Catalytic Reactor Design
Catalytic Reactor Design
Khalaf
University of Basrah
College of Engineering
Chemical Engineering Department
Fourth Year
Second Semester
Part One:
Heterogeneous processes; Catalysis and adsorption; Classification and
preparation of catalysts; Promoters and inhibitors, Rate equations of fluid-
solid catalytic reactions; Hougen-Watson and power law models;
Procurement and analysis of kinetic data;
Part Two:
Reaction and diffusion in porous catalysts; Isothermal and non-isothermal
effectiveness factors; Effect of intra-phase transport,effect of external mass
transfer,; Global reaction rate.
Part Three:
Design of catalytic reactors: Isothermal and adiabatic fixed bed reactors.
Part Four:
Kinetics of catalyst Poisoning, Kinetics of catalyst deactivation and
regeneration.
Part One:
• Heterogeneous processes; Catalysis and adsorption.
• Classification and preparation of catalysts; Promoters
and inhibitors.
• Rate equations of fluid-solid catalytic reactions.
• The Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW)
and power law models.
• Analyzing Data from Laboratory Reactors, analysis of
kinetic data.
An Active Site is a point on the surface that can form strong chemical bonds with an
adsorbed atom or molecule.
To make a catalytic process commercially viable, the number of sites per unit reactor
volume should be such that the rate of product formation is on the order of 1
mol/L·hour .
Metallic conductors: The metals that have strong electronic interaction with the
adsorbates are included in this category. The metals are used in various catalytic
reactions such as methanol synthesis, oxidation , hydrogenation and dehydrogenation
processes.
Semiconductors :
The oxides and sulfides of transition metals that have catalytic activity are included in
this category. Similar to conducting metals, they are also capable of electronic
interaction with adsorbed species and catalyze the same type of reactions
Common transition oxides and sulfides such as CuO, AgO, NiO CoO, Fe 2O3 , MnO,
Cr2O3, FeS, V2O5 show conductivity. These materials participate in catalytic reactions
and reaction occurs through acceptation or donation of electrons between the reactant
material and catalysts. Few applications of semiconductor catalysts are : CuO for
oxidation of nitric oxides, NiO for dehydrogenation of alkanes, MnO 2 for oxidation
of alcohols, and V2O5 for oxidation of hydrocarbons.
1.2-Support or Carrier:
Support or carrier provides large surface area for dispersion of small amount of
catalytically active agent. This is particularly important when expensive metals, such
as platinum, ruthenium, palladium or silver are used as the active agent. Supports
give the catalysts its physical form, texture, mechanical resistance and certain activity
particularly for bifunctional catalysts. Area of the support can range from 1 - 1000
m2/gm. Common supports are alumina, silica, silica-alumina, molecular sieves etc.
The surface area of α - alumina is in the range 1-10 m2/gm whereas the surface area
for γ or η - alumina can be in the range 100 – 300 m2/gm.
1.3-Promoters :
Promoters are generally defined as substances added during preparation of catalysts
that improve the activity or selectivity or stabilize the catalytic agents. The promoter
is present in a small amount and by itself has little or no activity
Negative promoters or inhibitors:
Inhibitors act opposite to promoters. When added in small amounts, these can reduce
catalyst activity, selectivity or stability. Inhibitor is particularly useful for reducing
the activity of a catalyst for undesirable side reactions. In oxidation of ethylene,
ethylene dichloride is added to inhibit CO2 formation thus acting as an inhibitor.
• In the case of metal catalysts, the metal is generally dispersed onto a high area oxide
such as alumina.
• Metal oxides also can be dispersed on a second carrier oxide such as vanadium
supported on titanium, or it can be made into a high-area oxide.
• These carrier oxides can have surface areas ranging from 0.05m2/g to greater than
100 m2/g.
• The carrier oxides generally are pressed into shapes or extruded into pellets.
• The following shapes are frequently used in applications: Table 1 lists some of the
important commercial catalysts and their uses.
The energy of activation of a catalytic reaction is, therefore, lower than the energy
barrier. Thus, it is necessary to determine the adsorption and desorption rates in a
catalytic process. Thermodynamically, we do explain the adsorption phenomenon of
a fluid at the surface from the Gibbs free energy. It should be spontaneous and, thus,
∆Gads <0.
In a heterogeneous reaction sequence, mass transfer of reactants first takes place from
the bulk fluid to the external surface of the pellet. The reactants then diffuse from the
external surface into and through the pores within the pellet, with reaction taking
place only on the catalytic surface of the pores. A schematic representation of this
process is shown in Figures 4 and 5.
• The LHHW approach assumes that all active sites are energetically uniform and,
upon adsorption, adsorbed species do not interact with species already adsorbed.
The rate equation derived from mechanistic model that simulates the actual surface
phenomenon during the process is preferred for reactions involving solid catalysts.
The Langmuir-Hinshelwood–Hougen-Watson(LHHW) approach is one of the most
commonly used way of deriving rate expressions for fluid solid catalytic reactions.
The advantages of this method are that :
During this method of derivation of rate expression, all the physical transport steps
like mass transfer from bulk phase to catalyst surface or diffusion of reactants from
pore mouth to interior pore (intraparticle diffusion) are excluded. Thus, it is assumed
that the external and internal mass transport processes are very rapid relative to the
chemical rate process occurring on or within the catalyst particle.
The chemical rate depends on as shown in figure 6:
1.3.1.1-Adsorption Step:
Types of adsorption:
The rate of detachment of molecules from the surface can be a first-order process;
that is, the detachment from the surface is usually directly proportional to the
concentradon of sites occupied by the adsorbed molecules
𝑟𝐴𝐷 = 𝑘𝐴 𝑃𝐴 𝐶𝑉 − 𝑘 ′𝐴 𝐶𝐴𝑆 .........……………………………………….. (1)
In terms of the adsorption equilibrium constant KA where
𝑘𝐴
𝐾𝐴 =
𝑘 ′𝐴
C
rAD = k A PA Cv − A S --------------------------------------..(2)
KA
1. Singe site mechanism: Only the site to which the reactant is absorbed is involved
in the reaction
…..(3)
Where
𝑘𝑆
𝐾𝑆 = ′
𝑘𝑆
2. Dual site mechanism: Adsorbed reactant interacts with another vacant site to form
the product
A·S + S ⇌ S + B·S
9(3)
……….(4)
…………………….(5)
1.3.1.3-Desorption Step:
Products are desorbed into the bulk gas phase
……(6)
Where :
𝑘𝐷
𝐾𝐷 =
𝑘′𝐷
Derive the rate equation for when the surface reaction is rate limiting
(true ~70% of the time)
For Dual site mechanism:
……….(7)
This is the rate equation in terms of measurable species and rate constants for
the surface reaction control .
Now derive the rate equation for when adsorption is rate limiting
Concentration of vacant and occupied sites must be eliminated from the rate equation
If adsorption is rate limiting, kS>>kAD, so rS/kS can be approximated as 0. Then
……………………………………………….(8)
……………………………………….(9)
Subsitute equations(7 and 8)in equation (9) and solve for Cv using the site balance
equation
………………………………(10)
…………………………. ……..(11)
……………………………… (12)
………(13)
Among the various steps described, the slowest step controls the overall rate of
reaction and the other remaining steps are assumed to be at near equilibrium
conditions. This approach greatly simplifies the overall rate expression, reducing the
number of rate constants and equilibrium constants to be determined from
experimental data. Further each step in this method is assumed to be elementary and
the number of sites is conserved in each step.
…………….. (14)
Now, since all the other steps are considered to be in equilibrium, therefore
concentration of adsorbed species can be obtained as follows.
For adsorption steps and desorption steps :
………………………….. (15)
Now ,
𝑪𝒕 = 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑪𝑨𝑺 + 𝑪𝑩𝑺 + 𝑪𝑪𝑺 + 𝑪𝑫𝑺
𝑪𝒕 = 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑲𝑪 𝑪𝑪 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑫 𝑪𝑽
𝑪𝒕
𝑪𝑽 = … … … … … … … … … … . (16)
𝟏 + 𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 + 𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩 + 𝑲𝑪 𝑪𝑪 + 𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑫
……………………….. (17)
…………….(18)
The above rate expression can also be derived in terms of bulk partial pressure.
