Unit - 2 Vapour Power Cycle - Theory - Notes
Unit - 2 Vapour Power Cycle - Theory - Notes
UNIT-2
Vapour Power Cycles
Contents: Carnot vapour power cycles, drawbacks as a reference cycle, Simple Rankine
cycle, description, T- S diagram, analysis for performance. Comparison of Carnot and
Rankine cycles. Effects of pressure and temperature on Rankine cycle performance.
Actual vapour power cycles. Reheat Rankine cycle. Numerical problems.
INTRODUCTION:
Vapour power cycles are used in steam power plants. In a power cycle heat energy
(released by the burning of fuel) is converted into work, in which a working fluid repeatedly
perform a succession of processes. In a vapour power cycle, the working fluid is water,
which undergoes a change of phase.
The above fig. shows a simple steam power plant working on the vapour cycle.
Heat is transformed to the water in the boiler (𝑄𝑅 )from an external source (furnace,
where fuel is continuously burnt) to raise steam, the high pressure high temperature steam
leaving the boiler expands in the turbine to produce shaft work (𝑤𝑇 ), the steam leaving the
turbine condenses into the condenser (where cooling water circulates), rejecting heat (𝑄𝑅 ),
and then the water is pumped back (𝑤𝑝 ) to the boiler.
Since the fluid is undergoing a cyclic process, the net energy transferred as heat
during the cycle must equal to the net energy, transfer as work from the fluid(because no
net change in its internal energy over the cycle).
By the first law of thermodynamics,
∑ 𝑄= ∑ 𝑤
𝐶𝑦𝐶𝑙𝑒 𝐶𝑦𝐶𝑙𝑒
Or 𝑄1 − 𝑄2 = 𝑊𝑇 − 𝑊𝑃
𝑄𝑠 − 𝑄𝑅 = 𝑊𝑇 − 𝑊𝑝
𝑄𝑠 = 𝑄1 - Heat transferred to the working fluid (kJ/kg)
𝑄𝑅 = 𝑄2 - Heat rejected from the working fluid (kJ/kg)
𝑘𝐽
𝑤𝑝 − 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 (𝑘𝑔)
Or
𝑄𝑠 − 𝑄𝑅 𝑄𝑅
𝜂𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒 = =1−
𝑄𝑠 𝑄𝑠
𝑑𝑞
Because WKT, 𝑑𝑠 = 𝑑𝑡
Fig a, b and c shows the schematic diagram for a simple steam power cycle which
works on the principle of Rankine cycle.
The Rankine cycle comprises the following processes:
Process1-2: constant pressure heat transfer in the boiler.
Process 2-3: reversible adiabatic expansion process in the steam turbine.
Process 3-4: constant pressure heat transfer in the condenser
Process 4-1: Reversible adiabatic compression process in the pump
The numbers on the plots corresponding to the numbers on the schematic diagram.
For any given pressure, the steam approaching the steam turbine may be dry saturated (state
2), wet (state 2’) or superheated (state 2’’), but the fluid approaching the pump is in each
case saturated liquid (state 4).
Steam expands reversible and adiabatically in the turbine from 2 to 3 or 2’ to 3’or
2’’ to 3’’, the steam leaving the turbine condenses to water in the condenser reversible at
constant or from state 3(or 3’ or 3’’) to state 4.
Also the water is heated in the boiler from steam reversibly at constant pressure
from state 1 to state (or 2’ or 2’’).
Apply SFEE for boiler, turbine, condenser and pump on the basis of unit mass of
fluid and neglecting the K.E and P.E changes, the work and heat quantities can be
evaluated.
We know general SFEE Equation i.e..,
Qx+m1 (h1+V1 2/2 + gZ1) = Wx+m2 ((h2+V2 2/2 + gZ2)
Apply above equation for flow device containing in steam power plant
Then we get,
For 1kg of fluid, the SFEE for the boiler as control volume,
Given, Qs + h1 = h2 => Qs = h2 – h1 ---------- (1)
SFEE to turbine, h2 = h3 + WT => WT = h2 – h3 ---------- (2)
SFEE to condenser, h3 = h4 – QL => QL = h3 – h4 ---------- (3)
SFEE to pump, h4 + WP = h1 => WP = h1 – h4 ---------- (4)
Efficiency of the Rankine cycle
T.ds=du+Pdv. Q=u+w
T.ds=dh-V.dp. dq=du+dw
T.ds=du+Pdv
h=u+Pv, u=h-Pv, du=dh-Pdv-Vdp.
h1-h4 =v4(p1-p4)
Usually the pump work is quite small compared to the turbine work and is same time
neglected.
