for 2017 and 2018 Awards
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 22,
2018)†
10.31 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Form of Deferred Cash Award Agreement for 2019 and 2020 Awards
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 21,
2019)†
10.32 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Form of Deferred Cash Award Agreement†*
10.33 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Executive Severance Practice (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.21 of Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed August 15, 2014)†
10.34 Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Performance Formula and Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.28 of Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2015)†
10.35 Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated May 5, 2016, between the Registrant
and Bruce Van Saun (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, filed May 9, 2016)†
10.36 Executive Employment Agreement, dated March 23, 2015, between the Registrant and Donald H. McCree
III and subsequent addendum dated August 2, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 3, 2017)†
10.38 Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 13, 2016, between the Registrant and John F. Woods
and subsequent addendum dated August 2, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 3, 2017)†
10.39 Executive Employment Agreement, dated August 25, 2011, between the Registrant and Susan LaMonica
and subsequent addendums dated July 15, 2014 and August 11, 2017†*
10.40 Supplemental Retirement Agreement, dated October 31, 1995, as amended, between Charter One
Financial, Inc. and, Charles J. Koch (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of Amendment No.
3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed September 8, 2014)†
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
101 The following materials from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2020, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements*
104 Cover page interactive data file in inline XBRL format, included in Exhibit 101 to this report*
Not applicable.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
_________________________________________________________________________________________
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:
1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Form 10-K”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
EXHIBIT 32.2
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:
1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Form 10-K”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. is one of the nation’s oldest and largest financial institutions,
with $183.3 billion in assets as of December 31, 2020.
Headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island, Citizens offers a broad range of retail and commercial
banking products and services to individuals, small businesses, middle-market companies, large
corporations and institutions. Citizens helps its customers reach their potential by listening to them
and by understanding their needs in order to offer tailored advice, ideas and solutions.
In Consumer Banking, Citizens provides an integrated experience that includes mobile and online
banking, a 24/7 customer contact center and the convenience of approximately 2,700 ATMs and
approximately 1,000 branches in 11 states in the New England, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions.
Consumer Banking products and services include a full range of banking, lending, savings, wealth
management and small business offerings.
In Commercial Banking, Citizens offers a broad complement of financial products and solutions,
including lending and leasing, deposit and treasury management services, foreign exchange, interest
rate and commodity risk management solutions, as well as syndicated loans, corporate finance,
merger and acquisition, and debt and equity capital markets capabilities.
Investor Relations
Additional information about the company,
including annual and quarterly financial information,
is available at investor.citizensbank.com.
Inquiries may also be directed to:
[email protected]
Bruce Van Saun Malcolm Griggs Michael Ruttledge
Executive Chairman and Chief Risk Officer Chief Information Officer
Chief Executive Officer
Committee Beth Johnson Ted Swimmer
Mary Ellen Baker Chief Experience Officer Head of Corporate Finance
Head of Business Services and Capital Markets
Susan LaMonica
Brendan Coughlin Chief Human John F. Woods
Head of Consumer Banking Resources Officer Vice Chairman
Chief Financial Officer
Stephen T. Gannon Donald H. McCree
General Counsel and Vice Chairman and
Chief Legal Officer Head of Commercial Banking
National
Reach
Deposits in all
50 states with
Citizens Access®
5 million
retail lending
customers across
all 50 states Branch Network
Commercial Coverage
Industry Vertical Coverage
1. Howard W. Hanna III will retire from the Board after his current term expires, effective as of the conclusion
of the April 2021 Annual Meeting.
IJ Citizens
Financial Group, lnc:M