…………………………. (19)
…………….(20)
…………………………. (21)
Now
𝑪𝒕 = 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑪𝑨𝑺 + 𝑪𝑩𝑺 + 𝑪𝑪𝑺 + 𝑪𝑫𝑺
𝑲𝑪 𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑪 𝑪𝑫 𝑪𝑽
𝑪𝒕 = 𝑪𝑽 + . + 𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑲𝑪 𝑪𝑪 𝑪𝑽 + 𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑫 𝑪𝑽
𝑲𝑺 𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩
𝑲𝑪 𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑪 𝑪𝑫
𝑪𝒕 = 𝑪𝑽 [𝟏 + .( ) + 𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩 + 𝑲𝑪 𝑪𝑪 + 𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑫 ]
𝑲𝑺 𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩
𝑪𝒕 …………………….(22)
𝑪𝑽 = 𝑲 𝑲 𝑪 𝑪
𝟏+ 𝑪 𝑫 .( 𝑪 𝑫 )+𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩 +𝑲𝑪 𝑪𝑪 +𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑫
𝑲𝑺 𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩
𝑪 𝑪
𝑪𝑨 −[ 𝑪 𝑫 ]
𝑲𝑪𝑩 …………………(23)
𝒓𝑨 = 𝒌𝒂 𝑪𝒕 𝑲 𝑪 𝑪
𝟏+ 𝑨 .( 𝑪 𝑫 )+𝑲𝑩 𝑪𝑩 +𝑲𝑪 𝑪𝑪 +𝑲𝑫 𝑪𝑫
𝑲 𝑪𝑩
……………………(24)
Example 1:
We now propose a mechanism for the hydrodemethylation of toluene. We assume
that toluene is adsorbed on the surface and then reacts with hydrogen in the gas phase
to produce benzene adsorbed on the surface and methane in the gas phase. Benzene is
then desorbed from the surface. Because approximately 75% of' heterogeneous
reaction mechanisms are surface-reaction limited rather than adsorption or
desorption-limited, we begin by mechanisms are assuming the reaction between
adsorkd toluene and gaseous hydrogen to be surface-reaction-rate-limited.
Symbolically, this mechanism and associated rate laws for each elementary step are.
we see that we need to replace CT·S and CB .S in the above equation by quantities that
we can measure.For surface-reaction-limited mechanisms, we use the adsorption rate
to obtain C T·S
Substituting Equations for 𝐶𝑇.𝑆 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐶𝐵.𝑆 into the site balance equation and
rearranging, we obtain
Next, substitute for C BS and CTS and then substitute for CV in surface reaction
equation to obtain the rate law for the case of surface-reaction control:
1- Assuming that step 2, the reaction between adsorbed A and gas phase B is
irreversible and the rate determining step, then the rate of reaction can be written
as(the reaction is not irrevesibile)
………………………………(25)
………………...(26)
………………..(27)
2-If the products are chemisorbed then the reaction may become reversible as shown
below(the reaction is reversibile)
………………………..(29)
Ct
𝑪𝒕
𝑪𝑽 =
𝟏 + 𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 + 𝑲𝑷 𝑪𝑷
𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 𝑪𝒕
𝑪𝑨𝑺 = 𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 𝑪𝑽 =
𝟏 + 𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 + 𝑲𝑷 𝑪𝑷
𝑲𝑷 𝑪𝑷 𝑪𝒕
𝑪𝑷𝑺 = 𝑲𝑷 𝑪𝑷 𝑪𝑽 =
𝟏 + 𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 + 𝑲𝑷 𝑪𝑷
Substituting CAS and CPS in rate expression gives:
𝑲𝑷 𝑪𝑷
𝒌𝑪𝒕 (𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 𝑪𝑩 − )
𝒓𝑺 = 𝒌𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝑪𝑩 − 𝒌𝒃 𝑪𝑷𝑺 = 𝑲 … … … … … … . . (𝟑𝟎)
𝟏 + 𝑲𝑨 𝑪𝑨 + 𝑲𝑷 𝑪𝑷
First simpler rate equations such as zero order, first order, second order irreversible
are tried. Mechanistic reaction models can also be tested. The W/F A0 and the right
hand integral in the design equation are evaluated numerically and plotted to test for
linearity (Fig.10). Linearity of the plot is used as criterion for judging if the selected
rate equation is a useful model for the data i.e consistent with the data. If not then
another rate equation may be tried.
Fig.10. Typical plot of W/FA0 vs integral value for linearity test in integral analysis of rate data.
The rate expression derived from Langmuir Hinshelwood model when surface
reaction is controlling is.
Now at zero conversion all the product concentration will tend to zero, hence
putting CC =0 & CD =0, the rate expression simplifies to
………………………………(31)
For this mechanism a typical plot of initial rate ri as a function of total pressure p t is
shown in Fig 11. When reaction data satisfy this plot then the reaction is said to be
adsorption A controlling. In similar way other models can be tested for fitting.
However, it should be noted that though the initial rate analysis is simple and can
reduce the number of rate expressions to be tested against the experimental but
cannot substitute a differential or integral analysis. It should be used as only as
preliminary kinetic analysis method.
Fig. 11. Typical plot for initial rate vs total pressure for reactions 𝐴 + 𝐵 ⇌ 𝐶 + 𝐷 when equimolal
mixture of A and B is used. A) surface reaction controlling B) adsorption of A controlling
the value of rate law parameters k, KA, KB cannot be analyzed as simply as in power
law kinetics. The rate law parameters can be determined by linear least square or
nonlinear least square method. In linear least square method, the above LH rate
equation can be linearized by dividing throughout by pA and pB and inverting it as
shown below:
………………………… (33)
The best values of the parameters a0, a1 and a2 are found by solving following three
equations
The above LH rate equation can also be solved by non-linear regression analysis.
Usually linearized least square analysis is used to obtain the initial estimates of the
rate parameters and used in non-linear regression. In non linear analysis the rate law
parameters are first estimated to calculate the rate of reaction ‘rc’. Then the values of
rate law parameters that will minimize the sum of the squares of difference of the
measured reaction rate rm and the calculated reaction rate rc , that is the sum of (rm-
rc)2 for all data points, are searched. If there are N experiments with K number of
parameter values to be determined then the function to be minimized is given by:
……………………….. (35)
Example 2:
The rate law for the ydrogenation (H) of ethylene (E) to form ethane (A)
H2 + C2H4 → C2H6 over a cobalt-molybdenum catalyst is:
Suggest a mechanism and rate-limiting step consistent with the rate law and then
derive the rate law.
Solution:
Because neither H2 or C2H6 are not in the denominator of the rate law they are either
not adsorbed or weakly adsorbed. Assume H2 in the gas phase reacts with C2H6
adsorbed on the surface and ethane goes directly into the gas phase. Then check to
see if this mechanism agrees with the rate law
Eley Rideal Model
Example 3:
t-Butyl alcohol (TBA) is an important octane enhancer that is used to replace lead
additives in . TBA was produced by the liquid-phase hydration (W) of isobutene (I)
over an Amberlyst-15 catalyst. The system is normally a multiphase mixture of
hydrocarbon, water, and solid catalysts. However, the use of cosolvents or excess
TBA can achieve reasonable miscibility.
The reaction mechanism is believed to be
(a)
(c)
(d)
Example(4):
The dehydration of n-butyl alcohol (butanol) over an alumina-silica catalyst. The data
in Figure were obtained at 750°F in a modified differential reactor. The feed
consisted of pure butanol.
(a) Suggest a mechanism and rate-controlling step that are consistent with the
experimental data.
(b) Evaluate the rate law parameters.
Solution:
(a)
(b)
Example 5:
The experimental data for the gas-phase, catalytic, irreversible reaction A + B→C is
given in the table. Suggest a rate law & mechanism consistent with the data.
Approach: Use graphs to show how -rA varies with Pi when Pj and Pk are held
constant.
We need to use these graphs to determine whether A, B, & C are in the numerator,
denominator, or both.
The rate law suggested for the experimental data given for the gas-phase, catalytic,
irreversible reaction A + B→C is:
Surface reaction step: B is not adsorbed on the surface, so B must be in the gas phase
when it reacts with A adsorbed on the surface.
The overall reaction is irreversible, so this step is likely irreversible
Postulate that the surface reaction is the rate limiting step since that is true the
majority of the time. Check if that is consistent with the observed kinetics
Example 6:
Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) is an important industrial solvent that can be produced
from the dehydrogenation of butan-2-ol (Bu) over a zinc oxide catalyst A → B+C
Bu → MEK + H2
The following data giving the reaction rate for MEK were obtained in a differential
reactor at 490°C.
If the limiting step is 2(irreversible surface reaction) and the others at Pseudo Steady
State (steps 1,3,and 4).
b- First we need to calculate the rate constants involved in the equation for –rA in part
(a). We can rearrange the equation to give the following
Homework Problems:
1-The reaction A + B → C is speculated to occur with adsorption of A and C on one
type of site; independent adsorption of B on a second type of site; and the surface
reaction between adsorbed A and adsorbed B is the rate limiting step.
a) Determine the fraction of vacant sites?
b) Determine the fractions of adsorbed species.?
c) Determine the reaction rate expression according to the described mechanism?
d) Qualitatively sketch the dependence of the reaction rate on PA, PB, PC (i.e., One
sketch for each, with other partial pressures held constant) ?
