Vector Addition: Graphical and Analytical Methods
Vector Addition: Graphical and Analytical Methods
Introduction
The term "vector" refers to a quantity with both magnitude and direction. It's usually
represented by an arrow with the same direction as the amount and a length proportionate to the
magnitude of the quantity. A number of mathematical operations can be performed with and on
vectors in this laboratory exercise. The addition of vectors is one such operation. The result can
be determined by adding two vectors together (or resultant).
(a.) Using two ways of vector addition, the graphical method and the analytical method,
specifically the law of sines and cosines, find the resultant vector R⃗1 of two supplied
vectors, A⃗ and B⃗.
(b.) Determine the resultant vector R⃗2 of three provided vectors, A⃗, B⃗, and C⃗, using
two vector addition methods: Graphical technique; and analytical method,
specifically the component method.
(c.) Compare and contrast the outcomes achieved through the use of graphical and
analytical methods.
However, as stated in the objectives, the following questions have been raised:
2. What are the common misunderstandings about the two vector addition methods?
3. What factors should be considered for determining the correct outcome of those two
methods?
4. Do you find it difficult to solve the two ways of vector addition? What exactly are
they?
Procedure
The following are the outcomes of the two distinct procedures that were used:
1. Which method did you find easier to use in determining the resultant vector R⃗1?
Graphical or analytical? Why?
The graphical method, which I find easier to use in obtaining the resultant vector R⃗1,
is easier to use since you just need to graph the three vectors given, which are vectors
A, B, and C, as well as pinpoint the exact spot of the findings you acquired from your
analytical methods. Then, using the triangle and polygon methods, you just measure
their distance from the starting point to the end point to obtain the corresponding
graphs.
2. Which method did you find easier to use in determining the resultant vector R⃗2?
Graphical or analytical? Why?
The method that I find easiest to use in finding the resultant vector R⃗2 is the same as
the first problem because you only need to graph the three vectors that are given,
namely vectors A, B, and C, as well as graph and pinpoint the exact location of the
results you obtained from your analytical method. Then, using the triangle and
polygon methods, you just measure their distance from the starting point to the end
point to obtain the corresponding graphs.
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the two methods of vector addition?
The advantage of the graphical method is that you can quickly and simply put the
correct measurement using your measuring equipment and identify their exact
location without having to use mathematical equations. The negative is that you will
have a lot of difficulties graphing since there will be moments when the results will
not be connected from one another and the measuring instrument will slip, forcing
you to restart from the beginning. The graphical method is also time demanding
because it must be drawn to scale and at acceptable angles. The analytical method has
the following advantages: it is more concise, accurate, and precise than the graphical
method, especially when considering the accuracy with which a drawing can be
made; it does not require an intensive computation in which you will receive an
immediate result; and it serves as a check for the graphical method. Meanwhile, the
drawback is that you'll have to check whether the resultant vector from your graphical
approach is the same as or not the same as the resultant vector from your analytical
method on a regular basis. It also necessitates a high level of mathematics knowledge
and ability to solve for the
vector of the outcome.
Conclusion
From the first two and three vectors used in the activity, we were able to generate an
accurate resultant vector. Using a triangle approach for graphing and analytically using laws of
sines and cosines, we first find the first resultant vector of the first two vectors, such as vector A
and B. After that, we use a polygon approach for graphing and the component method to find the
second resultant vector of the three vectors, such as vector A, B, and C. As a result, I infer that
the results and graphs may differ due to the various methodologies employed to get the resultant
vector. The graphical technique, on the other hand, is a simpler method to use because it does not
require any mathematical calculations and allows you to just enter all of the results and graph
them.