In that case h1=h4
= 3600/ ηRankine……….(kJ/kWh)
Work ratio= φδW/Positive work
= (WT-WP)/WT
WR = [(h2-h3)-(h1-h4)]/ (h2-h3)
- Carnot cycle has the maximum possible efficiency for the given limits of temperature.
But it is not suitable in steam power plants. Fig a, b, c shows that Rankine and Carnot
cycles on the T-S diagram.
- The reversible adiabatic expansion in the turbine, the constant temperature heat
rejection in the condenser and the reversible adiabatic compression in the pump
are similar characteristics features of both the Rankine and Carnot cycle.
- But whereas the heat addition process in the Rankine cycle is reversible and at
constant pressure, in the Carnot cycle it is reversible and isothermal.
- In fig a & c , QR is same in both the cycles, but since QS is more, ηCarnot> ηRankine
- The two Carnot cycles in fig a & b have same thermal efficiency
Therefore in fig. b also ηCarnot> ηRankine
But the Carnot cycle cannot be realized in practice because the pump work is very large.
- Whereas in a & c it is impossible to add heat at infinite pressures and at constant
temperature from 1c to 2, in b it is difficult to construct the quality at 4c , so that
isentropic compression leads to a saturated liquid state.
Some More Discussion and Comparison between Carnot and Rankine Cycle.
- Rankine cycle has higher specific workout put them Carnot between same temperature
limits.
- Rankine transfer provides high rate of heat transfer in boiler and condenser.
- Heat supplied at constant temperature in Rankine cycle is less than Carnot cycle.
- ηCarnot> ηRankine.
Fig (a): the effect of lowering the condenser for on the ideal Rankine cycle.
- Thermal efficiency of the cycle can be improved by reducing the condenser pressure,
I lowers the temperature of the steam and thus the temperature at which heat is
rejected.
The effect of lowering the condenser pressure on the Rankine cycle efficiency is
illustrated on T-S diagram in fig a.
- In the above fig it is seen that pressure reduces from P4 to P41, since it increases the
Wnet areas.
- Also it increases heat input from ‘1 to 2’ to ‘11 to 2’.
But this increase is very small.
Thus overall effect of lowering the condenser is an increase in thermal efficiency of the
cycle.
Superheating:
Fig b. the effect of superheating the steam to higher temperatures on the ideal
Rankine cycle.
Another way of increasing the average temperature during the heat addition process is to
increase the operating pressure of the boiler, which automatically raises the temperature at
which boiling takes place.
This, in turn, raises the average temperature at which heat is transferred to the steam
and thus raises the thermal efficiency of the cycle.
The effect of increasing the boiler pressure on the performance of vapour power
cycle is illustrated on T-S diagram.
Notice that for a fixed turbine inlet temperature, the cycle shifts to the left and
moisture content of steam at the turbine exit increases.
This undesirable side effect can be converted by reheating the steam.
Fig ‘a’ deviation of actual Vapour power cycle from the ideal Rankine cycle.
Fig ‘b’ the effect of pump and turbine.
The actual Vapour power cycle differs from the ideal Rankine cycle, as shown in
the fig ‘a’.
As a result of irreversibilities in various components mainly because of fluid friction
and heat loss to the surroundings.
Fluid friction causes pressure drop in the boiler, the condenser and the piping
between the various components.
As a result, steam leaves the boiler at a lower pressure. Also the pressure at the
turbine inlet is lower than that at the boiler exit due to pressure drop in the connecting pipes.
The pressure drop in the condenser is usually very small.
To compensate these pressure drop, the water must be pumped to sufficiently higher
pressure which requires the larger pump and larger were input to the pump
The other major source of irreversibility is the heat loss from the steam to the
surrounding as the steam flows through various components.
To maintain the same level of network output, more heat needs to be transferred to
the steam in the boiler to compensate for these considered heat losses. As a result cycle
efficiency decreases.
As a result of irreversibilities, a pump requires a greater work input, and a turbine
produces a smaller work output.
Under ideal conditions, the flow through these devices are isentropic. The deviation
of actual pump and turbines from the isentropic ones can be accounted for by utilizing
isentropic efficiency defined as,
ℎ −ℎ
𝜂𝑃 = 𝑊𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙 /𝑊𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = ℎ 1𝑠 − ℎ4
1𝑎 4
ℎ −ℎ
𝜂𝑇 = 𝑊𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 /𝑊𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙 = ℎ2 − ℎ3𝑎
2 3𝑠