Answer:
4- Given the following reaction rate expression and the following data
8-Given the following reaction rate expression and the following data
Part Two:
• Reaction and diffusion in porous catalysts.
• Isothermal and non-isothermal effectiveness factors.
• Effect of intra-phase transport.
• Effect of external mass transfer.
• Global reaction rate.
The internal molecular diffusion inside pores can be the limiting step and therefore it
is unwanted. Basically, there are three forms of diffusions occurring in the pores of
the catalyst:
1. Molecular (bulk) diffusion: may occur in big pore diameters (1–10μm) where the
mean free path of the molecules is small compared to the pore diameter.
The calculation of binary molecular diffusion coefficients in gases has been the
subject of much research. Two relationships that are widely used are the Chapman–
Enskog formula and the Fuller formula. The Chapman–Enskog formula is
………………………. ……..(1)
2. Knudsen diffusion: exists in middle pore diameters (10–1.000 Å) where the mass
transport happens by collision between the molecules and the wall.
However, as the pores become smaller, collisions between the molecules and the pore
walls become significant for gas-phase systems. The collisions between the diffusing
molecules and the wall gives rise to Knudsen diffusion. The Knudsen diffusion
coefficient, in m2/s, in a straight round pore can be calculated from the formula:
………………………………….. (2)
Where dp is the pore diameter in m, T is the temperature in kelvin, and the molar
mass of the diffusion species, M, is in kg/kmol or g/mol. The Knudsen diffusion
coefficient varies with the pore diameter, which implies that a range of diffusion
coefficients applies to a catalyst with a significant pore size distribution.
For a binary system, it has been shown that the pore diffusion coefficient can be
expressed as a function of the two quantities using the following relationship:
……….. ……(3)
……………….(4)
It would not be fruitful to describe diffusion within each and every one of the
tortuous pathways individually; consequently, we define an Effective Diffusion (De)
so as to describe the average diffusion taking place at any position r in the pellet. An
equation that relates De to either the bulk or the Knudsen diffusivity is
……………………………. ……..(5)
2.1-Effectiveness Factor η:
In a porous catalyst, the internal surface area within the pores constitutes the effective
surface on which the active metals are deposited. Hence, for reaction to occur, the
reactants need to travel through the pores to reach the active sites. If there is any
resistance in diffusion of the reactants through the pores, then both the activity and
selectivity of the process is affected. In the absence of any internal mass transfer
resistance within the pores the concentration of reactants can be assumed to uniform
and equal to the surface concentration. Hence, the rate of reaction will also be
uniform across the catalyst pellet and equal to the rate evaluated at surface
Rate of reaction for the whole catalyst pellets at any time is defined with respect to
outer surface conditions in term of effectiveness factor η as :
………………. (6)
Actual rate of whole pellet rp takes intrapellet mass transfer effects if any into
account.
𝒎𝒐𝒍
Rate of reaction per unit mass of catalyst ( ) =k1C
𝒌𝒈𝒄𝒂𝒕 .𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝒎𝒐𝒍
Rate of reaction per unit volume of catalyst (
𝒎𝟑 𝒄𝒂𝒕 .𝒔𝒆𝒄
) = k1Cρp
𝒌𝒈
Where ρp is the density of pellet ( ).
𝒎𝟑
𝒎𝟑 𝒎 𝒎𝟐
The units of k1 is (
𝒌𝒈.𝒔𝒆𝒄
) = 𝒌 (𝒔𝒆𝒄) ∗ 𝑺𝒂 (𝒌𝒈 )
𝒎𝟐
Where 𝑺𝒂 ( ) is the is the total active area inside the porous pellet per gram of
𝒌𝒈
pellet.
Then the mass balance equation over the element of thickness ΔR can be written as :
………………………………(7)
…………………………(8)
……………………….. (9)
Solving the differential equation (7) with boundary conditions (8) and (9) following
relation is obtained
……………………….. (10)
910
……………………… (11)
This concentration profile is used to evaluate the rate of reaction rP for the whole
pellet. Calculating the diffusion rate of reactant into pellet at position Rs per unit mass
of catalyst pellet.
……………………. (12)
…………………(13)
Or
…….(14)
substituting in equation (14), following relation for η can be obtained for isothermal
conditions.
………………………….(15)
Where for spherical pellets of radius rs, for a first-order reaction is given as ϕs
……………………………(16)
Hence, to calculate Thiele modulus, both effective diffusivity De and rate constant k1
need to be known. Fig 15 shows the typical plot of η vs φs.The Concentration profile
in a spherical catalyst pellet in is shown in fig 16.
The magnitude of the effectiveness factor (ranging from 0 to 1) indicates the relative
importance of diffusion and reaction limitations. The effectiveness factor is defined
as
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = 𝜼 𝑹𝑨𝒔
The resulting expression for the effectiveness factor for first order reaction is:
𝟏 ……………………….(17)
1- 𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝝋𝒔 ≤ 𝟑 , 𝜼 → 𝟏
As the figure shows, for small values of φs η→1 . Equation (16) shows that small
values of φs are obtained when the :
1. Pellets are small
2. Diffusivity is large
3. Reaction is intrinsically slow ( catalysts of low activity).
𝟏 ……………………….(18)
2- 𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝝓 ≥ 𝟓), 𝜼 = 𝝋𝒔
as For such large φs, intra-particle diffusion has a large effect on the rate. At this
condition, diffusion into the pellet is relatively slow and reaction occurs before the
reactant has diffused far into the pellet.
When η→1 , rate for the whole pellet is the same as the rate at surface concentration
Cs and the entire catalyst surface is fully active.
When η<<1 , the concentration within pellets drops from Cs to nearly zero in a
narrow region near rs. At this condition, only the surface near the outer periphery of
the pellet is effective and the catalyst surface in the central portion of the pellet is not
utilized. This situation can be caused by large particles, low De or high k 1; that is
very active catalysts.
Hence, low effectiveness factors are more likely with very active catalysts. More
active the catalyst, the more is the possibility that intrapellet diffusion resistance will
reduce global rate.
As noted in Equation 16, the Thiele modulus for spherical pellet is defined as:
𝟏 𝒎 𝒎𝟐 𝒌𝒈
Where 𝒌𝑽 (𝒔𝒆𝒄) = 𝒌𝟏 𝝆𝑷 = 𝒌(
𝒔𝒆𝒄
) ∗ 𝑺𝒂 (
𝒌𝒈
) ∗ 𝝆𝑷 (
𝒎𝟑
)
………………….(19)
With this new definition of the Thiele modulus, the solution must also change, and
the three new equations for the effectiveness factor are:
For each of the three geometries (plane wall, infinite cylinder, and sphere) considered
thus far, the generalized Thiele modulus becomes, respectively
…………….(20)
The general equation for irreversible reactions second order or higher can be
estimated from the formula:
The value of the Thiele modulus includes the surface concentration, which in turn
means that the effectiveness factor depends on the surface concentration of reactant.
In this case, the mole balance equation becomes a nonlinear differential equation and
requires a numerical solution.
𝑹 𝟏 𝒌𝟏 (𝑲+𝟏) 𝒌𝟏
∅𝒔 = √ ( ) ∶ 𝑲= ………………..(22)
𝟑 𝑫 𝒆 𝑲 𝒌𝟐
It can be seen that ∅𝑠 for reversible reactions is greater than for irreversible reactions
, so the effectiveness factor (η ) for reversible reactions is less than η for irreversible
reactions.
The rate of reaction for for reversible reactions is given by
𝑟𝑝 = 𝑘𝑅 (𝐶𝐴 − 𝐶𝐴.𝑒𝑞𝑢 )
Where:
𝑘1 (𝐾 + 1)
𝑘𝑅 =
𝐾
𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑩,𝒆𝒒 𝑪𝑨𝒐 ∗ 𝒙𝒆 𝒙𝒆
𝑲= =( )= =
𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨,𝒆𝒒 𝑪𝑨𝒐 (𝟏 − 𝒙𝒆 ) 𝟏 − 𝒙𝒆
For η near unity, the entire volume of the pellet is reacting at the same high rate
because the reactant is able to diffuse quickly through the pellet.
For η near zero, the pellet reacts at a low rate. The reactant is unable to penetrate
significantly into the interior of the pellet and the reaction rate is small in a large
portion of the pellet volume.The pellet's diffusional resistance is large and this
resistance lowers the overall reaction rate.
As the particle diameter becomes very small, the Thiele modulus decreases, so that
the effectiveness factor approaches 1 and the reaction is surface-reaction-limited. On
the other hand, when the Thiele modulus is large, the internal effectiveness factor is
small and the reaction is diffusion-limited within the pellet (see figure 17).
Fig.17: Effectiveness factor for different reaction orders and catalyst shapes.
……………….(24)
This criterion can be approximately used for most catalytic kinetics though it is
derived for a 1st order reaction . There are no diffusion limitations(the internal
diffusion may be neglected) and consequently no concentration gradient exists
within the pellet.
……………………………..(25)
…………………………….(26)
Example 1:
Dehydrogenation of hydrocarbon (mol.wt = 58) at atmospheric pressure was carried
out over chromia-alumina catalysts at 530 0C. The reaction follows a first order
kinetics with rate constant of 0.94 cm3 /s. g cat. The spherical catalysts are of 30 mm
diameter and average pore radius is 11 nm. Pellets have porosity of 0.35 and density
of 1 gm/cm3. Assume Knudsen diffusivity to be dominant. Predict an effectiveness
factor for the catalysts. Use parallel pore model with a tortuosity factor of 3.0
Solution:
Example 2:
The first-order, irreversible reaction (A→B) takes place in a 0.3 cm radius spherical
catalyst pellet at T = 450 K.At 0.7 atm partial pressure of A, the pellet’s production
rate is 2.5 ×10−5 mol/(gm. sec).
Determine the production rate at the same temperature in a 0.15 cm radius spherical
pellet.The pellet density is ρp = 0.85 g/cm3. The effective diffusivity of A in the pellet
is De = 0.007 cm2/sec.
Solution:
𝑟𝐴𝑝 = 𝜂 𝑟𝐴𝑠
𝑟𝐴 = 𝜂 𝑘 𝐶𝐴 𝑠
1 1 1
𝜂= ( − )
∅𝑠 tanh(3∅𝑠 ) 3∅𝑠
rA= 2.5 ×10−5 mol/(gm. sec)* 0.85 g/cm3 =2.125 mol\ cm3.sec
1 1 1
𝑟𝐴 = ( − ) ∗ 𝑘 𝐶𝐴 𝑠
∅𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ(3∅𝑠 ) 3∅𝑠
𝑚𝑜𝑙 1 1 1 −5
𝑚𝑜𝑙
2.125 = ( − ) ∗ 𝑘 ∗ 1.9 ∗ 10
𝑐𝑚3 . 𝑠𝑒𝑐 ∅𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ(3∅𝑠 ) 3∅𝑠 𝑐𝑚3
1
𝑘 = 2.61
𝑠𝑒𝑐
1
0.3 𝑐𝑚 2.61 𝑠𝑒𝑐
∅𝑠 = √ = 1.93
3 𝑐𝑚2
0.007
𝑠𝑒𝑐
1 1 1 1 1 1
𝜂 = ∅ (tanh(3∅ ) − 3∅ ) = 1.93 (𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ(3∗1.93) − 3∗1.93) =0.38
𝑠 𝑠 𝑠
The smaller pellet is half the radius of the larger pellet, so the Thiele modulus is half
as large or ∅𝑠 = 0.964, which gives 𝜂 = 0.685.
𝑚𝑜𝑙
The production rate is therefore :𝑟𝐴 = 0.685 ∗ 2.6 ∗ 1.9 ∗ 10−5 = 3.38 ∗ 10−5 3
𝑐𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑐
We see that decreasing the pellet size increases the production rate by almost 60%.
Notice that this type of increase is possible only when the pellet is in the diffusion-
limitted regime.
Example 3:
The rate constant for the first-order cracking of cumene on a silica-alumina catalyst
was measured to be 0.80 cm3\(s.gcat) in a laboratory reactor: Is the observed rate
constant the true rate constant or is there influence of pore diffusion?
Additional data:
𝑔𝑚 −3
𝑐𝑚2
𝑹 = 0.25 𝑐𝑚 ∶ 𝜌𝑝 = 1.2 3 ∶ 𝐷𝑒 = 1.0 ∗ 10
𝑐𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑐
Solution:
the Thiele modulus is defined in terms of the characteristic length of a pellet:
𝟏 𝟏 𝟏
𝜼= ( − )
∅𝒔 𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐡(𝟑∅𝒔 ) 𝟑∅𝒔
𝟏 𝟏 𝟏
𝜼= ( − )
𝟐. 𝟗√𝒌 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒉(𝟑 ∗ 𝟐. 𝟗√𝒌) 𝟑 ∗ 𝟐. 𝟗√𝒌
𝒄𝒎𝟑
𝒌 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟎
𝒔𝒆𝒄. 𝒈𝒎𝒄𝒂𝒕
𝜼 = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟓
Since 𝜂 is small, there is a great influence of pore diffusion on the observed rate.
Or we can use the Weisz–Prater criterion
Example 4:
A rate of 105 mole/hr m3 cat is observed for a gas concentration of Aof 20 mole/m3.
The catalyst particle diameter is 2.4 mm.
Let us assume effective diffusivity is 5x10-5 m2/hr.Is there a strong pore diffusion
resistance?
Solution:
𝒓𝑨𝒑 = 𝜼 𝒓𝑨𝒔
𝒓𝑨 = 𝜼 𝒌 𝑪𝑨 𝒔
𝒓𝑨 𝟏𝟎𝟓
𝜼𝒌= = = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒉𝒓−𝟏
𝑪𝑨 𝒔 𝟐𝟎
Since 𝜼 depends on k, we used a trial and error solution. We expect 𝜼 to be small. Let
us assume some value, say 0.01.
5000 5000
𝒌= = = 5 ∗ 105
𝜂 0.01
𝑹 𝒌𝑽 𝟐. 𝟒 ∗ 𝟏𝟎−𝟑 𝟓 ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟓
∅𝒔 = √ = √ = 𝟒𝟎
𝟑 𝑫𝒆 𝟔 𝟓 ∗ 𝟏𝟎−𝟓
𝟏 𝟏 𝟏
𝜼= ( − ) = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝟓
∅𝒔 𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐡(𝟑∅𝒔 ) 𝟑∅𝒔
Example 5:
The experimental data below is for first order reaction carried out in spinning basket
reactor. If the internal diffusion is important, find the effectiveness factor for each
spherical pellet.
Dp cm rA mol/gm.hr
0.6 0.09
0.3 0.162
0.09 𝜂1
=
0.162 𝜂2
𝜂1 = 0.556 𝜂2
∅𝒔𝟏 𝑅𝑝1
=
∅𝒔 2 𝑅𝑝2
0.6
∅𝒔𝟏
= 2 =2
∅𝒔 2 0.3
2
∅𝒔𝟏 = 2∅𝒔𝟐
The observed rate is also equal to the rate at which reactant "A" is transferred from
the bulk fluid to the external surface ("es") of the porous catalyst pellet.The rate of
mass transfer(MA) from the bulk fluid to the external surface is.
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = 𝜼 𝑹𝑨𝒔
𝟏 𝟏 𝟏
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = [ − ] 𝒌 𝑪𝑨𝒔
∅𝒔 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒉(𝟑∅𝒔 ) 𝟑∅𝒔
………………………………(30)
Now substitute this expression for CA,es into either of the above expressions for –rA,obs
(a little quicker with the second one) and rearrange to get our final goal!
……………………………….(31)
Where
………………………………(32)
where Ω, The Overall Effectiveness Factor, is the ratio between the observed rate
and the rate that would be obtained if all active sites in the pellet were exposed to A
at concentration CA,bulk.
Then
𝟏
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = [ 𝟏 𝒌𝟏 ] 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃 ………………………….(33)
+
𝜼 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
Or
𝟏
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = [ 𝟏 𝟏 ] 𝑪𝑨 𝒃 ………………………….(34)
+
𝜼 𝒌𝟏 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝟏
Resistance due to Internal Diffusion
𝜼 𝒌𝟏
𝟏
Resistance due to External Mass Transfer
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝟏 ……………………….. (35)
𝜴 = [𝟏 𝒌𝟏 ]
+
𝜼 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝜴→
𝒌𝟏
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ≪ 𝜼 𝒌𝟏
𝜴→𝜼
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = 𝜼 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
𝑪𝑨 𝒔 = 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
3- With negligible external and internal mass transfer resistance, Ω ≥ η ≥ 1, all active
sites inside the pellet are exposed to CA,b, and we have "kinetic control":
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
..………………………………..(36)
The mass transfer coefficient for single spheres is calculated from the Frössling
correlation:
𝒌𝒎 𝒅𝒑 𝟏 𝟏
𝑺𝒉 = = 𝟐 + 𝟎. 𝟔 ∗ (𝑹 ) 𝟐 ∗ (𝑺 ) 𝟑 ………………………….(37)
𝑫𝑨𝑩 𝒆 𝑪
𝒌𝒎 𝒅𝒑 𝝆 ∗ 𝒅𝒑 ∗ 𝒖 𝟏 𝝂 𝟏
𝑺𝒉 = = 𝟐 + 𝟎. 𝟔 ∗ ( )𝟐 ∗ ( )𝟑
𝑫𝑨𝑩 𝝁 𝑫𝑨𝑩
The Sherwood and Schmidt numbers are, respectively,
In this gas-phase catalytic reaction example, and for most liquids, the Schmidt
number is sufficiently large that the number 2 in Equation (37) is negligible with
respect to the second term when the Reynolds number is greater than 25. As a result,
Equation (37) gives
𝟏 𝟏
𝑫𝑨𝑩 𝒅𝒑 ∗ 𝒖 𝟐 𝝂 𝟐
𝒌𝒎 = 𝟎. 𝟔 ( )( ) ( )
𝒅𝒑 𝝂 𝑫𝑨𝑩
𝟐 𝟏
𝑫𝑨𝑩 𝟑 𝒖𝟐
𝒌𝒎 = 𝟎. 𝟔 ( 𝟏 )∗( 𝟏 )
𝝂𝟔 𝒅𝒑 𝟐
Figure 19 shows the variation in reaction rate with Term 2 in Equation (38), the ratio
of velocity to particle size. At low velocities the mass transfer boundary layer
thickness is large and diffusion limits the reaction. As the velocity past the sphere is
increased, the boundary layer thickness decreases, and the mass transfer across the
boundary layer no longer limits the rate of reaction. One also notes that for a given
velocity, reaction-limiting conditions can be achieved by using very small particles.
However, the smaller the particle size, the greater the pressure drop in a packed bed.
When one is obtaining reaction rate data in the laboratory, one must operate at
sufficiently high velocities or sufficiently small particle sizes to ensure that the
reaction is not mass transfer–limited.
Increasing the gas-phase velocity and decreasing the particle size will increase the
overall rate of reaction for reactions that are externally mass transfer–limited.
The effects of heat transfer are completely analogous to those of mass transfer. The
heat flux, q, across the stagnant boundary layer is related to the difference in
temperature and the heat-transfer coefficient, h according to:
𝒒 = 𝒉(𝑻𝒃 − 𝑻𝒔 ) …………………………...(40)
Steady state requires that the heat flux is equivalent to the heat generated (or
consumed) by reaction:
𝒓𝑨 ∗∆𝑯𝒓
= 𝑻𝒃 − 𝑻𝒔 = ∆𝑻 ………………………….(42)
𝒉
where ∆Hr is the heat of reaction per mole of A converted. To estimate the influence
of heat-transfer limitations on the observed rate, the change in temperature across the
film is found by evaluating the observed rate of heat generated (or consumed) and the
heat-transfer coefficient (obtained from J factor correlations, similar to the case of
mass-transfer coefficients):
Equation (42) can also be used to find the maximum temperature change across the
film. Using Equation (39) to eliminate the observed rate, the resulting equation
relates the concentration change across the film to the temperature change:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homework Problems:
1- A first order irreversible catalytic reaction A → P is carried out at isothermal
conditions, in absence of all external transport effects, in a stirred basket reactor on
two different size catalyst pellets. The pellets are spherical. The catalyst activity and
pore structure of the pellets are identical. Therefore the kinetic rate constant and
effective diffusivity are identical in pellets of both sizes. The temperature, pressure
and bulk reactant concentration are identical in both runs. The following data are
obtained.
a) Estimate the Thiele modulus(𝜃𝑆 ) and effectiveness factor for each particle. Are
internal diffusion effects pronounced in each pellet size?
b)What pellet diameter is needed to completely eliminate internal diffusion resistance
at the temperature of these experiments (i.e. 1).
2- The first-order reaction A→B was carried out over two different-sized pellets. The
pellets were contained in spinning basket reactor that was operated at sufficiently
high rotation speeds so the external mass transfer resistance was negligible. The
Rate mol/sec/g of 4.88 x 10-4 4.85 x 10-4 4.01 x 10-4 3.54 x 10-4 1 x 10-5
catalyst
From the above data, determine the intrinsic first order rate constant in the absence of
intraparticle diffusion. Also predict the rate if the particle size is 1.5 inch. It may be
assumed that effectiveness factor (𝜂) is inverse of Thiele modulus (𝜃𝑆 ) (i.e. 𝜂 = 1/𝜃𝑆 )
when 𝜃𝑆 ≥3.
Data:
(a) Calculate the intrinsic rate constant and the effective diffusivity.
(b) Estimate the effectiveness factor and the anticipated rate of reaction (robs) for a
finite cylindrical catalyst pellet of dimensions 0.6 cm x 0.6 cm (diameter = length).
6- Ercan et al. studied the alkylation of ethylbenzene, EB, with light olefins (ethylene
and propylene) over a commercial zeolite Y catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor with
recycle.. The solid-catalyzed liquid-phase reaction was carried out in excess
ethylbenzene at 25 bar and 190°C.
Assume the reaction is pseudo-first-order with respect to olefin. The porosity of the
catalyst was 0.5, the tortuosity was 5.0, and the density was 1000 kg m-3. The
observed rate (robsJ and rate constant (kobs) were measured for two different catalyst
pellet sizes. Relevant results are given below:
(a) Determine whether or not external and internal mass transfer limitations are
significant for each case. Assume the diffusivity of olefins in ethylbenzene is DAB =
1.9 * 10-4 cm2S-l.
(b) Calculate the Thiele modulus, (𝜃𝑆 ) , and the internal effectiveness factor), for
each case.
(c) Determine the overall effectiveness factor for each case.
a- For the following gas compositions, sketch the concentration gradients for A,
H2, and B for the case where the reaction is rapid enough to make PAave 10%
less than PA. Assume DA = 1\4DH2
9-For the 1st order reaction A → B which takes place over a spherical catalyst
particle:The maximum temperature rise over the catalyst is equal to 90 oF.
The effective diffusivity De = 5*10 6 ft2/sec
The effective thermal conductivity ke =0.25 Btu/hr.ft. oF
The heat of reaction is ∆HR = -5000 Btu/mole
What is the concentration of component A on the surface of the catalyst particle?
10-For the 2nd order reaction A → B which takes place over a spherical catalyst
particle:
The maximum temperature rise over the catalyst is equal to 100 oF.
The effective diffusivity De = 5*10 6 ft2/sec
The effective thermal conductivity ke =0.25 Btu/hr.ft. oF
The heat of reaction is ∆HR = -5000 Btu/mole
a) What is the concentration of component A on the surface of the catalyst particle?
b) What is the rate of mass transfer if the bulk concentration is 2*C As and the mass
transfer coefficient for the binary system is 1 cm/sec
11- Consider a porous catalyst pellet with a diameter of 6 mm. The porosity of the
pellet is 0.55, the tortuosity factor is 4.0, the internal surface area is 200 m2/g, and the
pellet density is 2.0 g/cm3. The following first-order reaction occurs in the pellet at a
temperature of 475 K: A → B where (−rA) = kCA
The rate constant at the reaction temperature has a value of 0.1 s−1. The molecular
weight of A and B is 16 g/mol. The bulk diffusion coefficient of A in the reacting
mixture is 5 × 10−5 m2/s. Determine the value of the effectiveness factor in the
pellet.
Part Three:
• Design of catalytic reactors.
• Isothermal and adiabatic fixed bed reactors.
In the chemical industry fixed-bed reactors are the standard type of reactors for
heterogeneously catalyzed gas phase reactions (two phase reactors). Multiple layers
of these screens constitute the catalyst bed that are used in commercial processes for
the oxidation or synthesis.
Applications of fixed bed reactor can be described in table 2.
𝑑𝑊 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 …………………………….(1)
∫𝐹 = ∫0
𝐴𝑜 𝑟𝐴 𝑝
𝟏
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = [ ] 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
𝟏 𝟏
+
𝜼 𝒌𝟏 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝟏
Resistance due to Internal Diffusion
𝜼 𝒌𝟏
𝟏
Resistance due to External Mass Transfer
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝑑𝑊 𝑥 𝑑𝑥
∫𝐹 = ∫0 ……………………………………(2)
𝐴𝑜 𝟏
[ 𝟏 𝟏 ]𝑪𝑨 𝒃
+
( 𝜼 𝒌𝟏 𝒌𝒎𝒂𝒆𝒔 )
𝑪𝑨 𝒃 = 𝐶𝐴𝑜 (1 − 𝑥)
𝟏 𝟏 𝟏
𝜼= ( − )
∅𝒔 𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐡(𝟑∅𝒔 ) 𝟑∅𝒔
𝑹 𝒌𝑽
∅𝒔 = √
𝟑 𝑫𝒆
Case 1: First order reaction ,both external and internal resistance are
important.
1
𝑅𝐴𝑝 = [ ] 𝑘1 𝐶𝐴 𝑏
1 𝑘1
+
𝜂 𝑘𝑚 𝑎𝑒𝑠
1
𝜴=[ ]
1 𝑘1
+
𝜂 𝑘𝑚 𝑎𝑒𝑠
𝑥 𝑥
𝑑𝑊 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥
∫ =∫ ( )=∫
𝐹𝐴 𝑜 0 𝜴𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃 0 𝜴𝒌𝟏 𝐶𝐴𝑜 (1 − 𝑥)
𝑥
𝑑𝑊 1 𝑑𝑥
∫ = ∫
𝐹𝐴 𝑜 𝜴𝒌𝟏 𝐶𝐴𝑜 0 1 − 𝑥
𝑾 −𝟏
= 𝐥𝐧(𝟏 − 𝒙)
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 𝜴𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨𝒐
𝑾∗𝜴𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨𝒐
−
𝑭𝑨 𝒐
𝒙=𝟏−𝒆
Since :
𝑾 = 𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 ∗ 𝑽𝒄𝒂𝒕
𝑾 = 𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 ∗ 𝑽𝑹𝑬𝑨𝑪𝑻𝑶𝑹 (𝟏 − 𝒆)
𝑾 = 𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 (𝟏 − 𝒆) ∗ 𝑨𝒄 ∗ 𝒁 … … … … … … … … … … … . . (3)
And
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 = 𝑪𝑨𝒐 ∗ 𝑨𝒄 ∗ 𝒖 and 𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅 = 𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 (𝟏 − 𝒆)
Where:
𝒁 𝑽(𝑹𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒆) 𝒎𝟑
= = = 𝝉(𝑹𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆)
𝒖 𝑸𝒐 (𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒄 𝑭𝒍𝒐𝒘 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒎𝟑
𝒔𝒆𝒄
−𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅 ∗ 𝜴𝒌𝟏 ∗𝝉
𝒙=𝟏−𝑒
Define:
𝒌∗ = 𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅 ∗ 𝜴𝒌𝟏
∗
𝒙 = 𝟏 − 𝒆−𝒌 𝝉
∗
𝑪𝑨 = 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝒆−𝒌 𝝉
Case 2: First order reaction , external mass transfer control.
𝟏
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = [ ] 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
𝟏 𝒌𝟏
+
𝜼 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ≫ 𝜼 𝒌𝟏
Then
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
𝒙 𝒙
𝒅𝑾 𝒅𝒙 𝟏 𝒅𝒙
∫ =∫ ( )= ∫
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 𝟎 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝑪𝑨 𝒃 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ∗ 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟎 (𝟏 − 𝒙)
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 𝟏
𝑾= 𝐥𝐧
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ∗ 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟏 − 𝒙
𝒙 = 𝟏 − 𝒆−𝒌𝒎𝒂𝒆𝒔 ∗𝝉∗𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅
𝑪𝑨 = 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝒆−𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ∗𝝉∗𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅
aes: external surface area of catalyst per catalyst mass.
𝟔 𝒎𝟐
𝒂𝒆𝒔 = ( )
𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 ∗ 𝒅𝒑 𝒌𝒈
𝟏
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = [ ] 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
𝟏 𝒌𝟏
+
𝜼 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ≪ 𝜼 𝒌𝟏
𝜴→𝜼
𝑹𝑨𝒑 = 𝜼 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃
𝒙 𝒙
𝒅𝑾 𝒅𝒙 𝟏 𝒅𝒙
∫ =∫ ( )= ∫
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 𝟎 𝜼 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒃 𝜼 𝒌𝟏 𝑪𝑨 𝒐 𝟎 (𝟏 − 𝒙)
Fig. 22: Axial concentration (a) and conversion (b) profiles in a packed bed.
Example 1:
The decomposition of hydrazine over a packed bed of alumina-supported iridium
catalyst is of interest . In a proposed study, a 2% hydrazine in 98% helium mixture is
to be passed over a packed bed of cylindrical particles 0.25 cm in diameter and 0.5
cm in length at a gas-phase velocity of 15 m/s and a temperature of 750 K. The
kinematic viscosity of helium at this temperature is 4.5 10 -4 m2 /s. The hydrazine
decomposition reaction is believed to be externally mass transfer–limited under these
conditions. If the packed bed is 0.05 m in length, what conversion can be expected?
Assume isothermal operation.
Solution:
𝒙 = 𝟏 − 𝒆−𝒌𝒎𝒂𝒆𝒔 ∗𝝉∗𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅
𝑪𝑨 = 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝒆−𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ∗𝝉∗𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅
Calculate the mass transfer coefficient km
𝒌𝒎 𝒅𝒑 𝝆 ∗ 𝒅𝒑 ∗ 𝒖 𝟏 𝝂 𝟏
= 𝟐 + 𝟎. 𝟔 ∗ ( )𝟐 ∗ ( )𝟑
𝑫𝑨𝑩 𝝁 𝑫𝑨𝑩
𝒌𝒎 𝒅𝒑 𝟏 𝟏
= 𝟐 + 𝟎. 𝟔 ∗ ( 𝟏𝟐𝟎. 𝟑 ) ∗ (𝟏. 𝟑) 𝟑 = 𝟗. 𝟐𝟑
𝟐
𝑫𝑨𝑩
𝟗. 𝟐𝟑 ∗ 𝟑. 𝟒𝟕 ∗ 𝟏𝟎−𝟒 𝒎
𝒌𝒎 = = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟖𝟕
𝟑. 𝟔𝟏 ∗ 𝟏𝟎−𝟑 𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝒁 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
𝝉= = = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟑𝟑 𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝒖 𝟏𝟓
𝟔
𝒂𝒆𝒔 =
𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 ∗ 𝒅𝒑
𝟔
− 𝒌𝒎 ∗ ∗𝝉∗(𝟏−𝒆)𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕
𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 ∗𝒅𝒑
𝒙 = 𝟏 − 𝒆−𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ∗𝝉∗𝝆𝒃𝒆𝒅 = 𝟏 − 𝒆
−𝟔∗𝒌𝒎 ∗𝝉∗(𝟏−𝒆)
𝒙=𝟏− 𝒆 𝒅𝒑
𝒙 = 𝟏 − 𝟎. 𝟏𝟕 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟑
At equilibrium 𝑀𝐴 = 𝒓𝑨 then
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 (𝑪𝑨 𝒃 − 𝑪𝑨 𝒔 ) = 𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝟐
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝟐 + ( ) 𝑪𝑨𝑺 − ( ) 𝑪𝑨𝒃 = 𝟎
𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝟐 𝒌 𝒂
−( ) + √( ) + 𝟒 ( 𝒎 𝒆𝒔 ) 𝑪𝑨𝒃
𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐
𝑪𝑨𝑺 =
𝟐
86 Chemical Engineering Department- University of Basrah
Catalytic Reactor Design - Fourth Year Dr.Ali .N.Khalaf
The general equation for irreversible reactions second order or higher can be
estimated from the formula:
𝒏 + 𝟏 𝒌 𝑽 ∗ 𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝒏−𝟏
∅𝒔 = 𝑳√( )
𝟐 𝑫𝒆
For second order reaction(n=2) and for spherical pellet L=R\3
𝒏 + 𝟏 𝒌 𝑽 ∗ 𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝒏−𝟏
∅𝒔 = 𝑳√( )
𝟐 𝑫𝒆
𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝑺
∅𝒔 = √( )
𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆
For second order reaction and for large values of the Thiele modulus, the
effectiveness factor is calculated by two methods:
𝟏
(a) 𝜼=
∅𝒔
𝟏
𝟐 𝟐 𝟑
(b) 𝜼= ( ) ∗
𝒏+𝟏 ∅𝒔
Consequently, for reaction orders greater than 1 , the effectiveness factor decreases
with increasing concentration at the external pellet surface (function of conversion).
The preceding discussion of effectiveness factors is valid only far isothermal
conditions. Note that the Thiele Modulus will be a function of position.
For simple design procedure we use method (a).
𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝑪
∅𝒔 = √( ) = √( ) 𝟐 𝑨𝒃
𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆 𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆
𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒃
√
𝑑𝑊 1 𝑥
𝟑 (𝟐) 𝑫𝒆
∫ = ∫ 𝑑𝑥
𝐹𝐴 𝑜 𝑘2 𝐶𝐴𝑜 2 0 (1 − 𝑥)2
( )
87 Chemical Engineering Department- University of Basrah
Catalytic Reactor Design - Fourth Year Dr.Ali .N.Khalaf
Define
𝑹 𝟑 𝒌𝟐
𝒄= √ ∗
𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆
𝒅𝑾 𝒄 𝒙
𝑪𝑨𝒃 𝟎.𝟓
∫ = (∫ 𝒅𝒙)
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟐 𝟎 (𝟏 − 𝒙)𝟐
𝒅𝑾 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟎.𝟓 ∗ 𝒄 𝒙
(𝟏 − 𝒙) 𝟎.𝟓
∫ = (∫ 𝒅𝒙)
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟐 𝟎 (𝟏 − 𝒙)
𝟐
𝒅𝑾 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟎.𝟓 ∗ 𝒄 𝒙
𝟏
∫ = ( ∫ 𝒅𝒙)
𝑭𝑨 𝒐 𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟐 𝟎 (𝟏 − 𝒙)
𝟏.𝟓
𝒅𝑾 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟎.𝟓 ∗𝒄
∫𝑭 = ∗ 𝟑(𝟏 − 𝒙𝟎.𝟓 )
𝑨𝒐 𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟐
𝟑 𝒄 ∗ 𝑭𝑨 𝒐
𝑾= (√𝒙 − 𝟏)
𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒐 𝟏.𝟓
Note:
𝟑 𝒄∗𝑭𝑨 𝒐
The units of ( 𝟏.𝟓 ) is kgcat
𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒐
𝑾 = 𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 (𝟏 − 𝒆) ∗ 𝑨𝒄 ∗ 𝒁
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝟐 𝒌 𝒂
−( √
)+ ( ) + 𝟒 ( 𝒎 𝒆𝒔 ) 𝑪𝑨𝒃
𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐
𝑪𝑨𝑺 =
𝟐
𝟐
𝟐
𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 𝒌 𝒂 𝒌 𝒂
−( ) + √( 𝒎 𝒆𝒔 ) + 𝟒 ( 𝒎 𝒆𝒔 ) 𝑪𝑨𝒃
𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐
𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝟐 =
𝟐
( )
𝟐
√(𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ) + 𝟒 (𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔 ) 𝑪𝑨𝒃 − 𝒌𝒎 𝒂𝒆𝒔
𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝜼 𝒌𝟐
𝑪𝑨𝒃 =
𝟐
𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒃
∅𝒔 = √( ) = √( )
𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆 𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆
𝟏
𝜼=
∅𝒔
𝑪𝑨𝒃 = 𝑪𝑨𝒐 (𝟏 − 𝒙)
The above equations solved by trial and error to𝑪𝑨𝒃 , ∅𝒔 ,and 𝜼 at different x
X ∅𝒔 𝜼
0
0.1
0.2
X final
Example 2:
Design a packed bed reactor in which the second order reaction A → B + 2C is being
conducted under internal diffusional limiting conditions and the exit conversion is
0.8. The fluid is being pumped into the reactor at a superficial velocity of u = 4 m/sec.
The reaction is being conducted at temperature T = 260°C = 533K and at inlet
pressure of P = 4.94 atm.
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
De=2.667 *10 -8 m2 / sec: 𝜌𝑐𝑎𝑡 = 2000 3 : 𝑑𝑝 = 0.4 𝑐𝑚 𝜌𝑔𝑎𝑠 = 1.9 3
𝑚 𝑚
𝑭𝑨 = 𝑭𝑨𝒐 (𝟏 − 𝒙)
𝑭𝑩 = 𝑭𝑨𝒐 𝒙
𝑭𝑪 = 𝟐𝑭𝑨𝒐 𝒙
𝑭𝑻 = 𝑭𝑨𝒐 (𝟏 + 𝒙)
𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝑺 𝑹 𝟑 𝒌 𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒔
∅𝒔 = √( ) = √( )
𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆 𝟑 𝟐 𝑫𝒆
−𝟓 −𝟎.𝟓 𝟏 − 𝒙 −𝟎,𝟓
𝜼 = 𝟐. 𝟎 ∗ 𝟏𝟎 𝑪𝑨𝒐 ∗( )
𝟏 + 𝟐𝒙
−𝟔
𝟏 − 𝒙 −𝟎,𝟓
𝜼 = 𝟏. 𝟕𝟑𝟒 ∗ 𝟏𝟎 ∗( )
𝟏 + 𝟐𝒙
At inlet x=0 then 𝜼 = 𝟏. 𝟕𝟑𝟒 ∗ 𝟏𝟎−𝟔
𝑥 𝑥
𝑑𝑥 1 𝑑𝑥
∫ = 2∫
0 𝜼 𝒌𝟐 𝑪𝑨𝒃 𝟐 𝑘2 𝐶𝐴𝑜 0 𝟏 − 𝒙 −𝟎,𝟓
(1 − 𝑥)2 𝟏. 𝟕𝟑𝟒 ∗ 𝟏𝟎−𝟔 ∗(
𝟏 + 𝟐𝒙 )
𝑥
𝑑𝑊 𝑔𝑚𝑐𝑎𝑡 . 𝑚𝑜𝑙. 𝑠𝑒𝑐 ∗ 𝑚6 𝑑𝑥
∫ = ∫
𝐹𝐴 𝑜 50𝑚6 ∗ (𝟏𝟑𝟑. 𝟎𝟐)2 𝑚𝑜𝑙2 ∗ 𝟏. 𝟕𝟑𝟒 ∗ 𝟏𝟎−𝟔 0 𝟏 − 𝒙 −𝟎,𝟓
(1 − 𝑥)2 (𝟏 + 𝟐𝒙 )
0,5
0.8 (
1 − 𝑥
1 ∗ 𝑚𝑜𝑙 ∗ 𝑔𝑚𝑐𝑎𝑡 . 𝑚𝑜𝑙. 𝑠𝑒𝑐 ∗ 𝑚6 )
𝑊= ∫ ( 1 + 2𝑥 ) 𝑑𝑥
𝑠𝑒𝑐 ∗ 50𝑚6 ∗ (133.02)2 𝑚𝑜𝑙 2 ∗ 1.734 ∗ 10−6 𝑜 (1 − 𝑥 )2
1 − 𝑥 0,5
0.8 (1 + 2𝑥 )
𝑊 = 0.652 ∫ 𝑑𝑥
𝑜 (1 − 𝑥 )2
𝑾 = 𝝆𝒄𝒂𝒕 (𝟏 − 𝒆) ∗ 𝑨𝒄 ∗ 𝒁
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homework Problems:
1-A first-order, gas-phase reaction A→2B is performed in a PBR at 400 K and 10
atm. Feed rate is 5 mol/s containing 20% A and the rest inerts. The PBR is packed
with 8 mm-diameter spherical porous particles.
The intrinsic reaction rate is given as: rA= 3.75 CA mol/kg(cat).sec. Bulk density of
the catalyst is 2.3kg/liter. The diffusivity is 0.1 cm2/s.
a. What is the value of the internal effectiveness factor? What does it signify?
b. How much catalyst (kg) is required to obtain a conversion of 75% in the reactor?
c- what is the percentage of internal and external resistances.
The reactor is operated isothermally at 260°C, and ethylene is fed at a rate of 200
mol/h at an inlet pressure of 10 atm. A stoichiometricamount of oxygen is added
through an air feed. The reactor is a multitubularreactor with 1000 parallel tubes,
each with an inner diameter of 1.5”(38.1 mm). The tubes are filled with catalyst
particles (diameter = 0.25”(6.35 mm), particle density ρcat= 120 lb/ft3 = 1922 kg/m3),
resulting in a bed void fraction of ε= 0.45.
The kinetics have been determined as: –r’C2H4= k’PC2H41\3PO22/3[mol/(lb cat .h)]
with a rate coefficient at 260oC of k’= 4 mol/(atm.lb . cat h).
How much catalyst is needed to achieve 60% ethylene conversion? (For simplicity,
assume that the properties of the reaction mixtures are at this temperature always
identical to those of air.)
3- The use of a differential reactor to study the formation of methane from hydrogen
and carbon monoxide over a nickel catalyst gave the following rate of formation of
methane:
Suggest a mechanism and rate-limiting step that is consistent with the experimental
observation for the reaction:
It is desired to produce 20 tons/day of CH4. Calculate the catalyst weights necessary
to achieve 80% conversion in a fixed bed reactor. The feed consists of 75% H2 and
25% CO at a temperature of 500°F and a pressure of 10 atm. Assume both molecular
and atomic hydrogen are adsorbed on the surface.
(a) First neglect both diffusional resistance and mass transfer resistance. What is the
mass of catalyst required to achieve the desired conversion?
6-A first order reaction A→ B Where –rA =kCA mol/(gm. cat. sec.) is performed
catalytically in a packed bed reactor working at steady state using non porous
spherical catalyst particles with radius of 0.075 cm. The diameter of the reactor is 35
cm. The density of the catalyst is 2.2 gm/cm3 and the bed voidage is 0.28. The
reaction rate constant is 0.15 (cm3)/(gm cat. sec.). The volumetric flow rate to the
reactor is 20000 cm3/sec and the external mass transfer coefficient is 0.08 cm/sec.
Assume isothermal operation and negligible dispersion. Calculate:
a) The total length of the reactor required for 65% conversion of A.
b) The amount of the catalyst needed for 95% conversion of A.
c) The conversion if the length of the reactor is 1 m.
8- We want to build a packed bed reactor filled with 1.2-cm porous catalyst particles
(density = 2000 kg/m3, De = 2 x 10-6 m3/m cat. s) to treat 1 m3/s of feed gas (1/3 A,
1/3 B, 1/3 inert) at 336 C and 1 atm to 80% conversion of A. Experiments with fine
catalyst particles which are free from diffusional resistance show that
9-In aqueous solution, and in contact with the right catalyst, reactant A is converted
to product R by the elementary reaction A→R. Find the mass of catalyst needed in a
packed bed reactor for 90% conversion of 10 4mol A/hr of feed having CAo= 103
mol/m3. For this reaction k"' = 8 x 10-4m3/m3 bed. s and k"' = 2 m3/m3 bed. s
Additional data:
Diameter of porous catalyst pellets= 6 mm
Effective diffusion coefficient of A in the pellet = 4 * 104 m3/m cat. s
Voidage of packed bed = 0.5
Bulk density of packed bed = 2000 kg/m3 of bed
Part Four:
• Kinetics of catalyst Poisoning.
• Kinetics of catalyst deactivation and regeneration.
4.1-Catalyst Deactivation:
Activity of catalysts normally decreases with time. The life of any catalyst generally
depends on type of reactions as well as reaction conditions. For example, catalysts for
catalytic cracking lose much of their activity within seconds due to carbon deposition
on the surface while promoted iron catalysts used in ammonia synthesis have a
lifetime of years. For any catalytic process, the life of catalyst is a major economic
factor. To regenerate or replace deactivated catalysts, the process needs to be
shutdown and consequently production is disrupted. Subsequent separation and
regeneration of catalysts also involve time and cost. Therefore, deactivation of
catalysts increases the cost of production significantly. Hence, any catalytic process
will be economically viable only if regenerations are required infrequently and can be
done inexpensively. A catalyst can be deactivated in three ways.
I. Poisoning
II. Fouling
III. Sintering or phase transformation
I. Poisoning
Poisoning basically involve chemisorption of reactants or products or feed impurities
on the active sites of the catalyst surface, thereby decreasing the number of active
sites available for catalytic reactions. Since poisoning involves chemisorptions, it is
known as chemical deactivation. This process can be reversible or irreversible.
Compound of sulphur and other materials are frequently chemisorbed on nickel,
copper and Pt catalysts. In reversible poisoning, the strength of adsorption bond is not
great and activity is regained when the poison is removed from the feed. When the
adsorbed material is tightly held on the active sites, poisoning is irreversible and
permanent.
II. Fouling
Rapid deactivation can be caused by physical deposition of substance on the active
sites of catalysts. Carbon deposition on catalysts used in petroleum industry falls in
this category. Carbon covers the active site of the catalysts and may also partially
plug the pore entrance. This type of deactivation is partially reversible and
regeneration can be done by burning in air.
Steps to reduce deactivation: Following steps can be taken to reduce the possibility
of deactivation of catalysts :
1. Parallel deactivation
Reactant (A) produces a side product (P) which can deposit on the surface thereby
deactivating it. Deposition depends on reactant concentration.
2. Series deactivation :
Reaction product (R) can decompose or react further to produce material (P) that
deposits and deactivates the surface. In this case, deposition depends on product
concentration.
3. Side-by-side deactivation:
In this mechanism, impurity in feed (P) deposits on the surface deactivating it.
Deposition depends on concentration of impurities in the feed.
4. Independent deactivation :
This catalyst decay involves structural modification or sintering of catalyst surface
caused by exposure of catalysts to extreme conditions such as high temperature. This
decay is dependent on time that the catalyst spends in high temperature conditions
and is independent of the materials in the fluid.
4.3-Deactivation kinetics :
Activity of catalysts pellet at any time is defined as
………………….(1)
……………………………...(3)
…………………………...(4)
The kd is the sintering decay constant. Integration with a=1 at time t=0 gives
……………………………(5)
Activity can be measured in terms of amount of sintering. If the total active surface
area of the catalyst is Sao at t = 0 and Sa at any time t, then activity can be written as
………………………......(6)
…………………………..(7)
…………………………….(8)
Ed is the decay activation energy. For reforming of heptanes on Pt /Al 2O3 value of Ed
is in the order of 70 kcal/mol.
Cc is the concentration of carbon on the surface in g/m2. The ‘n’ and ‘A’ are fouling
parameter functions of feed rate. Representative value of A and n for cracking of light
gas oil is 0.47 and 0.5 respectively when ‘t’ is in minute.
The activity can be related to amount of coke deposited on the surface by following
relation :
…………………………(10)
Substituting value of Cc from relation (9), in term of process time, activity can be
expressed as shown below.
…………………..(11)
Or
The Cp is the concentration of poison in feed. The ‘m’ and ‘q’ are respective orders.
The rate of removal of poison from the reactant by catalyst sites is proportional to the
number of sites that are not poisoned (Cto - Cps) and concentration of poisons in the
gas phase, Cp. The Cps is the concentration of poisoned sites and Cto is the total
number of fresh sites initially available. Then rate of removal of poison is equal to
rate of formation of poisoned site and is given as
…………………………(13)
Dividing throughout by Cto and if ‘f’ is the fraction of the total number of the sites
that have been poisoned then equation (13) can be written as
……………………………………...(14)
The fraction of sites available for adsorption (1-f) is essentially the activity a (t). Then
equation (14) becomes
…………………………(15)
…………………………(16)
……………………………(17)
.…………………………...(18)
…………………………….(19)
……………………(20)
τw is called the weight time similar to space-time τ . CA and ‘a’ vary with time
Substituting,
in equation (20)
…………………..(21)
Fig. 24. Plot to determine the rate constant and the deactivation rate constant for a reaction over
deactivating catalyst. ( For mixed reactor, constant flow and independent deactivation)
……………………………(22)
………………….(23)
……………….(25)
Fig. 25 . Plot to determine rate constant and deactivation rate constant for a reaction over
deactivating catalysts for mixed reactor, changing flow condition and parallel deactivation
Example 1:
We plan to run an isomerization of A → R in isothermal packed bed reactor ( pure A
feed, FA, = 5 kmol\hr, W = 1ton catalyst, P = 3 atm, T = 730 K). The catalyst
deactivates so we plan to make 120 day runs, then regenerate the catalyst.
(a) Plot conversion and activity versus time for the run
(b) find x for the 120 day run
The rate of reaction with CA in mol/m3 is described by
Solution:
In general for parts (a), (b), (c), and (d) we can write
or on rearranging
evaluating XA at various values of t gives the top most curve shown in Fig. 26.
𝟏𝟎𝟎 ∗ 𝒆−𝟎.𝟎𝟓 𝒕
𝒙=
𝟏 + 𝟏𝟎𝟎 ∗ 𝒆−𝟎.𝟎𝟓 𝒕
𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝒙 = 𝟏 + 𝟑. 𝟑𝟐𝟓 𝒕
𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝟏+
𝟏 + 𝟑. 𝟑𝟐𝟓 𝒕
From Fig. 26 we find by graphical integration that for the 120-day period, XA.start=
0.99, XA,end, = 0.20 for
It also clearly shows how different is the progress of the reaction with the different
orders of deactivation.
Homework Problems:
1-Under conditions of strong pore diffusion the reaction A → R proceeds at 700°C on
a slowly deactivating catalyst by a first-order rate
We plan to feed a packed bed reactor (W = 10 kg) with v = 100 liters\min of fresh A
at 8 atm and 700°C until the catalyst activity drops to 10% of the fresh catalyst, then
regenerate the catalyst and repeat the cycle,
(a) What is the run time for this operation?
(b) What is the mean conversion for the run?
Since reactant and product molecules are similar in structure, deactivation is caused
by both A and R. With diffusional effects absent, the rate of deactivation is found to
be
We plan to operate a packed bed reactor containing W = 1 ton of catalyst for 12 days
using a steady feed of pure A, FAo = 5 kmol\hr at 730 K and 3 atm (CAo = 0.05
mol\liter).
(a) First evaluate -da/dt, 𝝉, and then the general expression for 1 - XA.
(b) What is the conversion at the start of the run?
(c) What is the conversion at the end of the run?
(d) What is the average conversion over the 12-day run?
Relevant books:
1-Fogler, H.S. 1999. Elements of chemical reaction engineering. 3rd ed. Prentice-
Hall.
2- Levenspiel, O. 1999. Chemical reaction engineering. 3rd ed. Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
3-Froment, G.F.; Bischoff, K.B.; De Wilde, J. 2011. Chemical reactor analysis and
design. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-Missen, R.W.; Mims, C.A.; Saville, B.A. 1999. Introduction to chemical reaction
engineering and kinetics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
5-Carberry, J.J. Chemical and catalytic reaction engineering.
6-Smith, J.M. 1981. Chemical engineering kinetics. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Int. Book
Co., Singapore.
7-Hill, Jr., C.G. 1977. Introduction to chemical engineering kinetics and reactor
design. John Wiley & Sons.